The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2013-11-05Prepared:September 30,2013 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday,November 5,2013 9:00 a.m.—Board Room Town Hall 1.PUBLIC COMMENT 2.CONSENT AGENDA Approval of minutes dated September 10,2013 3.LOT 9,STANLEY HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION,1081 WEST LANE Owner:Frank W &Jeoffrey J Schageman Family Trusts Applicant:Steve Lane,Basis Architecture Request:Variance from EVDC Section 4.3,Table 4-2,which requires 50- foot setbacks from the property line in the RE—Rural Estate zone district.Request to encroach approximately fifteen (15)feet into the side setback to construct a proposed deck. Staff Contact:Phil KielsIer 4.REPORTS 5.ADJOURNMENT The Estes Volley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriote items not available at the time the agenda wos prepared. r / -4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment September 10,2013,9:00 a.m. Board Room,Estes Park Town Hall Board:Chair Jeff Moreau,Vice-Chair Bob McCreery,Members John Lynch, Wayne Newsom,and Pete Smith;Alternate Member Chris Christian Attending:Chair Moreau,Members McCreery,and Newsom Also Attending:Director Chilcott,Planner Kleisler,Recording Secretary Thompson Absent:Members Lynch and Smith Chair Moreau called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m.He introduced the Board members and staff.There was a quorum for the meeting. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence.There were three people in attendance. 1.PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2.CONSENT Approval of minutes of the August 6,2013 meeting. It was moved and seconded (McCreery/Smith)to approve the Consent Agenda as presented and the motion passed unanimously. 3.METES &BOUNDS PARCEL,217 Big Horn Drive Planner Kleisler reviewed the staff report.The property at issue is located at 217 Big Horn Drive,and the applicant has requested a variance from the Estes Valley Development Code Section 4.3 Table 4-2,which requires buildings and accessory structures be setback a minimum of ten (10)feet from the side property line in the RM—Muiti-Famlly Residential zone district.The applicant has requested to encroach approximately five (5) feet into the side setback to construct a proposed deck.Planner Kleisler stated the lot size is 0.14 acres,just over 6,000 square feet.The minimum lot size for a single-family dwelling in the RM zone district is 18,000 square feet.The existing dwelling is very close to the property line,and sits partially in the setback.The proposed deck would be located on the north end of the property. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 September 10,2013 Planner Kleisler stated the application was routed to affected agencies and adjacent property owners,and a legal notice was published in the local newspaper.No concerns were expressed by agencies or neighbors. Staff Findings 1.In determining whether special circumstances or conditions exist,staff found: a.The existing dwelling is partially located within the side setback.According to the Larimer County Tax Assessor,this single-family home was built in 1939 and is legally nonconforming to current setback standards. 2.In determining practical difficulty,staff found: a.The residential use may continue without the variance. b.The variance was not substantial c.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered with the approval of this variance.Nearby homes are generally the same size or larger, with some having decks similar in scope to the one proposed.Adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment as a result of this variance.The nearest property is a residential dwelling approximately 23 feet to the south. d.Affected agencies expressed no concerns relating to public services for this variance. e.The applicant purchased the property in late 2011,after the adoption of the current setback requirements. f.A variance appears to be the only practical option to construct a functional deck.Q3.Staff found the proposed variance represented the least deviation from the regulations that would afford relief,and the functionality of the proposed deck may be limited if built within the required setbacks. 