Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board Study Session 2022-03-08 March 8, 2022 5:30 p.m. – 6:45 p.m. Board Room 5:15 p.m. -Dinner In Person Meeting – Mayor, Trustees, Staff and Public To view or listen to the Study Session by Zoom Webinar ONLINE (Zoom Webinar): https://zoom.us/j/91077906778 Webinar ID: 910 7790 6778 CALL-IN (Telephone Option): 877-853-5257 (toll-free) Meeting ID: 910 7790 6778 If you are joining the Zoom meeting and are experiencing technical difficulties, staff will be available by phone for assistance 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting at 970-577-4777. 5:30 p.m. 2022 Street Improvement Program Overview. (Engineer Barr) 6:05 p.m. Town Shuttle Service to the YMCA Campus. (Manager Solesbee) 6:35 p.m. Trustee & Administrator Comments & Questions. 6:40 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Items. (Board Discussion) 6:45 p.m. Adjourn for Town Board Meeting. Informal discussion among Trustees concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this meeting at approximately 5:00 p.m. AGENDA TOWN BOARD STUDY SESSION Page 1       Page 2 PUBLIC WORKS Report To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Ryan Barr, Engineer Greg Muhonen, Public Works Director Date: March 8, 2022 RE: 2022 Street Improvement Program Overview Purpose of Study Session Item: Provide the Board an update on the 2022 Street Improvement and Trail Expansion Programs funded by the 2014 1A Tax Initiative. Town Board Direction Requested: Confirming acceptance of the proposed scope of work. Present Situation: • In 2014 the citizens of Estes Park voted to increase the sales tax by one percent with 60% of the increase going toward street improvements and 12.5% going toward trails expansion in the Town of Estes Park. • A goal was set to raise the system-wide Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to above 70 by the end of the term of the tax in 2024. • The Public Works Department has continued to expand our trails system in accordance with the Estes Valley Master Trails Plan. • Larimer County plans to chip seal many of their roads in Estes Park in 2022 using in-house labor. Rather than skipping the Town-owned segments on these county roads, Public Works is partnering with the County to have County crews chip seal our road segments at the same time. This collaboration is estimated to save Estes Park taxpayers approximately $50,000. Proposal: The 2022 Street Improvement Program consists of overlaying 1.8 centerline miles of roadway, asphalt patching at 10 roadway locations, crack sealing 2.8 centerline miles of roadway, and chip sealing 5.1 centerline miles of roadway. Approximately 3 of the 5 centerline miles of chip seal is planned to be accomplished by Larimer County in-house crews. Design projects occurring in 2022 include the Visitor Center Parking Lot reconfiguration, Third Street Rehabilitation, and Cleave Street Improvements. Page 3 Trail Expansion work in 2022 includes construction of three separate projects: Fall River Trail (CtB), Fall River Trail (TAP & MMOF), and Graves Avenue Improvements. These projects will add approximately 0.8 miles of surfaced trail to the Town’s trail network. Advantages: • This plan continues the work set forth in the original 2024 STIP Plan • Implementation of this plan will result in improved road conditions throughout Town, leading to higher citizen and guest satisfaction. • This plan includes preventive road maintenance, which will impact a larger percentage of the roads in Town, as opposed to only focusing on a few major repairs. • The entire road system is predicted to exceed an average PCI rating of 70 by the end of this program. We reached this system-wide average score in 2018 and will continue to plan cost-effective projects in order to maintain a PCI above 70 for the remainder of the program. Disadvantages: • Increased construction during the course of this program will produce localized detours and delays for motorists during construction periods; however, contractors will follow approved traffic control plans, and full road closures will be minimized as much as possible. • The average system-wide PCI is expected be above 70 in 2024; however, there will be some roads with PCI ratings below 70. Finance/Resource Impact: The proposed street improvements are funded through the 1A Street Improvement Fund (Fund 260). The proposed trail improvements are funded through the 1A Trail Expansion Fund (Fund 244), the Larimer County Open Space Fund (Fund 220), and the Community Reinvestment Fund (Fund 204). For 2022 the proposed spending is: $590,000 – Overlays and Patching $300,000 – Chip and Crack Sealing $365,000 – Personnel, Spray Patcher, Striping, Equipment, etc. $70,000 – Engineering Design Costs $48,000 – Cleave Street Interim Improvements (Design) $129,000 – Visitor Center Parking Lot (Design) $534,000 – Fall River Trail (CtB): $364k from Colorado the Beautiful (CtB) grant; $110k from Town; $10k from Larimer County Department of Natural Resources (DNR); $50k from Estes Valley Recreation and Park District (EVRPD) $2,221,000 – Fall River Trail (TAP & MMOF): $955k from Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) grant; $448k from Multi-Modal Options Fund (MMOF) grant; $718k from Town; $100k from EVRPD $900,000 – Graves Avenue Improvements: $500k from Colorado Safe Routes to School (SRTS) grant; $400k from Town Page 4 Level of Public Interest The known level of public interest in this item is moderate. Attachments: 1. 2022 Street Improvement Program and Trails Expansion presentation Page 5 Town of Estes Park 2022 Street Improvement Program and Trails Expansion Update 1A Streets Overview LEGEND Town Maintained Streets Non Town Maintained Streets Streams Lakes Parks Town Boundary Attachment 1 Page 6 3/9/2022 Town of Estes Park Street Improvement Program Goal Develop and implement a street improvement program to raise the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the Town of Estes Park to a value of 70 by the year 2024 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) 2016 PCI rating = 65 Program PCI goal = 70 Current PCI rating = 73 Page 7 3/9/2022 PCI Examples 100 85 72 5363 35 Reach System-Wide PCI of 70 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 PC I W e i g h t e d A v e r a g e Year Annual Condition Plot (Area Weighted Average) Projected PCI Actual PCI Page 8 3/9/2022 2021 Street Improvements Overlaid 1.6 miles of roadway and performed asphalt patching at 18 locations 2021 Overlay and Patching Country Club Drive Far View Drive Grand Estates Drive High Acres Drive Pine Lane Saint Vrain Lane Tranquil Lane Vail Court Performance Parking Lot improvements 2021 Street Improvements - Maintenance Crack Sealed 3.9 centerline miles Chip Sealed 4.2 centerline miles Page 9 3/9/2022 2022 Street Improvements Overlay and Patching – 1.8 centerline miles Overlay - Acacia Dr, Grand Estates Dr, Homesteader Ln, Lakefront St, Pioneer Ln, Prospector Ln, Sunny Mead Ln Patching – 10 locations identified for asphalt patch repairs Crack Seal – 2.8 centerline miles Chip Seal – 5.1 centerline miles Larimer County plans to chip seal many of their roads in Estes Park in 2022 (in-house). Public Works is coordinating with them to have the Town-owned segments (approx. 3 centerline miles) addressed at the same time. Likely to include the Town-owned segments of Fish Creek Road, High Drive, Highway 66, Mary’s Lake Road, Peak View Drive, and Riverside Drive 2022 Design Projects – 1A Streets Visitor Center Parking Lot – SB 267 Parking lot reconfiguration – awarded $1.03M grant with 20% local match of $257k IGA for design has been received, design to be completed by the end of 2024 Third Street Rehabilitation Rehabilitation project will follow utility upgrades from Water Division & Estes Park Sanitation District – Utility work expected to continue into 2023 Public Works will revisit one-way pilot program with residents to see if a different configuration should be tested in 2022, in order to help guide final design Cleave Street Improvements Public outreach and design in 2022, targeting construction in 2023 Coordination with Comprehensive Plan, which may influence design Page 10 3/9/2022 2022 – 1A Streets Budget 2022 Projected Expenditures $590,000 for Overlays and Patching $300,000 for Chip & Crack Sealing $365,000 for personnel, spraypatcher, striping, equipment, etc. $70,000 for Engineering Design Costs $48,000 for Cleave Street Interim Improvements (Design) $129,000 for Visitor Center Parking Lot (Design) Contingency funds are included STIP Production Summary Page 11 3/9/2022 Streets Improved – 1A Sales Tax Approximately 78% of roadway segments have been crack sealed, chip sealed, patched, or overlaid through 1A program. Pothole repair spray patcher performs hundreds of additional minor patching repairs each year. Currently on target to achieve PCI goal at end of program Pavement degradation is perpetual. Revenue from 1A tax is critical for maintaining PCI over the entire life of the roadway. Renewal in 2024 is very important. Reach System-Wide PCI of 70 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 PC I W e i g h t e d A v e r a g e Year Annual Condition Plot (Area Weighted Average) Projected PCI Actual PCI Unfunded $200k Annually Maintain PCI - Approx $1.1M Annually Page 12 3/9/2022 Colorado Asphalt Pavement Association (CAPA) – Local Agency Listing 1A Trails Overview Page 13 3/9/2022 1A Trails Priorities (Dry Gulch / Devils Gulch Connection) Trail # Project Name Estes Valley Master Trails Plan Project Priority Table Top priority Fall River Trail has been focus of grant applications Additional project priorities near the School District that are eligible for Safe Routes to School (SRTS) grants Trail Grant Opportunities 2021 Grant Applications - Trails Fall River Trail - ARPA EDA Tourism Not selected for funding Fall River Trail – Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) Contacted State Senator/Congressman offices for potential project funds Not selected for funding, but project interest was heightened among Representatives Will continue to pursue grant opportunities in 2022 – MMOF, GOCO, SRTS, RMS, CPW LWCF, CPW NMT, etc. Page 14 3/9/2022 2022 Trail Expansion Fall River Trail – Colorado the Beautiful (CtB) Non-Motorized Trails Grant Begins along Fish Hatchery Road where 2020 construction ended Awarded $364k with required local match of $109k; Supported with EVRPD funding ($50k) &Larimer County DNR ($10k) Targeting construction in summer 2022 Fall River Trail - Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) & Multi-Modal OptionsFund (MMOF) Along Fall River Road (US34) working west from current “trail ends” barricade TAP: Awarded $955k with required local match of $239k; MMOF: Awarded $448k with requiredlocal match of $179k; Supported with EVRPD funding ($100k) Targeting construction in summer 2022 Graves Avenue Improvements – Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Sidewalk along both sides of Graves Avenue to provide safe and accessible routes to the SchoolDistrict, Community Center, and other amenities Awarded $500k from Colorado SRTS with required local match of $125k Targeting construction in summer 2022 2022 Trail Expansion Graves Avenue Improvements Fall River Trail Page 15 3/9/2022 Other Non-Ballot 1A Projects active in the Engineering Division Downtown Wayfinding Plan Downtown Estes Loop (CFL) US 36 and Community Roundabout Routine Operations & Maintenance Drainage and Trails Maintenance Public Improvements by Private Development Disclaimer Project scope and timing can change based on various factors including Utility Work Usage of Contingency Funds Contractor Bid Amounts Unforeseen Road Damage Natural Disasters Etc. Page 16 3/9/2022 Thank You! Page 17       Page 18 PUBLIC WORKS Report To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Vanessa Solesbee, Parking & Transit Manager Greg Muhonen, Public Works Director Date: March 8, 2022 RE: Town Shuttle Service to the YMCA Campus Purpose of Study Session Item: Update the Town Board on staff, advisory board, and stakeholder discussions regarding possible reinstatement of Town shuttle service to the YMCA campus. Town Board Direction Requested: Public Works staff seeks Town Board direction on a combined request from the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), YMCA of the Rockies (YMCA) and Public Works staff to formally explore options to reinstate Town shuttle service to the YMCA campus beginning with the summer 2022 guest season. Present Situation: In November 2018, Town shuttle service outside of Town limits was discontinued. At that time, the change was supported by Town Administration, the Town Board and the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). Since 2018, visitation to the Estes Valley has increased steadily. While the pandemic drastically reduced transit ridership in 2020, Estes Transit saw a strong rebound in ridership (75% of pre-pandemic levels) in 2021. Other factors – including the introduction of seasonal paid parking, expansion of affordable regional summer transportation from the Front Range (Bustang to Estes) and new relationships forged through the recent water agreement between the Town and YMCA – have contributed to interest in revisiting the 2018 decision, with a specific focus on reinstating service to the YMCA campus. After receiving supportive recommendations from the citizen TAB and the Town’s ad- hoc Shuttle Committee in late 2021, Public Works reached out to YMCA staff to gauge interest in reinstatement of Estes Transit service to the YMCA campus. YMCA staff expressed enthusiastic interest in the possibility of service reinstatement; however, before additional time is invested in the discussion, Public Works staff thought it prudent to seek Town Board input and direction. Page 19 Proposal: With feedback from the Town Board, Public