HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 2019-08-13The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to provide high-quality, reliable services
for the benefit of our citizens, guests, and employees, while being good stewards
of public resources and our natural setting.
The Town of Estes Park will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town services,
programs, and activities and special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities.
Please call (970) 577-4777. TDD available.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK
Tuesday, August 13, 2019
7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
(Any person desiring to participate, please join the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance).
AGENDA APPROVAL.
PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address).
TOWN BOARD COMMENTS / LIAISON REPORTS.
TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT.
CONSENT AGENDA:
1. Bills.
2. Town Board Minutes dated July 23, 2019, Town Board Study Session Minutes dated
July 23, 2019 and Joint Study Session Minutes dated July 29, 2019.
3. Audit Committee Meeting Minutes dated July 23, 2019.
4. Family Advisory Board Minutes dated July 17, 2019 (acknowledgement only).
5. Revised Board Policy 101, Division of Responsibilities.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff for
Town Board Final Action.
1. ACTION ITEMS:
A. ORDINANCE 21-19 AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE
§7.12 TO PROHIBIT GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES IN MULTIPLE-LOT
SUBDIVISIONS AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. Planning Technician
Kreycik.
This proposed text amendment to the EVDC §7.12 and Appendix D would ensure
that reisdential developments do not install security gates and other barriers to
safe vehicular access.
B. ORDINANCE 22-19 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION, PORTION OF WILDFIRE
ROAD, WESTOVER CONSTRUCTION, INC., RDA ASSOCIATES LLC,
CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK, INC./APPLICANTS. Planner
Woeber.
A request to vacate the western portion of Wildfire Road in connection with
Wildfire Homes subdivision.
Prepared 08-02-2019
*Revised
1
NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was
prepared.
C. FINAL PLAT, WILDFIRE HOMES SUBDIVISION, WILDFIRE ROAD,
WESTOVER CONSTRUCTION, INC., RDA ASSOCIATES LLC, CROSSROADS
MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK, INC./APPLICANTS. Planner Woeber.
Final subdivision plat (Wildfire Homes) to subdivide four parcels, 16.082 acres
total, into two blocks and 43 lots.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN. Town Administrator Lancaster.
Consider the 2020 Board Strategic Plan.
REPORT & DISCUSSION ITEMS:
1. QUARTERLY BROADBAND UPDATE. Project Manager Swoboda.
ADJOURN.
2
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 25, 2019
Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes
Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town
of Estes Park on the 23rd day of July, 2019.
Present: Todd Jirsa, Mayor
Cody Rex Walker, Mayor Pro Tem
Trustees Carlie Bangs
Marie Cenac
Patrick Martchink
Ron Norris
Ken Zornes
Also Present: Frank Lancaster, Town Administrator
Travis Machalek, Assistant Town Administrator
Dan Kramer, Town Attorney
Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk
Bunny Victoria Beers, Recording Secretary
Absent: None
Mayor Jirsa called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and all desiring to do so, recited the
Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA APPROVAL.
It was moved and seconded (Walker/Bangs)to approve the Agenda with the
continuation of the Report and Discussion Item to August 13, 2019,and it passed
unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENTS.
Wallie Burk, owner of the Silver Saddle Inn stated concerns regarding attendance at his
business. He encouraged the Board to consider increasing advertising and expand
attractions to generate revenue rather than rely on National Park attendance to sustain
Estes Park.
TOWN BOARD COMMENTS
Trustee Zornes stated the Behavioral Health Policy Committee met on July 17, 2019 to
make recommendations to distribute $845,000 in funds to 11 agencies which were
collected through sales tax in 2018. The Estes Park School District would receive
$100,000 in funding for behavioral health services for students in need. A remaining
$155,000 would be available for Community grants after August 1, 2019. He added the
Open Lands Advisory Committee meeting would take place on July 25, 2019.
Trustee Norris stated the Family Advisory Board meeting was held on July 15, 2019 to
discuss the needs of families. The Town Board and the Larimer Board of County
Commissioners would meet on July 29, 2019 to discuss the IGA with the Town and
County.
Mayor Jirsa stated the Platte River Power Authority meeting would be held on July 25,
2019 to discuss bringing more renewable options to the service area.
Trustee Bangs stated Parking and Transit Manager Solesbee presented a report to the
Transportation Advisory Board related to data collected by the license plate monitoring
occurring in Town owned lots. A report of data would be presented to the Board in the
Fall 2019 and discuss how the data collected relates to the Downtown Parking
Management Plan. She added data shows an increase in use of the parking garage in
2019.
