Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2011-06-07Prepared:May 23,2011 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday,June 7,2011 9:00 a.m.—Board Room Town Hall 1.PUBLIC COMMENT 2.CONSENT a.Approval of minutes dated May 3,2011 b.Metes and Bounds Parcel,TBD Hwy 66,Parcel ID 35344-00-024,Rippling River Estates Owner:Stonewood Properties,LLC Applicant:Don Chasen Request:Renewal of variance approved December 1, EVDC Section 4.4,Table 4-5,which requires landscape buffer on alterial streets in Accommodations zone district.Request to approved variance. Dave Shirk 3.LOT 6 OF WEBSTERS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14,BLOCK ESTES PARK,170 Boyd Lane Owner:Cydney K Springer Applicant:Same as owner Request:Variance from EVDC Section 4. requires side yard setbacks of 10 Family Residential zone district. encroachment of 5.5 feet into construction of a proposed storage shed. Staff Contact:Dave Shirk 4.LOT 418,REPLAT OF TRACT 41 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 46,FALL RIVER ADDITION,AND A PORTION OF TRACT 101,AL FRESCO PLACE ADDITION,TBD Big Horn Drive Owner:Thomas &Rachelle Washburn Applicant:Jeff Moreau/Dallman Construction Request:Variance from EVDC Section 4.3,Table 4-2,which limits structure height to 30 feet above natural grade in the E 1—Estate zone district.Request to allow a height variance of two feet six inches for construction of a proposed dwelling. Staff Contact:Dave Shirk Staff Contact: 2009, a 25 the renew from foot A- the 10,TOWN OF 3,Table 4-2,which feet in the RM-MuIti Request to allow an the west setback for Continued on Page 2 Prepared:May 23,2011 Revised: 5.UNIT 1A,BUILDING 1,OLYMPUS VIEWS CONDOMINIUMS,1690 Big Thompson Avenue Owner: Applicant: Request: 6.REPORTS 7.ADJOURNMENT John Henry Don Hess/Owner,Hunter’s Chop House Variance from EVDC Section 4.4, rquires a 15-foot seback from property allow a 5.5-foot encroachment into the to allow an existing patio. Dave Shirk A meeting packet is available for review in the Community Development Department and the Estes Valley Library two business days prior to the meeting. The Estes Valley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Staff Contact: Table 4-5,which lines.Request to side yard setback RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estee Valley Board of Adjustment May 3,2011,9:00 a.m. Board Room,Estes Park Town Hall Board:Chair Wayne Newsom,Members Bob McCreery,John Lynch,Chuck Levine,and Pete Smith;Alternate Member Jeff Moreau Attending:Chair Newsom,Members McCreery,Lynch,Levine,Smith Also Attending:Planner Shirk,and Recording Secretary Thompson Absent:None Chair Ncwsom called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1.PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2.CONSENT Approval of minutes of the April 5,2011 meeting. It was moved and seconded (McCreery/Smith)to approve the minutes as presented and the motion passed unanimously. 3.TBD MOON TRAILWAY,LITTLE VALLEY 2 FILING Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report.The applicant has requested a variance to Table 4-2 ‘Base Density and Dimensional Standards”of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow a front yard setback of 30-feet in lieu of the 50-foot setback required and a side yard setback of 25-feet in lieu of the 50-foot setback required.The purpose of the variance request was to build a new detached single-family residence.The property is zone RE— Rural Estate.This lot is sub-sized for the zone district. Planner Shirk stated staff finds that special circumstances exist.The lot has a triangular building area if all setbacks are applied.The eastern portion of this triangle contains a drainage swale.Planner Shirk stated because the nearest structure is over 100-feet away,granting the variances would not violate the intent of the code for adequate building separation.Planner Shirk recommended the impact on the neighborhood would be minimal.Staff did not analyze the proposed building size with those in the nearby neighborhood. Planner Shirk stated the request was submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.No significant concerns were expressed.The closest neighbor to the property commented in support of the variance request,and the Little Valley Owners Association was also supportive of the request.Planner Shirk stated a property owner downhill from the applicant’s property was concerned about erosion. Based on this,the Larimer County Engineering Department recommended an erosion control plan be submitted with the building permit application.Another property owner expressed concern about the amount of potential construction activity. Staff recommends approval of the requested variance,with three recommended conditions of approval. Staff and Board Discussion There was a brief discussion about the proposed driveway. 4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 May 3,2011 Public Comment Celine LefleauNan Horn Engineering clarified that an erosion control plan would be included with the building permit application.She stated the proposed dwelling would be on a portion of the lot with fewer trees than other areas of the lot,which would help with limits of disturbance. Conditions 1.Compliance with the site plan and building design,as approved by the Board of Adjustment. 2.Setback Certificate.Prior to final inspection,a registered land surveyor shall provide to the Community Development Department a signed and stamped certificate that specifically verifies that the structure complies with the approved variance,and shall include a specific reference to the distance to property lines.Staff recommends a surveyor set survey stakes for foundation forms to ensure compliance with the approved variance. 3.Prior to issuance of a building permit: a.The builder shall meet with the Light and Power Department to discuss electrical connection. b.A detailed grading and erosion control plan shall be approved by the Larimer County Engineering Department. It was moved and seconded (Lynch/Smith)to approve the variance request with the findings and conditions recommended by staff and the motion passed unanimously. 4.REPORTS Planner Shirk reported the Creative Sign Design Review Board would be meeting to hear a request for a temporary banner time extension at Claire’s Restaurant due to the Bond Park renovation. Planner Shirk reported an item previously on the agenda was withdrawn by staff.The request was a challenge to staff’s interpretation of the EVDC 6.l.C Alteration of Non conforming Uses and Structures. There being no further business,Chair Newsom adjourned the meeting at 9:17 a.m. Wayne Newsom,Chair Karen Thompson,Recording Secretary Chasen Landscape Buffer Variance Request Estes Park Community Development Department,Planning Division Room 230,Town HaIl,170 MacGregor Avenue PC Box 1200,Estes Park,CC 80517 Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 www.estes.org MEETING DATE:June 7,2011 Previous approval dates Nov 2009 (expired) Oct 2007 (expired) REQUEST:A request to allow an access drive to be located within the required 25-foot arterial landscaping buffer zone. LOCATION:TBD Moraine Avenue,within unincorporated Larimer County OWNERIAPPLICANT:Don Chasen STAFF CONTACT:Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer/Surveyor/Consultant:Van Horn Engineering Parcel Number:3534400024 Development Area:2.55 acres Existing Land Use:Undeveloped Proposed Land Use:Multi-family residential/accommodations Zoning Designation:A Accommodations Adjacent Zoning: East:A Accommodations North:A Accommodations West:A-i Accommodations South:A Accommodations Adjacent Land Uses: East:Single-family residential North:Single-family residential West:Single-family residential South:Accommodations (Glacier Lodge) Services: Water:Town Sewer:UTSD PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND:The applicant,Don Chasen, requests a variance to Section 7.5.F.2b(6)“No Development in Street Frontage Buffer Area”of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow driveway access to be located ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT within twelve feet of the property line,within the mandated 25-foot arterial landscaping buffer zone. The purpose of this variance request is to develop this property with nine residential/accommodation units,for which the property is zoned (“A”Accommodations). This same variance request was approved by the Board in October 2007 and November 2009.Due to economic conditions,the owner has not initiated development. Development plan approval for Development Plan 08-05 is still in effect.This means the overall site plan approved by the Planning Commission is still in effect,though technically the variance has lapsed.Therefore,the applicant is requesting re-approval of this variance request. Staff recommends the approval timeframe be tied to the development plan approval. The area of the variance request is shown within the red oval: 0 REVIEW CRITERIA:In accordance with Section 3.6 C.“Standards for Review”of the EVDC,all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Board should keep these criteria in mind when reviewing the variance request. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES:This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.At the time of this report,no significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Page 2 of 3 zz—— Estes Valfey Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Chasen Variance Request FINDINGS: 1.This request complies with review criteria set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2.Special circumstances exist and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with Code standards. 3.The variance is not substantial. 4.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered,nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment. 5.The variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services. 6.The variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 7.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 8.The submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the property are not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. 9.Failure to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Therefore,Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requested variance to Section 7.5.F.2b(6)“No Development in Street Frontage Buffer Area”of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow driveway access to be located within ten feet of the property line,within the mandated 25-foot arterial landscaping buffer zone CONDITIONAL TO: a.District Buffer landscaping standards shall be applied in place of arterial street standards. b.Variance approval shall not lapse in the standard one year timeframe.Instead, variance approval shall be valid as long as the development plan approval does not expire. SUGGESTED MOTION:I move APPROVAL of the requested variance(s)with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Page 3 of 3 chasen variance Request 0 S j Statement of Intent -Variance Ripplin2 River Development -2O2S Moraine Avenue Variance Request:This variance request is for the renewal of a variance approved in 2007 and 2009 (compliant with section 3.6 of the Estes Valley Development Code).The land is zoned A —Accommodations under the current Estes Valley Development Code. Requested variances: Table 4-5 Street Setback -Existing:15’property line -Requesting:11.5’from County Required property line Section 7.5.F.2.b.(3)Arterial Landscape Buffer -Existing:25’property line -Requesting:11.5’from County Required property line The property is located in a portion of the Southeast ¼of Section 35,Township 5 North. Range 73 West and is currently a vacant parcel of land with street frontage on U.S. Highway 66 (Spur 66)also known as Moraine Avenue.The Road has been transferred from the State to the County and the County Right-of-Way requirements are to be used for the future development of this property.As a result,the county is requiring a dedication often feet of right-of-way along this property that pushes the setback further into the property.The variance requested here takes this right-of-way request and dedication into account. Also,this is the third request for this variance due to extenuating circumstances with thecurrenteconomyandstateofthefinancialmarkets.Construction lending for builders andcondominiumfinancingforbuyershasbeenhardtoattaintherebyminimizingthemarket for buyers of this type of property.Because the demand has been low,the owner has waited to develop and now is asking for this variance again.Because of the nature of this market,the owner would like to request a variance for two years instead of one,knowing the markets are still not great and may take more than a year to completely heal. The following represents the Standards for Review in the Estes Valley Development Code for a variance request: 1.Special Circumstances or Conditions Exist Narrowness —The lot lies between Moraine Avenue (Spur 66)and the Big Thompson Rivet the maximum width of the lot is 190’and the average width of the lot is approximately 135’.Trying to place an effective development with the code required setbacks would limit the area for a two lane road,a driveway,and dwelling units to 45’-l 10’with a majority of the lot having less than 60’to accommodate these required items.With a two lane road being a minimum of 22’wide,a driveway a minimum depth of 20’(to accommodate parking)and a dwelling of about 40’it would require at minimum an 82’wide buildable portion of the lot.With a majority(JØ of the lot 20’narrower than this,special consideration should be taken to provide for Ii a buildable situation.Also the site drops off from the road at a rapid rate and has abundant vegetation near the road which would allow the drive to be tucked close to the property line so the view from the road would be less impacted. Common to other areas -This is not common to most parcels in the area however it is common to the neighboring lot to the north.The neighboring lot to the north was recently developed and was granted 0’lot line setback to the State Highway (code specifies 25’setback,section 4 table 4-5,to an arterial street,see arterial street definition 13.3.228)and also was determined to have 30’setbacks to the river by section 7.6.E.2(b). By granting the variance to allow small portions of the driveway to be placed within the Landscape Buffer,the overall site will be less disturbed. 