Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2010-07-13Ru- Prepared:July 6,2010 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday,July 13,2010 9:00 a.m.—Board Room,Town Hall 1.PUBLIC COMMENT 2.CONSENT a.Approval of minutes dated June 8,2010 3.REQUESTS a.Lot 2,Barlow Subdivision,340 E.Elkhorn Avenue Owner:Barlow,Inc. Applicant:Steve Barlow Request:Variance from Estes Park Municipal Code 17.66.060 (12) Roof Signs,to allow the replacement of two non-conforming roof signs. Staff Contact:Bob Joseph 4.REPORTS 5.ADJOURNMENT Note:The Estes Valley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 0 0 0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 8,2010,9:00 a.m. Board Room,Estes Park Town Hall Board:Chair Bob McCreery,Members John Lynch,Chuck Levine,Wayne Newsom,and Pete Smith;Alternate Member Jeff Moreau Attending:Chair McCreery,Members Lynch,Levine,Newsom and Smith Also Attending:Director Joseph,Planner Dave Shirk,and Recording Secretary Thompson Chair McCreery called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 1.PUBLIC COMMENT None 2.CONSENT AGENDA Approval of minutes dated February 2,2010. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Newsom)to APPROVE the minutes as amended,and the motion passed unanimously. The minutes were corrected to read that Bob McCreery,not Chuck Levine,chaired the February 2,2010 meeting. 3.LOT 3,BLOCK 1,CARRIAGE HILLS 15T FILING,AMENDED PLAT,630 WHISPERING PINES,Applicant:Joe CoopNan Horn Engineering —Request for variance from EVDC Table 4-2,which requires a 25-foot minimum building setback from the side property line in the E-1 Estate zoning district.Request is to allow an encroachment of 13.4 feet into the setback for an existing garage. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report.The purpose of the request is to allow a detached garage that was inadvertently built in the setback to remain in place.The error was realized when the surveyor completed the survey for the setback certificate. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff findings concerning special circumstances or conditions. The structure was built using an incorrect property line,resulting in the structure being located within the setback area.In determining practical difficulty,staff found the existing single-family residential use may continue;the requested variance was not substantial; and the essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered. Adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment.This request was submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment.No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services.No comments were received from neighboring property owners.Planner Shirk stated the applicant’s predicament could be mitigated through some method other than a variance:1) the property line could be moved,which would require consent of the neighbor,purchase of the land,and followed by an amended plat,or 2)the structure could be moved.Staff suggested that neither of the options were practical.The variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief.Staff recommends approval of the requested variance conditional to finalization of the building permit and associated inspections no later than June 30,2010.Failure to do so shall render the decision of the Board of Adjustment null and void.June 30,2010 is the building permit expiration date. Public Comment: Joe CoopNan Horn Engineering stated his involvement with this request began at the time the setback certificate was required for the variance.He stated the applicant did most of the work prior to the construction of the garage.Mr.Coop said there was a survey marker at the site,but after taking measurements determined there was an error in the site plan. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 June 8,2010 He stated this incorrect marker had been used multiple times,as the true property pin was buried.Mr.Coop stated that the State of Colorado has regulations prohibiting the removal of any survey markers. Chris Kurelja/Applicant stated he received an extension on the original building permit.At the time of the original pour of the foundation,inspections were completed based on the incorrect pin. It was moved and seconded (Newsom /Srnith)to APPROVE the request for a variance from EVDC Table 4-2 to allow the existing garage to encroach 114 feet into the 25- foot side yard setback in the E-1 zoning district with the findings and condition recommended by Staff,and the motion passed unanimously. CONDITION: 1.Finalization of the building permit and associated inspections no later than June 30,2010.Failure to do so shall render the decision of the Board of Adjustment null and void. Discussion occurred about the erroneous pin and ways to avoid future errors.Mr.Coop explained that this was a common occurrence that requires a change in state laws.He took steps to make the correct pin more visible.Director Joseph stated that although the pin was placed incorrectly,chances are there is a legal description based on that pin, requiring the pin to remain in place. 4.REPORTS None. There being no further business,Chair McCreery adjourned the meeting at 9:30 a.m. Robert McCreery,Chair Karen Thompson,Recording Secretary 340 East Elkhorn Avenue Sign Variance Request Estes Park Community Development Department Town FlaIl,170 MacGregor Avenue __________ P0 Box 1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 www.estes.org PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND DATE OF BOA MEETING:July 13,2010 LOCATION:The property is located downtown at 340 East Elkhorn Avenue,within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT:Steve Barlow PROPERTY OWNER:Barlow,Inc. CONSULTANT/ENGINEER:None STAFF CONTACT:Bob Joseph APPLICABLE CODES:Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC)and Estes Park Municipal Code (EPMC) a—-— REQUEST; This property is zoned CD-Commercial Downtown.is approximately 0.05 acres in size according to the Tax Assessor records,and contains the one building shown in the photo. Per the Statement of Intent,Barlow.Inc.wishes to change two roof signs that were formerly permitted and have now been disallowed. Specifically,the applicant requests a variance to Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66.060(12).This section states that roof signs,except as specifically permitted in Section 17.66.110,are prohibited. The old roof signs have been removed;however,the supports for the signs remain.The below picture shows the proposed signs. II.DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number offarceJs Existing One Number of Parcels Proposed One Parcel Number(s)3525-147-002 Gross Land Area 0.05 acres I 2.068 square feet Zoning CD-Downtown Commercial Existing Land Use Business Services I Proposed Land Use Business Services Page #2—340 East Elkhom Avenue (Barlow Inc.)Sign Variance Request SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Valley Fire Protection District Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning This property and the adjacent properties are zoned CD-Downtown Commercial.Adjacent land uses are typical of the downtown area and include retail and restaurant uses.The property location is shown in the aerial photo below.— III.REVIEW CRITERIA All variance applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 3.6.C and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code.All applications for variances from Chapter 17.66 Signs shall also demonstrate compliance with Section 17.66.160 of the Municipal Code. This variance request does not fall within the parameters of staff-level review and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment. Page #3 —340 East Elkhorn Avenue (Barlow Inc.)Sign Variance Request IV.REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to reviewing agency staff and adjacent owners for consideration and comment.Legal notice has also been published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette.The following written comments have been submitted. Estes Park Public Works Department.See Greg Sievers’email dated July 1,2010. V.STAFF FINDINGS Staff finds: 1.Reviewing Agencies.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.All letters and memos submitted by reviewing agency staff,referred to in Section IV of this staff report,are incorporated as staff findings. 2.Section 17.66.160(3)of the Municipal Code states,in every case in which a request for a variance from the requirements of this Chapter [17.66 Signs]has been filed,the Board shall not grant a variance unless it specifically finds each and every one of the following conditions to exist. a.There are special circumstances or conditions,such as the existence of buildings,topography,vegetation,sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent public right-of-way,which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question;provided,however,that such special circumstances or conditions must be particular to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention and to not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises. Staff Finding:The applicant’s statement of intent describes the special circumstances they believe exist.These reasons include: •The building is small with windows and a tree covering the entire frontage of the building. •Putting signs on the roof would be the most visually appealing and most practical solution for the business owners as well as the property owners and the Town of Estes Park. Page #4—340 East Elkhom Avenue (Barlow Inc.)Sign variance Request •To make the sign visible on the front of the building,most of the window area would have to be covered as well as having a tree removed. b.The variance would be in general harmony with the purposes of this Chapter,and specifically would not be injurious to the neighborhood in which the business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention is located. Staff Finding:The Board should use their best judgment to determine if this variance would be in general harmony with the purposes of Chapter 17.66 Signs. Neighbors have not submitted written comments in support or opposition to the proposed sign. c.The variance is the minimum one necessary to permit the applicant to reasonably draw attention to this business or enterprise. Staff Finding:The Board should use their best judgment to determine if these are the minimum variances necessary. 3.Section 17.66.160(d)No variance for maximum sign area on a lot or building states,other provisions of this section to the contrary notwithstanding,the Board shall not have any jurisdiction to hear,nor the authority to grant,any variance from any section of this Chapter which limits the maximum permitted sign area on a single lot or building. Staff Finding:The applicant has not requested a variance from the maximum allowable sign area. 4.Section 17.66.160(e)states,the Board may grant a variance subject to any conditions,which it deems necessary or desirable to make the device which is permitted by the variance compatible with the purposes of this Chapter. Staff Finding:If the Board chooses to approve this variance,staff has recommended one condition of approval. 5.In addition to the review standards in Section 17.66.160 of the Municipal Code,the following review standards from the Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.C.apply. Page #5 —340 East Elkhom Avenue (Barlow Inc.)sign Variance Request a.Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance. Staff Finding:The business can continue to operate without the proposed sign. b.Whether the variance is substantial. Swff Finding:Staff does not find that the variance requests are substantial. c.Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. Staff Finding:The essential character would not be substantially altered and adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment. d.Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding:This application was routed to providers of public services,such as water and sewer,and no concerns were expressed about adverse impacts to the delivery of public services. e.Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of tIle requirement. Staff Finding:Per the statement of intent,the applicant has owned this property since 1989. On August 16,2006 the interpretation of the sign code changed.On this date Bob Joseph,Will Birehfield.and Carolyn McEndaffer discussed roof and wall signs and clarified that in order to quali’as a wall,rather than a roof sign,the slope of the roof must have an angel of 45°or less from vertical.The interpretation prior to this date was that the angle between the roof and the sign needed to be 450 or less. Prior Interpretation Highlighted in Yellow Any sign erected upon the side of a roof having an angle of forty- five degrees (45°)or less from vertical shall be considered a wall sign,and shall be subject to the size and height limitations noted under this Subsection. Page #6—340 East Elkhorn Avenue (Barlow Inc.)Sign vadance Request Current Interpretation Highlighted in Yellow Any sign erected upon the side of a roof having an angle of forty- five degrees (45°)or less from vertical shall be considered a wall sign,and shall be subject to the size and height limitations noted under this Subsection. f Whether the Applicant’s predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding:The applicant could request that the Town remove the streetscape tree in front of the building to improve visibility of the building. g.No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant’s property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding:Staff does not find that a regulation should be adopted to address this situation. h.No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision,pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding:The variance,if granted,will not reduce the size of the lot. Page #7—340 East Elkhom Avenue (Barlow Inc.)Sign Variance Request i.If authorized,a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding:The Board should use their best judgment to determine if the variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief j.Under no circumstances shall the Board of Adjustment grant a variance to allow a use not permitted,or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Finding:Not applicable. k.Per EVUC §3.6.D,failure of an Applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the Board of Adjustment null and void. VI.STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of a variance to allow two three-foot-by- four-foot roof signs in the location described in the submitted application. Page #8—340 East Elkhorn Avenue (Barlow Inc.)Sign variance Request (, Alison Chilcott Sent: To: Subject: Thursday,July 01,2010 10:21 AM Alison Chilcott FW:Barlow Sign Variance -Lot 2,Barlow Subdivision -Referral for From:Greg Sievers Sent:Thursday,July01,2010 9:17 AM To:Karen Thompson;Tracy Feagans Subject RE:Barlow Sign Variance -Lot 2,Barlow Subdivision -Referral for Comment PW is OK with the request.It will not affect any public access or safety. Greg Sievers,Project Manager Town of Estes Park,Public Works EngineeringPaBox1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 970.5 fl-3585 From:Karen Thompson Sent:Friday,June 11,2010 1:58 PM To:Greg White (greg@gawhlte.com);Jacqueline Halburnt;Scott Zurn;‘gsievers@estes.org’;Barbara Boyer Buck;TracyFeagans;Carolyn McEndaffer;sbarlow@frh.com Cc:Alison Chllcott Subject:Barlow Sign Variance -Lot 2,Barlow Subdivision -Referral for Comment REFERRAL FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application,which can be viewed by accessing the following links or by visiting our website at http;J/www.estes.orgJcomdev/CurrentRepuests.aspx. Barlow variance Sign Variance Address 340 E Elkhorn Avenue •rr -m Meeting Dates Estee valley Boai of Adjustment 711 3.’l C Project Documentation (PDF) Staff Report and Comments (PD F) Sn;Send CornnentsComments available A;so Gb c tt717/10 From:Karen Thompson Comment I Statement Intent and Aeoflcallon Site Plan I ( If you prefer paper copies of documents,please email me at kthompson@estes.org.Thank you for your help in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible,but no later than June 25,2010. Comments can be sent via mail,email (achiIcottestes.org),or fax (970.586.0249). Thank you for your comments. Karen Thompson Secretary,Community Development