HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1971-12-17,i at-e--I VQ-V’“Ww?I’
L
,._‘//
1i•I ‘liii
PHILLIPS •CARTER •REISTER AND ASSOCIATES,INC.
ORLEYO.PHILLIPS,PE ENGlNEERSARCHITECTSPLANNERSC0NSULTANTS
E.H.CARTER,PE
910-15TH STREET DENVER PHONE 266-2481FLOYDU.REISTR,AlA
DONALD 5.RAND PE
W.B.COLWELL,.JR.,PE
December 17,1971
The Estes Park Planning Commission
Box 1200
Estes Park,Colorado 80517
Re:One Thousand Pines
Final Plat
Gentlemen:
The subject Plat has been reviewed on the basis of the “new”Chapter 21,however the preliminary submittal of the plat was reviewed under “old”Chapter 21.In view of the above situation the review comments may seem to discredit the submittalhowevertheyareneverthelessnotedsoyoumayincludetheminastatementofexceptionstocorrectthedifferencesbetweenthe“old”and the “new”
The comments by paragraphs are:
21.5-1 (f),(g)and (h)These paragraphs are presumed to be exceeded since thegradeproblemhasbeengrantedanexception.
21.5-2 (a)Lots 7 and 11 have a width less than the 75 feet minimum.
21.7-1 (a)The plat is legible however it is not believed to be in ink.
21.7-5 Distances not shown to the nearest one hundredth of a foot.
21.7-6 The placement of monuments has not been field checked.
The subdivision closes mathematically.
21.7-9 It is assumed that the requirements of this paragraph can be met.
21.7-10 The information required by this paragraph has not been furnished,howevertheFinalPlatmaybeacceptedwiththeconditionthestreetplanandprofileandsewerandplanandprofilearesubmittedpriortotheconstructionofthesame.
Very truly yours,
W.B.Colwell,Jr.7
Assistant Town EngineerWBC/pmc