Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Valley Planning Commission 2001-09-17BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Meeting of the Estes Vailey Planning Commission Public Hearing on Estes Valley Development Code Revisions September 17,2001,1:30 p.m. Board Room (Room 130), Estes Park Municipal Building Commission:Chair Joyce Kitchen, Commissioners Wendell Amos, DeeDee Hampton, Ed McKinney, Cherie Pettyjohn, Edward Pohl, and Dominick Taddonio Attending: Chair Kitchen, Commissioners Amos, Pettyjohn, Pohl, and Taddonio Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott and Recording Secretary Wheatley Absent:Commissioners Hampton and McKinney Chair Kitchen called the meeting to order at 1:35 p.m. Director Joseph reviewed the purpose of the proposed Code Am®"d,r®nt®- revisions address and correct minor errors and omissions that have surfaced aft.®r “haH of experience working with the Code. Other minor f"s®lf(l!yaend Gxistino Code provisions to produce standards that are more workable. The Code rey'S'ons S dS into Sk 1 and 2 for discussion. Block 1 includes the less controversial and Se hous4Te?n^^^^^^^^^ to the Code. Block 2 includes items that will require more discussion and review. ■ intersections and driveways in order to agree with the requirements ,n Appendix D, Section iV, Streets and Roads, C. Intef eoto.n a"d D"V®"f^lo|fk f ^ |^;^EEiiSrrlS"o^ph& SSrTabttftTreliecS^ Ciassfflcation is reviewed by Staff r32l?P Wgme" irdSnanSTnnexS pmcesses. The addition of a gSSSSiS." ~... s^gV.eaarifSton d'lheTanguage tfS sretsnout the standards that identify land for the minor subdivision process relating to "®,®r a®ddsa™ta^areWnotaei'igible for the minor Addition of the provision that areas in hazard areas are not eny SCiab“n7nCdeer the procedures for minor subdivision by the deletion of the phrase ^Strfna^TO^ormaVandPth^sSnVstepl(foiwardedtotheGwSngeBodW shall be 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. §4.3 Table 4-1 - Adding the "® 1^£Se00,shfan72r000 .f. resp^^^^^^^^ sir-RtseTes the Downtown Design Overlay District and the Highway Corridor Overlay BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - September 17, 2001 Page 2 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. District. Add the Stanley Historic Overlay District which corrects an omission. §5.2 - Proposing ianguage that will avoid any discrepancy between the Code and State regulations regarding the maximum number of children cared for in a Family Home Day Care. Table 5-1 - Correction to the footnote in the Additional Requirements column to “§5.2.B.2.e.” Table 5-2 - Similar correction under Employee Housing in Table 5-2 to read “§5.2C.2.a. §5.3 - New provision being added to serve to restrict temporary uses to comply with the setbacks established for permanent buiiding structures. Additionally wording added “Staff may waive or adjust this provision.” §7.11 - Altering the requirement to provide for bicycle storage per twenty parking spaces rather than forty. ... §10.2 - Clarification regarding the process for Minor Subdivisions. §10.2 - Frontage lots - clarifying that the lots front onto an existing “dedicated public street.§10.3 - Add clarification to the Minor Subdivision process. §13.2.C - Revised definition of Bed & Breakfast will be discussed in Block 2. ^ §13.3 - Addition of a definition for barn/stable with the change in wording to read .. .used exclusively to store “farm implements”, grain, hay.... Definition of building envelope added.Modification of the definition of Floor Area, Gross to clarify the intent of he code in regard to attainable housing bonus units being exempt from the FAR calcula . Addition of a definition of Garage Sale with the change in wording to read ...of more Addition ofTdefinition of Statement of Intent which reflects actual practice^ „ Modification of the definition of Arterial Street to include community connector. Grap Appendi?B t-0Genera|dsubmittal requirement of Statement of Intent to reflect actual practice. Pnrrpction to the reference in Item “n” to read §7.2.D. Addffion of requirement for Names and Addresses °f adiaofn* pr°P!'5'° .root scale Clarifioatton of a requirement by Larimer County for a Small (changed from 600 ) Scale DeTteesrnaesubmittal requirement of a site specific lot survey in regard to the sketch plan Additional requirement of a submittal of an as-built development plan upon final Addfng'a mquiren? for staking of sites subiect to variance requests going to the Sim 9Hhei'ght Limitation - Revised method of calculating the maximum height limitation on steep slopes. PUBLIC COMMENT r i ■ i «trrrt irrhirh nrtw inHiiHPR “community Bill van Horn - Ti7e revised daf'nSon The additional connectors" such as Fish Creek Road affects pasp®^kin and |andscaping, are not requirements associated with an aderl,al®!^®®’JoseDhcPeci actuation where a garage built reasonable for “a comniunity connector. D"nos®Pfn0™^^ an additional setback to the 15-foot setback was a haf®'d .hM;-, ”®n da°ran|tin^ S'^l^diSmlr" This item was removed to Block 2 for discussion and review by staff. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - September 17, 2001 Page 3 As there was no further comment from the audience, the public hearing on the Code revisions from Block 1 was closed. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Pettyjohn) to recommend acceptance to Town Board and Board of County Commissioners of the amendments to the Estes Vaiiey Deveiopment Code, Biock 1, with the exception of the definitions of Bed & Breakfast and Arteriai Street and to inciude changes in wording as noted into the record. Motion passed unanimousiy with two absent. The Commission decided to adjourn the meeting and return to a study session to review the code revisions listed in Block 2. There will be another public hearing in October for those code revisions in Block 2. Meeting was adjourned at 2:19 p.m. /ArijL£±l Meribeth Wheatley, Recording retary