The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES Estes Valley Planning Commission 2002-03-19BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission March 19, 2002,1:30 p.m. Board Room (Room 130), Estes Park Municipai Buiiding Commission: Attending: Aiso Attending: Absent: Chair Cherie Pettyjohn, Commissioners Wendell Amos, DeeDee Hampton, Joyce Kitchen, Edward Pohl, Ed McKinney, and Dominick Taddonio Chair Pettyjohn, Commissioners McKinney, Hampton, Kitchen, Pohl, Amos and Taddonio Town Board Liaison Habecker, Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott and Recording Secretary Williamson None Chair Pettyjohn caiied the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated February 19, 2002. b. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 02-03, EPCO, INC. Applicant: Dennis K. Brown - Continued to the April 16,2002 meeting at the request of the applicant. c. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, PARK RIVER WEST, LOT 1 & LOT 2, PARK RIVER WEST SUBDIVISION Applicant: Rich H. Wille Trust - 28 condominium units on Lot 1 & 40 condominium units on Lot 2. It was moved and seconded (McKinney/Pohl) that the Consent Agenda be accepted and it passed unanimously. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. AMENDED PLAT. LOT 1. 2. AND 3. BLOCK 4. COUNTRY CLUB MANOR. Applicant: Anthony and Tanya Rowley, Virginia Taulane Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. This amended plat would combine Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4, Country Club Manor into two resultant lots. Upon review of a building permit, staff found Lot 2 was divided in 1977 by deed, without a plat. This is in conflict with state subdivision laws. This proposal complies with the applicable standards set forth in the EVDC, including property setbacks for the new modular home. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Amos/McKinney) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Amended Plat, LOT 1,2, AND 3, BLOCK 4, Country Club Manor with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. The notation “Lot 2” and “Lot 1” shall be removed from the dedication statement signature block. 2. The dedication statement shall include the following language, “do hereby subdivide the same into lots, utility easements as shown on this Plat, and do hereby designate and dedicate all such utility easements to and for the public use for the installation and maintenance of utility, irrigation, and drainage facilities and hereby designate the same as the Amended Plat of..." 3. The former lot lines shall be designated as “former lot lines”. 4. The two new lots shall be designated as Lots 1A and 1B of the Amended Plat. 5. Perimeter of the lots shall be cross-hatched and the zoning notation shall be removed BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - March 19, 2002 Page 2 from the final plat. 6. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be met by April 2,2002 to be placed on the April 9, 2002 Town Board agenda. 4. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT. LOTS 2 AND 3. TEN BROOK RESUBDIVISION. Applicant: Stephen Paul Chamberlain Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. This is a minor subdivision application for the Chamberlain Subdivision. The purpose of the plat is to adjust the interior lot line to eliminate the encroachment of the Lot 3 Ten Brook Resubdivision house on Lot 2 Ten Brook Resubdivision. This plat also enlarges the buildable area on the northern portion of Lot 2 Ten Brook Resubdivision. A building envelope is platted, which includes a fifteen foot front yard setback from CO Highway 34 Bypass. The Planning Commission has the authority to approve an eighteen foot nine inch setback. The building envelope should be removed from the plat and a note should be added to the plat stating that the northern setback is eighteen feet nine inches. The existing lots do not meet the RM zoning district minimum lot size or minimum lot width. The proposed boundary line adjustment does not make the lots conforming. One shared driveway off of Virginia Drive to the south should be encouraged for the two lots. The fence near the north property line should be removed or relocated outside the CO Highway 34 Bypass right-of-way. The service line to the existing house on Lot 2 of the Chamberlain Subdivision crosses Lot 1. A blanket easement will be signed by the applicant for the sewer line on Lot 1. The plat should dedicate a ten foot utility easement along the southern lot line of Lot 1 and Lot 2 for the overhead power line. Judy Nystrom was present to represent the applicant and answer any questions from the Planning Commission. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Kitchen/Hampton) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Boundary Line Adjustment, Lots 2 and 3, Ten Brook Resubdivision with the foiiowing conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. The building envelope shall be removed from the plat and a note added that eighteen foot nine inch (18’9”) building setback shall be the northern property line setback. 2. Lots 2 and 3 of the Ten Brook Resubdivision shall be labeled and the lot sizes shall be provided in acres and square feet. 3. Driveway access to Lot 1 and Lot 2 Chamberlain Subdivision shall be limited to Virginia Drive. 4. The fence near the north property line shall be removed or relocated outside the right-of-way. 5. The applicant shall grant a blanket easement for the sewer line on Lot 1 Chamberlain Subdivision. This signed easement, to be recorded by separate document, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Estes Park Sanitation District and Town staff. 6. The applicant shall submit an agreement, running with the land and signed by both lot owners, stating that the Lot 2 Chamberlain Subdivision owner will vacate the blanket easement when the owner of Lot 2 Chamberlain Subdivision relocates the sewer line entirely onto Lot 2, or a defined easement for the sewer line within 10 foot side yard setback is provided on Lot 1. This agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Estes Park Sanitation District and Town staff. 7. A copy of the recorded blanket easement and the signed agreement shall be submitted to staff within thirty (30) days of plat approval. 8. A note shall be added to the plat stating that a building permit will not be issued for Lot 1 Chamberlain Subdivision until such a time as the sewer is relocated entirely onto Lot 2 Chamberlain Subdivision, or a defined easement for the sewer line within 10 foot side yard setback is provided on Lot 1, and until such time as the Estes Park Sanitation District approves the relocation and/or easement. The note should also state that the sewer line shall be relocated by April 30, 2003 to prevent Lot 2 from delaying or preventing construction on Lot 1. 9. The plat shall dedicate a ten (10) foot utility easement along the southern lot line of BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - March 19, 2002 Page 3 Lot 1 and Lot 2 Chamberlain Subdivision for the overhead power line. 10. The pine tree near the Lot 1 Chamberlain Subdivision southern lot line is a “significant” tree and shall be protected in compliance with EVDC §7.3 Tree and Vegetation Protection. 11. Perimeter of the lots shall be cross-hatched and zoning notation shall be removed from the final plat. 12. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be met by April 2, 2002 to be placed on the April 9, 2002 Town Board agenda. 5. SPECIAL REVIEW 02-01. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHURCH. LOT 1. MARY’S LAKE SUBDIVISION. Applicant: Rocky Mountain Free Evangelical Church This is a development plan/special review application for the Rocky Mountain Evangelical Free Church. The property is zoned “A” Accommodations/Highway Corridor and religious assemblies are permitted by special review in this district. Kerry Prochaska of Cornerstone Engineering was present representing the applicant. He stressed the importance of the applicant to stay on schedule; however due to the extent of staffs conditions they are asking for a continuance to the next Planning Commission. He stated the Traffic Impact Analysis, which will be completed soon, will help to answer some of staffs conditions. The church does not feel they should be responsible for the entire traffic impact and road upgrades. Commissioner Taddonio asked whether the Traffic Impact Analysis would have a bearing on other staff conditions. Director Joseph advised that there would not be an impact on the other conditions. Public Comment: Jess Mann, senior pastor of the Rocky Mountain Church, stated the history of the church and the growth over the years. He also stated the desire to work with the Town to do what was right and equitable. Director Joseph complemented the church on their efforts to contact the neighbors and keep them informed of their project. Attorney White advised the Traffic Impact Analysis will show the impact of the church, the current traffic and the future traffic. After the study is analyzed, staff will have a recommendation they will discuss with the County. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Taddonio) to recommend continuance of the Special Review 02-01, Rocky Mountain Free Evangelical Church to the next Planning Commission on April 16, 2002. 6. REPORTS None. There being no further business, meeting was adjourne^t^O p.m. Cherfe Pettyjohn,')SKafr> telyn Williamson, Recording Secretary