Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Planning Commission 1972-08-08Estes Park Planning Commission Town of Estes Park Gentlemen: More than three years ago,Phillips,Carter,Reister and Associates, engineering consultants of Denver,completed their “Plan for Growth of the Estes Park,Colorado Water System”. Based upon cost estimates at that time,the complete implementation of the water department “Capital Improvement Program”would cost $2,934,500 to meet the growth demands that are foreseen to 1987. At a cost of more than $1,000,000,the Town has just completed the initial phase of that program with plant improvements at Glacier Creek and Black Canyon,and installation of an 18-inch pipeline from the Glacier Creek plant to the distribution system. But additional water at the plants is of no value if it cannot be delivered to the ultimate consumer...the new home,the new motel or other business in the area served by the Estes Park water system. Several factors were considered by the engineers when they tried to project the “normal”demand growth of the system.They,of course,had figures on the water usage demanded by homes and businesses that had been constructed before 1969. They knew that there were hundreds of lots within the confines of the system that would see the bulldozer and the carpenter’s hammer in the 70’s and the 80’s and tried to project the growth of the system when a great deal of this “raw land”was sold and developed.They tried to project a program which would enable the Town water department to furnish that essential ingredient to any growth --WATER. Eites Park,Colorado 80617 P.0.Box 1200 Telephone (Area 303)586.4461 August 8,1972 0cm (J) Estes Park Planning Commission August 8,1972 Page two They said that about $195,000 should be spent on the distribution system in 1972 and $270,000 on it in 1975.Storage tanks and larger pipes were included in the plans. But there was one factor that they could not possibly envision--- lot splitting,or creating more demand than normal in neighborhoods that were already platted and developed. In the early days of Estes Park,most subdividers were “generous” with the size of lots in their development;many of them were more than an acre in size.HotEes were widely spaced and the attractiveness of the Estes Park area was enhanced by this “open space”. Splitting of lots in these already—developed areas (while of doubtless virtue to the purse of the owner)puts an immediate strain on a water dis tribution system.Developers of new subdivisions are required to install mains that will meet the needs of the possible homes and businesses on that particular acreage,even if they have to run their principal supply main several hundred feet back to a city main that is large enough to serve the development. This is not true when lots are split in an already-developed section of the town.“One more tap won’t make any difference”is not a valid reasoning when lot splitting becomes widespread The available pressure is quickly reduced and long-time customers of the system are greatly inconvenienced The Water Committee of the Town of Estes Park asks the Planning Commission to have these facts in mind when they consider applications for lot splitting by special review,rather than by normal subdivision regulations. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER COMMITTEE Glenn Prosser,Chairman \\ H.Bernerd Dannels \\ Rollen Sutter \\ GP:eks