Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Town Board 2002-12-10Town of Estes Park,Larimer County,Colorado,December 10,2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Larimer County,Colorado.Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 10th day of December,2002. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present:John Baudek,Mayor Susan L.Doylen,Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W.Gillette David Habecker (delayed) Lori Jeffrey-Clark G.Wayne Newsom Also Present:Rich Widmer,Town Administrator Vickie O’Connor,Town Clerk Gregory A.White,Town Attorney Absent:None Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Jeffrey-Clark commented on a recent NLC Conference held in Salt Lake City. Trustee Jeffrey-Clark serves as the District 8 Small Cities Representative,and a sampling of topics discussed included:Home Security funding,health care,education,economy,and term limits. 1.CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1.Town Board Minutes dated November 26,2002,and Study Session dated November 20,2002. 2.Bills. 3.Committee Minutes: A.Community Development,December 5,2002: 1.Habitat for Humanity —Waiver of Building Permit/Plan Check Fees. 4.Estes Valley Board of Adjustment,December 3,2002 (acknowledgement only). 5.Estes Valley Planning Commission,November 19,2002 (acknowledgement only). 6.Estes Park Housing Authority,October 14,2002 (acknowledgement only). It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette)the consent agenda be approved,and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees —December 10,2002 -Page 2 I A.PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval ofl: Mayor Baudek opened the Public Heating for all Consent Agenda Items.Community Development Director Joseph requested Item 3.B.be continued to January 14,2003 to allow an opportunity to resolve a deck issue. 1.CONSENT ITEMS: 1.AMENDED PLATS: A.Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2,Block 9,Country Club Manor Addition,Michael &Coleen Allen/Applicants. 2.PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAPS: A.The Lodges at Black Canyon Inn Condominiums,a Portion of Meyer’s Addition,James Sloan/Applicant. 3.FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: A.Sunset Ridge,Portions of Lots 6 and 10,Block 10,Town of Estes Park,Roy &Michele Johnson/Applicants. B.Solitude Condominium IV,Lot 4,Solitude Subdivision,Crystal Creek Development,InciApplicant. C.Park River West Condominiums,Supplemental Maps V and VI, Lots I and 2,Park River West Subdivision,Richard H.Wille Trust/Applicant. There was no testimony,thus it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Newsom)that with the exception of item 3.B.above,the consent items be approved,and it passed unanimously. 3.ACTION ITEMS: Block 4 Text Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code.Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing,and Community Development Dir. Joseph reviewed the Staff Report advising that the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended approval of the following Block 4 Text Amendments: >Separate legal lot definition >Requirement for pre-application conference >Maximum building height >Timef tame for variance applications >Submittal requirements for variances Criminal/civil remedies and enforcement powers. The Town Board initially reviewed these amendments on November 12th and public comment was received.An updated document referring to Separate Legal Lot Definition--Process,pages 1 through 5 was distributed. Staff specifically reviewed the mechanics of said process.Town Attorney White has reviewed the update,and previous public comment has been considered.Staff would support delaying action on the Block 4 Amendments offering the Town Board an opportunity for additional review. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #18-02. As there was no public testimony,Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. Following a question and answer period,it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette)Ordinance #18-02 be approved.The motion passed by the following votes:Those voting “Yes”Trustees Gillette,Jeffrey-Clark and Newsom.Those voting “No”Trustees Barker and Doylen.Those “Abstaining”None.Those “Absent”Trustee Habecker. Board of Trustees —December 10,2002 -Page 3 Block 5 Text Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code — Presentation.Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing,and Community Development Dir.Joseph reviewed the Staff Report,confirming that this amendment includes proposed highway corridor design standards that implement specific policies that address Community Design,Scenic and environmental quality,and economics.A copy of the Town Board Study Session June 12,2001 where staff was directed to prepare draft standards, was distributed. The Highway Corridor Overlay District Section was thoroughly reviewed: •This section shall apply to all non-residential and multi-family development and/or re-development of structures any portion of which is located within 100-feet of State Hwy.34,36,7 and 66. •The Commercial Downtown District is exempt. •This section does not apply to existing structures unless a development plan is required by the EVDC. •Subsection C.3.h.“Building Color”shall not apply to existing structures unless a change in building color is proposed. Design standards were read aloud,and include: •Buildings or portions of buildings designed to represent or to replicate the recognizable physical form of a product to be sold,or a form commonly associated with a product to be sold are prohibited. •Maximum building height shall not exceed 20’above original grade within 30’from highway right-of-way;or 25’above original grade within 35’from highway right-of-way. •Metal siding shall be prohibited as primary siding material. •Roofing and exterior wall materials that are highly reflective shall not be allowed. •Facades that face public streets shall include variation in the wall plane to reduce the apparent bulk and length of long buildings. Prominent projections and/or recesses of at least 4’horizontal offset must occupy at least 20%of the length of the façade.Building setbacks for projections on arterial streets may be reduced to 15’; the average setback of the street façade shall be 25’.Building setbacks for projections on non-arterial streets may be reduced to 10’;the average setback of the street façade shall be 15’.Façade projections and recesses should be integral parts of the building,and not superficially applied trim,graphics,or paint. •All sides of a building that face a public street shall be finished with the same materials as the primary façade. •Long,uniform,continuous rooflines shall be avoided.Roof surfaces should be broken up with dormers,offsets,and variations in roof height. •Building color.(Items 1-6). As requested,staff will present favorable photos of metal buildings,and discussion followed on the “Modification from Standards”that allows the EVPC to waive or modify design standards set forth in Section 4.5C in conjunction with a site specific development pan that advances the purpose and intent of this Section. Trustee Habecker joined the Board at 8:05 p.m. Staff confirmed that property owners would be allowed to perpetually re paint an existing color,and that authority lies with the Planning Commission Board of Trustees —December 10,2002 -Page 4 to waive this standard;there is some allowance for more creative use of color within a basic color theme. Trustee Barker commented on “maximum building height”and stated,for the record,that he “wants this section deleted,as every property,not just the C-C should be included.”Trustee Habecker noted concern with the original grade of the highway,and questioned the direction being proposed on the Text 5 Amendments.Trustee Newsom stated that the standards are an attempt to improve the appearance of the highway corridors. Public testimony was heard from Cherie Pettyjohn (need less rules,not more;economics and expense to the property owner;creating an undesirable position for the Planning Commission (decision-making)). Corey Black/Best Western Silver Saddle (read a letter dated December 10, 2002 executed by Wallace Burke,Owner/Best Western Silver Saddle, noting objection to the highway corridor design standards). There being no further testimony at this time,Mayor Baudek announced that,as scheduled,the Public Hearing will be continued to January 14,2003 for final action. 2.ACTION ITEMS: 1.2002 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET RESOLUTION #37-02.Finance Officer Brandjord read said resolution supplementing the following funds previously discussed at Committee level and recommended for approval: Special Events $45,584 Open Space $28,046 Building Authority $93,450 Water Funds $2,180,000 It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Barker)Resolution #37-02 be adopted,and it passed unanimously. 2.PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR ELK &VEGETATION MANAGEMENT STUDY - PRESENTATION BY ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK REPRESENTATIVES.RMNP Supt.Baker introduced Ryan Monello,Biologist,who briefed the Trustees on the research model for Elk and Vegetation Planning.The proposed Project Agreement for the Elk and Vegetation Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement for the RMNP area includes 8 cooperating agencies,one of which being the Town. Supt.Baker reviewed Project background information,purpose,description of the planning process and products to be generated,the public involvement process, project team,roles and responsibilities.Administrator Widmer clarified the Town’s commitment in approving this Agreement.Discussion followed,and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette)the Mayor be authorized to execute the Project Agreement,and it passed unanimously.Town representatives on this Project are Town Administrator Widmer,Community Development Director Joseph,and Senior Planner Shirk. Ass’t.Supt.Tony Schetzsle briefed the Board on the 2003-2004 Bear Lake Road Reconstruction Project. Mayor Baudek expressed the Board’s appreciation for both presentations. Board of Trustees —December 10,2002 -Page 5 3.APPOINTMENTS.Mayor Baudek presented the following appointments/re- appointments for approval: A.Estes Park Building Authority —Reappointment of Peggy Lynch,3-yr.term, expiring 01/08/06. B.Museum Advisory Board —Reappointment of Sybil Barnes and Susan Harris,4-yr.terms,expiring 01/01/07. C.Committee Member Reassignments —David Habecker from the Light & Power Committee to the Public Works Committee (replacing Stephen Gillette),and Stephen Gillette from the Public Works Committee to the Light and Power Committee (replacing David Habecker).The effective date is January 1,2003. D.Estes Park Public Library Board —Appointment of Sarah Walsh,completing a 4-yr.term previously held by Helen Platt.Term expires 12/31/04. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Habecker)the appointmentslre appointments contained in Items A through D above be approved,and it passed unanimously. Concluding all action items,Trustee Barker requested anyone affected by the proposed highway corridor regulations be notified about the January 14,2003 Town Board meeting.Consensus was reached that,while notice is not to be construed as “legal notice”,nor as a precedent,staff was directed to notify said property owners.Trustee Habecker advised that he will be submitting amendments for consideration at the next meeting. 4.TOWN ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT. A.Light &Power Committee Meeting.The entire Town Board was encouraged to attend the Light and Power Committee Meeting scheduled Thursday,December 2th at 7:30 a.m.The proposed rate study will be presented. B.RMNP Visitation Report for November —Visitation is down 26%from last year, and year-to-date is down 5.7%. C.Stanley Ave.Sidewalk.Project update;will be very usable;will be great addition. D.Fall River Trail -W.Elkhorn.The first phase of this trail on W.Elkhorn Ave.has commenced and construction will soon continue into Performance Park. E.Performance Park.Phase 1 has been completed.Ph.2 will begin in March,and this phase includes landscaping,and a cover for the pavilion. Drawings/renderings are available in the Big Horn Restaurant. Mayor Baudek noted that due to the upcoming holiday schedule,the Town Board Meeting scheduled December 24,2002 has been cancelled.There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. hn Baudek,Mayor fl. __________ j Vickie O’Connor,Town Clerk