Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2007-11-06Prepared: October 31, 2007 Revised'... AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday, November 6, 2007 9:00 a.m. - Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated October 2, 2007 b. Metes & Bounds property located immediately north of 1895 Big Thompson Avenue, Yakutat Land Corporation/Applicant — Request by applicant for continuance to December 4, 2007 Estes Valley Board of Adjustment meeting 3. REQUESTS a. Lot 1, Block 4, Fall River Estates, 1400 David Drive Owner: Creekside Suites Condominiums/Multiple Owners Applicant: Elizabeth Blanchard, Vice President of Operations, Estes Park Condos Request: Variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 8.1.A, specifically in reference to Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66.060(13) to allow placement of an off -premise sign, and Section 17.66.110(3)b to allow the sign to placed 7.35 feet from the property line in lieu of the required 8-foot setback; and variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 7.6.E.1.a(2) to allow the sign to be placed 26.15 feet from the annual high- water mark of Fall River in lieu of the required 30-foot setback Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott b. Lot 4, Block 4, Fall River Estates, 1516 Fish Hatchery Road Owner: Bugle Point on Fall River Condominiums, Phase II/Multiple Owners Applicant: Elizabeth Blanchard, Vice President of Operations, Estes Park Condos Request: Variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 8.1.A, specifically in reference to Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66.060(13) to allow placement of an off -premise sign Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott 4. REPORTS 5. ADJOURNMENT Note: The Estes Valley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment October 2, 2007, 9:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Board: Chair Wayne Newsom; Members Cliff Dill, Chuck Levine, John Lynch, and Al Sager; Alternate Member Bruce Grant Attending: Chair Newsom; Members Levine, Lynch, and Sager; Alternate Member Grant Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott, Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Member Dill Chair Newsom called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. He welcomed Planner Chilcott back from maternity leave and congratulated her on the birth of baby Kathryn. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of the minutes of the September 11, 2007 meeting. There being no changes or corrections, the minutes were approved as submitted. 3. METES AND BOUNDS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2025 MORAINE AVENUE, Applicants: Steve Eck & Steve Williams — Request for variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 7.5.F.2.b(6) to allow portions of a driveway to be placed within the required arterial -street landscape buffer at a distance of 11.5 feet from the property line In lieu of the required 25-foot buffer Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. This is a request to allow portions of an access drive to be located within the required 25-foot arterial setback/landscape buffer zone. The property is zoned A —Accommodations and is currently undeveloped. The applicant contemplates future development of nine units on the site, which would require a development plan. However, this variance hearing in no way constitutes review of a development proposal, nor would approval of the variance imply approval of any future development plan. The applicant's intent to preserve significant trees if the property is developed as contemplated, including a 24-inch-diameter ponderosa, pushes portions of the access drive into the setback. Planning staff suggests that the required setback should be further reduced to allow the interior driveway to be twelve feet wide rather than ten feet wide and recommends approval of the requested variance with the requirement that district -buffer landscaping standards apply. This would provide approximately twice the amount of landscaping as that required to meet arterial -street landscaping standards and would require installation of evergreens rather than deciduous trees. Staff recommends this district -buffer landscaping be planted along approximately two-thirds of the highway frontage. Correspondence opposing this variance request was received from neighboring property owners Dave Ranglos of Glacier Lodge, 2166 Highway 66, and Cheryl Wagner, 1986 Dallman Drive, #5. A letter was also received from applicant Steve Eck. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 October 2, 2007 Public Comment: Zach HansonNan Horn Engineering and Surveying was present to represent the applicants. Board members did not have any questions for Mr. Hanson. Dave Ranglos/2166 Highway 66 stated he is the owner of two adjacent parcels located across the river from the applicant's property. He reviewed the information provided in his letter opposing the variance request. He stated the applicant could build fewer or smaller units to comply with required setbacks. He expressed concern about driveway -spacing requirements and the effect the applicant's proposed access may have on an existing easement across the subject property that provides access to his property. His concerns also included a possible retaining wall and fill that may be placed on the site with future development, impacts on the direction of the river flow, previous evidence of river water flowing through the middle of the lot during peak runoff periods, substantial and detrimental changes to the character of the neighborhood, disruption of the tranquillity of the river corridor, possible detrimental effect on his rental business, and lack of appropriate transition between the valley and the national) park as required by the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Newsom stated the Board is only reviewing a request to decrease the required setback from the road for a future driveway. Planner Shirk stated a letter received from Traci Downs of Larimer County Engineering indicates the county has no concerns with this variance request. The appllicant's submitted plans show the ingress/egress point to be approximately 300 feet from Mr. Ranglos' easement, which is greater than the 250-foot separation required. If a development plan for nine units is submitted in the future, it will be reviewed at the staff level); eleven or more units must be proposed in order for a development plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Steve Eck/applicant stated the placement of the driveway access was designed to accommodate Mr. Ranglos' easement and is 340 feet away. River water will not be diverted onto Mr. Ranglos' properly. He is proposing nine residences; Mr. Ranglos' property includes 36 rental units. Cheryl Wagner/1986 Dallman Drive expressed dismay that neighbors have so little say in devellopment proposals. She urged the Board to consider the impacts of the future residences and retaining wall to the environment and area wildlife. She expressed concern about density and increases in traffic and noise. Chair Newsom pointed out that the subject property is zoned for this type of development; if the applicant's proposal meets zoning guidelines it can not be disapproved. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Sager) to approve the variance request for the Metes and Bounds property located at 2025 Moraine Avenue, to allow portions of a driveway to be placed within the required arterial landscape buffer at a distance of 10 feet from the property line in lieu of the required 25-foot buffer, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously. CONDITIONS: 1. District -buffer landscaping standards shall be applied in place of arterial) -street standards. 4. LOT 2, GOOD SAMARITAN SUBDIVISION, 2000 PTARMIGAN TRAIL, Applicant: Shepherd of the Mountains Lutheran Church — Request for variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 1.9.E to allow a steeple structure and cross to extend 12 feet above the maximum slope -adjusted height limit of 32 feet, 9 inches Planner Chilcott summarized the staff report. This is a request by the Shepherd of the Mountains Lutheran Church for a twelve -foot variance to the maximum slope -adjusted height limit of 32.75 feet in order to construct and install a 45.25-foot steeple and aluminum cross. The Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) Section 1.9.E establishes the maximum height limit but excepts residential chimneys and telecommunications facilities, with some limitations. In considering whether special circumstances exist, the Board should consider that a steeple is typically an integral part of a church. There is no practical difficulty with this site; RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 3 October 2, 2007 a structure could be built to comply with the height limit. Building plans submitted with a Special Review for this property, which was approved in 2002, showed a church building and cross structure that complied with the height limit; the plans have since been redesigned. The Board must consider the protections offered by the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Planning staff suggests that if the impact of the steeple structure and cross would be similar to that of a chimney or telecommunications facility, the Board should consider the variance request. A letter of objection was received from the North End Property Owners' Association stating approval of the variance will have significant impact on the neighborhood even if the cross is not lit and is not shiny. In response to questions from Board members Levine, Grant, and Sager, Planner Chilcott stated the building meets the height limit; only the steeple structure and cross will exceed the height limit. The applicant's architect has indicated the cross will not be lit. The property was not posted with a variance notice as required; the applicant is responsible for posting this notice. Public Comment: Steve Lane/Basis Architecture was present to represent the applicant. He stated he is aware of the requirement to post a variance notice and apologized for the failure to post the notice. He prepared a photo survey for today's meeting and presented it to the Board. The applicant wanted a more traditional church architecture, including a steeple, than that shown with the Special Review in 2002. The proposed steeple structure is five feet tall and will match the architecture and roof coloring (a natural brown) of the church building. Although the cross will be constructed of aluminum, it can be anodized or powder -coated so as to provide a matt finish. The color has not yet been selected but will be a natural color, such as bronze, that fits the color scheme of the building. There will not be electric power in the steeple structure and the cross will not be lit. The contours of surrounding lands and the structures already in place on neighboring properties, including the Good Samaritan development and condominiums in the area, will largely block views of the cross from the north and the west. The impact of the requested variance will be similar to that of a chimney or communications tower that exceeds the height limit. Director Joseph thanked Mr. Lane for complying with staff's request to provide a photo simulation, noting it is not a requirement for submittal of a variance application. Following Mr. Lane's photo presentation, Planner Chilcott recommended approval of the variance request, subject to the recommended conditions of approval found in the staff report and the additional requirements that the cross not be lit and have a non -reflective, matt finish. Further discussion was held and is summarized as follows. The building is situated below grade; that portion of the building below the original grade does not count toward the height limit. Although the cross could be located on the portico, the congregation voted to locate the cross as proposed. Lighting for the parking tot should be downward directed. The building foundation has been poured; Planner Chilcott will verify that the required height certificate has been provided. It was moved and seconded (Sager/Levine) to approve the variance request for Lot 2, Good Samaritan Subdivision, to allow a steeple structure and cross to extend 12 feet above the maximum slope -adjusted height limit of 32 feet, 9 inches, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously. CONDITIONS: 1. Compliance with the submitted application. 2. A registered land surveyor shall set the survey stakes for the foundation forms. After the footings are set and prior to pouring the foundation, the surveyor shall verify compliance with the variance and provide a height certificate. 3. The cross and steeple shall not be lit. 4. The cross and steeple shall be constructed of a non -reflective, matt material. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment October 2, 2007 5. REPORTS None. 4 There being no further business, Chair Newsom adjourned the meeting at 10:05 a.m. Wayne Newsom, Chair Judie Roederer, Recording Secretary 1400 David Drive & 1516 Fish Hatchery Road Sign Variance Requests Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONBACKGROUND DATE OF BOA MEETING: November 6, 2007 LOCATION: The sites are located at 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road within the Town of Estes Park. Legal Description: Bugle Point on Fall River, Phase II Condominiums, and Creekside Suites Condominiums APPLICANT: Elizabeth Blanchard, Estes Park Condos PROPERTY OWNERS: Both properties are condominiumized and land is owned in common by ail condominium unit owners. STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott and Carolyn McEndaffer APPLICABLE CODES: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) and Estes Park Municipal Code (EPMC) REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting variances to allow off -premise signs to be located at 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road. If approved, the signs will advertise five condominiumized accommodations properties: Bugle Point on Fall River; Bugle Point on Fall River, Phase II; Creekside; Creekside Suites; and Antlers Pointe. The rental management company, Estes Park Condos, operates offices at the two above -mentioned addresses. Location of Pro ���I� � fdi IIIII�IIIII I� 1!iIIIIIIIII11 erties on which Off -Site Signs are Proposed Location of Pro, erties to be Advertised on the Off -Site Si ns " IN.")1 (((((ff ((0((Illi1(((° Page #2 Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road Sign Proposed at Bugle Point on Fall River Condominiums, Phase 11 1516 Fish Hatchery Road The applicant requests a variance to Section 17.66.060(13) of the Estes Park Municipal Code, which prohibits off -site signs from being permitted, erected, or maintained in the Town. If granted, the applicant would remove the existing Bugle Point entry sign and replace it with a larger, 56-inch-by-48-inch sign. Sign Proposed at Creekside Suites Condominiums 1400 David Drive The applicant requests variances to the following three Code sections. 1. Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66.060(13), which prohibits off - site signs from being permitted, erected, or maintained in the Town. 2. Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66.110(3)b, which establishes an eight -foot minimum setback from any property line for freestanding signs. 3. Estes Valley Development Code Section 7.6.E.1.a.2 River Corridors (b) Exception for Lots Developed Prior to the Adoption of this Code, which states, All buildings and accessory structures shall be set back at least thirty (30) feet horizontally (plan view) from the annual high- water mark of river corridors or, if not readily discernible, from the defined bank of the river. If granted, the applicant will modify the existing sign. The sign would remain 7.34 feet from the front property line and 26.15 feet from the annual high-water mark of the river. The sign dimensions, 110-inches-by-130- inches, will not change. II. SITE DATA AND MAPS Number of Lots/Parcels Parcel Number(s) Development Area Zoning Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Two lots on which off -site signs would be located. Five lots would be advertised on the signs, plus the Estes Park Condos management company. Bugle Point on Fall River, Phase II Creekside Suites Bugle Point on Fall River, Phase II Creekside Suites 35153-06-004 35153-12-000 3.139 acres 3.334 acres "A" Accommodations/Highway Corridor Accommodations/Some Residential Same 136,735 sq. ft. 145,229 sq. ft. Page #3 —Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road west SERVICES Water Sewer Fire Protection Electric Telephone Town of Estes Park Upper Thomson Sanitation District Town of Estes Park Town of Estes Park Q 'acent Land Uses and Zonin "A.1" 3 Single -Family Dwelling Units III. REVIEW CRITERIA All variance applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 3.6.0 and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. All applications for variances from Chapter 17.66 Signs shall also demonstrate compliance with Section 17.66.160 of the Municipal Code. This variance request does not fall within the parameters of staff -level review and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment. Page #4 ---Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. The following reviewing agency staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted comments. Estes Park Building Department See Carolyn McEndaffer's memo to Alison Chilcott dated October 26, 2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letter to Alison Chilcott dated October 24, 2007. V. STAFF FINDINGS Staff finds: 1. Reviewing Agencies. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All letters and memos submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 2. Section 17.66.160(3) of the Municipal Code states, in every case in which a request for a variance from the requirements of this Chapter [17.66 Signs] has been filed, the Board shall not grant a variance unless it specifically finds each and every one of the following conditions to exist. a. There are special circumstances or conditions, such as the existence of buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent public right-of-way, which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question; provided, however, that such special circumstances or conditions must be particular to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention and to not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises. Staff Finding: The applicant's statement of intent describes the special circumstances they believe exist. These reasons include, but are not limited to: • The five properties function as one with one on -site rental management company. Page #5 -Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road • Traffic in the neighborhood will be reduced by providing signage that better directs guests to the rental management office. It will also assist Town and emergency personnel in locating the correct office. In regards to the Creekside Suites sign, staff finds that the eight -foot front property line setback for signs and the thirty-foot river setback overlap at the comer of the lot where a sign would draw the most attention to the property. The impact of the sign to the river corridor is minimal. b. The variance would be in general harmony with the purposes of this Chapter, and specifically would not be injurious to the neighborhood in which the business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention is located. Staff Finding: The Board should use their best judgment to determine if this variance would be in general harmony with the purposes of Chapter 17.66 Signs. Neighbors have not commented that the proposed signs are injurious to the neighborhood. c. The variance is the minimum one necessary to permit the applicant to reasonably draw attention to this business or enterprise. Staff Finding: The Board should use their best judgment to determine if these are the minimum variances necessary. 3. Section 17.66.160(d) No variance for maximum sign area on a lot or building states, other provisions of this section to the contrary notwithstanding, the Board shall not have any jurisdiction to hear, nor the authority to grant, any variance from any section of this Chapter which limits the maximum permitted sign area on a single lot or building. 4. Section 17.66.160(e) states, the Board may grant a variance subject to any conditions, which it deems necessary or desirable to make the device which is permitted by the variance compatible with the purposes of this Chapter. Staff Finding: If the Board chooses to approve this variance, staff has recommended a number of conditions of approval. Page N6 -Variance Requests For 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road 5. In addition to the review standards in Section 17.66.160 of the Municipal Code, the following review standards from the Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.C. apply. a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance. Staff Finding: The existing use can continue. b. Whether the variance is substantial. Staff Finding: The Board should use their best judgment to determine if the variance requests for the off -premise signs are substantial. Staff does not find that the setback variance requests for the Creekside sign are substantial. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. Staff Finding: The Board should use their best judgment to determine if the variance requests will substantially alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff has not received comments from adjoining properties concerning the impacts of the requested variances. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: At this point in time, the variances will not affect the delivery of public services; however, the applicant should be aware that both signs are located within easements and the future use of the easement may require relocating the signs outside the easements at the expense of the property owner. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement. Staff Finding: This standard addresses whether or not the Code requirements changed during current property owners' ownership of the property. This standard is not intended to address whether or not the property owner reviewed Code to determine which regulations are applicable to his/her property. Page #7 Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road Staff has not reviewed the purchase history for all unit owners. However, based on the dates these properties were condominiumized, it is reasonable to assume that the majority of unit owners purchased their units after the February 1, 2000 effective date of the Estes Valley Development Code and after the adoption of the current sign code found in the Estes Park Municipal Code. Since these are public documents, the majority of the property owners purchased the property with knowledge of the requirements. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. g• Staff Finding: An option that would not require an off -premise sign variance is to add only "Estes Park Condos" to each of the two signs and instruct guests to look for the "Estes Park Condos" sign. No options exist for locating a visible sign for Creekside Suites at the comer of Fall River Road and David Drive that complies with the setbacks. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant's property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding: Staff does not find that a regulation should be adopted to address this situation. h. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: The variance, if granted, will not reduce the size of the lot. i. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The Board should use their best judgment to determine if the variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Page #8 -- Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road J• Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding: Signs are permitted in the Accommodations/Highway Corridor zoning district. k. Per EVDC §3.6.D, failure of an Applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the Board of Adjustment null and void. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Board chooses to recommend APPROVAL of the requested variances. Staff recommends that it be approved CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Compliance with the submitted application, including the proposed sign plans. However, staff shall have the authority to approve minimal revisions to the signs in the future without further Board of Adjustment review. 2. Compliance with Carolyn McEndaffer's comments in her memo dated October 26, 2007. 3. Both signs are located in easements. Future use of the easements may require that the property owner relocate the signs outside the easements at their expense. Page #9 —Variance Requests for 1400 David Drive and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road EM To: Alison Chilcott From: Carolyn McEndaffer, Plans Examiner/Code Compliance Officer Date: October 26, 2007 Re: Estes Park Condos, 1400 David Drive Variance Request The Department of Building Safety has the following comments regarding the Variance Request for the signs located at 1400 David Drive (Creekside) and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road (Bugle Pointe). 1. As incorrectly noted on the application, the Creekside sign permit #2533 issued 6/12/98, but was required per the permit to be located 8 feet off the property line and comply with the 30 foot site visibility triangle. The river setback was not addressed. 2. As noted on the application, revise the requested variances to EVDC 7.6.E.l.a (2) for the river setback. 3. The application states all three resorts are on the same property. According to the Larimer County Assessors database the three resorts are on 5 separate parcels of land and are not contiguous. The addresses are 1515 Fish Hatchery Road (Antlers Point) 1516 Fish Hatchery Road (Bugle Pointe) 1480 David Drive (Bugle Pointe) 1400 David Drive (Creekside) and 1340 Fall River Rd. (Creekside Condos). These are condominium properties with individual ownership. Please see attached Larimer County Assessors map. 4. The Bear Paw/River Stone (2100 Fall River Road) Off Premises sign variance granted June 2, 1998 stated the two lots were owned by the same person, the lots were contiguous and there was a hardship for one lot due to site restraints. 5. I have not been able to locate a sign permit for Antlers Pointe (1515 Fish Hatchery Road). Please check your records. I have included a picture of the sign. If a permit was not obtained, submit for permit so all properties will be in conformance with the code. 6. It's the Department of Building Safety's policy to obtain permission from the property owners for sign permits. The homeowners association for each development should approve in writing (according to their by-laws) the sign location and content. 7. Sign permits are required for every sign that is relocated or revised as required by (Estes Park Municipal Code) EPMC 17.66.140 Permits. 8. If the location for check in is a problem for visitors, I suggest check in location or instructions to be added to the sign. 9. The Department of Building Safety has concerns that granting of this variance may set a precedent for other applications for Off -Premises signs. Vie ANTLERS POINTE CONDOS 1ST ^rf5ri NATCIi iNV BUGLE POINT ON FALL RIVER CONDOS PH S lPP BUGLE POINT ON FALL RIVER CONDOS PH 2 " BUGLE POINT ON FALL RIVE 4 s r2. '®s -m,yr CONDOS 1ST I Fr CREEKSIDESUITES CONDOS 1ST FALL RIVER ESTATES AMD L687 BLK FALL RIVER ESTATES 1ST Q. 15.1�i Page I of �. '1IY„ rd'l ,161'qou' @V'uf'd1r91!,110PIi 1 5Z .I•r 64/1iid��au: w o� �,.'�!' u'�i���ur�, �ya!;il'uu��� 1^� Y A. ITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street Loveland, Colorado 80538 970/667-5310 Fax 970/667-2527 October 24, 2007 ALISON CHILCOTT, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Board of Adjustment - Variance Request - Estes Park Condos Dear Ms. Chilcott: I have the following comment: 1. The Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant a variance for off -premise advertising signs pursuant to Section 17.66.160 (c) of the Municipal Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. ry Truly Yours, a, ry A. White GAW/ldr Cc: Elizabeth Blanchard, Vice President of Operations Fax: 970/577-9314 And 10 800-3,49-1.D03 HIM Mug ill111111111101ili 1400 Daveil Dr,„ Estes Park, DO 8051„.- elizabetiiiii@eistescondositiorin Date: September 26, 2007 Owners: Randy and Kathy Collins Applicant: Elizabeth Blanchard, VP of Operations We are requesting two Property signs to be updated: 1.) Creekside at 1400 David Dr. Current Sign: ,(tt. A Proposed Sign: .Att.„, 2.) Bugle Pointe at 1516 Fish Hatchery Road Current Sign: it/ C Proposed Sign: 1,:\tt, Pc irt vevEvy „ est scon :coui S E P 2 6 2007 111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111piiilli Current location of sign (built in 2000), currently meets all sign code requirements except for "Off Premise." Sign location is not changing. Sign size is changing to: 56" X 48" Sign is changing from just advertising Bugle Pointe, to advertising all three properties. (Att 011) Sign will maintain the "V" structure as you see in the original sign. ( tt.0) REQUESTED VARIANCE: EPMC 17.66.060 (13) —Off Premise Sign New sign would advertise all three properties, instead of just Bugle Pointe. **Bugle Pointe • ce manages all three properties during the summer season (June — October). Bugle Pointe may stay open year round, sometime in the near future. Hub Current location of sign (built in 1998), does not meet three code requirements. Sign was authorized 1998, however the code is being interpreted differently now. Sign location is not changing. Sign size is not changing. Sign is changing from just advertising Creekside, to advertising all three properties. REQUESTED VARIANCES: EPMC 17.66.110 (3).b —8 ' Property Line Setback One side of property line to sign is: 29.85' Other side of property line to sign is: 7.34' EPMC 7.6.E.1.a (1) —30' River Setback Sign is 26.15 from river bank. EPMC 17.66.060 (13) --Off Premise Sign New sign would advertise ail three properties, instead of just Creekside. **Creekside Office manages all three properties (Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe & Creekside) YEAR ROUND. The Creekside sign was positioned in 1998 to meet each code requirement as close as possible. The sign can not move "back," as there is a 10' elevation change (down) behind the Creekside sign. The embankment drops sharply just behind the sign. Fall River is behind the Creekside sign. (A ttn K) The sign can not move forward, as this will further encroach on the "Property Line Setback" and the "30 foot sight Triangle." 96 um i' i111111iIIMom EPMC 17.66.060 (13) —Off Premise Sign We feel the need to place all three properties on one sign for the following reasons: All three resorts are on the same property tt L All three resorts are managed under one management company: Estes Park Condos Both the Creekside Office and the Bugle Pointe Office manage all three properties. Currently, guests aimlessly drive around the neighborhood looking for their "specific" office (either Creekside, Bugle Pointe or Antlers Pointe), not realizing that either office can assist them. The Bugle Pointe sign misleads guests to interpret it is ONLY for Bugle Pointe guests. The Creekside sign misleads guests to interpret it is ONLY for Creekside guests. Currently, there is no office sign for Antlers Pointe. These guests have no idea which office to check in to. We can decrease the amount of driving through the neighborhood by advertising all 3 properties on each of the two signs. This will direct guests immediately, to either the Creekside or Bugle Pointe office, without driving back & forth between Fish Hatchery, David Dr. & Fall River/Hwy. 34. The Antlers Pointe guests need signage to direct them to the Creekside and/or Bugle Pointe Offices. Currently, there is no signage to direct them to either office. Guests drive aimlessly up and down the adjacent roads (Fish Hatchery, David Dr.