Trustee Cenac stated the Trustee Talk was held on July 17, 2019 and encouraged public
attendance at the meetings to engage in conversations on public concerns.DRAFTinistratorinistr
ng Secretaryng Secretary
00 p.m.p.m.and all desiring to do and all de
(Walkerker//rrr BangsBangs))to to approverove
nd Discussion Item to Auguussion Item to Augu
f the Silver Saddle Innf the Silver Sad stated state
couraged the Board uraged the Board to to consiconsi
enerate revenue rather than revenue rather than rere
BOARD COMMENTSBOARD COMMENDReeeeZornes stated the BZornes stated the Behaviovio
ecommendations to distecommendations to
through sales tax ithrough sales tax
funding for befunding for be
d be availd be avail
sory sory
3
Board of Trustees – July 23, 2019 – Page 2
Trustee Martchink stated the Parks Advisory Board continues to research the Noxious
Weeds Ordinance, review the Arts in Public Places Policy and research future funding
mechanisms for public artwork.
TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT.
Administrator Lancaster provided a Board Policy Governance quarterly report on Policy
3.3 Financial Condition and Budgeting, Policy 3.12 General Town Administrator – Internal
Operating Procedures, and Policy 3.13 Town Organizational Plan. He reported
compliance with all areas.
1. CONSENT AGENDA:
1. Bills.
2. Town Board Minutes dated July 9, 2019 and Town Board Study Session Minutes
dated July 9, 2019.
3. Family Advisory Board Minutes dated May 2, 2019 (acknowledgment only).
4. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated June 18, 2019, Study Session
Minutes dated June 18, 2019, and Amended Minutes dated October 16, 2018
(acknowledgment only).
5. Parks Advisory Board Minutes dated June 20, 2019 (acknowledgment only).
6. Resolution 21-19 Authorizing Participation in the Colorado Statewide Investment
Program (CSIP) as a third investment pool.
7. Resolution 22-19 to Support the Application for Colorado Parks & Wildlife (CPW)
Colorado the Beautiful Trails Grant Program for Fall River Trail Extension Project.
8. Revised Policy 660 - Fund Balance.
9. Transfer of the Dannels Fire Station to the Estes Valley Fire Protection District and
an IGA for Access to Town Communication Facilities in the Dannels Fire Station.
10.Family Advisory Board Appointment of Sue Strom and Christy DeLorme for terms
expiring April 15, 2022.
11.Acceptance of Town Administrator Policy Governance Monitoring Reports.
12.Town Administrator Employment Contract.
13.First Amendment to Agreement with Avi Rocklin for Prosecuting Attorney Services.
It was moved and seconded (Zornes/Norris) to approve the Consent Agenda, and
it passed unanimously.
2. LIQUOR ITEMS:
1. TRANSFER A LODGING & ENTERTAINMENT LIQUOR LICENSE FROM
TAHARAA MOUNTAIN LODGE TO TAHARAA MOUNTAIN LODGE LLC DBA
TAHARAA MOUNTAIN LODGE, 3110 S SAINT VRAIN AVENUE, ESTES PARK,
CO 80517.Town Clerk Williamson presented the transfer application for the liquor
license stating all necessary paperwork and fees had been submitted. A temporary
permit was issued on June 28, 2019. The applicant also owns Twin Owls
Restaurant and has completed TIPS training in the past. Owner Thad Egan stated
the Black Canyon Inn sold with the new owner intending to operate as a wedding
only venue. Taharra Mountain Lodge was purchased with the intent to eventually
move the Twin Owls restaurant to the Taharra Mountain Lodge location. There
being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Zornes/Norris) to
approve the transfer of a Lodging and Entertainment Liquor License filed by
Taharaa Mountain Lodge LLC dba Taharaa Mountain Lodge, 3110 S Saint
Vrain Avenue, and it passed with Trustee Bangs recusing herself. DRAFTd Study Sed Stud
9 (acknowledgment only(acknowledgm
ated ated June 18, 201919, , Study SeSt
ded Minutes dated October 1ded Minutes dated October
June 20e 20, 2019 (acknowledgm, 2019 (a
articipation in the Colorado Staarticipation in the Co
estment pool.stment poo
port the Application for ColoradApplication for Colorad
Trails Grant Program for Fall Rnt Program for Fall
- - Fund Balance.Fund Balance.
Dannels Fire Station to the EsDannels Fire Station to theRAccess to Town Communicatioccess to Town CommunicatioRAAdvisory Board Appointment oBoard Appointment o
ng April 15, 20ng April 15, 2022.22.
