HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1978-05-16BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.» DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
/May 16, 1978
Commission:
Attending;
Also Attending:
Absent:
Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Hix, Houston, Rumley,
Graves, Swickard
Chairman Sager, Members Blair, Hix, Rumley, Swickard,
Houston (late arrival)
Town Administrator Hill, Town Engineer/Planner Widmer
Member Graves
The minutes of the April 18, 1978 Planning Commission meeting were
submitted and approved.
REZONING - STREET - 215 EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE - R-2 TO C-1:
Chairman Sager conducted a public hearing on f ®
215 East Riverside Drive from the existing R-2 Multiple Family Resi
j ri^uan 4-q c—1 Commercial. Kellie Steele,: appearing on beh
owner William Street, spoke in favor of the rezoning. no
persons present speaking in opposition and no cor5®®P°^^®n^LWhlaring received regarding the rezoning. Chairman Sager declared the
cTosld Member jLes Swickard moved the rezoning be favorably recom
mended to the Board of Trustees. Member Blair seconded the motion
and upon roll call the motion unanimously carried.
LOT SPLIT - STEFFENS - LOTS 100 & 101. ALFRESCO PLACE:
Erod Steffens submitted a petition requesting to divide a portion of
and !g120OLA“rSTe?irrSerfgta?dtirg rhe°;iopredaS?vlilon
were received from the following.
Water Superintendent .
Light & Power Director
Town Engineer/Planner,
May 9, 1978
April 24, 1978
May 10, 1978
to the request:
CD That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the property;
I-y-t-orr^°uSsran?rar?rSe*?y ^rghrrferhf j-fS^nfr!
rq'i That the granting or the exception will not be materially
(3> detrimental to the public fare°Pi«ri?oLrty of ?he
PpeffoLis ifsfiffdrcfffoSift fth tLdePutP°ses
Ld objectives of Title 16 of the Municipal Code.
Member Rumley seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
lot split - KANE - TRACT 59. FALL RIVER ADDITION:
Nicky Kane submitted a petition t8641Ic?LTandt139i64
River Addition into two parcels ^ Engineer/Planner
acres. A letter dated APrl1,17'that his intentions
Widmer was read ar^d1,^i1;scu®s®^‘hiae ‘ parcei ”B” with his property im-
were to sell Parcel "A and ne Blair m0ved the lot split
mediately west of the Par5el* of Trustees provided Mr. Kanebe favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees piu
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.t DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
May 16, 1978
Page Two (2)
sign a statement and/or agreement to be recorded which would combine
into one parcel Parcel "B" with his tract(s) located immediately west
and extending to Highway 34. This agreement would allow Parcel ’’B"
access to a public street. Member Blair also moved that the Planning
Commission finds the following facts with respect to the request:
(1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the property;
(2) That the exception is necessary for the preservation and the
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner,
(3) That the granting or the exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property in the neighborhood in which the property of the
petitioners is situated or in conflict with the purposes
and objectives of Title 16 of the Municipal Code.
Member Hix seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
REZONING - OLIVER - 217 BIG HORN DRIVE - R-2 to C-1:
Member Duane Blair moved that the following public hearing dates be
set for the rezoning request submitted by Eugene F. and Helen I.
Oliver:
Estes Park Planning Commission . . . June 20, 1978
Board of Trustees................................... • June 27 ’ 1978
Member Rumley seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
ANNEXATION AND ZONING - EAST ELKHORN ADDITION.
Attorney John Phipps, representing iEas?WElkho?n
Hilkene, presented the received f^om the following:
Addition. Letters regarding the plat were receiv«u
Town Engineer/Planner...................... May 11, 1978
Light & Power Director.................i . . May 3, 1978
Mountain Bell....................................... May 8, 1978
State Department of Highways.................May 5, 1978
Mr Phipps stated that the easements requested in Tow”goSihrslid
garding a telephone ’ f c 1 Cominercial be favorably recommended
in the Town Engineer's and Light & 1 th motion passed by the
^ollbwi ngCvotes ' trhoretrtirgd, Iwic.ard! Sa.er,
Member Hix abstained with Pe™issl°” |rg^TjH|RV°R0ADS1On'
T.ARIMER COUNTY EXEMPTION - WARD - FISH HATCHEKi
At the request of Tom ’^®pr|®3^pti^nL?equLtawhichhproJoserto
Commission reconsidered the Ward p f th state Fish Hatcherydivide approximately 3i acreSslocated east^of the Statsmaiiest q 2
into three parcels, , from the property owner stating his
acres. Mr. Brown read a let^fer, fmoved the exemption
reasons for the exemption. Me^ber+Ja^^® ?^^^„aers fordenial. Member be recommended to the Larimer County Commissioners ior aeni
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
May 16, 1978
Page Three (3)
Blair seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unanimously
carried.
ORDINANCE DEFINING "STRUCTURE", "BUILDING". "SETBACKS", CERTAIN WALL TYPES
An ordinance was submitted to the Planning Commission for its consid
eration defining "Structure", "Building", "Setbacks", "Nonbearing Wall
and "Retaining Wall" which should further clarify what is allowed in
the 8' setback in a C-1 Commercial zone. Member Duane Blair moved
the following public hearing dates be set for the proposed ordinance:
Estes Park Planning Commission
Board of Trustees........................
. June 20, 1978
. June 27, 1978
Member Rumley seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion unani
mously carried.
AMUSEMENTS IN C-2 AND C-1:
The Planning Commission discussed in great length special review re
quirements for amusements in C-2 Restricted Commercial and C-1 Com
mercial zones. Member Blair moved that all amusements, indoor and
outdoor be required to follow special review procedures in a C-i
zonf The motion was declared "dead" for lack of a second. Member
Swickard then moved that the Planning Commission
the zoning chapter to allow Indoor Musements as a Perm^“®^ru|^“y
to allow outdoor amusements by special review in C-1. Member Rumjes'
seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion th®
lowing votes: Those voting "Yes" Members Swickard. Rumley. Sager.
Those voting "No" Members Hix, Blair.
Member Blair moved that outdoor amusements^be “®5ai®PetoaLe-
rpview and indoor amusements not be permitted in C-2 accoraing
sent code requirements. Member Hix seconded the motion and bPOn jo11
call the motion was defeated by the following votes: Those voting
"Yes" Members Blair, Hix. Those voting "No" Members Swickard, Rumley,
Sager. Member Swickard moved that Indoor amusements be a permitted
and outdoor amusements be allowed by sP®cial r®”e™t5°‘passerby
fhe1%l!?:?Sdg1o?eI:nSeav^trgn"?0e^^ Se^Je^rC^fy! kard.
Sager. Those voting "No" Member Blair.
OFF-STREET PARKING DISCUSSION:
The Planning Commission scheduled a study session for May 24, 1978
discuss off-street parking requirements.
Member Margaret Houston arrived at this time.
MASTER PLAN:
Sle^apiTMCarerPrarnaiS%Cos™^?f°aSo^?ingairbaiia rajfSf |eth;
r~itcorttLcsfng!s^
the following to the Estes Park Planning Commission.
reaLfnegeddefigor^:^iirn?iUaSietoarioawn0drnbi?rreS^StfaiEhtS
2- Tahfeni^tcheetrred:?^rc? ^^“a StSe hforl^o^th.
3. That the plan be reviewed no less often than every five years
BRADFORD PUBLISHING COM DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Planning Commission
May 16, 1978
Page Four (4)
along with public hearings.
4. That Larimer County Planning procedures be followed as they
apply to subdivisions and rezonings.
According to 31-23-208 of the 1973 Colorado Revised Statutes, any
amendment to a Master Plan requires a public.hearing. The Planning
Commission directed the Town Planner to provide the Larimer County
Planning Commission with further explanation and background regarding
each iSLLendation and to Inform the Commission that amendments m
accordance with the recommendations are being pursued.
DEHAAN - ZONING REQUEST:
Mr. Fred DeHaan appeared requesting an opinion from the
mic?<:?ion as to whether he should seek a rezoning for Lot 2, DeViiie
Subdivision in order permit a general retail store or instead
an amendment to the Municipal Code re?ardia^ moved1thezone Following considerable discussion. Member Blair moyea rne
general consensus and recommendation of the
fhnt hp Dursue a rezoning for the remaining portion of DeVille J5Ub
WvLlonPp"sln«y^onedgC-2. Member Rumley seconded the motion and
upon roll call the motion unanimously carried.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Jo^nl Van Horn, Secretary