Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2019-08-20 The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Prepared: August 12, 2019 AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION August 20, 2019 6:00 p.m. Board Room, Town Hall 1. OPEN MEETING Planning Commissioner Introductions 2. AGENDA APPROVAL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Study Session Minutes: July 16, 2019 Meeting Minutes: July 16, 2019 5. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The Meadow Condominiums At Wildfire Senior Planner Woeber 6. PRELIMINARY CONDO MAP: The Meadow Condominiums At Wildfire Senior Planner Woeber 7. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The Divide Condominiums At Wildfire Senior Planner Woeber 8. PRELIMINARY CONDO MAP: The Divide Condominiums At Wildfire Senior Planner Woeber 9. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2625 Marys Lake Road, Estes Park Chalet Senior Planner Woeber 10. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1240 Big Thompson Ave, Best Western-Silver Saddle Planner I Hardin 11. ALARADO BUSINESS PARK: Director Hunt Request to Modify Condition of Development Plan Approval Re: US 34 Improvements 12. REPORTS 13. ADJ OURN Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado July 16, 2019 Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the PLANNING COMMISSION of the Estes Valley, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in Rooms 202/203 of Town Hall. Commission: Chair Leavitt, Vice-Chair White, Commissioners, Murphree, Smith, Theis, Converse Attending: Leavitt, Theis, Murphree, Smith, White, Converse Also Attending: Town Board Liaison Norris, Director Hunt, Planner I Hardin, Planning Tech Kreycik, Senior Planner Woeber, Recording Secretary Swanlund, Town Attorney Kramer Absent: none Chair Leavitt called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. introducing new Town Attorney Dan Kramer and new Planning Commissioner Dave Converse. There were four people in attendance. This study session was streamed and recorded on the Town of Estes Park YouTube channel. Goetz Minor Subdivision Planning Tech Kreycik explained the minor subdivision proposed for Lakewood Court. Due to a dedicated right of way intersecting the property, the owners would like to create two legal lots from one lot. There is currently one single-family home on the property; the owners plan to build an additional home on the second lot. Both homes will likely be used as a Bed and Breakfast. Hunt noted that the fee was waived for this application due to the odd circumstances of the lot. Gated Communities Code Amendment Planning Tech Kreycik discussed the proposed amendment regarding restrictions on Gated Communities which was continued from the June meeting. Owners of Private right-of-ways need to be able to protect their private status, which has been added to the text amendment. The main reason for this proposal is for safety and emergencies. Existing gated access properties will be grandfathered. There are no restrictions serving one private dwelling. This is aimed at permanent restricted access. Commissioner Theis suggested updating the language to Section 7, Appendix D regarding single-family homes. Kreycik confirmed this will be done before the meeting vote. Self-Storage Code Amendment Planner Hardin discussed the upcoming code amendment regarding Self Storage Units in CO- Commercial Outlying zoning. Seven of the 13 existing businesses are in CO zoning, which makes them non-conforming. An S1 Special Review will be required. Self-storage facilities will not be allowed on arterial streets or highways. It was requested to as the Fire Marshall about the storage of hazardous materials. Planning Commission Study Session July 16, 2019 – Page 2 Silver Saddle Development Plan Planner Hardin reported that the development plan will be continued to the August meeting due to concerns from Public Works and CDOT regarding the number of easements allowed on the property. The property currently has four, CDOT only wants them to have two. The plan is to add 18 units, enclosing the swimming pool, laundry facilities, office space, and a gathering lounge for guests. An amended plat will be submitted to the Town Board on July 23 reducing the smaller lot, thus increasing the larger lot. Wildfire Development Plan Planner Woeber stated that the Development Plan for The Divide (16 units) and The Meadow Condominiums (72 units) will be on the August 20 meeting agenda. The final plat will go before the town board on August 13. Upcoming Projects Review Director Hunt discussed the larger projects coming up. The Stanley Historic District has its own review committee, called the Technical Review Committee (TRC). Any proposals proposed by the Stanley Historic District go through this Committee, not the Planning Commission or the Town Board. The Film Center application is expected to be submitted soon. Other projects are CDOT Vehicle Storage Facility, Estes Park Chalet (Mary’s Lake Lodge) and Elkhorn Lodge. Parking Density and Downtown Building Height are code amendments that will likely be coming up in the next few months. Park and Rec Update Director Hunt and Chair Leavitt spoke on the recent discussions regarding the Park and Rec code amendment. In addition to an S2 Special Review, adding language in chapter 5, which would add restrictions and/or qualifications as to what is allowed in residential zones, would be included. This wording would match the amendments for private schools and historical museums. Rezoning could be a solution for some of the items on the list. Theis expressed concerns about loopholes in the code. With the new wording, it boils down to no commercial recreation is allowed in residential zoning with this code change. The Town Board could choose to remand or continue the item at next weeks meeting. Trustee Norris stated that every effort should be made to be clear when bringing this to the Town Board explaining the rationale, ability to apply conditions, and comparing A, B and C. A summary of public comments made to the Planning Commission regarding this as well as a summary of the Stanley Historic Home conditions would also be helpful. IGA Update Director Hunt reported that there will be a joint meeting/public input session held at Town Hall on July 29 at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the future of land use in the Estes Valley. There will be an on-line survey for those unable to participate. Commissioners can speak/write in as individuals on this. Ayres Associates update Planning Commission Study Session July 16, 2019– Page 3 Planner Woeber spoke on the parking spaces in density bonus housing. Ayres Associates recommended doing some “real world” studies on projects in the Estes Valley. Greg Gladov from Public Works has been asked to review this and should have a report soon. Wildlife Study statements in Development Plans Chair Leavitt requested there be a statement in Development Plans that confirms Colorado Parks and Wildlife was contacted and reviewed the wildlife habitat for a project. Director Hunt noted the caveat that we can’t make CPW respond to us. As of 2008, it is illegal to deny a development plan unless it involves big horn sheep or riparian habitat. Future Items Spot Zoning Single-Family zoning changes talks happening around the country Inconsistent rules between County and Town for commissioner training. A test is now required for a county appointed commissioner. Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 5:30 p.m. _____________________________________ Bob Leavitt, Chair Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 16, 2019 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Bob Leavitt, Vice-Chair Sharry White, Commissioners Steve Murphree, Frank Theis, Nick Smith, Dave Converse Attending: Chair Leavitt, Vice-Chair White, Commissioners Murphree, Theis, Smith, Converse Also Attending: Director Randy Hunt, Planner I Linda Hardin, Planning Technician Claire Kreycik, Recording Secretary Karin Swanund, Town Board Liasion Ron Norris, Town Attorney Dan Kramer Absent: None Chair Leavitt called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. There were seven people in attendance. OPEN MEETING APPROVAL OF AGEND A It was moved and seconded (Leavitt/White) to approve the consent agenda as presented and the motion passed 6-0. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONSENT AGENT 1. Study Session Minutes dated June 18, 2019 2. Meeting Minutes dated June 18, 2019 3. Large Vacation Home, 520 Heinz Parkway, Jeff Abbott, owner It was moved and seconded (Theis/White) to approve the consent agenda as presented and the motion passed 5-0 with Converse abstaining. It was moved and seconded (Smith/White) to approve the Large Vacation Home application as presented and the motion passed 6-0. ACTION ITEMS 1. AMENDED MINUTES Director Hunt described the missing clause from the October 18, 2018, thus the need to amend the minutes of that meeting. The following phrase has been added verbatim: “according to the findings of fact, with findings and conditions recommended by staff.” RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 16, 2019 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall It was moved and seconded (Theis/Smith) to approve amended minutes as presented and the motion passed 5-0 with Converse abstaining. 2. DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 1240 BIG THOMPSON AVENUE Staff requested a continuance of this item to the next meeting, August 20, 2019. The applicant has not yet received approval for access on the property from CDOT. It was moved and seconded (White/Murphree) to approve the continuance for reasons presented and the motion passed 6-0. 3. CODE AMENDMENT: SELF SERVICE MINI STORAGE IN CO ZONING Planner Hardin described the reason for the code amendment, stating the addition of self-service mini-storage use be allowed in CO, Commercial Outlying zoning districts following an S1 review process. The amendment restricts storage units on major arterial streets or highways and will also allow for expansion of existing businesses. It was moved and seconded (Smith/White) to recommend to the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and the Board of Larimer County Commissioners approval of the text amendment to the EVDC Tabel 4.4 as presented with findings as recommended by staff. The motion passed 6-0. 4. CODE AMENDMENT: GATED COMMUNITIES Continued from the June 18, 2019 meeting. Planning Technician Kreycik reviewed the proposed text amendment prohibiting the use of gate-controlled access to residential single-family subdivisions, apartment complexes or condominium developments. The updated text includes the addition of private right-of-ways being able to legally close their roads one day per year to preserve their private status. Commissioner Theis stated that he had changed his opinion on this amendment from last month and he sees the need given the wildfire hazards in this area. It was moved and seconded (Smith/Theis) to recommend to the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and the Board of Larimer County Commissioners approval of the text amendment to the EVDC Tabel Chapter 7, Appendix D with the following correction to Appendix D, Section 3.b.7 about “Driveway Opening Requirements.” The code shall read: “The primary entrance for driveway openings shall not have gated access or other security barriers installed, with the exception of private single-family driveways where gated RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 16, 2019 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall access is not restricted by Section 7.12.C”, with findings as recommended by staff. The motion passed 6-0. 5. MINOR SUBDIVISION: 638 LAKEWOOD COURT Planning Technician Kreycik described the present situation, history and proposal for the Minor Subdivision, creating two separate legal lots from one. The lot is currently split in two by a public right of way. Director Hunt added that the current situation is not typical for a plat and this proposal is intended to fix what was inadvertently created with the 2000 rezoning. He apologized to the owners for the length of time it took to correct it. Public Comment Marie Gordon, town citizen, asked if this opens the door for a possible future rezoning or multi-family use. The question was answered that it would not allow for this. It was moved and seconded (Leavitt/Murphree) to recommend to the Board of Larimer County Commissioners approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Goetz Minor Subdivision according to findings of fact, including findings and conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed 6-0. REPORTS • Joint meeting with Town Board and County Commissioners with public discussion to be held at Town Hall on July 29, 2019, 5:30 p.m. regarding the current IGA and the future of land use in the Estes Valley. There will be an on- line survey for the public in which to participate. ADJOURN There being no further business Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 6:32 p.m. _________________________________ Bob Leavitt, Chair _________________________________ Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: August 20, 2019 RE: The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire, Development Plan and Preliminary Condominium Map Applicant Request: Applicant requests review and approval of a Development Plan, and a recommendation to the Town Board on a Preliminary Condominium Map for a condominium project. Planning Commission Objectives: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC); and 2. Conduct a public hearing to consider applicant’s testimony, public comment, and Town staff’s findings and analysis; and 3. Approve or deny the Development Plan application; and 4. Provide a recommendation to the Town Board of Trustees on the Preliminary Condominium Map application. Location: Subject property is located north of US 34, south of Grey Hawk Court, west of Dry Gulch Road, along Wildfire Road. See attached vicinity map. Owner/Applicant: Owner/Applicants: Westover Construction, Inc., RDA Associates LLC, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Applicant Representative: Van Horn Engineering and Surveying, Lonnie Sheldon Project Description: Present Situation: The subject property is 5.19± acres in size and is undeveloped. The site is zoned RM- Multi-Family Residential. This is one component of the “Wildfire” project, which consists 43 total lots. Fourteen lots will be for detached single-family homes, 26 lots will be for townhomes, 2 lots will be for condominium projects (The subject condominium project, “The Meadows,” as well as “The Divide.”) One lot will be dedicated for an office use benefiting Crossroads Ministry. Also included are 10 outlots dedicated for open space, utilities, access, and drainage. The Wildfire project has received approval of a rezoning, a Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat. The Wildfire project property is to be annexed into the Town of Estes Park, with the annexation approval contingent on the various required approvals for the project. Proposal: Applicant proposes to develop the vacant lot with nine condominium buildings, with eight units per building, containing a total of 72 individual units. All units will be qualified as workforce housing. Workforce housing, under the EVDC §11.4.C., requires, “…at least one (1) resident in each housing unit annually submits an affidavit, including a copy of a W-2 form, to the Town certifying that the resident is employed within the Estes Park School District R-3 Boundary Map.” MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE MEADOWS AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 2 OF 5 As all units are proposed as workforce, the applicant is able to utilize the density and height bonus incentives per EVDC §11.4. The maximum permitted density for this lot using the density bonus incentive (200% of maximum base) is 84 units, however the applicant is proposing 72 with this project. The applicant has drafted a Restrictive Covenant and Agreement, which will be reviewed and approved by Town Planning staff and the Town Attorney’s office. The Restrictive Covenant and Agreement will be included with the report and recommendation to the Town Board for the Preliminary Condominium Map. Per Chapter 3 of the EVDC, Review Procedures and Standards, the condominium project requires review and action on a Development Plan. The Development Plan requires Estes Valley Planning Commission (EVPC) review and action. The condominium project also requires review and action under Chapter 10, Subdivisions. Section 10.5.H. applies to “Townhome Projects, Condominiums, and Other Forms of Airspace Subdivisions,” and under that Section, Condominiums “shall be reviewed in accordance with applicable procedures set forth for subdivisions in Chapter 3 of this Code.” This is the Preliminary Condominium Map, which requires an EVPC recommendation to the Town Board. Staff notes the Preliminary Condominium map is nearly identical to the Development Plan. Site Data Table: Engineer: Van Horn Engineering Parcel Numbers: Development Area: 5.19± acres Existing Land Use: Vacant land and office Proposed Land Use: Residential multi- family Zoning Designation: RM-Multi-Family Residential Adjacent Zoning: North: RM-Multi-Family Residential, CH (Commercial Heavy) and O (Office) South: E (Estate) East: ROW West: R (Residential) Adjacent Land Uses: North: Housing Authority condominiums (Park River), self-storage facility, contractor offices. South: Developed single-family homes (Lone Pine Acres) East: Dry Gulch Road ROW, undeveloped area. West: Undeveloped single-family home lots (Wildfire Homes Subdivision) MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE MEADOWS AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 3 OF 5 Review Criteria: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1. Buildings and Lots. The applicant proposes 9 buildings with 72 total units. 100% of units will be dedicated as workforce housing. All buildings conform to setback, height, and density requirements. 2. Landscaping. The project is required to plant a minimum buffer of 15 feet along the entire street frontage to include 1 tree for each 40 lineal feet and 1 shrub for every 15 lineal feet. The applicant meets this requirement. A minimum buffer of 8 evergreen trees and 11 shrubs per 100 linear feet of district boundary between single family and multi-family residential zoning is required. This requirement has been met. 3. Water. Water is to be provided by the Town of Estes Park Water Division. The Division has outlined requirements for the development. All comments have addressed by the applicant. 4. Fire Protection. Estes Valley Fire Protection District provided comments regarding emergency access. All comments have addressed by the applicant. Additional requirements related to fire sprinklers and alarms will be addressed at the building permit stage. 5. Electric. Electric service is to be provided by the Town of Estes Park Power and Communications Division. The Division’s requirements have been met. 6. Sanitary Sewer. The Upper Thompson Sanitation District has no objections to this proposal. Additional requirements will apply at time of building permitting. 7. Stormwater Drainage. A drainage study was submitted and reviewed by engineering staff with the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department with this development. Public W orks has no objection. 8. Access. Access to the site is provided by Wildfire Road from Dry Gulch Road. The applicant has proposed a left turn lane off of Dry Gulch Road to provide for safe movement into the development. All infrastructure comments from the Public Works Department have been satisfied. 9. Sidewalk/Trail. The applicant has proposed an 8’ multi-modal trail along Wildfire Road to connect to the existing trail at Dry Gulch Road. 10. Parking. The applicant has proposed 154 parking spaces, which complies with parking requirements within EVDC §7.11. 11. Outdoor Lighting. All lighting will be shielded and deflected downward in compliance with EVDC §7.9. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE MEADOWS AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 4 OF 5 12. Comprehensive Plan. This project conforms to goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically as follows: • 5.1 – Encourage a variety of housing types and pricing. • 5.2 – Encourage housing for permanent residents of all sectors of the community that is integrated and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods. • 5.5 – Provide for mixed-use developments which integrate commercial, housing, employment, and service needs. • 5.7 – Identify affordable housing opportunities on an ongoing basis. • 5.9 – Support the creation of public and private funding sources for affordable housing. • 5.10 – Establish a linkage between new development and the provision of affordable housing. • 8.4 The Town and County will encourage redevelopment and infill as a primary tool to create a compact community and to prevent sprawl. Public Notice: Written notice has been mailed to adjacent property owners in accordance with EVDC §3.15 General Notice Provisions. A legal notice was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette and the application is posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” webpage. The applicant has also posted two “development proposal under review” signs on the property. Level of Public Interest Medium: Public comments have been received, expressing no objection, and also pointing out “disadvantages” to the Wildfire project. The overall project is of relatively high interest for the Town of Estes Park. All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the Decision Making Body for the Development Plan. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 2. The Planning Commission is the Recommending Body for the Preliminary Condominium Map. 3. The Development Plan and Condominium Map are consistent with the recommendations of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Concerns and issues that were raised have been addressed or will be addressed at time of building permit. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE MEADOWS AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 5 OF 5 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan, and recommends the EVPC forward a recommendation of approval of The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map. Sample motions: (Separate motions required.) DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. I move to approve The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan application according to findings as presented. 2. I move to continue The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting [State reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to deny The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan application, finding that… [state findings for denial]. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP 1. I move to forward a recommendation of approval to the Town Board of Trustees of The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map application, according to findings of fact recommended by Staff. 