HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority 1982-12-28BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
i/' Urban Renewal Authority Committee
December 28, 1982
Committee:
Attending:
Also Attending:
Mayor Tregent, Trustees Dannels and Wood,
Planning Commission Chairman Sager, Citizens
Rosener and Patrick
All
Trustees Hix and Houston, Town Administrator Hill,
Public Works Director Widmer
PRESENTATION - THK ASSOCIATES, INC.:
Mr. Bob Giltner and Mr. Mark Trumbo of THK Associates, Inc. appeared
before the Committee to present their proposal for an Urban Renewal
Plan for Estes Park. Mr. Giltner gave a brief history of the
company, discussed the projects that they are currently involved
with, and then explained how an Urban Renewal Development Plan would
work for the Town of Estes Park. Mr. Giltner explained that Mr.
Floyd Tanaka, President of THK Associates, Inc., would be the Project
Director in Estes Park if they were chosen to do the project. THK
Associates, Inc. would also be working with the associated firms
of Leigh, Scott and Cleary, parking and traffic engineers; and
KKBNA, an engineering firm. Mr. Giltner stressed the importance
of community involvement and stated they would set up workshops
and seminars for community education. The THK proposal indicated
a cost of $60,000. A lengthy question and answer period followed.
PRESENTATION - CARL A. WORTHINGTON PARTNERSHIP:
Mr. Frank Gray, Mr. Jim Urbanas, and Mr. Dick Bauman, of Carl A.
Worthington Partnership, appeared before the Committee to review
their Downtown Development proposal for Estes Park. Mr. Gray stated
that he would be the Project Director/Planner and Mr. James Urbanas
would be the Project Coordinator/Planner. Carl A. Worthington
Partnership would be working with the associated firms of Browne,
Bortz and Coddington, economics experts; Transplan Associates,
parking and traffic engineers; and MeHaffy, Rider, Windholz and
Wilson, attorneys and realtors, and EDAW, landscaping architects.
Mr. Gray stated that the plan as presented would take approximately
15 weeks to complete and would be done in four phases: Phase 1,
analysis and program; Phase 2, alternative development scenarios.
Phase 3, action plan, and Phase 4, review and adoption. Mr. Gray
stressed community interaction and stated that there would be
community educational workshops as well as an office where citizens
could come and ask questions and also present their ideas. The
Worthington proposal indicated a cost of $125,180. A lengthy
question and answer period followed.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION;
Mayor Tregent asked for recommendations from the Committee. A
discussion followed. Mr. Steve Patrick moved_that the Committee
recommend to the Board of Trustees the retention of the firm o
Carl A. Worthington Partnership. Member Greg Rosener seconded the
motion and it passed unanimously.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Ann E. JenseiT^^TownCTerk