Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1986-07-15BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS /Planning Commission July 15, 1986 Commission: Attending: Also Attending: 2\bsent: Chairman A1 Sager, Commissioners David Barker, Duane Blair, Mark Brown, Mike Dickinson, George Hix, Steve Komito All Town Attorney White, Town Planner Stamey, Secretary O'Connor Town Engineer Widmer 1. Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held June 17, 1986 were submitted and approved. 2. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: 2.a. Development Plan #86-4 - Eagles Nest Resort, revised to "Golden Eagle Resort" (a revision of Crags Mountain Village): Mr. Paul Kochevar, representing the owners, presented the aforementioned development plan located on the Crags Lodge property. For comparison purposes, Mr. Kochevar displayed the Crags Mountain Village Plan. Crags Mountain Village Development Plan #85-2 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 21, 1985. The revised plan increases the number of units and proposes the same road system. Mr. Kochevar reported the actual size of the site was 23 acres which did not include the lodge area. Planner Stamey reviewed the staff report. The proposed Eagles Nest Resort revises the previous development plan in the following manner: Density - the Mountain Village was a 64-unit condominium project and the Eagles Nest Resort would range from 91 to 116 units; Development Concept - the previous proposal consisted of a combination of duplexes (15) , fourplexes (4) and sixplexes (3) and Eagles Nest identifies 25 building envelopes with either 3 or 4 units per envelope. In addition, one 12-unit building envelope was indicated; Facilities - two tennis courts and freestanding laun­ dry/convenience store were included in the Eagles Nest Resort proposal; Access - the secondary (or emergency) access road from the west has been deleted; Drainage - the proposed drainage detention pond on Lot 1, which was also to serve as parking, has not been shown as paved or as parking. Direc­ tion of drainage runoff has not been shown; Parking - with a few exceptions, driveways and garages to each unit were provided in the Crags Mountain Village proposal. Parking is now located in several parking bays along the private drive; Water Service - the Crags Mountain Village plan included a note regarding completion of a waterline loop prior to 50% of project completion; Building Envelopes - proposed building sites are generally located in previously proposed building areas, with one exception. The proposed 12-unit building is shown in an area previously reserved as open space. Due to building configuration, the cul-de-sac in the southeast portion of the site now serves increased density. Correspon­ dence was received from the following: Town Engineer.......................................................7/10/86 Town Attorney.......................................................7/09/8 6 Upper Thompson Sanitation District.....7/09/86 The Upper Thompson Sanitation District stated several defi­ ciencies were discovered in the sewer collection line serving this property. The District will not accept the sewer line, nor will they allow any further units to be connected to the BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - July 15, 1986 - Page two collection line until all discrepancy items have been cor­ rected. Discussion followed concerning the length of the proposed cul-de-sac which is 1,450' in length. The Town's subdivision standard for cul-de-sacs is 500' in length. Numerous professional planning and engineering sources have recommended cul-de-sac lengths from 400 to 1,000 feet maximum. These recommendations relate to safety and convenience concerns. Mr. Kochevar stated the reason for the cul-de-sac was to provide for future access for the property to the east. Mr. Kochevar added the proposed 12-unit building and convenience store will be eliminated. Two tennis courts are proposed; the "elevated" court could be constructed in an existing draw. Such a court would be a convenience for the occupants only. No portion of the tramway crosses the property. The property owners do not anticipate utilizing gas service. The average grade of the cul-de-sac will be 6-7% and the "switchbacks" will average 10%. Mr. Kochevar stated the owners would agree to a maximum of three dwelling units per building envelope along the cul-de-sac, for a total of 54 units; and, fourplexes on the remainder of the site, for a total of 32 units; with a grand total of 86 units plus the existing duplex. The applicants also requested the project name be revised to "Golden Eagle Resort." Following additional discussion. Commissioner Brown moved the name change be accepted and Development Plan #86-4 - Golden Eagle Resort be approved subject to the following conditions: On the cul-de-sac, construction triplexes for a total of 54 units. be limited to Provide street names. The entrance-loop street should be named a "circle"; the cul-de-sac a "court." 3, 4, The freestanding convenience store be eliminated. Dwelling units contain a minimum of 600 square feet of habitable floor area. The maximum building height be indicated on the plan. A note be placed on the plat as follows: In order to decrease the wildfire hazard identified as being on Lot 2 of Crags Addition, all new development will incorporate fire retardant shingles, and one-hour minimum fire protection construction, with surround­ ing trees trimmed away from structures. A "fire break" should be placed around the buildings, any trees should be removed within 30' of a chimney, roofs should be maintained to keep them free of pine needles and leaves, chimneys should have spark arrestors and all fireplace ashes should be placed within metal containers. 8, 9, A note be placed on the plat stating that a 6" waterline will be constructed that will loop back to Riverside Drive along the west boundary line by completion of 30 units. Indicate the drainage volumes calculated in the drainage study on the plan. Indicate the upper drainage pond parking area will be paved on the plan. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - July 15, 1986 - Page three 10. Proper execution of the signature blocks are con­ tained in the plan. 11. Prior to final approval, the Condominium Declarations and any appropriate Articles of Incorporation and ByLaws of the Homeowners Association be reviewed by the Town Attorney to ascertain whether or not they are adequate with regard to road access and maintenance. 12. No building permits will be issued until such time as all discrepancies listed in the Upper Thompson Sanitation District letter dated March 7, 1986 are corrected. Commissioner Dickinson seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 3. REPORTS; Planner Stamey presented a copy of the Larimer County Zoning Regulations which addressed Travel Trailer Parks. The Town might be limited in its ability to regulate activities that could occur on-site in the recently annexed Spruce Lake Addition due to its non-conforming status. The Town's zoning regulations did not contain regulations that apply to travel trailer parks. Upon such time as the revised residential zoning regulations are in place, the Town could adopt a modified version of the RV regulations. During the interim period. Commissioner Hix moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Trustees staff prepare a modified version of the Larimer County Zoning Regulations addressing travel trailer parks. Commissioner Blair seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. Vickie O'Connor, Secretary