HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1993-02-16BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
February 16, 1993
Commission:
Attending:
Also Attending:
Absent:
Chairman A1 Sager, Commissioners Wendell Amos,
Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Sue Doylen, Alma
Hix and Larry Wexler
All
Community Development Director Stamey, Public
Works Director Linnane, Town Attorney White,
Trustee/Liaison G. Hix, Clerk O'Connor
None
Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:31 p.M and
announced that the Agenda sequence would be amended.
1. MINUTES.
submitted>.f the JanuarSr 19' 1993 meeting were approved as
2. SUBDIVISIONS.
^ -'■eli-minarY Plat, Lots 5-18. M1-
Q9 time Iextension^to
would likeY to retain the ;rme/^ivnJi^tnt/.COnfirined that he
which is a replat of Mi Casa SuMn^i Green Subdivision"
hydrology reports, potential exposure of thp";• BaSed Upon associated with a deeper t4nnH r>, f ,then .1;Lne' and costs
concern with staff's recommendation APPlicant expressed
sewer be installed in U^ of ^i1n hat aJ15 diam®ter storm
Staff confirmed that the 212' oronloK0?036?!,10,, storin sewer, minimum Town standard of is" diameter • 1bo5th pre?iPitated the
to reach an agreement i j ^°wever, m an attemptdiameter with thi Applicant asffin1iU^d .fur^her discuss the
There were no other persons offerinadKf13 bein^ Prepared.
WatSof0Loeta (5Br-Wn1/aEUrv?1Ta> th| 0aaaaP‘ 9”-Y-d 1^r:tLTn:er^
subject to the foUoiing anl it pTs^e?una^taously": aPPr°Ved
1.
4.
5.
app?ovT1t.enSi0n f0r Six months from the date of
previously req'iared 3br?L c°mments/=onditions as
incorporated. Y piannin5f Commission be
practica(lWeconstruction'^conflict 1S” a
reguiS6 aPULbo1..iCEto™S se^^f^t"6 • islS^edthori Jd'S
every loo feet. r' to lnciude cleanouts
siLitttd with1th'e Pina? Plat9.6 Plan a"d pro£ile be
glJfcourl6" b°f 1dirmrtrd9etoiTOVf”eatS aoross
April or during t^rn^nth^/ttoSJr. tW° WeekS °f
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - February 16, 1993 - Page 2
Director Stamey noted that an Improvement Guarantee would also
be required with final plat submittal.
3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
^?^..D^Vel~^inent-Plan i^93~1# Lot 2* Amended Plat of Tract a.
y>oth ResuMivision. Fall River Lane - Apartment Buildings.
gp.hnson & Maria Lin/Applicant. Paul Kochevar reported that
13 proposing construction of 16 condominium
v.inour seParate buildings. A 32-space parkinq area
will be developed and there is one access point from Fall
commotio Vty (s°uth portion of each building) . There were no
(Wexler/Amo^*)1" Development11 Plan #93 iV m°Ve<I and seconded
upon the following ^and *1^ p'assed# un'anM?!0”" COnti”5-*
Fail River Lane be constructed in accordance with
first”1 building1; ^hicS^^er 'coZs Cf°™plt^tion of the
Publik^31 Department ^6<^ ll.Sst?iqiUaet?oend ^ tbe
for°the1f irstPbuilding^.SSUanCe °f 3 buildin5 Permi?
reqUeSted by the
line!'1’9 l0t t0 be screened on the west property
5' -cessThnity1;0 be deSi^Mtetl for handicapped
6' dUe““aVafndeenLct0ricnsev"/t-rel0Cated “tlUties he
to Light and Power Department1" sCtannSdtSaCst.e<S pursua"t
1.
2.
3.
7. Drainage swale be protected.
3.Be Amendment t-o soeeial t>«„4
Msociatea Prnrotl4.jl- ;f J 0 J n E . horn Ave-- ■Torrv
requesting: 1 \ rz4--------e_/Applicant. The Aor>lir,anf- 7~t~
development by 'r,eplacin?"e?Sen„t t0 the tecre^Mon pcjSI
constructed fee buildina wihh .,previously approved, to-be- oitting in this vicinity- T2) log structure that j^
placing a moved-in build in„) amendln?nt of the Concept Plan hv the pool areal tilt gAlH?S^OXilnately 25 '^54 • ,P ntrth of
bunkhouse/tack/storage* tndltVti”9 .would h® used fot
tLt thkWa?0n dinin3- and other uses'’6’'™!!’? n°nr-th balrn for use that the log cabin is in APPlicant confirmed
proposed 25'x54• buildina to hf f “a?or modification; the
be placed on a foundation S moved-in is well-built wlv?
