Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1978-07-18BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.» DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission v/July 18, 1978 Commission:Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Hix, Houston, Rumley, Graves, Swickard Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Hill, Town Engineer/Planner Widmer The minutes of the June 20, 1978 Planning Commission meeting were sub­ mitted and approved, ORDINANCE DEFINING "STRUCTURE", "BUILDING”, "SETBACKS", WALL TYP^: The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance defining "Structure", "Building", "Setbacks", "Nonbearing Wall", and "Retaining Wall" to further clarify what is allowed in the 8' setback in a C-l Commercial zoning district. Member Duane Blair moved consideration of the ordinance be tabled to allow further review and revision by the staff. Member Swickard seconded the motion and upon roll can the motion unanimously carried, ORDINANCE ALLOWING INDOOR AMUSEMENTS IN C-l AND C-2 BY RIGHT: Chairman Sager conducted a public hearing on the proposed which would allow indoor amusements by right in C-l and C-2 zoning districts ratherWthan by special review. There were no persons pre- senfspeaklS in favor of or in opposition to the proposed ordinance and no correspondence was received regarding the same. Chairman g declared tSrnr!nrclosed, Member James Swickard moved a recommenda­ tion be forwarded to the Board of Trustees to table consideration of this ordinance for further study and possible revision to limit the Jndoo?^SseSLirallowed by right. Member Hix seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unanimously carried, ORblHANCE CT.aBTPYTHG SPECIFIC USES PERMITTED BY SPECIAL REVIEW: Member Duane Blair moved the proposed mitted by special review and by right be set for public nearing follows , , August 15, 1978 , , August 22, 1978 Member Houston seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani­ mously carried. Estes Park Planning Commission Board of Trustees, S?rr7Safnrd nSr°t^o^ ofPfoi1,h|loJSg6rRtec?aSra??or;Ad|tion;;frS* the existing R-1 Residential ^to C-l Jom^®^CjQj’Willette of Estes Park representing the First Baptist Church, d Calender, Lyle Realty spoke in ta?ir?Sidents in the Reclamation Addition, Frantz, and Laurel Bens°n ’ July 12, 1978 from the Town Engineer PlannernwasPread1into ng request<^behreco^ended ?J0rSd^niaffoe?hJeToSarSdWof T^SsreIld ^MlmbirBla r-^^^conded the motion and upon roll call the motion unanimously carried, VENNER ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT: Tom Brown, on behalf of owners Mr and Mrs. Je”SSLor”’wrich the preliminary plat of the Venn®' AJf^i°S'Mano? and Hyde Pak, pro- is alrefeacS w?th acceL throu|h Lots 12 and Pl03!e|irch 6!t?o°unt?J Sniub3MaaSo?S eSfrr:;pondence regarding the prelam- inary plat was received from the following. BRADFORD PUBLISHING COM DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission July 18, 1978 Page Two (2) Mountain Bell....................................... July 10, Colorado Department of Highways . July 11, Estes Park Sanitation District. . July 12, Water Superintendent.......................... July 12, Light & Power Director..................... July 12, Town Engineer/Planner.........................July 12, 1978 1978 1978 1978 1978 1978' At the request of Tom Brown, Member Duane Blair moved consideration of the preliminary plat be tabled until the next meeting in order that a drainage plan and other items addressed in the correspondence can be submitted. Member Houston seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously. Ruth Bowie, property owner in Cummorah Subdivision which is adjacent to the proposed yenner Addition, sub­ mitted a petition requesting that the same zoning restrictions cur rently imposed by County zoning regulations also be imposed by the Town when Venner Addition is annexed. MASTER PLAN AMENDMENTS: A public hearing was conducted on proposed amendments to the^Estes Park Comprehensive Plan. No persons appeared speaking in favor of or opposition to the amendments and no correspondence was Jeceived. Member Margaret Houston introduced the following resolution and moved it be passed and adopted; resolution BE IT RESOLVED: That the Estes Park Comprehensive Plan, also known as the Estes Park Master Plan, be and the same is hereby amended as follows. 1. That all of the land lying North of the North line of Section 24, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., and North of the North lines of Sections 19, 20, and 21, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M. now designated -RESIDEN­ TIAL’' as shown on Map No. 5 of said plan, is changed to "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL". ; 2. That the following is added to the Introduction of said plan at page 17 thereof; Comprehensive Plan A Guide for Growth This Comprehensive Plan, also known as the Master Plan, is a guide for growth in the land area subject to said plan. 3. That the following is added to "Continuing Planning" of said plan at page 184 thereof: This Comprehensive Plan, also known as the Master Plan, shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission not less than every five years from the date of its adoption. 4. That the first paragraph on page 186 of said plan is amended to read as follows: An application for any development of land located within the Town of Estes Park shall be submitted to the Town Planner for processing. All subdivisions and BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission July 18, 1978 Page Three (3) rezonings of land located within the Town of Estes Park shall be in accordance with the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park and the Statutes of the State of Colorado. An application for any development of land located outside the corporate limits of the Town of Estes Park shall be submitted to the Larimer County Planning Director for processing. All subdivisions and rezonings of land located outside the corporate limits of the Town of Estes Park shall be in accordance with Larimer County land use regulations. Member Rumley seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Members Blair, Houston, Rumley, Graves, Hix, Swickard, Sager. Those voting "No" none. CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PLAN: At the Mayor’s request, the Planning Commission discussed specific items it would like included in a central business district study. Several of the items mentioned were building height limitations, fire protection requirements for buildings and specific uses of buildings, sidewalk requirements, river setbacks and the public use thereof, off-street parking evaluation, evaluation of traffic flows and alter­ nate routes, pedestrian safety, expansion of the downtown area, develop­ ment of the downtown area into a mall and also possibly developing a river channel through the mall. The Planning Commission unanimously decided to conduct several study sessions to further discuss these items and to obtain CBD studies conducted in other communities. CHALET ESTATES P.U.D. AND REZONING: The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Chalet Estates P.U.D. and rezoning which was referred by the Larimer County Planning Depart­ ment. The Chalet Estates P.U.D. comprises 230 acres and proposes 57 lots with 86 dwelling units and approximately 101 acres of open space. The requested rezoning: is from A—Accommodations to E—Estate. Corres­ pondence was received from the Town Engineer/Planner dated July 17, 1978. Member Byron L. Graves moved the Chalet Estates P.U.D. as pre­ sented be favorably recommended to the Larimer County Planning Com­ mission. Member Houston seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unanimously carried. Member Rumley moved the rezoning to E- Estate be favorably recommended to the Larimer County Planning Commis­ sion. Member Swickard seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unanimously carried. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned, Joan Van Horn, Secretary