The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Transportation Advisory Board 2019-8-21 A EP TOWN OF ESTES PA I Transportation Advisory Board Agenda August 21,2019 Current Members: Belle Morris(03/31/20) 12:00 PM—2:00 PM Stan Black(03/31/20) Gordon Slack(03/31/21) Room 202&203 Ron Wilcocks (03/31/21) Tom Street(03/31/22) Estes Park Town Hall Ann Finley (03/31/20) Linda Hanick(03/31/22) 170 MacGregor Ave Scott Moulton (03/31/22) Janice Crow(3/31/21) 12:00— 12:15 Public Comment 12:15— 12:20 Approval of June Meeting Minutes Chair Belle Morris 12:20— 12:50 TAB 2020 Priorities/PW Strategic Plan Chair Belle Morris 12:50— 1:10 TAC Regional Transit-Sales Tax Chair Belle Morris 1:10— 1:20 Project Updates Parking& Transit Manager Vanessa Solesbee 1:20— 1:40 Subcommittee Assignments Chair Belle Morris -Parking permit offerings and parking Parking& Transit Manager Vanessa Solesbee rates (both permit and meters) -Paid Parking Technology 1:40— 1:50 Project Updates Engineering Manager David Hook 1:50—2:00 Other Business Adjourn The mission of the Town of Estes Park Transportation Advisory Board is to advise the Board of Trustees and the Public Works staff on Local and Regional Comprehensive Transportation Planning Policies; Maintenance, Operation and Expansion Programs; and Transportation Capital Projects. Carlie Bangs, Town Board Trustee Liaison Greg Muhonen, Estes Park Public Works Staff Liaison RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 19, 2019 Minutes of a regular meeting of the Transportation Advisory Board of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Room 202 of Town Hall on the 19th day of June, 2019. Present: Gordon Slack Tom Street Belle Morris Ron Wilcocks Janice Crow Scott Moulton Ann Finley Linda Hanick Also Present: Trustee Carlie Bangs, Town Board Liaison Greg Muhonen, Public Works Director Vanessa Solesbee, Parking & Transit Manager Megan Van Hoozer, Public Works Administrative Assistant David Hook, Engineering Manager Absent: Stan Black Chair Morris called the meeting to order at 12:03 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT: No public comment. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A motion was made and seconded (Slack/Crow) to approve the May meeting minutes and all were in favor. TAB PRIORITY GRID REVIEW: Belle distributed the update priority grid based on the preferences provided to the Chair since the last meeting. The group reviewed TAB's Priority Grid with longer term members expounding on the items for history. Members discussed the importance of having the items fit the Town Board's Strategic Plan and the adopted Downtown Plan. The TAB would select items contained in these plans each year if they fit the purview of the TAB. Members Wilcocks and Finley agree since so much has already been identified that would benefit the community. Member Hanick would like to have something address the pedestrian crossing from the Estes Park Visitor Center to Stanley Village and Steamer Parkway due to the dangers of crossing on foot. Member Crow stated her preferences relate specifically to the Moraine Avenue corridor and the need to safely address multi-mobility. Member Slack agreed. Member Wilcocks wants something contained that is specific to an Elkhorn Avenue overpass or underpass at library pedestrian crossing as a result of the disruptiveness to traffic. Wilcocks would also like to expedite completion of the Fall River Trail if possible, or encourage continued active efforts. Wilcocks also stated a Cleave Street redesign needs priority. Chair Morris feels year-round shuttle service is critical. She'd also like to have something regarding bike travel safety, safer crosswalks and prefers no RVs be allowed downtown. Slack suggested the area campgrounds distribute a map taking the RVs Transportation Advisory Board —June 19, 2019 — Page 2 away from the downtown corridor, stating it should be in place before construction of the Downtown Estes Loop. Manager Solesbee loves the idea and suggested that Visit Estes Park (VEP) may get involved. VEP has staff, time and graphic capabilities to help in this effort. Finley stated that inclusion of an express route from the Visitor Center to Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) could potentially create an increase of those choosing to get out of their cars. Finley also stated that the installation, or creation of a priority driving lane for non-automobiles (hiker shuttle, bicycle, etc.) for specified times may encourage increased ridership and other transportation modes. The TAB went on to discuss new formatting of the updated priority grid. Chair Morris will bring the updated document back for the next meeting. Director Muhonen shared that the Town's Strategic Plan is in final discussion and is open to the public on June 26 from 4:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. in Town Hall Rooms 202 and 203. There will be a very robust list of requested items contained in the Strategic Plan. Muhonen will distribute the Strategic Plan to TAB members following the meeting. PROJECT UPDATES (G. Muhonen — Public Works Administration) Muhonen asked the TAB if anyone had seen the new pavement markings on Elkhorn Avenue. These are the diagonal striping for the Barnes Dance intersections. All members agreed this inclusion has been helpful. Muhonen informed the TAB there is potential to use color on the 4th Street Rehabilitation project to delineate bike versus pedestrian areas of designation. The Town is gathering data for traffic speeds and utilization on both 2nd and 3rd Streets. To date no excessive speed limit infractions have been recorded however the Police Auxiliary is still collecting data. The neighborhood appreciates the attention being given to their concerns. PROJECT UPDATES (D. Hook — Engineering Manager) Elkhorn Overlay: Manager Hook shared that pavement markings are being added at the US 34/US 36 intersection to improve the pedestrian crosswalks at the north leg of the intersection. The overlay and patching will take place in the coming weeks. Hook stated that the CDOT contract for Elkhorn work expanded to $1.4 million. Brodie Avenue Improvements: Coulson Excavating was the sole bidder for the Brodie Avenue Improvements so they'll be performing that work in addition to Elkhorn Avenue and 4th Street Rehabilitation projects, creating a total work package for Coulson of approximately $1.3 million. Hook discussed there would be a phased approach. The entire project will not be completed before the school season begins. For the eastern half of the project, Coulson may continue into August or September. The project is expected to begin next week. Downtown Wayfinding: The Downtown Wayfinding project was on hold and has not restarted due to other priorities this time of year. PROJECT UPDATES (V. Solesbee — Parking & Transit Manager) Manager Solesbee shared that CDOT's Bustang came to town. There is currently a draft Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) established for August 23, 2019 through the end of September. There will be two buses that will travel roundtrip from Denver's Union Station to the Estes Park Visitor Center. Bustang has an approximate capacity of 50 riders with an area provided to carry bikes. Bustang needs marketed in Estes Park. CDOT has requested marketing promotion and a space for the bus to park. Solesbee will keep all posted on updates. Solesbee stated that the banner art, since being approved, has been produced and has arrived with installation planned for June 20. Transportation Advisory Board —June 19, 2019 — Page 3 Parking: The real-time parking availability application is now available. Solesbee is working with Pubic Information Officer Kate Rusch to publish promotional language. Solesbee will provide a report to the TAB next month. Chair Morris suggested the parking application be added to Special Events permit approvals. Solesbee reported that the Parking Ambassadors have written just over 1,000 citations last year. Transit: Full transit service starts Saturday, June 22 and Shuttle Brochures are being delivered. Solesbee stated that the majority of comments received have been related to the discontinuation of service to the YMCA. RMNP is excited to share messages with for display on the Town's digital message signs. This messaging will help with RMNP traffic congestion and will help the traveler experience. Solesbee will be reaching out to initiate stakeholders meeting