be constructed; a permit has6 h)aint^ anc^ a front porch will barn and the Applica^ i-A ® b n obtamed to reinforce thl
this time. Wranglers3will0?!116^111115 a Portion of the
building. The north sidi S thl1! bS housed iu the moved-in
and the use will becomJ «fat barn wal1 will remain opll
loldd •tbat aPProximately %-acrtaitwnh dltlr' Paul Kochevar
condominium association was iby the adjacent
original Elkhorn Lodge submittal lncluded in theomittal of the Concept/Development
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - February 16, 1993 - Page 3
Plan--this area is not owned by the Applicant. Mr. Kochevar
confirmed that he personally inspected the proposed building
to be moved-in and it was found to be in good structural
condition. Chairman Sager announced that discussion would be
heard on each separate proposal. Fee Building; concern that
the building has been on the site for an extended length of
time and was placed on blocks, and the roofline is
swaybacked". The Applicant stated that the building will be
placed on a foundation and that he will change the appearance
eventually. Bunkhouse Building (moved-in) ; potential lack of
restroom facilities and time schedule for project completion
Slb;L-Vity tlifr®of* The Applicant responded that this building will not be moved-in until the foundation is
anrfStrUCT:^d* APPlicant will connect into existing water^d gas lines to supply such to the bunkhouse. Town Attorney
coiforSaany °.ccuPancy the bunkhouse required
conformance with the Building Code. Barn; parking—the Code
ISnilr S¥? loarrkin09„faorr:aS„';ePU„r74eWthf
B?rs°h?
thS'the Si^?s€riILurT"H?sl9l0cruV“the Zoning code does contain nn<ttt0rne^ White confirmed that
of ^theSpremise °lLrVaif ”°lr?0tnhEarf-'y-°”0^U-
srt^vfnL"?tSr“^^
Comments from the public were heard fr/im. m-concerns); Raymond Etmond «?orr-0+-^rd /5f0nL’ .Roy Jones (noise
(western boundary encroactoent ai?nd-0inianiUln Association
concerns); Patty VandergriffTcond««’^"^’ inadequate parking
concerns to Fall River) ;^nd David3^*^^^^111 ASmn* Mgr* (access
to existing regulations anv roric^beC!k°r/ Trustee (pursuant
building must meet curreSY BuildiS«Ctrt0 the “oved-in
building could possibly reqilire In °de • standards/* the
Director Stamey acknowledged lei^int of engineer's stamp).
Mr. and Mrs. Wayne Scarblouoh t Sp.ondence from
property and status of the5*^ lil °°ndition of the
(appearance of the loa buiid^-nllg bnilding); Eleanor Owen
accumulation, suqaest9 dill , g) ' and Patricia Newsom (junk
development)! M|gg2\ht0u?ircno'ren?idPtehrat? Pri°5 .to fni^hS
the existing construction materials I a cfrtain amount of
economical, the remaining “f" WhS"
seconded9(th^1 ^endment"^to' th^t Was —
Development Plan to replace a hf the Recreation Pondon-site log struetnrotl a new structure with an exiatinibuilding he3 p^acea^n . "fouZlZZ |SS^i<,adl <“ ^
Cede, (2) all exterior renovation to the Buil<Iing
repair of the windows and dOO^ OO-coTT.V^11!9- of the deok»
to eliminate the swavback annal-.. 6 construction of the roof
application of an awSOOiat? fln^sh'O; frS,hia3le roof' “d
conformance be completed h the lo9s> ^ a»d D.B.c.
It passed by the followYnq votesCaVatJsn °f the I’on,,' and
Commissioners Brown, Burgesi 9Dov^on o Those voting "Yes"
voting "NO" Commissioners tooO anl A. HiOf and "eXler- Those
hetWaapprmo0vVeedd contingent BUakh— Building
building, and parkinc ^ . work on the pond.
building on-site, andP(2) renovation1?*11 prlor to “oving the
installation of restroim’
BRADFORD PUBLISHtNG CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - February 16, 1993 - Page 4
Building Code, prior to occupancy, and it passed by the
following votes; Those voting •'Yes” Commissioners Amos, Brown,
Burgess, Doylen, Sager and Wexler. Those voting "No"
Commissioner A. Hix. Staff confirmed that the Applicant was
cited into Municipal Court with respect to junk accumulation,
thus this item would be resolved at that time.
®arn* The Planning Commission determined that the proposal
the b.arn incomplete. As the Applicant failed to
address substantial concerns on the barn conversion respective
to the public health, safety, and welfare, parking, and time
limits on music, it was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) the
request be denied, and it passed unanimously. Applicant was
advised to amend the development plan to show required parkina
tSdo?i^Liinpr0ytI^ents for this use* If the Applicant desires
nLd ?Sebe ICbSi?eI?gUeSt' ^ °Vera11 develoP”>e"t Pl« will
Sa3^0npSMger Fo^1?bfban 8-”inute recess; the meeting reconvened
"Rules of conduct" we?e rel^aloud.311 ln attendance' established
4.CONSOLIDATED REVIEW of North Meadow CondominiumsDevelopment Pronnaal Northwest Corner of Raven Avenue and DrGulcn Roads Richard Wille/ApplieaTif-,
Brfub^ris!;n(ro"V„m.vnar\ri“/„n^^ f1-- Part
Park Resubdivision consTsts "f n ^ 1?t- The
approximately 18,000 so ft 4-13 ^ots; 12 lots are
Three curb cuts and frontaae’mart ^r0n^ .onto Dry Gulch Road,
these lots. Lot i extends ProPosed to serve
subdivision, consisting of08 Jestem edge of the
Raven Avenue. Bill Van Hom 8 acres af)d secured access from
commented that the Statement of lStSntn?:ndi ApPlicant and
54 units, including seven ln^ludef a request for
4/fc. —with-the— adioini -be-eempat-ihle-
Avenue; ttr|^h!S^Petr^ridor tn1 Wk111 be from Raven
Dry Guich Road, taking advantage of sionn^SCaped alon9
Staff recommendations present no fluant open areas.Horn discussed the walkwav/fmection; however, Mr. Van
installed along the i-1 system* It could be
Gulch location. Mr. Van Horn0tind?-Y aS an altemate to a Dry "phased" and provided a su^^lrmed the pro:je^t will be
familiarity/understanding of 1 the Pi™0gra4!n to facilitate
Discussion included; review and a mPaft to the site.
Planning Commission that the d ^ determination by thenot justified, pSssiSutv OfP0 7"U.nlt density bonGs was
footprint/architectural elevatfon.^ n^^^^ more than onl
with building mass and densitv trann^^-the des;^9n, concerns
«^ade,4..llnPervious coverage, covenantitl0n/,^ Parking' average prevention. The Planm’erf cov®nants, and outside storaae
request for the 7-unit onu.? Cf^;LSSi °n de,termined that the
design were not justified?115 f0r SOlar orientation and siti
Comments from the «
(density, quality of lifeWerpolint:^d from: Walter Dunnmigration—does not objLt to diveie°n/ ^scenery. wildlife
however, he is oDoosed te development of the propertv
dev°V the ProP°sed density) ;PRonVHirvfvtr1f amended Plat to
development of the property- howevet heY (favors residential density); Ron Dutton . opposes the proposed
proposed density and called attentiony to ttlly Dl?nn (opposes were submitted containing o^ear\\rs\“
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - February 16, 1993 - Page 5
President/North End Property Owners Association (supports
replating into one lot, agrees the proposal is too dense. Dry
Gulch is the gateway to the north end, protect open space and
views); Carol Harvey (pollution, traffic); Seymour Grahzun
(density too high, quality of development is an important
factor); and Ruby Dobbins (pollution, access, traffic, over
development of the site). Mr. Van Horn and Project Designer
David Habecker offered rebuttal comments, which, in summary,
addressed the density. Following subsequent discussion, it
was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Brown) the Consolidated Review
for^ the lUnended/Preliminary Plat, Concept Plan for Special
Review #93-2 and Rezoning Request be continued to the March 16
meeting to allow sxibmittal of a revised development plan to
include reducing the density to a maximum of 47 units; design
revision to provide more sensitivity to E-Estate area at the
northwest corner of the site; move density lower (east) on the
site (e.g. two (2) fourplexes at the northwest corner rather
than two (2) 8-plexes) and project covenants, and it passed unanimously.
5. REPORTS.
dat.ed Jfnuary 29' 1993/ Robert L. Dekker requested tlme extension to complete the Pinewood Lane cul-de-sac
?ane 1' 1993 • It was moved and secIndeS
unanimously? 'eguest be approved, and it passed
m?S?ngbeatn95M0 pf.UMr.ther bUsiness' ^airman Sager adjourned the
Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk