The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Park Planning Commission 2022-09-20PLANNING COMMISSION – TOWN OF ESTES PARK TO BE HELD VIRTUALLY Tuesday, September 20, 2022 1:30 p.m. Estes Park, CO 80517 Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://zoom.us/j/93771272278 Or Join by Telephone: 1.Dial US: +1 833-548-0276 (toll free) 2.Enter Webinar ID: 937 7127 2278 followed by # The meeting will be live-streamed on the Town’s YouTube Channel and recorded and posted to YouTube and www.estes.org/videos within 48 hours. Public Comment When the moderator opens up the public comment period for an agenda item, attendees wishing to speak shall: 1.Click the “Raise Hand” button, if joining online on the Zoom client, or 2.Press *9 and follow the prompts if joining by telephone. 3.If you are watching live on YouTube, please call the number listed above, and mute your computer audio for the duration of your remarks. Once you are announced, please state your name and address for the record. The Town of Estes Park will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town services, programs, and activities and special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call (970) 577-4777. TDD available. Prepared September 14, 2022 1 NOTE: The Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION – TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, September 20, 2022 1:30 p.m. AGENDA APPROVAL PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address). CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Planning Commission Minutes and Study Session Minutes dated June 21, 2022 ACTION ITEMS 1. Rezone – Homes on Fish Hatchery Senior Planner Woeber 2. Conditional Use Permit for ADU Senior Planner Woeber 3. Development Plan – Twin Owls Motel Senior Planner Woeber DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. CompPlan Update Director Garner ADJOURN 2 3 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado June 21, 2022 Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the PLANNING COMMISSION of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. The meeting was held in the Town Board Room, 170 MacGregor Avenue in said town. Commission: Chair Matt Comstock, Vice-Chair Matthew Heiser, Commissioners Joe Elkins, Howard Hanson, Janene Centurione Attending: Comstock, Hanson, Heiser, Also Attending: Director Jessica Garner, Senior Planner Jeff Woeber, Planner II Town Board Liaison Barbara MacAlpine, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund Absent: Centurione, Elkins Chair Comstock called the meeting to order at 11:00 p.m. This was the first meeting in the Boardroom for this Planning Commission. Deputy Town Clerk Bunny Beers gave an overview on how to use the microphones and voting buttons for a live session. Matt Ashby, the consultant from Ayers Associates, introduced his team and began the slide presentation on the Missing Middle. Graham Smith from Multi.Studio was virtually present. The benefits of more housing options, how to get them, and what is “missing middle” housing were discussed. Obstacles to attaining missing middle housing were also reviewed. To summarize, the power comes from putting more units on a smaller lot, thus achieving the level of density and efficiency needed. A purpose and intent statement, guiding criteria, and what is appropriate will have to be explored. Knowing the vision will help with the mechanics of updating the Development Code. The draft code amendment could be ready by August, with public engagement in October and the final draft available for a November meeting vote. Chair Comstock adjourned the Study Session at 12:45 p.m. Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary draf t 4 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 21, 2022 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the ESTES PARK PLANNING COMMISSION of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in said Town of Estes Park on the 21 day of June 2022. Committee: Chair Matt Comstock, Vice-Chair Matthew Heiser, Commissioners Joe Elkins, Howard Hanson, Janene Centurione. Attending: Vice-Chair Heiser, Commissioner Centurione, Commissioner Elkins, Commissioner Hanson, Director Jessica Garner, Senior Planner Jeff Woeber, Planner II Alex Bergeron, Planning Technician LJ Baur, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund, Town Attorney Dan Kramer, Town Board Liaison Barbara MacAlpine Absent: Centurione, Elkins ChairComstock called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. AGENDA APPROVAL It was moved and seconded (Heiser/Hanson) to approve the agenda. The motion passed 3-0. PUBLIC COMMENT none CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL Commissioner Hanson asked that the Large Vacation Home approval be moved to action item one. It was moved and seconded (Hanson/Heiser) to approve the amended consent agenda. The motion passed 2-0, with Comstock abstaining. ACTION ITEMS 1.Large Vacation Home 851 Peak View Drive Director Garner Owner Drew Siroky, 851 Peak View Drive, explained that when he bought the five- bedroom home, it was approved for 12 occupants, but an occupancy of 10 was on the issued license. It was unknown why this was the case, but he wanted to comply with the regulations. It was moved and seconded (Hanson/Heiser) to approve the Large Vacation home and the motion passed 3-0. 2.Code Amendment Remove RE-1 Zoning Director Garner Staff is seeking approval to amend both the Development and Municipal Codes to eliminate the RE-1 Zoning District. Presently, only three parcels inside the Town are zoned RE-1, none of which are zoned for single-family use. The Purpose of eliminating RE-1 zoning is twofold: A)Remove a Zoning District that serves no useful purpose inside the Town of Estes Park. It is a residential Zoning District that requires a 10-acre minimum lot size. B)In an environment in which attainable and workforce housing is a critical need, it is hard to see how a 10-acre lot, single-family-only Zoning District has a role to play in the Town of Estes Park draf t 5 Planning Commission – June 21, 2022 – Page 2 It was moved and seconded (Heiser/Hanson) to recommend approval of the code amendment in accordance with the findings as presented. The motion passed 3-0. 3. Rezone 800 Castle Mountain Road from RE-1 to R2 Director Garner Staff requests to change the zoning of the Town-owned parcel from RE-1 to R-2 to remove the defunct Zoning designation and reflect the surrounding zoning of the adjacent properties. An additional rationale for the rezone request pertains to the parcel's acreage, which currently does not meet the development standards for RE-1. RE-1-zoned sites require a maximum of one unit per ten acres, and the site acreage is 4.07 acres, which falls below the minimum threshold for development. The Town has no intention to redevelop the parcel and anticipates the site being used indefinitely for water storage. It was moved and seconded (Hanson/Heiser ) to recommend approval of the Rezoning request in accordance with the findings as presented. The motion passed 3-0. DISCUSSION ITEMS Director Garner gave an update on the Comprehensive Plan. A draft of the four chapters has been produced, is available on engageestes.org and will be reviewed by the CompPac and Estes Valley Planning Advisory Committee on Thursday, June 23, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. A fully vetted draft plan is scheduled for an August review. July 12 will be a joint study session with the Town Board and the Planning Commission, with an update report given by Logan Simpson. The first week of August will be another community event, facilitated by Restorative Justice, focused on items that create controversy, mainly the built environment and land use. An overhaul of the Development Code will happen after the Comp Plan is completed. There is DOLA funding for this. Planning Technician LauraJane Baur has taken over the CPAW project and will have an update at the next meeting. There being no further business, Chair Comstock adjourned the meeting at 2:30 p.m. _______________________________ Chair Comstock Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary draf t 6 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Chair Matt Comstock Estes Park Planning Commission Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: September 20, 2022 Application: Rezone from A-1 (Accommodations) to RM (Multi-Family Residential) Town of Estes Park, Owner America West Housing Solutions, Applicant/Owner’s Representative Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the Town Board of Trustees, subject to the findings described in the staff report. Land Use: Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Institutional, Public/Semi-Public (INS) Existing Zoning District: Accommodations, Low-Intensity (A-1) Site Area: 21.8 Acres PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: The applicant requests the Planning Commission review the proposed request, and open and close a public hearing to consider and recommend approval of a “Zoning Map Amendment” (Rezoning) of 21.8 acres from A-1 (Accommodations) to RM (Multi-Family Residential). Location: The property is located south of the intersection of Fall River Road (Highway 34) and Fish Hatchery Road. Background: The Town of Estes Park has owned a 68 +/- acre property for many years. Although the Fish Hatchery was destroyed in the flood of 1982, the site is referred to as the “Fish Hatchery”, and contains the Historic Fall River Hydroplant Museum, as well as four residential structures used for temporary staff housing. The majority of the property is undeveloped. The Town of Estes Park sought a qualified Developer to help evaluate, plan, and implement the development of the Fish Hatchery Property for workforce housing. The current project would be development of multi-family rental units, with the potential for selective site amenities to attract and retain workers in the Estes Valley area. Due to their financial capabilities and expertise 8 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER REZONING, FISH HATCHERY PROJECT SITE AGE 2 OF 6 building workforce housing, America West Housing Solutions, a non-profit affordable housing development firm, was selected through a competitive bid process to partner with the Town and help design the site in a multi-phased process. The Town does not plan to sell the land, but rather retain ownership and enter into a long-term ground lease with the development partner. If approved, the historic Fall River Hydroplant, and the residence directly adjacent to it, will remain on the property and in use. The remaining Town-owned buildings may be demolished or reused as part of the new development. Project Description: The Town proposes to rezone 21.8 acres of the total site’s 68 acres from A-1 to RM, which is the first step in the process of entitlement to establish the Town’s first workforce housing project. Defined as a housing unit in which at least one adult household member is employed within the boundary of the Estes Park School District R-3 for at least 30 hours per week year-round, workforce housing requires verification of eligibility, which is completed when a tenant initially applies to live in workforce housing and on an annual basis through the Estes Park Housing Authority. The current A-1 Zoning does not allow for the multi-family use. RM is the only Zoning District in the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC) that allows the necessary density bonus and incentives for workforce housing, including an allowance to increase the building height from 30 feet to 38 feet, and double the density from eight units per acre to 16 units per acre. Location and Context: Project Location, Zoning 9 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER REZONING, FISH HATCHERY PROJECT SITE AGE 3 OF 6 Vicinity Map Table 1: Zoning and Land Use Summary UBJECT ARCEL Public/Semi-Public (INS) A-1 (Accommodations) Employee housing ORTH RE-1 (Residential Estate) Unincorporated RMNP Facility, Undeveloped OUTH N/A (RMNP) N/A Undeveloped, Park AST R (Residential) Unincorporated, County Residential EST Public/Semi-Public (INS) A-1 (Accommodations) Museum Project Analysis: Pending approval of the proposed Zoning District change, detailed plans for the workforce housing project will be finalized in the near future. Future steps for the project include a Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat and Development Plan that address access, parking, location and design of structures, drainage, water, wastewater, electric, landscaping, lighting, 10 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER REZONING, FISH HATCHERY PROJECT SITE AGE 4 OF 6 etc. The Estes Park Planning Commission and Town Board of Trustees each play a role in the subsequent processes, which require one or more public hearings. Review Criteria All applications for text or Official Zoning Map Amendments shall be reviewed by the EPPC and Town Board for compliance with the relevant standards and criteria set forth below and with other applicable provisions of this Code. In accordance with Section 3.3D “Standards for Review” of the EVDC, all applications for rezoning shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria: 1. The amendment is necessary to address changes in conditions in the areas affected. Staff Finding: One condition that exists in the Estes Park area is a shortage of workforce housing. Undeveloped, RM-zoned property is nearly nonexistent. Under today’s Development Code standards, RM zoning is necessary to develop workforce housing. 2. The Development Plan, which the proposed amendment to this Code would allow, is compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley. Staff Finding: Staff has waived the development plan requirement per Section 3.3.B.1 of the Estes Park Development Code: “All applications seeking to amend this Code to allow a change from one (1) zone district to a different zone district or seeking to amend this Code by changing the permitted uses in any zone district shall be accompanied by a development plan. This requirement may be waived by Staff if it finds that the projected size, complexity, anticipated impacts or other factors associated with the proposed development or subdivision clearly justify such waiver.” The EPDC implies (erroneously) that a “rezoning development plan” is necessary in order to determine whether a rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In fact, rezoning in and of itself is one of the legislative matters that should be reviewed for Comprehensive Plan consistency. The property is in the Fall River Sub-Area within the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. Recommendations for this Sub-Area that are applicable to the subject property include the following key issues: 1. Due to the steep topography and Fall River floodplain, development opportunities are severely limited within the planning area. 6. Hillside development must be evaluated to ensure that the quality of the physical and visual environment is not negatively impacted. 11. It is important to maintain the vistas from Fall River Road in to RMNP and from Fall River Road to Fall River itself. 11 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER REZONING, FISH HATCHERY PROJECT SITE AGE 5 OF 6 Chapter 6 of the Plan specifies, under Section 5.0 Housing, “Community Wide Land Use Policies,” which include: 5.1 Encourage a variety of housing types and price ranges. 