4.Staff found they could determine compliance with the variance without an official setback certificate. Staff recommended approval of the variance,with conditions listed below. Conditions 1.Compliance with the approved site plan. Staff and Board Member Discussion Member Moreau asked about the waiver of the setback certificate.He questioned whether the official setback certificate was being required unnecessarily on many projects. Member Newsom stated there have been instances where the plans have changed after the approval,requiring a setback certificate.Director Chilcott stated staff can frequently verify compliance without requesting an official setback certificate,and the building inspector can often make that determination.She stated there are parameters when a certificate is necessary,and staff would not be comfortable with changing policy to waive all setback (and foundation)certificates.She would review the current policy with staff. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 3 September 10,2013 Public Comment Steve Randall/applicant asked for clarification about the compliance verification after the deck is constructed.Planner Kleisler stated a letter would be mailed following the meeting providing direction for the completion of the project. It was moved and seconded (Lynch/Smith)to approve the variance request as presented with the findings and conditions recommended by staff and the motion passed unanimously. REPORTS Director Chilcott reported on the parking structure design charrettes presented last week. The Town board will proceed with the selection made at the meetings.She stated the design team will submit a development plan.The front setback must be a minimum of eight (8)feet and a maximum of sixteen (16)feet from the property line.Director Chilcott stated a variance request for the front setback was likely,and a special Board of Adjustment meeting may be considered.Construction is planned to be completed by late May,2014.She stated a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to hear the variance request and the development plan may be necessary to fit the project into the tight schedule.Director Chilcott will be reviewing timelines to make sure all legal deadlines can be met.In the CD—Commercial Downtown zone district,the purpose of the setbacks is to create a pedestrian area and allow views of the Visitor Center.There was some discussion during the presentation about the proposed lighting on top of the structure possibly exceeding the 30 foot height limit.She stated the proposed structure would contain three levels of parking,with the top level being exposed.She would stay in contact with the Board as to timelines and would appreciate cooperation to keep the project moving. Director Chilcott stated no new applications for the proposed pertorming arts center have been received.WiN Birchfield,Floodplain Manager,has received some information from FEMA regarding the floodplain in that area. When asked by Member Newsom about the status of Fall River Village,Director Chilcott reported all building permits have expired and there has been some damage to some of the unfinished buildings.Chief Building Official Birchfield has been talking to an owner’s representative concerning what would need to be done to reinstate work on the project. There being no further business,Chair Moreau adjourned the meeting at 9:24 am. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment September 10,2013 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 4 Jeff Moreau,Chair Karen Thompson,Recording Secretary 0 -.-. ____ 1081 West Lane Setback Variance Request Estes Park Community Development Department,Planning Division Room 230,Town Hall,170 MacGregor Avernie PC Box 1200,Estes Padç CO 80517 Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEEETING DATE: November 5,2013 REQUEST: This request is for a variance from the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC)Section 4.3,Table 4-2,which requires buildings and accessory structures be setback a minimum of 50 feet from the side property line in the RE Rural Estate zone district. The Applicant requests to encroach 15 feet into the side setback to construct an above-grade deck.The proposed deck would connect to an existing side deck and measure approximately 20’by 43’. LOCATION:1081 West Lane APPLICANT/OWNER:Steve Lane,Basis Architecture/Frank and Jeoffrey Schageman STAFF CONTACT:Phil Kleisler REVIEW CRITERIA:In accordance with Section 3.6 C.