HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 2009-10-27je)Prepared10/19/09*Revised10/23/09M..TOWNOfESTESPAIUçTheMissionoftheTownofEstesParkistoplanandprovidereliable,high-valueservicesforoutcitizens,visitors,andemployees.Wetakegreatprideensuringandenhancingthequalityoflifeinourcommunitybybeinggoodstewardsofpublicresourcesandnaturalsetting.BOARDOFTRUSTEES-TOWNOFESTESPARKTuesday,October27,20097:00p.m.AGENDAPLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE.(Anypersondesiringtoparticipate,pleasejointheBoardinthePledgeofAllegiance).SWEARINGINOFOFFICERROBERTSON.PROCLAMATION.AMERICANINDIANHERITAGEMONTH.PUBLICCOMMENT.(Pleasestateyournameandaddress).TOWNBOARDCOMMENTS.CONSENTAGENDA:1.TownBoardMinutesdatedOctober13,2009,TownBoardStudySessionMinutesdatedOctober13,2009,andTownBoardBudgetStudySessiondatedOctober9,2009.2.Bills.3.CommitteeMinutes:A.Utilities,October8,2009.1.ProspectAvenueElectricalUndergrounding-A-iExcavating,$110,289.36—Budgeted.2.WirePullerTrailer,$97,500—Budgeted.4.PurchaseofOneTonVehicleforParksDepartment,$32,340.32—Budgeted.5.EstesValleyPlanningCommissionMinutesSeptember15,2009(acknowledgementonly).6.EstesValleyBoardofAdjustmentMinutesSeptember1,2009(acknowledgementonly).7.EstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityMinutesSeptember16,2009(acknowledgementonly).
2.REPORTSANDDISCUSSIONITEMS:*1.TABOREMERGENCYRESERVEOPTIONS.TownAdministratorHalburnt.2.TOWNADMINISTRATORREPORT.TownAdministratorHalburnt.3.PLANNINGCOMMISSIONITEMS.ItemsreviewedbyPlanningCommissionorstaffforTownBoardFinalAction.MayorPinkham:OpenthePublicHearingforallConsentAgendaItems.IftheApplicant,PublicorTownBoardwishtospeaktoanyoftheseconsentitems,theywillbemovedtothe“ActionItem”Section.1.CONSENTITEMS:A.CONDOMINIUMMAP1.WonderviewVillageCondominiums,SupplementalCondominiumMap#3,140WillowstoneDrive,Unit12,CrystalCreekDevelopmentInc/Applicant.B.AMENDEDSUBDIVISIONPLAT1.AmendedPlat,Lots9,10,11,12&aportionofLot8,Block12ndAmendedPlat,TownofEstesPark,ThomasE.Widawski/Applicant.C.FINALSUBDIVISIONPLAT1.FinalPlat,Lots15,16,and17,Block2,TheNeighborhood,PawneeMeadows,LLC/Applicant.D.DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT1.FirstAmendmenttotheDevelopmentAgreementforTheNeighborhoodSubdivision,PawneeMeadows,LLC!Applicant.4.ACTIONITEMS:1.RESOLUTION#20-09—OFFICIALLYSCHEDULINGSPECIALMAILBALLOTELECTION—JANUARY12,2010.TownClerkWilliamson.A.Resolution#20-09B.IntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheTownofEstesParkandLarimerCountyElectionstoConductaMailBallotElection.2.ADJOURN.NOTE:TheTownBoardreservestherighttoconsiderotherappropriateitemsnotavailableatthetimetheagendawasprepared.1
CynthiaDeatsFrom:AdminiR3045Sent:Friday,October23,200912:41PMTo:CynthiaDeatsSubject:JobDoneNotice(Send)********************************JobDoneNotice(Send)JOBNO.2053ST.TIME10/2312:32PGS.2SENDDOCUMENTNAMETX/RXINCOMPLETETRANSACTIONOK6672527GregWhite5869561KEPL5869532TrailGazette5861691Channel86353677ReporterHerald2247899Coloradoan5771590EPNewsERROR
CynthiaDeatsFrom:AdminiR3045Sent:Friday,October23,200912:41PMTo:CynthiaDeatsSubject:JobDoneNotice(Send)********************************JobDoneNotice(Send)““‘JOBNO.2053ST.TIME10/2312:32PGS.2SENDDOCUMENTNAMETX/RXINCOMPLETETRANSACTIONOK6672527GregWhite5869561KEPL5869532TrailGazette5861691Channel86353677ReporterHerald2247899Coloradoan5771590EPNewsERROR1
CynthiaDeatsFrom:AdminiR3045Sent:Wednesday,October21,20093:46PMTo:CynthiaDeatsSubject:JobDoneNotice(Send)********************************JobDoneNotice(Send)‘(“f’*****************************JOBNO.2039ST.TIME10/2115:33PGS.2SENDDOCUMENTNAMETX/RXINCOMPLETETRANSACTIONOK6672527GregWhite5869561KEPL5869532TrailGazette5861691Channel86353677ReporterHerald2247899Coloradoan5771590EPNewsERROR1
Prepared10/19/09*RevisedTOWNofESTESPAIUçTheMissionoftheTownofEstesParkistoplanandprovidereliable,high-valueservicesforourcitizens,visitors,andemployees.Wetakegreatprideensuringandenhancingthequalityoflifeinourcommunitybybeinggoodstewardsofpublicresourcesandnaturalsetting.BOARDOFTRUSTEES-TOWNOFESTESPARKTuesday,October27,20097:00p.m.AGENDAPLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE.(Anypersondesiringtoparticipate,pleasejointheBoardinthePledgeofAllegiance).SWEARINGINOFOFFICERROBERTSON.PROCLAMATION.AMERICANINDIANHERITAGEMONTH.PUBLICCOMMENT.(Pleasestateyournameandaddress).TOWNBOARDCOMMENTS.CONSENTAGENDA:1.TownBoardMinutesdatedOctober13,2009,TownBoardStudySessionMinutesdatedOctober13,2009,andTownBoardBudgetStudySessiondatedOctober9,2009.2.Bills.3.CommitteeMinutes:A.Utilities,October8,2009.1.ProspectAvenueElectricalUndergrounding-A-iExcavating,$110,289.36—Budgeted.2.WirePullerTrailer,$97,500—Budgeted.4.PurchaseofOneTonVehicleforParksDepartment,$32,340.32—Budgeted.5.EstesValleyPlanningCommissionMinutesSeptember15,2009(acknowledgementonly).6.EstesValleyBoardofAdjustmentMinutesSeptember1,2009(acknowledgementonly).7.EstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthorityMinutesSeptember16,2009(acknowledgementonly).
2.REPORTSANDDISCUSSIONITEMS:1.TOWNADMINISTRATORREPORT.TownAdministratorHalburnt.3.PLANNINGCOMMISSIONITEMS.ItemsreviewedbyPlanningCommissionorstaffforTownBoardFinalAction.MayorPinkham:OpenthePublicHearingforallConsentAgendaItems.IftheApplicant,PublicorTownBoardwishtospeaktoanyoftheseconsentitems,theywillbemovedtothe‘ActionItem”Section.1.CONSENTITEMS:A.CONDOMINIUMMAP1.WonderviewVillageCondominiums,SupplementalCondominiumMap#3,140WillowstoneDrive,Unit12,CrystalCreekDevelopmentInc/Applicant.B.AMENDEDSUBDIVISIONPLAT1.AmendedPlat,Lots9,10,11,12&aportionofLot8,Block1,2AmendedPlat,TownofEstesPark,ThomasE.Widawski/Applicant.C.FINALSUBDIVISIONPLAT1.FinalPlat,Lots15,16,and17,Block2,TheNeighborhood,PawneeMeadows,LLC/Applicant.D.PROFESSIONALSERVICESAGREEMENT1.FirstAmendmenttotheAgreementforProfessionalServicesbetweentheTownofEstesParkandtheEstesParkHousingAuthority,TheNeighborhoodSubdivision.E.DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT1.FirstAmendmenttotheDevelopmentAgreementforTheNeighborhoodSubdivision,PawneeMeadows,LLC/Applicant.4.ACTIONITEMS:1.RESOLUTION#20-09—OFFICIALLYSCHEDULINGSPECIALMAILBALLOTELECTION—JANUARY12,2010.TownClerkWilliamson.A.Resolution#20-09B.IntergovernmentalAgreementbetweentheTownofEstesParkandLarimerCountyElectionstoConductaMailBallotElection.2.ADJOURN.NOTE:TheTownBoardreservestherighttoconsiderotherappropriateitemsnotavailableatthetimetheagendawasprepared.
TownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,October13,2009MinutesofaRegularmeetingoftheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldintheTownHallinsaidTownofEstesParkonthe13thdayofOctober,2009.MeetingcalledtoorderbyMayorPinkham.Present:MayorWilliamC.PinkhamMayorProTernChuckLevineTrusteesEricBlackhurstDorIaEisenlauerJohnEricsonRichardHorneierJerryMillerAlsoPresentGregWhiteTownAttorneyJacquieHalburntTownAdministratorLowellRichardsonDeputyTownAdministratorJackieWilliamsonTowriCierkAbsentNone/MayorPinkhamcalledthemeetingtoorderat700pmandalldesiringtodosorecitedthePledgeofAllegiancePROCLAMATIONMayorPinkhampresentedtheEstesParkRotaryClubswithaProclamationrecognizingthePurplePinkyProjectEndPolioNowThetwoClubsinvitedthecommunitytothepancakebreakfastonOctober242009andtheHalloweenfestivitiesTrusteeBlackhurstencouragedeverycommunitymembertodonatea$1forthecausetohelptoeradicatethediseasePUBLICCOMMENTSandyOsterman/ARDVicePresidentpresentedtheBoardwithalocalgovernmentguideproducedbytheorganizationtoeducatethepublicTheguideisavailablethroughemailingarequesttoARD@dim.com.DavidHabeckerrrowncitizenreadapreparedstatementregardingtheSchoolBoard’santiEPURAdecisiontheimprovementsEPURAaccomplishedaftertheLawnLakefloodthetaxbaseprovidedtheotherSpecialDistrictsintownbyimprovementsmadebyEPURA,andtheneedtocontinuetoimprovetheTown.FrankTheis/CountyresidentstatedagreementwithMr.Habecker’scommentsonEPURAandencourageddiscussiononthefutureprojectsEPURAcouldcomplete.TOWNBOARDCOMMENTS.MayorPinkhamreadanOdeandaResolutionofRespectinhonorofformerEPURADirectorWilSmithforhis10yearsofservicetoourcommunity.1.CONSENTAGENDA:1.TownBoardMinutesdatedSeptember22,2009,TownBoardStudySessionMinutesdatedSeptember22,2009,TownBoardBudgetStudySessionMinutesdatedOctober2,2009andJointTownBoardandEPURASpecialMeetingMinutesdatedOctober2,2009.2.Bills.
BoardofTrustees—October13,2009—Page23.CommitteeMinutes:A.CommunityDevelopment,October1,2009:1.2009-2010RooftopRodeoCommitteeAppointments.2.PowderRiverRodeoProductions,Inc.3-YearAgreement(StockContractorforRooftopRodeo):$7415012010,$76000/2011&$7985012012subjecttoappropriations.3.ProcurementPolicy.4.ClosureofElkhornAvenuefromSpruceDrivetoEastElkhornAvenueonOctober31,2009from5:00p.m.to9:00p.m.forthedowntownHalloweenprogram.Itwasmovedandseconded(Levine/Miller)toapprovetheConsentAgenda,anditpassedunanimously.2.LIQUORITEMS:1.LIQUORLICENSING:TRANSFEROFQWRSHIEROMSTEVEANDBARBNYTESdbaST.VRAINLANESTOWLFORTCOLLINS,LLCdbaCHIPPER’SLANESESTESPARKCENTER555SAINTVRAINAVENUETAVERNLIQUORLICENSETownClerkWilliamsonstatedthatthenecessarypaperworkandfeeshavebeensubmittedforthetransfer.TherequiredT.I.P.S.traininghasnotbeencompleted;however,thenewownersanticipatesendingthecurrentstafftotrainingassoonaspossibleandwouldrequiretrainingofnewstaffwithin90daysofemploymentMattHoeven/BowlFortCollinsLLCMemberstatedtheorganizationcurrentlyownsthreebowlingalleysandoperatesthemallasfamilyfriendlyfacilitiesTheorganizationhassolidtrainingandproceduresinplaceincludingincentivepolicies,toensurethestafffollowstheliquorlawsHestatedaliquorviolationhasnotoccurredatanyoftheirestablishmentsinthepast.threeyears.MayorProTemLevineremindedtheowneroftheirresponsibilitytoupholdrtheliquorlaws.Itwasmovedandseconded(BlackhursUEricson)toapprovetheTransferofOwnershipApplicationfiledbyBowlFortCols,LLCdbaCHIPPERSLANESESTESPARKCENTER1TOWNADMINISTRATORREPORT•TheWindTurbinesurveywouldbecompletedonOctober152009Theresti(tswouldbereviewedbythePlanningCommissiononOctober202009withtwopublicmeetingstofollowonNovember12thandNovemberl7.TheintentwouldbetobringforwardarecommendationtotheTownBoardattheDecember8ihmeetingjustpriortotheendofthemoratoriumonDecember9thThePlanningCommissionmayrequestanextensionofthemoratoriumifarecommendationcannotbereach.•EstesParkLocalMarketingDistrictChairKenLarsonrequestedtwomembersfromtheDistrictandtheTownBoardmeettodiscussstakeholderfees.TheitemwasdiscussedattheTownBoardStudySession.TheBoardreachedconsensusstatingtheLMDhasarevenuesourceofa2%taxonnightlyrentals,theIGAdidnotcontainthestakeholderfees,andtheLMDcouldretainthefeesandreimbursetheTownanequivalentamountfortheLMDstaffsalaries.4.ACTIONITEMS:1.PROPERTYTAXMILLEVYREDUCTION.Removedfromtheagendaatthebeginningofthemeeting.
BoardofTrustees—October13,2009—Page32.SKILLS&KNOWLEDGEBASEDQUALIFICATIONSFORCONTRACTORLICENSING.DirectorJosephstatedtheCommunityDevelopmentCommitteehasreviewedthelicensingrequirementsandrecommendedtheitembereviewedbytheBoard.TheTownrequiresbusinesslicensesbepurchasedbyallcontractorsworkingwithinEstesPark.Theselicensesarenotissuedbasedonqualificationsortesting.TheCountyhasenactedanewqualificationbasedcontractorlicensingprograms,whichiscommonisColorado,andrequestedtheTownrequirethesame.StaffwouldrecommendtestingandlicensingofcontractorsandallcommercialbuildingpermitapplicantswithintheTown.ExemptionstothelicensingwouldincludecontractorsrequiredtoholdStatelicenses(architects,engineering,electrical,plumbing,sprinklers,elevators/conveyancesandmanufacturedhomeinstallers,etc.)and/orapprovedpre-engineered/proprietarycertification,projectswherethescopeofworkislimitedtosuchcontractors,orownersofstructuresregulatedbytheInternationalResidentialCodeworkingontheirownhomeandaccessorystructures.TheseexemptionsfromtestingwouldnotincludeexemptionsfromanyotherrequirementsincludingbutnotlimitedtopermitsorTownbusinesslicensingStaffrecommendsthelicensingrequirementsbeconsistentwiththerequirementsenactedbyLarimerCountyforthedifferenttypesofcontractorlicensesandtoaccepttestresultsandqualificatinsfromothermunicipalitiesforlicensinglocally.CommentsandquestionsaresummarizedhowhastheContractorsAssociationrespondedconsistentlicensingrequirementsareneededthroughoutthevalleythecurrentlanguagewouldpreventacommercialpropertyownerfromapplyingforabuildhigpermitforaprojectthatacontractorhasnotbeenselectedapermitshouldonlybeissuedtothelicensedcontractorhowwHLthelicensingbemonitoredwhywouldcommercialpropertyownerbepreventedfromworkingontheirownpropertyiflicensingisapprovetherequirementsmustbeconsistentwiththeCountyrequirementsadditionalinformationonthelicensingclassesshouldbereviewedbytheBoardandthereshouldbeatransitiotoprovidecontractorsthetimetotaketheappropriatetestsDirectorJosephstatedthecontractorshaveexpressedsomeoppositionbutareinlargepartagreeabletothechangeChiefBuildingOfficial(CBO)Birchfieldcommentedthatmorethanhalfthejurisdictionsrequirequalificationtesting.CommercialpropertyownerscouldcompleteworkontheirpropertyiftheyholdtheproperlicensingBuildingsthatareopentothepublicareheldatahigherstandardFrankTheis!CMSPlanningandDevelopmentstatedthecontractorsinthevalleyarenothappywiththeproposedlicensingrequirements.Theadditionallicensingandrequirementswouldbefinanciallyburdensomeforthecontractorsthatarestrugglinginthecurrenteconomicclimate.HewouldliketohavetheCountyexempttheEstesvalleyfromtheirnewlicensingrequirements.HealsostatedtheTownBuildingofficialsshouldadministerinspectionsfortheentirevalleytosimplifytheprocess.DavidHabecker/Towncitizenquestionedifacontractordoesapoorjobwouldhelosehislicense?Licensingmaytakecareofsomeoftheissuesrelatedtothequalityofworkperformedintown;however,itwillnotmakethemscrupulous.CBOBirchfieldstatedthelicensingwouldregulatethequalityofworkandrequireallviolationstobeaddressedpriortorenewingalicense.
