Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1987-12-15BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission December 15, 1987 Commission: Attending; Also Attending: Absent: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners David Barker, Duane Blair, Mark Brown, George Hix, Steve Komito, Richard Wood Chairman Sager, Commissioners Barker, Blair, Brown, Hix, Komito. Wood Town Attorney White, Town Planner Stamey, Town Engineer Widmer, Secretary Jones None Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held November 17, 1987 were submitted and approved. DEVELOPMENT PLANS As a representative of the Methodist Church had not yet arrived, the Planning Commission concurred to consider Streamside Cottages at this time. 2.a. Development Plan Deercrest Subdivision #87-5, Streamside Cottages, Lot 2, Commissioners Hix and Wood cited a potential "conflict of interest" and stated they would not participate in discus­ sion or vote. Mr. Bill Van Horn, representing applicants. Bob Van Horn & Janiece Felsman, submitted the development plan and stated that applicants are proposing to construct eight additional accommodation units in two separate buildings, and a separate office/laundry facility. Streamside Cottages would then consist of a total of 14 accommodation units and one dwelling unit. Mr. Van Horn further stated that applicants are proposing to extend a 1" water line from the bridge to the south and connect to a 2" line. Water Department recommends the existing 2" line be connected to a 6" pipe instead of the proposed 1" pipe. Mr. Van Horn stated applicants would work with the Town and Water Committee on costs involved in extending the 6" main and fire hydrant. Planner Stamey presented the staff report and commented that Development Standards provide that drives and parking areas be surfaced with asphalt or concrete; however, the Planning Commission may approve an alternative surface which, because of seasonal or periodic use, will adequately prevent dust, erosion, and water accumulation. Applicants are proposing crushed granite drives and parking areas. Correspondence was acknowledged from the following agencies: Town Engineer................................December 8, 1987 Town Attorney................................December 7, 1987 Light and Power Dept..................December 8, 1987 Colorado Dept, of Highways...December 3, 1987 Public Service Co........................December 1, 1987 Estes Park Fire Dept..................December 15, 1987 Public Service Co........................December 11, 1987 BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Conunission - December 15, 1987 - Page 2 Town Engineer Widraer stated that the proposed 6" water main extension would function better for fire protection purposes if it were extended 190' south. Possibly the Water Depart­ ment could provide the 6" pipe to tie the existing 2" service together with the main extension. This would improve water circulation and pressures for Streamside, as well as adjacent property. In correspondence received from Colorado Division of Highways, it was indicated that highway width along this property, south of the centerline, was 40 ft. and an additional 10' of right-of-way should be dedicated to meet the projected traffic need. Town Attorney White commented that this was not an appropriate action. Discussion followed concerning paved driveways vs crushed granite driveways and parking areas. Applicants stated they were trying to produce a non-urban atmosphere and were opposed to using concrete or asphalt in these areas. A photo was submitted which showed the condition of the existing driveway and parking area. Chairman Sager ex­ pressed concern about erosion and sediment from the crushed granite polluting the nearby stream. Commissioner Brown stated he thought the crushed granite would be adequate for this area because of seasonal, limited use and moved for approval of Development Plan #87-5 with the following conditions: 1. The following be shown on development plan: o Sanitary sewer location and sizes o Lot dimensions o Dimensions of proposed buildings o Typical parking space/driveway dimension o Vegetation key 2. The 5,790 sq. ft. building be moved to provide 10' clearance from the existing 2" water line. 3. Provide signature of lienholders on development plan. 4. Show gas service line and easement. 5. Drive and parking areas surfaced with crushed granite, as presented. 6. Water line extension, as recommended by the Public Works Department, be subject to resolution by the Water Committee and Town Board. Commissioner Blair seconded the motion and it passed with the following vote: Those voting "yes". Commissioners Barker, Blair, Brown, Komito. Those voting "no". Chairman Sager. Abstaining, Commissioners Hix and Wood. 2.b. United Methodist Church, Amendment to Development Plan #86-2, Addition of Parking Area. Mr. Dana Wannemacher, representing United Methodist Church, presented the amended development plan and stated ap­ plicant's are proposing to construct an additional parking area on the north side of Fish Hatchery Road. This parking area would provide 18 additional parking spaces for the church. The development plan was approved by the Planning Commission in May, 1986. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 15, 1987 - Page 3 Planner Stamey presented the staff report and stated the proposed parking meets the town's parking design standards. Correspondence was acknowledged from the following agencies: Town Engineer....................................December 2, 1987 Town Attorney White.......................December 7, 1987 Light and Power Dept......................December 8, 1987 UTSD......................................................December 4, 1987 Colorado Div. of Highways............December 3, 1987 Public Service Co............................December 1, 1987 The highway department expressed concern about a portion of a granite retaining wall along the north side of the parking area touching the highway right-of-way and potentially adversely affecting the stability of the roadway embankment. The highway department also indicated that an additional 10' of right-of-way should be protected along this property. After further discussion. Commissioner Barker recommended approval of the amendment to Development Plan #86-2 with the following conditions: 1. Add to development plan: o Signatures of owners and lienholders o Vicinity map o Note indicating a completion date for asphalt paving and parking area landscaping o Radii of entrance and exit curves o Note that disturbed area in front of the parking lot, between the property line and Fish Hatchery Road asphalt, be revegetated and identify comple­ tion date. 15" driveway culverts development plan. be installed (and shown on 3. Additional elevations and dimensions of detention area be shown on Development Plan to verify required site (439 c.f.). 4. Locate natural gas lines in area prior to excavation. 5. Submit additional information (drawings) to CDOH regarding construction details of retaining wall. 3. Commissioner Wood seconded animously. PUBLIC HEARINGS the motion and it passed un- 3.a. C-0 Containment Chairman Sager opened the public hearing which was to consider adding the following performance standard to the C- O Outlying Commercial District: Section 17.16.060, B.: No principal use shall be allowed outside a building, except those permitted uses approved through special review. Planner Stamey commented that he had received expressed concerns and complaints about retail sales being conducted from a truck or trailer. Current regulations do not address BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 15, 1987 - Page 4 this issue. This provision would apply only to principal uses and not accessory uses. Additionally, if someone wanted to conduct sales out of a truck or semi-trailer, approval could be sought through special review. There was no comment from the opposition to this amendment, public hearing. audience in favor or in Chairman Sager closed the After discussion regarding application to principal and accessory uses. Commissioner Wood moved this amendment be favorably recommended to the Town Board. Commissioner Hix seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 3.b. Multi-family Density Calculation Chairman Sager opened the public hearing. Planner Stamey advised the Commission that input from Phil Herr on various methods of multi-family density calculation was forthcoming and requested this public hearing be delayed until it was received. Commissioner Hix moved this public hearing be con­ tinued until the next Planning Commission meeting on January 19, 1987. Commissioner Hix seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 4. 5. There being no 2:30 P.M. further business, the meeting adjourned at The Planning Commission adjourned to a study session to discuss the new Colorado Vested Rights statute and recent court decisions regarding land use regulations. Town Attorney White distributed a proposed ordinance which would incorporate the vested rights requirements into town regulations. Town Attorney White also distributed a memorandum outlining the recent land use decisions and potential applicability to local regulations and procedures. The study session adjourned at 3:15 P.M. rolyn