HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1995-01-17BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
January 17, 1995
Commissioners:
Attending;
Also Attending:
Absent:
Chairman A1 Sager, Commissioners Mark
Brown, Harriet Burgess, John Gilfillan,
Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas
Chairman Sager, Commissioners Brown,
Burgess, A. Hix, and Pohl
Trustee Liaison Dekker, Community
Development Director Stamey, Clerk
01 Connor
Commissioners Gilfillan and Thomas
Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 P.M.
1. MINUTES.
Minutes of the December 20, 1994 meeting were approved as
submitted.
2. ELECTION OF 1995 OFFICERS.
It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) Al Sager be elected
Chairman and it passed unanimously. It was moved and seconded
(A. Hix/Brown) Edward Pohl be elected Vice Chairman and it
passed unanimously. It was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess)
a representative from the Town Clerk's Office be elected
Recording Secretary, and it passed unanimously.
3. SUBDIVISIONS.
3. A. Portion of Tract 65, Fall River Addition. Penny
Kane/Applicant - Request Time Extension. In a letter dated
December 27, 1994, Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar
advised that on January 18, 1994, the Planning Commission
approved the preliminary plat for development of this
property. Ownership has changed, and the new owner would like
to pursue the subdivision. To allow filing of the final plat
in accordance with the Commission's approval of the
preliminary plat, the Applicant is requesting a one-year time
extension. Sale of the property is scheduled May 1. Mr.
Kochevar confirmed that the new owner does recognize all
requirements and conditions associated with prior approval of
the preliminary plat. As there were no comments from the
audience, it was moved and seconded (Brown/Burgess) the
request for a one-year time extension from January 17, 1995 be
approved, and it passed unanimously.
4. DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
4. A. Development Plan #95-1 - Lot 2, EPOC Subdivision of a
Portion of Lot 31. Manford Addition, Estes
Appliance/Applicant. Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar
stated that this proposal is for the construction of a new
building, serving as a repair and retail sales facility. The
first phase of this building will be 2,400 sq. ft. and it is
to be completed by September 1, 1996. The second phase will
be an additional 1,200 sq. ft. to be completed by February 1,
1998.
Parking. Parking is to be phased with seven spaces being
proposed for Phase I, and three spaces for Phase II.
Due to a meeting with staff, the following changes were made:
parking has been moved back on Graves and Community Dr. to
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - January 17, 1995 - Page 2
obtain the 15' setback; a 5' setback was obtained for the
storage enclosure; the sidewalk has been reconfigured to
include a ramp for the handicapped parking space; added a note
to the plan that any materials inside the storage enclosure
must be I* below the top of the fence; changed the Rose Glow
Barberry shrub to a Yellow Currant; added a note stating that
a buried electric line runs 5' north and the entire length of
the southern property line; future parking areas will be
seeded, not asphalted in accordance with the phasing concept;
the Applicant was in agreement with other staff
recommendations.
Community Development Director Stamey reported that standards
require 12 parking spaces for Phase I not seven as proposed,
and 6 spaces are required for Phase II not three as proposed,
resulting in a deficit of eight parking spaces. If the phased
parking concept is accepted by the Planning Commission, the
Town Attorney has suggested the development plan be recorded
to ensure that any subsequent owner of the property is
notice that there is a requirement for Phas®^ Sar^inI^T-ncted
minimum, 12 parking spaces for Phase I should
at this time. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that two
will be parked outside, along the east side of
the driveway. These trucks will remain only until
parking spaces are needed.
There were no comments from the ^u.d;^encf*., comments/questions inoluded: a portion of th® APPlfcant s
Statement of Intent was read aloud - town notes a
later date that additional parking is "®eded'rI!fneye w%1Jr ltySsJsSSSH.i'S&sir.s”;
of the fence (a total of 7').
There being no further discussion, it "_ais “°yedL“”a Epoc
SubdivisionHbe)app?ovedPwl?h the following conditions, and it
passed unanimously:
Where the business vehicles will be parked.
1.
2.
3.
The owner petition for inclusion in the UTSD.
All site improvements be completed Prior
issuance6 of I Certificate of Occupancy, or an
Improvement Guarantee be provided.
4. The Development Plan be reoorded tf°oren|nrnotice concerning the parking tor any
property owner.
5. annexations.
5.A.__Grey Fok Annexation^^ana ^apdliclnt" Chairman sager
Additions, Dick and -----This proposal consists of the
opened the public hearing. Ta1^celP totalling 51.84 acres,
annexation of two con^;Lg property to the Town of EstesThe plan is to anne^..tah,ePneJ^tions to meet the contiguous
Park through two sequential annex t ^ Town f or E-Estate
boundary rec5uireme1ntTJa docei^tative Bill Van Horn noted thatzoning. Applicant's Representative Bill iot single_faItlily
the Applicant is |ly E_Estate in the County, thedevelopment; zoning is currenriy
.T^nnexation and FirScVa3arnmdan Ssagi^
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - January 17, 1995 - Page 3
owner is requesting E-Estate Town zoning; and all municipal
services can be extended to this property.
Concern was expressed with the proposed single connection
route from Larkspur—the Commission is on record that such
single connections are unacceptable. In addition, CDOT should
be approached prior to consideration by the Planning
Commission. Mr. Van Horn stated that there are physical
limitations to obtain a secondary connection, and the owner
has met with CDOT although an application has not yet been
filed, and Town support was requested. Based upon density and
road connection concerns. Commissioner Brown urged the
Applicant to sequentially file all future additions.
Additional discussion followed: probability of an Annexation
Agreement for the balance of the property, requiring a
petition to be filed for the remaining property within 60 90
days; the Third and Fourth Additions will also be sequential;
and a 2%-acre tract will not be annexed.
There were no comments from the audience. The Commission
questioned whether the Applicant would ^^ that
Aareement relative to road connections, and staff advised tha
concerns should be addressed during preliminary plat
SoSsideratfon. There being no further teStimony, chaxrman
c?aaer closed the public hearing. Therefore, finding that i
?s9f^ the Town's best interest to annex the site, it was moved
and seconded (A. Hix/Burgess) Grey Fox faV0rably
second Additions, including E-Estate zoning,
recommended to the grSYes" 'commissioners Burgess,
i!1Hix!Lnp9ohT and sager 4°osTvoting "No.' connisalonen Brown.
s. B. Grey Fox_Estates. Preliminary Plat,—Pjck ;.;iow;k;ollVant Grey Vox Estates_a't Cedar Kiaga^x.x^.e^a
single-family subdivision. Th with scattered Ponderosa
from relatively flat open grass ^1^hi/C0anttsefeeeper slopes
Pines, to dense pP,nder°s<LoaDnDdJa^^^^ subdivision
that lead to granite out?ropPi”^S‘ D^oxi^ateiy 1.54 acres to
consists of 18 lots ranging Pp limited to single-family3.86 acres. This subdivision will be limirea uo y
uses only.
Mr. van Horn individually reviewad^^jll^ r16oiu|taff
recommendations fipdin? tW°hPrroadY tangent standard for theentryS^oad, e3a^^^defe^°the S Saddlel^:]^ connection until an
entire road system plan has been submitted.
+-Viat the proposal meets minimum lot Director Stamey confirmed that t P cul-de-sacs due tosizes. The street layout nesultn “^three ou^l^ oonnections.
topographic ixl require 8% to 10% grades. Care
Much of the street lay°uipr^;L1l^rcreqtrees and rock outcroppings
inStheesel*ection<o^the n°nd^aii'3nment^^^a^f^in g^^0™^at<^the
iwfawScilf^oS Sfserved by a private drive.
Staff is concerned that the prel^inadrsY St(particularly7 at
meet the Town's grade ata^dan^^^^^^ {clrves have not
intersections), and ^^a^ h A preliminary street profile
incorporated require g • Fox Drive entrance to
determing6 wKe^thr proposed "right-of-way geometry !S
acceptable.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - January 17, 1995 - Page 4
Chairman Sager noted the difficulty in locating the centerline
of the roadway at the site as stakes had not been installed
until Monday prior to the Tuesday meeting.
There were no comments from the audience. As there were
unresolved issues relating to the road system, it was moved
and seconded (Burgess/A. Hix) the Preliminary Plat be
continued to February 21, 1995, and it passed unanimously.
The Planning Commission advised the Developer to enter into an
agreement with the Town that ensures annexation of the
remaining property to the south and secondary street
connections (to Highway 7 and Saddleback). The Commission
also requested they be given the opportunity to review the
preliminary layout of Phase II and that the roadway centerline
be staked for the entire development.
6. REPORTS.
Chairman Sager reported on the following articles; affordable
housing program in Aspen and Sterling found in the November
12, 1994 issue of the CML Newsletter; community design,
neighborhood quality, overlay zones, building alongside
streams and rivers, recovering costs of the development
process found in the August, 1994 issue of APA Magazine.
Chairman Sager invited any interested party to review the
planning articles in the Community Development Office.
Director Stamey reported that the Development Plan for the
Black Canyon Inn has been revised: Unit 1 has been rotated in
its configuration. Unit 2 has been relocated south of the
restaurant, and Unit 4 has been moved to the west. Additional
parking must be added and staff will keep the Commission
informed on this project.
Chairman Sager expressed his appreciation to former Vice Chairman
A. Hix and adjourned the meeting at 2:45 P.M.
Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk