The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1989-08-15BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Coinmission August 15, 1989 Commission: Attending: Also Attending: Absent: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners David Barker, Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Polly Garrett, George Hix, Richard Wood Chairman Sager, Commissioners Barker, Brown, Burgess, Garrett, Hix, Wood Town Planner Stamey, Town Administrator Klaphake, Town Engineer Widmer, Town Attorney White, Secretary Jones None Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. approval of MINUTES The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held July 18, 1989 were submitted and approved. 2. Chairman Sager presented a P^^^Ug1^°rJa^QIt^emor4ting his 3 PUBLIC HEARING 3 Pnhllr HMi-ing Dates nn pp1~it~ion for Rezonjj^ O M »aal/Hlke HcDonaia in order to ^ve eto“esSile piblio Sfa0r™agtrihfs,^eLnGiS re^uLt to following dates: Planning Commission Town Board September 19, 1989, 1:30 p.m. September 26, 1989, 7:30 p.m. . „ j votG wcLS 11113.11 iniou.s •Member Hix seconded the motron and the vote of C-D Di-trirt Itse Standards Chairman Sager opened t^®^UregardingrmSdifIcation of the referral from the Town c°"™«tcial biatrrot. use standards in _ 4-v,at the proposed modificationPlanner Stamey advised that use, but would not be permit product assembly as a ^ on Eikhorn Avenue. Hepermitted on lots that have frontag ^ouid be lim;1.ted to further stated that product parts into a finished IfselllY of previously ma^^^f1^^^^®ring of materials from product. It wouidtn°oUid10be assembly of finished components raw products, but wouxu into a finished product. There were no comments from ^]j| aedieShairmanfSager declared ^position to the. ordinance change|;beChaH,x the public hearing /,cl°aed;he ^own Board to modify the^ °recotcmendation be made to t Member BEOWn seconded Dtifm^fioUnSean|tSfvSea^al unanimous. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Coiranission - August 15, 1989 - Page 2 4. SUBDIVISIONS 4.a. Amended Plat, Lot 2, Deer Crest Subdivision, and Tracts 56 & 57, Fall River Addition Members Wood and Hix advised they had a conflict of interest and would abstain from discussion and voting on this request. Planner Stamey noted that he had a Contract to Purchase proposed Tract 57, and, therefore, had not participated in review of this subdivision. He also requested to be excused during discussion and advised that Public Works Director Widmer processed the request and would provide staff comments. Mr. Bill Van Horn, representing applicants, advised that the site consists of 26.59 acres with 3 existing lots. The amended plat proposes to rearrange ^he existing tracts in order to create one additional tract, the smallest of which would be 1.82 acres. Mr. Van Horn state that he would add a note to the plat to provide for easements for the sanitary sewer service lines. Director Widmer summarized the staff report stating ini the Deer and Lot 2, where Streamside Cabins is llllllT. p?tt would add 1.16 acres to Lot 2 on ihfeast side of the listing lotiandvinorthiOfs ^alleEiver. He further stated that amended plat rearranges composed of Tracts ^6 and pi s acc0mmodations on sl'riouil PiidthIahirrIn Tract 56A, and another residence on Tract 57. After further discus?ion, .-1^e^?rt)eBmateriallY detrimental granting of the exception . . s to other property in the lo the public welfare the petitioner is neighborhood in whlJb. the pLposes and objectives of situated or m l^C^a^^^^biYer^coL.end the amended plat StiL1TiwrLrdewittI ariSlLlng conditions: +. V.O nrnvided for sewer service to 1' TraotsS57eand 58 across Tract 56A. An easement be provided for sewer service for Tracts 56A and 57 across Tract 56. include legal descriptions of all easements on the plat. , __r^r*! oT” to Town BoaiTciAll property pins be set p approval. ai^Woofibltatltngi11" V° 2. 3. 4. ;t:es irdi-h. "r*---------------------------- Hr. Art Anderson ^Sve^^llriSSef TrS^eitf Sd a recently purchased agreement provided that the fr^igiii? iS line all Incrcachment would be corrected. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 15, 1989 - Page 3 Planner Stamey summarized the staff report noting that the amended plat adjusts the common boundary line between two existing parcels (Tracts 1 and 2) and eliminates several offsets along the lot line. He also noted that all staff recommendations had been addressed. Member Barker stated that the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioner is situated, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of Title 16, and roove^ than thjS amended plat be favorably recommended to the Town Board. Member Barker further stated that all Pr°PeJtY prior to Town Board approval. Member Wood seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous. /■ ^ Plat of 5. 6. 7 and 10, and portloDS_of Lots 8 & 9. University Heights Addition.;. aPdrifinrtSi%hrgpu?^o-ro|-eraLnret Plfd1?^ard^fStc^?LurSee?ravTlld7war™s“?t1?cc;ted noted that, nistoricaiiy, iqoq +-he alley was re-in the dedicated alley, and in 1989 the alley dedicated to match the 0o?tionf of land of rededication, =Scle« ?heimenled plat clarifies the previous alley was uncieaj- this situation. Town Attorney White "“^ed that the street ia designated^^as ..alley" on the plat this should be ^hanged^ aavised correspondence actaowledged lines on the property fhao^ldaSe -eVg!serThete was farmer diso^ion property9andait°wasSsuggested these lines be located. Planner Stamey r®corTe^^edincSdedewitrLt°8 t^maLea more the dedicated street be Arnold who was present, reasonable building site. ,I?r; ' agreed this should be accomplis Member Garrett stated that the ^^anting^of^the^ex^^P^ or will not be materially neighborhood in which the injurious to other Pr°Perty.;LncrJa “ d9 or in conflict with p?JpLty of the Pf ?l4ir 16, and ".o^d to SvorlwrSScrr^end this amended plat to the Town Board with the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. Lot 9 be identified as Lot 9A and 9B. identified as Lot 8A. Lot 8 be to Town Board 5. Add 1/8" hatched border on plat. All property pins be set prior approval. • *: T Q east of the alley,Lot 8 and the portion of Lot 9, east be combined. 1. V- corvice lines across propertiesSbe1locatedtand an easement provided. __, . ■ —ri aTld the vote was unanimous.Member Brown seconded the motion and the BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 15, 1989 - Page 4 4.<i.____Preliminary Plat, Stanley Hills Siib. 2nd Filing, Applicant: Frank Normali and Equity Performance, Inc. Planner Stamey advised the Commission that a letter had been received from Estes Park Surveyors dated August 14, 1989 regarding the above referenced property. In this letter Mr. Paul Kochevar, President, stated that the preliminary plat need only include the 9.6 acre and 8.5 acre tracts that are North and Northeast of the Stanley Hotel. In conjunction with other modifications to be presented with their development plan, this reduces their submittal f ^ lot division. Therefore, Mr. Kochevar requested this preliminary pS Sr withdrawn. He stated that,a would be submitted in accordance with Section 16.40.010 of t Municipal Code. 5. SPECIAL REVIEW SfeerLfXanriSetSeSto?r1woi0Id “alstafri^^dlscS^fo^ °ofr voting on this request. Mr. Frank Gray presented thi|u?n°f?;oSepteS9atSSLepS pCn the Planning Commission ^eviewed^^ & result of the for the Stanley Hotel. H s filed and eventually acceptance of that plan, . j 7that this Special Reviewdeveloped. He further "“^ed thatt thrs^ aPe;Lllng un^ts request proposes a Phase ed Lot 2, and one dwelling on the southern portion o p P i f med the commission that unit on proposed Lot 4. ne x locations onaScLs to ?his development wouldtbethfromdtwOan of i9?6 Steamer Drive. He. s^^^®d0roiLt multi-family units on thisthe new development plan project ™ i of density in the particular parcel of land with | la|f important to the proposed 1989 plan. He stated i system be kept as adevelopment that the J-h^rnal^ road^ ytandardS; with a private road system, intent being to controll “rerto l°aLonaain”i property and provide security for the property owners. t. mt- Burt Wadman, architectA slide presentation was shown y • historiC and scenic fs°^nJ?^SancreorPthf'stfn°lSngHotel and proposed future development.a development plan reT^rsSttefK? having1"^ concept plan review. Another area of c= -Lekpressedd -mber^^gr that not enough time wa® flvrninmission just prior to the report presented to the-, . _d this report was a result ofmS?Ing. Hr. Kochevar explained th^eJf and a nuraber of several meetings 7wJ^^lsSsabdivision, and, as a res,fl^n°* residents of stanl®y ?i-catioS were made to the original SSttrit^ft'norabifln the area of the proposed private street system. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Coitunission - August 15, 1989 - Page 5 Member Sager commented that the public was interested in knowing the details of this proposed development and did not believe a review of the changes at this meeting was the appropriate way to get the information across to the public. He complimented Mr. Wadman on the slide presentation but felt it did not bring to light all information needed. Mr. Gray concurred and at this time requested_the review be tabled until the next Planning Commission meeting. Public comment was heard from the following: Mr Brooks Findley. Stated that he is a lender on a portion of thisproperty and that applicant did not have clear title to the land, that a deed is now being litigated, which is set for trial on Sept. l. Dr. Robert Smith. Suggested there were serious legal problems with the property in question. Wr- Roland Retrum.A resident of Stanley Hills, advised the commission that the li:0^0S^d H-!!sWf5iS fcand reaSdMseLt?er L?ed°Aigist 15, 1989 Hills P.U.D., ana reau nrooosed development. j,?!°RS?uInrefta?earetirdsS?th2n a^cS^r^oint ia aXao a concern. Mr. Frank normally tCthSl?teinterestawas°in Se 9 acres faft1 cfSnLnSi anr^ng Member Burgess ?uefioned how s,thee Society views this deve p p{anner stamey advised of a in the historical r®gist® * ittelson, historical architect, phone call from Mr’ i and requested additionalexpressing concerns with Ehase I, assign; scale; placement information, (e.g. grading, and view corridors). . „ . ^ a Mr Rick Spowart, District comments were also "2d®vgion if wildlife- He suggested ravi??°used« and Wmuif deer. Qf & ^Unti:!3 §afeherhou1sr3Sgir3SL^S^^^^ l^^rih^o&sftiin^^ Off ;--:tional Member Garrett stated and info-ation Information ahbmitted by t was needed to review this provided by the Publro,amOe th.s ^“1 the neXr“and mor-d to table gthrSr(mresgu«t m“riig. Member Srs?oonl"mot!rnan| the t^S S2rSeSix abstaining “-rihe^Hlstorical Society and rirsrofof9^!^1!?^!^ the interim. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Cominission - August 15, 1989 - Page 6 6.REPORTS Planner Stamey advised the Commission that the 1990 budget year was approaching and one item that warranted consideration was updating the Comprehensive Plan and looking at preparing a new document in 1990. He recommended a 2 year process be implemented to accomplish this in order to allow for public participation, and also have adequate funding for the Comprehensive Plan. There being p.m. no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:40 Carolyn /Jonesa, Secretary