HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2004-08-03I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment
August 3, 2004, 8:00 a.m.
Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building
Board:
Attending:
Aiso Attending:
Absent:
Chair Bill Horton, Members Chuck Levine, Wayne Newsom, Al
Sager, Cliff Dill, and Alternate Jeff Barker
Vice Chair Sager, Members Dill, Levine, and Newsom
Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott, Planner Shirk and Recording
Secretary Williamson
Chair Horton
Vice Chair Sager called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. The following minutes reflect
the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence.
1. CONSENT AGENDA
a. The minutes of the July 13, 2004 meeting.
2’ rP.T. 8, PROSPECT VILLAGE. 430 PROSPECT VII I DRIVE APPI IPANIT.
LyjS RUIZ - VARIANCE REQUEST FROM PLATTED SFTRAnK AMn qcoth^m a 5bLE 4-5 OF THE ESTES VALt FY DEVEI.OPMFMT gnnpK ANP SECTI°N 4
t^aan^®rfChfllco!t rev|ewed the staff report. The applicant requests a 31 foot variance
to a 66 foot wide platted setback to allow a 1,250 square foot (25 by 50 feet) outdoor
sealing area to remain 35 feet from the northern Property line and
S,!T thlsou'hern bank of ‘he Big Thompson River bank ThfapSISnt alio
riMti -StS o three foot variance to the fifteen foot side yard setback in the “CO”
iv.Miy III lilts spring or 2004 to delineate a new outdoor qoatinn arOQ
rttX“L?d%0q4o a “din9(permit’ but q° irrcom9plire wi^ hi sPSn ia ly ITL SetbAChkS- The proposed addi,i°n not
Sn“TebiiS?Sr~^
applidabl^b*uii(^n^permjtn^^I^Q|^ pfa'inlS'^"' W°Uld ne6d ,0 appl^for the
use is a permitted9usPe and n^^dK^SeS Tba
western3 edge ofaheadeck1asdsHwn !neth0U^d0f°r SeaHn9 is much o'oser than the
and is concerned with the proximity of the paHo toihe eBd0gaeonhemr1err.LeVine a9re6S
stated *the 'outdoor Sn^r h^h ff-a‘bo Herera. Mr. Herem
existed when Mr. Ruiz purchased the omnprfu w basinfss:I T.he outdoor seating
patio with new tables chairs oiitrinnr^ ^ bas ^r,ed to improve the existingWith all permit^ eqteremente ' hI ZwE? a"9 'l"0"19' Mr' Ruiz wi" oompi?
summer use and will cS for theSer 6 haVe 'he 0Utd00r seatin9 area 'o'
dirg “r^rHerste^rore93 in,r:!-I0 leaVe al1 tba itema not
duringthe Winter if possible. Vice Chair Saaer SatIdUhd '^h*0 l63^6 th® items out
all items removed and stored Planner phiirntf ? he understood staff would like
removed to help minimize threk)ng^te^r^1m^ctCOt^ t9ted Staff W°Uld ,ike a" ltems
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2
August 3, 2004
It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Levine) to approve the outdoor patio as
drawn on the site plan/parallel to the river and no closer than the northwest
corner of the patio and a three foot (3’) variance from the fifteen foot (15’) side
yard setback to allow an outdoor seating area to remain 12 feet from the
western property line and the motion passed unanimously with one absent.
1,
3.
A registered land surveyor shall provide an improvement location certificate
which includes the outdoor seating by August 6, 2004.
This is a seasonal approval only. Each year the outdoor seating, including,
tables and chairs, shall be installed no early than May 1st and shall be
removed by October 1st.
This is a ternporary approval only. Town staff can require removal of the
outdoor seating, including, but not limited to fencing, outdoor carpet, tables
and chairs, with thirty days written notice for reasons including occupying the
public easement.
Any Buiiding Code violations associated with the new outdoor seating area
shall be corrected within 30 days of Board of Adjustment approval.
—VALLEY 2nd filing TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARKLOT 19
nr^lu1!1 T-A'LW_AY' A_PP.1:IC,A.NT: PRISCILLA lqqnsten - vARiANce reqiifst
R0'V'.StU,.IUN.4' T-B-E 4;2-OF THE ESTES VAI 1 FY DEVELOPMENfcODW:
l* a request to build a detached work
Sr0ri[SbU^dhLn? ‘ha 50>‘ yard kXcK rn r-rV-SIsX
minimum lot «?i7P nf 9 c: xu ” Wl uibinci, wnicn nas aForest Se^icf!,nL2;5.Kfre±„Ihe.e-af,e"1 po.rtl°n of the lot »as purchased by theForest c?Prvipp imH^r uie loi was purchased by theexistinn under the f^evous owner, which resulted in the majority of the
triannuirchfL Su°?-t?d "'thln fh? re<Iuired 50 foct Setback. -
lot is stepniv <;innori h«ow!i -----"iimmizes me Duiidable area. Thethe buildable arL VhrpropSL^strurtiirr^ii0^ a|r°Ck outcroPPin9 in a Portion of
the applicant oroDoses than 200 square feet, andthe applicant proposes to locatethp sVr. .Pt. Z tnan square feet> andexcavated. The neighborhood ii hpn»/?trfCtUr? ? an area that has already been
pattern of the prooertv linpct xhf o.^.,i:!L?[est.e.C!’ and the lots do not have a clearpattern of the property lines The enniipLf ! ana the lots do not have a clear
Of the lot. However, 0a 0thar ar-
understends th^staff recomriendationsSent t0 anSWer ques,ions' She slated she
^ea|^^amount^onmpadrand t^e ^te^lready<^ists.^0r ‘he St°ra9e Sh6d Wil1 have
^^fa^^r«yan?o:.eCr5n0d)eds^S!l/L;aV;rVetbTrre Vhirty f0°‘ <3°’) -nance
shop/storage building twenty (20’)yfrodmthlbf^|k ,0 j>ulld a detached work
passed unanimously with one absem, h Slde yard setback and the motion
2. Prior to founSmTnlpeS0™ Sal ofCa°setrdka S',e plan'
registered land surveyor. ’ °f a setdack certificate prepared by a
iuLCH0ROAFrtSApp|T-a1MTAnnr-|d' ,TfN' OF THE 6TH PM .,on -
■REQUEST FROM SFfrTInr.i J-.,. . SHERMAN - VflPIA.|^p
Planner Shirk reviewed the staff rpnnrt ' xk- ■
setback of 7 feet in lieu of the 50 fe^^eouireJ to Iv fn'T®5* t0 allow a side
structure will not exceed the 30 foot heioht limit* anH ih3 ‘^ree slo,y tree house- The
to allow the structure to be built closer tn an Wa an? the Slde yard setback request is the adjacent lot. The apptanXXled K
applicant is over the square foot limit allowedTJXsoJllVm^yTte
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 3
August 3, 2004
of the tree house would have less of an impact on the neighborhood than if it met all
required setbacks.
Board Member Levine feels the applicant did not intentionally build the tree house
without first trying to obtain the necessary permits.
Planner Shirk stated another alternative to a variance would be to combine the lots
or move the lot lines through a boundary line adjustment. However, the applicant
has not decided what he would like to do with the property and the amended plat or
boundary line adjustment would take several months. The combination of the lots
would not eliminate the nonconforming density and might increase the degree of
nonconformity.
Joe Coop of Van Horn Engineering was present to represent the applicant. Mr.
Coop stated the applicant has obtained all of the necessary permits for the work
performed on the property.
Nels Larson, 1527Devils Gulch Road, stated the tree house is visible from his front
porch and all of his windows. He feels it decreases his property value and blocks his
last view down to the lake. He stated the installed landscaping does not screen the
tree house. Mr. Larson does not think Mr. Sherman should be allowed to build the
tree house because he is already over the allowable accessory structure limit. He
also feels the tree house could be placed elsewhere on the property.
It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Levine) to approve a forty-three foot (43’)
variance from the fifty foot (50’) side yard setback to buiid a three story tree
house seven feet (7’) from the side yard setback and Section 5.2.D.5.d to aiiow
an additionai accessory structure over the maximum aliowed and the motion
passed unanimousiy with one absent.
1. Full compliance with the Uniform Building Code and approved site plan.
5. REPORTS
None.
Board Member Newsom requests that staff be at the meeting before 8:00 a m so
the meeting can start on time. '
There being no further business, Vice Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 9:07
a.m. °
_________ __
Sager, Vice Chair ~Al Sager,
i^3|m1vi^ilSmi
Ja
■V..O> o.
mson, Recording Secretary