Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1984-12-18BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS /Planning Commission December 18, 1984 Commission: Attending: Also Attending: Absent: Chairman Al Sager, Members Duane Blair, Mark Brown, John Carmack, George Hix, Steve Komito, Richard Wood Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Brown, Carmack, Komito, Wood Town Administrator Hill, Attorney White, Planner Stamey, Town Engineer Widmer, Secre­ tary O'Connor Member Hix 1. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held November 20, 1984 were approved. 2. COUNTY REFERRALS: 2.a. Baldpate II Subdivision - Preliminary Plat: Mr. Gary Tuttle (Land Design Consulting), representing the owners, presented the preliminary plat for Baldpate II Subdivision. The proposed use for the 427 acre site is single-family residential and accommo­ dations. A marketing study and environmental analysis have been completed for the project. The schedule for development is 10 - 20 years. A primary aim for the proposal is to set the deyelop- ment back into the property so as not to be visible from Highway 7. The plan calls for using the existing roads (Old Fish Creek Road and a roadway cut) and creating three emergency access roads. 561 new dwelling units are being proposed, making the total dwelling units 592. A fiscal impact study has also been completed showing an estimated $275,000 in excess tax surplus. 50% occupancy of the guest units is anticipated. Water service will be supplied by the creation of a metropolitan district. Upper Thompson Sanitation District v;ill supply the sewer service. Planner Stammey acknowledged the following correspondence received to date: Upper Thompson Sanitation District.....................12/05/84 Colorado Dept, of Health (Water Quality).... 11/30/84 Office of the State Engineer..................................12/03/84 Tahosa Valley Landowners' Association...............11/30/84 Colorado Division of Highways................................12/05/84 U. S. Forest Service (Arapaho & Roosevelt)..12/04/84 Larimer County Engineering Department...............12/10/84 Light and Power Department.......................................11/16/84 Larimer County Health Department..........................11/27/84 Larimer County Parks Department............................12/06/84 Member Komito expressed concern regarding the public hiking trails now located in the Baldpate property. The owners stated they will continue to give an access for the trails to Aspen Brook, Highway 7 and Old Fish Creek Road; however, there is no access to the Crags. Mr. Giles Gere, representing the Upper Thompson Sanitation District (UTSD), supplied further background information stating the district did have the capacity to service this proposed development; however, the actual agreement between the owners and UTSD had not been consummated. _ Additional back­ ground information was received regarding litigation on the property, the creation of a new water district and fire pro­ tection. Member Blair moved the Estes Park Planning Commission recognize Baldpate II Subdivision as a viable development. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 18, 1984 - Page two however, the Estes Park Planning Commission has concerns regarding; environmental impact on air quality (i.e. fireplaces); water supply; sewer service; extension of the right-of-way road cuts along Highway 7, and needed improvements to the existing Lily Mountain Trailhead located in the development boundary. Member Brown seconded the motion and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Members Blair, Brown, Carmack, Sager, and Wood. Those voting "No" Member Komito. 2.b. Amendment to Larimer County Zoning Resolution; Planner Stamey acknowledged receipt of a letter dated December 10, 1984 submitted by Henry R. Baker, Planning Director, Larimer County Planning Department. The intent of the letter was to encourage the retention of large lot areas outside the urban growth areas and to process development proposals to increase density through the planned unit development approval process. The proposed amendment would add Section 24.9 to the Larimer County Zoning Resolution and would require a minimum lot area of 35 acres. The zoning amendment would only apply in the Farming Districts (FA and FA-1), Forestry District (FO and FO-1), the Accommodations District (A) , the Tourist District (T) , and the Open District (0) . As informed by Larimer County, the Baldpate submittal would not be affected. The zoning amendment would most greatly affect areas south of Estes Park. Mr. Bill Van Horn stated the change would affect approximately 10,000 acres of privately-owned land. Mr. Van Horn further stated the only option available to a property owner would be to change the applicable zoning. Mr. Giles Gere, representing the Estes Valley Improvement Association, and Greg Rosener, Realtor, also ex­ pressed concern and concurred with Mr. Van Horn's statements. Member Wood moved the the Larimer County Planning Department be informed the proposed zoning amendment has not had adequate study or input, does not appear to be in Estes Park's best interest and that the matter be taken under advisement and reconsidered at a later date in relation to the Estes Valley. Member Brown seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 3.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 3.a. CJL SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT; Mr. Todd Plummer, represent- ing the owners, presented the revised Final Plat for CJL Subdivi­ sion. A memorandum, submitted by Building Inspector Jones, dated December 17, 1984, was read. Four items of primary concern are; 1. The location of the angled exit doors located at the Fudgeworks Of Estes and Caramel Crisp Shops. 2. The lack of a parapet between the Fudgeworks Of Estes and Copper Penny Shops. 3. A questionable south 10 - 12' of wall between the Fudgeworks Of Estes and the Copper Penny Shops. 4. Openings in the common walls. A 4x4' glassed-in opening between the Fudgeworks Of Estes and Copper Penny Shops and a 4x9' opening between the Copper Penny and the Caramel Crisp Shops. Owners Crain, Jandrain and Lindquist stated that they would provide a two-hour fire wall to address Items 3 and 4 of Building Inspector Jones' memorandum. Discussion followed with Member Brown stating the Estes Park Planning Commission acknowledge the donation of a 10' public easement on the north side of Fall River, and approve the Final Plat of CJL Subdivision subject to the following conditions: BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 18, 1984 - Page three 1. Change dedication statement and surveyor's certificate to read Lots ^ and 21; 2. Remove ± notations from plat; 3. Remove the 25' dimensions on the north line; 4. Add exterior dimensions to the north and south boundary lines; 5. Clarify Note C; 6. Correct spelling of Copper Penny; 7. Add scale to vicinity map; 8. All property pins set prior to Town Board approval; 9. Clarify building envelope and lot lines; 10. Increase southernmost aerial power easement to 10'; 11. That a building permit on these three lots shall not be issued for exterior construction within 20' of Fall River until April 1, 1985 or adoption of proposed commercial zoning revisions, whichever occurs first. and that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property; that the exception is necessary for the preserva­ tion and the enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner; and that the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioner is situated or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of Title 16. Regarding Items 3 and 4 of Building Inspector Jones' memorandum, if and when the Town Board approves the Final Plat of CJL Subdivision, the openings in the common walls affecting the Fudgeworks Of Estes, Copper Penny and Caramel Crisp Shops will be done at the owner's discretion prior to May 31, 1985. Member Blair seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 3.b. LAKE MEADOW CONDOMINIUMS - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN #13, LOT 2, AYERS ACRES; Mr. Todd Plummer, representing the owners, present­ ed the revised Site Development Plan for Lake Meadow Condomini­ ums. Planner Stamey acknowledged receipt of the following correspondence: Colorado Division of Highways...................................12/10/84 Town Planner........................................................................12/11/84 Town Engineer......................................................................12/06/84 Light and Power Director..............................................12/05/84 X*7ater Superintendent.......................................................12/10/84 Town Attorney......................................................................12/11/84 Estes Park Fire Department.......................................... Upper Thompson Sanitation District........................12/11/84 Public Service Company..................................................12/03/84 National Park Service.....................................................11/30/84 Mr. Plummer stated adequate fire protection had been provided using the "ISO" standards. Fire Chief Rumley requested the water lines be upgraded if smaller than 6" and that fire plugs be spaced 300' apart. A clarification of parking spaces established the actual number as being 89 which does not equal the 2 spaces per unit required by the Municipal Code. Mr. Plummer stated that in an effort to save mature trees, one space was eliminated. Member Brown moved Lake Meadow Condominiums, Site Development Plan #13 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Site Plan should indicate/show: a. More information on project landscaping. b. Type and height of outdoor lighting. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 18, 1984 - Page four c. Yard fencing materials and total height. d. A note stating that fences shall not be allowed on the east side of Building H. e. Location of sidewalks. f. A note on snow removal/storage would be beneficial. g. Details of four detention ponds, including release structures and rates. 2. That until the Columbine Inn is connected to sanitary sewer (Upper Thompson Sanitation District), building permits will be issued only for Buildings A, B, G and H. 3. Completion of petition requirements for inclusion in Upper Thompson Sanitation District. 4. Engineer signature and stamp on drainage study. 5. Water service lines should be larger or looped (Water Department. 6. Resolve placement of fire hydrants subject to Fire Department approval. 7. Resolve main water line size subject to the Fire Department's and Water Department's approval. 8. Resolve encroachment of Buildings A and B on 15' Upper Thompson Sanitation District easement. 9. The ordinance regarding two parking spaces per unit be observed. Member Komito seconded the motion. Those voting "Yes" Members Brown, Carmack, Komito, Sager and Wood. Those voting "No" Member Blair. dbOjdtjL 4. NEW BUSINESS: 4.a. FAIRWAY CONDOMINIUMS - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION: In a letter dated December 11, 1984 submitted by Mr. Tom Brown, Estes Park Surveyors, a request was made to extend the completion date from December 31, 1984 to June 1, 1985 for Fairway Condominiums, Phase II. All improvements have been completed with the exception of the new water line. Member Brown moved Fairway Condominiums, Phase II be granted an extension to June 1, 1985 for completion of all improvements. Member Blair seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 4.b. JAMES SUBDIVISION - BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT: Mr. Paul Kochevar, representing the owners, submitted the James Subdivision Boundary Adjustment. The size of the site is 10.86 acres and includes two lots. Existing zoning is R - One-family Residence. Member Wood moved James Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Town Board subject to all property pins being set prior to Town Board approval and that the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioner is situated or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of Title 16. Member Brown seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 4.C. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN #15 - LOT 4, BLOCK 5, FIRST ADDITION TO LONE PINE ACRES: Mr. Paul Kochevar, representing the owners, presented the site development plan for Lot 4, Block 5, First Addition to Lone Pine Acres. The size of the site is 0.8 acres. Existing zoning is R-2 Multiple Family. Four more units are proposed with the completion date for the first unit being BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 18, 1984 - Page five January 1, 1987 and the remaining units being completed January 1, 1990. Planner Stamey acknowledged the following correspon­ dence : Colorado Division of Highways................................12/10/84 Town Planner.....................................................................12/11/84 Town Engineer...................................................................12/05/84 Light and Power Director...........................................12/05/84 Water Superintendent......................................... 12/10/84 Town Attorney...................................................................12/11/84 Estes Park Fire Department.......................................12/11/84 Public Service Company................................................12/03/84 National Park Service..................................................11/30/84 Upper Thompson Sanitation District.....................12/11/84 The owners are requesting a variance from the Upper Thompson Sanitation District to enable them to build in the sanitation district's easement. Following discussion, Member Wood moved Site Development #15 for Lot 4, Block 5, First Addition to Lone Pine Acres be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Maintain a minimum 10' separation between the existing four-plex unit and proposed duplex units. 2. The legal description should read "First Addition to Lone Pine Acres." 3. Pave the existing drive with 2" asphalt as part of this project. 4. Provide an emergency overflow for a drainage detention pond. Protect the downstream site from overflow with rip-rap. 5. Show details of detention area, outlet, and overflow on the site plan. 6. Retaining wall is setback 10' from the center of the water line which runs along the east lot line (Water Department.) 7. Provide more clearance between the garage on the west side of the new building and the south side of the existing building (Fire Department). A masonry block wall will be adequate. 8. Receive approval from the Upper Thompson Sanitation District for the drainage detention structure and eastern garage located in sanitation district's ease­ ment. 9. Include a vicinity map on the plat. Member Blair seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 4.d. LAND DEDICATION/FEE IN LIEU OF LAND DEDICATION - PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3: Mr. Herbert Wenger, Superintendent, was present and stated Park School District R-3, Poudre School District R-1 and Thompson School were requesting the establishment of a uniform County and City land dedication/fee in lieu of land dedication requirement to be applied to new residential develop­ ments. To date, the average land valuation is $8,000. The Larimer County Planning Commission has suggested a valuation of $12,000. In Estes Park, a total of 54 students have been gained with the period of growth increasing 5.6%. Mr. Wenger stated House Bill 1189 enables school districts to use funds derived from subdivision sites and land areas for capital improvements such as swimming pools. Planning Commission members indicated BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - December 18, 1984 - Page six that funds should be earmarked for growth impacts. Chairman Sager suggested that the Estes Park Planning Commission find that the burden lie with the School Board in identifying the method and manner in which the fee would be used and that at such time as this course of action is accomplished, a presentation be made to the Estes Park Planning Commission for their review with action recommended to the Town Board in accordance with the County Commissioners. 4.e. ADOPTION OF SUBMISSION SCHEDULE FOR ESTES PARK PLANNING COMMISSION; Planner Stamey presented a proposed submission schedule for special reviews, planned unit developments, site development plans and subdivision plats. The proposal recommends submittal requests be made 21 days prior to Planning Commission meetings and contain 21 copies of plats. Member Brown moved the Estes Park Planning Commission adopt the submission schedule with complete plats, site plans, etc. (with corrections and ad­ ditions) , being submitted to the Town Planner no later than two (2) working days prior to the next Town Board agenda. Member Wood seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 5.DISCUSSION; 5.a. COLORADO LAND USE COMMISSION - REVIEW; Planner Stamey submitted a staff report regarding the Colorado Land Use Commis­ sion request to designate the Stanley Hotel area as an area of state interest. Town Attorney White advised Trustees Brown and Wood not to participate in any discussion due to the public hearing on this matter, which is scheduled for Thursday, December 20, 1984. Members Brown and Wood therefore, excused themselves from the Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Sager recommended four members of the Planning Commission attend the public hear­ ing. Member Blair moved Chairman Sager represent the Estes Park Planning Commission at the public hearing being held December 20, 1984. Member Komito seconded the motion and it passed unanimous­ ly* 6.SET PUBLIC HEARING; 6.a. REVISION OF COMMERCIAL ZONING REGULATIONS; The proposal for revision of Commercial zoning, prepared by Philip B. Herr & Associates has been received. Member Komito moved a public hearing be set for Tuesday, January 29, 1985 at 7;30 P.M. in the Board Room of the Municipal Building. Member Blair seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Two "work sessions" prior to the public hearing will also be held - Friday, January 4, and Friday, January 18, 1985. Both work sessions will take place at 12;00 Noon. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. (9' ____ Vickie O'Connor, Secretary [APPROVED JAN 81985 TOWN Of ESTES PARK BOARD OF TROSTEES