HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority 1985-03-06BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
v/March 6, 1985
Commissioners;
Attending:
Also Attending!
Absent:
Chairman Charles H. Phares, Commissioners Anne K.
Moss, Edward B. Pohl, Dale G. Hill, J. Donald
Pauley, Lyle Frantz, Milton Ericson
Chairman Phares, Commissioners Moss, Pohl,
Hill, Pauley and Ericson
Executive Director Anderson, Attorney Windholz,
Bob Joseph, Secretary Heifner
Commissioner Frantz
Minutes of the February 20, 1985 meeting were approved as presented.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: None
?hc^rinsetSck:
Stanley Village.
COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Mnu?rs0nbfadrtJa:POMolifnaL?r!eFa!bra 12'
rirmilation - Traffic and Parkins - °^e^i°^tingrSetc!tS?thruS 34/36
intersection^thatEBillPVanHornrshould he contacted today as he will he
working in this area very soon.
Capital Improvements - Streetscape - Phase^^II^ Sgeetscape^i^^^^^ ^ underway.
according to Heath Construction op id f Eikhorn (Elkhorn and
Heath will be breaking ground on the soutn siae o
Moraine) in three weeks.
LIAISON: V. .q
.......a cormnission - Co^nissioner Moss reported that Mike Dickinson had
been appointed t^rThe Planning Commission.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
- j /TJoVii —Hi 11) that the most recent
NCE Bill - It was nioyed s®^°nQt Motion carried. This _
NCE bilT in the to ^sure that concrete is repoured in
leaves a retainage °!.final punch list are completed_and
front of Lonigan's, items on 5anty 0n brick installation,_
certain warranty lt5I?s' s^gttlLent will beYmade with NCE until notice
are completed. No final s^^^^!™®ntwrtimes, after which payment may
madeitend(10)tdaysrafter3thetsecond publication (barring any claims
or suits).
TJEW BUSINESS:
R. c. Heath BiU - s|Sine?h4 "^“"fSture and
“fSurifpresertrfof^ayien; ah hhe next URh meeting on March 20,
STAFF:
per person for non-members.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
March 6, 1985
Page 2
Attorney Windholz will file a Motion to Dismiss with regard to the
latest Stanley Village lawsuit.
Director Anderson directed a question to Tom Binstock regarding a
recent article in Skylark II with respect to a lawsuit before the
State Supreme Court and the legality of the urban renewal plan.
Binstock answered that (in relation to this suit -- Clark vs. the
Town) he wondered if the principal of the Town following its
zoning applied to urban renewal statutes which have since been
incorporated therein, which brings forth the question - which has
precedence C~1 or urban renewal?
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Donna Heifner, Recording secretary