in the near future. She feels a more robust discussion is needed for future decision-making, including diverse voices. Member Street suggested including visitors. Wilcocks suggested including business owners that currently have no alley access. Trustee Liaison Bangs offered additional suggestions for community outreach. OTHER BUSINESS With no other business to discuss, Chair Morris adjourned the meeting at 2:00 p.m. Recording Secretary Megan Van Hoozer, Public Works Department Coun Trans ortation E frastrctje 3 Funding Strategies FUNDING PROPOSAL UPDATE August 13, 2019 Following the July 25th Regional Task Force (RTF) meeting, Larimer County has worked with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to further define the project selection/funding details of the infrastructure and transit portions of the Half Penny sales tax and the issue of governance.This document outlines Larimer County's current proposal. RTF and TAC members are encouraged to discuss this proposal with staff and elected officials within their organization and contact Larimer County with questions or concerns. OVERVIEW OF SALES TAX STRUCTURE The Half Penny sales tax would generate an estimated $1,016M in revenue over the 20-year time horizon (2020-2039). Larimer County proposes all cash funding of projects (i.e., bonding would not be included in the ballot question), although bonding may be considered at a future date. Larimer County proposes the following allocation of the Half Penny sales tax: • $10M off the top to Project ID 1: 1-25 (Hwy 402 to Hwy 66)— planned to be $2M in each of the first 5 years • 45-50%to Transportation Infrastructure Projects • 15-20%to Transit Projects • 35%to Facilities (Veterans/Safety/ Human Services) CURRENT PROPOSAL First$10M to I-25 as seed money for gap from SH 402 to SH 66 35%of Half Pennfi Veterans/Safety/Huma Services Facilitie • • i /\ 45-50%of Half Penny Transportation Infrastructure 15.20%of Half Penny Transit ADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNANCE Over the 20-year life of the tax, there will need to be ongoing oversight and policy direction for project funding decisions and updates to the project lists.The County wants to share this responsibility with municipal partners throughout the COUNTY FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG glib Page 1 Larimer County Transportation Funding Proposal Update August 13, 2019 County and proposes to do so through collaborative groups at two tiers, similar to the ones formed to craft the current Prioritized Project List. An overall Policy Council would be formed, and each entity would appoint a member of the Policy Council to represent their interests and who could be either elected or appointed officials. Two Technical Advisory Committees are proposed to support the work of the Policy Council. One TAC would be formed for Transportation Infrastructure Projects, and a second for Transit Projects. Both TACs would make funding and prioritization recommendations to the Policy Council. Policy Council Technical Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Transportation Infrastructure Transit Policy Council The Policy Council will be composed of 9 voting members—an elected or appointed official from each of the 8 municipalities, plus Larimer County. CDOT, the North Front Range MPO, and the Upper Front Range TPR will be non- voting members of the Policy Council. A primary responsibility of the Policy Council will be to maintain an updated Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for all transportation projects.The 1-25 contribution will be allocated during the first five years and held as a local match. Policy Council approval will be needed to release the funds to CDOT for the project.The portion of the CIP for infrastructure projects (50% of the Half Penny) is the list that the TAC and RTF have developed during this process.The transit portion of CIP will initially be developed for 15%of the Half Penny proceeds. The Policy Council can use the 5%overlap between infrastructure and transit to make allocation adjustments.The Policy Council will also have discretion over elevating projects based on leveraging local match and/or other funding sources. Under normal operations, the Policy Council will operate using a supermajority vote structure, requiring a 2/3 vote of those present (typically, 6 of 9).A supermajority is recommended to demonstrate regional collaboration in the decisions made by the Policy Council and to avoid moving forward with controversial projects/decisions.An affirmative supermajority vote would enable a proposed action to move forward to the County Commissioners. Any member of the Policy Council could call for a weighted vote. If a weighted vote is called, the topic would be immediately tabled until the next Policy Council meeting, at which time the weighted vote would be enacted. The weighted vote would be structured such that Fort Collins (with the highest population)would receive 5 votes, Larimer County and Loveland would each receive 3 votes, and Berthoud, Estes Park,Johnstown, Timnath, Windsor, and Wellington would each receive 1 vote. The weighted vote would require a simple majority of votes for a proposed action to move forward to the County Commissioners. COUNTY FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG Page 2 Larimer County Transportation Funding Proposal Update August 13, 2019 Infrastructure TAC The Infrastructure TAC will be composed of 9 voting members—an appointed staff member from each of the 8 municipalities, plus Larimer County. CDOT, the North Front Range MPO, and the Upper Front Range TPR will be non- voting members of the Infrastructure TAC. The Infrastructure TAC will operate using a supermajority vote structure.Any proposal presented to the Infrastructure TAC would require a 2/3 vote of those present(typically 6 of 9)to be elevated to the Policy Council for consideration. Transit TAC The Transit TAC will be composed of 9 voting members—an appointed staff member from each of the 8 municipalities, plus Larimer County. The Transit TAC appointees are anticipated to be transit operators for those communities that currently operate transit. CDOT,the North Front Range MPO, and the Upper Front Range TPR will be non-voting members of the Transit TAC.The Transit TAC vote will be weighted based on the community's commitment to transit. Each member will receive one vote as a baseline, and additional votes will be given to those communities that fund transit. This will be calculated as the community's annual transit budget (excluding any state or federal subsidy) per capita. In the case of communities that cross county boundaries, the calculation would be based on community totals (funding and population) rather than only the portion within Larimer County.The number of additional votes to be allocated based on transit funding commitment will be established during the negotiation process for the Intergovernmental Agreements which will control the overall governance process for the regional transportation tax proceeds.The weighted vote calculation will be adjusted annually based on communities' allocation of their overall budget to transit. Weighting votes based on agency commitment of funds to transit could serve to encourage regional investment in a well-developed, regional transit network. TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS The Transportation Infrastructure Fund would be used to construct the transportation infrastructure projects developed and prioritized by the TAC.The project list and eligibility criteria will be available to voters to demonstrate the project types and selection methodology. The ballot language must allow for flexibility, recognizing that the project list will need to evolve. The following sections outline the proposed process for integrating new projects into the project list or influencing the timing of certain projects. The Transportation Infrastructure Project List(Attachment A) is divided into two tiers. Tier 1 projects (above the blue line) include each community/agency's top priority project, ordered based on the projects'total score using the evaluation methodology established by the TAC. Tier 2 projects (between the blue line and the brown line) are those projects that are anticipated to be funded within the 20-year time horizon of the sales tax, based on the 50%allocation of the Half Penny sales tax. The Tier 2 projects are ordered based on the projects'total score. Projects below the brown line are not anticipated to receive sales tax funding in the 20-year period; however,they would be eligible if revenue is available. Many of the municipalities, the County, and CDOT continue to pursue other revenue sources for the transportation infrastructure projects. Pursuit of other funding sources is encouraged, and the TAC and RTF have expressed that the process should be structured to avoid disincentivizing pursuit of other funding. Likewise, the TAC and RTF have expressed the value of the transportation infrastructure projects in solving regional transportation problems—by the nature of the eligibility criteria, these projects benefit the people of Larimer County and should not be treated as singularly benefiting the sponsoring agency. The process described below strives to balance these two sentiments, while also recognizing that priorities change, and there will inevitably be new regional transportation infrastructure project needs that are not included in the current project list. uourrrvaAx c FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG Page 3 Larimer County Transportation Funding Proposal Update August 13, 2019 Project Readiness (Tier 1 and Tier 2 Projects) The transportation infrastructure projects are in varying states of project readiness—some have gone through final design, while others are conceptual.The year of expenditure associated with each project(as identified in the project list) is based solely on the project's ranking (with Tier 1 projects assumed to be funded first) and the estimated revenues available in each year. The year of expenditure does not account for project readiness.The Infrastructure TAC will be responsible for developing a 5-year CIP that allocates funds to projects in each year based on anticipated revenue and project phase (e.g., design, right-of-way, construction). If a project is not ready for construction when the construction funds are available (either because the design and permitting are not complete or because the additional funds required for construction are not available, in the case of state highway projects), the next project on the list would be eligible to receive the funding. The bypassed project would then have first priority for receiving funding in subsequent years. Tier 1 Projects In the case of Tier 1 projects, if a sponsoring agency: 1. Is unable to secure the other funding required to complete the project by the time the sales tax revenue is available for that project (in the case of State Highway projects); or 2. Has secured full funding for the project through another funding source; or 3. Has established a different top priority project,then the sponsoring agency may propose to move another priority project into Tier 1.The new Tier 1 project would be ordered based on the project's total score compared to other Tier 1 projects.The sales tax allocation to the new Tier 1 project would be capped at the amount originally allocated to the top priority project being replaced. If a new project (i.e., not on the existing list) is desired for consideration as a replacement Tier 1 project, it would be subject to the eligibility requirements and evaluation process previously established. A replacement Tier 1 project would require an affirmative vote of the Infrastructure TAC and the Policy Council. Tier 2 Projects If a sponsoring agency faces one of the three conditions noted above (unable to secure other funding, has secured full funding, or has identified a replacement project)for a Tier 2 project,the integration of a replacement project will follow these protocols: • A new project that is replacing a Tier 2 project would be scored based on the established evaluation criteria and would be slotted in the project list based on its score relative to the other Tier 2 projects(and those below the funding line). The sales tax allocation to the replacement project would be capped at the amount originally allocated to the Tier 2 project, and the replacement project could only be slotted in at the same position as the project being replaced or lower. That is,the replacement project could not move into a higher position on the project list, even if its score is higher. This will enable communities to adequately plan for the timing of project funding without the risk of a project being "bumped"to a later year. • A new project that is not replacing a project on the list would be scored using the established evaluation process and would be added to the project list below the anticipated funding line. That is,the new project would be below the Tier 2 projects (even if it scores higher than some of the Tier 2 projects) and would be eligible to receive sales tax revenue after all Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects are funded, if revenue is available. coLARLMER urrry FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG Page 4 Larimer County Transportation Funding Proposal Update August 13, 2019 Any additional project needs that may arise would be subject to the eligibility requirements previously established.Any replacement of a Tier 2 project or addition of a new project to the list would require an affirmative vote of the Infrastructure TAC and the Policy Council. Reimbursement (Tier 1 and Tier 2 Projects) If a sponsoring agency secures full funding for a Tier 1 or Tier 2 project in advance of funding availability through this revenue source,the project could be built by the sponsor and a reimbursement agreement would be signed to reimburse the sponsor when the project comes up on the timed priority list.This option would facilitate early construction of some regional projects, and perhaps lower costs with less inflation. The reimbursement agreements would need to consider the timing and amount of reimbursement to ensure that any benefit of the accelerated construction timing accrues to the regional effort and does not negatively impact the availability or timing of funding for other projects. The opportunity to accelerate project construction could occur because a sponsoring agency secured bond financing or alternative sources of cash funding such as developer contributions, grants or other revenues.The reimbursement amount would be capped at the project expenditure cost (including bonding costs) but repaid at the time of the assigned construction year.This will enable the regional transportation funding pool to realize the cost savings associated with the expedited construction timing. The reimbursement option is an alternative to the project replacement options described above and would be requested at the discretion of the sponsoring agency.The reimbursement agreement would require an affirmative vote of the Infrastructure TAC and the Policy Council to move forward. TRANSIT PROJECTS If the Half Penny sales tax passes, the Transit TAC will go through a process to identify and prioritize transit projects, in a manner similar to the process established and completed for the transportation infrastructure projects.The recommendations of the Transit TAC will go to the Policy Council for approval. The following transit eligibility requirements are proposed: • No funding for existing operations and levels of service • Must demonstrate a regional benefit • Project must be in an adopted plan • Transit provider must support the project • Infrastructure, operations, and fleet Eligible transit project types may include: • Transit center, maintenance facilities, electric bus charging facilities • Transit stop • Mobility hub • Local or regional operations • Increased frequency • New routes • Route extensions • Demand responsive service • Transit technology(including planning and implementation) • Transit fleet, including replacement vehicles COUNTY FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG Page 5 ATTACHMENT A.TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE: PRIORITIZED PROJECT LIST(AUGUST 13, 2019) TOP PRIORITY OTHER FUNDING CURRENT PROPOSAL SALES TAX REMAINDER FOR COST TOTAL REQUIRED CUMULATIVE PROJECT NAME LOCATION COMMUNITY/ REQUEST SCORE RANK PORTION FOR PHASE B CUMULATIVE YEAR OF ALLOCATION (STATE,FEDERAL, ALLOCATION (2018$) OF PROJECT ALLOCATION EXPENDITURE (BASED ON AGENCY LOCAL PRIVATE) (BASED ON (2018$) (YOE) YOE) YOE) 1 1-25 Hwy 402 to Hwy 66 (Segments 5&6) CDOT $10.00 4.53 2 $10.00 $10M in funding "off the top" 21 US 34 Widening Boise to Rocky Mountain Ave Loveland $11.20 4.32 3 $7.68 $3.52 $7.68 2020 $8.31 $8.31 45 Lemay Realignment Lincoln to Conifer Fort Collins $10.00 2.82 13 $10.00 $17.68 2021 $11.25 $19.56 Larimer 2 Owl Canyon Improvements 1-25 to US 287 County $28.60 2.63 17 $15.00 $13.60 $32.68 2022 $17.55 $37.10 32 Moraine Ave (US 36) Multimodal Davis St to Mary's Lake Road Estes Park $20.00 2.50 22 $8.00 $12.00 $40.68 2022 $9.36 $46.46 40 LCR 5 (Main Street) Harmony to SH 14 Timnath $23.40 2.01 27 $15.00 $8.40 $55.68 2023 $18.25 $64.71 29 SH 392 Bridge Improvements Poudre River(1/2 mile east of LCR 3) Windsor $12.00 1.50 35 $9.60 $2.40 $65.28 2024 $12.15 $76.86 30 1st Street US 287 to Franklin Avenue Berthoud $5.00 1.04 38 $5.00 $70.28 2024 $6.33 $83.19 35 SH 1 Interchange Improvements 1-25 Wellington $29.00 0.86 40 $12.00 $17.50 $82.28 2025 $15.79 $98.98 44 LCR 3 Bridge Big Thompson River Johnstown $3.50 0.36 43 $3.50 $85.78 2025 $4.61 $103.58 1 Tier 1 18 SH 14 Widening 1-25 to Riverside $50.00 4.67 1 $20.00 $30.00 $105.78 2027 $28.47 $132.05 Horsetooth to Harmony, intersection 5 LCR 19 Expansion improvements at Trilby, 57th St, Coyote $4.50 3.76 4 $4.50 $110.28 2027 $6.40 $138.45 Ridge 23 SH 402 Widening US 287 to 1-25 $28.80 3.62 5 $11.52 $17.28 $121.80 2028 $17.05 $155.51 25 US 34 Widening Centerra Parkway to LCR 3 $10.60 3.46 6 $4.24 $6.36 $126.04 2028 $6.28 $161.78 3 LCR 17 Expansion Pyrenees Drive to 57th Street $26.25 3.30 7 $26.25 $152.29 2030 $42.03 $203.81 12 Power Trail Grade Separation Harmony $2.80 3.26 8 $2.80 $155.09 2030 $4.48 $208.29 46 East Prospect Road Sharp Point to 1-25 $4.00 3.16 9 $4.00 $159.09 2030 $6.40 $214.70 48 College &Trilby Fort Collins $1.60 3.06 10 $1.60 $160.69 2030 $2.56 $217.26 11 Timberline Grade Separation Annabel Ave to Suniga Rd (BNSF and Vine) $25.00 3.00 11 $25.00 $185.69 2032 $43.29 $260.55 16 Kechter Road Bridge 1-25 $10.00 2.84 12 $10.00 $195.69 2032 $17.32 $277.87 13 Poudre Trail Grade Separation Taft Hill $5.00 2.80 14 $5.00 $200.69 2033 $9.00 $286.87 10 Timberline Expansion Mulberry to Vine $8.00 2.71 15 $8.00 $208.69 2033 $14.41 $301.28 14 Long View Trail Grade Separation Trilby $5.00 2.70 16 $5.00 $213.69 2034 $9.36 $310.64 2 B Owl Canyon Improvements 1-25 to US 287 17 $13.60 $227.29 2035 $26.49 $337.14 US 34 Multimodal Trail Mall Road to Rocky Mountain National 34 Connection Park $10.00 2.61 18 $8.00 $2.00 $235.29 2035 $15.58 $352.72 4 LCR 5 Expansion Harmony Road to 1/2 mile south of $55.30 2.59 19 $55.30 $290.59 2039 $126.02 $478.73 Crossroads 9 LCR 13 Hwy 392 to LCR 13/LCR 30 $7.75 2.51 20 $7.75 $298.34 2039 $17.66 $496.39 _ 47 South Timberline Stetson Creek to Trilby $2.00 2.50 21 $2.00 $300.34 2039 $4.56 $500.95 Funding Line 43 Harmony Road 1-25 to LCR 1 $6.50 2.31 23 $6.50 22 Taft Avenue Improvements 11th St to Westshore Dr; US 34 intersection $5.30 2.18 24 $5.30 26 LCR 3 US 34 to Crossroads $5.40 2.15 25 $5.40 28 US 34/US 287 Loveland $8.10 2.14 26 $6.48 $1.62 40 B LCR 5 (Main Street) Harmony to SH 14 27 $8.40 20 US 34/US 36 Estes Park $6.00 1.89 28 $2.40 $3.60 7 LCR 28 (57th Street) US 287 to LCR 11C $10.75 1.74 29 $10.75 8 1 US 34 and US 36 Intersections at Mall Road $4.00 1.72 30 $3.20 $0.80 FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG AlibUNTY CURR TOP PRIORITY OTHER FUNDING SALES TAX REMAINDER ID PROJECT NAME LOCATION FOR COST TOTAL RANK PORTION REQUIRED FOR PHASE B CUMULATIVE YEAR 0 CUMULATIVE COMMUNITY/ REQUEST SCORE (STATE,FEDERAL, ALLOCATION (2018$) OF PROJECT ALLOCATION EXPENDITURE AGENCY LOCAL PRIVATE) (BASED ON (2018$) (YOE) YOE) 42 LCR 1 (Latham Parkwa ) Buss Grove to SH 14 $13.90 1.66 31 $13.90 41 LCR 1 (Latham Parkwa ) Kechter Road to Harmon $11.30 1.66 32 $11.30 27 Taft Avenue Widenin• 14th Street SW to 28th Street SW $10.40 1.62 33 $10.40 38 LCR 58 SH 1 to 1-25 (new interchan.e) $35.00 1.53 34 $14.00 $21.00 33 US 36 Intersection Improvements Mar 's Lake Road/Hi.h Drive $5.00 1.12 36 $4.00 $1.00 24 Bo d Lake Avenue Extension LCR 20C to SH 402 $8.40 1.06 37 $8.40 31 LCR 17 (Berthoud Parkwa ) LCR 10e to SH 56 $2.00 0.95 39 $2.00 37 LCR 9 SH 1 to Owl Canyon Road $3.00 0.62 41 $3.00 36 SH 1 Intersection Improvements LCR 62E $3.00 0.60 42 $2.40 $0.60 Note:All costs shown are in $Millions. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIGAikl