HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Public Works, Utilities and Public Safety 2019-11-14
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Public Safety, Utilities 8:00 a.m.
& Public Works Committee Town Hall Board Room
1. PUBLIC COMMENT
2. PUBLIC SAFETY
a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD
i. None.
b) REPORTS
i. Verbal Updates and Committee Questions.
3. UTILITIES
a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD
i. None.
b) REPORTS
i. Flood Impacts Dir. Bergsten
ii. IT – Verbal Update. Supt. Fraundorf
iii. Verbal Updates and Committee Questions.
4. PUBLIC WORKS
a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD
i. None.
b) REPORTS
i. Update on Fish Creek Corridor Repairs Dir. Zurn
ii. Sales Tax Initiative Report Dir. Zurn
iii. Verbal Updates and Committee Questions.
5. ADJOURN
AGENDA
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, August 8, 2013
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the PUBLIC SAFETY/UTILITIES/PUBLIC
WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County,
Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the
8th day of August, 2013.
Committee: Chair Blackhurst, Trustees Koenig and Phipps
Attending: Chair Blackhurst, Trustees Koenig and Phipps
Also Attending: Town Administrator Lancaster, Chief Kufeld, Dir. Bergsten,
Dir. Zurn, and Deputy Town Clerk Deats
Absent: Assistant Town Administrator Richardson
Chair Blackhurst called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m.
PUBLIC COMMENT.
Mike Kearney, Town resident, expressed dissatisfaction with the construction project
along Moraine Avenue. He stated that a project on a main artery such as Moraine
Avenue should never have been undertaken during the summer season and said that
when it was determined that the project could not be completed by Memorial Day, it
should have been stopped. Chair Blackhurst said the Town Board was made aware of
delays prior to the middle of June but, by that time, a contract had been let. He said
now that the project is underway it needs to be finished and asked Town Administrator
Lancaster to address the issues that have been encountered. Town Administrator
Lancaster said that in hindsight the job should not have been started with design and
contractor issues leading to delays, and stated that there was also some concern about
the viability of the grant if the project went into another fiscal year for the state. Director
Zurn expounded on the topic stating that this is a Town project along a state highway
and, therefore, requires coordination with the state. He said issues were encountered
related to the ownership of the retaining wall along Moraine Avenue and the design and
engineering of the sidewalk to be constructed atop the retaining wall, which required
redesign in order to satisfy the state. Once in the field it was determined that a redesign
in regard to grades was also necessary, causing further delays. Director Zurn noted
that the original design and engineering was not faulty, rather it had to be changed
when additional information came to light. He noted that Mountain Construction, low
bidder on the project, has been difficult to work with, however the Town is obligated to
the contractor and the specified timeline for completion of the job. Director Zurn said
stringent specifications for asphalt construction would preclude rescheduling the job
until fall. He said the scope of the project changed slightly, because of the possibility of
Public Safety/Utilities/Public Works Committee – August 8, 2013 – Page 2
building a one-way couplet in the future, and stated he anticipates that the Moraine
Avenue job will be completed in the next two weeks. Town Administrator Lancaster
said that staff has been communicating on a regular basis with businesses affected by
the project and said that in the long run the improvement should result in better access
to their establishments and better business in the future. The Committee also
expressed concern about the disruptions that may occur if the Federal Land Access
Program (FLAP) grant is awarded and a one-way couplet is built. Director Zurn said
that interruptions to traffic flow would be minimal during construction of a one-way
couplet and added financial compensation and relocation for affected businesses will be
considered.
The Committee questioned the Town’s bidding procedures. Town Administrator
Lancaster stated that Town policy does not require that the lowest bidder be hired for a
job. Director Zurn said the policy states that the lowest, responsible bidder be selected.
PUBLIC SAFETY.
REPORTS.
Reports provided for informational purposes and made a part of the proceedings.
