Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2011-05-03
Prepared:April 15,2011 Revised:April 28,2011* AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday,May 3,2011 9:00 a.m.—Board Room Town Hall 1.PUBLIC COMMENT 2.CONSENT a.Approval of minutes dated April 5,2011 3.REQUEST Owner:William J and Ruth C Cooper Applicant:Celine LeBeau,Van Horn Engineering &Surveying Request:Variance from EVDC Section 4.3,Table 4-2 requiring 50-foot minimum building setbacks from property lines in the RE- Rural Estate zone district.Request to encroach 25 feet into the west setback and 21 feet into the southwest setback for construction of a proposed dwelling. Staff Contact:Dave Shirk 4.REPORTS Creative Sign Design Review Board —Claire’s Restaurant *145 Stanley Circle Drive 5.ADJOURNMENT A meeting packet is available for review in the Community Development Department and the Estes Valley Library two business days prior to the meeting. The Estes Valley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment April 5,2011,9:00a.m. Board Room,Estes Park Town Hall Board:Chair Wayne Newsom,Members Bob McCreery,John Lynch,Chuck Levine,and Pete Smith;Alternate Member Jeff Moreau Attending:Chair Newsom,Members McCreery,Lynch,Levine,Smith Also Attending:Planner Shirk,and Recording Secretary Thompson Absent:None Chair Newsom called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1.PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2.CONSENT Approval of minutes of the March 1,2011 meeting. It was moved and seconded (Smith/Lynch)to approve the minutes as presented and the motion passed unanimously. 3.LOT I,SUNDANCE MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION,1531 Fish Hatchery Road Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report.The applicant has requested a variance to EVDC Section 4.3,Table 4-5 “Base Density and Dimensional Standards,”to allow a front yard setback of 12-feet in lieu of the 15-foot setback required,and to allow a river setback of 30feet in lieu of the 5O4oot setback required.The purpose of the variance request is to allow an addition to an existing structure.The property is zoned A-I—Accommodations. The applicant owns the undeveloped lot to the east.This lot,also part of the Sundance Mountain Subdivision,is subject to a conservation easement held by the Estes Valley Land Trust.This conservation easement prohibits construction of any buildings;this means that only one dwelling (the existing one)will be built on these two lots.The applicant submitted a copy of the recorded easement to Planning Division staff,which was forwarded to the Estes Valley Land Trust for opportunity to comment. This request was submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment.No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services.Upper Thompson Sanitation District submitted a memo outlining four comments.Prime among these was “the existing deck and hot tub are encroaching in the District’s sewer line easement and will need to be relocated out of the easement.”Staff recommends a condition of approval be removal of these encroachments prior to final inspection.The building permit plans should address this. Planner Shirk stated in March of 2010,the Town Board adopted the new wildlife habitat protection standards,which determine when a wildlife assessment plan is necessary. Because this property is located on a river corridor,and the property owner desires to reduce the river setback,the applicant retained the services of a wildlife biologist to conduct a wildlife impact assessment.This assessment was done by Chris Roe with Roe Ecological Services;Mr.Roe has experience with wildlife assessments in the Estes Park area.Mr.Roe’s assessment found that he believes the proposal will not have “...any significant long-term wildlife impact...(page 2 of the report).” RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 April 5,2011 Planner Shirk slated two adjacent property owners contact the Community Development department with questions about the variance request.Their questions were answered to their satisfaction,and any concerns were eliminated. Planner Shirk stated there was a non-conforming accessory structure encroaching into the setback near Fish Hatchery Road.Planning Division Staff recommends a condition of approval be the correction of this code violation prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed addition.Also,Staff recommends a condition of approval be that all exterior lighting,including existing,be code compliant with the new addition.This would require replacement of existing exterior lights.This would help offset the additional impact of the new addition being located closer to the river,and property across the river,than would typically be allowed.Lighting can also be directly related to wildlife standards. The property owner desires to amend the building envelope for the existing dwelling,but needed to apply for and receive the requested variance prior to that next step.The Town Board of Trustees would be the decision-making body on the amended building envelope. Staff recommended approval of the variance,with five (5)conditions of approval,listed below. Staff and Board Discussion There was discussion concerning the adjacent conservation easement and the proposed building envelope.Planner Shirk explained the EVDC required either a building envelope or a limits of disturbance area when the plat was approved.In this case,a building envelope was created.He stated the size of the dwelling complies with the EVDC for floor area ratio in the A-I zone district.The new addition will be farther away from the river than the existing structure.Member Lynch was concerned about the dwelling being in the flood plain.Planner Shirk stated the building permit review process would address any flood plain issues. Public Comment Mike Todd/Cornerstone Engineering stated the flood plain was verified by his company.It was determined that the proposed addition is adequately outside of the flood plain. Jeff Moreau/Applicaht stated the property owner wants to make better use of the property. With the variance approval,approximately 1000 square feet would be added to the existing dwelling,and would include a garage.To stay as far away from the river as possible,he proposed encroaching more into the setback that was closer to the road.Mr. Moreau stated the property owner had reviewed and agreed to the conditions of approval. Conditions I.Compliance with the site plan and building design,as approved by the Board of Adjustment; 2.Prior to issuance of a building permit,the platted building envelope shall be amended by the Town Board and the plat shall be submitted for recording; 3.Prior to final inspection; a.The accessory structure near Fish Hatchery Road shall be relocated to comply with setback requirements; b.The existing deck and hot tub that encroach in the Upper Thompson Sanitation district’s sewer line easement shall be relocated out of the easement; c.The building permit application shall include details outlining how this will be accomplished. 4.Setback Certificate.Prior to final inspection,a registered land surveyor shall provide to the Community Development Department a signed and stamped certificate that specifically verifies that the structure complies with the approved variance,and shall include a specific reference to the distance to property lines.Staff recommends a surveyor set survey stakes for foundation forms to ensure compliance with the approved variance. 5.All exterior lighting,including existing,shall comply with Section 7.9 of the Estes Valley Development Code. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 3 April 5,2011 It was moved and seconded (Levine/McCreery)to approve the variance request for Lot 1,Sundance Mountain Subdivision,with the findings and conditions recommended by staff and the motion passed unanimously. 4.REPORTS Planner Shirk reported the Creative Sign Design Review Board met for the first time on March 1,and approved a height variance for the Rocky Mountain Park nn.This newly established Sign Board will be the decision-making body for sign variances,and will also hear applications for the Creative Sign Program.An application will be heard in May for “Claire’s”restaurant. Planner Shirk reported that on April 12,2011,the Town Board would consider a moratorium on directly illuminated signs larger than ten square feet in size.This would give staff time to reevaluate the time period that variable message signs would be allowed to change,and to reevaluate the maximum size allowed.The proposed moratorium would extend through the 2011 summer season. Planner Shirk stated there would be two items on the agenda for the May meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment. Planner Shirk reported the staff report has been somewhat reduced by listing the standards of review as a separate document that will become a permanent document in the Member’s notebooks. In an eftort to reduce the use of paper,Member McCreery requested smaller copies of plats,elevation plans,etc.that are typically provided in the Board packets on large format paper.It was decided by staff and Board members for staff to determine which size would best serve their needs,with an effort to keep paper use down as much as possible. Member Levine reported that former Board member Cliff Dill was having serious health issues and was in the hospital in Loveland. There being no further business,Chair Newsom adjourned the meeting at 9:42 a.m. Wayne Newsom,Chair Karen Thompson,Recording Secretary Cooper Variance Request Estee Park Community Development Department,Planning DivisionRoom230,Town Hail,170 MacGregor AvenueP0Box1200,Estes Park,CO 80517 Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE:May 3,2011 REQUEST:Variance from the “RE” Rural Estate 50-foot side yard and front yard setback requirement. LOCATION:TBD Moon Trailway, within unincorporated Larimer County (go to the end of Little Valley Rd,turn left around the bend,then left again at Moon Trallway;look for pull-out area on left side of road) APPLICANT:Van Horn Engineering (Celine LeBeau) PROPERTY OWNER:William and Ruth Cooper STAFF CONTACT:Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer/Surveyor:Van Horn Engineering;Westover Construction Parcel Number:2407406020 Development Area:1.5 acre Existing Land Use:Undeveloped Proposed Land Use:Single-family residential Zoning Designation:RE-Rural Estate Adjacent Zoning: East:RE-Rural Estate North:RE-Rural Estate West:RE-Rural Estate South:RE-Rural Estate Adjacent Land Uses: East:Single-family residential North:Single-family residential West:Single-family residential South:Single-family residentiai Services: Water:Well Sewer:Septic ‘II,) PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND:The applicant requests a variance toTable4-2 “Base Density and Dimensional Standards”of the Estes Valley DevelopmentCodetoallowafrontyardsetbackof30-feet in lieu of the 50-toot setback required andasideyardsetbackof25-feet in lieu of the 50-foot setback required. The purpose of the variance request is to build a new detached single-family residence. Special circumstances exist.The lot has a triangular building area if all setbacks areapplied.The eastern portion of this triangle contains a drainage swale. Because the nearest structure is over 100-feet away,granting the variances would notviolatetheintentofthecode(50-foot setback requirement on each side of the propertylineequatestoaminimumbuildingseparationof100-feet). Because adequate building separation will be met,the impact on the neighborhoodwouldbeminimized.Staff did not analyze proposed building size with those in thenearbyneighborhood. REVIEW CRITERIA:In accordance with Section 3.6 C.“Standards for Review”of theEVDC,all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicablestandardsandcriteriacontainedtherein. The Board should keep these criteria in mind when reviewing the variance request. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES:This request has been submitted toallapplicablereviewingagencystaffforconsiderationandcomment.At the time of thisreport,no significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative tocodecomplianceortheprovisionofpublicservices. Building Height.Planning Division Stall has conducted a preliminary height calculationtodetermineiftheproposedstructurewouldcomplywiththemaximumallowedbuildingheight.The highest point above original grade would be 34.15 feet above grade.Themaximumallowedheightatthatpointwouldbe35feet.Based on this preliminarycalculation,the structure will comply with the maximum allowed height. Staff will perform a complete height calculation with the submittal of the building permit,which includes more detailed grading information than the variance request.Theapplicantshouldbeawarethatifthefinalplansdonotcomplywiththemaximumallowedheight,the structure may need to be redesigned to achieve compliance.Also,due to the structure height,a requirement of the building permit will be to have asurveyorverifystructureheightatthefoundationinspectionandagainattheroofinginspection.The purpose of this requirement is to ensure what is built in the fieldcomplieswiththeapprovedplans,and is intended to catch any errors as early in theprocessaspossible. Light and Power.The Light and Power Department has requested an on-site meetingwiththebuildertodiscusstheundergroundconnection,which must cross below MoonTrailway.This is included as a suggested condition of approval. Estes Valley Board of Adiustrnenl,May 3,2011 Page 2 of 4cooperVarianceRequest(LIttle Valley) Neighboring Property Owners.The applicant has submitted an email from the owner ofthepropertytothewest,the Otis’s,which includes in part “my best to you both as youbegintheprocessofbuildingyournewhomehereinEstes.”This is the property ownermostimpactedbythisvariancerequest. The designer,Bob Iwanicki with Westover Construction,has submitted a letter from LeefKennicke,President of the Little Valley Owners Assocation.This letter states the LVOAapprovedthevariancerequest“unanimously by the Board,with the support of theCovenantsComplianceCommittee.’ Planning Division Staff has received comments from Linda Moak,3960 Little ValleyRoad,regarding potential for erosion onto her downhill property.This concern stemsfrompastexperiencewithconstructioninthisarea.This concern was forwarded to theLarimerCountyEngineeringDepartment,who shares this concern.Based on this,Larimer County Engineering recommends an erosion control plan be submitted with thebuildingpermit.This has been included as a suggested condition of approval. FINDINGS: 1.This request complies with review criteria set forth in Section 3.6.C of the EstesValleyDevelopmentCode. 2.Special circumstances exist and practical difficulty may result from strictcompliancewithCodestandards. 3.The variance is not substantial. 4,The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered,norwouldadjoiningpropertiessufferasubstantialdetriment.5.The variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services.6.The variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will affordrelief. 7.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff forconsiderationandcomment.No significant issues or concerns were expressed byreviewingstaffrelativetocodecomplianceortheprovisionofpublicservices.8.The submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the property are not of sogeneralorrecurrentanatureastomakereasonablypracticabletheformulationofageneralregulationforsuchconditionsorsituations.9.Failure to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action withregardtothevarianceapprovalwithinone(1)year of receiving approval of thevarianceshallautomaticallyrenderthedecisionoftheBOAnullandvoid. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Approval conditional to; 1.Compliance with the site plan and building design,as approved by the Board ofAdjustment. 2.Setback Certificate.Prior to final inspection,a registered and surveyor shall providetotheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentasignedandstampedcertificatethatspecificallyverifiesthatthestructurecomplieswiththeapprovedvariance,and shallincludeaspecificreferencetothedistancetopropertylines.Staff recommends a(C) Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,May 3,2011 Page 3 of 4CooperVarianceRequest(Little Valley) surveyor set survey stakes for foundation forms to ensure compliance with theapprovedvariance. 3.Prior to issuance of a building permit: a.The builder shall meet with the Light and Power Department to discuss electricalconnection. b.A detailed grading and erosion control plan shall be approved by the LarimerCountyEngineeringDepartment. SUGGESTED MOTION:I move APPROVAL of the requested variances withthefindingsandconditionsrecommendedbystaff. C Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,May 3,2011 Page 4 of 4CooperVarianceRequest(Little Valley) aI‘I 4) -J 4) C.) C ha. Cu I 4)a00 C) r 1 1 fri ru1 I II‘I 0) a 0) C) C I.. Cu‘I ‘It C)a00 C.) \ 2 -i i::a-S-j \\, 4 r;fl - !! U - 2 , .r a — I! fl 3 * t 1& O Y. * r I7t .1 fl r. 3 1’ .‘ C iO • — Tt g c s . r’ l a. . GO ! ] ‘f l . S ‘O G : ) o 0 0 A/ O: : f l D d / Dc QU V O I O T O 3 A2 N f l Q 3 1T h 3 7 b ’ f l AZ 4 WL 2 NO 1 . L 3 W S JO IV ? J I ’ J ) Ô JS V f l J . L [ O O S YH I JO £W V d ‘O V J 7 J J CN O 2 . S Wo ] s M r n q n s A. V 7 7 V A J7 . t J - I 7 O LU ? NV 7 c [ 3J 1 8 è/ 2 c [ 0 0 3 ‘S (C I . ,) %W a ! e . c. - , , - TI t O S !] 3 N 0. - ’ fl o d 9Q • t • s- i p qc o , # Jf l SV 9 d NL I M ae h i t .- o. e I O ] , I ta JC 7 Ad 1 1 V A D: ; I 1 I d G: 0 0 3 S oi S ! 0 8 f l S dO TO ’ . - ’ II LI ’ t :O r O 34 d KD fl c - . I t G O o, r n o ! ] j . ’ : Q D 31 4 ! LV ca I 4 o n V (3 0 d TI : O ! S 10 11 0 4 C] O V ] H 01 5 0 0 0 0- dO ! 02 0 0 0 T H T O , ; .. - , ,J a o r, J . t s 3d l d CV ! 3O ! S C1 f l 0 ] I 61 .1 0 1 -I / S. 7 W 3 V 69 1 fl ’ y mI T uc , cL , S i / .7 - _: e s r , !/ . ,3 O V 0 S 25 ! - - 35 r 2 w 0 1 d 0 0 - 20 •l N , l S V c i 1 0 . ‘ OC ! 00 4 ! VO L 0. 0 3 .5 / I 12 0 3_ i .2 0 . 6 9 5 d, 0 ST Y ! ! ] 2/ ] £ c: r l o o 91 10 7 ca , 6 # dV 0 OI O S Y I J 1L , O i 60 2 3 d 4 Or ! r . Q i .f l ; , l 9 C . ; .1 5 0 . a I ____ t ci 4-) (V a) LU .4-, L0 w -c 0 C,) C0 .4) (V> a) Li) U, (0 Li) -Ct02 zE*:rrZZfS9fl -- tAamflOP1fl I cn0 if0z ) I 1 I I I N I ) IF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT To:Dave Shirk,Estes Park Planning Department From:Doug Ryan,Environmental Health Planner Date:April 11,2011 Subject:Cooper Residence Variance —Lot 20 Little Valley Second Filing The Cooper Residence variance is a proposal to allow to allow a new home to belocatedwithinthenormal50footpropertylinesetbacks. The Department’s main interest regarding residential development on rural arealotsistoensurethatadequatewaterandsewerareavailable.At this variancestagewegetinformationaboutthebuildingsetbackbutnotabouttheutilityplacement.At the later building permit stage,our office will need to issue apermittoinstallasewersystempriortoobtainingthebuildingpermit.A decisiontoissueasewersystempermitisbasedontheabilitytocomplywiththetechnicalrequirementscontainedtheLarimerCountyIndividualSewageDisposalSystemsRegulations.Septic systems are not required to be located within thebuildingsetbacklinebecausetheyareanundergroundimprovement.Theregulationnotedabovedoescontainminimumhorizontaldistanceseparationrequirementsbetweenvariouscomponentshowever,Based on the size of thelotandthesteepslopesanddrainagefeaturesontheproperty,placement of thewellandsepticsystemmaybeachallenge. Based on the information we do have,it appears that locating the house high onthelotwouldleaveopenmorepossibilitiesfordevelopingthesepticsystemontheproperty.Our Department would therefore not object to a setback variancesolongasitwasunderstoodthatthesewersystemstandardswillneedtobecompliedwithpriortoissuingabuildingpermit.We are available to consult withtheapplicant’s engineering firm about permitting for the sewer system. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal.I can be reached at498-6777 if there are questions prior to the hearing. cc:Celine Lebeau LAIUMER COMMUTED TO EXCELLENCE 1525 Blue Spruce Drive FoitcolUns,colorado 80524-2004 General Health (970)498-6700 Environmental Health (970)498-6775 Fax (970)498-6772 C) C) LARIMER ENGiNEERING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 11904dIIlIIe Fort Collins,Colorado 80522-1190 COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE (970)498-5700 FAX (970)498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO:Dave Shirk,Planner,Town of Estes ParkP0Box1200.Estes Park,Co 80517 FROM:Traci Shambo,Development Services Engineer 75 DATE:April 13,2011 SUBJECT:Lot 20,Little Valley Road Setback Variance—Estes Valley Planning Area Project Description/Background: This is a request from the setback requirement for a single family residence on Moon Trail Way in theLittleValleysubdivisioninEstesPark.The closest point of the home will be 30 feet from the road right-of-way. Comments: •Minimizing the distance between the face of a garage and the road right-of-way can create anunsafesituationwherevehicleshavetobackoutintotheright-of-way to enter the roadway.This is not an issue in this case because the layout of the proposed driveway provides spaceforvehiclestomaneuverandpullforwardintotheroad.In addition,given the terrain and thedistancethatthestructureisfromtheright-of-way and edge of road,the request should nothaveanadverseimpactonanyfutureroadwayimprovementsormaintenanceneeds.•Staff assumes that any subsequent improvements on this site will not adversely impact thedrainagepatternsorcreateerosionproblemsinthearea.The site has a drainage swale just tothenorthoftheproperty.Flows are directed into this drainage.Also.the terrain in this area issteepandthereforethereisanincreasedpotentialforerosion.Sediments and debris couldalsohewasheddownstreamontothepropertytothesouthiferosionandsedimentcontrolmeasuresarenotinplacepriortothecommencementofconstruction.This condition shouldhearequirementofthebuildingpermit. •All disturbed areas shall be replaced and reestablished in a condition equal to or better thanthehistoriccondition. •For more information on erosion and sediment control best management practices,the applicant maycallScottCornellwithourofficeat(970)498-5723 or Marc Lyons at (970)498-5709. Recommendation: Conditions of the building permit should include the requirement for a detailed temporary grading anderosioncontrolplanfortheconstructionphaseandadetailedfinalgradinganderosioncontrolplanforthepermanentcondition.The final erosion control plan shall require reseeding the disturbed areas andrequireanyotherpermanentmeasurestominimizeerosionandsedimentsleavingthesite.Appropriatetemporaryerosioncontrolmeasuresshallbeinplacepriortocommencinganyworkonthesite.WerecommendthatScottCornellinourofficeisoneoftheapproversofthebuildingpermittoensurethatC)the erosion control plans are adequate. C:\Documents and Settings\Dave Shirk.ENGINEERING\Local Settings\Temporary InternetFiles\0LK241\Lot 20 Little Valley setback VariancetVPA (2).docx Please fee]free to contact me at (970)498-5701 or e-ml at tshambo@laHmef.org if you have any ()questions.Thank you. cc:file C Dave Shirk Page 1 of2 From:Todd Steichen Sent:Monday,April 11,2011 4:20PM To: Cc: Karen Thompson;Dave Shirk Tracy Feagans;Barbara Boyer Buck;Reuben Bergsten Subject:RE:Lot 20,Little Valley,2nd Filing -TBD Moon Trailway -Cooper Residence -REFERRAL FORCOMMENT After a site visit L&P has no comments or concerns with this variance request. L&P will need to set up a meet with the property owner or developer since in the County and BP will notgetroutedtodepartmentstogooverhowtheyaregoingtogetpowertothelotwhichwillhavetobeundergroundfromprimarypoleacrossMoonTrailwaytoasecondarypedestalthentheirelectriciantakesitfromthere. Todd. From:Karen Thompson Sent:Friday,April 08,2011 10:46 AMTo:Jacqueline Halburnt;Barbara Boyer Buck;Tracy Feagans;Reuben Bergsten;Todd Steichen;tgarton@larimer.org;Trad Shambo;cmanley@larimer.org;leemare@airbits.comCc:Dave Shirk Subject:Lot 20,Little Valley,2nd Filing -TBD Moon Trailway -Cooper Residence -REFERRAL FORCOMMENT REFFERAL FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application,which can be viewed byaccessingthefollowinglinksorbyvisitingourwebsiteathttp://www.estes.org/comdev/CurrentReguests.aspx. StaffProjectNameProjectReportAddressMeetingDocumentationand StaffandTypeDates(P09 Comments Contact (PDF) Cooper Residence TBD Moon Board of and Aoollcation Staff Repo Send mmente Estes valtey Statement of Intent Vahance Iraflway djustment available to Dave Shirl at sisyii Site PIpA 4128/Ill dshirkestesorp (ç If you prefer paper copies of documents,please email the Staff Contact listed above.Thank you for your“elp in our effort to reduce the need for paper copies. 4111/2011 Page lof3 Dave Shirk From:Tony Simons [simonsap@co.lahmer.co.us]()Sent:Wednesday,April 20,2041 9:03 AM To:Dave Shirk;Tom Garton Subject:Fwd:Lot 20,Little Valley,2nd Filing -TBD Moon Trailway -CooperResidenee -REFERRAL FORCOMMENT Dave, I do not have any issues with this proposal. Tony Simons,Larimer County Sheriff Office. Forwarded message From:Torn Garton <gartonta@eo.larimer.co.us> Date:Mon,Apr 18,2011 at 10:58 AM Subject:Fwd:Lot 20,Little Valley,2nd Filing -T1ID Moon Trailway -Cooper Residence -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT To:“Simons,Tony”<simonsap@co.larimer.co.us> Please review &comment on since it affects wildfire mitigation. Forwarded message From:Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.or2> Date:Pd,Apr 8,2011 at 10:46 AM Subject:Lot 20,Little Valley,2nd Filing -TBD Moon Trailway -Cooper Residence -REFERRAL FOR COMMENT To:Jacqueline Halbuint <ihalburnt@estes.org>,Barbara Buyer Buck <bboyerbuck@estes.org>,Tracy Feagans <tfeagans@estes.org>,Reuben Bergsten <rbergsten@estes.on>,Todd Steichen<tsteichen@estes.org>,tgarton @larimer.org,Traci Shambo <shambotl@co.larimer.co.us>,cmanley @larimer.org,leernare@airbits.com Cc:Dave Shirk <dshirk@estes.org> REFFERAL FOR COMMENT This email is to notify you that staff has received a variance application,which can be viewed byaccessingthefollowinglinksorbyvisitingourwebsiteathttp://www.estes.org/comdev/CurrentReguests.aspx. UStaff Project Report 4/20/2011 rage i 01 2 Dave Shirk D From:Celine Leseau [celinevhe@airbits.coml Sent:Wednesday,March 23,2011 1:28 PM To:Dave Shirk Subject:FW:FW:Cooper,Little Valley Variance Hello Dave. Attached is a chain of emails regarding the Cooper Varkmce,The third message down (from Lourdes M.Otis onMarch14,201 I)is from the closest neighbors (Lot 21,to the west)in support of the Copper variance/new houselocation.Let me know if you have any questions or need more information.Thank you. Celine LeBeau Van Horn Engineering and Surveying (970)586-9388 x28 From:Bob Jwanicki [n,ailto:bobi@airbits.comJ Sent:Monday,March 21,2011 11:18 AM To:Celine LeBeau Subject:Fwd:FW:Cooper,UWe Valley Variance Hi Celine, The original stakes were already 5’over the line,so this confirms the additional 20’. (,mank You, Bob Original Message Subject:FW:Cooper,Little Valley Variance Date:Mon,14 Mar 201110:19:50 -0500 Froin:Ruth Cooper <wcoop @charter.net> To:’Bob Iwanicki’<bobi@airbits.com> Bob —FYI From:LOURDES fri OTIS [mailto:orep otisQ.com) Sent:Monday,March 14,2011 10:16 AM To:wcoop©charter.net Subject:RE:Cooper,Little Valley Variance Hi Bill and Ruth,It was good to meet you both as well.Please let this email confirm that we did indeedmeetatthebuildingsitenexttoourpropertyat4068LUtleValleyDr.Lou and I are in agreement withthe20footvariancetothewestfromthecurrentbuildingstakesfortheconstructionofyournew(esidence.My best to you both as you begin the process of building your new home here in Estesl Greg‘s Otis 214-668-6435. 3/23/2011 Page 2 of 2 From:wcoop@charter.net To:area otis@g.com CC:bobi@airbits.com Subject:Cooper,Little Valley Variance Date:Sat,12 Mar 2011 12:11:28 -0600 Hi Greg.It was really nice to meet you the other night.We certainly are looking forward to our newneighborhood! Thanks for coming out to look at the 20 foot variance we are requesting.Like we discussed,if you could write ane-mail back to me with copy to Bob Iwanicki (Westover Construction,see above)stating your name and address,that you are the neighbor in the direction that we are requesting to move the house an additional 20 feet to thewestofthecurrentbuildingstakesthatwereviewedtogether,and that you are in agreement with this.I believethat’s all we need. Westover Construction will then take this letter to the city when they file for the variance. If you have any more questions,let us know or if you would rather contact Bob Iwanicki. Thanks again,and we look forward to meeting your wife and drinking red wine on our new deck.Also,we neverheardtheendofthebearstory-last we heard you found him with a pound of butter in his mouthil Bill &Ruth Cooper ____________ Information from ESET Smart Security,version of virus signature database 5952(20110314) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com —_________Information from ESET N0D32 Antivirus,version of virus signature database 5971(20110321) __________ The message was checked by ESET N0D32 Antivirus. Ii ttp://www .eset.corn ____________ Information from ESET N0D32 Antivirus,version of virus signature database 5978(20110323) ___________ The message was checked by ESET N0D32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com () 3/23/2011 Page 1 of I DaveShirk * From:Dave Shirk Sent Monday,April 11 2011 327PM To:‘pmoak@aoi.com’ Cc:Karen Thompson Subject:RE:variance Linda- We will put a hard copy of the plans in Tuesday’s out-going mail. Also,I will remind the Larimer County Engineering Department about the erosion issues from a couple ofyearsago(same staff members —so they should remember) -dave David W.Shirtç AICP Planner,Estes Park Community DevelopmentP0Box1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 970-577-3729 From:pmoak@aol.com [mailto:pmoak@aolcom] Sent:Sunday,April 10,2011 8:49 AM To:Dave Shirk Subject:variance Hi,Dave..received the card yesterdat on the proposed variance,Is there some map of what they wish todoontheTBDMoonTrailway?I am not sure which lot this is,but (think it must be the one directly aboveour3870and3960LittleValleyRd.properties??Our biggest concern,as exemplified by the transfer afewyearsagoofsomucherosionwhenthepeoplebuiltaboveus,is any drainage issue.If they arewishingtoplacethehouseclosertoMoonTraitway,that is certainly understandable.We would like tolookatasiteplanofsortsbeforeresponding.Thanks. Linda Moak 4111/2011 Page 1 of 2 Dave Shirk From:jrourkelaw@aol.com Sent:Thursday,April 21,2011 9:51 AM To:Dave Shirk Cc:crourke@mines.edu Subject:Re:Variance request information Dear Mr.Shirk and members of the Board: Initially,I would like to state that I respect Mr.Coopers rights to develop his property within the existingguidelinesorsomereasonablevariancetherefrom.I also hope he will respect the rights of existinghomeownerstoenjoytheirproperty. I am envisioning the possibility of significant interference with access to my property on this single-laneroadwayduringconstruction,and an equally significant interference with the peaceful enjoyment of mypropertyforthemonthsthatthisstructureisunderconstructionduetonoise.I am also concerned aboutincreasedriskofawildfireduetoconstructionandhumanactivity.I would be interested in what plans theownerandbuilderhavefordealingwiththeseissues,to the extent reasonably achievable.I realize theseissuesmaybebeyondthepurviewofthisBoard. Respectfully submitted, Stewart J.Rourke Original Message From:Dave Shirk <dshirk@ estes.org> To:jrourkelaw <frourkelaw@aol.com> Cc:Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.org> Sent:Wed,Apr 13,2011 9:38 am Subject:RE:Variance request information We will send you a copy of the site plan and the building plans. The variance request is to “push”the structure toward the west property line,away from the drainage (andyourlotaswell).The variance also includes a request to build closer to Moon Trailway than typicallyallowed.The would minimize site disturbance for the driveway,and would help keep the structure as farupthehillaspossibleandasfaroutotthedrainageaspossible. From:irourkelaw@aol.com [mailto:jrourkelawaol.cpm)Sent:Wednesday,April 13,2011 7:58 AM To:Dave Shirk Cc:crourkecThminesedu Subject:Variance request information Mr.Shirk,I received a postcard notifying me of the Setback Variance request for the Cooper residencewhichistobebuiltonLot20,Little Valley,2d filing.I am the owner of Lot 18. Please send me whatever documents you can which pertain to this variance request.I am most ()interested in a sketch of the location of the proposed structure in relation to the property lines. 4/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 Thank you.Please feel free to call me at (303)973-8422 if you need clarification. Sincerely,0 Stewart J.Rourke raurkelaw@aol.com 0 412t1201 I April18,2011 Bill &Ruth Cooper 4 Rimbey Court Chesterlield,MO 63017 Dear BiB &Ruth, The Little Valley Owners’Association Board and a member of the CovenantsComplianceCommitteemetandreviewedyourplatmap)building request form andvariancerequest.Your request for a variance to our Covenants,as well as yourbuildingrequestwereapprovedunanimouslybytheBoard,with the support of theCovenantsComplianceCommittee. We appreciate the timely manner in which you provided us the details we needed.ItwasalsoveryhelpfultousthatyouhadalreadycommunicatedwithGreg&Lou Otisanddocumentedthattheyhadnoobjections.This allowed us to make a decisionwithoutwastingtimetosecureadditionalinformation. Good luck on the building of your home and please let us know if there is any additionalinformationyouneedfromusasyoucontinueforwardonyourproject. Please keep us informed as you continue through the process with the town.Also it’shelpfulifyouwouldletusknowwhenconstructionwillofficiallybeginassometimeswegetquestionsfromotherpropertyowners. Thanks, Lee Kennicke President LVOA cc:Bob Iwanicki,Westover Construction C TOWN OF ESTES PARI Memo To:Project Planner Shirk From:Utilities &Public Works Staff Date:AprIl 22,2011 RE:VARIANCE:Cooper Residence-TBD Moon Traliway Public Works: Little Valley is in the County. Light &Power: After a site visit L&P has no comments or concerns with this variance request. L&P will set up a meeting with the property owner or developer since property is in the County and will need to have underground wire from primary pole across Moon Trailway to a secondary pedestal;then to their property electrician will take it from there. Water: Not in Town water system. Town of Estes Park Public Works and Utilities reseive the right to amend comments contained herein at any time prior to final approvaL 0 0 .0 • Statement of Intent—Variance Request Hi Lot 20,Little Valley,Second Filing ., March23,2011 MAR 2 LOH Requested variances: Section 4.3.C.5.Table 4-2 ‘RE’Zoning Front Setback -Existing 50’from current property line -Requesting 25’from west property line and 29’from southwest property tine The legal description of the subject property is Lot 20,Little Valley,Second Filing,Larimer County,Colorado. Access will be from Moon Trail Way.The land is zoned RE Rural Estate (2.5 acre),under the current Estes Valley Development Code,with setbacks being 50’from all lot lines.The variance is being requested in order to obtain approval of a building setback less than prescribed in the EVDC Section 4.3.C.5 Table 4-2.The proposed house footprint totals approximately 3,923 square feet.The client is requesting a variance for the southwest portion of the house. Standards for Review: 1.Special circumstances or conditions exist on this lot since it is less than two acres (1.59 acres)in 2.5 acre zoning and is long and thin in shape.Fifty foot wide building setbacks are prescribed to RE Zoning,whereas twenty-five foot setbacks are prescribed to E-1 Zoning (I acre minimum)in which this lot fits more appropriately due to size.Due to the lot characteristics and zoning mentioned above,a very small (0.28-acre),steep (40%-43%slopes)allowable building area is available. 2.“Practical Difficulty Factors:” a.Without the variance the proposed home will have to be moved downhill,into steeper slopes closer to a drainage swale. b.The variance is fairly substantial-the request is to allow the southwest portion of the house to encroach into the 50’building setbacks a maximum of 25’. c.The house is proposed to be located in the southwest portion of the property that is not as heavily forested and less steep than the remainder of the property.Furthermore,a steep dry gulch bisects the northeast portion of the property.This proposed location of the house will also reduce impact to the site due to the proximity to Moon Trail Way and being positioned higher on the slope so that less cut and fill is required for the house and the driveway.The house should blend well with the character of the Lithe Valley neighborhood. d.This variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer because all surrounding lots have onsite wells and septic systems.This variance will not affect the continued use of surrounding wells and septic systems. e.The client did purchase the property with knowledge of the setbacks,however,when placing the house,wanted to reduce impact to the Site. f.If the house is moved to fit the prescribed 50’building setbacks,it will be located lower on the steep slope closer to the drainage,creating more impact to the Site (cut/fill),removing the some of the largest trees onsite,and will be more visible to surrounding neighbors (to the west and north). 3.The variance requested is not general or recurrent in nature,the situation is site specific. 4.The granting of this variance will not cause an increase in density or create the ability to create new lots. 5.If allowed,this variance represents the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. 6.The proposed variance request will not change or add previously permitted property uses. -2 Submittal Date __ H I I—__r 4liLtAiS,4sJt Ru7KC.CeoP€g. 1’ /.S’acresLotSize Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service F Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Septic Septic ‘Variance Desired (Development Code Section #): __________________________________________________________ 5 izth ,,z6vrcLs ifl l2es ieIe.4jot(hic -4-c Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1 =20) 1 reduced copy of the site plan (lix 17) I”The site plan shal(include information in Estes Valley Develcpriert Code Appendix B.Vll.5 (attached), The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. Town of Estes Pork -P.O.Box 1200 -170 MocGregor Avenue a Estes Park.CO 805)7 Community Development Deportment Phone:(970)577-3721 e,Fox:19701 556-0249 c www.esfes.org/ComDev S ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION IN MAZ3 2011 Record Owner(s): ‘Street Address of Lot: Legal Description:Lot:Rc Block: ________________ Subdivision:Lk)e Vaficv crrn..,A Parcel lD#:‘ftfl-t-J_ Tract: Zoning r Town r Town asfos-rtJnArt-{sInilrLe $t4-n,fcy) WRt F Well r Otii’er (Specify) Well F Other (Specify) F EPSD F EPSD F Other F F UTSD UTSD 3< Y None 1 Yes FNo L-E,RE*U. F Owner F F F F I o’-i?,€tc cQec D.ESZcSPA-lZt’-.rn .or-_ F Applicant ‘Consultant/Engineer RevIsed 11/20/09 S €4 C)----- .; ThET4IliTZTiiETh.. Record Owner(s)W.I1.ant?fav,4 C Ce’cpeY MailingAddress 4Ht$Jj,&,,nt—7217tc1-rv4.oieI fl40 (sn1Th- Phone ;Cell Phone Fax L Ema Applicant Vctvi Worn tyyiii3 ,Jht. Maihng Address Jc’-(3 1?st,c”-eL e4±Ccjrc’az’rk (n 4’1R Phone g2D-cwrqggIIICellPhone‘72c -a.37---og39- II1fl Fax g?-Q-5W(o-fljDf hllhIllJJl Email Vkca-jrbrLs.COrn j JConsultantIEngineer P14°t&j3.’ezst.(ee III)II Mailing Address r IIJIII Phone [iiWl!1I Cell Phone •Fax I !;HhlI Email F APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estee Valley Planning Area,both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: httQ://www.estes.orQ/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submIttal. Revised 11120/09 03/28/2011 OS:46 G3E5300845 FLIGHT OPS PAGE 04 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are mm and conect to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. b In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree thai the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Eates Valley Development Code (B/DC). I acknowledge that I ha’se obtained or have access to the EVOC.and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on tfle application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: httpilvestes,orrakXrnDevlDevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Bates Park for tiNng and receipt of the application fee by the Tawn does not necessarthj mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC, *I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline dale. 0”I understand that a rsubmittal fee WIN be charged If my application is incomplete. The Community Devetopment Department will potIt the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. 0’-I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. 0’1acknowledge that)have recek’ed the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule arid that ‘4 failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmitfal of an application that has become null and void. 0”1understand that I am required to obtain a ‘Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it IS dearly visible from the road.I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed buildhglstructure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)business dap prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request.“Failure of an applicant to apply for a building penhlit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of raceMng approval of the ‘variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA qull and vold.(Esres Valley Development Code Section 3.6D) Nam!s: Record Owner PLEASEPRINr:COoPKQ -‘i+I C.C00 er Applicant PLEASE PRINT:a (In e tYl t BC a4dt Signatures: Record Owne Date 3 ‘7 I I Applicant ___________________________________ Date /-. Rcvid S APPLICANT CERTIFICATION — I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC,and that,prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: httQ://www.estes.oro/CornDev/DevCode Funderstand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. fr The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Fates Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. P I acknowledge that I have received the stes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result r,my appicaticn or the approval of my appication becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that I am required to obtain a ‘Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked.I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)business days pricr to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request,“Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval of the variance shall automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void.”(Estes Valley Development Code Section 3,6.D) Names; Record Owner PLEASE PRINr: Applicant PLEASEPRINT:(Te ftne .at SIgnatures: Record Owner .Date4n’—C---Date 3/c2...i’l/Applicant Revsea’I/20/09 Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts ji’:’L’__er&::*#* ,“-%.-.L)Fmfl)(It) RE-I 1/lOAc.lOAc.200 50 50 50 30 20 RE 112.5k.2.5 Ac.200 50 50 50 30 20 E-1 I lAc.[3)100 25 25 25 30 20 . .25- E 2 ½Ac.(31 75 arterlais;10 15 30 20I5-other streets 25- R 4 34 Ac.60 arterials;10 15 30 20I5-other streets B-I 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 Single-family 25-=18,000;IIR-2 4 60 ‘io 10 30 20Duplex=¶5-other 27000 streets 40,000, Residential 5,400 sq.60;Uses:ft/unit RM Max =8 and (4)[8](Ord.ots 25- (3rd.Mhi 3 25-07 §1)than arteHais;10 [6]10 30 20(7]18-01 Senior 15-other #14)Institutional SenIor 100,000 streets LMnn Uses:InstItutional sq.ft.: Max —24 LivIng Uses:200 I —34Ac. INotestoTable4-2: (1](a)See Chapter 4,§4.3.0,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for single-family residentialsubdivisionsthatarerequiredtosetasideprivateopenareasperChapter4,§4.3.0.1. (b)See Chapter 11,§11.3,which allows a reduction in minImum lot size (area)for clustered lots in open spacedevelopments. (a)See Chapter 11,§11.4,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for attainable housing.(d)See Chapter 7,§7.1,which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area)for development on steep slopes.(Ord.2•02 §1) [2]See Chapter 7,§7.6,for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands.(3rd.2-02 #5;Ord.11-02 §1) [3)If private wells or septic systems are used,the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres.See also the regulations set forth in§7.12,“Adequate Public Facilities.’ 14)Townhome developments shall be developed on parcels no smaller than 40,000 square feet;however,each individualtovahomeunItmaybeconstn.icted on a mInimum 2,000 square foot lot at a naximum density of 8 dwellIng units per acre. (5)All development,except development of one single-family dwelling on a single lot,shall also be subject to a maximum floorarearatio(FAR)of .30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%.(3rd.25-07 §1) (6]Zero side yard setbacks (known as “zero lot line dev&opment”)are allowed for townhome developments. (1 Minimum buildIng width requIrements shall apply to mobile hon-isa located In a mobile horns park. [8)Single-family and duplex developments shall have mInimum lot areas of 18,000 s.f.and 27,000 s.f.,respectively.Cord 18-01#14) (9)All structures ehall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than tour adjacent or off-site dwellIngs orlots.The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or private roads,the edge of the dedceted right-of-way orrecordedeasementorthepropertyline,whlchsver produces a greater selback.The setback shall be the same as theapplicableminimumbuilding/structure setback.(3rd.11-021;3rd.25-07 §1) (IC]See Chapter 1,§1.9.E,which allows an increase In the maximum height of buhdlngs on siopes.(3rd.18-02 #3) I Zoning Districts §43 Residential Zoning Distiicts -‘en C) 0 C,,,,,’C Co o p e r Va r i a n ’ ’ ç O Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s Ci t y ST Zi p Ro b e r t & Li n d a Mo a k 39 6 0 Li t t l e Va l l e y Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ho w a r d & do n n a Ho r n 44 - 1 5 5 Oc o t i l l o Dr La Qu i n t a CA 92 2 5 3 Pr i s c i l l a Lo o n s t e n 17 3 0 Mo o n Tr a i l w a y Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Wi n d y Dr e a m s , LL C 28 6 3 7 Me a d o w Gl e n Wa y W Es c o n d i d o CA 92 0 2 6 Sc a n l o n Ex e m p t Ch i l d r e n ’ s Tr u s t Po Bo x 13 0 7 Ly o n s CO 80 5 4 0 St e w a r t & Ca r l o t t a Ro u r k e 76 0 2 S Co t t o n w o o d Mt n Li t t l e t o n CO 80 1 2 7 Un i t e d St a t e s of Am e r i c a Ge n e r a l De l i v e r y Wa s h i n g t o n DC 20 4 1 0 Sc o t t & Ri t a Ro g e r s 35 8 7 Sc o t t s d a l e Ci r Na p e r v i l l e IL 60 5 6 4 Gr e g o r y Ot i s 40 6 8 Ut t l e Va l l e y Rd Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ti m o t h y Bl a c k 91 8 Ar a p a h o e Ci r Lo u i s v i l l e CO 80 0 2 7 Fa b r i c i o & Ju d i t h Le d o u x 40 9 0 Li t t l e Va l l e y Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Pa u l i n o S a n c h e z 13 1 3 Wi l l i a m s S t l * 7 0 6 De n v e r CO 80 2 1 8 El d o n & Kr y s t a l Ki f e r P0 Bo x 25 8 5 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ca r o l y n Co d y Ca r o l y n De n n e h v 40 7 0 Li t t l e Va l l e y Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ma r i a n n e & Ve r n o n Oe p p i n g 40 2 8 Li t t l e Va l l e y Rd Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ka t h l e e n He n r y 23 0 Co e Rd Cl a r e n d o n Hi l l s IL 60 5 1 4 0 Co o p e r Va r i a n c e AP O COOPER VARSlTE DETAIL DRAWN I DATE I CML j 04—27—1 iJ 5 — 1 1 1 I F 1B 1.5 12 50’ CAP LOT 22 FOUND #4 REBA WITH PLASTIC #4 REBAR CAP #9485 PLASTIC CONTROL POINT #1#9485 (SEE NOTE 2) SCALE FOUND #4 REBAR to 1z=30’ WITH PI AcTIC CAP VAN HORN ENGINEERING I SCALE PROJ.NO. 1043 Fish Creek Rood —Estes Park,CO 80517 _____________________ Phone:(970)586—9388 —Fox:(970)586—sloi 1”30’2006—05—05 BA S I S OF BE A R I N G S T4 N , R7 2 W , LA R I M E R CO U N T Y , CO L O R A D O FO U N D #4 RE B A R WI T h PL A S T I C CA P #9 4 8 5 FO U N D 3 1 / 2 BR A S S CA P 4 2 . 0 0 ON 2 1 / 2 ” PI P E ST A M P E D _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ “D E P A R T M E N T OF AG R I C U L T U R E SE R V i C E SE 1 / 1 6 ” 43 FO U N D #4 RE B A R WIT H PL A S T I C CA P # 1 0 8 5 5 BE A R S N8 0 ’ O 2 ’ 2 0 ” E 13 . 0 6 ’ FR O M PL A i T E D CO R N E R LO C A T I O N 25 ’ RA L F WIC RI G H T — O F — W A Y FO R MO O N TR A I L W A Y RO A D AS DE D I C A T E D TO TH E PU B U C ON TH E UT r L E VA L L E Y PL A T SE C O N D Fl U N G ) FO U N D ST O N E AN D PI P E (1 ” DI A M E T E R PI P E , WIT H MU S H R O O M E D TO P AN D DO U B L E HE A D E D NA I L IN ST O N E PI L E ) AC C E P T E D AS TH E CO N T R O L L I N G MO N U M E N T FO R TH E OR I G I N A L LI T T L E VA L L E Y SU B D M S I O N SE C O N D FI L I N G LO T 2 0 , LI T T L E VA L L E Y SU B D I V I S I O N , SE C O N D FI L I N G , PA R T OF TH E N O 1 ’ l I t C W 41 . 7 4 ’ ( N 8 9 1 O ’ O o ) FO U N D #4 RE B A R WIT H T 1 C CA P #9 4 8 5 CO O P E R S I T E P L A N SO U T H E A S T QU A R T E R OF SE C T I O N 7, LO T 18 5 0 - L O T 2 0 2 ’ 1 . 5 9 A C R E S 1 / / / / LO T 1 9 I / / I / I FO U N D 5 / 8 ” DLA . . BE N T 0 (H O O K E D ) ST E E L RO D / - I I. 1 W ST E P1 1 1 1 B W 4 T A 1 O M L OM Y N O B lO T 10 li T a AS A 1* 1 0 SM A L Y PL A Y IO R NI . . R o a e n S W I 0 r A I T r J J 5 0 * 1 1 M E AT I • IT E R O A I S NO ME E i S a ON CO N T R a PO O l E I I (W t € r F U 6 WIT H 1W . R 0 ) WIT H NI A A K D BI V A I C 4 17 63 5 0 . 0 0 C I I 1 O L A T U BY Kl A N TO P O C A ’ O P , t ? ) . Z LO T B Z O I C m a l i . ES T A T E ( . A I Q TO 1W 15 1 1 5 VA L L E Y T& U O P L O I T . T 0 1 O ( S ME 50 FE E T FR O M AL L LO T a n 4. M E E i S a ON 11 € ‘* 1 N T H 11 € OF I l O J E C T PR O P E R T Y O I o * A o i 1 ON 1W EA S T DO BY A I” F 1 01 0 ON 1 W WE S T DO BY A 15 ” OI N E T E R M WiT H A F O S T t t I P 51 0 1 * 1 0 LS 9 4 R I T ! C 1W J U I * T S T C R OF (0 1 I L L1 f l 1 1 VA L L E Y 5 1 I O F U 5. SO Y B G W t I 1 1 I I OR 1C M 1W P R O P DA E W A Y NO E X S I O ME S I . T ) M E I U a L B O D C T I C ON 1W LO T . • A 1* 0 0 a R M Y RA T WA S O * 1 C D ON 1 G PR O P E R T Y BY 1 W O T F a — PR O J E C T 2 0 0 5 - 0 7 - f l AL L I S A l e Ft A T T W I f o m M I o l S D * N l E E B FF 0 6 IK k T RA T . 7. 1W F E S i I 17 1W PR O P O S E D I O AT DC 0 0 W P0 6 4 1 A W . t O* 1 O O L A L OR I O T W f l 55 2 1 . 6 (3 4 2 ’ AW A E i i . OR O E ) N 1W LO C A T O R 50 * 1 4 ON 1 S t ST E PL M L 15 € l a n a i ,a n w A a E l C 4 T AT l i t P0 6 4 1 B 3 5 2 M O E OF 6 * I L 06 4 C C PE R SE O T I O N I I S 17 1W ES T E S VA l L E Y DO T I f l O R C I T FO U N D #4 RE B A . R WIT H PL A S T I C CA P #9 4 8 5 #1 LO T 2 2 LO T 2 3 n m f l I. A S P T C ST E T C I 11 0 1 D C *1 0 I C T A L I ON ST E LO C A D O N TO £ D E T E m C . 2. T U t L f l E S I t WA l E R *0 1 PR O A C E D FR O M A PW A ’ A I E WI L L ON ST E . LO C A T O R TO D E T S C . 3. BL C T F I C I T h DO I C S T C DS C T F 0 T Y B PR O I W E D 1 T * 1 4 15 € TO N T I OF ES T E S PM B C LO f T * 1 0 PO W E R T S C I T WH O I RO T E *1 . 0 4 0 1W 4 I TR M . W A Y R— 0 — W . D . E C T LJ € S IA I S I R A T E D ON D O ST E P1 * 1 1 ME * D P f l A T E MO * m IC E * f l f l A W T W L L6 € S TO S E R f TI C ST E * 0 1 11 4 5 TO X LO C A T O R TO BE T E m C O . 4. 0* 5 1 PR O P N € GA S 11 * 1 . P R O A FO R TI C ST E BY A Pq O A T E D 0 0 R OF TI E E E O WIT H IT E W L A T O I ST E TO I r T E m a 5. 1U E P N S € i D S C T O I U f l I O C S E R U FO R l I t ST E 11 1 . 1 P R O . t O BY GO U T . W I I MS S , t X t I C Wi T l e . 15 € I I IR I L W A Y R- 0 — W . TI C LO C A T O R *1 0 IB T I L L A T O OF I L I e S WE T . DE T O R S O . 5. SC C O S S . A TO 11 € 1 0 € ST E *1 1 1 0 0 € OF F OF I TR W A Y . TO DE D C . S•1 0‘ff 1 , LE G E N D PO W E R PO L E A S FR ( S l I C E R PC l W ) SC A L E 1“= 2 0 ’ 0 lA t U A S I 0. MO RU T H C. E R 4 n a Y CO I R T O € S T C I O . 51 0 03 0 1 7 PO I O E R O S 4 PV C Th E E S (O L l i C E R C ) B i l E WW J O T (T L M E T E R NO T E D ) 50 . 5 f T _ 1 7 _ 5 _ y — - &A O R € * D DE C T m C t I C o FO S O II O W S C I T A T S D N (A S C m ) 00 . 0 0 l o S . OR C0 L O . A A T E D D * ? a ( lO W 6) (0 0 . 0 0 ) RA T T E D OR E D D e e G ( IO T E 6)