Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Town Board 2009-12-08
Prepared11/30/09*Revised12/3/09TOWNo.ESTESPAIUKTheMissionoftheTownofEstesParkistoplanandprovidereliable,high-valueservicesforourcitizens,visitors,andemployees.Wetakegreatprideensuringandenhancingthequalityoflifeinourcommunitybybeinggoodstewardsofpublicresourcesandnaturalsetting.BOARDOFTRUSTEES-TOWNOFESTESPARKTuesday,December8,20097:00p.m.AGENDAPLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE.(Anypersondesiringtoparticipate,pleasejointheBoardinthePledgeofAllegiance).PUBLICCOMMENT.(Pleasestateyournameandaddress).TOWNBOARDCOMMENTS.CONSENTAGENDA:1.TownBoardMinutesdatedNovember24,2009andTownBoardStudySessionMinutesdatedNovember24,2009.2.Bills.3.CommitteeMinutes:A.PublicSafety,November19,2009.4.AppealofStaffsdeterminationthatacommercialroastingoperationisausebyrightinthe“CH”CommercialHeavyzoningdistrict.Withdrawnbyapplicants.5.ReappointmentofKathyPalmeritotheEstesValleyLocalMarketingDistrictfora4-yeartermexpiringonDecember31,2013.6.LibraryBoardAppointments.2.REPORTSANDDISCUSSIONITEMS:1.TOWNADMINISTRATORREPORT.DeputyTownAdministratorRichardson.2.TOWNATTORNEYUPDATE.AttorneyWhite.3.PLANNINGCOMMISSIONITEMS.ItemsreviewedbyPlanningCommissionorstaffforTownBoardFinalAction.1.ACTIONITEMS:MayorProTernLevine:OpenthePublicHearing(A).Theformalpublichearingwillbeconductedasfollows:MayorProTem—OpenPublicHeating I•StaffReport•PublicTestimony•MayorProTern—ContinuePublicHearingtoJanuary26,2010.A.VacationHomesandBed&BreakfastAmendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode—FirstReadinglPublicHearing.B.AccessoryKitchenAmendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode—FirstReadinglPublicHearing.4.ACTIONITEMS:1.ORDINANCE#11-09EXTENDTEMPORARYMORATORIUMFORWINDTURBINES.AttorneyWhite.2.ORDINANCE#12-09SECTIONS9.40.010&9.40.020POSSESSIONOFFIREARMSONTOWNPROPERTY.ChiefKufeld.3.INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTWITHLARIMEREMERGENCYTELEPHONEAUTHORITY(LETA)FORCOPLINKINFORMATIONSHARINGSYSTEM.ChiefKufeld.4.TRANSITIONALINTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTANDINTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTWITHTHEESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT.AttorneyWhite&FireChiefDorman.5.ORDINANCE#13-09LEASINGOFTHEDANNELSFIRESTATIONTOTHEESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT.AttorneyWhite.6.RESOLUTION#24-09EMERGENCYRESPONSEAUTHORITYDESIGNATION.AttorneyWhite.7.INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTWITHESTESVALLEYLIBRARYDISTRICTFORFINANCIALSERVICES.FinanceOfficerMcFarland.*8.ORDINANCE#14-09SECTION17.66SIGNS,17.88BANNERSAND17.89TEMPORARYBANNERS.DirectorJoseph.9.RESOLUTION#25-09RECERTIFICATIONOFTHEMILLLEVY.FinanceOfficerMcFarland.10.RESOLUTION#26-092009SUPPLEMENTALBUDGETAPPROPRIATIONS.FinanceOfficerMcFarland.11.APPROVALTOATTEMPTRECOVERYOFCOLORADOTRUSTFUNDSTHROUGHPOLITICALACTION/TARPFUNDS.FinanceOfficerMcFarland.12.GRANDSTANDPROJECT—MISCELLANEOUSITEMS.•TownFinancialCommitment.•ContingencyFunding.•MiscellaneousFees.•BuildingPermit&DevelopmentApplicationFeeWaiver.•RoleofAd-HocDesignCommittee.13.ADJOURN.MEETINGCANCELLATIONNOTICE:TheTownBoardmeetingscheduledDecember22,2009hasbeencancelled.NOTE:TheTownBoardreservestherighttoconsiderotherappropriateitemsnotavailableatthetimetheagendawasprepared. JackieWilliamsonFrom:AdminiR3O45Sent:Thursday,December03,20099:37AMTo:JackieWilliamsonSubject:JobDoneNotice(Send)*****************************JobDoneNotice(Send)*****************************JOBNO.2173ST.TIME12/0309:28PGS.2SENDDOCUMENTNAMETX/RXINCOMPLETETRANSACTIONOK6672527GregWhite5869561KEPL5869532TrailGazette5861691Channel86353677ReporterHerald2247899Coloradoan5771590EPNewsERROR1 LadiesandGentlemenoftheBoard-12/8/2009MynameisAmyHamrick,ownerofKindCoffee.IjustwantedtotakeamomenttoaddresstheissuebeforeyouintheConsentAgendaregardingthepotentialmoveoftheKindCoffeeroastery.Afterthinkingaboutitforacoupleofweeks,Ihavecometotheseconclusions,someofwhichIhadlostsightofinthefrenzyofPublicHearingsandnegativecommentsmadeaboutmeandKindCoffee:1.KindCoffeehastherighttoroastcoffeeintheCommercialOutlyingzone,andinthebuildingwecurrentlyoperatein.Thisdecisionhasbeenupheldnotonce,buttwice,unanimously,byyou.2.Whileitisunfortunatethatmycurrentneighborsdonotliketheroastingoperation,itisnotmyfaultnorisitmyresponsibilitytomovesimplytomakethemhappy.Ihavepersonallymovedmyresidence2timeswithintownlimitsoverthepast12yearsbecauseofdevelopment/businesshappeningaroundus.Thatwasourchoicebasedontherightsofthepropertyownersandthezonesweweresurroundedby.3.KindCoffeeISaresponsible,green,communityfocusedbusiness.Wesupport12employeesyear-round,havetworetailcoffeelocationsintownalongwitharetailpresenceontheweb,andcontributefinanciallyandin-kindtoallsortsofcommunityorganizationsandevents.WeareanEstesPark-madeproductthatpeopletakehometotheirfriends,familyanddog-sitters.Wehavebeenroastingcoffeesince1998inthistown,andonlynowdowehaveafewneighborstogetherwhoarecomplaining.ThisdoesnotnegatethepositiveimpactwemakeeverydayinEstesPark.4.EstesParkismyfamily’shome,too.Ilivehere,shophere,andpaymytaxeshere.Asayear-round,permanentresidentANDbusinessowner,Ihaveavestedinterestinbuildingandgrowingnotonlymybusiness,buttheeconomiclivelihoodofthistown.MorefriendsthanIcaretocountarediscussingsellingorhavealreadysoldtheirhousesandaremovingTOTHEVALLEYbecausetheycan’tfindworkuptherethatisyear-roundandsustainable.Iworkeverydaytosupporttheviabilityofthistown.5.WhileIdonotapologizeformybusinessoperations,Iwouldliketoexpressmyappreciationforthetimestaffhasdevotedtothisissue.IdonothavetheabilitytoendthisdialogueatTownBoardmeetingsandMayor’sCoffeeChats,butthankfullyyoudo.Thankyouforyourtime. TownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,November24,2009MinutesofaRegularmeetingoftheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldintheTownHallinsaidTownofEstesParkonthe24thdayofNovember,2009.MeetingcalledtoorderbyMayorPinkham.Present:WilliamC.Pinkham,MayorMayorProTernChuckLevineTrusteesEricBlackhurstDorIaEisenlauerJohnEricsonRichardHomeierJerryMillerAlsoPresent:GregWhite,TownAttorneyJacquieHalburnt,TownAdministratorLowellRichardson,DeputyTownAdministratorJackieWilliamson,TownClerkAbsent:NoneMayorPinkhamcalledthemeetingtoorderat7:00p.m.andalldesiringtodoso,recitedthePledgeofAllegiance.SWEARINGINOFOFFICERROBERTSON.TownClerkWilliamsonconductedaswearinginceremonyforPoliceOfficerCalebRobertson.PUBLICCOMMENT.FrankTheis/Countyresidentandtownpropertyownerdoesnotsupportaseparatesetofregulationsforwindturbines.Hestatedthecurrentlandusecodecontainsregulationsthatshouldbeusedforthesightingofwindturbinesinthevalley.DavidHabeckerrrowncitizenreadapreparedstatementrequestingtheBoardstoprecitingthe‘underGod’Pledge.HethankedtheBoardfortheirworkonpreparingthe2010budget.TOWNBOARDCOMMENTS.MayorProTernLevineandTrusteeEisenlauerrecognizedtheRestorativeJusticeProgramfortheawardreceivedattheNLCConferenceforMunicipalExcellence.Onlyeightothermunicipalitieswererecognizedfromaroundthecountry.TheythankedandrecognizedthePoliceDepartmentandespeciallyAmandaNagIforhereffortsinmanagingtheprogram.TrusteeEricsonstatedthejointmeetingheldwiththePlanningCommissionandtheTownBoardtodiscussissueswasproductiveandencouragedfuturemeetings.TrusteeHomeierappreciatestheeffortofthePlanningCommissioninreviewingthepossiblewindturbineregulations.1.CONSENTAGENDA:1.TownBoardMinutesdatedNovember10,2009.2.Bills.3.CommitteeMinutes: ‘pBoardofTrustees—November24,2009—Page2A.CommunityDevelopment,November5,2009.1.WinterFestivalUseofBondPark,January16&17,2010.2.NeighborhoodSubdivisionFeeWaiverforattainablehousing.4.EstesValleyPlanningCommissionMinutesOctober20,2009andNovember12,2009(acknowledgementonly).5.EstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityMinutesOctober21,2009andSpecialMeetingMinutesOctober29,2009(acknowledgementonly).Itwasmovedandseconded(Levine/Miller)toapprovetheconsentagenda,anditpassedunanimously.TrusteeEricsonstatedareviewofthebillsdemonstratestheTowncontinuestohirelocalcontractorsforprojectsintown,thuskeepingmoneylocal.2.LIQUORITEMS:1.LIQUORLICENSING:TRANSFEROFOWNERSHIP—FROMHILLBROTHERSINC.dbaED’SCANTINA&GRILLTOKAGAMOINC.UbaED’SCANTINA&GRILL,390E.ELKHORNAVENUE,HOTEL&RESTAURANTLIQUORLICENSE.TownClerkWilliamsonstatedthatthenecessarypaperworkandfeeshavebeensubmittedforthetransfer.TherequiredTIPS.traininghasnotbeencompleted;however,KarlaDuboislnewowneranticipatessendingthecurrentstafftotrainingassoonaspossible.MayorProTernLevineremindedtheowneroftheirresponsibilitytoupholdtheliquorlaws.Itwasmovedandseconded(BlackhursUEisenlauer)toapprovetheTransferofOwnershipApplicationfiledKamagoInc.dbaED’SCANTINA&GRILL,anditpassedunanimously.3.REPORTSANDDISCUSSIONITEMS:1.COLLECTIONSTORAGEANDCLIMATECONTROLFEASIBILITYSTUDY.DirectorKilsdonkstatedin2008theMuseumreceivedaNationalEndowmentfortheHumanitiesgranttoretaintheservicesoftwoconsultants,acollectionsspecialistandanarchitect.Theirpurposewastoassesscurrentcollectionsstorageneedsanddevelopaplanforasuitablecollectionsmanagementfacility.Theproposedfacilitywouldbe6,000sq.ft.andcost$1.7million.TheMOUwiththeEstesParkMuseumFriendsandFoundation,Inc.(EPMFF)includesfundraisingforcapitalimprovements,therefore,thecostofthebuildingwouldbefundedthroughoutsidefundraisingbyEPMFFandgrants.2.GRANDSTANDPROGRESSREPORT.DeputyTownAdministratorRichardsonpresentedaprogressreportforthegrandstands,includingspreadsheetstotrackprogressandexpenses.DemolitionoftheoldgrandstandswascompletedonOctober27thTaylorKohrshassincebegunworkonsettingthegradesanddigginthefoundationforthebuilding.AbuildingpermitwasissuedonNovember13.Installationofwaterlines,electriclinesandsewerlineshasbeeninitiated.Achangeorderwouldbeforthcomingfortheredirectofthewaterline.Additionaldesigncostswouldbeincurredforthewaterstandpipestomeetyearrounduseoftheconcessionandrestroomfacilities.Inordertomeetcode,anengineerwasretainedtoreviewtheroofdesigntoensuretheventingofsmokeintheeventofafire.ThesteelstructureshouldbeonsitebymidJanuary.TheAd-HocDesignCommitteewouldreconvenetoaddresstheconcessionstandfinishesandwhichentitywouldberesponsibleforthecosts,i.e.concessionaire,EPURAorTown. BoardofTrustees—November24,2009—Page3TrusteeMillerrequestedtheBoardreviewTownfundscommittedtotheproject,thecontingencyfunds,miscellaneousfeeitems,(VIPChairs,soundsystem,landscaping),andaddressfeewaiversmentionedintheIGAwithEPURAatthenextBoardmeeting.TrusteeEricsonrequestedadiscussiononthefutureroleoftheAd-HocDesignCommitteealsobeadded.3.TOWNADMINISTRATORREPORT.•TheTownanticipatesthedemolitionoftheParkTheaterMalltobeginbyInterstateonMonday,November30thRockwellwouldremainopenandhalfoftheRiversideparkinglotwouldbeshutdownduringthedemolition.Itisanticipatedtotakenomorethan30days.•ThisFriday,November27thisthe‘CatchtheGlow“parade.4.ACTIONITEMS:1.PUBLICHEARING—2010BUDGET—ADOPTION.MayorPinkhamopenedthepublichearing,andFinanceOfficerMcFarlandreviewedthebudgetprocess.HediscussedhowtherevenuesateproposedtobeexpendedintheensuingfiscalyearfortheHighwayUser’sTrustFund.ThefollowingResolutionswerealsopresented:A.Resolution#21-09-SettingtheMillLevy(1.738millsfor2010)—Atemporaryreductioninthemilllevyfrom1.822millsto1.738millsisrequiredfor2010duetopropertytaxincreasespendinglimitsof5.5%perC.R.S.29-1-301.B.Resolution#22-09-Adoptingthe2010Budget.C.Resolution#23-09-AppropriatingSumsofMoney.FinanceOfficerMcFarlandstatednumbersreceivedfromotherentitiessuchasthecountyhavebeenverified.AdministratorHalburntstatedthebudgetcontainsa10%increaseforhealthinsurance.TheTown’sinsurancebrokercontinuestoworkonprovidingtheTownwiththebestinsuranceatthelowestcostandislookingatoptionsthatmayincreaseratesaslittleas1%.TrusteeBlackhurstrequestedstaffinvestigateselfinsuranceoptionsfor2011.DavidHabecker/lownresidentstatediftheTownmakesthedecisiontogoselfinsured,thentheTownmaywanttoconsiderinsuringallcitizensofEstesPark.Therebeingnofurthertestimony,MayorPinkhamclosedthepublichearing,anditwasmovedandseconded(Levine/Ericson)theHighwayUsersTrustFundandResolutions21-09,22-09and23-09beapproved,anditpassedunanimously.MayorPinkhamandtheBoardofTrusteesthankedstafffortheireffortsduringthebudgetprocess.2.TOWNBOARD2010GOALS.TownAdministratorHalburntreviewedthe2010TownBoardGoalsasdiscussedbytheTownBoardatapreviousstudysession:1)ImproveTransportation;2)SustainInfrastructure—ExploreStreetandDrainageUtility:3)StanleyParkRedevelopment;4)BondParkRedevelopment;5)DevelopEconomicStrategy—ExploreGrantOpportunities;andUpdateDevelopmentCode—SupportFireCode.DiscussionwasheardamongsttheBoardandissummarized:TrusteeEricsonproposedchangestothegoalswithmoredetailprovidedforgoalslistedandtheadditionofaffordablehousingandacommunitycenter;discussedtheneedtodevelopanenergypolicy;theFireCodetobeaddressedbytheFireDistrictandnottheTown;thegoalsshouldbebroadtoallowstafftodevelopanactionplan;andaffordablehousingtobeaddressedbytheHousingAuthority. BoardofTrustees—November24,2009—Page4Itwasmovedandseconded(Eisenlauer/Homeier)toapprovethe2010TownBoardofTrusteeGoalsaslistedwiththeadditionofDevelopEnergyPolicyaddedasasub-bullettoSustainInfrastructure,anditpassedunanimously.3.ORDINANCE#09-09—AMENDINGSECTIONS2.52.020AND2.52.040OFTHEMUNICIPALCODEPERTAININGTOSALARIESOFTHEMUNICIPALJUDGEANDMUNICIPALCOURTCLERK.TownClerkWilliamsonreportedperColoradoRevisedStatutes,theMunicipalCoderequiresthesalariesoftheMunicipalJudgeandtheMunicipalCourtClerkbereviewedeverytwoyears.Theincreaseinsalaryamountsto5%.TheBoarddiscussedtheneedtoestablishareviewprocessforappointeessuchastheMunicipalCourtJudgeandClerk.TownAttorneyWhitereadOrdinance#09-09.Itwasmovedandseconded(BlackhurstlMiller)toapproveOrdinance#09-09increasingthesalariesoftheMunicipalCourtJudgeandClerkeffectiveJanuary1,2010,anditpassedunanimously.4.ORDINANCE#10-09-TEMPORARYMORATORIUMFORMEDICALMARIJUANADISPENSARIES.TownAttorneyWhiteprovidedabriefhistoryonthelegalizationofmedicalmarijuana,includingthe2000constitutionalamendmenttolegalizetheuseformedicalproposes,andinFebruary2009thefederalgovernmentannounceditwouldnolongerenforcethefederalmarijuanalawsaslongasmarijuanawasbeingusedinaccordancewithstatelaw.ThischangehasresultedinanumberofnewpatientsandprimarycaregiversinColorado,includingtheopeningofmedicalmarijuanadispensaries.Thishasraisedanumberofpolicyandlegalissuesformunicipalities.TheTowndoesnothaveprovisionsintheMunicipalCodeortheDevelopmentCodetoaddressthesebusinesses.StaffrecommendstheTownBoardadoptanemergencyordinancetoimposeaseven-monthmoratoriumontheestablishmentofmedicalmarijuanadispensariesinTown.Duringthemoratorium,staffwouldworkonproposedcodeamendmentsrelatedtothesebusinesses.AttorneyWhitereadOrdinance#10-09.Afterfurtherdiscussion,itwasmovedandseconded(BlackhursUMiller)toapproveOrdinance#10-09placingatemporarymoratoriumonmedicalmarijuanadispensarieseffectiveimmediately,anditpassedunanimously.5.REQUESTTOENTEREXECUTIVESESSION:Itwasmovedandseconded(Eisenlauer/Levine)theTownBoardenterintoExecutiveSessionforthepurposeofdiscussingapersonnelmatter;notinvolvinganyspecificemployeeswhohaverequesteddiscussionofthemailerinopensession;anymemberoftheTownBoard(orbody);theappointmentofanypersontofillanofficeoftheTownBoard(orbody);orpersonnelpoliciesthatdonotrequirediscussionofmailerspersonaltoparticularemployees,underC.R.S.24-6-402(4)(f),anditpassedunanimously.MayorPinkhamcalleda10-minutebreakat8:55p.m.priortoenteringintoExecutiveSession.MayorPinkhamreconvenedthemeetingat9:50p.m.fromExecutiveSessionwhereuponheadjournedthemeetingat9:50p.m.WilliamPinkham,Mayor BoardofTrustees—November24,2009—Page5JackieWilliamson,TownClerk RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,November24,2009MinutesofaJointStudySessionmeetingoftheTOWNBOARDANDESTESVALLEYPLANNINGCOMMISSIONoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldatTownHallinRooms202&203insaidTownofEstesParkonthe24thdayofNovember,2009.Board:MayorPinkham,TrusteesBlackhurst,Eisenlauer,Ericson,Levine,HomeierandMillerCommission:CommissionersFraundorf,Hull,Lane,NorrisandPoggenpohlAlsoAttending:TownAdministratorHalburnt,DeputyTownAdministratorRichardson,TownAttorneyWhite,TownClerkWilliamson,DirectorJosephandPlannersChilcottandShirkAbsent:CommissionersKlinkandTuckerMayorPinkhamcalledthemeetingtoorderat5:05p.m.PRIORITIZEDEVELOPMENTCODECHANGES.TheTownBoardrankedalistofDevelopmentCodechangespresentedbytheEstesValleyPlanningCommission.Thelistbyhighestrankingincludedenforcementofcurrentdevelopmentcode,windturbines,vacationhomerentalsandBed&Breakfasts,accessorydwellingunits/kitchens,PlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)provisions(downtown),RM—Multi-FamilyResidentialandA-Accommodationsstandards(replaceexistingkitchenbaseddensityformulaswithaFloorAreaRatio(FAR)),adoptsolarpanelregulations,clarifycontainmentprovisionintheCD-CommercialDowntowndistricts(touroperatorsandbikerentals),expireddevelopmentplanapprovals,fixAppendixD(reconcileTownandCountyroadstandards),privateschools(developstandards),limitsitedisturbanceonoldlots,A-i-Accommodationdensityformulas(clarifydefinitionofunit),wildlifeandopenspace,inclusionaryzoning(affordablehousing),revisionofComprehensivePlan,andcommercial/residentialinterfacezoning.TrusteeMillersuggestedPUDsbeaddressedfirstandfocusontheentirevalleywiththreetypes,includingresidential,commercialandmixeduse.HestatedthePUDprocessencouragesdeveloperstobemorecreativeanddevelopintelligentdesign.Heencouragedstafftoreviewothercommunity’sregulationstodeterminewhatwouldworkforEstesPark.DiscussionoccurredamongsttheBoardandtheCommissionersandhasbeensummarized:theremaybesomeissuesthatcouldberesolvedratherquicklyandwithlittlestafftime;PUDscouldprovideadditionalhousingoptions;theTownshouldaddressthesolarpanelregulationsbeforeitbecomesanissue;PUDsneedtobeaddressedbecausetheyarenotreadilyavailablewiththecurrentcodelanguage;theBoardneedstohaveadiscussiononwhyregulationsarerequiredtoaddresscertainissuesbecauseregulationwithoutenforcementmaynotbetheanswer;enforcementofcurrentdevelopmentcodeshouldberemovedfromtheprioritylist;accessorydwellingunitsshouldbeaddressedwithworkforcehousingandPUDs;theComprehensivePlandoesnotincludeanenergypolicyandshouldberevised;thePlanningCommissionshouldreviewtheComprehensivePlanandsubmitareporttotheTownBoardonnecessarychanges/updates.Afterfurtherdiscussion,thetopprioritiesincluded1)PlannedUnitDevelopments(PUDs),Housing(specificcodechangestobeidentifiedafterthejointmeetingwiththeTownBoard,PlanningCommissionandtheHousingAuthorityinFebruary2010)and RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownBoardStudySession—November24,2009—Page2ComprehensivePlanreview.AdministratorHalburntsuggestedajointTaskForcebeestablishedwithTownBoardandPlanningCommissionermemberstoreviewtheComprehensivePlan.Adiscussionensuedonwhetherornottoregulatealternativeenergysuchassolarpanelsandsolararrays.Somemembersexpressedconcernwithpropertyrightsandquestionedtheneedtoregulate,whileothersexpressedconcernwithviewcorridorsandtherightsofneighboringpropertyowners.Aproblemstatementneedstobeoutlinedinordertoidentifyandaddresstheissuesrelatedtoalternativeenergy.WINDTURBINES.DirectorJosephstatedthePlanningCommissionhasstudied,reviewedthesurvey,andtakenpubliccommentontheissue,andhaveconcludedwindturbinesshouldberegulatedandnotbannedbystrikingabalancebetweenpropertyrightsandpublicconcern.AnextensionofthetemporarymoratoriumhasbeenrequestedtoallowthePlanningCommissiontimetoinvestigateanddevelopregulationforanewaffordableandefficientmicro-turbinebeforebringingarecommendationforwardtotheTownBoard.ThePlanningCommissionwouldrecommendthedevicesmeetinternationalstandardsbecausethestatehasnotdevelopedsafetystandardsforthedevices.Boardcommentsincluded:theproposedregulationswouldbanwindturbinesonmostlots;HOAsshouldaddresstheissue;whyregulatewindturbinesiftheintentistobanthem;aspecialreviewprocesswouldallowneighboringpropertyownersavoiceinthereviewprocess;andregulationsalreadyexistinthecodesuchassetbacks,heightandnoisethatshouldbeusedtoregulatewindturbines.PlanningCommissionavoidedthespecialreviewprocessbecausethereisnootherissueregulatedinthatmanner.TheCommissionfocusedonregulatingturbinesthroughsetbacks.AttorneyWhiteemphasizedavarianceforthesightingofawindturbineduetosetbackrequirementswouldnotbeinthepreviewoftheBoardofAdjustment,asthefunctionoftheBoardofAdjustmentistoaddressirregularitiesoflots.Discussionfollowedonhowtoaddresswindturbineseitherthroughregulationorabanthroughoutthevalley.TheTownBoardrequestedthePlanningCommissionbringforwardarecommendationfortheBoard’sconsideration.VACATIONHOMESANDBED&BREAKFASTCODEAMENDMENT-PROBLEMSTATEMENT.DirectorJosephstatedthevacationhomecodeamendmentshavebeensimplifiedinrelationtoservicesprovidedbyowner,mealservice,housekeeping,definitionofpartyandminorwordsmithing.Staffwouldreplacethewordagencyinthecodeamendmentswithrepresentative.ACCESSORYKITCHEN.DirectorJosephstatedtherecommendedcodechangewouldallowanaccessorykitchenonanylotwiththerecordationofalanduseaffidavit.Theaffidavitwouldensurefutureownersateawarethepropertycannotbeusedasaduplex.Therebeingnofurtherbusiness,MayorPinkhamadjournedthemeetingat6:45p.m.JackieWilliamson,TownClerk0 RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,November19,2009MinutesofaRegularmeetingofthePUBLICSAFETYCOMMITTEEoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldintheTownHallinsaidTownofEstesParkonthe1gthofNovember,2009.Committee:ChairEisenlauer,TrusteesHomeierandEricsonAttending:AllAlsoAttending:TownAdministratorHalburnt,DeputyTownAdministratorRichardson,ChiefKufeld,ChiefDormanandRecordingSecretaryPetrieAbsent:NoneChairEisenlauercalledthemeetingtoorderat8:00am.PUBLICCOMMENTNone.POLICEDEPARTMENTCOPLINKDemoandIntergovernmentalAgreement.COPLINKisashared,statewidedatabaseofindividualswhohavehadpreviouscontactwithlawenforcementorpriorarrests.AgenciesacrossColoradowhoaremembersofCOPLINKcanaccessthisdata,andcansearchforassociationsbetweenpeople,organizations,weapons,properties,vehicles,andlocationstoassisttheminapprehendingindividualssuspectedincrimesortohelpsolveopencriminalcasesinamoreeffectivemanner.TheinformationcontainedinCOPLINKisweb-basedandisupdateddaily.LarimerEmergencyTelephoneAuthority(LETA)hasenteredintoanagreementwiththeColoradoInformationandSharingConsortium(CISC)toallowLETAandtheparticipatingagenciesaccesstoCOPLINKataminimalcosttoeachagencybasedontheswornofficercount.TherewouldbenocosttotheEstesParkPoliceDepartmentatthistime;however,in2011maintenancefeeswouldbeassessedintheamountof$660.87.TheCommitteerecommendsapprovaloftheCOPLINKIntergovernmentalAgreementasanactionitemtotheTownBoardonDecember8,2009.AdditionofChapter9.40PossessionofFirearmsonTownProperty.ChiefKufeldpresentedaproposedOrdinancetoprohibitfirearmsonTownownedproperty,includingtheTownHall,ConventionandVisitor’sBureau,Museum,SeniorCenter,andStanleyParkFairgrounds.TheprohibitionwouldensurethesafetyoftheTownOfficials,employeesandcitizensofEstesParkconductingbusinessinthesefacilities.Thisamendmentwouldnotaffectthoseindividualswhoarelegallylicensedtocarryconcealedweapons.TheCommitteerecommendsapprovaloftheOrdinanceaddingChapter9.40totheTownofEstesParkMunicipalCodeasanactionitemtotheTownBoardmeetingonDecember8,2009REPORTS2and3rdQuarterStatistics.DetectiveSergeantJimKenneygaveanupdateon2’and3dquarterPoliceDepartmentstatistics.Reportsweremadeapartoftherecord. RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSPublicSafetyCommittee—November19,2009—Page2FIREDEPARTMENTREPORTSTransitiontoFireDistrict.OnNovember3,2009theelectorateapprovedtheformationoftheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrict(EVFPD).TheDistrictBoardwouldbesworninonNovember30,2009andholdtheirfirstofficialmeetingtoelectofficers,adoptthe2010budget,certifythemilllevy,andTransitionalIntergovernmentalAgreementandIntergovernmentalAgreement(IGA)withtheTownofEstesPark.TheIGAswouldtransferallfireapparatusandequipmentownedbytheTowntotheDistrict,andstipulatesthetransferofexistingpersonneltotheDistrict.ThedistrictwouldassumefireprotectionresponsibilityonJanuary1,2010.TheEVFPDhasalsoidentifiedtenotherareasthatneedtobeaddressedinordertocompletetheorganizationaltransferoffireservicesfromtheTowntotheDistrict:oDeterminethetransferofequipmentthroughanIGA,placingequipmentintotwocategories:1)operationalfireequipment,i.e.axes,pikepoles,thermalimagingcameras,radios,etc.;and2)administrativeequipment,i.e.computers,telephones,copymachines,officeequipment,etc.oDeterminethetransferofcurrentsuppliesincludingfirefightingfoam,officesupplies,andotherconsumables.oDeterminefutureuseandtrackingoffuel.oDeterminethetransferofallfireapparatusandrelatedinsurances.oDevelopagreementsforservicescurrentlyprovidedbytheTownofEstesParkincludingHumanResources,Accounting,FleetMaintenance,IT,andDispatching.oDeterminehowpersonnelbenefitswillbeprovidedincludingthetransferoftheVolunteerFirePensionFund.oDetermineleaseagreementpertheServicePlan/IGAfortheDannelsFireStation.oDetermineleaseagreementfortrainingsiteonElmRoad.oDeterminethetransferofallrecords,includingpersonnelandincident.oDeveloptimelinesforalloftheabove.TownAdministratorHalburntsuggestedmergingthePublicSafetyCommitteewithanothercommitteesinceonlythePoliceDepartmentwouldbereportinginthefuture.TheCommitteerequestedtocontinuereceivingquarterlyreportsfromtheFireDistrict.3QuarterReports.ChiefDormangaveapresentationontheyear-to-dateincidentrunreportsandtrainingreports.ChiefDormanreportedthetotalmonetarylossfortheParkTheaterMallwasjustover$1million.TownAdministratorHalburntreportedtherearetwoopeninvoicesforfireservicesandthoseindividualswerebeingsenttocollectionsforpayment,perthepolicyestablishedwiththeauditors.Shestatedpaymentplanoptionshavebeenofferedfortheoutstandingbills;however,theTownhasnotreceivedaresponse.Therebeingnofurtherbusiness,ChairEisenlaueradjournedthemeetingat9:02a.m.SandraPetrie,RecordingSecretary 800DunravenStreetP.O.Box897EstesParkColorado80517November27,2009JackieWilliamson,TownClerkTownofEstesParkP.0.Box1200EstesPark,Colorado80517DearMs.Williamson:WearewritingtowithdrawourappealtothestaffdeterminationapprovingtherelocationofKindCoffeeto841DunravenStreet.Wewouldappreciatetherefundofthe$300.00appealfeesubmittedwithourletter.RobertW.HowellMaryD.owell JackieWilliamsonFrom:ccook@airbits.comsent:Wednesday,December02,20092:53PMJackieWilliamsonGoodafternoon.WeattheRockyMountainParkHolidayInnhavedecidedtodropourappealconcerningtheKindCoffeeproject.ThankYoufortheopportunitytoconsiderthepossibleoperationaleffectsofthisprojectbutonceagain,wehavedecidedtodropourappeal.Thankyou.ChrstopherS.CookGeneralManagerRockyMountainParkHolidayInn1 TownClerk’sOfficeCMemoTo:MayorPinkham,TownBoardofTrusteesAdministratorHalburntFrom:JackieWilliamsonDate:12/3/09Re:ReappointmentofKathyPalmeritotheEstesValleyLocalMarketingDistrictBACKGROUNDKathyPalmeriwasappointedtoaone-yeartermexpiringDecember31,2009totheEstesValleyLocalMarketingDistrict(LMD)bytheBoardofTrusteeonNovember11,2008.Mrs.Palmerihasexpressedinterestinfulfillinganewfour-yeartermthatwouldexpireonDecember31,2013.ThenormalprocessforfillingavacancyonanappointedBoard/Commissionistoadvertisetheposition,acceptapplicationsandconductaninterviewprocess.SincetheappointmentofMrs.Palmeriwasforonlyone-year,staffisrecommendingtheTownBoardforegothenormalprocessandappointMrs.Palmeritoafour-yearterm.ShehasbeenandcontinuestobeavaluableappointmenttotheLMDBoard.BUDGETN/ARECOMMENDMOTIONImovetoapproveldenytheappointmentofKathyPalmeritotheEstesValleyLocalMarketingDistrictforafour-yeartermexpiringonDecember31,2013. ESTESVALLEYLIj3j_::::FClaudineLibraryDirectorcperrault@estesvalleylibrary.orgwww.estesorgeJackieWilliamson4December2009Clerk,TownofEstesParkP.O.Box1200EstesPark,CO80517DearMs.Williamson:TheEstesValleyPublicLibraryDistrict(Library)isnominatingBrian‘John’KamprathtofillaLibraryBoardofTrusteevacancy.Inaddition,wearerecommendingthereappointmentofAmyHamricktotheLibrary’sBoardofTrustees.JohnKamprath:ThevacancytobefilledbyMr.KamprathisduetothedeparturefromEstesParkofMs.LenieGabridgewhosetermexpiresonDecember31,2011.TheBoardreceivedthreeapplicationsforthispositionandinterviewedeachapplicant.TheBoardrecommendsthatMr.JohnKamprathbeappointedtoreplaceLenieGabridgeasaTrusteebeginningonJanuary1,2010andendingonDecember31,2011.JohnKamprathhas30yearsofexperienceincommercialconstructionwithanemphasisinbusinessdevelopmentandprojectmanagement.HegraduatedfromEstesParkHighSchoolandhasalonghistoryofcivicengagementlocallyandthroughouttheFrontRange.Mr.Kamprathandhiswifeandchildrenareavidlibraryusers,andheisveryenthusiasticaboutcontributingtothecommunityasaTrusteeforhislocallibrary.TheBoardbelievesthatMr.Kamprath’sextensiveexperienceinconstruction,projectmanagementandcapitalcampaigningwillbeofgreatvaluetotheBoardforplannedbuildingexpansionandanyfutureLibraryMillLevyproposalstothevoters.AmyHamrick:AmyHamrickwillsuccessfullycompletehertermonDecember31,2009.TheLibraryBoardofTrusteesrecommendsthatAmyHamrickbeappointedtoasecond4-yeartermcommencingJanuary1,2010andterminatingonDecember31,2013.TheLibraryBoardofTrusteesrespectfullyrequeststhattheTownBoardapproveJohnKamprathandAmyHamrick’sappointmentsasLibraryTrusteesatitsearliestconvenience.Sincerely,‘,;;t,.tt/arahWalsh,President-BoardofTrusteesEstesValleyPublicLibraryDistrict970-586-8116fax970-586-0189--‘P0Box1687•335EastElkhornAvenue•EstesPark,CO•80517 CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:RobertJoseph,Director,CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentAlisonChilcoff,PlannerDate:FirstReading:December8,2009SecondReading/Adoption:January26,2010QSubject:VacationHomesandBed&BreakfastAmendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode—FirstReading/PublicHearingVACATIONHOMES&B&BSBACKGROUND:StaffhaspreparedCoderevisionstoaddressconcernsexpressedbyresidentsabouttheimpactsofshort-termrentals,suchasvacationhomesandbedandbreakfastinns,inresidentialneighborhoods.Ifapproved,correspondingrevisionswillneedtobemadetotheMunicipalCode.TheseproposedMunicipalCoderevisionshavebeenincludedforinformationalpurposesanddonotrequiredactiononthepartoftheEstesvalleyPlanningCommission.Revisionstovacationhomeregulations,includingrevisionstothedefinitionofaccommodationuse,guestroom,guestquarter,householdliving,andnightlyrentalinEVDCChapter13,andrevisionstodistinguishbetweenB&Bsandvacationhomeusesandthedistrictsinwhichtheseusesarepermitted.BUDGET:N/AACTION:Noactionrequiredatthistime,asitisthefirstreading.ThesecondreadingandadoptionisscheduledforJanuary26,2010. AmendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeVacationHomes&B&BsEstesParkCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentTownHaIl,170MacGregorAvenueP0Box1200EstesPark,CO80517Phone:970-577-3721Fax:970-586-0249www.estesnet.comTOWNBOARDMEETINGDATE:December8,2009TITLE:AmendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeREQUEST:TomakeanumberofchangesandcorrectionstotheadoptedEstesValleyDevelopmentCoderelatingtoshort-termrentals,suchasbedandbreakfastinnsandvacationhomes.LOCATION:EstesValley,inclusiveoftheTownofEstesPark.APPLICANT:EstesValleyPlanningCommissionSTAFFCONTACT:BobJosephandAlisonChilcottAPPLICABLELANDUSECODE:EstesValleyDevelopmentCodePROJECTDESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND:StaffhaspreparedCoderevisionstoaddressconcernsexpressedbyresidentsabouttheimpactsofshort-termrentals,suchasvacationhomesandbedandbreakfastinns,inresidentialneighborhoods.Ifapproved,correspondingrevisionswillneedtobemadetotheMunicipalCode.TheseproposedMunicipalCoderevisionshavebeenincludedforinformationalpurposesanddonotrequireactiononthepartoftheEstesValleyPlanningCommission.Revisionstovacationhomeregulations,includingrevisionstothedefinitionofaccommodationuse,guestroom,guestquarter,householdliving,andnightlyrentalinEVDCChapter13,andrevisionstodistinguishbetweenB&Bsandvacationhomeusesandthedistrictsinwhichtheseusesarepermitted.ORGANIZATION:1.Texttobereplaceddelineatedwithstrikethrough(aPG44ghijklmnopqrstuvwxy).2.Newtextdelineatedwithunderline(abcdefghi1kImnopQrstuvwxyz).3.Revisionshavebeenorganizedsequentiallybychapterandsection.4.RevisionsmadesincetheAugust11,2009TownBoardstudysessionarehighlightedinyellow.RevisionDate:October28,20091 ITEM1:SHORT-TERMRENTALS:BEDANDBREAKFASTINNSANDVACATIONHOMES0Section4.3ResidentialZoningDistrictsB.Table4-1:PermittedUses:ResidentialZoningDistricts.AdditionalRegulationsUseClassificationSpecificUse“S”=PermittedbySpecialReview(ApplyinAllDistrictsUnless“—“=ProhibitedOtherwiseRE-iREE-lERR-1R-2RMStated)ACCOMMODATIONUSES.*,F__—BedandBreakfast——————P§5tBLow-IntensityInnpAccommodations——VacationHomePPPPPPPP§5.1.BSection4.4NonresidentialZoningDistrictsB.Table4-4:PermittedUses:NonresidentialZoningDistricts.LowIntensityAccommodationsBedandbreakfastinnsighilyRentalsVacationHome§5.1.8.InCD,suchuseshallnotbelocatedonthegroundfloorofabuildingfrontingonElkhornAvenueInCD.suchuseshallnotbelocatedonthegroundfloorofabuildingfrontingonElkhomAvenue-ShorttermandtonetermnightlyrentalsallowedasaprincipaluseinaresidentialdwellingunitSeealsoTable52whichallowsnightlyrentalsasanaccessoryustoadwellingunitint1,AInnCDzonindistrictsNonresidentialZoningDistricts“P”=PermittedbyRight“S”=PermittedbySpecialReviewUse“—“=ProhibitedAdditionalRegulations(ApplyClassificinAllDistrictsUnlessOtherwiseationSpecificuseAA-ICDCO0CIII-iStated)ACCOMMODATIONUSES———-——4,PPPpEnCD,suchuseshallnotbeHotel,Small—————locatedonthegroundfloorofabuildingfrontingonElkhomAvenue5.l.B00PPRevisionDate:October28,20092 Resortlodge/cabins——————§5.1.Plow-intensitySection5.1SpecificUseStandardsB.BedandBreakfastInnandVacationHome.\l1-bd-aHd-1+t+kfw44++n—w—s1N+I1-be-subjecttothefollowingstandards-Allbedandbreakfastinnsandvacationhomesshallbesubiecttothefollowing(see§5.1.B.2and§5.1.B.3foradditionalregulations):a.AnnualOperatingPermit.(1)Allbedandbreakfastinnsandvacationhomesshallobtainanoperatingpermitonanannualbasis.IfthepropertyislocatedwithinTownlimits,thebusinesslicenseshallbeconsideredthepermit.IfthepropertyiswithintheunincorporatedEstesValley,apermitshallbeobtainedfromtheTownofEstesParkCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentTownClerk’sOffice.(2)ThepermitshalldesignatealocalresidentorpropertymanageroftheEstesValleywhocanbecontactedandisavailabletwenty-four(24)hoursperday,withregardtoanyviolationoftheprovisionsofthisSection.Thepersonsetforthontheapplicationshallbetheagentoftheownerforallpurposeswithregardtotheoperationofthebedandbreakfastinnorvacationhome.(3)StateSalesTaxLicense.Aconditionofissuanceoftheannualoperatingpermitshallbeproofofacurrentsalestaxlicense.b.StateSalesTaxLicense.Allbedandbreakfastomesobtainastatesalestaxlicense.c.EstesParkMunicipalCode.PropertieslocatedwithintheTownofEstesParkshallcomplywithalltheconditionsandrequirementssetforthintheTownofEstesParkMunicipalCode,Chapter5.20.1.StructuresshallnotbealteredinawaythatchangestheirgeneralresidentialaJ)pearaflCe.2.Iffour()ormoreoilstreetparkingspacesareprovidedpursuantto§7.11,visualscreeningfromadjacentresidentialusesshallberequired.Otherthanregisteredguests,mealsshallheseiwedtothegeneralpublic.Nocookingorkitchenfacilitiesshallbeallowedintheguestrooms.RevisionDate:October28,20093 d.ResidentialCharacter.Bedandbreakfastinnsandvacationhomesshallnotbedesignedoroperatedinamannerthatisoutofcharacterwithresidentialuseofadwellingunitbyonehousehold.Thisincludes,butisnotlimitedto.thefollowing:(1)ExceptintheCDdistrict,designshallbecompatible,intermsofbuildingscale,mass,andcharacter,withlow-intensity,low-scaleresidentialuse.(2)Guestroomsshallbeintegratedwithinthebedandbreakfastinnorvacationhome.(3)Kitchenfacilitiesshallbelimitedtobeconsistentwithsingle-familyresidentialuse.Nokitchenfacilitiesorcookingshallbeallowedintheguestrooms.(4)Accessorybuildingsshallnotbeusedforamenitiesbeyondagazeboorsimilaroutdoorroom.(5)Nochangesintheexteriorappearanceshallbeallowedtoaccommodateeachbedandbreakfastinnorvacationhome,exceptthatone(1)wall-mountedidentificationsignnolargerthanfour(4)squarefeetinareashallbepermitted.(6)Vehiculartrafficandnoiselevelsshallnotbeoutofcharacterwithresidentialuse.e.Parking.(1)MinimumRequiredParking.ExceptintheCDDowntownCommercialzoningdistrict,thenumberofparkingspacesavailabletoadwellingunithousingabedandbreakfastinnoravacationhomeshallnotbereducedtolessthantwo(2).(2)MaximumAllowedParking.Nomorethanthree(3)vehiclesshallbeparkedoutsideatanyone(1)time.Vehiclesenclosedwithinagaragedonotcounttowardsthismaximum.On-streetparkingshallbeprohibited.Referto§5.2.B.2.f,whichmayfurtherlimitthenumberofvehiclespermittedonsite.f.EmployeeHousingUnits.Employeehousingunitsshallnotberented,leasedorfurnishedfortenanciesoflessthanthirty(30)days.(See5.2.C.2.a).g.AttainableHousingUnits.Attainablehousingunitsshallnotberented,leasedorfurnishedfortenanciesoflessthanthirty(30)days.(See§11.4.E).RevisionDate:October28,20094 h.AccessoryDwellingUnits.Bedandbreakfastinnsandvacationhomesshallnotbepermittedonresidentiallotscontaininganaccessorydwelling.(Seealso§5.2.B.2.awhichprohibitsrentalofaccessorydwellingunitsregardlessofthelengthoftenancy).i.CDDistrict.IntheCDDowntownCommercialzoningdistrict,suchuseshallnotbelocatedonthegroundfloorofabuildingfrontingonElkhornAvenue.j.Density.Onlyonevacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinnshallbepermittedperresidentialdwellingunit.2.Allbedandbreakfastinnsshallalsobesubjecttothefollowing:a.Occupancy.(1)MaximumOccupancy.Nomorethaneight(8)guestsshalloccupyabedandbreakfastinnatanyonetime.Thismaximumallowableoccupancyshallbefurtherlimitedbyamaximumoftwo(2)guestsperbedroomplustwoguests.Thisisnotintendedtoestablishmaxoccupancylimitsforindividualroomswithinabedandbreakfastinn.Forexample,threeindividualscouldbeaccommodatedinonebedroomandoneindividualinanother.(2)NumberofParties.BedandBreakfastInns.Bedandbreakfastinnsmayberented,leasedorfurnishedtoone(1)ormoreparties.b.HomeOccupations.Homeoccupationsmaybeoperatedonthesiteofabedandbreakfastinn.Bedandbreakfastinnsmayalsoofferlimitedancillaryservicestoguests,suchasperformingsmallweddingsorofferingclasses/workshopstoguests,providedtheyareincharacterwithresidentialuse.c.HouselceepingServices.Bedandbreakfastinnsshallbepermiedtoprovidedailyhousekeepingservicestoguests.d.MealService.Bedandbreakfastinnsmayprovidemealsservicetoregisteredguests;however,mealsshallnotbeprovidedtothegeneralpublic.3.Allvacationhomesshallalsobesubjecttothefollowing:a.Occupancy.(1)MaximumOccupancy.Nomorethaneight(8)individualsshalloccupyavacationhomeatanyonetime.Thismaximumallowableoccupancyshallbefurtherlimitedbyamaximumoftwo(2)individualsperbedroomplustwoindividuals.ThisisnotintendedtoestabIhmumoccupanyRevisionDate:October28,20095 limitsforindividualroomswithinabedandbreakfastthreeindividualscouldbeaccommodatedinoneindividualinanother.(2)NumberofParties.Vacationhomesshallberented,leasedorfurnishedtonomorethanone(1)party,occupyingthevacationhomeasasinglegroup.One(,‘shallconsistofrelatedand/ornonrelatedindividualsoccupy--1agroup,forexample,afamilyorgroupofgtogetheroragroupofbusinessassociates.Ownersofthevacationhomeshallnotbepermittedtooccupythevacationhomewhileapartyispresent.b.HomeOccupations.Homeoccupationsshallnotbeoperatedonthesiteofavacationhome,norshallvacationhomesofferancillaryservicestoguests.(See§5.2.B.2.d).c.HousekeepingServices.Vacationhomesshallbepermittedtoprovidehousingse’icesonlyatthebegingandendofaparty’sstay.d.MealService.Vacationhomesshallnotprovidemealservicetoregisteredguestsorthegeneralpublic.Section5.2.B.1AccessoryUses/StructuresPermittedintheResidentialZoningDistricts.Tabie5-1:AccessoryUsesandStructuresPermittedintheResidentialZoningDistrictsResidentialZoningDistrict“Yes”=Permitted“No”=NotPermittedAdditionalAccessoryUseRE-iREE-iERR-1R-2RMRequirementsNishtlyRentalsesesYesYesYesYes§5.2.B2.gVacationHome§5.1.BSection5.2.B.2AdditionalReuuirementsforSuecificAccessoryUses/StructuresPermittedintheResidentialZoningDistrictsd.HomeOccupations.(4)Operational:j)Homeoccupationsshallbeprohibitedonthesiteofavacationhomeand/oraccessorydwellingunit.(See§5.1.3and§5.2.B.2.a).e.Rentals.0RevisionDate:October28,20096 (1)Longtermrentals(leasetermsofthirty[30]daysormore)ofaprincipaloraccessoryresidentialdwellingunitshallbepermittedasanaccessoryuseinallresidentialzoningdistricts.(2)Short-riiiHizghtlyrentals(leasef1ethirty[301days)ofaprincipalresidentialdwellingunitshallbepermitteaaccessoryuseinallresidentialzoningdistricts,providedthatthefollowingconditionsaremet.AUpermittedshorttermrentalsofdwellingunitsshallberequiredto:(a)Complywithalltheconditions-andrequirementsassetforthintheTownofEstesParkMunicipalCot4ptr--5--24)and5.35,andT-ow--4+++Hbf.StorageorParkingofVehicles,RecreationalEquipmentandRecreationalVehicles.(7)BedandBreakfastInnsandVacationHomes.See§5.1.Bwhichfurtherlimitsvehiclestorageandparkingfordwellingunitsthatarepermittedasabedandbreakfastinnorvacationhome.Section5.2.C.1AccessoryUses/StructuresPermittedintheNonresidentialZoningDistricts.Table5-2:AccessoryUsesandStructuresPermittedintheNonresidentialZoningDistrictsNonresidentialZoningDistrict“Yes”=Permitted“No”=NotPermittedAdditionalAccessoryUseAA-iCDCO0CliI-iRequirementsRevisionDate:October28,20097 NihtlyRentalsNoYesYesNoNoNoNo§51.BVacationHomeinCD.suchuseshallnotbelocatedonthegroundfloorofabuildingfrontingonElkhornAvenueAsaccessorytoaprincipalresidentialuseont’.•TheshorttermnightlyrentalofadwellingunitasanaccessoryuseintheAIandCDdistrictsshallnrnbesubjecttotherequirementsof§52.W2.gabo’.’e.SeealsoTablewhichpermitsnightlyrpnt1r.cnnrinciniusedwellingunitA-IandCDzoning4i;inetsSection5.2..DGeneralDimensionalandOperationalRequirements.4.MaximumBuildingorStructureSizeforNonresidentialUses.ExceptasotherwiseexpresslylimitedorallowedinthisSection,andexceptforsiw+econtainingaccessorynightly-e-al++u*1-+accessoryrecreationalfacilitiesincludingswimmingpoois,freestandingaccessorybuildingsandstructuresshallnotbelargerthanonethousand(1,000)squarefeetofgrossfloorarea.(Ord.15-03#1)Section5.2.C.2aEmployeeHousing(4)RestrictiveCovenantRequired.(a)EmployeehousingunitsprovidedpursuanttothisSectionshallbedeedrestrictedforaperiodoftimenolessthantwenty(20)yearstoassuretheavailabilityoftheunitforlong-termoccupancyonlybyemployeesoftheprincipalbusinessuse.Suchrestrictionshallincludeaprohibitionofshort-termrentals(lessthanthirty[301days):see§5.1.Band/orrentalstothegeneralpublicoftheunit(s)exceptasotherwiseallowedbythisSection.Section11.4AttainableHousingDensityBonus,E.DevelopmentandDesignStandards.4.Short-TermRentalsProhibited.Attainablehousingunitsshallnotbeleasedorrentedrented,leasedorfurnishedfortenanciesoflessthanthirty(30)days(see§5.1.B).Section13.2.CUseClassification/SpecificUseDefinitionsandExamples.2.Accommodations,Low-Intensity.QRevisionDate:October28,2009$ a.GeneralDefinition:Visitor-servingfacilitiesthatprovidetemporarylodgingforcompensation,andwithanaveragelengthofstayoflessthanthirty(30)daysExceptintheCDdistrict,sSuchfacilityshallbedesignedtobecompatible,intermsofbuildingscale,massandcharacter,withapredominantlylow-intensityandlow-scaleresidentialand/orruralsetting.b.Examples:Thisclassificationincludesthefollowingtypesofspecificuses:(1)BedandBreakfastInn:Adetachedsiiwle-familyresidentialdwellingunitthatisrented,leased,oroccupiedasasingleaccommodationsunitforaccommodationspuiosesfortennsoflessthanthirty(30)daysandisoperator-occupiedonafull-timebasis.Anestablishmentoperatedin-a++-ewneroccupied,singlefamilydetacheddwellingunit,orportionthereof(excludingaccessorybuildings),thatprovideslodging,withorwithout-the-serviceofamorningmealonly,a-ndwheretheoperatorlivesonthepremises.—Nomorethaneight(8)guestsmaybeaccommodatedatanyone+4-t-m-+e—Accessorybuildin%sshallnotheusedfortmestquni-•o+ili*%3e-4-a-g-a7eboorsimilaroutdoorroom.(2)Hotel,Small:Anestablishmentcontainingnomorethaneight(8)guestroomsthatprovidestemporarylodgingwitheatinganddrinkingserviceandadiningroomwheremealsareserved.(3)NihtlyRentals:Nid---R4s+—lw+l+e--A1oisinglefamily,duplexormu4arn4y—dwellingunitthat-4s-4e€d--1ofcompensation,toprovid-4e-mporarylodgingforvisitorsandguests.Thetermofleaseinthispermittedprincipalnightlyrentalusemayheeithershortterm(lessthanthirtyt301+la)orlongterm(thirty1301days-ermore).See§5.2.Bfornightlyrent+4s—a11wed--as---a++—ac-cessoryuseintheresidential7n1’lT’uuisrjtts(4)ResortLodges/Cabins,Low-Intensity:Atractoflandundersingleownershipandmanagementwithnomorethanatotaloftwenty(20)guestroomsorguestunitsavailablefortemporaryrental.Theguestroomsmaybecontainedinamain“lodge”buildingand/orcontainedindetached,freestanding“cabin”structures(thelatterfreestandingstructuresshallnotincluderecreationalvehiclesormobilehomes).Asinglestructureshallcontainnomorethanfour(4)guestroomsorunits.Guestrooms/unitsinaresortlodge/cabinusemaycontainfullkitchenfacilitiesinlieuof“limitedkitchenfacilities,”butonlyifsuchguestroomscomplywithallconditionssetforthin§5.l.PofthisCode.(5)VacationHome.Aresidentialdwellingunitthatisrented,leased,oroccupiedasasingleaccommodationsunitforaccommodationspuosesforcompensationfortermsoflessthanthirty(30)days.RevisionDate:October28,20099 Section13.3DefinitionsofWords,TermsandPhrases6.AccommodationsUseshallmeanacommercial,visitorservingfacilitythatprovidestemporarylodginginguestroomsorguestunits,forcompensation,andwithanaveragelengthofvisitorstayofless-thanthirty(30)days.Examplesofaccommodationsusesincludemotels,hotels,bedandbreakfastinns,resortlodgesandhostels.Aprincipal“nightlyrental”useofadwellingunitintheA1orCDzoningdistricts,asmorespecificallydescribedin§13.2.C.2ofthisChapter,isanaccommodationsuse.Ontheotherhand,anaccessoryshortterm“nightlyrental”useofadwellingunitinaresidentialzoningdistrict,asallowedby§5.2.B.2.gofthisCode,isnotanaccoodationsuse.Seealsothedefinitionof“guestroomorunit”below,shallmeantherental,leasing.oroccupancyofanyroom,mobilehome,recreationalvehicle,campsite,orotherareainavisitor-servingfacilitythatprovidestemporarylodging,suchasanyhotel,motel,guesthouse,apartment,dormitory,mobilehomepark,recreationalvehicleparkorcampground,anysingle-familydwelling,duplex,multiple-familydwelling,condominiumunit,oranysuchsimilarplace,toanypersonwhom,foraconsideration,uses,possesses,orhastherighttouseorpossesssuchroom,mobilehomesite,recreationalvehiclesite,campsite,orotherareaforatotalcontinuousdurationoflessthanthirty(30)days.28.HouseholdLiving.a.GeneralDefinition:Afamilyunitrelatedbyblood,marriageoradoptionoreight(8)orfewerunrelatedindividuals(includingresidentandnonresidentcaregivers)livingtogetherinasingledwellingunit,withcommonaccesstoandcommonuseofalllivingandeatingareasandallfacilitiesforthepreparationandservingoffoodwithinthedwellingunit.Householdlivingshallincludeoccupancybyarenterhouseholdfortermsofthirty(30)daysormore.Refertothedefinitionof“accommodationsuse”forrenteroccupancyfortermsoflessthanthirty(30)days.b.Examples:Thisclassificationincludeshouseholdslivinginsingle-familyhouses,duplexes,townhomes,othermulti-familydwellingstructures,118.GuestUnitorGuestRoomshallmean:a.Aroomorsuiteofroomsinanaccommodationsusethatcontainssleepingandsanitaryfacilitiesandthatmayincludelimitedkitchenfacilities.Withtheexceptionofguestunitsorguestroomsinbedandbreakfastinnsandvacationhomes,guestunitsorguestroomsmayincludelimitedkitchenfacilities.Insteadofthepreviouslyrecommendedrevisionabove,keeptheexistingcodelanuagesothat“a”wouldcontinuetoread,a.Aroomorsuiteofroomsinanaccommodationsusethatcontainssleepingandsanitaryfacilitiesandthatmayincludelimitedkitchenfacilities.RevisionDate:October28,200910 b.Forpurposesofthisdefinition,“limitedkitchenfacilities”shallmeanakitchenthatisnotcontainedinaseparateroomandthatmayhaveasinkandonlythefollowingappliances:(a)arefrigeratornolargerthanthreeandone-half(3½)cubicfeet;(b)astove/ovennowiderthantwenty(20)inches;and/or(c)amicrowaveoven.447Gu’rI-Qtiarte+’*shall-N4wit+-quarters—wi-th-er-withorn-kitchenfacilitiesfortheuseoftemporaryuestsef-theoccupantsofthesinglefamilydwelling.159.NighthRentals,LongTennshallmeantheleasingofaprincipaloraccessorydwellingunitforcompensationandforatermofthirty(30)daysorlonger.See§13.2.C.2forthedescriptionofaprincipalnightlyrentaluse,and§5.2.B-e1thisCoderegardingaccessorynightlyrentalusesintheresidentialzoningdistricts.160.NightlyRentals,ShoeTcnnshallmeantheleasingofaprincipaldwellingunitforcompeationandforatermoflessthanthirty(30)days.See§13.2.C.2forthedesiptionofaprincipalnightlyrentaluse,and§5.2.BofthisCoderegardingnightlyrentalsinresidentialzoningdistricts.199.:Rcntc,ts,NightlyorShortTcrm.Seedefinitionof“NightlyRentals”above.RevisionDate:October2$,200911 EstesParkMunicipalCodeQ5.20.020Definitions.InthisChapter,thefollowingwordsandphrasesshallhavethefollowingmeanings:(1)24ccoinniocIatiowwea4heleasing,rentingor-furnishingofallyroom,mobilehomesite,recreationalvehiclesite,campsiteorotherareainanyhotel,motel,guesthouse,bedandbreakfast,apartment,dormitory,mobilehomepark,recreationalvehicleparkorcampground,anysinglefamilydwelling,duplex,multiplefamilydwelling,condominiumunit,vacationhomeoranysuchsimilarplacetoanypersonwho,foraconsideration,uses,possessesorhastherighttouseorpossesssuchdwelling,room,singlefamilydwelling,duplexunit,multiplefamilyunit,condominiumunit,vacationhome,siteorotheraccommodation_foratotalcontinuousdurationoflessthanthirty(30)days.Accommodationmeanstherental,leasing,oroccupancyofanaccommodationsiteand/oraccommodationsunitforatotalcontinuousdurationoflessthanthirty(30)days.(2)Accommodationsitemeansasiteconsistingofone(1)ormoreaccommodationunits,including,butnotlimitedtocondominiumunits,whicharelocatedonone(1)individualparcelofrealpropertyandundermanagementcontrolforrentalpuosesofanagent,entityoragency.QAccommodationsitemeansone(1)individualparcelofrealpropertyconsistingofone(1)ormoreaccommodationsunitsthatareundermanagementcontrolofanagent,entityoragencyforrentalpurposes.(3)Accommodationunitmeanseachindividualroom,setofrooms,site,singlefamilydwelling,duplexunit,multiplefamilyunit,condominiumunit,vacationhomeordividedarearented,leasedoroccupiedonaunitbasisinanaccommodation.Accommodationsunitmeansanyroom,mobilehome,recreationalvehicle,campsite,orotherareainavisitor-servingfacilitythatprovidestemporarylodging,suchasanyhotel,motel,guesthouse,apartment,dormitory,mobilehomepark,recreationalvehicleparkorcampground,anysingle-familydwelling,duplex,multiple-familydwelling,condominiumunit,oranysuchsimilarplace,toanypersonwhom,foraconsideration,uses,possesses,orhastherighttouseorpossesssuchroom,mobilehomesite,recreationalvehiclesite,campsite,orotherareaforatotalcontinuousdurationoflessthanthirty(30)days.(10)Vacationhomemeansaresidentialdwellingunit,asdefinedintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode,thatislocatedwithinaresidentialzoningdistrictandisrented,leasedoroccupiedonaunitbasisasanaccommodation.0RevisionDate:October28,200912 Vcieationhomemeansaresidentialdwellingunitthatisrented,leased,oroccupied—asingleaccommodationsunitforaccommodationspurposesforcompensationfortermsoflessthanthirty(30)days.(11)BedandbreakfastIii!?meansadetachedsingle-familyresidentialdwellingunitthatisrented,leased,oroccupiedforaccommodationspurposesandisoperator-occupiedonafull-timebasis.5.20.110Vacationhomesin;si4eii4ialzoningdistrictsandBedandBreakfastInns.4--i+ip1v-i+-ih—la++i-t-ningandoccupationof-anyvacationhomeesi-+g—ih-flwi++hw+o—lThwwRE1,RE,EI,E.R,R1,R2andRM-ThisSectionshallapplytovacationhomesandbedandbreakfastinns.(-1)Pu++S-€Thepurposeofthiseti-onistopermittheleasing,rentingawloccupationoT—*+tin-homesinresideni+d—-io+4ndistrictswhilemaintainingtheresidentialcha+c+l--ih**-districts.(2)Restrictionsonrentals.Theleasing,renting-e+j-at1+nrental,leasing,oroccupancyofallvacationhomesandbedandbreakfastinnssubjecttothisSectionshallberestrictedasfollows:a.CompliancewiththeapplicableregulationsfoundintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeisrequired.Vacationhomesshallnotbeoperated-inamannerthatisoutofcharacterwithresidentialuses.Thisincludesvehiculartrafficandnoiselevelsthatareoutofcharacterwithresidentialuses.Vacationhomesshallbedesignedtobecompatible,intermsofbuildingscale,massandcharacter,withapredominantlylowintensityandlowscaleresidentialsetting.Guestroomsshallbeintegratedwithinthevacationhome.Kitchenfacilitiesshallhelimitedtobeconsistentwithsinglefamilyresidentialuse.h.Avacationhomeshallberented,leasedorfunfishedtonomorethanone(1)partywitha-maximumofeight(8)individualguests.Thetotalmaximumoccupancyofeight(8)individualsshallbefurtherlimitedbyamaximumoftwo(2)guests--perbedroomplustwoindividuals.Intheeventthevacationhomeismanagedbyafulltimeonsitemanager,thevacationhomemayberented,leasedorfurnishedtomorethanone(1)partysubjecttothelimitationsoftwo(2)guestsperbedroomplustwo(2)individualswithamaximumofeight(8)guests.c.Nochangesintheexteriorappearancetoaccoodateeachvacationhomeshallheallowed,exceptthatone(1)wallmountedidentificationsignnolargerthanfour(4)squarefeetinareashallbepermitted.d.Only(1)vacationhomeshallbedistricts.nermittedperlotinsinglefamilyresidentialRevisionDate:October28,200913 e.Norecreationalvehicle,asthesameisdefinedinChapter13oftheEstes\1afleyDevelopmentCode,tent,temporaryshelter,canopy,teepeeoryurtshallbeusedbyanyindividualforlivingorsleepingpurposes.f.Eachvacationhomeispeittedamaximumofthree(3)guestvehiclesonsiteandparkedoutsideatanyone(1)time.Onstreetparkingshallbeprohibited.g.Vacationhomesshallbesubjecttocommercialutilityratesfortheentirecalendaryearofthecurrentlicense,andsalestaxcollectionandremittance.ItistheownersresponsibilitytonotifytheUtilityBillingDepartmentwhentheresidenceisnolongerbeingusedsavacationhomeafterthelicenseexpires.h.TheapplicationforabusinesslicenseforanyvacationhomeorbedandbreakfastshalldesignatealocalresidentorpropertymanageroftheEstesValleywhocanbecontactedbytheTownwithregardtoanyviolationoftheprovisionsofthisSection.Thepersonsetforthontheapplicationshallbetheagentoftheownerforallpurposeswithregardtotheissuanceofthebusinesslicense,theoperationofthevacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinn,andrevocationofthebusinesslicensepursuanttothetermsandconditionsofthisSection.1n++++-hepefaw9ww1eei’4-2()04;4w-erobtainedabusinesslicensefromtheTownfor20t)4shallbeentitledtooperatethevacationhometotheextentofitsoperationontheeffectivedateoftheordinancecodifiedherein,includingbutnotLimitedtothenumberofguestindividualsallowedtooccupythevacationhomeatanyone(1)time,thenumberofguestvehiclesallowedtobeparkedonsiteandanypermittedsignageidentifyingtheoperation-ofthevacationhome.IntheeventtheoperationofthevacationhomegrandfatheredbythisSectionisabandonedforaperiodofone(1)yearortheownerdoesnotmaintainabusinesslicenseforthevacationhomeinanysubsequentcalendaryear,thevacationhomeshallthenbesubjecttoallofthetermsandconditionsofthisSection,includinghutnotlimitedtothenumberofguestindividualsoccupyingthepremises.thenumberofvehiclesallowedtobeparkedoutsideone-*i-e-andtheignageidentifyingtheoperation-4thevacationhome.(3)Violation.ItisaviolationofthisSectionforanyowner,agent,guestand/oroccupantofavacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinntobeconvicted,includingapleaofnocontest,ofaviolationofSection9.08.010(DisturbingthePeace)ofthisCode;tofailtocollectandremitallrequiredsalestaxtotheStatedueandowingfortheleasing,rentaloroccupationofavacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinn;toviolateanyprovisionsofthisSection;and/ortofailtoacquireandpayforabusinesslicense.ForthepurposeofthisSection,onlyviolationsofSection9.08.010ofthisCodewhichoccuronthepremisesofthevacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinnandwhileavacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinnisbeingoccupiedasavacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinnshallbeaviolationofthisSection.000RevisionDate:October22,200914 (4)Revocationoflicense.TheTownmayrevokethebusinesslicenseofanyvacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinnforviolationoftheprovisionsofthisSectionasfollows:a.TheTownClerk,uponthereceiptandverificationofanyviolationofthisSection,shallgivewrittennoticetotheowneroragentthataviolationhasoccurred.b.UponthereceiptandverificationofanysubsequentviolationofthetermsandconditionsofthisSection,withintwo(2)yearsofthedateofthewrittenwarningsetforthinSubsectionaabove,theTownClerkh11jj.yrevokethebusinesslicensebygivingwrittennoticetotheowneroragentoftherevocationofthelicense.Saidrevocationshallbeforone(1)yearfromthedateofthenotice.c.UponthereceiptandverificationofanysubsequentviolationofthetermsandconditionsofthisSectionwithintwo(2)yearsafterreinstatement,theTownClerkshallrevokethebusinesslicensebygivingwrittennoticetotheowneroragentoftherevocationofthebusinesslicense.Saidrevocationshallbefortwo(2)yearsfromthedateofthenotice.Uponrevocationofthebusinesslicense,theowner’srighttooperateavacationhomeorbedandbreakfastinnonthepropertyshallterminate.(5)Appeal.AnyowneroragentwhowishestocontestthewrittenwarningortherevocationofabusinesslicenseshallbeentitledtorequestahearingbeforetheTownClerkbywrittennoticedeliveredinpersonorbycertifiedmail,returnreceiptrequested,totheTownClerkwithinfifteen(15)daysofthedateofthewarningorrevocation.TheTownClerkshallholdahearingontheappealanddeterminewhetherornotaviolationoftheprovisionsofthisSectionhasoccurred.TheownershallbeentitledtopresentanyevidenceofcompliancewiththetermsandconditionsofthisSectionatsaidhearing.ThedecisionoftheTownClerkastowhetherornottheviolationoccurredshallbefinalandnotsubjecttofurtherappeal.RevisionDate:October28,200915 CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:RobertJoseph,Director,CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentDavidShirk,PlannerDate:FirstReading:December8,2009SecondReading/Adoption:January26,2010Subject:AccessoryKitchenAmendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode—FirstReading/PublicHearingACCESSORYKITCHENSBACKGROUND:Overthecourseofthelastseveralyears,PlanningStaffhasreceivednumerousbuildingpermitrequestsforsecondkitchensinsingle-familydwellingunits.ADwellingUnitisdefinedas“abuildingorportion[emphasisadded]ofitdesignedandusedaslivingandsleepingquartersforasinglehousehold,andthatincludesexclusivesleeping,kitchen,eatingandsanitaryfacilities.Becauseofthisdefinition,CommunityDevelopmentpolicyisthatasecondkitchen,inassociationwithsanitaryfacilities,constitutesaseconddwellingunit,whichisprohibitedonmostsingle-familyresidentiallotswithintheEstesValley(exceptionforlotsthatare1.33timestheminimumlotsize).Thepurposeofthisamendmentistoestablishuseanddevelopmentregulationsforasecondkitchenwithinasingle-familydwelling.Theseregulationsareintendedtosupportthefollowingpurposes: 1)Toallowaccessorykitchensassociatedwithsingle-familydwellings,forusebythefamilyresidingwithinthedwellingunit,accessorytothefirstkitchenwithinthedwellingunit.2)Approvalofakitchenaccessorytoasingle-familydwellingshallnotbeconsideredapprovalofaseconddwellingunitoraccessorydwellingunit.MeetingDates.•FirstPlanningCommissionmeetingwasheldSeptember15,2009.Initialmeeting,setparameters.•SecondPlanningCommissionmeetingwasOctober20,2009.Voted6-0torecommendapproval,withoneabstention.•SecondTownBoardhearingisscheduledforJanuary26,2010.•BoardofCountyCommissionersmeetingdatehasyettobescheduledBUDGET:N/AACTION:Noactionrequiredatthistime,asitisthefirstreading.ThesecondreadingandadoptionisscheduledforJanuary26,2010. IAccessoryKitchensEstesParkCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentMunicipalBuilding,170MacGregorAvenuePCBox1200EstesPark,CO80517Phone:970-577-3721Fax:970-586-0249www.estesnet.com/Com_DevEstesValleyPlanningCommission-•September15,2009:Initialdiscussion,setparameters•October20,2009:Voted6-0torecommendapproval,withoneabstentionTownBoard—•FirstReading:December8,2009•SecondReading:January26,2010BoardofCountyCommissioners—•TBDREQUEST:Toadoptregulationspertainingtomultiplekitchensinasingle-familydwelling.STAFFCONTACT:BobJosephPURPOSEANDINTENT:Thepurposeofthisamendmentistoestablishuseanddevelopmentregulationsforasecondkitchenwithinasingle-familydwelling.Theseregulationsareintendedtosupportthefollowingpurposes:1)Toallowaccessorykitchensassociatedwithsingle-familydwellings,forusebythefamilyresidingwithinthedwellingunit,accessorytothefirstkitchenwithinthedwellingunit.2)Approvalofakitchenaccessorytoasingle-familydwellingshallnotbeconsideredapprovalofaseconddwellingunitoraccessorydwellingunit.DATE: FORMATTING:1)Existingtextinblackfont.2)Proposedtextinred_underhned_text.3)Texttoberemovedinbluestrikethrough.4)ChangesmadebyPlanningCommissionarehighlighted.§5.2ACCESSORYUSES(INCLUDINGHOMEOCCUPATIONS)ANDACCESSORYSTRUCTURESA.GeneralStandards.[NoChanges]B.AccessoryUseslStructuresPermittedintheResidentialZoningDistricts.1.TableofPermittedAccessoryUsesandStructures.0Table5-7AccessoryUsesandStructuresPermittedintheResidentialZoningDistrictsResidentialZoningDistrict“Yes”=Permitted“No”=NotPermittedAdditionalAccessoryUseRE-fREE-1ERR-JR-2RMRequirements2.AdditionalRequirementsforSpecificAccessoryUses/StructuresPermittedintheResidentialZoningDistricts.ci.AccessoryKitchen.(1)Approvalofakitchenaccessorytoasingle-familydwellingshallnotconstituteapprovalofaseconddwellingunitoraccessorydwellingunit.(2)Thedwellingshallnotbeoccupiedbymorethanonefamilyunit,asdefinedinSection13.2.C.28“HouseholdLiving.”(3)Thedwellingshallhaveonlyoneaddress.(4)Interioraccessshallbemaintainedtoallpartsofthedwellingtoensurethatanaccessorydwellingunitorapartmentisnotcreated.0Accessorykitchen0§5.2.B.2.g(5’LandUseAffidavit, (a)AccessorykitchenslocatedinaportionofthedwellingthatalsoincludessanitaryfacilitiesshallrequireaLandUseAffidavitpreparedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.(b)TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentshallrecordthisLandUseAffidavit,attheapplicant’sexpenseatthefimeofissuanceofabuildingpermit.C.AccessoryUsesandStructuresPermittedintheNonresidentialZoningDistricts.[NoChanges]D.GeneralDimensionalandOperationalRequirements.Thefollowingstandardsshallapplytoallaccessoryusesandstructuresinallzoningdistricts,exceptfor:(1)Satelliteantennadishesaccessorytoresidentialusesthatareone(1)meterorlessindiameter;and(2)Satelliteantennadishesaccessorytononresidentialusesthataretwo(2)metersorlessindiameter.(Ord.15-03#1)5.MaximumCumulativeGrossFloorAreaAllowedforallAccessoryUsesinAccessoryBuildings,AccessoryStructuresand/orPrincipalBuildingsforResidentialUses.Maximumcumulativegrossfloorareaforallaccessoryuses,excludingaccessorynightlyrentals,inaccessorybuildings,accessorystructuresand/orprincipalbuildings(excluding:accessojykitchens,d,acesorçhtIyientaL’ikaccessoryoralstructures)shallnotexceedthelargestcomputationofthefollowing:a.Onethousandtwohundred(1,200)squarefeetofgrossfloorarea;b.Fiftypercent(50%)ofthegrossfloorareaoftheprincipalbuilding,excludingtheattachedgaragefloorarea;c.Forlotswithanetlandareagreaterthanone-half(½)acreandlessthanorequaltoone(1)acre:500+[1,000(a)J*.d.Forlotswithanetlandareagreaterthan(1)acre:1,400+[400(a)J*.*Where“a”=netlandareainacresChapter13-DefinitionsSection13.2.C28.HouseholdLiving.a.GeneralDefinition:Afamilyunitrelatedbyblood,marriageoradoptionoreight(8)orfewerunrelatedindividuals(includingresidentandnonresidentcaregivers)livingtogetherinasingledwellingunit,withcommonaccesstoandcommonuseofalllivingandeatingareasandallfacilitiesforthepreparationandservingoffoodwithinthedwellingunit.b.Examples:Thisclassificationincludeshouseholdslivinginsingle-familyhouses,duplexes,townhomes,othermulti-familydwellingstructures,manufacturedhousingandotherstructureswithself-containeddwellingunits. eISection73.3130.Kitchenshallmeanaroomorspacewithinaroomequippedwithsuchelectricalorgashook-upthatwouldenabletheinstallationofarange,ovenorlikeapplianceusing220/40voltsornaturalgas(orsimilarfuels)forthepreparationoffood,andalsocontainingeitherorbotharefrigeratorandsink.130.1Kitchen,Accessoryshallmeanakitchenotherthantheprincipalkitchenassociatedwithasingle-familydwelling.0C cMemoDate:December3,2009To:TownBoardofTrusteesFrom:GregoryA.WhiteRE:OrdinanceNo.11-09ExtendTemporaryMoratoriumforWindTurbinesBACKGROUND:OrdinanceNo.11-09extendsthecurrentmoratoriumontheissuanceofanybuildingpermitsorreviewofanyapplicationsforbuildingpermitsforwindturbineswithintheTownforaperiodofninety(90)days.Theperiodofninety(90)daysisnecessarytoallowsufficienttimefortheEstesValleyPlanningCommissiontomakearecommendationtotheTownBoardandtheBoardofCountyCommissionersofamendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodewithregardtotheconstruction,location,andoperationofwindturbineswithintheEstesValleyPlanningarea.BUDGETIMPLICATIONS:Therearenobudgetaryimplications.STAFFRECOMMNDATION:TheStaffrecommendstheadoptionofOrdinanceNo.11-09toextendthetemporarymoratoriumontheissuanceofbuildingpermitsforwindturbineswithintheTownofEstesParkforninety(90)days.RECOMMENDEDMOTION:Imovetoapprove/denyOrdinance11-09toextendthetemporarymoratoriumforwindturbines. ORDINANCENO.11-09ORDINANCEEXTENDINGTHETEMPORARYMORATORIUMONTHEISSUANCEOFBUILDINGPERMITSFORWINDTURBINESWITHINTHETOWNOFESTESPARKWHEREAS,onAugust11,2009,theTownofEstesParkadoptedResolutionNo.15-09imposingatemporarymoratoriumontheissuanceofanybuildingpermitbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentfortheinstallationofanywindturbinewithintheTownofEstesPark;andWHEREAS,theEstesValleyPlanningCommissionhasheldseveralpublichearingsonamendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCoderegardingregulatoryprovisionsfortheconstructionandoperationofwindturbineswithintheEstesValleyPlanningAreaincludingtheTownofEstesPark;andWHEREAS,theEstesValleyPlanningCommissionhasnotconcludeditsreviewofthisissueandwillholdadditionalpublichearingspriortoforwardingtotheBoardofTrusteesandBoardofCountyCommissionerspossibleamendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCoderegulatingtheconstructionandoperationofwindturbineswithintheEstesValleyPlanningArea;andWHEREAS,isitnecessarytoextendthetemporarymoratoriumontheissuanceofanybuildingpermitforanywindturbineuntilsuchtimeastheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownandtheBoardofCountyCommissionershaveanopportunitytoreviewtherecommendationsoftheEstesValleyPlanningCommissionwithregardtoanyregulationaddressingtheconstruction,locationandoperationofwindturbineswithintheEstesValleyPlanningArea;andWHEREAS,itisnecessarytoextendthemoratoriumimposedbyResolutionNo.15-09foranadditionalninety(90)daystoallowthecompletionoftheprocessofreviewofpossibleregulationsfortheinstallationandoperationofwindturbineswithinC.R.S.andtheEstesValleyPlanningArea;andWHEREAS,pursuanttotheapplicableprovisionsofSection29-20-101etseq.C.R.S.knownastheLocalGovernmentLandUseControlEnablingActof1974,theBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkhasthepowertoextendthetemporarymoratorium.NOWTHEREFORE,BEITORDAINEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,asfollows:0 1.TheBoardofTrusteesherebyextendsthetemporarymoratoriumontheissuanceofanybuildingpermitbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentfortheinstallationofanywindturbinewithintheTownofEstesParkimposedbyResolution15-09foranadditionalperiodofninety(90)daysfromtheeffectivedateofthisOrdinanceincluding,butnotlimitedto,theprocessingofanyapplicationforbuildingpermitsfiledwiththeCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentfromtheeffectivedateofthisOrdinance.2.ThisextensionofthetemporarymoratoriumshalltakeeffectimmediatelyupontheadoptionofthisOrdinanceandcontinueforaperiodofninety(90)daysunlessamendedand/orterminatedbyfurtheractionoftheBoardofTrustees.WHEREAS,theimmediatepassageofthisOrdinanceisnecessaryforthepreservationofthehealth,safety,andwelfareofthecitizensoftheTown,andthereforethisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinforceimmediatelyafteritspassage,adoption,andsignatureoftheMayorortheMayorProTern.INTRODUCED,READ,ANDPASSEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARKonthis_____dayof___________,2009.TOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOMayorATTEST:TownClerk EstesParkPoliceDepartmentMemoTo:MayorPinkhamandBoardofTrusteesFrom:WesKufeld,ChiefofPoliceCC:JacquieHalbumt,TownAdministratorDate:December3,2009Re:Ordinance#12-09Section9.40.010&9.40.020PossessionofFirearmsonTownPropertyBackgroundInanefforttoensurethesafetyofTownOfficials,employeesandcitizensofLstesParkconductingbusinessintheTownofEstesParksbuildingswherepublicaccessispermitted,anordinancetoamendtheMunicipalCodeisproposed.Chapter9oftheTownofEstesParkMunicipalCode,PublicPeace,MoralsandSafetywouldbeamendedtoprohibitfirearmsonTownpremisesinthefollowinglocations:MunicipalBuilding,ConventionandVisitor’sBureau,ConferenceCenter,Museum,SeniorCenterandStanleyParkFairgrounds.BudgeUCostsNobudgetimplications.StaffRecommendationStaffrecommendsapprovalofordinanceamendment.RecommendedMotionImovetoapprove/denyOrdinance#12-09toaddSection9.40PossessionofFirearmsonTownPropertytotheMunicipalCode. ORDINANCENO.12-09ANORDINANCEAMENDINGCHAPTER9,PUBLICPEACE,MORALS,ANDSAFETYOFTHEMUNICIPALCODEOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOBYTHEADDITIONOFCHAPTER9.40REGARDINGPOSSESSIONOFFIREARMSONTOWNPROPERTYWHEREAS,Section29-11.7-104C.R.S.providesthattheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownmayenactanordinanceforthepurposeprohibitingtheopencarryingofafirearminabuildingoraspecificareawithintheTown;andWHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteeshasdeterminedthatitisinthebestinterestoftheTownanditscitizenstoprohibittheopencarryingoffirearmswithincertainTownbuildingsandtheStanleyParkFairgroundsasprovidedherein.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITORDAINEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:Section1.TheMunicipalCodeoftheTownofEstesParkshallbeamendedwiththeadditionofthefollowingChapter:Chapter9,PublicPeace,MoralsandSafetyChapter9.40.010FirearmsProhibitedonTownPremises(a)ItshallbeunlawfulforanypersontocarryorpossessanyfirearminthefollowingTownbuildings:1.MunicipalBuilding2.ConventionandVisitor’sBureau3.ConferenceCenter4.Museum5.SeniorCenter(b)ItshallbeunlawfulforanypersontocarryorpossessanyfirearmontheStanleyParkFairgroundsproperty.(C)TheTownshallpostsignsatthepublicentrancestothebuildingsandtheStanleyParkFairgroundsinformingpersonsthattheopencarryingoffirearmsisprohibitedinthebuildingsortheStanleyParkFairgrounds.0 (U)Thisprohibitionshallnotapplytoapersoncarryingaconcealedfirearmifsuchpersonisinpossessionofavalidstateconcealedfirearmpermitandincompliancewithfederalandstatelawsandregulations.(e)PossessionofavalidconcealedcarrypermitshallnotconstituteadefensetoachargeofopenlycarryingafirearmonanyTownpremisesspecifiedherein.(f)Nothinginthissectionshallbeconstruedtoallowthecarryingofanyfirearmexceptinaccordancewithallstateandfederallawsandregulations.(g)Nothinginthissectionshallbeconstruedtoforbidanypeaceofficerwhoisdulyauthorizedtocarryafirearmorfirearmsfromcarryingorwearingsuchfirearmsasmaybenecessaryintheproperdischargeofthatofficer’sduties.9.40.020Definitions.AsusedinthisChapter;(1)Firearmmeansanyhandgun,automatic,revolver,pistol,rifle,shotgun,orotherinstrumentordevicecapableoforintendedtobecapableofdischargingbullets,cartridges,orotherexplosivedevices.Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeenforcedthirty(30)daysafteritsadoptionandpublication.INTRODUCED,READANDPASSEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,THIS______DAYOF_________________2009.TOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOBy:_______MayorATTEST:TownClerk2 IherebycertifythattheaboveordinancewasintroducedandreadatameetingoftheBoardofTrusteesonthe_______dayof______________________,2009,andpublishedinanewspaperofgeneralpublicationintheTownofEstesPark,Coloradoonthe________dayof_________________,2009.TownClerk30 EstesParkPoliceDepartmentMemoTo:MayorPinkhamandTownBoardofTrusteesFrom:WesKufeld,ChiefofPoliceCC:TownAdministratorJacqufeHalburntDate:12/3/2009Re:IntergovernmentalAgreementwithLarimerEmergencyTelephoneAuthority(LETA)forCOPLINKInformationSharingSystem.COPLINKisaseamless,integratedsystemofstatewideinformation-sharingtechnologyandservicesthatwillenableagenciesacrossthestatetofacilitatesharingdatainanefforttoimprovetheeffectivenessofeachagencyandtheColoradocriminaljusticesystem.LanmerEmergencyTelephoneAuthority(LETA)hasenteredintoanagreementwiththeColoradoInformationandSharingConsortium(CISC)toallowLETAandtheparticipatingagenciesaccesstotheCOPLINKataminimalcosttoeachagencybasedontheswornofficercount.Ascheduleofcostsforeachagencyisincludedintheinformation.LETAhascoveredtheconversiondatacosts,licensingfeesandannualdatamaintenancewhichisextensive.BudqeUCostThereisnocosttotheEstesParkPoliceDepartmentatthistime,however;in2011maintenancefeeswillbeassessedintheamountof$660.87.StaffRecommendationStaffrecommendsapprovalofagreement.RecommendedMotionImovetoapprove/denytheIntergovernmentalAgreementwiththeLarimerEmergencyTelephoneAuthority(LETA)fortheuseofCOPLINKbytheEstesParkPoliceDepartment. INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTREGARDINGTHEREGULATIONANDUSEOFTHECOPLINKINFORMATIONSHARINGSYSTEMTHISINTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENT(“thisAgreement”)ismadeandenteredintothis___________dayof,20,byandbetweentheLARIMEREMERGENCYTELEPHONEAUTHORITY,hereinafterreferredtoas“LETA”,theCITYOFFORTCOLLINS.COLORADO;theCITYOFLOVELAND,COLORADO;theTOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:LARIMERCOUNTY,COLORADO;theBOARDOFGOVERNORSSTATESYSTEM(ColoradoStateUniversity),andtheTOWNOFBERTHOUD.COLORADO;hereinaftercollectivelyreferredtoas“theParticipatingParties”.WITNESSETH:WHEREAS,aspartofitsmissionastheemergencytelephoneserviceproviderforLarimerCounty,Colorado,LETAprovidestheParticipatingPartieswithequipmentandservicestoenablethepartiestoeffectivelyreceiveemergencytelephonecallsandtodispatchemergencyservicesinresponsethereto;andWHEREAS,LETAandtheParticipatingPartieshavedeterminedthattheavailabilityofacomprehensive,state-wideinformationsharingnetworkwouldbeavaluablecomponentoftheLarimerCountyemergencytelephoneservicesnetwork;andWHEREAS,LETAhasenteredintoanagreementwiththeColoradoInformationandSharingConsortium(“CISC”)toallowLETAandtheParticipatingPartiestoaccesstheCOPL1NKinformationsharingsystem(“COPLINK”);andWHEREAS.LETAhasagreedtoprovideCOPLINKtotheParticipatingPartiesforaminimalcostestablishedbyCISCandbaseduponswornofficercount;andWHEREAS,bythetermsofthisAgreement,LETAandtheParticipatingPartiesdesiretoagreeuponsuchrequirementsandguidelines,andfullysetforththerelationshipbetweenLETAandtheParticipatingPartieswithregardtotheuseofCOPLINK; NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationofthemutualpromisescontainedherein,andforothergoodandvaluableconsideration,thereceiptandadequacyofwhichisherebyacknowledged,LETAandtheParticipatingPartiesagreeasfollows:1.Preamble.ThepartiesacknowledgethattherecitalssetforthabovearetrueandcorrectandthoserecitalsareincorporatedintothebodyofthisAgreement.2.ConditionsforuseofCOPLINK.LETAagreesthat,incooperationwithCISC,itshallmakeCOPLINKavailableforusebyeachoftheParticipatingParties.Beginningin2011,eachoftheParticipatingPartiesagreestopayannualcostsinaccordancewiththeScheduleofCostssetforthonExhibit“A”,attachedtothisAgreement.PriortocommencinguseoftheCOPLINKsystemeachParticipatingPartyshallcompletesuchtraining,andshalladoptsuchreasonableinternalusepolicies,asmayberequiredbyCISCorLETA.Inadditiontotheforegoing,eachoftheParticipatingPartiesagreesthatitshallcomplywiththeCOPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProcedures,acopyofwhichisattachedheretoasExhibit“B”.3.Licensing.EachoftheParticipatingPartiesshallbeconsideredanauthorizeduserofCOPLINKandshallberequiredtosigntheCOPLINKSoftwareEnd-UserAgreementasafurtherconditionoftheuseofthesystem.TheParticipatingPartiesshallatalltimescomplywiththelicensingprovisionscontainedintheCOPLINKSoftwareEnd-UserAgreementwhichisincludedintheCOPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProcedures,attachedasExhibit“B”.4.MemorandumofUnderstanding.EachoftheParticipatingParties,asauthorizedusersofCOPLINK,acknowledgethereceiptandreviewoftheMemorandumofUnderstanding(CISC),acopyofwhichisattachedheretoasExhibit“C”.EachoftheParticipatingPartiesagreesthatasaconditionofcontinueduseofCOPLINKeachshallbeboundbythetermssetforththereinwithregardtoauthorizedusers.5.Term.ThisAgreementshallbecomeeffectiveastoeachoftheParticipatingPartiesupontheapprovalbysuchpartyandLETA,andshallremainineffectwithregardtoeach individualParticipatingPartyuntilterminated.Terminationmayoccuratanytimewithorwithoutcause,andshallbecomeeffectiveuponthirty(30)dayswrittennoticetoLETA.6.Liability.Eachofthepartiesheretoshallbesolelyresponsiblefortheactionsoromissionsofitsofficersandemployees,butshallnotberesponsibleorlegallyliableforthenegligentactsofanyotherpartytothisAgreementorofitsofficersandemployees.InnoeventshallLETAbeliableforanylossordamagesrelatedtotheaccuracyorcompletenessofanydataprovidedtotheParticipatingParties,norshallLETAbeliableforanyspecial,incidentalorconsequentialdamages.NothinginthisAgreementshallbeconstruedasawaiverofthenoticerequirements,defenses,immunitiesandlimitationseitherpartymayhaveundertheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct(Sec.24-10-101,C.R.S.etseq.)orofanyotherdefenses,immunities,orlimitationsofliabilityavailabletoeitherofthepartiesbylaw.7.RelationshipoftheParties.ThepartiesenterintothisAgreementasseparateandindependententitiesandshallmaintainsuchstatusthroughoutthetermofthisAgreement.8.Amendment.NoamendmentorothermodificationofthisAgreementshallbevalidunlesspursuanttoawritteninstrumentsignedbyLETAandtheParticipatingParties.9.Assignment.ThebenefitsandburdensunderthisAgreementmaynotbeassignedbyanypartytoanyotherwithoutwrittenconsent.10.PartiestoExerciseGoodfaith.LETAandeachoftheParticipatingPartiesagreetodevotetheirbesteffortsandtoexercisegoodfaithinimplementingandadheringtotheprovisionsofthisAgreement.11.IntentofAgreement.ThisAgreementisintendedtodescriberightsandresponsibilitiesonlyasbetweenthenamedpartieshereto.Itisnotintendedto,andshallnotbedeemedtoconferrightstoanypersonsorentitiesnotnamedaspartiesherein.3 12.Counterparts.ThisAgreementmaybesignedincounterparts.INWITNESSWHEREOF,thepartiesheretohavecausedthisIntergovernmentalAgreementtobeexecutedthedayandyearfirstwrittenabove.LARIMEREMERGENCYTELEPHONEAUTHORITYBy:_________________________ExecutiveDirectorAPPROVEDthis______dayof,200CITYOFFORTCOLLINS,COLORADOBy:_________________________CityManagerAPPROVEDthis______dayof,200_CITYOFLOVELAND,COLORADOBy:_________________________CityManagerAPPROVEDthis______dayof,200_0 TOWNOFBERTHOUD,COLORADOBy:CityManagerAPPROVEDthis______dayof,200_TOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOBy:TownManagerAPPROVEDthis______dayof,200LARIMERCOUNTY,COLORADOBy:CountyAdministratorAPPROVEDthis______dayof,200BOARDOfGOVERNORSSTATESYSTEM(ColoradoStateUniversity)By:(Title)APPROVEDthis______dayof______200_5 ExhibitAScheduleofCostsAnnualfeestobeassessedin2011AgencyServiceCostLETADataConversionCosts*$217,350.00AuroraNodeStandupCost*$18,686.65LicenseFee*$90,986.00Annualdatamaintenance$28,350.00LarimerCountySheriff’sAnnualsoftwaremaintenance$8,521.71DepartmentandAnnualhardwarereplacementFortCollinsPoliceDepartmentAnnualsoftwaremaintenance$5,565.20andAnnualhardwarereplacementEstesParkPoliceDepartmentAnnualsoftwaremaintenance$660.87andAnnualhardwarereplacementLovelandPoliceDepartmentAnnualsoftwaremaintenance$3,069.47andAnnualhardwarereplacementBerthoudPoliceDepartmentAnnualsoftwaremaintenance$313.04andAnnualhardwarereplacementColoradoStateUniversityPoliceAnnualsoftwaremaintenance$1,356.52DepartmentandAnnualhardwarereplacement*onetimefee ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProceduresPurpose:ToestablishguidelinesandproceduresfortheuseoftheCOPLINKinformationsharingsystemintheStateofColorado.DeclarationregardingDatasharing:AllMemberAgenciesagreetosharedatawithothermemberAgenciesthathaveenteredintotheColoradoInformationSharingConsortiumMOU.AdditionalpublicsafetyagenciesthatbecomemembersoftheConsortiumarerequiredtosharetheirData.InextremecircumstancesamemberAgencymaywithholdorpreventaccesstoData.’Theseextremecircumstancesmayinclude,butarenotlimitedtosituationswhenthesharingoftheDatawouldbeharmfulorcompromisingtoaninvestigation;aviolationofthelaw;orsomeothercompellingreasonarticulatedbytheMemberAgency.(Datadoesnotincludepolicereportnarrativesorsupplementalreportnarratives.)References:•MemorandumofUnderstanding-ColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(MOU-CISC)•MemorandumofUnderstanding-NorthwestMetroInformationSharingConsortium(MOU-NMISC)•C.R.S.24-72-301et.seq.regulatesthereleaseofcriminaljusticerecords•C.R.S.19-1-304regardingJuveniledelinquencyrecords•C.R.S.19-1-307regardingthereleaseofchildabuseandneglectrecords•CBICriminalJusticeInformationSystemportal-CJISdocumentshttps://www.cjisportal.com/CO/launchpad/index.pI•CCICDeclarationofUnderstanding(CCICDOU)2•MemberAgencyspecificrequirements,rules,andregulations1.0Definitions1.1AuthorizedUser:meanslawenforcement,publicsafety,orcriminaljusticeagenciescontributingnoDatathatareallowedbytheCISCaccesstocertainCOPLINKData.1.2ColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(“CISC”)meansthestatewidegroupofpublicsafetyagenciesthathavesignedtheMemorandumofUnderstandingdatedApril14,200$.‘MOUNMISC7.2Datasharing2SeeAttachment#1 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProcedures1.3COPLINK:meanstheinformationsharingandanalysissoftwarelicensedtotheMemberAgenciesbyKCCunderthenameCOPL1NK.(COPLENKisasearchengine,notadatasource;itsimplyreplicatesthedatathatexistsinaMemberAgency’sCriminalJusticeRecords).1.4Data:meansfacts,detailedinformation,orothermaterialprovidedbyaMemberAgency.(Datadoesnotincludepolicereportnarratives,supplementalreportnarratives,orIntelligenceInformation.)1.5MemberAgencyUser:meansamemberofanyMemberAgencyoftheCISCwhohasbeentrainedtouseCOPLINK.2.0Governance:2.1AdherencetotheguidelinesandproceduresisgovernedbytheExecutiveCommitteeasestablishedbytheMOU-CISC.33.0Administration:3.1EachHostnodewillappointanAdministratorandinformtheCISCBoardofDirectorsofsaidappointment.3.1.1TheAdministratorwillbeappointedbytheCISCBoardofDirectorstotheTechnicalCommitteeandperformthoseassignedduties.43.2BestpracticessuggestthateachMemberAgencyshouldhaveatleasttwoSystemAdministrators.3.2.1TheMemberAgencySystemAdministratorswillberesponsibleformaintenanceoftheMemberAgencyusersfortheiragency.3.2.2MaintenanceoftheMemberAgencyuserswillinclude,butisnotlimitedtothecoordinationoftraining,andadherencetoallpolicyrequirementsforusingtheCOPLINKsystem.3.2.3ToensureallMemberAgencyusersunderstandtherequirementsforusingtheCOPL1NKsystem,theMemberAgencySystemAdministratorwillhavetheMemberAgencyuserreadandsignauseragreementatthesuccessfulconclusionoftheirtraining.MOUCISC3.2;4.5ExecutiveCommittee;Violations‘MOUCISC3.3TechnicalCommittee2 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProcedures3.2.4ToensurecompliancewiththeproperuseoftheCOPLINKsystem;MemberAgencySystemAdministratorswillperformoccasionalrandomauditsofitsuse.3.2.4.1IntheeventaviolationisdiscoveredtheMemberAgencyshalldemonstratetotheExecutiveCommitteeoftheCISCthatcorrectiveactionhasbeentaken.3.2.4.2Intheeventofextreme,repeated,uncorrectedsituationsbyaMemberAgency,theBoardofDirectorsoftheCISCwillhavetheultimateauthoritytodeterminetheappropriateresolution,whichcouldresultindisqualifyingthatMemberAgencyfromusingtheCOPLINKsystem.53.3EachMemberAgencyuserandAdministratormustmeetthebackgroundscreeningrequirementstosecureemploymentwithaMemberAgency.63.4AuthorizedusersfromoutsidetheMemberAgencieswillberequiredtomeetthestandardsestablishedfortheMemberAgencyusers.4.0Training:4.1EveryMemberAgencyuserwillberequiredtoattendCOPLIISfKtrainingprovidedbytheiragency.4.2InadditiontothefunctionaltrainingofhowtousetheCOPLINKsystem,theMemberAgencyusermustbeinstructedthattheinformationobtainedisCriminalJusticeinformationandmustbetreatedpercurrentlaws,regulationsandagencyspecificrequirements.74.2.1Examplesofmisuse:4.2.1.1PrisonerinavehicleseeinginformationdisplayedontheMDIscreen.4.2.1.2Runningoffamilymembers4.2.1.3RunningofpersonalacquaintancesMOUCISC4.5Violations6MOUCISC4.4LimitationofUseC.R.S.24-72-201et.seq.and24-72-301;C.R.S.19-1-304et.seq.:CCICDOU3 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProcedures4.2.1.4Non-LawEnforcementand/orpersonalcuriosityinquiries4.2.1.5Allowingotherstosigninundertheuser’slogonoraccessingunderanotheruser’slogon.4.3AttheconclusionofthetrainingtheMemberAgencyuserwillberequiredtosignauseragreementform.ThisformwillbemaintainedbytheMemberAgencySystemAdministrators.(Seeattachmentsregardingmodeltrainingoutline,andtheuseragreementform.)5.0RulesofUsage:5.1Inadditiontotheguidelinesestablishedthroughthereferenceslistedinthisdocument,certainotherrulesofusageofCOPLINKwillalsoapply.5.1.1AllinformationprintedfromtheCOPIINKSystemwillbedisposedofperagencyspecificrequirementsinthehandlingofcriminaljusticerecords.5.1.2PrintedinformationfromaCOPLINKqueryshouldnotbeincludedinacasefiling.5.1.2.1Anexceptiontothiswouldbethecreationofaphotoline-upfromCOPLINK.5.1.3WhenreferringtoinformationobtainedthroughCOPLINKinapolicereport,thesourceagencywillbecitedasthesourceandnotCOPLINK.(SeeattachedmodelexamplesofhowtodocumenttheuseofCOPL[NK).5.1.4AnyinvestigativeleadsdevelopedthroughaCOPLINKquerydoesnotamounttoprobablecauseandonlyassistsinthefurtheringofaninvestigation.5.1.5ItisincumbentupontheMemberAgencyusertocompleteaverificationoftheinformationobtainedthroughaCOPLINKquery.5.1.6OwnershipandReleaseConstraints(SeeMOUCISC5.1).6.0Security:04 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProcedures6.1MemberAgencieswillberesponsibleforthesecurityoftheCOPLINKsystemwithintheirrespectiveworkenvironments.ThissecurityneedstobeincompliancewithcurrentsecurityforLawEnforcementsensitivematerialandequipment.6.1.1Examplesofthesesecurityproceduresare:6.1.1.1IftheinformationisaccessedfromaMobileDataTerminal(MDT)inavehicle,thevehiclemustbelockedwhentheoperatorisnotinthevehicle.6.1.1.2TheMDIshouldbesignedoffwhennotinuse6.1.1.3ThescreenmustbepositionedsoastonotaLlowaprisonertoviewitsdisplayedinformation.6.1.1.4Desktopcomputersmustbelockedorloggedoffwhennotattended.5 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProceduresAttachment#1CCICDECLARATIONOFUNDERSTANDINGIUNDERSTANDTHATWHENIACCESSCCIC/NCICIMUSTHAVEAWORKINGKNOWLEDGEOFTHEOH-LINECCICMANUALANDOPERATIONALSCREENSAVAILABLEONTHECCICTERMINAL.IUNDERSTANDTHATIMAYACCESSTHENCICOPERATINGMANUALANDTHENCICCODEMANUALWHICHAREEEPTATMYAGENCY.IUNDERSTANDTHATIFANDWHENAUTHORIZEDTOPERFORMUCR/NIBRS,DEPARTMENTOFCORRECTIONS,COLORADOSTATEPATROL,DISTRICTATTORNEY,ORJUDICIALTRANSACTIONS,THATTHOSESERVICESWILLBEUSEDACCORDINGTOSTANDARDPROCEDURESANDPOLICIESSETFORTHFORTHOSESYSTEMS.IUNDERSTANDTHATTHECCICSYSTEMISFOROFFICIALCRIMINALJUSTICEPURPOSESONLY.TNECCICSYSTEMMAYNOTBEUSEDFORLICENSINGORNON-CRIMINALJUSTICEEMPLOYMENTPURPOSES.IWILLCOMPLYWITHALLPOLICIESANDPROCEDURESTHATRELATETOMYUSEOFCCIC.IFURTHERUNDERSTANDTHATIWILLMOTUSETHECCIC/HCICSYSTEMTOOBTAINIMFORMATIOM,CRIMINALOROTHERWISE,FORPERSONALUSE,GAIN,BENEFITORREMUNERATION.MISUSEORNEGLECTOFTHESYSTEMCOULDRESULTINCRIMINALPROSECUTIONAND/ORSUSPENSIONOFMYAUTHORIZATIONTOOPERATEACCICTERMINAL.IUNDERSTANDTHATALLTRANSACTIONSWHICHIPERFORMONACCICTERMINALARERECORDEDATTHECBIANDTNATPRINTOUTSOFTHOSETRANSACTIONSMAYBEREQUESTEDRYAUTHORIZEDPERSONNELFORREVIEWATANYTIME.IUNDERSTANDTHATATALLLEVELSOFACCESS,ALLINFORMATIONRETRIEVEDFROMTHECCICSYSTEMCANONLYRERELEASEDTOOFFICIALCRIMINALJUSTICEPERSONNELANDTHATNOPERSONOUTSIDETHECRIMINALJUSTICESYSTENMAYRECEIVESUCHIMFORMATIOMEITHERVERBALLYORINTYPEWRITTENDRHANDWRITTENFORM,UNLESSRELEASEISAUTHORIZEDDRREQUESTEDINTHEMESSAGERECEIVEDDRINARELATEDMESSAGEFROMTHEORIGINATINGAGENCY.IUNDERSTAMDTHATIMAYSENDANDRECEIVENARRATIVEMESSAGES(SWITCHEDMESSAGETELETYPETRAFFIC)EITHERPDIMT—TD-PDINTDRTOMULTIPLEDESTINATIONSOVERTHECOLORADOLAWENFORCEMENTTELECOMMUNICATIONSSYSTEM(CLETS);ANDTHATIMAYSENDPOINT-TO-POINTDRNULTIPLEDESTINATIONTELETYPETRAFFICOVERTHENATIONALLAWENFORCEMENTTELECOMMUNICATIONSSYSTEM(NLETS)THROUGHTHECCICSYSTEN.IUNDERSTANDTHATWHENSENDINGSWITCHEDMESSAGETRAFFICBYCLETS,NLETS,DRBDTHTHATIMUSTUSETHEMESSAGEFORMATSPROVIDEDFORSANE.IUNDERSTANDASACERTIFIEDCCICOPERATOR,IFAUTHORIZEDBYMYEMPLOYER,IMAYOBTAININFORMATIONFROMALLTNEFILESINCCICANDNCIC,LIMITEDINFORMATIONFROMTHECOLORADOJUDICIALDEPARTMENT,THECOLORADODEPARTMENTOFCORRECTIONS,THECOLORADODISTRICTATTORNEY’SCOUNCIL,VEHICLEREGISTRATION,DRIVER’SLICENSEANDDRIVERHISTORYINFORMATIONFROMTHEDEPARTMENTOFMOTORVEHICLES(DMV)INCOLORADOANDINOTHERSTATES,ANDCRIMINALHISTORYINFORMATIONFROMCOLORADO,OTHERSTATES,ANDTHEFBITHROUGHCCIC.IUNDERSTANDTHATWHENIDETECTAPROBLEMINTHECCICSYSTEMITISMYRESPONSIBILITYTOREPORTTHATPROBLEMIMMEDIATELYTOMYSUPERVISORORMYAGENCY’SCCICSERVICECOORDINATOR.IUNDERSTANDTHATPUBLICSAFETYANDTHEPERSONALSAFETYOFLAWENFORCEMENTOFFICERSDEPENDSUPONNYPROFICIENCYINTHEUSEOFTHECCICSYSTEMANDITSINFORMATION.IUMDERSTANDTHATTHISDOCUMENTWILLBECOMEAPERMANENTRECORDATTHECOLORADOBUREAUOFINVESTIGATIONANDTHATMYSIGNATURESIGNIFIESTHATIHAVEREADANDUNDERSTANDTHECONTENTSOFTHISDOCUMENTANDMYRESPONSIBILITIESASACCICTERMINALOPERATOR.SUPERVISOR’SSIGNATUREOPERATOR’SSIGNATURE6 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProceduresAttachment#2COPLINKUserAgreementIunderstandthatwhen1accessCOPLINK1musthaveaworkingknowledgeoftheCOPLINKsystemandtheCOPLINKUsersGuidelines.Theseguidelineswillbemadeavailabletomebymyagency’sCOPLINKAdministrator.IunderstandthattheCOPLINKsystemisforofficialuseonly.IwillcomplywithallpoliciesandproceduresthatrelatetomyuseofCOPLINK.IfurtherunderstandthatIwillnotusetheCOPLINKsystemtoobtaininformation,criminalorotherwise,forpersonaluse,gain,benefitorremuneration.Misuseorneglectofthesystemcouldresultincriminalprosecutionand/orsuspensionofmyauthorizationtousetheCOPLINKsystem.IunderstandthatwhenIperformaCOPLFNKsearchandobtaininformationfromanotheragency’IwilltreatthatinformationasCriminalJusticeinformationandproperlydisposeofitwhenIhavefinishedusingIt.IunderstandthatallactivitywhichIperformontheCOPLINKsystemissubjecttobeingauditedbymyAgencyAdministrator.IunderstandthataccesstotheCOPLINKsystemislimitedtothosewhoaretrainedauthorizedusersofthesystem.AllinformationfromtheCOPLINKsystemcanonlybereleasedbytheoriginatingagency.IunderstandthatwhenIdetectaproblemintheCOPLNKsystem,oradataerror,itismy’responsibilitytoreportthatproblemimmediately’tomysupervisorortomyAgencyCOPLfNKAdministrator.Iunderstandthatthisdocumentwillbecomeapermanentrecordwithmyagencyandwithmysignature,IattestthatIhavereadandunderstandthecontentsofthisdocumentandmyresponsibilitiesasaCOPLINKsystemuser.MemberAgencyAdministrator’sSignatureUser’ssignatureDateDateAgencyUser’sprintedname7 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProceduresAttachment#3COPLINK:ModelTrainingOutlineWhatcanCOPLINKdoforyoua.Overviewb.LawEnforcementUseOnlyc.Currentparticipatingagenciesd.futurepossibilitiesII.SearchFormsa.Personi.Subtabsb.Organizationc.Locationd.Vehiclee.Propertyf.DocumentIII.ConductingaSearcha.Personsb.ViewingresultsIV.AssociationSearches0a.Explanationoffunctionb.ConductinganAssociationsearchV.RefineSearcha.Explanationoffunctionb.ConductingaRefineSearchVI.Visualizera.ConvertRefineSearchorAssociationSearchtoalinkchartb.ExpandingsearchparameterswithinlinkchartVII.Practicala.Handsonuseofthesoftwarei.Severalscenariospresented,workthroughasaclassI.SinglesearchusingPersonsearchform2.SinglesearchusingLocationsearchform3.SinglesearchusingVehiclesearchform4.AssociationSearchusingPersonandVehiclesearchforms5.RefinedSearchusingPersonandVehiclesearchforms6.VisualizerVIII.Conclusiona.Remindtraineesaboutsecurityofthesystemanditscontents2 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProceduresb.QuestionsNote:TheArvadaPoliceDepartmentwillhaveamodelPowerPointpresentationavailableforreviewuponrequestwhentheNorthwestMetroNodeislivewithversion4.0ofCOPLNK.Attachment#4ModelexamplesofhowagencieshavedocumentedtheuseofCOPLINKintheirreports.1.Afterarecordssearch(COFLINKqueiy)IwasabletolearnthatapersonthatgoesbythenameofJohnSmithlivesat1234MainStinLakewood.ThiswasbasedonareportwrittenbyDet.JoneswiththeArvadaPoliceDepartment,CR#08-01234.Iwentto1234MainSt.tocontactMr.Smithandspeaktohimaboutthiscase.2.WhileinvestigatingahitandrunaccidentIreceivedinformationfromanindependentwitnessstatingtherunvehiclewasawhitevanwithapartialColoradoplateof743T.AfterreceivingthisinformationIconductedarecordssearchandfoundtwovehiclesmatchingthosedescriptors.ThroughfutureinvestigationIwasabletodetermineoneofthevehicleswasinvolvedintheaccident.IcontinuedmyinvestigationbyidentifyingtheownerofthisvehiclebasedonatrafficsummonswrittenbyLakewoodPoliceDepartment,CR#09-11111.3.WhileinvestigatingabankrobberywhichoccurredattheKeyBanklocatedat1234LongDrive,Ireceivedaphotographofthesuspectfrombanksecuritysurveillance.Officersonscenereceivedadescriptionofthesuspectasfollows:Hispanicmale,5’5”to5’8”,150to180Ibs,brownhairwithanunknowntattooonhisneck.Ithenconductedarecordssearchandreceived64possiblematchestoincludemugshots.Iwasabletocreateamugbookandcomparethesurveillancephototothemugshots.ThroughcomparisonsIwasabletolocateamatchonabookingphotooutofColoradoSpringsPoliceDepartmentinreferencetoanarrestmadeonCR#09-1234foranunrelatedtheft.4.Duringmyinvestigationofanassault,IinterviewedapossiblesuspectbythenameofTaylorBrownDOB01/01/81.WhileinterviewingBrown,headvisedhewasunfamiliarwithvictim,MichaelSmithDOB02/02/82.However,througharecordssearchIwasabletodetermine9 ExhibitBColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(CISC)COPLINKUsersGuidelinesandProceduresSmithwasanassociateofBrown,asbothBrownandSmithwerecontactedtogetherduringatrafficstopbyAuroraPoliceDepartmenton02/02/09referenceCR#09-3888.010 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(2tRevisedVersion,AdoptedbyCISCVoteAndValidatedbyBoardChairon10/23/09)ThisMemorandumofUnderstanding(“MOU”)ismadeandenteredintoonthis14thdayofApril,200$(andsubsequentlyrevisedby75%voteofapprovaloftheColoradoInformationSharingConsortiummembership,recordedatameetingoftheCISCon2/9/09)byandbetweenthepartiesbelowandallfuturesignersofthisagreement,knowncollectivelyas“MemberAgencies”orindividuallyasa“MemberAgency.”ThefollowingColoradolawenforcementagenciesherebycreateastatewideColoradoInformationSharingConsortium(“Consortium”):theAdamsCountySheriffsOffice,theArapahoeCountySheriffsOffice,theDouglasCountySheriffsOffice,theJeffersonCountySheriffsOffice,theMesaCountySheriffsOffice;andthePoliceDepartmentsforthefollowingCities:Arvada,Aurora,theCityandCountyofBroomfield,Brighton,CastleRock,CherryHillsVillage,ColoradoSprings,ColumbineValley,CommerceCity,theCityandCountyofDenver,Englewood,FederalHeights,Glendale,Golden,GrandJunction,GreenwoodVillage.Lakewood,Littleton,LoneTree,Northglenn,Parker,Sheridan,Thornton.Westminster.WheatRidge;aswellasthe1stJudicialDistrictAttorney’sOffice,the17thJudicialDistrictAttorney’sOffice,andtheColoradoDepartmentofPublicSafety(includingCBIandCSP).PurposeThepurposeofthisMOUistohelpallMemberAgenciesworkcooperativelytoestablishaseamless,integratedsystemofstatewideinformation-sharingtechnologyandservices.TheMemberAgenciesagreetoworkinavarietyofwaystofacilitatesharingdatainanefforttoimprovetheeffectivenessoftheirrespectiveAgencyandtheColoradocriminaljusticesystem.Toaccomplishthesegoals,theMemberAgenciesagreetousetheinformation-sharingcomputersoftwareknownasCOPLINK,providedbyKnowledgeComputingCorporation(“KCC”).THEREFORE,theMemberAgenciesherebyagreetothefollowing:1.0Definitions:1.1AuthorizedUser:meanslawenforcement,publicsafety,orcriminaljusticeagenciescontributingnoDatathatareallowedaccesstocertainCOPLINKinformationper4.2below.1.2BoardofDirectors(“Board’):meanstheChiefExecutiveOfficerofeachMemberAgency,ortheirdesignee.eachofwhomshallhavevotingrightsinthedecisionsoftheConsortium.1.3ColorcidoIn/irmationSharingConsortium(“Consortium”or“QISC’):meansthecollectiveMemberAgencies.1 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortium1.4COFLINK:meanstheinformationsharingandanalysissoftwarelicensedtotheMemberAgenciesbyKCCunderthenameCOPLINK.1.5Data:meansfacts,detailedinformation,orothermaterialprovidedbyaMemberAgency.(Datadoesnotincludeintelligenceinformation,butmayincludepolicereportnarratives,supplementalreportnarrativesandothertext-relatedinformationasdeterminedandreleasedbyeachagency’spolicy.)1.6DataRepository:meansthecomputerequipmentusedtoconnectanddisseminateCOPLINKinformationtoMemberAgenciesandAuthorizedUsers.1.7FiscalAgent:meanstheentityorpersonapprovedbytheBoardtomanageaccountsforgrantsorotherfundsappliedforbytheConsortiumandthe1SFasdetailedin3.5,6.2,6.3and7.1below,oranyotherConsortium-relatedfinancialmatters.1.8HostNode(“Node”):meansoneoffouragencieshousingthedatarepositorywithinthestateofColorado:theJeffersonCountySheriffsOffice,theGrandJunctionPoliceDept.,theAuroraPoliceDept.,andCBI.1.9IntelligenceInjörmation:meansevaluateddatarelevanttotheidentificationofcriminalactivityengagedinbyanindividualororganizationreasonablysuspectedofinvolvementincriminalactivitythatmeetscriminalintelligencesystemsubmissioncriteriaassetforthin2$CFRPart23.1.10KnowledgeComputingCorporation(“KCC’):meansacorporationwithitsprincipalplaceofbusinessat6601E.GrantRoad,Suite201,Tucson,Arizona$5615,andtheowneranddeveloperofCOPLINK.2.0EffectiveDateandTermofMOU2.1EffectiveDate:TheeffectivedateofthisMOUisthedatenotedabove.2.2Term:ThisMOUshallremainineffectuntilterminatedasprovidedherein.3.0TheBoardandCommittees3.1BoardofDirectors:Thechiefexecutiveofficers(“CEO”)oftheMemberAgenciesshallserveontheBoardofDirectors(“Board”).TheseCEOsshallbevotingmembersoftheBoardandmayappointanalternatewhowillhavethesamevotingrightsastheCEOwhenparticipatinginBoardmeetingsintheabsenceoftheCEO.TheBoardwillmeetatleastonceperyeartoaddresssystemoperations,financialmatters,elections,andanyothermattersofconcerntoMemberAgenciesorHostNodes.20 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortium3.2ExecutiveCommittee:AttheannualBoardmeeting,anExecutiveCommitteeshallbeelectedconsistingofaChair,Vice-Chair,Secretary,andarepresentativeselectedbyeachHostNodetorepresenttheinterestsoftheBoard.TheExecutiveCommitteeshallberesponsiblefortheday-to-dayoperationsoftheCOPLINKprojectandisempoweredtoactonbehalfofMemberAgenciesbetweenmeetingsandduringemergencies.3.3TechnicalCommittee:TheBoardshallappointsystemadministratorsfromeachHostNodeandfromMemberAgenciestoserveontheTechnicalCommittee.TheTechnicalCommitteeshallmakerecommendationstotheBoardonspecificationsfordesigningandbuildingasecurenetwork,locatingcommerciallyavailablesoftware,connectingMemberAgenciestothenetwork,providingregularsystemmaintenanceorupgradesasnecessary,andmakingothertechnicalrecommendationsfortheoperationofthesystemdeemedrelevanttotheBoard.ThiscommitteeshallbetheprimarypointofcontactwithKCCconcerningoperationofCOPLINK.meetingasoftenasnecessarytoaccomplishitspurposes.3.4Users’Group:TheBoardshallappointrepresentativesfromeachHostNodeandfromMemberAgenciestoserveontheUsers’Group.TheUsers’GroupshallmakerecommendationstotheBoardontheuseoftheCOPLINKsystem,includinginputonaccessingtheDataRepository,training,modifications,upgrades,planningforsustainabilityofthesystem,andanyotherissuedeemedrelevanttotheBoard.TheUsers’GroupshallfurtherrecommendtotheBoardoperationalguidelinesgoverningtheuseoftheCOPLINKsystem,meetingasoftenasnecessarytoaccomplishitsgoals.3.5financialCommittee:TheBoardshallappointrepresentativesfromeachHostNodeandfromMemberAgenciestoserveonthefinancialCommittee.TheFinancialCommitteeshallcollecttheInformationSharingfee(“ISP’)fromnewMemberAgenciesassetforthin7.1andmakerecommendationstotheBoardonthedispersalofthe1Sffundsforannualmaintenancefeesandtodefrayothercosts.ThefinancialCommitteeshallworkwiththefiscalAgentonanyotherdutiesconcerningthefinancesoftheConsortiumasdirectedbytheBoard.3.6OtherCommittees:TheBoardisempoweredtocreate,dissolve,orreconstitutecommittees,appointrepresentatives,andperformotheractionsasdeemednecessarytofulfillthepurposesstatedherein,includingthecreationofadisputeresolutionboardorotherteamsnecessarytofurthertheCOPLINKproject.3.7Quorum:Attendanceinperson,telephonically,orelectronicallybyfiftypercent(50%)oftheMemberAgenciesshallconstituteaquorum.Decisionsshallbebymajorityvoteofallthosepresent,exceptforanymodificationstothisMOU,whichrequiresamajorityofatleastseventy-fivepercent(75%)ofallMemberAgencies.Absenteevotingisnotauthorized.3 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortium3.8Bylaws:TheBoardshallestablishbylawsforsettingagendas,noticerequirementsformeetings,andvotingrights,including:assignment,e-voting,Boardandofficervacancies,orotherissuesnecessarytomanagetheConsortium.4.0DataAccessandSecurityRequirements4.1DataAccess:AccesstoMemberAgencies’DatawillbeprovidedutilizingasecurenetworkmaintainedbytheHostNodes.QuerycapabilitiesshallbeprovidedtoMemberAgenciesandAuthorizedUsersutilizinganysecurenetworkconfigurationthatisacceptabletotheHostNode.TheinformationresidingintheDataRepositoriesshallgenerallybeavailableduringregularlyscheduledbusinesshours.MemberAgenciesagreetoinformeachotherinadvance,wheneverpossible,ofscheduleddowntimes.4.1DataSharing:AllMemberAgenciesagreetoshareDatawithotherMemberAgenciesthathaveenteredintothisMOU.AdditionalpublicsafetyagenciesthatbecomeMemberAgenciesoftheConsortiumarerequiredtosharetheirData.4.2AuthorizedUsers:TheBoardmayallowanagencyaccesstoCOPLINKasanAuthorizedUserforaperiodofoneyear,subjecttoannualrenewalbytheBoard.AnAuthorizedUsershallsignandagreetoabidetothetermsofthisMOU.AuthorizedUserswillcontributenoDatatotheDataRepository,butalsohavenovotingrights.MemberAgenciesindividuallymaynotgrantAuthorizedUserstatustoanynon-memberAgency.AuthorizedUserswithsignificantDataavailableforconversionshallgenerallyberequiredtomakesuchDataavailabletotheConsortiumwithinone(1)yearafterbecomingAuthorizedUsers.TheBoardshallhavesolediscretiononrenewingornotrenewingaccesstoanAuthorizedUser.4.3SecurityRequirements:MemberAgenciesagreetomaintainandenforcesecurityrequirementsforthesystemasdevelopedandspecifiedbytheBoard.TheHostNodeforeachMemberAgencyisresponsibleforinvestigatingallegationsofsecurityviolations,resolvinganysecuritybreaches,andreportinganyincidentstotheExecutiveCommitteeper4.5below.4.4LimitationofUse:MemberAgenciesandAuthorizedUsersacknowledgethattheinformationhostedintheDataRepositoriesshallbeusedforpublicsafetypurposesonly,andthatonlypublicsafetyagencyemployeeswhohavepassedanadequatebackgroundscreening,approvedbytheHostNode,willbeallowedaccesstotheCOPLINKsystem.4.5Violations:IfatanytimeaMemberAgencyorAuthorizedUserviolatesthetermsofthisMOUregardingaccesstoorsharinginformation,thatagency’sHostNodeisaccountabletotakeappropriatestepsthatresolvethesituation.TheapplicableHostNodeisrequiredtoreportanyviolationandthestepstakentoresolvetheviolationtotheExecutiveCommittee.TheExecutiveCommitteewillensuretheHostNodehastakenappropriatestepstoresolvetheviolationinthebestinterestsoftheConsortium.IftheExecutiveCommitteefeelsthatstandardhasnotbeenmet,ithastheauthoritytoremandcD ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortiumtheinvestigationbacktotheHostNodeforfurtherinvestigation.DisputesaHostNodecannotresolveshallbedecidedbytheBoardoranycommitteedesignatedbytheBoardforthatpurpose.5.0InformationOwnership,ReleaseandAccuracy5.1OwnershipandReleaseConstraints:MemberAgenciesshallretaincontrolofandremaintheofficialcustodianofallinformationcontributedtotheDataRepository.ArequestforinformationpursuanttoC.R.S.24-72-201et.seq.orC.R.S.24-72-301et.seq.shallbereferredtotheMemberAgencythatcontributedtheDatabeingrequested.5.2InformationAccuracy:MemberAgenciesandAuthorizedUsersacknowledgethatDatamaintainedintheDataRepositoryconsistsofinformationthatmayormaynotbeaccurate.5.3DataErrors:ItwillbetheresponsibilityofMemberAgenciestocorrectdataerrorsthathavebeenidentifiedatthatMember’ssolecostwithinareasonabletime;butnolaterthanninety(90)daysfromthedateofnotification,unlessanextensionisrequestedofandgrantedbytheBoard.5.4IntelligenceInformation:AnyDatapresentintheIntelLeadmoduleofCOPLINKistheproprietaryinformationoftheMemberAgencycontributingthatData.EachMemberAgencyusingtheIntelLeadmodulehasanaffirmativeobligationtoassurethatallDatacomplieswith2$CfRPart23.OtherMemberAgenciesorAuthorizedUserswishingtoaccessDataintheIntelLeadmodulemustcontacttheMemberAgencyresponsibleforcontributingthatproprietaryinformation.TheMemberAgencyresponsibleforcontributingtheDatashallhavesolediscretionregardingreleaseofthatinformation.6.0FinancialConsiderations6.1FinancialResponsibility:EachHostNode,MemberAgency,orAuthorizedUserisresponsibleforthecostofacquiringandmaintainingthenecessaryhardwareandlicensedsoftwaretoparticipateintheCOPLINKproject.NothinginthisMOUrequiresanyagencytofundtheactivitiesofanyotherMemberAgencyorAuthorizedUser.6.2Grants:AnyHostNode.MemberAgency,orAuthorizedUsermayindividuallyorcollectivelyapplyforgrantfundingforthissystem.MoniesappliedforbyanindividualagencyorapartnershipofagenciesshallinnowaybecontrolledbyorfallunderthejurisdictionofthisMOUnorshallsuchfundsbeconsideredpassthroughfundsforthefiscalAgent.OnlywheretheConsortiumasagroupappliesforagrant,orotherfunds,willtheFiscalAgentbeconsideredapassthroughentity.TheFiscalAgentwillnotberesponsibleforinitialcostsinapplyingforanygrantsorotherfundingonbehalfoftheConsortium.5 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortium6.3FiscalAgent:Atleastonceperyear,theFinancialCommitteeshallconductareviewoftheFiscalAgent’sConsortium-relatedaccountingrecords.SuchreviewsmayalsobeconductedatthediscretionoftheBoard.AllreviewsshallbepaidforbyConsortiumfunds.TheBoardisauthorizedtopaytheFiscalAgentareasonablefeeforservicesrendered,includingdirectandindirectcosts.7.0Membership7.1The1SFforNewMemberAgenciesisasfollows:ForeachP.0.S.T.certifiedpeaceofficer’fTE2-$184‘Foreachnoncertifiedpeaceofficer(deputysheriffordetentionofficer3)FTE—$92TheFiscalAgentshallholdallreceived1SFpaymentsinanaccount.7.2NodeSelection:NewagenciesmayjoinanyHostNodewillingtoacceptnewMemberAgenciesorAuthorizedUsers.NewagencieswestoftheContinentalDividewillbeencouragedtojointheGrandJunctionNode.NewagencieseastoftheContinentalDividewillbeencouragedtochoosebetweentheAuroraNodeandtheJeffersonCountyNode.TheStatenodeshallgenerallybereservedforstateagenciesandwilltakeothernewagenciesuponspecialrequestbytheState.OnceanewMemberAgencyorAuthorizedUserhasselectedaHostNodesaidagencymustremaincommittedtothatselection,includingfinancialsupportoftheirHostNode,unlesstheHostNodewithdrawsfromtheConsortium.AuthorizedUsersmaybechargedareasonablenodefeeatthediscretionoftheHostNode.7.3Licensing:EachMemberAgencyandAuthorizedUserarerequiredtosigntheCOPLLNKSoftwareEnd-UserLicenseAgreement.CompliancewithlicensingshallbemonitoredbytheapplicableHostNode.CRS16-2.5-102.Certifiedpeaceofficer—P.O.S.T.certificationrequired.“Thefollowingpeaceofficersshallmeetallthestandardsimposedbylawonapeaceofficerandshallbecertifiedbythepeaceofficerstandardsandtrainingboard,referredtointhisarticleasthe‘P.O.S.T.board”:Achiefofpolice;apoliceofficer;asheriff;anundersheriff;adeputysheriff;aColoradostatepatrolofficer;atownmarshal;adeputytownmarshal;areservepoliceofficer;areservedeputysheriff;areservedeputytownmarshal;thedirectoroftheColoradobureauofinvestigation;apoliceofficerorreservepoliceofficeremployedbyastateinstitutionofhighereducation;aColoradowildlifeofficer;aColoradoparksandrecreationofficer;aColoradopoliceadministratororpoliceofficeremployedbytheColoradomentalhealthinstituteatPueblo;anattorneygeneralcriminalinvestigator;acommunityparoleofficer;apublictransitinvestigator;acommunityparoleofficer;apublictransitofficer;andthedepartmentofcorrectionsinspectorgeneral.”2FullTimeEquivalentCRS16-2.5-103.Sheriff-undersheriff-certifieddeputysheriff-noncertifieddeputysheriff.“(1)Asheriff,anundersheriffandadeputysheriffarepeaceofficerswhoseauthorityshallincludetheenforcementofalllawsofthestateofColorado.AsheriffshallbecertifiedbytheP.O.S.T.boardpursuanttosection30-10-501.6,C.R.S.AnundersheriffandadeputysheriffshallbecertifiedbytheP.O.S.T.board.(2)Anoncertifieddeputysheriffordetentionofficerisapeaceofficeremployedbyacountyoracityandcountywhoseauthorityislimitedtothedutiesassignedbyandwhileworkingunderthedirectionofthechiefofpolice,sheriffanofficialwhohasthedutiesofasheriffinacityandcounty,orchiefexecutiveoftheemployinglawenforcementagency.”6 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortium7.4MemberAgencyTermination:AnyMemberAgencymayterminateitsparticipationinthisMOUwithorwithoutcauseuponthirty(30)dayspriorwrittennoticetoeachoftheotherMemberAgencies,unlesssuchterminationisprohibitedbyagrantconditionorunlesstheMemberAgencyisaHostNode.7.5HostNodeTermination:AMemberAgencythatisalsoaHostNodewishingtowithdrawasahostorterminatingitsparticipationinthisMOUmustinformtheotherMemberAgenciesinwritingnolessthanninety(90)dayspriortotermination.ThedepartingHostNodeisresponsibleforlocatingasuccessorHostNodeandassistinginthetransitiontothenewHostNode.7.6fiscalAgentTermination:TheFiscalAgentmayterminateitsroleasthefinancialagentfortheConsortiumwithorwithoutcausebyinformingtheBoardChairmanandfinancialCommitteeinwritingnolessthanninety(90)dayspriortotermination.Inaddition,thefiscalAgentmay,uponrequestbythefinancialCommittee,assistinlocatingasuccessorfiscalAgentandhelpinthetransitionperiod.TerminationbythefiscalAgentrequiresareviewoffinancialstatementstoassureasmoothtransitionofthebooksandaccountstothenewfiscalAgent.TerminationoftheFiscalAgentpositionshallnotservetoterminatethatagency’sMemberAgencystatus.8.0Miscellaneous8.1ThisMOUisintendedtoprovideaplanforpromotingtheCOPLINKsystemstatewide.NothinginthisMOUshallbedeemedtosupersedeoroverruleanyagreementsbetweenHostNodesandMemberAgenciesorAuthorizedUsers.AgreementsbetweenagenciesinaHostNodearepresumedtobevalidandwillbesupportedfullybytheConsortium.8.2NoneoftheMemberAgenciesorAuthorizedUserswaivesrights,limitations,anddefensesoftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,codifiedatC.R.S.24-10-101et.çqorotherrightsorprotectionsasotherwiseprovidedbylaw.ThepartiesheretoexecutethisMOUasoftheEffectiveDate.AgencyName:__________By:7 ExhibitCMemorandumofUnderstandingColoradoInformationSharingConsortiuma8a FireDepartmentMemoTo:MayorPinkham&BoardofTrusteesFrom:FireChiefScottDormanDate:12/1/2009Re:IntergovernmentalAgreementsBackground:TheServicePlanforthedevelopmentoftheEstesValleyFireProtectionDisthctfEVFPD)included2IntergovernmentalAgreements(IGAs):TheTransitionalAgreementwhichisineffectuntilJanuary1,2010andtheContinuingOperationsAgreement,effectiveJanuary1,2010.TheServicePlanwasdraftedbyTownAttorneyGregWhite,reviewedbyEVFPDAttorneyDickLyons,approvedbytheelectorateonNovember3,2009andapprovedbytheEVFPDBoardonNovember30,2009.Budget:BudgetasperIGArequirementsRecommendations:MayorPinkhamandBoardofTrusteesapprovalofthe2IntergovernmentalAgreements.1 MemoDate:December4,2009To:TownBoardofTrusteesFrom:GregoryA.WhiteRE:EstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictBACKGROUND:ThefollowingIntergovernmentalAgreements,OrdinanceandResolutionareforthepurposeoftheEstesValleyfireProtectionDistrictassumingtheresponsibilityforfireresponseinitsServiceAreawhichincludestheTown.TheapprovaloftheIGAs,OrdinanceandResolutionarenecessarytotransferauthorityovertheEstesParkVolunteerFireDepartmentfromtheTowntotheDistrict,leasetheDannelsfireStationandfiretrainingareatotheDistrict,providerevenuesfromtheTowntotheDistrict,providefortheprovisionofcertainservicesfromtheTowntotheDistrict,transfervehiclesandequipmentfromtheTowntotheDistrict,andtransfertheEstesParkVolunteerFirePensionFundtotheDistrict.Thedocumentsareasfollows:1.TransitionalIntergovernmentalAgreement.ThisIntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheTownandtheDistrictprovidesthattheTownshallretainoperationalcontrolandresponsibilityforfireservicestoJanuary1,2010.ThemainpurposeofthisAgreementistoprovidetheexactdatebywhichresponsibilityandliabilityforfireservicesaretransferredfromtheTowntotheDistrict.2.IntergovernmentalAgreement.ThisistheagreementbetweentheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictandtheTownwhichaddressestransferofoperationalactivitiesoftheEstesParkVolunteerFireDepartmentfromtheTowntotheDistrict,leasingoftheFireStationfromtheTowntotheDistrict,paymentoftheTown’sfinancialobligationtotheDistrict,transferofallvehiclesandequipmentoftheFireDepartmenttotheDistrict,andprovisionofdispatchingservices.ThisAgreementprovidesfortheemploymentofthethreecurrentFireDepartmentemployeesbytheDistrict,agreementbytheDistricttohonorallpre-existingagreementsrelatedtoprovisionoffireservices,andtheprovisionofcertainotherservicesbytheTownincluding,butnotlimitedto,accounting,humanresources,andvehicleC) maintenanceservicesuponrequestfromtheDistrict.TheIntergovernmentalAgreementalsoaddressesthetransferoftheEstesPark‘\TolunteerPensionFundfromtheTowntoanewTolunteerPensionFundformedbytheDistrictincludingtheassumptionofallpensionliabilitiesforallEstesParkVolunteerFirefighters,retiredandcurrent,bytheDistrictthroughthenewVolunteerPensionFund.3.OrdinanceNo.13-09.ThisOrdinanceapprovestheleaseoftheDannelsFireStationandfiretrainingareafromtheTowntotheDistrict.TheDistrictistomaintainandrepairthepremisesincludingthestructure,parkinglot,irrigationsystems,andmechanicalsystems.Thetermoftheagreementisfortenyearsplustwoadditionalfive-yeartermsoftheoptionattheDistrict.ThereisnorentpayablepursuanttothetermsoftheLease.4.ResolutionNo.24-09.ThisResolutiondesignatestheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictastheDesignatedResponseAuthorityfortheTownofEstesPark.BUDGETIMPLICATIONS:TheIntergovernmentalAgreementrequirestheTowntopay7%ofitssalestaxannuallytotheDistrict.TheDistrictisrequiredtopayforservicesperformedbytheTownfortheDistrictwhichwillbedetailedinaseparateAgreement.TheDistrictwillalsoberesponsibleforallcostsassociatedwiththeDannelsFireStationformaintenanceandrepair.TheTownwillhavenofurtherobligationforanyfundingoftheEstesParkVolunteerFirePension.STAFFRECOMMNDATION:TheStaffrecommendsthattheBoardapprovetheTransitionalIGAandtheIntergovernmentalAgreement,adoptOrdinanceNo.13-09approvingtheleaseoftheEstesParkFireStationtotheDistrict,andResolutionNo.24-09designatingtheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictastheEmergencyResponseAuthorityfortheTown.RECOMMENDEDMOTIONActionItem#4Imovetoapprove/denytheTransitionalIntergovernmentalAgreementandtheIntergovernmentalAgreementwiththeEstesValleyFireDistrict.ActionItem#5Imovetoapprove/denyOrdinance#13-09fortheleasingoftheDannelsFireStationtotheEstesValleyFireDistrict.ActionItem#6Imovetoapprove/denyResolution#24-09designatestheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictastheemergencyresponseauthorityfortheTownofEstesPark2 INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTFORTHETRANSITIONPERIODBETWEENTHETOWNOFESTESPARKANDTHEESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICTESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT--TOWNOFESTESPARKINTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTTHISAGREEMENT,effectivethis_____dayofDecember2009,isbyandbetweentheESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT,aColoradoSpecialDistrict,(“District”and“EVFPD”)andtheTOWNOFESTESPARK,aColoradoMunicipalCorporation,(“Town”).RECITALS:WHEREAS,theDistrictwasorganizedbyorderoftheLarimerCountyDistrictCourtdatedNovember17,2009forthepurposeofprovidingfireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueservicestopersonsandpropertieslocatedwithintheDistrict;andWHEREAS,theboundariesoftheDistrictextendbeyondtheTowninunincorporatedLarimerCountyandincludeallpropertieslocatedwithintheTownhavingatotalareaofabout66.3squaremiles;andWHEREAS,thepartiesrecognizethevalueofenteringintothisIntergovernmentalAgreementforthemutualbenefitofbothparties;andWHEREAS,bothpartiesmutuallyagreethatitisnecessarytoworktogetheringoodfaithtoprovideneededfireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueservicestopersonsandpropertieslocatedwithintheDistrictconsistentwiththefinancialresourcesoftheparties;andWHEREAS,theTowncontinuestooperatetheEstesParkFireDepartmentforthepurposeofprovidingfireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueservicestopropertieslocatedwithintheTownandtopropertieslocatedwithintheEstesParkFireDepartment’sOtherProtectionArea;andWHEREAS,theEstesParkVolunteerFireDepartmentprovidespersonnelandotherresourcestotheEstesParkFireDepartmenttoassistintheoperationsofthedepartment;andWHEREAS,theDistricthasthelawfulauthoritytoprovidefireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueserviceswithintheDistrict;andWHEREAS,Section29-1-203,C.R.S.,providesthatthepartiesmaycooperateorcontractwithoneanothertoprovidefunctionsandserviceslawfullyauthorizedtotheindividualentities;andWHEREAS,thepartieshavedeterminedtoenterintothisIntergovernmentalAgreementforthepurposeofprovidingthetermsandconditionsfortheprovisionoffireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueservicesbytheEstesParkFireDepartmenttotheDistrict;and01 WHEREASthistimeperiodbetweenvoterapprovaloftheDistrictandatimewhentheDistricthasreceivedsufficientadvaloremrevenuesandotherfundstobecomefinanciallyviableshallbecalledthe“transitionperiod”;andWHEREAStheCountyTreasurerwillnotbegindistributionoftaxrevenuestotheDistrictuntilthesecondquarterof2010;andWHEREAStheDistrictwillhaveinsufficientrevenuestomeetDistrictfinancialobligationsuntilreceiptofrevenuefromtheTowninJanuaryof2010;andWHEREAStheDistrictwillnotbefinanciallyviablenorfinanciallycapableofoperatingtheEstesParkFireDepartmentuntilitreceivesTownfundsin2010;andWHEREAS,pursuanttotheapplicablestatutesoftheStateofColorado,thepartiesheretoareauthorizedtoenterintothisIntergovernmentalAgreement.NOW,THEREFORE,INCONSIDERATIONOFTHEFOREGOING,THEDISTRICTANDTHETOWNAGREEASFOLLOWS:TheRecitalssetforthaboveareherebyincorporatedintothetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement.1.ThisagreementshallbeeffectiveupontheexecutionbybothpartiesheretowhichshalloccurassoonaspossiblefollowingtheformationoftheDistrict.ThisagreementshallcontinueinforceandeffectuntilJanuary1,2010.2.Duringthetransitionperiod;a.ItistheintentofthepartiesthatthecurrentlevelofresponsetofireandrescueincidentsprovidedbytheEstesParkFireDepartment‘EPFD”)andtheEstesParkVolunteerFireDepartment,existingatthetimeofexecutionofthisAgreement,shallremainsubstantiallythesamelevelofservicesprovidedbytheTownunlessthepartiesmutuallyagreetorevisionsofthelevelofresponsetofireandrescueincidentswithintheTown,andb.ItistheintentthattheDistrictshallserveallpersonsandpropertieswithintheboundariesofthedistrictequallyandwithoutpriorities,andc.PriortotheelectiontoestablishtheDistrict,theTownshallprovideloans,atprevailingrates,andii.ofsufficientfundstotheInitiativeCommitteetocoverexpensesofgettingtheinitiativeapprovedbytheLarimerCountyCommissioners,andontheballotandtocovernon-politicalelectionexpenses,andiii.thetotalvalueoftheprincipalandinterestoftheseloansshallnotexceed$25,000,andiv.ifthevotersapprovetheformationoftheDistrictandthetaxlevy,theloansshallbeaddedtothefundsloanedtothedistrictasdescribedin2.dherein.2 U.TheTownshallprovideloans,atprevailingrates,andii.ofsufficientfundstotheDistrictfortheDistricttomeetminimumlegalobligationsandotherexpensesduringthetransitionperiod,however,iii.atnotimeduringthetransitionperiodshallthetotalvalueoftheprincipalandinterestoftheloansexceed$40,000,andiv.therepaymentoftheloansshallbeaccordingtotermsnegotiatedbetweentheTownandtheDistrictDirectors.3.UnderthetermsoftheintergovernmentalagreementforcontinuingoperationsandwhentheDistricthassufficienttaxrevenuesandotherfunds,orhasreasonableexpectationsofsuchrevenuesandfunds,tomeettheremaining2010financialobligationsoftheDistrict,theDistrictshallassumetheremaining2010financialobligationsoftheEPFDanditssuccessors.4.EitherpartymayterminatethisAgreementbywrittennoticetotheotherpartygiving90calendardaysormorenoticeoftheintenttoterminate.5.Totheextentthisagreementconstitutesamultiplefiscalyeardebtorfinancialobligationofeitherparty,itshallbesubjecttotheannualbudgetaryprocessandannualappropriationofeachindividualentity,andArticleX,Section20oftheColoradoConstitution.Neitherpartyshallhaveanyobligationtocontinuethisagreementinanyfiscalyearinwhichnosuchappropriationismade.6.SincetheEPFDprovidesalloftheoperationalresponsestofireandrescueincidentsintheDistrictduringthetransitionperiod,untilJanuary1,2010,andsincetheDistrictwillassumeoversightresponsibilityofthefiredepartmentasofJanuary1,2010,decisionsbytheTownwithregardtooperationsoftheEPFDmaysignificantlyimpacttheDistrict.TheTownshallconsultwiththeDistrictandthepartiesshallmutuallyagreepriortomakinganyfinaldecisioninthefollowingareas:a.AnymajormatterwhichwouldhaveasubstantialbudgetaryimpactontheDistrictsuchasnewcommunicationsystems,increaseinnumberofpaidpersonneloftheEPFD,andchangesinmanpowerandequipment;andb.ChangesinresponsepatternswhichwouldhaveasubstantialeffectuponresponsewithintheDistrict;andc.Hiringofanynewfirechief;andd.Purchaseofnewfireenginesandrescuevehicles.7.DefaultandRemedies.IntheeventofdefaultunderthisAgreementbyeitherparty,thenon-defaultingpartyshallgivethedefaultingpartywrittennoticeofsaiddefault.Inthateventthedefaultingpartyshallhavethirty(30)daystocurethedefault.Intheeventthedefaultingpartydoesnotcurethedefault,thenon-defaultingpartyshallbe03 entitledtoallremediesavailableatlaworinequity,includingreasonableattorney’sfeesandcostincurredbythenon-defaultingpartybyreasonofsaiddefault.8.Indemnification.Totheextentpermittedbylaw,thepartiesherebycovenantandagreetoindemnify,defendandholdharmlessoneanotherfromandagainstanyandallliability,claims,losses,expenses,costs,charges,damages,judgments,obligations,expenses,attorneyfees,litigation,and/ordemandsofanykindwhatsoeverarisingfromorduetotheindemnifyingparty’snegligenceintheperformanceofitsdutiesunderthisagreement.9.Insurance.EachpartyshallmaintaincomprehensivegeneralliabilityandautomobileliabilityinsuranceduringthetermofthisAgreementwithaminimumcombinedsinglelimitcoverageofatleast$1,000,000.Suchinsuranceshallnametheotherpartyasanadditionalinsured.10.Allnotices,demandsorotherdocumentsrequiredordesiredtobegiven,madeorsenttoeitherparty,underthisAgreement,shallbemadeinwriting,andshallbedeemedeffectiveuponmailingorpersonaldelivery.Ifmailed,saidnoticeshallbemailed,postagepre-paid,certifiedmail,returnreceiptrequestedasfollows:EVFPDAttention:BoardPresidentP.O.Box1200EstesPark,Colorado80517TownofEstesParkAttention:TownAdministratorP0Box1200EstesPark,CO8051711.NothinginthisAgreementshallbedeemedawaiverofthedefensesandlimitationsoftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,Section24-10-101,et.seq.C.R.S.,nordeemedtoconferanybenefitstoanypersonnotapartytothisAgreement.12.ThisAgreementrepresentstheentireagreementofthepartiesandanyamendmenttothisAgreementshallbeinwritingandexecutedbybothpartieshereto.13.ThepartiesenterintothisAgreementasseparateandindependentgovernmentalentitiesandeachshallmaintainsuchstatusthroughoutthetermoftheAgreement.ATTEST:SecrfltaryThisagreementshallbegovernedbythelawsoftheStateofColorado.ESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT4iU:1.‘—‘It/1i.tflLUo--4 TOWNOFESTESPARKBy:_________________ArrEST:TownClerk05 INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENTFORCONTINUINGOPERATIONSBETWEENTHETOWNOFESTESPARKANDTHEESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICTTHISAGREEMENT,effectivethis_____dayof_____________2009,isbyandbetweentheESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT,aColoradoSpecialDistrict,C’District”and“EVFPD”)andtheTOWNOFESTESPARK,aColoradoMunicipalCorporation,Q’Town”).RECITALS:WHEREAS,theDistrictwasorganizedbyorderoftheLarimerCountyDistrictCourtdatedNovember17,2009forthepurposeofprovidingfireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueservicestopropertieslocatedwithintheDistrict;andWHEREAS,theboundariesoftheDistrictextendbeyondtheTowninunincorporatedLarimerCountyandincludeallpropertieslocatedwithintheTownhavingatotalareaofabout66.3squaremiles;andWHEREAS,thepartiesrecognizethevalueofenteringintothisIntergovernmentalAgreementforthemutualbenefitofbothparties;andWHEREAS,bothpartiesmutuallyagreethatitisnecessarytoworktogetheringoodfaithtoprovideneededfireprotection,firesuppressionandrescueservicestopropertieslocatedwithintheDistrictconsistentwiththefinancialresourcesoftheparties;andWHEREAS,bothpartiesunderstandthattheTownreceivessalestaxrevenuesfromtheStateapproximatelyfortyfivedaysfollowingtheendofthemonthinwhichthetaxeswerepaidbytheconsumer;andWHEREAS,theDistricthasthelawfulauthoritytoprovidefiresuppression,firepreventionandrescueserviceswithintheDistrict;andWHEREAS,Section29-1-203,C.R.S.,providesthatthepartiesmaycooperateorcontractwithoneanothertoprovidefunctionsandserviceslawfullyauthorizedtotheindividualentities;andWHEREAS,thepartiesmutuallyagreetosharethecostsofalloperationsandotherexpensesoftheEstesParkFireDepartmentanditssuccessors;andWHEREAS,thepartieshavedeterminedtoenterintothisIntergovernmentalAgreementforthepurposeofprovidingthetermsandconditionsfortheprovisionoffiresuppression,firepreventionandrescueservicesbytheEstesParkFireDepartmentanditssuccessorstotheDistrict;andWHEREAS,pursuanttotheapplicablestatutesoftheStateofColorado,thepartiesheretoareauthorizedtoenterintothisIntergovernmentalAgreement. NOW,THEREFORE,INCONSIDERATIONOFTHEFOREGOING,THEDISTRICTANDTHETOWNAGREEASFOLLOWS:TheRecitalssetforthaboveareherebyincorporatedintothetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement.1.ThisAgreementisforthecalendaryears2010andsubsequentyearssubjecttotheterminationandbudgetprovisionsofParagraphs16and17ofthisAgreement.ThisAgreementshallautomaticallyrenewforanadditionaloneyearperiodonJanuary1ofeachcalendaryearunlessterminatedbyeitherpartypursuanttoParagraph16ofthisAgreement.2.ThisagreementshallbecomeeffectiveonJanuary1,2010immediatelyupontheterminationoftheIGAdatedDecember____,2009betweentheDistrictandtheTownwhichspecifiestheagreementsforthetransitionperioduntilthenewlyformedDistricthasfinancialviability.3.TheDistrictshallcollectadvaloremtaxesonpropertieswithintheDistrict,asdescribedintheServicePlanfortheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrict,topayforaportionoftheservicesdescribedherein.4.Withinthefirstten(10)businessdaysofJanuary2010,theTownshallmakethefirstpaymenttotheDistrictintheamountofone-halfofsevenpercent(7%)ofthetotalestimatedsalestaxreceiptsoftheTownforthecalendarYear2010.5.Withinten(10)businessdaysfollowingAugust15,2010,theTownshallmakepaymenttotheDistrictintheamountofsevenpercent(7%)oftheactualsalestaxrevenueforthecalendarmonthofJuly2010,withanadjustmenttocorrectforanydifferencebetweentheJanuary2010payment,basedonestimatedrevenue,andtheactualsalestaxrevenuesforthemonthsofJanuarythroughJune2010.6.ForeachcalendarmonthsubsequenttoAugust2010,withinten(10)businessdaysofthereceiptofsalestaxrevenuefromtheState,theTownshallmakepaymenttotheDistrictintheamountofsevenpercent(7%)oftheactualsalestaxrevenueforsaidmonth.7.TheTownshalltransferownershipofallTown-ownedassetsoftheFireDepartment,includingvehicles,totheDistrictwhenthisagreementbecomeseffective.ThevehiclesshallbetransferredtotheDistrictAs-IswithnowarrantyexcepttheTownshallassignanywarrantiesonanyvehiclestotheDistrictifsaidwarrantiesarestillinforceandeffect.8.TheTownshallallowtheDistricttooccupyandusetheDannelsFireStation.TheDistrictshallcomplywithallofthetermsandconditionsoftheSpecialUsePermitbetweentheUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInteriorandtheTowndatedApril29,1996,SpecialUsePermit6-LM-60-L3717;exceptthattheTownshallberesponsibleforthelandscapedareaasshownonExhibit4oftheSpecialUsePermit. 9.TheTownshallprovidedispatchingandcommunicationsservicestothefiredepartmentforanappropriateannualamounttobeagreedtobythepartiesduringSeptemberofeachcalendaryearforthesubsequentyear.10.TheDistrictshallprovideoversightmanagementofthefiredepartmenttomaintain,ingeneralandasaminimum,thecurrentlevelofresponsetofireandrescueincidentsthroughouttheDistrictwhichhavebeenprovidedbytheEPFDandtheEstesParkVolunteerFireDepartment,atthetimeofexecutionofthisAgreement.a.EachpartyunderstandsthenecessityofmaintainingcontinuingconsistentandreliableservicestothepersonsandpropertiesoftheDistrict.TheDistrictshallconsultandinformtheTownorTownrepresentativesconcerning;i.ChangingneedsforfireandrescueservicesthroughouttheDistrict,andii.ChangesinthelevelofresponsetofireandrescueincidentswithintheDistrict,andiii.Changesandadditionsofmajorapparatus,andiv.ChangesinstationingofmajorapparatuswithintheDistrict.11.Thepartiesunderstandandagreethatintheeventthepartiescannotmutuallyagreeonanyofthemattersof10.a.above,orothermatterspertainingtothebusinessoftheDistrictortheoperationsoftheFireDepartment,theDistrictmaymakethefinaldecision,initssolediscretion.12.TheDistrictshallemploythethreecurrentTownemployeesworkingfortheFireDepartmentbeingtheChief,TrainingOfficerandtheAdministrativeAssistant.TheDistrictshallenterintoEmploymentContractswiththethreeindividualsforaminimumofthirty-six(36)monthsbeginningJanuary1,2010.ThetermsandconditionsoftheEmploymentContractsshallincludeasalaryequaltoorgreaterthantheemployee’sTownsalary,shallcontainsubstantiallythesamebenefitsaseachemployeereceivesfromtheTown,andtheemployeeshallbesubjecttoterminationanddisciplinepursuanttothesametermsandconditionsassetforthintheTown’sPersonnelPolicyinitsformonJanuary1,2010.ThedistrictmayestablishaDistrictPersonnelPolicyforthethreeidentifiedemployeesfollowingthethirty-six(36)monthperiod.13.TheDistrictshallrepaytotheTownallloansunderthetermsoftheloanagreements.14.OnJanuary1,2010,theDistrictshallassumeallresponsibility,includingfinancial,fortheFireDepartment,maintenanceandreplacementofequipmentandapparatus,andallotherFireDepartmentobligationsandserviceobligationssetforthintheServicePlanoftheDistrict.TheonlyobligationoftheTownwithregardtoprovisionoffireserviceswithintheDistrictshallbethepaymentsdescribedin4.,5.and6.herein.15.TheDistrictshallhonorallpreexistingagreementsrelatedtofireandrelatedrescueservicesbetweentheTownandothergovernmentalentities.PriortoJanuary1,2010,theDistrictshallenterintoanagreementwithLarimerCountyandtheLarimerCountySherifftoreplacetheagreementdatedthe17thdayofSeptember2007betweentheTownofEstesParkandLarimerCountyandtheLarimerCountySheriffcoveringfire protection,firesuppressionandrescueservicesbytheTownofEstesParkandtheEPFD.16.Within90daysofformation,theDistrict’sBoardofDirectorsshallexecuteanintergovernmentalagreementwiththeLarimerCountyBoardofCountyCommissioners,inaformthatisagreeabletobothparties,whichagreementshallcontain,asaminimum,certainprovisionsthat:(i)requirestheDistricttoconsiderandpromptlyprocesspropertyowners’petitionsforinclusionofpropertylocatedintheDevil’sGulch/GlenHavenareatoensurethatsuchpropertiesreceiveadequatefireprotectionservicesinareasonableandcosteffectivemanner;and(ii)requirestheDistricttosubmitanyproposedlocation/constructionofDistrictfacilitiesintheunincorporatedportionoftheDistricttotheCounty’slandusereviewprocess,consistentwithapplicableColoradolawsandCountyregulations.17.EitherpartymayterminatethisAgreementbywrittennoticetotheotherpartyonorbeforeJuly1ofeachcalendaryear.SuchterminationshallbeeffectiveonDecember31ofsaidcalendaryear.18.EachpartyunderstandsandagreesthatthesumsnecessarytoprovidetheservicesandpaythecostsofthisAgreementshallbesubjecttotheannualbudgetaryprocessofeachindividualentity.ThefinancialobligationsofthepartiesshallnotbedeemedtobefinancialobligationsunderArticleX,Section20oftheColoradoConstitution.ThepartiesshallhavetherighttoterminatethisAgreementinwhole(butnotinpart)undertheprovisionsofParagraph17inthesoleeventthattheparty’sboardofdirectorsorgoverningbodyfailstoappropriatemoneysufficientforthecontinuedperformanceofthisAgreement.19.Indemnification.Totheextentpermittedbylaw,thepartiesherebycovenantandagreetoindemnify,defendandholdharmlessoneanotherfromandagainstanyandallliability,claims,losses,expenses,costs,charges,damages,judgments,obligations,expenses,attorneyfees,litigation,and/ordemandsofanykindwhatsoeverarisingfromorduetotheindemnifyingparty’snegligenceintheperformanceofitsdutiesunderthisAgreement.20.DefaultandRemedies.IntheeventofdefaultunderthisAgreementbyeitherparty,thenon-defaultingpartyshallgivethedefaultingpartywrittennoticeofsaiddefault.Thedefaultingpartyshallhavethirty(30)daystocuresuchdefault.Intheeventthedefaultingpartydoesnotcurethedefault,thenon-defaultingpartyshallbeentitledtoallremediesavailableatlaworinequity,includingreasonableanattorney’sfeesandcostsincurredbythenon-defaultingpartyfromsaiddefault.21.Services.TheTownshallprovide,uponrequestfromtheDistrict,accounting,humanresource,andvehiclemaintenanceservicesfromtheapplicableTownDepartmentstotheDistrict.Thecostofsaidservicesshallbenegotiatedannuallybetweentheparties.22.Pension.TheTownmaintainstheEstesParkVolunteerPensionFund(the“Fund”)forthepurposeofprovidingpensionbenefitspursuanttoSection31-30-1100etseq.C.R.S.-theVolunteerFirefighterPensionAct.OnorbeforeJanuary1,2010,theDistrictshall formanewVolunteerPensionFundfortheDistrictpursuanttotheapplicableportionsoftheVolunteerFirefighterPensionAct.OnorbeforeJanuary10,2010,theTownshalltransferallfundsintheTownofEstesParkVolunteerFirefighterPensionFundtothenewVolunteerPensionFund.Priortothetransferofthefunds,theDistrict,theTownandtheNewVolunteerPensionFundshallenterintoaseparateagreementaddressingthefollowing:a.TheDistrictandtheFundshallagreetocontinuetopaythesamelevelofpensionbenefitstoallretiredVolunteersbeginningJanuary1,2010.b.TheDistrictandtheFundshallrecognizeallvestedyearsofserviceofallcurrentVolunteermembersoftheDepartmentandanyinactiveorretiredmemberswhohavenotyetreceivedapension.c.TheDistrictandtheFundshallagreetomaintainthecurrentpro-rataretirementpensionfortenyearsormoreofvestedservice.U.TheDistrictagreestoannuallycontributesufficientfundstotheNewVolunteerPensionFundtomaintainanactuariallysoundretirementpensionfundtomeettheDistrict’sandFund’sobligationspursuanttothisParagraph.e.TheDistrictandtheFundspecificallyunderstandandagreethattheTownmayhavefutureliabilitytoVolunteerFirefighterswhohavelefttheEstesParkVolunteerFireDepartmentbutreceiveapensionthroughanotherVolunteerPensionFundintheStateofColoradopursuanttoSection31-30-1123C.R.S.TheDistrictandtheFundagreethatthefundstransferredtothenewVolunteerPensionFundincludesufficientfundstocoveralloftheTown’spotentialobligationstosaidVolunteerFirefighters.TheDistrictandtheFundshallassumeandpayallfutureobligationsoftheTownpursuanttothisSection.f.TheDistrictandtheFundagreetoprovideyearlyfinancialreportsandactuarialstudiestotheTownfortheTown’sreviewwithregardtotheDistrictandtheFundandtheirobligationspursuanttothetermsandconditionsofthisSection.23.Allnotices,demandsorotherdocumentsrequiredordesiredtobegiven,madeorsenttoeitherparty,underthisAgreement,shallbemadeinwriting,andshallbedeemedeffectiveuponmailingorpersonaldelivery.Ifmailed,saidnoticeshallbemailed,postagepre-paid,certifiedmail,returnreceiptrequestedasfollows:EVFPDTownofEstesParkAttention:BoardPresidentAttention:TownAdministratorP.O.Box1200P0Box1200EstesPark,Colorado80517EstesPark,CO8051724.NothinginthisAgreementshallbedeemedawaiverofthedefensesandlimitationsoftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,Section24-10-101,et.seq.C.R.S.,nordeemedtoconferanybenefitstoanypersonnotapartytothisAgreement. 25.ThisAgreementrepresentstheentireagreementotthepartiesandanyamendmenttothisAgreementshallbeinwritingandexecutedbybothpartieshereto.26.ThepartiesenterintothisAgreementasseparateandindependentgovernmentalentitiesandeachshallmaintainsuchstatusthroughoutthetermoftheAgreement.ThisAgreementshallbegovernedbythelawsoftheStateofColorado.‘JaIIe,EST%aEY%7ONDISTRIaArrES11IiSecretaryTOWNOFESTESPARKBy:A1TEST:TownClerk0 SeememounderActionItem#4forbackgroundinformation ORDINANCENO.13-09WHEREAS,theTownofEstesParkandtheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistricthaveagreedintheIntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheentitiestoleasetheDannelsFireStationandthefiretrainingareafromtheTowntotheDistrict;andWHEREAS,Section31-15-713(1)(c)C.R.S.providesthattheleaseofanyrealestate,togetherwithanyfacilitythereon,ownedbytheTownforaperiodofmorethanoneyearshallbeapprovedbyordinance.NOWTHEREFORE,BEITORDAINEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,asfollows:1.TheLeasefortheDannelsFireStationandthefiretrainingareabetweentheTownandtheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrict,acopyofwhichisattachedheretoandincorporatedhereinbythisreference,isherebyapproved.TheofficialsoftheTownofEstesParkareherebyauthorizedtoexecutetheLease.WHEREAS,itisnecessarytohavetheeffectivedateoftheLeaseasJanuary1,2010,andthereforetheimmediatepassageofthisOrdinanceisnecessaryforthepreservationofthehealth,safety,andwelfareofthecitizensoftheTown,andthereforethisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinforceimmediatelyafteritspassage,adoption,andsignatureoftheMayorortheMayorProTem.INTRODUCED,READ,ANDPASSEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARKonthis_____dayof,2009.TOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOMayorATTEST:TownClerk IherebycertifythattheaboveordinancewasintroducedandreadatameetingoftheBoardofTrusteesonthe_______dayof______________________2009,andpublishedinanewspaperofgeneralpublicationintheTownofEstesPark,Coloradoonthe________dayof________________,2009.TownClerk0 DRAFT#3;12/04/09LEASEAGREEMENTTHISLEASEAGREEMENTiseffectivethe1stdayofJanuary,2010,betweentheTOWNOFESThSPARK,COLORADO(the“Town”)andtheESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICT(the“District”).1.LEASEOFPREMISES.TheTowndoesherebyleasetotheDistrict,theDannelsFireStationandtheEstesParkFireTrainingArealocatedintheTownofEstesPark,Colorado(the“premises”)morefullydescribedasfollows:SeeExhibitA2.USETheDistrictshall,duringthetermofthisLeaseincludinganyfenewalorextensionthereofoccupyandmaintainthepremisesasafirestationandfiretrainingarea.TheDistrictshallnotconstructanyadditionalstructuresonthepremiseswithoutthespecificwrittenpermissionoftheTown.3.DISTRICTRESPONSIBILITIESTheDistrictcovenantsandagreesasfollows:a.TomaintainandrepairthepremisesandkeepsameingoodorderandrepairandattheexpirationofthisLease,tosurrendersaidpremisesinasgoodorderandconditionasoftheeffectivedateofthisLease,lessordinarywearandtear.l\’Iaintenanceandrepairincludes,butisnotlimitedto,theinteriorandexteriorofthestructure,theirrigationsystemandlandscaping,theroof,andtheparkinglot.b.Tokeepthepremisesclean,freeofdebris,andorderlyandtoobeyallordinances,regulationsandstatutesoftheTown,LanmerCounty,theStateofColorado,andtheUnitedStates.c.Toberesponsibleforandpayfortheremedyingofanyandalldamagedonetothepremisesofwhatsoevernature.Intheeventthepremisesarenotleftinacleanandorderlyconditionordamagehasoccurred,theexpenseofcleaningand/orrepairordamageshallbethatoftheDistrict. d.Tousethepremisesoniyforafirestation,Districtoffice,andfiretrainingarea.Thereshallbenocommercialactivityonthepremisesthatisnotaccessorytotheaboveuses.e.NottoalterthepremisesinanymannerexceptwiththeTown’swrittenconsent.AnyimprovementstothepremisesshallremainwiththepropertyaspermanentadditionsuponterminationofthisLease.f.Tomaintainandrepairallmechanicalandelectricalsystemsonthepremises.g.ToallowtheTowntohavefreeaccesstosaidpremisesatallreasonabletimesforthepurposeofexaminingandinspectingtheconditionofthesameorexercisinganyrightreservedtotheTownonthetermsandconditionsofthisLease.h.Toberesponsibleforpaymentofallutilitiesforthepremises.4.TERMThetermofthisleaseshallbeforaten(10)yearperiodcommencingonthefirstdayofJanuary2010andendingonthe31stdayofDecember2020.TheDistrictshallhavetheoptiontoextendthisleasefortwo(2)additionalfive(5)yearperiods.TheDistrictshallgivetheTownwrittennoticeofitsintenttoextendthisleaseatleasesix(6)monthspriortotheendofthebaseterm,oranyextendedterm,suchnoticetobeinwritinganddeliveredtotheTownattheaddressspecifiedinParagraph11hereof.Intheeventthatthisleaseisextendedforanadditionalperiod,alltermsandconditionsofthisleaseshallremaininforceandeffect.5.RENTThereshallbenorentpayableforleasingofthepremises.6.INSURANCEa.TheDistrictshallprovidetheTownwithcertificatesofliabilityinsuranceforcomprehensivegeneralliabilityandcomprehensiveautomobileliabilityinsuranceinanamountofnolessthanOneHundredFiftyThousandDollars($150,000)perperson,andSixHundredThousandDollars($600,000)peroccurrence,andFiftyThousandDollars($50,000)propertydamage,namingtheTownasadditionalinsuredonthepolicyorpolicies.TheDistrictmaysatisfythisrequirementbyobtainingappropriateendorsementtoanyumbrellapolicyorliabilityinsurancetheDistrictmaymaintain.TheDistrictmayprovidefortheinsurancesetforthpartiallyorwhollybymeansofaselfinsurancepool.02 b.TheDistrictshallprovidetheTownwithacertificateofpropertyinsuranceinanamountnolessthanthefullreplacementvalueofthefirestationbuildingincludingallfixturesonthepremises.TheTownshallbenamedasanAdditionalInsuredonthepolicy.TheDistrictmayprovidefortheinsurancesetforthpartiallyorwhollybymeansofaselfinsurancepooi.c.IntheeventthattheliabilitylimitsoftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityActareincreasedoverthecurrentlimitsofOneHundredFiftyThousandDollars($150,000)perperson,andSixHundredThousandDollars($600,000)peroccurrence,theDistrictshallbeobligatedtoincreaseitsgeneralandautomobileliabilityinsuranceinanamountequaltoorgreaterthanthelimitsoftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct.7.GOVERNMENTALIMMUNITYThepartiesunderstandandagreethatthepartiesarerelyingon,anddonotwaiveorintendtowaive,byanyprovisionofthisLease,themonetarylimitations(presently$150,000perpersonand$600,000peroccurrence)oranyrights,immunitiesandprotectionsprovidedbytheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,Section24-10-101,etseq.C.R.S.,asfromtimetotimeamendedorotherwiseavailabletothepartiesoranyoftheftofficers,agentsoremployees.8.INDEMNITYTotheextentlawfullyallowed,theDistrictagreestoindemnify,protectandsaveharmlesstheTownfromanyandallclaims,demandsandliabilityforanyloss,damageorinjury,includingdeath,orotherlikeordifferentcasualtytopersonsandpropertyusedbyandgrowingoutoforhappeninginconnectionwiththeDistrict’suseandoccupancyofthepremises,andanyequipmentlocatedortobelocatedthereon,duetothenegligenceoftheDistrict,itsagents,servants,oremployees.Saidindemnificationshallincludeallreasonableattorney’sfeesandcourtcostsincurredbytheTownforthedefenseofallclaims,damages,andliabilitiesthataresubjecttotheDistrict’sindemnificationobligation.9.CONDITIONOFSITEDuringthetermofthisleaseandanyRenewalTerm,theDistrictshallberesponsibleforanyandalldamagestothepremisescausedbyorattributedtoanyactionsbytheDistrictoritsusers.10.TERMINATIONUponterminationofthislease,theDistrictshallbeentitledtoremoveallofitspersonal()propertywithoutdamagingtheTown’sunderlyingpropertyand/orstructure.3 11.NOTICESAllnoticesrequiredorpermittedhereundershallbeinwritingandshallbedeemedgivenifpersonallydeliveredormailed,certifiedorregisteredmail,returnreceiptrequested,orsentbyovernightcarriertothefollowingaddresses:IftotheTown,to:TownofEstesParkAtm:TownAdministratorP0Box1200EstesPark,CO80517IftotheDistrict,to:EstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictAttn:BoardPresidentEstesPark,CO80517Orifamorecurrentaddress,orname,hasbeengiventotheotherpartyinwriting,tosuchotheraddress,orname.12.WAIVERFailureordelayonthepartoftheTowntoexerciseanyright,powerorprivilegehereundershallnotoperateasawaiverthereof.13.DEFAULTIfeitherpartyisindefaultofanyofitsobligationshereunderandsuchdefaultshallcontinueforaperiodofmorethanthirty(30)daysafterwrittennoticethereof,eitherpartymayterminatethisLeaseAgreementforsaiddefault.14.ASSIGNMENTTheDistrictshallnotassignitsrightsunderthisLeaseAgreementoranyinterestherein,orsubletthewholeoranyportionoftheleasedarea,withoutthepriorwrittenconsentoftheTown.04 15.ENTIREAGREEMENTTheLeaseAgreementconstitutestheentireagreementofthepartiesheretowithrespecttothesubjectmatterhereofandsupersedesallprioroffers,negotiations,andagreements,whetherwrittenororal,betweenthepartiesheretowithrespecttothesubjectmatterhereof.16.MISCELLANEOUSPROVISIONSa.TheDistrictagreesthatitshallnot,byanyactoromission,causeadefaultinanyofthetermsorconditionsoftheSpecialUsePermitbetweentheUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInteriorandtheTowneffectiveJuly15,1995whichwouldresultintherevocationoftheSpecialUsePermit.IntheeventthattheSpecialUsePermitisrevoked,thisLeaseshallautomaticallyterminateandtheTownshallhavenoliabilitytotheDistrictfortheterminationoftheSpecialUsePermit.Insaidevent,theDistrictagreestocooperatewiththeTowntoallowpossessionofthepremisesbytheUnitedStates.b.TheTownshallbeentitledtoaccesstheDannelsFireStationforusebytheTownofitsRedundantEmergencyDispatchCenterlocatedinthestation.TheDistrictshallprovidetheTownwithmeansofaccesstothestationforuseoftheCenter.TOWN:TOWNOFESTESPARKBy:MayorATTESTTownClerk,5 STATEOfCOLORADO))ss.COUNTYOfLARIMER)Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis______dayof2009,byBillPinkham,MayoroftheTownofEstesPark.WITNESSmyhandandofficialseal.Mycommissionexpires:NotaryPublicDISTRICT:ESTESVALLEYFIREPROTECTIONDISTRICTBy:BoardPresidentSTATEOfCOLORADO))ss.COUNTYOfLARIMER)Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis______dayof________________2009,by_________________________,BoardPresidentoftheEstesValleyfireProtectionDistrict.WITNESSmyhandandofficialseal.Mycommissionexpires:NotaryPublicCD6 EXHIBITADANNELSFIRESTATIONLEGALDESCRIPTION:AneasementfortheuseoftheTownofEstesPark,saideasementlocatedintheEYzoftheW½ofSection30,T5N,R72Wofthe6thP.M.,LanmerCounty,ColoradolyingNorthofthenortherlyright-of-waylineofU.S.HighwayNo.36andbeingmoreparticularlydescribedasfollows:COMMENCINGattheNortheastcornerofsaidSection30;thenceSouthalongtheEastlineofsaidSection30,2647.66feettotheE¼corneroftheaforementionedSection30;thenceN63°35’40”W3427.54feettotheNortheastcornerofsaideasementandtheTRUEPOINTOFBEGINNING;thenceS14°52’OO”W295.00feettothenortherlyright-of-wayofsaidU.S.Highway36;thencealongsaidnortherlyright-of-wayN81°38’06”W185.00feet;thenceleavingsaidright-of-wayN18°09’OO”W139.83feet;thenceN14°52’OO”E198.70feet;thenceS75°0$’OO”E260.00feettotheTRUEPONITOFBEGINNING,saideasementcontaining1.739acresmoreorless.ESTESPARKFIRETRAININGAREAThatportionoftheNortheastcornerofLot2,ElmRoadSecondAddition,totheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,StateofColorado,usedandoccupiedbytheEstesParkVolunteerfireDepartmentfortrainingactivitiesincludingnon-exclusiveuseofthecurrentaccessacrossthenorthernportionofLot2.7 SeememounderActionItem#4forbackgroundinformation RESOLUTIONNO.24-09WHEREAS,thetermsoftheIntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheTownandtheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictprovidethattheDistrictwillberesponsibleforallfireandemergencyservicesintheTownbeginningJanuary1,2010.NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,asfollows:1.TheBoardofTrusteesdesignatestheEstesValleyFireProtectionDistrictastheemergencyresponseauthorityfortheTownofEstesPark.Datedthis_____dayof____________,2009.TOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOMayorATTEST:TownClerk FinanceDepartmentCMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:SteveMcFarland,FinanceOfficerDate:December8,2009Subject:IntergovernmentalAgreementwithEstesValleyLibraryDistrictforFinancialServicesBackgroundTheTownofEstesPark(“Town”)andtheEstesValleyLibraryDistrict(“Library”)haveenjoyedasuccessfulworkingrelationshipfortheperiod2004-09asoutlinedintheattachedIGA.TheIGAspellsoutthedetailsunderwhichtheTownperformsaccountingtasksfortheLibrary.LibraryDirectorClaudinePerrauftandBoardChairpersonSarahWalshhavereviewedtheIGAandChairpersonWalshintendstosigntheagreementbeforetheTuesdayDecember8,2009TownBoardmeeting.TheattachedunsignedIGAispresentedforBoardperusalinlieuofthesigneddocument.TherearenomaterialchangesfromtheoldIGAtothenewone.StaffRecommendationStaffrecommendsthattheTownBoardapprovethenewIGAbetweentheTownandLibrary.RecommendedMotionImovetoapprove/denytheIntergovernmentalAgreementwiththeEstesValleyLibraryDistricttoprovideFinancialServicestotheDistrict. INTERGOVERNMENTALAGRFEMFNITHISAGREEMENTeffectivethe1stdayofJanuary,2010,byandbetweentheTOWNOFESTESPARK,aMunicipalCorporation,hereinafterreferredtoasthe(“Town”)andtheEstesValleyLibraryDistrict,aquasi-municipalcorporationandpoliticalsubdivisionintheStateofColorado,hereinafterreferredtoasthe(“District”).WHEREAS,theTownoperatesafinanceandaccountingoffice;andWHEREAS,theDistrictdesirestocontractwiththeTownforcertainfinancialandaccountingservices;andWHEREAS,Section29-1-203,C.RS.,providesthatthepartiesmaycooperateorcontractwithoneanothertoprovidefunctionsandserviceslawfullyauthorizedtotheindividualentity;andWHEREAS,pursuanttotheapplicablestatutesoftheStateofColoradothepartiesareauthorizedtoenterintothisIntergovernmentalAgreement.NOW,THEREFORE,INCONSIDERATIONOfTHEFOREGOINGANDTHECOVENANTSANDAGREEMENTSHEREINCONTAINED,THEPARTIESHEREBYAGREEASFOLLOWS:1.TheTownshallprovidefinancialandaccountingservicestotheDistrictassaidservicesaremorefullysetforthonExhibit“A”attachedheretoandincorporatedhereinbyreference.2.TheDistrictshallpaytotheTownforitsservicesthesumof$1,762.00permonth.ThesumisduepayableonthefirstdayofthefirstcalendarmonthfromtheeffectivedateofthisAgreement.Themonthlypaymentof$1,762.00shallbeincreasedby3%compoundedannuallyonJanuary1ofeachsuccessiveyear.3.TheDistrictshallprovidethenecessaryfinancialandbillinginformationnecessarytoallowtheTowntoperformtheservicessetforthonExhibit“A”.4.ThepartiesunderstandandagreethattheinformationprovidedfromtheDistricttotheTownshallbeusedbytheTownonlyintheservicestobeprovidedunderExhibit“A”.TheTownherebyagreesnottoprovideanyportionofsaidinformationtoanythirdpartywithouttheexpresswrittenconsentoftheDistrict.ThepartiesunderstandandagreethatboththeDistrictandtheTownaresubjecttotheapplicableprovisionsofArticle72ofTitle24,C.RS.,commonlyknownasthePublicRecordsLaw.IntheeventtheTownreceivesarequestforinformationreceivedfromtheDistrictortherequestedinformationisaproductoftheTown’sservicespursuanttothisAgreement,theTownshallinformtheDistrictoftherequest.TheDistrictshallconsultwiththeTownimmediatelytodeterminewhetherornottherequestshallbehonoredundertheapplicabletermsandconditionsofthePublicRecordslaw.IftheDistrictinstructstheTownnottohonortherequestoranyportionthereof,theDistrictshallindemnify-1-0 andholdtheTownharmlessfromallcostsincurredbytheTownasaresultofitsfailuretoprovidetherequestedinformationincludingbutnotlimitedtoallattorneysfees,expertfeesandcourtcostsincurredbytheTownasaresultofitsdenialofsaidrequest.ThepartiesagreethattheTownshallcomplywithanyorderofanyCourtrequiringreleaseofinformation.5.ThisAgreementshallbefortheperiodfromtheeffectivedatehereofthroughDecember31,2011.ThisAgreementshallautomaticallyrenewforadditionalone-yearperiodscommencingJanuary1ofeachyearimlessterminatedbyeitherpartyhereto.EitherpartymayterminatethisAgreementbygivingthirty(30)daysnoticeofterminationinwritingtotheotherparty.TheDistrictshallpaytheTownallcompensationduethroughthedateoftermination.6.ThisAgreementcontainstheentireagreementbetweenthepartiesandmaybeamendedbythepartiesonlyinwriting.7.TheDistrictisnotanagentoremployeeoftheTownandtheTownisnotanagentoremployeeoftheDistrictforanyoftheterms,conditionsorservicesprovidedunderthetermsofthisAgreement.8.Totheextentpermittedbylaw,theDistrictagreestoindemnify,holdharmlessanddefendtheTown,itsofficers,agents,volunteersandemployees,fromandagainstallliabilityforanyandallclaims,liens,suits,demandsoractionsfordamages,injuriestopersons,includingdeath,propertydamage,includinglossofuse,andexpenses,includingcourtcostsandreasonableattorneys’feesarisingoutoforresultingfromtheDistrict’sintentionalandnegligentactionsinitsprovisionofanyservicesorinformationunderthetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement.9.Totheextentpermittedbylaw,theTownagreestoindemnify,holdharmlessanddefendtheDistrict,itsofficers,agents,volunteersandemployees,fromandagainstallliabilityforanyandallclaims,liens,suits,demandsoractionsfordamages,injuriestopersons,includingdeath,propertydamage,includinglossofuse,andexpenses,includingcourtcostsandreasonableattorneys’feesarisingoutoforresultingfromtheTown’sintentionalandnegligentactionsintheprovisionofanyservicesorinformationunderthetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement.10.TheTownandtheDistrictwillprovideeachotherwithpromptnoticeofanyeventcoveredbytheindemnitysectionofthisAgreement,andintheeventofaclaimoractionwhichisfiled,eachpartymayemployattorneysofitsownchoosingtoprepareanddefendtheclaimoractiononitsbehalf.11.Allnotices,demandsorotherdocumentsrequiredordesiredtobegiven,madeorsenttoeitherparty,underthisAgreementshallbeinwriting,shallbedeemedeffectiveuponmailingorpersonaldelivery.Ifmailed,saidnoticeshallbemailed,postageprepaidregisteredasfollows:-2- TownofEstesParkTownAdministratorPCBox1200EstesPark,CO80517EstesValleyLibraryDistrictExecutiveDirectorPOBox1687EstesPark,CO8051712.ThisAgreementshallbeconstruedinaccordancewiththelawsoftheStateofColorado,andvenueforanycivilactionwithrespecttheretoshallbeproperonlyinLarimerCounty,Colorado.13.ThepartiestothisAgreementunderstandandagreethatthepartiesarerelyingon,anddonotwaiveorintendtowaive,byanyprovisionsofthisAgreement,themonetarylimitationsorterms(presently$150,000.00perpersonand$600,000.00peroccurrence)oranyotherrights,immunities,andprotectionsprovidedbytheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,Section2440-101,et.Seq.,C.R.S.,asfromtimetotimeamendedorotherwiseavailabletothepartiesoranyoftheirofficers,agentsoremployees.14.ThisAgreementshallbebindinguponthesuccessorsandassignsofthepartieshereto.ThisAgreementmaynotbeassignedbyeitherpartyheretowithoutthewrittenconsentoftheotherparty.15.ThepartiesunderstandandagreethatthesumsnecessarytopayfortheserviceshereinshallbesubjecttotheannualbudgetaryprocessoftheDistrict.ThefinancialobligationoftheDistrictshallnotbeamulti-yearfinancialobligationunderArticleX,Section20oftheColoradoConstitution.TheDistrictshallhavetherighttoterminatethisAgreementintheeventthattheDistrict’sgoverningbodyfailstoappropriatemoniessufficientforthecontinuedperformanceofthisAgreement.16.IntheeventofdefaultunderthisAgreementbyeitherparty,thenon-defaultingpartyshallgivethedefaultingpartywrittennoticeofsaiddefault.Thedefaultingpartyshallhavethirty(30)daystocuresuchdefault.Intheeventthedefaultingpartydoesnotcurethedefault,thenon-defaultingpartyshallbeentitledtoallremediesavailablebylaworequity,includingreasonableattorney’sfeesandcostsincurredbythenon-defaultingpartyduetosaiddefault.-3- TOWNOFESTESPARK,BY:_______________MayorATTEST:TownClerkEstesValleyLibraryDistrictBY:_________________-4- EXHIBITAScopeofServices(‘)GeneralAccountingFunctions:ProcessingofcashreceiptsInvestmentaccountingCashmanagementassistanceGeneraljournalentryMonthlyfinancialreportingAnnualbudgetentryAssistwithannualauditbyindependentauditorsAccountsPayable:Processingofpaymentstovendors1099reportingandissuance0Payroll:Bi-weeklyprocessingDirectdepositsPayrolltaxprocessingandreportingBenefitprocessingandreportingEndofyearreportingW-2reportingandissuance(D CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentMemoTo:MayorPinkhamandTownTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:BobJoseph,Director,CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentDate:December3,2009Subject:RevisionstotheSignCode:TemporaryBannersBackground.LastspringstaffwasdirectedbytheCDCtopreparerevisionstothesigncodeasneededtoallowtheuseoftemporarybanners,(currentlyprohibited).Subsequentlyataskforcewasorganizedtostudytheentiresigncode.Includedwithinthetaskforcerecommendationwasacallfortheallowanceoftemporarybanners.TheSignCodeispresentlyfoundintheMunicipalCodeandassuchisnotsubjecttoreviewandrecommendationbythePlanningCommission.Therefore,thisdraftisbeingpresentedtotheCDCforreviewandrecommendationtotheTownBoard.Thisrevision,ifenacted,willonlypertaintopropertiesinsidethecitylimits.Budget.N/ARecommendation.TheCommunityDevelopmentCommitteerecommendstheapprovaloftheproposedamendmentstoChapter17oftheMunicipalCode,regardingtemporarybanners,totheTownBoard.Motion.Imovetoapprove/denytheproposedamendmentstoSections17.66,17.88and17.89Chapter17oftheMunicipalCode. C:\DocumentsandSeffings\RobertJoseph\Desktop\TBmemo-TemporaryBannersfinal.docFormatting:1)Existingtextinblackfont.2)Proposednewtextinblueunderlinedtext.3)Texttoberemovedinredstrikethrough.17.66.040Definitions.(26)s.Windsignmeansasignconsistingofone(1)ormorebanners,pennants,ribbons,spinners,streamersorcaptiveballoons,orotherobjectsormaterialsfastenedinsuchamannerastomoveuponbeingsubjectedtopressurebywindorbreeze,butdoesnotincludeflagsorTemporaryBannersandTownSponsoredEventsBannersasprovidedforherein.17.66.060Prohibitedsigns.Thefollowingsignsshallnotbepermitted,erectedormaintainedintheTown:(1)Signswithvisiblemoving,revolvingorrotatingpartsorvisiblemechanicalmovementofanydescriptionorotherapparentvisiblemovementachievedbyelectrical,electronicormechanicalmeans,exceptforTownSponsoredBannersandTemporaryBannersasprovidedinsections17.88and17.89,time-temperature-datesigns,traditionalbarberpetes,andgaugesanddialswhichmaybeanimatedtotheextentnecessarytodisplaycorrectmeasurement;(5)Windsignsandbanners;17.66.070Temporarysigns.(3)TemporaryBanners.See17.89Chapter17.88BannersTownSponsoredEventBanners(thefollowingsectionistoberelocatedto17.88.020,notdeleted)0•Page2 C:\DocumentsandSeffings\RobertJoseph\Desktop\TBmemo-TemporaryBannersfinal.doc17.88.010Locationofbanners.BannersmaybeplacedatthefollowingdesignatedlocationswithintheTown,pursuanttotheprovisionsofSection1-7.66.050ofthisCode:t4)OntheeastsideoftheVisitorCabininBondPark,four(4)feetbyeight(8)feetmaximum.(2)Intheright-of-wayareawestoftheHighway34and36intersection,thirty(30)feetbythree(3)feetmaximum.(3)OnafreestandingdisplayinfrontoftheConventionandVisitorCenterBuildingalongHighway3’l,four(4)feetbyeight(8)feetmaximum.(Ord.6-97§1,1997;Ord.17-02§1,2002;Ord.9-07§1,2007)17.88.010DefinitionofTownSponsoredEventBanners(TSEBanners).TownSponsoredEventBannersaresignsconsistingofcanvas,nylon,vinylfabricorothermaterialofsimilarphysicalcharacteristicsthatbearstextand/orgraphicsintendedtoidentifyTownSponsoredEvents.77.88.020LocationofTSEBannersmaybeplacedatthefollowingdesignatedlocationswithintheTown.pursuanttotheprovisionsofSection17.66.050ofthisCode:(1)OntheeastsideoftheVisitorCabininBondPark,four(4)feetbyeight(8)feetmaximum.(2)Intheright-of-wayareawestoftheHighway34and36intersection,thirty(30)feetbythree(3)feetmaximum.(3)OnafreestandingdisplayinfrontoftheConventionandVisitorCenterBuildingalongHighway34,four(4)feetbyeight(8)feetmaximum.(Ord.6-97§1,1997;Ord.17-02§1,2002;Ord.9-071,2007)17.88.02077.88.030Specifications.Specificationsrelatingtothesize,length,construction,wording,lighting,installation,removal,TownindemnificationandfasteningshallbeobtainedfromtheSpecialEventsDirector.(Ord.6-97§1,1997)•Page3 C:\DocumentsandSeflings\RobertJoseph\Desktop\TBmemo-TemporaryBannerstinaLdoc__017.88.03017.88.040Application.Applicationtousenomorethantwo(2)ofthelocationsatanytimemustbesubmittedtotheSpecialEventsDirectoratleastthirty(30)dayspriortotheproposedevent.(Ord.6-97§1,1997)17.88.04017.88.050Typeofevent.OnlyeventsthataresponsoredbytheTownorapprovedbytheTownshallbeeligibletoplacebannersattwo(2)ofthethree(3)locationsatanyone(1)time.(Ord.6-971,1997)17.88.05017.88.060Numberoflocations.ConventionandVisitorCenterBuildinglocationlistedatSubsection17.88.010(3)aboveshallbeterminatedwhenthesitelistedatSubsection17.88.010(2)isavailable,foramaximumoftwo(2)designatedbannerlocations.(Ord.6-97,1997)Chapter17.89TemporaryBannersDefinition:TemporaryBannersaresignsconsistingofcanvas,nylon,vinylfabricorothermaterialofsimilarphysicalcharacteristicsthatbearstextand/orgraphicsintendedtoidentifyordirectattentiontoanycommercialmessageorproduct,service,place,activity,business;oranynon-commercialmessageorgraphic.Thissigncategoryandassociatedregulationsfoundinthischapter(17.89)expresslyexcludesTownSponsoredEventBannersasprovidedforinChapter17.88.Temporarybannerpermitrequired:PermitsshallbeissuedthroughtheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentwithinseven(7)calendardaysuponreceiptofacompleteapplication,providedStafffindstheapplicationtobeincompliancewithallapplicablemunicipalregulations.PermitCost:$30NumberofPermitsGranted:Asingleentitymayapplyforuptofourtemporarybannerpermitsinacalendaryear.Nosingleentitymayholdmorethanoneactivetemporarybannerpermitatatimeonthesamesite.0•Page4 C:\DocumentsandSettings\RobertJoseph\Desktop\TBmemo-TemporaryBannersfinal.docTimeDisplayed:Atemporarybannerpermitallowsthedisplayofone(1)temporarybannerforamaximumoffourteen(14)consecutivedays.Amaximumoftwoconsecutivepermitsareallowedperyear.Athirdandfourthpermitmaybeissuedafteralapseofatleast30calendardays.Location:Bannersmustbeaffixedflushtothewallofaprincipalbuildincjoronthesupportingstructureofanalreadypermittedpermanentfreestandingsign,atamaximumheightof20ft.aboveexistinggradeasmeasuredtothehighestpointofthetemporarybanner.Number,SizeandShape:InallzoningdistrictsexceptCD-CommercialDowntownaTemporaryBannerPermitallowstheuseofone(1)temporarybannerperlot.Temporarybannersshallnotexceedthirty-two(32)squarefeetinareaonanysinglesideorsixty-four(64)squarefeetincumulativearea,andshallnotexceedsix(6)feetinverticaldimension.IntheCD-CommercialDowntownzoningdistrictthiscodeallowsone(1)bannerperlotwithamaximumallowablesizeofeighteen(18)squarefeet.Allbannersshallberectangularinshapeandshallbesecurelyfastenedatallfourcornersatalltimes.Issuanceofpermitsfortemporarybannersshallbeexemptfromthecumulativesignareacalculationsandlimitationsfoundinsection17.66.110.TemporaryBannerRemoval:Bannersshallberemovedbytheapplicantwithintwenty-tourhoursoftheexpirationofthepermit.CodeViolation:AnytemporarybannerinstalledwithoutapermitordisplayedafterpermitexpirationisinviolationoftheMunicipalCodeandissubiecttoamunicipalcitationpluscourtfeesforeachandeverydaytheviolationexists.Ifaperson,propertyowner,orbusinessownererectsanybannerwithoutreceivingapermitashereinprovided,orifapermitholderfailstoremoveabannerwithin24hoursofexpirationofthepermit,theyshallbeineligibletoreceiveatemporarybannerpermitforaperiodoftwelvemonthsfromthedateofviolation.Avalidcopyofthepermitshallbekeptonsiteatalltimesthebannerisdisplayed.TemporaryBannerMaintenance:Alltemporarybannersshallbemaintainedingoodcondition,includingallpartsandsupports.TheChiefBuildingOfficialordesigneemayinspectandhaveauthoritytoorderthepainting,repair,orremovalofabannerthatconstitutesahazardtopublichealth,safety,orwelfarebyreasonofinadequatemaintenance,dilapidationorobsolescence.•Page5 ORDINANCENO.14-09ANORDINANCEAMENDINGSECTION17.66AND17.88REGARDINGSIGNSANDBANNERSANDADDITIONOFSECTION17.89REGARDINGTEMPORARYBANNERSOFTHEMUNICIPALCODEOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARKWHEREAS,theCommunityDevelopmentCommitteehasrecommendedtheamendingofChapter17.66andChapter17.88andaddingChapter17.89oftheMunicipalCodewithregardtosigns,bannersandtemporarybanners;andWHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkhasdetermineditisinthebestinterestoftheTownthattherecommendedchangesandadditionstoChapter17.66,Chapter17.88andChapter17.89beapproved.NOWTHEREFORE,BEITORDAINEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:Section1.Chapter17.66andChapter17.88oftheMunicipalCodeareherebyamendedandChapter17.89isherebyaddedasmorefullysetforthonExhibit“A”attachedheretoandincorporatedhereinbythisreference.Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeenforcedthirty(30)daysafteritsadoptionandpublication.PASSEDANDADOPTEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,THISDAYOF_______________,2009.TOWNOFESTESPARKMayorATTEST:TownClerkIherebycertifythattheaboveOrdinancewasintroducedandreadatthemeetingoftheBoardofTrusteesonthe_______dayof____________,2009,andpublishedinanewspaperofgeneralcirculationintheTownofEstesPark,Co’orado,onthe________dayof______________________,2009.TownClerk ORDINANCE14-09-Exhibit“A”Section1:Sections17.66.40(26)s,17.66.060(1)and(5),Section17.66.070(3),Section17.88.010,Section17.88.020(1),(2)and(3),Section17.88.030,Section17.88.040,Section17.88.050,andSection17.88.060oftheMunicipalCodeshallbeamendedtoreadasfollows:17.66.040Definitions.(26)s.Windsignmeansasignconsistingofone(1)ormore,pennants,ribbons,spinners,streamersorcaptiveballoons,orotherobjectsormaterialsfastenedinsuchamannerastomoveuponbeingsubjectedtopressurebywindorbreeze,butdoesnotincludeflagsorTemporaryBannersandTownSponsoredEventsBannersasprovidedforherein.17.66.060Prohibitedsigns.(1)Signswithvisiblemoving,revolvingorrotatingpartsorvisiblemechanicalmovementofanydescriptionorotherapparentvisiblemovementachievedbyelectrical,electronicormechanicalmeans,exceptforTownSponsoredBannersandTemporaryBannersasprovidedinsections17.88and17.89,time-temperature-datesigns,andgaugesanddialswhichmaybe—animatedtotheextentnecessarytodisplaycorrectmeasurement;17.66.060Prohibitedsigns.(5)Windsigns17.66.070Temporarysigns.(3)TemporaryBanners.See17.8917.88TownSponsoredEventBanners17.88.010DefinitionofTownSponsoredEventBanners(TSEBanners).TownSponsoredEventBannersaresignsconsistingofcanvas,nylon,vinylfabricorothermaterialofsimilarphysicalcharacteristicsthatbearstextand/orgraphicsintendedtoidentifyTownSponsoredEvents.17.88.020LocationofTSEBanners.BannersmaybeplacedatthefollowingdesignatedlocationswithintheTown,pursuanttotheprovisionsofSection17.66.050ofthisCode:(1)OntheeastsideoftheVisitorCabininBondPark,four(4)feetbyeight(8)feetmaximum.(2)Intheright-of-wayareawestoftheHighway34and36intersection,thirty(30)feetbythree(3)feetmaximum.(3)OnafreestandingdisplayinfrontoftheConventionandVisitorCenterBuildingalongHighway34,four(4)feetbyeight(8)feetmaximum.(Ord.6-97§1,1997;Ord.17-02§1,2002;Ord.9-07§1,2007)1Ord.14-09Exhibit“A” 17.88.030Specifications.Specificationsrelatingtothesize,length,construction,wording,lighting,installation,removal,TownindemnificationandfasteningshallbeobtainedfromtheSpecialEventsDirector.(Ord.6-97§1,1997)17.88.040Application.Applicationtousenomorethantwo(2)ofthelocationsatanytimemustbesubmittedtotheSpecialEventsDirectoratleastthirty(30)dayspriortotheproposedevent.(Ord.6-97§1,1997)17.88.050Typeofevent.OnlyeventsthataresponsoredbytheTownorapprovedbytheTownshallbeeligibletoplacebannersattwo(2)ofthethree(3)locationsatanyone(1)time.(Ord.6-97§1,1997)17.88.060Numberoflocations.TheConventionandVisitorsCenterlocationlistedatSubsection17.88.010(3)aboveshallbeterminatedwhenthesitelistedatSubsection17.88.010(2)isavailable,foramaximumoftwo(2)designatedbannerlocations.(Cud.6-97,1997)Section2.Section17.89.010,Section17.89.020,Section17.89.030,Section17.89.040,Section17.89.050,Section17.89.060,Section17.89.070,Section17.89.080andSection17.89.090shallbeaddedtotheMunicipalCodetoreadasfollows:Chapter17.89TemporaryBanners17.89.010Definition.TemporaryBannersaresignsconsistingofcanvas,nylon,vinylfabricorothermaterialofsimilarphysicalcharacteristicsthatbearstextand/orgraphicsintendedtoidentifyordirectattentiontoanycommercialmessageorproduct,service,place,activity,business;oranynon-commercialmessageorgraphic.Thissigncategoryandassociatedregulationsfoundinthischapter(17.89)expresslyexcludesTownSponsoredEventBannersasprovidedforinChapter17.88.17.89.020Temporarybannerpermitrequired.PermitsshallbeissuedthroughtheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentwithinseven(7)calendardaysuponreceiptofacompleteapplication,providedStafffindstheapplicationtobeincompliancewithallapplicablemunicipalregulations.17.89.030NumberofPermitsGranted.Asingleentitymayapplyforuptofourtemporarybannerpermitsinacalendaryear.Nosingleentitymayholdmorethanoneactivetemporarybannerpermitatatimeonthesamesite.17.89.040TimeDisplayed.Atemporarybannerpermitallowsthedisplayofone(1)temporarybannerforamaximumoffourteen(14)consecutivedays.Amaximumoftwoconsecutivepermitsareallowedperyear.Athirdandfourthpermitmaybeissuedafteralapseofatleast30calendardays.2Ord.14-09Exhibit‘A” 17.89.050Location.Bannersmustbeaffixedflushtothewallofaprincipalbuildingoronthesupportingstructureofanalreadypermittedpermanentfreestandingsign,atamaximumheightof20ft.aboveexistinggradeasmeasuredtothehighestpointofthetemporarybanner.17.89.060Number,SizeandShape.InallzoningdistrictsexceptCD-CommercialDowntownaTemporaryBannerPermitallowstheuseofone(1)temporarybannerperlot.Temporarybannersshallnotexceedthirty-two(32)squarefeetinareaonanysinglesideorsixty-four(64)squarefeetincumulativearea,andshallnotexceedsix(6)feetinverticaldimension.IntheCD-CommercialDowntownzoningdistrictthiscodeallowsone(1)bannerperlotwithamaximumallowablesizeofeighteen(18)squarefeet.Allbannersshallberectangularinshapeandshallbesecurelyfastenedatallfourcornersatalltimes.Issuanceofpermitsfortemporarybannersshallbeexemptfromthecumulativesignareacalculationsandlimitationsfoundinsection17.66.110.17.89.070TemporaryBannerRemoval.Bannersshallberemovedbytheapplicantwithintwenty-fourhoursoftheexpirationofthepermit.17.89.080CodeViolation.AnytemporarybannerinstalledwithoutapermitordisplayedafterpermitexpirationisinviolationoftheMunicipalCodeandissubjecttoamunicipalcitationpluscourtfeesforeachandeverydaytheviolationexists.Ifaperson,propertyowner,orbusinessownererectsanybannerwithoutreceivingapermitashereinprovided,orifapermitholderfailstoremoveabannerwithin24hoursofexpirationofthepermit,theyshallbeineligibletoreceiveatemporarybannerpermitforaperiodoftwelvemonthsfromthedateofviolation.Avalidcopyofthepermitshallbekeptonsiteatalltimesthebannerisdisplayed.17.89.090TemporaryBannerMaintenance.Alltemporarybannersshallbemaintainedingoodcondition,includingallpartsandsupports.TheChiefBuildingOfficialordesigneemayinspectandhaveauthoritytoorderthepainting,repair,orremovalofabannerthatconstitutesahazardtopublichealth,safety,orwelfarebyreasonofinadequatemaintenance,dilapidationorobsolescence.03Ord.14-09Exhibit“A FinanceDepartment0MemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:SteveMcFarland,FinanceOfficerDate:December8,2009Subject:Resolution#25-09—RecertificationoftheMillLevyBackgroundResolution#21-09(settingthemilllevy)wasadoptedintheNovember24,2009TownBoard(Thmeeting.ThemilllevywascalculatedfromtheAugust25,2009printingoftheCertificationofValuationbyLarimerCountyAssessor.Themilllevyiscalculatedfromlineitemsinthedocumentandusestheformula(Revenues/CurrentYear’sNetTotalTaxableAssessedValuation)x1,000=MillLevy.TheAugust25,2009documentyieldedamilllevyof1.738.TheAssessor’sOfficeissuedarevisedCertificationofValuationbyLarimerCountyAssessordatedNovember25,2009—onedayaftertheTownadoptedResolution#21-09.Inthereviseddocument,theCurrentYear’sNetTotalTaxableAssessedValuationchangedfrom$189,944,802to$188,354,090.Theresultingcalculationchangesthemilllevyfrom1.738to1.752.IftheBoardchoosestonotamendthemilllevyfrom1.738to1.752,aresulting$2,638inpropertytaxrevenuewillbelost/forfeited.StaffRecommendationStaffrecommendsrevisingthemilllevyadoptedinResolution21-09from1.738to1.752.RecommendedMotionImovetoapprove/denyResolution#25-09recertifyingtheMillLevysetforthinResolution#21-09. RESOLUTIONTOREVISEMILLLEVYNO.25-09ARESOLUTIONLEVYINGPROPERTYTAXESFORTHEYEAR2009TOHELPDEFRAYTHECOSTSOFGOVERNMENTFORTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOFORTHE2010BUDGETYEAR.WHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkadoptedtheannualbudgetinaccordancewiththeLocalGovernmentBudgetLawonNovember24,2009;andWHEREAS,theamountofmoneynecessarytobalancethebudgetforgeneraloperatingexpenseis$330,073;andWHEREAS,theCertificationofValuationbyLarimerCountyAssessordatedNovember25,2009revisedtheAugust25,2009’s“CurrentYear’sNetTotalTaxableAssessedValuation”lineitemfrom$189,944,802to$188,354,090.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:ThatforthepurposemeetingallgeneraloperatingexpensesoftheTownofEstesParkduringthe2010budgetyear,thereisherebyleviedataxof1.752mills(revisedfromoriginalcalculationof1.738mills)uponeachdollarofthetotalvaluationforassessmentofalltaxablepropertywithintheTownfortheyear2010.The1.752millsisatemporaryreductionoftheoriginal1.822millsduetopropertytaxincreasespendinglimitsof5.5%perC.R.S.29-1-301.ThattheTownClerkisherbyauthorizedanddirectedtoimmediatelycertifytotheCountyCommissionersofLarimerCounty,Colorado,themillleviesfortheTownofEstesParkashereinabovedeterminedandset.ADOPTEDthis8thdayofDecember,2009.TOWNOFESTESPARKMayorATTEST:TownClerk FinanceDepartmentMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:SteveMcFarland,FinanceOfficerDate:December8,2009Subject:Resolution#26-092009SupplementalBudgetAppropriationsBackgroundAttheendofeachcalendar/fiscalyear,theTownisrequiredtoassessandifnecessary,amendtheQcurrentbudgettoaccountforanyfundsthathaveexceededtheirapprovedexpenditurelevels.BudgetoveragesareoftentheresultofBoard-approvedopportunitiestakenthroughouttheyearthatwereunknownatthetimeofthebudgetcreation.Insomeinstances,theexpendituresevenhaverevenueoffset.ThefollowingpagescontainexplanationsfortheproposedSupplementalappropriationstothe2009Budget.ExplanationofdocumentTheattachedspreadsheetisdividedintotwosections.Thefirstsectionofthedocumentreportsrevenues.Duetotheeconomicdownturn,revenuesinmanyofthefundshavelaggedoriginalforecasts.Wherepossible,stepsweretakentomitigatetherevenueshortfallbyreducingexpenditures.Inafewinstances,revenueshaveexceededexpectations.A)ColumnAreports2009revenuesasforecastedintheoriginal2009budget,approvedinNovember2008.B)ColumnBreports2009revenuesasestimatedasofNovember23,2009.C)ColumnthreereportsthevariancebetweencolumnsAandB. Thesecondsectionofthedocumentreportsexpenditures.Thecolumnsinclude:A)Theoriginalbudget,B)Thesupplementalappropriationsthatoccurredduringtheyear(rollovers,511P/building),C)Theprojectedfinalexpenditures(thisisthefocalpointofthedocument,andistherevisedtotal2009expendituresbeingrequestedforapproval),D)ThesumofcolumnsA&B,andE)WhetherornotcolumnC(newforecast)exceedscolumnD(originalforecast).ExplanationofvariancesinexpendituresAspreviouslystated,themiddlesection(expenditures),greycolumnC(“2009EOYH.T.E.11/23/09—EndingExpenditures)isthecolumnthatwillbecomethenewlyappropriatedexpenditureamountsforallrespectivefunds.Thefollowingcommentsareinregardstoonlythefundsthatwillexceedoriginalbudget:A)CommunityReinvestment(CRF).TherewerenoexpendituresoriginallybudgetedintheCRE.Sincethen,theTownhastakenontheGrandstandsprojectaswellasthearchitecturalrenderingsfortheMPECproject.B)ConservationTrust(CTF).TheCTFisexpectedtoexpend$20,100morethanwhatwasoriginallybudgeted.ThisisduetoneglectingtorolloverphaseoneoftheBondParkfromthe2008budget.The2008amountwasreturnedtofundbalance,butthenre-budgetedduringthe2009year.C)SeniorCenter.TheSeniorCenterFundwillexceedbudgetbecausethefunditselfisbeingclosedoutandthebalancetransferredtotheCVB—CommunityServicesFund.The$5,838transfertoclosethefundisseenasanexpenditure,thereforecausingtherevisedexpendituretotaltoexceedtheoriginalbudgetby$3,102.Otherwise,SeniorCenterwouldbeunderbudget.D)OpenSpace.TheOpenSpaceFundisexpectedtoexceedbudgetduetoa$140,000grantreceived.TheGrantpiggybacksontothe$179,000existingbudgetedprojectsforatotalof$319,000.Anadditional$15,000wasbudgetedinpayrollfortheseasonalhiringofanengineertomanagetheproject(s),aspergrantinstructions.The$15,000isincludedinthe$319,000total.E)Fire.TheFireFundis$24,352overbudgetbecause$24,997willbeexpendedtoclosethefund.Otherwise,Firewouldbeunderbudget.F)Water.TheWaterFundwillexceedbudgetduetocostoverrunsinthecapitalprojectarea.0•Page2 G)Medical.TheMedicalInsuranceFundwillexceedbudgetby$7,520duetoarequiredactuarialstudyrequiredbyGASB45forpost-employmentbenefits.H)FiremenPension.TheFiremenPensionFundistoexceedbudgetby$1,155duetoanactuarialstudyperformedmid-yeartodetermineappropriatepayoutlevelsinlieuofrecentmarketfluctuations.StaffRecommendationStaffrecommendsadoptingResolution#26-09forsupplementalappropriationforthe2009Budget.RecommendedMotionImovetoapprove/denyResolution#26-09adoptingthesupplementalappropriationsforthe2009budget.•Page3 RESOLUTIONTOAPPROPRIATESUMSOFMONEYNO.26-09ARESOLUTIONADJUSTINGAPPROPRIATIONSTOTHEVARIOUSFUNDSANDSPENDINGAGENCIESINTHEAMOUNTSANDFORTHEPURPOSESASSETFORTHBELOWFORTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOFORTHEBUDGETYEARBEGINNINGONTHEFIRSTDAYOFJANUARY,2009,ANDENDINGONTHELASTDAYOFDECEMBER,2009.WHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkhasadoptedtheannualbudgetinaccordancewiththeLocalGovernmentBudgetLawonNovember25,2008;andWHEREAS,overthecourseofthefiscalyearendingDecember31,2009,theestimatesincludedintheadoptedbudgethavebeenrevisedtomoteaccuratelyrepresenttheactualrevenuesandexpendituresnecessarytooperatethegovernment;andWHEREAS,itisnotonlyrequiredbylaw,butalsonecessarytoappropriatetherevenuesprovidedinthebudgettoandforthepurposesdescribedbelow,soasnottoimpairtheoperationsoftheTownofEstesPark.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:Thatthefollowingattachedsumsareherebyappropriatedfromtherevenueofeachfund,toeachfund,forthepurposesstated.ADOPTEDthis8thdayofDecember,2009.MayorATTEST:TownClerk0 INFORMATIONFORSUPPLEMENTALAPPROPRIATIONTO2009BUDGET2009BudgetHJ.E.(11/23/09)Favorable/(2009ApprovedBudget)2009EOYEstimate(Unfavorable)REVENUES101General11,096,02010,668,315(427,705)204CommunityReinvestment1,527,0001,527,01111207Museum306,788291,126(15,662)211ConservationTrust34,30033,400(900)217SeniorCenter205,524208,3392,815220LarimerCtyOpenSpace241,000402,247161,247222CVB(CommunityServices)2,952,1602,947,854(4,306)229Fire622,500533,549(88951)419BuildingAuthority92,84092,8400502Light&Power11,880,02611,952,97372,947503Water3,506,4813,193,939(312,542)605CatastrophicLoss36,00023,000(13,000)606Medical13,66011,500(1,860)612Fleet273,800280,9697,169625InformationSystems458,669455,86g200635VehicleReplacement564,880548,380(16,500)709FiremenPension154,605264,605110,000710PolicePension1,667710(957)716Theater9,0002,700(6,300)Total33,976,92033,442,626(534,294)includesoilsourcesofmoneyinflow:revenues,proceedsfromdebt,fransfersinEXPENDITURESABCDOriginal2009Budget+supplementalappropriations-2008BOYH.T.E.Favorable/(Resolution03-09,02/10/09)H.tE1.1123/09(A+B)(Unfavorable)_____________________________(Resolution04-09,02/10/09)EndIpendt*xes_________________________101General11,646,121222,956-11,578,11111,869,077290,966204CommunityReinvestment024,5101,346,38724,510(1,321,877)207Museum350,9240335,998350,92414,926211ConservationTrust85,500010,60O85,500(20,100)217SeniorCenter212,1530215,255212,153(3,102)220LarimerCtyOpenSpace211371118,666469,Th7330,037(139,700)222CVB(CommunityServices)3,012,44318,9353,03O,6083,031,378770229Fire712,819359,431-1,096,6027,072,250(24,352)419BuildingAuthority92,8400-.:92,84092,8400502Light&Power13,904,036526,38412,964,14614,430,4201,466,274503Water4,306,1674,644,S63-9,217,9528,950,730(267,222)605CatastrophicLoss1,000,00001,000,0001,000,0000606Medical99,9150107,43599,915(7,520)612Fleet334,337663332,362335,0002,638625InformationSystems498,8379,292506,998508,1291,131635VehicleReplacement391,0000391,000391,0000709FiremenPension127,9400129,095127,940(1,155)710PolicePension2,56502,5652,5650716Theater21,000021,00021,0000Subtotal37,009,9685,925,40042,943,691,42,935,368(8,323)Transfers5,498,01405,498,014Totals31,511,9545,925,40042,977,19137,437,354ailfundsincludefofolexpendituresandtransfersout FinanceDepartmentMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:SteveMcFarland,FinanceOfficerDate:December8,2009Subject:ApprovaltoAttemptrecoveryofColoradoDiversifiedTrustfundsthroughpoliticalaction/TARPfunds.BackgroundIn2008,theTownlost$45,200.65beingheldbyColoradoDiversifiedTrustasaresultofthepooledinvestmentsheldinLehmanBrothers.Sincethattime,effortstorecoverthelostmonieshaveprovedfruitless.OnNovember20,2009theTownreceivedcommunicationfromtheBoulderCountyTreasurer’sOffice(seeattached)detailingeffortsbeingmadetopetitionCongressandappropriateCommitteestouseTARPfundstopurchasetheLehmansecuritiesheldbylocalgovernments.StaffisapproachingTownBoardforpermissiontowritelettersofsupportbecause:1.Theletterswouldbeconsideredapoliticalaction,and2.ThepetitionedmonieswouldbeTARP-related,whichmeansthattheFederalGovernmentwouldbeusingmoniesto“cover”fundslostinourMunicipalpooledfunds.Suchabailoutisnotavailabletoprivatecitizens.StaffhascontactedtheotherEstesParkDistricts(Hospital,Library,Sanitation,School)andconfirmedthatthey(atleastatthestafflevel)aresupportiveofsaidcourseofaction.StaffRecommendationStaffrequestsapprovalofallowingletter(s)ofsupporttobewrittentoRep.MarkeyandtoSenatorsBennettandUdall,withcopiestotheWhiteHouse.Staffalsorequestsapproximately$226tobespentfromaccount101-1100-411-22-98tocovertheadditionaleffortsbyCapitolRepresentativestorecoversaidfunds. RecommendedMotionImovetoapprove/denytheTownofEstesParksupportthecoalitionofmorethan150localgovernmententitiesintherecoveryoffundslostintheColoradoDiversifiedFundduetopooledinvestmentfundswithLehmanBrothers.002 BoulderCountyTreasurer’sOfficeBobHullinghorst,BoulderCountyTreasurerPDBox471BoulderCD80306303-441-3511Friday,November20,2009DebbieMcDougallTownofEstesParkPDBox1200EstesPark,CD80517DearDebbie:Asyouknow,theTownofEstesParklost$45,200.65inCDTlastyear.SinceBoulderCountyhadasimilarloss,Ihavebeenworkinghardwithacoalitionofmorethan150localgovernmentofficialsfromaroundthecountrytryingtorecoverthemoneyweinvestedinhighlyratedLehmansecurities.LastMay,membersofthecoalitiontestifiedbeforetheHouseFinancialServicesCommittee.WesupportedCongressmanEshoo’sHR467requiringTreasurySecretaryGeithnertouseTARPfundstopurchasetheLehmansecuritiesheldbylocalgovernments.ChairmanBarneyFrankandmanyontheCommitteewereverysupportive.Threeweeksago,CongressmanEshooandfourotherRepresentatives.includingColorado’sRepresentativeEdPerimutter,hadaproductivemeetingwithSecretaryGeithner.Lastweek,wesecureddramaticsupportfromSenatorFeinstein,andthisweekEshoosentaverystrongfollowuplettertoSecretaryGeithner.TheseareattachedWe’vebeenmakingprogress,butweneedyourhelpintwoareas.IrecentlymetwithBarneyFrankinDenver.Franksaidifwewantedaction,wemustgetourlegislatorstousetheirinfluencewiththeWhiteHouse.HesaidnothingisgoingtomovewithoutcooperationfromtheAdministration.S,first,needyourhelpbywritingaletterofsupporttoRep.BetsyMarkeyandtoSenatorsBenneandUdall,withcopiestotheWhiteHouse.Iwillcallyouaboutthis.IamalsoworkingwithCapitolRepresentatives,agovernmentrelationsfirmwithofficesinWashington.Withoutthem,wewouldnothaveprogressedthisfar.NowtheCoalitionhasaskedCapitolRepresentativestoworkgettingsupportfromotherstateswheretherehavebeensubstantiallosses,likeOregonandWashington.ThismeansmoretimeaswellassotofpocketexpensesandtravelbyCapitolRepresentatives.Unfortunately,Iamoutofmoney.$seconweneedyourfinancialhelp.Ihavespentalittleunderonepercenttotrytoregainmytaxpayer’sfunds.Iamtryingtoraiseabout$20,000,orhalfapercent,fromyouandotherCDTinvestorstocoveranadditionaleffortbyCapitolRepresentatives.Yourshare,ifyouhaveit,wouldbe$226.00.Iwouldappreciateyourconsideringthisrequest.ThemostimportantthingyoucandoissendaletterofsupporttoRep.BetsyMarkeyandtoSenatorsBennettandUdall,andcopytheWhiteHouse.Thankyouverymuchinadvanceforyourhelp.BobHullinghorstbhullinghorstbouldercounty.org rø2d9a€€November17,2009€ofe6yt%-iTheHonorableTimothyF.Geithner,SecretaryDepartment0ftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,N.W.Washington,D.C.20220DearSecretaryGeithuer,OnOctober2&’wehadaproductivediscussionabouteffortstoresolvethefinancialhardshipsfacedbylocalgovernmentsintheaftermathoftheLehmanBrothers’bankmptcy.YouandIwerejoinedbymyColleagues,RepresentativesSpeier,Farr,MillerandPerimutter,andeach0fthemeloquentlydetailedtheseverecutsincriticalservicesandprogramsthatlocalgovernmentsarefacingduetotheFederalReserve’sdecisioninSeptember2008toallowLehmanBrotherstofail.Whii5youagreedthatreductionsinservicesandprojectsatthelocallevelwereextremelyharmfultotheAdministration’seconomicrecoveryefforts,youalsoexpressedyourconcernthatyouddnothavethelegalauthoritytouseTARPfundstoassistlocalitiesthathavebeenimpactedbtheLehmanbankruptcyorothermajorbankfailures.Asyouknow,Iwrotelanguagewaspart0ftheTARPlegislationtospecificallygivetheTreasurySecretarytheauthoritytoaddressthesetroubledassets.Duringourdiscussion,however,youinformedusthatattorneysattheTreasuryDepartmentarenotconvincedthatth5languageissufficienttoallowTARPfundstobeusedforthispurpose.Talzingnoteofourresolvetofindaremedyforth5situation,youagreedtogobacktoyourattorneystoclarifythelealissuesandconcernsandtorecommendpossiblelegislativeremedies.YouaskedwhetherIwaswillingtogiveyoutwoweekstoconferwithyouradvisorsandthenreturntouswiththeoutcome0fthesediscussions,andIwashappytod0Ithasnowbeenmorethantwoweeksandweareveryeagertoheartheresults0fyourconsultations,andIhopewecanscheduleafollow-upmeetingassoonaspossible.PleasehaveyourstaffcontactmyExecutiveAssistantJenaGrossat(202)225-8104attheixearliestconveniencetoarrangeatimeforustomeetagain.0Mostgratefully, INFORMATIONFORLETTERS:Pleaseuseyourownlanguage,ofcourse.Ihavebeenencouragedtomentionthefollowing;“supportofJ-IR467”foruseofTARPfunds“purchaseofLehmanBrotherssecuritiesfromstateandlocalagencies”Ihavealsobeenencouragedtoexplainthatrecoveryofthesefundsshouldhaveadirectimpactonlocalgovernment,andgivespecificexamples.Ihavebeentoldthatspecificexamplesthatincludeanumberofjobscreatedorpersonsemployedisbest.Ifyouhaveapersonalconnectionwithanyoneonthelist,pleasecalltotellthemyourletteriscomingandaskthemifyoushouldemailthemacopy.PleasesendacopyofyourletterstomeThanksagainforyourhelp.BobHullinghorst HouseRep.DianaDeGette(D-ist)1530LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4431;225-5657Denver:(303)844-4988Rep.JaredPolls(D-2nd)501CannonHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-2161;226-7840Boulder:(303)484-9596JohnSalazar(D-rd)1531LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4761;226-9669GrandJunction:(970)245-7107p.BetsyMarkey(D-4th)1229LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4676;225-5870Ft.Collins:(970)221-7110$enateSen.MichaelBennet(D)702HartSenateOfficeBuilding(202)224-5852;228-5036Denver:(303)455-7600WebSiteSen.MarkUdall(D)317HartSenateOfficeBuilding(202)224-5941;224-6471Deiwer:(303)650-7820WebSite.Iecuti’,reTheWhiteHouseRep.DougLamborn(R-.sth)2372RayburnHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4422;226-2638ColoradoSprings:(719)520-0055Rep.MikeCoffman(R-6th)1508LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-7882;226-4623LongTree:(720)283-9772Rep.EdPerlmutter(D-7th)415CannonHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-2645;225-5278Lakewood:(303)274-7944i6ooPennsylvaniaAvenueNWWashington,DC20500Pleaseincludeyoure-mailaddressPleasesendacopy,Attn:CeciliaMunoz,DirectorofIntergovernmentalAffairs0 LossesduetoLehmanBrothersBankruptcyListedbyStateinDecliningOrderbySizeofLossEstablishedAsifMay5,20021California$789Million2.Florida$465Million3.Oregon$200Million4.Washington$130Million5.Arizona$61Million6.Minnesota$56Million7.Missouri$50Million8.Nevada$50Million9.Illinois$23Million10.Michigan$10Million11.NewYork$6Million12.NewMexico$5.7Million13.Massachusetts$5.2Million14.Colorado$5Million15.Georgia$>1Million16.Delaware$>1Million17.Pennsylvania$>1Million18.Alaska$>1Million19.Texas$>1Million20.NewJersey$>1Million21.Mississippi$>1Million22.Tennessee$>1Million Octoberxx,2009TheHonorableTimothyF.GeithnerSecretaryUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,NWWashington,DC20220DearSecretaryGeithner:WearewritingtourgeyoutoutizeSection103(7)oftheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008toworkconstructivelywithcommunitiesnationwidewhoareexperiencingfinancialdifficultyresultingfromthefailureofLehmanBrothersandWashingtonMutual.Asyouknow,theeconomicrescuelegislationincludedthisprovisiontorequireTreasurytoconsidertheimpactoffinancialmarkettossesonlocalgovernmentalentitiesinimplementingtheTroubledAssetRecoveryProgram(TARP).LocalgovernmentsandpublicagenciesimpactedbythefailureofLehmanBrothersandWashingtonMutualarealreadysufferingsignificantlyfromtheeffectsofthenationaleconomicdownturn.Theadditional$1.7billioninlossesassociatedwiththecollapseofthesefinancialinstitutionsareforcingmanyofthesepublicentitiestolayoffcriticalpersonnel,delayorterminateongoingandmuch-neededcommunityconstructionprojectsandcutvitallocalservices.This$1.7billioninlossesrepresentsonly1/4of1percentofthetotalamountsetasideforTARP,and2.4%ofthe$70billionthatbanksparticipatinginTARPhavereturnedtoTreasurysofar.Weunderstandtheenormityoftheissuesfacedbygovernmentatalllevelsinthecurrenteconomicclimate,andrealizethatTARPfundingtoreplaceresourceslostasaresultoftheLehmancollapsewillnotsolvealloftheproblemsthatlocalgovernmentwillbefacingforyearstocome.However,thebenefittoberealizedbyprovidingTARPassistancetolocalentitiesharmedbytheLehmanandWashingtonMutualfailurewouldbeimmediate,withlong-termpositiveconsequencesforthecitizenswhodependonlocalgovernmenttoprovidetheeducationalservicestohelppreparetheirchildrenforlife,healthandhumanservicestothoseindireneedofthoseservices,andpublicsafetyservicesforthebenefitofentirecommunitiesacrossthecountry.Accordingly,werespectfullyrequestyourassistancewiththismailerandurgeyoutouseyourexistingauthorityoutlinedintheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActtoaidtheseimpactedlocalentitiesnationwide.Thankyouforyourtimeandattentiontothisseriousmailer.Sincerely,0 CaliforniaStateAssociationofCountiesNovember10,2009BOOKStTeetSuite101TheHonorableTimothyF.Geithner,SecretaryDepartmentoftheTreasury958141500PennsylvaniaAve.,NWWashington,DC.20220916.327J500FDearSecretaryGeithner,916.441.5507Onbehalfofthe58Californiacounties,IwritetorequestthatyouexercisetheauthorityprovidedundertheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008toextendthesameTroubledAssetReliefProgram(TARP)assistancetopublicinvestmentsastheTreasuryhasalreadyaffordedprivateinvestments.Likebusinessesateverylevel,countygovernmentsinCaliforniaandthroughoutthenationhavebeenseverelyimpactedbytheeconomicdownturnandthefailureoflargefinancialinstitutionslikeLehmanBrothersHoldingsandWashingtonMutual,andareingreatneedofyourassistance.JustastheDepartmentofTreasuryhasrecognizedthevalueofpreventingfurtherdeteriorationofournationaleconomythroughthestabilizationoflargeinsiltutionssuchastheBankofAmerica,Citigroup,GoldmanSachs,AIGandtheautoindustry,sohasCongressrecognizedlocalgovernment’svalueinstabilizingoureconomyaslargeemployersandtheprovidersofcriticalservices.ForthisreasonSection103(7)wasincludedintheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008toenabletheTreasurytoassistlocalgovernmentsaffectedbythestateofthenationaleconomythroughtheTARPprogram,suchasthosecountiesnationwidewhohavesustainedseverelossesfollowingthecollapseofLehmanBrothersHoldingsandWashingtonMutual.Estimatesindicatethatlocalgovernmentsacrossthecountrywhomadeconservative,highlyratedinvestmentsintheseinstitutionsnowface$1.7billioninlossesrelatedtothesefailures,including:$3millionforDouglasCounty,Oregon,$5millionPimaCounty,Arizona,$3milliontoMaderaCounty,California,$40millionSarasotaCounty,Florida,and$155millioninSanMateoCounty,California.Theselossesareimposingdramaticcutsonservices,includinghealthandeducation,aswellaseconomicdevelopmentandjobswithinthesecounties.tnmanycases,theselossesrepresentcriticalstateandfederalmatchingfundsforbadlyneededtransportationandschoolconstructionprojects.Asaresult,thelossisimmediate,compoundingandtong-term,stallingtheaffectedcommunity,aswellasbecomingadragonthenationaleconomy’srecovery.Forexample,inSanMateoCountythislosshasdirectlyresultedintheeliminationof1,658jobs,includingteachersandnurses,andwillresultinaprojectedfuturelossof$216millionwithinthelocaleconomy,GrantedtheauthoritybyCongress,theTreasurymaintainstheabilitytoassisttheseimpactedlocalgovernmentsthroughtheTARPprogram.YouruseofthisauthoritywillenabletheseaffectedcountiestoputTARPreliefsupporttoworktoimprovetheeconomythroughcapitalpurchases,constructionandjobcreation.Localgovernmentsaretransparentandaccountableandwilldemonstratetangible,measurablebenefits.NosuchcertaintyexistswhenTARPfundsareusedintheprivatesector. HonorableTimothyGeithner,SecretaryDepartmentofTreasuryNovember10,2009Page2Thankyouforyourconsiderationofthisimportantrequest.PleaseJetmeknowifIcanprovideanyadditionalinformationorsupportinthismailer.Respectfully,PAULMCINTOSHExecutiveDirectorCaliforniaStateAssociationofCountiesC:HonorableNancyPelosiSpeakeroftheHouse235CannonHouseOfficeBuildingWashington,D.C.20515SenatorDianneFeinstein331HartBuilding2”andCStreets,N.EWashington,D.C.20510SenatorBarbaraBoxer112HartBuilding2”andCStreets,N.EWashington,D.C.20510VVCongresswomanAnnaEshooV205CannonHouseOfficeBuilding1andindependenceAvenue,SE.Washington,D.C.20515CongresswomanJackieSoeler2ffCannonHouseOfficeBuilding1andIndependenceAvenue,SE.Washington,D.C.20515CeciliaMuñozDirectorOfficeofIntergovernmentalAffairsTheWhiteHouseWashington,DC20500MichaelBlakeDeputyDirectorOfficeofIntergovernmentalAffairsTheWhiteHouseWashington,DC205000#vCSACTrcaswyLetter SsLECTCOMMRTEEONINTaUGENCE-CHMRMANDIANNECOMMITTEEONAPPROf’RCAllONSCALIFORNIAThEJUDICIAflYCO+.ØAITIEEONRULESANDADMINISThA11ON11nittbState$enatWASHINGTON,DC20510-0504hffp//felnsteln.senate.govOctober28,2009TheHonorableTimothyF.GeitimerSecretaryoftheTreasuryUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,NWWashington,D.C.20220DearSecretaryGeithner:Ireceivedtheattachedletterfrommorethan20Californiacities,counties,andpublicagenciesthatcouldloseanestimated$250millionasaresultofhighly-ratedinvestmentswithfailedinstitutionssuchasLehmanBrothers.Iwouldappreciateyourreviewoftheirconcerns,andurgeyoutoworkconstructivelywiththesecommunitiestoprovideassistance.TheeconomicdownturnhashitCaliforniahard;theunemploymentratestandsat12.2percentandthenumberofhomeforeclosuresisthehighestintheNation.Theresultformunicipalitieshasbeenjobcuts,infrastructureprojectsplacedonhold,andreducedbudgetsforcriticalservicesatthemostinopportunetime.Inthiscontext,aslocalgovernmentsstruggletotightentheirbeltsamiddecliningtaxrevenues,theimpactofanadditional$250millioninlossesonCaliforniacitiesandcountiesisparticularlysevere.ThisproblemisnotlimitedtoCalifornia.Citiesnationwidestandtolose$1.7billionduetoconservative,highly-ratedinvestmentsinfailedfirms.Asyouknow,theEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008givesTreasurytheauthoritytoutilizeTroubledAssetsReliefProgram(TARP)fundstoproviderelieftotheseimpactedmunicipalitiesnationwide.Yet,todate,youhavenotchosentoexercisethisauthority.Iwouldappreciateanexplanation,andaresponseoutliningthestepsTreasuryispreparedtotaketoprovideassistancetolocalcommunitiesandprotecttaxpayerinvestmentsininstitutionssuchasLehmanBrothers.I Thankyouforyourattentiontothisimportantmatter.Ilookforwardtohearingfromyou.PleasedonothesitatetocontactmeifIcanprovideanyadditionalinformationorassistance.Bestregards.EnclosureDF:atSincerely,)0StatesSenator7 0DEPARTMENTOFTHETREASURYWASHiNGTON,D.C.June17,2009SECRETARYOFTHETREASURYTheHonorableJackieSpelerU.S.HouseofRepresentativesWashington,DC20515DearRepresentativeSpeler:ThankyouforyourletterdatedMay22,2009,regardingyourrequestthatTreasuryprovideassistanceundertheTroubledAssetReliefProgramtopublicentitiesthatsufferedlossesasaresultofthefailureofLehmanBrothers.Weagreethatitisimportanttoprovidesupportforstateandlocalgovernmentsinthisdifficultrecession.ThatiswhyundertheAmericanRecoveryandReinvestmentAct(ARRA),weprovidedover$144billionindirectaidtostatestosupportinvestmentsinhealthandeducationandpreventpainfhlcutstosocialservices.Inaddition,theARRAprovidedsignificantsubsidiesforstateandlocalgovernmentalborrowingcoststhroughthecreationoftheBuildAmericaBondsprogram,whichallowsforanunlimitedissuancein2009and2010andhasalreadybeenusedtoprovidefinancingforover$11billionofnewcapitalprojects.Inresponsetoyourrequest,whilewehaveemployedawidearrayofpoliciestoaddressthefinancialcrisis,TreasurydoesnotcurrentlyintendtomakepurchasesofLehmanBrotherssecuritiesfrompublicinstrumentalities.However,Treasurystaffcontinuestomonitorthefiscalchallengesfacingstateandlocalgovernments,thestateofthemunicipalbondmarket,andthebroaderconsequencesofthecreditfreezethatfollowedLehman’scollapse.Asperyourrequest,IwouldbehappytospeakwithyoutohearanyconcernsyouhaveaboutmunicipalitiesspecificallyimpactedbyLehmanBrothers’collapseandmakemystaffavailabletofurtherdiscussthisissue.,STcerely,daifiothyF.Geithner anitttStatcsdnatcWASHINGTON,DC20510October24,2008TheHonorableHenryM.Paulson,Jr.SecretaryUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,NWWashington,DC20220DearSecretaryPaulson:WewritetofollowupontheattachedlettersentearlierthisweekbywentyCaliforniacitiesandcountiesregardingtheTroubLedAssetRecoveryProgram(TARP)!intheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008.Californiacitiesandcountiescouldloseanestimated$250millionaqaresultofinvestmentswithfailedinstitutionssuchasLehmanBrothersandWashingtc4nMutual.Thisisparticularlytroublingbecausethesewerehighly-rated,conservativeinstrumntsdesignedtoprovidevaluetoinvestors,includingtheselocalgovernments.Theseverelcssesincurredbylocalgovernmentsnowthreatensnotonlyretirementsecurityandjobs,butalsotheavailabilityofpublichealthandsafetyservicesincommunitiesthroughoutourstate.Asyouknow,theeconomicrescuelegislationincludedprovisionsthtrequireTreasurytoconsidertheimpactoffinancialmarketlossesonlocalgovernmentalentitesaspartoftheTARP.Accordingly,werequestthatyouworkconstructivelywithCalifomilacommunitiesthatareexperiencingfinancialdifficultiesasaresultoffailedhighly-ratedinvestnentstohelpdevelopsolutionswhichkeeplocalcommunitiessolventandprotecttaxpayerinvestments.Wecannotignorelocalcommunitiesthatmaybecomeunabletopro’jideessentialpublichealthandsafetyservicesfortheircitizens.Pleasedonothesitatetocontact!ustodiscusshowwecanworktogethertoaddressthissituation.Thankyouforyourtimeandattentiontothisseriousmatter.DianneFeinsteirjUnitedStatesSetiatorSincerely,BarbaraUnitedStates ••“BoulderCountyTreasurer‘sOfficeBobHullinghorst,BoulderCountyTreasurerPDBox471BoulderCO80306303-441-3511Friday,November20,2009DebbieMcDougallTownofEstesParkP0Box1200EstesPark,CO80517DearDebbie:Asyouknow,theTownofEstesParklost$45,200.65inCDTlastyear.SinceBoulderCountyhadasimilarloss,Ihavebeenworkinghardwithacoalitionofmorethan150localgovernmentofficialsfromaroundthecountrytryingtorecoverthemoneyweinvestedinhighlyratedLehmansecurities.LastMay,membersofthecoalitiontestifiedbeforetheHouseFinancialServicesCommittee.WesupportedCongressmanEshoo’sHR467requiringTreasurySecretaryGeithnertouseTARPfundstopurchasetheLehmansecuritiesheldbylocalgovernments.ChairmanBarneyfrankandmanyontheConrmitteewereverysupportive.Threeweeksago,CongressmanEshooandfourotherRepresentatives,includingColorado’sRepresentativeEdPerimutter,hadaproductivemeetingwithSecretaryGeithner.Lastweek,wesecureddramaticsupportfromSenatorFeinstein,andthisweekEshoosentaverystrongfollowuplettertoSecretaryGeithner.TheseareattachedWe’vebeenmakingprogress,butweneedyourhelpintwoareas.IrecentlymetwithBarneyFrankinDenver.Franksaidifwewantedaction,wemustgetourlegislatorstousetheirinfluencewiththeWhiteHouse.HesaidnothingisgoingtomovewithoutcooperationfromtheAdministration.S,first,needyourhelpbywritingaletterofsupporttoRep.BetsyMarkeyandtoSenatorsBenneandUdall,withcopiestotheWhiteHouse.Iwillcallyouaboutthis.IamalsoworkingwithCapitolRepresentatives,agovernmentrelationsfirmwithofficesinWashington.Withoutthem,wewouldnothaveprogressedthisfar.NowtheCoalitionhasaskedCapitolRepresentativestoworkgettingsupportfromotherstateswheretherehavebeensubstantiallosses,likeOregonandWashington.ThismeansmoretimeaswellassomeaijfpocketexpensesandtravelbyCapitolRepresentatives.Unfortunately,Iamoutofmoney.weneedyourfinancialhelp.Ihavespentalittleunderonepercenttotrytoregainmytaxpayer’sfunds.Iamtryingtoraiseabout$20,000,orhalfapercent,fromyouandotherCDTinvestorstocoveranadditionaleffortbyCapitolRepresentatives.Yourshare,ifyouhaveit,wouldbe$226.00.Iwouldappreciateyourconsideringthisrequest.ThemostimportantthingyoucandoissendaletterofsupporttoRep.BetsyMarkeyandtoSenatorsBennettandUdall,andcopytheWhiteHouse.Thankyouverymuchinadvanceforyourhelp.c2_?BobHullinghorst-bhu1linghorstbouldercounty.org ov6d,f%,9,4e4emdNovember17,2009TheHonorableTimothyF.Geithner,SecretaryDepartment0ftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,N.W.Washington,D.C.20220DearSecretaryGeithner,OnOctober28t11wehadaproductivediscussionabouteffortstoresolvethefinancialhardshipsfacedbylocalgovernmentsintheaftermath0ftheLehmanBrothers’bankruptcy.YouandIwerejoinedbymyColleagues,RepresentativesSpeler,Fart,MillerandPerlmutterandeach0fthemeloquentlydetailedtheseverecutsincriticalservicesandprogramstfiatlocalgovernmentsarefacingduetotheFederalReserve’sdecisioninSeptember2008toallowLehmanBrotherstofail.WhileyouareedthatreductionsinservicesandprojectsatthelocallevelwereextremelyharmfultotheAdministration’seconomicrecoveryefforts,youalsoexpressedyourconcernthatyouddnothavethelegalauthoritytouseTARPfundstoassistlocalitiesthathavebeenimpactedLtheLehmanbankruptcyorothermajorbankfailures.Asyouknow,Iwrotelanguagewaspart0ftheTARPlegislationtospecificallygivetheTreasurySecretarytheauthoritytoaddressthesetroubledassets.Duringourdiscussion,however,youinformedusthatattorneysattheTreasuryDepartmentarenotconvincedthatthi5languageissufficienttoallowTARPfundstobeusedf0tb5purpose.Takingnote0fourresolvetofindaremedyforthissituation,youagreedtogobachtoyourattorneystoclarifythelegalissuesandconcernsandtorecommendpossiblelegislativeremedies.YouaskedwhetherIwaswillingtogiveyoutwoweekstoconferwithyouradvisorsandthenreturntouswiththeoutcomeofthesediscussions,andIwashappytod0so.Ithasnowbeenmorethantwoweeksandweareveryeagertoheartheresults0fyourconsultations,andIhopewecanscheduleaf0ll0-meetingassoonaspossible.PleasehaveyourstaffcontactmyExecutiveAssistantjenaGrossat(202)225-8104attheirearliestconveniencetoarrangeatimeforustomeetagain.Mostgratefully, INFORMATIONFORLETTERS:Pleaseuseyourownlanguage,ofcourse.Ihavebeenencouragedtomentionthefollowing:“supportofHR467”foruseofTARPfunds“purchaseofLehmanBrotherssecuritiesfromstateandlocalagencies”Ihavealsobeenencouragedtoexplainthatrecoveryofthesefundsshouldhaveadirectimpactonlocalgovernment,andgivespecificexamples.Ihavebeentoldthatspecificexamplesthatincludeanumberofjobscreatedorpersonsemployedisbest.Ifyouhaveapersonalconnectionwithanyoneonthelist,pleasecalltotellthemyourletteriscomingandaskthemifyoushouldemailthemacopy.PleasesendacopyofyourletterstomeThanksagainforyourhelp.BobHullinghorst HouseRep.DianaDeGette(D-ist)1530LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4431;225-5657Denver:(303)844-4988Rep.JaredPolls(D-2nd)501CannonHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-2161;226-7840Boulder:(303)484-9596JohnSalazar(D-3rd)1531LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4761;226-9669GrandJunction:(970)245-7107BetsyMarkey(D-4th)1229LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4676;225-5870Ft.Collins:(970)221-7110Senate::Sen.MichaelBennet(D)702HartSenateOfficeBuilding(202)224-5852;228-5036Denver:(303)455-7600WebSiteSen.MarkUdall(D)317HartSenateOfficeBuilding(202)224-5941;224-6471Denver:(3o3)650-7820WebSiteIxecutije‘TheWhiteHouseRep.DougLamborn(R-5th)2372RayburnHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-4422;226-2638ColoradoSprings:(719)520-0055Rep.MikeCoffman(R-6th)1508LongworthHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-7882;226-4623LongTree:(720)223-9772Rep.EdPerimutter(D-7th)415CannonHouseOfficeBuilding(202)225-2645;225-5278Lakewood:(303)274-79441600PennsylvaniaAvenueNWWashington,DC20500Pleaseincludeyoure-mailaddressPleasesendacopy,Attn:CeciliaMunoz,DirectorofIntergovernmentalAffairs LossesduetoLehmanBrothersBankruptcyListedbyStateinDecliningOrderbySizeofLossEstablishedAsifMay5,20081.California$789Million2.Florida$465Million3.Oregon$200Million4.Washington$130Million5.Arizona$61Million6.Minnesota$56Million7.Missouri$50Million8.Nevada$50Million9.Illinois$23Million10.Michigan$10Million11.NewYork$6Million12.NewMexico$5.7Million13.Massachusetts$5.2Million14.Colorado$5Million15.Georgia$>1Million16.Delaware$>1Million17.Pennsylvania$>1Million18.Alaska$>1Million19.Texas$>1Million20.NewJersey$>1Million21.Mississippi$>1Million22.Tennessee$>1Million Octoberxx,2009TheHonorableTimothyF.GeithnerSecretaryUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,NWWashington,DC20220DearSecretaryGeithner:WearewritingtourgeyoutoutilizeSection103(7)oftheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008toworkconstructivelywithcommunitiesnationwidewhoareexperiencingfinancialdifficultyresultingfromthefailureofLehmanBrothersandWashingtonMutual.Asyouknow,theeconomicrescuelegislationincludedthisprovisiontorequireTreasurytoconsidertheimpactoffinancialmarketlossesonlocalgovernmentalentitiesinimplementingtheTroubledAssetRecoveryProgram(TARP).LocalgovernmentsandpublicagenciesimpactedbythefailureofLehmanBrothersandWashingtonMutualarealreadysufferingsignificantlyfromtheeffectsofthenationaleconomicdownturn.Theadditional$1.7billioninlossesassociatedwiththecollapseofthesefinancialinstitutionsareforcingmanyofthesepublicentitiestolayoffcriticalpersonnel,delayorterminateongoingandmuch-neededcommunityconstructionprojectsandcutvitallocalservices.This$1.7billioninlossesrepresentsonly1/4of1percentofthetotalamountsetasideforTARP,and2.4%ofthe$70billionthatbanksparticipatinginTARPhavereturnedtoTreasurysofar.Weunderstandtheenormityoftheissuesfacedbygovernmentatalllevelsinthecurrenteconomicclimate,andrealizethatTARPfundingtoreplaceresourceslostasaresultoftheLehmancollapsewillnotsolvealloftheproblemsthatlocalgovernmentwillbefacingforyearstocome.However,thebenefittoberealizedbyprovidingTARPassistancetolocalentitiesharmedbytheLehmanandWashingtonMutualfailurewouldbeimmediate,withlong-termpositiveconsequencesforthecitizenswhodependonlocalgovernmenttoprovidetheeducationalservicestohelppreparetheirchildrenforlife,healthandhumanservicestothoseindireneedofthoseservices,andpublicsafetyservicesforthebenefitofentirecommunitiesacrossthecountry.Accordingly,werespectfullyrequestyourassistancewiththismailerandurgeyoutouseyourexistingauthorityoutlinedintheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActtoaidtheseimpactedlocalentitiesnationwide.Thankyouforyourtimeandattentiontothisseriousmailer.Sincerely, CaliforniaStateAssociationoftounfies1INovember10,2009lIOOkStTeefSuite101TheHonorableTimothyF.Geithner,SecretarySoentoDepartmentoftheTreasury958147500PennsylvaniaAve.,NWWashington,D.C.20220916327.7500rDearSecretaryGeithner,916.441.5507Onbehalfofthe58Californiacounties,IwritetorequestthatyouexercisetheauthorityprovidedundertheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008toextendthesameTroubledAssetReliefProgram(TARP)assistancetopublicinvestmentsastheTreasuryhasalreadyaffordedprivateinvestments.Likebusinessesateverylevel,countygovernmentsinCaliforniaandthroughoutthenationhavebeenseverelyimpactedbytheeconomicdownturnandthefailureoflargefinancialinstitutionslikeLehmanBrothersHoldingsandWashingtonMutual,andareingreatneedofyourassistance.JustastheDepartmentofTreasuryhasrecognizedthevalueofpreventingfurtherdeteriorationofournationaleconomythroughthestabilizationoflargeinstitutionssuchastheBankofAmerica,CiUgroup,GoldmanSachs,AIGandtheautoindustry,sohasCongressrecognizedlocalgovernment’svalueinstabilizingoureconomyaslargeemployersandtheprovidersofcriticalservices.ForthisreasonSection103(7)wasincludedintheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008toenabletheTreasurytoassistlocalgovernmentsaffectedbythestateofthenationaleconomythroughtheTARPprogram,suchasthosecountiesnationwidewhohavesustainedseverelossesfollowingthecollapseofLehmanBrothersHoldingsandWashingtonMutual.Estimatesindicatethatlocalgovernmentsacrossthecountrywhomadeconservative,highlyratedinvestmentsintheseinstitutionsnowface$1.7billioninlossesrelatedtothesefailures,including:$3millionforDouglasCounty,Oregon,$5millionPimaCounty,Arizona,$3milliontoMaderaCounty,California,$40millionSarasotaCounty,Florida,and$155millioninSanMateoCounty,California.Theselossesareimposingdramaticcutsonservices,includinghealthandeducation,aswellaseconomicdevelopmentandjobswithinthesecounties.Inmanycases,theselossesrepresentcriticalstateandfederalmatchingfundsforbadlyneededtransportationandschoolconstructionprojects.Asaresult,thelossisimmediate,compoundingandlong-term,stallingtheaffectedcommunity,aswellasbecomingadragonthenationaleconomy’srecovery.Forexample,inSanMateoCountythislosshasdirectlyresultedintheeliminationof7,658jobs,includingteachersandnurses,andwillresultinaprojectedfuturelossof$216millionwithinthelocaleconomy.GrantedtheauthoritybyCongress,theTreasurymaintainstheabilitytoassisttheseimpactedlocatgovernmentsthroughtheTARPprogram.YouruseofthisauthoritywillenabletheseaffectedcountiestoputTARPreliefsupporttoworktoimprovetheeconomythroughcapitalpurchases,constwctionandjobcreation.Localgovernmentsaretransparentandaccountableandwilldemonstratetangible,measurablebenefits.NosuchcertaintyexistswhenTARPfundsareusedintheprivatesector. HonorableTimothyGeithner,SecretaryDepartmentofTreasuryNovember10,2009Page2Thankyouforyourconsiderationofthisimportantrequest.PleaseletmeknowifIcanprovideanyadditionalinformationorsupportinthismatter.Respectfully,PAULMCINTOSHExecutiveDirectorCaliforniaStateAssociationofCounesC:HonorableNancyPelosiSpeakeroftheHouse235CannonHouseOfficeBuildingWashington,D.C.20515SenatorDianneF&nslein331HartBuilding2landCStreets,N.EWashington,D.C.20510SenatorBarbaraBoxer112HailBuilding2andCStreets,N.EWashington,D.C.20510CongresswomanAnnaEshoo205CannonHouseOfficeBuilding1andIndependenceAvenue,SE.Washington,D.C.20515CongresswomanJackieSpeler2ffCannonHouseOfficeBuildinglandIndependenceAvenue,S.E.Washington,D.C.20515CeciliaMuñozDirectorOfficeofIntergovernmentalAffairsTheWhiteHouseWashington,DC20500MichaelBlakeDeputyDirectorOfficeofIntergovernmentalAffairsTheVifliiteHouseWashington,DC20500#vCSACTreasuryLetterII 9NSTEINsEcTcoMMrntEONIN7tWOENCE-CHAIRMANDIANCOMMITtEEONAPPROPfILAflONSCALIFORNIAONTHEJUDICIARY-COI.IIffEEONRULESANDADMINISTRATiONnttcbtatcenateWASHINGTONDC20510-0504hftphYelnsteJn.senate.govOctober28,2009TheHonorableTimothyF.GeithnerSecretaryoftheTreasuryUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,NWWashington,D.C.20220DearSecretaryGeithner:Ireceivedtheattachedletterfrommorethan20Californiacities,counties,andpublicagenciesthatcouldloseanestimated$250millionasaresultofhighly-ratedinvestmentswithfailedinstitutionssuchasLehmanBrothers.Iwouldappreciateyourreviewoftheirconcerns,andurgeyoutoworkconstructivelywiththesecommunitiestoprovideassistance.TheeconomicdownturnhashitCaliforniahard;theunemploymentratestandsat12.2percentandthenumberofhomeforeclosuresisthehighestintheNation.Theresultformunicipalitieshasbeenjobcuts,infrastructureprojectsplacedonhold,andreducedbudgetsforcriticalservicesatthemostinopportunetime.Inthiscontext,aslocalgovernmentsstruggletotightentheirbeltsamiddecliningtaxrevenues,theimpactofanadditional$250millioninlossesonCaliforniacitiesandcountiesisparticularlysevere.ThisproblemisnotlimitedtoCalifornia.Citiesnationwidestandtolose$1.7billionduetoconservative,highly-ratedinvestmentsinfailedfirms.Asyouknow,theEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008givesTreasurytheauthoritytoutilizeTroubledAssetsReliefProgram(TARP)fundstoproviderelieftotheseimpactedmunicipalitiesnationwide.Yet,todate,youhavenotchosentoexercisethisauthority.Iwouldappreciateanexplanation,andaresponseoutliningthestepsTreasuryispreparedtotaketoprovideassistancetolocalcommunitiesandprotecttaxpayerinvestmentsininstitutionssuchasLehmanBrothers. V.I,Thankyouforyourattentiontothisimportantmatter.Ilookforwardtohearingfromyou.PleasedonothesitatetocontactmeifIcanprovideanyadditionalinformationorassistance.Bestregards.Sincerely,)EnclosureDFatStatesSenator7 DEPARTMENTOFTHETREASURYWASHINGTON,D.C.June17,2009SECRETARYOFTHETREASURYTheHonorableJackieSpeierU.S.HouseofRepresentativesWashington,DC20515DearRepresentativeSpeierThankyouforyourletterdatedMay22,2009,regardingyourrequestthatTreasuryprovideassistanceundertheTroubledAssetReliefProgramtopublicentitiesthatsufferedlossesasaresultofthefailureofLehmanBrothers.Weagreethatitisimportanttoprovidesupportforstateandlocalgovernmentsinthisdifficultrecession.ThatiswhyundertheAmericanRecoveryandReinvestmentAct(ARRA),weprovidedover$144billionindirectaidtostatestosupportinvestmentsinhealthandeducationandpreventpaiiiniicutstosocialservices.hiaddition,theARRAprovidedsignificantsubsidiesforstateandlocalgovernmentalborrowingcoststhroughthecreationoftheBuildAmericaBondsprogram,whichallowsforanunlimitedissuancein2009and2010andhasalreadybeenusedtoprovidefinancingforover$11billionofnewcapitalprojects.Inresponsetoyourrequest,whilewehaveemployedawidearrayofpoliciestoaddressthefinancialcrisis,TreasurydoesnotcurrentlyintendtomakepurchasesofLehmanBrotherssecuritiesfrompublicinstrumentalities.However,Treasurystaffcontinuestomonitorthefiscalchallengesfacingstateandlocalgovernments,thestateofthemunicipalbondmarket,andthebroaderconsequencesofthecreditfreezethatfollowedLehman’scollapse.Asperyourrequest,IwouldbehappytospeakwithyoutohearanyconcernsyouhaveaboutmunicipalitiesspecificallyimpactedbyLehmanBrothers’collapseandmakemystaffavailabletofurtherdiscussthisissue.ffcerely,othyF.Geithner K.anitcaStatcscnatcWASHINGTON,DC20510TheHonorableHenryM.Paulson,Jr.SecretaryUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury1500PennsylvaniaAvenue,NWWashington,DC20220DearSecretaryPaulson:October24,2008WewritetofollowupontheattachedlettersentearlierthisweekbywentyCaliforniacitiesandcountiesregardingtheTroubledAssetRecoveryProgram(TARP)’intheEmergencyEconomicStabilizationActof2008.Californiacitiesandcountiescouldloseanestimated$250millionaaresultofinvestmentswithfailedinstitutionssuchasLehmanBrothersandWashingtc4nMutual.Thisisparticularlytroublingbecausethesewerehighly-rated,conservativeinstrumentsdesignedtoprovidevaluetoinvestors,includingtheselocalgovernments.Theseveretossesincurredbylocalgovernmentsnowthreatensnotonlyretirementsecurityandjobs,buta’sotheavailabilityofpublichealthandsafetyservicesincommunitiesthroughoutourstate.Asyouknow,theeconomicrescuelegislationincludedprovisionsthtrequireTreasurytoconsidertheimpactoffinancialmarketlossesonlocalgovernmentalentitiesaspartoftheTARP.Accordingly,werequestthatyouworkconstructivelywithCaIifomiacommunitiesthatareexperiencingfinancialdifficultiesasaresultoffailedhighly-ratedinvestnentstohelpdevelopsolutionswhichkeeplocalcommunitiessolventandprotecttaxpayeinvestments.Wecannotignorelocalcommunitiesthatmaybecomeunabletoproideessentialpublicbealthandsaftyservicesfortheiritizeris.Pleasedonothesitatetocontactustodiscusshowwecanworktogethertoaddressthissituation.Thankyouforyourtimeandattentiontothisseriousmatter.DianneFeinsteir1UnitedStatesSeatoraSincerely,BarbaraBoxUnitedStates -h’salltooobvioustomethatwhatwas,inmyopinion,derivedfromthejointmeetingarenotwhatwasdecided.I’velistenedtotherecordingandreadthetranscriptsandIthinktheysupportmybeliefastowhatwasdecided.Inmymind,weapprovedanottoexceedamountof$927,000-period.TheIGAendedupwithanamountof$1MstrictlybecausetheIGAsaid“includingcontingency”.Theintent,asfarasI’mconcerned,wastoputthatamountintheIGAstrictlysothatifthe$927Khadtobeincreased,theIGAwouldn’thavetobeamended,nomore,noless.Iwantitontheagendasowecandiscussitandfinalizetheamountforonceandforall.-IdonotagreewiththeassertionthatbecausetheIGAsays“weshall”wavefeesisthesameasactuallydoingso,regardlessofwhatitsays.I,andotherTrustee’s,believethatweneedtotakeseparate,formalactiontowavethefees.Ilookatitthisway,ifIsayI’mgoingtogiveyouadollar,itdoesn’tmeanmuchuntilIactuallygiveyouthedollarandyouhaveitinyourhands.Ergo,weneedtowaivethefees.Wealsoneedtotalkaboutwhattodowithwaterfees.-Thethirdissueregardstheitemsputintothe“additionalfees”.ThesecanwaituntilJanuary,iftheymust.TheBoardneedstodiscusstheseforthereasonsEricoutlinedatthemeeting.Iknowitdidn’thappenthisway,butappearancesarethatthesethreeitemswere“snuckin”.Regardlessoftheintentorhowandwhytheywerelistedas“additionalfees”,theyneedtobediscussedbytheBoard.Forexample,thelastconversationwehadaboutthesoundsystemwasthatthecommitteerecommendedthataconsultantbehiredtoreviewtheexistingsoundsystemandmakerecommendationsregardinganewone.Thenextthingweknowisthatit’sonthelistandanewsystemisapparentlybeingdesignedbysomelocalconsultant.AllofthisistakingplacewithouttheBoardauthorizingthefunds.Tackingthemonalistentitled“additionalfees”isnotonlymisleadingbutdoesnotconstituteapprovalorallocationoffunds.Again,Pmnotmakingaccusations,butthisistheperceptionofsome. ...AGREEMENTTHISAGREEMENT,effectivethe2nddayofOctober,2009,byandbetweentheTOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,aMunicipalCorporation(“Town”),andTHEESTESPARKURBANRENEWALAUTHORITY,aColoradoUrbanRenewalAuthority,abodycorporateandpoliticoftheStateofColorado,(“Authority”)(thepartiesarealsoreferredtocollectivelyasthe“Parties”or,individually,a“Party”).WHEREAS,inthefurtheranceoftheobjectivesoftheUrbanRenewalLawofColorado(Section31-25-101etseq.,C.R.S.),theAuthorityisengagedintheimplementationoftheUrbanRenewalPlanforthe21stCenturyUrbanRenewalArea(the“Plan”),whichisanurbanrenewalplanforcertainportionsoftheTownofEstesPark.ThePlanwasapprovedbytheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownonMay18th,2008;andWHEREAS,aspartoftheimplementationofthePlan,theAuthorityidentifiedcertaingrandstandimprovementstoStanleyParkFairgroundsassuchadevelopmentproject(the“GrandstandProject”)thatshouldbeundertakenbytheAuthoritypursuanttothetermsandconditionsofthePlan;andWHEREAS,theTownhasagreedtoprovidefunding,feewaivers,andotherservicesasmorefullysetforthinthisAgreementfortheGrandstandProject;andWHEREAS,theGrandstandProject,whencompleted,willcontributetotheeconomicQdevelopmentoftheTown,removeblightinthePlanArea,upgradepublicfacilitiesandinfrastructureinthePlanArea,improveconditionsandcorrectproblemsinpublicamenitiesatStanleyParkFairgrounds,andexpandtheTown’seconomicbaseforthecontinuedattractionofresidentsandvisitorstothePlanArea;andWHEREAS,thePartiesdesiretosetforththetermsandconditionsapplicabletotheGrandstandProject.THEREFOREINCONSIDERATIONOFTHEFOREGOING,THETOWNANDTHEAUTHORITYAGREEASFOLLOWS:1.TheAuthorityshallberesponsiblefortheprogramming,design,andconstructionoftheGrandstandProject,thescopeofwhichisattachedheretoasExhibitAandincorporatedhereinbythisreference.2.TheAuthorityshalluseAuthorityfundsforsaiddesignandconstructionandberesponsibleforallobligationsincurredinthedesignandconstructionoftheGrandstandProject.TheTownshallberesponsibleforanamountnottoexceed$1,000,000fortheGrandstandProject.SaidfundsshallbeusedbytheAuthorityonlyforpaymentofconstructioncostsoftheGrandstandProject.IntheeventthatthecostoftheGrandstandProjectexceeds$2,121,000andtheAuthorityhasnofundsavailabletopaytheoverage,theTownshallbyaseparatewritten ttotheTown.followingthetransferofthegrandstandstotheTown,theTown,andnottheAuthority,shallbesolelyresponsibleforthemaintenanceandrepairofthegrandstands.9.Totheextentlawfullyallowed,theAuthorityagreestoindemnifyandholdharmlesstheTownanditstrustees,officers,agents,employeesandassignsfromandagainstallclaims,liability,damages,losses,expensesanddemands,includingattorney’sfees,onaccountofinjury,loss,ordamage,including,withoutlimitation,claimsarisingfrombodilyinjury,personalinjury,sickness,disease,death,propertylossordamage,whichariseoutoforareinanymannerconnectedwiththisAgreementortheGrandstandProjectifsuchinjury,loss,ordamageiscausedinwholeorinpartby,thenegligentact,omission,error,professionalerror,mistake,negligence,orothernegligentfaultofAuthority,oranyofficer,employee,representative,oragentofAuthority;provided,theforegoingprovisionsshallnotapplytolossordamageorclaimsthereforeattributabletoactsoromissionsoftheTown,itsagents,officers,employeesorcontractorsorofsubcontractorsemployedbytheircontractors.10.TheTownshallprovidetheAuthoritywithliabilityandpropertydamageinsurancecoveragetoprotectbothPartiesfromanyclaimorlosshereunder.TheAuthorityshallrequirethatBuildersRiskcoveragebeprovidedbythegeneralcontractorfortheGrandstandProject.TheAuthorityshallrequireallcontractorsandsubcontractorstocarryinsuranceinscopeandamountsconsistentwithTownrequirementsforconstructioncontractsoftypeandscopeoftheGrandstandProject.(J11.Multiple-FiscalYearObligation.TheAuthorityisnotsubjecttoarticleX,section20oftheColoradoConstitution.ThisAgreementshallbeamultiplefiscalyearobligationoftheAuthorityuntilfullyperformedbytheAuthority.12.MISCELLANEOUSA.GoverningLawandVenue.ThisAgreementshallbegovernedbythelawsoftheStateofColorado,andanylegalactionconcerningtheprovisionshereofshallbebroughtinLanmerCounty,Colorado.B.NoWaiver.DelaysinenforcementorthewaiverofanyoneormoredefaultsorbreachesofthisAgreementbyeitherpartyshallnotconstituteawaiverofanyoftheothertermsorobligationofthisAgreement.C.Integration.ThisAgreementandanyattachedexhibitsconstitutetheentireAgreementbetweenAuthorityandtheTown,supersedingallpriororalorwrittencommunications.D.NoThirdPartyBeneficiaries.ThisAgreementisnotintendedandshallnotliedeemedtoconferanyrightsonanypersonorentitynotnamedasaPartyhereto.3 S.ofGod,fires,floods,strikes,labordisputes,accidents,regulations,initiative,referendum,ororderofcivilormilitaryauthorities,shortagesoflaborormaterials,orothercauses,similarordissimilar,whicharebeyondthecontrolofsuchParty.M.GoodFaithofParties.IntheperformanceofthisAgreementorinconsideringanyrequestedapproval,acceptance,orextensionoftime,thePartieagreethateachwillactingoodfaithandwillnotactunreasonably,arbitrarily,capriciously,orunreasonablywithhold,condition,ordelayanyapproval,acceptance,orextensionoftimerequiredorrequestedpursuanttothisAgreement.N.PartiesNotPartners.NotwithstandinganylanguageinthisAgreementoranyotheragreement,representation,orwarrantytothecontrary,thePartiesshallnotbedeemedtobepartnersorjointventurers,andnoPartyshallberesponsibleforanydebtorliabilityofanyotherParty.0.MinorChanges.ThisAgreementhasbeenapprovedinsubstantiallytheformsubmittedtothegoverningbodiesoftheParties.TheofficersexecutingthisAgreementareauthorizedtomakeandmayhavemade,minorchangestothisAgreementandattachedexhibitsastheyhaveconsiderednecessary.SolongassuchchangeswereconsistentwiththeintentandunderstandingofthePartiesatthetimeofapprovalbythegoverningbodies,theexecutionoftheAgreementshallconstitutetheapprovalofsuchchangesbytherespectiveParties.P.DefenseofAgreement.IntheeventoflitigationchallengingthelegalityorvalidityofthisAgreement,thePartiesshallcooperatetodefendthevalidityorenforceabilityofthisagreement.ThisAgreementisdatedthisI3”da’ofOCc2.2OO9.5 0EXHIBITASCOPEOFSERWCESTheGrandstandProjectasdefinedbythefollowingdocumentsincorporatedhereinbythisreference.•ProjectManualforSTANLEYPARKGRANDSTAND,August27,2009•ProjectManualforGRANNYMAYGRANDSTANDDEMOLITION,August25,2009•Addendums1,2,and3issuedbyThorpAssociatesP.C.•BidForm—TaylorKohrsConstruction,includingAlternates4,8,9,10,13,14,16,17•BidForm—CornerstoneConstructionConcepts,Inc.007 Outstanding Fees Amount Explanation Drainage Study/Drainage Improvements $25,000 Expense for study and improvements.Also need state permit Design Fees $15,000 Roger Thorp additional design costs -reserve Construction Administration $15,000 Roger Thorp will provide on-site project administration per AlA Water Tap Fees $109,000 Fees for water service due to increased number of bathrooms VIP Chairs $30,000 New chairs for the grandstand boxes Sound System $60,000 Upgrading system Foundation $5,000 Successful metal building manufacturer’s design adjustments Materials Testing $10,000 Quality assurance for concrete,geological,footing excavation Use of existing utilities $5,000 Contractor use of existing utilities for project Builder’s Risk Insurance $1,700 Landscaping $60,000 Landscaping could be delayed to coincide with building the parking lot Community Development Fees $14,413 These fees can be waived by the town $350,113 cRECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarirnerCounty,Colorado,October2,2009MinutesofaSpecialmeetingoftheBoardofTrusteesandtheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldintheTownHallinsaidTownofEstesParkonthedayofOctober,2009.MeetingcalledtoorderbyMayorPinkham.Present:MayorWilliamC.PinkhamMayorProTernChuckLevineTrusteesEricBlackhurstDoriaEisenlauerJohnEricsonJerryMillerWayneNewsorn,EPURAChairCommissionersArtBlumeJacquieHaiburntIreneLittleSharryWhiteRonWilcocksAlsoPresent:LowellRichardson,DeputyTownAdministratorWilSmith,EPURADirectorGregWhite,TownAttorneyJackieWilliamson,TownClerkAbsent:TrusteeRichardHorneierMayorPinkhamcalledthemeetingtoorderat12:05p.m.PUBLICCOMMENT.None.1.APPROVALOFGRANDSTANDCOSTESTIMATE.RogerThorprrhorpAssociatesreviewedtheprocessofdesign,developmentandbiddingforthedemolitionandconstructionofthenewgrandstandfacilityattheStanleyFairgrounds.Twenty-twobidswerereceivedforthedemolitionportionthatincludedtwoalternativestosalvagethebuildingandthebleachers.LocallyownedCornerstoneConstructionConceptssubmittedthelowbidwiththetwoalternatives.ThesteelstructurewouldbemovedtoadairyfarminBellvueandthebleacherwouldbemovedtotheElizabethRodeo.TheconcretewouldberemovedbyKearneyandSonsandCornerstoneConstructionConceptsandrecycled.Eighteenbidswerereceivedforthenewconstructionofthegrandstandwithseventeenalternatives.TheAd-HocGrandstandCommitteereviewedallthealternativeandrecommendedeightbeincludedinthebid:#4—removaloftheannouncerbooth,#8—utilizegangbasinsinthebathrooms,#9—trenchdrain,#10—slopedarenawall,#13—walk-incoolerandfreezerforconcessionstand,#14—lightshields,#16—removalofplywooddeckingontheceilingunderneaththegrandstands,and#17—interlockingbleachersystem.ThorpAssociatesrecommendsthelowbidderTaylor-KohrsofDenverwithabidof$1689million,includingthedemolition,17%($300,000)oftheworktobecompletedbylocalcontractors,useofalocalprojectmanager,andthesteelbuildingtobeprovidedbyAmericanBuildersbondedbyTaylor-Kohrs.Mr.Thorpstateddemolitioncouldbegin -tRECORDOFPROCEEDINGSSpecialMeetingBoardofTrustees&EPURA—October2,2009—Page2assoonasthestatepermitisobtainedwith21daysscheduledfordemoand185daysforconstructionwithacompletiondateofMay10,2010iftheprojectbeginsthemiddleofOctober.HeemphasizedthecostsavingsEPURAandtheTownwouldrealizebybuildingthegrandstandsthisyearversuswaitingayear.DeputyTownAdministratorRichardsonstatedadditionalcostsfortheconstructionofthebuildingareestimatedat$350,113andincludeitemssuchasadrainagestudy,designfees,constructionadministration,watertapfees,FF&E,landscaping,etc.TheAd-HocCommitteeofTrusteeMiller,TrusteeEisenlauer,CommissionerBlumeandCommissionerWhitereachedconsensusonthealternativesandtherecommendationofTaylor-KohrsfortheEPURAproject.MayorProTernLevinequestionedthebiddifferencesbetweenlocalgeneralcontractorsandcontractorsfromthevalley.Mr.Thorpstatedthedifferencewasapproximately6%.TrusteeBlackhurststatedtheprojecthasdoubledinprice,andtouseCRFtopayfortheprojectwouldeliminatetheoptiontobuildarevenuegeneratingfacilitysuchastheMPEC.IftheBoardapprovestheestimate,hewouldencouragetheBoardtousealocalcontractorinanefforttostimulatethelocaleconomy.2.DEDICATIONOFTOWNFUNDSFORGRANDSTANDPROJECT.DeputyTownAdministratorstatedEPURAhasafundbalanceofapproximately$1.1millionfortheproject,andtherefore,thebalanceoftheproject,$927,000,wouldneedtobefundedbytheTown.EPURADirectorSmithstatedEPURAcoulddedicatethe2010propertytaxincrementtotheprojectinadditiontothecurrentEPURAfundbalance.DiscussionfollowedamongsttheBoardwithregardtothehiringofalocalcontractorfortheproject;thesafetyissuesthatexistatthegrandstands;thegrandstandssupportexistingrevenuegeneratingeventsatthefairgrounds;andallbidderswereprovidedthesameinformation,andadditionaltimeforreviewshouldbegivetoMr.ThorptoreviewlocalcontractorbidsiftheBoardproposesEPURAconsideralocalcontractor.Mr.ThorpstatedtherecommendationtouseTaylor-Kohrs,avalleycontractor,hasbeenprovidedasthebestvalueoption.Hestatedthebidprocesswasdifficultbecausemanyofthelocalsubcontractorsrefusedtoprovidegeneralcontractorsfromthevalleywithbids.Taylor-Kohrshassubmittedabidtoutilize17%oftheprojectwithlocalcontractors.TheTownBoardofTrusteesmovedandseconded(Levine/Miller)todedicateTownfundsfortheEPURAprojecttocompletetheStanleyFairgroundGrandstandconstructionintheamountnottoexceed$927,000,andthemotionpassedwithTrusteesBlackhurstandEricsonvoting“No”.3.INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENT(IGA)BETWEENTHETOWNOFESTSPARKANDESTESPARKURBANRENEWALAUTHORITYFORTHEGRANDSTANDCONSTRUCTION.AttorneyWhitereviewedthe(GAbetweenEPURAandtheTownofEstesParkforthegrandstandproject.TheIGAstatesEPURAwouldberesponsiblefortheconstructionandmanagementofthegrandstandprojectandtheTownwouldprovidefundingfortheprojectintheamountof$927,000.TheagreementprovidesaprovisionforEPURAtopaytheTownbackforanyadditionalcostsnotincludedintheagreementforthecompletionoftheproject.ExhibitAwouldberevisedtoincludethebiddocumentsforthedemolition,constructionandtheadditionalitemsneededtocompletethegrandstands. ‘4RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSSpecialMeetingBoardofTrustees&EPURA—October2,2009—Page3DiscussionfollowedontheneedforadditionalTownfundstoincludeacontingencyfortheprojectasoutlinedinitem2oftheagreementorstrikingofthelanguageincludinganadequatecontingency’.TheBoarddiscussedaddinganadditional5%foracontingencytotheconstructioncostof$1.689million.Afterfurtherdiscussion,theTownBoardofTrusteesmovedandseconded(Eisenlauer/Miller)toapprovetheIntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityandtheTownofEstesParkforthecompletionoftheStanleyFairgroundGrandstandprojectwiththeTownapprovingadditionalfundsincludingacontingencyontheconstructioncostsforatotalTowncontributionof$1millionandaprojectcostofconstructionof$2.121million,anditpassedwithTrusteeBlackhurstvotingNo”.TheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthoritymovedandseconded(Wilcocks/White)toapprovetheIntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityandtheTownofEstesParkforthecompletionoftheStanleyFairgroundGrandstandproject,anditpassedunanimously.4.AWARDCONTRACTFORGRANDSTANDCONSTRUCTION.TheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthoritymovedandseconded(Little/Wilcocks)tocontractwithCornerstoneConstructionConceptsandTaylor-KohrsforthedemolitionandconstructionofanewgrandstandfacilityattheStanleyFairgroundsatacostnottoexceed$1.689million.WhereuponMayorPinkhamadjournedthemeetingat1:36p.m.WilliamC.Pinkham,MayorJackieWilliamson,TownClerk0 TB/EPURAJointMeetingOctober2,2009TranscriptionofItems#2and#3Item#2Chuck:YourhonorIwouldmovethattheTownBoarddedicatefundsforthegrandstandsprojectinsupportoftherecommendation.Jerry:Second.Mayor:Ihaveamotionandasecondanda,yes.Lowell:Mr.MayorIamsorrytointerruptbutweneedtohaveanumberidentifiedintheamountofhowmuchnottoexceed.Mayor:OKanddoweneedtheassistanceofMr.McFarland.Lowell:Wecertainlycould.Jacquie:WellIdidaquickcalculationdownhereillcaninterjectitis$927,000.Mayor:Doyouagreewiththat?SteveMcFarland:Yeah,thatisright.Mayor:AndIguessthequestionisshoulditbethemotionbeforthatamountornottoexceedanamountthatisslightlyabovethat.Lowell:Youcertainlycoulddothat.Mayor:Itisnotmymotion.Jerry:IIImayoneofthequestionsistheseadditional$350,000worthoffeessomeofthesearewaivablebytheTownBoardIthink,thatisaseparatequestionthanneedstobeaddressedtodaybutthat$350,000couldchangecoulditnot?Lowell:Itcertainlycould.Jerry:Yeah,soIguess,Chuckyoumadethemotion.Jacquie:Ithinkyouguysaresafesayingnottoexceed$927,000.Chuck:Somoved.Mayor:OKIhaveamotionandasecond. Jerry:I’llsecondit.Mayor:OKandIguesswewillhavetodohandvotes...godowntherow,JettyJerry:Aye.Mayor:John?John:QuestiondoesthispresumethattheEPURAboarddoesnothavetheflexibilityinseeking,IammakingthismotecomplicatedbutbasedonwhatChuckandErichavebeensaying,toseeifthatlocalcontractorcanmeettherecommendedcontractorbid?Lowell:Can’tdothat.Jacquie:No.John:Nowhat?Jerry:Therewasn’tamotion.John:IknowImeantherearetwodecisionsonehowmuchweregoingtoputintothisandthenwhowe’regoingtopick.Jerry:Wedon’tpick.Mayor:Thereisonedecisionforthisboard,wedon’t’pick.John:IknowEPURApicks.Mayor:That’sright.Sothequestionbeforethisboardatthispointintimeisthequestionofdedicationoffundingforthisproject.John:OK,butmypointisifyougoto$950,000nottoexceedthat,thatbasicallyprecludestheEPURAdecisiontomakeareconsiderationofthecontractorusingthe$102,000number.Mayor:Thatisnotourdiscussion.John:OK,itismyobservationthen,solet’sgobacktoaskmewhatIamvotingonagain,please.Mayor:OK,doyousupportthemotion?John:Couldyoupleaserepeatthemotion.Jerry:Toallocate$927,000worthoffundstowardtheproject.0 Mayor:Nottoexceedthe$950,000.Jerry:No,$927,000.Lowell:Itwas$927,000.Mayor:OKJohn:No.Eric:No.Doria:Yes.Chuck:Yes.Mayor:OK,sothemotionpassesthreetotwo.Iwillnotbevotingonthis.Item#3Mayor:OK,nextistheintergovernmentalagreementbetweentheTownofEstesParkandtheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityforthegrandstandconstructionandwehavetheagreement.Affy.Whitedoyouwanttodiscussthiswithusplease.Greg:SurethisagreementisanagreementbetweentheTownofEstesParkandtheEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityforthegrandstandsprojectitisafairlysimpleagreementit’stheauthority’sprojecttheyhavetheresponsibilityoftheprogrammingdesignandconstructionofthegrandstandsprojecttheywillbethecontractingpartytheywillbetheonethatcontractswiththeconstructionforboththedemolitionandtheconstructionofitandberesponsibleforthemanagementofthatconstruction.TheTownundertheagreementwouldpledgebasedonthemotionthatjustpassed$927000tocompletethatprojectthereisaprovisionintheagreementthatsaysthatifitexceedsthe$927,000theTownandEPURAwillenterintoanagreementwhereEPURAwillpaythatmoneybackfromfuturefundsreceivedbyEPURA.Thereisasomethingthathasnotbeenattachedtotheagreementorisnotcompletewhichisanexhibitthatisthescopeoftheprojectmyrecommendationwouldbethatthatexhibitincludethebidsforthedemolitionandthegeneralcontractorwhichsetforthallofthefinancialinformationastowhatistobebuiltandalsothedocumentthatyouhavebeenhandedwhichisthe$350,000worthoffeesthatwillencompasstheprojectsothatwouldbemyrecommendation.IfanybodyhasanyotherquestionsconcerningtheIGAIwouldbehappytoanswerthem.Jerry:Mr.WhitewehaveanexhibitAthatispartofourpackage.Greg:ThatexhibitisinappropriateIthinkthatisjustadescriptionofwhatRogerdidthatisnottheproject. Jerry:Iamjustclarifying.Greg:Yeah,Idon’tknow,Ididn’tseethisuntilIwalkedinsomyrecommendationwouldbetoactuallyputthebiddocumentsintherethatiswhattheprojectisandthatwouldcompletetheagreementandthenyouwouldhaveatrackofexactlywhattheexpensesareandIassumethatthebiddocumentsareveryvoluminousandprecise.Jerry:Iwouldalso,wellIwouldsubmitthatthefinalpriceistheresultoflengthynegotiationswiththelowthreeorfourbidderssothatIthinkwhatyouareactuallylookingforinsteadofthebiddocuments,althoughtheycouldcertainlybeattachedandIamnottheattorneyyouare,butIthinkwhatweneedaspartofthisexhibitisasynopsisfromRogerof...Greg:Yes,ofwhatwe’rebuilding,yes.Jerry:Yeah,OKjusttoclarify.Greg:AndwecancertainlysupplythatbyworkingwithRogerandthebiddocuments.Wenowknowwhatthepriceisandwhatisbeingbidandweknowthealternativessothatcanbeaddedastheexhibit.Mayor:OK.AnyquestionsofAttorneyWhiteonthepartoftheEPURAboard?Ron:Yeah,beforeIcanbecomfortablevotingfortheagreement,althoughIdothinkitisprettystraightforward,Idoneedtohearorwitnesswhatalloftheseblanksareexactly,formetobecomfortableto,soIgatherinarticle2thefirstblankis$927,000.Greg:Thatiscorrect.Ron:Whatisthenextblank?Greg:$927,000.Ron:Isthatthetotalcostofthegrandstandorjustthecost...Greg:No,thatshouldbethetotalcost,excusemeyou’reright.Ron:That’swhatIneedalltheseblanksfilledinplease.Greg:Myfigureshowitisapproximately$2,048,121wecanverifythatifyouadduptheEPURAfundsavailablewhichis$1,121,282;thegrandstandbidpriceof$1,698,008;and$350,113whichistheamountofthe...Ron:Andwhatdidthatcometo?0 Irene:Couldyourepeatthatthetotalamount?Greg:Thetotalamountisactuallythetotalamountis$2,048,121.Ron:OK,verygooddowninthethirdparagraphofthatarticleanotherblank.Greg:Thatwouldbeonceagain$2,048,121.Eric:Inparagraphinthatsecondparagraphwherethefirstdollaramountwasincludeditsaysincludinganadequatecontingency.Ithinkwe’veheardfromthearchitectthatthereisnocontingency.Greg:Ithinkhesaidthereweresomecontingenciesinthebiddocument.Lowell:Thereissomecontingencywithinthebidamount.Eric:Andwhatwouldthatpercentagebe?Roger:Wehavenotreviewedtheirnumbersindetail.Eric:Wehavenotreviewedthenumbersindetailsowedon’tknowwhatthatisindetail.Wedon’tknowwhetherthereisacontingency.We’revotingonanagreementherethatsaysthereisacontingency.Roger:Whenwebidaprojectwegetanumberanduntilwechooseacontractortheyhavenoresponsibilitytobreakouttheirnumberscompletely.ThecontractorforTaylorKohrsishereifyouwouldliketospeakwithhim.Hemightbeabletogiveyousomeideaofwhatcontingencytheycarryintheirnumbers.Eric:Thatisuptothebidder.Dowewanttodothat,Imean,Iamnotrunningthemeetinghere.Roger:Excusemerightnowthereisabidamount.Ifthereisacontingencyinthereitistheirs,itisn’tyours.Doyouunderstand?Eric:Yessir,Ido.Theintergovernmentalagreementthatweareabouttoapprovehasinparagraphtwothatthereisabidamountincludinganadequatecontingency.That’swhatthedocumentsays.Myquestioniswhatistheadequatecontingency?Isthereacontingencybuiltintothisnumber?Roger:Canyouspeaktothat?RayBlum:IamRaymondBlumwithTaylorKohrs.Thereisnocontingencyinourbidnumberbecausethiswasahardbidandthedocumentsdidnotaskordirectthattherebeacontingency.Idoubtifanyothercontractorthatbidthisasageneralcontractorhasacontingencyinahardbid,itispracticallyalmostunheardof. 4Eric:Thankyouverymuch.Mayor:Thankyou.Eric:Strikethatparagraph,strikethatsentencefromtheagreement.Greg:Fine,ifthatiswhattheboarddesires.Greg:Yes,wecanstriketheadequatecontingencylanguage.Mayor:OKgood.Thankyou,Eric.Otherquestions?:CompletiondateisMay10thof2010.Jacquiedoyouhavesomething?Jacquie:Yes,thankyouMr.Mayor.IthinkitiscrucialtoidentifyiftheTownneedstoputmoremoneyasideforacontingencyfundwhichwasthepointofmyearlierquestion.Imustnothaveaskeditcorrectly.Isn’tthereacertainpercentagethatisnormallyrequiredasacontingencywithaproject?IfweneedtoputanotherhalfmilliondollarsasideasacontingencyIthinkweneedtoknowthat.Mayor:Jerry?Jerry:RogercanhelpmewiththisissuebutIdon’t...Jacquie:Andifwedon’tneedtoputitasidethat’sfinetoo,butwejustneedtoknow.Jerry:Iwasgoingtogenerallysayacontingencyitdependsonthesizeoftheprojectorthedollaramountandhowcomfortableeverybodyiswiththebidbutgenerallycontingenciescanrunfromanywherefrom5%to20%soitisbasicallyanarbitrarynumberwouldn’tyousay?Roger:Well,itistoanextent.Whenyouhaveahardbidproject,contractorscan’taffordtoputcontingenciesintheirnumbersthattheyputforthpubliclyortheyneverwouldgetanywork.Thereissomefinalvalueengineeringthatwillgoonwiththiscontractor,whoeveryouchoose,thatwillhelpbringthecostdownsome,andifyoucaretolookatthatasacontingency,youcandothat.Thereareseveralitemsthatwe’reanxioustolookatbutwecan’tdothatuntilwehaveacontractor.Jerry:Thanks,Roger.Oneoftheotherthingswecoulddoisweformallyallocated$927,000towardsthisprojectoneofthethingswecoulddoiswecoulduptheamountinthiscontractwithouthavingtoallocatethefundsatthispointintimesothatif,inotherwords,thecontractwouldbeinplacenowcorrectmeifIamwronghere...Greg:Yes,youhaveanIGA,thereisacontingencyintheIGAthattheurbanrenewalauthorityisabletocometoacontractthatreflectsthesefigurestheIGAevenif0 approvedtodayissubjecttotheurbanrenewalauthoritybeingabletocontractwiththegeneralcontractorforboththedemolitionandtheconstructionofthegrandstands.Jerry:Foranamountlessthanthe...Greg:Foranamountlessthanthe,foranamountatleastequaltothe$2,048,121figure.Jerry:Right.Greg:Iftheycannotdothatthenthisagreementwouldeitherhavetoberenegotiatedorisvoidbecauseoneofthethingsthatyoudon’thaveistheydonothaveaIthinkyoulookatthesequenceofeventswehaveanowforthefirsttimeactualfiguresIthinkthisisthefirsttimetheboardhasdiscussedactualbidfigures.Younowhavethoseinyourpossessionyouhave,thetownhaspassedamotionsayingtheywillcommit$927,000totheprojectandthenthenextstepisfortheurbanrenewalauthoritytoselectthecontractorletthebidandgetacontractthatfitsintothosefigures.Now,Jerry:Sowhenwearetalkingcontingencytheusualframeofmindisthatacontingencyisinplacetocoverchangesduringthecourseofconstruction.SothatleadstomyquestionandIamnotsureifitwas‘yesI’mwrong’or‘yesI’mtight’butcouldwenotmaketheagreementamount,saywemaketheagreementamountinsteadof$927,000it’s$940,000withoutgoingbackandreallocatingthefundsatthispointintime?Greg:Yesthe$927,000waswhatwasintheresolution.Jerry:Right.Greg:Butyouwanttoputintheagreementcouldbedifferentyesifyouwanttobuildyourcontingencyintotheagreementtightnowyoucoulddothat.Jerry:Andthenifatsomepointintimeinthefuturethereisachangeorderforsomethinganditwouldkickthetotalcontractpriceoverthe$2,048,000thenitcouldcomebacktotheboardforanallocationofadditionalfunds.Doesthatmakesense?ImeanthatisjustonethoughtratherthangoingbackandJacquie:Youknowiftheboardfeelscomfortablewithpotentialcostincreasescomingbackforapproval,wellthatisfine.Forme,puttingonmytownhatforamoment,we’regoingthroughthebudgetingprocessnowthereareotherprojectsbeforethetownandIjustthinkitisimportanttoknowifthereisanotherpotential5%oftheproject$100,000...ifthereisaanotherpotential$100,000thatisgoingtocomeoutoftheORE,Ijustwantyouguystobeawareofit.That’smypoint.Mayor:Understand.So,Jerryyouarerunningthecalculatordoyouhaveafigurethatyouwouldliketosuggest? Jerry:A5%contingencyis$102,400.Lowell:5%contingencyofthe$1.698millionorofthe$2,048,000?Jerry:The$2.048million.Greg:$2.048millionwouldbe$100,000.Jerry:Exceptyouraiseagoodpoint,wedon’tneedacontingencyonthefees.Ifwehada5%contingencyontheproposedcontractamountof$1.69millionitwouldbe$82,000roughly.Mayor:Soareyourecommendingthatwemakethatapartoftheagreement?Jerry:Iguessbasedonthatforthepurposesoftheagreement,andthisisjustthinkingoutloud,ratherthanallocatingthefundswe’veallocated$927,000Iwouldsuggestwemakeitanevenmillionthatisadding$80,000tothe$927,000forthecontingencybutthatifthosefundsareneededthenitwouldcomebacktotheboardthatisjustoneapproach.Mayor:IguessaquestionforGregandthatis,arewebetterofftowe’vegotthe$927,000justsimplymakethecontingencythedifferencebetweenthe$927,000andthemillion.Greg:YesIthinkthatisfine.Wellamilliondollarsyouknowyou’reagreeingtospendamilliondollarsyouhavealreadygot$927,000infiguresandthatputs$73,000worthofcontingencymoneyinthat.Mayor:RightOK.Inthatcasefurtherdiscussion,John?Eric,Doria?Thenifthereare...arethereanyfurtherquestionsforAttorneyWhiteontheIGA.Greg:Mr.Mayor,Iwouldsuggestthatifwearegoingtomakethosechangesthatthechangewouldbeamilliondollarsinthefirstblankinparagraph2,thesecondblankthegrandstandprojectexceedswouldbe$2,121,121,Iadded$73,000tothatandonceagainthatwouldbethefigureinthelastparagraphofsection2.Jerry:Andthe‘includinganadequatecontingency’wouldremain.Greg:Ithinkyoucantakethatout,you’vealreadyputthe$73,000inso.Mayor:OK.Inthatcasearewereadyforamotion?Lowell:Mr.Mayoryouhaveaquestiondownattheend.Mayor:Yes,Irene? IIrene:Intheendofparagraph2westrikeout‘includinganadequatecontingency’areweputtingthatbackinthendidyouputitbackin?Greg:Idon’tthinkitmakesanydifference,Ithinkthetownhasalreadyputthe$73,000contingencyinitsoitiskindofaredundantstatementatthatpoint.Irene:OK,fine.Mayor:AnyotherquestionsforAttorneyWhite?InthatcaseweneedapprovalfirstbytheBoardofTrusteessoisthereamotion?Doria:YourHonor,IwouldmakethemotionthatweapprovetheIntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheTownofEstesParkandEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityforthegrandstandconstruction.Mayor:Ineedasecond,isthereasecond?Jerry:I’llsecond.Mayor:OK,we’llgodownthelineagainIwillstartwithTrusteeMiller.Jerry:Aye.John:YesEric:Nay.Doria:Aye.Chuck:Aye.Mayor:OK,andthemotionpasses.Thankyou.