Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Park Board of Adjustment 2023-04-04BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT – TOWN OF ESTES PARK 170 MacGregor Avenue – Town Hall Board Room Tuesday, April 4, 2023 9:00 a.m. Estes Park, CO 80517 The meeting will also be live-streamed on the Town’s Youtube Channel and recorded and posted to YouTube and www.estes.org/videos within 48 hours. AGENDA AGENDA APPROVAL. PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address). CONSENT AGENDA: 1.Board of Adjustment Minutes dated January 3, 2023 ACTION ITEMS: 1.Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2023 2.Variance Request 510 Moraine Ave Planner I Washam 8-foot side setback in lieu of 25-foot setback 3.Variance Request 281 W Riverside Dr Planner I Washam This item is continued to the next Board of Adjustment Meeting, May 2, 2023 REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1.Upcoming meeting items ADJOURN The Town of Estes Park will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town services, programs, and activities and special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call (970) 577-4777. TDD available. March 29, 2023 1 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 3, 2023 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the ESTES PARK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. The meeting was held in said Town of Estes Park on January 3, 2023. Board: Chair Jeff Moreau, Vice-Chair Wayne Newsom, Board Member Joe Holtzman Attending: Chair Moreau, Board Member Holtzman, Community Development Director Jessica Garner, Senior Planner Woeber, Planner I Kara Washburn, Town Board Liaison Barbara McAlpine, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund Absent: Newsom Chair Moreau called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. There were nine people in attendance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved and seconded (Holtzman/Moreau) to approve the agenda. The motion passed 2-0. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA It was moved and seconded (Holtzman/Moreau) to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion passed 2-0. Public Comment: none VARIANCE REQUEST TBD Raven Avenue Senior Planner Woeber The Applicant seeks a 10-foot variance to the minimum lot width standard for the RM Zone District in accordance with Estes Park Development Code (EPDC) Section 3.6.C. If approved, the property will be subdivided into five lots, each 50 feet wide. Discussion: David Emerson, director of St. Vrain Habitat for Humanity, relayed plans for providing affordable housing in Estes Park at a 60% AMI or lower. He thanked the Board for hearing the variance. It was moved and seconded (Moreau/Holtzman) to approve the variance request for a 10-foot setback to the minimum lot width in accordance with the findings as presented. The motion passed 2-0. VARIANCE REQUEST 160 First Street Planner I Washburn The Applicant requests approval of a variance to allow a reduced front setback of eight and three-tenths feet (8.3’) and a reduced arterial road setback of twenty-two feet six inches (22’-6”) in lieu of the fifteen feet (15’) and twenty-five feet (25’) respective setbacks required in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zoning District under Section 4.4.C.4. of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). The Applicant proposes eliminating three parking spaces in the subject area to construct a deck for outdoor seating at the El Mex-Kal Family Restaurant. Discussion: Member Holtzman requested removing the fourth parking space and including a bollard. Backing out of those parking spaces is a hazard. Mark Rismiller, the property owner, explained the reason for not using the 4th parking space for the decking was due to Estes Park Sanitation concerns with accessing the clean-out sewer lines. He will check with EPSD on the placement of the bollard. It was moved and seconded (Moreau/Holtzman) to approve the variance request for reduced front setback and reduced arterial road setback for the subject property addressed as 160 1st Street in the Town of Estes Park, with findings as outlined in the staff report with the addition of installing a bollard to keep people from parking in the fourth parking spot. The motion passed 2-0. dra f t 3 Board of Adjustment, January 3, 2023 – Page 2 REPORTS The comprehensive plan passed in December. The next project will be updating the Development Code. A restructuring of the fee schedule will also be done in 2023. The Community Development offices will be remodeled, hopefully starting in the Spring. There being no further business, Chair Moreau adjourned the meeting at 9:23 a.m. Jeff Moreau, Chair Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary dra f t 4 Community Development Memo To: Chair Jeff Moreau Estes Park Board of Adjustment Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Kara Washam, Planner I Date: April 4, 2023 Application: Variance Request for Side Setback 510 Moraine Avenue, Estes Park CS & NC, LLC, Owner/Applicant (Coffee on the Rocks) Jes Reetz, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc., Consultant Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of Adjustment approve the variance request, subject to the findings described in the report. Land Use: 2022 Estes Forward Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors Zoning District: Commercial Outlying (CO) Site Area: 1.69 Acres +/- (73,812 SF) ☒PUBLIC HEARING ☐ORDINANCE ☐LAND USE ☐CONTRACT/AGREEMENT ☐RESOLUTION ☒ OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL ☒ YES ☐ NO Objective: The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow a reduced side setback of eight feet (8’) in lieu of the twenty-five foot (25’) setback required in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zoning District under Section 4.4.C.4. of the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). If approved, the applicant intends to construct a partially open pavilion. Background: The applicant purchased Coffee on the Rocks in 2006, and has been using temporary tents since 2020 to host weddings and other special events. In lieu of utilizing temporary tents and structures, the owner is proposing to construct a 20’ x 48’ partially open pavilion near the western property line of the subject variance request. The pavilion will 5 2 be 8 feet (8’) from the property line at the closest location. The existing coffee shop has a setback of approximately 4 feet (4’) from the same property line. Variance Description This is a request to approve a variance to allow a reduced side setback of eight feet (8’) in lieu of the twenty-five foot (25’) side setback required in the CO (Commercial Outlying) Zoning District. Location and Context: The 1.69-acre lot is located at 510 Moraine Ave with frontage along Highway 36 to the north and Big Thompson River along the southern property line. A large pond makes up approximately half the parcel, and is encircled by a paved walking path that serves as a natural focal point and recreational feature for customers. A large, paved parking lot with thirty-five (35) spaces is located on the north side of the property with access from Moraine Ave. Adjacent properties east of the subject property are zoned CO (Commercial Outlying), and residential uses and zoned RM (Multi-Family), E-1 and E (Estate) are located to the west and south of the subject property. 6 3 Vicinity Map Zoning Map 7 4 Zoning and Land Use Summary Table Comprehensive Plan (2022) Zone Uses Subject Site Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors CO (Commercial Outlying) Commercial North Mountains & Foothills RE-1 (County Land: Estes Valley Rural Estate) Undeveloped South Suburban Estate E-1 & E (Estate)Residential East Mixed-Use Centers & Corridors CO (Commercial Outlying) Commercial West Mixed Residential Neighborhood RM (Multi-Family) Residential Project Analysis Review Criteria: The Board of Adjustment (BOA) is the decision-making body for variance requests. In accordance with EPDC Section 3.6.C., Variances, Standards for Review, applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Standards with staff findings for each are as follows: 1.Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code’s standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: Special conditions exist that reduce the developable areas of the property due to the large pond near the center and Big Thompson River along the southern property line. Aerial imagery obtained from Larimer County Assessor shows the pond existing prior to the owner purchasing the property in 2006. 2.In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a.Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff Finding: Without the variance, the property can continue being used as a coffee shop. However, the occasional events at the facility would be enhanced with the construction of a permanent pavilion. 8 5 b.Whether the variance is substantial; Staff Finding: The variance request for a reduced side setback of eight feet (8’) is moderately substantial. In addition, the existing coffee shop on the property has a setback of approximately 4 feet (4’) from the same property line, significantly less than the twenty-five feet (25’) setback required per code. The proposed setback would not be uncharacteristic for the property. c.Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Staff Finding: Staff does not find that the Commercial Outlying (CO) character of the immediate neighborhood would be altered, nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. Events have taken place in temporary tents located in the subject area of the proposed setback variance for nearly three years without complaints from the neighboring properties. d.Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: No public utilities would be affected by the variance request. A grease interceptor for the coffee shop would need to be modified to accommodate the proposed concrete patio, and access to it would be maintained. In addition, the water service for the coffee shop is in the general vicinity of the proposed improvements, and requires coordination with the Utilities Department and the Sanitation District prior to and during construction. e.Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff Finding: It is unknown whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of setback requirements. f.Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: The Applicant’s predicament could potentially be mitigated by locating the proposed pavilion to another area of the property. However, due to the location of the existing coffee shop, pond, river, and patio this would require significant disturbance to the property. 