Acceptance of Town AdministraAcceptance of Town Adminis
Town Administrator EmployTown Administrator E
t Amendment to Agt Amendment to A
ed and seced and sec
nimounimou
4
Board of Trustees – July 23, 2019 – Page 3
3. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff
for Town Board Final Action.
1. ACTION ITEMS:
A. AMENDED PLAT, LOTS 15A & 16A, GRAND ESTATES ADDITION,
WALLACE AND LAURINE BURKE, OWNER, DBA BEST WESTERN PLUS
SILVER SADDLE INN.Mayor Jirsa opened the public hearing. Planner
Hardin stated the amended plat would reconfigure two platted lots, vacate
existing easements and dedicate new easements. The property owner
submitted a development plan to add 18 guest units, move the swimming pool
to a new indoor location, addition of staff and guest laundry facilities, staff
break rooms, guest lounge and an office. The changes would create lots 15B
and 16B. The applicant stated the property would be increased from a second
story to a third story property. Staff recommended the approval of the
amended plat. Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing. It was moved and
seconded (Norris/Cenac) to approve the application for the amended plat
to reconfigure Lots 15A and 16A of Grand Estates Addition and vacate
and dedicate easements as presented, and it passed unanimously.
B. FINAL PLAT, GRADY MINOR SUBDIVISION, 625 W ELKHORN AVENUE,
PANORAMIC ESTES, LLC/OWNER.Mayor Jirsa opened the public
hearing. Planner Woeber stated the request would subdivide one parcel into
two legal lots and is located north of West Elkhorn Avenue, east of James
Street, and west of Far View Drive, within Town limits. The property is zoned
E-1 Estate containing a total land area of approximately 2.29 acres and is
currently developed with two single family homes and a detached garage.
Staff recommended the approval of the final plat. Mayor Jirsa closed the
public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Cenac/Walker)to approve
the Grady Minor Subdivision Final Plat according to findings as
presented,and it passed unanimously.
C. ORDINANCE 19-19 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION, PLATTED STANLEY
COURT LOCATED BETWEEN COMANCHE STREET AND DUNRAVEN
STREET, MARK NEWENDORP, AGA DEVELOPMENT LLC, APPLICANT.
Mayor Jirsa opened the public hearing. Planner Woeber stated the ordinance
presented vacates an existing platted, but never built right-of-way. Per state
statute, vacated rights-of-way merge with the adjoining property or properties
with half of the right-of-way going to each laterally adjoining property. The
vacation does not leave any property owner without street access. Due to a
water line in the area, staff have recommended a condition of approval be a
dedicated twenty-foot (20’) utility easement to the Town. Mayor Jirsa closed
the public hearing and Attorney Kramer read the ordinance into record. It was
moved and seconded (Norris/Martchink)to approve Ordinance 19-19,
vacating platted Stanley Court, with the condition of approval as
recommended by staff,and it passed unanimously.
D. SUPPLEMENTAL CONDOMINIUM MAP #8, SUNDANCE
CONDOMINIUMS, 1400 SIERRA SAGE LANE, KINLEY INVESTMENT,
NATHAN KINLEY, OWNER.Mayor Jirsa opened the public hearing. Planner
Woeber stated nine units have been built with the required Supplemental
Condominium map filed and recorded per the Development Code. The tenth
unit requires approval and filing as the Eighth Supplemental Condominium
Map for Sundance Condominiums. Trustee Martchink requested clarification
on a map presented with a miss-labeling of a street as Fall River Road which
require correcting to Sierra Sage Lane. Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing.
It was moved and seconded (Cenac/Norris) to approve the Eighth
Supplemental Condominium Map for Sundance Condominiums with the
correction to the mislabeled road name on presented map #8,and it
passed unanimously.DRAFTthethe
ng.ng.It wIt
tion for tion fo the a
Estates Addition Estates Ad a
d it passed unanimouslyit passed una
VISION, 625 W ELKHORN AVVISION, 625 W ELKHORN
FTRR..Mayor Jirsa opened thr Jirsa opened t
Fhe request would subdivide one request would
orth of West Elkhorn Avenue, of West Elkho
Drive, within Town limits.hin Town The
otal land area of approximatelotal land area of app
h two single family homes antwo single family homes
he approval pproval of the of the final platfinal plat
was moved ed and secondedd seconded (
nor Subdivision Final Platnor Subdivision Final Plat
nd it passed unanimouslynd it passed unanimo .