BoardofTrustees—October13,2009—Page4Afterfurtherdiscussion,itwasmovedandseconded(Levine/Miller),todirectstafftoprepareanOrdinancefortheimplementationofqualificationsbasedbusinesslicensingforbuildingcontractorsandmakesuchrequirementconsistentwiththeLarimerCountyrequirements,anditpassedunanimously.3.REVISED2009ORGANIZATIONALCHART.AdministratorHalburntstatedwithfouroftheCVBstaffbecomingLMDstaff,theTownhastheopportunitytoreorganizeoperationstoincreaseeffectivenessandefficiencybybringingtogetherthedivisionwhichprovidemorecommunitybasedservicestoourresidentsandvisitorsunderonedepartment.ThenewCommunityServicesdepartmentwouldbeformedandincludetheMuseum,SeniorCenter,Visitor’sCenter,Fairgrounds/EventsandConferenceCenter.Thisreorganizationwouldnotresultinanynewpositions,onlyreorganizationofcurrentsupervisoryresponsibilitiesBettyKilsdonklMuseum&SeniorCenterDirectorwouldbemethenewdirectorfortheCommunityServicesdepartmentAfterfurtherdiscussionitwasmovedandseconded(BlackhursUMiller),toapprovetherevised2009OrganizationalChartcreatingtheCommunitySerVicesDepartmenttoincludeMuseum,SeniorCenter,r,FairgroundslEventsandConferenceCenter,anditpassed
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,October13,2009MinutesofaStudySessionmeetingoftheTOWNBOARDoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldatTownHallinRoom130insaidTownofEstesParkonthe13thdayofOctober,2009.Board:MayorPinkham,TrusteesBlackhurst,Eisenlauer,Ericson,Levine,HomeierandMillerAlsoAttending:TownAdministratorHalburnt,DeputyTownAdministratorRichardson,TownAttorneyWhite,TownClerkWilliamson,DirectorsKilsdonk,McFarland,PickeringandZurnAbsent:NoneMayorPinkhamcalledthemeetingtoorderat430pmMULTIPURPOSEEVENTCENTER(MPEC)SCHEMATICSRogerKenney/KenneyAssociatesIncreviewedthefinalschematicsfortheMPECandIndoorArenaChangestothetwostructuresareminimalandincludemovingtheMPECbuilding15feettoensuretruckscanmaneuverthegradebetweentheparkinglotandthebuildingincreasethelobbytoincludeinteriorstairsinanefforttokeepthebuildingfromsittingtoofarbelowtheparkinglotaddedticketingareawithinthelobbyincreasetheuppermeetingareainconjunctionWiththeincreasedlobbyforanadditional1000squarefeettotheoverallbuildingconcession/cateringkitchenaddedtoallowforinteriorandexterioraccessandanadjacentoutdoorfoodcourtandasquarebasehasbeenaddedunderneaththesilowithastonefaçadetoallowformoreefficientuseofofficespahemdArenaschematicshaveremainedthesamefromtheAugust25threviConstructioncostsareestimaciat$3185millionfortheMPECandanadditional$250,000forFF&E.Atra6ipactstudyconfirmedtheneedforturnlanesonCommunityLaneatacostof$267689TheparkinglotadjacenttotheMPECincludinglandscapingisestimatedat$547827TheestimatesdonotincludelandscapingaroundthebuildinginteriororexteriorsignageandtapfeesKenneysuggestedtheBoardsendthetwobuildingsoi4forbidbeforeeliminatingitemsfromthedesignAdministratorHalburntstatedthTownhasapproximately$2millioninfundsnotincludingthefundssetasideforSOPAthatcouldbeusedtofundtheconstructionoftheMPECDiscussionfollowedamongsttheBoardtheTownshouldmoveforwardwithconstructiondocumentstimingofconstructionadefinedlistofitemsshouldbedevelopedthatarenotincludedintheestimatedprice;theMPECshouldnotbedecreasedinsizebecausethebuildingwasdesignedbasedonuserinput;andtomakethebuildingmarketableyouneedtheappropriatefloorspacetorent.AdministratorHalburntstatedstaffhascompletedaproformafortheMPECwithanestimated$200,000neededtosubsidizetheoperations;however,shesuggestedtheBoardhaveaprofessionalproformaconducted.DirectorZurnstatedanextendeddelayintheprojectwouldlimittheabilityforcompletionofcivilsiteworkthisfall.AstudysessionwouldbeheldtheweekofOctober19thtodiscussthenextstepsandtheproforma.CVBSTAKEHOLDERFEES.AdministratorHalburntstatedtheEstesParkLocalMarketingDistrictChairKenLarsonrequestedtwomembersfromtheDistrictandtheTownBoardmeettodiscussretainingaportionoralloftherevenuegeneratedbyStakeholderServices.Staffdoesnot
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownBoardStudySession—October13,2009—Page2recommendadditionalfundingfortheLMDbecausetheTownhascommittedover$300,000annuallytopayforemployeesalariesandbenefitsfor5years;paidforallmarketingandadvertisingtoallowtheLMDtocollectandaccumulatetheapproved2%taxduring2009withanestimatedfundbalanceof$750,000;andthelargefundbalanceallowstheLMDtohaveabetterfinancialpositionthantheTownatthistime.TheLMDwouldliketomodifythefeestructureandcannotmoveforwardwiththechangeswithoutaffectingtheTown’sbudget.AnoptioncouldincludetheLMDretainingthestakeholderfeesandprovidingtheTownwithacreditforstaffsalariestooffsetthestakeholderrevenuelost.Discussionfollowedandissummarized:theLMDhasarevenuesourceandsalariesarebeingpaidforbytheTown;thestakeholderfeespaidforthehiringofoneFTEandtooffsetbuildingmaintenancecosts;andtheLMDcouldretainthestakeholderfeesandreimbursetheTownanamountequaltotheaverageincreaseinfeescollectedovertheyears.PROPERTYTAXMILLEVYREDUCTIONDonWidrig/FireDistrictTaskForceMemberinformedtheBoardtherearefourclassesofvotersfortheproposedFireDistrictincludingthosethatWouldvotenoandyesbusinessownersopposedduetotheGallagheramendmentandTownresidentsthatalreadypayTownpropertytaxforfireprotectionTheTaskForcerequeststheBoardconsiderloweringthepropertytaxby6%theperceivedcostoffireprotectionasagoodfaithjesterforthetwoundecidedgroupsThereductionwouldhaveasmalleffectontheoverallTownbudgethowever,itwould/baveagreatereffectonthebusinessownersReductionofthepropertyta9t1d,haveapositiveeffectontheelection.FrankTheis/TaskForceMemberstatedthepssageoftheFireDistrictwoulddecreasethecosttoCountyresidentsandinëreethecosttotheTrusteesconstituents.ThereductioninpropertytaxcouldsaijhTownmoneyinthefuturewiththepassageofthedistrict.TheBoardconsensuswasnottomoveforwardWitbreductioninthemillevy.Commentswereheardahdaresummarized:theFireDistrictTaskForceshouldhaveaddressedthisissueatthebeginning;thebudgetprocessdoesnotallocatepercentagestodepartmentstheTownisalreadyfacingreductionsin2009and2010andthereductionwouldbeaninsignificantamountofmoneyperTownhouseholdTheBoardrequestedtheTaskForceadvertisetothecommunitythebenefitsoftheFireDistrictienewequipmentpaidstafflowerISOratingetcTherebeingnofurtherbusiness,MayorPinkhamadjournedthemeetingat6:38p.m.JackieWilliamson,TownClerk
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,October9,2009MinutesofaRegularmeetingoftheTOWNBOARDBUDGETSTUDYSESSIONoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldatTownHallinsaidTownofEstesParkonthegthdayofOctober,2009.Board:MayorPinkham,TrusteesBlackhurst,Eisenlauer,Encson,Homeier,LevineandMillerAttending:MayorPinkham,TrusteesEisenlauer,Ericson,Homeier,LevineandMillerAlsoAttending:TownAdministratorHalburnt,DeputyTownAdministratorRichardson,FinanceOfficerMcFarland,TownClerkWilliamsonAbsent:TrusteeBlackhurstMayorPinkhamcalledthemeetingtoorderat8:30am.2010BUDGETPRESENTATIONMUSEUM!SENIORCENTERMuseumTheendingfundbalancewilldecreaseattheendof2010tomaintainabalancebelowthetargeted5%ThetransferfromtheGeneralFundhasincreasedin2010becauseofaconsiderablylowerfundbalancein2009versus2008.O&Mandrevenuesremainflatfor2010PersonnelincreasesslightlytoreflecttheincreasesinhealthinsurancecostsTheMuseumFriendsarecontributing$22,000fordesignworkonanewcollectionsbuildingfirealarmshedpaintingandroofreplacementlandscapingandCobbMacdonaldCabinroofreplacemenr”StaffhascompletedanMOUwiththeFriendstofocustheirfundsoncapitalimprovementsinsteadofoperationalexpensedfortheMuseumTheproposedbudgetwillbeupdatedtoremovetheduplicateentryfortheCobbMacdonaldCabinroofreplacementof$6,000undercapitalanddecreasethetransferby$6,000fromtheGeneralFundGrantfundingforoperationhasbecomelimitedandmostfundingrequiresspecificprojectsDiscussionfollGwedontheneedtodevelopapolicyforSpecialRevenuefundstohaveaminimumfundbalancelessthan5%TownAdministratorHalburntstatedthesefundsmaintainedhigherbalancesinthepasttofundplannedcapitalpurchases,andtherefore,heldGeneralFundmoneythatcouldbeusedformoreimmediateprojects.TheSpecialRevenuefundshavebeendecreasingtheirfundbalancesforthepasttwoyearstolimittheamountofGeneralFundmoneysittingintheseaccounts..AllSpecialRevenueFundbalanceswillreflecta1%fundbalancefor2010.TheMuseumhaspreparedacostestimateforrepairstotheKnoll-WillowcabinandcontinuestolookforfundingsourcesincludingfederalgrantsortheMuseumFriends.SeniorCenterRevenuesareprojectedupslightlyin2010,O&MremainsflatandPersonnelupslightlyduetohealthinsuranceincreases.Thefoodcontractisinthesecondofathreeyearcontract.Utilitiesdecreasein2010withtheseparationofthewatermetersforthebuildingandthelandscapingirrigationsystem.SeniorCenterInc.wouldprovidefundstopurchasefoldingchairsandassociatedracks.
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownBoardBudgetStudySession—October9,2009—Page2CVBTheCVBbudgethaschangedfor2010withthepassageoftheEstesParkLocalMarketingDistrict(LMD)in2009andnolongercontainsaccountsforCommunicationandtheVisitor’sGuide.AllmarketingandadvertisingarethefinancialresponsibilityoftheLMDbeginningin2010.RevenueshavedecreasedbytheamountofadvertisementsalesintheVisitor’sGuide.O&Mhasdecreasedwith$1millioninadvertisingtransferredtotheLMD.InvestmentincomeintheAdvertisingbudgetwouldbemovedtoadifferentCVBfund.•VisitorCenter—O&Mdecreasesin2010asstafffindsmethodstooperatemoreefficientlyandPersonnelcostsdecreasewiththetransferoftheCommunicationManagertotheLMD.Revenuesareprojectedtoincreasein2010withincreasedtrafficandsalesofmiscellaneousitemsattheCenter.HostingofthewebsitehasbeenmovedtotheLMD;however,therearemaintenancecoststhataresharedamongsttheCenterandtheLMDforwebtoolsusedforvisitorreferrals.AportionofthemaintenancecontractsandITcostshavebeentransferredtotheLMD,therebydecreasetheoverallcosttotheCenter.TheBoardquestionedifaportionoftheutilitieswouldbepaidforby’theLMDinthefutureStaffwouldevaluateandconsideranaddendumtotheIGAnextyeartocoverutilities•FacilitySales&Marketing—O&Mremainsflatfor2010andPersonneldecreaseswiththetransferoftheGroupSalesandMarketingManagertotheLMDRevenuesaredownwithasignificantdecreaseinlargegroupsalesStaffwouldbespendingmoretimeattractingconvenhonsandlargegroupmeetingfor2010andbeyond.•LocalMarketingDistrict—TheTownwouldcontinuetopaythesalariesofthefourCVBemployeetransferredtotheLMDatacostof$297,069forthenextfiveyears.RevenuesareLMD’fundspaytheincreasedsalaryfortheDirectorposition.•SpecialEvents—Revenuesareprojectedtoincreasein2010.PersonnelcostsincreasewithanincreaseinseasonalworkersandthereallocationoftheCVBDirector.Themaintenanceonthearenahastobecompletedeverythreetofouryearsatacostof$50,000.MarketingofthespecialeventshasbeenmovedtotheFacilitySalesandMarketingaccount.Manuredisposalwasdownin2009withadecreaseintheHunterJumpers.TrusteeEricsonrequestedmoredetailforrevenuesStaffwouldreviewthefeasibilityandoptionofmakingtheDVDoftherodeoavailableforsale.ThegrandstandprojectwouldincreasetheutilitiesattheFairgroundsandadjustmentshavenotbeenmadefor2010.•ConferenceCenter—O&Mincreasesin2010toaddressupgradesrequiredtothe20yearoldbuilding,includingtheconcrete,backstairway,replacementofthesoundsystemandlighting.Thestackingchairsarebeingreplacedovertime.MayorPinkhamcalledabreakat9:50a.m.andreconvenedthemeetingat10:05a.m.TRANSPORTATIONDeputyTownAdministratorRichardsonreviewedthechangesmadetotheshuttlesystemin2009,includingthenewFallRiverRoadroute,smallervehicles,newshuttlesignsateachstopwiththerouteandpickuptimes,andalossof$10,000inadvertisingrevenuewiththeuseofsmallerbuses.Theshuttlesystemwasdown29%inridershipmostlikelyduetoachangeinoperatinghoursandanewroute.Costofridershipwasupsignificantlyin2009byalmost$2.00perrider.The2010budgetincludes$177,555forbuses,fuel,drivers,officesuppliesandsignagewithareductioninservicedays.Staffwouldreviewoptionsformakingthebusesmoredistinctivetotheriders.POLICEThePoliceDepartmenthasseenanincreaseinPersonnelcostsrelatedtoincreasesinhealthcarebenefitsandanincreaseinthenumberofemployeesmovingfromsingle
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownBoardBudgetStudySession—October9,2009—Page3coveragetofamilycoverage.TheHospitalandthePolicehavebeenoperatingwithanMOUfordispatchservicesinexchangeformedicaltestingrelatedtoarrestsorsexassaultexams.BothentitieshaveagreedtoendtheMOUandbegininvoicingforservicesin2010.TheTownwouldrealize$40,000inrevenueforDispatchservicesandmedicalexpensesofapproximately$15,000fromPatrol.CommunityServices-PersonnelcostsandO&MincreaseswiththeRestorativeJusticecasemanagermovingfromhalftimetofulltime.Additionalcostsarebeingoffsetwithfourdifferentgrantsreceivedfromfourdifferentagencies,includingaJuvenileAccountabilityBlockGrant,FormulaGrant,DiversionGrantandJusticeAssistanceGrantforatotalof$81,355($68,835/Salaryand$12,520/O&M).•Patrol—O&Mdecreasesin2010withareductioninfuelcostsandareductionincapitalexpenditures.•Dispatch—O&Mincreaseswiththe800mhzradiosMISCELLANEOUSrTheBoardrequestedstaffnotcuttheChristmaspartyoremployeeincentivesfromthe2009budgetstatingthesesitemsshowtheTownsappreciationfortheemployeesdedicationandhardworkthroughouttheyearThenextBudgetStudySessionisscheduledOctober16th830am—1200pmikhamadjournedthemeetingat11:02a.m.Therebeingnofurtherbusiness,
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,October8,2009.MinutesofaregularmeetingoftheUTILITIESCOMMITTEEoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldintheTownHallinsaidTownofEstesParkonthe8thdayofOctober,2009.Committee:ChairmanHomeier,TrusteesBlackhurstandEricsonAttending:ChairmanHomeier,TrusteeEricsonAlsoAttending:TownAdministratorHalburnt,DeputyTownAdministratorRichardson,UtilitiesDir.Goehring,Asst.UtilitiesDir.Bergsten,RecordingSecretaryPetrieAbsent:TrusteeBlackhurst,TownAdministratorHalburntChairmanHomeiercalledthemeetingtoorderat8:00a.m.PUBLICCOMMENT.None.LIGHT&POWERDEPARTMENTProspectAvenueElectrical:RequesttoAcceptBidThePublicWorksDepartmentisdesigningtheProspectAvenuebypassforroadreconstructionfromStanleyAvenuepastthehospitaluptoOurayDrive.LightandPowerhasrequestedallrelatedoverheadutilitywiresbeburiedpriortothestartoftheroadproject,whichisestimatedtobeginin2010.Fivelocalcontractorswerecontactedtoprovidebidsfortrenchingandtheinstallationofconduitforthisproject.BidBudgetA-iExcavating$110,289.36$250,000DuellExcavatingNOBIDSUBMITTEDFairbanksExcavatingNOBIDSUBMITTEDKearney&Sons$114,890.00KitchenExcavatingNOBIDSUBMITTEDStaffrecommendsacceptingthebidfromA-iExcavating.TheCommitteerecommendscontractingwithA-IExcavatingfortheProspectAvenueundergroundelectricprojectfor$110,289.36from#502-7001-580-35-58.BudgetedPurchaseofUndergroundWirePullerTrailerThe2009LightandPowerDepartmentbudgetincludes$85,000forthepurchaseofanundergroundwirepuller.Thepullerwouldbeusedtoinstallpowercablethroughundergroundconduit.Threecompanieswerecontactedtoprovidebids.MountainStatesUtilitysubmittedtheonlybidat$97,500.DirectorGoehringstatedthat$12,500canbetransferredfromtheLightandPowertransformeraccountintothecapitalequipmentaccounttocoverthedeficit.TheCommitteerecommendscontractingwithMountainStatesUtilitySales,Inc.forthepurchaseofthe2009ShermanReillyMod#DDHA-75-DC-TIAirHoseAssemblyfor$97,500from#502-6501-560-26-43.
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSUtilitiesCommittee—October8,2009-Page2LIGHTANDPOWERREPORTS.0MarysLakeWaterTreatmentPlantUpdate—Theprojectisstillongoingandnearingcompletion,withanestimatedwaterproductiondateofDecember3rd2009.OperatortrainingonthenewsystemhasbeenscheduledforOctober19ththroughOctober30th,2009.Duringmembranetestingbrokenfiberswerefoundinthefirststageandsecondstagemembranes.GE/Zenonisreviewingthebreakageamountandpotentialcauses,andwillbediscussingmodulereplacementwithHDR.Themembraneshavea5yearreplacementwarrantyandperformancetestingofthemembraneswilldetermineiftheywillneedtobereplacedimmediatelyoriftheycanbereplacedsometimeinthefuture.TherebeingnofurtherbusinessChairmanHomeieradjournedthemeetingat8:20a.m.SandraJ.Petrie,RecordingSecretary00
___TOWNofESTESPARKESTESPARKPublicWorksDepartmentC0L0RAD0INTER-OFFICEMEMORANDUMDATE:October22,2009TO:MayorPirikhamandBoardofTrusteesFROM:DaveMahanySUBJECT:ParksDepartmentOneTonVehicleReplacement(G22A)(VehicleReplacementFund635-7000-435-3442/p.168)Background:The2009VehicleReplacementFundBudgetincludes$40,000(635-7000-435-3442/page168)forthereplacementoftheParksDepartmentOneTonFlatbedDumpTruckG22A.Thisisa1993FordF3504x2FlatbedDumpTruck,16yearsoldw/77,220miles.(Replacementtype4—7-8yearsor80,000—90,000miles).•AlternativeFuelOption:“NoOptionAvailable”forthistype/sizeworktruck.Cost/Budget:Cost:•PhilLongFord,ColoradoSprings,CO.2010FordF4504x2w/FlatbedDumpBody$35,340.32Trade-In1993FordF350w/FlatbedDump4x2(G22A)($3,000.00)BidPrice$32,340.32•BurtArapahoeFord,Centennial,CO.2010FordF4504x2w/FlatbedDumpBody$35,434.32Trade-In1993FordF350w/FlatbedDump4x2(G22A)($3,000.00)BidPrice$32,434.32•SpradleyBarrFord,Ft.Collins,CO.2010FordF4504x2w/flatbedDumpBody$38,940.72Trade-In1993FordF350w/FlatbedDump4x2(G22A)($2,500.00)BidPrice$36,440.72Budget:$40,000.00(VehicleReplacementFund635-7000-435-34-42/p.l68)Cost:$32,340.32Action:ThePublicWorksCommitteerecommendsthepurchaseofthe2010fordf4504x2w/FlatbedDumpfromPhilLongford,ColoradoSprings,CO.for$32,340.32v/tradeoutoftheVehicleReplacementFundtobeincludedontheConsentAgendaattheNovember10,2009TownBoardMeeting.
