HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1998-04-21BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
April 21,1998
Commission:
Attending:
Also Attending:
Chair A1 Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Alma Hix,
Edward Pohl and David Thomas
Commissioners Brown, Burgess, Sager, and Thomas
Trustee Liaison G. Hix, Town Attorney White, Direetor Stamey, Senior
Planner Joseph, Public Works Director Linnane, Recording Secretary
Botic
Absent:Commissioners A. Hix and Pohl
Chair Sager called the meeting to order at 1:33 p.m. and welcomed Commissioner Burgess to
another six-year term on this Board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the March 17, 1998, meeting were approved with a request from
Commissioner Thomas to review the tape to clarify the inconsistency in item 2.a.
regarding who made the motion. Subsequent to this meeting the tape was reviewed and
the following correction has been made.
“It was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) to favorably recommend to the
Board of Trustees approval of the Amended Plat of Lots 7,8, and 9, Ft. Morgan
Colony Addition, ...”
VACATION RENTAIv UPDATE (Director Stamey was not present during this
discussion.)
Attorney White reviewed the history stating that since passage in the 1980s, there has
been no allowance of vacation/transient (less than 30 days) rentals except for
Commercial Accommodations businesses. Options include: continuing as we have with
the joint commission addressing the issue, a moratorium, regulation of particular
zones. If this issue is to be regulated, Mr. White recommends the Planning
Commission amend the current Code which would involve public hearings by Planning
Commission and Town B oard, and final action by the Town B oard. A third party survey
was completed by Ed-Venture Associates, Inc., Richard S. Putney.
Chair Sager stated Staff is requesting a recommendation to Town Board. If a change is
recommended, public hearings will be held by Planning Commission and Town Board
and existing uses would be grandfathered. Senior Planner Joseph noted that the third
party survey included data from: Berthoud, Fort Collins, Loveland, Breckenridge,
Durango, Frisco, Glenwood Springs, Silverthome, Steamboard Springs, Summit County
(Colorado), Jackson (Wyoming), Park City (Utah) and Teton County (Wyoming).
Audience comments included the following:
Tom Melton, in Town resident. He expressed concern with lack of past enforcement
and opportunity for citizen input. Mr. Melton was a weekly renter in the 70s and is
opposed to the enforcement of the existing Code, stating those with limited incomes
need rental revenue to pay mortgage payments.
Howard Speer, Fall River Estates. He recently realized this is happening, is concerned
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - April 21,1998 Page 2
with lack of enforcement and is opposed to allowing vacation rentals.
Annie Raccine, Range Realty. She stated weekly rentals are paying sales tax, this issue
may be addressed through covenant changes and is opposed to the Town taking over and
‘policing’.
Jim Czarnowski, also representing his parents’ Tom and Patti, Fall River Estates.
He questioned zoning an area residential if commercial activities are allowed and noted
buyers have ‘residential’ expectations. He urged the Commission to take a stand and
stated a moratorium will be unsatisfactory.
Dona Williford, Charles Heights (County), E-Estate. There is a rental property in her
neighborhood which brings van loads of people. She has expectations for her home and
urged the Commissioners to take action restricting vacation rentals which she
anticipates will be followed by the County.
Dominick Taddonio, Windcliff (County). Mr. Taddonio stated he had been an
observer in today’s Study Session and stated his opinion/clarification on issues
discussed in the Session (takings, buyers expectations regarding zoning distinction of
short term/long term). He related his negative neighborhood experiences of short term
renters. He does not understand the sales and commercial taxes which may impact
EVRD and Park School District. He cautioned grandfathering, as this may set a
precedent for other issues to be grandfathered.
Commissioners Discussion. In response to Mr. Melton’s comments. Commissioner
Thomas reviewed the history of the February 17,1998 Planning Commission meeting
and Mr. Thomas’ request for a third party survey. Commissioner Brown questioned the
idea of covenants to restrict usage; Attorney White stated covenants work well at a
project’s beginning. Commissioner Burgess noted that not all areas have covenants and
stated she has received numerous telephone calls from people who were unaware they
could complain about the illegal vacation rentals in their neighborhoods. Chair Sager
sated the Ordinance should be enforced and rewritten to reflect community desires.
Commissioner Thomas agreed with Chair Sager.
Commissioner Brown stated the B oard has heard the viewpoints expressed and he would
encourage the Estes Valley Planning Commission to address this and to not make
changes for one summer which may not be dealt with appropriately. Recognizing this
issue demands addressing, it was moved and seconded (Brown/Thomas) to favorably
recommend to the Board of Trustees that the Estes Valley Planning Commission
give consideration to this issue, and it tied with the following votes. Those voting
“Yes,” Commissioners Brown and Thomas and those voting “No,” Commissioners
Burgess and Sager.
Discussion continued with Attorney White stating existing uses will be grandfathered
so ‘takings’ is not an issue. Commissioners expressed their desire to look forward in
a proactive manor.
It was moved and seconded (Sager/Burgess) to favorably recommend to the Board
of Trustees that Town Attorney White prepare an Ordinance to prohibit short
term rentals in residential zones, and it passed with the following votes. Those
voting “Yes,” Commissioners Burgess, Sager and Thomas, those voting “No,”
Commissioner Brown.
Due to prior conunitments. Attorney White was excused from the Meeting at 2:30 p.m.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - April 21,1998 Page 3
3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN
3.a. Development Plan 98-01, Lot 1, Beaver Point Third Addition, Jack
Williams/Applicant. Director Stamey joined the meeting at this time. Senior
Planner Joseph stated that Applicant needs more time to address concerns raised
by staff and has agreed to continue this item until May. Applicant’s
representative, Ross Stephen, stated agreement with Mr. Joseph. It was moved
and second (Brown/Burgess) to continue Development Plan 98-01, Lot 1,
Beaver Point Third Addition, until May 19, 1998, and the motion passed
unanimously.
4. SPECIAL REVIEW
4.a. Amended Special Review 97-02, Lots lA and 5A of the Amended Plat of
Lots 1 and 2, Lee and Alps Addition and of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A
and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, located in the NE V4 of the SW V4 of
Section 25, T5N,R73W of the 6th P.M., Lynn W. Kinnie/Applicant. This is
a request for amendments to the lighting and P.A. System for the Miniature Golf
Course. Chair Sager opened the Public Hearing. Applicant’s representative. Bill
Van Horn, explained the request and noted that if they comply with staffs
request to shorten the light fixtures from 12' to 10', the illumination will be
reduced and will require additional light fixtures. Mr. Van Horn submitted
pictures of the eastbound and westbound profiles. The proposed light style was
selected because of the similarity to the downtown lights (tear drop/gooscncck).
The request for the height reduction was not due to a traffic safety issue and Mr.
Van Horn questioned what will be gained and noted this will be a problem with
the overall lighting design. In response to Chair Sager’s concerns with the
proposed spot lights, Mr. Van Horn noted they will be totally directional,
directed at ground features and will not produce off-site glare. They will
provide short distance lighting and if problems arise, they will be
addressed/corrected. The foot bridges plans show lights at both ends and none
in the center at this time. The second part of Applicant’s request is to utilize a
public address system to assist in management of play on the course and
possible background music. Currently a ‘bull hom’ pole-mounted speaker is
utilized (on the old course). Approximately 20-25 speakers (disguised as
enhancements to the decorative scheme) will be installed at ground level which
will be significantly less than current system. Applicant is requesting
background music be allowed; music would not be louder than customers’
conversations. This will result in fewer conspicuous speakers, which will be
subject to testing/approval by the Commissioners. Mr. Kinnie stated the old
golf course will be removed.
Senior Planner Joseph read correspondence from Joe T. Adair, 351 Moraine
Avenue, expressing concern with sound and requesting sound be contained
within40'from the property line of Mr. Kinnie’s business. Mr. Joseph stated
his willingness to withdraw the recommendation to lower the light fixtures if
Applicant shows this will require additional fixtures. In accordance with the
original approved. Applicant has submitted photographs for staff approval which
illustrate the proposed character, color and design elements (a change from the
original Old West theme). Chair Sager closed the Public Hearing.
It was moved and seconded (Brown/Thomas) to approve the request for
Amended Special Review 97-02, Lots lA and 5A of the Amended Plat of
Lots 1 and 2, Lee and Alps Addition and of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A
and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, located in the NE V4 of the SW V4 of
Section 25, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., with the following conditions, and
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - April 21,1998 Page 4
it passed unanimously.
• All street fixtures located on the north side between the river and the
highway shall be shortened two feet (from 12’ to 10) as per Section
17.36.030 F.2.a. unless Applicant provides an Engineer’s
Statement/design sheet stating this reduction will require added fixtures.
• There shall be no glare emanating from the ground mounted accent
lighting and Applicant shall provide an Engineering Statement that it
meets Section 17.24.010 B.4.
• Sound
1. Approve the sound (P.A. system and music) subject to review by
the Planning Commission after installation.
2. The Sound System shall be in conformance to meet Section
17.24.040 and because this adjoins the C-D District, the distance
shall be lowered from 200' to 40'.
5. SUBDIVISION
5.a. Amended Plat, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Lone Pine Acres Addition, SW
corner of Raven Avenue and Lone Pine Drive, Mack Enterprises,
Inc./Applicant. This is a proposal to combine 2 lots into 1 lot. Applicant’s
representative, Ross Stephen, stated most changes requested by staff have been
made. Chair Sager questioned the utility easement. Senior Planner Joseph
requested Mr. Stephen clarify information stated in the August 12,1994 letter
written to Bill Linnane, Public Works Director, from Paul Kochevar, Estes Park
Surveyors and Engineers, Inc. Mr. Stephen stated the Applicant is aware of
(street) costs and has no problem with sharing the cost. Mr. Joseph stated staff
will follow-up with Mr. Stephen regarding labeling of lots prior to Town Board
and stated recommendation #2 of the staff report is being withdrawn. Stating
that there is no obligation to continue the 1994 process as it is a private matter,
it was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) Amended Plat, Lots 3 and 4,
Block 1, Lone Pine Acres Addition, SW corner of Raven Avenue and Lone
Pine Drive, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees with the
following conditions, and it passed unanimously.
• Prior to Town Board Staff and Applicant’s representative will resolve Lot
Labeling.
• The dedication statement shall be revised to read “drainage easements.”
• The vicinity map shall be added to the plat.
• The delineation of the utility easements at the northeast comer of the
site shall be continued to street right-of-way.
REPORTS - none.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business. Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 3:15 p.m.
JCA. LlGotj^ ')___
Roxanne S. Botic, Recording Secretary