ANCE 19ANCE-19 RIGHTRI-OFF--WAYWARART LOCATED BETWEEN COLOCATED BETWEEN CO
DRREET, MARK NEWENDORP,MARK NEWENDORP,DRMayor Jirsa opened the public Mayor Jirsa opened
presented vacates an existipresented vacates an
sstatute, vacated rightscated rights--ofo
with half of the rightthe -o
vacation does not levacation does no
water line in the awater line in the
edicated twenedicated twen
public hepublic he
dada
5
Board of Trustees – July 23, 2019 – Page 4
E. ORDINANCE 05-19 AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT
CODE REGARDING THE “PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES” USE
REVISING THE DEFINITION, REVISING THE PERMITTED USES TABLES,
AND ADDING SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS.Mayor Jirsa opened the public
hearing. Trustee Walker recused himself due to private property with an
existing grandfathered use. The Town Board reviewed the amendment at the
April 9, 2019 public hearing where staff were directed to inventory existing
uses in the Estes Valley which may be impacted by the change continuing
the item to May 28, 2019. At the May 28, 2019 public hearing the Board
directed staff to revise the amendment due to concerns regarding
grandfathered use which may limit any existing, grandfathered use from
growth or expansion. The amendment was further reviewed at the July 9,
2019 study session where staff presented the Board with revisions which
would allow Park and Recreation Facilities as a “Special Review” use in
residential zoning districts. Based on the Board direction staff presented three
exhibits for review. Exhibit A [RED] as the original amendment drafted and
recommended by the Planning Commission which has not been revised.
Exhibit A [BLUE] amendment would allow Private Park and Recreation
Facilities in Residential Districts as a “S1” review. Exhibit A [GREEN] was
presented and recommended by staff for approval which distinguishes
“Public” and “Private” use, and included a list of uses in the subsection to
Chapter 5 specifying certain allowed uses which would require a “S2” review.
The S2 review would require a Planning Commission public hearing review
and Town Board approval allowing multiple options for public comment. Town
Richard Ralph/Town citizen and Kent Smith/Town citizen spoke in favor of
Exhibit A [GREEN].
Those speaking against the Ordinance and recommended subsection to
Chapter 5 pending further review included Joanna Darden/Town citizen and
Jeff Spalding/Town citizen.
Wallie Burke/Town citizen stated his support for increased tourism although
uses should be kept out of residential areas.
Jeff Spalding/Town citizen spoke in favor of the Exhibit A [Red] or Exhibit A
[GREEN]. He stated any commercial uses on private lots goes against the
meaning of residential lot. There has to be a two-stage process with ample
public hearing opportunities to ensure public concerns are addressed. The
list of potentially allowed uses requires careful consideration with public input.
Doug Sacarto/County citizen questioned “Public” versus “Private” uses. He
stated if the use brings a crowd it is contrary to the use as a private residence.
Additionally, he questioned the measurement of low impact in private
residences and stated the moratorium should be sustained.
Jay Vetter/County citizens suggested the Board consider rezoning of
undeveloped properties versus the proposed amendments.
Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing. Board discussion followed and
comments have been summarized: Concern over the continuance of the
moratorium, the need for multiple review stages and public input, and
concerns for the specific use list in the subsection of Chapter 5 which may be
limiting or could become to lengthy if items continue to be added or modified.
A substitute motion was recommended to approve Ordinance 05-19 Exhibit
A [RED] as approved by the Planning Commission, and died for a lack of a
second.
It was moved and seconded (Cenac/Martchink) to direct staff to proceed
with Exhibit A [GREEN], clarify the list of uses in the subsection of
Chapter 5 with definitions and continue the item to August 27, 2019, and DRAFTn stan sta
amendmamend
chch has not bha
Private Park and RPrivate Pa
eview. view Exhibit xhibit A [GREE
for approval for ap which distinguwhich
dd aa list of uses in the subseclist of uses in the su
uses which would require a “S2uses which would require a “S
anning Commission public heanning Commiss
ng multiple options for public cmultiple option
enen anda Kent Smith/Town citizemith/To
against the Ordinance and ree Ordinance and r
ng further review ng further review included inclu JoaJoa
/Town citizen/Town citize .
urke/Town citizen statedurke/Town citize his shis
should be kept out of residentiould be kept out of residenti
Jeff SpJeff Spaalding/ldi Town citizenTown spo
[GREEN]. He stated [GREEN]. He stated any coa
meaning ofmeaning of residential loresidential lo
public hearing opportung opportu
list of potentially allolist of potentially
oug Soug Sacartcarto/o/
ed if the ed if the
nana
6
Board of Trustees – July 23, 2019 – Page 5
it passed with Mayor Pro Tem Walker abstaining and Trustee Zornes voting
“No”.
F. ORDINANCE 20-19 AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT
CODE REGARDING “SELF-SERVICE MINI-STORAGE” IN NON-
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, TABLE 4-4.Mayor Jirsa opened the
public hearing. Planner Hardin stated a local business owner contacted staff
regarding expanding his mini-storage business. This led to staff discovering
seven mini-storage facilities zoned CO Outlying Commercial which are legally
non-confirming and are unable to expand. This was due to the rezoning which
occurred in 2000. The amendment would include self-service mini-storage
use allowed in the CO zoning district following the S1 review process. The
amendment also restricts those facilities on major arterial streets or highways.
Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing and Attorney Kramer read the
ordinance into record. It was moved and seconded (Norris/Walker)to
approve Ordinance 20-19,and it passed with Trustee Cenac abstaining.
3. ACTION ITEMS:
1. RESOLUTION 23-19 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS.Director
Hudson reviewed the budget appropriation highlighting eligible spousal coverage,
small settlements claims, General Funds increase, and Trails Fund increase.
There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Norris/Zornes)
to approve Resolution 23-19, and it passed unanimously with Trustee Bangs not
present to cast a vote.
2. POWER & COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION PURCHASE OF LOT 9, DEVILLE
SUBDIVISION, 1180 WOODSTOCK DRIVE.Director Bergsten stated the
purchase would be for office and warehouse space to support the construction and
long-term operations of a new high-speed broadband network for businesses and
residents. Staff has discussed options with contractors to reduce the construction
estimate. John Meissner/Town citizen stated concern for the cost and the
acquisition of more property. Director Bergsten stated the property is located in an
ideal location with an existing building adequate for remodeling and use. It was
moved and seconded (Bangs/Martchink) to approve the Power &
Communications Division Purchase of Lot 9, Deville Subdivision, 1180
Woodstock Drive, and it passed unanimously.
3. APPOINTMENTS TO THE LARIMER COUNTY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY
COUNCIL.Staff recommended Trustee Zornes and Howard Laurens, Town
resident to represent the Town on the Solid Waste Advisory Council. It was moved
and seconded (Norris/Cenac)to appoint Trustee Zornes and Howard Loren to
the Larimer County Solid Waste Advisory Council, and it passed with Trustee
Zornes abstaining.
4. AMENDED MEMORADUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH THE ESTES
PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY (EPHA).Assistant Town Administrator Machalek
stated the amendments remove the reference to Town-provided office space,
clarifies language as it relates to Strategic Planning for Housing, removed use of
the Town Attorney for legal services, minor advisement to other support services
and would eliminate the EPHA’s agreement to continue to attempt to reduce
annual request for funding. Staff recommended approval of the amended MOU. It
was moved and seconded (Zornes/Norris) to approve the amended MOU with
the EPHA, and it passed unanimously.
Whereupon Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
Todd Jirsa, Mayor
Bunny Victoria Beers, Recording SecretaryDRAFT dd ( (
ee Cenaee Ce
ET APPROPRIATIONSET APPROPRIATI .Di
FTighlightingighligh eligible spousal covspousa
s increase, and Ts increase, a rails FFundund
as s moved and secondedmoved and s (No
passed unanimouslysed unanimo with Tru
ONS DIVISION PURCHASE NS DIVISION PURCHA
AFOODSTOCK DRIVETOCK DRIVE..DirectDirecAFffice and warehouse space to swarehouse space to
of a new highof a new high--speed broadbanspeed broadban
s discusss discusseded options withons w contr
MeisMeissner/Town citizen state/Town citizen
more property. Director Bergsmore property. Director Berg
on with an existing building awith an existing building a
and secondedseconded (Bangsngs//MM
munications Division Purchmunications Divis
odstock Driveodstock Drive,and it passednd it pa
APPOINTMENTS TO THEAPPOINTMENTS TO THEDOUNCILOUNC.Staff recomreDdentdentto represent thto represent
econdedeconded ( (NorNor
mer Coumer Cou
ainain
7
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado July 23, 2019
Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the TOWN BOARD of the Town of
Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in the
Board Room in said Town of Estes Park on the 23rd day of July, 2019.
Board: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustees Bangs,
Cenac, Martchink, Norris and Zornes
Attending: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustees Bangs,
Cenac, Martchink, Norris and Zornes
Also Attending: Town Administrator Lancaster, Assistant Town Administrator
Machalek, Town Attorney Kramer and Recording Secretary
Disney
Absent: None
Mayor Jirsa called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING IN TOWN.
