Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Works, Utilities and Public Safety 2016-11-10 Thursday, November 10, 2016 Public Safety, Utilities 8:00 a.m. & Public Works Committee Town Board Room 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. PUBLIC SAFETY a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i. None. b) REPORTS i. Verbal Updates and Committee Questions. 3. UTILITIES a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i. HDR Capital Project Engineering Expenditure Limit. Dir. Bergsten Supt. Boles b) REPORTS i. Verbal Updates and Committee Questions. 4. PUBLIC WORKS a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i. None. b) REPORTS i. Town Hall Security Camera and Recording System Phase 1 Mgr. Landkamer ii. Verbal Updates and Committee Questions. Dir. Muhonen Mgr. Ash 5. ADJOURN AGENDA 1       2 Memo Utilities Department To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee Town Administrator Lancaster From: Utilities Director Bergsten Water Superintendent Boles Date: November 10, 2016 RE: HDR Capital Project Engineering Expenditure Limit Objective: Communicate transparently and ensure compliance with our purchasing policy by requesting approval of expenditures with HDR Engineering exceeding $100,000. Present Situation: In 2013 we issued an RFP for on-call engineering services. HDR was one of three firms selected as responsive responsible bidders with market competitive rates. In August of this year the USDA Rural Development indicated grants and 40-year loans are available for drinking water capital projects. The USDA estimates we have a four-year eligibility window as our population growth will disqualify us from funding. We have begun capital project scoping and engineering with HDR. Our 2016 expenditures with HDR will exceed $100,000 with the addition of these projects. Proposal: We propose approval of expenditures with HDR, not to exceed $200,000. Advantages: • We will receive grant money to help fund this capital project. • Engineering design of capital projects is a no-regrets activity since the plans can be retained and used anytime in the future. Disadvantages: None Action Recommended: Staff recommends approval. Budget: No change to the approved 2016 budget is required. Level of Public Interest Low. Funding for this work is included in the approved 2016 budget. Recommended Motion: I recommend approval to the Town Board of HDR expenditures not to exceed $200,000, to be included on the Consent Agenda at the November 22, 2016 Town Board meeting. 3       4 PUBLIC WORKS Report To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee Town Administrator Lancaster From: Jon Landkamer, Public Works Facilities Manager Date: November 7, 2016 RE: Camera and Recording System Phase One Objective: The Town staff have identified several issues and inadequacies in the existing camera system in Town Hall. The long term goal is to improve and expand the camera and recording system to improve security in and around Town owned buildings. Present Situation: The existing system in Town Hall is a mix of cameras and technologies. The system is failing and in need of updating and improvement. Some of the cameras are coaxial based and the recording system is not a roust unit. Without going into too much detail, we have room for a great deal of improvement. Proposal: We are recommending that a new system be designed and installed, with Town Hall being the number one priority. The RFP for this project was posted on Bidnet with a distribution count of around 700 vendors. 25 people attended the mandatory pre-bid meeting and site walk, and from this process, we received 8 qualifying proposals. A committee of staff was formed to review the submitted proposals and the field of eight was narrowed to two. The two firms were then asked to come for an interview and give a proposal on their system and how it would benefit the Town. These interviews and presentations were held on November 4, 2016. Company Contact City Total Bid Falcon Networks Robert Letson Broomfield $78,266.66 Inteconnex Todd Ritchie Loveland $77,709.78 Advantages:  Improved documentation of activities in and around Town Hall.  Increased security of Town Hall and associated internal functions.  Increased deterrent of vandalism and/or theft in and around Town Hall. Disadvantages:  Disruption of operations during construction. 5 Action Recommended by Staff: Public Works is recommending that Inteconnex be awarded the project, with negotiations of the construction agreement to maximize storage capacity for future growth. A thorough process of contractor selection has been performed. Our decision will likely carry us through several phases of work, and we should stay consistent with the hardware to make the system function to its fullest potential. Budget: The preliminary budget for this project was set at $100,000 in 2016, with $26,000 proposed for 2017. Since the quotes came in significantly below the target budget, Public Works would like to negotiate the agreement, to maximize the initial investment. There are plans to add cameras at the Visitor Center and possibly the Transit Facility Parking Structure in the near future and we would like to install equipment that will adequately service this addition. Level of Public Interest: None Sample Motion: None Attachments: None 6