2. I move to continue The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map application to the next regularly scheduled meeting [state reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to forward a recommendation of denial to the Town Board of Trustees of The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map application, finding that… [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. Development Plan Set 5. Preliminary Condominium Map 1631 1659 1739 1759 1821 1741 1740 1661 1720 1740 1730 851 1825 730 1761 1821 1820176017201660 631 651 721 731 741 1771 1765 176117411721 1660 1740 1776 1810 1820 1830 1840 1860 17201660 1719 611 17531851 1741 1747 1732 177916331655 1520 1508 1504 1500 610 1725 1760 561 1901 2000 863 1715 1629 1680 1681 1717 1817 1903 1913 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1755 1775 1795 1815 1835 1855 1875 18951735171516951675165516351615 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1775 1773 1950 RAVEN AVE HIGH PINE DR RAVEN CIR RAVEN CT NORTH RIDGE LNGRAY HAWK CTWILDFIRE RD DRYGULCHRDPTARMIGAN LN GRAY HAWK CT LONEPINEDRRED TAIL HAWK DRRED TAIL HAWK DR RAVEN CIRRAVEN CI R C R A B A P P LE LNCRABAPPLELNSOA RI NG CIR SOARING CIR P T A R M I G A N TRL PTARMIGAN TRL OLYMPIAN LNOLYMPIAN LN This draft document was prepared for internal use by the Town of Estes Park, CO. The Town makes no claim as to the accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon. Due to security concerns, The Town requests that you do not post this document on the internet or otherwise make it available to persons unknown to you. 0125250 Feet 1 in = 231 ft±Town of Estes Park Community Development Wildfire Homes Printed: 5/29/2019 Created By: Brittany Hathaway Subject Properties SUPPLEMENT TO WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT May 21, 2019 Applicants submit this Supplement to the Wildfire Statement of Intent for the purpose of clarifying information and explaining revisions to the pending development applications made as a result of the Staff and agency review: 1. The four Properties that make up the Wildfire Annexation are surrounding by property within the Town limits and the right-of-way for Dry Gulch Road, but are not an enclave under State statute. 2. The Townhome Subdivision for the Divide Townhomes at Wildfire is now a part of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision. The Divide Townhomes are proposed to be constructed on 26 lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H.7.c. 3. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision is accompanied by an application for vacation of approximately the west 705 feet of the existing Wildfire Road right-of-way; the right-of- way vacation is proposed to occur prior to the dedication of right-of-way for a different alignment of Wildfire Road on the Wildfire Homes Subdivision plat. 4. The Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire includes 72 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 72 units include the 42 units allowed as the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC plus 30 bonus units (or 71% of the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus for workforce housing pursuant to EVDC § 11.4.D). Because 100% of the 72 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 9 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 5. The Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire includes 16 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 16 units equal two times (or 200%) the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC as allowed pursuant to the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus provisions of EVDC § 11.4.D. Because 100% of the 16 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 2 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 6. The Development Plans for The Meadow Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums are both accompanied with applications for preliminary subdivision plats pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H. 2 7. A restrictive covenant for the purpose of assuring the long-term availability of the workforce housing units in The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums As required by EVDC § 10.4.E.4., will be reviewed by the Town Board with the preliminary subdivision plats for The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums. 8. Parcel C is included within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“NCWCD”) and the Municipal Subdistrict. The owners of Parcels A, B and D consent to the inclusion of their Properties into the NCWCD and, as applicable, into the Municipal Subdistrict, and such owners have executed and submitted petitions for such inclusions. The NCWCD approved the petitions on May 9, 2019. 9. A preannexation agreement has been submitted and is under review by the Town Attorney. The Wildfire Preannexation Agreement will be on the Town Board’s agenda the same night as the public hearing on the Wildfire Homes Annexation. 10. The previously requested waiver 1) has been revised in response to comments from Public Works dated April 27, 2019, to increase the turn lane redirect taper length from 160 feet to 266 feet in length. WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT For Submittal on 4-18-19 BACKGROUND Westover Construction, Inc. (“Westover”), Wildfire Development, LLC (“Wildfire”), RDA Associates, LLC (“RDA”) and Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. (“Crossroads”), (referred to collectively herein as the “Petitioners”) are the owners of the Properties described on the four exhibits attached hereto: Exhibit A (“Parcel A” or the “Westover Property”); Exhibit B (“Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property”); Exhibit C (“Parcel C” or the “RDA Property”); and Exhibit D (“Parcel D” or the “Crossroads Property”). The Properties are located in the northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., lying west of Dry Gulch Road, about ½ mile north of US 34 in the North End Planning Area of the Estes Valley. Although once on the very edge of the Town, the Properties are surrounded by residential uses of various types and densities within the Town limits. South of the Properties is an Estate (“E”) zoned neighborhood (1/2 acre minimum) called Lone Pine Acres which was annexed to Estes Park and developed in the 1960’s. To the southwest is the Ranch Meadows Condominiums in the RM Multi-Family Residential zone district (“RM”) of the Town, and to the west is the Reserve in the E-1 Estate (“E-1”) zone. North of the Properties is Vista Ridge, an approximately 6-acre Estes Park Housing Authority project of 59 affordable and market rate condominiums, and The Neighborhood, an approximately 10-acre subdivision that includes small single-family lots and the Salud Family Health Center on Dry Gulch Road. Just north of The Neighborhood are the Talons Pointe Apartments and the Falcon Ridge Apartments and Townhomes, both of which are also Estes Park Housing Authority affordable housing projects with a combined 89 units, and the Good Samaritan Society – Estes Park Village, a senior community with 46 paired homes, a 34-unit apartment complex and a 24-bed assisted living center. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Petitioners desire to annex the Properties to the Town, and then rezone and subdivide it for the development of a variety of single family homes, townhomes and condominiums to provide additional housing options in the Estes Valley in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, the applications submitted are as follows: 1. Wildfire Homes Annexation of all four of the Properties, a total of 16.802 acres. 2 2. Wildfire Homes Rezone from the current zonings of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), RE Rural Estate (“RE”) and CH Heavy Commercial (“CH”), to a combination of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), R Single Family Residential (“R”), and RM Multi-Family Residential (“RM”). 3. Wildfire Homes Subdivision is proposed to include 14 single family lots (six ½- acre lots in the E zone, eight ¼-acre lots in the R zone), a townhome project (The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire which is noted as Block 2 of this subdivision), two lots for workforce housing condominium projects (The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire and the Divide Condominiums at Wildfire), 6 outlots for drainage and other purposes, and one lot in the O zone for the relocation of Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. The existing commercial construction operation now located on Parcel B will be relocated to a location outside of the Properties. 4. Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire (9 buildings, 8 units/building) on Lot 1 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units. 5. Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire (2 buildings, 8 units/building) on Lot 16 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units.. 6. Townhome Subdivision for The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire a subdivision of Block 2 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision into 26 townhome lots meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units Petitioners believe that the housing they intend to provide is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and needed to help provide additional housing options for the residents of the Estes Valley. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The units shall be eligible for the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus (Sec. 11.4.D) if at least one (1) resident in each housing unit annually submits an affidavit, including a copy of a W-2 form, to the Town certifying that the resident is employed within the Estes Park School District R-3 Boundary Map). The Wildfire project is a 128-Unit development of approximately 16 acres. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision will create six Outlots (A,B,C,D,E and F) to provide transitions between internal density and zoning changes. The total acreage of these Outlots is approximately 1.06 acres. Annexation of the Properties is also proposed. Currently, the limits of the Town of Estes Park surround the Properties and the perimeter of the Wildfire Homes Annexation as proposed is 4611 feet long. Right-of-Ways are proposed as necessary on both Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road for dedication of access to the proposed development. At 3 this time, there is no additional right of way width proposed on Wildfire Road, nor Dry Gulch Road (although it appears that the recently constructed sidewalk along the west side of Dry Gulch Road may be within the subject property limits). Additional right of way may be pursued on Dry Gulch Road with the design of the north bound left turn lane that has been determined to not be required (by LCUASS Standards), but is proposed to be constructed for safety. Utility Easements are also dedicated for the current utility needs as well as future needs associated with the buildout of this plan. At buildout, the housing units in this development will be sold individually and used as single family housing. HOA(s) are being formed and Covenants also formed for the proposed use and care of the common spaces and improvements. The right of way for Wildfire Road and the internal looping road will be dedicated to the Town for maintenance. ACCESS: Currently the southern 9 acre lot (Parcel C) is vacant and has no internal roads. Parcel C is adjacent to the Wildfire Road right of way for access as well as adjacent to the internal road in Lone Pine Subdivision (North Ridge Lane). No daily access to North Ridge Lane is proposed and only emergency access is proposed there. Emergency access is also proposed at the southeast corner of the internal loop road. All lots that are proposed have frontage on a public street or front on a private access easement (Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5). Outlot B on the west side of the loop road is also for access that would (in the future) possibly connect to properties to the west in the Reserve Subdivision. This area adjacent to the west side of the Wildfire Homes Development is in a Conservation Easement that does not allow roads; therefore, no physical road is proposed. The ground there is relatively flat and can be accessed in an absolute emergency. The Traffic Impact Study (attached with this submittal) has shown that there is not a requirement for the left turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road. This development has planned for that and it is indicated as proposed for construction with this submittal. A preliminary design for that improvement is also included herein. It is a somewhat complicated improvement given the alignment of the current road, the large storm sewer catch basin in the southwest quadrant, and the steep (retaining wall) slope to the east with the floodplain of Dry Gulch Creek nearby. Additional right of way is not felt absolutely necessary, but would be helpful to decrease the cost of that possible improvement. A Traffic Memo has been submitted and the formal Traffic Impact Study is also now included. Fire truck access is adequate for the appropriate wheel base truck length and is shown specifically on the attached development sheets. The steepest new internal main road profile grade is less than an 11% slope which meets the EVDC. As mentioned above, emergency access loops are also proposed to mitigate the possible long cul-de-sac concern. Pedestrian access is provided with a looping sidewalk paralleling both sides of the internal looping road as well as a detached sidewalk generally following the south side of Wildfire Road leading to the large sidewalk on the west side of Dry Gulch Road. Bicycle traffic is expected to share the road system in this subdivision as no individual bicycle lanes are proposed. 4 OPEN SPACE: This project includes six Outlots and other areas of open space as shown on the attached designs. There are no outstanding or noticeable specific features on this site (like wetlands, or rock outcrops, or significant trees). UTILITIES: This property is currently adjacent to all the main utilities. The main lines will be tied into and extended for use by the proposed condominiums, Townhomes and single family lots. ELECTRIC: Contact has been made with the Town of Estes Park Light & Power Department as well as an Electric Engineer. The current plan is to come off of the existing three phase power along the west line with drops to transformers to serve the western portions of this subdivision. All proposed electric lines will be buried. The same plan is true for the southern line which is a secondary line. Transformers are shown on the electric utility plan to serve the units along the southern side of the development with all buried lines. There has been some preliminary discussion about burying the lines along the south side of the subdivision (with help from the southern adjoining lot owners in Lone Pine Subdivision). The poles and service lines along the south line are on or near the Lone Pine lots. Should a new buried power line be completed, agreements with southern lot owners would be needed to re-connect their service lines. A 20’ Utility and Drainage Easement is proposed along this south line within the W ildfire Homes Subdivision for this utility improvement if an agreement comes together. If an agreement cannot be made, then the plan as outlined above will move forward. WATER: A water main exists to the north of this development within the Neighborhood Subdivision and the new main lines through this development will connect to that water main (proposed here between Lots 15 and 16). This subdivision will include a looping water main running west to east to connect to the existing main in Wildfire Road east of the circle road. This connection will help to balance pressures in this area of Town. SEWER: Upper Thompson Sanitation District controls the sewer lines in this area of Estes Park and gravity flow main lines are proposed in easily accessible locations to serve the future units and connect to the existing sewer main line in Wildfire Road east of the circle road. PARKING: The EVDC parking quantities are proposed or exceeded with this development. Internal parking is provided on the ground floor of the 8-plexes (8 in each building), and additional outside parking is also proposed. Code required parking for the proposed multi-family and townhome units collectively is 239 spaces, while 251 spaces are being provided. The Crossroads land use currently has 22 spaces and operates acceptably. The proposed Crossroads site is planned to have 25 spaces. 5 STORMWATER: Given that this property is close to a river (Dry Gulch Creek), and there are established roadside ditches along Wildfire Road, the main drainage changes are higher on the lot in the area where stormwater features are not currently present. A Preliminary Drainage Report meeting the requirements of the Larimer County Stormwater Management Manual is included with this submittal. Also, two relatively large detention ponds (with outlet structures) are proposed to the north and south of the proposed looping road. These detention ponds provide open space for the development and also hold back the difference between historic runoff and the increased runoff from the increased hard surfacing associated with this proposal. The ponds are provided with relatively shallow side slopes in at least one direction for animal and public safety. The net result downstream is that no increase in flow (Cubic Feet per Second) is proposed to Dry Gulch Creek. Of course, disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to promote grass growth and to minimize erosion and look aesthetically pleasing. SCHEDULE: One general phase is proposed for buildout. A consecutive approach is planned for construction. The current plan is to work from higher density (Townhomes) to the Condominium units, and then single family lots. The units are planned to be built simultaneously or consecutively without any delay following the over-lot grading, and installation of roads and utility main lines. CODE WAIVERS: All of the appropriate Utility District, EVDC and other standards for development (requirements) are met with this submittal except for the following three (3) items: 1) Redirect Taper length for north portion of the turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road. As mentioned above, this turn lane is not required by the cited standard, but is proposed by the developers for safety of the future residence. The taper and striping lengths for this proposed improvement equal or exceed the similar left turn lane recently constructed just 500’ north of the proposed left turn lane. 2) Appendix D.lll.B.6 where shared single family driveways may be shared by up to four units. Lots 2-6 are proposed to share the driveway in the access easement proposed. Lot 6 could access from Divide Circle, however not as safe as accessing on the private driveway. 3) Multi-modal path detached and located on the south side of Wildfire Road. This concrete walk is proposed at 8’ wide. Federal Standards (AASHTO) suggests a 10’ width. Reasoning for this waiver is limited right of way (some of the sidewalk area is proposed in easements), site disturbance is limited with a smaller path (keeping the roadside ditches along Wildfire Road), the uncommon (non-existing) occurrence in Estes Park of a multi-modal path in a residential subdivision, and most importantly, this proposed 8’ path connects to the existing ‘downstream’ 6 path along the west side of Dry Gulch Road (recently constructed trail system connection to the Town). 7 Exhibit A to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel A” or the “Westover Property” owned by Petitioner, Westover Construction, Inc. Current zoning: RE Rural Estate Zoning District Address: 1851 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-016 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP WITH ALL BEARING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.56 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 20 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 8 Exhibit B to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property” owned by Petitioner, Wildfire Development, LLC Current zoning: CH Heavy Commercial Zoning District Address: 1753 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-015 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 343.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE IN THE DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114, ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 2, HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 9 Exhibit C to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel C” or “RDA Property” owned by Petitioner, RDA Associates, LLC Current zoning: E Rural Estate Zoning District Address: vacant property Parcel Number: 25200-00-007 Legal Description: A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE W1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, MONUMENTED BY A BRASS CAPPED PIPE WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NW1/4 OF SECTION 20 CONSIDERED AS BEARING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 1506.46 FEET TO A BRASS CAPPED PIPE; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST 236.97 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 163.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT 225.13 FEET, SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 26 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 430.10 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST 222.57 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 288.62 FEET SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 13 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 973.48 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 81 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 287.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST 666.81 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 326.57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 10 Exhibit D to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel D” or “Crossroads Property” owned by Petitioner, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Current zoning: O Office Zoning District Address: 851 Dry Gulch Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-910 Legal Description: A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 20 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 1506.3 FEET, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 26 MINUTES EAST 395.8 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES EAST 161 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 46 MINUTES WEST 377 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 274.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1983 IN BOOK 2239 AT PAGE 1089 AND SHOWN IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 22, 1986 AS RECEPTION NO. 86020283. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. RecordOwner(s)MailingAddressPhoneEmailContactInformationApplicantMailingAddressPhoneEmailConsultantlEngineerMailingAddressPhoneEmailMINERALRIGHTCERTIFICATIONArticle65.5ofTitle24oftheColoradoRevisedStatutesrequiresapplicantsforDevelopmentPlans!SpecialReviews,Rezoning,PreliminaryandFinalSubdivisionPlats,MinorSubdivisionPlatsifcreatinganewlot,andPreliminaryandFinalCondominiumMapstoprovidenoticeoftheapplicationandinitialpublichearingtoallmineralestateownerswherethesurfaceestateandthemineralestatehavebeensevered.Noticemustbegiven30dayspriortothefirsthearingonanapplicationfordevelopmentandmeetthestatutoryrequirements.IherebycertifythattheprovisionsofSection24-65.5-103CRShavebeqnmetNames:RecordOwnerPLEASEPRINT:ApplicantP____________________________________Signatures:_______________Date_3J’//’RecordOwnerDate.3,///‘tApplicant/—OWNER&APPLICANTCERTIFICATIONAsOwner,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandIamtherecordowneroftheproperty.frAsApplicant,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandinfilingtheapplicationIamactingwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftherecordowner(s)oftheproperty.IgrantpermissionforTownofEstesParkemployees,reviewingagencystaff,PlanningCommissioners,membersoftheTownBoardofTrustees,orLarimerCountyCommissionerswithproperidentificationaccesstomyppertyduringthereviewofthisapplication.IacknowledgeIhavereceivedtheEstesValleyDevelopmentReviewApplicationScheduleandamawarethatfailuretomeetthedeadlinesshownonsaidschedulemayresultinmyapplicationbeyingdelayedoranyapprovalofmyapplicationbecomingnullandvoid.Names:ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:1/LA—.tCI4L/4rRecordOwnerPLEASignatures:____________________________RecordOwner_____________Date1’________Date_______Applicant______________________________________________________Revised20110109KT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: August 20, 2019 RE: The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire, Development Plan and Preliminary Condominium Map Applicant Request: Applicant requests review and approval of a Development Plan, and a recommendation to the Town Board on a Preliminary Condominium Map for a condominium project. Planning Commission Objectives: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC); and 2. Conduct a public hearing to consider applicant’s testimony, public comment, and Town staff’s findings and analysis; and 3. Approve or deny the Development Plan application; and 4. Provide a recommendation to the Town Board of Trustees on the Preliminary Condominium Map application. Location: Subject property is located north of US 34, south of Grey Hawk Court, west of Dry Gulch Road, along Wildfire Road. See attached vicinity map. Owner/Applicant: Owner/Applicants: Westover Construction, Inc., RDA Associates LLC, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Applicant Representative: Van Horn Engineering and Surveying, Lonnie Sheldon Project Description: Present Situation: The subject property is 1.01± acres in size and is undeveloped. The site is zoned RM- Multi-Family Residential. This is one component of the “Wildfire” project, which consists 43 total lots. Fourteen lots will be for detached single-family homes, 26 lots will be for townhomes, 2 lots will be for condominium projects (The subject condominium project, “The Divides,” as well as “The Meadows.”) One lot will be dedicated for an office use benefiting Crossroads Ministry. Also included are 10 outlots dedicated for open space, utilities, access, and drainage. The Wildfire project has received approval of a rezoning, a Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat. The Wildfire project property is to be annexed into the Town of Estes Park, with the annexation approval contingent on the various required approvals for the project. Proposal: Applicant proposes to develop the vacant lot with two condominium buildings, with eight units per building, containing a total of 16 individual units. All units will be qualified as workforce housing. Workforce housing, under the EVDC §11.4.C., requires, “…at least one (1) resident in each housing unit annually submits an affidavit, including a copy of a W-2 form, to the Town certifying that the resident is employed within the Estes Park School District R-3 Boundary Map.” MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE DIVIDE AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 2 OF 5 As all units are proposed as workforce, the applicant is able to utilize the density and height bonus incentives per EVDC §11.4. The maximum permitted density for this lot using the density bonus incentive (200% of maximum base) is 16.3 units, where the applicant is proposing 16. The height bonus incentive allows a maximum height of 38 feet, with a maximum height of 34.83 feet being proposed. The applicant has drafted a Restrictive Covenant and Agreement, which is now being reviewed by Town Planning staff and the Town Attorney’s office. The Restrictive Covenant and Agreement will be included with the report and recommendation to the Town Board for the Preliminary Condominium Map. Per Chapter 3 of the EVDC, Review Procedures and Standards, the condominium project requires review and action on a Development Plan. The Development Plan requires Estes Valley Planning Commission (EVPC) review and action. The condominium project also requires review and action under Chapter 10, Subdivisions. Section 10.5.H. applies to “Townhome Projects, Condominiums, and Other Forms of Airspace Subdivisions,” and under that Section, Condominiums “shall be reviewed in accordance with applicable procedures set forth for subdivisions in Chapter 3 of this Code.” This is the Preliminary Condominium Map, which requires an EVPC recommendation to the Town Board. Staff notes the Preliminary Condominium map is nearly identical to the Development Plan. Site Data Table Engineer: Van Horn Engineering and Surveying Parcel Numbers: Development Area: 1.01± acres Existing Land Use: Vacant land Proposed Land Use: Residential multi- family Zoning Designation: RM-Multi-Family Residential Adjacent Zoning: North: R-1 (Residential) South: RM (Multi-Family Residential) East: R (Residential) West: RM (Multi-Family Residential) and O (Office) Adjacent Land Uses: North: Single-family residences (The Neighborhood) South: Proposed townhomes (Wildfire Homes Subdivision) East: Undeveloped single-family residential lots (Wildfire Homes Subdivision) West: Wildfire Homes Subdivision outlot, office MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE DIVIDE AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 3 OF 5 Review Criteria: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1. Buildings and Lots. The applicant proposes two buildings with 16 total units. 100% of units will be dedicated as workforce housing. All buildings conform to setback, height, and density requirements. 2. Landscaping. The project is required to plant a minimum buffer of 15 feet along the entire street frontage to include 1 tree for each 40 lineal feet and 1 shrub for every 15 lineal feet. The applicant meets this requirement. A minimum buffer of 8 evergreen trees and 11 shrubs per 100 linear feet of district boundary between single family and multi-family residential zoning is required. This requirement has been met. 3. Water. Water is to be provided by the Town of Estes Park Water Division. The Division has outlined requirements for the development. All comments have addressed by the applicant. 4. Fire Protection. Estes Valley Fire Protection District provided comments regarding emergency access. All comments have addressed by the applicant. Additional requirements related to fire sprinklers and alarms will be addressed at the building permit stage. 5. Electric. Electric service is to be provided by the Town of Estes Park Power and Communications Division. The Division’s requirements have been met. 6. Sanitary Sewer. The Upper Thompson Sanitation District has no objections to this proposal. Additional requirements will apply at time of building permitting. 7. Stormwater Drainage. A drainage study was submitted and reviewed by engineering staff with the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department with this development. Public W orks has no objection. 8. Access. Access to the site is via Divide Circle, from W ildfire Road. All infrastructure comments from the Public Works Department have been satisfied. 9. Sidewalk/Trail. The applicant has proposed a 5’ sidewalk along Divide Circle to connect to a proposed 8’ multi-modal trail along Wildfire Road. 10. Parking. The applicant has proposed 34 parking spaces, which complies with parking requirements within EVDC §7.11. 11. Outdoor Lighting. All lighting will be shielded and deflected downward in compliance with EVDC §7.9. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE DIVIDE AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 4 OF 5 12. Comprehensive Plan. This project conforms to goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically as follows: • 5.1 – Encourage a variety of housing types and pricing. • 5.2 – Encourage housing for permanent residents of all sectors of the community that is integrated and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods. • 5.5 – Provide for mixed-use developments which integrate commercial, housing, employment, and service needs. • 5.7 – Identify affordable housing opportunities on an ongoing basis. • 5.9 – Support the creation of public and private funding sources for affordable housing. • 5.10 – Establish a linkage between new development and the provision of affordable housing. • 8.4 The Town and County will encourage redevelopment and infill as a primary tool to create a compact community and to prevent sprawl. Public Notice: Written notice has been mailed to adjacent property owners in accordance with EVDC §3.15 General Notice Provisions. A legal notice was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette and the application is posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” webpage. The applicant has also posted two “development proposal under review” signs on the property. Level of Public Interest Medium: Public comments have been received, expressing no objection, and also pointing out “disadvantages” to the Wildfire project. The overall project is of relatively high interest for the Town of Estes Park. All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the Decision Making Body for the Development Plan. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 2. The Planning Commission is the Recommending Body for the Preliminary Condominium Map. 3. The Development Plan and Condominium Map are consistent with the recommendations of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Concerns and issues that were raised have been addressed or will be addressed at time of building permit. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: THE DIVIDE AT WILDFIRE CONDOMINIUMS PAGE 5 OF 5 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan, and recommends the EVPC forward a recommendation of approval of The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map. Sample motions: (Separate motions required.) DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. I move to approve The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan application according to findings as presented. 2. I move to continue The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting [State reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to deny The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Development Plan application, finding that… [state findings for denial]. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP 1. I move to forward a recommendation of approval to the Town Board of Trustees of The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map application, according to findings of fact recommended by Staff. 2. I move to continue The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map application to the next regularly scheduled meeting [state reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to forward a recommendation of denial to the Town Board of Trustees of The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire Preliminary Condominium Map application, finding that… [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. Development Plan Set 5. Preliminary Condominium Map 1631 1659 1739 1759 1821 1741 1740 1661 1720 1740 1730 851 1825 730 1761 1821 1820176017201660 631 651 721 731 741 1771 1765 176117411721 1660 1740 1776 1810 1820 1830 1840 1860 17201660 1719 611 17531851 1741 1747 1732 177916331655 1520 1508 1504 1500 610 1725 1760 561 1901 2000 863 1715 1629 1680 1681 1717 1817 1903 1913 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1755 1775 1795 1815 1835 1855 1875 18951735171516951675165516351615 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1775 1773 1950 RAVEN AVE HIGH PINE DR RAVEN CIR RAVEN CT NORTH RIDGE LNGRAY HAWK CTWILDFIRE RD DRYGULCHRDPTARMIGAN LN GRAY HAWK CT LONEPINEDRRED TAIL HAWK DRRED TAIL HAWK DR RAVEN CIRRAVEN CI R C R A B A P P LE LNCRABAPPLELNSOA RI NG CIR SOARING CIR P T A R M I G A N TRL PTARMIGAN TRL OLYMPIAN LNOLYMPIAN LN This draft document was prepared for internal use by the Town of Estes Park, CO. The Town makes no claim as to the accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon. Due to security concerns, The Town requests that you do not post this document on the internet or otherwise make it available to persons unknown to you. 0125250 Feet 1 in = 231 ft±Town of Estes Park Community Development Wildfire Homes Printed: 5/29/2019 Created By: Brittany Hathaway Subject Properties SUPPLEMENT TO WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT May 21, 2019 Applicants submit this Supplement to the Wildfire Statement of Intent for the purpose of clarifying information and explaining revisions to the pending development applications made as a result of the Staff and agency review: 1. The four Properties that make up the Wildfire Annexation are surrounding by property within the Town limits and the right-of-way for Dry Gulch Road, but are not an enclave under State statute. 2. The Townhome Subdivision for the Divide Townhomes at Wildfire is now a part of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision. The Divide Townhomes are proposed to be constructed on 26 lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H.7.c. 3. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision is accompanied by an application for vacation of approximately the west 705 feet of the existing Wildfire Road right-of-way; the right-of- way vacation is proposed to occur prior to the dedication of right-of-way for a different alignment of Wildfire Road on the Wildfire Homes Subdivision plat. 4. The Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire includes 72 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 72 units include the 42 units allowed as the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC plus 30 bonus units (or 71% of the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus for workforce housing pursuant to EVDC § 11.4.D). Because 100% of the 72 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 9 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 5. The Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire includes 16 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 16 units equal two times (or 200%) the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC as allowed pursuant to the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus provisions of EVDC § 11.4.D. Because 100% of the 16 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 2 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 6. The Development Plans for The Meadow Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums are both accompanied with applications for preliminary subdivision plats pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H. 2 7. A restrictive covenant for the purpose of assuring the long-term availability of the workforce housing units in The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums As required by EVDC § 10.4.E.4., will be reviewed by the Town Board with the preliminary subdivision plats for The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums. 8. Parcel C is included within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“NCWCD”) and the Municipal Subdistrict. The owners of Parcels A, B and D consent to the inclusion of their Properties into the NCWCD and, as applicable, into the Municipal Subdistrict, and such owners have executed and submitted petitions for such inclusions. The NCWCD approved the petitions on May 9, 2019. 9. A preannexation agreement has been submitted and is under review by the Town Attorney. The Wildfire Preannexation Agreement will be on the Town Board’s agenda the same night as the public hearing on the Wildfire Homes Annexation. 10. The previously requested waiver 1) has been revised in response to comments from Public Works dated April 27, 2019, to increase the turn lane redirect taper length from 160 feet to 266 feet in length. WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT For Submittal on 4-18-19 BACKGROUND Westover Construction, Inc. (“Westover”), Wildfire Development, LLC (“Wildfire”), RDA Associates, LLC (“RDA”) and Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. (“Crossroads”), (referred to collectively herein as the “Petitioners”) are the owners of the Properties described on the four exhibits attached hereto: Exhibit A (“Parcel A” or the “Westover Property”); Exhibit B (“Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property”); Exhibit C (“Parcel C” or the “RDA Property”); and Exhibit D (“Parcel D” or the “Crossroads Property”). The Properties are located in the northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., lying west of Dry Gulch Road, about ½ mile north of US 34 in the North End Planning Area of the Estes Valley. Although once on the very edge of the Town, the Properties are surrounded by residential uses of various types and densities within the Town limits. South of the Properties is an Estate (“E”) zoned neighborhood (1/2 acre minimum) called Lone Pine Acres which was annexed to Estes Park and developed in the 1960’s. To the southwest is the Ranch Meadows Condominiums in the RM Multi-Family Residential zone district (“RM”) of the Town, and to the west is the Reserve in the E-1 Estate (“E-1”) zone. North of the Properties is Vista Ridge, an approximately 6-acre Estes Park Housing Authority project of 59 affordable and market rate condominiums, and The Neighborhood, an approximately 10-acre subdivision that includes small single-family lots and the Salud Family Health Center on Dry Gulch Road. Just north of The Neighborhood are the Talons Pointe Apartments and the Falcon Ridge Apartments and Townhomes, both of which are also Estes Park Housing Authority affordable housing projects with a combined 89 units, and the Good Samaritan Society – Estes Park Village, a senior community with 46 paired homes, a 34-unit apartment complex and a 24-bed assisted living center. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Petitioners desire to annex the Properties to the Town, and then rezone and subdivide it for the development of a variety of single family homes, townhomes and condominiums to provide additional housing options in the Estes Valley in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, the applications submitted are as follows: 1. Wildfire Homes Annexation of all four of the Properties, a total of 16.802 acres. 2 2. Wildfire Homes Rezone from the current zonings of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), RE Rural Estate (“RE”) and CH Heavy Commercial (“CH”), to a combination of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), R Single Family Residential (“R”), and RM Multi-Family Residential (“RM”). 3. Wildfire Homes Subdivision is proposed to include 14 single family lots (six ½- acre lots in the E zone, eight ¼-acre lots in the R zone), a townhome project (The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire which is noted as Block 2 of this subdivision), two lots for workforce housing condominium projects (The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire and the Divide Condominiums at Wildfire), 6 outlots for drainage and other purposes, and one lot in the O zone for the relocation of Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. The existing commercial construction operation now located on Parcel B will be relocated to a location outside of the Properties. 4. Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire (9 buildings, 8 units/building) on Lot 1 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units. 5. Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire (2 buildings, 8 units/building) on Lot 16 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units.. 6. Townhome Subdivision for The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire a subdivision of Block 2 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision into 26 townhome lots meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units Petitioners believe that the housing they intend to provide is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and needed to help provide additional housing options for the residents of the Estes Valley. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The units shall be eligible for the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus (Sec. 11.4.D) if at least one (1) resident in each housing unit annually submits an affidavit, including a copy of a W-2 form, to the Town certifying that the resident is employed within the Estes Park School District R-3 Boundary Map). The Wildfire project is a 128-Unit development of approximately 16 acres. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision will create six Outlots (A,B,C,D,E and F) to provide transitions between internal density and zoning changes. The total acreage of these Outlots is approximately 1.06 acres. Annexation of the Properties is also proposed. Currently, the limits of the Town of Estes Park surround the Properties and the perimeter of the Wildfire Homes Annexation as proposed is 4611 feet long. Right-of-Ways are proposed as necessary on both Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road for dedication of access to the proposed development. At 3 this time, there is no additional right of way width proposed on Wildfire Road, nor Dry Gulch Road (although it appears that the recently constructed sidewalk along the west side of Dry Gulch Road may be within the subject property limits). Additional right of way may be pursued on Dry Gulch Road with the design of the north bound left turn lane that has been determined to not be required (by LCUASS Standards), but is proposed to be constructed for safety. Utility Easements are also dedicated for the current utility needs as well as future needs associated with the buildout of this plan. At buildout, the housing units in this development will be sold individually and used as single family housing. HOA(s) are being formed and Covenants also formed for the proposed use and care of the common spaces and improvements. The right of way for Wildfire Road and the internal looping road will be dedicated to the Town for maintenance. ACCESS: Currently the southern 9 acre lot (Parcel C) is vacant and has no internal roads. Parcel C is adjacent to the Wildfire Road right of way for access as well as adjacent to the internal road in Lone Pine Subdivision (North Ridge Lane). No daily access to North Ridge Lane is proposed and only emergency access is proposed there. Emergency access is also proposed at the southeast corner of the internal loop road. All lots that are proposed have frontage on a public street or front on a private access easement (Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5). Outlot B on the west side of the loop road is also for access that would (in the future) possibly connect to properties to the west in the Reserve Subdivision. This area adjacent to the west side of the Wildfire Homes Development is in a Conservation Easement that does not allow roads; therefore, no physical road is proposed. The ground there is relatively flat and can be accessed in an absolute emergency. The Traffic Impact Study (attached with this submittal) has shown that there is not a requirement for the left turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road. This development has planned for that and it is indicated as proposed for construction with this submittal. A preliminary design for that improvement is also included herein. It is a somewhat complicated improvement given the alignment of the current road, the large storm sewer catch basin in the southwest quadrant, and the steep (retaining wall) slope to the east with the floodplain of Dry Gulch Creek nearby. Additional right of way is not felt absolutely necessary, but would be helpful to decrease the cost of that possible improvement. A Traffic Memo has been submitted and the formal Traffic Impact Study is also now included. Fire truck access is adequate for the appropriate wheel base truck length and is shown specifically on the attached development sheets. The steepest new internal main road profile grade is less than an 11% slope which meets the EVDC. As mentioned above, emergency access loops are also proposed to mitigate the possible long cul-de-sac concern. Pedestrian access is provided with a looping sidewalk paralleling both sides of the internal looping road as well as a detached sidewalk generally following the south side of Wildfire Road leading to the large sidewalk on the west side of Dry Gulch Road. Bicycle traffic is expected to share the road system in this subdivision as no individual bicycle lanes are proposed. 