The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1975-11-18RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission Meeting ^November 18, 1975 Commission: Attending: Chairman Prosser; Members Wagner, Steele, Sager, Hix, Petrocine and Blair Chairman Prosser; Members and Blair Wagner, Sager, Hix, Petrocine, Also Attending: Secretary Hill, Town Engineer/Planner Van Horn, and Town Attorney Ernest G. Hartwell Absent:Member Steele It was moved, seconded and carried the minutes of October 21, 1975 be approved.i MASTER PLAN: j Roger Burton of Lord and Associates, Inc. distributed copies of the Intro duction which serves as a transition between Phase II and Phase III and the text accompanying the Land Use Plan. He reported that the text of the Transportation Plan is nearing completion. DAVE PEARSON - REZONING (PUBLIC HEARING) LOT 31, BONNIE BRAE ADDITION Chairman Prosser proceeded to conduct a public hearing on the proposed rezoning of Lot 31, Bonnie Brae Addition from the existing R-1 Residential to R-2 Multiple Family Residential District;. Dave Pearson, owner of said lot, appeared before the Commission speaking in favor of the rezoning. There were no persons present speaking in opposition to the rezoning. Chairman Prosser declared the hearing closed. Member Wagner moved the rezoning be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees. Member Petrocine seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion unanimously carried. BAKER - REZONING (PUBLIC HEARING TRACT 20, [fALL RIVER ADDITION: Chairman Prosser proceeded to conduct a public hearing on the proposed rezoning of Tract 20, Fall River Addition from the existing R Residential to R-2 Multiple Family Residential District:. There were no persons pre sent speaking in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. Town Engineer/ Planner Van Horn explained the location of the proposed rezoning and stated that it was not in keeping.with the character of the existing neighborhood. Chairman Prosser declared the hearing closed. Member Sager moved the re zoning be recommended for denial to the Board of Trustees. Member Blair seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion unanimously carried. ROSE C. SNYDER - LOT SPLIT: Paul Van Horn appeared representing Rose Snyder in her request for a lot split of a parcel of land containing portions of Lots 20 & 22, Block 10, Town of Estes Park. The proposed division!of land would form a 11,784 square foot lot and a 14,045 square foot lot in the existing R-2 Multiple Family Residential Zoning District. Member Sager moved the lot division be recommended to the Board of Trustees for approval and that the Planning Commission finds the following facts with respect to the request.! 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property; RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission Meeting November 18, 1975 Page Two (2) 2) That the exception is necessary for the preservation and the enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner; 3) That the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioner is situated or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this title. ! Member Hix seconded the motion. Upon roll carried. call the motion unanimously BIGLER - REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 16.16.080B (ROAD GRADE); A request for a variance from section 16.16J080B of the Municipal Code was submitted by Robert H. Bigler which would involve constructing Acacia Drive at an 8% grade from the intersection with Avalon Drive for a dis tance of 250 feet east. Member Wagner moved the variance be granted. Member Blair seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed by the following votes; Those voting "Yes" Members Blair, Hix, Petrocine, Prosser, Wagner. Those voting "No" none. Member Sager abstained with permission from the Planning Commission. STANLEY ADDITION; As a result of previous meetings with the Planning Commission, Bill Lamont, and Town staff, the developers submitted the following items and stated their intent to follow the Planned Unit Development procedure for the Stanley Addition. 1) Preliminary Plat - depicting zoning, proposed streets, existing buildings and utility [easements 2) Preliminary Unit Development Site Plan - depicting the phases of development, proposed maximum densities and floor area ratios, streets, blocks and tracts, and types of development 3) Schematic Land Use Plan - depicting the various land uses and their locations 4) Concepts and Objectives 5) Restrictions, Controls and Covenants Darrel Smith, Leon Fedderson, and Richard Ball on behalf of the Stanley development presented and discussed many items with the Planning Commis sion and Planning Consultant Bill Lamont and Town Attorney Ernest G. Hartwell. First item of discussion was the necessary amendment of the Municipal Code to allow the Planned Unit Development procedure in the R-2, C-2 and C-1 zoning districts. Town Attorney Ernest G. Hartwell recommended that such an amendment to the Code include the adoption of the 1972 Planned Unit Development Act of the State of Colorado. Member Wagner moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Trustees that the Municipal Code be amended to allow the Planned Unit Development procedure in all zoning dis tricts except the DR Developing Resoutce District and to include adoption of the procedure of the 1972 Planned Unit Development Act of the State of Colorado. Member Hix seconded the motion. [Upon roll call the motion unan imously carried. j RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission Meeting November 18, 1975 Page Three (3) The concept of phase development in which t;he Stanley Addition would be submitted in separate phases rather than in one complete plan was dis cussed. The Planning Commission agreed to jthis procedure and the under standing was established that the Planning [commission would set the major guidelines upon which the more detailed sibe plans would be based and that no building permits would be issued until specific site plans and plat were submitted and approved. I I u2eJherM2SSiQeo?t^Sn tl?e locat!on of residential and commercial uses. Members of the Planning Commission were concerned with the loca- co?ne?fwh?nh a 1;jgh1den®ity.residential development in the northeastern h h abuts loV density neighborhoods. Also of concern was the = (c?imnerc:Lal and residential) around the Freeland Court cul- Otherwise, the general locations of residential and commercial uses were acceptable. j [ A revised road system plan was proposed and generally accepted by the Planning Commission except for the Hotel access road and curb cut As previously stated, the Planning Commission|does not favor another curb 34 BY:PaSS and the developers negotiateWith the adjacent property owner to reach a solution which is presentlv being pursued by the developers. wnicn is presently A great deal of discussion centered around the proposed densities and Se? r • tlOSs development) 1 The dLelope“ co^JInded S "■axrmum densities listed on the plans were not necessarily the gested that1thraotuLWmai'? bS devet°Pe<i- [The Planning Commission sug- ° -1 . a{^^^a^ maximum densities be determined and stated tn aiirMTtoZllVeTslTsiVJllTstr-. The ^^“-ns'CommisslSfaSo JeSo^enLf10" sitiesfeandtdirected°To^eEngineer/Plannerb”e 1S-tion .of _ the, various den- tant Lament to recommend maximum densities Van Horn and Planning Consul- for the various uses. ^NDMENT TO SECTION 16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE - REQUIRED SIGHATURES: Sa? tec?fnny1frrSt G- H;rtwe11 recommended to the Planning Commission anf ifefioJdeL S„aS?atfa^d rtSUire thS K9natures of property owners moved that section appropriate documents. Member Sager Toto AttSraev FrnSai c u ! Municipal Code be amended as recommended by uZn row caTl Hartwel1- Member Wagner seconded the motion,upon roll call the motion unanimously carried. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. Secretary Chairman