& Fall River/Hwy. 34), wondering where the office is. Both the Creekside and Bugle Pointe signs are worn and dated. They are not easily read as cars drive by. This slows traffic and increases opportunity for traffic accidents. The proposed new signage is highly visible from the road and can be read easily without having to stop. The Creekside, Bugle Pointe and Antlers Pointe entrances are not visible from the "main" road, Hwy. 34. If the Creekside sign is changed to reflect all three properties, guests will immediately turn onto David Drive where the Creekside Office is located. This will likewise happen for guests arriving from the opposite direction by the Bugle Pointe Office. They will immediately turn into the Bugle Pointe Office, based on the improved, proposed signage. Emergency and town utility personnel have had difficulty finding each of the offices. The assumption is that each property is a different company, so they don't go to the specific office we need them at. If the signage reflects that Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe and Creekside are ALL part of Estes Park Condos, there will be no confusion as to where to arrive. Guests continually request that we change our signage to reflect all three properties. They receive a confirmation letter explaining this; however, they become confused when they are driving and see different signage. All 73 owners of the Estes Park Condos property have requested we change our signage for the same reasons mentioned above. NIV.II�mipill � h III EPMC 17.66.060 (13) -- • .'' Premise Sign Creekside began operation in 1998. Bugle Pointe began operation in 2000. Antlers Pointe began operation in 1996 (Estes Park Condos purchased it in 2006). (Total of 73 condos) All three properties have strong name brand recognition. If we change our name to only Estes Park Condos, this will only add to the confusion we are currently suffering from. Some guests know us only as Creekside, as they stay there every year and are not interested in the other properties. Likewise, for Antlers Pointe and Bugle Pointe. The following 3 resort properties in Estes Park have Off Premise signs: • Bear Paw - • Mary's Lake Lodge - Att.. • Lake Shore Lodge - HI • Crags Lodge — At , I The following resort property in Estes Park has a 30' River Setback Variance • 4 Seasons Inn - At.. Thank you for your consideration. We appreciate your time evaluating this matter. Warm regards, Elizabeth Blanchard VP of Operations Cell: 719-200-5065 SEP 2 6 ?'007 ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Submittal Date: HI I , ;mler IIro, r4i n ii n Record Owner(s): Street Address of Lot: Legal Description ot: I Block: Subdivision: arcel ID # j ;-(?,* Section 1344E4 IIIo1I4a1u.1 4''..1iaar•i Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use 14011, ,10 Tract: Townshi Ran Zoning Existing Water Service I- Well i""'"" Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service J7Town r. Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service "' EPSD UTSD Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service G""""'" EPSD ` UTSD Existing Gas Service .P' Xcel """"" Other r None Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Yes pecific varian desired (state development code section # C rDrot naliol1 Name of Primary Contact Person " 1al ,;j,IN . r 14, 1,4 d,/ did� Septic f Septic r Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.0 of the Estes Valley Development Code) r 1 copy (folded) of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1" = 20') ** l"""" 1 reduced copy of the site plan (11" X 17") r Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) ** The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.VII.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule). Copies must be folded. Town of Estes Park .. P.O. Box 1200 • . 170 MacGregor Avenue ..th Estes Park. CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 Fax (970) 586-0249 .6 www.estesnet.com/ComDev ontact Information'! „°" Primary Contact Person is Owner X Applicant Record Owner(s) ,► ,�+" y r • Mailing Address Q • Phone Cell Phone 0 — 1 - I Fax . `- -7 + 1 4 Email " 1t 2..a- "' out Applicant - r Z Mailing Address Phone i CeII Phone ( " Fax ' 0 Email k r" Consultant/Engineer is, 5 �)t ►-,e4- 01 �i,iI,IIIVQ�I } • r Consultant/Engineer t•" € Mailing Address %P , > / < .L Phone CeII Phone Fax Email (` 2 0) 1: �►i APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. D ECEOVED PLIC T C ! TIN ► I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. • In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). ► I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online atwww.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) ► I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. • I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is Incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. ► l understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. ► The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. O. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. ► I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. ► I understand that I am required to obtain a "Variance Notice" sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road. I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked. I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10) business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. ► I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request, "Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void." (Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT.: CII z.-4,le44\ j\p4y1(11‘aj-d Signatures: Record Owner Applicant .9-1)160,Ap_kcLi.a D ECIECIVE SEP 2 6 2007 Date Qilvrb7 Date .,,M. Ly O7 Revised 10/13/06 111111111111 § 8.1 Compliance with Town and County Sign Codes CHAPTER , SIGNS t COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN AND COUNTY SIGN CO ES A. Signs in the Town of Estes r ® All signs in the Town of Estes Park shall comply with the Estes Park Sign Code, set forth in Chapter 17.66 of the Town of Estes Park Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. B. Signs in Larimer Coun ® All signs in unincorporated Larimer County shall comply with the Larimer County Sign Code, set forth in §8.7 of the Larimer County Land Use Code, as amended from time to time. igl a Zoning Section 17.66.050 (17) Signs commonly associated with, and limited to information and directions related to the permitted use on the lot on which the sign is located, provided that each such sign does not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square inches in total area. (This cate- gory shall be interpreted to include such signs as "no smoking," "rest room," "no solicitors," "self-service" and similar informational signs.) (18) Signs which identify items such as credit cards, menus or prices; limited to one (1) such sign for each use, not to exceed four (4) square feet per face or eight (8) square feet in total area. Such signs may be attached to the building, as projecting or wall signs, or included as an integral part of a freestanding sign. (19) Regulatory signs erected on private property, such as "no trespassing" signs, which do not exceed two (2) square feet per face or four (4) square feet in total surface area, limited to four (4) such signs per use or per building. (20) Text or copy changes on signs specifically designed to permit changes of the text or copy thereof; (21) A sign, which does not exceed six (6) square feet per face or twelve (12) square feet in total surface area; limited to six (6) feet in height and limited to one (1) such sign per lot and which does not propose, concern, reflect or promote a commercial purpose. (22) Vending machine signs, provided that such signs are limited to the product being vended. (Ord. 11-76 §2(part), 1976; Ord. 36-76 §1, 1976; Ord. 17-80 §1, 1980; Ord. 21-82 § 1(A), (B) and (C), 1982; Ord. 1- 87 §1, 1987; Ord. 6-87 §1, 1987; Ord. 15-97., 1997; Ord. 17-02 §1(part), 2002) 17 Supp. 9 17.66.060 Prohibited signs. The following signs shall not be permitted, erected or maintained in the Town: (1) Signs with visible moving, revolv- ing or rotating parts or visible mechanical movement of any description or other appar- ent visible movement achieved by electrical, electronic or mechanical means, except for time -temperature -date signs, traditional bar- ber poles, and gauges and dials which may be animated to the extent necessary to display correct measurement; (2) Signs with optical illusion of move- ment by means of a design which presents a pattern capable of reversible perspective, giv- ing the illusion of motion or changing of copy; (3) Signs with lights or illuminations which flash, move, rotate, scintillate, blink, flicker, vary in intensity, vary in color or use intermittent electrical pulsations; (4) Strings of light bulbs used in connection with commercial premises for commercial purposes, other than traditional holiday decorations except as provided in Subsection 17.66.050(9); (5) Wind signs and banners; (6) Signs which incorporate projected images, emit any sound which is intended to attract attention or involve the use of live animals; (7) Any sign which is installed or erected in or projects into or over any public right-of-way, except in the case of a sign for which a permit has been issued in confor- mance with the requirements of this Chapter; Zoning Section 17.66.060 (8) Signs not permanently affixed or attached to the ground or to a permanent structure, (for example, banners, sandwich boards and handheld signs). Temporary real estate signs attached to posts driven into the ground and temporary safety barriers are excepted. (9) Any sign or sign structure which: a. Is structurally unsafe, or b. Constitutes a hazard to safety or health by reason of inadequate mainte- nance or dilapidation, or c. Is capable of causing electrical shocks to persons likely to come in con- tact with it; (10) Any sign or sign structure which: a. Obstructs the view of, may be con- fused with or purports to be an official traffic sign, signal or device or any other official sign, or b. Creates an unsafe distraction for motor vehicle operators, or c. Obstructs the view of motor vehicle operators entering a public roadway from any parking area, service drive, private driveway, alley or other thoroughfare; (11) Any sign which obstructs free ingress to or egress from a required door, window, fire escape or other required exit way; (12) Roof signs, except as specifically permitted by Section 17.66.110; 117r30 Supp. 9 (13) Off -premises advertising signs. (14) Signs not pertinent and or not clearly related to the permitted use on the property where located, except for temporary political signs, as permitted and regulated by Section 17.66.070, and except for signs permitted under the provisions of Section 17.66.130. (15) Except as provided in Subsection 17.66.050(8), any sign having direct illumination, including but not limited to visible neon tubing. (Ord. 17-02 §1(part), 2002) 17.66.070 Temporary signs. Temporary signs in all zoning districts shall be subject to the following specific require- ments: (1) Construction signs. Signs advertis- ing subdivision, development, construction or other improvements of a property shall be permitted in any zoning district and shall comply with the following: a. Such signs shall be limited to free- standing, wall or window signs, shall not exceed thirty-six (36) square feet in total area nor eighteen (18) square feet per face, and shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height. No riders or attachments to such signs shall be permitted. For residential developments consisting of five (5) dwelling units or less, the maximum area permitted for a construction sign shall be three (3) square feet per face for each dwelling unit being constructed. Zoning Section 17.66.110 17.66.110 Sign regulations in nonresidential zones. The following regulations shall apply to all uses in nonresidential zoning districts. (1) Total allowable sign area. a. The total area of all signs on any face of a building shall not exceed one and one-half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage at ground level, and three-quarters (0.75) square foot per lineal foot of second story building frontage. b. The maximum allowable total cumulative sign area for any one (1) business shall not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square feet. (2) Signs or uses with multiple frontage. The total area of all signs on any face of a building shall not exceed one and one-half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage at ground level, and three-quarters (0.75) square foot per lineal foot of second story building frontage. Supp. 9 (3) Freestanding signs: a. Maximum height: twenty-five (25) feet. b. Minimum setback: eight (8) feet from any property line, four (4) feet from any building. c. Number: One (1) freestanding sign per street frontage, not to exceed two (2) per lot. d. Maximum area: No freestanding sign shall be larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet. 1 .3,5 The combined total of all freestanding signs on an individual property or single lot shall not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square feet. (4) Signs on canopies, awnings and architectural projections. a. Maximum area: The total area of such signs shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the width of the projection multiplied by the vertical height of the projection. b. Projection: 1. The face of any such sign shall not project above or below the face of the canopy, awning or architectural projection. Signs may project horizon- tally beyond the face of a canopy or architectural projection the distance necessary to accommodate the thick- ness of the letters, but no more than twelve (12) inches. 2. Signs displayed on architectural projections which extend fifteen (15) inches or less from the face of a build- ing may be considered wall signs, and are subject to those provisions. (5) Projecting signs: a. Minimum setback: four (4) feet from street property line in the Commercial Downtown (CD) Zoning District, or eight (8) feet from property lines in all other zoning districts, and no closer to a sideline of the building or storefront than to the centerline of the same building or storefront. b. Minimum clearance: Nine (9) feet from the ground to the bottom edge of the sign. General Development Standards § 7.6 Wetlands and Strom Corridor Protection (1) National Wetlands Inventory prepared by the U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; and (2) Colorado Natural Heritage Program maps. b. Unmapped Wetlands. The review of a development proposal may discover a potential wetland that has not been mapped or for which the boundaries have not been clearly established. In such instances, the Applicant shall retain a qualified wetland expert to delineate the boundaries of the wetland a . rding to accepted professional standards. E. Buffer/Setback Areas. 1. Stream or River Corridors. a. Building/Structure Setbacks. (1) Stream Corridors (except in the CD zoning district). All buildings and accessory structures shall be set back at least thirty (30) feet horizontally (plan view) from the annual high-water mark of stream corridors, or if not readily discernible, from the defined bank of the stream, Where defined banks are not readily discernible, the setback shall be m>,sured from the thread of the stream. See Figure 7-10. (Ord. 2-02 #5) Supp. 6 7-28a ,11Ir q,i4911�Vi Gtll6'�d�d�Yii��INq'41w'd�Hpl�lmwii��,r44�IIIIII�Y; "D" 8.5" tall x 7.5" wide "S" 11.25" x 6.25" "C" 5.7"tall x4.7"wide "e" 4.3" tall x 3.8" wide "C"3"tall x2.5"wide "F" 6" tall x 6.5" wide "F" 4.5" tall x 5" wide c+) N A' A um � N X � § AƒT \N .>�( Mt000000mV / \f. « 2©9°!; 2.2007 13:05 4 "E" 4.5" tall x 2.25" wide "D" 3.5" tall x 3" wide X 0 "F" 2.6" _ II x 2.75" wide 2 518" tali text O X 8 co 0 " C 111•31,,, „,, BL4Lrlte f)).( )• 0 11111 d , . 14,0 Offire (if 1,1's?,eksic 1$ 0111'UM410 „Ail0000l """" 1„ 111111111 „?'1'1'111,11:11l11111i:11)1?11111111111111111111111111A„,',11',11,11',11,','1,11',11',11',11,',11',11',11,11',11,1,11„11111,d1',1111'11111''''111111111' 1111M Al U111 1111111 to Rocky Mountain National Park (1 mile NW) Gazebo 13 1109100, B 41 rigalow & Property: Fall River Room Hot Tub ilk • Downstairs Units III1Upstairs Units to Estes Park 3 miles SE ... • ",,/••"I„ 1,1 k3 BEDROOM CONDOS r ULL kfT(HIENS fiRfpukts WIN • IN ROOM SPAS 2100 Fall River Road Estes Park, CO 80517 Bearpawestespark.com 1 yq III II IL MARYS I i+F ✓ '� ' VIIImi i VNR' .liip L O D t I 1111'r M II 01I RLb}xt'Fx 7 � T R t, 4110, un,V,(:,,t1„,,, 111;Pn 141:110111111111'1 „� uuill llllllllllllllhlllolllllll rfff li/llf�/1 /e, 2625 Marys Lake Road Estes Park, CO 80517 www.maryslakelodge.com MA YSIA .7„ LODGE J�.., GE Illliiil''''"Y'NIViNYlll"u6Nhll"id��Yili�fllllWIIIIRWII°IIVNIIIP'" Im 1��VI"uuuuuuuuuu,ll II III Julullllllll IIIIII m11111111111111111111111111111111111111I lunul 41 WlWrlb` I` 1 llll'II'Ildf( g ififf 1, wlli�' uWl IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII: II,II °°Nlli o '11�IIIIIYI liiill 1,1u1l nlPllllll, WI 111111 1111 o illrl', sn� TT IYihlm U SiIvcrado Restaurant ,Lake Shore Lodge (CO11 reIVire (Pater °°°°° �,mIIIII,III,p1101„wl '7r " 11111111 ,a 114!),!::;:1111::' 4�; W 0 ill INr;' II 1700 Big Thompson Ave Estes Park, Colorado 80517 www.lakeshorelodge.com Silva Il10000001 .. 111.1111111111'11:::::111"1,11111111:11111.1111111111.1111111111111111111111.111,11111111111111111111001111111111111111111,, 4 II�II .Wi mll��I II �.vv�oi,�� 300 Riverside Dr Estes Park, CO 80517 www.cragslodge.com 110111111111 1111111111111 AT �I 'JACK V %S \ N \: .� J j IL\ \ A} \ 1130 West Elkhorn Avue Estes ParkCO851 www.4-seasonsinn.com \/\ \ \\ \ \}'.1.11111111111111111111 pplppicl ( }0 000111 ƒ/ \ .\\ \ AI \�ƒ � §°, .� y « Property Location: 1451 DAVID DR Parcel ID # 3515308007 GORDON, BEVERLY H 325 LEYDEN ST DENVER CO 80220 Property Location: Parcel ID # 3515310001 JIM RANDY COMPANY, LLC 1400 DAVID DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 4 Parcel ID # 3515312004 LIU, TIANYING 10901 W 120TH AVE STE 215 BROOMFIELD CO 80021 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 11 Parcel ID # 3515312011 NORDBROCK, DAVID A/STACY D 21289 N 91 ST DR PEORIA AZ 85382 Property Location: 2225 FALL RIVER RD Parcel ID # 3515300007 PRATT, LESLIE ANN W PO BOX 1440 ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 8 Parcel ID # 3515312008 SANTILLI, THOMAS 1813 W MEAD PL CHANDLER AZ 85248 Property Location: 1480 DAVID DR 16 Parcel ID # 3515309016 GRICE, KENNETH G 1057 W CHOKECHERRY DR LOUISVILLE CO 80027 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 10 Parcel ID # 3515312010 KOCOUREK, LINDA L./THOMAS E 2705 BERMUDA CIR COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80917 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 2 Parcel ID # 3515312002 MARTINEZ, TAMI LINDER PO BOX 337252 GREELEY CO 80633 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 5 Parcel ID # 3515312005 NORTON, ALAN/CAROL ANN 8956 PRAIRIE KNOLL DR LONGMONT CO 80503 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 21 Parcel ID # 3515312021 RAMSEY, PERRY P (.21) 1156 NORTHRIDGE DR ERIE CO 80516 Property Location: 1361 DAVID DR Parcel ID # 3515305010 SPEER REVOCABLE TRUST 1361 DAVID DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1341 DAVID DR Parcel ID # 3522205011 HEINS, TODD L/JODY A 2108 MACON DR CEDAR PARK TX 78613 Property Location: 1421 DAVID DR Parcel ID # 3515305008 KRUEGER, JOHN E/MARLENE R 1421 DAVID DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1401 DAVID DR Parcel ID # 3515305009 MORANVILLE, GARY M/PAMELA D 8415 DRAY DR ARVADA CO 80003 Property Location: 1340 FALL RIVER DR A Parcel ID # 3522236001 POWELL, ROBERT M/JUDY S 553 OVERLOOK DR MONROEVILLE AL 36460 Property Location: Parcel ID # 3522237001 RANDY, JIM, CO, LLC 2250 BLUE SPRUCE CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1500 FISH HATCHERY RD Parcel ID # 3515306002 TIMBER CREEK PROPERTIES, LLLP 475 PEAK VIEW DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1509 FISH HATCHERY RD Parcel ID # 3515307901 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PO BOX 1906 ESTES PARK CO 80517 Property Location: 1480 DAVID DR 14 Parcel ID # 3515309014 WASSON, MICHAEL D 1327 WALDEN CT LONGMONT CO 80501 Property Location: Parcel ID # 3522000944 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1311 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS CO 80524 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 18 Parcel ID # 3515312018 WEI, LUNING Lt/JIAN 425 S SNOWMASS CIR SUPERIOR CO 80027 Property Location: 1480 DAVID DR 15 Parcel ID # 3515309015 VERMEER, ROGER D 6114 TILDEN ST FORT COLLINS CO 80528 Property Location: 1400 DAVID DR 3 Parcel ID # 3515312003 YAN, VI 10901 W 120TH AVE 215 BROOMFIELD CO 80021 ;W h . § MO 8 ) BUGLE POIN |1| z N N N W , w N.wuJN, 0 QN z<pnttw~ SWW.,ZmVZ ZY a-WOWz00<<Z W 1-=f < ZJ,>. 0 -x ZPow0,y_0 c`5-J_l,aw zi 'ZF-aw.�i3z<U mz=5ZmmEOOK1Op s<Q0=WIZA-a'KOU0 2ZV1 N W z Z .00x N~, w zpy.oic"--avazo0 0 amwwws O w ''--�U�w 0 71 F2 Zw0WW}W+�>NmO] N W 30OO z��-.�i���z gJ� o �I °; o p H N< O w a} F0 N p 0 t.0 nN. w<Jp W=g0N<Z0<" Nv ...... za'UOUV1<Z N ??}fJy--Jn w z Zm6oazZOw0P05‹ Op�J�N c= Z~a'<LI J1,J0 maw <JOW o-m (-4_0m wOLL 62.iNaO 4z4-0b0 �=¢ D�- OOKpp,O�Q�3,Jr JW~ ow WZJce}JZJF,6N..:; 1- F- N w('oa 0 ('JJJ <MuyOyOy0 Z=z90 zw6wzW ELASW-oaoao 0,zowwamx -ozwxao w�op000M aUFUNUwU JU(n w a W O(nmwowl-O¢QQjmjj W w a CREEKSIDE SUITES z 0 M N W -,zcv=aoc- Wage 1 ot 1 ri Nov 2, 2007 1 00 P The Evergreens on tett River •,.aveorpros(cporpknage corn> wpom Dear Elizabeth, Tvt n looks GREAT! e approve! Good Luck en Tuesday! CrWg & Keeley Hansen Owners The Evergreens on Fan River Or' [nal Message From:: Elizabeth Btettchard Toi` The Eivergreq04 ohFell Riyor Sent:: FrIday,, November 02„ 2007 M11 Al5 AM Subject Altai Keeley Hi Keeley, 1 hate to bother you..,..,..., however t was hoping to speak, to you about the proposed sgrtage we ace asking the Town to approve You h.ad received a notice in the mad, along with all the other neighbors in the iirrea 0 meet with the Board this Tuesday at 9 am to "presentour case and we reaCh a decision that same day 'they have mentioned to me that it may be a good idea to have the "neighbohng business "(The Evergreens 'o), email me a quick opinion on whether you "mind' the signage or not We are not changing the size ad the sign al att. We are just wanting to change what is displayed on the sign I have attat hed what we hope to have the sign took WC, I can explain ihro nnore detail over the. phone (you have tune My cell iri 19-200-5055 1 don't. want you to Teel obligated. Its not required that I have it "II" hey lust suggested it would be a good idea would feet better i1190 over the details w/ you on the phone however Its Just tocr mi„rott to erne Tharks so much!! Elizabeth Blanchard 02 of Operations eli2ah4 tirK@Raafx.ondos corn Estes Park Condos': Antlers Pointe., Bugte Pointe and Creekside Suites twv estustio ridos con 1400 David Dr, Estes Park„ CO 80517 1.I00-3.10.1003 970-U77'000e http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view—bsp&ver=ymdfwq781tpu 11/5/2007 w trom ins evergreens on ran raver cevergrnsgonelmage com> to Elaabeth Blanchard < .00m>. date Nov 3, 2007 9:20 PM subject Re: Response from The Evergreens on Fall River signed -by oneimage.com Dear Elizabeth, ,w,,;10 : rn1G1:6. NOV oaya ago) HeulY ECsf ..ems 2_ a---p 2_ Thank you for your e-mail in regards to your new signage for Antlers Point, Bugle Point and Creekside Suites. We are aware that the signs will all incorporate the three names of your three properties and that they will be grouped under the main name of Estes Park Condo's. This signage is fine with us, here at The Evergreens on Fall River. We are sure it will help direct your guests and potential guests to your lovely establishments. It looks great to usl Good Luck. Keeley and Craig Hansen Owners/Managers The Evergreens on Fall River 1500 Fish Hatchery Rd. Estes Park, CO. 80517 (970) 577-9786 x 0 — Original Message — From: Elizabeth Blanchard To: ric; ; rgreens on Fall Rtter • 1111110 Wiled tea - Sent: Friday, November 02, 20071:39 PM Subject: Re: Response from The Evergreens on Fall River Hi Keeley and Craig, I wanted to mention to you that one of the variances we had to apply for was an "off -site variance,'" That is due to us displaying Antlers Poirde, Bugle Pointe and Creekside all on one sign. You could take exception to cur proposed sign, since you have 2 units that are on Fall River, amongst the ones that we have That is just how the sign codes are written, If you could mention in your email to me...--. the above "situation,"°'so the /own Board understands that you are aware of this "issue" and that you don't mind that we advertise all three properties. --And if you do mind, that is o.lc too. :0) I am attaching our "Statement of Intent" that I submitted to the town rve included both signs for your convenience, as well (Creekslde and Bugle Pointe), Thanks for taking the lime to consider this Don't feel obligated to read the whole 'Statement of intent -document. I just want you to have all the facts, if you are interested. Warm regards, Elizabeth Elizabeth Blanchard http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ymdfwg78 ltpu 11/5/2007 oater,`"r l c� ftll % k PROPOSED SIGNAGE HOA BOARD VOTE (5 HOA's) Each of the HOA Board members received the following: 1.) The same proposal the Town received. 2.) The Creekside and Bugle Pointe proposed sign renderings 3.) The attached letter (Page 2) The "email" votes are also attached from each of the members below. CREEKSIDE SUITES. 2 Yes votes based on 3 members Randy Collins -President: Yes Kathy Collins-Secretary/Treasurer: Yes Erin Santilli-Member at Large: No response Vice President -Vacant position: CREEKSIDE COWS! 3 Yes votes and 1 No vote based on 4 members Randy Collins -President: Yes Kathy Collins-Secretary/Treasurer: Yes Mick Leth-Vice President: No Sheri Rodgers -Member at Large: Yes BUGLE POINTE PHASE I. 4 Yes votes based on 4 members Randy Collins -President: Yes Kathy Collins-Secretary/Treasurer: Yes Ron Willet-Vice President: Yes Ken Grice-Member at Large: Yes BUGLE POINTE PHASE Ili 4 Yes votes based on 4 members Randy Collins -President: Yes Kathy Collins-Secretary/Treasurer: Yes Kurtis Kelly -Vice President: Yes Scott Ballstadt-Member at Large: Yes ,ANTLERS POINTE! 2 Yes votes based on 2 members Randy Collins -President: Yes Kathy Collins-Secretary/Treasurer: Yes 1 of 2 I am meeting with the Town Board this Tuesday, November 6, 2007. The purpose of the meeting is to request approval for changing our existing signage at the Bugle Pointe Office, and the Creekside sign at Fall River & 1400 David Dr. The size of the Creekside size is remaining the same. We are requesting that we change the signage description to reflect all three properties: Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe and Creekside. You can view our proposed signage in the attached document. We are requesting the Bugle Pointe sign to be enlarged slightly. We are also requesting that we change the signage to reflect all three properties: Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe and Creekside. You can view our proposed signage in the attached document. The sign will remain a "V" structure. However, we are hoping to enlarge the sign to accommodate the new descriptions. I have also attached our proposal to the Town. This proposal includes all variance requests. The variances were addressed when the signs were originally built; however, the process starts from scratch when any type of change is made to a sign. The Town mentioned that it would be ideal to have all five HOA's on our property vote on the proposed signage prior to my meeting with them this Tuesday. I apologize for the late notice. I was just notified of this request. Please submit your email vote to me by Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6pm. I appreciate you attending to this matter. The response needs to be a yes or no vote based on the information I have provided you within this letter and the attachments. There will not be negotiations as to what the signs says, how it is displayed, etc... This is left to the Town Board. They have been reviewing our request for the last two months. I am more than happy to answer any questions that you may have. Please do not hesitate to email me. Warm regards, Elizabeth Elizabeth Blanchard V.P. of Operations elizabeth@estescondos.com Estes Park Condos: Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe and Creekside Suites www.estescondos.com 1400 David Dr. Estes Park, CO 80517 800-349-1003 970-577-0068 2 of 2 Page 1 of 1 Creekside Suites HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage unbox IN0A-SigitS Elizabeth Blanclliard CreeNide Suites HOA BOard Miy. 41;.,.!,..r.'1" hy Collinsollec,!r(„:„C. Nov 2 (3 days ago) Elizabeth Blanchard NaNy falmil to send the ettechoochN Nov 2 (3 days ago) no rkc424 ollconn el izabetheestesoo ndos.com„ Nov 3, 2007 1000 AM RwCreekside Suites HOA Board Vote - Propoued flignape Randy Collins - Yes Kathy Collins - Yes - Mkt Quved - v From' Eliaabeth Blanchard Nainnixellelloslosecndosomirm tom Sent FOIL 2 Nov 200 11'.:52 .Sublect creeksale .Suites 40A Board Vote .... Facommed %page Nov 3 (2 days ago) - 00e, CIPKII - TO. Oreekside Suites INDA IFicard Rad'Collins-Prosident Kathy Coal ns-SeorelarylTreasurer, Erin Sarilinlbernber a Lcarge 'Noe President -Vacant posillionli am meeting with the 'TOWn IBoard litis Tuesday„ INovember 0,, 2007 The purpose of 'the meeting vs ito request ;approval tor o0o'Igo% aur existing signore at the Bugte Pointe Office end the Creekslide sign El 1[ ,flapt River 8, 140Q1 Dowd 'The size cidf tllo ksrrr size lie inemalning the same, VVE..31,0 requesting 'that we change 'Ur*, eignage c.lesproptionlo r0V0C 0three qlopeities. Antlers Pointe, Bogle lunite and Creekside You can 'view OWpropesed signage 0 ho attached clocument 03 are requestiling the Bogle Pointe sign to he. enlarged Nightly 0Ve are allso requesting that 'we change 'the sgpage to refilect all three properties. Antlers Pointe, Bogie Pooilito and Creakelde You can vUew ,our proposed signage illne attached .docurnent The sign wilt remain a "v" structufe Movmver„ vele are flipping to ei'llarge line sign ,M ascounnodate the new 01lescuplens. I have also attached our !proposal to the Tool. This Ipmposall includes al variance usl The variances 'Were .addressed when Me signs were ociginally however, the pro:less adds Nom scratch 'whern any tyr,oe of change ,s made to a slgri The Town mentioned that it 'would be idea° ic 0ave..a1111 HOks on our propeny vote on the propsed ,.5'vgnage prior to my meeting ',Ant them ltas Tuesday, II iapellogrze for the tale notice. II was iust Li-Doh:Ned of this request Pieoso submit your erne o voto to me lby Monday: November 5„ '2007 at 6pm v appreciate you attending lo this matter Inc response ft 00001000 ee a yes o ro vote Ilxised N.11 T the information have provided you within thin llter and 'the attachments There will not lbe 'negotiations as to ryvhat the signs ,says, Inow it is displayed, etc..... This 'is tett to the Town Board 'They lhave Ildeefu PEW EL,Wing ,jr request 'tor the last two 'months, n haIPPV airiri more CPI's to ahower arty questions 'that you Imlay Inave Please do not hesitate Ito emaill ime ',Narion regards.: Elizabeth http://mail.google.corn/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=y- mdfwq781tpu 11/5/2007 Page 1 ot C#eekside Condos HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage orbox HOR..Stgrtli Elizabeth Blanchard TO: Clieeknine Condos HOA Elinafd (Randy CollirlivResident Ilinthy Nov 2 (3 days ago) AcoV11404 anticom to elizelbeth vv. Nev 3 (2 days ago) Randy Colliers - Yes '"------ Kathy Collins Yes „ivviva" Offited lloct ----OolginW Message.. — From:: Efizoboth Blanohetd ..:.eli•galhethiS4KINOII,iliongtlis lignlivi. fa! lethrhs7P(Ohlilili core vINlillisrlis7Hililiaoll Sent:: Ilin 2 Nov 2007 12:04 pm Subject. Cure Condos IHOA Board Vote Proposed Signage Ili C.:IS-- -Jill 'Il Iv-filvv) i vo.., Creekside Condos HOA Board Randy Colliirs-Phesident Kathy CollimoliSeoreliaryliifreesurer, Kick L \Ace President, Shen Redgers-Memlber at Large) am meeting wilth the Town :Board !this Tuesday:, November G„ 2007.. The purpose ol the 'meeting is to request aop(cval for changlog our eststllio sionage al the Bugle Pante Office.and the Creeksde sign all. ;Fall River 10 1100 Dnwid Dr The size of Ike Creelliske !size ls remaining tne same 'We are requesting Chat we change the signage descontlion to reflect ,alIt three propetties: Antlers Pointe, Bugle Ponta and iCreekside.. You oath rviiew our proposed eignage on the attached document We are requesling the Bugle IPointe slign lo be enlarged slightly.. We are ialso requesting that vac change tlhe ,slignape to reflect al three ploperties' Antiers Pointe, Bugle Pohrole and Oreeksvde. You can view our proposed sllionge rthe attached ittocomeivii Ti sign woli rernain a "V" structure.. Inlowever, we aoe hoping to lenlarge the :Sign to ,accommedelte the now descniplions. V nave allso attached ,our poposal to the Town This lorphosal lincludes all valiance requests "rlhe veniances were addressed 'when the ,sions 'were ortglinallly built; ,howelier the process sltarns front scratch when any Nee of f.;'1"'fi2irogo ,s inn voan .a sign The Iblivro mentioned that WOUIld he. !ideal to lhave ali five HONE; en our propoity vole on the piopserli signaoe 50100110 my mootithg with Itherri this Tuesday II ielpothgize tor the Mahe nultite. V was juisit notified lei this request. Please stibinit your oared 'votelo oe II:py Monday: November Ili, 2001 at lipoi.. apples:rate you atteneVng 5this innatteir. Tlhe response heeds 'ho be a yes or no vairt Irtaseo 301 hhe linkirmation V hkaive provided you seelitin liras Vetter arid 'hie attachments. There wlit nut be inegatoatens .as to '01131 ilhe signs says: how it O displayed„ ore_ This is Veit to the 'Town IBoard. They have been ceviewing OW request lot the Oast hire months I ash nu:Nre 'than happy to ilinswer airoy questions that 'you may lhave.. Illitease do rot hesitate lo email1 me Warm regards. IEllizaboth lElliza bell Blanchard 'VP Of OperationS 0ov.400etht5rs1e5con0o5zq5i11 Estes Park Coodos;; .Arthers IPomte, Bugle IPolinte ir 01 Creekslde Soles www.sistescondoscom 1400 'David Dr °Estes Fliuk„ CO 80517 800.349A0113K, 970-577 -04065 http://mail.google.coni/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ymdfwq781tpu 11/5/2007 Page 1 of 1 Creekside Condos HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage inlhcax HOA-Signs Elizabeth Blanchard ' r, Nov 2 (3 days ago) Nov 3 (2 days ego) 6:36 PM (17 hours ago) 8:46 PM (15 hours ago) irkco01464aoi.com krIn s. I<3f1,y I. rC,„ d Ili a tF l.i-i'itO it,'i1 SHE I RODGERS ftrAll.uu ra„,!! ,,Ir ton.iC'o.irr b P,n,m Elizabeth Blanchard lvTive ,e,.n lipw,�€urur.EYl Ir ire SHERIRODGERS GE,f iMi,r��!�ii.'n, 10:12 AM (2 hours ago) fir Elizabeth Blanchard •celabeth@estescondos.com>, dale Nov 5,200710;12AM a i'igaP,�aY, Re' Creekside Condos HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage Yes on the signage vote. Myprevious comment had nothing to do with the sign changes. It had to do with the statement In the letter to the town that states "all of the 73 owners have expressed " My point is that I had never expressed that the signage be changed and I am one of the 73 owners. That statement did not go unnoticed by the other people who called me and mentioned the same. That's all. Thanks, Sheri --- Original Message ----- From: Elizabeth Blanchard Hide quoted tees To:SHERIRODGERS Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 8:46 PM Subject: Re: Creekside Condos HOA Board Vole - Proposed Signage Over the last two years 1 have been told during the HOA meetings, phone conversations and cirta,ill correspondence that our signage needs to be updated and reflect "who we actually are." Furthermore, the Management Company is paying for the total cost of the new signage. I have received "Yes" votes from the other Board H0A's thus far. We have also received the full support of the neighborhood. The neighborhood consists of anyone within 500 feet of either sign. I think everyone understands that the new signage is an immense upgrade from what we currently have. Everyone has been very supportive........including the Town, thus far. Regardless of the HOA Board vote, the signage will be the Town's decision. The HOA vote regarding signage isn't a requirement for the proposed signage. That decision is made by the Town. It was just a recommendation to propose a vote. I chose to follow through, to keep you all involved. Thank you, Elizabeth C Cy\3cs http://mail .google.com/mail/?ui2&vievvbsp&veymdfwg781 tpu 11 /5/2007 4:J I-M (J1 minutes ago) ±xr;;q iF Page 1 of 1 bra elizabethaestescondos.com, x „lo x Nov 5, 2007 4:19 PM xx xx, rx Re: Creekside Condos HOA Board Vote - Proposed Sugnage After reading your letter to the Town Board, I found that it states all 73 owners have requested the new signs. This is the first t have heard of new signs, I have not requested new signs, and am disturbed that you told the Town Board this. For this reason I will vote NO/ Mick Leth HELCO., INC. Condo F http://mail.google,corn/mail/?ui=2&viet bsp&verymdfwg781tpu 11/5/2007 rage 1 Newer 3 of Older r Bugle Pointe Phase 1 HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage law( tOA ndonS Elizabeth Blanchard „DD.' Bugle 1.'„,orrne r,:rh.rrprie, r-er,„:hrr, Ir3orrrie (Rdrp„b„., f..„„rofrirrrreProrrircient Kathy (sort on-r,„,Pr„. Ftostmaater ir(t.,),,ortIrtKttti,, mtto ;.tflott,alot,tttC,trf,tromi mtA, rf,rrigeral inerwerrue trorn rkcolle18413@aotcoin elizabettmlestescondos.com, r•tat,::2! Nov 3, 2007 959 AM cl Re: Bugle Pointe Phase I HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage Ran* Collins - Yee 7 Kathy - Yes ----Original MessageFrom Etizaheth Blanchard <ollizahedtpkesitescondes corn" o Ken Grice .torirrefrehrgornarr r„ree>„ ken once,. <glphaperaeognel net Y., "rine Welets Er mug, op.ioteditext - Sent Fri„ 2 Nov 2007 12'12 pin Subject' Bugle PeertoPhase I IHOA Board Vote -Proposed Si!grage Nov 2 (3 days ago) Nov 2 (3 days ago) • Nov 3 (3 days ago) v X, ,.....A.N TO. Bugle Pointe Pr tase hi0A Beard (Randy Colliins-PresidenKothy Colline-SocretaryiTreasurer, Ron 'Wttlet-Vice Presrdent„ Kern ,Gree-llgerolder o1...arge) am meeting with the Town Board 'this Tuesday, November 6, 2007 The purpose of the meeting iis to request approval for changing rtrrir existng srgnage art trtne Bugle Portrite Office, and dre Cr eekstrie sign at Fait River & 1400 David Or The size of the Creekside skze is remaining the same Wo are requesting that we change the signage description to reflect air three propertiesAntlers Porhille, Bugle Porrile and Creeksicre YOU Oran vrew our proposed slonage in the attached document We are requesting the Bugle Pointe sign to he, enlarged slightly. We ;are allso requesting thalt we change the srgnage Ocrreflect all three properties' Antlers Porie, IBugle Pointe and .Greekstrle You can View our proposed sigioge1 ne attached doclfmert 'The sign remain a "'V"" structure II -However. we are hoping to enlarge the sign to accommodate the new descripports II have also attached lour piroposal to the 'Town. 'This proposal includes nh variance requests.. The via [Frances weco addressed when the signs were origtnally bulk however. thr,.. Iprocess stens from sualch when any tyl:),e, of change is Made to a sign rhe Town mentioned that 4.1: would be ideal to have all five 6-IONS on our property vote on the propsed slignage prior to ity meeting with them this Tuesday. ai,ologize Icon the tate 'notice II yam Ittstnotified of 'this requeet. IRease siilernit your email 'vole 'tc ine Id)/ Monday, Nevembet 5. 2001 at iannn apprepole .yeki ;Rinendmrg to this matter 'The mopeetite need% to be ifiyes or no vote based on 'the inforrrkation I have orovrded you wine0 this letter and the attrachnnente There will inot be negotbfions as to what the signs says Prime it is drsplayed„ etc.. TIhris is lett •lio the Town Board They have been revrewirrg our request for the last two months 0 am more than hargdy Ocr answer any ,questiiins treat you may have Please rrio rot hesitate lo email the Warm regards, Elizabeth Elli,nbeth Blanchard V.P. of Operations ettzebethrgr'„estespc,NCkg CO Estes Park Condos' AilPointe., Bugle Parole ;and Creekside Suites www erstesr.rortrks.nore 1100 David Dr Estes PraiR„ CO $05.17 3.49-1003 976-5.77011968 http://mail.google.com/mailflui=2&vi s p&verry- mdfwq 7f 1 tpu 11/5/2007 Page 1 of 1 signage Lindkmx 11,10.Ayiq,ns it The Wads el,lizabethaestescondos.come ,, NOv5. 20076:31 PM sgnage 6:31 PM i'2 hours ago) Mt¢ it:v Elizabeth. - We vole for the changing of our exiling signage al the Bugte Pa Office,and the Creekside sign a1 Fait' River 8 1400 David Dr Ron & Sharon Willet P P VN Sir_.: .� httn://mail.eooele.com/mail/?ui-2&view=bsn&verwmdfwg781 tpu 11 /5/2007 rage i or Bugle Pointe Phase I HOA Board Vote Proposed Signage Inbox IHC)A Sir IIbh.BIlanclhatd "Tirr) ;Err...role flrrhatrie 11 Lirorritri (Illrrrhirihurty Keirrith hltriMIA:h.:rho Nov 2 (3 days ago) Postreaster Ihthrrhr 'rriairrf.rroh eynerarre. allurrircur eirire altArrutu.rthrlriltrriail.riennut cuht frrnitrirthall merrurratirri Nov 2 (3 days ago) rrknollitterrieirrpaoLcorri Francry . "irrerri Arrirluhr Collrinh . tir.chirichierrrr Ilhharrha Rehnovachl Nov 3 (3 days ago) t I to Elizabeth My vote for the reterenoed proposed signage note is Yes Thanks, On 1112107 „ lErreabeth Stanchand hretirzatinthrilrestlerrgjorntrio earns wrote. rt. ra TO. Bugie :Pointe ;Phase fHDA lEktard (Randy CorrtnettHrestrient, Kathy Goams-Secretaryfirre,asrarer, IRrin > 'WHO rVice 1Presi5ent„ Ken Grine-Member at Large) rrir am meeting with the Turan Board this Tuesday, November If '2007 s Trie parPose of the rne8u lo rer.per.,,t approval for ,chariquig our eraPseng signage ar't the IBuglle Painte Office, and the Creek -side sign at Fail 1River & > 1400 David Dr The size of the Creeksirk size is remaining the same We are requesting rs that we change the swage de:501'01bn to retied eill three properties. > Anders Pante, Bulge Painie and Creekside, 'You can view our proposed rrh signege on the ;attached document s We ,afP requesting the :Bugle Pointe sign No be oorarged saghtly Vile are > allso requesting that vrre change Me rsignage to refit sit three propertres; th Anders Painter, Bugle Pointe arrid Creellcside You can view our proposed signage 1 1 attarrilhecr document. "The sign W V remain a \r"" structure s However, we are hoping14 erearge the sign rio ancomniordate the now >;olescrrptions. :rt II have arso ,atteched our proposal to the "frown. This peonosat inciades03 rv,adance requests.. ir tie variances were ;addressed when the signs we're originality hoillir .hrowever, the process starts rone seratolh viten any type of change lis made to a sign The Town menNifined trhat rmentild lee to have 81111 filye 11-QA"s on out property yore rarr the preened signege phor to my meeting wiith them this > "Tuesday 11 apologize tor the. late notice.. II was iLIM n;otilltert crt this yr; request Please subrert your errtart 'vote to nee Or/ Monday Novorrebet 1 2007 ,at Ifipen r appreciate ;you anertdirc to this :matter. 'Irre response needs to 11:1,e rrt 's 'yes tur no vote based o the information I Ihreve nrovide,d you within Ithis > latter a rit.1 the atto chments. inhere wall 'not lee negottehoos as to what the s sirges says, how tr dreMeyeri, etc 171rs. os left to the "Irown 10;1:hard. > They have been revisnarng our request for the laSt No relent% > I am more than happy to answer any questions tlhat you may have Please do r> riot lhesitute 4 143lit nee. 01 'Warm regards, rY Elizabeth IBianchard rti..Frt al Operations etinfieth gresrerscuncicar: huhu rri Estes Pack Condos AnItiers 1Pornte Ougre lf,ointe and Creeksicre Suites > wyoy.,;tiartersrionclos > /;400 .David Dr y lEstes Park, 5 0 51707 800-349,4003 01 7-,577 0068 1:21 PM (6 minutes ago) http://mail.google.corn/mail/?ui.----2&view—bsp&ve mdfwq781tpu 11/5/2007 Page 1 of 1 Bugle Pointe Phase II HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage intarte WA. -Signs El[Rebirth Blanchard Mt Coma WYNN Phase Hoorn Ma, anra,P miclarn tray i• al as • al Kahrtis Kay , Ww 0111,0071Mal here clhevuor make w,r,' rkc011464$4,0011,Wena elizebetheastesciondos.com, rilmir Nov3, arli 9:5B AM Re: Bugle Pointe Phase a FIOA Board Vote - Proposed Sionage Randy Collins - Yes Kathy Coffins - Yes ‘..1 Messegemo Prose Elizabeth Bieschisrid cattimilmethddestascliados.cono Ilikedytmistesterem !nig; sclasillstoditaimaimatisam aids publr.1111,,1 Sent: Fri 2 Nov 2001 12°10 iprn Subject:: Bogie Parole Phase 00 HOS, Borate Voile i• Proposed Sidney), 'TO. Bugle Pointe Pease ill 110A Board (Randy CollOrm-Presidenr, Kenny OralineSearilieryfTreaSurat. Poets Keay:Vim Presiderto Scott iffillistaarlibtertar et target .am meeting wil the 'Tcwri Board this 'Tuesday., November 3 2007.. 'Tee purpose tif 0011001017 vs ito request apeetwat ter :changing itor enticing signage at RIlfie Swgfie 11:klirRe Office. and the Crisalkside oryrioltoi Pties & 1400 Dena :Ea The size el the Criethiside size is rarnaning dna same lthe are ceauesling Mei we thane eta isilarrette descliation la reheat 000 three proderrias. Angara Pointe Ballo Fcrmto and Cteekside YOUI earl WON, our proposed strode in the alladhed dernmeell. lehle are requestirogtoro Bole Pante sign 0 be a•dargaa istilightry. We aro ellso cesiting 1010 ore change Ulla !haulage ite react ad iiihree iprodaress itinibers irseilete„ Baglie Pointe end Cretkside Yon can view lea,V1 proposed smarmy, m 1100liiitahen 1100011000 "ree :clan wo remath a 'V" :structure. Iliowever„ wo ere radeihrom to casco tIlle sigh qa Dersammedale Cle new, descriptions. Ihese also attached roar prepu,S0111100 1110 Time. This oroposall includes di Varilaxe rowasis 'The vatianoos were addressed when ithe sighs wore orffitaffilly built nowever„ t ha 'process starts tram scratch when any type at change lis made tide clew The Town mentioned Mat it:would lee ciecl neve a ve HOKrii, on our moody vole on the wired sign se pear id my rammer to with them Ms Tuesday apologize lor the late lactllice I was kon nebred of this request Please wawa your email voile te ma by Ittandley„ NOvereber 5. :2010 Snmershrediele you !Wending Ile this wieder The :response needs le be a yeti or :no vote based ion are informatinn 0 have !puny:idea yair Main this toiler and the iellteatimants, 'There wit n110 be ammailtelians as to r0r11 9001199111101910011 te disobeyed, etch This is Oen to Ma Town Soma Tiffity hem berm reweaving Our r ewe:VI ter Ma Oast laiVe .1710,1111hs 8M, m00110101107171t100iriSmX Male CohaS0i0010, von Dins, WaVe. Pllaace do hot nerritata lo email Jute.. Warm regards„ Prizebeth c,„6:(2, Itibov 2 i93IdeoS ado) INas :2 (3:cleys egg) Nov 3 it3 days bard Peony http://mailaooale.com/mail/?ui=2&view0bsn&ver—vmdfwu781tpu 11/5/2007 Page 1 0/ 1 Kurth Kelly ekkelly .steslibrary org>, Elizabeth Bla rd eelizabethgestes., ,iorir come, dale Nov 3, 2007 713 PM stitwci RE: Bugle Pointe Phase II HOA z ...rd Vote - Prop, Signage signed yahoo.corn • I agree and aleo • Hide quoted taxi I 4, Kits Kelly ckkelly@esfesllbrartorg5 wrote Hi Elizabeth, Thank you for the information. These changes make sense to me. It helps communicate to the public that the 3 properties are under the same management. I vote yes for the proposed sign changes Kurtls Kelly Original Message -- From: creeksidesultes0erenejl.cern [mallto:greksideluites@greall.com) On Behalf Of Elizabeth Blanchard Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 1:16 PM To: kkellyeiesteslibrrary.erg; ssi2alislactleliYaboo.cern Subject: Bugle Pointe Phase II HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage .10 : Bugle Pointe Phase II BOA Board (Randy Collins -President. Kathy Collins-Secretary/Treasurer. Karns Kelly -Vice President. Scott Ballstadt-Member at Large) I am meeting with the "town lIoard this Tuesday, November 6, 2007.. The purpose tit" the meeting is to request approval for changing our existing signage id he Bugle Pointe Office, and the Creekside sign at Fall River & I,100 David Dr. The size of the Creekside site is remaining the same. We are requesting that we elimize the signuee description to reflect all three properties: Anders Pointe, 13ugle Pointe and Creekside, You can viee,' our proposed signage in the attached document We are requesting the Bugle Pointe sign to be enlarged slightly „ We are also requesting that we change the signage to reflect all throe properties. Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe and Creckside, You can view our proposed signage in the attached doeument. The sign will remain a ''V'" structure% I IOW ever, We are hoping to enlarge the sign to accommodate the new descriptions, have also attached our proposal to Ilte Town. Thi,i proposal includes all variance request:. 11 variances wcre addressed when the signs were originally built; however, the process !Aims from scratch when any type of change is made to a sign. The Town mentioned that it would ho ideal to have all lire 110A's on our property vote csi the propsed signage prior to iny meeting 'with them this "Nodes:. 1 apologize for the late notice, I was just notified of this request. Please submit your email vote 10 me by Mondax. November 5. 2007 at 6pin. 1 appreciate von attending to this matter, flie response needs to be a yes or no vote bused on the intbrination 1 have provided you within this letter and the attachments, There +01 not be negotiations as to what the signs says, how it is displayed. etc... This is left In the 'limn Board, They have been reviewing our request for the last two months. I am more shun happy to answer any questions that you may have. Please do not hesitate to email me. Warm regards. Elizabeth Elizabeth Blanchard http://maii.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ymdfwq781tpu 11/5/2007 rage Galan Cp.lairo..(tar r.N.79Prinm,u11:6 fq-919.5. '14Vg0. Impra !.Qoataptia llolbo;t (3420) Chats 8end Etna OtorttN ft la) AO [Mat sAwnises) Candleiets Chat oftrl I Elizabeth Blanchard ttritli Hy, Andy Collins Erin Leyden Estes Condos Gr Estes Condos Int Carrie Larson Estes Condos Gr Estes Condos Int Estes Condos In! Kathy & Randy C . Clphomi 9, Add C441 Labels TtOtt ADDIREISSEgt ADYSETt0111M0 tttEy, Attltt AUDI Apt EIA AtAtoofgrta Paskaa:k (1) CEIRNIF, ftiltpt3 AgE55: IFirtNIUQ lt RsodourE Vote SITRTP. tiOttlE ithSilltESS REPORT .gg COO Cartmitt CA11011E tilt AMMER unpaignip pour OpEj tabeltoa-signs Search Mait Search the Web creeksIdesultesegnmil.com &Ong§ Older Terstott Illeto Otortoti 0 P 1-Ne.12 Creall; ,'9; 501" ttottOtt_Ato2ttlattpon VTeltsite mew Attlornettlet.corri - Interactive web sites to improve communications in condo assoc.. t t..totto tot L ttt !t" ja.,:,:.1ga TITClAtStoost' Remove WWI "l'HOA-SIgns" Report Spam Delete Mote Actions Bugle Pointe Phase 11 HOA Board Vote - Proposed Signage max HOA- Signs Elizabeth Blanchapd Ott., Btott lttyttot ott ttOt rot., It: Nov 2 (3 days ago) KLIAN Keay t, Elizabeth Blanchard celizabeth@iestescondos.corn>, ssballstadt@yahoo.corn, (t.tic Nov 2,, 2007 4:40 PM R. Bugle Pointe Phase 11 HOA Board Vote -Proposed Signage Hi Elizabeth, Nov 2 (3 days ego) Reply Thank you for the information. These changes make sense to me. It helps communicate to the public that the 3 properties are under the same management. I vote yes for the proposed sign changes. Kunts Keity --Original Message-- 1Fronat toot ksidesultes ttt grnailcom l[mailtotcreeksidesuitesqltomait tom) On f Elizabeth Blanchard SentFriday, Niovember 02, 200'7 11OlS PM Tot kktilyMestesitbrary,orgt, ssballttadt@yahootsorn Subject: Bugle Pointe Phase 101 HOA. Board Vote - Proposed SIgnage TO: Bugle Pointe Phase 11 110A Board (Randy Collins -President. Kathy Collins,Seercbiryi1r.astirr. Kurlis K.elly-Vice President,.1eott 13allstadt-Member at 1 urge) I all] Meeting with the 10W11 130/11rd this Tuesdas No% ember 6. )007. 111e purpose of the meeting is to request apprinal lor changing our existing signage at the Bugle Pointe Office. and the Creeks:1de sign et 1 all River it 14(10 1)avid 1)r. The size of the Creckside siZe is remaining the same. We are requesting that we change the signage description to reflect all three properlies Antlers Pointe. 13ugle Pointe and Creeksidc. You can vietv our prinxised signage in the attached doel1111C111, We arc requesting the Bugle Pointe sign to be enlarged slightly, We are also requesting that we change the signagc to reflect all three properties: Antlers Pointe, Bugle Pointe and Creekside. You can VieW 011iprciposed signage 01 the attached docunient 1 hc sign will remain a "V'' structure, llowcYer. We http://mil.google.com/mailflui=2&view=bsp&ver=ymdfwq781tpu n Newer 2 of 6 (Need: k Pr E._xpa tot to! Fors tr Would you like to. 4 I 1400 David Dr Estes Park, CO 80517 Sponsored Links HOA Survival Kit Customized how-to' guides for running your homeowners association www proaccesq itnm Breckenridge Ski Condoz Breckenridge Lodging Center Discount Lodging & Accommodations www erec3a44X,m4rtodatiOn$ COM Big Bear Cool Cahlas Big Bear Cabins - spa, pool table Pet friendly available.. Limo! www loigbearc;oolleabies.com Yosemite Home for Fele Inside the Park gates,spaclous 3000 sq ft house with apartment for sa Www sterrascanic Duraango Vacation Rentaic Choose between 3 premier properties Siopeside/ river. Units sleep 6-10, vacationdu nip corn 11/5/2007 Page 1 ot .0`0QCM V V 4b1NrIPAN 11'0 NOV 1,4 ClayS agO) elizabethaestescondos.com„ iaiaaa? Nov 3, 20071001 AM alma Re, Antlers Pointe HOA Board Vote - Proposed New Signage Kathy Collins - Yes Randy Collins -Yes a I saiaa a Hive aaavaiwi \.” Message — — From- Elizabeth &orchard iteLaellaethrhOha.eale,a,"0,04dPs.epailt> To. Kathy & Randy Cola ins <niapp00000thlhOlaraPL.corp> Sent. Fri, 2 'Nov !2007 11 43 am Subject. Anders Poiade H004 Board Vote , Proposed New Signege TOT Anthers Pointe BOA Board tRaridy Collions,0Presideof Kathy Colirts-SecratoryfIrreasure0 0 am meeting with the Town Board this 'Tuesday, Noverriber '6. 2007. TIrhe purpose of the meeting lis to request approval/ for changing our extsting signage at the Bugle Pointe Ofhoe ard the Greeksitle sign at 'Fail' River & 14010 'David Dr °The size oT the Creeksilde size is rernatrilahg the same.. 'We are requesting that wo 'change the signage doscrip0hion to retied three 1Pronerties Antlers Pointe: Bugle Pointe and Oreekside.. 'You can vie0or W.% proposed sagnage in the attached document We are requesting the Bogie 1Poinfie 'sign to be enlarged stlightly We are also requeoting tlhalt ere chance the sir:pageto rertiect eh three properties Anthers Pointe, Bugle Pointe .ond Creeksido.. You con VIEW our i'yoposed el'gria00:he rIdle attached alociphent. 'Ilhe sign remain a ""'V"" structure hiumrever, we we Irtopita) to err re the alga', to accommodate the new cleaionotirros have atm) attached our proppsoi to the Town. This proposal includes ath variance requests The variances miere airteheased virrhen the signs were orliginalliy ihowever„ the process starts 'Porn scratchi when any type of ihhhertge is made to a e'en.. The Town 'mentioned that woulld be ideat 'Ito have Jett five EllOA's 00 r,yar property vote 'an the opposed 'stooge prior to nny meetirig with them 'this Tuesday. Ilapohogize or hlrie hate 'police. 0 was jest notified of this request Please SLObrrih your 'email vote to rre by Monday November '5„ 200? at 'Ohm 1 appreciate you ,atteriding 'to this mailer The response needs 'ho Ithe a yes or no vote based on the intormation 1 have provided you within tires letter and the attachments. There 11not be negotiations as 'to what the signs says, how it is dis011ayed„ etc.. TN's' heft to the Town IBoard.. They have lacien reviewing our Inequest for lithe .last two months arn more than happy to answer env gueratrons that you may Inaye Please do not hesitate to einarl roe. Wahrrt rtr0garPs, Elizabeth Eliza Oelth 13achard V F of Operations elli.zabethigesrescondesopm Estes Park Gordo's. AntiersfAolinte, Bugle IPorrite and Cr eekside h3rd'aer000 ',ANY P!41k-."j:i! 41)0 EXIS .001100 FWD David Dr Estes Park. CO 80517 1000034g-1003 97006677-0068 hhmage Removed] ftmage.IRernoved] http://iriail.google.com/mail/?ui=28cview=bsp&ver-ymdfwq781tpu 11/5/2007