Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2008-06-03131 Prepared: May 28, 2008 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday, June 3, 2008 9:00 a.m. — Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. CONSENT a. Approval of minutes dated May 6, 2008 3. REQUESTS a. Lot 2, Block 6, Windcliff Estates 5th Filing, 3469 Eaglecliff Circle Drive Owner: Gary & Judy Peet Applicant: Don Darling Request: Variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 4.3, Table 4-2, to allow front -yard setbacks of 15.26 feet from the northeastern property line and 12.39 feet from the southwestern property line, as set forth in the proposed plan, in lieu of the 25-foot setbacks required in the E-1 Estate zoning district Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 4. REPORTS 5. ADJOURNMENT Note: The Estes Valley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment May 6, 2008, 9:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Board: Chair John Lynch, Members Cliff Dill, Chuck Levine, Wayne Newsom, and Al Sager; Alternate Member Bruce Grant Attending: Chair Lynch; Members Levine, Newsom, and Sager Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Member Dill, Alternate Member Grant Chair Lynch called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of the minutes of the February 5, 2008 meeting. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Newsom) to approve the minutes. There being no changes or corrections, the minutes were approved as submitted. 3. METES AND BOUNDS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 460 VALLEY ROAD, Owner/Applicant: Stanton B. Peterson — Request for variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 4.3, Table 4-2, to allow replacement and expansion of decks on an existing residence 23.2 feet from the eastern property line and 6.4 feet from the southern property line in lieu of the 25-foot setbacks required in the E-1— Estate zoning district Director Joseph summarized the staff report. This is a request for reduction of the required 25-foot setback to allow for a deck to wrap around the south corner of an existing residence, which is located 20 feet from the property line. The southeast corner of the deck would be located 6.4 feet from the south property line; the northeast corner of the deck would be located 23.2 feet from the east property line. Staff finds that special circumstances exist in that the lot is only half -acre in size but is within a one -acre zoning district (E-1). Also, the home was constructed in its current location in 1913 and the corner of the home is situated within the setback. The variance request was prompted by the applicant's renovation of the residence. The home could be occupied without approval of the requested variance; however, the degree of additional encroachment into the setback is minimal considering the location of the residence. The requested variance would not negatively impact the character of the neighborhood. The adjoining property owner on the south, Christopher Wood, has submitted a letter in support of the request. Delivery of services would not be adversely affected by approval of the requested variance. No reasonable alternative exists. The variance request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. Upper Thompson Sanitation District expressed no objection to the variance request. A letter of support was received from Christopher Wood, as noted above. Planning staff recommends approval of the requested variance with two conditions of approval. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment February 5, 2008 2 Public Comment: Lonnie SheldonNan Horn Engineering was present to represent the applicant. He expressed the applicant's agreement with the recommended conditions of approvall. Member Newsom noted the main door to the residence is on the south side and a second door exists on the east side. The deck accommodates both doors; it is needed for access and for safety reasons... He expressed support for the variance request, as did Member Levine. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Levine) to approve the variance request for the Metes and Bounds property located at 460 Valley Road to allow replacement and expansion of decks on an existing residence 23.2 feet from the eastern property line and 6.4 feet from the southern property line In lieu of the required 25-foot setbacks, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. Full compliance with the Building Code. 2. Submittal of a setback certificate prepared by a qualified surveyor. 4. METES AND BOUNDS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 845 W. WONDERVIEW AVENUE, Owners: Reese A., Flint H., and Regan W. Cheney and Corrine Cheney -Burke, Applicant: Van Horn Engineering — Request for variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 4.3, Table 4-2, to allow an addition to an existing residence to be built 20 feet from the southern property line in lieu of the required 50-foot setback required in the RE —Rural Estate zoning district Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. This is a request to allow a 20-foot setback from the southern property line in lieu of the 50-foot setback required iin the RE —Rural Estate zoning district. The purpose of the request is to allow the expansion/remodel of an existing cabin that was built circa 1915, very close to the property line, and prior to the adoption of setback requirements. The remodel would include removal and replacement of the existing kitchen and a bathroom addition. Rock outcroppings at the northeast corner of the residence and an existing driveway with a retaining wall on the west and south sides of the residence limit the available area for an addition. The lot contains a mapped rockfall hazard area, which is located east of the building site. The applicant retained a professional geologist who has experience in the Estes Valley and in the applicant's neighborhood. The geologist conducted an on -site evaluation and concluded there is "minor rockfall hazard potential." The most pertinent special circumstance associated with this variance request is the location of the existing house in relation to the setback. There can be beneficial use of the property without a variance; however, the cabin is small and currently has no bathing facilities. The requested variance is not substantial and would not negatively impact the neighborhood; the cabin is not visible from neighboring properties. The cabin has been owned by the family since the time it was constructed. The variance request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from Upper Thompson Sanitation District, Larimer County Engineering Department, and Rocky Mountain National Park. All expressed no objection or no major concerns or issues with the requested variance. Neighboring property owner Shane M. Ring also submitted a (letter expressing no objections to the proposed addition. Planning staff recommends approval of the requested variance with one condition of approval. Public Comment: Lonnie SheldonNan Horn Engineering was present to represent the property owners. He expressed agreement with the recommended conditions of approval. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment February 5, 2008 3 Bob Cheney/Owner stated his father had homesteaded the property in 1912 and built the house between 1912 and 1915. The property has been in his family since the time it was homesteaded; he was born in the house. He stated it meant a lot to him to fix up the cabin and expressed a desire to make it livable. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Sager) to approve the variance request for the Metes and Bounds property located at 845 W. Wonderview Avenue to allow an addition to an existing residence to be built 20 feet from the southern property line in lieu of the 50-foot setback required in the RE —Rural Estate zoning district, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. Prior to pouring foundation, submittal of a setback certificate prepared by a registered land surveyor. 5. REPORTS Director Joseph indicated Member Dill has decided not to seek renewal of his appointment when it expires at the end of June. He expressed appreciation for Member Dill's years of service. Chair Lynch wished him "Good fishing." There being no further business, Chair Lynch adjourned the meeting at 9:22 a.m. John Lynch, Chair Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary WIN Peet Setback Request Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: May 27, 2008 REQUEST: A request by Gary and Judy Peet for a variance from the 25- foot side yard setback as required in the "E-1" Rural Estate zoning district. LOCATION: 3469 Eaglecliff Circle Drive, within the unincorporated Estes Valley (in Windcliff — see vicinity map on site plan). FILE #: 3469 Eaglecliff Cir. Dr. 06/03/08 I. SITE DATA TABLE: Parcel Number(s): 3410117002 Number of Lots: One Proposed Land Use: S.F. Residential Adjacent Zoning - East: "E-1" Estate (1-acre) West: "E-1" Estate (1-acre) Adjacent Land Uses - East: Residential West: Private Open Space Total Development Area: .39 acres Existing Land Use: Residential Existing Zoning: "E-1" Estate (1-acre) North: "E-1" Estate (1-acre) South: "E-1" Estate (1-acre) North: Private Open Space South: Residential No 1111111111 111 I 3469 Eagle CWiCir Dr 0„ II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND: The applicant requests a variance to Table 4-5 "E-1" Setback of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow front/side setbacks of 9-feet in lieu of the 25-feet . Specifically, the applicant wishes to construct a small addition with a new deck and stone patio as shown on the submitted plans. III. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No concerns have been identified. IV. REVIEW CRITERIA: In accordance with Section 3.6 C. "Standards for Review" of the EVDC, all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth below: 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code's standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. The lot is undersized for the "E-1" Estate one -acre district (.37-acres), and has a permanent private open space located on the lot adjacent to the northwest. If the lot were zoned either "E" 1/2-acre or "R" 1/4-acre, the proposed 10 foot side yard setbacks would nearly comply. 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; A conforming structure could be built on the site. b. Whether the variance is substantial; The requested variance is to place the northwest sides of the structure within 12.39' of the property line. The existing structure is already encroaching into the setbacks about nine feet. This would maintain an adequate spatial buffer. In this regard, the northwestern side -yard setback is not considered substantial. On the Front side of the existing home a pop out is proposed that would be 15.26 ft from the property line. The area occupied by the pop out is minor (2'xll '). c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; The essential character of the neighborhood would not change. Several other similar lots in Windcliff have received similar variances d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer; Not applicable. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; The owner purchased the lot in 2003, the Estes Valley Development Code and associated building setbacks were implemented in February 2000. Prior to the EVDC, the site was zoned Larimer County "E-1 " Estate, which had 25 foot setbacks. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. A conforming structure could be built on the site. 3. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant's property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Not applicable. 4. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Not applicable. 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. The Board should use their best judgment in determining if this represents the least deviation that would afford relief 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Not applicable. 7. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. A vote of approval should include the following conditions: • Prior to pouring foundation and footers, submittal of a setback certificate prepared by a certified engineer, surveyor, or architect. This certificate should verify structure corners. • Submittal of a building permit application demonstrating: 1) Compliance with the submitted site plan. V. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. As set forth above under Section IV Review Criteria. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requested variance to Table 4-2 "E-1" Front/Side Yard Setback of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow Front/Side yard setbacks of 12.39 ft. and 15.26 ft. as set forth in the proposed plan in lieu of the 25-feet required CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Prior to pouring foundation and footings, submittal of a setback certificate verifying layout of building and deck improvements as per the approved plan shall be prepared by a certified engineer, surveyor, or architect. 2. Submittal of a building permit application demonstrating compliance with the submitted site plan. LAPSE: Failure of an Applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void. SCALE S SHOWN PROJ. NO. 2007-122 VICINITY MAP 3469 EAGLECLIFF CIRCLE DRIVE ESTES PARK, CO 1111111111111111111111111111 SUBJECT PARCEL ALPINE ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 39, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Phone: 970 577-1581 — Fox: (970) 577-1591 DRAWN BY PJB DATE 5--1-08 I Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 5-14-08 Re: Peet Residence -Variance Request, 3469 Eagle Cliff Circle Drive The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for a Variance Request for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) We have know comments. 1 GENERAL STATEMENT OF INTENT PEET SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST LOT 2, BLOCK 6 AMENDED PLAT OF WINDCLIFF 5TH FILING Gary and Judy Peet are the owners of 3469 Eaglecliff Cir Dr and want to improve the existing 20 year old property. The scope of work include a small expansion on the north west comer, a new deck to the same side and the removal of an existing deck along the west Eaglecliff Cir Dr facing side. The exterior will have a new stucco siding and a new roof. The interior will have some remodeling and a new kitchen. The site plan shows the setback lines inside the existing building as the home was constructed prior to the Estes Valley Development Code. The proposed addition and deck will require consideration as a result of the new code but will be less intrusive than the existing west facing deck that will be removed. 1. Special considerations or circumstances: The existing home is well outside the setback lines on this lot. To make any alterations on the existing property would be in violation of the Development Code. 2. Beneficial use of the property without the variance: The existing home is fine but dated and as the neighborhood continues to be developed, remodeling and expanding the older homes becomes much more attractive for the Windcliff development. 3. Substantial variance: Because of the removal of an exesting deck and the size of the addition, the variance is not substantial. 4. Neighborhood impact of the variance: The proposed improvements on the existing home will increase the exterior appearance of the property and it will blend the surroundings. 5. Adverse impact delivery of public services: There will be not impact on any services. 6. Applicant's awareness at time of purchase: The applicant's were not aware of any variance needs or had an interest in the changes at the time of purchase. 7. Can there be mitigation of predicament other than a variance: The addition and new deck cannot be added without a variance as the setback lines to through the interior of the existing home. 8. Conclusion: Windcliff is a unique neighborhood with older homes and new homes alike, so it's natural for property owners to improve on the older homes to keep up with the neighborhood. As these improvements are made, many of the older lots have setbacks that encroach on the existing structures as a result of the new development code from a few years ago. In this proposed expansion, the variance is necessary. The appearance and the enjoyment of the improvements will be a benefit to owners and neighbors alike. `r ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Submittal Date: General Information Record Owner(s): G4F Y Tv '' Street Address of Lot: 31f "tycY el9442-C1•1,-14 ebe AC. Legal Description Lot: Block: Subdivision: Parcel ID # y)ol - 17 S to Information Lot Size 56 Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service W>>vpc.2.; 5 B Z. Section 42 P, 74711. Tract: Township Range Zoning a. ? OZ Town fmm" Well r Other (Specify) l Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service r Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? a1)49776 )7157-fld/iW ✓ EPSD IR UTSD r Septic ✓ EPSD f""" UTSD r Septic IX Other f— None r Yes F. No Specific variance desired (state development code section #):(att 5 505 1, zL irAg. FT (7. 71 f ) z, ' Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person ®/t(j9g1(y- Mailing Address y o 9 iCbbF.6 CAQ per. ✓ Application fee (see attached fee schedule) r Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.0 of the Estes Valley Development Code) r 1 copy (folded) of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1" = 20') ** f 1 reduced copy of the site plan (11 °' X 17") ✓ Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) ** The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.VII.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule). Copies must be folded. Town of Estes Park -e% P.O. Box 1200 -a 170 MacGregor Avenue .. Estes Park. CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 ,s‘ Fax: (970) 586-0249 .f• www.estesnet.com/ComDev li ti { Contact Information; Primary Contact Person is f' °" Owner )< Applicant Record Owner(s) &19 i, Consultant/Engineer Mailing Address 2 2J G w CI 12,119. Co Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Mailing Addres Phone ";, r t' 1017 CeII Phone %7d 4 2-1 " - 77 - e `}be wG.' , eor Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Mailing Address """ ir ,r X Phone L✓ j CeII Phone 1. 3 Fax S Email 7 LLG co 8°05/7 APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. Ali fees are due at the time of submittal. rovD 3 200200 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ► I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. ► In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). ► I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) ► I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. ► I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. ► I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. ► The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. ► I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. ► I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. ► I understand that I am required to obtain a "Variance Notice" sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road. I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked. I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10) business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. ► I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request, "Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void." (Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 6), f Applicant PLEASE PRINT: DO Al Signatures: Pim1 200 /../A3(S i ECIEUVE Record Owner Date Applican Date 22 g Revised 10/13/06 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ► i hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true an and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of t ► in submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). ► I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) ► I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. ► I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. ► I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. II, ► The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. ► i grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. ► I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. ► I understand that I am required to obtain a "Variance Notice" sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road. I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked. I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10) business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. I. i understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request, "Failure of an applicant to apply for a b permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one 1 uilding year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void." (Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Imes: a Record Owner PLEASE PRINT. Applicant PLEASE PRINT. DON ;natures: Record Owner Applican Date Date Zoning Districts § 4.3 Residential Zoning Districts Ta le 4-2 ase i nsity an i ensionai tender esi•ential Zoning :districts Max. Net Zoning density Area (sq District (units/acre) . ft) MinimumLot.. Stanch s 1] RE-1 1/10 Ac. 10 Ac. RE 1/2.5 Ac. 2.5 Ac. E-1 1 1 Ac. [3] Width () 200 200 100 lnirnum Building/Stricture Setbacks [ [4] Front (ft.) 50 50 25 Side Rear (ft.) (ft-) 50 50 50 50 25 25 Max. Min. Building Building Height Width (ft.) [10] E O Max. Lot r Coverage (%) 30 20 30 20 30 20 n/a E 2 % Ac. [3] 25-arterials; 75 15-other streets R 4 ' Ac. 25-arterials; 60 15-other streets 10 15 10 15 n/a n/a 30 20 30 20 n/a n/a R-1 8 5,000 Single- family = R-2 4 18,000; Duplex= 27,000 RM Ord. 18- 01 #14) Residential Uses: Max = 8 and Min =3 Senior Institutional Living Uses: Max = 24 40,000, 5,400 sq. ft./unit [4] [5] [8] Senior Institution- al Living Uses:'/z Ac. 50 60 60; Lots Greater than 100,000 sq. ft.: 200 15 10 15 30 20 n/a 25-arterials; 15-other 10 10 streets 25-arterials; 15-other streets 10 [6] 10 30 20 30 20 [7] Duplex = 50% Multi- family= 50% Notes to Table 4-2: [1] (a) See Chapter 4, §4.3.D, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for single-family residential subdivisions that are required to set aside private open areas per Chapter 4, §4.3.D.1. (b) See Chapter 11, §11.3, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for clustered lots in open space developments. (c) See Chapter 11, §11.4, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for attainable housing. (d) See Chapter 7, §7.1, which requires an Increase in minimum lot size (area) for development on steep slopes. (Ord. 2-02 ##4-6) [2] See Chapter 7, §7.6 for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands. (Ord. 2-02 #5; Ord. 11-02 §1) [3] If private wells or septic systems are used, the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres. See also the regulations set forth in §7.12, "Adequate Public Facilities." [4] Town home developments shall be developed on parcels no smaller than 40,000 square feet; however, each indMdual town home unit may be constructed on a minimum 2,000 square foot lot at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre, [5] Multi -family developments shall also be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of .30. [6] Zero side yard setbacks (known as "zero lot line development") are allowed for town home developments. [7] Minimum building width requirements shall no apply to mobile homes located in a mobile home park. [8] Single-family and duplex developments shall have minimum lot areas of 18,000 s.f. and 27,000 s.f., respectively. (Ord 18-01 #14) [9] All structures shall be setback from public or private roads that serve more than four dwellings or lots. The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or private roads, or the edge of the dedicated right-of-way or recorded easement, whichever produces a greater setback. The setback shall be the same as the applicable minimum building/structure setback. This setback is not applicable in the "MP' district. (Ord. 11-02 §1) [10] See Chapter 1, §1.9.E, which allows an increase in the maximum height of buildings on slopes. (Ord. 18-02 #3) Supp. 4 4-7 # k - 24 cp— m 0 © $ 2 / 222-9c' co; :- ®f tx/;- k-§o• 50oo_1>-2,GR03421 R22Gdox oul42220 RIN' 6 O 2 &,E w r N%■= 0 i 0 X w h o•/ a-\ o R f a Q o c c o > e m ®.0 e ®c § 2> m■ w 2 Akkz_i�/muikkOkkwkkC� 8 $ 2 ■ $ $ — 2 -0 '0 CI / �� k D§ Q U m e t m >- c_ E m �_ o Q E20 - © >o>f 323 rri ° ' • E ` z 2"t% 2 E& 0 4 o c 0. \"�222�a)c'J0 �*6 2�N22$ o m x o cuc 0 k e o .- 0: E §mE0amo2wDz �w��Iwm«; 0 ���02�0�K ��§�2�kk2�I- la 02 2—q@r am CO1-- ��_ Gam_ � ■ 0 :5 co 0 2 § m k 13 2 _ 1 0 Ws k - Na. • t & _ £ o E aa) o-I i-© k w/ ° i • l § E0cad02 o m�CiIQkff�a��2a2��kk§/k c■a w E N« em_ at ■ a) 2 % & « § e § E § % • k k % k k 2)§ 2 k§ E k@ k O «�mc22omQ-1U-g4wRQ�AAlRR Peet Variance 00 4' ui J L ,d‘ _ /7 1" 2 I 3 ,.5. IL -3 a )-- a 4 4' H' th „ss T.< w 0 0 t ,T Lt 3469 EAGLECLIFF CIRCLE DRIVE ESTES PARK, CO SITE PLAN ALPINE ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 39 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 paul@alpinebuilderslIc.com 970.577.1581 ph 970.577.1591 fx DATE REVISION BY de 3469 EAGLECLIFF VICINITY ESTES PARK, CIRCLE MAP CO DRIVE ii. w5 �� 55 h+ 48 it 1 mu m+ #1 mawe im w m� 04 IMYtl/'D y'4Q� N i_,._,. 1 tip j �hM1i�b y�yx�uy�, y '.A. y pp 5V 0`AM+ ry ry ry��y-,� �y IVIV I '0 �rJ'U wnw ,4 � � i.. 0"� � 1'a QU mi 5a y 11EB a^ 1 { 4 wwwwwwww 11 12 02 i (77 �� ,-,(u ��°�+d wµ +„e. f fh9urZiM� „ fr fi4 0 15 „„„ 5�y�� �y +� d f5r J a I111111111� ' yf 0. q yy "V b y � f\ i III { 1 1 1 ++++ i C2 u IWWWuuuuuuRm wry ww 1�r u, mlmmwlm�wiulNw mu wywwuuuuumuiwwuuli rug 111 �ommumumluuulm uuinmi mmuuuuuiulululwluuuu'wlum �°', 1il�nlioi uu 'y p "I uuli �uuNuu w it upu uuuuum ppou { fi ' uuuuu IIUIIIUIIIUIIIUIIIUIIIUIIIUIVmmi111UlllUlllUlllUlllUlllUlllUlll um If — J 1µ r 07 is ...^ 1`1 a1 rJ 1 W 111111111111 -y °kP ad. 14 ° 2 8 u , �3 y � , y „..4 �� m., , IPi lu y yru 5515 01 „„, ���� R� e r p ������� Rums 14 13 moo, 10110111°4 I 7w6 aB � 5k 1 0, I � 'It Ili?�,. 1 12 11 r � „ffl EMI 11111111 111111111111111 it010 ilAMM 0110 mum 1uum20" 11111lllll NVw�� inn w- mw-- .^ ���� hnif mm �i0 muuum mm ttmce mmmmmn in IIIIIIIII in 11111 SUBJECT PARCEL SCALE PROJ. NO. ALPINE ENGINEERING, LLC DRAWN BY DATE PO BOX 39, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 `S SHOWN 2007-122 Phone: (970) 577-1581 — Fax: (970) 577-1591 PJB 5-1-08 A. PS (o(r) . RBEr-9RF (oCr) 3NONd va 531,3 . na >W. Ns3 cea ONIA3AlIf1S ONV ON12133NION3 NOON NVA any 1taIAHaallox Ism sTe AaNaHD Ae Nosin3a 31. SONVIHVA HOd NV' d a.LIS 1331-15.