HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Code and Sanitation Committee 1972-11-15RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Code and Sanitation Committee
November 15, 1972
Committee: Chairman Sutter; Trustees Burgess and Wagner
Attending: Chairman Sutter; Trustees Burgess and Wagner
Also Attending: Town Administrator Hill and Building Inspector Van Horn
AIR CURTAIN DESTRUCTOR:
Town Engineer Van Horn reported on a proposed lining of the fire pit at
the dump. The attached letter, dated November 7, 1972, from Inseco,
Inc., contains the detailed information.
The Committee recommends the proposal submitted by Inesco, Inc. be
accepted.
DUMP USE FEES:
The Committee discussed proposed increased fees for 1973. It was decided
to continue this study until such time as more accurate dump cost figures
are available.
BUILDING PERMIT ROUTING SLIP:
Town Engineer Van Horn submitted a proposed routing slip for use prior
to the issuance of a building permit. The Committee recommends approval.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Dale G. Hill, Town Administrator
APPROVED
NOV 2 7 1972
TO;l1V OF ESTES PI1'di(
?? BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Z50thtF .)of -efite5
Estes Park, Colorado 80517
))r.ia / s i
X;{i� ^tires T.�jy-�Y
���"Y
7, s
`- ,r( ��• r p�.'�
�"� n` wgr.1 7,-- A`'1k^
P. O. Box 1200
Code and Sanitation Committee
Town of Estes Park
Dear Sirs:
Telephone (Area 303) 586.4461
November 15, 1972
I would like to recommend to the Committee that the proposal
submitted to the Town by Inseco, Inc. for the lining of the pit
of the air curtain destructor be accepted.
After considerable investigation into fire brick, pumice
stone, ceramics, and steel, it is felt that the only material
that will withstand the heat, impact and abrasion, is the one that
is recommended.
Inseco is a nation wide firm with over twenty years experience
with municipal incineration and refinery and refactory applications.
They maintain a full time engineering staff that recommended the
above solution and are recommended by their customers. There is a
one year guarantee on materials and workmanship.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF ESTES PARK 7/0imi...
aziem
William Van Horn
Town Engineer
WVH/ed
a
,IIII `..
%\
J �-
IP
INSECO, INC.
November 7, 1972
City of Estes Park
City Hall
Estes Park, Colorado 80507
Attention: Mr. Bill Van Horn
Subject: Incinerator Refractory Lining
Quotation #65-72
Dear Sir:
After careful consideration and inspection of your
incinerator, I feel that gunniting over the existing
concrete would not solve your problem.
Any material that we would install would have a heat
transfer into the concrete. Therefore, I recommend,
a 1" (inch) thick layer of Eagle-Picher PV Block In-
sulation be installed first. This material will stand
1900° F. thus protecting the concrete.
After this is installed we would pour in place a 4"
(inch) thick wall of Plibrico Tuff Mix with anchors
installed on 18" (inch) centers. Tuff Mix is a high
temperature abrasion resistance refractory castable.
The height of the pour would be 8' (feet) as you and
I previously discussed.
The total labor and material price for this job would
be $4,760.00 complete.
All work would be done by men well experienced in this
type of installation.
5750 PECOS ST. P.O. BOX 21100
• DENVER, COLORADO 80221 • (303) 433-6436
1
Page 2
City of Estes Park
Mr. Bill Van Horn
Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this quotation
and should any questions arise, feel free to call me.
I hope we can be of service to you in the near future.
Sincerely yours,
INSECO, INC.
Robert Whitney
RW/ls
Enclosures
-
cr
•
PLOcAS' L°6:31' Q 1Aa0I V CQOI'AMaES3
Plicast 27 • Plicast 27-C • Plicast Tuff -Mix
Plicast Hydro -Mix • Plicast Trowl-Mix
Formulated for these conditions and requirements:
A. To provide one-piece castable refractory construction' suited to high' temperature
service temperatures.
B. To offer a choice of in-service qualities for meeting special operating conditions
or furnace zone requirements.
C. To offer a choice of installation methods.
P LI�l r1G®"
This report gives detailed
product characteristics and
chief gduantages,the primary
data on which to base mate-
rial selection for any applica-
tion. Some of the many uses
are presented as a guide.
SPECIFIC
ADVANTAGES
COMMON
0 APPLICATIONS
PRODUCT
CHARACTERISTICS
P.C.E. (Fusion Point):
Recommended Service
Temperature Range:
Composition %—AI203-Si02:
Coefficient of Thermal
Expansion:
Abrasion Resistance:
Acid Resistance:
Wt. to Place 1 Cu. Ft.:
:Wt. in Service:
Water Ratio:
Minimum Time
' Before Firing:
Setting Characteristics:
Average Storage Lite:
Packaging:
Applicable Specss
Pneumatic Application:
• excellent resistance to abrasion. •
PLICAST HYDRO -MIX --Specifically formulated to provide maximum resistance •to mois-
ture and thermal shock.
PLICAST TROWL-MIX—General purpose first quality castable prepared ' especially for
trowelling applications. Excellent workability.
PLICAST 27—Basic first quality castable for general duty under high temperature service
conditions.
PLICAST 27-C—Large grain size, with much greater strength to carry heavy loads. Excel-
lent thermal .shock resistance.
PLICAST TUFF -MIX —Maintains high strength uniformly from 1000 to 2500 deg. F., offering
BOILER FURNACES —Waste heat and
direct fired. Tube backing, rear arches,
floors, hydraulic ash pits.
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES —Aluminum
holding, , annealing, stress relieving,
normalizing, heat treating.
Plicast 27
Cone 16
(2715°F.)
200 to 2500°F.
40-43
0.0000029
Fair
• Fair
1151bs.
115-118 lbs. _
9 qts./100 lbs.
24 hrs.
Hydraulic
12 months
1001b. bags
ASTM C-401-60
Class C
Use Plicast
Hearth Cement
Plicast 27-C
Cone 16
(2715°F.)
200 to 2550° F.
40-43.
0.0000029 •
Excellent
Good ,
1221bs.
125-128lbs.
7 qts./1001bs.
24 hrs.
Hydraulic
12 months
' 1001b. bags
ASTM C-401-60
•
Not
Recommended
INCINERATORS-Floors,.breechings,
moray chambers, ash pits.
CEMENT & ALLIED FURNACES —Dryers, •
clinker doolers, dust chambers, stack
linings; sulphur and phosphorous
furnaces.
Plicast
Tuff -Mix
Cone 17 °
(2755°F.)
0.0000029
Fair
1201bs. .
120-125.1bs.
7 qts,/100lbs.
24 hrs...
Hydraulic
12 months
100lb. bags
ASTM C-401-60
Class C
Use Plicpst
Tuff -Mix G
Plicast
Hydro -Mix
Cone 15
(2605*F.)
• 200 to 2500°F.
41-43
0.0000029
Good
Fair
1101bs.
110-113 lbs.
10 qts./100 lbs.
24 hrs.
Hydraulic
12 months
100 lb. bags
ASTM C-401-60
Class C
Use Plicast
Hydro -Mix G
Plicast
Trowl-Mix
Cone 14-15
(2580°F.)
200 to 2400°F.
35-40
0.0000029
Fair
Fair
100 lbs.
103-108 lbs.
10 qts./100 lbs.
' 24 hrs. ,
Hydraulic
12 months
1001b. bags
ASTM C-401-60
Class B
Not
Recommended
See other side for additional data .. .
o\( A
PROPERTIES
Temp. (•F.)
10:;,
1600
2000
2500
230
1000
1500
2000
2500
Mean Temp.
500
1000
1500
2000
INSTALLATION
Plicast Plicast Plicast.
Plicast 27 Plicast 27-C Tuff -Mix ' Hydro -Mix Trowl-Mix
LINEAR SHRIN GE (%)- STM C-179, C-269
0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00
0.0 - - 0.2 -
0.0 0.00 0.1 0.2 0.45
0.2 0.03 0.2 0.4 0.55
+ 0.2 0.31 1.5 1.1 0.60
MODULUS OF RU RE (PSI) - STM C-133, C-268
.
500-550 700-800 850-950 700-750 400-500
300-350 - - 450-500 -
275-325 400-500 550-650 400-450 225-275
250-300 350-450 450-550 350-400 250-300
800-850 600-700 900-1000 850-900 600-700
THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY BTU/HR./S. FT./IN/•F.-ASTM C-202
3.40 3.40 4.20 3.40 3.40
4.10 4.10 4.85 4.10 4.10
4.95 4.95 5.42 4.95 4.95
5.85 5.85 • 6.00 5.85 5.85
.a
Mix with prescribed amount of water and install as follows: Plicast 27 and 27-C are
poured behind forms (Plicast Hearth Cement, similar to Plicast 27 but a fine grind, can
be placed with wet or dry gun equipment). Plicast Hydro -Mix and Plicast Tuff -Mix are
poured but are also available with similar properties in special formulation for pneumatic
placement: see table above. Plicast Trowl-Mix is intended only for trowel application.
NOTE: All figures are "averaged' results of laboratory tests and reasonable varia-
tions can be expected.
CAUTION: The figures given apply when these materials are poured in place.
Pneumatic application will increase strength, thermal conductiu#y, and density,
varying with the application equipment and technique.
ICU R AC TO RIFE
INCINERATORS
ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION
PLIBRICO COMPANY, 1800 Kingsbury St., Chicago, I11. 60614
Form PLR•985-A•-Printed In U.S.A.
Merit 3.66
•
%.�
i'I�1f 1Il r� `.n 7r1Y .,ti1
y ..,„A�▪ 'i !r J 1�•••re,•
ma�cc,, /�ti • ff"_,
u �:� . L rf. /t ,f'
Ali H
- _'C rZ io�47f 1
+. "...- ..1, . I S•,.Z. t.,. tL 3'rC .a.. i;rshY^u-�]id 'SS,. ..i�:,.(_a�..z....l�hr �' r "�` `t- �
Estes Perk, Colorado 80517 P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (Area 303) 586.4461
The Town Engineer's Office is proposing to adopt a procedure wherein
each applicant for a building permit will be routed to the suppliers of
public utilities prior to issuance of the permit. This procedure is
essentially the same as that now used by Larimer County in the Estes Park
area. The purpose for it is to ascertain that:
1. The required utilities are available at the building site.
2. Installation of such utilities will be in conformance with
applicable regulations.
3. Tap fees, connect fees, etc. are paid in advance of
issuance of a building permit.
The applicants would be routed to you only in those instances where
we believe you are affected. Adoption of the foregoing procedure will
aid in proper issuance of building permits. It will also ensure timely
payment of all fees, and will avoid or reveal potential problems for the
applicant.
We would appreciate your favorable response to the above and any
suggestions that you may wish to make prior to implementation. It is
proposed to proceed with it's adoption in approximately two weeks.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
William Van Horn
Town Engineer
WVH:eks
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
ROUTING SLIP
Building Address Permit No.
Owner Date
Builder
Use of Building
Legal Description of Property
1. TOWN LIGHT AND POWER DEPARTMENT
Remarks Work Order No.
Approved Date
2. TOWN WATER DEPARTMENT
Remarks Tap No.
Approved Date
3. ESTES PARK SANITATION DISTRICT
Remarks
Approved Date
4. UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISTRICT
Remarks
Approved Date
5. COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Remarks
Approved Date
6. MOUNTAIN BELL
Remarks
Approved Date
7. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
Remarks
Approved Date