4 OPEN SPACE: This project includes six Outlots and other areas of open space as shown on the attached designs. There are no outstanding or noticeable specific features on this site (like wetlands, or rock outcrops, or significant trees). UTILITIES: This property is currently adjacent to all the main utilities. The main lines will be tied into and extended for use by the proposed condominiums, Townhomes and single family lots. ELECTRIC: Contact has been made with the Town of Estes Park Light & Power Department as well as an Electric Engineer. The current plan is to come off of the existing three phase power along the west line with drops to transformers to serve the western portions of this subdivision. All proposed electric lines will be buried. The same plan is true for the southern line which is a secondary line. Transformers are shown on the electric utility plan to serve the units along the southern side of the development with all buried lines. There has been some preliminary discussion about burying the lines along the south side of the subdivision (with help from the southern adjoining lot owners in Lone Pine Subdivision). The poles and service lines along the south line are on or near the Lone Pine lots. Should a new buried power line be completed, agreements with southern lot owners would be needed to re-connect their service lines. A 20’ Utility and Drainage Easement is proposed along this south line within the W ildfire Homes Subdivision for this utility improvement if an agreement comes together. If an agreement cannot be made, then the plan as outlined above will move forward. WATER: A water main exists to the north of this development within the Neighborhood Subdivision and the new main lines through this development will connect to that water main (proposed here between Lots 15 and 16). This subdivision will include a looping water main running west to east to connect to the existing main in Wildfire Road east of the circle road. This connection will help to balance pressures in this area of Town. SEWER: Upper Thompson Sanitation District controls the sewer lines in this area of Estes Park and gravity flow main lines are proposed in easily accessible locations to serve the future units and connect to the existing sewer main line in Wildfire Road east of the circle road. PARKING: The EVDC parking quantities are proposed or exceeded with this development. Internal parking is provided on the ground floor of the 8-plexes (8 in each building), and additional outside parking is also proposed. Code required parking for the proposed multi-family and townhome units collectively is 239 spaces, while 251 spaces are being provided. The Crossroads land use currently has 22 spaces and operates acceptably. The proposed Crossroads site is planned to have 25 spaces. 5 STORMWATER: Given that this property is close to a river (Dry Gulch Creek), and there are established roadside ditches along Wildfire Road, the main drainage changes are higher on the lot in the area where stormwater features are not currently present. A Preliminary Drainage Report meeting the requirements of the Larimer County Stormwater Management Manual is included with this submittal. Also, two relatively large detention ponds (with outlet structures) are proposed to the north and south of the proposed looping road. These detention ponds provide open space for the development and also hold back the difference between historic runoff and the increased runoff from the increased hard surfacing associated with this proposal. The ponds are provided with relatively shallow side slopes in at least one direction for animal and public safety. The net result downstream is that no increase in flow (Cubic Feet per Second) is proposed to Dry Gulch Creek. Of course, disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to promote grass growth and to minimize erosion and look aesthetically pleasing. SCHEDULE: One general phase is proposed for buildout. A consecutive approach is planned for construction. The current plan is to work from higher density (Townhomes) to the Condominium units, and then single family lots. The units are planned to be built simultaneously or consecutively without any delay following the over-lot grading, and installation of roads and utility main lines. CODE WAIVERS: All of the appropriate Utility District, EVDC and other standards for development (requirements) are met with this submittal except for the following three (3) items: 1) Redirect Taper length for north portion of the turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road. As mentioned above, this turn lane is not required by the cited standard, but is proposed by the developers for safety of the future residence. The taper and striping lengths for this proposed improvement equal or exceed the similar left turn lane recently constructed just 500’ north of the proposed left turn lane. 2) Appendix D.lll.B.6 where shared single family driveways may be shared by up to four units. Lots 2-6 are proposed to share the driveway in the access easement proposed. Lot 6 could access from Divide Circle, however not as safe as accessing on the private driveway. 3) Multi-modal path detached and located on the south side of Wildfire Road. This concrete walk is proposed at 8’ wide. Federal Standards (AASHTO) suggests a 10’ width. Reasoning for this waiver is limited right of way (some of the sidewalk area is proposed in easements), site disturbance is limited with a smaller path (keeping the roadside ditches along Wildfire Road), the uncommon (non-existing) occurrence in Estes Park of a multi-modal path in a residential subdivision, and most importantly, this proposed 8’ path connects to the existing ‘downstream’ 6 path along the west side of Dry Gulch Road (recently constructed trail system connection to the Town). 7 Exhibit A to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel A” or the “Westover Property” owned by Petitioner, Westover Construction, Inc. Current zoning: RE Rural Estate Zoning District Address: 1851 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-016 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP WITH ALL BEARING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.56 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 20 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 8 Exhibit B to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property” owned by Petitioner, Wildfire Development, LLC Current zoning: CH Heavy Commercial Zoning District Address: 1753 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-015 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 343.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE IN THE DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114, ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 2, HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 9 Exhibit C to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel C” or “RDA Property” owned by Petitioner, RDA Associates, LLC Current zoning: E Rural Estate Zoning District Address: vacant property Parcel Number: 25200-00-007 Legal Description: A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE W1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, MONUMENTED BY A BRASS CAPPED PIPE WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NW1/4 OF SECTION 20 CONSIDERED AS BEARING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 1506.46 FEET TO A BRASS CAPPED PIPE; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST 236.97 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 163.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT 225.13 FEET, SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 26 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 430.10 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST 222.57 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 288.62 FEET SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 13 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 973.48 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 81 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 287.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST 666.81 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 326.57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 10 Exhibit D to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel D” or “Crossroads Property” owned by Petitioner, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Current zoning: O Office Zoning District Address: 851 Dry Gulch Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-910 Legal Description: A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 20 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 1506.3 FEET, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 26 MINUTES EAST 395.8 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES EAST 161 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 46 MINUTES WEST 377 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 274.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1983 IN BOOK 2239 AT PAGE 1089 AND SHOWN IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 22, 1986 AS RECEPTION NO. 86020283. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. RecordOwner(s)MailingAddressPhoneEmailContactInformationApplicantMailingAddressPhoneEmailConsultantlEngineerMailingAddressPhoneEmailMINERALRIGHTCERTIFICATIONArticle65.5ofTitle24oftheColoradoRevisedStatutesrequiresapplicantsforDevelopmentPlans!SpecialReviews,Rezoning,PreliminaryandFinalSubdivisionPlats,MinorSubdivisionPlatsifcreatinganewlot,andPreliminaryandFinalCondominiumMapstoprovidenoticeoftheapplicationandinitialpublichearingtoallmineralestateownerswherethesurfaceestateandthemineralestatehavebeensevered.Noticemustbegiven30dayspriortothefirsthearingonanapplicationfordevelopmentandmeetthestatutoryrequirements.IherebycertifythattheprovisionsofSection24-65.5-103CRShavebeqnmetNames:RecordOwnerPLEASEPRINT:ApplicantP____________________________________Signatures:_______________Date_3J’//’RecordOwnerDate.3,///‘tApplicant/—OWNER&APPLICANTCERTIFICATIONAsOwner,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandIamtherecordowneroftheproperty.frAsApplicant,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandinfilingtheapplicationIamactingwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftherecordowner(s)oftheproperty.IgrantpermissionforTownofEstesParkemployees,reviewingagencystaff,PlanningCommissioners,membersoftheTownBoardofTrustees,orLarimerCountyCommissionerswithproperidentificationaccesstomyppertyduringthereviewofthisapplication.IacknowledgeIhavereceivedtheEstesValleyDevelopmentReviewApplicationScheduleandamawarethatfailuretomeetthedeadlinesshownonsaidschedulemayresultinmyapplicationbeyingdelayedoranyapprovalofmyapplicationbecomingnullandvoid.Names:ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:1/LA—.tCI4L/4rRecordOwnerPLEASignatures:____________________________RecordOwner_____________Date1’________Date_______Applicant______________________________________________________Revised20110109KT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: August 20, 2019 RE: Estes Park Chalet Development Plan Applicant Request: Applicant requests review and approval of a Development Plan to establish an accommodations facility in an A (Accommodations) Zoning District. Planning Commission Objectives: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC); and 2. Conduct a public hearing to consider applicant’s testimony, public comment, and Town staff’s findings and analysis; and 3. Approve or deny the Development Plan application. Location: The property is located to the west of the intersection of Mary’s Lake Road and Kiowa Drive, approximately ¼ mile south of Mary’s Lake, in the Town of Estes Park. See attached vicinity map. Owner/Applicant: Owner/Applicants: Marys Lake Lodge Hotel Owners Association, represented by ML Properties LLC, Morgan Mulch Representative: Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers, David Bangs Project Description: Present Situation: The property is the longtime location of Mary’s Lake Lodge, which was heavily damaged in a fire in June 2018, and later demolished. The lodge contained 16 accommodation units. The subject parcel is 7.12 acres in size and is zoned A (Accommodations). The 7.12 acres, consisting of three lots, also contains accommodation units in addition to the lodge, as described further below. The “north wing” of the burned structure remains, containing 10 accommodations units. Although attached, the north wing contains separately-owned condominiums, and is not under the ownership of the Estes Park Chalet owner/applicant. Proposal: Applicant proposes to rebuild the lodge, which will have 49 rooms, a restaurant, meeting space, and a craft brewing area. Staff notes the Estes Park Chalet project involves the rebuild of the lodge facility, along with a new proposed “Event Facility.” With that, staff has reviewed and evaluated the impacts of the project as a whole, while at the same time recognizing there are two distinct approval processes. The uses-by-right in the Accomodations Zoning (Hotel/Motel and Restaurant) are considered for action by the EVPC in the Development Plan, while at the same time recognizing the project involves the Event Facility. The Event Facility use itself is subject to an S1 Level Special Review, with final action by the Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees as the governing body. There is no recommendation by the EVPC for the S1 Special Review. The Special Review is scheduled for the August 27, 2019 Town Board hearing. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 2 OF 4 Site Data Table Engineer: Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers, David Bangs, PE Parcel Numbers: 3402434002, 3404340003, 3402434001 Development Area: 7.12± acres Existing Land Use: Accommodations, condominiums Proposed Land Use: Lodge and restaurant, demolished and proposed to be rebuilt Zoning Designation: A (Accommodations) Adjacent Zoning: North: A (Accommodations) and RE (Rural Estate) South: E (Estate) East: A (Accommodations) West: E (Estate) and RE (Rural Estate) Adjacent Land Uses: North: Single-family residences South: Vacant land East: Condominiums, vacant land West: Vacant land Review Criteria: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1. Buildings and Lots. There are three lots involved in the project, for a total of 7.12 acres. This area contained 81 accommodation units, including the 16 that have since been removed (with the fire and subsequent demolition). Adding the new, proposed 49 units will give a total of 114 units, which complies with the density requirements in the A (Accommodations) Zoning District. The proposed buildings conform to setback and height requirements. The maximum height of the proposed lodge is 29.68 feet. The maximum allowed height in the A Zoning District is 30 feet. 2. Landscaping. The site is largely developed, with a substantial number of existing mature trees and forested areas. EVDC “Parking Lot Perimeter” landscaping requirements are met with the applicant’s proposal, involving planting of trees and shrubs. 3. Water. Water is to be provided by the Town of Estes Park Water Division. The Division has outlined requirements for the development, noting there may be additional utility work required at the construction phase. 4. Fire Protection. Estes Valley Fire Protection District provided comments regarding emergency access. The District notes requirements related to fire sprinklers and alarms, which have been acknowledged by the applicant. Access, grade and turning radius have been designed and revised to comply with Estes Valley Fire District’s requirements. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 3 OF 4 5. Electric. Electric service is to be provided by the Town of Estes Park Power and Communications Division. The Division has outlined requirements for the development, noting there may be additional utility work required at the construction phase. 6. Sanitary Sewer. The Upper Thompson Sanitation District has no objections to this proposal. Additional requirements will apply at time of building permitting and the construction phase, which have been acknowledged by the applicant. 7. Stormwater Drainage. A Preliminary Drainage Report was submitted, and was reviewed by the Town Public Works Department. Public Works notes the Report refers to a 2006 Drainage Report for the site, which they did not have on file. Public Works will require the applicant to file a Final Drainage Report, with the Construction Plan review process, and notes Construction Plans are required to be submitted for approval with any building permit or grading permit. The exception is Permit B-11171, recently issued for shoring and excavation. Other revisions required by Public Works have been addressed by the applicant, and “…appear to be satisfactory” to Public Works Engineering staff. 8. Access. Access to the site is from Kiowa Drive, via Mary’s Lake Road. Current access, a shared “commercial” gravel drive, would be paved, at a slightly lesser grade than the existing. Access, grade and turning radius are designed to comply with Estes Valley Fire District’s requirements. 9. Parking. The applicant has proposes providing 196 parking spaces, based on a parking study submitted by Kellar Engineering. With the proposed event facility and various accommodations uses, a parking study was determined to be necessary, and staff finds the study to be acceptable. The applicant proposes 31 new spaces, to total 196. 10. Outdoor Lighting. Parking lot lighting is not proposed. Exterior building lighting will comply with lighting requirements under the EVDC, §7.9. 11. Comprehensive Plan. The accommodations uses have long been established on this property, well predating the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. The site is within the “Mary’s Lake Planning Sub-Area,” with Future Land Use categorized as Accommodations. Staff finds the project is consistent with policies within the Comprehensive Plan, including the following Community Wide Policies from Chapter 6 of the Plan: 7.3 Sustain and support the existing tourism industry and marketing programs. 7.5 Recruit businesses and companies that benefit from the environment and fit with community values. 7.7 Establish the basis for a sound tourism market and sustainable economic climate. Public Notice: Written notice has been mailed to adjacent property owners in accordance with EVDC §3.15 General Notice Provisions. A legal notice was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette and the application is posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” webpage. MEMO TO EVPC, 8/20/19 RE: ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 4 OF 4 Level of Public Interest Low: Staff has received one inquiry from an adjacent owner, regarding the utility easements on this property and how adjacent condominium’s utilities may be impacted. The applicant has addressed this and there do not appear to be issues. All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the Decision Making Body for the Development Plan. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 2. The Development Plan and Condominium Map are consistent with the recommendations of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Concerns and issues that were raised have been addressed or will be addressed at time of building permit. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Estes Park Chalet Development Plan, and recommends the EVPC forward a recommendation of approval of the Estes Park Chalet Preliminary Condominium Map. Sample motions: 1. I move to approve the Estes Park Chalet Development Plan application according to findings as presented. 2. I move to continue the Estes Park Chalet Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting [State reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to deny the Estes Park Chalet Development Plan application, finding that… [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent from Trail Ridge Consulting 3. Statement of Intent from Owner/Applicant 4. Application 5. Development Plan Set 6. Architectural Drawings Site Location Ê MARYS LAKE S SAINT VRAIN AVEGREYFOXDRKI OWATRLMA R Y S L A K E R D UT E L N ARAPAHO RD HIGHW A Y 7 K I O W A D R P R O M O N T O R Y D R KIOWACTBLUEBIRD LN SADDLEBACK L N L A KEWOODCTLARKSP U R A V EL AKOTA CTKERR RD FISHCR E E K R D BAKERD R R A M S H O R N R D CHALETRIDG ECTG R E E N P I N E C T SIOUX CT UTE LN 0 250 500 Feet -Town of Estes Par kCommunity Development Printed: 8/15/2019 Created By: Jeff Woeber Project Name: Project Description: Development Plan Estes Par k ChaletFor Illustrative Pur poses Onl y PAGE 1 OF 4 June 19, 2019 Jeff Woeber Senior Planner Community Development Department Town of Estes Park 970-577-3729 RE: Statement of Intent for The Estes Park Chalet Dear Jeff: Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers, LLC is pleased to submit this Application for Development Plan Review on behalf of subject property owner Mary’s Lake Lodge Hotel Owners Association. This letter is to serve as the Statement of Intent for the proposed project and will provide general descriptions regarding compliance with the key applicable standards for review as defined in the Estes Valley Development Code. Please refer to the Development Plan submitted herewith for specific details regarding the proposed project. Project Information The subject property includes three parcels, located at 2625 Marys Lake Road with approximately 7.12 acres of land area. The parcel is currently developed and contains 81 total accommodation units (including the 16 that previously burned down). The property is zoned A-Accommodations per the Estes Valley Zoning District Maps. The project will include rebuilding the historic lodge building, a new events center and constructing utility services/additional parking to support the facility. Redevelopment of this property has been focused on preserving as much of the mass, form, and detailing of the former Mary's Lake Lodge while updating the structure for modern building codes, zoning limitations, and modern hotel operations. The building remains three stories tall, plus a "walk- out" lower level. The main entry is now on the lower level to improve accessibility and a port-cochere has been added. Exterior decks are reflective of the prior lodge on both the main and upper levels of PAGE 2 OF 4 the Chalet. The third level retains the Lodge's low plate heights and dormers as the primary roof forms and a new roof deck is accessed on this level. The exterior trim and finish of the Chalet is designed to match existing trim and finish at the existing "north wing" and "south wing" condo buildings on the site. A new event center is accessed via an enclosed bridge spanning from the third level of the Chalet to the hillside to the west. The event center is located at the site of the existing outdoor event venue. The access bridge enters the lower level of the Event Center. The main floor of the Event Center is set to provide views over the top of the Chalet from the main banquet hall and deck. The upper level of the Event Center provides a lounge area and an outdoor event venue for 200 guests. The location and detailing of the Event Center are intended to make it subordinate to the Chalet despite greater overall elevation. Exterior trim and finish match the trim and finish of the Chalet and other existing buildings on the site. Compliance with General Development and Development Standards Zoning District Standards: The proposed accommodations development is a permitted use by right for the zoning district of the subject property and is subject to Development Plan Review. The events/wedding use is subject to Special Review. The project team is submitting two applications for concurrent review with the overall site detail and development for each review completed together. The minimum property area is 40,000 square feet with a minimum width of 200 feet. The proposed development meets the applicable minimum lot size standards with the smallest proposed lot being 40,240 square feet. Setbacks for the new properties are 15’ to the front and sides and 10’ to the rear of the properties in accordance with the zoning district standards. The average slope of the property is approximately 21%. The buildable site average slopes for the proposed improvements and changes are: 18%. The maximum allowable lot coverage for properties in the Accommodations Zoning District is 50%, this development plan utilizes an existing building site (the Lodge), and an additional 3891 square foot events center and will be in compliance with the allowable max. lot coverage. The maximum building height is 30 feet. The proposed building height for the Lodge is 29.68’, while the events center is proposed to be 29.79’. The proposed development generally complies the applicable zoning district standards for access, parking and adequate public facilities with the requested waivers noted within. Grading/Slope Protection Standards: The development has been designed considering the nature of the slopes encompassing much of the overall property boundary. The proposed building site provides a reasonable buildable area for the events center construction. The grade of the access drive for the proposed events center is currently 20%. The applicant is requesting a waiver to the drive aisle longitudinal grade standards set forth in the EVDC for commercial access drive, considering that the proposed access drive will be graded at 15.9%. PAGE 3 OF 4 The proposed grading and improvements to the access drive will improve the existing condition and will primarily be used by staff and for loading access to the events facility. 11 spaces (including one loading space) are proposed for the event center building accessed off the service drive subject to the waiver for longitudinal grade standards. All other applicable standards are met with this access drive. Transportation/Parking: A parking study has been completed to determine the property’s parking requirements. The results of the study are the property in whole (condos, hotel and events facility) needs 195 parking stalls, of which 153 are existing, with 42 proposed to total 195 upon completion of the development. The proposed development does not trigger the 50 peak hour trips requiring a transportation impact analysis. Adequate Public Facilities: The subject property is in an area to be serviced by the following utilities (note: additional service lines are needed; all existing units/lots are already connected to public utilities): Electric- Town of Estes Park New single-phase primary lines are proposed from the existing transformer along the south side of the remaining portion of the Lodge. The events center will receive a new service line and the new lodge will maintain the existing electric tie-in. Water- Town of Estes Park New 6” DIP water service line for the events center will connect to the existing 8” DIP main located in the existing access easement of Lot 3a. The location of the events center will require re-routing of the existing 8” main line. New easements are not required for this relocation. A new 6” DIP water service line for the Lodge will connect to the existing 8” DIP main north of the Lodge building. Sewer- Upper Thompson Sanitation District New sewer connection services for the events center will be a 6” SDR-35 line to be run along the existing access drive south of the main lodge to an existing manhole east of the garage building. The Lodge sewer service will be an 8” SDR-35 line to an existing manhole north of the lodge. Natural Gas- Xcel Energy Natural gas services are to be provided for the events center from the existing main in the access drive south of the Lodge. The main lodge will maintain its existing gas connection near the northeastern corner of the lodge. PAGE 4 OF 4 Communications/Broadband- TDS or Century Link New communications services are proposed from the existing communications pedestal along the south side of the remaining portion of the Lodge. The events center will receive a new service line and the new lodge will maintain the existing communications tie-in. Storm Drainage The existing drainage conditions for the development will not be altered by the proposed development. Minor increases in storm water runoff are anticipated to be negatable over the 30+ acres that drain into the existing detention basin. (See Drainage Report). Access The new proposed events center building will be provided vehicular access by a shared, commercial drive that utilizes the existing access point off Kiowa Drive. The current access is gravel. Applicant proposes a 20’ wide paved access drive approximately 4% less steep than existing (see above Grading and Slope Protection Standards). Adequate loading area and turn around dimensions will be provided at the end of this access drive. All other access points will remain in the current location with improvements proposed to meet the minimum width requirements for fire apparatus access. Mapped Hazard Areas: Portions along the fringe of the subject property are within the boundaries of the Estes Valley Mapped Wildfire Hazard Area, the mapped Steep Slope Geologic Hazard Area, and the mapped River, Stream, and Wetland Area. Proposed construction will not occur in the mapped hazard or wetland areas. We thank you for time and consideration of the proposed “The Estes Park Chalet” Development. If there are any questions about the project or items discussed above, please don’t hesitate to contact me at 970-308-8221. Sincerely, David Bangs, P.E. Principal Engineer Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers, LLC May 15, 2019 RE: The Estes Park Chalet Statement of Intent from the Marys Lake Lodge Hotel Owners Association To whom it may concern: We are very excited to submit our application for the rebuild of Mary’s Lake Lodge! Our architect Jeff Van Sambeek with Lodestone Design and Dave Bangs with Trail Ridge Consulting have done a beautiful job of developing our concept for the new lodge. We feel this will not only be an amazing asset for the Marys Lake property but for the town of Estes Park as well. In terms of what will remain the same, the exterior of the lodge will maintain its mountain rustic appearance. We still want to be the quintessential mountain lodge, and so the new exterior will be made of wood and will maintain the shape of the two mountain peaks on the north and south side. The middle peak will still be there as well but will be transferred to the lower level to create a distinct and visually appealing entrance for guests into the grand lobby. We will also keep our restaurant that many of you have enjoyed in the past – it will be on the main level with a beautiful bar area, a two-sided fireplace that guests can enjoy from the restaurant side or the lobby side, as well as a wraparound patio for outdoor seating. We will continue to be a premier wedding venue as well, and the plan is for both reception and ceremony to be located at what was originally the Forever Garden behind the main lodge. Although we are making some updates and changes to our beloved lodge, the goal is to remain true to who we are. We simply want to add new amenities for all of our guests and the condo owners to enjoy, while making improvements in areas that were underutilized before. Let’s talk about what is going to be new, starting with when guests first arrive. The ground level that has previously been just crawl space and the Foundation Room (or the spa way back when) will be excavated out to become our grand lobby and restaurant. When guests enter the lobby, they will be able to see the new restaurant and bar from the main entrance, as well as a grand staircase next to our check-in desk. Across from the check-in desk, there will be 2 sets of elevators. This main level will have meeting spaces for conferences, rehearsal dinners, private parties, etc. and an indoor pool and jacuzzi as well. Our goal is for the pool area to be very kid- friendly with a tube slide and small play area in the shallow end for toddlers. There will be large windows in both the pool area and the meeting rooms so that guests can see the amazing views to the east. Some of you may recall that we had a partnership with a brewery in Loveland, CO to be able to private label their beers and market our restaurant as a brew pub. This time around, we will have the space on the main level to actually put in a brewery system to create our own beers on site. This system is called “Smart Brew” and it has been hugely successful in several restaurants around the country. It allows for us to not only have creative control for our beers, but also for conferences and weddings to come in and create their own craft brew for their specific event. We think it could be a huge selling point and make us stand out as a venue. The first floor (which was originally the lobby floor of the old building) will have hotel rooms and a small fitness center as an amenity for our guests; the third floor will also have more hotel rooms. The fourth floor is where we are going to have some fun! Some of you may be asking yourselves – what about the famous deck off of the Tavern that had those incredible views? We are planning to bring that back in the form of a Roof Top Bar. The views will be the best on property, and we will have full bar service as well as food options available. We think this will be a great amenity for guests of the entire property to enjoy! The fourth floor will also have our premium suites, which will be used as our honeymoon suites primarily. We will have a “Groom’s Lounge” on this level as well, which will simply be a space with some seating, TVs, etc. for the groomsmen to congregate prior to the ceremony. The fourth level will also be where guests can get to the new wedding venue, which will be accessible by a sky walk from the main lodge to what was originally the Forever Garden. This new venue will have two floors. The entry level will have the reception space, and there will be an elevator and stair access to the second floor, which is where the outdoor ceremony venue will be. The new outdoor venue will have a retractable awning so that we can easily cover guests in the event of bad weather. The views will be the same amazing panoramic views as before. There will be a space on this level for brides and bridesmaids to get ready in and congregate before the ceremony. There will be a beautiful cascading staircase that leads to the reception area. The reception space will have windows all around, a wraparound deck for an outdoor cocktail hour, and the ceiling will have the peaked look with wooden beams to maintain some of the original look of the Grand Room. To sum up, the primary updates we are making to the lodge are as follows: 1. 49 Total Hotel Rooms (King and Double Queen Rooms and Premium Suites) 2. 2 Elevators in the main lodge/1 Elevator in the Wedding Venue 3. 3 Meeting Spaces (with retractable walls so that they can open to make 1 large meeting space) on the main level for Conferences, Rehearsal Dinners, and Private Events 4. Full Service Restaurant and Bar with Wraparound Patio on the main floor 5. Smart Brew Tanks on display, and a private “craft brewing” room for guest use 6. Indoor Pool with tube slide and kids area and Indoor Hot Tub 7. Roof Top Bar with Food Service and Full Bar, retractable awning, and the original “Tavern Deck” views 8. New Premier Wedding Venue behind the main lodge that is attached by a Sky Walk 9. More parking available for guest use We believe there is bright future for this property despite the unfortunate circumstances that have occurred due to the fire. With this new development plan we are very excited to open our doors once again. Thank you for your consideration for The Estes Park Chalet. Sincerely, Morgan and Ashley Mulch Submittal Date: Pre-Application (check application type(s))Minor Subdivision Plat Condominium Map Development Plan Amended Plat Preliminary Map Special Review Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Other: Please specify Project Description Lot Size Proposed Land Use Town Well None Town Well None Existing Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD UTSD Septic None Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD UTSD Septic Existing Gas Service Other None Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Name of Primary Contact Person Email Primary Contact Person is Owner Applicant Consultant/Engineer Application Fee 1 copy, 11" X 17" reduced set of plat/plans ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Application Type(s) Boundary Line Adjustment Site Information Xcel Rezoning Petition General Information Project Name Supplemental Map Community Development Department Phone: 970-577-3721  Email: planning@estes.org  www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Statement of Intent Digital copies PDF emailed to planning@estes.org Contact Information Other (specify) Project Address Parcel ID # Legal Description Refer to the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for application submittal requirements. Town of Estes Park  P.O. Box 1200  170 MacGregor Avenue  Estes Park, CO 80517 Existing Land Use Existing Water Service Attachments Proposed Water Service 3 copies, 24" x 36" (folded) of plat/plans Other (specify) Revised 2017.01.09 KT Please check only one box Estes Park Chalet New accommodations structure, Parking areas, and Events Center Lot 3, Mary's Lake Subdivision, AND Lot 3a and Lot 3b, Mary's Lake Replat Accommodations, single & multifamily home Accommodations, single & multifamily home 2625 Marys Lake Road, Estes Park, Colorado, 80517 7.12 acres A-Accommodations A-Accommodations David Bangs dbangs@trailridgece.com 3402434002, 340434003, 3402434001 Consultant/Engineer PLEASE PRINT: PLEASE PRINT: Date Date ► ► ► ► PLEASE PRINT: PLEASE PRINT: Date Date Record Owner Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. Notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. Phone Record Owner(s) Email Signatures: I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Contact Information Phone Mailing Address Record Owner Applicant As Applicant, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the record owner(s) of the property. Names: Mailing Address Applicant Email Email Record Owner Phone Mailing Address Applicant Signatures: I grant permission for Town of Estes Park employees, reviewing agency staff, Planning Commissioners, members of the Town Board of Trustees, or Larimer County Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and am aware that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application beying delayed or any approval of my application becoming null and void. Names: Applicant OWNER & APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Record Owner Applicant As Owner, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property. Revised 2017.01.09 KT Marys Lake Lodge Hotel Owners Association, represented by ML Properties LLC 2625 Marys Lake Road, Estes Park, Colorado, 80517 720-556-8239 morgan@maryslakelodge.com Marys Lake Lodge Hotel Owners Association by representative ML Properties LLC 2625 Marys Lake Road, Estes Park, Colorado, 80517 720-556-8239 morgan@maryslakelodge.com David Bangs, Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers 970-308-8221 dbangs@trailridgece.com 1191 Woodstock Dr, Estes Park, Colorado, 80517 Type text here Morgan Mulch Morgan Mulch 05/15/19 05/15/19 BOUNDARY OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEETS SITE PLAN WEST AND GRADING PLAN WEST BOUNDARY OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEETS SITE PLAN EAST AND GRADING PLAN EAST LOT 27, KIOWA RIDGE OWNERS: LOUDERMILKFAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST ZONING: E1-ESTATE PROMONTORY AT KIOWA RIDGE CONDOS OWNERS: PROMONTORY HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION ZONING: A-ACCOMMODATIONS PROMONTORY AT KIOWA RIDGE CONDOS OWNERS: PROMONTORY HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION ZONING: A-ACCOMMODATIONS SITE BENCHMARK #99 EL.=8141.5' SITE BENCHMARK #98 EL.=8147.9' SITE BENCHMARK #97 EL.=8200.9' (∆ (∆ ∆ (∆ LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 NOTES: 1.THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY NOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. 2.CONTOURS SHOWN ARE AT A 1' INTERVAL AND ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD SURVEY DATA DURING APRIL AND MAY, 2019. 3.MANY MORE TREES EXIST ON SITE THAN ARE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 4.ENGINEER DOES NOT WARRANT THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREAS. THOSE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER. 5.CONTACT INFORMATION: OWNER MARY'S LAKE LODGE HOTEL OWNERS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ML PROPERTIES LLC 2625 MARY'S LAKE ROAD ESTES PARK, CO 80517 APPLICANT ML PROPERTIES LLC 2625 MARY'S LAKE ROAD ESTES PARK, CO 80517 CONSULTANT/CONTACT PERSON DAVID BANGS, P.E. TRAIL RIDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE ESTES PARK ,CO 80517 970-308-8221 6.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3, MARY'S LAKE SUBDIVISION, LOTS 3A AND 3B, MARY'S LAKE REPLAT 7.PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ESTES VALLEY MAPPED WILDFIRE HAZARD AREA, AND THE MAPPED STEEP SLOPE GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA. NO PROPOSED BUILDINGS FALL WITHIN EITHER MAPPED HAZARD AREA. NO PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD AREA. 8.THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE A.D.A. AND U.B.C. 9.ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR GUARANTEED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 10.APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN CREATES A VESTED RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. OWNER'S CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE OWNERS OF THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO PERTAINING THERETO. __________________________________________________ MARY'S LAKE LODGE HOTEL OWNERS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ML PROPERTIES LLC APPROVAL APPROVED BY THE ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION ON THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 20_____. __________________________________________________ _____________________,CHAIR VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1000' KIOWA COURT PROJECT AREA MARY'S LAKE ROAD PEAK VIEW DRIVE MARY'S LAKE ARAPAHO RD PROMONTORY DRIVE KIOWA DRIVE STATE HIGHWAY #7 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN STATISTICAL INFORMATION: ZONING DISTRICT - A-ACCOMMODATIONS SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS - A-ACCOMMODATIONS, E-ESTATE, E-1-ESTATE SETBACKS - 25' ARTERIAL, 15' FRONT, 15' SIDE, 10' REAR GROSS PROJECT AREA - 310,000 SF/7.12AC PROJECT AREA IN FLOODPLAIN - 0 SF NET PROJECT AREA - 310,000SF PRE-FIRE EXISTING ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS - 16 UNITS TOTAL PROPOSED ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS - 49 UNITS TOTAL DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA OF LOT 3 TOTAL LAND AREA = 221,756SF SLOPE ON LOT 3 = 1800+100(20.0-12)=2600SF REQUIRED PER ACCOMMODATION UNIT EXISTING ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS=60 EXISTING REQUIRED LAND AREA = 2600*60=156,000 S.F. REMAINING DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA=65,756 S.F. DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA OF LOT 3A TOTAL LAND AREA = 40,240SF SLOPE ON LOT 3A = 1800+100(25.8-12)=3180SF REQUIRED PER ACCOMMODATION UNIT EXISTING ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS=9 EXISTING REQUIRED LAND AREA=9*3180=28,620 S.F. REMAINING DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA = 11,620 S.F. DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA OF LOT 3B TOTAL LAND AREA 48,004 S.F. SLOPE ON LOT 3B = 1800+100(17.5-12)=2350SF REQUIRED PER ACCOMMODATION UNIT EXISTING ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS=12*2350=28,200 S.F. EXISTING REQUIRED LAND AREA = 28,200 REMAINING DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA=19,804 S.F. AVERAGE SF REQUIRED PER ACCOMMODATION UNIT = 2710 S.F. ALLOWABLE ADDITIONAL ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS: 97,180 S.F. / 2710 S.F./UNITS =36 UNITS EXISTING PARKING SPACES=153 SURFACE SPACES =12 GARAGE SPACES =165 TOTAL TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 195 SPACES (SEE TRAFFIC REPORT) REQUIRED ADA SPACES: 6 SPACES TOTAL (5 CAR, 1 VAN) ADDITIONAL PARKING PROVIDED - 31 SPACES FOR NEW ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS, 196 TOTAL EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: 142,055 S.F. PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 153,596 S.F. ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE = 310,000*0.5=155,000 S.F. SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER © 2019 NEW 6' CONCRETE GUTTER PAN 816081568157815881598161816281638164 51.9'6.0'9.6'6.0'54.0'7.5'50.0'60.0'87.3'25.0'47.0'22.0'23.4'27.9'7.7'42.6'33.0'33.5'5.8 ' 10.0' 4.5'2.0' 30.5'33.0'26.9'14.5' 9.9' 18.0' 9.9' 6.5'17.0'8.0' ∆30.0'30.0'30.0'30.0'SITE TRIANG L ESITE TRIANGLE SOLID LINE = NEW FOOTPRINT BASEMENT FFE=8160.0' LOWER FFE=8170.84' MIDDLE FFE=8180.49' UPPER FFE=8190.14' MEAN ROOF HEIGHT = 8201.18' NEW GARDEN LEVEL NEW 20' PAVED SERVICE DRIVE - FIRE ACCESS TO EVENT CENTER TO BE FROM UPPER CHALET ACCESS DRIVE NEW EVENT CENTER LOWER FFE=8190.14' MIDDLE FFE=8200.14' UPPER FFE=8218.14' HIGHEST ROOF RIDGE=8235.48'DECK 20' DRIVE WIDTHNEW RETAINING WALL LOADING SPACE NEW RETAINING WALL NEW RETAINING WALL 10.1' 21.6' NEW RETAINING WALL 21.0'NEW CDOT TYPE C INLET - SEE UTILITIES SHEET EMERGENCY EXIT LANDING NEW GARDEN LEVEL 81 6 5 8 170 8 175 81 8 0 8180 81 8 5 8185 8 1 90 8190 81958200 8200 82058205 8210 82 1 0 8178 818081758190 817781778178 81958183 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE PLAN EAST 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40' SITE PLAN NOTES: 1.THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY NOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. 2.CONTOURS SHOWN ARE AT A 1' INTERVAL AND ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATIONS OF PROPERTY MONUMENTATION RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (NAVD88) 3.UTILITY LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS TRUE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED UPON LOCATES SURVEYED IN THE FIELD, GIS INFORMATION FROM THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, AND HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED AT LARIMER COUNTY RECEPTION #20060022139. ENGINEER DOES NOT WARRANT THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREAS. THOSE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER. NEW WALKWAY TO LOWER FLOOR OF EVENT CENTER BOTTOM OF WALKWAY ELEV.=8191' PORTE-COCHERE LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT/CONCRETE FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER 30' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT 14' CLEARANCE UNDER WALKWAY © 2019 81568157NEW CURB AND GUTTER 8160 8165 8170 8175 8170 8175 8170(∆ (∆ DECK TO BE REMOVED 8178 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40' 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE PLAN WEST SITE PLAN NOTES: 1.THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY NOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. 2.CONTOURS SHOWN ARE AT A 1' INTERVAL AND ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATIONS OF PROPERTY MONUMENTATION RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (NAVD88). 3.UTILITY LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS TRUE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED UPON LOCATES SURVEYED IN THE FIELD, GIS INFORMATION FROM THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, AND HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED AT LARIMER COUNTY RECEPTION #20060022139. ENGINEER DOES NOT WARRANT THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREAS. THOSE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER. LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER © 2019 NEW EVENT CENTER LOWER FFE=8190.14' MIDDLE FFE=8200.14' NEW 6" BARRIER CURB816081568157815881598161816281638164 NEW LANDING @ MIDDLE FFE FOR EMERGENCY EXIT NEW 6' CONCRETE GUTTER PAN ∆30.0'30.0'30.0'30.0'SITE TRIANG L ESITE TRIANGLE SOLID LINE = NEW FOOTPRINT BASEMENT FFE=8160.0' LOWER FFE=8170.84' MIDDLE FFE=8180.49' UPPER FFE=8190.14' MEAN ROOF HEIGHT = 8201.18' NEW GARDEN LEVEL NEW GARDEN LEVEL 1.5:11.5:12.8:13.3:1TOW=8211.8' BOW=8199.5' TOW=8209.7' BOW=8199.5' TOW=8209.5' BOW=8198.5' TOW=8195.2' BOW=8195.1' TOW=8194.2' BOW=8194.0' TOW=8197.7' BOW=8192.6' TOW=8173.1' BOW=8171.3' TOW=8181.3' BOW=8174.6' TOW=8189.2' BOW=8179.2' TOW=8193.0' BOW=8180.6' TOW=8190.0' BOW=8177.3'TOW=8189.3' BOW=8176.9' TOW=8182.6' BOW=8177.5' TOW=8183.8' BOW=8177.2' TOW=8178.2' BOW=8170.8' TOW=8177.5' BOW=8170.8' TOW=8180.1' BOW=8170.8' TOW=8181.0' BOW=8170.8' 6.5% 7.2% 15.9 % 15.9 % 11.0% TOW=8157.5' BOW=8149.9' TOW=8156.2' BOW=8152.3' TOW=8195.4' BOW=8178.8' 81 6 5 8 170 8 175 81 8 0 8180 81 8 5 8185 8 1 90 8190 81958200 8200 82058205 8210 82 1 0 8178 818081758190 817781778178 81958183 62.00  61.58  91.50  93.71  96.10  96.85  90.40  90.56  91.63  94.41  98.20  91.68  91.89  98.00  98.00  61.65  61.99  62.68  62.48  62.32  59.73  57.86  57.32  54.20  80.40  80.54  80.47  80.40  78.24 78.56  77.12  77.30  79.62  1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40' ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRADING PLAN EAST GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL REQUIRED PERIMETER SILT AND CONSTRUCTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY (STOCKPILING, STRIPPING, GRADING, ETC). ALL OTHER REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AS INDICATED IN THE APPROVED PROJECT SCHEDULE, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT. 2.AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING AND CONTROLLING ON-SITE EROSION INCLUDING KEEPING THE PROPERTY SUFFICIENTLY WATERED SO AS TO MINIMIZE WIND BLOWN SEDIMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHOWN HEREIN. 3.PRE-DISTURBANCE VEGETATION SHALL BE PROTECTED AND RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. REMOVAL OR DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AREA(S) REQUIRED FOR IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, AND FOR THE SHORTEST PRACTICAL PERIOD OF TIME. 4.ALL SOILS EXPOSED DURING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY (STRIPPING, GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATIONS, STOCKPILING, FILLING, ETC.) SHALL BE KEPT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION BY RIPPING OR DISKING ALONG LAND CONTOURS UNTIL MULCH, VEGETATION, OR OTHER PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMPS ARE INSTALLED. NO SOILS IN AREAS OUTSIDE PROJECT STREET RIGHTS OF-WAY SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY FOR MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS BEFORE REQUIRED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL (E.G. SEED/MULCH, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) IS INSTALLED, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL ENTITY. 5.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF CONCRETE. 6.ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO TOP OF FINISHED PAVING AND LANDSCAPED AREAS. 7.MATCH EXISTING GRADES AT THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER © 2019            3.0 :13.0 :18156815776.20 76.02  74.78  74.56  74.34 72.29  72.29  72.46  65.39  8160 8165 8170 8175 8175 8170NEW CURB AND GUTTER (∆ (∆ TOW=8183.8' BOW=8177.2' TOW=8157.5' BOW=8149.9' TOW=8156.2' BOW=8152.3' TOW=8155.3' BOW=8153.9' 8178 57.32  54.20  53.77  1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB 20' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 40' ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRADING PLAN WEST 3" TYPE SX HOT MIX ASPHALT 4" COMPACTED CLASS 5 ABC COMPACTED NATIVE SUBGRADE BARRIER CURB PAVING SECTION NOT TO SCALE PAVING SECTION TO BE A MIN OF 3" ASPHALT ON 4" ROAD BASE LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER © 2019 (∆ (∆ ∆ (∆ NEW ELECTRIC/COMMUNICATION SERVICE UTILITY BOXES TO BE RELOCATED NEW BURIED ELECTRIC/COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE NEW 6" DIP SERVICE NEW 6" DIP SERVICE NEW 8" SEWER SERVICE MAINTAIN EXISTING GAS SERVICE RE-ROUTED 8" DIP MAIN LINE NEW 12" ADS STORM SEWER NEW MANHOLE RIM EL=8145.50' INV. IN=42.00' INV. OUT=41.90' NEW MANHOLE RIM EL=8175.96' INV. IN=72.46' INV. OUT=72.36' NEW MANHOLE RIM EL=8178.15' INV. IN=74.65' INV. OUT=74.55' NEW TYP "C" INLET RIM EL=8176.71' INV. IN=73.21' INV. OUT=73.11' TIE NEW STORM SEWER INTO EXISTING INLET SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN UTILITY PLAN LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER NEW 6" SDR35 SERVICE RELOCATE EXISTING ELECTRIC PRIMARY LINES ALONG THIS EMBANKMENT AS NEEDED DUE TO GRADING UTILITY BOXES TO BE RELOCATED © 2019 (∆ (∆ ∆ (∆ SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com© 2019 DAB ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL-APPEARING LAND FORMS, WITH CURVES THAT BLEND IN WITH ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SLOPES. ABRUPT ANGULAR TRANSITIONS AND LINEAR SLOPES SHALL BE AVOIDED. 2.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITHIN ONE GROWING SEASON AFTER CONSTRUCTION USING A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVE GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. THE DENSITY OF THE REESTABLISHED GRASS VEGETATION AFTER ONE GROWING SEASON SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND INVASION OF WEEDS. 3.ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE EXISTING VEGETATIVE COVER IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED, THAT ARE NOT OTHERWISE COVERED WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS, SHALL BE SUCCESSFULLY RE-VEGETATED WITH A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVE OR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. 4.ON MAN-MADE SLOPES OF 25% OR GREATER, PLANT MATERIALS WITH DEEP ROOTING CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE SURFACE RUNOFF. ALL MAN-MADE SLOPES GREATER THAN 50% WILL BE MULCHED AND NETTED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION AND RE-VEGETATION. 5.TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING RE-VEGETATION OR LANDSCAPING, SUCH AS CUT-AND-FILL SLOPES. 6.NO TREES OR VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED OUTSIDE THE APPROVED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. 7.CONIFER TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 50% EIGHT FEET TALL AND 50% AT SIX FEET TALL AT PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 50% AT FOUR INCH CALIPER AND 50% AT TWO INCH CALIPER PLANTING. SHRUBS SHALL BE 5 GALLON CONTAINER OR LARGER AT PLANTING. 8.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NUMBER 1 G0RADE AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY STANDARDS OF THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, TITLE 35, ARTICLE 25, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. 9.ALL LANDSCAPES SHALL INCLUDE A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING AUTOMATED SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH INDIVIDUAL DRIP LINES FOR NATURAL AREAS. SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE TEMPORARY FOR PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE IN PLACE FOR A MINIMUM OF 18 MONTHS. 10.REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY, GROWING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRIGATING, PRUNING, WEEDING, MOWING, FERTILIZING, REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS IN POOR CONDITION AND OTHER MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANTINGS AS NEEDED. 11.ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED, GUYED AND FENCED TO PROTECT FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. NO CHAIN LINK FENCING SHALL BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. 12.DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE BY WILDLIFE. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: DISTRICT BUFFER: N/A STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER: N/A PERIMETER PLANTINGS - 1 TREE PER 30' AND 1 SHRUB PER 5' PROPOSED PARKING LOT PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS - 110' SOUTH, 190' NORTH= 300', 10 TREES, 60 SHRUBS REQUIRED INTERIOR PLANTINGS - N/A (<30 NEW SPACES) TOTAL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 10 TREES AND 60 SHRUBS LEGEND (NOT ALL ITEMS SHOWN ON EACH SHEET) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE TREE (SIZE NOT NOTED) SHRUB CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER 1 4 N EW S P A C E S ( P E R V I O U S P A V E R S )5 NEW SPACES (1 VAN ADA )5 NEW SPACES3 NEW SPACES2 NEW SPACES3 NEW SPACES 3 N E W S P A C E S 11 N E W S P A C E S ( 1 A D A , 1 L O A D I N G T Y P E B ) LEGEND SCALE: 1" = 40' 80'40'0 1191 WOODSTOCK DRIVE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517 www.trailridgece.com * 970-308-8221 * dbangs@trailridgece.com DAB PARKING INFORMATION: EXISTING PARKING SPACES=153 SURFACE SPACES =12 GARAGE SPACES =165 TOTAL TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 195 SPACES (SEE TRAFFIC REPORT) REQUIRED ADA SPACES: 6 SPACES TOTAL (1 CAR, 1 VAN) ADDITIONAL PARKING PROVIDED - 31 SPACES FOR NEW ACCOMMODATIONS UNITS, 196 TOTAL EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: 142,055 S.F. PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 153,596 S.F. ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE = 310,000*0.5=155,000 S.F. SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENTATION ANNOTATIONS ABCDE EASEMENT BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT FENCE LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE/WALK SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE WILDFIRE HAZARD BOUNDARY EASEMENT CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD BOUNDARY ELEC/TELE/CABLE PEDESTAL/TRANSFORMER © 2019 ESTES PARK CHALET DEVELOPMENT PLAN PARKING PLAN DN DN NORTH WING (ADJACENT CONDOS) HOTEL FOOTPRINT SOUTH WING (CONDOS) REGRADE DRIVE IN THIS AREA TO OPEN UP MORE OF THE LOWER LEVEL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EVENT CENTER REGRADE DRIVE IN THIS AREA TO OPEN UP MORE OF THE MAIN LEVEL BAR PATIO HOT TUB PATIO PORTE COCHERE WIDEN ROAD AND REMOVE ICE HOUSE ALTERNATE SERVICE AND DELIVERY ENTRANCE (36' TRUCK SHOWN FOR SCALE) POSSIBLE DUMPSER ENCLOSURE LOCATION NEAR EXISTING GARAGE INTEGRATE NEW DECK WITH EXISTING WATER FEATURE NGROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN:CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A0-0 SITE PLAN June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1" = 20'-0"1 SITE PLAN # REVISION DATE 1 Revision 1 3-3-99 DN UP UP UP GRAND STAIR TO MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA:11,225 SQ.FT. PORT COCHERE NEIGHBORING CONDO DECK AREA SECONDARY DELIVERY SERVICE RAMP AND ENTRY BUSINESS CENTER DESKSTAIR TO HOT TUB DECK VALET AND LUGGAGE STAGING RETAIL AREA Bar ? Entry ? Meeting Room 1 ? Pool and Hot Tub ? Craft/Activity Room ? Pool Mech. ? Cooler ? Gen. Mgr. ? Office 2 ? Office 3 ? ELEVATOR EQUIP. Elect. ? EMP. LOCKERS Meeting Room 2 ? Meeting Room 3 ? Wait Station ? Cook Line ? Scullery ? Lobby ?Brewhouse?MOP SINK Prep. Area ? Dry Goods ? Cooler ? Mech. ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.0 CHALET LOWER LEVEL PLAN June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETN# REVISION DATE SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 CHALET LOWER LEVEL PLAN DN UP DN LARGE STANDARD HOTEL ROOMS (x4) PRIVATE DECKS OPEN TO BELOW GROSS FLOOR AREA:10,267 SQ.FT. FIRE TABLE AREA REGRADE ROAD FOR GARDEN LEVEL ROOMS @ THIS LEVEL #201 Large King ? #203 Large King ? #205 Large King ? #207 Large King ? #209 King Suite ? #211 King Suite ? #213 King Suite ? #215 King Suite ? #217 King Suite ? #219 King Suite ? #221 King Suite ? #223 King Suite ? #204 King ? #206 King ? #208 King ? #210 King ? #212 King ? #214 King ? #216 King ? #218 King ? Guest Gym ? ROUGH-IN FOR FUTURE HOT TUB OPEN TO BELOW Mech. ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.1 CHALET MAIN LEVEL PLAN June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 CHALET MAIN LEVEL PLAN N# REVISION DATE DN OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW EGRESS STAIR FROM ABOVE GROSS FLOOR AREA:11,298 SQ.FT. FIRE EXIT @ GRADE THIS LEVEL #301 Large King ? #303 Large King ? #305 Large King ? #307 Large King ? #309 King Suite ? #311 King Suite ? #313 King Suite ? #315 King Suite ? #317 King Suite ? #319 King Suite ? #321 King Suite ? #323 King Suite ? #300 King ? #316 King ? Housekeeping, Laundry, IT, Mech. ? Admin. ? #318 King ? #314 King ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.2 CHALET UPPER LEVEL PLAN June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 CHALET UPPER LEVEL PLAN N# REVISION DATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO EVENT CENTER ROOF DECK AREA (~2500 SQ.FT.) SKYLIGHT OVER RECEPTION LOBBY GROSS FLOOR AREA:8,029 SQ.FT. ROOFTOP BAR WITH OPERABLE ROOF 8'x48' RECREATIONAL BOCCE BALL CT. Rooftop Deck Service ? #401 Bridal Suite ? #400 Bridal Suite ? #403 Bridal Suite ? #405 Bridal Suite ? Groom's Quarters ? Exec. Conf. Rm. ? Housekeeping and Storage ? Housekeeping and Storage ? #402 King ? #404 King ?1" / 12"RAMP#406 King Suite ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.3 CHALET THIRD LEVEL PLAN June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 CHALET THIRD LEVEL PLAN N# REVISION DATE DN GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.4 CHALET ROOF PLAN June 19, 2019 LDG THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEJVS 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 CHALET ROOF PLAN # REVISION DATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO HOTEL EXTERIOR STAIR TO MAIN LEVEL DECK ABOVE THIRD LEVEL OF HOTEL FLOOR ELEVATION:8192' GROSS FLOOR AREA:2,800 SQ.FT. Storage and Mechanical ? Welcome Lobby ? EXTERIOR STAIR TO PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EXTERIOR STAIR TO EVENT VENUE SERVICE ENTRY SWEEPING STAIR TO UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION:8202' GROSS FLOOR AREA:3,800 SQ.FT. DJ AREA Deck ? Banquet Hall ?Women's ? Men's ? Buffet Service ? Storage ? Banquet Kitchen ? Elevator Landing ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.9 EVENT CENTER LOWER AND MAIN LEVEL June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 EVENT CENTER LOWER LEVEL NSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"2 EVENT CENTER MAIN LEVEL # REVISION DATE EVENT STAGE EVENT SEATING FOR ~200 PEOPLE EXTERIOR STAIR TO DECK FLOOR ELEVATION:8216' GROSS FLOOR AREA:1,300 SQ.FT. OPERABLE ROOF ABOVE Upper Hall ? Bride's Quarters ? Men's ? Women's ? Event Venue ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.10 EVENT CENTER UPPER FLOOR AND ROOF PLAN June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"2 EVENT CENTER ROOF PLAN # REVISION DATE CLOSET/REF. CABINET CLOSET/REF. CABINET Sitting Room ? Bedroom ? Sitting Room ? Bathroom ? Bedroom ? Bathroom ? Toilet ? Toilet ?GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A1.13 ROOM LAYOUTS June 19, 2019 JVS THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEJVS 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALETSCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"1 STANDARD SUITE SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"2 LARGE HOTEL ROOM SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"3 STANDARD HOTEL ROOM SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"4 PREMIUM 1-BEDROOM SUITES SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"5 PREMIUM 1-BEDROOM SUITE CLOSET/REF. CABINET # REVISION DATE T.O. MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR 100' -0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR 109' -7 3/4" CHALET LOWER LEVEL PLAN 89' -1 7/8" T.O. FDN. WALL 98' -9 7/8" T.O. THIRD LEVEL SUBFLOOR 119' -3 1/2" T.O. THIRD LEVEL PLATE 128' -4 5/8" EVENT CENTER LOWER LEVEL 120' -11 1/2" EVENT CENTER MAIN LEVEL 130' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL 147' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER T.O. FOUND. 129' -3 3/8"17' - 0"9' - 6"EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL PLATE 155' -6 5/8"8' - 1 1/8"EVENT CENTER HIGHEST RIDGE 163' -1 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE 135' -9 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE PLATE 125' -9 5/8"10' - 10 1/8"9' - 7 3/4"9' - 7 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"10' - 0"DRIVE AISLE AND PARKING AREA @ EVENT CENTER ENCLOSED BRIDGE FROM CHALET TO EVENT CENTER EMERGENCY EXIT WITH WALKWAY TO ADJACENT PARKING AREA FULL CUT-OFF WALL PACK @ 9' AFF HIGH GRADE @ DRIVE (GRADE @ BRIDGE IS LOWER) COMPOSITE ROOFING, TYP. WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. DECK DIVIDERS WITH FROSTED GLASS TOP PANELS PORT-COCHERE BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.CLEARANCE14' MIN.WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP. ARTIFICIAL STONE VENEER TO MATCH RECLAIMED STONE T.O. MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR 100' -0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR 109' -7 3/4" B.O. FDN. WALL 85' -1 7/8" T.O. FDN. WALL 98' -9 7/8" T.O. THIRD LEVEL SUBFLOOR 119' -3 1/2" T.O. THIRD LEVEL PLATE 128' -4 5/8" EVENT CENTER LOWER LEVEL 120' -11 1/2" EVENT CENTER MAIN LEVEL 130' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL 147' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER T.O. FOUND. 129' -3 3/8" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL PLATE 155' -6 5/8" EVENT CENTER HIGHEST RIDGE 163' -1 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE 135' -9 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE PLATE 125' -9 5/8" LOWEST GRADE @ CHALET: 8160.0' HIGHEST RIDGE AT CHALET VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING WITH WARM CHESTNUT STAIN 1X4 COMPOSITE TRIM, TYP. @ WINDOWS AND DOORS 1x12 COMPOSITE TRIM BAND 8x8 STAINED TIMBER DECK POST, TYP. POWDER COATED STEEL GUARD RAIL WITH STAINED WOOD TOP RAIL NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER GUARD RAIL OVERLAY STONE CLAD POST BASE NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER TRUSS NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER PERGOLA OVER ROOFTOP BAR AREA STAINED STAIR TO UPPER LEVEL EVENT VENUE @ EVENT CENTER BEYOND NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER OPERABLE ROOF FRAME FOR ROLL-UP ROOF GLASS TOP PANEL ON PARAPET GUARD RAIL FULL CUT OFF WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURE @ 9' AFF 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WITH BISTRO WALNUT STAIN, TYP. COLUMN BASES CLAD IN RECLAIMED NATURAL STONE DECK DIVIDERS BETWEEN UNITS. LOW WALL WITH SHAPED FROSTED GLASS PANEL ABV., TYP. WOOD DECK RAILS, POST, AND FASCIA TO BE NATURAL PINE STAINED FINISH BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP. WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A2.1 ELEVATIONS June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALET# REVISION DATE SURVEY: 8160.0' SURVEY: 8170.84' SURVEY: 8180.49' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8195.68' SURVEY: 8206.68' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8201.18' AVERAGE GARDE: 8183+8160 / 2 = 8171.5' HIGH POINT @ CHALET GRADE: 8183.0' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8200.14' SURVEY: 8218.14' SURVEY: 8226.23' SURVEY: 8235.48' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8230.86' AVERAGE GARDE: 8212+8190 / 2 = 8201.0' LOWEST GRADE @ CHALET: 8160.0' LOWEST GRADE @ EVENT CENTER: 8190' HIGHEST GRADE @ EVENT CENTER: 8212.0' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8230.86' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8200.14' SURVEY: 8218.14' SURVEY: 8226.23' SURVEY: 8235.48' AVERAGE GARDE: 8212+8190 / 2 = 8201.0' SURVEY: 8160.0' SURVEY: 8170.84' SURVEY: 8180.49' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8195.68' SURVEY: 8206.68' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8201.18' AVERAGE GARDE: 8183+8160 / 2 = 8171.5' T.O. MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR 100' -0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR 109' -7 3/4" T.O. FDN. WALL 98' -9 7/8" T.O. THIRD LEVEL SUBFLOOR 119' -3 1/2" T.O. THIRD LEVEL PLATE 128' -4 5/8" EVENT CENTER LOWER LEVEL 120' -11 1/2" EVENT CENTER MAIN LEVEL 130' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL 147' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER T.O. FOUND. 129' -3 3/8" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL PLATE 155' -6 5/8" EVENT CENTER HIGHEST RIDGE 163' -1 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE 135' -9 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE PLATE 125' -9 5/8" POST BASES CLAD IN RECLAIMED STONE NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER POSTS AND BEAMS COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOFING, TYP. DECK DIVIDERS WITH SHAPED GLASS TOP PANEL WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOFING, TYP. DRIVE AISLE ELEVATION VARIES EXIT STAIR LANDING BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING EXISTING CONDO STRUCTURES TO REMAIN EXISTING CONDO DECKS TO REMAIN WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. T.O. MAIN LEVEL SUBFLOOR 100' -0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL SUBFLOOR 109' -7 3/4" T.O. FDN. WALL 98' -9 7/8" T.O. THIRD LEVEL SUBFLOOR 119' -3 1/2" T.O. THIRD LEVEL PLATE 128' -4 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE 135' -9 5/8" CHALET HIGHEST RIDGE PLATE 125' -9 5/8" GRADE AT GARDEN LEVEL DOOR TO BRIDGE FOR EVENT CENTER ACCESS. BRIDGE NOT SHOWN. ARTIFICIAL STONE VENEER TO MATCH RECLAIMED STONE WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED FIBER CEMENT BAD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. EXIT DOOR AND LANDING FROM STAIR ENCLOSURE. ACCESS TO DRIVE AISLE. AREA OF EXISTING CONDO STRUCTURE TO REMAIN HIGHEST RIDGE @ CHALET SKYLIGHTS OVER ATRIUM BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP. SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST CHALET ELEVATION GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A2.2 ELEVATIONS June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALET# REVISION DATE SURVEY: 8160.0' SURVEY: 8170.84' SURVEY: 8180.49' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8195.68' SURVEY: 8206.68' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8201.18' AVERAGE GARDE: 8183+8160 / 2 = 8171.5' HIGHEST GRADE @ CHALET: 8183.0' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8201.18' SURVEY: 8195.68' SURVEY: 8206.68' AVERAGE GARDE: 8183+8160 / 2 = 8171.5' LOWEST GRADE @ CHALET: 8160' HIGHEST GRADE @ CHALET: 8183.0' LOWEST GRADE @ EVENT CENTER: 8190.0' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8230.86' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8200.14' SURVEY: 8218.14' SURVEY: 8226.23' SURVEY: 8235.48' AVERAGE GARDE: 8212+8190 / 2 = 8201.0' HIGHEST GRADE @ EVENT CENTER: 8112,0' EVENT CENTER LOWER LEVEL 120' -11 1/2" EVENT CENTER MAIN LEVEL 130' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL 147' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER T.O. FOUND. 129' -3 3/8" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL PLATE 155' -6 5/8" EVENT CENTER HIGHEST RIDGE 163' -1 5/8" BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP. WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER SHADE STRUCTURE GLASS TOP PANEL AT GUARD AT EDGE OF ROOF DECK NATURAL PINE STAINED WOOD DETAILING AT DECK AND STAIR. BRIDGE TO CHALET. (SHOWN IN SECTION) ARTIFICIAL STONE VENEER TO MATCH RECLAIMED STONE EVENT CENTER LOWER LEVEL 120' -11 1/2" EVENT CENTER MAIN LEVEL 130' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL 147' -5 1/2" EVENT CENTER UPPER LEVEL PLATE 155' -6 5/8" EVENT CENTER HIGHEST RIDGE 163' -1 5/8" BISTRO WALNUT PAINTED 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP. WARM CHESTNUT PAINTED FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, TYP. ARTIFICIAL STONE VENEER TO MATCH RECLAIMED STONE NATURAL PINE STAINED TIMBER SHADE STRUCTURE KITCHEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOF MOUNTED @ THIS LOC.GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. A2.3 ELEVATIONS June 19, 2019 LDG THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEJVS 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALET# REVISION DATE SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1 EVENT CENTER EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"2 EVENT CENTER WEST ELEVATION MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8230.86' SURVEY: 8190.14' SURVEY: 8200.14' SURVEY: 8218.14' SURVEY: 8226.23' SURVEY: 8235.48' AVERAGE GARDE: 8212+8190 / 2 = 8201.0' MIDPOINT OF ROOF SURVEY: 8230.86' AVERAGE GARDE: 8212+8190 / 2 = 8201.0' CHALET LOWER LEVEL PLAN 89' -1 7/8" T.O. FDN. WALL 98' -9 7/8" WOOD WRAPPED SOFFIT RECESSED SHELVING HEARTHE CHALET LOWER LEVEL PLAN 89' -1 7/8" T.O. FDN. WALL 98' -9 7/8" SALVAGED PINE TRUNK SALVAGED WAINSCOT DROPPED CEILING BACKLIT STAINED GLASS PANEL GROUPODESTONELDESIGNLODESTONE DESIGN GROUP701 DELAWARE AVENUE SUITE CLONGMONT, CO 80501PHONE: 303-800-8633FAX: 303-731-0877mail@lodestonedesign.comwww.LodestoneDesign.comThe Information shown on this document represents copyrighted intellectual property. Reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted without the prior consent of Lodestone Design Group. ISSUE RECORD DATE DRAWING TITLE: DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: PROJECT #: 5-15-19DEVELOPMENT REV. I2.0 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS - LOWER LEVEL June 19, 2019 Author THE ESTES PARK CHALETPROJECT ADDRESSCITY, STATE ZIP CODEChecker 19-022THE ESTES PARK CHALET# REVISION DATE SCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"1 FIREPLACE WALL @ LOBBY SCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"2 FIREPLACE WALL @ BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Linda Hardin – Planner I Date: August 20, 2019 RE: Development Plan – Best Western Plus Silver Saddle Inn Applicant Request: Approval of a Development Plan for an addition and remodel to the existing hotel and amenities. Planning Commission Objectives: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC); and 2. Conduct a public hearing to consider applicant’s testimony, public comment and Town staff’s findings and analysis; and 3. Approve or deny the Development Plan application. Location: 1260 Big Thompson Avenue, legally described as Lot 16B of the Amended Plat of Lots 15A and 16A of the Amended Plat of Lots 15 and 16, and the vacated street adjoining said Lots, Grand Estates Addition to the Town of Estes Park. Owner/Applicant: Wally and Laurine Burke Applicant’s Representative: Jason Walker, Van Horn Engineering Project Description: Present Situation: The subject property sits on 3.33 acres and is developed with 63 guest units, 3 employee housing units, office space, meeting rooms, and various guest amenities including a workout facility and swimming pool. History: The motel was originally constructed in 1955. In 1971, Wallace and Laurine Burke purchased what is now known as the Best Western Plus Silver Saddle Inn. Through the years they have continued to improve the motel property with various amenity upgrades and remodels of the property. Most recently, in 2012, they added 8 guest units, remodeled 4 guest units and added meeting space. Proposal: The current application is to add 18 guest units to the motel, move the swimming pool to an indoor location, and add separate laundry facilities for guests and staff. In addition, Planning Commission, August 20, 2019 Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan Page 2 of 5 the proposal includes employee break areas and an office. Additional parking is included to accommodate the increase in guest units. Site Data Table: Engineer: Jason Walker, Van Horn Engineering Parcel Number: 2519433016 Development Area: 3.33 acres Existing Land Use: Accommodations Proposed Land Use: Accommodations Zoning Designation: A - Accommodations Adjacent Zoning: East: A, Accommodations North: E-1, Estate & RM, Multi-Family Residential West: A, Accommodations South: A, Accommodations Adjacent Land Uses: East: Coyote Mountain Lodge, Accommodations North: Reserve 1st, Single-Family Residences and: Ranch Meadow Condos PH22, Multi-family Residences West: Hotel Estes, Accommodations South: Grand Estates ADD AMD L16B, Burke Residence Services: Water: Town of Estes Park Sewer: Estes Park Sanitation District Review Criteria: Depending on the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based on issues relevant to any project. 1. Buildings and Lots. One building additions is proposed. This building will provide 18 additional accommodation guest units, an indoor swimming pool, guest laundry, staff laundry, guest lobby, and office space. The lot was recently amended to accommodate the additional use and accommodate easements necessary for utilities. 2. Landscaping. An alternative landscaping plan is proposed which provides new landscaping to be added to new parking areas only. Existing landscaping on the property will not be reduced. The proposed building addition will cover an area that is primarily impervious (current parking). The limited landscaping currently in this area will be replaced with one tree and 3 shrubs. The alternate plan requests a waiver of required landscaping for the following reasons: Planning Commission, August 20, 2019 Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan Page 3 of 5 • Current impervious coverage of the property is 58%. This was within the standards allowed at the time of development. With the recent amended plat, the impervious coverage was decreased to 56.5%. This is still above the current maximum regulation of 50%, but moving toward that goal. The amount of impervious coverage limits the addition of new landscaping options for the property. • The requirement cannot be met on the southeast parking structure due to utility lines underground. Shrubs will replace trees in this area. • Due to existing development on the property, the existing landscaping does not meet the current requirements. There are approximately 20% of the required trees and 52% of required shrubs. The proposed plan will provide for 32% of the required trees and 64% of the required shrubs. 3. Water and Electric. The proposal includes a dedicated utility easement just south of the southeastern parking structure and running west to the property line. Also added is an electrical easement central to the property at the request of Estes Park Power and Communications. All requirements of Estes Park utilities have been met. 4. Sanitary Sewer. The existing 6” service line is sufficient for the proposed development. 5. Fire Protection. Estes Valley Fire Protection District provided comments regarding sprinklers and alarms that will be addressed at the building permit stage. 6. Stormwater Drainage. As the property is currently developed, a new drainage report is not considered necessary. Construction plans must include details for all drainage, erosion and sediment control improvements to be approved by Estes Park Public Works. 7. Parking. Parking and accessibility requirements with regard to number of spaces are met with this proposal. A revised Development Plan must be submitted prior to signatures, that corrects and details parking geometry in compliance with the EVDC. The proposed plan indicates some parking spaces at 18’ in length, and code requires they be 19.5’ in length. Also, width measurements for driveways in parking areas will need to be compliant with the code and indicated accordingly. 8. Access. The property currently has four (4) accesses off of Big Thompson Avenue (Highway 34). CDOT has required that two (2) of these accesses be removed. The proposal removes two accesses and permit applications have been received and acknowledged by CDOT for compliance with the requirement. Permits from CDOT shall be issued before construction in this area can begin. 9. Sidewalk/Trail. A redirection of the trail is proposed to meet requirements for parking to back out to the north. Estes Parks Public Works has reviewed and conceptually approved the plan for this redirection. Planning Commission, August 20, 2019 Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan Page 4 of 5 10. Exterior Lighting. New exterior lighting will be shielded and downcast in compliance with the EVDC. 11. Comprehensive Plan. This project confirms to the goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan, specifically as follows: • Policy 1.7 – Urban land use should occur within the Town limits of Estes Park. • Policy 4.7 – Implement access control improvements as development occurs. • Policy 7.3 – Sustain and support the existing tourism industry and marketing programs. • Policy 7.10 – Require that commercially zoned land be developed as commercial as the principal use. This property is part of the North End Planning Sub-Area in the Comprehensive Plan and is designated commercial for accommodation uses. Public Notice: Written notice has been mailed to adjacent property owners in accordance with EVDC §3.15 General Notice Provisions. A community meeting was held on March 31, 2019, in accordance with EVDC §3.2.B. A legal notice was published in the Estes Park Trail Gazette and the application is posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” webpage. The applicant has also posted a “Development Proposal Under Review” sign on the property – a photo of the sign is included. Public Interest: Medium There have been only two written comments received. One in favor, and one opposed to the project. Several verbal comments have requested details about the project. Opposition has been mainly from a few residents of Ranch Meadows that have concerns about the height of the addition and restricting their current views. All comments received in writing are available www.estes.org/current applications. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making Body for the Development Plan. 2. Adequate public and private facilities are currently available to serve the proposed addition. 3. The Development Plan is consistent with the recommendations of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff or consideration and comment. Concerns and issues that were raised have been addressed or will be addressed at time of building permit. Planning Commission, August 20, 2019 Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan Page 5 of 5 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan, with the following conditions: 1. All public (and applicable private) improvements shall be designed and constructed by the developer in accordance with Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC), Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS), and CDOT standards. 2. Detailed construction plans for grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control, driveway, parking, and trail improvements shall be prepared/submitted/review/approved by Estes Park Public Works and, as applicable, CDOT, prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. ROW permits shall be issued by CDOT and Estes Park Public Works for the work in the CDOT ROW , prior to issuance of any building permits. 4. All improvements shall be fully constructed prior to the issuance of any building permits (unless otherwise approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.12.C.1 and Section 10.5.K of the EVDC), or the installation of the same have been guaranteed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10. 5. A Revised Development Plan will be submitted prior to signatures with changes/corrections to parking geometry compliant with EVDC 7.11.O.3. Sample Motion: 1. I move to APPROVE the Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan application according to findings of fact and including conditions as recommended by Staff. 2. I move to CONTINUE the Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that… [state reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to DENY the Silver Saddle Addition Development Plan application, finding that… [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Statement of Intent 2. Application 3. Development Plan Set a. Site Plan b. Grading and Drainage Plan c. Landscaping and Lighting Plan 4. Public Comments 5. Photo – “Development Proposal” sign in place -ISTATEMENTOFINTENTSILVERSADDLEDEVELOPMENTPLANANDAMENDEDPLATofLot16A,GrandEstatesAdditiontotheTownofEstesPark,locatedinSection19,Township5North,Range72Westofthe6thP.M.,LarimerCounty,ColoradoPROJECTLOCATION:TheproposeddevelopmentiswithinSection19,Township5North,Range72Westofthe6thP.M.TheproperyislocatedadjacenttoandsouthofU.S.Highway34andnorth&westofLakefrontStreet.Thepropertyaddressis1260BigThompsonAvenue.OWNER:TheownersofthislandandtheapplicantsareWallyandLaurineBurke.Thereisnolienholderontheproperty.PROJECTDESCRIPTION.Thisprojectisanadditiontotheexistingmotelbuilding.Theadditionsofanindoorpooi,18guestunitsaswellasadditionalhotelamenitiesareproposedforthisdevelopmentplan.Theamenitiesincludeastafflaundryandbreakrooms,aguestlaundryroom,aguestloungeandanoffice.Thereisalsoaproposedelevatedslabparkingstructurewithstorageandsomeadditionalparkingunderneath,locatedtothesoutheastonthesubjectproperty.Theadditionalparkingunderneathwillbeventilatedtomeetallapplicablehealthandsafetystandards.AnAmendedHathasbeencreatedtocorrectmultipleeasementsthatdonotdirectlyfollowthelayoutoftheutilities.Thisamendedplatvacatescertaineasements,anddedicatespublicutilityeasementsthatwillencompassallutilities.ACCESS:CurrentlytheSilverSaddleMotelhas4accessesoffU.S.Hwy34.Theseaccesseshavebeeninexistencesincethemotelwasbuiltin1955.Historicallytheaccesseshaveservedthemotelwellwithoutanyissuesandtheproposedadditionwilladdminimaltraffictotheaccessesandnotchangetheflowofthetraffic.AsrequestedbytheColoradoDepartmentofTransportation,weproposetoremovetwooftheexistingaccessestotheSilverSaddleMotel.ATraffic/AccessMemoisincludedwiththissubmittal.LOTCOVERAGE:Historically,themotelhashad58%imperviouscoverage.Weproposetolowertheimperviouscoverageonthepropertyto56.5%bydoinganamendedplattogetmoreperviouslandfromtheAzonedlottothesouth.ThecodestatesthatAccommodationszoningmayhaveamaximumof50%imperviouscoverage.Therefore,wewillbeaskingforawaiveratPlanningCommissiontocontinuetheallowedimperviouscoverageonthelotat56.5%.Historically,thecodespriortothecurrentcodeallowed80%.UTILITIES:Therearenoproposedchangestoutilitymainlinesasapartofthisproject.The3”waterservicelineand6”firelineareadequatetohandletheproposedaddition.SewerServicetotheexistingbuildingwillneedtobereviewedbyEstesParkSanitationtodetermineadequacyoftheexistinglineoncetheproposedadditionisincluded.ThegasmeterforthemainbuildingwillhavetoberelocatedtothePage1of2 -west.Theelectrictransformermayneedtobeupsizedfortheproposedaddition.Weproposetomaintaintheuseoftheexisting6”sewerserviceline.LANDScAPING:Thispropertycurrentlyhasmaturelandscapinginplace.Weproposetomaintaintheexistinglandscapingandprovidelandscapingforthenewparkingareas.Theplantingrequirementsbasedontheparkinglotarea,arterialfrontageandimperviousareaare101treesand313shrubstotal.Twenty-onetreesand157shrubsexistcurrentlyontheproperty.Duetospaceandutilitylocationlimitationsonthelotweareproposingtoplant11additionaltreesand36additionalshrubsandrequestingawaiverfortheremaining69treesand120shrubs.Landscapinghasbeenshownonthedevelopmentplanonlyforthenewparkingareas.Theonlyvariationweproposeisforthenewsoutheastparkingstructure.Thelandscapebufferareaiscurrentlyoccupiedbywaterandsewerlines,sovegetationisnotdesirableovertheselines.Weareproposingshrubs,butnotreesasanalternativetominimizeexistingutilityconflicts.STORMWATER:ThispropertyislocatednorthofLakeEstes.CurrentlywaterflowsoffthesubjectpropertyandtowardsLakefrontStreet.TherehavebeenmultipleimprovementsmadetoLakefrontStreettofacilitatetheflowofstorniwateradequatelytoLakeEstes.Noimprovementsareproposedforoff-sitestormflow.Weproposethatadrainagereportisunnecessaryforthisproposedaddition.Adrainagememoisattached.Onsitewehaveproposedsomeflowdissipaters(rip-rap)andwaterqualityswalestoaddressthestormwaterquality.SCHEDULE:Theadditionisplannedtobebuiltinthefallof2019.Thereisnotananticipatedphasingplantobuilditout.CODEWAIVERS:Allthedevelopmentanddistrictrequirementsaremetwiththissubmittalexceptforthefollowingforwhichwearerequestingwaivers:1.Thecodestatesthatamaximumof50%imperviouscoverageisallowedonpropertieswithAccommodationsZoning.Wearerequestingthatawaiverbegrantedtoallow56.5%imperviouscoverageonthesubjectproperty.Historically,whentheSilverSaddleMotelwasbuiltin1955theallowableimperviouscoveragewas80%ofthelotarea.WiththelastDevelopmentPlanfortheSilverSaddle(2012),58%imperviouscoveragewasallowed.Weareadjustinglotlinestoaddareatothesubjectproperty,sothatwecanimproveonthehistoricallotcoverage.2.Thelandscapingproposedforthissubjectpropertyislessthanthatrequiredbythecode.Wearerequestingthatanalternativelandscapingplanbeallowedduetothesiteandutilityrestrictionsoutlinedabove.Asstatedabove,theplantingrequirementsbasedontheparkinglotarea,arerialfrontageandimperviousareaare101treesand313shrubstotal.Twenty-onetreesand157shrubsexistcurrentlyontheproperty.Weareproposingtoplant11additionaltreesand36additionalshrubsandrequestingawaiverfortheremaining69treesand120shrubs.Page2of2 SITE PLAN LOT 15A AND 16A GRAND ESTATES ADDITION ESTES PARK,COLORADO VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 046 ‘55 04808 40.LOWS SANK.CQLQN000 505’/ PHONE;(970)585—4388 FAX;(970)555 —SlOt r110—4C58 O -5-14(Ph—(0 0HCii -•1 /*/—I -1’- Nc .. •(S. I x 4 :çQ €ri-Li 8 © 0 S S 0 0 S S F F F’- 0 S I, S F 2 SF S S F —9-9 0. -4 -0 0. —9 C -a > 5: 1 ‘F’’F”25 — - 11 9 09’ p. 02 CJD < Ri 9 C S U Ri Rin 0-c Ri z-9 14 0 89 1 PS 9 -I 0- 09 C) 2 —9 C 09 F -IsSIP, >z C -H ri C) ri C U) -H m m > C C 0 z 2: C) (I-) > C 1 0 (/) C) z C ri c-f) -I>—I ri U) C C 0z -I 0 I m -I 0 z 0 -Ii ri U-) —I ri U) (I) > U U Ri 0) 0 ‘9 I ri ri 2: C m C -a -I 0 T9 r 0 U-) c-fl > z C 0) n 0 -I 0’ 0 ‘9 - :i: ri > ri z C ri C I 5 O F Pp. F !—U -un z F S F U U -H 0 zF S F GRADING &DRAINAGE 4 —.Zr LOT iSA AND 16A GRAND ESTATES ADDITION VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 1Q4 FISH CREEK RD.ESTES PARK,COLORAOO 80517 PHONE:(070S 586—9395 •FAX:(910)505—8101 ESTES PARK,COLORADO CSLABE3OAEASS’RAALBEAEVCAD-SAS•EA’AL-ARFEARAALANEFONAGC-OC.RTAIESALESDRAW‘AZALEA’ARSPRGES.E:LESASL:A*TRJR’DGRASTSNSAIRL•ALAASG’ESStBEA.5-SWAL,,AREASE’rAAaOPABERA’RSMALLBEDO\OGUATCTOTNA,CEGROWIACSGATCISABERCC•AT’ARC’CA.LSAAAEASarAANOCAA.