5.3 Establish a balanced program of incentives, and public and private actions, to provide affordable housing. The proposed rezoning is the first step to establish zoning on the subject property, which can subsequently be developed consistent with these Land Use Policies. Staff Finding: The proposed rezoning is compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Town, County or other relevant service providers shall have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities that might be required if the application were approved. Staff Finding: Service and utility providers have reviewed the rezoning application and indicated they are able to provide adequate services to this site. Reviewing Agency Comments: This rezoning application was referred out for agency comments. Agency comments received were minimal, with no issues identified and no recommendations for this stage of the project. Public Comments: Two neighborhood and community meetings regarding the workforce housing project were held in mid-January and July 14, 2022 at the Hydroplant Museum adjacent to the Fish Hatchery property. There were approximately 30 attendees. Staff discussed the rezoning and the project, and answered numerous questions. Attendees both opposed and supported the project. There was input and discussion of impacts including traffic, visual impacts, wildfire evacuation, etc. Staff emphasized that the development was not being approved by the rezoning, and additional review and approval processes would address such impacts in detail. Comments in support of the rezoning noted the general shortage of housing in the Estes Park area. In accordance with the notice requirements in the EPDC, notice of the Planning Commission meeting was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette, on September 2, 2022. Notice was mailed to all required adjacent property owners on August 31, 2022. Any comments submitted will be posted to: www.estes.org/currentapplications. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the Recommending Body for the Zoning Map Amendment. 2. The Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees is the Decision-Making Body for the Zoning Map Amendment. 3. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the subject property. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 12 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER REZONING, FISH HATCHERY PROJECT SITE AGE 6 OF 6 5. The Zoning Map Amendment application complies with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment. SAMPLE MOTIONS FOR THE ZONING MAP AMENDMENT: 1. I move to forward a recommendation of approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Zoning Map Amendment application, to rezone 21.8 acres from A-1 to RM, according to findings of fact recommended by Staff. 2. I move to continue the Zoning Map Amendment application to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that … [state reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to forward a recommendation of denial to the Town Board of Trustees of the Zoning Map Amendment application, finding that … [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. Map of Property, Area to be Rezoned 4. Applicant’s Zoning Map 5. Legal Description of Area to be Rezoned 6. Fish Hatchery Project FAQ 13 JUL /ufi Submittal Date:7/20/2022 ESTES PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION Pre -App Development Plan Special Review Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat o Boundary Line Adjustment Q ROW or Easement VacationoStreetNameChangeTime €Rezoning PetitionoAnnexationRequest S Extension Other Please snecifv Condominium Map o Preliminary MapoFinal MapoSupplemental Map Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Homes at Fish Hatchery Proposed rezoning of the northeast 21.8 acres from A-i Accommodations to RM Multi-family 1754 FIsh Hatchery Road N 1/2 SW 114 16-5-73;EP,DC RD AS PER 539-575;LESS 87000339,89003857,91004492,92080005,94099702,96086646 35160-00-938 Lot Size 21.8 acres (for rezone) Existing Land Use Residential Proposed Land Use Multi-f amity Residential Existing Water Service ØTown Proposed Water Service 0 Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service Cl Xcel Existing Zoning A-I Accommodation o Other (specify) Cl Other (specify) 0 UTSD B IJTSD ONo 0 None Proposed Zoning RM Multi-Family Q Septic C None C Septic Site Access (if not on public street) _________ Are there wetlands on the site?0 Yes Site stakin9 must be completed at the time application is submitted.Complete?B Yes Ci No flnns&wu,nmat., Name of Primary Contact Person Keith Meier -______ Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is C Owner 0 Applicant C Consultant/Engineer Application fee Statement of intent 2 copies (folded)of p1st or plan 11 X 17 reduced copy of plat or plan 0 8 0 0 8 Area of Disturbance in Acres 21.8 acres Q Well Q None C Well Q None Q EPSD D EPSD C Yes Q Other CN0 P.0.Box 9024,Woodland Park,Colorado 80866 C Sign Purchase ($10) C IE Digital Copies of plats!plans in TIFF or PDF format emailedto planningestes.org B B Please review the Estes Park Development Code Appendix B for additIonal submittal requirements,which may Include ISO calculations,draInage report,traffic Impact analysis,geologic hazard mitigation report, wIldfire hazard mitigation report,wetlands report,and/or other additional Information. Town of Estes Pork -e.P.O.Box 1200 -170 MacGregor Avenue -Estes Pork.CO 80517 Community Development Deportment Phone:(970)577-372!-th rox:(970)586-0249 .e.www.estes.org/CommunityDeveloprnent Revised 2020.0423 ks 14 Cell Phone APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Park Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estes.org/planningforrns —jqyts for refunds must be made in writing.All fees are due at the time of submIttaL MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Tide 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans,Special Reviews, Rezoning,Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats,Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot,and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to aLl mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed.This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CR5 have been met, Names: Signatures: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant Record Owner / Applicant t:;::;.* ______ Date ______ Date Fax Record Owner(s)Town of Estes Park -Jason Damweber,Assistant Town Administrator Mailing Address PC Box 1200 ________________________________________ Phone 970.577.3707 ____________________________ Cell Phone Email jdamweber@estes.org Applicant Keith Meter,America West Mailing Address P.O.8ox 9024,WoodLand Park,Colorado 80866 Phone 719.641.0871 Fax Email kmeier@amedcawest.org 1nsultant!Englneer Emily Fetton,KimLey-liom Mailing Address 3801 Automation Way,Suite 210,Fort ColLins,CO 80525 _____________________________ Phone 720.636,8273 _______ Cell Phone _____________________________________________________________ Fax ___________________________________________________________________________________ Email_emily.fetton@kimtey.horn.com _________________________________ Revserj 2020.04 2.3 15 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in fifing the application lam acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I’In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement.I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). 0’I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EPDC,and that, prior to filing this application,I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Park Development Code is available online at: httni/www.estes,oraloevcode 0 I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the apflcation Is complete under the applicable requirements of the EPOC. 0 I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more If the information provided is Incomplete,inaccurate,or submitted after the deadline date. 0 I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. 0’The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. 0 I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. 0’I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Park Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void.I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRWT.345t),nd D4,-ItJtBe’4-... Applicant PLEASE PRINT:Vtct4k SIgnatures: Record Date __________ Date MtflJln—7..Applicant Revised 2020.04.23 ks 16 Date: July 20, 2022 Mr. Jeff Woeber 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Homes at Fish Hatchery Rezoning Application Narrative Introduction, Site History and Statement of Need The Fish Hatchery property is a 68-acre lot located on the west edge of Estes Park at the base of the Rocky Mountains. The property is currently in the town limits of Estes Park and is zoned A-1 Accommodations. This application includes a proposed rezoning of the northeast 21.8 acres of this property to RM Multi-Family Residential to allow for a workforce housing community. This narrative is a component of the Rezone Application, outlining the review criteria for a rezone, and how this proposal aligns with these criteria. The Estes Park Fish Hatchery is a historic site containing the original fish hatchery and hydroelectric plant. The fish hatchery was built and opened in 1907, and the hydroelectric plant was built in 1909. Both were in operation until 1982. The Town of Estes Park understands that workforce housing is necessary to sustain a stable, year-round local economy. At the same time, the gap between income levels for local workers and free market home prices and rents in the Estes Valley continues to widen. The situation makes it increasingly difficult for many local workers to afford to live in the Estes Valley. The Town believes that planning for the development of workforce housing is necessary to divert the loss of such housing in the free market, as well as the loss of local workers who are unable to afford housing in the Estes Valley. For these reasons, the Town and America West Housing Solutions are partnering to construct workforce housing on the Fish Hatchery Property. Standards for Review The Estes Park Development Code outlines the process and standards for review of all rezone applications. All applications for Official Zoning Map amendments are reviewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission (EVPC) and Board(s) for compliance with the relevant standards and criteria set forth below and with other applicable provisions of the Development Code. 1. The amendment is necessary to address changes in conditions in the areas affected. Response: The Estes Park Housing Needs Assessment has identified workforce housing as a priority for the town due to several factors that are making housing unattainable to families and young/middle aged households that are the primary workforce households (source: EPHA). The Town has identified this site as a viable location for workforce housing and does not anticipate that accommodation uses are likely to occur, therefore a rezone to RM Multi-Family Residential is necessary. 17 2. The development plan, which the proposed amendment to this Code would allow, is compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley; Response: The 1996 Comprehensive Plan discusses affordable housing and housing diversity as important elements of the Town’s growth future. Chapter 2, Planning the Valley’s Future, lists “Encouraging a range of housing opportunities” as one of the primary broad goals of the Town’s plan. Chapter 6 also lists the need to encourage a variety of housing opportunities as a community-wide policy for retaining permanent residents from all sectors of the community. This chapter also discusses the need for obtaining public and private funding for affordable housing opportunities. Therefore, the proposed rezone to allow multi-family workforce housing on this property is compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Estes Park Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Town, County or other relevant service providers shall have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities that might be required if the application were approved. Response: The Fish Hatchery property is currently within the Town Limits of Estes Park, and services are available to serve the site if it is approved to be rezoned to RM Multi-Family Residential. Next Steps Following public hearings and approval of this rezoning request, a subdivision application will be submitted to finalize the property boundary. Preliminary designs will continue to be developed and shared with the community for feedback. Based on comments received, the design team will refine and present alternatives in order to reach a preferred design. The preferred design will then be shared at a community open house and go through the approval process, including a public hearing. Once approved, construction associated with the 21.8- acre parcel is anticipated to begin spring of 2024. 18 K : \ N C O _ C i v i l \ 1 9 6 4 9 4 0 0 0 _ E s t e s P a r k \ C A D D \ E x h i b i t s \ E x h i b i t L o t S p l i t . d w g J u l 1 3 , 2 0 2 2 8 : 0 8 a m LEGEND: NORTH 19 UNINCORPORATED LARIMER COUNTY UNINCORPORATED LARIMER COUNTY UNINCORPORATED LARIMER COUNTY NORTH SCALE 0 50 100 200HOMES AT FISH HATCHERY EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK UNINCORPORATED LARIMER COUNTY FALL RIV E R R O A D / H W Y 3 4 CURRENT ZONING: A-1 ACCOMMODATIONS ZONING: A ACCOMMODATIONS ZONING: A ACCOMMODATIONS ZONING: A ACCOMMODATIONS ZONING: E ESTATE 20 PARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND BEING LOCATED IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH CENTER SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, AS MONUMENTED BY A 2-1/2" BRASS CAP STAMPED "U.S. GENERAL LAND OFFICE", WHENCE THE CENTER QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, AS MONUMENTED BY 2-1/2" BRASS CAP STAMPED "GENERAL LAND OFFICE", BEARS N 00°37'00” E, A DISTANCE OF 1275.75 FEET FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS USED IN THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, N 00°37’00” E, A DISTANCE OF 259.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, N 79°18'57" W, A DISTANCE OF 552.55 FEET; THENCE N 78°56'23" W, A DISTANCE OF 7.24 FEET; THENCE ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°11'03", A RADIUS OF 551.70 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 117.32 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N 72°28'16" W, 117.10 FEET; THENCE ALONG A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°52'23", A RADIUS OF 551.70 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 114.32 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N 60°26'33" W, 114.12 FEET; THENCE S 00°37'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 467.37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, S 89°04'25" W, A DISTANCE OF 1,829.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG SAID WEST LINE, N 00°07'41" E, A DISTANCE OF 1,263.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, N 88°48'44" E, A DISTANCE OF 866.83 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, S 01°11'16" E, A DISTANCE OF 415.06 FEET; THENCE S 59°56'07" E, A DISTANCE OF 352.64 FEET; THENCE N 87°06'25" E, A DISTANCE OF 190.56 FEET; THENCE N 87°03'52" E, A DISTANCE OF 365.54 FEET; THENCE S 81°52'31" E, A DISTANCE OF 83.38 FEET; THENCE S 89°39'43" E, A DISTANCE OF 101.15 FEET; THENCE N 68°42'43" E, A DISTANCE OF 103.19 FEET; THENCE N 88°21'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 42.34 FEET; THENCE S 77°09'28" E, A DISTANCE OF 99.23 FEET; THENCE S 47°32'13" E, A DISTANCE OF 117.81 FEET; THENCE S 63°54'02" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.34 FEET; THENCE S 87°02'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 64.48 FEET; THENCE N 82°49'41" E, A DISTANCE OF 104.02 FEET; THENCE N 60°37'26" E, A DISTANCE OF 178.87 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE, S 00°30'34" W, A DISTANCE OF 423.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2,017,578 SQ. FT. OR 46.317 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 21 PARCEL B A PARCEL OF LAND BEING LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, AS MONUMENTED BY 2-1/2" BRASS CAP STAMPED "GENERAL LAND OFFICE”", WHENCE THE SOUTH CENTER SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, AS MONUMENTED BY A 2-1/2" BRASS CAP STAMPED "U.S. GENERAL LAND OFFICE", BEARS S 00°37'00” W, A DISTANCE OF 1275.75 FEET FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS USED IN THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE TO ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, S 00°37'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 187.