HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1997-01-21BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
January 21, 1997
Commission:
Attending:
Also Attending:
Absent:
Chairman A1 Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown,
Harriet Burgess, John Gilfillan, Alma Hix,
Edward Pohl and David Thomas
Chairman Sager, Commissioners Burgess,
Gilfillan, A. Hix and Pohl
Trustee Liaison G. Hix, Director Stamey,
Senior Planner Joseph, Secretary Botic
Commissioners Brown and Thomas
Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.
1. MINUTES
Minutes of the December 17, 1996 meeting were approved as
presented.
2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 1997
Al Sager was nominated Chairman and it passed unanimously. Ed
nominated Vice Chairman and it passed unanimously.
It was also noted the Community Development Secretary or a
representative from the Town Clerk's Office would serve as Recording Secretary.
REZONING
^‘a• Lots 1 and 2, Mirabell Subdivision. From R-S, 1 and 2^amiiy To. E-Estate, Single Family. It was moved and seconded
i?1X) the Rezoning of Lots 1 and 2, Mirabell Subdivision From R-S, 1 and 2 family To E-Estate, Sinqle
Family, be withdrawn and it passed unanimously. 9
ctfj:-- ?.P!Cial .feVi!W 97~lf LOt 2’ Thirteenth Fairvi.y gubdivision,—Brodie Avenue and Matthew Cfrcit-. mil,
?^VelOPnl^nt ^Llqhth°USe Group/Applicant-.: This is a requelt
for construction of 54 condominium units. Chairman ^arror- opened the Public Hearing. Applicant'rrJpreeentaSve
l99fielSr' expl®lned tl!:LS item was presented at the December
1996 Plannj^g Commission meeting as a discussion item onlv
regarding the road system. The Plan today has bee? altered to
reduce density by two units with the sje road system as
December, recognizing it does not address all ti?CO“^er?S- There is a P°tSS?SSfor so?e tS?
traffic, the site is a three tiered configuration which allows
H=rirlnCr5aSedaV:LlUal 0pen sPace/ everyone will have their own back yard, and they have tried to save trees. The owner is
proposing to construct a concrete curb and gutter, 24' wide
flnSdi 5 , Sldev?lks' two traffic calmers which will be lighted
parkin<?dSbaved‘ H^herG Wl11 °ff street Pai^king and one parking bay. He expressed agreement with all staff
recommendations except including a disclosure statement in
Sa^et.T:0ntXaCtS* However/ he did agree to meet with the EVRPD
Staff to reduce conflicts and stated the owner is
willing to financially contribute to make changes.
S.taiIie.y clarified that the Town's position is to work with the Applicant to find a mutual solution regarding the
fai^ay. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report
4-thf4:XeaSOnS Why 1rhis ProP°sal is a Special Review and noted staff is recommending a street name change that does
not begin with 'Elk Ridge'. Director Stamey reviewed written
correspondence received from: Bettie Chamberlin - 134?
Matthew Circle, Jack Endacott - 1350 Matthew Circle, Estes
Park Mountain Fairways, Inc., and Christopher Downs of
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - January 21, 1997 Page 2
Harding, Shultz and Downs - 1200 17th Street, Suite 1950,
Denver, Colorado.
Audience comments were heard from Lew Wallace, 1433 Matthew
Circle, President of Estes Park Mountain Fairways, Inc. who
submitted a Petition on behalf of the EPMFI residents
protesting the extension of Matthew Circle or any other street
system that would connect their Association with the proposed
Elk Ridge Subdivision. He expressed concern with the 22'
width of Matthew Circle, traffic issues of children and
vehicles, golf carts, etc. and believes this proposal is poor
planning and create an unsafe situation.
Jim Smith, 1437 Matthew Circle, was concerned that an
existing trash bin and area used for stacking snow will be
eliminated with the approval of the proposal and he suggested
an alternative site for an additional road. Chairman Sager
stated the trash enclosures are on public property, it is
regrettable they were placed their initially, and up to this
time there has been no effort to have them removed.
