HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1979-04-17BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
V April 17, 1979
Commission: Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Graves, Hix, Houston
Rumley, and Swickard
Attending: All
Also Attending: Town Administrator Hill, Town Engineer/Planner Widmer
mHetedna^rapprovedMarCh 2°' 1979 Plannln^ Commission meeting were sub-
JELSEMA ADDITION - ANNEXATION & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING:
Chairman Sager conducted a public hearing on the annexation and zoning
JelsLa Tiustaspoke i^favor11/?!; HOrn, rePresenting Bruce Beckord and
Family zoning. He state^that tl^pena?n?Xatl0n and proP°sed R"2 Multiple
o Qn' crn+K 1 4^ ne s“atecl tuat the petitioners would agree to establic;hlonJnn Z the WeSt Wne If granted tte 1-2 MuSSl^
and zoning. A letteredSedaAp?ilPlok;Lin§7Qnf0PP0Sitl0n to the annexation
bPLanS:arnni^frard tS^I™ -em-
R-Re^dential? tMh»^LarSdw°LLrr^lLSn^“S jSat^tbl-’re^^feidL^^lnrbf7
the motion unanimously carried SeCOnded the m°tion and upon roll call
land which is1boundedCondtheeeast bveMPrrP°Sed rezoning of a tract of
Wonder View Avenue, and on the wpc!ty?1MaJ?reg0r Avenue, on the south by
from the existing R-1 Res?den?JrL^ the east line of Alfresco Place
spoke in favor of the rezonina No r. Residential. Bill Van Horn
sition. A letter was received'from thoS?nS appeared speaking in oppo-
April 5, 1979. Chairman Sager declared Jnglneer/P1anner dated
James H. Swickard moved the feLnin^ ^onn ! Rearing closed. Member
to the Board of Trustees. Membe^ BlS^o1 Jav°rably recommended
roll call the motion unanimously carried ded hG motion and upon
—-^E RIVER SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT:
plat of pinenRivI?rsubdi^ilionnwhiLhnn Kinn:Le’ presented the final
the Klnnie Addition into 14 multiple 5J°P°Ses dividing Tract B of
petition was also submitted for nn1 fainaly residential lots. A
the Municipal Code to allow a dead endestiSn+t? Section 16.16.060 of
feet, and a cul-de-sac with a riSht of ^.•ength lonser than 400
way radius of 45 feet, and island ^^Sfurofll ^o f 5T° feet7 traveled
final plat were received from the followingfeet' Letter® reSardi"g
W™rELgperl«/enaSr ' ' ' ' ' fPr11 13' 1979
Colorado Geoiogical Survey! ! ! pKa“,27f7?979
Xbdeer-SSgbaer1rL°LSrprSeiIddt^t the rS9UeSt radius
feet and a maximum unpaved centermisland rUH^lde paved radius of 45
and tha,t the Planning Commission finds theafoi|l? 21 feet are provided to the request: -tssion iinds the following facts with respect
the property; rG are special circumstances or conditions affecting
enjoyment subs?Stefal°prope??r??gS? o?rtJeepSftSf:::^a°n an<J thS
3. That the granting of the exception will not be materlaHy
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.y DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - April 17, 1979 - Page Two (2)
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in
the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioners is situated
or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of Title 16 of the
Municipal Code.
Member Rumley seconded the motion arid upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
Member Margaret Houston then moved that the final plat be favorably
recommended to the Board of Trustees subject to the following conditions:
1. Dimension locating the west end of the river setback and
access line and a statement of the total area of the subdivision be
added to the plat.
2. All revisions to the engineering information be completed
and submitted prior to Town Board approval.
3. The waterline depth be a minimum of 5 feet finished grade
and that the waterline be hooked from the existing 18" city main and
looped to the existing 4" waterline on Prospect Village Lane.
4. Each joint be grounded with an approved grounding device to
enable continuity throughout the system.
Member Rumley seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
LOT SPLIT - SEYBOLD SUBDIVISION - TRACT 55, FALL RIVER ADDITION:
Bill Van Horn presented the petition and plat of Seybold Subdivision
which proposes to divide Tract 55, Fall River Addition into two tracts
of .94 and 3.54 acres. Letters regarding the division were received
from the following;
Town Engineer/Planner .
Water Superintendent. .
Light & Power Director.
April 13, 1979
April 10, 1979
April 17, 1979
Member James H. Swickard moved the lot split be favorably recommended
to the Board of Trustees and that the Planning Commission finds the
following facts with respect to the request:
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the property;
2. That the exception is necessary for the preservation and the
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioners;
3. That the granting of the exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in
the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioners is situated
or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of Title 16 of the
Municipal Code.
Member Graves seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
AMENDMENTS TO EXCEPTION (LOT SPLITS) REQUIREMENTS:
Current lot split requirements were discussed and Member Graves moved
the Planning Commission recommend Chapter 16.40 of the Municipal Code
be amended to allow exceptions which do not create more than two
building sites (as opposed to two lots) and to formalize plat require
ments. Member Hix seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion
unanimously carried.
LOT SPLIT - CHIQUITA SUBDIVISION - LOT 130, ALFRESCO PLACE:
Bill Van Horn presented the petition and plat of Chiquita Subdivision
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - April 17, 1979 - Page Three (3)
which proposes to divide Lot 130, Alfresco Place and a portion of the
SW4SE4 of Section 24, T5N, R73W into three parcels. Two of the re-
parcels, each approximately .7 acres, would be building sites
and the third parcel, approximately .1 acre in size, is being created
to clear an encroachment of the residence located immediately southeast
The third parcel would be deed restricted to prevent its ever becoming
a separate parcel. Letters regarding the lot split were received from the following:
Town Engineer/Planner ,
Light & Power Director,April 17, 1979
April 17, 1979
Correspondence was received from the Town Attornev via telenhonp
ade(luate easement be provided for the waterline and the5aS ^in|11S^relS ?rignated as lots rather Sacis Seier
BoSd if be favorabIy recommended to the
iS'eLeLnron bot?^ld« ? T°Wn Att°mey's approval and to a
and Si th SeS of the existing waterline being providedtSdthea^equls?:anning Commission the following facfsPw?Ih rLpect
the property^ there are special eircumstances or conditions affecting
enjoyment and thS
detrimental to the publicnwelfareeovX^e^t:i°n Wil1 n0t be materially
the neighborhood in which the propertynorthrne?i?-her property in or in conflict with the purposes aSdL?o Petitioners is situated Municipal Code. Purposes and objectives of Title 16 of the
mously carried?COnded the motlon and uPon roll call the motion unani-
CommissioSnLetiSg ofVMfyPl5llj97gaanSgS be set for the Planning
May 22, l979 for fhe foiiowing1proposed^ordinancesaS^eeS meetln' °f
to remove one and two family dwellings7!rom°20 0:^ ihe Munlc:LPal c°de Commercial zone. y awej-llngs from special review in C-1
to remove onfanr^riamuf dweU?lf;36'02° °? the Maalclpal Code
Restricted Commercial zone. g from special review in C-2
pertalning°tfp“k?nf «“”?e3:Ss0?o"io3da040 f the Ma“iaaPal Code
zoning district. -cements for lodging businesses in C-2
requir^R-2rusen«rtetnednfnCc!fvSnin7-3^°f th6 MuniclPal Code to
Sizes required in R-2. oniug district to meet lot area
mously carried.Se00nded the m0tl0a -11 call the motion unanl-
LARIMER CODNTY. referral - HATiT, EXEMPTIOM - MJRYS r,flgE aB^a .
approximately slxracreseintoStwoemPt:Lin request "'hich proposes dividing
below Marys Lake A letS^ da?ed Aur^S11?ed,^5SCtS about b/4 mlir g
house. Member dam^r^-sSrk^Jr^o-d1!1?! la0llCl:-m*?i-er-i-i”ge
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission - April 17, 1979 - Page Four (4)
favorably recommended to the Larimer County Board of Commissioners
Member Houston seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion
passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes” Members Blair
Graves, Hix, Houston, Rumley, Swickard. Those voting "No" Member
O 3.^017 •
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
&UA.
Joan Van Horn, Secretary