‘Standards for EVDC,all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with standards and criteria contained therein. The Board of Adjustment is the decision-making body for this application. Review”of the the applicable REFFERAL AND PUBLIC COMMENTS:This request has been routed to reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment.A legal notice was published in the Trail Gazetta Affected Agencies.No concerns expressed during review. Public.A property owner to the north of the Schageman residence emailed staff stating that they have no objection to granting this variance. STAFF FINDINGS: 1.Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g.,exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness,shallowness or the shape of the property)that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code’s standards,provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards,this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding:Staff does not find that special circumstances or conditions exist relating to lot shape and size.The home is not located within the side setback.According to the Larimer County Tax Assessor,this single-family home was built in 1963.Minimum lot standards are found in Table 4,2 of the EVDC and include the following: Measurement Required 1081 West Lane Minimum Width 200 Feet Approx.198 Feet The lot size and dimensions are generally in line with the standards and intent of the RE Rural Estate district.Town records also indicate that a 50’ side setback has been required since the 1963 Larimer County Zoning Resolution was enacted. Staff does find that the location of the building creates practical difficulty in constructing a functional deck.The southeast corner of the home is located approximately four (4)feet from the southern property line. Additionally,it appears that less vegetation would be impacted if constructed on the south side of the building (see photo to right). 2.In determining ‘practical difficulty,the BOA shall consider the following factors: a.Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff Finding:Residential use may continue. 1ff7- 1081 West Lane Setback Variance Request Page 2 of 4 b.Whether the variance is substantial; Staff Finding:The variance is not substantial. c Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Staff Finding:The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered with the approval of this variance.Adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment as a result of this variance.The nearest property is a residential dwelling approximately 192 feet to the southwest,as measured from the edge of the proposed deck. d.Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding:Affected agencies expressed no concerns relating to public services for this variance. e.Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff Finding The property was transferred to the applicants in 1993,after the adoption of the 5Q’side setbacks. f.Whether the Applicant’s predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding:Per section 1 .9.D.b.(4)of the EVDC,the applicant may construct a patio or deck,uncovered and at-grade,“provided that they do not extend more than thirty percent (30%)of the required setback distance to any required setback.” 3.If authorized,a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding:Shortening the proposed deck would impact the practical usability of the space.The only alternative appears to be an at-grade patio or deck,or a substantial design of the current proposal. 4.In granting such variances,the BOA may require such conditions as will,in its independent judgment,secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. 1081 West Lane Setback Variance Request Page 3 of 4 Staff Comment Staff can determine compliance with the variance without a setback certificate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requested variance CONDITIONAL TO: 1.Compliance with the approved site plan. 2.All new exterior lighting comply with EVDC Section 7.9. SUGGESTED MOTIONS I move to APPROVE the requested variance with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. I move to DENY the requested variance with the following findings (state reason/findings). 1081 West Lane Setback Variance Request Page 4 of 4 &.ACK CPNVON DR !flJ: .1 r,‘ I, ‘I Jrtj -Wa-iCM Southeast view from from yard. South view of proposed deck location. 