Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1990-02-21BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission (Meeting Continued from February 20, 1990) February 21, 1990 Commission: Attending: Also Attending: Absent: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners David Barker, Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Polly Garrett, George Hix, Richard Wood All Community Development Director Stamey, Secretary Jones None 1. Chairman Sager called this meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 3:47 p.m. Special Review 90-1. Go-Cart Track, Lots—5A & 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, Applicant: Lvnn Kinnie Members of the Planning Commission and other interested convened at 3:00 p.m. at proposedogo-carteSrte SLadeve?SSent"0ni?fwafnotefthat the cart was clocked by Sf pSice DeSr^ent with a radar gun and showed to be running at speeds of approximately 15-17 mph. Chairman Sager reported h^s. noise than indicated that Pass?;^^°a^!i q ^sed in the demonstration and the one go-cart vehicle being usea in an issue> suggested the ob:] xie should be whether or not this He further suggested tha orjcropriate for the town,proposed development would be appropriate lu Director Stamey reported ^he results^^of^^^a^^telephone characteristics of the 5Crt.horsItoWas ir^Si^s fll F is concernea- The caused for the demo was a 5 hp car . Mrh Vao? lfsrsn opinion^Sbackgroundernoisetwould fovfr ?S'sSSnfol-thrgo-cart track. There was discussion regarding SomM difference between fQ°rrett suggested the test, using to 24 vehicles. Member ^Llistic one, that the data only one vehicle, was not jn(qicated there would be noise provided by the throne cart could be intrusion, and that tb® noise analysis done for anotherheard. Mr. Van Horn cited a nois y the source of go-cart track that rndrcated 3°0 J||t o£ undj fcut 50 noise, one gt't^^PlfSecIbeis at the same distance. He further sfa?fdC1/a^Jt^^^^^^^ Sr^errintdhethrandddit0iralb?r:ff!c on Highway 36. Member Brown commented that -.d^on his |e propertyEowner °tl ‘^ffSVtl^i^rc-ercfal.hre/felt the SneirtfoF this°developraent^to adverse affects. conferenoe cent=r. thede could SSSetf Wifi grow Mefet B-wnhfr ftiio?SarfflavSrSifreco^Ldation to the Town Board conditions as follows: BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - February 21, 1990 - Page 2 Applicant submit a revised site plan addressing the issues of parking, stairs, river access, lighting, landscape plan, softening of the chain link fence, the maximum number of carts be limited to 40, operating hours be from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., the maximum speed of the carts be 20 miles per hour, the development be completed prior to operation of the track, and that the engine size be limited to 5 horsepower. Member Wood seconded the motion. There was further discussion regarding town°PriMe^erSGarrett dII?Sera to Gary Coleman regarding noise^J^dth®h^JaPthe t?!apaCon 0LehebaSmdoeSn' ^ typicSircSme on the cart. andqMr!ecoSn !mmedn?he?e“LldmbI eSome emission. Member Wood asked Mr cS!tmaf alo^his experience with parking demand. Mr. Van Horn responded^^1®^e°ation onCdirt and that is a recommended modificatro Without it. Mr. Van Horn statedWthatnproposedUparkingfwasnbased on the town code and anticipated demand. Following these |iriow1s!nS 'Hemh^rBarklf lSress*°Larre0ttte4 -^^ers Brown. Sager, wood voting yes'. The motion failed. concern was expressed by Member Barker “f proPsel on neighboring property owners, noting a that the issue residential end motel development.e HerSth.s use and that he the appropriateness of tlie . be a noise problem. Zll not "convinced there would im^aot on the town Member Hlx was sS wus not sure the town needed and Member Burgess stated sne wa another go-cart track. _ h r Garrett moved to deny the application £oj_ thgMember Garrerr m Board of Trustee __ncerns recommend approval to b^!eTintrusion, environmental following reasons: Noise in negative impact on area NrS S S s ‘s;r|:k?Slin the _ the neighborhood. Members, Barker, aSVer^?^on ISd the vote was as den57^ and Membersthe motion ana tu voting yes (to >'Y.r.:l e,A 4-3.BdtSass, Garrett^ w&qH vot.ng no> ,,^3 motlon oarrie Brown. Sag . n his op.nion, the co^unity is “onfinu!ngatf Sterugg^e kth an identity problem. 5' 5.a. Director Stamey updated the Pia“in?te?,,m’tK1Co™lttee Long Range Planning too a representative from that would te.expanded to in Distt10a;„uid be made after representatives. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - February 21, 1990 - Page 3 5.b. Riverwalk Project - This item was continued to the March Planning Commission meeting. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business. Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 5:10 p.m.