HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority 1984-05-02BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
'y/May 2, 1984
Commissioners:
Attending:
Also Attending:
Absent:
Chairman Charles H. Phares, Commissioners Larry
Helmich, J. Donald Pauley, Edward B. Pohl, Dale
G. Hill, Anne K. Moss, Arthur L. Anderson
Chairman Phares, Commissioners Anderson,
Moss, Pauley and Pohl
Executive Director Barbara Cole, Secretary Heifner,
Russ Caldwell, John Hanley, Greg Johnson, Fred
Marienthal, Jim Windholz, Frank Normali and
Bob Cheney
Commissioners Helmich and Hill
There were no corrections or additions to the April 18 minutes. They
stand approved as read.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Bob Cheney, Manager of Upper Thompson Sanitation
District expressed his concern about manholes involved in the streetscape
project. He has not been contacted at all concerning their facilities
out there. Chairman Phares stated that Design Studios West is the
architect and NCE is the construction firm on the job. Bob said he
thought he should have some input into this problem if their manholes
are being raised. Cole requested Secretary Heifner to call Russell
Moore and have Russell give Bob Cheney a call.
Frank Normal!, owner of The Stanley Hotel, expressed concern over conflict
of interest in that if asked to serve on the URA Board he could not
because he is a property owner in the District. He feels abandoned and
doesn't know if his interests are being properly represented, particularly
with respect to development in front of a National Landmark. He feels
badly that he has not been called by anyone on the URA Board for his
comments or suggestions or had him involved in any way. He feels everyone
in the room has conflicts of interest. He is also concerned about
property owner's visual rights and scenic and corridor easements. Basically
his main concern is a developer(s) coming in, insensitive to Estes Park's
needs and being allowed to develop an area which may not be visually
attractive to the other natural and man-made surroundings, specifically a
building such as The Stanley Hotel, designated as a Landmark by the U. S.
Department of the Interior.
BILLS:
Cole presented the following bills:
Town of Estes Park:
Tap Main
Water Fountain (Badger Meter &
Remote Readout)
Health Insurance:
Delta Dental for B. A. Cole
D. J. Heifner
Office Supplies:
Autsy Business Center
Estes Park Stereo (blank tapes)
Pratt's Office Products
Design Studios West:
Construction Mgmt. Services
17.45
125.10
142.55
45.16
27.80
14.36
81.48
123.64
6,445.84
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
May 2, 1984 - Page Two
Town of Estes Park;
Time spent by Mike Mangelsen regarding
Streetscape Project
$ 2,603.63
TOTAL BILLS $ 9,360.82
Pohl suggested more discussion with the Town on Mangelsen's bill. Moss
questioned Design Studios West bill. Cole said that this was the first
payment. A motion was made and seconded (Anderson-Pauley) to pay the bills
with the exception of the Mangelsen bill.
COM^IUNICATIONS;
Cole read a thank you from Donna Heifner, URA Secretary, for the planter
given to her during National Secretary's Week. She reviewed a letter
from the CDDA Board of Directors regarding the Annual Membership Meeting
to be held at 9:00 a.m.. May 18, 1984 in Grand Junction. Cole has been
nominated to the Board of Directors. Someone else on the URA Board may
wish to go and the suggestion was made that Hill and Pohl (Special Assess
ment District Committee) might possibly attend.
Cole also read a letter to Richard Wood from Chairman Phares regarding
control of an eight foot strip (pedestrian walkway) fronting each property
owner's lot. Chairman Phares commented that he had received an invitation
to attend a May 17 meeting of the Public Works Committee at 2:00 p.m. and
that anyone wishing to attend with him would be welcome. A letter was read
to Russell Moore from Cole with regard to the Chevron Station sidewalk
issue. Chairman Phares said we might have more comment about this
situation after the Public Works Committee Meeting. In the meantime, he
said the work was progressing and it will be in place.
OLD BUSINESS:
Job Description:
Pohl stated he would present this at the next Board Meeting for approval.
NEW BUSINESS:
Bond Issue:
Russell Caldwell, Kirchner-Moore & Company, spoke to the Board regarding
the Bond Issue. The closing is scheduled for May 3, 1984 at 10:00 a.m.
Caldwell explained where we are at present with the bonds. He then
introduced John Hanley who is new to Kirchner-Moore and working with their
sales staff. Caldwell then introduced Greg Johnson and Fred Marienthal from
Kutak, Rock & Huie, bond attorneys, who went over the bond documents. Each
Board Member received a packet of these documents for their reference.
Johnson explained Resolution 13 which is the URA Board's authorization anc^
approval for issuance of the bonds. The bond documents given to each Board
Member are the Exhibits to Resolution 13.
Pauley raised the question of why we should have to pay a premium to redeem
bonds anytime. Caldwell stated that this is fairly standard among bond
holders and Johnson stated the premium is low, around 3%, and felt Kirchner
Moore had done a good job for the URA on premium rate. Windholz suggested
the Board meet after lunch with the attorneys to go over any questions they
might have regarding the bond documents. A motion was made and seconded
(Pauley-Anderson) to suspend any rules that would prohibit final adoption
of Resolution 13. Motion approved.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
May 2, 1984 - Page Three
A motion was made and seconded (Moss-Pauley) that the Board adopt
Resolution 13 (Authorization For The Issuance of $1,320,000 Aggregate
Principal Amount of EPURA Tax Increment Bonds Series 1984) essentially
as drafted with the proviso that the Board go over the documents for
explanation and any changes. Motion approved.
Windholz explained Resolution 14 (EPURA Cooperation Agreement With
Town of Estes Park and Central Bank & Trust Company of Denver). Cole
questioned calling in independent counsel should the Town and/or the
Authority decide to amend the Plan. Who pays for the independent
counsel each time the plan is amended? Windholz stated that Central
Bank will not approve it until they get an opinion from bond counsel.
Caldwell said the bondholders will want to know that each time the
Plan is amended they don't want the Board or the Town to do anything
in their power to dilute the ability to repay the bonds. Each time
the plan is amended, bond counsel will have to take a look at it.
Cole again questioned who pays for the independent counsel and Caldwell
said "the Authority pays". "These are URA's bondholders and it would
be the Authority's responsibility." Cole asked at what rate and Caldwell
said he didn't know. Caldwell said that this would not be a major piece
of work, i.e. BBC charged $500.00 to write a 3-page letter on the Tax
Increment Rate and that is the kind of magnitude Caldwell would expect.
Caldwell said he does not envision getting into a lot of time or cost
with this issue and Kirchner-Moore would take a look at each amendment
at no charge. Windholz stated that any independent attorney could be
used, that he did not feel Central Bank & Trust would insist on a bond
attorney, that we could shop around but most attorneys hourly rates
begin at $125.00/hour and that time spent for something of this nature
would probably entail around 5 hours.
Caldwell said there will probably be some minor items in the Plan where
we probably won't use a bond attorney at all. Chairman Phares indicated
that this was a cost he had not anticipated but since it may occur down
the line, he doesn't think there is any way it can be avoided as long as
it is negotiated. Caldwell said he would work with the URA Board to make
sure this is not a burdensome item and will spend time with the attorneys
explaining the Board's view as your financial advisor. A motion was made
and seconded (Pohl-Anderson) that Resolution 14 be adopted. Motion
carried and resolution adopted.
Traffic Circulation;
Cole reported to the Board that she met with Dick Bauman on May 1 from
Transplan Associates, Inc. He will be preparing a proposal for the
Board's review with regard to alternatives for the one-way traffic
circulation system. Cole asked the members of that committee (Anderson,
Pauley and Widmer) if they could prepare a list for her of performance
criteria in terms of what those alternatives should be. Cole needs to
get this to Dick Bauman as soon as possible. If any of the other Board
members have opinions with regard to the one-way traffic system, Mr.
Bauman needs that information as soon as possible.
Parking Analysis;
Cole developed an 8-point parking analysis to be undertaken by Bob
Josephs, Landscape Architect, which she read to the Board. Rate of
compensation for Josephs would be $7.75/hour under a contract labor
agreement which means that we would be paying him about $7.00 after
social security and would pay him every 14 days. He would submit a
bill every 14 days and we would have to pay him within ten days following
receipt of the bill. If work in excess of 40 hours/week is requested by
the Authority for a specific project, an overtime hourly rate which is
acceptable to both parties shall be negotiated. Reimbursable expenses^
are basically the same as with Design Studios West. There is an additional
retainer clause related to under 50 hours of work in a 2-week period.
Cole and Windholz will meet with Josephs to review the contract and
report on it at the next Board meeting.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
May 2, 1984 - Page Four
Resolution 15;
Cole read the Resolution and motion was made and seconded (Pauley-Moss)
that Resolution 15 (A Resolution of The Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
Approving an Agreement With Ruth Watson for the Purchase of Real Property)
be adopted. Motion approved. Tim Asbury asked if there was a dollar
amount agreed upon and what it was. Chairman Phares stated that the
dollar amount was $79,500.
Planning Commission Liaison;
Moss introduced Steve Komito, liaison from the Planning Commission to the
URA.
Streetscape Construction Committee;
Anderson stated that weather permitting, the mason should have all the
bricks down on West Elkhorn in 2 weeks. Lightpole bases on south side
will be put in this afternoon or tomorrow. Tree grates will be in possibly
by Friday, May 4 and medallions completed the end of this week or next week.
Traffic will be open Saturday and open permanently from this point on. The
street might have to be closed sometime next week for a day as curbing is
poured in front of Grandpa's and in that area. They will be working this
Saturday.
If good weather prevails, the south side is tentatively scheduled for
completion at the end of May or first of June, except for the area in front
of Grandpa's which may take an extra week. Cole reiterated that one-way
traffic would be open this weekend and from then on. Anderson stated that
it might have to be closed from time to time for work to be done. Cole said
that if anybody had any questions to call Bob Ault because he is the person
responsible for closing the street if safety problems arise.
Cole read a memo to the URA Board from Cole regarding concern over the
color of the light source on the new streetlights. It is Cole's recommenda
tion that we keep the high-pressure sodium light decided by the Board at the
end of 1983. Anderson stated that the merchants are concerned about what
the lights are going to look like. Light from their own stores will be a
major factor more than the color of the streetlights. Motion was made and
seconded (Pohl-Pauley) that we continue with the lights that are on order.
Moss questioned that if we went with a 20" globe would we have to order all
new lamps. Cole said we would have to order new globes if we went to a
different light source. Changing the light source would result in a 40%
increase in material cost and less energy efficiency. Motion approved.
Confluence Park Committee Report;
Moss received a letter from Stanley Anderson, Vice-President, Acquisitions
Colorado Capital Management, Inc. The letter refers to confluence park
development. Colorado Capital Management believes more information is
needed before a knowledgeable developer will make the necessary commitments
to this project. Moss suggested we write to Colorado Capital Management
and see what their fee would be. In that way, their analyses would be on
record for any developer who would be interested in doing the project. Moss
believes Colorado Capital Management does have the capabilities to undertake
this work. Pauley stated that this type of information is necessary but
perhaps we should submit this to bid and suggested BBC as an example
because of their experience in our community. Cole recommended that the
information be packaged in such a manner that would be familiar to
developers rather than public agencies. Cole stated that BBC indicated
that such work could be better done by a development firm. Windholz
suggested the possibility of having a person or company who might ultimately
be selected to do the development provide this type of information. Cole
said that John Gunyou recommended the firm of Harlan & Miles, a real estate
development firm.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority
May 2, 1984 - Page Five
Cole has not had an opportunity to call Bill VanHorn or John Wheeler
and wondered if someone on the committee could set up a meeting with the
Confluence Park Committee (Development Committee) and them regarding
Stanley Village.
STAFF REPORTS:
Cole:
Cole notified the Board of the Colorado Municipal League Conference to
be held in Vail June 19-23. Cole will be attending one or two days and
Windholz suggested that Chairman Phares and Moss attend regarding T.I.F,
financing. The motion was made and seconded (Pauley-Anderson) that
Cole's travel, lodging and meal expenses to Vail be covered by the
Board. Motion approved.
Cole stated that the URA Staff is no longer under the town pension
program and are presently in violation of the IRS. Chairman Phares
said he would deal with this and would talk it over with Windholz
after Windholz contacts Greg White. Pohl read from the URA Bylaws,
Section lOA, Page 3 and questioned the "Urban Renewal Law". Windholz
said that the purpose of that section is that the Authority is
authorized to hire personnel (staff) to carry out its functions under
the Urban Renewal Law.
Motion was made and seconded (Moss-Pohl) to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned.
Motion carried.
Donna Heifner, Recording Secretary