Works staff would work with the YMCA, TAB and other stakeholders (e.g., Chamber’s Lodging Council, former Brown Route stops and sponsors, Visit Estes Park) to identify options for reinstatement of service to the YMCA campus beginning with the 2022 summer guest season. Options for service reinstatement and anticipated finance/resource impact would be brought back to the Town Board at a regular meeting in April. Advantages: • Provides a free, public transportation option for visitors, locals and employees who visit, live and/or work along the Hwy 66 corridor to access many areas of Town without depending on an automobile. • Anticipated reduction in congestion and vehicle emissions; possible improvement in public safety (fewer car trips). • Improved access and transportation equity for those who cannot or choose not to drive or own a vehicle. Disadvantages: • Exploration of transit service expansion for summer 2022 requires additional work for the Parking & Transit Division Manager; however, both TAB and the YMCA staff have committed to assisting Town staff as needed to move this conversation forward. • There are other locations in the Estes Valley that have expressed interest in transit service and it is likely not possible to consider all new service requests prior to the 2022 summer guest season; however, Public Works staff will continue to work to understand additional needs and define a process for future service expansion if so directed by the Town Board. Finance/Resource Impact: Transportation Fees, 101-5600-456.22-60 Reinstatement of service to the YMCA could happen within the existing 2022 Transit budget; however, this change would decrease the user service frequency of the Brown Route from 30 minutes to 60 minutes. The addition of a second bus on the Brown Route would mitigate the diminished service frequency (and allow each stop to continue being served every 30 minutes); however, the increased cost for a second bus is estimated to be $60,933 for the 2022 guest season (includes bus lease and hourly rate for bus operations). This increased cost was not budgeted in 2022, so Public Works staff would need to explore options to cover the additional cost (e.g., sponsorships, partner contributions, General Fund dollars, and grant funding). Page 20 Level of Public Interest Public interest in this item is moderate. Outreach that was conducted by the Town’s former Transit Program Manager in 2018 is attached (Attachment #1). Since 2019, the Parking & Transit Manager has received a handful (less than 10) emails and/or phone calls from locals and visitors asking to reinstate YMCA service. However, in 2021 alone, staff received new inquiries from five lodging locations outside of Town limits asking about the possibility of new transit service connections. Attachments: 1. Appendix A: Community Feedback Regarding Shuttle Service Outside Town Limits (from November 18, 2018 Town Board packet) Page 21 1 Appendix A: Community Feedback Regarding Shuttle Service Outside Town Limits The following information was collected via e-mail and through public comments at the Shuttle Committee and Transportation Advisory Board meetings: “The Brown route stops shown in the letter of 8/21 reflect a significant # of Estes Park guests and employees which would be effected by discontinuance. I do not believe it will impact our particular business traffic in a tangible way. However, the impact to the town in the following areas should be considered: a)additional traffic stress. Estes Park has had an ongoing struggle with traffic stress due to personal vehicles. A decrease of the Brown route, which serves a significant # of people including the"Y" which is a city unto itself, will add to this difficulty affecting tourist satisfaction and return rates. b)potential decreased sales tax revenue for the town. Our personal experience with shuttle use is guests which have cars use the shuttle when a couple of people wish to go into town to shop when others go elsewhere. Without this service available, individual "shoppers" may stay home as their family day trips elsewhere. c)increased difficulty in town ability to get qualified employees for summer. Every j1 questionnaire we see asks about shuttle or bus service. These people do not have transportation. This is an important part of their decision making in whether they will visit, work in and spend $$ in Estes Park or in California or New York. US students considering a summer work stay also frequently do not have reliable transport. A side note on this - our experience is that summer workers, especially those relying on Estes Park transport spend the vast majority of their paychecks right back into the Estes Park economy. Finally, I would make a suggestion. The overall economy and way of life is enhanced for Estes Park with the shuttle service. However, those using it receive additional benefits. Consideration should be given to a SMALL use fee each time of use by any individual, perhaps $0.50 or $1.00. This would help with funding constraints and as long as the fee was very reasonable, shouldn't affect ridership or burden those using it much.” Jim Addison, Valhalla Resort (September 9, 2018) Attachment 1 Page 22 2 “We’re obviously disappointed that the brown route may be discontinued. While the service is most definitely a benefit to our guests and staff, I strongly believe that the influx of tourists from the Y and the staff that travel to second jobs is of benefit to the town as well. Guests regularly use the shuttle to avoid downtown parking issues. Group members (that have arrived by tour bus) use the shuttle to access town. Many seasonal staff use the shuttle as they do not have cars. Some seasonal staff use the shuttle to commute to their second job in town.” Dave DeLuca, Estes Park Center Director, YMCA of the Rockies (August 24, 2018) “The September 5, 2018 Trail Gazette has an article that the town trustees have suggested discontinuing certain stops on the Brown shuttle route, because those stops are not in town limits. You are quoted as saying that "the feeling was that the stops outside of Town do not collect sales tax revenue to support the service." However, people who use that shuttle to come to town, probably buy things in town, thus providing sales tax revenue. Many people who work or visit the YMCA do so without a car. The town shuttle gives them a way to get to/from town. It is a good public service. When congestion of town streets in the summer is such a concern, why would eliminating shuttle service be thought to be a good idea?” Dorothy Dewitz, Estes Park Resident (September 5, 2018) “Thank you for providing information about the Town Board considering suspending shuttle service along Hwy. 66. I appreciate the opportunity to express my thoughts on the matter. First, I would be interested to know what the numbers are for ridership of the shuttle system in our area. Being outside the town limits, even though we do not directly pay town sales tax, all of our guests who use the shuttle system do spend money that generates town sales tax. I thought the Shuttle system was created to alleviate parking and road congestion issues in order to give all visitors the best possible experience in and around Estes Park. Assuming that the ridership numbers are decent, I believe it would be prudent to keep at least two of the stops that are potentially being cut. I would assume that the YMCA stop has a great number of riders considering the sheer number of guests that the YMCA can accommodate. One additional stop mid-way, such as #8 Eagle Cliff / Hwy 66 would allow guests from Glacier Lodge, Valhalla, Machin’s, Rockmount Cottages, Paradise on the River, & others in the area to have one centrally located stop. I think it would be foolish to cut ALL of the stops that are listed. Surely, the town would still like the sales tax generated by our guests shopping, dining, and enjoying entertainment within town limits.” Holly Reetz, Rockmount Cottages (September 4, 2018) Page 23 3 “As owners of Paradise on the River, would hope the Town Board would consider continuing with the shuttle service. We believe discontinuing the service would be shortsighted by the Town. Thousands of guests over the busy season will now be driving into town, instead of using the shuttle, making it even more congested and less friendly to the environment. Those businesses in Town would be losing business to those that decide to not even go into town because they either do not have a vehicle or because of the congestion. I know some employees even use the shuttle to come and depart from their places of employment. Those of us with resorts outside of the Town limit do pay the 2% tax to the marketing district which benefits Estes Park immensely. Also, the special district was created and successfully passed by the electorate to take the marketing burden off the Town. I believe there is a couple of million dollars that no longer falls upon the Town budget. The Town should gladly support those businesses that help pay for the creation of business within the Town with their customers and guests.” Robin Eldridge, Diana Eldridge, Paradise on the River (August 26, 2018) “I’m a frequent visitor to Estes Park and use the free shuttles exclusively. I