1081 West Lane Setback Variance Request Photo Attachment View from West Lane.proposed deck. Southwest neighbor,from location of proposed deck. It I 1081 West Lane Setback VaHance Request Photo Attachment .. TOWN OF ESTES PMU Inter-Office Memorandum To:Community Development From:Jeff Boles,Cliff Tedder and Steve Rusch Date:1012112013 Re:Stanley Heights variance setback.Lot 9,Stanley Heights Subdivision.1081 West Lane. The Water Department has no comments or concerns regarding the above application,as the proposed deck is not near the existing water service line. own of Estes Park Mail -Schageman Residence Variance http://mail.google.coin/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=aIa8Oe52la&view=pt&se.... Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.org> ESTES PARK Q Schageman Residence Variance 2 messages Dorothy Gibbs <owlsnest@beyondbb.com>Tue,Oct 22,2013 at 8:35 PM To:planning@estes.org I live on the north side of the Schageman residence,and have no objection at all to the granting of this variance. Dorothy Scott Gibbs 1240 Devil’s Gulch Rd. Estes Park CO 80517 IlL OC 232013 970-586-4092 ——-----—-_j / ccMwNvoLoPMENij owlsnest@beyondbb.com Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.org>Wed,Oct 23,2013 at 9:07 AM To:Dorothy Gibbs <owlsnest@beyondbb.com> Cc:Phil Kleisler <pkleisler@estes.org> Good Morning,Dorothy - Thank you for your comment,I will forward it to Phil Kleisler,the planner working on this project. I hope you came through the flood unscathed. Karen (Newsom)Thompson Administrative Assistant Community Development Department Town of Estes Park Phone:970-577-3721 Fax:970-586-0249 kthompson@estes.org (Quoted text hidden] 0 of I 10/23/2013 9:07 AM .. ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REQUEST FOR VARIANCE STATEMENT OF INTENT Lot 9,Stanley Heights 1081 West Lane,Estes Park,Colorado This application isa request for a variance from the setback requirements of Table 4-2 in the RE zoning,from SO- feet to a maximum of 35-feet (30%,see below)in one location to allow the corner of an above-grade deck to be constructed square to the existing house. Per section 1.9.D.1.b.4 of the EVOC,“patios and decks,uncovered and at-grade”,are permitted in the setback “provided they do not extend more than thirty percent (30%)of the required setback distance to any required setback.”The proposed deck meets all of these criteria,except “at-grade”as the proposed deck would be approximately 5-feet high. Review Standards 1.Special circumstances or conditions exist:The property is part of the Stanley Heights subdivision which was formed in the 1940’s.The existing home was constructed during the 1950’s.The property is in Larimer County,and was re-zoned in 1999 and included into the Estes Valley Development area.The lot is long and narrow for its size,and the existing home sits close to the southeast corner of the property, though the house itself does fit within the EVDC setbacks. 2.Practical Difficulty a.The property has been in use without the variance;however,the owners (who have kept the home in the family since its original construction)would like to make better use of the property, especially in the summer season,by constructing an outdoor living space,at the same level as the main floor. b.The variance is not substantial.The EVDC already allows ‘at-grade’decks within the setback at the same distance proposed by this application.Furthermore,due to the angle of the home versus the property line,the area of deck projecting into the setback is relatively small. c.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be altered,nor would adjoining properties suffer detriment as a result of the variance. d,.The variance would have no effect on public services. e.As stated above,the applicant’s family has owned the property since the 1940’s and so the EVDC setbacks were applied after the home was constructed. f.It would be possible to make the deck smaller or provide a ‘step-down’to an ‘at-grade’portion, or cut off the deck at the corner;however,all of these alternatives would impact the practical usability of the outdoor space —please refer to the floor plan. 3.The conditions reflected in this application are not general.They are specific to this particular home and property,size and orientation. 4.No reduction in lot size or increase in number of lots is proposed by this variance request. 5.The plan proposed is not excessive in meeting the owner’s desire for the highest and best use of their property. 6.The variance does not propose a non-permitted or prohibited use. Prepared by:Steve Lane,AlA BASiS Architecture PC ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION to bl fgeq—1-A-Nt- Tract: V. Scil P%CPt%Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service )<Town Proposed Water Service XTown Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service XceI Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Zoning F#tt t—’i P L)t-::tace:€MUfl Variance Desired (Development Code Section #):44t4td3Ct M O—%t L.A in .i i ima *,o —r.o,tr i-.o.v-eS Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Prson is Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.C of the Estes Valley Development Code) 1 copy (folded)of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1’=20’) I reduced copy of the site plan (1i”X 17’) F The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix BVII.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule).Copies must be folded. Iybmittal Date: 0 Record Owner(s):N’A&W.(73 Sc CJ4AM -ft1bffee a sc4-fkt*4M ThMIUI ThAIç, Street Address of Lot: _________— Legal Description:Lot: ___________ Block: _______________ Subdivision:S]ct4I.k%-1 4+eltiHTS ParceHD#:2S t’}Lo cell £ F F Well Well F F F F Other r Other EPSD EPSO Other (Specify) (Specify) r UTSD r UTSD r None )Septic Septic F Yes ycNo 0 F Owner cSrg a-1-ttie-,R,en is A9cfk1tC’?t V. V4/ ---Applicant t’2-Ptt-ThOMSc.S te-E,c-r€tbo) ‘$.,Cnnr ‘ntIFnr”n _______ Town of Estes Pork .P.O.Box 1200 -a 170 MacGregor Avenue -.Estes Port CO 805)7 Community Development Deportment Phone:(9701 577-3721 .Fox:(970)586-0249 ..www.estes.org/CornDev Revised 11/20/09 Va,0) . SE Z 2 n t “ S I— a St >, — 0a a- a a,C:4-aC0(U(. 2a-aS00CSS014 . Sa’CC0a)Da, -C0Laa,a’ -C>0Cis(C0.C00.0. CCIC-Ca)0D0Ca) -Ca, -C0(00a)a)a,U) -oCC)Sa) -cC- ) 0Da,a,C0CCCCCa.0)a,a,Uci , a,Sta) -C0U)>a)0E00C00a)U, a)CC Ea00E0S4-S4z•0eajCII e ci APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby eartHy that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowlri:Jge and that in filing the application am acting with he knowledge and consent of the owners ci the properly. fr In suLrntir’pthe application materials and sgrniig his application agreement,I acknowledge and agree that the applicaton is subject to the appicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the E-stes Valley Development Code (EVOC). I acknowledge that I FlavE.obtained ot have access to the EVOC,and that.prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunfty to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessatiy mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I understand that this variance request may oe delayed In processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline dale. I understand that a resubrnittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. b The Community Development Department wIll notify the applicant In writing of the datç on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I”I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Beard 01 Adjustmefit Vanance Application Schedule and that failure to meet The deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. understand that I am required to obtain a ‘Variance Notice”sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road.I uiide,stand that the corners of my property and the proposed b’Jildln9/structure corners must be field staked.I understact that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10)busIness days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing I understand that it the Board of Adjustment approves my request.“Failure of an applicant to apply For a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1)year of receiving approval at the variance may automatically render the decision of the BOA null arid void.’(Estes Valley Development Code Section 3,6.D) Names: Record Owner PLEASE mIINr fyysvs..’k Lj Sctacxivtr ‘+]cnIcy I Sc LX..Applicant PcEAsc PS/NT $,t&?lsN’J*—,,bAe’i.AQ.co4qtt.’p.att- SIgnatures. Owner , F ‘gf /-L.Date ‘7.V.i’-C) Applicant / Pc.4I3erl tl/20/09 Zoning Districts g 4.3 Residential Zoning Districts Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Minimum BulldlngfStructure Min Zoning Standards [13 [5]Property line Setbacks (2][4]Max.Building District (Ord.2507 §1)[91 (Ord.25-07 1)Building Width (ft.)Max.Net Density Area Width Side Height (units/acre)(sq ft.)(It)Front (ft.)(ft.)Rear (ft.)(ft.)[101 RE-i 1/10 Ac.10 Ac.200 50 50 50 30 20 RE 1/2.5 Ac.2.5 Ac.200 50 50 50 30 20 E-1 1 lAc.[3]100 25 25 25 30 20 25- arterials;10 15 30 20E2½Ac.[3]75 15-other streets 25- arterials;R 4 %Ac.60 10 15 30 2015-other streets R-1 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 Sirigte-farnily 25- =18,000;arterials;R-2 4 60 10 10 30 20 Duplex =15-other 27,000 streets 40,000, Residential 5,400 sq.60; Uses:ft/unit Lots 25-RM Max =8 and [4](8)(Ord.Greater arterials;(Ord.Mm =3 25-07 §1)than 15-other 10(61 10 30 20 [7]18-01 Senior #14)Institutional Senior 100,000 streets Living Uses:Institutional sq.ft.: Max =24 Living Uses:200 1/2 Ac. Notes to Table 4-2: [11 (a)See Chapter 4,§4.3.0,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for single-family residential subdivisions that are required to set aside private open areas per Chapter 4,§4.3.0.1. (b)See Chapter 11,§11.3,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for clustered lots in open space developments. (c)See Chapter 11,§11.4,which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area)for attainable housing. (d)See Chapter 7,§7.1,which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area)for development on steep slopes. (Ord.2-02 §1) [2]See Chapter 7,§7.6,for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands.(Ord.2-02 #5;Ord.11-02 §1) [3]If private wells or septic systems are used,the minimum lot area shalt be 2 acres.See also the regulations set forth in §7.12,“Adequate Public Facilities.” 14]Townhome developments shall be developed on parcels no smaller than 40,000 square feet:however,each individual townhome unit may be constructed on a minimum 2,000 square foot lot at a rnaimum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. [5]All development,except development of one single-family dwelling on a single lot,shall also be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR)of .30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%.(Ord.25-07 §1) [6]Zero side yard setbacks (known as “zero lot line development”)are allowed for townhome developments. [7]Minimum building width requirements shall J2 apply to mobile homes located in a mobile home park. [8]Single-family and duplex developments shall have minimum lot areas of 18,000 s.f.and 27,000 s.f.,respectively.(Ord 18-01 #14) [91 All structures shall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than four adjacent or oft-site dwellings or lots.The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or private roads,the edge of the dedicated right-of-way or recorded easement or the property tine,whichever produces a greater setback.The setback shall be the same as the applicable minimum building/structure setback.(Ord.11-02 §1;Ord.25-07 §1) (10]See Chapter 1,§1 .9.E,which allows an increase in the maximum height of buildings on slopes.(Ord.18-02 #3) Supp.8 4-7 Sc h a g e m a n Re s i d e n c e Va r i a n c e . x l s Ow n e r Ow n e r II Ad d r e s s Ci t y ST Zi p Ke r r y Pr o c h a s k a 31 8 Ov e r l o o k Ct Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Je f f r e y & Kr i s t i n e Ro g e r s 60 6 8t h Av e Ro c k Fa l l s IL 61 0 7 1 Al i e c e Ma t t s o n Ro b e r t Jo n e s 82 1 N Is l a n d Te r NW At l a n t a GA 30 3 2 7 Gu y & Le s l i e Va n D e r W e r f 79 0 No r t h U, Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Mu r i e l Ma c G r e g o r Tr u s t P0 Bo x 46 7 5 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 We s t La n e Ca m e l o t , LL C 76 Ch e r r y v a l e Rd Bo u l d e r CO 80 3 0 3 Do r o t h y Gi b b s 12 4 0 De v i l s Gu l c h Rd Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Ga r y Ki l e P0 Bo x 74 9 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Er b e Fa m i l y Tr u s t 10 0 1 Bl a c k Ca n y o n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Me l v i n & Le o n o r a Ru e p p e l 99 1 Bl a c k Ca n y o n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Je a n Ca r i s o n Tr u s t e e 95 0 Bl a c k Ca n y o n Dr Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Gl e n & Jo y Fr e d e r i c h s P0 Bo x 13 4 7 Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 D & E St e w a r t Tr u s t 10 0 0 We s t Ln Es t e s Pa r k CO 80 5 1 7 Sc h a g e m a n Re ic e Va r i a n c e . x l s 0 C Q S ti-p Ix 4; 6•’ -‘r r I 1.__.-_ --TI L * ‘N — 0-r_r::. n.j -4 In -p r 0 0 n 0 .1 r 0 I E I V 1 I (A)c,J -J -2% , , s t 0 : : - n r L : , , . 2 . , . , C c r o s s 5 r . . . 4 1 , , - , - - r ; .i . O K * o s - i . — ‘N I - . 10 3 0 2 3 1 .i A Q S N C J 1 V J t I 0 0 0 1 . _ rO 3 V C rN ; 3 0 3 3 SN I S A N E ; W - : - : ‘ i c f l . a n t i C - r 35 AA A s n s c ! 4 r ci LI V 10 0 1 1 CY I V 3 NE L D I .3 3 K m 1 3 1 3 4 3 0 3 1 5 U 2 1 3 4 C ; F 0 J 3 0 5 1 4 1 4 f l o r U f l i , 50 4 1 3 Cr - ; 01 4 . 1 * 13 . 3 5 ( 1 5 5 4 0 Ni ‘0 4 : 3 0 l a NO d E C E S 9 N O J I t T h o r AN Y r 0 $ I C * : 7 t s r 0 0 . . 59 3 1 o ( 1 f l o 3 0 : 5 - o L c O .S Y S s O 0 33 * 1 . 1 ; . : 1 3 1 4 5T h 1 ES S l I C E . t . : 3 5 : - k . . , . 33 1 ’ 1- OE I C I ’ L I * Y 11 1 3 f l 3 4 4 3 W & 0 1 (1 5 35 3 4 5 3 0 3 4 ; £ E . 1 4 3 d 3 . 1 . .0 0 0 0 34 0 3 5 C l 03 1 0 0 9 34 1 ’ o l O E 1 ( 3 : A E C M I S N : 3 4 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 . ! 3 5 5 (1 1 1 ( 1 . 0 3 3 0 1 0 01 1 9 3 a * 3 1 E 1 ; 1 0 0 2 0 5 5 9 1 2 1 0 0 3 .1 * 9 3 31 0 1 1 1 0 ‘i C r - 4 l i i i , 4 . 1 1 1 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 : 3 * 3 3 4 0 : 0 5 . I 3 4 O S o 5 F 30 * 1 0 E t S C ’ N .0 0 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 3 4 0 0 * 3 1 0 ! ‘5 0 . 4 4 - 0 * . 1 3 . 4 1 3 3 £ 5 c r 5 0 : 0 0 0 s 3 : c i NO .3 3 * is y . 1 0 5 3 5 1 * 0 : ( ‘ r o y , .3 3 3 4 ( 1 5 3 — — 1 0 9 3 3 3 C F E ’ 3 — : C ‘3 5 0 1 0 0 : 0 ! ¶ 0 4 ,i O S V 3 S ] N 4- S N E S C C 1 0 I 3 X 53 0 0 . 1 o . ‘ ( 3 - 3 o n 9 0 3 0 1 3 0 ) ‘ c c ( 0 0 0 9 0 1 3 0 40 31 0 : V 4. 3 4 S ’ ( 0 5 Q ” - E L J U l O W * 1 5 0 5 4 MV I E t O 0 * 3 4 3 0 0 32 0 9 1 0 0 * . . , : - S s O 0 m l ! ER . . 13 1 0 9 3 93 3 3 1 11 * 0 .C 1 0 9 5 0 4 0 4 2 1 3 * 1 3 3 0 3 (1 3 1 9 4 .I O I L Q A O 0 3 0 ’ - I C I :s g L O N s . r p n h l w n s 1 0 3 0 J c l d c - 5 , 1 . O ’ 1 1 5 0 7 0 4 31 5 0 1 * 0 1 3 9 0 1 4 3 0 3 ( 1 0 31 3 : : : t - V’ 1 0- 3 . 0 3 1 2 0 EE N E C ’ 4 3 04 . 1 3 4 5 . 0 4 0 0 ( 3 1 * t o O _ i ON bJ A 1 1 * 0 1 . 0 3 4 0 2 4 3 . ’ l OL 4 - i _ h o S I X C! : , ‘ 3 - i - I E Y CO ! O _ a II o c o S I . $ 0 5 NI 3 0 ( 0 ( 5 ( 1 3 4 0 4 0 3 3 3 1 03 5 3 1 . 1 * 4 1 . 0 3 4 0 3 5 3 5 11 * O ! J ” 0 .1 5 0 3 1 3 4 3 _ h O N . I - ! 2 0 3 4 4 2 1 1 03 3 . 2 1 2 ± 3 : 0. l4 ( 1 O 3 3 0 3 0 9 5 3 4 ; 00 0 0 3 1 3 5 0 0 3 3 5 3 4 * ! 2 0 0 54 1 34 0 0 2 1 ? 04 4 5 UY . 0 E N E 3 . 0 0 : 00 LE N V .5 0 10 n i l 0 0 0 i 3’ - ! rO 15 1 0 9 3 1 01 53 ) 1 3 4 0 5 0 5 1 9 4 * .5 1 & C 3 *0 $ 9 0 6 1 3 3 0 0 0 9 52 3 ( 1 5 : . : 3 - 1 1 : 4 . ’ c , s c r j y , ’ o : , C f l 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 3 9 1 * 3 9 3. 9 * IV 5 3 0 4 0 9 1 1 . 9 1 4 4 3 1 HL ’ M 4. 0 1 1 3 3 9 3 1 0 0 41 I r I r 14 . 3 4 3 1 : - S O d Cl O Y 03 1 4 3 0 ! 0 . S_ h C O 1 2 1 3 3 5 4 4 5 0 1 SE R b SO 13 1 4 4 0 L 2 1 : - N W l W 3 4 ’ 1 0 3 ’ 9 3 9 35 1 4 1 1 0 , 1 0 . 3; 1 : - 4. * 2 2 1 5 ( 1 3 0 9 0 3 9 (1 5 . 9 0 3 1 3 3 4 41 L 5 II I ;. 3 3 3 0 3 3 9 50 0 0 31 1 0 1 3 5 0 3 0 3 4 0 3 *1 0 3 0 3 1 4 1 . 1 0 9 3 1 * 0 9 MO 13 3 0 ) 1 1 ! 10 1 3 . . A 3 - t 0 1 0 3 3 1 4 0 or . 1 v A 0 0 3 53 3 1 1 ( 0 3 9 0 1 1 1 3 1 3 0 3 5 0 4 0 1 1 33 1 1 31 . 9 0 11 0 . 01 . 0 3 0 9 4 £ 1 0 30 3 0 3 1 i 3 1 9 0 ‘ 5 E E L : ! 24 . .3 . .5 3 1 3 0 3 5 9 1 5 1 * 3 1 3 4 1 1 9 04 3 3 0 5 0 3 3 9 3( 0 9 5 0 4 EH I NI 10 0 4 1 1 3 4 * 9 SC S I ] 3 5 1 9 3 5 3 33 1 9 ii ‘5 5 3 0 1 4 3 1 43 5 4 1 0 NC (1 3 1 0 3 3 5 5 ) 0 3 9 53 3 3 1 9 3 4 5 5 9 1 3 3 1 3 5 0 3 1 5 1 3 1 4 3 0 9 ‘ 3 0 1 6 3 : 5 3 ] 0 9 I I 31 1 . .0 2 11 : 0 3 1 ! !O N 35 9 H I l CI V 3 5 Q ’ 0 S C’ 5 ’ 2 d 53 5 1 1 9 3 * 9 33 4 3 . JO 50 0 1 3 3 4 3 1 1 O W AJ E S O S 3 4 2 5 0 3 ‘1 03 1 1 0 * 51 E V ] 1. 3 1 5 1 1 3 5 4 1 3 5 1 1 3 v O 3 N 3 ‘5 3 9 w 00 3 3 9 0 0 0 4 5 33 5 . . 0 .5 . 1 9 0 9 0 0 9 31 5 3 0 4 0 * 0 3 3 1 1 3 W 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 t ‘ 5 0 5 0 0 3 3 41 3 1 1 4 30 0 4 5* 0 1 4 1 . 0 9 5j S 4 3 3 1 3 5 1 3 4 0 S I W I E 1 0 51 5 1 3 1 1 1 1 V ] 3 3 0 * 0 3 3 0 3 I 9 0 4 33 1 1 II 41 1 0 4 3 35 4 . N O 3 1 3 3 3 O d NI 50 1 1 3 4 ( 4 10 3* 1 1 9 1 3 NO 1 0 4 0 3 9 1 : 1 o O t d l Q X E 03 1 9 1 . 1 0 A3 1 3 5 3 3 3 9 55 1 . 4 4 0 0 4 0 1 11 4 1 [ .3 0 4 0 5 ON 11 1 3 9 1 1 I 1 4 1 0 3 31 * 1 1 33 1 1 NI 0 3 1 3 1 0 1 3 0 LV :s N y r J I p x z , 2 N Z J J f l O 3 2 1 S f l - o c . & r c E : 0 31 . 9 1 3 ‘5 3 4 0 3 1 9 1 40 £ 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 3 r d 31 1 1 0 ! 53 3 4 q i N c 4 1 1 2 5 3 3 5 3 3 1 1 : 1 1 4 4 4 ( 3 13 9 3 33 1 3 0 1 31 ( 1 * 3 3 4 c l * 1 : 1 0 3 3 3 0 3 5 1 •1 V I d 03 9 1 9 1 5 2 1 3 4 . 0 0 9 34 1 1 10 04 4 0 5 0 3 35 3 3 5 4 1 0 0 3 31 1 1 31 35 9 3 53 3 1 0 0 ’ 0 ’ { 5 . 3 0 2 1 1 5 3 1 4 0 . 1 0 4 V C’ . ‘. 0 5 1 3 3 5 5 1 A 1 5 ! S N l l 4 I A O N 9 1 0 3 3 0 3 4 0 3 9 7 4 0 9 5 4 0 03 3 1 1 0 3 1 5 3 1 4 l 1 1 0 S 3 4 0 30 55 9 3 13 3 4 14 01 4 3 3 0 9 i I .3 3 4 3 ’ . 13 1 1 0 1 9 0, . 0* 0 1 . 3 1 s t : ji t * 3 3 5 4 3 H 1 3 0 3 41 3 3 5 1 . 4 . 1 3 1 ( 0 * 1 5 1 5 40 4 3 3 0 0 11 3 3 4 4 1 14 o 0 5 ‘ 4 . - o . C H , N * 0 3 5 40 3 1 1 1 1 34 4 1 01 . L I I ] 95 ( 1 15 3 4 4 33 5 0 1 3 1 . . “5 0 4 HI S * 1 IC .5 3 4 £1 . 33 5 1 4 3 *1 1 1 1 3 1 * . 5 43 1 1 3 1 . *7 .3 1 3 1 5 4 0 5 3 5 5 3 0 s4 9 3 1 1 3 4 0 1 74 4 1 LV 04 1 3 5 ( 1 1 2 5 3 3 7 . o l s O C f l l ON 1 4 3 9 1 0 0 2 0 3 31 1 1 1 34 0 1 0 3 1 5 0 4 3 5 3 9 . ‘ N Q J J 4 J ? 3 U 7 Y 5 2 7 - 7 / N / / / , . . 7 / — — — 1 w Q 0 6 9 4 . 0 2 3 31 3 3 0 , 53 0 0 5 0 , 1 * 0 .1 0 * 1 0 1( 1 0 , 0 3 1 * 0 1 ’ 3 1 1 0 3 0 0 53 3 0 1 03 1 1 * 41 o 1 4 3 3 5 0 i ’ W n o l l 0 * ( 41 3 1 1 3 1 I 0 ’ 3 0 - 0 ’ s S C, W 1 3 5 ’ ‘ 5 3 0 , 0 ’ . : r 3 4 3 , 3 3 3 1 : y I 1 . C 0 : 31 ’ ‘H - t 3 ’ - ° 1 3’ . ’ . C 3 0 0 a i d m 0 3 4 0 . - : - 11 1 0 . 5 1 . 3 9 5 53 1 5 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 3 4 0 ! 3 3 , r 3 C ’ , 0 1 3 1 3 5 3 1 ¶0 ’ . : , . 7 3 5 , 0 f l ’ 1 \ ’ 0 *1 1 4 1 1 * 31 09 3 1 1 19 4 . l 3 . S & c 0 0 4 91 9 3 4 14 13 5 S a i d ’ s cv - 9 : 1 1 1 3 3 ( 1 1 0 3 31 0 0 4 —. 1 , 5 0 : 9 1 0 3 3 : 0 ( 1 3 . ’ ; — ‘1 2 - 7 51 9 0 1 ‘1 1 _ S 44 1 1 9 50 1 3 1 3 * J o n 11 1 Un : 9 7 I 3 - 14 9 3 4 0 9 : 00 eD . 1 0 3 3 4 ’ (3 3 3 4 1 0 ) W ± 1 . 9 0 5} P 3 4 5 3 ’ ! ’ ! G W I 7 3 t c c II I O C X 0 0 — 9 - . . 0 - — i n . i s 3 .3 1 9 3 4 3 . 0 9 0 9 . 0 4 * Z ’ : r _ _ _ 7 0 ’ 7 0 . 0 3 4 5 , I —— 7 /I I 1 / - / / 1 0 5 1 9 _ h *0 0 3 j I i 33 5 s / i 3 J ‘1 0 3 1 1 5 1 - 2 3 5 4 . 3 / I 0 P L 4 5 3 1 1 4 3 : 0 3 I L 3 4 £ 1 5 0 0 S 0 2 • l 1 * 5 1 ? 1 1 1 , 1 0 0 9 1 / ; a , O L 6 . 5 : : 31 1 4 11 5 5 : , :0 5 ) 4 ‘‘ \ • 2 i 31 0 0 3 0 C I I I 1 1 / I J I I , O I O t b 4 . 0 / : : 1 3 5 3 ‘ 1 : - l a V . 3 / : 11 3 ’ 10 3 4 1 Nj 0 f t 3 . LI 5 0 3 [ ‘ 3 0 3 0 30 . ; 3 0 1 1 5 , , ; 11 3 ] \ — - . 1 / 1 :3 3 0 ; ( 3 1 . 4 0 3 ! 0 0 . 5 .1 .3 : 0 9 1 0 4 . 3 / . [ 7 . 3 3 0 1 > 1 1 ’ 3 ’ 3 .0 0 3 1 3 . 3 . 1 4 . 7 :s O S . t . 3 1 ’ . - 4 3 (1 3 - _ v s , I _ / - - - _ - _ - . - -I - - .4 / I 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 A ’ 3 _ t I ‘ O 1 / i A S N io ’ - 1 z t h 1 31 9 , 44 / - . a i . o , 3 0 4 - / / 1 tI l t I ( 3 0 5 4 0 , 3 0 3 1 3 * ! 1 11 0 1 4 4 0 3 4 4 ‘ - j o t s / k 4 1 — _ / ç r 7 ( 0 2 s 3 4 ) f l ’ 1 ! ‘ - ‘ - 3 i n s d f l 3 3 0 * 1 0 0 3 3 4 3 0 ‘ ‘ — 4 30 4 3 3 r u w a . r n : : . - _ , _ _ - - / 0 3 5 ( — d — .1 5 3 C c 1 W 41 1 0 / ?& U 3 0 N 1 3 V . 0 j , 40 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 3 1 9 5 0 ; 3 9 3 1 4 0 3 0 0 C N5 . 4 4 13 1 1 * , 0 d —! 1 9 1 1 0 3 0 5 3 [c C 5 ’ 11 0 3 0 5 .4 0 5 4 3 . 4 1* ‘4 3 9 3 .0 1 . 4 4 3 3 0 3 1 3 4 0 4 7 3 . 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 i . ’ * 14 1 1 ! 0 0 1 9 0 41 1 0 9 . 3 1 1 1 1 9 4 1 93 4 1* 1 1 3 (. 1 * 0 L3 3 0 ) ‘ 0 1 0 . 0 01 0 1 1 1 c o l i c 5 1 5 3 0 . 1 9 4 g’ L Q J V V ‘ J J J J Q I V 9 J I I I S N M Q J ‘E 1 A 1 0 1 1 3 7 S J O H S L L V [ T h £S ’ V u H h J f l O S ’ * J V 7 c [ A 3 A è[ f l S J N 3 P V A Oè [ c [ P V I 0 J V e 1 0 7 0 3 { i i V f l O 3 U J H I U V 7 ‘ R d H J 9 H U L L J O j S 3 7 , 4 Hu L L GN V ‘ f l NO I L L 3 H S ’ J O U 3 L L ? J V D JS V Z H L L è 3 O N HH L L J O N O J L L è I O J V N I J & L V 3 0 7 Oi V M H C CD 0 i03 ‘.0 ‘U’ In Ioi I— LANE —IIn 0 U, ‘0’ 0-, U, Ull Eli a ‘F’ a 0 I’D I’ \ ‘I \Lii ‘ ii I I’ ‘I ‘ 2 ‘ . I 2 I- 2 0 r EQ :1:0> 0-n ‘ I’ I’ I’ SETBACK r - -U 0-o 2 8 z m m rnwm I;/\ \ I —I 0 ‘1 L -N4d37’E 211.22’ WEST C/) CD CD Scha9em Residence aemodel dttiofl — - -park r:n%rDtacio tSObl I a tø C C BASiS 1692 Big Thompson Avenue,Suite Estes park,Colorado 80517 H a) D tOa-’ C, CD Ba) I• RI 1.3 C.) 1.3 0 -‘ C.) o w 0 •0 C, 0 G Q cx It Cl)COz--a cp a -‘1cp Z0z1 o — -UCT U) Schageman Residence RemodellAddition Estes Park,Colorado 80517 —.0 o M —ww 0 BASiS 1692 Big Thompson Avenue,Suite 100 Estes Park,Colorado 80517