Ed Stauffer, 1453 Matthew Circle, immediate past president of
EPMFI, stated Paul Kochevar had spoken with the Town on the
trash bin location and this was done with Town approval. He
suggested haying a cyclone fence erected during construction
and replaced with a split rail fence after completion of construction.
:^1^0 Matthew Circle, expressed concerns with traffic (senior citizens use the street as a walkway/current
Sm conJii nFr;Ct0rS/laWn.ra0WerS)- He believes the proposal
c°^slst of too many units with 100+ additional vehicles
V. • 1 e 1?e.arby affordable housing development will addmaSv0letrkfWficCh S?LTeSUlt in.the hlgaest dens??r^n to™
many traffic problems and suggested havina a second
SderstMdnCwhvy SjTUniidy Church of 1;he Rockies and did not unaerstand why this idea was previously eliminated and
requested only one access on Matthew Circle for emergency use
Dirf^tor.Linnane reviewed the meetings held over
Matthew Circle and meet Town street standard! 9 SS Wlth
Developer, Leonard Arnold, 527 Hickory Drive Birr viv?SsatfmSed ‘i113 iS t1h? 0nly d-velopne^t ha is wL^ved w^^Hi
this time, some earlier concerns have been correo+ad ana = c
the^ original1 idea" fy reC°gni2e art" un^ab!::
road ™l“ot faasaibla dueCto"slope" ""nfd church
neighborhood concerns and expresSPed interett inrbsina1r„thH
??JgSoSrtowithd Wite?ed .Stree?s and Srde™!ks and wni S?e
$10,000 towards mitigation of potential golf course probllms.
Commissioner Gilfillan joined the meeting.
increasedetraffit:2an^1+hned,CJ:r8lt' exPressed concerns with increased traffic and the diminishing view and questioned the
ownership status of the property. Mr. Kochevar stated tho
fpP1^ca1tfon bas. ,the signature of the current land owner and
remain^11Cant; hS seller has chosen to have the For Sale sign
Frank Grimm, 1445 Matthew Circle, stated the orooosed
driveways will cross private property and he was alsoPtold by
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - January 21, 1997 Page 3
Mr. McKinnon an easement existed. Director Stamey stated the
easement is unrelated to the street dedication, and no gap
®^ists between the street R~0—W and the east property line.
Donald Anderson, 1410 Matthew Circle, emphasized his concerns
with entrances and exits and believes the road by Community
Church should be considered.
Lew Wallace, 1433 Matthew Circle, read a section from the
easement, expressed drainage concerns and believes the church
entrance can be utilized as an entrance.
Chairman Sager closed the Public Hearing at 2:42 pm.
Director Stam^ reminded the Commissioners that a motion would
need to specifically address items 1-4 in the staff report.
Commissioner A. Hix stated she was sympathetic to Matthew
residents and was uncomfortable with the street plan
sP°nsej_to her question on the two unit density
bonus, Mr. Kochevar stated the living areas of 39 units will
face the south and Code would allow 3.9 units, however, they
re only requesting 2 units. Chairman Sager stated it is
ai}reasc>na^le/ uud unnecessary to approve a proiect which Kill result in an inmedlate request Yor a ff?bJck
c°imnissioner pohl expressed his sympathy to current residents and suggested adding another entrance current
WorkiCsubSttedrtnt?? L^fnane einPhasized the memo from Public worxs submitted to the Planning Commission statjnrr
clarified qthlt tL C<M^thSew0nSrcle ^ Director Stamey
property line was originally dedicatL i 1i>1ng eastlocating the future Street Yconnection. ll0W flexiblllty
e?^lne°mne\rt "“"ieSoffelhf iTsu^^^^ \his having
hLn^l^e^tdaffeCstu^oratS and hnoSK btf t^r^tr^^^fiSd9
overrule staf f PP H? beUevL 0"'1SSion is P=^°P°=ing to
improved plan with support fromtthe Fire61!!4 pr°P°Sal is an
works and Planning stHf. Discussion crnUn5ed nt' PUbliC
seconded (^ager/GilfillSn)arSDeciaie?ted' it; was moved and
Development, Lot 2, IhirtSn?i e“eVlew 97_1' Elk Ridge
favorably recommended “ the Board31^^ Su‘>di''ision, be
following findings and conditions »UStees ”ith the
following votes: those voting "Yes" ’ 1 passec! by th®
Pohl, and Sager, those voting "0^ '.f ™ ?lonsrs Gilfillan,A. Hix. voting no", Commissioners Burgess and
• Deny solar bonus.
• Approve street layout as presented.
• Remove on-street parking.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Conunission - January 21, 1997 Page 4
• The 30' perimeter setbacks, with the exception of the parking bay, be met.
• Sidewalks to be 5' in width.
• Drainage improvements along Brodie Avenue are to be
designed so as not to interfere with future pedestrian and bike paths.
• Developer to change the name of Elk Ridge Drive.
• A water main construction plan and a roadway plan and
trf^iC ,,calmern details to beYp?ovided.
The 'calmer“must have a street light and be designed to provide traffic safety. -Lyneu to
• Trash bins on adjacent Mountain Fairway Circle must be
Beel0eCloTer toifc°^odattthe proposed roa^ connecSon!
Developer is to work with the Mountain Fairwav
Association to relocate the trash enclosures. Y
diLusJerelatedhaol1f meet Wi-th T°Wn and EVRPD Staff to aiscuss related golf course issues.
5. DEVELOPMENT PT.AKTR
Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report statina
the proposal has been revised to Sude 2ta?f
recommendations in the staff report and a concept sK?ch
plan has been submitted, for other ad-ifl<-an+-
street
'I- - “inS
shared between Lots. 9Respondina tiVThay-S W:Ll1 n0t be
to0Srerdn1S«t?fira“S4j^ Wi^ioerf a^a^ h2 ™ s daegS^
2 Lot 55 « j* W1<f/Bu.r9ess) Development Plan #97-
f oUowing' conditions,° andU“1;aSSis°ed nnan&ty With the
pJ^Wninian and Tnot^t^b3
added stating "All dif^urbemias shall be
gras^mix. »r°m eroslon and b® reseeded with native
One handicap adaptable unit should be identified.
• A note to be added to the Plan statina "Al 1
improvements shown on the Plan must be installed or
?S?nSnyd"Pri0r t0 iSSUe 0f a final Certff?ci?d of
5-b* g-eveioP"»ent Plan 97-3, Lot 26. Ranoh Subdivic1nn
T5iS tn9UebSull1dSinSr
have been worked out with Public Works. The?e is a 30^
emergency access easement located along the east property
line of this lot which will need to be kept clear of
thJe^se nf°th®r imProveinents which might interfere with he use of this easement by emergency vehicles and a note
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Conunission - January 21, 1997 Page 5
to this effect should be placed on the Development Plan.
Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn was present.
There were no comments or questions. It was moved and
seconded (Burgess/A. Hix) Development Plan #97-3, Lot 26,
Ranch Meadow Subdivision be approved with the following
conditions, and it passed unanimously.
• Surfacing: The asphalt surface to be identified
with a note on the plan.
• Access: A note to be placed on the Development Plan
stating: "The emergency access easement located
along the east property line of this lot will be
kept clear of trees or other improvements which
might interfere with the use of this easement by
emergency vehicles."
• Utilities: It will be the Developer's
responsibility to relocate any obstructions in the
emergency easement if any emergency response agency
determines it is necessary. This will be done
prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
• Landscaping: The Planning Commission approves this
planting plan and the proposed sizes. A note to be
added stating "All disturbed areas shall be
protected from erosion and be reseeded with native
grass mix."
• A note to be added to the Plan as follows: "All
site improvements and landscaping shown on this
Plan must be installed or guaranteed prior to issue
of a final Certificate of Occupancy."
• One handicap adaptable unit should be identified on
the plan.
6. REPORTS/OTHER
Director Stamey reported Larimer County Planning Commission
unanimously adopted the Comprehensive Plan on December 18,
1996 with minor language modifications and the areas
identified for special study (Giant Track and Fall River).
There being no further business, Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 3:40 p.m.
J
Roxanne S. Botic, Recording Secretary