3.No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant’s property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to 9 6 make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 4.No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 5.If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The proposed variance would be the least deviation from the Development Code. 6.Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding: The applicant requests a setback variance in order to construct a partially open pavilion to be used for occasional outdoor events. This use, categorized as an event facility, is permitted by right in the CO (Commercial Outlying) zoning district per Table 4-4 of the EPDC. In addition, the primary use of the property, categorized as an eating/drinking establishment, is also permitted by right in this district. 7.In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Staff Finding: Not applicable. Review Agency Comments The application was referred to all applicable review agencies for comment. Public Works: Does not support the setback variance request due to the proposed pavilion being situated in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). New construction in the SFHA should be minimized whenever possible. There are concerns that in the event of a flash flood, evacuation could be problematic due to the proposed pavilion serving as a gathering place for large crowds of people. A Floodplain Development Permit (FDP) will be required to construct the proposed pavilion. However, the setback variance request is independent of the FDP process. 10 7 Estes Park Utilities: No objection to the setback variance request but remind s the applicant of the privately owned water service line located in the vicinity of the proposed pavilion structure. Upper Thompson Sanitation District (UTSD): No concerns with the setback variance request but will make further comments once the location of the grease interceptor and its service laterals are shown on plans for the proposed improvements. No other agencies had concerns or comments. Public Notice Staff provided public notice of the application in accordance with EPDC noticing requirements. As of the time of writing this report, no written comments have been received for the variance request. ●Written notice mailed to adjacent property owners on Feb ruary 15, 2023. ●Legal notice published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette on February 17, 2023. ●Application posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” website on February 15, 2023. Advantages This variance would allow the Applicant to construct a permanent pavilion structure to replace the temporary tent that has been used in the subject location for the past few years. The proposed pavilion would allow the business to continue hosting private and public events for the community. Disadvantages There are no known disadvantages of the variance to allow a reduced side setback of eight feet (8’) for the subject property. However, the proposed pavilion is situated in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), and a Floodplain Development Permit (FDP) will need to be issued if the setback variance is approved and the Applicant proceeds with the proposed improvements. Action Recommended Staff recommends approval of the proposed variance described in this staff report, with setbacks consistent with the Site Plan for Coffee on the Rocks Pavilion provided in Attachment 3. Finance/Resource Impact N/A Level of Public Interest Low. 11 8 Sample Motions I move to approve the variance request for reduced side setback of eight feet (8’) for the subject property addressed as 510 Moraine Ave. in the Town of Estes Park, with findings as outlined in the staff report. I move to deny the requested variance with the following findings (state reason/findings). I move that the Board of Adjustment continue the variance to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that [state reasons for continuance]. Attachments 1.Application 2.Statement of Intent 3.Site Plan . 12 13 14 15 January 19, 2023 Mrs. Jessica Garner Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Co. 80517 RE: 510 Moraine Ave Structure Setback Variance Request Dear Mrs. Garner, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES), on behalf of the owner of Coffee on the Rocks, is submitting a variance request for a proposed pavilion setback at 510 Moraine Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Legal Description Subject property is a metes and bounds legal description as described in warranty deed recorded at Reception No. 20060090220 dated 11/30/2006 in the records of the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder. The property is also identified as Parcel No. 3525300003 in the Larimer County Assessor records. Variance request: Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards for the Nonresidential Zoning Districts CO, Minimum Building /Structural Setbacks abutting Residential zoned district, Side - 25 feet. The owner is requesting an 8-foot setback. Project Description The owners of Coffee on the Rocks purchased the property in 2006. Temporary tents have been used by the owner since 2020 to host weddings and other special events. In lieu of utilizing temporary tents and structures, the owners are proposing to construct a 20’ x 48’ partially open pavilion along the western property line. The pavilion is proposed to be 8-feet from the property line at the closest location. Currently, the existing coffee shop resides 4-feet more or less from the property line. Practical Difficulty 2. When determining “practical difficulty” the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be beneficial use of the property without the variance; a. The property is currently used as a coffee shop and has held events utilizing temporary structures. The proposed structure does not provide a change of use and only enhances the venue quality. 16 510 Moraine Avenue, Request for Variance Setback Parcel Number 3525300003 Page 2 of 2 January 19, 2023 b. Whether the variance is substantial; a. The variance would be considered substantial with a required 25-foot setback due to the property abutting a residential zoned district. The owner is requesting an 8-foot setback due to existing constraints on the property. With the existing coffee shop currently 4± feet from the property line, the proposed setback is not uncharacteristic for the property. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; a.The variance would not have a significant impact on the neighborhood. Events have taken place without complaints from the neighboring property. The proposed structure would also provide more visual and sound barrier for the adjoining properties. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect delivery of public services such as water and sewer; a. No public utilities would be affected by the variance. A grease interceptor for the coffee shop would need to be modified to accommodate the concrete patio. Access to the grease interceptor would be maintained. In addition, the water service for the coffee shop is in the general vicinity of the proposed improvements. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with the knowledge of the requirement; a.The applicant purchased the property in 2006 with the intent of opening and operating a coffee shop. During that time the owner identified the need for wedding venues and special events in the Estes Valley. In 2020 they began holding wedding and special events on the property. Based on the existing structure proximity to the west property line the owner was not aware of the required setback. f. Whether the Applicant’s predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance; a.With the existing physical constraints between the existing building, pond, flood plain and grades, no alternatives are available without a variance request. 3. The conditions on this property are unique for Estes Park considering the abutment to the Big Thompson River and the pond. 4. The proposed variance will not reduce the size of the subject property or create additional building sites. 5. The requested variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 6. The proposed use of the pavilion (weddings and events) is allowed by right within the CO – Commercial outlying zoning district. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Jes Reetz Planner 17 SHEET TITLE: 1 CLIENT: SHEET PROJECT TITLE: 11001-001 JOB NO.SHEET DATE: SCALE: JAN 2023 AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:MST REVISION:BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: DATE: MST JLR --- COFFEE ON THE ROCKS SITEPLAN PAVILION COFFEE ON THE ROCKS 2023 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1692 BIG THOMPSON AVE. SUITE 200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 PH: (970) 586-2458 FAX: (970) 586-2459 SITE STATISTICS: Utilities: Water Town of Estes Park Electric Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Gas Excel Telephone Century Link AVERAGE SLOPE = ~4.0% ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NET LOT COVERAGE (80%): GROSS/NET LAND AREA -73,616± SF 1.69± ACRES SITE LAND AREA COVERAGE STATISTICS COVERAGE % LOT (GROSS LAND AREA - 73,616± SF) EXISTING LOT COVERAGE Buildings 1273 sf 1.74% Parking/Drives 10651 sf 14.47% Walkways/ Patio 1250 sf 1.70% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE Pavilion 900 sf 1.22% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 25,500 sf 19.12% TOTAL OPEN SPACE 11,350 sf 80.88% SITE STATISTICS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 25 BEARS SOUTH 61°00' WEST 1007.8 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40°30' EAST 195.1 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°30' EAST 140 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE CENTER OF THE BIG THOMPSON RIVER; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG CENTER OF SAID RIVER TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 29°47' WEST 380 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CS & NC, LLC 510 MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 PROPERTY OWNER: PROPERTY SIZE = 1.69 ACRES ZONING - COMMERCIAL OUTLYING (CO) HIGHWAY SETBACK = 25 FEET SIDE SETBACK (EAST) = 15 FEET SIDE SETBACK (WEST) = 25 FEET RIVER SETBACK = 30 FEET VARIANCE REQUEST: TABLE 4-5 [6] STATES; "SETBACK SHALL BE INCREASED TO 25 FEET IF THE LOT LINE ABUTS A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY" OWNER PROPOSES AN 8-FOOT SETBACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE. 40 SCALE 1" = 40' 0 40 80 120 LEGEND: SCALE 1" = 1000' VICINITY MAP MAP TAKEN FROM ESTES PARK DIGITAL MAPPING SITEPLAN COFFEE ON THE ROCKS PAVILION 510 MORAINE AVE. ESTES PARK, CO 80517 M: \ C E S _ J o b s \ 1 0 0 1 _ 0 0 1 5 1 0 M o r a i n e A v e \ S i t e p l a n . d w g , 1 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 9 : 2 3 P M , J L R 18 19