2.“Practical Difficulty” a.Whether there can be beneficial use of the property without the variance? The property is zoned A-Accommodations and has the potential for many units.Without the proposed variance,the property would not be functional to meet the driveway and parking standards of the E.V.D.C.due to the narrowness of the property. b.Whether the variance is substantial? The variance is not substantial,relative to other approved variances in the area.The neighboring property was granted a 0’Landscape Buffer on a portion of their lot for a driveway in 2004.This request is to be 11.5’away from County required property line (which would be 21.5’away from the original property line)in comparison the proposed driveways on this lot will be 21.5’further away from the road than a portion of the neighbors to the north. c.Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or neighbors would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance? There would not be a substantial altering or a major impact on the surrounding’ properties.The surrounding properties are zoned A-Accommodation as well and the neighboring property to the north is a more dense development with a greater impact on its site.The proposed development will be in character with recent developments in the area. d.Whether the variance would affect the delivery of public services? There will be no adverse affect to the delivery of public services such as water and sewer.There currently exists a sewer main that runs along the eastern portion of the property.The proposed development will be extending the water main from the north onto their property and installing fire hydrants which will have a positive impact on the surrounding properties. e.Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement? The original applicant was not aware of the County requirement for the road dedication (when the development process started)as the road was originally owned by the State of Colorado.The current owner/applicant did purchase the property knowing this variance was approved,however due to difficulties 0 in the financial markets,the development has been slow to move and theownerhashadtorenewthevariance.The neighboring property to the northwasgrantedavariancetobuildonalotthatissimilarincharacter.j Whether the Applicant ‘s predicament can be mitigated through some othermethod? There is no other easy alternative to this lot shape predicament.Even if thisparcelwentthroughthecountyprocesstoappealtheright-of-way dedicationtherewouldstillneedtobeavarianceforthedevelopmentofthisparcel. 3.The variance requested is not general or recurrent in nature,the situation is sitespecific.Given the special circumstances associated with the request and thetopographyandvegetationonthesitethisisauniquerequest. 4.The granting of this variance will not cause an increase in density or create theabilitytocreatenewlots. 5.The proposed variance will be the least deviation from the regulations that willaffordreliefandallowtheapplicanttousethepropertyasthedevelopmentcodeintends. 6.The proposed variance request will not allow a use not permitted,or a useexpresslyorbyimplicationprohibitedunderthetermsoftheE.V.D.C.for itszoningdistrict.The applicant would like to develop the property withcondominiumswhichisallowedintheA-accommodations zoning district.7.In granting such variances,the applicant realizes the BOA may require suchconditionsaswill,in its independent judgment,secure substantially the objectivesofthestandardsovariedormodified. Additional information: 1.Additional trees and shrubs will be planted to shield the driveway (variancefeature)from sight that will meet the District Buffer requirements which are more densethantheArterialStreetBufferrequirements. 2.The variance is to allow small portions of the driveways within the landscapebuffer.The buffer extends further into the property due to the County required roaddedication. 3.The property was originally shown on the FEMA maps to be almost entirely outofthefloodplain,however in the process of trying to develop this property it was foundthattherewasanerrorintheFEMAmapping.This error was corrected through theFEMALOMRprocess.The result of this is that a significant portion of the lot is nowwithinthefloodplain.An application has been approved by FEMA to place fill on aportionofthelottobringitoutofthefloodplainandprovideforabuildableareaon thelot.The amount of fill proposed is to accommodate the site layout and is considerablylessthancouldbeplacedbasedontheFEMAmapping.Fill has been imported anderosioncontrolmeasuresareinplacetoprotectsedimentationtransport. 0 35 3 4 4 0 8 l o 2 35 3 4 4 O a 2 Cr e a t e d by La r i r r w r C o t a i t y GI S t: n g da t a fr o m nt t p e s o u c e s . La h n w r c e t r t y ma k e s no wa r r a n t y as to th e ac a i r a c y . Th i s pf O d u c l ma y ro t re f b c t re c e n t td a t pr i o r t o tI da t e of pi n t ir s . 11 0 0LA R I M E R . CO U N T Y CO M M I T T E D TO EX C E L L E N C E Ta x Pa r c e l 6/ 2 1 2 0 1 1 35 3 4 3 1 61 GR E E L E V B O U L D E R CO L O N Y AM D Ot e d ka DO u i E d n CG a r a s Wo d Mo u n t a i n Na f r o n & P a d c ( L a d m e r P o r t o n ) cJ € W+ E Submittal Date: . ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Tract:4..J_4- 7.SfCctcnrs VQca.&J Existing Water Service r Town Proposed Water Service p<rown Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service r Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? xAJenarSeptic r Septic Kce 7 ‘Variance Desired (Development Code Section #):7h/t %,.4.—,+Cco,,vlee-7ct/r._...,—5(4-SacJcOP /“and -rF.2.b.3—2c’Ar,./L’ Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is 1/ors4 S-,nee//s l KConsulta nt/Engineer X Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1’=20)** jc(1 reduced copy of the site plan (lix 17) The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix S.Vll.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. I Town of Estes Park P.O.Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park,CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone:(970)577-372].Fax:(970)556-0249 w.w.estes.org/CornDev &c...coO cC 7rore r—*e c 7Z A,.n&t lternq ,vt,o,, Record Owner(s):, .Street Address of Lot: Legal Description:Lot:/-‘L4— Subdivision:A)1—1 ParcellD#:35,,3’j9-..&&-ozq / Block:/)/4— Lot Size ,. I—. Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Zoning 4 - Afp/,4 .$4ti4 PesrL..t44 (Specify) (Specify) rwe r Well r r r AJO‘ztrOtherrOther EPSD EPSD Other r UTSD K UTSD None r Yes XN0 2bc—6ccc’L4J7 ‘4”- Owner /&Z13 eS’’A Crsekt1,6Ies 2ri&Co ?t/’7rApplicant II i26i8 S 0 ZflO ov-crrter..1-at-te g’,c%PL&Cc2 °S7’1 I cg ..‘a I 111111II!iIIIIel!1Tll11i!iiiTiir.i. Record Owner(s)fD,eLL,aoJ Prope,—/ies 2-1C 54fl, Mailing Address PhonejCellPhone Fax Email C%esert /o/3 aApe. Applicant 2op’u (CAc cPn Mailing Address &n-te a C &c-’neV Phone Cell Phone Fax-Email ConsultantlEngineer V0 Y0rv Ap’a ?i-ee—1’tq’ Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Faxn Email 0avke ,,,.-A ;-1 - ,cg-Ck i&clcs7cec ?r/(CO 9tt1777&-ra&-?3s- 77e—4/g3-rz,o 770—sis-ct—cs-/el n 0 APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area,both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: http://www.estes.org/ComDev/Schedules&FeesIPlanninpAplicationFeeScheduleDdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 11/20/09 . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted ace true and coned to the best of my knowledgeandthatinFilingtheapplicationIamactingwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftheownersoftheproperty. In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that theapplicationissubjecttotheapplicableprocessingandpublichearingrequirementssetforthintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode(EVOC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had theopportunitytoconsulttherelevantprovisionsgoverningLheprocessingofanddecisionontheapplication.The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: htlp.//www.estes.org/Cornflev/DevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the apphcation feebytheTowndoesnotnecessarilymeanthattheapplicationiscompleteundertheapplicablerequiremenlsoftheEVDC. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided isincomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. ‘I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. b’The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of lhe date on which the application isdeterminedtobecomplete b’I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with properidentificationaccesstoraypropertyduringthereviewofthisapplication. b’I acknowledge that t have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and thatfailuretomeetthedeadlinesshownonsaidscheduleshallresultinmyapplicationortheapprovalofmyapplicationbecomingnullandvoid.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has becomenullandvoid. N I understand that I am required to obtain a “Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department andthatthissignmustbepostedonmyproperlywhereitisclearlyvisiblefromtheroad.I understand that the corners ofmypropertyandtheproposedbuilding/structure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must bepostedandthestakingcompletednolaterthanlen(10)business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustmenthearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,“Failure of an applicant to apply for a buildingpermitandcommenceconstructionoractionwithregardtothevarianceapprovalwithinone(1)year ofreceivingapprovalofthevarianceshallautomaticallyrenderthedecisionoftheBOAnullandvoid,”(EstesValleyDevelopmentCodeSection36D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NI 7&q a r Applicant PLEASE PRiNT.flfn?aL IJ-/6t.a 4.—/irSignatures: Record Owner I /°/%ga,sept/Date _______________ Applicant /(3ha,J Date ______________ 0 Revised I /)L/(i9 Zoning Dish icls .-4.4 Nonresidential Zoning Districts 4.Table 4-5:Density and Dimensional Standards for the Nonresidential Zoning Districts. Table 4-5 Minimum Land Area per Accommodation or Residential Unit (sq.ft.per unit) Accommodation Unit =1,800 [11: A Residential Units: SF =9,000; 2-Family =6,750; MF =5,400 A-i 10,890 Dwelling Units (2nd Floor)No rnininium gross land area per unitf(rd.15-03 #3) CO n/a Cover age 0 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential Zoning Districts Zoning District Minimum Lot Size [1 Area (sq ft) 40,000 [2] Minimum Buildingl Structure Setbacks [1 (81 Front Side Rear (ft.)(ft.)(ft.) -- Width (ft.) 100 [3] Arterial =25 15]; All other streets = 15 15(6]10[6] -J Arterial =25 [5]; All other streets = 15 15 Accommodation Units Only = 1,800; SF &2-Family (stand-alone)= 9,000; 000[2]50[3] __ 10 30 .20 30 CD Dwelling Units (1st Floor)I unit per 2,250 square feet of gross land area Accommo dation uses =20,000 All other uses =n/a SF & 2-Family (stand alone)=25; MF (stand alone)= 100; All other uses =n/a Mini mum = 8 Maxi mum = 16 I 30 If lot abuts a residential property = 10; All other cases =0 If lot abuts a residential property = ID; All other cases =0 nla Lots fronting arterials = 40,000 [2]; Outdoor Commercial Recreation! Entertain ment = 40,000 (2] All other lots =15,000 [2] Fronting arterials = 200; All other lots =50 Arterial =25(5]; All other streets =15 15 [6]15(6].25 6530 0 Supp.5 4-21 Zoning Districts Noa’esidenf Ia!Zoning Districts NOTES TO TABLE 4-5: [1]For guest units in a resort lodge/cabin use thatperguestunitshallbe5400squarefeet.See also 5.1 .P below. have ft/il kitchen facilities,the minimum land area requirement [2]If private wells or septic systems are used,the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres.See also the regulations setforthin§7.12,Adequate Public Facilities.” [3]For lots greater than 2 acres,minimum lot width shall be 200 feet. [4]See Chapter 7,§7.6 for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands.(Drd.2-02 #5;Ord.11-02§1) 1]All front building setbacks from a public street or highway shall be landscaped according to the standards setforthin§7.5 of this Code. Setback shall be increased to 25 feet if the lot line abuts a residential zoning district boundary. [7]See Chapter 7,§7.1,which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area)for development on steep slopes.(Ord.2-02 #6) [8]All structures shall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than tour dwellings or lots.Thesetbackshallbemeasuredfromtheedgeofpublicorprivateroads,or the edge of the dedicated right-of-way orrecordedeasement,whichever produces a greater setback.The setback shall be the same as the applicableminimumbuilding/structure setback.This setback is applicable only in the “A-i”district.(Ord.11-02 §1) 191 See Chapter 1,§1 gE,which allows an increase in the maximum height of buildings on slopes.