Manager Landkamer provided a presentation on electric vehicle charging and the Alt
Fuels Colorado Program with Zachary Owens, Program Manager for Transportation
Fuels and Technology of the Colorado Energy Office. They provided background on the
Alt Fuels Colorado Program highlighting the inception and goals of the program to place
electric vehicle charging stations along major transportation corridors. Estes Park has
been identified as a Tier I corridor. Should the Town choose to participate in the
program, a total of 8 Fast charging stations could be installed in town with a cost share
of approximately $100,000. The Board discussed cooperation with Utilities, the
difference between current electric vehicle charging stations and fast charging stations,
2020 budget implications and in-kind options, and charging station locations. It was
determined participation in the program would be discussed during the 2020 budgeting
process.
DISCUSSION OF RECREATIONAL USES CURRENTLY IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING
DISTRICTS. Director Hunt presented a discussion on recreational uses in residential
zoning districts. He provided a historical review of Ordinance 05-19 and discussed the
newest alternative, Exhibit A [Green], which differentiates public and private park and
residential facilities with only specific uses allowed in residential zoning districts as an
S2 Special Review. He explained the difference between S1 and S2 Special Reviews.
The Board discussed different types of recreation uses, differences between ‘public’ and
‘private’ facilities as opposed to ‘commercial’ and ‘non-commercial’ facilities, and
distinctions of S1 and S2 Special Reviews.
DISCUSSION OF BUILDING MAINTENANCE CODE.
Director Hunt and Interim Chief Building Official Rusu presented a discussion on
potential of using the Building Maintenance Code which arose from an electrical fire
downtown. The International Building Code does not provide the Town the right to
perform inspections regarding building maintenance issues, whereas, the Maintenance
Code does. The Board discussed existing hazards and public safety issues in
commercial spaces. It was determined staff would research budget implications,
operational requirements and review the Building Maintenance Code at a future Study
Session.
TRUSTEE & ADMINSTRATOR COMMENTS & QUESTIONS.
None. DRAFT8
Town Board Study Session – July 23, 2019 – Page 2
FUTURE STUDY SESSION AGENDA ITEMS.
Town Administrator Lancaster stated Larimer County requested a discussion on the
proposed transportation tax with the Town Board, it was determined to schedule this for
a Town Board meeting. Town Administrator Lancaster stated a discussion on property
tax for vacation homes with Larimer County Assessor Overbeck would be scheduled for
August 13, 2019. Trustee Bangs requested the Board discuss a Memorandum of
Understanding with Sister Cities to detail clear expectations. It was determined to
schedule this for a Study Session in the fall.
There being no further business, Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 6:13 p.m.
Kimberly Disney, Recording Secretary DRAFT9
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado July 29, 2019
Minutes of a Joint Study Session meeting of the ESTES PARK TOWN
BOARD AND LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSION of the Town of Estes
Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in the Board
Room in said Town of Estes Park on the 29th day of July 2019.
Board: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustees Bangs,
Cenac, Martchink, Norris, and Zornes
County Commission: Chair Donnelly, Commissioners Johnson and Kefalas
Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Machalek, County Manager
Hoffman, Attorney Kramer, Community Development
Director Hunt, County Planning Director Ellis and Town Clerk
Williamson
Absent: Town Administrator Lancaster
Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Jirsa. Introductions were conducted
for both elected bodies and Town and County staff. Commissioner Donnelly reviewed
the current state of development in the Estes valley and stated the Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) forming the joint land use planning area between the Town and
County would expire in February 2020. The joint planning area was a new process
when it was proposed and approved and still a unique planning method in Colorado.
Director Hunt reiterated the Town and County have been discussing since February
2019 the upcoming expiration of the IGA. He provided an overview of the cooperative
planning effort in the Estes valley which began in the early 1990s. The current joint
Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the County in 1996 and the Town in 1997. On
February 1, 2000 the first IGA with a 20-year term was approved along with a new
Estes Valley Development Code and zoning plan. The IGA also includes a joint Estes
Valley Planning Commission, Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, policies on annexation,
decision-making authority with respective elected representatives, and the Town staff in
Community Development to review and manage the land use code throughout the
planning area on behalf of the County.
Director Ellis presented other joint planning examples, including those Larimer County
has with Fort Collins, Loveland, Berthoud and Windsor, Steamboat Springs and Routt
County, and Lyons and Boulder County. All joint planning examples have similar
cooperative planning area agreements and/or growth management areas.