“ADDSTAN-CESABREORARP’E7SDASTP_SP50C.PDRAOtUBERS‘EEENSITTQROATRETESRAR.TSMOGRASSQEZERrES.AAA•TEDCOREGOOrAGSCASCoSNAG,REA3EGAAJETOPRBEOR’SO’—PTOTACIAANO•A,AZ0.TRtEENS-3ALPPORTRAYQPTOESATERAWPTPBTSTWACStEATARNACUTER0SCABSEEORDIRE-Ic‘NE’ARE501OflA_SEWEANEDBOAR‘0.SBORTACATSSAULL*ESIACCESL-AENCEEYAIEOAPAS’MflNALALESSTAIDOPIABTALTOTAWPTAOGRASSESAlASCROLACCREEPS‘-SIAWlRASLTRTSORSTORNRSA’TR.N_nITRB’TORALSATTIAEPPOC”DDNANBCSRTSTCSTROLLSILEETEOTHATR’TLEEEBTACIRAT)RPZXPSL-StAaATAC.AFALLAIM.REACtSATRITGTEWERTSARSODTOREMACTAG*73‘WIrEDTOEDASLEGACEE.AATESTASTEATTORAATVASOROAPORS‘7‘ARE•A&OR$TATTOO’FEASSALE‘LGtTRACTSROASTEDStORMCOOQTPTK’O•ASANALA.RES’X%PtTOAIDCO’ISEE€ETPOTLATERSEWABEERSREOSRRGROZEGETAPOA.ORLR.JNCSINSSVGAASTAIllAIDfluHEFTSOCTTIIFEPTTECNSMALLRESIZESASSOTIAl[IGOATRIFTTILLAlITSETATSOTTIE!TALLATPLflJT1BESECITSOIASTREESSMALLRESTEEDASSODAlrOANASCBCALORERANDSOCATRINDINCHCASIRERRLMATTAGSETPARSSESAJLRESGALLONCOAITABETORLARGERATPLAUATRTIGRT.LPLATATNIGERIA,SIOALLAEFTTHEAllRICANISSOLAATTOTOFSAUTEUTMETATRECEfiCATIOBFEEBLTTRTTTSTATEISISATOLLCOTAT1TROTASsEOAALITTSTANDARDSSFThECOLORADONNRSERTACT,TTTTI35.ARSCLEARCES-ASBBTTAOEDBRLLLATASSLARCEORNATELTTACLSTEAPROPRBITTSIBCTTUT!TAGAIJAOANTCNSPPITAEELPTSISTERNIT!TNEMSATLDRIPGENESFLITiOTATSTRFAREASECOLIEEOLARTOTCARTBSSTALLTEOAITITAOAEDNAIBEALTART000TTUNOCONDITTONATALLTTAESTNEPROPERTYOWNERISRESFDTBSINLEPETRESULTETROGATANS.PANTING.TAGEDINE.LRSOTTIG.PERTILDEINE.TEPLAEEAESRT’PLANTSETAPOOREORSTITEAAANDOThERRAITETETEATCEOFALLPLARAENONASABETTER-TB-ALLTO[ESSRALLBESTAREDRUSTATESAlTOPTTICESTOPROTECTFROMTULELIPESAVAGENOCTT.TINLINEFENCINGTROLLNEALLDWEDTOPRDTSETLANDSCAPINGFOOlWILDLIFEDAMAGE-EEPATTTAETATSTSRILELIFESTNWLA.ROTRERCSPSTILIDLEPODPRARRASEDYA’LTLTEAL5-TTEISSTTEPLAITATREPDESOATATTOBEALOTASTTIIIBETTEREETNTTTEETUSALANESARISPLOTNORANITAPTSSETAENTSSPGTERFLAT3ALLESTETIETLIETTINSTEIIEETERASEUDDEONTIOERENTSIIFTEREEIJTRETITLRETISTSAPSBEEAUELRSDATEETTETINGESAPTTETTARAICRPTOTAOEESSLAFEElENTSCEGGN’NGFTCTA050LICSTEWTABSLEFATTAATNNOTTORECO.AVTSPGBTTTTTTTSEEVELOPNENTPLANPLTSJAATTNGREQUIREMENTS:LOTTREEPETTOLINEALPEETMADTLTTGDTETUNEALFEETALONEARTERIALSTREETSTENTESSIPESSWEPTRATEATSIRENSTTOEEEET3ELINEALFEETVAlETSDRGDPERSLINEALFEETFEEPARRINEALETSSTEPMAEREARLETL]TIETTAT’TEST-RETSTREESENDATSTTRARTRRTPUALSTREETFRTSTLCEITDEEPEUATLITIEALFEET•JIE0SARANPER00LINEALFEETULOTASALLATTINIALSTREETFRONTAGESSNBETElRETTATREESPARRITSLET51MBWEEATTEATATOLTSPENATSETASFOFPUPAISACLOTAREAR.DTASF-RTEG’RESNTREESARTNSATURNIAPP051025CDISRATETTREERT.SESEDGOSPEUTROGSFEFTBRFRR’EATCOAIRAEE73.2TISPREOUIRES7DITEE$ARIDATASTDGDSTOTALREQUIRES•RTETTAU_TTREDTRSNSARTPURRINGLOTLAIIETCAPIASTATTREESARE3T3EHOADTTETULEEASTITIELMAETCAPITBGATTREES(1SOTSAEA’OIGALANESCPINGRLAAAEATE57TRUANTTOTALPROPOSEDRENTLPABGSCAPATNEiTTTREESIRETASRRBROOMI9flWIOEtSI32‘SECTWARADS9•AtTSRECO.IIMEIVDEDSEEDVIXLw__P_-R.T--S‘IDEVELOPMENTPLANLOT16BOFTHEAMENDEDPLANTOFLOTS15AAND16AOFTHEAMENDEDPLATOFLOTS15AND16,ANDTHEVACATEDSTREETADJOININGSAIDLOTS,GRANDESTATESADDITIONTOTHETOWNOFESTESPARKNOTES:AALC__UC-!,zI—Hr—01—ETAE-0Cl)F—D-l—lCIDC[1]—InIe—DRDEEMCAECTF.OIT:0-MESCALET3ESNOt07/3D‘DODDEEEOE—DS—T7PLANTSCHEDULE:PLRAITTREESEALODAXN_TASRESLEESPSORXRCST6SIEEA’SA—ASIBPERS’AR7MS’RTNARoLALA,,AAASEAOASAGECONTRACUTRTA,TROAAI‘ad::ASTATTOOSATIN_E—ELECTTSUTAEoR3-ENSRAEAEUTILTOLIUEONTERSECLEANGOTSSOAPSOAR-7SCAt75OIL7SGALEZRIEWES@Nr.TR.AARDSC-A-GASLINT--—PEACE ToWhomItMayConcern:WestronglysupporttheimprovementoflodgingintheEstesValley.Thus,wesupporttheimprovementofTheBestWesternat1240BigThompsonAve.EstesPark,Colorado80517.ImprovementtohotelinfrastructureintheEstesValley,andinthiscasespecificallytheBestWestern,willthebenefittouristandthecommunityasawholeincludingcompetitors.However,wedohaveafewconcernsabouttheproject.Ourfirstconcernistheheightofthebuilding;itappearstobemiscalculatedunderthecurrentcode.Thefront(northfacing)heightappearstobe30ftwhiletheback(southfacing)appearstobe40ft.Thecalculationswillneedtobechecked,andifnecessary,avariancewillneedtobeissued;wedonotobjecttoavariance.Anotherconcernwehaveistheconductoftheownerasithasbeenasissueinthepast.IhavelistedafewofthepastissueswehavehadwiththeownerofBestWesterntogiveyouanideaofhisproblematicbehavior:1.TheowneroftheBestWesternhasthreatenedlawsuitsoverafencethatblewdownduetowind2.Heyelledatustopayforafencethatabearbrokedown3.Hethreatedalawsuitoveraroofshinglethatblewonhisproperty4.Hehascalledthehealthdepartmentonusnumeroustimes5.Hehascalledthebuildingdepartmentonusnumeroustimes6.HehascalledthepolicedepartmentonusnumeroustimesPleasenotethatwithalltheseinteractionslistedaboveithasbeenproventhatwewerenotatfaultforanything.Afewyearsback,theEstesParkPoliceDepartment(EPPD)evenapproachedusandaskedifwecouldgetarestrainingorderagainsttheownerofTheBestWesternsoEPPDwouldnotbewastingresourcesonfalsecalls&baselessclaims;wedidnotpursuetherestrainingorder.Ourinteractionwiththeownerhasnotbeenafaircompetitorinteraction,ithasbeenharassment.SincetheneighborsoftheBestWesternareaccommodations,weaskthatcompliancewithcitycodesonnoiseandtimesofconstructionbeaconditionofapproval.Lackofcomplianceshouldbeconsideredviolationofthepermit.Harassmentofthecompetitionshouldnotbetolerated.Byputtingthesesconditionsonthebuildingpermit,itwilllimittheamountofconflictontheprojectandhopefullyeliminateanywasteofEPPD’s&i.arimerCountyCourtstimeandeffort.Compliancebythedevelopertoobtainfinalapprovalismuchstrongerthanasmallfinebythedeveloperforwakingupourguests,taintingtheirexperienceofEstesParkandfurtherdetreatingtheneighborrelationship.Sincerely,ThomasC.HochstetlerHochstetlerResortsSilverMoonInn,HotelEstes&AppenzellInn August6,2019TO:WhomItMayConcernRE:ProposedAdditiontotheSilverSaddleMotelWerecentlyreceivedanoticefromtheTownofEstesParkPlanningCommissionrelatingtothisproposedadditionasapossiblyimpactedneighbor.MaryandIhaveownedacondominiumatRanchMeadowsacrossBigThompsonAvefromthisfacilitysince2010.Wepurchasedthecondoprimarilyfortheviewitandmanyothersinourcomplexenjoyofthenearbymountains.In2012theownerofthemoteladdedatallersignandanadditiontotheeastwingofhisbuildingthatpartiallylimitedourviewleavinguswithlessofviewthanwehadpreviously.Thisviewisparamounttoourandourneighbors’enjoymentofourpropertyandequallyimportant,thevalueofourproperty.Mary’srootsgodeepintheEstesValleyandowningandehjoyingourpropertyisveryimportanttous.HerGreatGrandfather,AlbinGriffithhomesteadedintheValleyinthelate1800’s,hissawmillprovidedmuchofthelumberfortheStanleyHotelandheandhisSonsDanandJohnestablishedtheGriffithLumberCO.DanandLouiseGriffithbuiltandoperatedtheRockmountCottagesuntiltheyretired.MaryhelpedhergrandmotherLouisecleancabinswhenshewasyoungandlivinginEstes.WehaveapaintinginourcondothatwasgiventoDanGriffithasbarterforworkhedidforAlbertWandsmanyyearsago.Theaboveispresentedtoemphasizehowimportantourcondoandtheaccompanyingviewistous.Thepostedinformationthattheproposedadditionwillbe29.46feethigh.WehaveconfirmedwiththeArchitectthatthiswillmatchtheexistingEastAddition.AtthisheightitwilleffectivelyeliminateourviewoftheContinentalDividefromProspectMountainallthewayNorth.OurunitsweredesignedwithlargepicturewindowsontheUS34sidetoallowtheownerstoenjoytheviewsandwehopetocontinuetoenjoythemandmaintainourpropertyvaluesforusandourfamily.Ronand,Marytevens2llty_Lr1.o2z,eRmstevens26@corncast.net1360RavenCircle,UnitE ¼.ç;7..;t14’fLt?L•nIr.1,.-;y_4_.—jA—.c;3——V——II-ITN--it,-r<-aI...I ___—DEvELOPMENT!PR0PQPE’’0qTc,5”372i-4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff Report To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Randy Hunt – Community Development Director Date: August 20, 2019 RE: Alarado Business Park: Request to Modify Condition of Development Plan Approval Re US 34 Improvements Applicant Request: Approval of an applicants’ request to modify the conditions of Development Plan approval by adding an option for traffic management on U.S. 34 adjacent to the project site. The applicants specifically are asking that the conditional approval allow for the possibility of a traffic signal at the U.S. 34 / Steamer Drive intersection, rather than the additional traffic lane approved in Oct. 2018, provided that CDOT approves the signal and that other necessary steps (including funding) align. Location: 420 Steamer Drive, north of Big Thompson Ave. (Highway 34), and east of Steamer Drive, legally described as Lot 1 of Stanley Hills Subdivision. Vicinity Map: See attachment 1 Owner/Applicant: Alarado Properties, LLC Applicant’s Representative: Lonnie Sheldon, Van Horn Engineering Project Description: Present Situation: The Development Plan for this project (attachment 3) was approved on Oct. 16, 2018. The Planning Commission minutes (attachment 4) indicate that the Plan was approved with an additional eastbound lane to be added on U.S. 34 adjacent to the project, in order to address additional traffic volume and complexity associated with the project. Since the Plan approval, additional traffic analysis has been done. New traffic information indicates that at least one signal warrant has been met for the U.S. 34 / Steamer Drive intersection when Alarado’s anticipated traffic is accounted for. (Signal warrants are standard threshold criteria used by transportation engineers to determine if and when an intersection qualifies for installation or modification of a traffic signal.) Meanwhile, certain difficulties have become of concern with CDOT’s approach to the additional traffic lane. These may be described as a gradual broadening of the required minimums. A detailed review may not be necessary here; suffice it to say that proportionality of cost between a new lane and a signal may not be as great as once thought. Planning Commission, August 20, 2019 Alarado Business Park: Condition change Page 2 of 3 Proposal: The Town, and possibly CDOT, have also been interested in more comprehensive solutions for the intersection, due to Alarado and to larger traffic management issues in this vicinity as well. Again, detail would take up a lot of room in this report, but the issues can be summarized by noting that a signal may be a better option to address conflicts between pedestrians and motorists, as well as to accommodate traffic volume and complexity. All of this means that additional funding could be sought to augment funding provided by Alarado for a signal design and construction (est. cost of a new signal is upwards of $300,000.) CDOT has not formally approved this signal option, but they are aware of the discussion and have not said “No” so far. A formal CDOT approval would be necessary, as well as Town and others. We should also note that until design is done, it’s not 100 percent clear that a signal is feasible, nor is it clear it won’t be more expensive than the standard figure cited above. The added lane is still the default solution, unless Planning Commission changes the condition, and the lane design is proceeding so that no time is lost. However, if the Commission is willing to add the additional option of a signal to substitute for the lane, design and submittal for approvals could occur for that alternative. This is an “either-or” option, as the new traffic lane would be unnecessary if a signal is properly designed and installed. Approval of the modified condition would allow immediate progress toward a signal design. Time is of the essence in this matter. As even a quick look shows, the building is underway. Current permits are for constructing a core and shell (foundation is already in place); tenant- finish permits for the Urgent Care and the Jimmy John’s are not filed yet but are expected soon. Staff has stated that we need to have CDOT and Town approval for a traffic solution on U.S. 34 before tenant-finish permits are issued. The Hospital indicates that they need to open the Urgent Care in spring 2020. Staff has also stated that a Certificate of Occupancy would not be issued for the Jimmy John’s until the U.S. 34 work is finished and operational. The idea is that traffic management infrastructure needs to be in place by the time the traffic shows up. Unfortunately, CDOT approvals are rarely quick. Staff and the applicants agree that a timely (Aug. 20) decision by Planning Commission is important to avoid introducing further delays. Approval of the motion will not lock in either option for the U.S. 34 traffic solution; it will only allow continued design of the signal and a path to possible approval of that option. Staff will be glad to keep PC apprised of progress on resolving the traffic situation, timetables, etc. Public Interest: Interest in the Alarado project itself last year was moderate, with more interest in the nearby residential area, including interest in traffic issues at the subject intersection. Interest in the traffic lane itself has not been high. Staff has informally notified the Stanley Hills HOA that a signal option is a possibility in this context and that there is a discussion on the PC’s Aug. 20 agenda. Staff Findings: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Planning Commission is the decision-making Body for the Development Plan including the requested modification. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project, or will be provided in conjunction with the project. 2. The development plan is consistent with the recommendations of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission, August 20, 2019 Alarado Business Park: Condition change Page 3 of 3 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Concerns and issues that were raised have been addressed or will be addressed at time of building and other required permits. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the following modified conditions, with all other condition(s) of approval remaining unchanged from the Oct. 16 Planning Commission Development Plan approval: 1. Either of the following options shall be designed and constructed to address traffic mitigation issues identified in the project’s Traffic Impact Study: a. The proposed eastbound through lane on US 34 shall be constructed, subject to final approval by the Town (Public Works) and CDOT, including, but not limited to: private driveway impact, drainage analysis, and confirmation of appropriate lane length to properly mitigate level of service; OR b. A traffic signal at the U.S. 34 / Steamer Drive intersection shall be designed and constructed, subject to final approval by the Town (Public Works) and CDOT. 2. Any future change in use will require a new Traffic Impact Study and associated mitigation. Sample motion: 1. I move to approve the modification to conditions of approval for the Alarado Business Park Development Plan application according to findings of fact and including conditions as recommended by Staff. 2. I move to continue the modification to conditions of approval for the Alarado Business Park Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting, finding that … [state reasons for continuing]. 3. I move to deny the modification to conditions of approval for the Alarado Business Park Development Plan application, finding that … [state findings for denial]. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Alarado Request for Planning Commission Hearing 2018-08-08 3. Final Development Plan, Alarado Business Park (approved Oct. 16, 2018) 4. Planning Commission Minutes, Oct. 16, 2018 561 835 833 741 621 800 800 655 665 675 685 695 690 680 670 520 451 500 610BIGTHOMPSONAVESTEAME R D R This draft document was prepared for internal use by theTown of Estes Park, CO. The Town makes no claim as tothe accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon. Due to security concerns, The Town requests that youdo not post this document on the internet or otherwisemake it available to persons unknown to you. 0 40 80Feet 1 in = 71 ft±Town o f Estes ParkCommunity D evel opment Al arad o Busine ss ParkSteamer Dr./Big Th ompson Printed: 9/10/2018Created By: Brittany Hathaway Subject Property RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission October 16, 2018 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall 1 Commission: Chair Bob Leavitt, Vice-Chair Sharry White, Commissioners Nick Smith, Russ Schneider, Robert Foster, Frank Theis, Steve Murphree Attending: Chair Leavitt, Commissioners, White, Foster, Murphree. Smith and Theis, Schneider Also Attending: Director Randy Hunt, Town Attorney Greg White, Senior Planner Jeff Woeber, Planner II Brittany Hathaway, Town Board Liaison Ron Norris, County Staff Liaison Michael Whitley, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund Absent: none Chair Leavitt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. There were approximately 30 people in attendance. 1. OPEN MEETING Planning Commission/Staff Introductions 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved and seconded (Theis/Foster) to change the order of the agenda as presented moving item number 6 Castle Ridge Rezone to item number 5. The motion passed 6-0, with Murphree not voting. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of August 21, 2018 Planning Commission meeting minutes. It was moved and seconded (White/Smith) to approve the consent agenda as presented and the motion passed 7-0. 4. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN: Beaver Point Subdivision, 1281 High Drive Planner Hathaway reviewed the project. It is located to the east of Heinz Parkway and north of Moraine Avenue, within Town limits. The property is zoned A-Accommodations. The land area is 2.85 acres and is currently developed with a single family home and garage. The proposal is to create 3 legal lots. There have been no public comments. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Preliminary Minor Subdivision Plat. Owner/Applicant Discussion: Dave Bangs, Trail Ridge Consulting Engineers, was available to answer questions. There was compliance with county regulations pertaining to fire. There were no agency comments of significance found. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission October 16, 2018 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall 2 Commission Comments: No concerns were observed in walking the property. It was moved and seconded (Foster/Murphree) to recommend that the Town Board of Trustees approve the Beaver Point Minor Subdivision Plat according to findings of fact, including findings recommended by staff. The motion passed 7-0. 5. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT: Castle Ridge Minor Subdivision, Fall River Road, northwest of West Elkhorn Avenue. Planner Woeber reviewed that the applicant, Estes Park Housing Authority, is contracting to purchase this property contingent on approval of rezoning from RE-Rural Estate to RM- Multi Family Residential. The parcel is just under 7 acres in size. A conceptual development plan was submitted. Legal notices were published and letters mailed to adjacent property owners. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment. Applicant Discussion: Current property owner Bill Van Horn stated that it is an appropriate change of zoning for this property. Estes Park Housing Authority Executive Director Naomi Hawf spoke on the needs of work force housing and the plans for the lot. Thomas Beck, Architect, added that this is adequate zoning for this lot and it is possible to develop this as multi-family as long as it is kept to the bottom 1/3 of the lot. Public Comment: Jon Nicholas, Estes Park Economic Development Committee, was not asked by his board to endorse this, but the location is ideal with the Fall River corridor being commercial, and the closeness to Elkhorn Avenue. Commission Comments: Proximity to downtown and the natural zoning buffer make this a desirable project. There is no guarantee that the housing authority will buy the property, and once it is rezoned, it is rezoned with all uses that come with RM zoning. It was moved and seconded (White/Murphree) to recommend that the Town Board of Trustees approve the Zoning Map Amendment application for Lot 2 of the Castle Ridge Minor Subdivision, according to findings of fact recommended by staff. The motion passed 7-0. 6. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Alarado Business Park, 800 Big Thompson Avenue (new address pending), Lot 1 of Stanley Hills Subdivision. Planner Hathaway reviewed the proposal of a mixed-use commercial and residential building including an urgent care facility, sandwich shop and employee housing. Written notice has been mailed to adjacent property owners, a legal notice was published and the applicant posted signs on the property. Public interest is medium, both in support of and RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission October 16, 2018 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall 3 opposed to the project. Staff recommended approval of the Alarado Business Park Development plan with the following conditions: The proposed eastbound through lane on US 34 is subject to final approval by Public Works and CDOT, and any future change in use will require a new Traffic Impact Study and associated mitigation. Commissioner/Staff discussion: Residential use is classified as employee housing as an accessory use which is allowed in CO zoning. No housing for the general public will be allowed. Owner/Applicant discussion: Lonnie Sheldon, Van Horn Engineering, reviewed the timeline and details of the project with a PowerPoint presentation. A neighborhood meeting was held, which was well attended. All code requirements have been met, including the Variances approved by the Board of Adjustment on October 2. Maximum occupancy would be limited to 8 unrelated people per unit. The land has at this lot has always been zoned commercial, one of the few vacant CO lots left in town. A buffer of dedicated open space exists on north and west sides of the lot. Drainage and utilities have not been controversial. 20-year deed restrictions for employee housing have been drafted. This development meets the code of CO zoning and land use by right as well as meeting community needs. Ryan Wells, owner/developer, reviewed his background and reasoning behind the project. The property was originally planned for just a Jimmy Johns, but through numerous public conversations, it evolved into the current design. Matt Delich, Traffic Consultant, spoke at length on the traffic studies conducted, both in low and high season. Adding the Eastbound through lane meets the criteria for the Town of Estes Park and CDOT. Larry Leaming, CEO of Estes Park Health (EPH), spoke on the interest the hospital has and the importance of Urgent Care, especially after business hours. The Emergency Room should not be the only option for medical care. The traveling public are use to looking for Urgent Care. This will be available and visible for all, with x-rays, lab and pharmacy on site. Ambulances will be taking people to the ER, not urgent care. Hours will be tracked and decided based on demand. Associated expenses will not strain the Hospital or Family Medical Clinic due to revenues gained from the urgent care. Phil Heinrichs, owner/developer, stated his commitment to the long term success of the project. The on-site Jimmy John’s manager will also act as the property manager. Eight business have made commitments for leasing residences. Public Comment: Those speaking against the Development Plan, citing reasons of the disproportional residential footage ratio to the commercial footage, delivery vehicles for Jimmy Johns not calculated into the traffic study, pedestrian and automobile traffic, and not enough parking: RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission October 16, 2018 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall 4 David Courtes, Janet Jones, Shaun Jones, Deb Seick, Kris Adams, Pete Maxwell. Those speaking in favor of the Development Plan stating the huge need for housing and meeting community needs: Tim Cashman, Randy Brigham, David Batey, Gerald Mayo, Ryan Leahy, Charlie Dickey, Bill Van Horn, John Nicholas, Guy Beesley, Naomi Hawf. Applicant Comments: Pedestrian traffic will be mostly on the north side of Highway 34, with residents going to work at Stanley Village and downtown. The unallocated space in the building is a basement, which Estes Park Health has agreed to lease. EPH and Jimmy Johns will have two units each. Leases to J-1 visa holders generate enough income to cover the whole year. Added landscaping on the eastern property line is acceptable. CDOT will not make any commitments until a full plan set is submitted. Commissioner concerns/discussion: o Impressed with the interactions with the neighborhood community. o Parking restrictions would be included in the lease: 69 spaces total, 11 for employee housing, 44 for businesses. Spaces were calculated at 1.3 per unit. If parking becomes a problem, it is up to the owner to correct. o Rentals will be strictly to businesses with contracts for a unit, and inhabitants must be employed in the Estes Valley, not leased to the general public. o EPH stated that they are renting the entire 12,000 sf. 3000 for urgent care, the extra 9,000 sf will be determined as needs arise. o Traffic study does not meet peak hour needs for a light. o The risks involved will fall on the developer, not the town. o Traffic light, cross-walk or roundabout installation discussions with CDOT. o One building will not make a huge difference in traffic compared to the benefit the project will provide. o Mixed use is a creative and thoughtful design. o Planning Commission has no jurisdiction over the Board of Adjustment’s decision. o Request for an additional traffic and pedestrian study when project is complete. It was moved and seconded (Theis/Foster) to approve the Alarado Business Park Development Plan with the following conditions: Additional landscaping shall be installed along the eastern property line, including trees and shrubs to provide adequate screening from the neighboring property, with the landscaping to be designed and installed outside the dedicated public utility easement. The motion passed 7-0. MINUTES AMENDED AT THE 7/16/19 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AS WRITTEN BELOW: RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission October 16, 2018 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall 5 It was moved and seconded (Theis/Foster) to approve the Alarado Business Park Development Plan according to the findings of fact, with findings and conditions recommended by staff, with the condition that the applicant provide a plan that shows trees planted on the eastern boundary as part of a landscape buffer, and they can be on the neighbors property to satisfy that, to provide adequate screening from the neighboring property, with the landscaping to be designed and installed outside the dedicated public utility easement. The motion passed 7-0. Due to time constraints, Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 4:18 p.m. _________________________________ Bob Leavitt, Chair __________________________________ Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary