Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Valley Planning Commission 2001-02-20BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission February 20,2001,1:30 p.m. Board Room (Room 130), Estes Park Municipai Buiiding Commission: Attending: Chair Joyce Kitchen, Commissioners Wendell Amos, DeeDee Hampton, Ed McKinney, Cherie Pettyjohn, Edward Pohl, and Dominick Taddonio Chair Kitchen, Commissioners Amos, Hampton, McKinney, Pettyjohn, Pohl, and Taddonio Also Attending: Planner Shirk, and Recording Secretary Wheatley Absent: None Chair Kitchen called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 2001. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Pohl) that the Consent Agenda be accepted as presented. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT Bud Hampton, 1575 Devils Gulch Road, spoke regarding the formation of the Knoli-Wiiiows Conservancy. Their mission statement was provided to the Commission. Their objective is to preserve The Knoll and the Willows Wetlands Area in a natural state for education and research in the memory of Enos A. Mills. 3. SUBDIVISIONS Lockard Plat, Part of SE1/4 and SW V4 of Section 18-5-72,1541 Devils Gulch Road, Applicants: Wesley and Valenda Lockard. Lonnie Sheldon from Van Horn Engineering was present representing the applicants. Planner Shirk gave the staff report. Pursuant to a variance granted in November 2000, the applicant is requesting to combine two lots of record into a single platted lot. The purpose of the November variance was to aliow for an addition to an existing residence that was built when the setback was 10 feet. A condition for the variance of combining the two lots was required since the residence straddies the parcel line. Neither lot currently conforms to the minimum lot size, nor would the resultant lot should the proposal be approved. Therefore, the status of legal non-conforming lot size wouid continue. Based on the identified steep slopes located on the extreme northern portion of this site, a Limits of Disturbance should be established with this proposal. This proposal is located within identified elk and deer wildlife areas. Based on the relatively minor nature of this request. Staff finds waiving the requirements of Section 7.8 of the Estes Vailey Development code meets the standards to grant a waiver for overall subdivision design. A note should be placed on the plat indicating that development is subject to applicable regulations. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff reiative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Planner Shirk read the staff findings into the record. Lonnie Sheldon advised the applicant agreed with the staff report. In response to comments made by the Commission, he said future vicinity maps would be improved and the typographical errors would be corrected on the plat prior to the County Commissioners hearing. Public Comment: None. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - February 20, 2001 Page 2 It was moved and seconded (Amos/Pettyjohn) to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners of the Lockard Plat, with the following conditions and it passed unanimousiy. 1. 2. Limits of disturbance shail be estabiished in accordance with guidelines set forth in Section 7.2.D.2 “Criteria for Establishing Limits of Disturbance.” The following note shall be placed on the plat: “The area represented on this plat is within an identified wildlife habitat area. Development is subject to applicable regulations.” 5. REPORTS Planner Shirk reported on a meeting with Clarion and Associates, Russ Legg and Jeannine Haag from the County and Town Attorney White, at which time potential revisions to the code were discussed. These included, but not limited to, height restriction, FAR calculation, definition of streams, definition of a building envelope, and process for a minor subdivision. Some items that Clarion will be researching are the definition of a kitchen in accommodation zoning, accessory structures and garages, the floor area ratio, and geohazards. The Commission requested time for review of these items such as a work session prior to the public hearing. Effort should be made to encourage public attendance at these hearings. Further discussion was requested on accessory dwelling units and overlay zoning to the entrances to the Town. Commissioner Amos commented that the 3-minute limitation on public comments should be adhered to in the future. Commissioner Taddonio asked Mr. Hampton for some clarification as to the desired goals of the group. Mr. Hampton reviewed the mission statement and how it could be used for funding proposals that would help the Town with financing the project. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m. Meribeth Wheatley, Recording Secretary