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSRegularMeetingoftheEstesValleyPlanningCommissionSeptember75,2009,6:00p.m.BoardRoom,EstesParkTownHallCommission:ChairDougKlink;CommissionersAlanFraundor[,JohnTucker,BettyHull,SteveLane,RonNorris,andRexPoggenpohiAttending:ChairDougKlink,CommissionersAlanFraundorf,BettyHull,SteveLane,RonNorris,andRexPoggenpohlAlsoAttending:DirectorJoseph,TownAttorneyWhite,PlannerShirk,PlannerChilcott,TownBoardLiaisonHomeier,andRecordingSecretaryThompsonAbsent:CommissionerJohnTuckerThefollowingminutesreflecttheorderoftheagendaandnotnecessarilythechronologicalsequence.ChairKlinkcalledthemeetingtoorderat6:00p.m.7.PUBLICCOMMENTNone.2.CONSENTAGENDAApprovalofminutesfromAugust18,2009PlanningCommissionmeeting.Itwasmovedandseconded(Hull/Fraundort)thattheconsentagendabeapprovedascorrected,andthemotionpassedunanimouslywithoneabsent.3.AMENDEDPLAT—Lots9,10,11,12&aportionofLot8,Block1,2dAmendedPlat,TownofEstesPark,Owner/Applicant:ThomasWidawskiPlannerShirkreviewedthestaffreport.Ifapproved,thisamendedplatwillconsolidatefivelotsintotwolotsandwillallowtheexistingstructurestofitontheirownlots.Hestatedtheownerplansonrestoringtheexistingbuildingsat203and205ParkLane,whichstraddleexistingpropertylines.Theoriginallotswereplattedin1907.ThisproposalcomplieswithapplicablesectionoftheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode(EVDC),andhasbeensubmittedtoallapplicablereviewingagencystaffforconsiderationandcomment.Nosignificantissuesorconcernswereexpressed.
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyPlanningCommission2September15,2009ThisisaPlanningCommissionrecommendationtotheTownBoard.StaffrecommendsapprovalwithconditionsoutlinedintheStaffReport.PublicComment:LonnieSheldonofVanHornEngineeringrepresentedtheapplicant,whohasreadandagreeswiththeconditionsofapproval.Theproposedplanincludessomechangeofuseofthebuildings,allofwhichareallowedintheCommercialDowntownzoningdistrict.Itwasmovedandseconded(Fraundori/Poggenpohl)torecommendapprovaloftheAmendedPlatofLots9,10,11,12andaportionofLot8,Block1,2uidAmendedPlat,TownofEstesParkwiththefindingsandconditionsrecommendedbystaff,andthemotionpassedunanimouslywithoneabsent.CONDITIONS:1.CompliancewithmemosfromEstesParkSanitationDistrict,TownAttorneyGregWhite,andPublicWorksDepartment4.REVISIONSTOESTESVALLEYDEVELOPMENTCODE-SHORTTERMRENTALSRevisionstovacationhomeregulations,includingrevisionstothedefinitionofaccommodationuse,guestroom,questquarter,householdliving,andnightlyrentalinEVDCChapter13,andrevisionstodistinguishbetweenB&Bsandvacationhomeusesandthedistrictsinwhichtheseusesarepermitted.(JDirectorJosephreviewedtheProblemStatement,whichhasevolvedoutofvariousdiscussionsbetweenStaff,PlanningCommission,andTownBoardduringstudysessionsandemailcorrespondence.Thefollowingconsensushasbeenreached:TheissueistoclarifythedistinctionsbetweenaB&Bandavacationhome;thepurposeistoreconcilethecurrentmunicipalcoderegulationswithreferenceintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode(EVDC).Inparticular,StaffhasaskedtheTownBoardtovoicetheiropinionsaboutwhetherornottheuseofavacationhomeshouldbeallowedasaprincipaluseinaresidentialzoningdistrict.Oftheresponsesreceivedthusfar,TownBoardsupportsprincipaluse;thescopeistoclarifythedefinitionsofvacationhomesandbedandbreakfasts,realizingthatoutrightprohibitionofvacationhomesandB&Bsisnotopenforconsideration.TownBoardhasgiventhiscoderevisiona“medium”levelofpriority;andfinally,thedesiredoutcomeistoenhancetheclarityandpredictabilityoftheregulatoryframeworkforownersofvacationhomepropertyandtheirneighbors,andtoproducearegulationthatcanbeadoptedintotheEVDC.PlannerChilcottstatedSection4.3wouldaddvacationhomesasaprincipaluseinallresidentialzoningdistricts,achangefromthecurrentaccessoryuse.B&BswouldbeallowedasaprincipaluseinR-2andRMzoningdistricts.Section4.4removesB&BsfromtheCOzoningdistrict.ThereasoningbehindthischangeisB&Bsareintendedtoexistinsingle-familyhomes,whicharenotanalloweduseintheCOdistrict.TheproposedrevisionsalsolineupthelanguageintheMunicipalCodewiththeEVDCby
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyPlanningCommission3September75,2009eliminatingtheterm“nightlyrental”andreplacingitwith“vacationhome.”DirectorJosephclarifiedtheTownBoardhasexclusiverightsonrevisionstotheMunicipalCode,andthechangeslistedinthisdraftwouldneedtheirapproval.PlannerChilcottstatedsection5.1clarifiesdistinctionsbetweenB&Bsandvacationhomes,usingsomeofthelanguagefromtheMunicipalCodeandinsertingitintotheEVDC.AbusinesslicensewouldberequiredforB&BsandvacationhomeslocatedwithintheTownlimits,andapermitwouldberequirediftheB&BorvacationhomeisoutsidetheTownlimitbutwithintheEVDCarea.LanguageintheMunicipalCodeconcerningpropertymanagersbeingavailable24hoursadaywouldmoveintoEVDC.AColoradosalestaxlicensenumberwillberequired.PlannerChilcottreviewedtheexceptionforB&BsandvacationhomesintheCDzoningdistrict,wherethedesignandoperationshouldbeincharacterwiththeresidentialneighborhood.Shestatedsection5.1.B.1.d.2and5.1.B.1.d.3mayneedmodificationatalaterdatedependingontheoutcomeofcoderevisionsconcerningthenumberofkitchensallowedinasingle-familyhome.Anyaccessorybuildingsonthepropertyshallnotbeusedforamenitiesbeyondagazeboorsimilaroutdoorroom.Nochangesintheexteriorappearanceshallbeallowed,exceptforpermittedsignage.Trafficandnoiselevelsshallnotbeoutofcharacterwithresidentialuse.Whereparkingisconcerned,PlannerChilcoffstatedallB&Bsshallhaveatleasttwoparkingspaces,andnomorethanthreevehiclesshallbeparkedoutsideatanyonetime.On-streetparkingisprohibited.Severalitemsinthisproposedcoderevisionareincludedascross-referenceswithotherareasintheEVDC.Namely;EmployeeHousingUnits,AttainableHousingUnits,andAccessoryDwellingUnits.IntheCDzoningdistrict,B&BsandvacationhomesarenotallowedonthegroundfloorofabuildingfrontingonElkhornAvenue.Also,onlyonevacationhomeorB&Bshallbepermittedperresidentialdwellingunit.Section5.1.B.2addressesdifferencesformaximumoccupancybetweenB&BsandvacationhomesaswellasthenumberofpartiesallowedtorentroomsatB&Bs.NomorethaneightguestsshalloccupyaB&Batanyonetime,inadditiontotheownersoroperatorsofthebusiness.B&Bsmayberented,leased,orfurnishedtooneormorepartiesatthesametime.ThemaximumoccupancyforvacationhomesshallfollowtheEVDCregulationsforthenumberofpersonsallowedunderthehouseholdlivingdefinition.Vacationhomesshallberentedtonomorethanoneparty,andtheownersofthehomeshallnotbepermittedtooccupythehomewhileapartyispresent.PlannerChilcottstatedtheexistinglegal,non-conformingB&BswouldbegrandfatheredaslongastheyremainincontinuousoperationasaB&B.PlannerChilcottstatedtheproposedcoderevisionsallowB&Bstoprovidemealservicetoregisteredguests,butnottothegeneralpublic.Also,B&Bsmayofferlimitedancillaryservicestoguestsasahomeoccupation.Homeoccupationsinvacationhomesand/oraccessorydwellingunitsareprohibited.
REcoRDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyPlanningCommission4September15,2009PlannerChilcottnotedachangeinsection5.2.B.1toremovenightlyrentalsasanaccessoryuse,andtherulespertainingtovacationhomesmovedtotheprincipalusesection.Shenotedthevariouspointsofcross-referenceinthecodeincludesusingthesamelanguageandtermsbetweenboththeMunicipalCodeandtheDevelopmentCode.Insection13.3DefinitionsofWords,TermsandPhrases,therehasbeenaslightrevisiontothedefinitionofB&B,changingowner-occupiedtooperator-occupied.Thedefinitionfornightlyrentalswasremovedandreplacedwithadefinitionforvacationhome,bothintheMunicipalCodeandtheDevelopmentCode.CommissionerLanesuggestedachangeinthedefinitionofAccommodationsUsetoreadforcompensationratherthanforaconsideration.PlannerChilcottnotedthisdefinitioncoversalltypesofaccommodations,notjustvacationhomesandB&Bs.AclarificationwasalsomadeintheHouseholdLivingdefinitiontodifferentiatebetweenlong-termandshort-termrentals.StaffrecommendskeepingthecurrentdefinitionofaGuestUnitorGuestRoom.Thiscouldberevisedatalaterdatedependingontheoutcomeofthekitchencoderevisions.CommissionerNorrissuggestedaddinglanguagetoensurethereisaresponsiblepartyinchargeoftheproperty,aswellaslanguagetoensurethecollectionoftheappropriatetaxes.PublicComment:None.Itwasmovedandseconded(Hull/Fraundort)tocontinuetherevisionstotheEVDCforShortTermRentalstothenextregularmeeting.Themotionpassedunanimouslywithoneabsent.5.REPORTSDirectorJosephdistributedcopiesofDraperCity,Utah’scodeonsecondkitchensinsingle-familydwellings.HerequestedfeedbackonthiscodefromtheCommissioners.CommissionerKlinkstatedthatfromtheStudySessiondiscussion,itissuggestedwordingshouldreadAdditionalratherthanSecondkitchen.ReviewingtheDraperCityCode,DevelopmentStandards-PermiffedUse,itwasagreedamongsttheCommissionto:strikeitem(1)Theresidenceshallhaveonlyonefrontentrance;incorporate(2)Theresidenceshallhaveonlyoneaddress;incorporatepartof(3)Aninterioraccessshallbemaintainedtoallpartsoftheresidencetoassurethatanaccessoryunitorapartmentisnotcreated;donotincorporatethesecondsentenceof(3);defer(4)totheLight&Powerdepartmenttodetermineincorporation;morediscussionneedstooccurbetweenstaffandCommissionersconcerning(5)Asecondkitchenshallexistonlyaspartoftheprimarystructureandshallnotbeinstalledinanaccessoryor“out”building.Thecommentwasmadethatthisisnotapplicablebecauseaccessorydwellingunitsarenotallowedinthe
___RECORDOFPROCEEDINGS____________EstesValleyPlanningCommission5September15,2009EVDCarea;incorporate(6)whichrequiresadeedrestrictiondeclaringtheresidencewillnotbeconvertedintotwoormoreunitswithoutspecificapproval;strike(7)concerninglimitinguseofthesinglefamilyresidencetoafamilyonly.TownAttorneyWhitestatedthedeedrestrictionshouldbewrittenstrongenoughtocovertheuseoftheresidence;strike(8)ConstructionofanysuchkitchenshallmeetstandardsofthecurrentbuildingcodesadoptedbytheCity.Itisfeltthisisredundant.Itisunderstoodcurrentbuildingcodeswillapply.CommissionerKlinkdirectedStafftoproduceadraftandpresentitatthenextPlanningCommissionmeeting.CommissionerNorrisstatedStaffandthePlanningCommissionershavecompiledalistofpossiblecodechangesandwillbesubmittingthemtotheTownBoardforprioritization.TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmenthashadnopre-applicationmeetingssincethelastPlanningCommissionmeeting.TheTownBoardapprovedtheLocation&Extent/SpecialReview09-OlfortheStanleyParkGrandstand.CommissionerKlinkaskedDirectorJosephtoexplaintheenforcementprocesswiththecurrentcomplaintsataresidenceonGrandEstatesDrive.DirectorJosephstatedthisongoingenforcementactioninvolvesanunpermittedaccessorydwellingunitinadetachedgarage.Thepropertyowneriswillingtotrytocomeintocomplianceandisintheprocessofconnectingthegaragetotheprincipaldwelling.Permitswereissued,theownerwasadvisedthegaragecouldnotbeusedasalivingunit,andaneighborhascomplainedthattheconditionwasbeingviolated.Shealsocomplainedaboutconstructiononthesitetakingtoomuchtime.TheBuildingDepartmentinspectedthepropertyandaskedforandreceivedaletterfromtheownerstatinghisintenttocorrectthecurrentcodeviolations.Thepropertyownerdeniesviolationofoccupancyofthegarage.DirectorJosephbelievestherehasbeenanongoingeffortbythepropertyownertoreachcompliancewiththecode.Theneighboriswellwithintheirrightstoexpectcodecompliance.Buildingpermitshaveanexpirationdate,butaslongasyoushowprogress,theprocesscangoonforalongtime.Thedepartmentcontinuestoworkwithbothparties.Therebeingnofurtherbusiness,ChairKlinkadjournedthemeetingat7:15p.m.DougKlink,ChairKarenThompson,RecordingSecretary
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSRegularMeetingoftheEstesValleyBoardofAdjustmentSeptember1,2009,9:00a.m.BoardRoom,EstesParkTownHallBoard:ChairChuckLevine,MembersJohnLynch,BobMcCreery,WayneNewsom,andAlSager;AlternateMemberBruceGrantAttending:ChairLevine,MembersLynch,McCreery,andNewsomAlsoAttending:DirectorJoseph,PlannerAlisonChilcoff,PlannerDaveShirk,andRecordingSecretaryThompsonAbsent:NoneChairLevinecalledthemeetingtoorderat9:00a.m.1.PUBLICCOMMENTNone2.CONSENTAGENDAApprovalofminutesdatedAugust4,2009Itwasmovedandseconded(Newsom/Sager)toAPPROVEtheminutesaspresented,andthemotionpassedunanimously.3.METES&BOUNDSPARCELLOCATEDAT189&191E.RIVERSIDEDRIVE,Owner/Applicant:Minglewood,LLC—Requestforvariancefrom§1.9.D.2.awhichrequiresunobstructedsetbacksfromthegroundtotheskyinstreamandrivercorridors.Requestistoallowtheroofeavetoencroachintothe10-footsetbackPlannerChilcottreviewedthestaffreport.Theproperlyownerisrequestingavariancetoconstructaportionofaroofeaveintheten-footriversetbackestablishedinEVDC§7.6.E.1.a(3)StreamandRiverCorridorsinthe“CD”DowntownCommercial.Specifically,theownerrequestsavariancetoEVDCSection1.9.D.2.aStreamandRiverCorridors,whichstates,Developmentsetbacksshallbemeasuredasthedistancebetweenthedelineatedstreamorrivercorridor,assetforthin§7.6.D.2,andthefurthermostprojectionofabuildingorstructurealongalineatrightanglestothesetbackline.Setbacksshallbeunobstructedfromthegroundtotheskyexceptasotherwisespecificallyallowedin§7.6.DofthisCode.Therequestedvariancewillallowtheroofeavetoencroachapproximately2.5feetintothesetback,andisneededinordertoproceedwithaplantoconstructtwostoriesabovetheexistingMountainMunchiesbuilding.Thisrequesthasbeensubmittedtoreviewingagencystaffandadjacentproperlyownersforconsiderationandcomment.Staffreceivedonecommentinoppositiontotheproposedvariance.
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyBoardofAdjustment2September1,2009PlannerChilcottstatedthatstaffreviewedthevariancerequestforcompliancewithEVDCSection3.6.C,whichincludesevaluatingwhetherornotspecialcircumstancesandpracticaldifficultyexistincomplyingwiththecodestandardsfromwhichavarianceisrequested.StafffindsthatspecialcircumstancesexistandpracticaldifficultymayresultfromstrictcompliancewithCodestandards.ThelotismuchnarrowerthanmostCD-CommercialDowntownzonedlots.Rangingindepthfromaminimumoffifty-threefeettoamaximumofseventy-fivefeet,thisnarrowdepthcombinedwiththeriverandfront-yardsetbacksreducespossiblebuildingdepth.Theproposedadditionfollowstheexistingbuildinglineandwillnotencroachanyfurtherintotheriversetbackthantheexistingbuilding.Theexistingfirstflooreavethatencroachesintotheriversetbackwillberemovedandaneweaveconstructed.OneofthepurposesoftheriversetbackintheCDzoningdistrictistoprovideroomforpublicpedestrianaccesstoFallRiverandtheBigThompsonRiver.PublicpedestrianaccessalongthissectionoftheBigThompsonRiverisunlikelyduetotheproximityofexistingbuildingstotheriver.PublicpedestrianaccesstotheBigThompsonRiverisprovidedontheoppositesriverbank,nexttothepublicparkinglot.Indeterminingpracticaldifficulty,PlannerChilcottnotedStafffindsthattherecanbeabeneficialuseofthepropertywithouttherequestedvariance.Theexistingusescancontinue.Stafffindsthatthevariancerequestisnotsubstantial.Theencroachmentwillnotfurtherreducepedestrianaccesstotherivernorhaveanyfurtherimpactonwildlifehabitat.Stafffindsthattheessentialcharacteroftheneighborhoodwillnotbesubstantiallyalteredandthatadjoiningpropertieswillnotsufferasubstantialdetriment.Theproposedadditionisinkeepingwiththestyleoftheexistingbuilding.Thepropertyownerpurchasedthepropertywithknowledgeoftheriversetback.PertheLarimerCountyTaxAssessorrecords,theownerpurchasedthepropertyonAugust12,2004,whichisaftertheFebruary1,2000effectivedateoftheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode.Theapplicanthasmadesignificantimprovementstothispropertyandhasreceivedanumberofvariancesinthepasttocompletetheseimprovements.TheroofeavecouldbeeliminatedprovidedthiscompliedwiththeBuildingCode.Thepropertyownerisconcernedaboutmaintenanceproblemsiftheeaveiseliminated.Thesubmittedconditionsorcircumstancesaffectingtheapplicant’spropertyarenotofsogeneralorrecurrentanatureastomakereasonablypracticabletheformulationofageneralregulationforsuchconditionsorsituations.Thevariancewouldnotreducethesizeofthelot.Thevariance,ifgranted,representstheleastdeviationfromtheregulationsthatwillaffordrelief.TheproposeduseofthebuildingispermittedundertheEVDC.Staffrecommendsapprovalofthevariancerequestwithconditions.TheCodeCompliancecDconditionisduetosomeoutsidestoragethatneedstobecleanedup.PublicComment:
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyBoardofAdjustment3September7,2009PaulWhyard/Applicanthashadmultiplevariancesonthisproperty.HeisintheprocessofgatheringupmaterialsforfutureconstructionandhasbeenincontactwithCodeEnforcementOfficeAndrewHartaboutthearea.Mr.WhyardisconcernedaboutGregSievers/PublicWorksProjectManagercommentsconcerningthisproject.Mr.Sieversbelievesthetwoexistingdrivewaycuts,whichwereinstalledbytheTownin2004,arenotofappropriategradeandwillpresentapedestrianhazard.Mr.WhyarddisagreeswithMr.Sievers,butwouldliketodiscussthepossibilityofeliminatingthedrivewaycutsaltogether.ThepropertyownerstatedafenceandstairwayisplannedinfrontofthebuildingfacingRiversideforpedestrianaccesscontrol,andthiswillpreventvehiclesfromtryingtousethecutasadriveway.Mr.Whyardalsobelievesitwillbeinthebestinterestofthepublictoremovethecuts.DirectorJosephstatedCondition#2couldberemovedfromthevarianceapprovalprocessanddealtwithduringthebuildingpermitprocess.Mr.WhyardhasscheduledameetingwithScottZurntodiscussthisissue.Herecognizesthevisibilityofthelocation,andhopesthisprojectwillincreasebusinessforthemandwillallowthemtohiremoreemployeesandbeopenyear-round.ASandyLasson/AdjacentPropertyOwnerstatedtheWhyard’shavebeengoodneighbors,butsheisconcernedaboutatavern/loungegoinginacrossthestreetfromtheirrentals.Theviewhasalreadybeencompromised,andwillbemoresowiththeproposedaddition.Shebelievesherpropertyvalueswilldrop.MemberNewsomstatedthisconcernshouldbeaddressedattheTownBoardlevelwhentheapplicantappliesforaliquorlicense.MemberLynchwantstomakesurethestorageissueisaddressedandatimeframeisgiven.PlannerChilcottstatedtheproposedfencewillneedtocomplywiththeSiteVisibilityTriangleintheEVDCthatisusedtodeterminethesafetyofintersections.Itwasmovedandseconded(Lynch/Sager)toAPPROVEtherequestforavariancefromEVDC§1.9.D.2.a.toallowtheroofeavetoencroachintothe10-footsetbackinthestreamcorridorwithconditions.*CONDITIONS:1.Compliancewiththeapplication.2.AnycodeviolationsshallbeaddressedtotheCodeComplianceOfficer’ssatisfactionpriortoissuanceofaletterofcompletion/certificateofoccupancyfortheaddition.3.Aregisteredlandsurveyorshallverifycompliancewiththevarianceandprovideastampedandsignedsetbackcertificate.Themotionpassedunanimously.4.LOT4,BLOCK2,FALLRIVERESTATES,2180BlueSpruceCourt,Owner/Applicant:KennethandPatriciaCzarnowski—RequestforvariancefromEVDC§4.3.C.5,Table4-2,whichrequiresa25-footminimumside-yardsetbackintheD-1Estatezoningdistricttoallowastorageroomanddeckaddition10feetfromthesidepropertyline
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyBoardofAdjustment4September7,2009PlannerChilcottreviewedthestaffreport.Thepropertyownersarerequestingavariancetoconstructan“attached10footby22footwalk-outallconcrete,fireresistantstorageroomadditiontothewestsideofthegarage.Theflatroofwouldalsobeutilizedasadeck.”PlannerChilcottstatedthatstaffreviewedthevariancerequestforcompliancewithEVDCSection3.6.C,whichincludesevaluatingwhetherornotspecialcircumstancesandpracticaldifficultyexistincomplyingwiththecodestandardsfromwhichavarianceisrequested.StafffindsthatspecialcircumstancesexistandpracticaldifficultymayresultfromstrictcompliancewithCodestandards.Thisrequesthasbeensubmittedtoreviewingagencystaffandadjacentpropertyownersforconsiderationandcomment.PlannerChilcottstatedthespecialcircumstancesarerelatedtothesmallsizeofthelotintheE-1Estatezoningdistrict.Thelotis0.46acres,andE-1hasaminimumlotsizeofoneacrefornewlotsandtwenty-fivefootsetbacks.Thislotissignificantlyundersizedforthezoningdistrict.Thehousewasconstructedin1977,priortotheadoptionoftheEVDC.Portionsoftheexistinghousearewithinthetwenty-fivefootside-yardsetback.Adrainageswalerunsthroughtheeasternsideoftheproperty,whichcouldimpactdrainageiftheprojectwasbuiltontheeastsideofthehouse.Indeterminingpracticaldifficulty,PlannerChilcottnotedthevariancerequestisnotsubstantial.IfthislotwerezonedE-Estate,theproposedadditionwouldcomplywiththesetback.Stafffindsthattheessentialcharacteroftheneighborhoodwouldnotbesubstantiallyalteredandthatadjoiningpropertieswouldnotsufferasubstantialdetriment.StaffhasreceivedaletterofsupportfromtheFallRiverEstatesArchitecturalControlCommittee.Thisletternotedthat“AdetachedstructurewouldnotconformtotheAssociations’covenantsandwouldbeopposedbythisCommittee.”Adetachedstructurewouldhavemoreimpactonthecharacteroftheneighborhoodandwouldresultinmorelanddisturbance.Noothercommentswerereceived.Staffrecommendsapprovalofthevariancerequestwithconditions.PublicComment:MemberSagerquestionedtheaccuracyoftheaddress,notingthestreetsignsaysBlueSpruceDrive,andtheapplicationindicatedBlueSpruceCourt.PlannerChilcottindicatedsheisworkingwiththeBuildingDepartmentonthisissue.MemberLevinebelievesTownAttorneyGregWhite’scommentshouldbeaconditionofapproval.KennethCzarnowski/Applicantappreciatestheacknowledgementoftheincorrectaddressaswellasthethoroughnessofstaffwiththisapplication.Heagreeswiththeconditionsofapproval.Itwasmovedandseconded(Sager/Newsom)toAPPROVEtherequestforavariancefromEVDC§4.3.C.5,Table4-2toallowconstructionofastorageroomanddeckaddition10feetfromthesidepropertylinewiththefollowingconditions.
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesValleyBoardofAdjustment5September1,2009CONDITIONS:1.Compliancewiththeapplication.2.CompliancewiththecommentsintheTownPublicWorksandUtilitiesDepartmentmemodatedAugust21,2009.3.Aregisteredlandsurveyorshallsetthesurveystakesforthefoundationforms.Afterthefootingsareset,andpriortopouringthefoundation,thesurveyorshallverifycompliancewiththevarianceandprovideastampedandsignedsetbackcertificate.4.Adetailedgradinganddrainageplanshallbesubmittedforstaffreviewandapprovalwiththebuildingpermitapplication.5.CompliancewiththecommentsinthememofromTownAttorneyGregWhitedatedAugust13,2009Themotionpassedunanimously5.REPORTSNone.Therebeingnofurtherbusiness,ChairLevineadjournedthemeetingat9:38a.m.ChuckLevine,ChairKarenThompson,RecordingSecretary
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado,September16,2009MinutesofaRegularmeetingoftheESTESPARKURBANRENEWALAUTHORITYoftheTownofEstesPark,LarimerCounty,Colorado.MeetingheldintheMunicipalBuildinginsaidTownofEstesParkonthe16thdayofSeptember,2009.Commissioners:ChairmanNewsom,CommissionersBlume,Halburnt,Little,WhiteandWilcocksAttending:ChairmanNewsom,CommissionersBlume,Halbumt,Little,andWhiteAlsoAttending:EPURADir.SmithandDeputyTownClerkDeatsAbsent:CommissionerWilcocksChairmanNewsomcalledthemeetingtoorderat8:00am.COMMUNITYCOMMENTS.MichaelMenard,PresidentoftheEstesValleyContractorsAssociation,requestedlocalpreferencebeappliedwhenconsideringbidsfortheupcomingGrandstandsProjecttokeepthesedollarscirculatingwithinthecommunity.BenGreer,CornerstoneConstructionConcepts,askedthattheEPURABoardconsiderlocalpreferencefortheGrandstandsProjecttokeepdollarsinthecommunityandprovideworktosupportlocalcontractors,theiremployeesandfamilies.COMMISSIONERCOMMENTS.ChairmanNewsomnotedthatavacancyontheBoardcreatedbythedeathofCommissionerMartinsenwillbefilledatafuturedatebyanappointmentmadebytheMayorandTrustees.CommissionerLittleexpressedappreciationforExecutiveDirectorSmith’scontributionstoEPURA.MINUTES.TheminutesoftheregularmeetingheldJuly15,2009,wereapproved.DISCUSSION—EPURABUDGETFORFISCALYEAR2010.Dir.Smithpresentedadraftbudgetforreview.ThebudgetistraditionallyadoptedinDecemberbut,duetohisresignation,Dir.SmithproposedadoptingthebudgetinOctoberpriortoleavinghispositionasExecutiveDirector.EPURAhascommittedallofitsremainingmoniestotheGrandstandsProjectandtheFaçadeImprovementProgram.Theprojectedpropertytaxincrementfor2010isexpectedtobeapproximately$20,400.Thedraftbudgetreflects$20,400availableforprojectsandnomoneybudgetedforadministration,whichwilllikelybetakenoverbyTownpersonnel.Dir.Smithrecommendedproceedingwithpostingthepublicnoticeforadoptionofthebudget.TheCommissionersdiscussedtheFaçadeImprovementProgramacknowledgingitsbenefits,butquestioningwhethertheprogramshouldbediscontinuedsotheremainingfundscanbeusedontheGrandstandsProject,orifanendingdateshouldbeimposed.Originally,$90,000wasdedicatedtotheFaçadeImprovementProgramwithnospecifiedendingdate.Dir.Smithreportedthatapproximately$40,000hasbeencommittedtotheprogramthusfarandanticipatesadditionalapplicationswillbereceivednowthatthebusyseasoniswindingdown.Afterdiscussion,itwasmovedandseconded(White/Little)tocontinuetheFaçadeImprovementProgramuntilthe$90,000originallyappropriatedtotheprogram
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGS-________________EstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthority—September16,2009—Page2hasbeenutilized,anditpassed.Thosevoting‘Yes”CommissionersLittle,NewsomandWhite.ThosevotinguNoCommissionersBlumeandHalburnt.Itwasmovedandseconded(LiffleM!hite)thatDir.SmithpublicizetheNoticeofProposedBudgetinordertoproceedwiththebudgetadoptionprocess,anditpassedunanimously.LOCALPREFERENCEADDENDUMTOGRANDSTANDSINVITATIONTOBID.ChairmanNewsomvoicedconcernthatdelayingthebiddingprocessinordertowriteandadvertiseanaddendumtotheInvitationtoBidmayresultintheGrandstandsProjectnotbeingcompletedonschedule,andopenedthefloorfordiscussion.JerryMiller,Townresidentandlicensedarchitect,spokeinfavorofaddingalocalpreferenceaddendumtothebiddocumentsandextendingthebiddateasacourtesytobidders.Hesaidaddendumlanguageandprocessessimilartothefederalgovernment’sMinorityBusinessEnterprise(MBE)selectionprocesscouldbeutilizedwhichwouldrequirebidderstodemonstratethattheirproposalsincludebidsfromlocalsubcontractorsforaspecificdollaramountofthetotalcontract.MarkWestover,WestoverConstruction,supportedlocalpreferenceandquestionedwhetherlocalpreferencemightdiscouragevalleycontractorsfrombiddingontheproject.Hesaidageneralcontractorshouldbechosenbasedonqualifications,expertise,andprice.RogerThorp,ThorpAssociates,architectfortheGrandstandsProject,reviewedmethodsutilizedtoraiseawarenessandgenerateinterestintheprojectwhichincludednewspaperarticles,legalnotices,anannouncementattheEstesValleyContractorsAssociationmeeting,advertisementintheDailyJournal(apublicationwithcirculationthroughoutColoradoandWyoming),theTown’swebsite,andplanroomsinFortCollins,Denver,andCheyenne.Hestatedthatapproximately60%oftheoverallcostoftheprojectwillbeforthesteelbuildingandbleachersandsuggested10%asareasonablefigureforlocalpreferenceonaprojectofthistype.Mr.Thorprecommendedissuinganaddendumnotifyingcontractorsthatlocalpreferenceintheamountof10%ofthetotalconstructioncostswillbeappliedtotheproject,butopposedextendingthebidclosingdate.Headvisedthatatthistimeratherthantoextendthebiddeadline,localpreferencebeconsideredasthebidsarereviewed.Followingdiscussionitwasmovedandseconded(HalburntlBlume)that10%oftheoverallconstructioncostsoftheGrandstandsProjectbeawardedlocally,withlocalbeingdefinedaswithintheEstesValleyplanningarea,andthatanaddendumtotheInvitationtoBidbeissuedSeptember16,2009,withnoextensionofthebiddeadlinedate,anditpassedunanimously.Mr.ThorpinvitedtheCommissionerstoparticipateinthebidopeningforthedemolitionoftheexistinggrandstandswhichwilltakeplaceonSeptember16,2009,at2:00p.m.inRoom130oftheTownHall.EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR’SREPORT.1.GrandstandsUpdate—Biddeadlineforthedemolitionofthegrandstandsis2:00p.m.September16,2009,andbidsforgrandstandconstructionaredueonSeptember22,2009.2.Resignation—Dir.SmithsubmittedhisresignationasEPURAExecutiveDirectoreffectiveOctober13,2009.HeexpressedhisappreciationtotheCommissionersandhishopesforEPURA’scontinuedsuccess.OnbehalfoftheCommissioners,ChairmanNewsomregretfullyacceptedDir.Smith’s
RECORDOFPROCEEDINGSEstesParkUrbanRenewalAuthority—September16,2009—Page3resignationandthankedhimforhisprofessionalleadershipandcontributionstoEPURA.CommissionerHalburntstatedthatDeputyTownAdministratorRichardsonwillassumethedutiesoftheEPURAExecutiveDirector.Whereupon,ChairmanNewsomadjournedtheregularmeetingat9:17am.CynthiaDeats,DeputyTownClerk
CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:DavidShirk,Plannert&’Date:October27,2009Subject:WonderviewVillageSecondSupplementalCondominiumMap(Unit12)Background.OnMay23,2006,theTownBoardapprovedthePreliminaryCondominiumMapforWonderviewVillage,aseventeenunitresidentialdevelopmentcurrentlyunderconstruction.Theapplicant(SteveMurphree)nowrequeststofinalizethefourthunitofthiscondominiumsubdivision.Theremainingthirteenunitswillbefinalizedasdevelopmentproceeds.Themapisconsistentwiththeapproveddevelopmentplanandpreliminaryplat.Budget.N/AAction.Staffrecommendsapprovalofthe“CondominiumMapofWonderviewVillageCondominiumsUnit12”CONDITIONALTO:1)Compliancewithoriginalpreliminarycondominiummapapproval(May23,2006).2)CompliancewithapproveddevelopmentplanofWonderviewVillage.3)Servicelinesandmeterlocationsshallbedelineatedontheplansheet.
UMC-r tZ.\
1
(
____________
____
WONDERVIEW VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM AP (SUPPLEMENTAL MAP #3)UNIT 1pij
LOCATED IN THE S 1/2 OF SECTION 24,T5N,R73W OF THE 6TH P.M,Ifl’\SEP 25 2009
COUNTY OF LARIMER,STATE OF COLORADO U U_________
LeGEND:
0
CANER,.COAAIAA hEutAl
cA DOWN CADAMO 01101(1
SOBFEF0
L1(A(0 C MAE CMII —
PROJECT DENCOBARK:
DOUGlAS OlGA
DUO VETOR’S CERTIFICATO:
ADMOA &(jCnO.MilD ACM OCR lION Al IA AIIM.CANAStAAt1410MAOAlAARAAAIUAA00ARMADAWEANIDALAID
AlICIA GA CADEt AAWAMIACA At IMPOAAES (AltAr,AD’AD
BOARD OF TRUSTEES LDAALPJLAAA:
WICAMI ME MDAAIW II Al WOO IWA1AAA Al NA tARtCA
DEDICATION:
CMDOfloA A PAAOCMA 0 MEANOI JIWIWIIMA AD RMA
0 OAANDAA flRl GAO ME OAR 1(1(1001 RI AtM.At ACM
A 1110101 Al 001101 IAAWACM,A ME ARIA ADAIAWI AL 70
AMMMIAAS AAAIAAAAAAMAANAARA (LIDIARARAII At NEAt
S
0
w040EI41’
(34 o’yPASS)
BASIS OF BRA/lANE:
OCADNEA MA COLA AA AIR lOCAl AlA Al AlA AD.A/A.AWRERNA
VESTED BIGIITS STATEMENT:
CommunityDevelopmentDepartmentMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTwsteesTownAdministratorHalbumtFrom:DavidShirk,PlannerDate:October27,2009Subject:AmendedPlatofLots9-12,andaportionofLot8,Block1,EstesParkAmendedPlatBackground.ThisisarequestbyThomasWidawksi(propertyowner)tocombinefivelotsintotwolots.Thepropertiesarelocatedat203/205ParkLane(northfromBondPark,andeastofVirginiaDrive).Theownerplansonrenovatingtheexistingbuildings,whichstraddleexistingpropertylines.Thepurposeoftheamendedplatistoeliminatethoselotlines,originallycreatedwiththeTownofEstesParkplatin1906.Thisplatwillconsolidatethoselotsintoaconfigurationthat“fits”theexistingstructures,andwillprovideappropriateeasementsforutilityservicelines.Thisrequesthasbeensubmittedtoallapplicablereviewingagencystaffforconsiderationandcomment.Nosignificantissuesorconcernswereexpressedbyreviewingstaffrelativetocodecomplianceortheprovisionofpublicservices,thoughagenciescommentshavebeenincludedassuggestedconditionsofapproval.Thesecommentsfocusedoneasementsanddraftingrequirements.
ExistingConfigurationBudget.N/AProposedConfigurationAction.AttheirregularlyscheduledSeptember15meeting,theEstesValleyPlanningCommissionfound:1.ThisproposalcomplieswithapplicablesectionsoftheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode.2.Thisrequesthasbeensubmittedtoallapplicablereviewingagencystaffforconsiderationandcomment.Nosignificantissuesorconcernswereexpressedbyreviewingstaffrelativetocodecomplianceortheprovisionofpublicservices.3.Withinsixty(60)daysoftheBoard’sapprovaloftheamendedplat,thedevelopershallsubmitthefinalplatforrecording.Iftheamendedplatisnotsubmittedforrecordingwithinthissixty-daytimeperiod,theapprovalshallautomaticallylapseandbenullandvoid.4.ThisisaPlanningCommissionrecommendationtheTownBoard;Basedontheforegoing,thePlanningCommissionvotedtorecommendAPPROVALoftheAmendedPlatofLots9,10,11,and12,andaportionofLot8Block1,SecondAmendedPlatTownofEstesParkCONDITIONALTOcompliancewithmemosfromEPSD,TownAttorneyWhite,andPublicWorks(attached).SUGGESTEDMOTION:ImovetorecommendAPPROVALoftheproposedamendedplattotheTownBoardofTrusteeswiththefindingsandconditionsrecommendedbythePlanningCommission.—V-j‘A:-—3—;II-Lj•‘L——fl4atzrcant.I—-_,-—•Page2
EstesParkSanitationDistrictPCBox722,EstesPark,CO80517August21,2009DaveShirkTownofEstesParkFaxNumber:970.586.0249RE:EstesParkAmendedPlat(Widawski)Attention:DaveShirkConcerningPlanningCommissioncommentsforanAmendPlatforLots9,10,11,12&aportionatBlock8,Block1,2ndAmendedPlotTownofEstesPark,thedirectorshadthefollowingcomments:1.ThesewerlineforLot8AneedstobemovedoutfromunderthefootprintofHeirloomJewelers(201ParkLane)andthesewerlineeasementforLot8AneedstobeallLot9A.AportionoftheeasementappearstoextendundertheHeirloomJewelersbuilding.2.AsewerlineeasementfortheHeirloomJewelers(201ParkLane)needstobeshownontheplot.Theprivateeasementshownontheplotdoesnotextendtothepropertylineofthe201ParkLane.3.Atsomepointtherewilllikelybethreedifferentownersallsharingasewerlineinthisarea.Soallcurrentandfutureownersareawareofthesituation,asharedsewerlineagreementbetweenthethreelots(including201ParkLane)needstobeexecutedandrecordedwithLarimerCounty.AcopyofthedocumentshallbeprovidedtotheDistrict.4.Thesewerlineneedsimprovement.ThelineshallbereplacedwithasixinchservicelinefromtheconnectingmanholeintheislandalongVirginiaDrive.TheDistrictisworkingwithMr.Widawskiconcerningthisreplacement.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecallmeat586-2866.Fax586-4712.Sincerely,JamesDuellDistrictManagerc.DavidBangs,VHEOffice:1201GravesAvenue970.586.2866/Plant:610BigThompsonAve970.586.3516Fax:970.586.4712
PagelofiDaveShirkFrom:JamesDuellUldepsd@qwestoffice.net]Sent:Wednesday,September23,200911:06AMTo:Miller,Jerry;ConnieBowser;DaveShirk;Edwards,AdamSubject:RE:ProspectInndevelopmentHelloConmeAsperconversationwithJerryMiller,pleaseallowthisemailtoreflectthattheDistrictandTomWidawskiareinagreementwiththeprocessforreplacingthesewerservicelinetotheproposedProspectInnonParkLane.Thetimingforthereplacementwillbethisfalloncecommercialactivityslowsdownsufficientlytominimizeanydisruptiontoneighboringbusinesses.JamesDuellEstesParkSanitationDistrictThistransmission,includinganyattachments,maycontaininformationthatisprivileged,confidentialand/orexemptfromdisclosureunderlaw.Ifyouarenottheintendedrecipient,anydisclosure,copying,distributionoruseoftheinformationinthismessage,includinganyreliancethereonbyyouoranyotherthirdperson,isprohibited.Ifyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleaseimmediatelycontactthesenderanddestroythismessageinbothelectronicandanyhardcopyformats.9/24/2009
NorthParkPlace1423West29thStreetLoveland,Colorado$0538GREGORYA.WHITEAttorneyatLaw970/667-5310Fax970/667-2527DAVESHIRK,PLANNERIICOMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDEPTTOWNOFESTESPARKP0BOX1200ESThSPARK,CO80517Re:PreliminaryAmendedPlatandAmendedPlat—Lots9,10,11,12&13&aportionofLot8,Block1,TownofEstesPark-WidawsidDearMr.Shirk:PreliminaryPlatIIhavenocomment.AmendedNatIhavethefollowingcomments:1.ThePlatshowsaccessandmaintenanceeasements.Bothoftheseshallbelabeledasprivatemutualaccessagreementandprivateaccessandmaintenanceeasement.2.TheDedicationStatementdedicatesperpetualpubliceasementsfortheinstallationandmaintenanceofutilitiesanddrainage.AstherearenopubliceasementsontheAmendedPlat,thisreferenceintheDedicationStatementshallbedeleted.3.TheAmendedPlatcontainsthewords“proposedpropertyline”.ThisdesignationshouldberemovedfromtheAmendedPlat.GAW/ldrCc:VanHornFax:970/586-8101acall.August13,2009Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleaseDavid
ESTES_PARKC0L0RAD0MemoTownofEstesPerkPu!kWoki.&JtIesTo:TracyFeagansAugust21,2009WidawskiAmendedPlatat205ParkLanePlannerDaveShirk,BobGoehring,JeffBoles,ToddSteichen,ReubenBetgsten,ScottZurnandGregSieversBackground:ThePublicWorksandUtilitiesOepartmentshaveenclosedprogresscommentsregardingthesubmittalsreceivedtodateandremaingeneralasthesubmittalsarenotcompleteandconstructiondrawingsforthepublicimprovementshavenotbeensubmitted.ItisimportanttonotethattheseDepartmentsreservetherighttomakeadditionalcommentsandrevisecommentsasmotedetailisprovidedinthesubsequentsubmittalsanddevelopmentplans.Engineering:HerearePWcommentsontheParkLaneBuilding,proposedAmendedPlatforLots9,10,11,12,etc.Block1TownofEstesPark.1)TheprovideddrawingneedtoshowtheutilityservicestoHeirloomJewelsbuilding.ThiswillhelpustomoteefficientlyreviewtheAmendedPlatforaccuracyandanypossibleutilityeasementconcerns.2)Showwatermetersonallproperties.(forsamereasonas#1)3)Showsewerservicestoallproperties.4)Showelectricmeterstoallproperties.5)Identify“public”RightsofWay.6)Clearlyidentifyownershipofthelandscape/concretepropertyontheSWcornerofsubjectproperty.7)Lot9Amayneedalandscape,utility,publicaccesseasementattheSWcorner.8)ProvideapublicaccesseasementalongthesouthfaceofLot8A,andSEcornerofLot9A.9)OHUatwalkingbridgeareaneedstobe‘within’theeasement.Partofitisoutside.10)ThefulllengthofVirginiaDrivesidewalkneedsapublicaccesseasement.11)ShowwatermainallalongtheParkLaneside.12)Thereisanunidentifiedfaint-dashedlinealongthesouthsidewalkofLot9A,partofwhichhasabearinganddistance.13)Showexistingor‘tobeabandon’OWlineandmeterlocations,andexplainmoreclearlywhat’sgoingonwiththem.14)Provideanelectricorutilityeasementalongsouthsidefortheexistingstreetlights.From:Date:Re:•Page1
,,.%——-.‘S-*a\‘\-S-‘.\d’9)Add15’EasementsforUndergroundElectricUtilityandrepair,maintenanceandreplacementofstreetlightsalongParkLane10)Addnote,“Waterlineabandoned.”Totheabandonedline.15)Adddatesofolddedicats(book778—etc).Liiht&PowerandWater:BelowarethecommentsfromEstesParkUtilities,WaterandLight&Power:1)Add15’EasementforOverheadElectricServiceto201ParkLN-2)PrimaryElectricalongVirginiaDriverequires15’Easement___—\——-—.._.——•3)Add15’easementForOverheadElectriclineina’ley4)AddUndergroundElectricservice5)ChangeelectricboxtoTelcoBox6)Addtolegend,Easementline&UndergroundUtilities7)AddElectricCabinetatbaseofpoleonVirginiaDrive8)ClarifywhichoverheadlineswillstayandtheonelinebeingremovedtgntOve,h,dCommunLc,onO,s1QWt5T—EotPage2
11)Insureconstructionpen...Lspecifieseachservicerequiresadedatedmeter.VerifyexistingOWlineisisolatedfromabandonedline.IJn4çnindndrp$r,narntnicar,plcm,ofhØits13)CrossConnectionRequirements:a.Allservicelinesarerequitedtohaveanapprovedbackflowpreventiondeviceinstalledforcontainmentpurposes.Thedevicetypewillbedependantuponthehazardassociatedwiththeservice(highhazardorlowhazard).ThedevicewillbetestedbyaCertifiedCross-ConnectionTechnicianuponinstallationandannuallythereafter.b.Allirrigationsystemsarerequiredtohaveanapprovedbackflowpreventiondeviceinstalledforisolationpurposes.ThedevicewillbetestedbyaCertifiedCross-ConnectionTechnicianuponinstallationandannuallythereafter.c.ContacttheCross-ConnectionControlSpecialistat970-577-3625withanyquestionsregardingthebackflowrequirementsforthisproperty..4%4%..4%4%4%12)ShowfuturePage3
IESTES___PARKCOLORADOMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:AlisonChilcoff,PlannerII,andDate:October21,2009Re:TownofEstesParkCommunityDevelopmentRoom210,TownHallP.O.Box1200,EstesPark,CO80517BobJoseph,CommunityDevelopmentDirectorFinalSubdivisionPlat,AmendedPlatofLots15,16,and17,Block2,TheNeighborhood,PawneeMeadows,LLC/ApplicantFirstAmendmenttotheDevelopmentAgreementforTheNeighborhoodSubdivision,PawneeMeadows,LLC/ApplicantBackground.Thismemoisrelatedtoitems3.1.Cand3.1.DontheOctober27thTownBoardagenda.FinalSubdivisionPlatPawneeMeadows,LLChassubmittedafinalsubdivisionplatapplicationtosubdividethreeR-1-zonedlotsinPhaseIIofTheNeighborhoodsubdivision(Lots15,16,and17,Block2)intofivelots.TownBoardapprovedthepreliminaryplatapplicationforthissubdivisiononJuly28,2009.Thisplatwillincreasethetotalnumberofsingle-familylotsinTheNeighborhoodsubdivisionfromthirtytothirty-twoandincreasethenumberofattainablelotsfromfifteentoseventeen.StaffwillreviewandapprovearevisedAttainableHousingAgreementidentifyingwhichseventeenlotswillbedeed-restrictedasattainable.Therevisedagreementwillberecordedwiththissubdivisionplat.
Belowisalocationmapandtheportionofthefinalplatshowingtheapprovedlotconfiguration.7’Hh’NMGHBt)RHOOD•4TalonsPointe‘vkCt_____isa[RidgejStaffrecommendsthatapprovalofthefinalsubdivisionplatapplicationbeconditionedoncompliancewiththepreliminaryplatapplication.TheJuly22,2009TownBoardstaffreportdescribingthepreliminaryplatconditionsofapprovalisattached.Planningstaffroutedthisapplicationtoaffectedagenciesforreviewandcomment.Commentsfromthefollowingagenciesareattached.•EstesParkPublicWorksandUtilities.TracyFeagans’October16,2009memo.•LarimerCountyTaxAssessor.MeganHarrity’sOctober8,2009email.DevelopmentAgreementThe2005DevelopmentAgreementbetweentheTownandPawneeMeadows,LLCandaproposedamendmenttothisagreementareattached.Theamendmentclarifiesthatthelotscreatedwiththeabove-mentionedsubdivisionaresubjecttotheagreement.Budget.Theapplicanthasrequestedfeewaivers.ThisrequestwillbescheduledforCommunityDevelopmentCommitteeandTownBoardreviewinNovember.Action.Approvalofthefinalplatapplicationwiththefollowingconditionsofapproval:1.Compliancewiththeapprovedpreliminaryandfinalplatapplications.2.Priortoplatrecordation,electricinfrastructureshallbeinstalledtoLightandPower’ssatisfactionandelectricworkshallbepaidinfull.CH1W%((IIRIo0-2•Page2
3.Priortoplatrecordation,2007and2008propertytaxesforLots15,16,and17,Block2shallbepaidinfull.Q4.AnamendedDevelopmentAgreementshallbereviewedandapprovedbyTownBoardandshallberecordedconcurrentlywiththisfinalplat.5.ArevisedAttainableHousingAgreementshallbereviewedandapprovedbystaffandshallberecordedconcurrentlywiththisfinalplat.•Page3
TownofEstesParkCommunityDevelopmentC0L0RAD0Room210,TownHallP.O.Box1200,EstesPark,CO80517MemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:AlisonChilcott,PlannerII,andBobJoseph,CommunityDevelopmentDirectorDate:July22,2009Re:PreliminarySubdivisionPlat,AmendedPlatofLots15,16,and17,Block2,TheNeighborhood,PawneeMeadows,LLC/Applicant.Background.PawneeMeadows,LLChassubmittedapreliminaryplatapplicationtosubdividethreeR-1-zonedlotsinPhaseIlofTheNeighborhoodsubdivision(Lots15,16,and17,Block2)intofivelots.PawneeMeadows,LLCdescribesintheirstatementofintentthatthisisanefforttokeeptheprojectviablegiventheslowsales.Increasingthenumberoflotsreducestheinfrastructurecostsperlot,allowinghomesontheselotstobesoldforabout$20,000lessthanhomesbuiltonotherlotsinthesubdivision,whilealsoincreasingthehomesizebyaboutfifteenpercent.Thissubdivisionwouldincreasethetotalnumberofsingle-familylotsinTheNeighborhoodfromthirtytothirty-twoandthenumberattainable(deed-restricted)lotsfromfifteentoseventeen.ESTESPARKTheEstesValleyPlanningCommissionrecommendedapprovalofthepreliminaryplatattheirJune76,2009meeting.Belowisalocationmapandcopyofthepreliminaryplat.TIlE.‘E1t;IIBOIIH(U;I)TalonsPointetC••.RedTailHawkCt•.,.;SaIud.t.,\Vç.I“1
0Action.ApprovalofthepreliminaryplatapplicationwiththeEstesValleyPlanningCommissionsfindingsandrecommendedconditionsofapproval.1.Compliancewiththesubmittedapplication.2.NochangestotheoriginalNeighborhoodsubdivisionapprovalareapprovedexceptthosenotedinthestaffreport.3.Aminormodificationtotheside-yardsetbacktoallowplatted7.5-footsidesetbacksononeside,providedthereisa12.5-footsetbackontheoppositeside.4.Fencingonindividuallotsshallberestrictedto40inchesinheight.QBudget.FeewaivershavebeenrequestedandwillbescheduledforCommunityDevelopmentCommitteeandTownBoardreview.•Page2
mlISCOTTDOYLE,CLERK•‘ILRINERCOUNTYCO200tr-00619540s_—t.\.>tJ/jj-IIPAGES—8FEE$41.00DOC$0.00#494424DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTTHISAGREEMENTiseffectivethis28thdayofJune,2005,byandbetweenPAWNEEMEADOWS,LL.C.,aColoradolimitedliabilitycorporation,hereinafterreferredtoas“Owner,”andtheTownofEstesPark,amunicipalcorporationoftheStateofColorado,hereinafterreferredtoas“theTown”.WITNESSETH:WHEREAS,theTownhasreceivedapetitionforannexationofthepropertymoreparticularlydescribedonExhibitA,whichisattachedhereto,incorporatedherein,andmadeaparthereof(suchpropertyishereafterreferredtoas“theProperty”);andWHEREAS,theOwnerhassubmittedaPreliminaryPlatforthesubdivisionoftheproperty;andWhEREAS,itistothemutualbenefitofthepartiesheretotoenterintothisagreementregardingtheannexationanddevelopmentofthePropertyintheTownandothermattersassetforthherein;andWIIEREAS,OwneracknowledgesthePropertyissubjecttoallordinances,resolutions,andotherregulationsoftheTown,astheymaybeamendedfromtimetotime;andWHEREAS,partoftheconsiderationfortheannexationofthePropertyintotheTownistheexecutionandapprovalofthisDevelopmentAgreementbytheparties.NOW,THEREFORE,INCONSIDERATIONOFTHEABOVEPREMISESANDTIlECOVENANTSASHEREINAFTERSETFORTH,ITISAGREEDBYANDBETWEENTHEPARTIESASFOLLOWS:1.ThepurposeofthisAgreementistosetforththetermsandrequirementsofthedevelopmentofthePropertyintheTown.Exceptasexpresslyprovidedforhereintothecontrary,alltermsandrequirementshereinareinadditiontoallrequirementscontainedintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeandtheEstesValleyComprehensivePlan.2.ThepartiesrecognizethatitistheintentanddesireofOwnertodevelopthePropertygenerallyconsistentwiththezoningandlandusessetforthinParagraph12below,andthatthegrantingofsuchzoningbytheTownisamaterialconsiderationoftheOwner’sagreementtoannexthePropertytotheTown.3.TheTownagreestomakeavailabletothePropertyalloftheusualmunicipalservicesprovidedbytheTowninaccordancewiththeordinancesandpoliciesoftheTown.TheservicesprovidedbytheTowninclude,butarenotlimitedto,policeprotection,water,electricity,andfireprotectiopLTOWNOFESTESPARK;JATIN:TOWNClERK’SOFFICE1P.O.BOX1200ESTESPARK,CO80517
policeprotection,water,electricity,andfireprotection.OwneracknowledgesthatTownservicesdonotinclude,wastewaterserviceswhichareprovidedbytheUpperThompsonSanitationDistrict.4.RequiredpublicimprovementsshallbedesignedandconstructedtoTownstandardsbyOwnerandatOwner’sexpense.OwnerfurtheragreestoprovidefinancialguaranteesforconstructionofallrequiredimprovementsassetforthineachphaseofthedevelopmentandtodedicatetotheTownanyoralloftheimprovementsasrequiredbyTownordinances.5.Thededicationofpubliceasementsforutilities,rights-of-wayforstreetsandotherpublicwaysshallbebysubdivisionplatorappropriateinstrumentofconveyanceacceptabletotheTown.SuchdedicationsshalloccuratthesubdivisionofthePropertyunlesstheTownspecifiesanothertime.TheTownandtheOwneragreethatsuchdedicationsshallonlybeforthoseeasements,rights-of-wayforstreetsandotherpublicwaysdirectlyrelatedtoandgeneratedbythedevelopmentintendedtooccurwithinthePropertyandthatnotalcingtherebywilloccurrequiringanycompensation.6.On-siteandrequiredoff-sitewaterandwastewatermainsandappurtenancesshallbeconstructedtoTownandSanitationDistrictstandardsbyOwneratOwner’sexpense.7.ItisintendedbybothpartiesthatthefullareawillbezonedanddevelopedgenerallyasdescribedinthepreliminaryplatsubmittedforreviewandrecommendedforapprovalbytheEstesValleyPlanningCommission.8.Owneragreesthatthedesign,improvement,construction,development,anduseofthePropertyshallbeinconformancewithallapplicablelawsandordinancesandthatOwnershallcomplywithallTownordinances,resolutionsandregulationsincluding,butnotlimitedto,ordinances,resolutionsandregulationspertainingtoannexation,subdivision,zoning,stormdrainage,utilities,accesstoTownstreetsandfloodcontrol,unlessspecificprovisionsofthisAgreementprovideotherwise.9.IntheeventthattheTown,eitherbyTownBoardactionorinactionorbyinitiativeorreferendum,takesanyactioncontrarytotheDeveloper’sdevelopmentrights,asdescribedinParagraphs11and12,Owner,initssolediscretion,shallhavetheoptiontodisconnectthePropertyfromtheTown.Insuchevent,Townagreestoactingoodfaithtoaccomplishsuchdisconnectionasexpeditiouslyaspossible.IntheeventofanydisconnectionaspermittedinthisParagraph,thefollowingshallapply:.(a)Individualdevelopmentprojects(i.e.forwhichfinalplatsorplanshavebeenapproved)withinthePropertywhichhavebeenbuiltupto25%ofanticipatedfinalbuildoutshallnotbeincludedinanydisconnectionoftheProperty;CD2
(b)IntheeventofanactionbytheTownwhichwouldgiverisetothedisconnectionremedysetforthherein,theOwnershallgivetheTownatleastsixty(60)dayswrittennoticeofsuchdefaultandtheirintentiontoseekdisconnection,andtheTownshallhavearighttodoanyactwhichwouldremoveorterminatetheOwner’srighttodisconnectthePropertypursuanttotheprovisionsofthisparagraphduringtheabovestatedsixty(60)dayperiod.10.ThePartiesagreethatifanypart,term,portion,orprovisionofthisAgreementisheldbyacourtofcompetentjurisdictiontobeillegalorinconflictwithanylawoftheStateofColoradooranyfederallaw,thevalidityoftheremainingparts,term,portions,orprovisionsshallnotbeaffected,andtherightsandobligationsofthepartiesshallbeconstruedandenforcedasiftheAgreementdidnotcontaintheparticularpart,term,portion,orprovisionheldtobeinvalid.11.Recognizingthevalueofattainablehousingandthenatureofattainablehousing,theTownshallnotrequirethesubdivisionofthepropertytoincludeopenspace.12.Asconsiderationfortheannexation,rezoningandsubdivisionoftheProperty,thePartiesagreethatthemaximumdevelopmentonthePropertyshallbeasfollows:A.TheownershallhavetherighttodevelopBlock1andBlock2intheR-1zoningdistrictas;1).15singlefamilyattainablehousingunitsuponsinglefamilylotswithaminimumlotareaof5,000squarefeet.AttainableshallbeasdefinedintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeasamendedhereinas;OwneroccupiedhousingunitsthatareattainabletohouseholdsearningtheLarimerCountyAreaMedianIncomeorbelow,adjustedforhouseholdsize,andUnitsshallberestrictedtoassuretheavailabilityoftheunitforsaletopersonsmeetingtheincomeguidelinesanddefinitionsetforthintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode,asamendedherein,foraperiodofnotlessthan30years,and2).15singlefamilyhousingunitsuponsinglefamilylotswithaminimumlotareaof5,000squarefeet.B.TheownershallhavetherighttodevelopBlock3inthe0-OfficezoningdistrictasdescribedontheconceptplanreviewedbytheTownandsubjecttothevestedrightsperioddescribedherein.SaidBlock3shallreverttoREzoningifdevelopmentisnotinitiatedandcompletedwithinsaidvestedrightsperiod.13ThePartiesagreethattheywillcooperatewithoneanotherinaccomplishingtheterms,conditions,andprovisionsoftheAgreementandwillexecutesuchadditionaldocumentsasnecessarytoeffectuatethesame.3
I14.ExceptasspecificallyotherwiseprovidedinthisAgreement,noPartyshallinanywayassumeanyoftheliabilityoftheotherPartyforanyactorobligationoftheotherParty.15.ThisAgreementmaybeamendedonlybymutualagreementoftheTownandOwner.Suchamendmentsshallbeinwriting,shallbecovenantsrunningwiththeland,andshallbebindinguponallpersonsorentitieshavinganinterestinthePropertysubjecttotheamendmentunlessotherwisespecifiedintheamendment.16.ThisAgreementembodiestheentireagreementoftheParties.Therearenopromises,terms,conditions,orobligationsotherthanthosecontainedherein,andthisAgreementsupersedesallpreviouscommunications,representations,oragreements,eitherverbalorwritten,betweentheParties.17.AsusedinthisAgreement,theterm“Owner”shallincludeanyofthetransferees,successors,orassignsofOwner,andallsuchPartiesshallhavetherighttoenforcethisAgreement,andshallbesubjecttothetermsofthisAgreementasiftheyweretheoriginalpartiesthereto.IntheeventofatransferofalloranyportionoftheProperty,thetransferringOwnershallberelievedofanyandallobligationsundertheAgreementwhichariseafterthedateofsuchtransferwithrespecttothetransferredProperty,providedthatthetransfereeassumesinwritingallsuchobligations.SaidwrittenassumptionsofallobligationsandreleaseofliabilityshallbeeffectiveonlyuponreceiptandwrittenapprovalbytheTown.()18.ThisAgreementshallbebindinguponandinuretothebenefitofthePartiesheretoandthetransferees,successors,andassignshereof,andshallconstitutecovenantsrunningwiththeland.ThisAgreementshallberecordedwiththeCountyClerkandRecorderofLarimerCounty,Colorado,atOwner’sexpense.Subjecttotheconditionsprecedentherein,thisAgreementmaybeenforcedinanycourtofcompetentjurisdiction.19.(a)BreachbyOwner,Town’sRemedies.IntheeventofadefaultorbreachbytheOwnerofanyterm,condition,covenant,orobligationunderthisAgreement,theTownmaytakesuchactionasitdeemsnecessarytoprotectthepublichealth,safety,andwelfare;toprotectlotbuyersandbuilders,andtoprotectthecitizensoftheTown.TheTown’sremediesinclude:(I)ThereftisaltoissuetotheOwneranydevelopmentpermit,buildingpermit,orcertificateofoccupancy;(II)Ademandthatthesecuritygivenforthecompletionofthepublicimprovementsbepaidorhonored;04
((III)TherefusaltoconsiderfurtherdevelopmentplanswithintheProperty,and/or(IV)RezonethePropertyoranyportionthereofwhichhasnotbeendeveloped;(V)Anyotherremedyavailableatlaw.Unlessnecessarytoprotecttheimmediatehealthsafety,andwelfareoftheTownorTownresidents,theTownshallprovidetheOwnerten(10)days’writtennoticeofitsintenttotakeanyactionunderthisParagraphduringwhichten-dayperiodtheOwnermaycurethebreachdescribedinsaidnoticeandpreventfurtheractionbytheTown.(b)BreachbyTown,Owner’sRemedies.ThePartiesagreethatintheeventofabreachbytheTownofthisAgreement,OwnerwillhavetherighttoseekonlytheremediesprovidedforimpairmentofOwner’svestedpropertyrightsassetforthinSection24-68-105,C.R.S.ordisconnectionofthePropertyoraportionthereofpursuanttoParagraph9herein.20.ThePartiesagreethattheOwnershallnotberesponsibletotheTownforanylitigationcost,includingattorneys’feesandcourtcosts,incurredbytheTownasaresultofanythirdpartyclaimmadeagainsttheTownarisingoutofthetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement.21.IfanyPartybreachesthisAgreement,thebreachingpartyshallpaythenon-breachingparty’sreasonablecostsandattorney’sfeesincurredintheenforcementofthetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement.22.OwnershallnotifytheTown,inwritingof,anysaleortransferoftheProperty,andthename,address,andtelephonenumberofthetransferee.UponthesaleorothertransferofanyportionoftheProperty,thetransferorofsuchportionshallbereleasedfromallliabilityandobligationunderthisAgreementrelatingtosuchportionprovidedthatallsuchliabilitiesandobligationsshallbeassumedbythetransfereepursuanttothetermsandconditionsofParagraph17above.(unlesstransfereeisahomebuyer,abuyerofdevelopedcommercialproperty,orgovernmentalentity).23.VestedRights.InrecognitionofthelandsizeofthedevelopmentcontemplatedunderthisAgreement,thesubstantialinvestmentandtimerequiredtocompletethedevelopmentoftheproject,thephaseddevelopmentoftheproject,andthepossibleimpactofeconomiccyclesandvaryingmarketconditionsduringthecourseofthedevelopment,theOwnerandtheTownagreethatthevestedrightsestablishedunderthisAgreementshallcommenceontheeffectivedateofthisAgreementandshallcontinueasfollows:5
(((a)DevelopmentshallcommenceonBlock1andBlock2withinone(1)yearofapprovalofthepreliminarysubdivisionplatandbecompletedwith3yearsaftertheapprovalofthepreliminaryplat;and(b)DevelopmentshallcommenceonBlock3withinthree(3)yearsoftheeffectivedateofthisAgreementanddevelopmentshallbecompletedonBlock3withinten(10)yearsoftheeffectivedateofthisAgreement(theVestingPeriod)“Vestedrights”shallapplyonlytozoningandlanduseapprovalsoncethoseapprovalshavebeenmade.AftertheexpirationoftheVestingPeriod,suchvestedrightsshallbedeemedterminatedandofnofurtherforceoreffect;provided,however,thatsuchterminationshallnotaffect(a)theannexationofthePropertytotheTown;(b)anycommon-lawvestedrightsobtainedpriortosuchtermination;(c)anyrightarisingfromTownbuildingpermitsissuedpriortotheexpirationoftheVestingPeriod;or(U)anysubdivisionoftheProperty.24.AllnoticesrequiredunderthisAgreementshallbeinwritingandshallbehand-deliveredorsentthefacsimiletransmissionorfirstclassmail,postageprepaidtotheaddressesofthepartieshereinsetforth.Allnoticebyhand-deliveryshallbeeffectiveuponreceipt.Allfacsimiletransmissionsshallbeeffectiveupontransmissionsreceipt,providedahardcopyismailedthesamedate.Allnoticesbymailshallbeconsideredeffectiveseventy-two(72)hoursafterdepositintheUnitedStatesmailwiththeproperaddressassetforthbelow.Eitherparty,bynoticesogiven,maychangeaddresstowhichfuturenoticesbesent.NoticetoTown:TownofEstesParkAttn:RandyRepola,TownAdministratorP.O.Box1200EstesPark,CO$0517NoticetoOwner:PawneeMeadows,LL.C.Attn:PaulM.Kochevar,PresidentP.O.Box3047EstesPark,CO8051725.ThisAgreementismadesolelyforthebenefitofthePartiesheretoandisnotintendedtonorshallitbedeemedtoconferrightstoanypersonsorentitiesnotnamedasPartieshereto.26.ThelawsoftheStateofColoradoshallgovernthevalidity,performance,andenforcementoftheAgreement.Shouldeitherpartyinstitutelegalsuitoractionforenforcementofanyobligationcontainedherein,itisagreedthatthevenueofsuchsuitoractionshallbeinLarimerCounty,Colorado.06
27.TheTownisenteringintothisAgreementingoodfaithandwiththepresentintention,onthepartofthepresentTownBoard,thatthisAgreementwillbecompliedwith.However,becausesomeoftheprovisionsofthisAgreementmayinvolveareasoflegaluncertainty,theTownmakesnorepresentationastothevalidityorenforceabilityofthisAgreementandthatnosuchwarrantyismadeonthepartoftheTown.TheOwnersacknowledgethattheannexationandzoningofthePropertyaresubjecttothelegislativediscretionoftheBoardofTrusteesoftheTown.NoassurancesofannexationorzoninghavebeenmadeorrelieduponbytheOwners.Intheeventthat,intheexerciseofitslegislativediscretion,anyactionwithrespecttothePropertyhereincontemplatedisnottaken,thenthesoleandexclusiveremedyforthebreachhereofshallbethewithdrawalofthepetitionforannexationbytheOwners,ordisconnectionfromtheTowninaccordancewithstatelaw,asmaybeappropriate.28.ThisAgreementshallbenullandvoidiftheTownfailstoapprovetheannexation,rezoningandJorsubdivisionofthePropertyasprovidedherein.29.IntheeventofdisconnectionofthePropertyoraportionthereoffromtheTownasaresultofthedefaultoftheTowninthetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement,theTownshallcontinuetoprovidemunicipalelectricserviceandwaterservicetothePropertyifandtotheextentsaidutilityservicewasprovidedpriortodisconnection.Ratespayableforsaidservicesfollowingdisconnectionshallbeout-of4ownratespursuanttotheTown’sutilityratestructure.TOWNOfESTESPARK,COLORADO,AMUNICIPALCORPORATIONBy:ZLp4%%sMayor3’.”-!y:tL_,cQ-toaClerk?bscn1csworntoandacknowledgedbeforeme.—COnrnssionexpires:_______________PAWNERMEADOWS,L.L.C.,ACOLCORPORATIONSubscribed,sworntoandMyCommissionexpires:/0—1£—II1b3(20Y7By:7
IEXHIBITAPROPERTYDESCRIPTIONAportionoftheNW1/4ofSection20,T5N,R72Wofthe6thP.M.,LarimerCounty,ColoradobeingmoteparticularlydescribedascommencingattheW1/4cornerofsaidSection20,asmonumentedbyaBLMbrasscappedpipe,andwithallbeatingscontainedhereinbeingrelativetotheWestlineofsaidNW114consideredasbearingN01°3128”E;thenceN01°31’28Eadistanceof627.22feettotheTRUEPOINTOFBEGINNING:thenceS89°55’59”Eadistanceof1684.37feetalongtheNorthlineoftheHilleryParrackExemptionandtheNorthlineofVistaRidgeSubdivision;thenceS89°59’14”EalongtheNorthlineofVistaRidgeSubdivisionadistanceof177.08feet,moteorless,totheEastright-of-waylineofDryGulchRoad;thenceN12°40’57”Wadistanceof242.02feetalongsaidEastright-of-wayline;thenceN89°5448”Wadistanceof1802.06feetalongtheSouthlineofGoodSamaritanSubdivisiontotheWestlineofsaidNW1/4;thence501°31‘28”Wadistanceof236.91feettotheTRUEPOINTOFBEGtNNING;Containing9.946acres,moreorless.08
FIRSTAMENDMENTTODEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTTHISFIRSTAMENDMENTTODEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT,iseffectivethis___dayof________________2009,byandbetweenPAWNEEMEADOWS,LLC,aColoradolimitedliabilitycorporation(“Owner”)andtheTownofEstesPark,Colorado,aMunicipalCorporation(the“Town”).WITNESSETH:WHEREAS,thepartiesenteredintoaDevelopmentAgreementeffectivethe28thdayofJune,2005,andWHEREAS,theOwnersubmittedaFinalPlatfortheresubdivisionofthreeofthelotsontheProperty;andWHEREAS,itisnecessarytoamendParagraph12oftheDevelopmentAgreementinordertoreflectthechangestothePropertypursuanttotheAmendedPlatofLots15,16and17,Block2,TheNeighborhood.NOW,THEREFORE,INCONSIDERATIONOFTHEABOVERECITATIONSANDTHECOVENANTSANDCONDITIONSCONTAINEDHEREIN,THEPARTIESAGREEASFOLLOWS:1.Paragraph12(A)(1)oftheDevelopmentAgreementbetweenthepartieseffectiveJune28th2005shallbeamendedtoreadasfollows:A.1).17singlefamilyattainablehousingunitswithaminimumlotareaof5,000squarefeet.AttainableshallbeasdefinedintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeasamendedhereinas;OwneroccupiedhousingunitsthatareattainabletohouseholdsearningtheLarimerCountyAreaMedianIncomeorbelow,adjustedforhouseholdsize,andUnitsshallberestrictedtoassuretheavailabilityoftheunitforsaletopersonsmeetingtheincomeguidelinesanddefinitionsetforthintheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode,asamendedherein,foraperiodofnotlessthan30years,and2.AllthetermsandconditionsoftheDevelopmentAgreementshallremaininforceandeffect.
AGREEDTOandsignedbythepartiesthisdayof,2009TOWNOFEsTEsPARKBy:______________________________________MayorATTEST:TownClerk0STATEOFCOLORADO))ss.COUNTYOFLARIMER)TheforegoingFIRSTAMENDMENTTODEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_____dayof_________,2009,byBillPinkham,asMayoroftheTownofEstesPark,amunicipalcorporationestablishedunderthelawsofthestateofColorado.Witnessmyhandandofficialseal.(SEAL)___________________________________NotaryPublicMyCommissionexpires:0
PAwNEEMEADows,LLCBy:ManagerSTATEOFCOLORADO))ss.COUNTYOFLARIMER)TheforegoingFIRsTAMENDMENTTODEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTwasacknowledgedbeforemethis_______dayof_______________,2009,by_____________________,asManagerofPawneeMeadows,LLC,alimitedliabilitycorporationestablishedunderthelawsofthestateofColorado.Witnessmyhandandofficialseal.(SEAL)___________________________________NotaryPublicMyCommissionexpires:
TownClerk’sOfficeCMemoTo:HonorableMayorPinkhamBoardofTrusteesTownAdministratorHalburntFrom:JackieWilliamson,TownClerkDate:October22,2009Subject:Resolution20-09forIntergovernmentalAgreementConcerningElectionServicesandMailBallotPlanBackground.TheTownBoardsetaspecialelectiontobeheldonJanuary12,2010fortheEPURAInitiatedOrdinanceattheirAugust25,2009meeting.SincethattimestaffhasbeenworkingwiththeCountytodraftanIGAbetweentheCountyandtheTownforthespecialmailballotelectionandamailballotplantobesubmittedtotheSecretaryofStateforapproval.ThisagreementplacesmostoftheelectionresponsibilitiesontheCountyClerkandRecorderforthepreparationandconductofthespecialelectionandprovidesfortheappropriateelectioncoststobepaidforbytheTown.TheagreementalsooutlinesthedutiesoftheTownasthepublicentitywhichincludesprovidingtheCountyClerkandRecorderwithacertifiedlegaldescriptionandverificationofthestreetlocator,settingtheballotlanguage,andpublicationsasrequiredbylaw.Budget.Thecurrentestimatedcostoftheelectionis$5,279.Fundshavebeenbudgetedinaccount#101-1400-414-26-01.Action:Imovetoapprove/denyResolution#20-09andtheIntergovernmentalAgreementwiththeCountyforthespecialelectiononJanuary12,2010.
RESOLUTION#20-09WHEREAS,anInitiatedOrdinancePetitionwasfiledwiththeTownClerkonJuly8,2009;andWHEREAS,aStatementofSufficiencyoftheInitiatedOrdinancePetitionwasissuedbytheTownClerkonAugust6,2009;andWHEREAS,onAugust25,2009,theTownBoardreviewedtheStatementofSufficiencyandtheInitiatedOrdinance;andWHEREAS,theTownBoarddidnotadopttheInitiatedOrdinanceaspresented,andasrequiredbySection31-11-104C.R.S.,theTownBoardapprovedResolutionNo.16-09settingaspecialelectionontheInitiatedOrdinanceforJanuary12,2010;andWHEREAS,itisthedecisionoftheTownBoardbytheadoptionofthisResolutiontoholdtheInitiatedOrdinanceelectionofJanuary12,2010bymailballotpursuanttotheprovisionsofSection1-7.5-104C.R.S.;andWHEREAS,theTownBoardherebydeterminesthattheLarimerCountyClerkandRecorder’sOfficeshallconductthemailballotelectiononbehalfoftheTownofEstesPark;andWHEREAS,itisnecessarytoauthorizetheTownClerktofixtheballottitlefortheInitiatedOrdinance.NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:1.ThatpursuanttotheprovisionsofSection1-7.5-104C.R.S.theSpecialElectionofJanuary12,2010shallbeamailballotelectionconductedinconformancewiththeprovisionsofArticle7.5ofTitle1C.R.S.2.ThatScottDoyle,ClerkandRecorderofLarimerCounty,ColoradobeandisherebyappointedastheDesignatedElectionOfficialfortheTownofEstesParkfortheconductofthismailballotelection.3.ThattheMailBallotPlan,acopyofwhichisattachedheretoasExhibitA,befiledwiththeColoradoSecretaryofStatebytheDesignatedElectionOfficial.4.ThattheDesignatedElectionOfficialisherebyauthorizedtomakeanyrequestedchangesintheMailBallotPlanbytheColoradoSecretaryofState.5.ThattheAgreementConcerningElectionServicesbetweentheLarimerCountyClerkandRecorderandtheTownofEstesPark,acopyofwhichisattachedheretoasExhibitB,isherebyapproved.
6.ThattheTownClerkisherebydesignatedbytheBoardofTrusteestofixtheballottitleoftheInitiatedOrdinancefortheSpecialElectiononJanuary12,2010andtransmitsaidballottitletotheDesignatedElectionOfficial.Datedthis,2009.MayorATTEST:TownClerk00
MAILBALLOTPLANCOLORADOSECRETARYOFSTATE1700BRoADwAY,SUITE270DENVER,COLoRADO80290PHONE:303-894-2200FAX:303-869-4861INTRODUCTIONPursuanttosection1-7.5-105(1)oftheColoradoRevisedStatutesandtheColoradoSecretaryofState’sElectionRule12.3.2,thedesignatedelectionofficialresponsibleforconductingamailballotelectionmustsubmitawrittenmailballotplantotheSecretaryofState.Thismailballotplanmustbesubmittedatleastsixty-five(65)dayspriortoaregularspecialdistrictelectionandnolaterthanfifty-five(55)dayspriortoanyotherelection.Additionally,aspecialdistrictmayrequestaseven(7)dayfilingextensionifthemaltballotplanisforaregularspecialdistrictelectionthatmaybecancelled.PleaseseeElectionRule12.3.5formoreinformation.Thefollowingstandardfihtableformisdesignedtoaidyouinyourcompletionandsubmissionoftherequiredmailballotplan.Thisformmaybecompletedonlineandthensavedtoyourcomputer.Onceyouhavesavedtheformtoyourcomputer,youwillbeabletosubmittheentireplantotheSecretaryofState’sofficeviaemail,regularmail,orfax.Pleaserefertotheinstructionsectionbelowformorecompleteguidance.NOTE:Pursuanttosection1-7.5-104,C.RS,amailballotelectioncannotbeheldforelectionsorrecallelectionsthatinvolvepartisancandidatesorelectionsheldincoijunctionwith,oronthesamedayas,acongressionalvacancyelection.AseparateplantemplatewillbeavailableforanyprimaryelectionconductedasmailballotinaccordancewithHouseBill09-1015.INSTRUCTIONSPleasereadthissectionCoMPLETELY.Failuretodosomayresultinunduedelayintheapprovalofyourplan.)Spacesandcheckboxesareprovidedbelowforeachrequiredaspectofthemailballotplan.Pleasefillouttheforminitsentirety,makingsuretocheckallboxeswhereapplicable.Additionalpagesmaybeattachedtotheendofthemailballotplanifnecessary.ElectionRules12.3.2and12.3.4requirethesubmissionofasamplesecrecysleeveorenvelopeandawrittentimetable,respectively.AcopyoftheSecretaryofStateapprovedsecrecysleeveisincludedattheendofthisform.Pleasereviewthesecrecysleeveandindicateyourusageoftheapprovedsleevebycheckingtheboxassociatedwiththesecrecysleeve(Item“t.”ofthemailballotplan).Additionally,awrittentimetableisprovidedattheendofthisfillableform.Pleasefillinthedatecolumnofthetimetabletoindicatethedateorrangeofdatesforeachrequiredoccurrence.Whenyouhavecheckedeachapplicableboxandsuppliedallrequiredinformation,pleasesavetheformtoyourcomputer.Oncetheformissaved,youmaychooseyourmethodofsubmittal(email,regularmail,orfax).TheSecretaryofState’sofficerecommendsthatyouemailyourplanasanattachmenttorose.sanchez@sos.state.co.us;doingsowillensureamorepromptresponse.1-lowever,ifyoupreferregularmailorfax,pleasebeawarethatthesemethodsarealsoacceptable.PleasesendanymailedorfaxedplansATTN:RoseSanchez.ATTENTIONHOMERtLEMUNICIPALITIESTheSecretaryofStatewillnotreviewthemailballotplanofanyhomerulemunicipalitythatfailstoreadandaffirmthefollowingdeclaration.Pleaseindicateyouraffirmationbycheckingthebox.LjAlthoughIamsubmittingthisplanonbehalfofahomerulemunicipality,thismailballotelectionwillbeconductedinaccordancewithstatelaw.Assuch,thisplandoesnotcontainanylocally-adoptedelectionproceduresthatdifferfromthestateproceduressetforthintheColoradoMaitBallotElectionAct(1-7.5-101through1-7.5-111,C.R.S.)orinElectionRule12.ColoradoSecretaryofStateUpdated7/13/09
Nameofpersonsubmittingplan:ScottDoyle,LarirnerCountyClerkandRecorderAddress:200W.OakStreet;fortCollins,CO80521(P0Box1547;FortCollins,CO80522)Email:sdoyte@larimer.orga.Dateoftheelection:January12,2010b.Typeandnameofthejurisdiction(s)involvedintheelection(Example:county,municipality,specialdistrict,schooldistrict,etc.):LarimerCountyandTownofEstesPark.c.Descriptionofthetypeofelectiontobeconducted(Example:coordinatedelection,recallelection,specialelection,etc.):SpecialElectionfortheTownofEstesPark.d.Citationofthestatuteauthorizingtheelection:UniformElectionCodeof1992(TitleI,Article7.5,ColoradoRevisedStatutes)andSection31-11-104C.R.S.e.Estimatednumberofeligibleelectors:3800.Betweentwenty-two(22)andeighteen(18)daysbeforetheelection,thedesignatedelectionofficialwillmailtoeachactiveregisteredelectoramailballotpacket.f.Nameofthedesignatedelectionofficialwhowillberesponsibleforallaspectsoftheelection:ScottDoyLe,LarimerCountyClerkandRecorderg.IftheelectionisNOTbeingconductedbytheCountyClerk&Recorder,anindicationofwhethertheCountyClerkandRecorderwillassistintheelectionfortheentityotherthanbyprovidingalistofregisteredelectorsandotherinformationrequiredbystatute(Pleasechecktheappropriatebox):NOTAPPLICABLEINLARIMERCOUNTY.LIYes,theCountyClerkandRecorderwillassistintheelectionfortheentityotherthanbyprovidingalistofregisteredelectorsandotherinformationrequiredbystatute.(Ifyes,pleasereadthefollowingstatementregardinguseofcountyvotingsystems,checkthecorrespondingboxifapplicable,andprovidetherequestedinformation.)ElTheCountyClerkandRecorderwillassistintheelectionfortheentitybyprovidingvotingsystemstobeusedbytheentityduringtheelection.Themakeandmodelnumberofthevotingsystemstobeusedisasfollows:Make(s):ModelNumber(s):LINo,theCountyClerkandRecorderwillnotassistintheElectionfortheentityotherthanbyprovidingalistofregisteredelectorsandotherinformationrequiredbystatute.h.Totalnumberof“Placesofdeposit.”Note:Forsecurityreasons,unmonitoredfreestandingplacesofdepositlocatedout-of-doorsarenotallowed(Inadditiontoindicatingthenumberof“placesofdeposit,”pleasereadthestatementsbelow,checktheappropriatebox,andprovideadditionalinformationifapplicable):3(three)All“placesofdeposit”andanywalk-invotinglocationswillbelocatedwithinthepolitical)subdivision.2
Atleastoneorall“placesofdeposit”willbelocatedoutsideofthecounty,municipality,orspecialdistrict.Such“placesofdeposit”arewithinreasonableproximitytothepoliticalsubdivisionorthemajorityofelectors.ThereasonsforrequestingpermissionfromtheSecretaryofStateforsuch“placesofdeposit”areasfollows:Twoplacesofdepositwillbelocatedwithinthepoliticalsubdivision(TownofEstesPark).TherewillbeanadditionalplaceofdepositattheLarirnerCountyClerk’sofficelocatedat200WestOakStreetinFortCollins,CO.ForelectionscoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorder,thetotalnumberofwalk-invotinglocations:N/A.Walk-invotingisnotrequired.ThisspecialelectionisforamunicipalityandtherearenoothercoordinatingentitiesNumberofaccessiblevotingmachinesanticipatedbeingusedforwalk-invotinglocationsinelectionscoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorder:N/Aj.Lengthoftimeaccessiblevotingmachineswillbeavailableforwalk-invotinginelectionscoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorder(Pleaseincludehoursofoperation.Example:7:00amto7:00pm.):N/Ak.PleasecompletethewrittentimetabLeneartheendofthisform.Youmustprovideadateorarangeofdatesforeachoccurrencelistedintheleft-handcolumnofthetimetable.Indicationofhowpostagewillbehandledforballotpacketsreturnedasundeliverable(Pleasereadandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingthebox):Asthedesignatedelectionofficial,Iherebyaffirmthatballotpacketswillbemarked“DONOTFORWARD.ADDRESSCORRECTIONREQUESTED,”“RETURNPOSTAGEGUARANTEED,”oranyothersimilarlanguagethatisinaccordancewithUnitedStatesPostalServiceregulations.m.Indicationofprocedurestobefollowedtoensurecompliancewithstatutesandrules,includingpersonsresponsibleforeachstage(Pleasereadandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingeachbox):Asthedesignatedelectionofficial,IherebyaffirmthatIhavereadandunderstandArticle7.5ofTitle1,C.R.S.andSecretaryofStateElectionRule12andthatappropriatemeasuresandprocedureswiltbeundertakentoensurecomplianewiththesestatutesandrules.Ifthedesignatedelectionofficialisnotthepersonresponsibleforsuchcompliance,pleaseindicatethepersonresponsible:Thedesignatedelectionofficialwillsupervisethedistributing,handling,countingofballotsandthesurveyofreturnsinaccordancewithrulespromulgatedbytheSecretaryofStateandwilltakethenecessarystepstoprotecttheconfidentialityoftheballotscastandtheintegrityoftheelection.ThePostmasterorlocalpostalrepresentativehasbeennotifiedoftheelectionandprovidedwiththedesignoftheballotpackettoensurethatpostalstandardsaremet.Forelectionswheremultipleballotswillbeincludedinthesamepacketorwillbesentinseparatepackets,theballotsandreturnenvelopesshallincludedistinctivemarkingsorcolorstoidentifypoliticalsubdivisionswhenthecolorsordistinctivemarkingswillaidinthedistributionandtabulationoftheballots.3
Forallcoordinatedelectionswheremorethanonemailballotisbeingmailedorpollingplaceelectionsarebeingheldaswellasthemailballotelection,theoutgoingenvelopeaswellastheinstructionsorothernoticeshallhavethefollowingnotice:“Thismaynotbeyouronlyballot.Otherelectionsmaybeheldbyotherpoliticalsubdivisionsbymailorbypollingplace.”AlldepositedballotswillbecountedasprovidedinArticle7.5ofTitle1,C.R.S.andbyrulespromulgatedbytheSecretaryofState.Amailballotwillbevalidandcountedonlyifitisreturnedinthereturnenvelope,theself-affirmationonthereturnenvelopeissignedandcompletedbytheeligibleelectortowhomtheballotwasissued,andtheinfonnationonthereturnenvelopeisverified.Iftheelectionofficialdeterminesthataneligibleelectortowhomareplacementballothasbeenissuedhasvotedmorethanonce,thefirstballotreturnedbytheelectorwillbeconsideredtheelector’sofficialballot.n.Descriptionofprocedurestobeusedtoensureballotsecurityatallstagesoftheprocess(Pleasereadandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingeachbox):Theballotorballotlabelwillcontainthefollowingwarning:“WARNING:Anypersonwho,byuseofforceorothermeans,undulyinfluencesaneligibleelectortovoteinanyparticularmannerortorefrainfromvoting,orwhofalselymakes,alters,forges,orcounterfeitsanymailballotbeforeorafterithasbeencast,orwhodestroys,defaces,mutilates,ortamperswithaballotissubject,uponconviction,toimprisonment,ortoafine,orboth.”Thereturnenvelopewillhaveprintedonitaself-affirmationsubstantiallyinthefollowing0form:“IstateunderpenaltyofperjurythatIamaneligibleelector;thatmysignatureandnameareasshownonthisenvelope;thatthavenotandwillnotcastanyvoteinthiselectionexceptbytheenclosedballot;andthatmyballotisenclosedinaccordwiththeprovisionsofthe“UniformElectionCodeof1992.”Date:__________________SignatureofVoter:•Whennotbeingprocessed,ballotpacketswillbeplacedinasafe,secureareaunderthesupervisionofthedesignatedelectionofficial,electionjudge,orpersondesignatedbythedesignatedelectionofficial.Areplacementballotmayberequestediftheballotwasdestroyed,spoiled,lost,ornotreceivedbytheelector.Theelectorrequestingthereplacementballotmustcompleteaswornstatementincompliancewithsection1-7.5-107(3)(d)(l),C.R.S.Theformmaybemailedtoanelectoralongwiththeirmailballotpacket,however,itmustbereturnedtotheelectionofficialonorbeforeelectionday.Ballotswillnotbeleftunattendedwhilebeingprocessed.Afterprocessingiscomplete,ballotswillbeplacedinasafeandsecurearea.AccesstothesecureareashallbedeterminedbytheCountyClerkandRecorderordesignatedelectionofficial.o.DescriptionofproceduresformaintainingprivacyandsecurityofaccessiblevotingmachinestobeusedinanelectioncoordinatedbytheCountyCterkandRecorder(ifthissectiondoesnotapply4
toyou,pleasechecktheboxmarked“Notapplicableandthenindicatethereason(s)whythissectiondoesnotapplytoyou):ElAtthevoter’srequest,theelectionjudgewillinstructthevoterontheuseoftheaccessiblemachine.LIEachaccessiblevotingdevicewillbepositionedastoprotecteachvoter’sprivacywhilevoting.LIforelectionscoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorder,asecurityplanwillbesubmittedinaccordancewithRule43inadditiontothemailballotplan,ifsuchsecurityplanhasnotalreadybeenreceivedbytheSecretaryofState.InanelectioncoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorder,ifavotersurrendersamailballottothedesignatedelectionofficialandvotesin-persononanaccessibledeviceprovidedfortheelection,theaccessibledevicewillbesubjecttotheprivacy,securityandaccuracystandardssetforthintheElectionRulesandTitleI,C.R.S.Notapplicableforthefollowingreason(s)(Pleasecheckallthatapply):ThiselectionisbeingconductedasanindependentmailballotelectionthatisnotcoordinatedwiththeCountyClerkandRecorder.ElThiselectionwillbeconductedwiththeuseofpaperballots;novotingmachineswillbeinvolvedinthiselection.p.ForNovemberelectionscoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorderonly,descriptionofprocedurestobeusedforsignatureverification(Pleasereadandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingeachbox.Ifthissectiondoesnotapplytoyou,pleasechecktheboxmarked“Notapplicable”andsupplytherequestedinformation.):LIAnelectionjudgewillcomparethesignatureontheself-affirmationoneachreturnenvelopewiththesignatureoftheeligibleelectoronfileintheofficeoftheCountyClerkandRecorder.ElIf,uponcomparingthesignatureontheself-affirmationonthereturnenvelopewiththesignatureoftheeligibleelectoronfilewiththeCountyClerkandRecorder,theelectionjudgedeterminesthatthesignaturesdonotmatch,twootherelectionjudgesofdifferentpoliticalpartyaffiliationswillsimultaneouslycomparethesignatures.Ifbothotherelectionjudgesagreethatthesignaturesdonotmatch,theCountyClerkandRecorderwill,withinthree(3)daysafterthesignaturedeficiencyhasbeenconfirmed,butinnoeventlaterthantwo(2)daysaftertheelectionday,sendalettertotheeligibleelectorexplainingthediscrepancyinsignaturesandaformfortheeligibleelectortoconfirmthattheelectorreturnedaballottotheCountyClerkandRecorder.ElIftheCountyClerkandRecorderreceivestheformwithineight(8)daysaftertheelectionconfirmingthattheelectorreturnedaballottotheCountyClerkandRecorderandenclosingacopyoftheelector’sidentification,andiftheballotisotherwisevalid,theballotwillbecounted.ElIftheeligibleelectorreturnsthefonnindicatingthattheelectordidnotreturnaballottotheCountyClerkandRecorder,oriftheeligibleelectordoesnotreturntheformwithineight(8)daysafterelectionday,theself-affirmationonthereturnenvelopewillbe5
categorizedasincorrect,theballotwillnotbecounted,andtheCountyClerkandRecorderwillsendcopiesoftheeligibleelector’ssignatureonthereturnenvelopeandthesignatureonfilewiththeCountyClerkandRecordertotheDistrictAttorneyforinvestigation.LIAnoriginalreturnenvelopewithanenclosedsecrecyenvelopecontainingavotedballotthatisnotcountedduetoadiscrepancyinsignaturesinaccordancewiththeaboveprocedureswillbestoredundersealintheofficeoftheCountyClerkandRecorderinasecurelocationseparatefromvalidreturnenvelopesandmayberemovedonlyundertheauthorityoftheDistrictAttorneyorbyorderofacourthavingjurisdiction.LiInthecaseofadisagreementamongtheelectionjudgesastowhetherthesignatureofaneligibleelectorontheself-affirmationonthereturnenvelopematchesthesignatureoftheeligibleelectoronfilewiththeCountyCterkandRecorder,themailballotwillbecountedinthesamemannerasballotsreceivedinvalid,verifiedreturnenvelopes.LIAnelectionjudgewillnotdeterminethatthesignatureofaneligibleelectorontheself-affirmationdoesnotmatchthesignatureofthateligibleelectoronfilewiththeCountyClerkandRecordersolelyonthebasisofsubstitutionofinitialsoruseofacommonnickname.NotapplicableasthiselectionisbeingconductedasanindependentmailbalLotelectionthatisnotcoordinatedwiththeCountyClerkandRecorder.q.DescriptionofProcedurestobeusedforballotsreturnedbyelectorswhohavenotpreviouslyvotedinColoradoandhavefailedtoincludeproperproofofidentification(section1-7.5-107(3.5)(d),C.R.S.):Uponreceiptofamailballot,fromanelectorwhohasnotpreviouslyvotedinColorado,whichdoesnotcontainaproperformofidentificationasrequiredundersectionl-7.5-107(3.5)(b),C.R.S.,thedesignatedelectionofficialwill,withinthree(3)daysafterreceiptofthemailballot,butinnoeventlaterthantwo(2)daysafterelectionday,sendtotheeligibleelectoraletterexplainingthelackofcompliancewithsectionl-7.5-107(3.5)(b),C.R.S..Ifthedesignatedelectionofficialreceivesacopyofidentificationincompliancewithsectionl-7.5-107(3.5)(b),C.R.S.withineight(8)daysafterelectionday,andifthemailbaltotisotherwisevalid,themailballotwillbecounted.r.Descriptionofprocedurestoensureprivacybyuseofasecrecysleeveorsecrecyenvelopesoreceivingjudgescannottellhowtheelectorvoted(Pleasereadandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingeachbox):TheSecretaryofStateapprovedsecrecysleevewillbeincludedinthemailballotpackage.s.Descriptionofprocedurestobeusedtoreconcileballotsissued,ballotsreceived,defectiveballotsandsubstituteballots(Pleasereadandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingeachbox):NOTE:LarimerCountywilldatestamptheballotenvelopesandnottheballots.Ballotswillbedatestampeduponreceipt.Eachdaywhenballotscomein,ajudgewillcounttheballots,batchthem,andrecordthenumberofballotsreceivedincludingthosethatwerereturnedasundeliverable.6
ThedesignatedelectionofficialortheCountyClerkandRecorderwillmaintainadailyreconciliationlogcontainingthenumberofballotsissued,returned,andoutstanding.t.PleasereviewtheSecretaryofStateapprovedSecrecySleeveatthebottomofthisfillabteform.(Pleasereadthefollowingstatementandindicateyourcompliancebycheckingthebox):Asthedesignatedetectionofficial,IherebyaffirmthattheSecretaryofStateapprovedsecrecysleevecontainedattheendofthisformisatrueandaccuraterepresentationofthesecrecysleevetobeusedinthemailballotelection.SECRECYSLEEvEANDVOTERINSTRUCTIONSAREPROVIDEDINTHESAMEEMAILUNDERTHENAME“VOTERINSTRUCTIONS.PDF”7
WRITTENTIMETABLECoLoRADoSECRETARYOFSTATE1700BROADWAY,SUITE270DENVER,CoLoRADo$0290PHONE:303-894-2200FAX:303-869-4861PursuanttoElectionRule12.3.4,thedesignatedelectionofficialmustprepareawrittentimetableforconductingthemailballotelectionwithspecificdatesorrangeofdateswheneachactivityistobecompleted.Pleasecompletethefollowingtimetablebysupplyingthefollowingdatesorrangeofdatesontheright:Date:DatecopyofwrittenplanwassubmittedtothegoverningbodyOctober27,2009DateofapprovalofelectionbygoverningbodyAugust25,2009DateofsubmissionofwrittenplantoSecretaryofState’sofficeOctober28,2009AnticipateddateofapprovalbySecretaryofStateDecember3,2009DateofpublicationofnoticeofelectionDecember23,2009DateofnoticeofelectiontothecountyclerkN/ADateofnoticeofelectiontothecountyassessor,ifproperlyownersareN/AeligibletovoteintheelectionDateofcloseofregistrationDecember14,2009DatebywhichtheCountyClerkandRecordermustsubmitthelistofeligibleelectorstothepoliticalsubdivisionand,ifpropertyownersareeligibletoN/Avoteintheelection,thedatebywhichthecountyassessormustsubmitthelistofpropertyownersForelectionscoordinatedbytheCountyClerkandRecorder,datenoticewillN/Abegiventovotersofwalk-invotingandaccessiblevotingoptionsDateballotswillbemailedDecember21,2009DateverificationandcountingofballotswillbeginDecember28,2009DateofelectionJanuary12,201008
MAILBALLoTPLANCoLo1DoSECRETARYOFSTATE1700BR0AIwAY,SUITE270DENVER,COLoRADo$0290PHONE:303-894-2200FAX:303-869-4861Thankyouforaccessingthemailballotplanonlineform.Pleasesavethisformdowntoyourcomputersothatitmaybesubmittedtoourofficeuponcompletion.formsshouldbesubmittedviaemail(rose.sanchez@sos.state.co.us),regularmail,orfax,ATTN:RoseSanchez.PleasefeelfreetocontacttheSecretaryofState’sofficewithanyquestionsyoumayhave.
AGREEMENTCONCERNINGELECTIONSERVICESTHISAGREEMENTismadeeffectivethis—dayof________,2009,betweentheLarimerCountyClerkandRecorder(“Clerk”)andtheTownofEstesPark(the“Town”):TheTownhassetaspecialelectiononJanuary12,2010pursuanttoSection31-11-104CRS.(the‘Election”);andTheTownwishestoconductamailballotelectionpursuanttothetermsandconditionsofthisAgreement;andTheClerkhasagreedtoperformcertainelectionservicessetforthhereininconsiderationoftheperformancebytheTownofitsobligationsandpaymentofafeeassetforthherein;andTheTownhasapprovedthisAgreementpursuanttoResolutionNo._______,whichResolutionisincorporatedhereinbyreference.NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationoftheirmutualpromisescontainedherein,thepartiesagreeasfollows:I.DutiesoftheClerkTheClerkhasdesignatedCynthiaColeman,whosetelephonenumberis(970)498-7941,asthe“ContactOfficer”toactastheprimaryliaisonbetweentheClerkandtheTownforthepurposesoftheElection.TheContactOfficershallactundertheauthorityoftheClerk.TheClerkagreestoperformthefollowingduties,orsuchotherdutiesasmaybemutuallyagreeduponbythepartiesinwriting,inconnectionwiththeElection:A.PreparationfortheElection1.ProvidetheTownastreetlocatorfile,whichliststhestreetaddresseslocatedintheTownwithintheClerk’svoterregistrationsystem.2.AssistandinformtheTownonanymatterthatshouldensuretheefficientpreparationandconductoftheElection.TheClerkshallnotprovidelegaladvice.3.ManageallvoterrecordsandcorrespondenceinaccordancewithTitle1,ColoradoRevisedStatutes,ColoradoSecretaryofStateElectionRulesandpolicydirectivesoftheColoradoSecretaryofState.4.Supply,deliverandsetupallnecessaryitemsfortheconductandpreparationoftheElection.5.Certifytheelectionjudgesanddeterminetheircompensation.Trainelectionjudgespriortotheelection,includingspecificinstructioninthesecureoperationoftheelectionequipment.6.PlacetheballotcontentproperlycertifiedtotheClerkinaccordancewithlawupontheballot.Certifytheballotcontenttotheprinter.Contractforprintedballotsandcoordinatepaymenttoprinter(s).TheClerkreservestherighttoprintonlytheballotissueidentifyinginformationontheballotandtheballottitleonaseparatesheetofpaperoranyotherformofballotasdirectedbytheColoradoSecretaryofState.Toavoidballotspaceissues,theClerkrequestseachissueandquestionarenotmotethan250words.7.Provide,nolaterthantwentydaysbeforetheElection,noticebypublicationofamailballotelection[1-5-205etseq.,C.R.S.;1-7.5-107(2.5)C.R.S.].SuchnoticeshallsatisfythepublicationrequirementoftheTowninSection31-10-501(1)C.R.S.8.ConductanyrequiredtestsandauditsofthevotingsystempriortoandaftertheElection[1-7-509(1)C.R.S.,SecretaryofStateElectionRule11.5].9.EstablishbackupproceduresandabackupsiteforthecountingoftheElection,shouldthecountingequipmentbecomeunavailableduringthecount.1
10.FileandreceiveapprovalfromtheColoradoSecretaryofStateoftheMailBallotPlan.TheClerkshallnotifytheTownofanychangesoramendmentsmadebytheColoradoSecretaryofStatetotheMailBallotPlan.B.ConductoftheElection1.ProvidethatmailballotpacketsbemailedtoeveryeligibleelectorandthattheElectionshallbeconductedinaccordancewithC.R.S.Title1,Article7.5.2.Provideforthesecurityandprocessingofallmailballots.Providefortheverificationofsignaturesontheself-affirmationonthereturnenvelope.3.FacilitatespecialaccommodationsforallmilitaryandoverseascitizensasprovidedbytheUniformedandOverseasCitizensAbsenteeVotingAct.4.ProvideprovisionalballotstoelectorswhoqualifyunderC.R.S.§1-8.5-101.Provideatelephonenumberthatprovisionalvotersmaycalltoinquireiftheirprovisionalballotcounted.5.ProvideproperlytrainedpersonnelforthepreparationandconductoftheElection.ProvidepersonnelatthetabulationcenteronElectionDay/Nighttocertifyunofficialresults.6.PreserveallElectionrecordsforatleasttwenty-fivemonthsaftertheelection.7.Conductarecountofanycontestwherethefinalballottabulationresultsarecloseenoughtorequitearecountorifrequestedbyaninterestedparty.II.DutiesoftheTownTheTownhasdesignatedScottDoyle,LarimerCountyClerkandRecorderasitsDesignatedElectionOfficial(DEO”).TheTownshallperformthefollowingdutiesinconnectionwiththeElection:A.PreparationfortheCoordinatedElection1.Postand/orpublishanyotherlegalnoticesrequiredpursuanttorelevantprovisionsoftheColoradoMunicipalElectionCodeof1965,§31-10-101,etseq.,C.R.S.,asamended,exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein.2.Besolelyresponsiblefordeterminingwhethertheballotquestionisproperlyplacedbeforethevoters.3.Reviewtheinformationcontainedinthestreetlocatorfileandcertifyitsaccuracy,aswellasanychanges,additionsordeletionstothefile.ThecertificationofthestreetlocatorfileshallbemadenolaterthanNovember13,2009at5:00p.m.totheClerk.4.Provideacertifiedcopyasanemailattachmenttoymedinalarimer.orgoroncompactdisc(650MBorhigher),intheformatrequestedbelow,nolaterthan________________daysbeforetheelectionat5:00p.m.,oftheballotcontenttotheClerkexactlyasandintheorderinwhichitistoappearandbeprintedontheballotpagesandsampleballots.ThecertifiedballotquestionshallbefinalandtheClerkwillnotberesponsibleformakinganychangesafterthecertification.•MicrosoftWord‘97oraversionofMicrosoftWordabletobeconvertedtoMicrosoftWord97•FontType:Anal•FontSize:10point•Justification:Left•AllMargins:0.5inches5.ProofreadandapprovetheTown’sballotcontentforprintingwithinonebusinessdayofreceiptfromtheClerk.TheTownshallprovideafaxnumberanddesignateapersontobeavailableforproofingandapprovingballotcontentforprinting.TheClerkagreestokeepallcontactpersonnelapprisedofballotprintingstatusforallcontacts.TheTownhasdesignated__________________________________whosephoneis________________________andfaxnumberis_________________________________02
6.IfrequestedbytheClerk,provideperson(s)toparticipateinballotcounting,andrecountfortheElection.TheTownpersonnelmayparticipateinvariousboardswithpersonnelfromtheClerk’sofficetoensureTown’sparticipationineachoftheelectronicvotetabulatingproceduresthatshallbeused.Theperson(s)providedbytheTownmustberegisteredtovoteinLarimerCounty.B.ElectionContest1.TheTownshallimmediatelynotifytheClerkofanyElectioncontestthatisinitiatedandshallkeeptheClerkapprisedoftheneedtoretainElectionrecordsforuseinsuchacontest.C.ElectionCosts1.KeepanaccurateaccountofallElectioncostsincluding,butnotlimitedto,supplies,printingcosts,legalnotices,temporarylaborandotherexpensesattributabletotheClerk’sadministrationoftheMailBallotElectionfortheTown.2.TheTown’scostshallbebasedonCountyexpendituresrelativetotheElectionandthenumberofelectors.3.TheTownaversthatithassufficientfundsavailableinitsapprovedbudgettopayitsElectionexpenses.4.Ifitisdeterminedthatcountingmustbemovedtoanestablishedbackupsite,allrelatedcostsshallbepaidbytheTown.5.Uponreceiptoftheinvoice,paytotheClerkwithinthirtydaysafeewhichshallbeanamountdeterminedinaccordancewiththeformulasetforthonExhibitAwhichisattachedheretoandincorporatedhereinbyreference.6.Payanyadditionaloruniqueelectioncostsresultingfromdelays,recounts,and/orspecialpreparationsorcancellationsrelatingtotheTown’sparticipationintheElection.QIll.AdditionalAgreements1.IntheeventacourtofcompetentjurisdictionfindstheElectionfortheTownwasvoidorotherwisefatallydefectiveasaresultofthesolebreachorfailureoftheClerktoperforminaccordancewiththisAgreementorlawsapplicabletotheelection,theTownshallbeentitledtorecoverexpensesorlossescausedbysuchbreachorfailureuptothemaximumamountpaidbytheTowntotheClerkunderthisAgreement.TheClerkshallinnoeventbeliableforanyexpenses,damagesorlossesinexcessoftheamountspaidunderthisAgreement.ThisremedyshallbethesoleandexclusiveremedyforthebreachavailabletotheTownunderthisAgreement.2.NoportionofthisAgreementshallbedeemedtocreateacauseofactionwithrespecttoanyonenotapartytothisAgreement,noristhisAgreementintendedtowaiveanyprivileges,immunitiestotheparties,theirofficersoremployeesmaypossess,exceptasexpresslystatedinthisAgreement.3.TimeisoftheessenceunderthisAgreement.ThestatutorytimeframesorrequirementsoftheCodeandtheRulesshallapplytothecompletionofanydutiesortasksrequiredunderthisAgreement.3
EXHIBITAUNITCOSTHOURSDAYSNUMBERTOTALLabor(subtotal)$1,080.00$Electionsetupandequipmenttesting20.00812$320.00$Ballotissuanceandvotermaintenance20.001152$600.00$Receiveandcountballots-judges10.00412$80.00$Canvasselection20.00212$80.00Ballots(subtotal)$4,049.00SetupFee$100.001$100.00$11“Ballot0.353800$1,330.00$OutgoingEnvelope0.063800$228.00$SecrecySleeve/Envelope0.063800$228.00$Instructions0.063800$228.00$ReturnEnvelope0.063800$228.00$11”Ballots(replacements)0.35100$35.00$Postage0.443800$1,672.00Miscellaneous(subtotal)$150.00Publishnoticeofelection$50.00Retentionboxes,labels,seals$50.00Forms,reports,sampleballots$50.00GrandTotal$5,279.0004
INWITNESSWHEREOF,thepartiesheretohaveexecutedthisAgreementtobeeffectiveuponthedatefirstabovewritten.LARIMERCOUNTY,COLORADOCLERKANDRECORDERDate:________________________________________________________________________________________ScottDoyleDate:_______________________________BOARDOFCOMMISSIONERSOFLARIMERCOUNTY,COLORADOATTEST:DeputyClerkoftheBoardKathayC.RennelsChair,BoardofCountyCommissionersApprovedtoastoForm:CountyAttorneyTOWNOFESTESPARKDate:________________________________________By:_______MayorATTEST”TownClerk5
TownBoard,October27,2009(#35)Goodevening,AnarticlebyRobertMarus&KenCampinTheBaptistStandardnewsmagazineexploresthereasonswhymanyChristiansengageininternetgossipandthespreadingoffalserumorstosupporttheirreligion.Thisquotefromthatarticlehascaughttheattentionoftheatheistcommunity:“So,whyareChristianssowillingtobelieveunsubstantiatedrumors?Andmoretroubling,whyareChristians,whoshouldholdthehigheststandardsoftruth-telling,soeagertospreadrumors—andevendownrightlibels?”Whywouldyouexpectanyonewhoidentifiesthemselvesbytheirunsubstantiatedbeliefs,tobecompletelyrational,logical,andsubstantiallytruthfulinallotherconsiderations.Ifapersoncanbelieveinangels,Noah’sArk,asixthousandyearoldearth,andrisingfromthedead,theycanbelieveanythingistrue.WhenIsaythereisnoGod,manyreligiouspeople,whocannotproveotherwise,haveretaliatedwithlies,rumors,socialandpoliticalostracism,andintimidation.Rabidlyheldreligiousbeliefscanonlycausetroublewhenbroughtintoasecularmeetingofwethepeople,sodon’tyouthinkitwouldbebesttoleaveanymentionofGodoutsidethisroom?Don’tyouthinkit’stimetostoprecitingthe‘underGod’Pledge?Onanothertopic,itshouldbenotedthatcommercialpropertyownersdonothavetheabilityto‘writeofforexpensetheproposedfiredistricttaxanywherenearthepointwhereitdoesn’tcostthemanything;aswassuggestedinlastweekscandidateforum.Now,thebusinesscommunitydoesn’twanttoappearunappreciativeofthesupportwegetfromresidents,especiallythevolunteersattheVisitorsCenterandfiredepartment.Wedoappreciatethatsupportandhaveinmanywaysshownit,butwewouldalsoliketobeappreciatedfortheenormouscontributionwemaketothewelfareandenjoymentofourtown,mostlyintheformofpropertyandsalestaxes,employment,andafunenvironment.TheAppenzellInnhasgeneratedoveramilliondollarsintaxessinceopening,butinsteadofahigh-five,Igetadifferentgesturefornotwantingtocoughupanother$1,250ayearforthefiredistrict.Thesesentiments,alongwithapopularmovementtoabolishEPURA,arehardlysignsofappreciation.Now,beforeyougetyourviolinsout,Idounderstandthattherealityofgettinganyempathyforabusinessmanissimilartothatforahealthinsurancecompanyorlawyer.Butyouwouldthinkthattheresidentswouldunderstandtherelationshipbetweenathrivingeconomyandathrivingcommunityandsupporttheirownselfinterest.ForthatreasonIwouldurgethecontinuationofEPURAandfinishingtheworkatStanleyParksometimebeforeI’mgone.Thankyou,DavidHabecker