1. Estes Valley Victim Advocates – 6-Month Report – Executive Director Mary
Mesropian said the program is celebrating its 25th anniversary this year and credited
former police chief Dave Racine and Jo Pierce with being instrumental in the
creation of the organization. She said 167 people have been served so far this year
through the advocate, counseling, bilingual outreach, and safe house programs, and
said she anticipates approximately 250 to 300 people will have been served by the
end of the year. She said that the organization lost $7,000 in funding this year which
will need to be made up through other sources.
2. Verbal Updates –
o US Pro Challenge – Planning continues for the bike race on Saturday, August
24th with weekly meetings being held in preparation for the event. The Police
Department will be hiring ten additional officers from Boulder County and the
City of Boulder to work the event at $55/hour plus vehicle mileage. The
officers will be on duty from approximately 8 a.m. till 5 or 6 p.m. on race day
to help with crowd and traffic control and pedestrian safety. Chief Kufeld said
by reallocating funds the additional expense of approximately $10,000 can be
absorbed by the department. Chief Kufeld said he is expecting the event to
go smoothly, despite the fact that large crowds and increased traffic are
anticipated. He said an estimated 5,000 people are expected to gather to
view the race at the switchbacks and added that shuttle routes and schedules
are being adjusted to accommodate the crowds. Rocky Mountain National
Park (RMNP) staff will be assisting with traffic control at the intersection of
Marys Lake Road and Moraine Avenue.
Public Safety/Utilities/Public Works Committee – August 8, 2013 – Page 3
o Staffing – Amanda Nagl and Noel Bryan have both resigned from their
positions with the Police Department and will be taking positions in Fort
Collins. Sergeant Corey Pass will be promoted to Support Services
Commander and Melissa Westover, who has been receiving training from Ms.
Nagl, will be promoted to a managerial-type position. The records position
will be filled as soon as possible. In addition, a new police officer has been
hired and is scheduled to start work on August 19th.
o Hail Storm Damage – Two new police cars received significant hail damage
while parked at the car dealership in Greeley during a recent storm. Staff is
working with the dealership to rectify the situation; staff’s preference would be
to order new vehicles to replace those damaged during the hail storm.
UTILITIES.
ENTERPRISE FUND LARGE MAINTENANCE EXPENSE POLICY.
Director Bergsten presented a proposed policy that would allow for the accrual of funds
to be used to cover expenses related to large maintenance projects for Light & Power
and Water. For example, replacement of the filter media at Glacier Water Treatment
Plant at a cost of approximately $150,000 is performed every 15 years with the next
replacement scheduled for 2017. In addition, membrane replacement at Marys Lake
Water Treatment Plant will occur every 12 years at an estimated cost of $900,000. The
first replacement is planned for 2022. The policy would allow for the financial burden of
large maintenance costs such as these to be spread out over a period of years. The
Committee commended staff for being proactive and planning ahead for these costs,
however, Chair Blackhurst voiced concern about the appearance of an unfunded liability
which could affect bonding rates. Director Bergsten stated that Finance Officer
McFarland has been in contact with the Town’s auditors about this topic and will have
additional information when the item comes forward to the Town Board. Town
Administrator Lancaster said that the Town should also be planning for expenses
related to care and maintenance of Town-owned buildings by getting allocation and
replacement plans in place. He cited the vehicle replacement fund as a good example
of such a program. The Committee recommends approval of the Accrual of Major
Maintenance Costs Policy as an action item at the August 27, 2013, Town Board
meeting.
REPORTS.
Reports provided for informational purposes and made a part of the proceedings.
1. Utilization of Water Bleeders – Director Bergsten said water bleeders are used by
the Water department as a maintenance tool for freeze protection and quality
control, as well as an effective method of deferring capital projects such water
main replacement. He said that Carriage Hills has the highest density of
bleeders on the system and stated that the cost of freeze protection bleeders in
Public Safety/Utilities/Public Works Committee – August 8, 2013 – Page 4
this area including sewer discharge fees, is $2,071 per year. He estimated the
capital cost to replace the water mains in this area at $2,713,000. Chair
Blackhurst took issue with the example provided and said the Town has adopted
a Water Conservation Plan and should be determining what needs to be
accomplished in order to avoid putting 12% of the Town’s treated water on the
ground through bleeder systems. Director Bergsten said the distribution system,
water plants, and bleeders will all be investigated and considered as a master
plan is developed.
2. Light & Power Capital Projects – Crews have completed the dirt work and pulled
all the wire for the Fall River/Big Thompson project. Clean up is underway and
re-seeding will take place next spring. Removal of the overhead lines is ongoing
and expected to be completed by the end of the year. The Allenspark project
entailed the replacement of approximately 60 poles, which has been completed,
and replacement of 12,000 feet of overhead line down Big Owl Road. Tree
trimming is completed and the project is ahead of schedule. Director Bergsten
commended L&P crews for taking on these projects in-house at a cost savings to
the Town.
3. IT – A Request for Proposal (RFP) has been published for a firm to provide IT
support to the Town, which would consist primarily of a remote help desk to
provide resolution to issues that arise. Superintendent Fraundorf estimates that
nearly half of the requests for support could be resolved remotely. He expects to
receive three to four proposals in response to the RFP. Also, an advertisement
is currently running for a full-time IT staff person.
PUBLIC WORKS.
REPLACEMENT OF STREETS VEHICLE #G-95.
Streets Vehicle #G-95, a 1996 International 4800 single axle dump truck, has been in
service for 17 years. The 2013 budget contains $135,000 for the replacement of this
vehicle. The Town utilized the State of Colorado competitive bid process with the low
bid being submitted by Transwest Trucks. Staff is recommending the purchase of a
2013 Freightliner M2106 single axle dump truck from Transwest Trucks in Commerce
City, Colorado, at a cost of $130,871, including trade-in. The Committee recommends
approval of the purchase of a 2013 Freightliner M2106 single axle dump truck at a
cost of $130,871 from the vehicle replacement fund #635-7000-435-34-42
budgeted, as a consent agenda item on the August 27, 2013, Town Board meeting
agenda.
There being no further business, Chair Blackhurst adjourned the meeting at 9:24
a.m.
Public Safety/Utilities/Public Works Committee – August 8, 2013 – Page 5
Cynthia Deats, Deputy Town Clerk
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Report
To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works (PUP) Committee
Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Utilities Director Bergsten
Date: November 14, 2013
RE: Flood Update
Objective:
To provide an update on Utilities’ flood-related damage restoration efforts.
Present Situation:
Water Department:
Fifteen sites were damaged in our service area. Five stream crossings were damaged
in the Fish Creek corridor.
Location Description Description of Damage
Fish Creek Road & Brodie Avenue Damaged Water Line
Fish Creek Road & Country Club Drive Damaged Water Line
Fish Creek Road between Van Horn Engineering and
Stone Bridge Development Damaged Water Line
Fish Creek Road at Stone Bridge Development Damaged Water Line
Fish Creek Road between Stone Bridge Development &
Creek Side Court Damaged Water Line
Fish Creek Road & Brook Court Exposed Water Line
Fish Hatchery Road and Ziola Court Exposed Water Line
1580 Fall River Road at Pine Haven Cottages Exposed Water Line
MacGregor Water Tank Exposed Water Line
Little Valley Road Exposed Water Line
Tunnel Road (South of YMCA Entrance) Exposed Water Line
Fall River Drive (south across bridge from pump house)
Water Main Line Cover
Washed Away
Bear Paw Subdivision, HWY 66 Exposed Water Line
Fall River Estates Pump House Building Flooded / Cleanup
1520 Fall River Road, Castle Mountain Lodge Exposed Hydrant Lateral
1
Approximately 400 water customers were impacted by the boil water order which is
about 8% of our customers. There are six water services that have not been restored
due to service line or building damage.
Light and Power Department:
Ten sites were damaged in the service area.
Fish Creek Underground conduit exposed and damaged
County Road 43 Multiple poles down or missing base support material
Fox Creek Multiple poles down or missing base support material
North Fork Multiple poles down or missing base support material
Highway 34 Ten poles down or missing base support material
Windcliff Underground conduit exposed and damaged
Kerr Road Underground conduit exposed and damaged
McGraw Ranch Underground conduit exposed and damaged
Hwy 7 (mud slide) Three poles down or missing base support material
Fall River Minor damage to one transformer and multiple
Approximately 1500 electric customers have been impacted by the outages,
approximately 15% of our customers.
As of today there are about 150 meters not responding. Most of these are waiting for an
inspection to be completed. Thirty accounts have been terminated at the customer’s
request.
Utilities completed one FEMA worksheet for temporary work mostly completed up
through 10-15-2013. FEMA classifies work as either temporary or permanent repairs.
A description of the work, including costs, is written up on “project work sheets”.
The following chart summarizes the information in the worksheet we submitted to
FEMA:
Item Eligible (overtime only)Total Our share (12.5%)
Labor 1,051 hours $53,891 $6,736
Equipment 1,137 hours $31,345 $3,918
Materials Various $12,108 $1,514
GRAND TOTAL $97,344 $12,168
All FEMA eligible costs are covered at 75%. The State of Colorado committed to
covering another 12.5% leaving the Town’s costs at 12.5%. There are three funding
sources depending on the circumstances:
Insurance Overhead and ground
mounted assets
Active water plants, fire hydrants and
overhead power lines
FEMA Underground assets Water mains, underground power lines,
emergency access work
County Special circumstances e.g. County Road 43 emergency access
work
2
PUBLIC WORKS Report
To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee
Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Scott Zurn, PE, Public Works Director
Date: November 14, 2013
RE: Update on Fish Creek Corridor Repairs
Objective:
To provide an update on the Fish Creek flood-related damage restoration efforts.
Present Situation:
Four entities, consisting of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Upper Thompson
Sanitation District and Estes Valley Recreation District, have agreed to create one legal
entity through an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). This IGA-created authority would
become the entity to design and contract restoration efforts of the Fish Creek corridor
and would subsequently be reimbursed by entities such as FEMA, Federal Highway
Administration and other available grants and loan opportunities as restoration activities
are accomplished.
The IGA is being drafted and reviewed by each entity and will be presented to the
various IGA boards for consideration and approval. Once approval is reached, Larimer
County will be the lead agency overseeing restoration efforts. A technical committee
will be created with a staff representative from each member of the IGA and will give
direction to Larimer County on issues related to restoration design and construction.
Permanent repairs will require complex study and assessment, including complex
environmental and mitigation designs and approvals. Members of the IGA have
anticipated that because of these complexities and federal and state regulations
attached to FEMA and Federal Highway Administration reimbursements, permanent
repairs are not likely to begin until the fall of 2014.
Because of this long effort, the Federal Highways Administration and CDOT have
agreed to reimburse an emergency repair consisting of at least a one-lane road through
the entire length of the Fish Creek corridor. Repairs begin this week and are lead by
Larimer County and their contractor, Connell Resources, Inc. Work will continue until
completion of the one lane, roughly estimated to be finished before Christmas.
PUBLIC WORKS Report
To: Public Safety, Utilities & Public Works Committee
Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Scott Zurn, PE, Public Works Director
Date: November 14, 2013
RE: Sales Tax Initiative Report
Roadway and Drainage Status of Infrastructure:
Roadway corridors are an essential piece of public infrastructure. This community asset
replacement value exceeds $100,000,000. As a comparison, this is approximately the
value of a car for each and every man, woman and child that live in Estes Park.
For the past 20 years, the Town has allocated an average of $180,000/year for
maintenance of these assets. This equates to $25/person/year that went toward
infrastructure maintenance. Again as a comparison, $25 dollars/ year went into
maintaining that car for the last 20 years. Of course, this is not an “apples to apples”
comparison, however it demonstrates that the last twenty years of maintenance for
streets and draineges was underfunded and today we see a declining infrastructure as
a result.
Various conditions and situations exist within the Town regarding infrastructure -
everything from improperly designed and constructed infrastructure to aged and failing
infrastructure. Many of these situations show up in failure when they are under stress of
increased traffic and growth or are simply old and cannot handle the rain events that
Mother Nature gifts our roads and drainages.
For example, in July 2012, a single-
event rainstorm damaged $100,000
worth of roadway infrastructure.
Roadway damage experienced with this
type of storm is the result of not having
applied annual maintenance procedures
or adequate concrete curb and gutter
and roadside ditches. Cost-effective
treatment applications for asphalt, like
crack-seal or slurry-seal and asphalt
overlays, would have directed runoff
effectively down the roadway and
prevented erosion (shown at right).
Based on assessments, staff brought recommendations forward to the Public Works
Committee as early as 2007 for funds to be made available to replace old and
deteriorated culverts along Fish Creek with box culverts. The following items have also
been identified through assessment and recommended as maintenance needs:
In 2008, a drainage study encompassing about 60% of the Town’s drainage area was
conducted by RG Associates. The study assessed the current drainage infrastructure
and recommended improvements that amounted to nearly $10,000,000.
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Prospect Mountain area - $8,314,966
Elm Road - $1,529,893
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE
Town is responsible for maintenance and upkeep on12 public bridges. These bridges
are inspected annually by an outside agency to evaluate the current condition.
Inspections were most recently completed on 7/17/2013. Recommended maintenance
costs break down in the following manner for the Town of Estes Park Public Bridges:
Fall River Ct. - $34,900
Spruce Dr. - $33,100
Fish Hatchery Rd. #2 - $12,180
Fish Hatchery Rd. #1 - $31,375
David Dr. - $38,450
Homestead Ln. - $29,750
Fall River Ln. - $31,100
Old Ranger Rd. - $32,710
Crags Dr. - $4,900
Ivy St. - $33,925
Rockwell Dr. - $26,375
East Riverside Dr. - $39,630
Recommended Bridge Maintenance Total - $348,395
While none of these recommendations are immediate safety concerns, they are
standard and maintenance issues. Addressing these recommendations would prolong
the life of the bridges and put them in the best possible position to weather storms.
Of course, these assessments were needs identified prior to the flood, and the Town is
faced with funding repairs of failed drainage infrastructure in addition to previously
assessed needs.
CARRIAGE HILLS DAM FAILURE
The flood created significant damage to the Carriage Hills Dams. In the inspection
report, the State Dam Inspector identified maintenance items and repair requirements to
bring the dams up to current standards. Construction repair costs have not been
finalized, but are estimated it to be $300,000. It is still undetermined how much FEMA
will reimburse, as they only replace what was lost.
Public Works has completed its worksheets to FEMA for roadway/drainage repairs as a
result of the flood. These repairs are spread throughout Town and repairs range
upwards of $1,500,000, excluding Fish Creek corridor losses. Town funding of damages
related to drainage failures are $350,000, excluding Fish Creek corridor losses.
Our infrastructure of roads and drainages are integrated systems and poor drainages
reduce roadway life. Experiences in the last two years have shown that inadequate
drainage also destroys roadways. It is important to identify that poor drainage systems
contribute to accelerated deterioration of Town roadways. These roadways, as has
been discussed for many years, are quickly deteriorating into a system average of poor
condition by 2016 at current funding levels. See attached condition map for projected
Town asset conditions.
As an example, the current funding rate for road maintenance will require four years of
savings to repair one mile of Dry Gulch Road in 2016 - this means no other
maintenance.
Other areas, such as First Street through Fourth Street, are examples of infrastructure
slipping into unsafe conditions.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
Included with this report is a copy of the Pavement Conditions Index presentation
delivered to the Town Board in June 2012. The roadway condition in 2012 was in the
fair-poor condition and falling. Recent flooding events throughout the Town have only
escalated the deterioration rate of the system.
Scott A. Zurn, PE, CFM, Public Works DirectorKevin Ash, PE, Public Works Civil Engineer