(Ord.18-02 #3) 5.Number of Principal Uses Permitted Per Lot or Development Parcel. a.Maximum Number of Principal Uses Permitted.One (1)or more principal uses parcel,except that in the A zoning use shall be permitted per lot or shall be permitted per lot or development district,only one (1)principal residential development parcel. b.Permitted Mix of Uses.Where more than one (1)principal use is permitted per lotordevelopmentparcel,mixed-use development is encouraged,subject to thefollowingstandards: (1)More than one (1)principal commercial/retail or industrial use permitted byrightorbyspecialreviewinthezoningdistrictmaybedevelopedorestablishedtogetheronasinglelotorsite,or within a single structure,provided that eu applicable requirements set forth in this Section and Codeandallotherapplicableordinancesaremet. Minimum Lot Size [7) Zoning District 0 Minimum Land Area per Accom rn o dation or Residential Unit (sq.ft per unit) Residential Units(2 Floor) 1 unit 2,250 sq. ft.C FA of principal use. -Area (sq It) 15,000 [2] Width (ft.) Fronting Arterials = 200; All other lots =50 Minimum BuildinglStructure Setbacks [4)131—. Front j Side Rear (ft.)(ft.)(ft.) Arterial =25 [5]; Allother 15[6]15(6] streets =15 Max. Building Height (ft.)19) 30 Max. FAR .25 Max.Lot Coverage (%) 50 I—i CH n/a 6,000(2]50 15 0 161 0(6]30 j .50 80 n/a 15,000 [2] Fronting Arterials = 200; All other lots =50 Arterial =25 [5]; All other streets =15 (Ord.2-02#6;Ord.11-02 §1;Ord.15-03#3) 10[6]1016]30 .30 80 [6] Supp.5 4-22 Ri p p l i n g Ri v e r Es t a t e s Va r i a n c e Re n e w a l Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s a BL D De v e l o p e r s , LL C 20 8 6 Up l a n d s Ci r Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 St e w a r t & Je f f r e y Ca r d Ki m b e r l y Ca v a n a g h 35 0 6 Au r o r a Av e De s Mo i n e s IA 50 3 1 0 - 4 8 2 7 Jo h n & Ma r g u e r i t e Me n a r d i 15 2 8 St o n e s Pe a k Dr Lo n g m o n t CO 80 5 0 3 Be n j a m i n & Do n n a Ma c T a v i s h 10 3 Oa k r i d g e Dr Bu r r Ri d g e IL 60 5 2 7 Ro b i n & Di a n a El d r i d g e 19 8 6 Da l l m a n Dr # 9 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ra y m o n d & Sh i r l e y Re e t z 18 5 2 Hw y 66 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Pa t r i c i a Gi l l e t t e P0 Bo x 20 S 0 8 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 1 Ja n e & Li n d a Mi l l e r 56 3 0 Ga r n e t St Go l d e n CO 80 4 0 3 - 2 0 7 2 Jo h n & Mi c h a e l a Bl a z e k 99 4 3 Br o a d m o o r Rd Om a h a NE 68 1 1 4 ‘S Mi c h a e l & Na n c y Wa l z 63 5 2 W Fr e m o n t Dr Li t t l e t o n CO 80 1 2 8 Da v i d & Ka r e n Ra n g l o s PU Bo x 32 8 4 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ri v e r p e a k s , LL C 44 0 1 As h t o n Ct No r m a n OK 73 0 7 2 Ja y & Ly n n Ly k i n s PS C 46 1 Bo x 50 FP O AP 96 5 2 1 - 0 0 5 0 Sa r a h Wa l s h 82 5 Br e a k w a t e r Dr Ft Co l l i n s CO 80 5 2 5 - 3 3 0 3 Fi n n i g a n Qu a l i f i e d Pe r s o n a l Re s Tr u s t 70 4 Du n w o o d y Ch a c e NE At l a n t a GA 30 3 2 8 - 6 0 0 9 Ja m e s & Pe n n y Ra n g l o s P0 Bo x 26 5 6 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Sa r a h Wa l s h 22 6 4 Ea g l e Cl i f f Rd Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ri c h a r d & Ca r o l Mi n k e r 42 5 8 Al t u r a Rd Ft Wo r t h TX 76 1 0 9 To f t Fa m i l y Tr u s t 20 7 1 Hw y 66 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ca r o l Va n Ho r n 44 0 9 Ab b y Wa y Ju n e a u AK 99 8 0 1 - 9 5 5 5 Es t e s Re s o r t Gr o u p , LP P0 Bo x 46 7 Ke m p TX 75 1 4 3 Te r e s e De w a l d 79 0 0 S 98 t h St Li n c o l n NE 68 5 2 6 Ro d & Do n n a Cl o u g h 37 0 1 9 W Cr e e k Wa l l a c e NE 69 1 6 9 Gl a c i e r Lo d g e , LP PC Bo x 26 5 6 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ro c k m o u n t Co t t a g e s 25 1 0 Hw y 66 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ri p p l i n g Ri v e r Es t a t 3r i a n c e Re n e w a l V A R I A N C E R E Q U E S T F O R - f l A M E N D E D D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N S T A T I S T I C A L I M F O R M t ‘_ W R I P P L I N G R I V E R E S T A T E S 0 1 4 0 69 0 4 — 36 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 — OS 10 1 0 1 — 70 4 rU T 00 5 2 0 1 5 0 5 4 5 5 . d o l T - I S ’ , 04 0 1 — I S . 01 A R — I O 00 1 0 — 5 5 0 79 0 3 4 2 0 0 0. OS I 0 0 1 T S PO S T RO W S 40 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 . 10 0 1 4 1 — 5 5 ’ . 24 0 1 — IS . RE A R — 50 0 1 * 4 0 0 c m D E V E L O P M E N T AN D U T I L I T Y P L A N & i A L 0 1 E R I S C T T O A TR A C T OF LA N D LO C A T E D IN TH E SE 34 OF - SE C T I O N 3 4 , TO W N S H I P 5 NO R T H , RA N G E 7 3 WE S T A S O W N U RE Q U I R E M E N T S : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OF TH E 6 t h P. M . , CO U N T Y OF LA R I M E R , ST A T E OF (R I O t Fl O O R TO TI l E 16 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 IF 11 ( 1 01 0 1 0 12 1 1 COL0 RAD 0 10 0 . PU 90 0 0 0 5 0 1 90 * 1 0 0 1 0 5 II I ? , 66 5 1 1 00 5 TO T A L LI S A 00 7 4 05 0 0 ) 0 5 0 — 00 . 1 0 0 40 . —00 05 ( 0 9 0 05 5 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 TO T A L LO R I S AR E A AY 0 6 . A & E — 01 , 0 2 5 0- I — CE R T I F I C A T I O N AN D AP P R O V A L : • TH E IJ A O E R S I O I E O . 01 0 1 0 m l o r o t o s . 00 SA N E S T AU V E E TH A T 19 4 0 RE A L I TH E OW N E R 70 4 0 0 0 . SE 00 0 6 0 0 1 0 10 00 0 ) 2 5 0 10 0 IW I S I C O ? AC 0 0 0 S S O , T T Y ON AC C 0 0 5 N I C E 04 T H TH E AD A . M D 7 0 0 5 w 8 0 00 0 9 5 5 1 2 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 9 0 5 6 5 0 0 2 9/ A 0 I PR O P E R T Y AS 5 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 TH E 02 0 0 0 7 4 1 1 9 0 00 0 O€ W L O P 6 4 0 A T 0 1 0 9 0 5 0 1 4 0 10 - C . P 0 9 2 1 0 0 PR O P O S E S 04 9 5 0 0 9 0 5 ( l ) 95 . 0 5 0 9 0 0 0 4 1 0 4 , M D AS SH O O t ) 00 1 11 0 5 0 0 1 PL A R OO I A U . 05 3 1 0 5 5 0 TO 10 1 2- 15 1 0 0 9 9 0 UO T I T T N C 00 , 1 10 0 Lo C A T E D AT TH E EN T R Y PO S I T S OF 01 1 51 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 . AT T 0 0 0 E O TO TH E 4 5 1 0 ) 9 0 7 TO 59 0 0 0 5 0 30 0 0 0 5 0 0* 4 1 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 9 5 01 SO L E I? AL O i l IW I J I E 0 0 0 L E AL l i t TO W N AL 1 5 1 1 0 00 2 5 . 40 1 0 YO U . 05 02 6 8 1 1 5 1 0 * 1 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 1 5 0 50 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 . 00 1 0 I I J N I C S 04 0 T H 7 * 5 5 0 4 7. 0 09 IN S ES T E R VA L L E Y 09 0 0 1 1 0 9 1 4 0 7 3 7 ST A S E S 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 6 0 * 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 4 2 ( 5 4 09 9 0 0 5 - 1. 0 1 0 O S 0 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 40 1 5 45 9 0 OT H E R 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 5 01 TO E TO N I 0 1 10 5 0 1 5 04 ) 0 0 . 00 0 9 0 IS 01 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4 02 0 ) 0 5 1 0) P4 0 0 1 0 0 Al I A S 1) 0 ) 1 5 00 0 b° ° C0 . 0 0 A O 0 PE R T A 7 I O I O 51 1 0 1 1 0 . 3. AU . 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 10 0 8 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 0) 4 4 1 1 01 00 I W I S T E D 0 8 54 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 ( 0 IA A0 0 0 0 5 0 5 I C T 00 T H TI l D E 40 0 1 1 0 5 0 7 . 1 2 * 4 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 . - < 0 9 0 ‘0 . 5 0 . 00 0 0 0 • 22 . 5 0 4 07 . 5 2 ” 4. PE R SE C T I O N 7 . 2 * 0 , 0C T N H ) R O WA l L S 00 1 0 00 1 0 0 F l I T 10 1 1 45 0 1 01 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 . S. PE R SE C T I O N 7. 1 3 . ‘C O I I S O T L OC T 0 0 . VE N T S *0 9 0 O I l E R E0 0 9 0 I I I I 0 4 0 AI I A C H T O TO TH E 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 5 0 1 0 91 0 0 8 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 n . 1 0 4 / I l 0 . 0 6 0 - 2 0 5 5 C D 1 0 0 0 Th E 8 0 0 1 O W L 01 0 5 1 1 1 0 1 0 . CO V E R E D 0 0 04 0 0 1 1 0 I I 00 0 1 1 0 0 1 90 5 5 0 1 I4 0 A C I 5 . y r c n n RI G H T S ST A T E M E N T ’ / Z 00 9 1 0 0 . 5 1. CH O S E N 0. l o s o N I 0 0 o o w , ) . 07 51 5 1 0 * 1 * 0 5 0 50 0 4 14 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 5 5 . I I — 7. 02 6 9 0 0.1 W - B [l A Y 50 91 0 0 5 1 0 41 0 0 0 WA L L . 00 0 0 1 6 50 1 5 1 1 5 04 0 1 1 1 51 4 4 0 5 0 2 10 0 WE 0 4 0 0 0 E O S [ N T 5 . I - “ Vl C 0 N f l ’ Y MA P 52 1 3 1 24 C R 5 . AS AW A E N O E O . I I J 01 (C A S I o 1. — 00 0 ’ AS P 4 O V A S o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DR I b I _ q 70 0 0 4 AL 10 1 1 5 PA S S CO I 0 1 0 I I T Y 01 9 0 1 0 ) 0 5 4 0 4 7 R R T 0. 40 5 5 9 0 . bI S E C T O R N 79 W I 0 2 9 0 0 5 4 1 AL TH I S PL A N 00 1 5 1 5 0 A 0. 5 1 1 0 PR O P E R T Y 09 0 4 7 07 0 7 0 0 4 0 ) 7 TO AR T I C L E 00 01 50 5 . 1 24 , 0 . 0 . 5 . AS 0 . 0 5 9 0 ( 5 . — S 1 W 5 0 I 0 R o ’ O 5 U A E - 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 ‘ — 4 - . 00 5 ’ 0 5 P 0 i 0 7 0 0 09 6 5 70 5 1 04 0 0 1 0 1 50 5 — 10 9 0 1 0 00 1 1 1 9 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 04 0 0 50 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 . 0 6 5 9 0 0 8 0 o o I 1 r o ” x \ 5 0 1 % 10 0 5 5 9 0 00 . 1 0 0 01 0 5 1 0 1 0 E 1 _ 55 0 0 8 5 4 9 0 0 1 3 7 0 0 ON E t l 02 1 1 8 0 P 1 5 ( 0 7 k “ t 1 S S o o , o o o o o o s o 00 0 1 0 0 0 5 4 09 1 0 10 1 5 ® ( ‘ 00 5 0 1 4 0 0 0 — 01 0 4 5 0 0 1 mO R O N I C 01 0 9 0 0 0 . - - 11 8 0 1 ) 5 - I . - 0 , 0 _ _ — 5 0 5 4 0 0 0 ( 0 0 8 1 ( 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 7 Q (1 0 7 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 D m 0. 7 0 1 00 0 0 1 1 05 0 0 41 0 9 1 0 0 5 0 51 4 0 0 0 5 6 4 $ — 01 0 0 5 0 1 50 0 0 00 4 71 - C o t 15 0 SS L C T S C ‘ ° 30 1 0 4 0 2. S • TA P 00 40 00 0 5 0 0 ‘ — 5 I * > - , , , j , 09 0 . 0 7 ) 1 0 01 4 0 6 0 0 ) 9 0 01 2 U i 4 10 0 0 00 1 0 “5 0 0 10 1 0 SO (0 0 5 2 . (1 0 0 5 0 0 07 9 0 9 0 0 0 50 * (A ) 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 r CI I 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 5 5 0 05 1 1 05 7 0 4 4 1 0 ‘9 \ \ . • (9 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 5 1 0 Oo J O R (9 0 . 9 0 ) 40 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 ) 0 5 0 3 1 0 0 8 1 1 0 1 95 0 WA T E R VO L O E N. \ 1 - ” ” — . , , , . . . — . . , , , • (R I 04 0 0 0 0 1 0 05 0 7 5 0 5 05 0 0 SO C - — 0 - — 55 5 55 0 02 ) 5 , . ( ‘ V I 0’ 1 0 oo s 00 0 ’ O S € O 05 0 — 0 0 5 0 70 1 0 1 0 0 2 09 0 1 0 0 0 55 5 0 00 0 0 ) 9 04 - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ e E I o z o r t — - E E ) 3 ) I I 1 — - - —- - I - - N , 1 0 0 5 5 C - - — - - - - — I 5 1 0 0 7 0 5 - ‘ - - - - - - . - - - - - - - / 2 t . - - - — — — - ‘ t ” ' ’ 24 ’ Tl G 5 l - 0 T W S i ‘ L ‘ ‘ — 0 ‘ ‘ , _ _ _ _ E5 5 0 0’ OS P 1 0 1 L T 0 00 0 0 0 9 1 0 00 0 0 1 0 80 4 0 0 9 - 08 ) 0 - 0 1 - 1 0 0 1 1 p CO O S 00 AS P O S L O _ _ . j ) SP U R 0 8 (C O U N T Y RO A D ) ‘ % I V 1 m0 1 0 I - O E Y 0 0 0 0 K I S S ( 0 9 “ \ \ ] - w - w A 0 0 0 4 l , ‘ - ° o ’ ’ - — - ’ - - P J (8 0 RI G H T — O F — w A Y “ 1 9 0 1 0 ) 0 1 1 0 1 4 0 1 5 1 0 - — - - - - — — - — - - _ _ _ _ _ _ I - - 01 4 1 0 F0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 - A L - W A Y W 0 S : 0 4 0 .0 2 J — .L , . — — — — — — I 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 7 5 0 5 00 ’ 50 8 0 0 3 0 00 00 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 ) 0 8 0 1 4 0 1 I 0 t z . - i - - P — ’ ’ ° ’ “ “ — — , _ _ _ , CA P . 0 1 s p . s I LS 1 A 1 f l O . 1 ’ o o ± t a e 0 _ 7’ 0 4 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 \ jC 0 ? 5 “ - ‘ W ’ - ‘ — “ ‘ T _ _ _ f l - 7 : / p _ _ _ _ _ _ ç ) . 0 z J , 7 ! - . 5 1 55 4 2 - - * — — - - _ _ _ _ . 55 0 R t S _ ‘ z ’ ° ’ : - , , , _ _ _ _ -- - L 5 0 OO I T O S 0 0 1 I 2 _ _ - :: : - : D - - - - ‘E 8 t ’ J O i _ _ _ _ _ / _ _ 2 I / 9 g L - - / l / I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / IF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . —‘ • . : - ‘ : ‘ - - - - - . o ’ - , ‘ : f l R T I C A E 50 9 1 0 0 p GU T T E R DE T A I L 5 * 1 4 1 0 n 2 0 T T 0 4 a — 4 ’ P ’ h t — — - - 0 . - I , - / 9 5 NO T rA S C A L n O N ” _ 5 I — - — - - - , o , f r / I I DR O W N Dl E 1 0 2 1 5 0 0 4 T O I E C O I I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I E O I F C I C O C . I 3 I T O O I S 0 4 0 0 1 I 0 0 S T S T- W N ) . Ph 0 , _ a ‘ ,° o / r- — . — - — N -I A 1 - 00 5 0 0 0 1 0 01 00 0 ) 0 1 7? lI S T 0 ’ 16 5 10 0 P. O . , 00 1 0 € 50 0 0 4 70 0 1 0 0 0 5 44 40 0 1 0 0 0 , I ’ - 0 I ‘ ° t ” ‘ I - 0 LA - B 30 02 0 5 0 0 0 EA S T IT O - T I 05 5 1 ‘0 10 1 00 0 1 00 4 0 7 40 00 1 0 6 0 1 5 . A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 ‘ •‘ t W ’ — — “ V I __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SI N 00 1 00 0 0 1 C t 10 ) 0 01 51 4 1 1 11 0 0 1 1 1 59 0 0 84 . I I I 90 0 0 5 5 _ 0 , , ‘ , ‘ 7) 0 - 60 .0 4 ’ ‘P IC A L E — 01 0 9 7 0 0 1 1 0 59 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 1 4 5 0 0 4 40 + 0 0 5 1 . . ‘ 1 . ’ ’ ’ ‘ I ‘ , ‘ / . “ . 1 0 3 0 5 5 1 0 1 2 2 A J ; - ’ , L J L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t ± Y f l F 0 7 0 4 0 0 1 - ” N O — — — - / 00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 01 1 C ! L W M h ‘ 1 0 0 5 5 5 0 : 0 4 5 0 00 4 0 0 3 0 0 6 6 5 4 1 4 0 54 0 . (0 5 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 01 0 5 0 6 6 40 0 0 _. - , - l f l Y : 3 ’ - - ‘ , ‘ W W - A lO N E 01 0 0 Fl I T 00 0 T T A 00 MA O 04 0 * 2 3 0 . 70 TO E 50 9 0 0 9 00 ( 0 9 0 0 0 1 01 00 0 1 1 9 0 10 0 5 1 0 . ( 3 1 * _ 4 0 ‘ V . — — — — I “ — J I l t 51 26 00 50 9 0 00 0 7 9 0 0 1 50 1 17 0 0 0 0 55 1 0 0 0 08 5 5 ( 0 0 0 I i 40 4 4 1 0 1 — . 12 ’ 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 5 11 0 1 0 0 4 4 . 0 0 5 02 54 5 1 03 0 4 RI t E 01 1 0 1 0 i t 00 5 5 5 00 ) 0 1 0 0 4 0 00 1 90 0 4 0 1 1 TO 10 0 2 50 1 0 0 0 00 5 0 4 0 65 5 0 5 6 0 . 00 0 1 0 05 0 1 9 5 0 0 0 5 1 0 4 1 5 5 0 0 1 0 7 0 ! 5 0 0 0 4 01 n i l o o o p s o o 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 HO * 1 — — - — . - — - ‘ 1 ’ OF 05 0 9 5 00 0 7 1 0 . 0 0 9 0 00 0 5 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 9 0 0 4 00 0 1 0 4 1 0 50 S t I L L V - 30 2 I I __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 3 0 5 0 00 [ 3 a r n i c n n p a a s & o . n n 2 11 1 0 9 0 0 10 4 0 4 4 0 11 5 00 4 1 1 0 00 TI l E 54 5 15 6 1 0 5 5 6 4 00 1 4 0 50 0 T 1 4 30 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CO N 40 4 5 1 0 0 70 4 00 0 1 50 4 1 6 0 5 1 0 0 0 I 50 0 0 1 0 0 9 5 5 0 0 ) 0 44 0 0 0 0 7 70 50 : 0 5 0 0 00 5 1 42 . 0 0 0 ) 0 15 9 € 04 05 5 0 00 I I I I 10 1 0 40 4 1 0 1 4 5 0 5 5 11 4 4 € 54 2 0) 0 0 00 1 0 5 00 . ON E 00 1 0 0 00 0 0 7 09 10 0 0 ( 0 0 5 l _ . . - — — _ _ _ ) __ 5 _ _ 90 0 1 0 05 0 9 5 , CO 00 0 ( 7 15 0 5 5 04 2 0 0 , 50 00 0 0 7 05 0 0 1 4 09 0 44 4 0 6 1 9 . 51 4 0 0 01 51 1 . 1 5 1 4 0 . 5 0 0 ’ S ’ S — l ? l S 10 0 5 00 8 - 0 5 0 8 20 0 4 0 — 0 7 — 1 0 m G - m u , - J y c rn o l u o m , o DA r / H S Z AS NM a O Inz o 0 _ Z 0 j p 1 rj L ’ I P - a 3 t n j a C I D -. 2 0 C L 0 9 0 0 1 m ns m m u — — V a n w n 4 m m b . J t a d d lm t VO J mm — . — - - - - - - I 1 z _ - T 4 9 I f t / — u & - - - - - , ‘ — _ _ — — . — / t ‘ O / n ” — - — - — ” — ” — — — ( _ _ _ _ _ - - — r — — - - - - - ‘ ‘ _ . _ \ \ \ ( , t o i r ô ( O f l , e ø . ii j o r ’ ” - R, / “ / t , , t t a r n o s o o n • • ‘ a I - r — /— —. / $ ‘ — a — I 101 4 1 3 ‘ : : : r —— 01 4 1 0 1 1 ‘ - ( 5 3 s j ’ - / ‘ 1 \ l . 7 I . • - - 1] V d 1 13 A V U O / ‘ , ; ‘ / w o o o 0 0 o a w i ‘i - i A . - t ZZ Z . _ . . ,4 l o l l •.—.• --— - ‘ \ OJ S o d O H d / o. - £0 3 1 1 0 J $1 1 , j -Y n o n — - _ _ _ _ / / / 1 — ) r . s L j . —- - ‘ + - t r r , . c o w n S q . n a a l - 0 0 0 / . / , _ - - f l a z - / r i ç ’ ° ) z o o s q s r , , . *. / - , ‘ i s , ; > ‘ a u ( 4 1 1 0 ) 1 - • —— . _ . - • / / , , $ / \ \ / ‘ ‘ - s i 0 0 h i c z _ _ - ) o t 3 c z L n a •0 - _ : - . _ • - 0 _ t , I L ( \ I , - a ” \ \ •. - z r c — • • 01 1 - - / ‘ / 1 • • “ - , , . —. - _ _ _ _ . - X ’ — • 4 - - — - - - I - “ 1 _ _ _ / 7< , ) : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - c 0 0 1 . 4 7 _ c V i i S . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - “ “ . o .- q , - W °‘ _ — 0 1 T h r_ — — — - - f r - — —- _ _ _ _ — - : - r - _ - - —- / — — “ I . I — - - —_ _ _ _ - —- — fl o w lO d 1W . ‘ - - / \ N . _ _ _ —_—- — . — - - - — — J N - —_ r - - t 1 l 0 I S W i l l s - — -a — - - ° r ’ z r — - - - - - r E E j — — : - — — ——E z _ . . z z z -— — - I —- a I 0 f l 3 0 0 (o o - w o o a a f l 0 1 M 0 U d o 01 9 V N o I l r u u v ) I — —- 0 — - m e r (A V 1 % — s o - - J j J o j a 09 ) 1 / - - , ,y M - 3 0 1 H 0 0 4 t “ * %0 t ’ g g 0 & 3 g ( u v o a A. L b J n o o ) 99 j n j s / VW N I S V 4 0 30 0 3 A V M _ 1 O 0 ’ IT S H I S Y 4 0 3 0 0 3 ._ _ _ _ - - - — _ H r : - — - _ L _ _ — / I 0 H I l S i , 0 9 — - . — - - , - — — - - — N 99 d , 1 -- -- - ‘ 1 1 3 x 3 7 1 1 3 5 3 0 0 1 0 3 W C d - -- -- 1 I - 3 A 0 33 A 1 1 0 , I 30 01 -L O I I N O ) 30 0 0 - . d 3 1 3 I — I I - 33 1 4 3 4 f l S — a — - — a fl h O I X 1 W d 01 1 W S S 0 ’ \ l . %C . u - n c x o 3 -- — s — - - — 2 — — — 52 4 0 1 0 31 V / o O H d 11 ) 0 1 IN k ) 1) 5 0 0 1 3 0 ) 0 0 1 OJ S O d O N o i (0 1 ) - Q 10 3 1 1 0 1 1 ] M0 f l L M ON O L S L X ] _ _ _ _ .1 1 1 0 90 4 0 1 ] 51 4 1 3 1 41 3N I 1 33 4 1 1 0 3 5 10 3 M 3 1 — s — 4 — Oq 0 7L 9 ’ c n z C, . - u j 31 1 1 ) 4 14 3 1 V M 01 4 1 ) 3. F d 0 . O 1 31 0 0 4 O3 S O d O S d 9Q 11 ) 1 5 3 0 3 1 31 9 1 ) 0 l f l S l O l d l1 1 l o H d I l I i 11 ) 1 5 3 0 3 4 31 1 0 1 3 1 1 3 PI N O 4 S 0 I o 1 31 1 0 1 0 3 1 3 33 1 1 { O e N r I s o O 40 51 0 0 0 0 1 31 4 1 1 33 4 1 3 1 3 5 51 ) 0 3) 0 0 NO V 7 1 51 ) 0 3) 0 1 1 33 4 1 1 0 3 5 10 3 1 1 ) 4 1 ]N 1 1 NO V 1 5 10 3 1 1 ) 4 1 31 0 1 ) 0 0( 0 4 N 0 3 . I OW 31 3 1 10 0 4 N 0 3 . Z 30 1 0 1 3 3 1 3 01 0 4 N0 3 . f Z HI ) ) ) 3N f l 30 1 4 0 ( 3 5 I] l0 0 0 N O O 3 1 4 0 3 .2 II f l O N O 3 3N O H 4 3 1 3 I C lN f l 31 1 0 1 3 3 1 3 A 0 N 0 3 3 S 3N f l 31 1 0 3 . 3 3 1 3 40 ( 1 ) 0 1 1 ) 0 4 W 30 0 0 NO V 0 1 5 3 5 3 1 NO S d I N O N I U l d d O ço v o 0 ( 10 3 ) 1 0 1 0l 4 0 d 1 0 0 ( ) — 34 0 5 0 00 1 0 1 1 4 ( - v 0 5) 3 Z . 1 d f l V d h 3 D ) 1 0 9 . 10 1 4 3 5 1 1 O3 S O d O 1 0 o ’ (1 1 ) 0 5) (1 0 1 4 5 1 1 ’ C C C C O ) , . I C 3 S 0 1 4 0 ) 0 4 ’ * 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 10 3 3 5 0 — 0 3 4 01 S 0 4 0 1 0 d ( 0 L ) 0 HO k O S 4/ 4 0 ) 0 50 3 3 0 1 3 5 03 5 0 1 0 ) 0 4 (9 ) (0 0 0 0 ) 10 , 0 1 1 1 4 1 43 4 3 0 03 5 0 1 0 0 1 4 ( 0 1 ) (o o 00 ) 01 1 ( 1 1 1 ) NO V ! N I 1 0 0 1 03 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 ( g ) 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 ) 0 3 5 30 1 0 01 1 0 4 0 0 1 4 01 5 0 4 0 ) 0 1 ( 2 1 ) f - f l — — - - — SN O I S N 3 I 4 I O 0 3 0 3 3 0 03 1 1 ) 3 0 0 3 0 39 01 1) 3 1 0 1 ) 4 0 SN O I S N 3 I S I 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 SH O I S N 3 0 1 I O 03 1 0 0 5 1 ) 3 0 1 NO 1 0 V I N 3 I ’ I I I N O Y I M 0 5 10 0 iO f l O f l V NO I I V I N 3 I ’ I O N O V I ON f l O d 31 0 H 9 1 ) I ’ I 4 3 l . NL, - - -- ‘ i 33 0 3 4 0 1 1 - m i , c o n a X I I I 1 a o — _ 15 0 1 11 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 30 1 0 0 0 5 3 0 3 1 8 I 110 1 0 0 0 1 01 4 3 - 1 0 ( 0 0 01 00 0 4 30 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 * 3 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 00 1 0 3 1 0 1 4 e 0 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 £1 1 1 1 10 1 0 11 1 3 1 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 51 1 1 1 3 5 0 0 1 0 1 3 d 30 m O O 10 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 03 1 0 3 0 1 13 ) 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 33 4 1 00 1 4 ‘J O H n 01 3 0 * 0 0 1 8 10 4 0 1 1 1 0 0 01 0 1 5 0 0 0 30 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 0 1 0 03 0 0 03 0 1 0 0 1 01 1 0 1 0 8 1 1 13 3 0 Hu M 03 1 4 1 3 3 3 0 0 5 3 0 30 11 1 0 4 1 31 0 0 — 4 1 13 4 0 1 1 00 01 0 3 0 W 0 1 1 4 1 1 0 3 d Y * f l 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 1 10 1 0 8 7 1 1 0 1 O0 1 W O S O M 30 11 0 4 1 11 3 0 3 4 1 00 0 * 0 0 0 0 1 0 ’ dI S C 30 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 NV 0 30 0 3 31 1 1 1 1 4 0 3 5 3 0 33 1 1 0 4 1 43 1 3 3 3, 0 1 40 s1 H 3 , 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 ] s 31 0 0 91 4 0 3 3 0 0 13 1 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 10 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 W IS 03 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 0 11 0 3 8 15 0 0 10 0 8 5o 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 @3 0 1 0 3 1 0 3 1 1 0 I i 39 40 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 i l T h 14 0 0 1 1 0 5 1 3 4 40 34 3 , 4 0 1 4 IG W 03 ( 1 1 00 4 5 1 3 35 03 3 3 3 0 0 1 1 03 1 0 30 3 0 30 1 90 0 03 1 0 0 7 1 1 3 1 d 0 AT ’ 0 4 11 0 3 0 1’ , i 4 00 0 1 4 10 1 1 0 00 4 1 4 01 1 1 0 4 1 11 0 0 04 0 0 01 1 0 4 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 03 1 0 0 0 4 4 ? 31 1 1 01 01 0 0 3 4 01 0 0 01 0 0 1 1 1 4 11 0 1 0 4 30 0 ? 00 0 1 1 3 0 3 9 1 0 0 1 3 0 4 31 1 1 33 3 0 1 8 03 3 0 0 0 mm 18 3 1 1 0 AD l l V d i O U O 40 10 0 3 1 4 1 1 0 3 3 00 0 0 3 3 0 1 1 4 3 0 18 0 0 4 01 1 0 1 1 3 4 01 1 1 1 1 01 1 0 * 0 03 4 10 1 1 1 0 0 3 11 1 3 0 5 0 11 0 0 0 1 13 1 1 0 8 4 01 03 3 1 1 0 1 4 OI l Y Q u I t 00 03 3 4 0 1 01 1 11 4 1 1 5 53 1 S t 11 1 4 4 3 O w S i I T ’ 11 1 31 0 0 1 W 5 ( 3 • 3 j W f 40 ( 3 1 0 3 4 1 00 4 0 0 1 0 3 31 1 0 1 40 10 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 1 1 14 0 4 1 0 30 1 01 0 1 1 40 4 0 0 0 0 11 0 * 0 01 1 4 30 0 0 1 I 00 0 0 0 4 4 80 4 O I f l 1 0 0 3 d S 03 0 0 0 3 5 4 0 1 1 30 11 1 5 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 ) 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 31 0 1 03 3 1 1 OT O 4 0 10 0 3 1 4 1 1 13 0 0 1 3 11 0 0 0 20 8 1 0 0 0 4 LV 0 3 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 01 1 0 00 4 OI l Y 4 1 4 1 3 3 10 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 14 4 31 01 0 1 3 30 13 0 4 6 03 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 -5 30 0 0 1 0 0 1 IV 13 4 1 43 3 4 0 0 10 0 01 1 4 IW O 03 3 4 1 0 6 0 10 0 IV 0 3 1 5 31 1 fl O S S 03 3 0 1 03 3 0 1 1 0 3 03 1 0 1 1) 0 0 1 VS O 4 3 O N O I Os ’ I F I X 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 1 4 30 33 0 1 4 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 03 1 1 0 01 1 4 18 0 0 0 3 8 0 d IN 1 0 0 0 0 40 13 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 01 0 0 3 r . 4 1 3 4 3 _ 0 4 3 4 0 3 3 1 l l f l ’ 8 4 34 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 00 1 0 0 3 0 40 4 00 0 6 1 1 3 0 4 1 3 4 i i 03 , 1 0 4 4 0 3 4 3 d 3 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 SW 14 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 4 0 3 30 0 0 1 1 0 14 0 1 1 0 3 1 41 1 1 1 1T 1 0 4 8 0 1 1 I 1 4 0 31 1 TW i G 00 0 4 0 3 1 3 1 * 1 43 0 0 1 1 3 0 f l A 1 l 1 1 3 40 SI S O 1 05 1 3 0 0 1 3 0 40 3 J 1 0 W 0 101 1 1 1 13 0 3 0 3 C 3 3 1 5 10 4 1 5 3 0 a • o I f l % - 3 0 I n 0 1 f 1 5 1 3 3 4 30 01 03 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 01 1 0 f l a T 4 4 1 1 S 30 01 1 3 1 0 0 011 0 0 4 1 S 30 11 1 0 0 . •1 1 0 4 0 1 I (3 0 1 1 0 ( 3 1 0 4 01 1 1 0 0 3 33 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 S W l 1 0 0 3 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 3 3 0 30 3 4 1 1 0 3 0 0 11 1 1 5 0 5 33 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 8 0 k w o 4 11 0 4 03 0 3 3 4 01 0 0 00 1 1 3 W 1 1 30 c a l - I NO W ] 11 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 11 3 0 0 0 0 03 0 3 1 0 11 4 1 8 0 1 II 03 1 0 4 34 0 0 31 0 4 0 2 0 3 3 3 1 5 - 3 4 30 03 40 3 4 4 r TN - ‘S Z L O M NV J c F c [ V 3 S U N V 7 UN V DN I U V è I O S 3 L L V J S 3 U 3 A I è I O N I 7 c k [ I J NV 7 c [ J N f l V c I O 7 S A 3 T [ U 3 T [ N P V V è [ O L t [ js g r w g u _ 3 Q V I U V A ©C ci 55 5 3 0 04 3 0 4 40 0 1 3 0 10 0 1 0 I 04 1 4 3 0 0 1 3 0* WI 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 03 05 0 5 1 ] 40 1 0 4 1 4 00 1 0 1 0 30 1 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I 55 5 . 0 0 31 1 4 0 30 1 0 1 4 1 13 0 5 1 0 3 0— 0 ) 41 1 0 1 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 3 9 01 3 5 03 0 0 1 3 0 3 0 00 0 0 0 5 \ . 0 3 f 0 f l O ( f l E O I % 0 0 O •O 1 0 f l S 00 4 01 3 0 1 4 0 0 30 00 00 1 1 5 01 0 0 0 5 1 5 11 0 0 4 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 II 30 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 30 4 3 0 1 f l 31 5 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 1 0 13 0 3 3 4 4 0 1 58 01 4 10 0 0 5 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 0 9 0 0 00 4 1 1 5 4 3 .0 14 5 0 1 1 11 1 1 1 0 11 0 50 1 1 0 0 01 0 0 0 3 0 01 0 0 40 0 1 0 1 1 0 00 0 1 1 50 4 1 ’ ( 4 n 00 4 3 3 0 0 0 4 0 3 30 10 1 1 * 8 1 2 8 0 4 0 30 1 1 33 1 11 0 33 4 0 1 1 30 ‘ i l l 14 3 0 3 4 4 1 40 00 0 3 ] 14 0 1 11 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 10 0+ 1 1 7 1 1 3 3 M 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 I I 0 0 1 03 3 4 1 4 10 01 53 1 0 1 1 08 0 1 1 0 0 80 4 0 31 1 1 5 0 3 11 6 - S J 1 1 0 5 7 0 V 2 M 0 3 31 0 0 1 1 1 0 9 0 3 E - i N 3 0 0 :1 1 0 8 11 14 o 0 T 0 3 1 0 00 0 0 I s 1 5 0 5 . - 1 3 w D : n M [ 3 1 0 4 0 1 31 4 0 3 0 01 IO N s . u r a j u N O I S Springer Side Yard Variance Request Estes Park Community Development Department,Planning Division :I Room 230,Town HaIl,170 MacGregor Avenue ‘ PC Box 1200,Estes Park,CC 80517 _______ Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 www.estes.org MEETING DATE:June 7,2011 REQUEST:Variance from the 1 0-foot setback requirement to allow a side yard setback of 5.5-feet. LOCATION:170 Boyd Lane,within the Town of Estes Park OWNERIAPPLICANT:Cydney Springer STAFF CONTACT:Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Parcel Number:3525217006 Development Area:.20 acre (+1-) Existing Land Use:Single-family residential Proposed Land Use:Same Zoning Designation;PM Mu/ti-family Adjacent Zoning: East:AM Mu/ti-family J North:RM Mu/ti-family West:RM Mu/ti-family Jth:PM Mu/ti-family Adjacent Land Uses: East:Single-family residential North:Single-family residential West:Single-family residential South:Single-family residential Services: Water:Town Sewer:EPSD PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND:The applicant requests a variance to Table 4-2 “Base Density and Dimensional Standards”of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow a side yard setback of 5.5-feet in heu of the 10-foot setback required. The purpose of the variance request is to allow a detached 192 square foot “all-purpose shed”(12’x 16’).The applicant intends to use the shed as a painting studio. ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Consultant:None (applicant representing herself,site plan based on survey prepared by suiveyor Pick Enaland) REVIEW CRITERIA:In accordance with Section 3.6 C.“Standards for Review of the EVDC,all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Board should keep these criteria in mind when reviewing the variance request. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES:This request has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.At the time of this report,no significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. FINDINGS: 1.This request complies with review criteria set forth in Section 3.6.0 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2.Special circumstances exist and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with Code standards. 3.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered,nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment. 4.The variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services. 5.The variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. fl Estes valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Page 2 of 3 :1 Springer Side Yard variance Request 6.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 7.The submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the property are not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. 8.Failure to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Approval conditional to: 1.Compliance with the site plan and building design,as approved by the Board of Adjustment. 2.Setback Certificate.Prior to final inspection,a registered land surveyor shall provide to the Community Development Department a signed and stamped certificate that specifically verifies that the structure complies with the approved variance,and shall include a specific reference to the distance to property lines.Staff recommends a surveyor set survey stakes for foundation forms to ensure compliance with the approved variance. SUGGESTED MOTION:I move APPROVAL of the requested variance with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Estes valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Page 3 of 3 Springer Side Yard variance Request 0 Dave Shirk r Crom:Kevin Ash L.ent:Friday,May 27,2011 2:49 PM To:Alison Chilcott;Dave Shirk Cc:Scott Zurn Subject:RE:Development reviews due today 27 may 2011 Dave and Alison, Scott and I went through the variance requests for: Rippling River Development Chophouse Washburn residence building height Springer side yard set-back Sundance proposed garage Public Works does not have any comments on these. Let me know if we are missing any that are due today. Thank you, Kevin Ash,PE Public Works Civil Engineer Town of Estes Park r70.5773586 desk 370.227.0437 cell kash@estes.org From:Reuben Bergsten Sent:Friday,May 27,2011 12:28 PM To:Scott Zurn;Kevin Ash Cc:Alison Chilcott;Jeff Boles Subject:Development reviews due today 27 may 2011 FYI LI TOWN or EASTES PAIZJç Inter-Office Memorandum To:Reuben Bergsten From:Jeff Boles Date:5/27/11 Re:Springer Residence Variance,170 Boyd Lane After review of the Variance Request the Water Department has no comments. 0 Dave Shirk Crom:Todd Steichen Aent:Friday,May13,2011 9:28 AM To:Karen Thompson;Dave Shirk;Tracy Feagans Cc:Reuben Bergsten Subject:RE:Lot 6 of Websters Subdivision of Lot 14,Block 10,Town of Estes Park -170 Boyd Lane - Springer Residence Variance -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT After a site visit L&P has no comments or concerns with this variance request. Todd. From:Karen Thompson Sent:Thursday,May 12,2011 2:15 PM To:Jacqueline Halburnt;Scott Zurn;Kevin Ash;Barbara Boyer Buck;Tracy Feagans;Jeff Boles;Reuben Bergsten;Todd Steichen;Will Birchfield;Derek Rosenquist;Jim Duell (jj4eosdtpwestoffice.net) Subject:Lot 6 of Websters Subdivision of Lot 14,Block 10,Town of Estes Park -170 Boyd Lane -Springer Residence Variance -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT REFFERAL FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application,which can be viewed by accessing the following links or by visiting our website at http://www.estes.org/comdev/CurrentReciuests.aspx. Staff Project ReportProjectName.StaffAddressMeetingDatesDocumentatIonandandType (PDF)Comments Contact (PDF) Statement of IntentEstesValleyBoardof Staff Report Send CommentsandApnlicationSpringerResidenceVariance1OBoydLaneAdjustmentavailabletoDaveShirkat 6/7/11 6/2/Il dshirkcestesorgSitePlan If you prefer paper copies of documents,please email the Staff Contact listed above.Thank you for your help in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible,but no later than May 27,2011. Comments can be sent via mail,email (dshirk@estes.org),or fax (970.586.0249). Thank you for your comments. I Karen Thompson 0 . Statement of Intent April 26,2011 To:Estes Valley Board of Variance From:Cydney Springer,170 Boyd Lane,Estes Park,CO Subject:Cydney Springer’s request for building side yard set-back variance for an all purpose shed to be located at 170 Boyd Lane. Requested Set Back Variance:Current Development Code calls for a side yard building set-back of 10 feet.Applicant is requesting a side yard set-back of 5.5 from the westerly boundary for the construction of a 16ft by lift all-purpose shed. Rational of requested set-back: Due to the size of the subject lot coupled with the narrow lot width,the requested set back is needed in order to minimize the impact of the proposed shed on the existing structures located on the subject lot as well as minimizing the impact on the current parking area.With the requested set back,the overall character of the subject property will remain as currently exists.Review of the general neighborhood would indicate the granting of the requested set-back variance would provide for a set-back which is common for the neighborhood and that strict compliance with the Development Codes standards does create practical difficulty in utilizing the subject property as noted above. With the review of the elements for determining the practical difficulty of following a strict interpretation of the Estes Valley Development Code,the following observations are made by the Applicant: 1,The requested variance is a minimal exception to current Development Code; 2,The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered; 3.The adjoining property owners would not be substantially impacted; 4.The delivery of public services would not be negatively impacted; 5.When the applicant purchased the property,the building set-back requirements were known but at the time of purchase,construction of the proposed shed had not been anticipated. 4- ubniittal Date: ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Block:Lot:L _______________ Tract: ________ Subdivision:h)pøçorcc cc*hcI wic,nU o’4-4 IL{191k /0 Tot.u,o oC Parcel ID#:/7 __6,-—I5Sis PArk Well Well çz r Pa k’tG r tOther (Specify) F Other (Specify) EPSD EPSD Other None ‘Variance Desired (Development Code Section #):7L q7 - a Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is r Application fee (see attached fee schedule)r Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section S.e.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) F 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1”=20’) F 1 reduced copy of the site plan (11’X 17”) The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.Vlt.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review l(see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).CopIes must be folded. Town ot Estes Park -P.O.Box 1200-.170 MacGregor Avenue .Estes Park,cc 80517 Community Development Deportment Phone:(9701 577-3721 -Fax:(0l 586-0249 ..v4vw.estes.org/con,Dev 0 Record Owner(s): Street Address of Lot: Legal Description: —-a 1<nriccC(J(JCJ$Df’(,-no /nJB /ZoningLotSizecs’x ,‘s’7 C -08C C6 14) Existing Land Use -c,’ci Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Town Proposed Water Service 7 Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there weUands on the site? te-cc1ona4ljC’cPiJ’ F F F UTSD F UTSD r Septic Septic F Yes —(3 i’-;0d i ,toc --SOft-rszcer j5(Owner F Applicant ‘tAec’..-SQ4r’4r .Pa ]r 6onsultanuEngineer Revised 11120/09 .. ecenmN.rnrnnwunh. Record Owner(s)Cc4 L’c’t k Mailing Address 00 €7Y 0 CL),,cc4’tc PArQ,(DC)Ot 9 Phone Q7o--Sso-Zta Cell Phone 7O -3;o — Fax IJIh Email p44 5princjcrQv’ncs Onfl r’Applicant ..n.c fl4,n/e Mailing Address A-c A IIIIIIIIIY4I Phone s4n7,a d4 mtnc ‘IiJJU11I Cell Phone ir=,ftc A h,”L/e i ift1I Fax A ! Email c,iyu tc AhnJe_, Idila D (Pr 1t1!PI j]Mailing Address Il!4iIi1 Phone Cell Phone IhlJ’1!MI Fax__________________________________________________________ lllIAlluhIBhllll Email APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estee Valley Planning Area,both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: http:llwwwestesorpfComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningAoclicationFeeSchedulepdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 11/20/09 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in riling the application lam acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. fr In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: httD://www.estes.oro/ComDev/Devcode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for tiling and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that lam required to obtain a “Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,“Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void,”(Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT;Li ‘ç-(C Applicant PLEASE PRINT:(I 4 F’’9 c pr I tflc’Pr Signatures:-‘. Record Owner 4.nrP,z 1 bfl—.—’’Date ii)y./;4J U0 Applicant Date Revised 11/20/09 Zoning Districts . Table 4-2 . §4.3 Residential Zoning Districts Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Mlfllmwfl Lot ,BuRngfSfrtid’n0g*rbaL_‘(imlts(,‘(sqt1,(ft)Fttt (ft)flO] REi 1110 Ac.10 Ac.200 50 50 50 30 20 RE 1/2.5 Ac,2.5 Ac.200 50 50 50 30 20 E-i I 1 Ac.[3)100 25 25 25 30 20 E 2 ‘½Ac.[3J 75 10 15 30 20 streets 25- 8 4 ¼Ac.60 10 15 30 20 streets 8-1 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 Single-family 25- =18,000;anerials8-2 4 60 ‘10 10 30 20Duplex=1Sotfler 27,000 streets 40,000, Residential 5,400 sq.60;Uses:ft/unit RM Max =8 and [4][8](Ord.L.OtS 25- (Ord.Mm =3 25-07 §1)Greater arterials;10 r&i 10 30 20 71801Senior,than 15-other #14)Institutional Senior 100,000 streets Living Uses:lnstltuional sq.ft.: Max —24 Living Uses:200 ½Ac. I I INotestoTable4-2: (a)Sea Chapter 4,§4,3.D,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for single-family residentialsubdivisionsthatarerequiredtosetasideprivateopenareasperChapter4,§4.3.D.1. (b)See Chapter 11,§11.3,whIch allows a reduction In minimum lot size (area)for clustered lots in open spacedevelopments. (c)See Chapter 11,§11.4,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for attainable housing. (ci)See Chapter 7,§7.1,which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area)for development on steep slopes.(3rd.2-02 §1) (2]See Chapter 7,§7.6,for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands.(3rd.2-02 #5;Ord.11-02 §1) [31 ii private wells or septic systems are used,the minimum lot area shah be 2 acres.Sea also Ihe regulations set forth in§7.12,‘Adequate Public Facilities.” [4)Townhome developments shall be developed on parcels no smaQer than 40,000 square feet;however,each individuaitownhomeunitmaybeconstructedonaminimum2,000 square foot iot at a maximum density of S dwelflng units per acre. [5]ADdeveiopmerit,except development of one single-famfy dwelling on a single lot,shah aiso be subject to a maximum floorarearatio(FAR)of .30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%.(3rd.25-07 §1) [8]Zero side yard setbacks (known as “zero lot kne development’)are aliowed for townhome developments. [7]Minimum buiidlng width requirements shah j apply to mobile homes iocated in a moblie home park. [8]Single-family and duplex developments shall have minimum lot areas of 18,000 s.f.and 27,000 s.f.,respectively.(Ord 18-01#14) [9]All structures shaii be set back from pubhc or private roads that serve more than four adjacent or off-site dweilings oriots.The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or private roads,the edge of the dedicated right-of-way orrecordedeasementorthepropertythe,whichever produces a greater setback.The setback shall be the same as theapplicableminimumbulidinglstructuresetback.(Ord.11-02 §1;3rd.25-07 §1) [10)See Chapter 1,1.9.E,which allows an increase In the maximum height of bufldings on slopes.(3rd.18-02 #3) C 11] ee gt&Cs 4’S se-’64’t’ I) I) II’’1 I —ii I•I I 1i I,IrII I I _______ -7YV LANE OF THE I7TIE COMMITMFMT TERMS,AGREEMENTS, CONDI/JONS AND 1.11PM 7 REFERS TO PROV/S/OHS, O8LIGAT)ONS AS CONTMVEO IN AGREEMENT FOR USE AND RELEASE DRIVEWIY AND ACCESS E4SDAENT AS SET FOR!??IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED 7/21/1997,RECPT./97046708. “S.- I FURmER STAlE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON TI-fE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE 7/13/2005,EXGEPT LIJILITY C ECTIONS,ARE EN?7RELY wITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF 77fF PAPPfl PWPPT AC j DL —H1 ni’ LIJIIAOP I C\I I :jUt BOIL - ‘a-, I — “ •k \ U. \ ‘1- IL) I STORY ROCK & FThWE HOUSE NORTH S SCALE:1’‘‘2O’ 0 END./4 RESAR w/ YELLOW CAR L5j9485 /70 BCTI)LIJYS Fr I, 54, IRAWSNAliON liThE INSURANCE CO.: TNEP00005O6 C—4,6/16/2005 LEGAL OUSCRIPIION:LOT 8,WEBSTER’S SUBDIVISION OF LOT t4,BLOCK It).TOWN OF ESIES PARK CCLCR400 JOB Na:486.01 IAJPJ?OYEIEV7 20C4770N CInIFICATE’ ,c}IEREor STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCAliON CERI7F7CAIE WAS PREPARED FOR TRANSAI4T1ON RILEINSURANCEUD,THAT iT IS NOT A LAND SURVP(P/AT OR iMPROVEMENT SURVEY P/AT AND THAT IT ISNOTTOBERELIEDUPONFORP-IF ESTABLISHMENT OP PENCE BUlLDING OR FUTURE IMPROVEMENT LINES. 0 .. V.,,.,,J kflt.CV,I,:j oil-ti a’Ito.Pata’‘‘ 32 x 36’Ab,Lc&ylesbtd,flt,iflIf I PiofldREa.d r—r I iiiiiriiiiiTfliiiiirfliiii III1_11__I..__j.___.II II_[_l__j__J__,III11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111‘Iiliii’11311 liii 1111111 Iii ill_I 11111IIIlIilIIIIIIIIliiiiiiiIiIII 13’ 11111111111111111111111111 IL.—-1 36’ Rear blcvation Iklcd.lictic-r1111131111111IT\lI 11111111 T I I I I I I I I I I I’4 I I I I I I I I111111111111111IN111111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I\I I I I I I I I III‘liE!’I I I’ll I1IIMIIIIIIIII[IUI I I I I 1 II 11 I I IN I Ti I I I I I 1:1; 1)oorj l:ruIt LIeaiio,i CV-J 0 0 0 I — I CCuw . . Bookcase/Lit a Bookcase/Rr C]0 C) a 0 >< rn a -a 0) C), CDa.n a Sp r i n g e r Re s i d e n c e Va r i a n c e Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s çj y jo h n & Ph o e b e Na u g h t o n 52 0 5 Ch i c a g o St Om a h a NE 68 1 3 2 Th o m a s & Ka t h l e e n Ho c h s t e t l e r 17 5 Sp r u c e Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 De n n i s & De b o r a h Po i r i e r 29 1 1 Wi n d r i f t Ln Be r t h o u d CO 80 5 1 3 - 8 4 8 8 Ci n d y Ca r l s o n 26 1 Co u r t n e y Ln Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Es t e s Pa r k Bi g Ho r n PO A , In c . 54 0 0 Sh e r i d a n Bl v d . Ar v a d a CO 80 0 0 2 Na n c y Be l k n a p PC Bo x 40 0 7 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ri c h a r d & El e a n o r Si m p s o n 24 2 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Su e As h b y PC Bo x 37 7 3 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Li n d a Vi l l a n u e v a 14 3 Bo y d In Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Da n i e l Sc h a a f 32 0 Da v i s St Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Pa u l Va n Ho r n Tr u s t 22 6 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Br i a n , Ci t t a , Gu y l e n e Br o w n 23 4 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 De n n i s & Su s a n Ho p p e n w o r t h 60 0 Ba l l t o w n Rd Sh e r r i l l IA 52 0 7 3 Ed w a r d & Jo y c e Mc K e e 47 5 Th i s t l e d o w n Wa y Th e Vi l l a g e s FL 32 1 6 2 Er i c & Ke n d i s Br a t r u d 23 8 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ga r t h & Ca t h y Le w i s 10 2 0 Sc o t t Av e Es t e s Pa r k CD 80 5 1 7 .. :e Va r i a n c e 0 Sp r i n g e r Re s Washburn Height Variance Request Estes Park Community Development Department,Planning Division Room 230,Town Hall,170 MacGregor Avenue P0 Box 4200,Estes Park,Co 80517 Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 rw.estes.org ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE:June 7,2011 REQUEST:Variance from the adjusted maximum height limit of 35’6”to allow a maximum height of 37’8”(2’2”variance). LOCATION:TBD Big Horn Drive,within the Town of Estes Park. To get there,turn north off Wonderview Avenue on Big Horn Drive,then turn left at 461 Big Horn Drive.Property is located on left side of the drive,approximately 150 yards west of Big Horn Drive (see aerial photo on next page). APPLICANT:Jeff Moreau,Dailman Construction PROPERTY OWNER:Thomas and Rachelle Washburn STAFF CONTACT:Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Consultant:Dallman Construction (builder):Thorp Associates (Joe Calvin,architect) Parcel Number:3524300042 Development Area:1 .2 acres Existing Land Use:Undeveloped Proposed Land Use:Single-family residential Zoning Designation:E-1 Estate Adjacent Zoning: East:E-1 Estate North:E-1 Estate West:E-1 Estate South:E-1 Estate Adjacent Land Uses: East:Single-family residential North:Single-family residential West:Single-family residential South:Single4amily residential Services: Water:Town Sewer:EPSD PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND:The applicant requests a variance to Sections 4.3 Maximum Building Height and Section 1.9.E2 Measurement of Maximum Building Heights on Slopes to allow a new single-family residential dwelling.The proposed height would be 37’8”from existing grade,where 35’6”would typically be allowed. REVIEW CRITERIA:In accordance with Section 3.6 C.“Standards for Review”of the EVDC,all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Board should keep these criteria in mind when reviewing the variance request. Maximum Building Height.The standard height limit of the development code is 30-feet from original grade.However,this standard is modified by Section 1.9.22 of the EVDC, which provides for a “sliding scale”regarding maximum building height.Essentially,the uphill side of a structure is limited by the 30’limit,while the downhill side of the structure is allowed to exceed the 30’limit a factor of half the elevation drop.What this means is that if the original grade drops by 10’over the footprint of the house,the downhill side would have a maximum height of 35’;if the drop is 14’,the maximum downhill height would be 37’. Due to the allowed modification,which was implemented several years ago to minimize height variances,staff recommends the structure be designed to comply with the height limit. fl Estes valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 H Washburn Height Variance Request Page 2 of 4 REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES:This request has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.At the time of this report,no significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Neighbor Comments.The applicant has submitted two letters of support from two nearby neighbors (see attached). FINDINGS: 1.This request does not comply with review criteria set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2.Special circumstances do not exist and practical difficulty would not result from strict compliance with Code standards. 3.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered,nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment. 4.The variances would not adversely affect the delivery of public services. 5.The variances represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 6.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment,No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 7.The submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations.The conditions associated with this lot —slope —are recurrent within the Estes Valley,and the development code was amended in 2001 to account for such conditions with the adoption of Section 1.9.E2. a Failure to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Disapproval. Should the Board opt to approve the variances,Staff recommends the following conditions be imposed: 1.Compliance with the site plan and building design,as approved by the Board of Adjustment. 2.Height Certificate.Prior to final inspection,a registered land surveyor shall provide to the Community Development Department a signed and stamped certificate that specifically verifies that the structure complies with the approved variance,and shall include a specific reference to the structure height. fj Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Page 3 of 4 Washburn Height Variance Request SUGGESTED MOTION:I move DISAPPROVAL of the requested variances with the findings recommended by staff. 0 1 Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Page 4 of 4 H Washburn Height Variance Request Dave Shirk Todd Steichen Friday,May 13,2011 1:20 PM To:Karen Thompson;Dave Shirk;Tracy Feagans Cc:Reuben Bergsten Subject:RE:Lot 41 B,Replat of Tract 41 &a portion of Tract 46,Fall River Addition &a portion of Tract 1O1,Al Fresco Place Addition -Washburn Variance Request -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT L&P has no comments or concerns with this variance request. Todd. From:Karen Thompson Sent:Thursday,May 12,2011 2:12 PM To:Jacqueline Halburnt;Scott Zurn;Kevin Ash;Barbara Bayer Buck;Tracy Feagans;Jeff Boles;Reuben Bergsten;Todd Steichen;Will Birchfield;Derek Rosenquist Subject:Lot 418,Replat of Tract 41 &a portion of Tract 46,Fall River Addition &a portion of Tract 101,Al Fresco Place Addition -Washburn Variance Request -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT REFFERAL.FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application,which can be viewed by accessing the following links or by visiting our website at http://www.estes.orglcomdev/CurrentRepuests.aspx. Staff Project ReportProjectName..StaffAddressMeetingDatesDocumentationand and Type (PDF)Comments Contact (POE) statement of Intent Estes Valley Board of Staff Report Send Comments Washburn Residence and ADoticajion variance TBD Big Horn Drive Adjustment available to Dave Shirk at 617111 6/2/lI dshirkc6eztes.orp Site Plan If you prefer paper copies of documents,please email the Staff Contact listed above.Thank you for your help in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible,but no later than May 27,2011. Comments can be sent via mail,email (dshirkestes.org),or fax (970586.0249). Thank you for your comments. Karen Thompson Administrative Assistant 1 Dave Shirk From:Kevin Ash Sent:Friday,May 27,2011 2:49 PM To:Alison Chilcott;Dave Shirk Cc:Scott Zurn Subject:RE:Development reviews due today 27 may 2011 Dave and Alison, Scott and I went through the variance requests for: Rippling River Development Chophouse Washburn residence building height Springer side yard set-back Sundance proposed garage Public Works does not have any comments on these. Let me know if we are missing any that are due today. Thank you, Kevin Ash,PE Public Works Civil Engineer Town of Estes Park 970.577.3586 desk 970.227.0437 cell kash@estes.org From:Reuben Bergsten Sent:Friday,May 27,2011 12:28 PM To:Scott Zurn;Kevin Ash Cc:Alison Chilcott;Jeff Boles Subject:Development reviews due today 27 may 2011 FYI 1 DALFIIAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANflNC. 211 FOURTH STREET April 26,2011 80517 Community Development Department Town of Estes Park P.O.Box 1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 RE:Lot 418 Fall River Addition Parcel #35243-00-042 To whom it may concern: Jeff Moreau/Dallman Construction on behalf of the Owners Thomas and Rachelle Washburn are pleased to submit site plans as well as elevations for a variance request at Lot 416 Fall River Addition. Owners The property is currently owned by Thomas and Rachelle Washburn. Property Description Currently the lot is vacant,and the owners are interested in constructing a new single family residence on the lot.The lot is zoned E-1 with allowable height of 30’above natural grade. EVDC 4.3 Table 4-2 (MaxImum Building Height)&EVDC 1.9.E.2 Figure 1-4 (Measurement of Maximum Building Height on Slopes Due to the steepness of the lot,the large rock outcroppings and the elevation of the shared driveway at the North West corner of the lot,the proposed North West driveway will be steeper than desired (greater than 20%).Also due to the large rock outcroppings and amount of rock below the top soil extensive blasting will need to be done to place the house at the maximum allowable height per the calculations provided in the EVDC 1.9.E.2 Figure 1-4 (see the attached calculations).We are requesting that a height variance be granted of 2’-6”to allow for the decrease in the steepness of the North West driveway to 15%grade as it approaches the house and to lessen the impact of the blasting on the lot.It also appears that if the variance is granted there will be no ill effect on the views from any of the surrounding or future residences (please see attached letters from two of the neighboring properties). Access Access to this site is from a private road off of Big Horn Drive. Utilities Water-Town of Estes Park Sewer-Estes Park Sanitation District Telephone-Uwest Electric-Town of Estes Park Gas-Xcel Energy DALLØVN CONSTRUCTION COMPAf’JY INC. 211 FOURTH STREET ESTES PARK,COLORADO 80517 PH:970-586-5141 FAX:970-586-4387 Drainage There are no plans to adversely change the drainage patterns. Sincerely Dailman Construction Company Inc. Jeff Moreau DALL N CONSTRUCTION COMPA INC. Point A 211 FOURTH STREET ESTES PARK,COLORADO 80517 PH:970-586-5141 FAX:970-586-4387 Washburn Residence Allowable Height Calculations Point B Natural Grade =7,748.15’ Natural Grade =7,737.20’ Point B is where the roof ridge is the highest above natural grade Maximum Height Mb Mb=30’+0.5 (a-b) Mb=30’+0.5 x 10.95’ Mb=35.47’ Maximum Ridge Elevation Natural Grade at Point B +Mb 7,737.20’+35.47’=7,772.67’ Proposed Ridge Elevation Main level finished floor +main level to ridge dimension 7,749.84’+25.0’=7,774.84’ Height of Ridge above Natural Grade at point B ‘ci 7,774.84’-7,737.20’=37.64’(37’-S”) Requested Variance 7,774.84’(proposed height)—7,72.67’(calculated max.height)=2.17’(2’-3”) Submiftal Date: ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMEN APPLICATION Block:Tract:4 1 Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service F XceI Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? 1 1R rrRg Septic Septic 211 4th st F Owner rX Applicant F Consultant/Engineer___________ The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.Vll.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review ‘(see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. Record Owner(s):Thomas and Rachelle Washburn I5treetAddressof Lot:TED Bia Horn Drive Legal Description:Lot:4 lB ________________ Subdivision:P411 River Add ParcellD#:35243-00-042 TTn-in,nrniroA mt Zoning p-i N’w $I nrrl p Pami iv P.Ri rinn F Town K Town F F Well Well r r Other (Specify) r Other (Specify) EPSD F UTSD EPSO F UTSO Other Noner Big r r Horn DriverYes Variance Variance Desired (Development Code Section #):EVDC 4 .3 Table 4-2 (Max.Building Height)EVDC 1.9.E.2 Fig l-4(Measurement of Max.Bldg.Ht.on Slopes) (per attached calculations and additonal 2’-6”is requested) Name of Primary Contact Person ,TRff Mnraii Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is I Ix Ix Ix lx Estes Park.rn Rfl’17 Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1’=20)** I reduced copy of the site plan (lix 17’) Town of Estes Park P.O.Box 12 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park,co 80517 Q Community Development Deportment Phone:(970)577-3721 -e.Fax:(970)586-0249 th w.w.estes.org/ComDev Revised 1/20/09 .. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Càde (EVDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVOC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: hftp:Ilwww.estes.orqlcomDevlDevcode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requiremen of the EVDC. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or morn if the information provided is incomplete,Inaccurate,orsubmitted after the deadline date. I understand that a resubrnittal e will be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that I am requited to obtain a ‘Variance Notice’sign tram the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be held staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing.- p.I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,‘Failure of an applIcant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receIving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void.’(Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.0) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT.‘[ODI4>YPfle6tUt n,czs.#8ye’Af Applicant PLEASEPMNT IA PP ,2lcWen—q Signatures:5j44.5W 4Sct-ti-— Record ownerNZi.Lrnw._7’-&_2.ii__-—..Date 9/?s’/i / Applicant /t.4r tT440t1 Date 59457’tC /I Revised I I/20/090 Applicant Jet t Moreau/Daliman Construction MailingAddress2ll4th St.Estes Park,CO 80517 Phone 970-586-5141 Cell Phone97O-227-5871 Fax 970-586-4387 EmailJeft@DallrnaflConstrUctiOfl.COrn IConsultant!EngineerThorp Associates PC MailingAddressPD Box 129 Estes Park,CO 80517 Phone97O-586-9528 Fax970-586 -4145 EmailJOe@thOrpaSSoC .com . Record Owner(s)Thornas and Rachelle Washburn MailingAddress3o37 Kinqfisher Pt.Chuluota,FL 32766 Phone4O7-971-8233 Cell Phone Fax Emailqatorpt74@qmail .corn 0 Cell Phone APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area,both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: http://wwwestesorg/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedulepdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 11/20/09 Zoning rEstricts * Table 4-2 . 4.3 Residential Zoning Districts —b Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Notes to Table 4-2: [1](a)See Chapter 4,§4.3.0,which allows a reduction in mhiimum lot size (area)for single-family residentialsubdivisionsthatarerequiredtosetasideprivateopenareasperChapter4,§4,3.D.1. (b)See Chapter 11,§11.3,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for clustered lots in open spacedevelopments. (c)See Chapter 11,§11.4,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for attainable housing. (d)See Chapter 7,§7.1,which requires an increase In minimum lot size (area)for development on steep slopes,(Ord.2-02 §1) [2)See Chapter 7,§7.6,for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands.(Ord.2-02 #5;Ord.11-02 §1) [3]If private wells or septic systems are used!the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres,See also the regulations set forth in§7.12,“Adequate Public Facilities.’ [4]Townhome developments shall be developed on parcels no smaller than 40,000 square feet;however,each irldMdualtownhomeunitmaybeconstnjctedonaminimum2,000 square foot lot at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units ler acre. [5]All development,except development of one single-family dwelling on a single lot,shall also be subject to a maximum floorarearatio(FAR)of .30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%.(Ord.25-07 §1) [6]Zero side yard setbacks (known as “zero lot line development”)are allowed for townhome develdpnients. 17)Minimum building width requirements shall apply to mobile homes located In a mobile home park. [8]Single-family and duplex developments shall have minimum lot areas of 18,000 s.f.and 27,000 s.f.,respectively.(Ord 18-01#14) [9]All structures shall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than four adjacent or off-site dwellings orlots.The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or prwate roads the edge of the dedicated Tight-of-way orrecordedeasementorthepropertyline,whichever produces a greater setback.The setback shall be the same as theapplicableminimumbuilding/structure setback.(Ord.11-021;Ord,25-07 §1) [10]See Chapter 1,§1.9.E,which allows an increase In the ma,dmum height of buildings on slopes.(3rd.18-02 #3) .-,.‘;Minimum tot .elns’a Mill.Zoning -“Jt StendsrdsttHSl Pr ‘Sbab2fl4i MsIL .BuDdingrn1Ni-.[G1’Otd.2SOflh) ‘ WIth(ft)-‘::,:anstty,-..tftea’Wide,Height ..‘;‘timb(acfe)’Iq1L)(ft.)Frocit(ft)(Vt)Rearm.)(Rfl103 RE-i IulOAc.lOAc.200 50 50 50 30 20R1/2.5 Ac.2.5 Ac.200 50 50 50 30 20 E-1 1 lAc.(3]100 25 25 25 30 20 . 25- E 2 ½Ac.[3)10 15 30 20 streets 25- A 4 ¼Ac.60 10 15 30 20 streets A-i 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 Single-family 25- =16,000;ñeñalR-2 4 60 ‘10 10 30 20Duplex=15-other 27,000 streets 40,000, ResidentIal 5,400 sq.60; Uses:ft/unit AM Max =8 and [4)[8)(Ord.Lots 25-(oti.M=3 25-oni)Greater 10(6]10 30 20[7] #14)institutional senior ioo,ooo streets Livinn Uses:Institutional sq.ft.: Max —24 Living Uses:200 ½Ac. q,nr,fl Variance Board Estes Park,Colorado To Whom It May Concern, It has come to our attention that Tom and Rachelle Washburn have purchased the property immediately to the north of our home at 415 W. Wonderview Avenue.Although they will have a Big Horn street address the property is adjacent to our back yard. We also understand that they are requesting a variance for the height of the home they wish to build which could possibly be 24-30”above the current height limitation.After looking at the property it appears to us that such an increase in height would not adversely impact our property.What would impact multiple neighbors is if the variance is not granted and they need to blast the rock to lower the elevation on the house.Previous construction projects on the hill have required blasting. We have felt the effects of such blasting. Due to the historic nature of our home we are concerned that further blasting could cause more harm,especially when it is directly above our property and blasting waves generally travel downhill.There are also neighbors on each side who sit slightly below the proposed building site who would be exposed to the effects of additional blasting as well. Therefore,we would encourage a positive response to the request for the height variance. Sincerely, Kelly and Gary Brown 415 W Wonderview Avenue Estes Park,Co 80517 970-586-2021 •4 AP 2 6 2UjjApril14,2011/) C April 17,2011 To Whom It May Concern We live at 501 Big Horn Drive and we were the original developers of Lots 41a and 41b, Fall River Addition.We support the request of Mr.And Mrs.Thomas Washburn for a variance from the height requirement for their home to be built on Lot 41 b.The additional height of 2 +1-feet would only be at the ridgeline and would in no4way obstruct the views of any neighbor.The dwelling to the north of this lot sits at least a 100 feet higher and would look out over the top of this proposed house,which would be behind a ridge along the driveway.The property slopes sharply from north to south,and contains many large trees and boulders.Due to the topography it would be necessary do a lot of additional blasting in order to achieve their optimal interior ceiling height,and would result in a very steep driveway on the west. Therefore,we hereby request that you grant the Washburn’s petition for a variance. Respectfully submitted, Charles F.Hix,Jr.and Alma I.Hix Wa s h b u r n Re s i d e n c e Va r i a n c e Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s cl i x a Zi n Ch a r l e s Hi x , Jr . PD Bo x 24 3 5 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Fa r m e r s St a t e Ba n k of Oa k l e y Ka n s a s 10 0 Ce n t e r Oa k l e y KS 67 7 4 8 Ga r y & Ke l l y Br o w n P0 Bo x 77 8 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Th o m a s & Ra c h e l l e Wa s h b u r n 30 3 7 Ki n g f i s h e r Pt Ch u l u o t a FL 32 7 6 6 Pa u l Ro m i g 41 1 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ro s a l i n d Ro s e n b i u m Ro b e r t Mi l l e r P0 Bo x 40 4 0 3 Tu c s o n AZ 85 7 1 7 - 0 4 0 3 Ro s s & De b o r a h Ma x w e l l 50 3 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ge o r g i a & Ru s s e l l Bi h r 50 9 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Da v i d & An n Ra c i n e 46 1 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Do r o t h y & Ja m e s Ba n k e r 45 1 Bi g Ho r n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 . Wa s h b u r n Re ic e Va r i a n c e Q I C a i-.. m 00 z — ni0> -ICi) (00 roO -2. -Dc’)aZOO Zm. 2 0 0 0 0 D C W1 0I’r C 0 03 C D 0) /It / / >-o 1 1’) y N) 0 -I -N > 0 0 -I Cz 9o -U 0 -I 0z 0 -Il -I > 0 -1 0 >r T1 20 niLi, 0 0 -vr > 0 m > 0 0 -I 0z -1 0 z 0 T1 m Li, -4 rn U, I r C -1a ni -Qr >-I C -n -I > 0 -I a -U C -I Cz C -Il -I > 0 -I a ‘1 >rr m / I I n, CR n, znn, > “ —C-, 01 -Q S n’D — > S C S C o —DC— —0 C 0 R’noZ OC.coco a —ro jC SC CM CM 5: C, —r oao —-D fl C, <C,2 Ct -c S WA S H B U R N RE S I D E N C E 10 T 4 1 B, RE P L A T OF TR A C T 41 & PO R T I O N OF TR A C T 4 6 , FA L L RI V E R AD D I T I O N & PO R T I O N OF TR A C T 10 1 AL FR E S C O PL A C E AD D I T I O N TO W N OF ES T E S PA R K , ST A T E OF CO L O R A D O H e i g h t V a r i a n c e R e q u e s t Ap r i l 2 7 , 2 0 1 1 A-. Si t e Pl a n , , r l o r t h S N- . - — . - 1 Al l o w a b l e He i g h t Ca l c u l a t i o n po s , i ana t u r a l g r a d e 4 8 : 5 p o n t na t u r a l g r a d e = 37 . 2 0 po i n t b is wh o r e th e ro o f ri d g e is th e hi g h e s t a b o v e na t u r a t gr a d e Ma x i m u m He i g h t Mo = 30 ’ + 0 5 (a - b ) 1V 5 30 + 0. 5 x 10 . 9 5 M 35 . 4 7 ’ Ma x i m u m Ri d g e Et e v a t i o n na t u r a t g r a d e at b + 3 7 2 0 4- 3 5 . 4 7 ’ 72 - S T P r o p o s e d Ri d g e Et e v a t i o n m a i n ev e t fi n i s h fl o o r + fl o o r le v e l to ri d g e d i m e n s i o n 49 . 8 4 ’ + 25 0 ’ 7 4 8 4 He i g h t of Ri d g e ab o v e Na t u r a t Gr a d e at po i n t b 74 . 8 4 - 37 . 2 0 ’ 37 . 6 4 ’ or 37 - W R e q u e s t e d V a r i a n c e 7 4 . 8 4 - 72 . 6 7 2. 1 7 ’ ca y 2. 2 5 ’ or 2’ - 3 L14 1 Th o r p A s s o c i a t e s RC . _ _ _ _ _ _ AR C H I T E C T S an d PL A N N E R S N ‘ S ‘ S ‘ S - S . ‘ S h- - n 4 - . A “ i ’ S F S c a l e : F’ — 2 C - G ’ 2 o f 3 00 — ni0—10)00) -9. zozm. C-i “ di Z.,vQ -720rnt->onrnn1 >> 20fl 7S—i-v -Ini rZ0-n-n200 8rO> 70fl >>aone. Qrn’ >-nci> n r 0Th’Pll].apIo 42611011 300 PM 0 /t, (0 (I 00 6 z C r-1 :3- rn CD c-P C D 0 0 Hunter’s Chophouse Variance Request Estes Park Community Development Department,Planning Division I Room 230,Town HaIl,170 MacGregor Avenue P0 Box 1200,Estes Park,CO 80517 _______ Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE:June 7,2011 REQUEST:Allow a patio seating area 8-feet from the east property line,in lieu of the 15-feet required. LOCATION:1690 Big Thompson Avenue,within the Town of Estes Park APPLICANT:Don Hess (Hunter’s Chophouse) PROPERTY OWNER:John Henry STAFF CONTACT:Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Consultant:Applicant is representing himself;site plan prepared by Cornerstone Engineering Parcel Number:2520363001 Development Area:.45 acres,+1- Existing Land Use:Restaurant Proposed Land Use:Same,with outdoor seating area Zoning Designation:CO Commercial Adjacent Zoning: East:A Accommodations North:CO Commercial West:CO Commercial South:CO Commercial Adjacent Land Uses: East:Lake Estes Marina parking lot North:Commercial (“strip mall9 West:Undeveloped (with motel use further west)South:Accommodations (Lake Shore Lodge) Services: Water:Town Sewer:UTSD PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND:The applicant requests a variance to Table 4-5 ‘Base Density and Dimensional Standards”of the Estes Valley Development Code to allow a side yard setback of 8-feet in lieu of the 15-foot setback required. The purpose of the variance request is to allow a fenced patio seating area to remain in place;the patio and access stairs were built without a building permit.Based on this, Community Development Staff recommends a condition of approval be that all required permits for the patio and stairs,as well as other open permits,be finalized no later than July 5,2011. The patio is near the eastern property line,which abuts the access road to Lakeshore Lodge and the Lake Estes Marina.Because of this,the impact on the character of the neighborhood in minimal. REVIEW CRITERIA:In accordance with Section 3.6 C.Standards for Review’of the EVDC,all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Board should keep these criteria in mind when reviewing the variance request. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES:This request has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.The Division of Building Safety has stated “the business currently known as Hunters Chop House has unresolved issues with the Building Division,These include un-permitted work and un-approved work.I recommend any variance approval be conditioned on resolving these issues.” C ..t. 1 Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,June 7 2011 Page 2 of 3 Li Hunters Chophouse Side Yard Setback variance Request FINDINGS: 1.This request complies with review criteria set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2.Special circumstances exist and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with Code standards. 3.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered,nor would adjoining properties suffer a substantial detriment. 4.The variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services. 5.The variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 6.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 7.The submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the property are not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. 8.Failure to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Approval with the following conditions: 1.The patio shall not be used by customers until the access steps and patio have been permitted and final inspection approval.This shall be completed on or before July 5,2011. 2.Prior to issuance of the permit for the steps/patio,the applicant shall finalize all outstanding building permits. SUGGESTED MOTION:I move APPROVAL of the requested variance with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,June 7,2011 Page 3 of 3 Hunters Chophouse Side Yard Setback Variance Request Dave Shirk From:Kevin Ash Sent:Friday May 27,2011 2:49 PM To:AIisor Chilcott;Dave Shirk Cc:Scott Zurn Subject:RE:Development reviews due today 27 may 2011 Dave and Alison, Scott and I went through the variance requests for: Rippling River Development Chophouse Washburn residence building height Springer side yard set-back Sundance proposed garage Public Works does not have any comments on these. Let me know if we are missing any that are due today. Thank you, Kevin Ash,PE Public Works Civil Engineer Town of Estes Park 970.577.3586 desk 970.227.0437 cell kash(aiestes.org From:Reuben Bergsten Sent:Friday,May 27,2011 12:28 PM To:Scott Zurn;Kevin Ash Cc:Alison Chilcott;Jeff Boles Subject:Development reviews due today 27 may 2011 FYI TOWN OF ESTES PARIç Inter-Office Memorandum To:Reuben Bergsten From:Jeff B&es Date:5127111 Re:Hunters Chop House,1690 Big Thompson Avenue After review of the Variance Request the Water Department has no comments. . Dave Shirk From:Todd Steichen Sent;Friday,May 13,2011 11:55AM To:Karen Thompson;Dave Shirk;Tracy Feagans Cc:Reuben Bergsten Subject;RE:Unit 1A,Bldg 1,Olympus Views Condos-Hunter’s Chop House Variance -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT L&P has no comments or concerns. Todd. From:Karen Thompson Sent:Thursday,May 12,2011 3:05 PM To:Jacqueline Halburnt;Jackie Williamson;Scott Zurn;Kevin Ash;Barbara Boyer Buck;Tracy Feagans;Jeff Boles; Reuben Bergsten;Todd Steichen;Will Birchfield;sgenpler)evrvd.com;Carolyn McEndaffer;Jes Reetz Subject:Unit 1A,Bldg 1,Olympus Views Condos-Hunter’s Chop House Variance -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT REFFERAL FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application,which can be viewed by accessing the following links or by visiting our website at http://www.estes.org/comdev/CurrentReguests.aspx. Submitted Applications Staff Project ReportProjectNameAddressMeetingDatesDocumentationand Staff ContactandType(PDF)Comments (PDF) Olympus Views Statement of Intent Condominiums Esles Valley Board of Stall Report Send Comments to 1690 Big Thompson and ApolicalionAdjustment available Dave ShirK at AvenueHuntersChopHouse 617/lI 6/2111 dshirk(aestes.orgSitePlan Variance If you prefer paper copies of documents,please email the Staff Contact listed above.Thank you for your help in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible,but no later than May 27,2011. Comments can be sent via mail,email (dshirlc@estes.org),or fax (970.586.0249). Thank you for your comments. Karen Thompson Administrative Assistant Community Development Department 1 . Dave Shirk ____________________ (om Alison Chilcott Jnt:Friday,May 13,2011 12:31 PM To:DaveShirk -•‘ Subject FW Hunter Chop House Comment From:Stan Gengler [mailto:scjengler©evrod.coml Sent:Friday,May 13,2011 11:24 AM To:Alison Chilcott Cc:Hanson,Annie Subject:Hunter Chop House Comment Hi Dave:It was hard for me to determine what the variance request was by the owner.It appears to me that it’s the existing concrete slab and fence installed last year,We do not object to approving the variance request.Our only concern is that some park at Lake Estes Marina property to access the business.We would confirm that parking is not permitted on Lake Estes Marina property to access Hunter’s Chop House.Thanks for allowing us to comment. Stanley C.Gengler,Executive Director Estes Valley Recreation &Park District P.O.Box 1379 Estes Park,Colorado 80517 970-586-8191 1. S Don Hess Hunters Chophou5e 1690 Big Thompson Ave Estes Park,CO 80517 The old owner had built the patio to the edge of the property line.We were told if we came back 8 feet that we would not be required to get a variance.I would like to know why the rules have changed now! If we were told that we would have to get a variance in the first place then the patio would have been built to the edge of the property line as it has now really taken a lot of patio space away. Don Hess 0 ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION I Submittal Date: Record Owner(s):,1c124 Street Address of Lot:J/9ô Legal Description:Lot: r Well Well r r r Yes r Other (Specify) F Other(Specify) EPSD .R UTSO EPSD g UTSO Other r None ENo ‘Jariance Desired (Development Code Section #):-iat1.scs “ct”.b .., C) of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is toon /,iS5 V Application fee (see attached fee schedule)Ø81Ortatementofintent(must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1”=20’)** Dl reduced copy of the site plan (H”X 17”) **The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.Vll .5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. Town of Esles Pork th P.O.Box 1200#170 MaCGregOr Avenue -th Estes Pork,CD 80517 Community Development Department Phone:(970)577-372)..Fox;19701 556-0249 -www.estes.org/ComDev LU //Q7r’i -Owj,c Ac’? tie?I yofl /Jt-si Dcii I/ni o’nc Subdivision; ParcellD#:4)3l.3_omi onc/nIss __________ Block. _______________ Tract: ________ i A %1r 1,‘si..as Giarj V 9,b?u,’Q4 i ZoningLotSize Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service g Town Proposed Water Service Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service $?Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? F r r r Septic Septic F Owner /26jv 4.(t,4 /Po19 /ut//,v,ç/o,-Co fo5/7 4plicant r Cons’ltant/Encsr Revised 11/20/09 -.... —— Record Owner(s)fft’Ai /74,,,ij j4s,tt’4.thk C!#hSM?5 MailingAddressI02t/iT (Uuu/ed 9 lvrf/,,iq/tvi to 1v5V9 Phone -p95-flyJ Cell Phone “-Y56! Fax Erriall Applicant Maihng Address r Phone Cell Phone Fax ¶-Email 6k/lw/dAvis Jw/g,I,1’m Consultant/Engineer______________________________________________________________________ Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email t164%,i Co DV9 97o-2q-q7S.2f “-- 9w 46t- APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area,both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: http:/Mww.estes.orQfCornDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApjlicationFeeSchedule.pdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 11120109 . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: http://www.estesorQ/ComDev/DevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that I am required to obtain a “Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (ID)business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,“Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void,’(Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT;72CI’//,r 5 Applicant PLEASE PRINT 2(,?/4 55 Signatures: Record Owner /Vft /V,Date ________________ Applicant .Date ___________ Revised 1y20/09 j Zoning D/stricts ,<4 t’ion!vssidential Zoning Districts 4.Table 4-5:Density and Dimensional Standards for the Nonresidential Zoning Districts. Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential Zoning Districts Minimum Land Minimum Building!U. Area per Minimum Lot Size [7J Structure Setbacks [4)[8)Max. Accommodation Max.Lot or Bldg Cover- Zoning Residential Unit Area Width Front Side Rear Height Max.age District (sq.ft.per unit)..(sq ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft.)(ft.)[9]FAR (%) Accommodation ArterialUnit=1,800 [1]; =25 [51 A Residential Units.40,000 [2]100 [3]AU other 15 [6]10 [6]30 N/A 50 2-Family =6,750; 15MF=5,400 Arterial =25 [5]; A-i 10,890 15,000 [2]50 [31 All other 15 10 30 .20 30 streets = 15 -______ Accommodation Units Only = 1,800; SF &2-Family SF &(stand-alone)= 9,000;2-Family [vi If lot If lot Accornmo-(stand-ni-abuts a abuts aDwellingUnitsdationusesatone)=25;mum =residential residential CD (1st Floor)1 unit =20000 MF (stand-property =property =30 2.0 n/aper2,250 square alone)=Maxi-10;10;feet of gross All other .mum =land area uses =n/a 100, 16 All other All other All th r cases=0 cases=0 Dwelling Units (2nd Floor)No uses =n/a minimum gross land area per unit (Ord.15-03#3) _______________________________________ Lots fronting arterials = 40,000 [2]; Outdoor Fronting Arterial Commercial arterials ==25 [5]; CO n/a Recreation/200; All other 15 [6]15 [6]30 25 65 Entertain-All other streetsment=lots 50 =1540,000 [2] All other lots =15,000 [2] _____________________________________________________ 0 Supp.5 4-21 S.. j Zoning Districts 1.4 Nonresidential Zoning Districts 5.Number of Principal Uses Permitted Per Lot or Development Parcel. a.Maximum Number of Principal Uses Permitted.One (1)or more principal uses shall be permitted per lot or development parcel,except that in the A zoning district,only one (1)principal residential use shall be permitted per lot or development parcel. b.Permitted Mix of Uses.Where more than one (1)principal use is permitted per iot or development parcel,mixed-use development is encouraged,subject to the following standards: (1)More than one (1)principal commercial/retail or industrial use permitted by right or by special review in the zoning district may be developed or established together on a single lot or site,or within a single structure, provided that all applicable requirements set forth in this Section and Code and all other applicable ordinances are met. Zoning District 0 CH Minimum Lot Size [71 Area Width (sqft)(ft.) Minimum Land Area per Accommo dation or Residential Unit (sq.ft.per unit) Residential Units (2nd Floor) I unit 2,250 sq. ft.GFA of principal use. n/a Minimum Building/Structure Setbacks [4][8] Rear Max. Building [Max.Lot Height (ft.)[9] 15,000 [2] 6,000 [2] Front (ft.) Arterial =25 [5]; All other streets =15 15 Fronting Arterials = 200; All other lots =50 50 Max. FAR 15 [6] Coverage --JL4 15 [6]30 .25 50 0[6]0[6]30 .50 Fronting Arterial !Arterials ==25 [5]; I-i n/a 15,000 200;All other 10 [6]10 [6]30 .30 80[2] All other streets lots=5O =15 (Ord.2-02#6;Ord.11-02 §1;Ord.15-03#3) 80 NOTES TO TABLE 4-5: [I]For guest units in a resort lodge/cabin use that have full kitchen facilities,the minimum land area requirement per guest unit shall be 5,400 square feet.See also’5.1 .P below. [2]If private wells or septic systems are used,the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres.See also the regulations set forth in §7.12,‘Adequate Public Facilities.” [3]For lots greater than 2 acres,minimum lot width shall be 200 feet. [4]See Chapter 7,§7.6 for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands.(Ord.2-02 #5;Ord.11-02 §1) [5]All front building setbacks from a public street or highway shall be landscaped according to the standards set forth in §7.5 of this Code. [6]Setback shall be increased to 25 feet it the lot line abuts a residential zoning district boundary. [7]See Chapter 7,§7.1,which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area)for development on steep slopes. (Ord.2-02 #6) [8]All structures shall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than four dwellings or lots.Thesetbackshallbemeasuredfromtheedgeofpublicorprivateroads,or the edge of the dedicated right-of-way orrecordedeasement,whichever produces a greater setback.The setback shall be the same as the applicable minimum building/structure setback.This setback is applicable only in the ‘A-i’district.(Ord.11-02 §1) [9J See Chapter 1,§1 .9.E,which allows an increase in the maximum height of buildings on slopes.(Ord.18-02 #3) Supp.5 4-22 Hu n t e r s Ch o p I- -e Va r i a n c e AP O 0 Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s Ci t y ST Zi p Co l o r a d o Ki t c h e n & Ba t h of Es t e s Pa r k , In c . P0 Bo x 20 Lu c e r n e CO 80 6 4 6 La k e s h o r e Lo d g e , LL C 17 0 0 Bi g Th o m p s o n Av e Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Bi g Th o m p s o n , LL C 12 2 0 Bi g Th o m p s o n Av e Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Un i t e d St a t e s of Am e r i c a De p t of th e In t e r i o r P0 Bo x 13 6 6 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 PT Pr o p e r t i e s , LL C 16 9 2 Bi g Th o m p s o n Av e Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ca p i t a l Co m m e r c i a l Pr o p e r t i e s , LI C 16 9 2 Bi g Th o m p s o n Av e n u e , Su i t e 10 0 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Le o n & Be t t y Va n St e e n b u r g h 18 2 5 N La k e Av e Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 . Hu n t e r s Ch o p Ho u s e Va r i a n c e AP O BACK SIDES EAR (1W) i”UTIUTY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT “s--ca::j%==:t / N’ / 3p...:/ .25’SEtBACK FRONT 1O UTILITY’&- FOUND BENBIKERACK •••,‘%DRAINAGE BLIABRASS /L G.t.E. EASEMENT. of —--/. .. -/—EXISTING SIGN L)./ .-çs ....4h0/ __ I ____ °•‘ji -.C ,rTh, r .:R13 BUIL.DING#1 ILBI.IILDINGISLCL I “A21BUILDING41 /<II!SIDEWALK q....... /10’UTILITY &/ U L.C.E.BUILDING 41 P13 —.,::.)AIR CONDITIONG ).——DRAINAGECOMPRESSO /•EASEMENT11[L.C.E.BUILTYNG #1 __ ‘/4.0 L1.•/CONCRETE CURB j4 •GREASE TRAP /&GOiTER 9 1 [‘FREEZER i iL.0L BUILDING 41G.C.E. LC.E.BUILDING #1 1/ -.1.3’— 71 I SIDEWALK —ö ‘LC.E.BUILDING #1 ./•I D C;.•_1.7f’ —. .6 \.4 I”TRASH L 12.0ENCLOSURE LC:E*1 -f I’•G.C.E. cSIDEWAkcr-B.swre.‘f’j &/ ...flZ.33.4d—1 4/ IL 4’ / /. <SIDEWALK LFREEZE I I / / L.C.E.BUILDING #1 I G.1C.E./15’SETBACK / -i ‘EAR /RETAINING WMJ- 584’,1LC.E.BUILDING 42 ‘ /0;.1-F [—20.O’—-—2. /•.1 AREA “/ BUILDING - ‘JI’.LCE C-.-I’./•OVERHANG IS—z BUILDING #2 \•LOX.BUILDING #2- ___ / _____ \I • /1— !ffsr.4..iso’ .n ‘• / SIDEWALK :/t P V / /Q-L.C.E.—1°-/BUILDING #2 9.3’BUILDING f2 /•I BUILDING IS LC.E./ / ...1 FORUNITSIN // •rj BUILDING 42 .// . / . S S 8&V.’Q8”E 150.42’(PL&rrrn\ 9485 SIDES (1w) 44 .w.ow I PLS )485 5’UTILITY & flNAIIILAP