Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Firemen's Pension Board 1986-11-05LYNN A. HAMMOND ROGER E. CLARK GREGORY A. WHITE JENNIFER J. STOCKER HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE LAW OFFICES FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, SUITE 41B 200 EAST SEVENTH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 303-667-1023 November 5, 1986 Estes Park Firemen's Pension Board c/o Dale Hill Town of Estes Park Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Sirs: 1141 RECTIVED NOV 1 2"OUN9ELV19 lorzi EVVy A 0 Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the situation concerning Marvin Steel's request for firemen's pension. I have examined the Constitution and By-laws of the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department, being the revision of March 1, 1983 and the training amendment of December 3, 1985. Also, I have examined the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park and state statutes relating to the firemen's pension matters. It is my opinion that the Constitution and By-laws of the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department are not rules and regulations of the Firemen's Pension Board unless the same have been adopted by the Board. Also, it appears that the expulsion of Mary Steel from the Fire Department may have not been in conformance with the said By-laws as any expulsion must be reviewed by the hearing committee. Section 31-30-415, C.R.S., 1973, specifies the statutory requirements for a firemen's pension. The requirements are: 1) a minimum of ten years of active service; 2) said years of active service only counts if thirty-six (36) hours of training is taken by each volunteer fireman during each active service year on or after January 1,.1978. 3) the attainment of 50 years of age. It is my opinion that Mary Steel is entitled to a pro -rated pension based on the number of years of active service. There is no requirement in the state statute that the firemen be a member of the department at the time of application for a firemen's pension. In the case of Agee v. Trustees of the Pension Board, 33 Colo App 268, 518 P2d 301, 1974, the Colorado Court of Appeals Firemen's ion Board c/o Dale Hill November 5, 1986 Page 2 P s found that a fire pension board does not have discretionary power to alter pension eligibility requirements mandated by the General Assembly through the state statutes. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. truly yours, (-,1_42- A. White GAW/pbj