The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES Estes Valley Planning Commission 2002-12-17BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission December 17, 2002,1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Commission: Attending: Also Attending: Absent: Chair Cherie Pettyjohn, Commissioners Wendell Amos, Bill Horton, Joyce Kitchen, Edward Pohl, Richard Homeier, and Dominick Taddonio Chair Pettyjohn, Commissioners Horton, Pohl, Homeier, and Taddonio Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott, Town Board Liaison Habecker and Recording Secretary Williamson Commissioner Amos and Kitchen Chair Pettyjohn called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA STAUFFER SUBDIVISION, 665 & 685 Riverside Drive, Applicant. Hillery ParracK Condominiumize 2 units. Conditions of Approval: im riprlarations by Town Attorney White. 1. Review and approval of the Jj. eFr 1 & 2 T4N R73W, 2550 S. St. COT,Comp:!aAn«wi(hTown Attorney White’s memo dated November 26,2002. it was moved and seconded (Homeier/Pohl) that the Consent Agenda be accepted and it passed unanimously with two absent. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. interest community to be created >s Comm^ Occupancy, restricts the use of each umt to Article VIII - Restrictions on Use, Ali^ation a hasPnot reserved the right to build additional ^^t commercial and office use on'V-hThis°ccwr(^inium map consists of two units or withdraw property from thetJ^rfps°C(l^.tn 1977 staff has not determined if these are two lots/parcels described on two separate d®®d®3na19VCantshould combine the two lots mtoona cspnarate lots. If they are two separate lots, th pp rnmhine them. The existing uses are If the parcels were not legally sudd‘^id®d;1 nhot conform to the fifteen-foot side and rear- permitted in this zoning district. The bu 9 Dercent impervious coverage requirement. If setback. The site does notconformtothefittyp . P ts staff has not reviewed the Public Comment: None. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - December i f, zuuz Page 2 It was moved and seconded (PohlH-addonio) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Preliminary Condominium Map, Lots 42 & 43, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, 131 Stanley Avenue with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent. ^ •1 The two lots/parcels shall be combined into one lot with this condoniinium maP- 2 The name in the Declaration is Common Point Professional Condominiums and th® ' e of the map and name in the dedication is “Common Point Condominiums. The two 3. The Declam^onrefers to unit numbers and the map has unit letters. The two shall be 4. Piiofto recording the final condominium map the applicantshaWsubmitanattome/s certificate stating that the map and declaration complies with the Colorado Comm Interest Ownership Act (§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). units (two duplexes, one single) at the cor 9 totalina six units This application is for the currently exists at the site, and is planned to be filed for review and development plan only, and a future condomi P ZOned “RM” Multi-Family, approval prior to individual sale. The site ■ : e’at |east 1974. Based on the lot The site, and neighborhood has been zoned as rseusc;5esr;a^fuantitf Th;s pr0p0sal includes the size, this site could be developed with up 9 ontain landscaping, comply with zoning provision of sidewalks, will pave the ex'stin9 dnv y, proposal meets all applicable requirements, and retain additiona t J EsteL vaHe^ Development Code, zoning and general development standards set forth^ locatjoy of certain buiidings This proposal also complies with setbacks.h p in sjgnatureS from 18 neighborhood Public Comment: „^Qrric rf^nardino the increase in traffic on both Spruce rBirHom'sfesfrdllgrn and s;^ Onv9e are Ssed to get around EiKhorn during the summer months. does not believe this is a significant increase. Ks Scp"rd problems. J U, n t+aH fr\r Sue Ashby. 220 Bighorn Drive, f at|^f hthe XstUeeT theeEstes Park have on the tree. . depend ^the^a^^at He'sta^^hat'he h^^aiway^ti^d to s^^re^nb!^uilding around them. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning commission - December 17, z002 page 3 It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Homeier) to approve of the Development Plan 02-21^ Bighorn at Spruce Condominium Development, a portion of Lots 22 & 12, Block 10,2n Amended Plat, Town of Estes Park, 221 Bighorn Drive with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 1. Submittal of a revised site plan delineating all proposed outdoor parking spaces, replacing ‘Town of Estes Park Comm. Dev. Director” with “Estes Valley Planning Commission. Cherie Pettyjohn, Chair”, compliance with Public Works Director Linnane’s comments dated December 6.2002, and compliance with Estes Park Sanitation Districts memo dated December 11, 2002. , 2 Before issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit construction drawings that include specific details regarding grading, site drainage, building height, erosion 3. SKrtIrSTrepaJeX a registered land sun,eyo;of0aJJinb® corner and southern deck of building C . Square FootTge Swed, and Density Benus fer Attainable Housing. Public Comment: Accessory Uses: thP rar club He gave a brief history of the car clubs John Spooner was presenl to r®Pr®f ®"‘ tb® pe revisions. He stated that the car club does interest and Involvement with the mren Xein garages and other accessory structures detached orXS duXlcerned alout the cumulative tota. square footage allowed for garages. Director Joseph advised that by gi.SQif'^rages!'the neTaffe^ wiHbe'tover11^ structures and placing a limit onthenumber ot garag ^malority of bujlding permits for accessory stmctures per neighborhood. H accessory use should be accessory structures will be 'oraf;®9aenSacHceesXds mctum is more than 50 percent of the incidental to the principal use, and if an accessuiy ai.p "use U would not be considered rncidental. Commissioner Taddonio is concerned about re'^gi"^tJ[,genhgaragers0that house the family Srst b"dohnot belong in a residential neighborhood. feds the'acces^ory buMtag'shouW be^imited'lndS SdSntS Singufslfthe useaofethe building. commissioner Horton Xever smaller iots sxrctXruX"^^^^ roXSXaXsoTuSbXtdS^ ry dwelling currently allowed is small for a family. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - December 17, 2002 Page 4 Commissioner Horton questioned if Mr. Ault has had difficulty finding employee housing. Mr. Ault stated that he was unable to hire seasonal employees because he did not have housing available for them. Director Joseph stated you could let the property owner decided how to allocate the square footage within the 125 percent of the floor area ratio cap. The property owner could then decide how to allocate the space per unit instead of setting a square footage limit. Outdoor Display ♦ Director Joseph stated that the Town Board has directed the Community Development Committee to look into the outdoor display language within the sign code. The Town Boar has asking the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to remove the outdoor display language from Ordinance 17-02. It was moved and seconded (Homeier/Horton)to recommend repeal of the outdoor display langurs from Ordinance 17.02 until such time that revised language is brou^tforward by the Community Development Committee, and it passed unanimousiy with two absent. they plan to attend any public meeting. Pinnnpr «5hirk oave a brief review of the Development Plan for Mt. View Townhomes currently being renewed bVy6stated there have been some neighborhood concerns. 42 p.m.business, meetirr J^qu^tVnV^Hiamson. Recording Secretary