am elderly. I fly into Denver and take the shuttle from the airport. There is no Uber/Lyft and no reliable taxi. I have heard you are planning to stop or shrink the local shuttle service. Do not do that! Without the local shuttles, I can no longer visit Estes Park. I pay rent at resorts, buy groceries, souvenirs, eat out, take tours. I spend about $3,000 here in 10 days and don’t plug up the downtown traffic. There are many more retired folks like me, increasing as the population ages. More like me would come here if transportation not a major barrier. We are a niche that has time and money. We don’t want T-shirts and taffy. Cater to us. Thanks for listening. The Brown route is my route. I stay at Paradise, Glacier, Marys Lake resorts and the Y. Please, I beg you, don’t mess it up. These places are ideal for we older folks who like peaceful beautiful landscapes and uncrowded comfy accommodation with thoughtful kind hosts. No loud nightlife, no T-shirts or taffy, and we can’t hike anymore.” Beverly Apel, Iowa (August 24, 2018) “My name is Rachel Ames and I am an Estes Park area resident. I recently heard that the city is considering eliminating some stops of the Estes Park Shuttle along Spur 66 and Mary’s Lake Rd. I live in the High Drive neighborhood and while I don’t personally take the shuttles into Estes, I have had relatives who have stayed at the YMCA and they loved the shuttle into town. Parking is always an issue and they appreciated being able to hop on the shuttle to have dinner and go shopping. I really hope you and the other town leaders recognize the incredible value that the shuttles provide to visitors who might not want to drive into town or those who have large trucks/RV’s and who can’t easily park downtown. Offering alternative transportation is always the right thing to do. Thanks for listening.” Rachel Ames, Estes Park Resident (August 24, 2018) Page 24 4 “I recently heard the town of Estes Park is considering eliminating Shuttle stops along Hwy 66 and Mary’s Lake Road. I think this plan is very short sighted. I cannot imagine any town not wanting to Shuttle in visitors to its downtown area, especially one as heavily reliant on tourism such as Estes Park. The Shuttle helps reduce both traffic and parking issues as well as providing a great community service and welcome to visitors. The Shuttle should be viewed as a benefit for Estes Park businesses, the town of Estes Park, as well as a friendly, efficient, environmentally conscious means of transportation for the greater Estes community. Thank you and I hope you will consider the broader consequences of this decision.” Andy Ames, Estes Park Resident (August 22, 2018) “I’m writing to express my concern about a proposed change reportedly being considered by the Town to remove shuttle stops outside the Town limits. I strongly believe such a change would be detrimental to Estes as a whole. When people visit Estes Park, they certainly don’t stay within (or even think about) the Town limits. I strongly urge the Town not to remove these shuttle stops.” Charlie Wood, Estes Park Resident (August 22, 2018) “Thank you for making me aware the town board is considering halting the service for stops located outside of the town limits. Just to clarify my guests that use the shuttle appreciate and value the service. My employees also use the service. I wish ridership was higher and I understand and appreciate the board looking for cost savings. I would think the more visitors that we can encourage to use the shuttle service, will only reduce traffic congestion? I would expand the service not reduce it? Even if you had one shuttle run year-round, or at least matching the [Rocky Mountain National] Park bus schedule. Lastly, I would consider paying a service charge for providing the stop to help offset the expense. Thank you again for bringing the issue to my attention, and thank you for providing the service to my guests. They spend a lot of money inside the city limits; gas, food, entertainment, shopping and other services. It's not like they have many other options, they have to go to town!” Dave Ranglos, Glacier Lodge (August 22, 2018) Excerpt from the August 9, 2018 Shuttle Committee Meeting Julie Pieper (Owner, Mama Rose’s & Poppies Pizza and Grill) added that many J1- Students reside at stops along the Brown Route, especially the YMCA. Adequate Page 25 5 transportation is one question that employers have to address when working with the student employees. Multiple J1-Students work more than one job and the shuttles are critical to helping fill employment opportunities and provide a quality guest experience. Businesses are already having a difficult time filling open positions and retaining staff. For 12 years, guests have relied on a wider access to the Estes valley via the shuttles and the Brown Route. Excerpts from the August 15, 2018 Shuttle Committee Meeting Minutes “The Center Director for the YMCA of the Rockies, Dave Deluca was a member of the public and stated he understands budget restrictions but would like to further discuss the situation with the Town. Deluca can provide transportation for the YMCA staff utilizing their own fleet but needs to budget accordingly.” “Executive Director of the Good Samaritan Estes Park Village, Julie Lee, expressed concern that the change in shuttle service will exacerbate traffic congestion situation by requiring more driving downtown.” Page 26 YMCA of the ROCKIES 2515 TUNNEL ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO 80511 P 970.586.3341 F 970.586.6088 YMCAROCKIES.ORG ESTES PARK CENTER SNOW MOUNTAIN RANCH CAMP CHIEF OURAY Mayor Koenig, Mayor Pro-Tem Martchink and Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees, YMCA of the Rockies looks forward to the opportunity of reinstating the Town of Estes Park shuttle service to our property and the benefits it would provide to YMCA guests, staff and the Estes Park community. As one of the largest providers of guest accommodations in the Estes Park area, we know the positive impact our guests and staff have on t he local economy by visiting shops, restaurants and services outside of the YMCA. During the summer months, the YMCA can host up to approximately 5,000 guests at full occupancy served by 450 staff. Overwhelmingly, the majority of our guests arrive in their own private vehicles and potentially contribute to increased traffic and parking congestion in high-use areas around Estes Park and the downtown corridor. We believe including the YMCA in the shuttle network would help greatly in reducing the number of private vehicles leaving the YMCA property and aid in the overall positive experience visitors have in Estes Park. Our marketing and communications team is already developing plans to increase awareness and information available to YMCA staff and guests, encouraging the use of the shuttle service if it is approved. We would also encourage YMCA employees who are residents of the newly purchased Glacier Lodge to use the service that departs from the YMCA property. Thank you for your time in considering the reinstatement of the shuttle service to YMCA of the Rockies and continuation of the positive partnership between our organization and the Town of Estes Park. Sincerely, Shannon Jones General Manager YMCA of the Rockies – Estes Park Center Page 27 To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Town Administrator From: Belle Morris, Chair, Transportation Advisory Board Date: February 27, 2022 RE: TAB recommendation to explore Transit services outside of Town limits. Dear Honorable Mayor Koenig and Trustees, The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) enthusiastically supports the exploration of transit services outside the Town limits that includes a route to the YMCA of the Rockies and other potential locations. Transit access that includes the outer parameters of the Estes valley will benefit residents, businesses, employees, and visitors. The seasonal traffic congestion and emission pollution generated by single occupant vehicles traveling into the Downtown corridor from outside the Town limit areas can be reduced by an effective Transit program. TAB encourages exploration of transit routes that provide reliable alternative transportation. TAB understands the value and advocates for connected multi-modal transportation, which provide safe and comfortable mobility for all abilities and age groups. The recommendation to explore transit will support these desired outcomes to benefit the Estes Park community. TAB thanks Mayor Koenig and Town Trustees for allowing the opportunity to provide our recommendation. Sincerely, Belle Morris Chair, Estes Park Transportation Advisory Board Page 28 March 22, 2022 •Remote or In-Person for Weekly Mayor Meeting April 12, 2022 •Downtown Loop Updates •2022 Paid Parking Program Update May 10, 2022 •CIRSA Liability and Risk as an Elected Official •Town Board Orientation 101 Items Approved – Unscheduled: •Town Board and Chamber Board Meet and Discussion •Governing Policies Updates •Stanley Park Master Plan Implementation •Quarterly CompPAC Update •Downtown Loop Updates as Necessary Items for Town Board Consideration: None. Future Town Board Study Session Agenda Items March 8, 2022 Page 29       Page 30