The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1988-11-15BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Coinmission November 15, 1988 Commission: Attending: Also Attending: Absent: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners David Barker, Duane Blair, Mark Brown, Polly Garrett, George Hix, Richard Wood Chairman Sager, Commissioners Barker, Blair, Brown, Garrett, Wood Town Planner Stamey, Town Attorney White, Town Engineer Widmer, Town Administrator Klaphake, Secretary Jones Commissioner Hix Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Town Attorney White advised the Commission that Commissioner Hix had ^pLsible conflict of interest on all the agenda items and, therefore, would excuse himself from the meeting. 1. approval of minutes The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held October 18, 1988 were submitted and approved. 2. SPECIAL REVIEWS Special Review #88-3r Carousel at National Park Village ^uth. Applicant: Deer Ridge, Inc,^ Hr. Roger Thorp, representing NaJi°“ii^“^sViJ^a^?opoSg presented this request =tetrng that gf ?0 thI to install a carousel x He explained that this i0n"LrnrofVlthf Ln?ury" oarousil and in such a way that would not be the need for borhood and surrounding _ are ^ntej-tainment. He further traditional, family or;L®^1 , adeguate with a maximum of 4 explained that The carousel would be placed on a parking spaces being 1°®t- ^ . moss rock with planters platform consisting of . located on each side to containing eve^gree^“Sj Pl The9 carousel would be located act as a noise buffer. The car Marys Lake approximately 200 ft. from bot Consideration sight lines Road. He stateCmh?hfftrCets to decide where to place the S?ousfia?rmiSiSenSse and lighting problems. ^ Planner Stamey re^iewedb tpJrmftted through Special Review commercial amusement may TownBoard. The two basicby both Planning Commission and Town^Boar transmission of issues regarding this proposal farther stated that the light and ^ound °ff7^maf hS to mitigate these landscaping treatments on-site may neip issues. carousel wouia provx and those over 65. Heparticularly those under 5 Years and ^erican folk art and stated that it is of a Kit Carson carousel ff^irfing?o??Stle ISplIlned the proposed inaaWeni1iniSt^Sn C0fllSSfa^S?eiLTafSuLment activities. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - November 15, 1988 - Page 2 Mr. Webermeier also stated he would work with the Beaver Point neighborhood to maintain a comfortable noise level and to minimize their concerns. Mr. Darrel Manis, 850 Black Canyon Drive, who is in association with Mr. Webermeier on this project, stf carousel is a "beautiful piece asset to the community. The music would be on_ntJPe operator controlled, with waltzes and ^°00l and 50's. He further stated they wanted to be gooa neighbors with the community and would make a special e to make sure the sound level was acceptable. The following testimony was heard in "opposition to the carousel: SafSSL'-1prLHU:?i?lSrEnt“S=e Eatates Property owners MarkWwSttlesey - owner of Lazy R Cottages Ray Lindsey - Representing EVIA Steve Komito - 151 Courtney Lane Jean Weaver - 1031 Marys Lake Road Marge Dunmire - 1352 Marys Lake Ro Dorothy Cohen - 765 Lower PartTi!lagfsou?h!%iUnMe,0l°°ariLfright!ng!1-^^ and neighborhood character concerns. Mr. Jay Grooters -ggeated an a=tive to beouCrradered useableeyear-roundUand^during infleUJnt weather. also submitted and tead corre^ondence from interested parties, all opposeaPlanner Stamey the following carousel: Sne Sireye-eL;rrtlIyVe°aa raSrk Entrance Estates Property Owners Norman Ream - 671 Heinz hwaY 7 Bob & Edna Mills Kiley - 6760 Highway Planner Stamey also ?heito?SSr °w!tr 288 signatures (submitted by Mona Mae Caldwell), all opposing the carousel. Rebuttal comment was heard from Mr. and Roger Thorp. Further discussion -"^i™^^?SrngBlrkSr sulgeSd ?he suitability of ^ ^usementS- ComraisslC,ne?town needed a policy statement on see if the carousei Brown suggested a s°^^d b the premises, and moved to music can be con^a^ned miest to the December 20th meeting continue action on investigating these issues. Motion so as to allow time.fBa?ker and the vote was as was seconded by Commissi k Blair, Brown, Sager, Woodfollows: Commissioners Bark^ , December 20th meeting, votina to continue to _ commissioner Garrett voting agains . Manis, Scott Webermeier BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - November 15, 1988 - Page 3 2.h. special Review #88-4. Woodstock Building, Lots 5 and_6 DeVille Subdivision, Applicant; Tim McPhee Mr. Bill Van Horn presented the req^esJQont.0b®onsLScttaS applicant. He stated the proposal is to office/warehouse facility of approximately 16,800 SJ- £J: ADoroximately half of the building would be devoted to office spaceT the rest would be warehouse space for the building trades. Planner Stamey reviewed the ^^aff repert stating that two construction phases_are proposedn Wrthoeeaohe Ph-Ltot.ti? g 8,400 sq. ft. 0ff . s ..Up indicated there were ma^or total of 51 spaces indicated. He indicatea driveway is concerns relating to access and should befairly steep for a oommercral ftiveway (llj) and shouldthe building'^ “e ^Iso'notefthat lo^EngS-t Widmer had made fniSe? of comments regarding the drainage plan. correspondence was acknowledged from the following review agencies: Light S Power Dept..................Sove^L3!', 1988 n?r ofHS;yr;;;;;:;::::Ho:eSber 3; i988 Town Ingfiler!!........................November 9, 1988 Town Engineer Wldmer addressed the drainage/de^^^^ be facilities and commented that all drainag^^^ He further done with the firsb Diaced between the north edge ofstated that the material p concrete curb appears the north asphalt ^ could cause the orifice pipes to to be unplanted soil. This , ld be used. Also concern plug, preferably irrigated the front of the was expressed about dd i | may not be adequate tobuilding. The small surface d£ai_odic inundation. Icing m protect the jbulld;Lngan! ?he steps could be a problemfront of the doorways and on tne suept, during the winter. Further discussion ^ollP-d^concerning wi«™%^hatdWere not addressed on the plan. dan with so many details still uncomfortable in , ^oved that this special review needing to be wof15e<^o°utn^til the next regular meeting on request be continued i rant sufficient time toDecember 20, «B8 to 9Sean.aPPJo™?ssionlr Blair seconded Strj;lt?onra0ard °trieotee wPa^anunanimous. 3. REZONING • T ? po^-■^y^inhn Addition,—froIQ. Mr. Bill van Horn submitted thrs _tequest applicant is requesting !°nQ5fgfnally zoned T-Tourist and family. This property was Ywhich time the owner b Skfd aby°real trta1te gert0thrp?efenrorr^ts Ersrisirft thwSirb 0ht Js TdvLtage, from a tak standpoint, to combine the two lot . Planner Stamey su™aritf the staff re^^ afisin^ithat comprehensive flaf JeSLfnif ?Lt sites such as thrs be BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - November 15, 1988 - Page 4 used only for scattered single-family residential use. He further advised that rezoning of Lot 2 to R-M Multi-family is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; that the site is not suited for high density development because of limited access, steep slopes, and water service elevation. After reviewing this request. Planner Stamey suggested the E-Estate zoning be retained. Discussion followed concerning combining the 2 lots without a zoning change, and calculation of density. Town Attorney White advised that it is not legally possible to place conditions on a rezoning request. If the Commission is concerned about density, conditions would need to be placed on an amended plat. After further discussion. Commissioner Wood moved to continue action on both this rezoning request and the Amended Plat until the next Planning Commission meeting on December 20. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m. Carolyn 0oneSecretary