HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1985-04-20BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Coitimission
August 20, 1985
Commission:
Attending:
Also Attending;
Absent:
Chairman A1 Sager, Members Duane Blair, Mark_
Brown, Mike Dickinson, George Hix, Steve Komito,
Richard Wood
Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Brown,
Dickinson, Hix, Komito
Town Administrator Hill, Town Attorney White,
Town Planner Stamey, Secretary O'Connor
Member Wood
1. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held July 16,
1985 were submitted and approved.
2. COUNTY REFERRALS:
Bixbryan ,EsXeb^P6 ircreyqprSoHjdSnumberekotRflls
Tbe size sa1c\ees^\5JtSaCJe2S;8Pacres. Existing zoning
IS. Lot 1 tC• 11 \7an 'HoTn reoresenting the owners, stated is E-Estate. Bill Van Horn, rjePr.e®en^: y_rODertv in confor-
the owners desire to better u i 1 ondence in favor of
mance with existing zoning. received. Member Hix
or in opposition to the ^equest Reauest be favorably
moved the Bixby-Van Dyke Exempti pla^n^ng Cornitlission with
recommended to the Larime OT14-oyFish Creek Road be located the condition that ^rxveways onto Cr|^^wn seconded the
to ensure adequate visibility. Memoer
motion and it passed unanimously.
2 .b. —^^i^^^^^^-Gere^:^^^epresentTr^^?hi^^3wi^^-^^^:t^
11E— 1" Estate: Giles Gere, r p ■ation have requested
the Charles Heights county Planning Commission,
uniform zoning from the La ... the itA« Accommodations The Association desires to elxmrnate the^ for the entire
zone and are ProPos1lIJ.g . District has a minimum lot size
subdivision. The E-1 Esta zoning will more appropriately
of one acre. The s in this subdivision. No
reflect existing or in opposition to the zone
correspondence 1.n !aV° jerry white/La^rimer County Planning
change was received. Member Blair moved the Charles
Office had no c°inment' pst to E-1 Estate be favorably
Heights Zoning c^^ngeT r county Planning Commission,
recommended to the <J^eU ^otion and it passed
Member Dickinson seconded the m
unanimously.
3. SUBDIVISIONS;
^7/r
3.a.
17. Block 8, C,oun1HTica3lt" — ar-nPptinc [tern @ of the
nroperty owners diffi Y . 4-hp dedication of a 10
staff recommendation concerni^g^^ Engineer Widmer and Mr.
street easement rec3u®^^ b^ix moved the Lababidi-Hurst
Widmer's ab.seIice' tabled, with further c?nsld®^atBoundary Adjustment be tab\edt scheduled meeting which is
September611985.neMeniberUBlaix eeconaea the .otron ana rt
passed unanimously. T.nt 27, Firs^
3.b. Mirabell Subdivision, aL^ The proposed sudqi-
Resubdivision °£ BuanI?t uui Lli cnH 7TT: Mount View Lane; size
vision is located at rn lots are proposed: Lot 1
oi the site is .58 2 113°t6S4o“quare feet. Existing
11,450 square feet; Lot 2
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - August 20, 1985 - Page two
zoning is R—1, One and. Two Family Residences. The existing
residences were built in 1965 and 1972. Technically, the
buildings on this site do not conform with the R-1 Regu
lations as one single-family residence or one duplex is
allowed on a lot. The second residence was built as a guest
house. Currently, the residences are under separate owner
ship as condominiums. The lot split would not enable the
construction of additional dwelling units. Planner Stamey
read the staff report. Paul Kochevar, representing the
owners, stated the owners could comply with all start
recommendations. Mr. Kochevar questioned if a One-year,
"Subdivision Improvement Agreement" which would a lien
against both properties to ensure that the installation of a
separate water service line for each lot an^
utility easement, were completed, would Je. ac?eP^able.
Planning Commission. Attorney White advised this type of
agreement has proven to be cumbersome and «°°7len,1ce0dnnJ"
improvement Guaranty, cash, or a °f. .CoredJ^i;e
Backstrum, Broker, stated she has listed the property ror
sS and anything other than a Subdivision Improvement
Agreement would create a financial hardship on tbe
owners. Following discussion. Member Brown stated that were
special circumstances or conditions affecting pr°p^rt^4
enSymenteSrf suSsianSarp?Ser?5 ^^aterJa^^^
iet;^tarto-thl 0p£ubSce S-SrWI^4foL33l ?
property in. the nelghborh^d in whxuh the pr°P«tyosOef and
following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Identify Mount View Lane as a private street.
Identify the property pin located 12.78' north of
the southeast corner of Lot 1.
All property pins set prior to Town Board approval,
provide separate water service for each lot and
necessary utility easement.
Identify the dimensions for the easement shown on
the plat.
installing aL?eparatfwa^efsLvice for each lot.
Member Blair seconded the motion and it passed unanim y
4. ANNEXATIONS:
4 •a • Arapaho Mydows t EhstateS!>0Danneaids Addition
located south and west of Highway 7. Applicantsand Pinewood Acres, north and west of Higny Biler.
are Luce, frope^^^^^^^ a^e requesting
There are sixc.trac^f' siL Pis 199.01 acres. Bill Van
annexation. 0tfhe hproperty owners stated the property
Horn, representing the P^°Per -i . desired the proper-
will be a valuable ®nneKation and pw1aasnndeerslsrtaI„ey rfaa the
SaHV?e1p?rta,S paointfng out Item *7 of Town Engineer Widmer's
August 13, 1985 letter:
7. Future ,^®-i°P-ntainngthjhSe a“ar^ betL1eennVBo:k
a public street along paae 637. I believe
•? ' in the Town's interest to require, byIt would be in tne lowi either
separate dedication, thirty teeu vou
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - August 20, 1985 - Page three
side of this lot line (total width 60') r all the
way to Luce's east property line, and also the 30'
road easement along the 661' of Book 1377, Page
486. This should be dedicated as street
right-of-way prior to annexation. The remainder
can be obtained when the adjacent property annexes.
Planner Stamey stated a discussion was held with District
Manager Cheney/Upper Thompson Sanitation District, which
clarified the District's concerns regarding utility
easements. Mr. Van Horn stated the owners could comply with
staff recommendations. Member Brown moved Arapaho Meadows
Addition Annexation be favorably recommended to the Town
Board with the following conditions:
1. Correct the following in the "property description"
of the plat and in the Annexation Petition:
a. "S88°05'E, 122.0' to
should be "S68°05'E..
the northerly.
chord which bears
should be
b. "...subtended by a
N88°53'29"E..."
"...S88°53'29"W...";
c. Area, investigated by Town Engineer Widmer
was 198.945 acres, in lieu of 199.01 acres.
2. Each parcel should be identified with tract num
bers, with the area shown for each.
3. The deeded distance for the east.line of Book 2300,
Page 637 should be shown as (1076.28').
4. The adjacent Town subdivisions north of Book 1377,
Page 486 should be properly identified.
5. The Board of Trustees Certificate should read
"ordinance" in lieu of "resolution."
6. The right-of-way of State Highway 7 adjacent to
Arapaho Meadows should be annexed with this plat to
include:
a. The portion of State Highway right-of-way,
adjacent to the Havens property.
7. Dedicate road right-of-way as follows:
a. The 30' road easement along the 661' of Book
1377, Page 486.
b. Thirty feet (30') either side (60' total) of
the lot line between Book 1377, Page 486 and
Book 2300, Page 637, from the northeast
corner of Book 2300, Page 637, west to
Luce's east property line.
8. Call attention to the abandoned sewage treatment
plant on the Watson property, which represents a
public safety hazard and should be filled-in at
some point in time.
Member Hix seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Vickie O'Connor, Secretary