Department Town of Estes Park 170 MacGregor Avenue P0 Box 1200 Estes Park,CC 80517 Phone:970.577.3721 Fax:970.586.0249 kthpmpson@estes.org 0 2 Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Town of Estes Park Community Development Department PD Box 1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 EVBoA Members; This is a statement of intent to change two roof signs that were formerly permitted andhavenowbeendisallowed.The tenant in the build has changed and we would like tochangefromtheoldtenantsbusinessnametothenewtenantsbusinessname.ThesignsconformtotheEstesMunicipalSignCode(Title 17.66)except 17.66.060 RoofSigns. The building is a kiosk style building of 500 square feet.The entire frontage is windowsandthesignagewasoriginallyplacedin1990with2conforminguseroofsignsfacingthetrafficarea.Since the change in the Sign Code now precludes roof signs,we would like to apply for a variance to put the new tenants signs up onto the existing signbrackets. Standards for Review (Section 3.6C of the EV Dev.Code) 1.Special Circumstances:The building is small with windows and a tree covering theentirefrontageofthebuilding.Putting the signs on the roof would be the most visuallyappealingandmostpracticalsolutionforthebusinessowneraswellasthepropertyownerandtheTownofEstesPark.To make the sign visible on the front of the building,most of the window area would have to be covered as well as having a treeremoved. 2.Pracicality: a.Beneficial Use:Would not be as visually appealing but can be done. b.Substantial:no. c.Neighborhood Character:By not allowing the variance the neighborhood appeal would be blighted by the covering of the front of a building with a sign and having to remove a tree to make the sign visible. ci.Affect Services:N/A e.Property Purchase:The sign was a previously allowed use and has been inexistenceforover20years.The Sign Code has be re-interpreted to disallow the current placement. f.Otherwise Mitigated:Not easily or as visually appealing. 3.Circumstances:See #1 Special Circumstances. 4.Lot Size:N/A . 5.Least Deviation:Other than positioning the sign in a different location,there would be no other deviation from the Estes Valley Sign Code.The signage would conform with the Sign Code in size based on frontage of the building and will be below the 25 foot height requirement.. 6.Non Permitted Use:N/A 7.Conditions:If applicable. Thank you for your consid ration, Steve Barlow,Applicant Barlow Plaza POBox4l2S Estes Park,CO 80517 970.586.9083 970.227.4356 a own of Estes Pol<e.P.O.Box 1205 .,170 MacOrego’Avenue .Estes Park.CO 83517 Community Deveiopment Department Phone:(970)577-3721 .e Fox:(970)586-0249 .d.vnswestes.org/ComDev I [.- c,I JUN 92010 ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I APPLICATION11SubmittalDateT‘-c_9,‘o to aItreIrIITiIrn1iWbr.T. Record Owner(s):•‘A It Cc?L—’,7.’—’C Street Address of Lot:3 IU j L/’(flc’e.—)AOL. Legal Description:Lot:Q_Block:Tract::2 Subdivision:2 OL4 —tcc?._—‘ ParcellD#:3çt—Iqfoo. lnniw1ic.i.J Lot Size Q 0 ZoninglJjExistingLandUseT?.tr”vr L_ 1111111fffflR1 Illllh1llulHl Proposed Land Use Q...6 Tp,s L IDPJMiINh1II Existing Water Service Pt Town r Well F Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service f Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service t EPSD F UTSD r Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service nt EPSD r UTSD F Septic Existing Gas Service Xcel r Other F None3SiteAccess(if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site?F Yes No Efl,i.r* Variance Desired (Development Code Section #):7,bi,CQ (Lt)Ill yc IIllhliJIIIII Name of Primary Contact Person ?t flc!Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is F Owner ‘Applicant r Consultant/Engineer AlWi1iiTiB Application fee (see attached fee schedule) $.Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) F 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of I”=20)** $I reduced copy ol the site plan (11 X 17”) *k The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.Vll.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. Rü3osc is1 Revised 11/20/09 ,;l <n1D,(p 1OT)9--o-Ss--‘Yc’o3 ?-V -g35- q30 -nc-o984 ..IG1rnThThi[.i. Record Owner(s)A?1 17 L—’Tnr Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email P/k Applicant S-rtn--i4tLOL.-’ MailingAddress To ]!w)c ‘nzr,Ecr Co Phone ‘ii°-T& Cell Phone ‘f7-O 2 Z7 —‘-‘SZ Fax Email 4rzLoc..e FtZr.coin ConsultantiEngineer L_ Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area,both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: http/Jwww estes org/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/Planni ngApnhcationFeeSchedu le.pdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised fl/2o/09 .. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: httpJ/www.estes.org/CornDev)DevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estee Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. 0”The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. 0’I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full tees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. 0’I understand that lam required to obtain a “Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I understand that the comers of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,“Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void,”(Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.0) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT:frtLOc/-r cgt4 7Z1DA’Z LQ}7-e Xi Applicant PLEASEPRIN.c_T,.1i ‘ctt \.CC-. signatures: Owner ______________________________________________ Date _______________ Applicant ________________________________________________________ Date szj r)I () Revised 11)20/09 1 I 4 I N’ ‘1,; 1’ $r’ 11 ii r I 41 a.- F t -/1 4 -4- I (8)Signs not permanently affixed attached to the ground or to a permanent structure,(for example,banners,sandwich boards and handheld signs).Temporary real estate signs attached to posts driven into the ground and temporary safety barriers are excepted. (9)Any sign or sign structure which: a.Is structurally unsafe,or b.Constitutes a hazard to safety or health by reason of inadequate mainte nance or dilapidation,or c.Is capable of causing electrical shocks to persons likely to come in con tact with it; (10)Any sign or sign structure which: a.Obstructs the view of,may be con fused with or purports to be an official traffic sign,signal or device or any other official sign,or b.Creates an unsafe distraction for motor vehicle operators,or c.Obstructs the view of motor vehicle operators entering a public roadway from any parking area,service drive,private driveway,alley or other thoroughfare; (14)Signs not pertinent and or not clearly related to the pennitted use on the property where located,except for temporary political signs,as permitted and regulated by Section 17.66.070,and except for signs permitted under the provisions of Section 17.66.130. (15)Except as provided in Subsection 17.66.050(8),any sign having direct 17.66.070 Temporary signs. not limited to 17-02 §lcpart), Temporary signs in all zoning districts shall be subject to the following specific require ments: (1)Construction signs.Signs advertis ing subdivision,development,construction or other improvements of a property shall be permitted in any zoning district and shall comply with the following: a,Such signs shall be limited to free standing,wall or window signs,shall not exceed thirty-six (36)square feet in total area nor eighteen (18)square feet per face,and shall not exceed twelve (12)feet in height.No riders or attachments to such signs shall be permitted.For residential developments consisting of five (5)dwelling units or less,the maximum area permitted for a construction sign shall be three (3)square feet per face for each dwelling unit being constructed. . Zoning Section 17.66.060 [Ises advertising signs. illumination,including but visible neon tubing,(Ord. 2002) (11)Any ingress to or window,fire way; sign which obstructs free egress from a required door, escape or other required exit Roof signs,except as specifically1 by Section 17.66.110; 17-30 Supp.9 Ba r l o w Si p ‘‘ a r i a n c e AP O Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s Ci t y , St a t e , Zi p Pl a n B Pr o p e r t i e s , LL C 36 1 5 Mu s k r a t Cr e e k Dr Ft Co l l i n s , CO 80 5 2 8 Es t e s Vi l l a g e Pr o p e r t i e s , LT D P0 Bo x 41 3 0 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Wa p a t i Mo u n t a i n , RL L P 20 0 8 0 s 96 t h St Hi c k m a n , NE 68 3 7 2 Ba r l o w , In c PC Bo x 11 1 6 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Ja d e m o r n i n g , LL C P0 Bo x 35 2 3 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Wi n d y Ci t y , LL P 32 2 5 De v i l s Gu l c h Rd Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Ju l i a n & El i z a b e t h Wo j c i k Ma c i e j & Pa v l i n a Ku s n i e r z 72 9 Pi n e w o o d Dr Ly o n s , CO 80 5 4 0 Ch u r l So o n Im P0 Bo x 25 6 5 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Un i v e r s a l Ha r m o n y , LL C 11 4 Ti m b e r Ln Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 TL C He i r l o o m s , LL C 35 6 E El k h o r n , Un i t 4 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Mi n d f u l So l u t i o n s , LL C P0 Bo x 15 9 2 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Ch a r l e s Sa x t o n P0 Bo x 28 3 8 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Br o w n f i e l d s Le a t h e r Sh o p , In c P0 Bo x 25 0 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Di a n a Po c h o p P0 Bo x 58 Es t e s Pa r k , CC 80 5 1 7 An n Ra c i n e P0 Bo x 16 0 4 Es t e s Pa r k , CO 80 5 1 7 Ba r l o w Si g n Va r i a n c e AP O JV . 2: S [ ] E ’ o J O P F C 6 2 w e s 1 F F - S i ? l i t 40 4 5 0 7 4 1 p a i n 0 2 0 2 , 0 3 - s 2 W C C I C C F ) t EA T I a p - . v O S W a LT S T 7 7 • _ S 4 GI O T I T A L & t O G - 32 - 4 F O i a l t 5 6 5 0 4 S f l w s 1T 3 P C W A J A L ’ D S C O T I t O T 2 - 4 ’ T A 0 5 1 5 1 F 5 0 V FE W 9 4 0 1 0 F F 0 3 7 2 0 6 RE F - D O E E s s l i t [ C S A S a i l 5 5 L l 4 . C T 4 0 ST 0 2 9 3 5 9 oo a S B - t ’ W [ ‘ S l i t i c c F L I S t 9 I f - . ’ ‘- ? 7 7 L L I S E F - 5 5 5 c 5 L —o r o s - t , . q a - i S . 35 5 5 -‘ / 7 7 1 1 t h C - & S L S W C 0 / e — s , o S t . SA L a d A S I t F E S C C t S TO RE 1 ’ i l S l 0 2 5 : 0 0 L > 9 5 T i t 9 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 : 9 5 8 77 24 7 77 8 4 ’ S n / s Cl ? ? o r 4 P7 7 1 7 7 1 5 4 7 90 0 C C F7 7 4 3 T5 W 0 T W 0 J , V S i F T SC E 5 / ’ 07 2 03 9 - 7 0 6 77 ) 9 1 9 5 4 P L f l I 0 0 0 P 4 X 7 7 W / a ’ SO C TO DC 59 2 2 0 3 7 7 2 - 0 0 0 0 5 [f A L L 51 0 , 1 7 7 6 0 0 3 9 7 0 5 P B ’ t v E E D O T I 9 W a L L AS 9 - 5 5 . 1 1 TA 77 0 : 47 7 1 . 5/ A L L A C E L l S AS 17 7 0 0 1 0 1 9 4 5 0 4 0 7 7 1 77 2 2 9 7 1 5 5 T a l 2 - CO W S TO 19 2 3 5 1 5 82 0 2 0 5 1 1S F - T O O l 7 7 5 9 7 9 5 WF O O T . % : s t o o l V P 1 L . 4 P ? M T L D 07 7 3 , 0 ? 59 2 D V 7 7 9 2 0 2 - I t t S T W W 0 2 1 9 0 a 74 5 5 7 7 4 1 - S i t AW A Y f l O 3 SL O a L I l l f l y , o - v p 41 7 7 5 6 7 1 - 1 2 - a t c r s QV L ? a’ [ 0 0 9 2 . 0 1 5 0 • R S 7 7 L 5 4 5 6 0 0 2 5 0’ o l 4 7 . WA L I E 9 8 0 5 5 1 FF 5 6 4 W / th I s . 5 / 0 4 3 5/ 1 4 0 W F 07 7 7 7 $ 1 A f l ’ I t 0 P P L C a n t s 72 ’ Ca - A L [# 5 5 7 55 7 % f l [ h a L 0 0 1 3 5 2 0 5 5 9 1 C O l t C o p s A 40 2 1 9 2 5 5/ , ’ 2 1 9 4 C a l l c / E S 4’ 5 1 5 7 7 - 5 5 9 0 2 - 1 5 0 4’ I l L 10 1 1 [ # 5 1 5 9 1 7 2 a l A - a FA L l . 5 5 / f l I/ O P 5 1 PT F t s 92 1 4 3 1 TO 0 2 - 1 1 4 5 1 97 7 7 7 8 72 ’ DL SO W 5 0 r C - 5 . 2 # T 0 0 7 7 5 1 F l F5 7 [I A / I l TO 3 4 ’ -A S / F 0 7 1 4 0 * 0O ’ _ 1 4 5 7 0 f l i P 0 0 3: 0 2 3 0 1 5 55 . - S 77 1 5 1 1 3 % TR E E 0 2 9 5 5 5 P S , O T A T 5 15 1 3 7 5 7 : IW F E S O:v . 3: O O N C S E T E 0/ I S A 65 2 - A r E E S -5 5 5 0 0 3 1 5 4 1 7 7 5 1 6 1 5 4 5 SI L A S . AS FO 1 5 D 03 2 - O S S T 54 ’ C O l t . f l & / 2 1 0 9 7 5 7 4 7 7 1 7 3 2 0 9 4 DO W E L S I S ’ S A S S 12 ’ 0 5 D O n 4’ C O S t . SL A B WV 5 1 4 5/ 1 4 22 : 4 4 0 . 5 4 ? . O I L S 4’ A f l ? S t L 4 $ F l - C 0 2 - 3 9 9 1’ CX L C o l t . F I R TO 7- 7 7 1 20 ’ 55 1 - 0 5 / 1 8 , 1 5 5 •s 3 w D S CO r E I I I . 0 0 / II I 0 5 5 T 6 1 A 5 0 1 t6 2 1 ? 0 / : 6 0 1 1 9 4 1 r 2 I L S F I S 3 r O 5 e w o w r o l l . C O t FL O G S TO .D 9 2 ’ 7 1 3 1 CO l T C a t 51 5 6 ‘ 5 5 1 n . r a % LA S S A A T C S l AS R I O 0 4 7 0 * f t E A 4 4 0 7 7 5 5 0 4 2 1 0 5 27 CA t ; F * i . L 5 / a l ) , 0 / # 4 9 0 3 ’ 0 6 vE S T 64 0 . 1 1 Ft . ? . C C I A [ 9 OF 0 CI T J s a t 9 1 5/ / F I T 9 4 0 0 7 1 0 4 1 3 0 6 0 5 0 77 9 2 0 1 ) C a L n I 04 / FZ I 9 4 S E P T O l 4 U a Y x T x ? F L a n T n 9 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 1 Oh 4’ 5 5 1 0 SA P o5 / 1 T 4 C a ’ V / C T S V 6 4 4 5 9 2 . FA L L . 0 4 4 3 0 5 2’ F L a S S I O L S p a s 0 5 3 5 1 1 4 a W O T h 4 5 5 9 0 4 4 1 0 0 , - DI V . 5 M E T A L S 0 3 T 0 4 V 2 • D L 2 9 - A 5 9 5 2 5 9 31 ’ 0 6 11 7 7 0 0 4 F . 0 9 2 C S T E 0 51 1 - , o 4 0 E 5 . I L L 71 5 5 4 : F ’ P O ’ t E 5 0 0 [t W A ’ F C 4 53 5 5 4 4 5 40 1 7 1 0 5 AL 9 3 3 5 3 5 I A S I C 4 F F D S n , P a l - f l A 6 1 3 w - f l i T p — s o c 5 9 7 C t o s 5 . s5 6 .5 / 4 , 6 2 . f l ? a A t 0 0 3 0 5 8 1 2 4 4 0 6 7 7 . ‘ P a r r . : t r 1 o 5 4 5 1 S F 6 1 3 • AL L 5 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 ’ S i C I 50 1 7 7 4 5 , TO C1 5 5 1 % T :3 5 4 ( 3 3 : 5, 7 7 ( 5 4 0 c S/ f l IL L 0 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 0 2 - l a s CC I T T • DC C I ? ) 1 / L I DA S O T A S S FO G [ I t / m a T r a p As s o c i a l e s P - c R 0 . Bo x Es t e s P7 0 1 ’ , C o 5 I 7 OC & 5 3 6 - ? B 0 7 7 5 0 : 5 3 4 - 3 7 3 S W 11 1 0 5 S T E PL _ 2 - f l C . a a r a I n ‘0 1 9 3 3 5 A T 5 2 1 T h 5 6 7 7 _ 0 2 9 0 2 9 _ _ _ _ _ I f l f l 0 9 0 s 1 1 0 9 , 0 C / 0 4 7 0 6 I 3 3 4 E L I C J 4 O P N 7 - L _ = _ • • _ ç I H L O T 2 ‘‘ \ 4 t 1 r r - n OS — - — P 1 5 1 1 1 2 - I L l . L O T 1 _ _ _ - t / ” ’ L T 3 •EL - D 3 ’ , < I . / \ / . : L ’ I - ‘ I - - 4 1 ? -. t -- (I L _ _ _ _ I I r- I S t ’ s 1 a C 5 [ # 5 1 0 4 6 n 3 5 7 2 1- - I I O W ? r- S W I C C [ # n P a I l S a a _ _ ‘ . I _ _ _ f - E E : II I ‘ T ’ I _ _ _ _ _ _ ‘ S F 0 0 2 2 - f l I . “ E T L I -— — — & L t L 1 I S I L R A t ( 4 E P L A E E j 4 - j _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C E j ‘ I t I l i m - • L : I I P _ a i I _ F t . _ _ I I T ’ / I Ij . V W A L E S 77 5 . 5 7 7 II - ‘ I _ _ _ _ / 4 4 4 9 6 4 F -M I S TC I L I T S I 4 O J C 7 0 5 0 [1 1 0 1 Ii - —-— — — I ): ii / ‘ / 7 ’ I • 1 0 - 7 2 3 ’ I i 1 E L u F l 4 3 t o a r a I - * [ h C A I S P E L T 1, 5 4 7 7 / / i t , j ,L —--: _ _ _ fl 5 5 5 0 0 5 0 2 4 1 1 3 3 / / - p s s . s \ 5 1 _ _ - a O C A T E I - ‘ p a s o - A l a I - 4 r 5 5 1 / _ _ _ _ _ _ S E 77 0 7 7 1 6 11 0 6 1 / / p J ” C j ° 0 1 9 7 0 H — - \ - e - - - T . . * - / / . - - I - - H 0 7 7 5 9 , 7 7 7 7 5 2 - 9 9 5 4 5 4 J 1 9 -— o r . . _ — - . T 7 7 . 0 C v E t “ 4 -! 4 r . [ C - 5 7 ’ 7 @ 6 — W 1 N FU 2 - S 1 MO ? T W © D R 0 @ f l @1’ f l Q f l • we ’ 19 1 2 - 0 9 ‘C OF 19 DA I S F E 1 1 9 9 0 R f l S : 1 1 3 ’ AD 5 1 I A ’ C t 1 5 C O s . . — A TO r- 1 A 9 N S S T , S a J E r U6 . TO 5 W E E T _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — e . - L _ _ _ _ A Z A c 2 9 2 P — ‘ : — 4 ; E I _ j . 6— % _ EX i S T . 3 / 4 ’ TO r- I A J r I S— % TO tI M - I AT rV P - T N D E OF S T R E E T O’ W A T E R—— - t - . - ‘ — — 6— — G— . - — - - 3 3 4 B EL R - I O P - M LO T 1 0 2 0 6 0 A E - - - a — - - . - . - 1 BA R L O W . $ F. F . - MV . - 1 4 . 2 6 , II h 61 1 6 M 7 2 3 0 W 0 ’ E 7 7 0 0 -- . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ t 2 a a I F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — . — . L r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ • —1 rr _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. U) I - I _ _ • I _ _ / _ _ _ I L U \ Q l M & 6 r E \J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / _ _ I _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ , E L - T 9 _ _ _ _ _ _ MM 0 I T O / 4 i W A F __ / - } . , N - I - I I . 0 2 0 , 4 j I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 / I I ’ ; . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 I_ . - : G R E I _ _ _ _ _ RE L O C A T E / L _ _ I / i W A 6 A S S E R V E _ _ _ _ _ / I — — I 4 a . I 4 / / / I — — - Li T AS \ _ I ( I— — a > 4 , — 14 3 EL - _ _ _ _ _ / 6 R E i 5 E TR A P 1 M E \