HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1982-09-21BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.» DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
Commission:
Attending:
Also Attending:
Absent:
- September 21, 1982
Chairman A1 Sager, Members Duane Blair, George
J. Hix, Margaret Houston, Steve Komito, Craig
W. Meusel, Richard A. Wood
Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Houston, Meusel,
Komito, Wood
Town Administrator Hill, Town Engineer/Planner
Widmer, Secretary Jensen
Member George J. Hix
suSmi??efa“eapZvea“' 1982' Plannlng meeting were
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - ESTES PARK APTS.:
aprpeSSabee1foSr11?SrcrSsSr?i
Sr1caw4?;sUfLua^Lrgtm|onrtL°nf^rcrf?
Farmers Home Administration Mr tSo?l1S Snd Wl11 be financed the
modification in his sitro^^n - ‘ Sollenberger requested one
rather than two. 1LriSollenSerge?ee?SatnLS?w SSr dwelling aait
indicates that one parking hat hlstorical data
Of this nature. Correspcnaenee was rec^lverfccS'^S^^EJLwin™PlSX
Town Engineer/Planner . . nr-,
"Strif pLnegr Director^* DapL ' ! ! ! •' •' ^
Water sS^r^e^^50"
Town Attorney . *...................................9/20/82
..................................................... 9/ 9/82
letters listed°aboved rinathenTothepPrOViSi0nS in several of the
(1) Mr. Sollenberger ag^eeS to T?mf?g.i^eer/Planner,s letter:
Pm by Puttin5 this as a iestricSonU?ne?H0f Vehicles aHowed
so they knew they were not fiianifno ?h! S-5 Home A-a-ninistratlon
development. nancing the residence as part of this
In response to the Di r.4- r.
development is still being dSoiSserwJr^S^1 a<2) Acc®ss to the
^f036 to a solution. (3) The C!111--Fth thlS dePartment and they w??i ite Plan* (4) The eigL-Sit bSilde runoff is addressed on
be moved back two feet to accom^PL1?:nt9hrSSwayhLLifWay
prnovredSrenilcSicthL^^gdhattaanf„dPO:dedri?ireC?0r:S ^^ey will
Light and Power Department. tional site information to the
In response to the lettpr ■Fr-z-.m 4-v •
Thompson Sanitation District- SL wf??10* ManagGr o£ the Upper
outlined. strict. They will comply with the provisions
linneresSL0wrast06tLecLasteirnSpULeerlSLe??eSP;: letdter! ,2) The
b^changed on the plat to reflect theDriVSchan^a?e0rtLLt-wScajni:i11
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - September 21, 1982 - Page 2
In response to the Town Attorney's letter:
met.The provisions have been
Chairman Al Sager asked if there was anyone present who would like
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, this site development.
Mr. Harv Neeley spoke in favor of the development plan. Mr. Paul
VJn Ho^n.said that he was disappointed in the density and the two-
fu°fY+.?^;Lgh!: buJ w^s not 0PP°sing the plan. Member Duane Blair moved
?lan be.ffvorably recommended to the Board of Trustees
ali-tue Prov;Lsions niet, as outlined in the letters listed above,
mber Richard A. Wood seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.*
BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT - BLOCK 10, COUNTRY CLUB MANOR:
T127'?®Prasenting the owners, presented a plat of Lots
^ 3' ?fock 10 of Country Club Manor which proposes adjusting
e boundary lines to make two lots out of three. The following correspondence was received: uxxuwing
Light & Power Director .......................... Q/nq/fi9
Town Attorney........................................! ! ! ! 9/02/82
................................... 9/14/82Town Engineer/Planner
A discussion followed regarding the provisions in the Town/Enaineer
letter of September 14 198^twLPrOViS1°2S in the T°Wn Engineer/Planner' s
seconded thePmotion a^d “8p;s“ldreu“timoS1U"ee Mar9aret H°USt0n
LARIMER COUNTY REFERRALS:
T^curLfzone " S^"gale faI"lly re-'3ence In a
before the Commission to explain th?t-RMad‘n Mr* Zlgler aPPeared
law, was givina him lanS t ^r* DeSanti, his father-in-
on Fish Hatchery Road. Mr DeSan+-f modular hoine on the property
property. The variance request hJre^entlYi,haS a h0me 0n this
lot" Section 30.2 22 of c® lsubas?d the "definition of a
Larimer County which states onl5roJ!enS:^Vei Z°2in? Resolution for
allowed on a T Tourist zoned irJh ;^ain:^dy dwelling is
Member Duane Blair moved that -hhic After a lengthy discussion,
to the Larimer County Board of Adiustmentt bM ffvorably recommended seconded the motion Ld it pLsed'uS^So^slyf'h6" Craig MeUSel
NICHOLAS STANITZ - request e-the property more salLbll M? ?auigKoehPr°PertY lines to make
owner, appeared to request approve? F Kochevar, representing the
The property is located betwee^the two f ?S pr0Pertl? lina reconfiguration
(SW% of the N% of the NW% of the SW^ o? Carriage Hills
R73W of the 6th PM). Member Maraarei- SW^ °f Section 1, t4N,
be favorably recommended to the Larimer m°ved that this request
Member Hrcberd fl. Wo0d seco„ded
|xplainpTthfJGMrf Eonfld™."o™i' er;iR^e«Wiamer' TOWn En9lneer/Planne
^lbinU for Ravencrest Heiqhts Mt-7 T»T-e ere requesting a second
Sketch Plan as submitted was inadequatema^dSfated+-Jhat thS Subdivision given several questioner ,7CI>-Q -Lnaaecluate and from the information
about the availability of domesticWwJter fr’ Widmer exPrassed concern
disposal. Member Margaret Houston -vld^ t^irM?:0WieSme?nsend T"3"6
BRADFORD PUBUSHINQ CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - September 21, 1982 - Page 3
letter to the Larimer County Planning Commission expressing the Estes
_Planning Commission's concerns and that the developers of this
subdivision have not provided adequate information. Trustee Richard
A. Wood seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
1983 BUDGET;
The PTanning Commission requested that the following items be included
in the 1983 budget: Funds to allow Mr. Widmer and one Planning
Commission member to attend the National Planning Conference in
Seattle, estimated cost $3,600; funds to allow a Riverfront
nnh?ISP-ent Acc?ss Plan to be drawn up and made available to the
$500^ approximately $20,000; and American Planning Association
Widmer stated Mr. Baker, of the Larimer County Planning
LaSpr1ro/ Jxp5^ssec? a desire to setup a Liaison Committee between
Lhf a?L„haalabLe" ??Snb2^tL°grhe L—
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Ann E. Jens^Secretary