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE, S 00°37'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 404.52 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, S 60°37'26" W, A DISTANCE OF 178.87 FEET; THENCE S 82°49'41" W, A DISTANCE OF 104.02 FEET; THENCE N 87°02'45" W, A DISTANCE OF 64.48 FEET; THENCE N 63°54'02" W, A DISTANCE OF 34.34 FEET; THENCE N 47°32'13" W, A DISTANCE OF 117.81 FEET; THENCE N 77°09'28" W, A DISTANCE OF 99.23 FEET; THENCE S 88°21'45" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.34 FEET; THENCE S 68°42'43" W, A DISTANCE OF 103.19 FEET; THENCE N 89°39'43" W, A DISTANCE OF 101.15 FEET; THENCE N 81°52'31" W, A DISTANCE OF 83.38 FEET; THENCE S 87°03'52" W, A DISTANCE OF 365.54 FEET; THENCE S 87°06'25" W, A DISTANCE OF 190.56 FEET; THENCE N 59°56'07" W, A DISTANCE OF 352.64 FEET; THENCE N 01°11'16" W, A DISTANCE OF 415.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, N 88°48'44" E, A DISTANCE OF 999.36 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, S 76°47'46" E, A DISTANCE OF 755.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 949,678 SQ. FT. OR 21.802 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 22 The Homes at Fish Hatchery: Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is “workforce housing”? o In the Town of Estes Park, workforce housing is defined as a housing unit in which at least one adult household member is employed within the boundary of the Estes Park School District R-3 for at least 30 hours per week year-round. Eligibility verification is completed when a tenant initially applies to live in workforce housing and on an annual basis through the Estes Park Housing Authority. 2. Why support the workforce? o The people that work in and for our community support Estes Park’s many services and amenities – much more of them than a typical town of our size – that make our community a great place to live year-round. They are medical professionals, police officers, teachers, tradespeople, utilities staff, business owners and employees, national park employees, and so many more. Many people not only prefer to live in the community where they work, but need to live there (for timely response such as emergency responders, for example) and be part of the community themselves. Without supporting this workforce, our community will lose many benefits and become a very different place to live and visit. 3. Is workforce housing the same as low-income housing? o No. Workforce housing simply requires that a member of the household be employed locally. The Homes at Fish Hatchery will target households earning between 61-175% area median income for Larimer County. 4. What is the basis (need) for the Town proposing a new housing development? o A Housing Needs Assessment conducted by the Estes Park Housing Authority for the Estes Valley in 2016 found that approximately 1,600 housing units were needed to address workforce housing shortages. A shortage of housing in general, and especially affordable housing, has led to significant recruitment and retention issues for local employers, including businesses, the school district, hospital, police department and the Town government. The community is losing families and young/middle aged households, which are primarily workforce households. The Town and Estes Park Housing Authority will be seeking a consultant this year to conduct a new assessment and develop a strategic plan. Given the sharp increase in housing costs in the past few years, we expect the issue has only gotten worse since the last assessment was conducted. 5. Why put workforce housing on the Fish Hatchery property? (Why was this property selected?) o The 2016 Housing Needs Assessment specifically recommended that the Town-owned Fish Hatchery property be utilized to help address local housing shortage. The recommendation further states: "Preliminary discussions regarding the Fish Hatchery property are occurring. Develop a plan for this 75-acre property in conjunction with the Housing Authority that accommodates needed workforce housing development in balance with protecting natural areas and trail access. The property provides a unique opportunity to provide moderate and middle income ownership and rental housing and is large enough to develop a mix of units and densities to meet a variety of needs." 23 o Another reason we are utilizing this property has to do with the extremely high financial cost of development. The Town is able to leverage the property to entice a private developer to partner with the Town to help address the workforce housing need and invest what we are estimating will be in the ballpark of $50 million to construct the project. The Town simply does not have the financial resources to purchase more property, extend utilities if necessary, and construct housing itself. o Timing is another critical factor as the housing crisis in Estes Park continues to compound. Any factors that delay development of desperately needed housing puts Estes Park’s businesses and services, and our community’s sustainability, at risk. 6. How did you arrive at the number of proposed apartments? o While the site can accommodate greater density from a development code perspective, the existing utility infrastructure (namely water and sanitary sewer) can only accommodate around 200 units before significant/costly upgrades are required. This was a major factor when the preliminary concept for around 190 units was developed. 7. Why did the Town partner with a developer? o The Town has partnered with AmericaWest Housing Solutions, a non-profit affordable housing development firm, to develop the project because they have the financial capabilities and expertise to utilize Town-owned property for the purpose of building workforce housing. 8. Who is the developer? o AmericaWest Housing Solutions 9. Is the land being sold? o No. The Town does not plan to sell the land, but rather retain ownership and enter into a long-term ground lease with the development partner. 10. What is the process? o First, the Town entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with AmericaWest Housing Solutions, the development firm selected through a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Next, a Development Agreement (see below) will be negotiated that outlines the roles and responsibilities of the developer vis-a-vis the Town for the life of the project (expected to be 99 years). If a Development Agreement is approved by AmericaWest and the Town (by the Town Board with public input), the project must go through the Development Review Process, where application materials are reviewed by Planning Staff in the Community Development Department and the Development Review Team. The application will be presented to the Estes Park Planning Commission in a public hearing. The Planning Commission will then forward a recommendation to the Town Board, which will vote on a final decision for the project at a public hearing. There will be many opportunities for public input during the process. 24 11. What is a “development agreement”? o A development agreement is a contract between a local jurisdiction and a developer which details the obligations of both parties and the terms and conditions that will govern development of a specific property. A signed Development Agreement is binding on both parties (AmericaWest Housing Solutions and the Town of Estes Park) and provides assurances that the development conditions that have been negotiated will not change during the term of the agreement. 12. What studies or assessments need to be completed as part of the process? o At a minimum, the following studies/assessments will be required to help determine how the development can be safely built: geotechnical assessment, Phase I environmental testing, traffic impact analysis, and utilities modeling (to ensure that utility infrastructure can accommodate what is being built).If any other or further analysis is required, the Town and AmericaWest will be informed during the development review process and that analysis will be completed. 13. How will water and sewer utilities be impacted? o Minor upgrades may need to be made to the water and/or sewer utilities to accommodate the development, but existing services should not be impacted. 14. How will impacts to wildlife and the river be mitigated? o AmericaWest Housing Solutions has experience developing housing in Colorado mountain communities where wildlife and waterways abound. In addition to adhering to standards required by state and local regulations, we plan to consult with Colorado Parks and Wildlife and other organizations as appropriate on recommended mitigation strategies. 15.What is planned for the existing buildings on the property? o The Historic Fall River Hydroplant, and the residence directly adjacent to it, will remain on the property and in use. The remaining Town-owned buildings may be demolished or reused as part of the new development. 16. How will increased traffic be addressed? o A traffic impact analysis will need to be conducted and the findings reviewed in order to determine how we can best address/mitigate traffic impacts resulting from the development. This could include realignment of existing roads, addition of traffic signals or signs, and/or installation of pedestrian amenities. Town staff is also interested in exploring the feasibility of extending public transit service to the site or otherwise providing shuttle services for residents of the development. 17. How does the Town benefit from the project? o The Town will benefit from the project by creating around 190 new workforce housing units to house local workers, supporting their quality of life as well as everyone who benefits from their work in the community. 18. What will the development look like? o This will be determined through the development process. The preliminary concept includes about 190 units in about 12 three-story buildings on the north side of the Fall River. A visual can be found at estes.org/fishhatchery. 25 19. What amenities will be included as part of the project? o This will be determined through the development process. We expect there will be a space for childcare built as part of the development. 20. How would this development affect the new Fall River Trail? o It won’t. The new trail will not be affected by the project. 21. How is the Town working with neighbors during this project and how can stakeholders stay informed and engage? o Input from neighbors (and all residents) will be critical to the success of this project and will help shape what is ultimately expected of the developer. To date, public engagement has included a meeting on-site January 15 and a virtual meeting (presentation and Q&A format) the evening of January 18. Additional opportunities to engage throughout the process will be announced on the project web page at www.estes.org/fishhatchery, and through the Town’s General News listserv and social media. Visit the Town’s website to subscribe to Town news releases. o Residents are encouraged to share their thoughts throughout the process and especially when decision points are before the Town Board. The next “decision point” will be consideration of the draft Development Agreement. Negotiations at the staff level are still occurring, so it will likely be later this winter or spring before a Development Agreement is presented to the Town Board for consideration. If the Development Agreement is approved, the development review process will begin. This process involves Town Board and Planning Commission decision points, along with required public hearings. 22. Where can I find additional information as it becomes available? o The Town’s project webpage will be regularly updated with information, including findings from required studies:estes.org/fishhatchery. 26 EPPC, September 20, 2022 “Fish Hatchery” RezoningZoning Map Amendment Town of Estes Park Property America West Housing Solutions, Representative/Developer 68 acres total, zoned A-1 (Accommodations) 21.8 acres proposed to be rezoned to RM (Multi-Family Residential) 2 Fish Hatchery Rezoning 4 Rezoning to RM is proposed for a multi- family, workforce housing project RM is the only zone district in the EPDC that provides for multi-family with incentives for workforce housing 5 Rezoning only If rezoning approved, detailed plans for the workforce housing project will be drafted and finalized Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat require review and action by EPPC and Town Board Development Plan requires review and action by EPPC; this will address access, parking, location and design of structures, drainage, water, wastewater, electric, landscaping, lighting, etc. 6 Review Criteria Public meetings held on site, January and July Review agency comments were minimal Staff findings 7 Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the Town Board of Trustees 27 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Park Planning Commission Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: September 20, 2022 Application: Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit Stanton Peterson Revocable Trust, Owner Lonnie Sheldon, Van Horn Engineering and Surveying, Inc., Applicant Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit Request, subject to the findings described in the staff report. Land Use: Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Single Family Residential, E-1 (Estate) Zoning District: E-1 (Estate) Lot Area: 0.49 Acres PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: The applicant requests the Planning Commission review the proposed request, and open and close a public hearing to consider and approve a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to establish an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in an E-1 (Estate) Zone District. Location: The property is located approximately 500 feet west of the southwest corner of the intersection of Wonderview Avenue and Valley Road, addressed as 460 Valley Road. Background: In one action to address the workforce and affordable housing shortage in the Estes Park area, the Town Board approved a Code Amendment to the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC) in January 2022 to allow ADUs on most residential properties which previously prohibited them. An ADU is defined in the EPDC as “…a second dwelling unit which is integrated either with a single-family detached dwelling structure or with a detached accessory structure on the same lot as the principal dwelling.” Under the new regulations, a lot with residential zoning that is not at least 70% of the required minimum lot size may have an ADU with approval of a CUP. This is the first application to be processed under this new requirement. 28 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER CUP FOR AN ADU, 460 VALLEY ROAD AGE 2 OF 6 A Variance was approved by the Estes Park Board of Adjustment in April 2022, to construct the subject ADU 2 feet from the northern property line, in lieu of the 25 feet required in the E-1 Zone District. The ADU would be located above a detached garage. Project Description: The applicant proposes one structure with a detached garage and an ADU on the upper level. The garage would be 800 square feet, and ADU would be 712 square feet in size. The structure would be located directly north of the existing residence. The existing three-bedroom, “ranch style” residence was constructed in 1913 and is 1865 square feet in size. ADU Floor Plan: 29 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER CUP FOR AN ADU, 460 VALLEY ROAD AGE 3 OF 6 Location and Context: Project Location, Zoning 30 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER CUP FOR AN ADU, 460 VALLEY ROAD AGE 4 OF 6 Vicinity Map Table 1: Zoning and Land Use Summary OMPREHENSIVE LAN ONING SES UBJECT ARCEL Single Family, E-1 E-1 (Estate) Residential ORTH Single Family, E-1 E-1 (Estate) Residential OUTH Single Family, E-1 E-1 (Estate) Residential AST Single Family, E-1 E-1 (Estate) Residential EST Public/Semi-Public (INS) A (Accommodations) Church 31 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER CUP FOR AN ADU, 460 VALLEY ROAD AGE 5 OF 6 Project Analysis Review Criteria Section 5.2.B.2.a.of the Development Code requires a legally-nonconforming lot that does not have at least 70% of the required minimum lot area to “pursue Accessory Dwelling Unit approval by application for a Conditional Use Permit”. The subject property is 0.49 acre in size, and is zoned E-1. The minimum lot area requirement for E-1 is 1.0 acre. Section 3.16 of the Development Code contains procedures and standards for approval of a Conditional Use Permit, and staff’s comments are below: § 3.16 Conditional Use Permit A. Procedures for Approval on Conditional Use Permit. Applications for approval of a Conditional Use Permit shall follow the standard development approval process set forth in §3.2 of this Chapter, except for the following modifications. Staff Comment: The application is following the CUP approval process as prescribed. B. Standards for Review. All applications for a Conditional Use Permit shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable criteria and standards set forth in Chapter 5, "Use Regulations," or Chapter 14, "Wireless Communication Facilities (WCFs)" of this Code, as applicable, and the following requirement: The application for the proposed Conditional Use Permits mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services and the environment. Staff Comment: There are no Use Regulations specifically for ADUs. The ADU would cause little or no adverse impact to nearby land uses, public facilities and services, or the environment. Reviewing Agency Comments: This CUP application was referred out for agency comments, which were minimal, and no issues were identified and no recommendations received. Public Comment: Typically, a required neighborhood and community meeting is scheduled well in advance of an EPPC meeting. An exception was made by staff for this project, as the ADU project complied with all EPDC public notice requirements with the recent variance process. The neighborhood and community meeting is scheduled for September 19, 2022. Staff has asked the applicant’s representative to provide an overview of the September 19 meeting to the EPPC. In accordance with the notice requirements in the EPDC, notice of the Planning Commission meeting was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette, on September 2, 2022. Notice was mailed to all required adjacent property owners on August 31, 2022. Any comments submitted will be posted to: www.estes.org/currentapplications. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making Body for the Conditional Use Permit. 2. Conditions of approval are not necessary. 32 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER CUP FOR AN ADU, 460 VALLEY ROAD AGE 6 OF 6 3. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the subject property. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. The Conditional Use Permit application complies with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. Action Recommended: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Sample Motions: 1. I move to approve the Conditional Use Permit application, according to findings recommended by Staff. 2. I move to continue the Conditional Use Permit application to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that … [state reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to deny the Conditional Use Permit application, finding that … [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. ADU Site Plan 4. ADU Floor Plans 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 N 41 MAIN LEVEL GARAGE FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"N 25 ' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 32'-0" 10'-0" SQUARE FOOTAGES MAIN LEVEL 800 sqft GARAGE 23'-9" x 23'-5" STORAGE BATH ROOM COVERED ENLTRY 3'-0" TALL RETAINING WALLS 3'-0" TALL RETAINING WALLS OPTIONAL FUTURE CONCRETE PAD SIZE T.B.D. UP 10'-0" SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 10-0" S E T B A C K MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON RAISED PLATFORM SHELVING BY OWNER SHELVING BY OWNER A3 04 / 08 / 2022 ST A N & M A R Y P E T E R S O N N E W G A R A G E A N D A P A R T M E N T 46 0 V A L L E Y R D - E S T E S P A R K , C O 8 0 5 1 7 OF 10 SHEET NUMBER ISSUE DATE REVISIONS MAIN LEVEL GARAGE FLOOR PLAN SHEET TITLE PRELIMINARYSCHEMATIC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - - - 42 DO W N UPPER LEVEL APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"N SQUARE FOOTAGES UPPER LEVEL 712 sqft BEDROOM 11'-9" x 10'-1" LINEN DO W N KITCHEN & DINING 10'-6" x 10'-9" LIVING 15'-1" x 12'-2"DECK 4'-6" x 11'-7" CHASE Q T.V. LOCATED IN CORNER OR ABOVE MANTLE PLATFORM APARTMENT SIZE STACKED WASHER AND DRYER WITH CABINETRY ON BOTH SIDES LAUNDRY & STORAGE 8'-7" x 10'-1" REF BATH ROOM 25 ' - 0 " 32'-0" 22 ' - 0 " 1'- 6 " 1'- 6 " GAS FIREPLACE OPTIONAL KITCHEN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" REFKITCHEN & DINING 10'-6" x 10'-9" A4 04 / 08 / 2022 ST A N & M A R Y P E T E R S O N N E W G A R A G E A N D A P A R T M E N T 46 0 V A L L E Y R D - E S T E S P A R K , C O 8 0 5 1 7 OF 10 SHEET NUMBER ISSUE DATE REVISIONS UPPER LEVEL APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SHEET TITLE PRELIMINARYSCHEMATIC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - - - 43 EPPC, September 20, 2022 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Stanton Peterson Revocable Trust, Owner Van Horn Engineering, Representative Under recently-adopted ADU requirements, ADU is a use-by-right, unless the property is less than 70% of minimum required lot area Property is 0.49 acre, E-1 Zoning requires 1 acre 2 Detached Garage proposed, with ADU on upper level ADU proposed at 712 square feet, 800 is maximum allowable size Setback Variance approved by BOA in April Code requires use to meet specific standards, “Use Regulations” in Chapter 5 however there are none specific to ADU 3 Extensive review process, with plan revisions to comply with Planning, Public Works, Fire, Water, Electric, Wastewater requirements Neighborhood and Community Meeting November 2021 4 Impact to area and adjacent properties would be negligible, no conditions are recommended No opposition Minimal input from review agencies 5 Planning Commission is the Decision-Making Body Staff recommends approval of the CUP 44 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Chair Matt Comstock Estes Park Planning Commission Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: September 20, 2022 Application: Development Plan, Twin Owls Motor Lodge Castle Peak Holdings, Owner Craig Middleton, Applicant Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Development Plan application, subject to the findings described in the staff report. Land Use: Comprehensive Plan Designation: (Future Land Use): Accommodations (A) Zoning District: Accommodations (A) Site Area: 4.56 Acres PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: The applicant requests the Planning Commission review the proposed request and open and close a public hearing to consider and approve a Development Plan for upgrades and expansion of a motel in an A (Accommodations) Zone District. Location: The 4.56-acre property is located west of the intersection of North St. Vrain Avenue (Highway 36) and Stanley Avenue, addressed as 700 North Saint Vrain Avenue. Background: The Twin Owls Motor Lodge was originally established in 1955 and contains a 40-room motel, a four-plex structure that had been previously used as employee housing, a storage shed and a pool. Existing structures total 19,863 square feet. The current owner is renovating the property and has begun remodeling work that does not require Development Plan approval and falls outside the scope of this request. 45 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER TWIN OWLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGE 2 OF 5 The subject lot, and an adjacent lot (Lot 1 and 2, Little Prospect Mountain Addition) were previously configured so the motel itself was bisected by an interior lot line. An amended Plat was approved by the Town Board in late 2018, which adjusted the faulty lot line to the current configuration. Despite the physical address as 700 North St. Vrain Avenue, access to the property is only from Stanley Avenue. Project Description: The Applicant proposes two new buildings totaling 21,054 square feet with 62 rooms, along with eight new cabins totaling 2800 square feet, to total 110 rooms throughout the site. The project will involve upgrades to water, wastewater and electric infrastructure, additional access, internal circulation, parking areas, and landscaping. See attached Development Plan set and Review Criteria below. Location and Context: Vicinity Map 46 LANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER TWIN OWLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGE 3 OF 5 Zoning Map Zoning and Land Use Summary Table OMPREHENSIVE LAN ONING SES UBJECT ROPERTY Accommodations (A) Accommodations (A) Motel ORTH Public/Semi-Public (INS) CO (Outlying Commercial) Electrical Substation OUTH Residential (R) R-2 (Residential) Residential AST Office (O) O (Office) Medical Clinic EST Residential (R) E (Estate) Residential Project Analysis: Review Criteria: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1. Buildings and Lots The lot is described as Lot 1A, Amended Lots 1 and 2, Little Prospect Mountain Addition. Following the renovations, there will be 40 pre-existing motel rooms and 62 new rooms in two new buildings and eight cabins, for a total of 110 47 PLANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER TWIN OWLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGE 4 OF 5 Accommodation Units. The cabins will be 350 ± square feet in size and will not have kitchens. All structures comply with the EPDC 30-foot maximum building height standard, measured according to the EPDC’s Rule of Measurement for height (Section 1.9.E). Accommodations zoning requires 1,800 square feet per unit, with proposed Accommodation Units requiring 4.55 acres. The subject property contains 4.56 acres. 2.Landscaping The property contains a long-established hotel with a large number of existing, mature trees and landscaping. The attached landscaping plan provides specific detail of existing and new trees and shrubs. Most existing trees will be preserved. The landscaping plan provides tables showing compliance with the various landscaping requirements of the EPDC, Section 7.5. Staff finds the landscaping plan complies with EPDC requirements as applicable. 3.Lot Coverage The maximum allowable lot coverage for development in the Accommodations Zoning District, per the EPDC Section 4.4.C., is 80%. The applicant has calculated 54.7% lot coverage for this project. 4.Water, Electric Water and electric service is provided by the Town of Estes Park Utilities which has no objection to this Development Plan. 5.Fire Protection The applicant worked closely with the Estes Valley Fire Protection District to ensure the motel facilities and access meet applicable fire code. All motel facilities will be sprinkled. The District has approved the Development Plan, noting there may be additional requirements to be addressed during the building permit review. 6.Sanitary Sewer The Estes Park Sanitation District provides wastewater service. The applicant has revised the plans according to the District’s requirements. Additional requirements are to be addressed during the building permit review. 7.Access, Parking Twin Owls has an existing driveway from Stanley Avenue, with another “exit only” driveway proposed to the south, also from Stanley Avenue. The applicant has worked closely with the Town Public Works staff to ensure both comply with separation distance and other applicable standards. Waivers have been approved by Public Works for the existing access, percentage of grade for the access, and drainage related to the access. Additional parking areas are proposed for a total of 122 off-street parking spaces. Required handicap/van-accessible spaces, as well as bicycle parking areas, are proposed. Parking for the site meets minimum EPDC requirements. 8.Exterior Lighting The project does not propose any new exterior lighting. 9.Comprehensive Plan The site is located within the “Fish Creek/Little Prospect Mountain Planning Sub Area,” per Chapter 6, Community Wide Policies, of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Code for the subject property is Accommodations (A). There are no specific recommendations regarding the accommodations/motel use for this Sub Area. Reviewing Agency Comments: This application was submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 48 PLANNING OMMISSION EPTEMBER TWIN OWLS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGE 5 OF 5 The Development Plan has gone through three reviews and resubmittals. The current Plan complies with Public Works, the Estes Valley Fire Protection District, Utilities, and the Estes Park Sanitation District’s requirements. Public Comments: A neighborhood and community meeting, required by the EPDC, was held on November 9, 2021. Twenty attendees received information regarding the project. There were questions and discussion regarding motel employees, motel design, traffic, access, parking, wildlife, the restaurant, lighting, signage, and pedestrian access. The meeting was primarily informational, with no attendees voicing opposition. In accordance with the notice requirements in the EPDC, notice of the Planning Commission meeting was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette, on September 2, 2022. Notice was mailed to all required adjacent property owners on August 1, 2022. Any comments submitted will be posted to: www.estes.org/currentapplications. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Development Plan complies with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. 2. The Development Plan complies with the applicable goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. 3.The Planning Commission is the decision-making body for the Development Plan. 4.Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed projects. 5.This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Action Recommended: Staff recommends approval of the Twin Owls Motor Lodge Development Plan. Sample Motions: 1.I move to approve the Development Plan application, according to findings recommended by Staff. 2.I move to continue the Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that … [state reasons for continuing]. 3.I move to deny the Development Plan application, finding that … [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1.Statement of Intent 2. Application 3.Development Plan (Architectural, Site Plan) 4.Development Plan (Cabin Detail) 5.Photo of Proposed Cabins 6.Development Plan (Landscaping Plan) 7.Development Plan (Civil Plans) 49 > Comments on Twin Owls Hotel Development Plan Application 1 message Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:56 AMMarina Connors <> To: jwoeber@estes.org, Jennifer Waters <jwaters@me.com>, planning@estes.org Cc: Greg Muhonen <gmuhonen@estes.org> Jeff and Jennifer, In early August, I received a Notice of Public Hearing for The Twin Owls Development Plan which was scheduled for August 16. I was planning on speaking at that meeting. I got a follow up notice that the public meeting for this development plan has been moved to September 20. I would like to share my comments with you now because if my traffic count comment is considered, it should be addressed during the summer. It may be too late to address this comment after September 20. I am grateful for the upgrades being done at the Twin Owls Hotel. The site needs improvement, however, I would like confidence that the decision to add more guest rooms is based on accurate information. Thank you for taking the time to consider these comments. I have attached a few files which may be helpful when reviewing my comments. Marina Connors 650 Highland Ln, Estes Park, CO 80517 ______________________ I have reviewed the Twin Owls Hotel Development Plan Applica on and associated documents and have comments on the traﬃc study, sign plan and preliminary drainage report. I found these documents on the following website: https://estespark.colorado.gov/currentapplications. This website includes a Revised Development Plan, dated 7/20/22 which shows a new loop road through the site, as shown on drawing DP1.5. Also on the website is a Development Plan dated 4/15/22, which does not show the loop road. The traﬃc study, sign plan and preliminary drainage report were all prepared based on the 4/15/22 version of the site plan. These documents should be updated based on the revised site plan. Speciﬁc comments follow: Revised Drainage Report 1) The report states that the proposed development will increase impervious area by 12%. On the revised development plan, drawing DP1.5 it looks like there is an increase of impervious area of about 30-50%. The impervious area calculaon should be updated based on the new site plan. 2) The report states that the increase in total peak ﬂow is minor. This should be revisited based on the correct site plan and an updated impervious area calculaon. Traﬃc Study 3) Traﬃc Count: Calculaons are based on an exisng traﬃc count done in November 2021. This number was factored/adjusted and used as a basis for the traﬃc study. It is frequently diﬃcult to make a le hand turn from Stanley Ave. onto Highway 36, especially in the summer. There has not been much use of this hotel in the last ﬁve years. When the hotel improvements are complete, I expect more traﬃc on Stanley Ave., which may signiﬁcantly increase challenges at the intersecon of Stanley Ave. and Highway 36 The traﬃc study concluded that "the Twin Owls Motor Lodge Expansion will have minimal impact on the area streets.” Why not take a traﬃc count now, during the summer, rather than relying on an adjusted value? An actual count could then be compared to the factored/adjusted November count for validaon of the assumpons. Doing so would give me more conﬁdence that this conclusion is correct. Sign Plan 4) Only two of the four pages of the plan are included in the version posted on the website. Please provide all four sheets of this plan aer it is revised based on the updated site plan. Vertical Sight Distance on Stanley Ave. 5) When making a le hand turn out of Stanley Cir. onto Stanley Ave. there is a high point on Stanley Ave. that limits visibility of cars that will be entering/exing the exisng and possibly the proposed new driveway out of the Twin Owls Hotel property. Will this vercal sight distance be reviewed for the development? Retaining Wall on South Side of US 36 6) There is a mber retaining wall along the north side of the property and south side of this sidewalk. It is failing. Will improvements to this retaining wall be included in the project? 8-11-22 left Stanley Ave to 36.MOV 2 attachments Stanley Cir. turn onto Stanley Ave. Vertical Sight Distance.jpg 448K Retaining Wall on Hwy 36.jpg 597K Beacon Bay Project Management | 6965 University Blvd. Winter Park, FL 32792 | 407-636-3232 July 21, 2022 RE: Letter of Intent, Rev. 1 - Twin Owls – Hotel Renovation and Expansion To Whom it May Concern, Beacon Bay Project Management (“BBPM”), on behalf of Castle Peak Holdings (“CPH”), is submitting a plans for future development on the property located at 700 North Saint Vrain Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado, 80517. The intent of the development is to renovate and reposition the existing motel structures, which have been in disrepair for years, reducing the existing guestroom count by seven (7), while adding Eight (8) new guestroom cabin structures and Sixty Two (62) new guestrooms in two new buildings on the existing lot. The development plans are based on what is currently allowed within the existing accommodation zoning code based on the lot size. The new cabins would be located on the southwest portion part of the property, which is southwest of the existing buildings (Twin Owls Motor Lodge). The new buildings with sixty two (62) new guestrooms would be located on the southeast portion of the property, which is southeast of the existing buildings. In addition to the new build structures mentioned above, CPH intend to add a kitchen and restaurant to the existing public space (lobby structure) of the Twin Owls Motor Lodge, which will include interior and outside seating located on a porch directly to the south of the building. It is acknowledged that a building permit application (22-EP-0035) for the restaurant in the lobby structure has been On Hold pending approval of the Development Plan. With the development plan and the new restaurant, the parking spaces will be increased from 33 existing to 122 total. A traffic study (previously submitted) has been completed which reflects the development will have minimal impact on area streets. Scoping of the existing sewer lines has occurred, per Town directive. Site staking modifications are pending the acceptance of proposed design, unless directed to occur prior to acceptance, please advise preference by the Town. Ownership has elected to forego lighting at the new parking areas, instead maintaining a dark sky approach. The building lighting is shown in the architectural plans to meet the code requirements. Landscaping: Native and waterwise plants for revegetation, landscape areas around parking and buffer zones have been selected using the recommended plant list for Estes Valley. Existing trees are preserved, and additional evergreens are strategically placed to screen the property and adjacent neighbors. All disturbed slopes will be reseeded with native seed mix and restored as natural-appearing landforms. Proposed native, evergreen buffer trees costs are expected to be $25,000 for materials and installation. The maintenance plan for landscaping includes installation of irrigation systems, horticultural care, and regular monitoring of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs for needle loss and/or damage. Plant material that has over 50% leaf or needle loss shall be replaced within the same growing season per 50 Beacon Bay Project Management | 6965 University Blvd. Winter Park, FL 32792 | 407-636-3232 CPH is excited to invest in reinventing and repositioning Twin Owls Motor Lodge into a destination that travelers and locals will embrace and frequent, while celebrating everything that makes the community of Estes Park so special. We look forward to presenting our concept during our pre-application conference. Please see Twin Owls Development Check List Doc to help guide through the plans. Warm Regards, Craig Middleton Craig Middleton VP of Project Management 51 Revised 2020.04.23 ks Condominium Map Preliminary Map Final Map Pre-App Development Plan Special Review Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat Project Description Lot Size Area of Disturbance in Acres Proposed Land Use Town Well None Town Well None Existing Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD UTSD Septic None EPSD UTSD Septic Is a sewer lift station required?Yes No Existing Gas Service Other None Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Are there wetlands on the site?Yes No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete?Yes No Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is Owner Applicant Consultant/Engineer Attachments Please review the Estes Park Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Project Address Parcel ID # General Information Boundary Line Adjustment ROW or Easement Vacation Street Name Change Time Rezoning Petition Annexation Request Extension Other: Please specify Project Name Supplemental Map ESTES PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION Type of Application Submittal Date: Site Information Application fee Statement of intent 2 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Xcel Primary Contact Information Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721  Fax: (970) 586-0249  www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Town of Estes Park  P.O. Box 1200  170 MacGregor Avenue  Estes Park, CO 80517 Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to PLEASE CHECK ONLY ONE BOX Sign Purchase ($10) 52 Revised 2020.04.23 ks Consultant/Engineer PLEASE PRINT: PLEASE PRINT: Date Date Names: Email Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application Applicant Record Owner(s) Signatures: MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Park Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estes.org/planningforms All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. Record Owner 53 Revised 2020.04.23 ks ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► PLEASE PRINT: PLEASE PRINT: Date Date APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EPDC. http://www.estes.org/DevCode Record Owner Applicant Signatures: I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Park Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge Names: In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Park Development Code (EPDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EPDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Park Development Code is available online at: 54 1-Common Lilac 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Common Lilac 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Common Lilac 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Colorado Spruce1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce R15' 15' 10' 15' 10' 24' 0.00 0.52 10% DN A101 2 2 2 2 1 A101 1 A101 A101 1 101 BUILDING SECTION EXTERIOR ELEVATION ROOM TAG DOOR TAG WINDOW TAG ROOM NAME MATERIAL TAG REVISION CLOUD & TAG1 1i WALL TAG KEYNOTEXX SPOT ELEVATION INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAIL CALLOUT DETAIL REFERENCEA101 1 1 GRID LINE LEVEL 0' -0" CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE PT-1 1 1/4" DIMENSION ST. VRAIN AVE STANLEY AVE SCLAE: NTS Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A0.000 COVER SHEET 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SITE ADDRESS: 700 N ST VRAIN AVE (ADDRESS SUBJECT TO CHANGE) ESTES PARK, CO 80517 SCOPE OF WORK:NEW CONSTRUCTION, 2 BUILDINGS OF MOTEL COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 62 GUEST ROOMS AND HOUSEKEEPING SPACES, PLUS 8 FREE STANDING GUESTROOMS AS PRE- FABRICATED CABINS. CONVERSION OF EXISTING HOTEL LOBBY TO NEW RESTAURANT. ALL ASSOCIATED SITE AND LANDSCAPE WORK. T.O. FIRST LEVEL = EL. 100'-0" = 7,522.00 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL USE AND OCCUPANCY: 310.3 RESIDENTIAL GROUP R-1: MOTELS (TRANSIENT) 311.2 STORAGE GROUP S-1: MODERATE-HAZARD STORAGE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREA LIMITATIONS CONSTRUCTION TYPE:BUILDING F | TYPE V B | 14,342 SF RESIDENTIAL GROUP R-1 WITH ACCESSORY OCCUPANCIES BUILDING G | TYPE V B | 6,712 SF RESIDENTIAL GROUP R-1 WITH ACCESSORY OCCUPANCIES BUILDING B | TYPE V B | 6,928 SF GROUP A-2 WITH ACCESSORY ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR: R-1 (SPRINKLERED) 28,000 (NS) ALLOWABLE HEIGHT:30 FEET 3 STORIES PROPOSED HEIGHT: BUILDING B:25' -2" 2 STORIES BUILDING F NORTH:24' -7 1/2"3 STORIES BUILDING F SOUTH:28' -6"3 STORIES BUILDING G:26' -0"3 STORIES ZONING 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE ESTES PARK LOCAL AMENDMENTS A.C.AIR CONDITIONING ADJ.ADJACENT ADDT'L ADDITIONAL A.F.F.ABOVE FINISH FLOOR A.H.AIR HANDLER ALT.ALTERNATING ALUM.ALUMINUM BD.BOARD BLD'G BUILDING BLK'G BLOCKING CALCS.CALCULATIONS CL.CENTERLINE CLG.CEILING CONC.CONCRETE CONT.CONTINUOUS CORR.CORRUGATED CNTR.CENTER DET.DETAIL DIA.DIAMETER DIM.DIMENSION DWGS.DRAWINGS (E)EXISTING EA.EACH ELEC.ELECTRICAL EQ.EQUAL EXIST.EXISTING EXPAND.EXPANDED EXT.EXTERIOR F.C.FINISH CEILING F.F.FINISH FLOOR FLR.FLOOR F.S.FINISH SURFACE GA.GAUGE GALV.GALVANIZED G.L.GRID LINE GYP. BD.GYPSUM BOARD HT.HEIGHT H.V.A.C.HEATING / VENTILATION / AIR CONDITIONING INT.INTERIOR MAX.MAXIMUM M.B.MACHINE BOLT MECH.MECHANICAL MIN.MINIMUM MTL.METAL (N)NEW N/A NOT APPLICABLE N.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACT N.T.S NOT TO SCALE. O.C.ON CENTER PNT.PAINT P.T.PRESSURE TREATED REF.REFERENCE REQ'D REQUIRED RM.ROOM S.S.STAINLESS STEEL SIM.SIMILAR STL.STEAL STLS.STAINLESS STRUCT.STRUCTURE(AL) STOR.STORAGE SUSP.SUSPENDED T.B.D.TO BE DETERMINED THK.THICK T.O.W.TOP OF WALL TYP.TYPICAL U.N.O.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE V.I.F.VERIFY IN FIELD V.S.VENT SHAFT W/WITH W.C.WATER CLOSET WD.WOOD W.H.WATER HEATER W.P.WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SYMBOLS PLOT PLAN ABBREVIATIONS VICINITY MAP APPLICABLE CODES PROPOSED BUILDING USE:HIGH INTENSITY ACCOMMODATIONS | HOTEL NEW KEYS -PLANNING SUBMISSION JULY 21, 2022 ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE: ESTES PARK MUNICIPAL CODE | TITLE 17: ZONING LOT AREA: 198,520 SF /4.56 ACRES BUILDING FOOTPRINT:30,098 SF + PAVED AREA: 78,476 SF 108,574 SF / 198,520 = % LOT COVERAGE: 54.7% ZONING:A | ACCOMMODATIONS | HIGHWAY CORRIDOR MINIMUM LAND AREA PER ACCOMMODATION (45 UNITS X 1800 SF) 81,000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE 40,000 SF MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 80% FRONT SETBACK (ARTERIAL)25 FEET SIDE SETBACK 15 FEET REAR SETBACK 10 FEET LOT LINES NEAR RESIDENTIAL 25 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT 30 FEET EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION: "A" ACCOMODATIONS NUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS: EXISTING: 40 NEW: 62 GUESTROOMS + 8 CABINS TOTAL: 110 PARKING REQUIRED: 1 SPACE PER ROOM < 750 SF = 110 SPACES 1 SPACE PER 3 EMPLOYEES = 4 SPACES 75% OF 1 SPACE PER 100 SF OF CUSTOMER SERVICE AREA (INDOOR & OUTDOOR) = 8 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED = 122 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 122 PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS: 9' X 19' 6" DRIVE AISLE WIDTH:24' TWO-WAY, 20' ONE-WAY FIRE ACCESS & 12' ONE-WAY AT EXISTING NON-CONFORMING ROADWAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1A AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2 OF LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION, RECORDED JANUARY 11, 2019 AT RECEPTION NO 20190001789, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO BUILDING AREA: 506.1.3 BASEMENTS. BASEMENTS NEED NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING PROVIDED THE TOTAL AREA OF SUCH BASEMENTS DOES NOT EXCEED THE AREA PERMITTED FOR A ONE-STORY ABOVE GRADE PLAN BUILDINGS FRONTAGE INCREASE FACTOR (EQUATION 5-5) PERIMETER OF BUILDINGS HAVING A MINIMUM FRONTAGE DISTANCE OF 30' -0" BUILDING B (391'-0" / 490'0" -.25) X 30 / 30 = .55 ALLOWABLE AREA (EQUATION 5-2) BUILDING A-B (A-2): (18,000 + (6,000 X .55)) = 21,300 X 2 = 42,600 SF > 8,953 SF PLANNING NOTES: ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETE OR GUARENTEED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADA AND UBC. APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN CREATES A VESTED RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, CRS AS AMMENDED. 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 55 OCCUPANCY LEGEND - EGRESS R1 S1 F SOUTH F NORTH F SOUTH F NORTH F SOUTH Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A0.005 BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING G - LEVEL 011 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING G - LEVEL 022 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING G - LEVEL 033 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING F NORTH GARDEN LEVEL4 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING F LEVEL 015 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING F - LEVEL 026 1/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING AREA PLAN - BUILDING F - LEVEL 037 BUILDING F AREA CALCULATIONS ITEM TOTAL BUILDING AREA GARDEN LEVEL LEVEL 01 R-1 HOTEL ROOMS TOTAL R-1 (ACCESSORY) 2,688 PROPOSEDAREA (SF) 5,040 13,104 336 PROPOSED PER TABLE 506.2/TYPE VB/SM (WITH HEIGHT INCREASE): R1:7,000 SF/FLOOR A-2:6,000 SF/FLOOR B:27,000 SF/FLOOR S-2:40,500 SF/FLOOR LEVEL 02 LEVEL 03 S-2 STORAGE PROPOSED PROPOSED BUILDING G AREA CALCULATIONS ITEM TOTAL BUILDING AREA GARDEN LEVEL LEVEL 01 R-1 HOTEL ROOMS TOTAL R-1 (ACCESSORY) 2,168 PROPOSEDAREA (SF) 1,988 6,428 2,272 PROPOSED LEVEL 02 S-1 STORAGE PROPOSED PROPOSED 284 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 2,272 2,272 6,712 2,688 2,688 902 --- --- --- --- --- --- 336 902 5,376 3,590 2,688 14,342 2,688 2,168 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 56 (E) POOL (E) PATH PROPERTY LINE 10 ' SETBACK (E) BUILDING F (E) BUILDING A (E) BUILDING B (E) BUILDING C (E) BUILDING D (E) BUILDING E (E) POOL HOUSE (E) EASEMENT ADA 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ADA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 2 3 (E) PARKING LOT N ST. VRAIN AVE STANLEY AVE EXISTING ACCESS ROAD TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROAD TO BE REPAVED AND CONNECTED TO FUTURE RING ROAD LEGEND SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE (E) GRAVEL ROAD (E) PAVEMENT TO BE RESURFACED PLANTING (E) SITE/RETAINING WALLS TO REMAIN Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A0.100 SITE PLAN - EXISTING 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1" = 30'-0" SITE PLAN - EXISTING1 10 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 57 1-Common Lilac 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Common Lilac 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Common Lilac 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Quaking Aspen 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce R 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 10' - 0"15' - 0" 10' - 0" 0.00 0.52 10% (N) BUILDING G 3 STORIES 23 GUESTROOMS + (N) LAUNDRY R 15' - 0" (N) CABINS 8 KEYS (N) PARKING LOT; 9 SPOTS DECOMPOSED GRAVEL (E) POOL (N) DECK (E) ACCESS ROAD; TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE 10 ' SETBACK (E) BUILDING A (E) BUILDING B (E) BUILDING C (E) BUILDING D (E) BUILDING E (E) POOL HOUSE (E) EASEMENT (E) PARKING WITH (N) ADDITION; 15 SPACE; 1 ADA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ADA 14 ADA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 48 49 50 51 57 52 53 54 55 56 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 15' - 0" 10' - 0"15' - 0" 10' - 0" (N) BUILDING F SOUTH 3 STORIES 23 GUESTROOMS + (N) LAUNDRY (N) BUILDING F NORTH 2 STORIES 16 GUESTROOMS ADA 111 ADA 112113 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 97 96 95 94 93 9899100101102103104105106107108109110 122 121 120 119 118 ADA 117 116 115 TRASH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN, TO BE PERMITTED UNDER SEPERATE SUBMITTAL (N) BIKE RACKS PER EDDC 7.11M 114 SITE PLAN BREAKDOWN (E) BUILDING A: 16 KEYS (E) BUILDING C: 8 KEYS (E) BUILDING D: 8 KEYS (E) BUILDING E: 8 KEYS (N) "ALT" CABINS: 8 KEYS (N) BUILDING G: 23 KEYS GUESTROOM TOTAL: 110 KEYS (40 EXISTING, 70 NEW) PARKING TOTAL: 122 (N) BUILDING F: 39 KEYS Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A1.000 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED NEW KEYS 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1" = 30'-0" SITE PLAN - PROPOSED1 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 58 UPUP CH C C D H C RRD CWI CWO 4818 42 18 36 14 48 18 30 14 36 14 36 14 6018 24 18 60 18 30 18 36 18 48 14 3614 48 14 3618 4218 24 18 RRD ITEM#B3 ITEM #B23 ITEM #B34 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 BACK OF HOUSE STAFF WC (E) ELECTRICAL ROOM(E) MECHANICAL ROOM STORAGE STORAGE STAIR 1STAIR 2 B-A B-B 60' - 8" 41 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 22 ' - 0 " 4' - 0"19' - 2"11' - 7"3' - 5 1/2"19' - 6 1/2" STORAGE DRY STORAGE 59' - 9" 12' - 1 1/2"26' - 0"8' - 2"11' - 9 1/2" FIREPLACE FOUNDATION STAFF LOUNGE LEGEND -FLOOR PLANS DEMO WALL (E) WALL (N)WALL Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A1.001 PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN - BUILDING B - BASEMENT 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN - BUILDING B - BASEMENT1 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 59 DN DN DN UP DN T 36 24 2414 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 KITCHEN ADA WC LOBBY STORAGE WC B-A B-B 41 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 60' - 8" 6' - 0"6"6' - 0"6"6' - 0"6"6' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 5 1/2" 14' - 8 1/2" 12 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 3 " 2' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 4' - 0 " 33 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 9" 2' - 8 " 4' - 0 " 3' - 4 " 4' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " LEGEND -FLOOR PLANS DEMO WALL (E) WALL (N)WALL Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A1.002 PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 01 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 011 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 60 ITEM #B16.1 ITEM #B13.1 A--C A-B A-1B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 MECH. ROOF MECH. RM. J1 WC 2 J1 BUNK ROOM B-A B-B OPEN TO BELOW 76' - 5" 41 ' - 4 1 / 2 " CU T L I N E SE E S H E E T A 1 . 0 0 0 26' - 7" 3' - 5 1/2"2' - 10"2' - 10"2' - 10"2' - 10"2' - 10"2' - 10"2' - 10"2' - 10" 16' - 2 1/2" 1' - 6" LEGEND -FLOOR PLANS DEMO WALL (E) WALL (N)WALL Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A1.003 PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 02 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN - BUILDING B - LEVEL 021 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 61 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce 1-Colorado Spruce DN UP UP DN 15' - 0" ADA 119 ADA 120 ADA 121 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 104 103 102 101 100105106107108109110111112113114115116117118 24 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 12' - 0" EXIT ONLY EXISTING ROAD Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A1.010 PROPOSED OVERALL PLAN - NEW KEYS 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1/16" = 1'-0" NEW KEYS - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN/PARKING PLAN1 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 62 LEVEL 1 ABC 0" LEVEL 2 ABC 8' -8" T.O. ROOF 25' -2" 8' - 8 " 16 ' - 6 " 25 ' - 2 " OPEN TO BEYOND LEVEL 1 ABC 0" LEVEL 2 ABC 8' -8" T.O. ROOF 25' -2" CU T L I N E SE E S H E E T A 1 . 0 0 0 16 ' - 6 " 8' - 8 " 25 ' - 2 " OPEN TO BEYOND Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A2.001 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BUILDING B 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED ELEVATION - BUILDING B - FRONT2 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED ELEVATION - BUILDING B - BACK1 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO CHANGE TO BUILDING HEIGHT / ENVELOPE 10 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 63 G -LEVEL 01 G -LEVEL 02 G -LEVEL 03 G -T.O. ROOF G-1G11G-3G-4G-8G-9 G-2G-5G-6G-7G-10 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " G -MEAN AVG. G -BLDG HEIGHT OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 26 ' - 0 " G -LEVEL 02 G -LEVEL 03 G -T.O. ROOF G-1 G11G-3 G-4 G-8 G-9G-2 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-10 9' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " G -MEAN AVG. G -BLDG HEIGHT OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 26 ' - 0 " G -LEVEL 01 G -LEVEL 02 G -LEVEL 03 G -T.O. ROOF G-B 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " G-A G -MEAN AVG. G -BLDG HEIGHT OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 26 ' - 0 " G -LEVEL 01 G -LEVEL 02 G -LEVEL 03 G -T.O. ROOF G-B 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 16 ' - 0 " G-A G -MEAN AVG. G -BLDG HEIGHT OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 26 ' - 0 " Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A2.010 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BUILDING G 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING G - EXTERIOR ELEVATION BACK1 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING G - EXTERIOR ELEVATION FRONT2 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING G - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIDE3 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING G - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIDE 024 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PER ESTES PARK DEVELOPMENT CODE 1.9 E.1 (3) MEASUREMENT OF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. HEIGHT MEANS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE MEAN AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE MEAN HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN THE LOWEST POINT OF THE TOPMOST TOP PLATE AND HIGHEST RIDGE FOR A GABLE, HIP OR GAMBREL ROOF. 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 64 F -LEVEL 01 F -GARDEN LEVEL F -LEVEL 02 F-1F-9 F-2F-3F-4F-6F-7F-8 F-5 F -N. -T.O. ROOF 6' - 7 1 / 2 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ( F N O R T H ) 24 ' - 7 1 / 2 " F -AVG. M. RF. F. NORTH -LEVEL 01 F. NORTH -LEVEL 02 F. NORTH -LEVEL 03 F -NORTH T.O. ROOF F. NORTH -AVG. M. RF. F -LEVEL 01 F -GARDEN LEVEL F -LEVEL 02 F-D F-C F-B F-A 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ( F N O R T H ) 24 ' - 7 1 / 2 " F -N. -T.O. ROOF 6' - 7 1 / 2 " F. NORTHF. SOUTH F -AVG. M. RF. F. NORTH -LEVEL 01 F. NORTH -LEVEL 02 F. NORTH -LEVEL 03 F. NORTH -T.O. ROOF F. NORTH -AVG. M. RF. F -LEVEL 01 F -GARDEN LEVEL F -LEVEL 02 F-DF-CF-BF-A 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " F -N. -T.O. ROOF OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ( F N O R T H ) 24 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 6' - 7 1 / 2 " F. NORTH -LEVEL 01 F. NORTH -LEVEL 02 F. NORTH -LEVEL 03 F. NORTH -T.O. ROOF F. NORTH F. SOUTH F -AVG. M. RF.F. NORTH -AVG. M. RF. Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A2.011 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BUILDING F NORTH 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING F NORTH - EXTERIOR ELEVATION FRONT11/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING F NORTH - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIDE2 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING F NORTH - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIDE3 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PER ESTES PARK DEVELOPMENT CODE 1.9 E.1 (3) MEASUREMENT OF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. HEIGHT MEANS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE MEAN AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE MEAN HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN THE LOWEST POINT OF THE TOPMOST TOP PLATE AND HIGHEST RIDGE FOR A GABLE, HIP OR GAMBREL ROOF. 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 65 F -LEVEL 01 F -LEVEL 02 F -LEVEL 03 F -T.O. ROOF F-DF-CF-BF-A OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ( F - S O U T H ) 28 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " F. SOUTH LEVEL 01 F. SOUTH LEVEL 02 F. SOUTH LEVEL 03 F. SOUTH T.O. ROOF F. NORTH F. SOUTH F -AVG. M RF.F. SOUTH AVG. M. RF. F -LEVEL 01 F -LEVEL 02 F -LEVEL 03 F -T.O. ROOF F-D F-C F-B F-A 10 ' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ( F N O R T H ) 28 ' - 6 " F. SOUTH LEVEL 01 F. SOUTH LEVEL 02 F. SOUTH LEVEL 03 F. SOUTH T.O. ROOF F. NORTHF. SOUTH F -AVG. M RF. F. SOUTH LEVEL 01 F. SOUTH LEVEL 02 F. SOUTH LEVEL 03 F. SOUTH T.O. ROOF F. SOUTH AVG. M. RF. F -LEVEL 01 F -LEVEL 02 F -LEVEL 03 F -T.O. ROOF F-1 F-9F-2 F-3 F-4 F-6 F-7 F-8F-5 10 ' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T ( F S O U T H ) 28 ' - 6 " F -AVG. M RF. F. SOUTH LEVEL 01 F. SOUTH LEVEL 02 F. SOUTH LEVEL 03 F. SOUTH T.O. ROOF F. SOUTH AVG. M. RF. Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 1/8" = 1'-0" A2.012 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BUILDING F SOUTH 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PER ESTES PARK DEVELOPMENT CODE 1.9 E.1 (3) MEASUREMENT OF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. HEIGHT MEANS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE MEAN AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE MEAN HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN THE LOWEST POINT OF THE TOPMOST TOP PLATE AND HIGHEST RIDGE FOR A GABLE, HIP OR GAMBREL ROOF. 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING F SOUTH - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIDE3 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING F SOUTH - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIDE1 1/8" = 1'-0" BUILDING F SOUTH - EXTERIOR ELEVATION FRONT2 66 HIGHEST POINT OF ROOF ELEVATION POINT OF GRADE ELEVATION 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " LOWEST POINT OF ROOF ELEVATION 6' - 7 1 / 2 " MEAN AVERAGE ROOF ELEVATION OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 24 ' - 7 1 / 2 " LOWEST POINT ROOF ELEVATION HIGHEST POINT ROOF ELEVATION HIGHEST POINT GRADE ELEVATION LOWEST POINT GRADE ELEVATION MEAN AVERAGE ELEVATION OF FINISH GRADE 12 ' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 4' - 6 " 4' - 6 " OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 26 ' - 0 " MEAN AVERAGE ROOF ELEVATION HIGHEST POINT OF ROOF ELEVATION LOWEST POINT OF ROOF ELEVATION POINT OF GRADE ELEVATION 10 ' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 28 ' - 6 " MEAN AVERAGE ROOF ELEVATION Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A2.105 BUILDING HEIGHT DIAGRAMS 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB BUILDING HEIGHT DIAGRAM - F NORTH2 BUILDING HEIGHT DIAGRAM - G3 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PER "ESTES PARK DEVELOPMENT CODE 1.9" BUILDINGS NOT TO EXCEED 30'-0" IN HEIGHT. MEASUREMENT TAKEN FROM THE MEAN AVAERAGE ELEVATION OF FINISHED GRADE. BUILDING HEIGHT DIAGRAM - F SOUTH1 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 67 Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Architect of Record DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client St. Vrain Properties LLC 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NO T Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 1191 Woodstock Ave Estes Park, CO. 80517 Tel 970.342.4101 Landscape Designers Studio Campo 300 Lawrence St. #9 Denver, CO. 80205 A7.010 MATERIAL / FINISH PALETTE 001081 07.21.22 TL TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN CL/LB 2 PLANNING RESUBMISSION 07.21.2022 EXTERIOR RAILING FINISH COLOR THROUGHOUT FACADE FINISH TRIM COLOR THROUGHOUT BUILDING "B" FLAGSTONE PAVING WIDE PLANK CEDAR FINISHED TO MATCH (E) REFURBISHED WOOD CLADDING AT GUESTROOM BUILDINGS 68 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" A A B B C C 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 3 A1-00 3 A1-00 +0' - 0" 8' - 8 1/8"8' - 8 1/8" +20' - 7 1/8" 8' - 5 5 / 8 " 0' - 7 7 / 8 " 7' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 5' - 7 1 / 4 " 0' - 3 1 / 8 " 1' - 9 3 / 4 " 0' - 3 1 / 8 " 1' - 10"6' - 8 3/8" 0' - 3 1/8" 2' - 7 3/8" 5' - 11 1/4" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" A A B B C C 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 3 A1-00 3 A1-00 +20' - 7 1/8" 7' - 1 1 1 / 4 " +0' - 0" 5' - 8 1/8"3' - 0"8' - 8 1/8" 8' - 8 1/8"8' - 8 1/8" 3' - 1 3/8" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 3 A1-00 3 A1-00 20' - 0" +20' - 7 1/8" +0' - 0" 8' - 11"8' - 11"8' - 11" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 GROUND FLOOR 0' - 0" 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 0 TERRAIN LEVEL VARIES 3 A1-00 3 A1-00 +20' - 7 1/8" 20' - 0" 12' - 1"1' - 10"6' - 1 3/8" +4' - 2 3/8" +0' - 0" 8' - 11"8' - 11"8' - 11" Issued Sheet Title Project Revisions Issued Date Project Location © Copyright - DenOutdoors INC, 2022 Construction Notes 1.All work shall conform to all state and applicable codes & ordinances. 2.No drawing is to be scaled; use dimensions only. 3.Dimensions are taken from face of masonry, concrete or wood stud framing members unless otherwise indicated. 4.Confirm all existing conditions before proceeding with the said work. 5.Items not noted, but implied as necessary for the performance of the contract, are considered part of the work. 6.All work is to be executed by mechanics skilled in their trade. 7.All trades will cooperate with each other to facilitate the progress if the entire job. 8.Contractor(s) is to protect the public and premises during the period of construction with adequate shoring, bracing, fencing, lighting, ventilation, etc. 9.All changes or substitutions are to be approved by the owner before being incorporated into the work. 10.Conform to all manufacturers instructions & specifications for the installation or use of all materials unless otherwise noted. 11.All exterior lumber & lumber in contact with masonry, concrete, or soil to be pressure treated or properly protected to avoid deterioration. PLANNING DOCUMENTS MATERIAL CALL OUTS TRAILBORNTRAILBORN A-FRAMEA-FRAME Estes Park, Colorado, USA 11 July 20, 2022July 20, 2022 A2-00A2-00 ELEVATIONSELEVATIONS 1/4" 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION11 1/4" 1'-0" REAR ELEVATIONREAR ELEVATION22 1/4" 1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION33 1/4" 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION44 DOORS AND WINDOWS Black Pella Lifestyle (or similar approved) EXTERNAL CLADDING Tongue and Groove Tight Knot Cedar with Pine Tar finish (or similar approved) ROOFING Standing Seam panel (or similar approved) STRUCTURE Spruce Prefabricated Timber Kit ROOF Matte Black Color Selection DECKING 5/4 Cedar Select Tight Knots (or similar approved) 69 70 1 Tree Relocation/Removal in Proposed Sewer Easement 9.12.22 AJ 0.00 0.52 (N) BUILDING G 3 STORIES 23 GUESTROOMS + (N) LAUNDRY (N) CABINS 8 KEYS (N) PARKING LOT; 9 SPOTS (E) POOL (N) DECK (E) ACCESS ROAD; TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE 10 ' SETBACK (E) BUILDING A (E) BUILDING B (E) BUILDING C (E) BUILDING D (E) BUILDING E (E) POOL HOUSE (E) EASEMENT (E) PARKING WITH (N) ADDITION; 15 SPACE; 1 ADA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ADA 14 ADA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 48 49 50 51 57 52 53 54 55 56 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (N) BUILDING F SOUTH 3 STORIES 23 GUESTROOMS + (N) LAUNDRY (N) BUILDING F NORTH 2 STORIES 16 GUESTROOMS ADA 111 ADA 112113 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 97 96 95 94 93 9899100101102103104105106107108109110 122 121 120 119 118 ADA 117 116 115 TRASH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN, TO BE PERMITTED UNDER SEPERATE SUBMITTAL (N) BIKE RACKS PER EDDC 7.11M 114 EXISTING SWALE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN EASEMENT TOTAL EXISTING TREES PRESERVED IN FRONT LOT AREA WITHIN PROPERTY LINE= 30 TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL = 4 SITE SURVEY EXISTING TREE/VEGETATION BOUNDARY TOTAL EXISTING TREES PRESERVED IN EAST SIDE LOT AREA = 24 TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL = 21 TOTAL EXISTING TREES PRESERVED IN WEST SIDE LOT AREA = 4 TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL = 0 TOTAL EXISTING TREES PRESERVED IN REAR LOT AREA = 4 TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL = 4 PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Landscape Architect DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client Castle Peak Holdings 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Landscape Architecture & Planning 3000 Lawrence Street, #9 Denver, Colorado 80205 303.900.5820 www.studio-campo.com Landscaping Plan Proposed Development & Existing Vegetation 001081 L1 09.12.2022 AJ CP 0 SCALE: 1"=30' 3015 60 LEGEND TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLANS TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Site Survey Tree/Vegetation Boundary Existing Trees to Be Preserved Total Within Property Line = 117 Existing Trees to be Removed Total Within Property Line = 30 Total Replacement Trees Required by Estes Park Development Code 7.3 = 60 Boundary Line for Lot Area Tree Counts Existing Trees to be Removed w/ Sewer Easement Total Within Property Line = 16 Additional Replacement Trees Required by Estes Park Development Code 7.3 = 32 1 71 EPDC Section 7.3 (Replacement Trees) TOTAL Existing Trees 147 Existing Trees Preserved 117 Existing Trees Proposed for Removal 30 EPDC Replacement Ratio (2 trees for 1 removed)60 EPDC Replacement Ratio (2 trees for 1 removed) REQUESTING 25% VARIANCE. 60 REQUIRED, REQUESTING 25% LESS TO MAINTAIN SAFE DENSITY OF PONDEROSA PINE MEADOW TREE DENSITY. REQUESTING 50 50 Sewer Line Easement-Proposed Trees for Removal 16 EPDC Replacement Ratio (2 trees for 1 removed) REQUESTING 25% VARIANCE. 32 REQUIRED, REQUESTING 25% LESS TO MAINTAIN SAFE DENSITY OF PONDEROSA PINE MEADOW TREE DENSITY. REQUESTING 24 24 Grand Total Proposed New Trees 74 TOTAL Preserved Trees with Replacement 191 EPDC Section 7.5.E.1. (Impervious Surfaces) TOTAL Sq. Ft. Impervious Surface (existing & new structures)29,630 Required Trees (1 tree/1000 Sq. Ft. Impervious Surface)30 Proposed New Trees 74 EPDC Section 7.5.F (Parking Screening Accommodations/Residential District Boundary) Total Rear Lot Line Linear Feet New Building F and G Parking Lot 254 Total Sq. Ft. Preserved and Existing Trees and Shrubs along Rear Lot Line 756 Required Trees (8 evergreen trees /100 Linear Feet)20 Proposed New Trees Parking Lot F along Lot Line 15 Required Shrubs (11 shrubs/100 Linear Feet) along Lot Line 28 Proposed New Shrubs 28 Total Square Feet Landscape Islands New Building F and G Parking Lot 1,555 Total Parking Islands 5 Total New Parking Island Trees 5 Total New Parking Island Shrubs 16 EPDC Section 7.5.F (Buffer Accommodations/Residential District Boundary SOUTH) Total Southern Rear Lot Line Linear Feet New Cabins & Access Road 472 Required Trees (8 evergreen trees /100 Linear Feet)38 Proposed New Trees 15 Existing Trees Preserved 23 Required Shrubs (11 shrubs/100 Linear Feet) along Lot Line 52 Proposed New Shrubs 47 Existing Shrubs Preserved (Sq. Ft.)320 Total Western Side Lot Line Linear Feet New Cabins & Existing Parking 305 Required Trees (8 evergreen trees /100 Linear Feet)24 Proposed New Trees 16 Existing Trees Preserved 8 Required Shrubs (11 shrubs/100 Linear Feet) along Lot Line 34 Proposed New Shrubs 34 Total Linear Feet New Overflow Parking Lot & Road 106 Total Sq. Ft. Preserved Pea Shrub Hedge 500 Required Trees Parking Lot Buffer (1 tree per 25 LF)4 Proposed New Trees 5 Required Shrubs (1 shrub per 10 LF)11 Proposed New Shrubs Preserve Existing Total Square Feet Landscape Islands Added to Existing Lots in front of Buildings A, B, C, D & E 2,449 Total Parking Islands 12 Total New Parking Island Trees 9 Total Existing Trees Preserved at Building Landscape Beds 13 Total New Parking Island Shrubs 29 Proposed Landscape Plan Meets this Requirement EPDC Section 7.5.F (Overflow & Existing Parking Lot Buffers and Islands) Proposed Landscape Plan Meets this Requirement with Inclusion of Preserved Shrubs and Trees Proposed Landscape Plan Meets this Requirement with Inclusion of Existing Trees and Shrubs. Proposed Landscape Plan Exceeds this Requirement Proposed Landscape Plan Exceeds this Requirement Proposed Landscape Plan Meets this Requirement with Inclusion of Preserved Shrubs and Trees Proposed Landscape Plan Meets this Requirement Proposed Landscape Plan Meets this Requirement with Inclusion of Preserved Shrubs and Trees EPDC Section 7.5.F (Buffer Accommodations/Residential District Boundary WEST) 1 Tree Relocation/Removal in Proposed Sewer Easement 9.12.22 AJ 0.00 0.52 EXISTING MEADOW TO BE PRESERVED. DISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED WITH NATIVE PLANTING. TRASH SCREENING EPDC ROAD FRONTAGE TREE REQUIREMENT OF 23 TREES MET THROUGH EXISTING TREES LOCATED WITHIN PROPERTY LINE AND NORTH OF PROPERTY LINE NEW STRUCTURES 7' BUFFER NO NEW TREE PLANTING ZONE. EXISTING TREES WITHIN 7' BUFFER WILL BE PRESERVED. (8) NEW ASPEN TREES, 2" CAL. (N) PROPOSED PARKING WITH NEW BUFFER TREES (5) AND 500 SF PRESERVED SCREENING HEDGE. (N) 1152 SF of PROPOSED PARKING ISLANDS EACH INCLUDE 1 TREE AND 2 SHRUBS MIN. MEETS EPDC PARKING LOT ISLAND REQUIREMENTS (N) PROPOSED PARKING BUFFER INCLUDES 756 SF PRESERVED VEGETATION, NEW TREES (15) AND (28) NEW SHRUBS 3'- 0 " SMALL DIAMETER BUFFER SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED IN 3' BUFFER BETWEEN NEW FIRE ACCESS ROAD AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY NEW PATHS 10'-6" 6'- 6 " NEW STRUCTURES 7' BUFFER NO NEW TREE PLANTING ZONE. EXISTING TREES WITHIN 7' BUFFER WILL BE PRESERVED. 7' - 0 " 20' - 0 " EXISTING SWALE HAMMOCKS IN EXISTING TREES NEW GAS FIRE PIT 280 SF195 SF 313 SF 324 SFNew Lot Building F & G New Overflow Lot 10 6 ' - 0 " 223 SF 370 SF 172 SF 140 SF 878 SF 95 SF 255 SF 177 SF 100 SF 219 SF 569 SF 74 SF EXISTING TREES ON SOUTH SIDE OF PARKING TO BE PRESERVED SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING TREES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN 472'-0"Linear Feet A c c o m o d a t i o n s / R e s i d e n t i a l Z o n i n g D i s t r i c t B o u n d a r y 10 4 ' - 0 " 20 1 ' - 0 " REAR & WEST SIDE ACCOMMODATIONS/RESI DENTIAL BUFFER MET WITH NEW AND PRESERVED TREES AND SHRUBS. PLEASE SEE TABLE FOR CALCULATIONS. Li n e a r F e e t A c c o m o d a t i o n s / R e s i d e n t i a l Z o n i n g D i s t r i c t B o u n d a r y Lin e a r F e e t A c c o m o d a t i o n s / R e s i d e n t i a l Z o n i n g D i s t r i c t B o u n d a r y SCREEN Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Landscape Architect DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client Castle Peak Holdings 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Landscape Architecture & Planning 3000 Lawrence Street, #9 Denver, Colorado 80205 303.900.5820 www.studio-campo.com 001081 L2 09.12.2022 AJ CP 0 SCALE: 1"=30' 3015 60 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLANS TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LEGEND Site Survey Tree/Vegetation Boundary 117 Existing Trees and Shrubs to Be Preserved Boundary Line for Lot Area Tree Counts Landscaping Plan Planting, Screening and Buffers 45 Proposed New Evergreen Trees 21 Proposed New Deciduous Trees Proposed New Shrubs EPDC COMPLIANCE TABLE 9 Proposed New Trees for Sewer Easement Tree Removal. With requested variance in table below, 9 additional trees will meet required EPDC Code with 74 total proposed new trees. 1 1 72 1 Tree Relocation/Removal in Proposed Sewer Easement 9.12.22 AJ Scale Drawing No. Drawn By Checked By Project Title Drawing Title Date Project No. North Landscape Architect DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. No.Revisions Date By Copyright Note Stamp Electric Bowery Ltd. Retains Design Copyright over Design Drawings & Specifications. Contractor Humphrey Rich Construction 10200 Old Columbia Rd. Columbia, MD. 21406 Tel 301.349.1687 Architect / Designer Electric Bowery, Ltd. 720 Hampton Dr. Venice, CA 90291 Tel 310.439.1771 Engineer Ramirez Johnson + Associates 3295 Blake St. #104 Denver, CO. 80205 Tel 720.598.0774 Client Castle Peak Holdings 228 Park Ave South New York, NY 10003 RE L E A S E D F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N NO T AS NOTED Landscape Architecture & Planning 3000 Lawrence Street, #9 Denver, Colorado 80205 303.900.5820 www.studio-campo.com 001081 L3 09.12.2022 AJ CP TOWN OF ESTES PARK LANDSCAPING PLAN NOTES 1. All disturbed areas shall be restored as natural-appearing land forms, with curves that blend in with adjacent undisturbed slopes. Abrupt angular transitions and linear slopes shall be avoided. 2. All areas disturbed by grading shall be revegetated within one (1) growing season after construction, using a substantial mix of native or adapted grasses and groundcovers. The density of the reestablished grass vegetation shall be adequate to prevent soil erosion and invasion of weeds. 3. All portions of the site where existing vegetative cover is damaged or removed, that are not otherwise covered with new improvements, shall be successfully revegetated with a substantial mix of native or adapted grasses or groundcovers. 4. On man-made slopes of 25% or greater, plant materials with deep rooting characteristics shall be selected that will minimize erosion and reduce surface runoff. All man-made slopes greater than 50% to be mulched and netted to ensure adequate stabilization and revegetation. 5. To the maximum extent feasible, topsoil that is removed during construction shall be stockpiled and conserved for later use on areas requiring revegetation or landscaping, such as cut-and-fill slopes. 6. No trees or vegetation shall be removed outside the approved limits of disturbance. 7. Conifer trees shall be sized as 50% eight feet tall and 50% six feet tall at planting. Deciduous trees shall be sized as 50% at two-inch caliper and 50% at two-inch caliper planting. Shrubs shall be 5 gallon container or larger at planting. 8. All plant material shall meeting the American Association of Nurserymen specifications for Number 1 grade, and shall comply with the quality standards of the Colorado Nursery Act, Title 35, Article 26, C.R.S., as amended. 9. All landscapes shall include a properly functioning automated sprinkler system with individual drip lines for non-turf areas. 10. Required landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, growing condition at all times. The property owner is responsible for regular irrigation, pruning, weeding, mowing, fertilizing, replacement of plants in poor condition and other maintenance of all plantings as needed. 11. All trees shall be staked or guyed and fenced to protect from wildlife damage. No chain-link fencing shall be allowed to protect landscaping for wildlife damage. 12. Department of Wildlife shall not be responsible for damage by wildlife. Ponderosa Pine Colorado Spruce Quaking Aspen Rabbitbush Smooth Sumac Mesa Verde Spruce Bluebeard Soapweed Yucca Leadplant Chieftain Manzanita Big Sagebrush Fernbush Rock Spirea Snowberry Boulder Raspberry Coyote Willow Kinnikkinnik Autumn Amber Sumac Snakeweed Powis Castle Sage Fringed Sage False Indigo Plains Prickly Pear Catmint Rocky Mtn Penstemon Pineleaf Penstemon Clary Sage Wichita Mountain Goldenrod Lambs Ear Spotted Gayfeather Giant Sacaton Indian Grass Blue Grama Prairie Dropseed TREES SHRUBS GROUNDCOVER PERENNIALS GRASSES Virginia Creeper CLIMBING PLANTS PROPOSED PLANT LIST TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLANS TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Boundary Line for Lot Area Tree Counts Landscaping Plan Notes 6' - 0 " 8'-2" Fit to Existing Panel Size Metal, 6', painted to match exterior trim Finished Grade 4" 5'-3 3/4" Ponderosa Pine Panel, rough cut from mill, 1x6 boards, sanded and sealed with water-based exterior sealer Randomized Pattern, shift orientation of wood coursing and panel layout to create organic pattern, final layout to be approved by landscape architect Metal Bracket, bolted to backside of panel and affixed to fence, painted to match exterior trim EXAMPLE FENCE/TRASH SCREENING 73 AREA OF DETAIL FOR SITE PLAN AND GRADING 1 AREA OF DETAIL FOR SITE PLAN AND GRADING 2 AREA OF DETAIL FOR SITE PLAN AND GRADING 3 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TREE COVERAGE LEGEND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN SEWER MANHOLE ASPHALT SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER MAIN EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER CONCRETE SURFACE DIRT / GRAVEL SURFACE STORM SEWER 74 STANLEY AVENUE 58.28 58.21 58.30 49.3049.23 49.30 49.21 58.21 58.12 59.25 59.26 58.90 58.90 58.41 57.16 55.91 55.52 55.26 51.10 55.05 55.42 56.13 55.72 57.86 56.23 56.23 47.23 47.23 44.05 44.62 39.86 42.90 42.55 52.53 53.09 15. 0 % 14 . 9 % 2.4% 0.6% NEW ASPHALT PARKING LOT (37 SPACES, 3 ADA) 0.0%2. 0 % 23 . 0 0 ' 125.34' 23 . 0 0 ' 125.33' 42.02 75 5 9 ASPHALT PARKING AREA (10 NEW SPACES) ASPHALT DRIVEWAY (REPAVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY) LANDSCAPED AREA CURB CUT FOR NEW DRIVEWAY BUILDING G FFE:7556.5 23 ROOMS LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA BUILDING F (N) FFE:7558.3' 39 ROOMS CURB CUT FOR NEW DRIVEWAY NEW CDOT TYPE 2 DIRECTIONAL RAMP AT EXISTING SIDEWALK AND NEW DRIVEWAY NEW CDOT TYPE 2 DIRECTIONAL RAMP AT EXISTING SIDEWALK AND NEW DRIVEWAYNEW ROCK RETAINING WALL 2' SHOULDERS WHERE DRIVE WIDTH =12' NEW 20.0' PAVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS 1.2%0.7% 58.44 58.84 58.59 0.0% 1.9 % 4:1 8:1 3:1 5:1 1.8% 1.3 % 0.2% 7540 754 5 75 5 0 75 5 0 755 0 7555 7555 7553 75 5 4 755 6 75 5 7 7550 754 0 75 4 5 75 4 1 754 2 754 3 754 4 754 6 754 7 7559 20.0' AISLE WIDTH 19.5' (TYP.) 9.0' (TYP.) AT EXISTING SIDEWALK AND NEW DRIVEWAY 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL REQUIRED PERIMETER SILT AND CONSTRUCTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY (STOCKPILING, STRIPPING, GRADING, ETC). ALL OTHER REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AS INDICATED IN THE APPROVED PROJECT SCHEDULE, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT. 2.AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING AND CONTROLLING ON-SITE EROSION INCLUDING KEEPING THE PROPERTY SUFFICIENTLY WATERED SO AS TO MINIMIZE WIND BLOWN SEDIMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHOWN HEREIN. 3.PRE-DISTURBANCE VEGETATION SHALL BE PROTECTED AND RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. REMOVAL OR DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AREA(S) REQUIRED FOR IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, AND FOR THE SHORTEST PRACTICAL PERIOD OF TIME. 4.ALL SOILS EXPOSED DURING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY (STRIPPING, GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATIONS, STOCKPILING, FILLING, ETC.) SHALL BE KEPT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION BY RIPPING OR DISKING ALONG LAND CONTOURS UNTIL MULCH, VEGETATION, OR OTHER PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMPS ARE INSTALLED. NO SOILS IN AREAS OUTSIDE PROJECT STREET RIGHTS OF-WAY SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY FOR MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS BEFORE REQUIRED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL (E.G. SEED/MULCH, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) IS INSTALLED, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL ENTITY. 5.IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE EROSION POTENTIAL, ALL TEMPORARY (STRUCTURAL) EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL: a. BE INSPECTED AT A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY TWO (2) WEEKS AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT STORM EVENT AND REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. b. REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS ALL THE SURROUNDING DISTURBED AREAS ARE SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED AS DETERMINED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. c. BE REMOVED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED AS DETERMINED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR.WHEN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REMOVED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL OF ALL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM ALL DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN UP ANY INADVERTENT DEPOSITED MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY AND MAKE SURE STREETS ARE FREE OF ALL MATERIALS BY THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. 7.ALL RETAINED SEDIMENTS, PARTICULARLY THOSE ON PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES, SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER AND LOCATION SO AS NOT TO CAUSE THEIR RELEASE INTO ANY WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. 8.COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM (CDPS) REQUIREMENTS MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO DISCHARGE OR ALLOW THE DISCHARGE OF ANY POLLUTANT OR CONTAMINATED WATER FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES. POLLUTANTS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, OIL AND GAS PRODUCTS, LITTER, AND SANITARY WASTE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES TAKE WHATEVER MEASURES ARE NECESSARY TO ASSURE THE PROPER CONTAINMENT AND DISPOSAL OF POLLUTANTS ON THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 9.A DESIGNATED AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE FOR CONCRETE TRUCK CHUTE WASHOUT. THE AREA SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO CONTAIN WASHOUT MATERIAL AND LOCATED AT LEAST FIFTY (50) FEET AWAY FROM ANY WATERWAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONCRETE WASHOUT MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PRIOR TO THE AREA BEING RESTORED. 10. A VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL PAD SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL VEHICLES EXITING EXISTING ROADWAYS. NO EARTHEN MATERIALS, I.E. STONE, DIRT, ETC. SHALL BE PLACED IN THE CURB & GUTTER OR ROADWAY AS A RAMP TO ACCESS TEMPORARY STOCKPILES, STAGING AREAS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS, AND/OR BUILDING SITES. 11. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF CONCRETE. 12. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO TOP OF FINISHED PAVING AND LANDSCAPED AREAS. 13. MATCH EXISTING GRADES AT THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 14. ALL MATERIAL EXCAVATION, PLACEMENT, AND COMPACTION SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE PROJECT. PAVING SECTIONS AND STRUCTURAL SLAB ON GRADE REINFORCING AND THICKNESS ARE BY OTHERS. UNSUITABLE MATERIALS (MUCK) ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE DEPTH DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE EXCAVATED AREAS SHALL BE BACKFILLED TO THE FINISH GRADED SECTION WITH APPROVED MATERIALS. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 15. THIS GRADING PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY NOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. 16. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY MONUMENTATION. 17. TRAIL RIDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS DID NOT CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE PRESENCE OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF AND REPAIR TO ANY EXISTING UTILITIES. TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL BURIED ELECTRIC SERVICE SANITARY SEWER MAIN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40' ASPHALT SURFACE 75 3' NYLOPLAST MANHOLE W/ SOLD COVER RIM ELEV: 7544.95 3' NYLOPLAST MANHOLE W/ SLOTTED COVER RIM ELEV: 7545.25 INV. IN (W): 7537.84 INV. OUT (N): 7537.84 STUB OUT 24" ADS FOR FUTURE CONNECTION 43 LF OF 24" ADS-12 @ 132 LF OF 24" ADS-12 @ 2.0 % DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATIO DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH RIPRAP RUNDOWN d50 = 18" 24" ADS-12 STORM SEWER (FROM BACK PATIO AREA) REPLACE EXISTING WALL IN KIND FOLLOWING STORM SEWER INSTALLATION SANITARY SEWER TO BE REPALCED INV. OUT: 7535.20 57.44 57.44 60.28 60.28 57.66 57.66 39.61 39.23 39.10 39.16 41.42 40.57 40.84 38.16 35.95 36.80 39.64 39.60 38.30 37.9437.94 38.17 38.30 42.02 41.31 41.07 ??? 48.93 43.92 44.86 40.37 39.40 4+8 6 4+00 PI: 3+98.13 PI: 4+52.27 PI: 4+66.23 45° HZ. BEND PI: 4+76.23 STA. 4+63.20 11.25° VERT. BEND 7545.34 7545.60 FFE 7557.66 FFE 7560.28 FFE 7557.44 FFE 7555.78 FFE 7555.68 55.29 55.22 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 7545 7550 7555 7546 7547 7548 7549 7551 7552 7553 7554 7556 8 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL (14 LF) REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL (56 LF) 90 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 10 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 14 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL AS NEEDED 39.64 40.04 39.44 39.67 39.64 40.06 40.13 ??? STACKED ROCK RETAINING WALL LANDSCAPING AREA NEW ASPHALT PAVING & STRIPING (50 SPACES) NEW ASPHALT PAVING & STRIPING - 13 SPACES, 2 ADA STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS ADA CABIN GRAVEL PATH TO CABINS (TYP.) 2:1 ??? 30.21 34.70 35.43 32.74 40.11 32.28 32.38 35.95 36.05 2:1 56.07 56.10 56.09 55.21 4.0%2.9 % 4.0 % NEW 20.0' PAVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS 9. 4 % 10. 0 % 4.5 % 55.64 55.96 53.82 53.27 48.62 NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE 75 6 0 2:1 2. 0 : 1 10 . 4 % 1.5% 7540 754 0 7540 753 6 753 6 753 7 753 8 7539 7541 7542 7543 7544 19.5' (TYP.) 9.0' (TYP.) 44.09 44.52 44.42 7535 753 2 7533 7534 7536 7537 7538 7539 NEW 6' CONCRETE PAN 6.8 % NEW CDOT TYPE 2 DIRECTIONAL RAMP AT EXISTING SIDEWALK AND NEW DRIVEWAY NEW CDOT TYPE 2 DIRECTIONAL RAMP AT EXISTING SIDEWALK AND NEW DRIVEWAY 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL BURIED ELECTRIC SERVICE SANITARY SEWER MAIN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40'ASPHALT SURFACE 76 DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATIO DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH 24" ADS-12 STORM SEWER (FROM BACK PATIO AREA) SANITARY SEWER TO BE REPALCED 63.75 61.00 57.44 57.44 60.28 60.28 57.66 57.66 60.99 61.04 61.08 63.76 39.61 37.94 38.17 38.30 48.93 43.92 44.86 7540.9 2 7544.6 2 7543.0 6 NEW S T A I R S TOS: 7 5 4 4 . 2 6 BOS: 7 5 4 0 . 5 0 7544.2 6 7539.7 1(MATC H E X . ) 7539.7 0(MATC H E X . ) 7539.7 2 (MATC H E X . ) 7539.7 8 (MATC H E X . ) TOC: 7 5 4 0 . 0 7 BOC: 7 5 4 0 . 0 7 TOC: 7 5 4 0 . 5 7 BOC: 7 5 4 0 . 0 7 TOC: 7 5 4 0 . 0 5 BOC: 7 5 4 0 . 0 5 TOC: 7 5 4 0 . 5 5 BOC: 7 5 4 0 . 0 5 TOC: 7 5 4 0 . 7 2 BOC: 7 5 4 0 . 2 2 TOC: 7 5 4 0 . 8 2 BOC: 7 5 4 0 . 2 9 (MATC H E X . ) 7539.6 8(MATC H E X . ) 7539.5 8 (MATC H E X . ) 12:1 12:1 12 : 1 12:1 12:1 50:1 TOW= 7 5 4 5 . 4 0 ' BOW= 7 5 4 1 . 5 0 ' TOW=7 5 4 5 . 4 0 ' BOW= 7 5 4 1 . 5 0 ' TOW=7 5 4 3 . 4 7 ' BOW= 7 5 4 0 . 9 2 ' TOW=7 5 4 4 . 6 0 ' BOW= 7 5 4 0 . 9 2 ' TOW=7 5 4 4 . 7 6 ' BOW= 7 5 4 1 . 5 0 ' TOW=7 5 4 4 . 7 6 ' BOW= 7 5 4 4 . 2 6 ' TOW= 7 5 4 5 . 8 5 ' BOW=7 5 4 3 . 0 6 ' TOW= 7 5 4 5 . 8 5 ' BOW= 7 5 4 5 . 3 5 ' TOW= 7 5 4 4 . 4 0 ' BOW=7 5 4 0 . 5 0 ' TOW= 7 5 4 5 . 6 0 ' BOW=7 5 4 4 . 2 6 ' TOW= 7 5 4 4 . 6 6 ' BOW=7 5 4 1 . 5 0 ' 7544.2 6 1.8 % TOW= 7 5 4 5 . 8 5 ' BOW=7 5 4 3 . 0 6 ' 7540.8 2 50 : 1 TOW= 7 5 4 4 . 4 ' BOW= 7 5 4 0 . 5 ' 14 LF C O N C R E T E RETAIN I N G W A L L REPLA C E E X I S T I N G RETAI N I N G W A L L A S NEEDE D NEW S T A I R S TOS: 7 5 4 3 . 4 4 BOS: 7 5 4 0 . 3 1 7543.8 1 (MATC H E X . ) 7540.2 0(MATC H E X . ) 7540.2 0(MATC H E X . ) 7543.6 6(MATC H E X . ) TOW= 7 5 4 3 . 7 5 ' BOW=7 5 4 0 . 4 0 ' TOW=7 5 4 3 . 7 5 ' BOW= 7 5 4 0 . 3 8 ' 7543.8 1 (MATC H E X . ) 7532.3 7 7532.1 6 7532.1 5 7537.9 7 (MATC H E X . ) 7536.8 0 9.5% 2.7% 4:1 4:1 4:1 7536.8 0 7534.7 6 7534.8 8 7532.0 5 FFE 7557.66 FFE 7561.80 FFE 7564.71 FFE 7561.58 FFE 7560.28 FFE 7557.44 FFE 7555.78 FFE 7555.68 55.29 55.22 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 '20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15 ' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 20' 15' 7545 7550 7555 756 0 7546 7547 7548 7549 7551 7552 7553 7554 7556 755 6 7556 75 5 7 7557 755 7 75 5 8 7558 755 8 755 9 75 6 1 75 6 1 8 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL (14 LF) REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL (56 LF) 90 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 10 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 14 LF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL AS NEEDED 39.64 40.04 39.44 39.67 39.64 40.06 40.13 ??? 20'X15' A-FRAME CABIN, TYPICAL OF 8 STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS ADA CABIN GRAVEL PATH TO CABINS (TYP.) 2:1 ??? 35.95 36.05 2:1 57.26 56.07 56.48 57.68 56.10 56.09 55.21 4.0% 5.1% 2.9 % 4.0 % 2% NEW 20.0' PAVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS NEW 20.0' PAVED FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS 9. 4 % 10. 0 % 4.5 % 1.4% 9.4% 58.90 55.64 55.96 53.82 53.27 48.62 ONE - W A Y A C C E S S TO E A S T - - - > 75 6 0 10 . 4 % 7543 7544 44.09 44.52 44.42 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB 4" CONCRETE SLAB (SEE REINFORCING SCHEDULE) 4" COMPACTED CLASS 5 ABC NATIVE SUBGRADE 3" TYPE SX HOT MIX ASPHALT 4" COMPACTED CLASS 5 ABC NATIVE SUBGRADE TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR STORM SEWER ASPHALT RETAINING WALL BURIED ELECTRIC SERVICE SANITARY SEWER MAIN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40' 77 NEW WATER QUALITY SWALE NEW INLET FROM SWALE TO CONNECTED TO NEW STORM PIPE 8" SDR35 SANITARY SEWER4 SERVICE 6" SDR35 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE NEW 8" DIP WATER MAIN NEW 8" DIP WATER MAIN NEW 8" DIP WATER MAIN NEW 6" DIP WATER SERVICE 3/4" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE (TYP. FOR CABINS) NEW 8" SDR35 SEWER MAIN NEW 20.0' SEWER EASEMENT NEW 20.0' WATER MAIN EASEMENT NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW GREASE TRAP NEW MANHOLE NEW 8" SDR35 SEWER MAIN TO REPLACE 6" SERVICE NEW MANHOLE NEW MANHOLE NEW MANHOLE NEW MANHOLE NEW 8" SDR35 SEWER MAIN 6" SDR35 SEWER SERVICE 4" SDR35 SEWER LINE (TYP. FOR CABINS) 20.0' SEWER MAIN EASENET 20.0' SEWER MAIN EASEMENT 20' WATER MAIN EASEMENT 20.0' WATER MAIN EASEMENT NEW MANHOLE NEW MANHOLE NEW 20.0' SEWER MAIN EASEMENT 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL BURIED ELECTRIC SERVICE SANITARY SEWER MAIN 4"(CABINS) 8" (HOTEL UNITS) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 6" WATER/FIRE SERVICE SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 ASPHALT SURFACE 78 TRUCK BODY FRONT RIGHT TIRE PATH REAR LEFT TIRE PATH FRONT LEFT TIRE PATH TRUCK BODY FRONT LEFT TIRE PATH REAR LEFT TIRE PATH REAR RIGHT TIRE PATH R48.4' R107.1' R97.3' R46.5'R40.0' R45.0' R40.0' 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2022 DAB TWIN OWLS MOTOR LODGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL BURIED ELECTRIC SERVICE SANITARY SEWER MAIN 4"(CABINS) 8" (HOTEL UNITS) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 6" WATER/FIRE SERVICE SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 FIRE APPARATUS DIMENSIONS USED FOR TURN ANALYSIS SCALE 1"=3' ASPHALT SURFACE 79 EPPC, September 20, 2022 Twin OwlsDevelopment Plan Castle Peak Holdings, Owner Beacon Bay Project Management, Applicant Twin Owls Motel established 1955 New ownership, renovating and expanding 700 North Saint Vrain Avenue 2 3 Existing motel has 40 rooms A (Accommodations) Zoning Proposal is to keep existing (currently being renovated), add two buildings with 62 new rooms, eight cabins, totaling 110 units Restaurant is being added, within a portion of the existing facility 4 Extensive review process, with plan revisions to comply with Planning, Public Works, Fire, Water, Electric, Wastewater requirements Neighborhood and Community Meeting November 2021 5 6 Review Criteria, Accommodations density, landscaping, lot coverage, utilities, fire, access, parking, Comprehensive Plan Review Agency comments and requirements 7 Planning Commission is the Decision-Making Body Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan