Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2010-11-02Prepared: September 29, 2010 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:00 a.m. — Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. CONSENT a. Approval of minutes dated October 5, 2010 3. REQUESTS a. Portion of Lot 9, Owner: Applicant: Request: Staff Contact: 4. REPORTS 5. ADJOURNMENT Mount View Park Subdivision, 250 Granite Lane Michael Childs Doug Gertsch Variance from EVDC Section 4.3, Table 4-2, which requires 25-foot side setbacks from property lines in the E-1 - Estate zone district. Request to allow an eight (8) foot encroachment into the side setback and a five (5) foot encroachment into the front setback to construct an addition to the existing dwelling. Alison Chilcott Note: The Estes Valley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment October 5, 2010, 9:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Board: Chair Bob McCreery, Members John Lynch, Chuck Levine, Wayne Newsom, and Pete Smith; Alternate Member Jeff Moreau Attending: Chair McCreery, Members Levine, Newsom, Smith, and Moreau Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott, Planner Shirk, and Recording Secretary Thompson Absent: Member Lynch Chair McCreery called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes of the July 13, 2010 meeting. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Smith) to approve the minutes as presented, and the motion passed unanimously. 3. LOT 5, THUNDER MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION, TBD THUNDER MOUNTAIN LANE — Variance from Estes Valley Development Code Section 4.3, Table 4-2, which requires a 25-foot side -yard setback from property lines in the E-1—Estate zone district. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance from the required 25-foot side -yard setback to allow a 15-foot setback in the E-1—Estate zone district. The variance would allow construction of a proposed single-family dwelling. The proposed building site is located at the far end of Thunder Mountain Lane, in the Thunder Mountain PUD. Specifically, the lot is on a small cul-de-sac that serves five lots. Planner Shirk stated the typical neighbor notifications were not completed for this variance; however, the legal notice was published in the newspaper. Planner Shirk spoke directly with two of the neighbors and received a letter of approval from the HOA. The applicant, Bruce Gregg, spoke with the remaining surrounding home owners. Planner Shirk explained that the proposed construction area was the highest point on the lot, and backed up to open space owned by the HOA. He stated that special circumstances existed due to a wetland area and a the presence of a water main on the northern portion of the lot. In determining practical difficulty, staff found the property could be put to beneficial use without the variance. Staff found the requested variance was not substantial, and the essential character of the neighborhood would not be changed by this variance. The proposed location would place the dwelling out of the neighbor's view corridors. The variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services, as the location of the proposed dwelling would be south of an existing water main and electric line. Planner Shirk stated the property has been in the same family since the original platting of the lot. He stated the Board of County Commissioners vacated the building envelopes in the Thunder Mountain PUD in 2000, at the request of the HOA. If those envelopes were still in place, this proposed dwelling would comply with the original building envelope. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment October 5, 2010 2 Planner Shirk reviewed the site plan. He stated a setback certificate would be required to verify the location of the foundation. Board and Applicant Discussion: Member Levine questioned the placement of the notification signs in relation to the property lines, and the applicant answered those questions to the satisfaction of the Board. Member Smith questioned the neighbor's view corridor, and received a satisfactory answer from the applicant. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Smith) to approve the variance request to allow a side -yard setback of 15 feet in lieu of the 25-foot setback required in the E-1— Estate zone district, with the findings recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. REPORTS None. There being no further business, Chair McCreery adjourned the meeting at 9:22 a.m. Bob McCreery, Chair Karen Thompson, Recording Secretary iIP 250 Granite Lane • Setback Variance Request ESTES PARK COLORADO LMUMEI V �o�N,f I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE: November 2, 2010 LOCATION: The site is located at 250 Granite Lane, within the Town of Estes Park. The lot has a metes and bounds legal description; a portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Doug Gertsch/Michael W. Childs and Jacqueline A. Karsky STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) REQUEST: The property owners are requesting variances to Estes Valley Development Code Section Table 4-2, which establishes twenty -five-foot setbacks from all property lines in the E-1-Estate zoning district, in order to: 1. Construct and partially cover a second floor deck seventeen feet from the side. property line; and Oki jtliffr �e�in�IrnA�Nla0011 2. Remove and replace a covered entryway twenty feet from the front -property Iine. ti IIII NII111111111111011111111 117/201k0 14:07 North Elevation II. SITE DATA Number of Lots/Parcels One Parcel Number(s) 35243-05-021 Lot Size 0.34 acres 14,907 square feet per Tax Assessor records Zoning E-1—Estate Existing Land Use Single -Family Residential Proposed Land Use Single -Family Residential SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Valley Fire Protection District Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Page #2 -- 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request LOCATION MAP u�u^�t ,idpa�ui SITE PLAN M Granite Ln PtMj ?r 118 ��IlYdhifa��ui�uu Page #3 — 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING MacGregor Ranch Zoning RE.1 47%j%a° Single -Family III. REVIEW CRITERIA All variance applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in EVDC Chapter 3.6.0 and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. This variance request does not fall within the parameters of staff -level review and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. A legal notice was also printed in the Estes Park Trail - Gazette. Reviewing Agency Comment The following reviewing agencies submitted written comments. Town Building Department See Will Birchfield's email to Alison Chilcott dated October 6, 2010. Town Light and Power Division See Todd Steicken's email to Alison Chilcott dated October 6, 2010, Town Attorney See Greg White's email to Alison Chilcott dated October 21, 2010. Estes Valley Fire Protection District See Derek Rosenquist's email to Alison Chilcott dated October 6, 2010. Page #4 — 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request Xcel Energy See Len Hilderbrand's email to Alison Chilcott dated October 7, 2010. Public Comment 240 Granite Lane, owned by Magnuson Revocable Trust Mark Magnuson has contacted staff to state his mother's opposition to the deck variance request. He discussed the possibility of submitting comments in writing and/or attending the Board of Adjustment meeting. 240 Granite Lane is adjacent to, and immediately east of, 250 Granite Lane (see aerial photo above). V. STAFF FINDINGS Staff finds: 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code's standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: Staff recommends that the Board use their best judgment to determine if special circumstances exist and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with Code standards. The following special circumstances exist. a. At 0.34 acres this lot is undersized for the E-1 Estate zoning district. The E-1 Estate zoning district has a minimum lot size of one acre for new lots. This lot is closer in size to new lots in the E-Estate zoning district, which has a minimum lot size of one-half acre for new lots and a side -yard setback of ten feet rather than twenty-five feet. b. The house was constructed in 1977, prior to the adoption of the EVDC. Portions of the existing house are within the setbacks. At the time of construction the property was zoned R-2 — Multiple -Family. The minimum required setbacks from all property lines were ten feet. 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance. Page #5 — 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request Staff Finding: Staff finds that there can be a beneficial use of the property without the requested variance. The existing house could continue to be used. b. Whether the variance is substantial. Staff Finding: Staff recommends that the Board use their best judgment to determine if the variance is substantial. This lot is 0.34 acres, which is comparable to lot sizes in the E- Estate zoning district. If this lot were zoned E-Estate, the side -yard setback would be ten feet rather than twenty-five feet and the proposed deck and entryway would comply with the setbacks. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. Staff Finding: Staff recommends that the Board use their best judgment to determine if the essential character of the neighborhood has changed. At the pre -application stage, staff advised the applicant that initially we were supportive of the variance request; however, prior to making a final determination we would need to complete our review, which included review of affected agencies and adjacent property owners comments. Our opinion was that the essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered and that adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment. During a site visit, staff noted that the closest house, 240 Granite Lane, was downhill, partially screened by trees, and approximately 125 feet away. Since then the son of the owner of 240 Granite Lane has stated that the owner is opposed to the variance request (due to the detriment to her property). d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: This application was routed to providers of public services, such as water and sewer. No concerns were expressed about adverse impacts to the delivery of public services. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement. Staff Finding: This standard addresses whether or not the Code requirements changed during current property owners' ownership of the property. For example, did the property owner purchase the property prior to adoption of the required setbacks? Page #6 — 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request The property owner purchased the property with knowledge of the twenty -five- foot setback. Per the Larimer County Tax Assessor records, the owner purchased the property in 2008; after the 2001 adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code and establishment of the twenty-five foot setbacks. At time of purchase, the property owner was under the impression that the minimum side setback was ten feet based on notes on a 1995 Improvement Location Certificate (included in the Board's packet). f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: For the entryway roof, the applicant could complete normal repair and maintenance to the existing roof or remove and not replace the roof. For the deck, the applicant could not build the deck, narrow the deck, or build a deck in another location. 3. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant's property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding: The submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the applicant's property are not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. 4. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: The variance would not reduce the size of the lot. 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The variance, if granted, represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding: The proposed use is permitted. Page #7 — 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request 7. In granting this variance, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standards varied or modified. Staff Finding: If the Board chooses to approve this variance, staff has recommended conditions of approval. 8. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All letters and memos submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Board chooses to recommend approval of the two variance requests staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the application. 2. A Colorado registered land surveyor shall set the survey stakes for the piers and provide a stamped and signed setback certificate prior to the pier inspection. The Board could choose to vote on the front -yard and side -yard setback variance requests separately (two votes). Page #8 — 250 Granite Lane Setback Variance Request Alison Chilcott 1m: Greg White [greg@gawhite.com] ,nt: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:02 AM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: FW: Childs Variance - Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT Alison: I have reviewed, and I have no comment. Thanks, Greg From: Karen Thompson fmailto:kthomnsonCestes.oral Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:26 PM To: area@aawhite.com; Jacqueline Halburnt; Scott Zurn; asieversOestes.orq; Barbara Boyer Buck; Tracy Feagans; Bob Goehring; Jeff Boles; Reuben Bergsten; Todd Steichen; Will Birchfield; Derek Rosenquist; Carolyn McEndaffer; Len Hilderbrand(Jenh1IderbrandOxceleneray.com); donna.masnnaagwest.com; rpattersonebafablgy; James DueII Cc: Alison Chilcott Subject: Childs Variance - Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT REFERRAL FOR COMMENT s email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application, which can be viewed by accessing the following .Ks or by visiting our website at htto://www.estes.ore/comdev/CurrentReauests.aspx. Childs Residence Variance 250 Granite Lane Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 11/2/10 Statement of Intent and Application Site Plan Stall Report Send Comments to available Alison Chilcott at 10/28/10 achlicQtt9estes.orq If you prefer paper copies of documents, please email the Staff Contact listed above. Thank you for your help in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible, but no later than October 22, 'r)10. Comments can be sent via mail, email (achilcott@estes.org), or fax (970.586.0249). Thank you for your comments. 1. Alison Chilcott From: Sent: To: Subject: Hilderbrand, Len [Len.Hilderbrand © XCELENERGY.COM] Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:42 AM Alison Chilcott Childs Variance Xcel Energy see's no problems with variance to 17' set back. Len Hilderbrand Designer 970-225-7848 Alison Chilcott "rom: Todd Steichen ant: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:52 PM To: Karen Thompson; Alison Chilcott Cc: Tracy Feagans Subject: RE: Childs Variance - Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT Light & Power has no comments or concerns with this corrective rezoning.. Todd. From: Karen Thompson Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:26 PM To: Greg White; Jacqueline Halbumt; Scott Zurn; Greg Sievers; Barbara Boyer Buck; Tracy Feagans; Bob Goehring; Jeff Boles; Reuben Bergsten; Todd Steichen; Will Birchfield; Derek Rosenquist; Carolyn McEndaffer; Len Hilderbrand (Ienhiiderbrand@xcelenergy.com); Donna Mastriona (donna.mastriona@qwest.com); Rod Patterson (rpatterson@bajabb.tv); 'James Duel!' Cc: Alison Chilcott Subject: Childs Variance Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT REFERRAL FOR COMMENT ')is email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application, which can be viewed by accessing the following . iks or by visiting our website at http:(/www.estes.org(comdev/CurrentReouests.aspx. Childs Residence Variance Estes Valley 250 Granite Lane Board of Adjustment 11/2/10 Statement of Intent and Aeollcatiort Site Plan ! Start Report available 10/28/10 Send Comments to Alison Chilcott at achllcott@estes.ora if you prefer paper copies of documents, please email the Staff Contact listed above. Thank you for your help in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible, but no later than October 22, 2010. Comments can be sent via mail, email (achilcott@estes.ortr), or fax (976.586.0249). Thank you for your comments. 1 Alison Chilcott From: Karen Thompson Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:40 PM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: FW: Childs Variance - Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT From: Will Birchfield Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:19 PM To: Karen Thompson Subject: RE: Childs Variance - Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT No comment. Will Birchfield, CBO, CFM Chief Building Official Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3728 (P) 970-586-0249 (F) www.estesnet.com From: Karen Thompson Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:26 PM To: Greg White (greg@gawhite.com); Jacqueline Ha'burnt; Scott Zurn; 'gsievers@estes.org'; Barbara Boyer Buck; Tracy Feagans; Bob Goehring; Jeff Boles; Reuben Bergsten; Todd Steichen; Will Birchfield; Derek Rosenquist; Carolyn McEndaffer; Len Hilderbrand (IenhIlderbrand@xcelenergy.com); Donna Mastriona (donna.mastriona@qwest.com); Rod Patterson (rpatterson@bajabb.tv); 'James Due Cc: Alison Chilcott Subject: Childs Variance - Portion of Lot 9, Mount View Park Subdivision - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT REFERRAL FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application, which can be viewed by accessing the following links or by visiting our website at http://www.estes.ore/comdev/CurrentReguests.aspx. Alison Chilcott 'OM: 4nt: To: Subject: Derek Rosenquist Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:06 PM Alison Chilcott Childs residence variance No comment from the fire department Derek Rosenquist Training Captain Estes Valley Fire Protection District 970-577-3690 September 20, 2010 To: Estes Park Board of Adjustment From: Michael Childs (Owner) Doug Gertsch (Agent -Contractor) Perhaps the major special circumstance in this request is that the rules for larger parcels of land are still in effect even though this is a smaller lot and seemingly should be substantially reduced according to normal city lots. There has been beneficial use of this property for many years and this variance request does not indicate a dire necessity for a change, but reflects the desire of owner to improve the usability and attractive appeal of the property. The variance would reduce the 25' -- side yard setback to 17' (seventeen feet) which would be in excess of normal rules for this size property. The essential character of the neighborhood would only be improved by this addition as it will substantially change the 70's look of the existing dwelling to a very Colorado mountain look with exposed wood and timbers. It will have almost zero affect on any of the neighbor's views. It will have no affect on any of the sewer -water or power lines on the property. The owner purchased this property with no knowledge of the 25' minimum side setback. It was assumed that It had more like a standard lot with 10' — 15' setbacks as there are no easements on the property. It appears that the granting of this variance is the only way that this particular improvement can be done. Mich el Chi ds Doug Gertsch Owner Agent -Contractor ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Submittal Date: Genera! Illnformation Record Owner(s): L ► Street Address of Lot: & 5 GIQ, 1#Jt Legal Description:" Subdivision: Parcel ID#: SZ -- `WSJ — OZ Situ Informillior Lot Size' 1 Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Town Proposed Water Service P Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Frimary Coml;rcl Inforrnailon Block: Tract: Zoning i Well 'F"""' Other (Specify) r Well Other (Specify) EPSD r UTSD J EPSD r UTSD "" Other ,,,,, None "w" Septic r Septic Name of Primary Contact Person Dbl l Cc - Complete Mailing Address 13 Zry ) s 2S1 Prima Contact Person is Owner P . A..licant I' Consultant/En a sneer Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Lel Val-41LO co g0s31 Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.0 of the Estes Valley Development Code), 1 copy (folded) of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1"' = 20') ** 1 reduced copy of the site plan (11" X 17") ** The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.V11.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule). Copies must be folded. Town of Estes Park -4% P.O. Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue •e. Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 .ev Fax: (970) 586-0249 www.estes.org/ComDev Revised 11 /20/0i9 Contact I. r(_; IFIi10I Record Owner(s) Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email IN\i C14 E,-L. CAlt-ttsS f �1 S4- co t)a C?'. Lc)OG ce.u.- 303 -435 - 11(05 G4. Applicant b6 u c CO1 .`rsc(` - cok) TQ/ C ro Mailing Address 13 Z1 W. 5+i S`r� 401 CO, ear 3 7 9.7O 6WD 143 47 GEu Cell Phone'' Fax c17d ^ — dg3L/ Email Consultant/Engineer Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both Inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included In your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: All requests for refunds must be made In writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 11/20/09 A • • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ► 1 hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. ► In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). ► I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code Is available online at: .t1AttE ,r t f . / ,Vv ode ► I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. ► I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the Information provided Is incomplete, Inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. ► I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. ► The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. ► I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application... ► i acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. ► I understand that I am required to obtain a "Variance Notice" sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where It is clearly visible from the road. I understand that the comers of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked. I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10) business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of AdJustment hearing. ► I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request, "Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void." (Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Record Owner Appl ant Date Revised 11/20/09 Zoning Districts (Ord. 18-01 #14) § 4.3 Residential Zoning Districts Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Residential Uses: Max = 8 and Min =3 Senior Institutional Living Uses: Max = 24 Notes to Table 4-2: [1] (a) See Chapter 4, §4.3.D, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for single-family residential subdivisions that are required to set aside private open areas per Chapter 4, §4.3.D.1. (b) See Chapter 11, §11.3, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for clustered lots In open apace developments. (c) See Chapter 11, §11.4, which allows a reduction in minimum lot slze (area) for attainable housing. (d) See Chapter 7, §7.1, which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area) for development on steep slopes. (Ord. 2-02 §1) [2] See Chapter 7, §7,8, for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands. (Ord. 2-02 #5; Ord. 11-02 §1) [3] if private wells or septic systems are used, the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres. See also the regulations set forth in §7.12, "Adequate Public Facilities." [4] Townhome developments shall be developed on parcels no smaller than 40,000 square feet; however, each individual townhome unit may be constructed on a minimum 2,000 square foot lot at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. [5] All development, except development of one single-family dwelling on a single lot, shall also be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of .30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%. (Ord. 25-07 §1) [61 Zero side yard setbacks (known as "zero lot line development") are allowed for townhome develdpments. [7] Minimum building width requirements shall n21 apply to mobile homes located in a mobile home park. [8] Sln le•family and dtclex developments shall have minimum lot areas of 18,00081 and 27,000 s.f., respectively. (Ord 18-01 #14) [9] Ali structures shall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than four adjacent or off -site dwellings or lots. The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or private roads, the edge of the dedicated right-of-way or recorded easement or the property line, whichever produces a greater setback. The setback shall be the same as the applicable minimum buildtng/structure setback. (Ord. 11-02 §1; Ord. 25-07 §1) [10] See Chapter 1, §t.9.E, which allows an increase in the maximum height of buildings on slopes. (Ord. 18-02 #3) Single-family 18,000; Duplex = 27,000 40,000, 5,400 sq. ftfunit [4] [8] (Ord. 25-07 §1) Senior Institutional Living Uses: Yx Ac. 60; Lots Greater than 100,000 sq. ft.: 200 25- arterials; 15-other streets 25-.... arterials; 15-other streets Supp. 8 4-7 so r 5 3 co N N W 0 000 , an N N N l0 f-. lfl 0 m N ,--� •--E r i N �--i N P�} ' 1P1 Lry lA N V1 N U 0 0 00000, N N 00 CO CO CO CO 00 V Noo00000°c cc yOO e '0N L L L oo a CO a CO a inC 411 CO • IA CO to p p w u1 w -.1 LW LI S L 0l c 0 PO Box 4675 M N PO Box 3354 • c < o 's 0 to w M 1n CFI N John Tormalehto 425 Ammons St 365 Northridge Rd E Childs Residence Variance .161."aleavinprial. 60 142 ,Pe 6,,,,,,m,"*.mrrarranrrarranrer " man Duo cs 'tl I KY miLLWIJKK zui 0:970 461 0834 nuka-G`1-ceLLW IAD: YJ7 i•KU!'I; r1.LlaF Il IMEEIQUISIMUSIGATION TION rigfai.Eigalg PRO1?thTY .OESC RIPTI0N: The North 150 feet of the East 110 feet of LoC 9, IT! VXD •PARK, Town of Estes 1sark, County of Lar.•.LIrrair, State of Colorado SOURCi: Key Banks PuJ Lender: Key ammisisk G ;2.A NJ I `T ,�� L- 4 r 1 r� r!'q'`�T'E Ilv Its -Na I.1;Yir :, r RAI-1g SO' 57 w I1G 1r� INEAsor OVITIPY THAT g?Mi IE n'pew PURTNEROERrIFY THAT, ]'luTY UONNq TIpNS,DoR yFou ' T 1 t3 NO APR 1XcCPT A3NOTEA AOOORDINO YOWL nEPA, IB EA:1000ln THE FOLLoy rAV@. +: C3 BY 0 y1pqr�R,,A�7 oR AN t ECCERRov eNT.oeuAviT PiAt. o IT IZ NFOR T?Dec F f - u ll.Ot�lO,QlTOT1�pgFURJR4 dIP MBNrEINE% AOVBI(fr tet ON n;:< MOVE 0E ORfOED PAACQiw ON TfllB o,1rt3 e ^ 15 - 9 6 EXCtel QHTIRELY Wrn4 N TN; 5 LINDARIEf: oP THE pAROEL, EXoEFr Aa BNoWN. THAT TNE rig AU Ng OBBCAI EOrnaN+uesOrIMPROvehlFNTOONANYAA/OINW4DHEUI9Ea,©(CiwrASNOlt, AHO T QVesNOB OR SIGN va F1YY EASEMENT CCoss'lNo OR DUROI<1�l AErr PRAT OF CA10 PARCEL N r 0P NOUaWU AND URBAN OEY&LoPM ENT FLOOD 1N5uRAI+tcE RATE i(AP$, 7N15 PROPERTY BQrrowe r: I�usGQ.0 o c��od--azWit= oATfit 4 -.7c _ xoNra: r _ AM SURVEYS 6410 South College Avenue, Suite E Port Ca111ns, Colorado 80525 Toh (303) 2x6-3007 PAX (303) 226.3027 10 'd ADdRttI;s I 650 8191 WE) CIO.: Transamerica Title R:£1 96-17&-lad -Dr ZZ Oo 0 z f1 "�-j 2 Nm> z �N Oi morn A n OI/LI/60 31Va azooi#aor o� mo c oam. c� o=o c _ -1ic 000o 0 AO O o m co Nad V O o c0 O io 0 V O TIM 3dld „L ONfOi o'er xz 0 MMW-111.-11111...- N00'09'13"E 150.22(F) N00'00'00"E 150.00(R) 0310N SV 83N800 aNf1w = O co 0 _ n, 11 F oA 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 (8)oo'oSI 3„00,00.0os (d)9S'oS l 3„ Zo,S0.00s m0=m- 0 00 z-o-2 O > Z 2 Dm m cDi o omcm ,ammr,�O 0,02mm0 >mmo� z r O mo z m N z V z N zq m A = O m 00ZWO oOm A1ors 0 m> mz 0->C �m 1:5c �nz < Dt**11 £ j r V m m m SOm Z0 m o = mCm=mm jm=-Di m r0O 0 - mO DA D 0 = 0 0-1 Z = Vri x_- 0w 33som 7 0 _ 31V3IJ11830 S.80A3AdfS 0 1 roc Mx oo q m m V m z Lo mo moo 00 z 0 O 0 o mjj = O Z D Z O ray OMm = Z m O r mm 0 M MO m ZN= z13 > z 0. mop 0 O z>0 m O zm_ Am ot 008 1331S „Z/L 3dld LI111111111111111111111111111111111111111'I taw Ili111111111 1111 i11111 uuuww ll q g 2010 1/11 liiA -04 mog 114 1 in 8�og SNY1 3,LINVII0 t21 y .ti za 0 r w o t d vn 0 o .▪ . y � y1-3 bz N ao g rj] � ;U y rr o oz y O z zx db O CT z 0 .3 x 0 y x rj z 0 0 y CO do 'xuVd Mein iunoP A AIns 1MHN A021dHH