The meeting’s facilitated discussion would consist of small group discussions with a
facilitator and note taker to discuss the three to five year vision of land use and planning
in the Estes valley; what might be accomplished long-term with the continued land use
planning agreement; when the Town updates the Comprehensive Plan is it important to
plan for land uses in the Estes valley; and general input on land use planning
agreement or how Larimer County should transition to provide development review
services starting next year.
Mayor Jirsa called a break in the meeting to begin the facilitated discussions in Rooms
201/202/203 at 6:03 p.m. Mayor Jirsa reconvened the meeting a 6:57 p.m.
Facilitators provided a review of common concerns heard at each facilitated group.
Comments have been summarized: support for cooperative planning with a
comprehensive approach; determine what items are not working and fix them; explore
and understand why the elected officials are supporting the dissolution of the current
IGA; address current issues before beginning the comprehensive planning effort; desire DRAFT10
Joint Town Board County Commission Study Session – July 29, 2019 – Page 2
for a long-range Comprehensive Plan for the entire valley and follow it and don’t get
diverted by current issues; plan that preserves wildlife and the views; a plan which
encourages a diverse demographic population – housing, economy, etc.; plan to
balance tourism and commercial business with the needs of the residents; supported
the relationship if there was an independent Planning Commission for the county
residents which reports directly to the County Commissioners; restructure the
Development Code after the adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan; Town services
expanded to the Larimer County residents; protection of the existing rural area and rural
Larimer County; annexation should remain voluntary; for workforce housing while
complimenting open space; intergovernmental cooperation needs to be strengthened to
balance the needs of the community as it relates to land use; balance between
aesthetics, beauty and livability with the consideration of revenue and sales tax;
residential and commercial interests are kept separate; protect the community character
with infill development and height of development, i.e. two stories versus three;
consistent and predictable application of the rules; a need for a consistent voice with
regard to those who can vote and those who cannot because valley and town residents
receive the same services; and both the Town and County should be involved in the
development of the new Comprehensive Plan.
Director Ellis stated the questionnaire would be available through August 12, 2019,
results on the questionnaire to be reported shortly thereafter; move forward late
September with options for the public and elected officials to review; and in November
the Town and County would hold a joint hearing to review a proposed IGA.
Commissioner Kefalas stated the individuals attending the current meeting represent
only one demographic, no representation from the younger members of the community
and the business community. He would like to be more intentional in gaining their
viewpoints.
There being no further business, Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m.
Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk DRAFT11
12
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 23, 2019
Minutes of a Regular meeting of the AUDIT COMMITTEE of the Town of
Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal
Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 23rd day of July, 2019.
Committee: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustee Cenac, Town
Administrator Lancaster, Finance Director Hudson, Account
Manager Garcia and Accountant Johnson
Attending: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustee Cenac, Town
Administrator Lancaster, Assistant Town Administrator
Machalek, Finance Director Hudson, Accountant Johnson,
Town Clerk Williamson, VEP Chief Financial Officer Benes
and Randy Watkins/ACM LLP
Absent: Accounting Manager Garcia.
Chair Jirsa called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m.
2018 CAFR AND SINGLE AUDIT REVIEW.
Mr. Watkins reviewed the audit wrap-up and stated the primary areas of focus and
consideration of findings for the audit included revenue recognitions, accounts
receivable and allowances, capital assets and depreciation, long-term debt, pension
and OPEB reporting, evaluation of ongoing concerns, and evaluation of estimates and
single audit procedures. He stated the auditors provided an unmodified opinion, a clean
opinion, of the financial statements. The Statement of Net Position was reviewed and
outline a total net position of $1.326 million and included new line items to address the
OPEB liability and deferred inflow of OPEB related liabilities. As of December 1, 2018,
the Town’s governmental funds reported a combined ending fund balance of $14.886
million with approximately $8.049 million of unrestricted funds. He reviewed the
government funds, proprietary funds (Enterprise funds), and internal funds addressing
the net position of the activities and the net position of each fund. He stated all the
funds with the exception of internal funds realized a positive cash flow. A single audit
was conducted and no findings related to compliance were identified and an unmodified
opinion was issued. CBDG grants and FEMA funding were tested. The Fish Creek
project was not included in the Town’s audit because the project was coordinated by
and included in the Larimer County audit.
Director Hudson stated the capitalization of assets has been reviewed and will be
completed within the month the asset goes into service rather than at the end of the
year. He stated the audit would be presented to the Town Board on August 27, 2019 as
an action item with the auditing firm present.
CONSIDER OF APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS FOR 2019 AUDIT
Director Hudson reviewed the audit process and stated Town staff and Visit Estes Park
staff had concerns related to quality of the services provided, lack of follow through,
timeliness, lack of audit comments, lack of reporting such as Beyond the Numbers to
provide the audit in laymen’s terms, and a lack of quality control, i.e. errors found by
staff. After further discussion, it was agreed to send a joint letter to ACM, LLP to outline
the concerns of the Town and VEP and request a response from the company on how
the company would address the deficiencies.
There being no further business, Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 9:17 a.m.
Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk DRAFT13
14
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 17, 2019
Minutes of a special meeting of the Family Advisory Board of the Town of Estes Park,
Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Room 203 of the Estes Park Town Hall,
on the 17th day of July, 2019.
Present: Laurie Dale Marshall
Michael Moon
Rachel Balduzzi
Jodi Roman
Also Present:Ron Norris, Town Board Liaison
Travis Machalek, Assistant Town Administrator
Suzanna Simpson, Recording Secretary
Absent: Karen Randinitis
Nancy Almond
John Bryant
Guests: Jon Nicholas, Estes Park Economic Development Corporation
Chair Dale Marshall called the meeting to order at 3:07 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None
TRUSTEE LIAISON REPORT:
The Town Board has approved the 2020 Strategic Plan. This can be viewed on the Town’s
website and public comment can be received through July 31, 2019.
Two Family Advisory Board members will be appointed at the next Town Board meeting,
Tuesday, July 23.
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Member Moon announced that ECE has been declared a public charity by the United
States Internal Revenue Service as of Monday, July 15.
Assistant Town Administrator Machalek provided an update on the Town Administrator
and Assistant Town Administrator positions. He has finished negotiations with the Town
Board for his promotion to Town Administrator and the Town Board will vote on the
contract at the July 23 meeting. Following the pending approval of his contract, the
15
Family Advisory Board – July 17, 2019 – Page 2
Assistant Town Administrator position will be advertised. That position will be the liaison
for the Family Advisory Board and Assistant Town Administrator Machalek will remain the
liaison until that time.
Member Roman recently learned about the “Double Up Food Bucks” program, which
doubles the value of federal nutrition assistance such as SNAP or food stamps. The
program is available locally through Miller Farms at the Estes Valley Farmers Market, the
Longmont, Fort Collins, Berthoud, and Boulder Farmers Markets. More local vendors can
be found at www.doubleupcolorado.org.
APPROVAL OF MAY MINUTES:
It was moved and seconded (Roman/Moon) to approve the May meeting minutes and the
motion passes unanimously.
CHILDCARE AND HOUSING TASK FORCE UPDATE:
Assistant Town Administrator Machalek provided an update on the Childcare and
Housing Task Force. He previously sent a draft of the report that was submitted to the
Town Board. Included in the report is a full page of single line recommendations to the
Town Board. All of these recommendations have been incorporated in one form or
another into the 2020 Strategic Plan. The Town is exploring what it would look like to
create a self-replenishing fund balance reserve to fund childcare. ECE and EVICS are
working together moving forward so that when the Town invests, they are doing so in an
environment where there is alignment and collaboration. There will also be workforce
housing guidelines created, which will detail what the Town is focused on when
investments are made in workforce housing through land, code changes, or funds. The
childcare funding policy is the document that will guide the use of fund balance reserves
into childcare facilities. The Assistant Town Administrator position will be the responsible
party for coordinating the Town’s participation in workforce housing and childcare. Most
of the Family Advisory Board recommendations were incorporated into the
recommendations of the task force and thereby into the strategic plan. Assistant Town
Administrator Machalek offered congratulations to the Family Advisory Board for the
defined deliverables they instigated.
Additional discussion took place on the recommendation for the Town to catalyze
conversations between EVICS/ECE and other providers to make sure that all who are
working on childcare efforts are communicating with each other in a more formalized way
to ensure alignment for potential funding. Member Moon added that the conversations
have been productive and that he and EVICS have agreed on three basic things: organic
growth of childcare base, protection of current spots, and ECE exploring new capacity.
16
Family Advisory Board – July 17, 2019 – Page 3
Trustee Norris recommends that the Family Advisory Board add an agenda item in the
fall to follow up on funding for any of these items.
WORKING MEETING PORTION:
Executive Assistant Simpson provided a brief update on how this portion of the meeting
will be recorded. The entire exercise will not be transcribed, only action items and salient
points will be recorded.
The goal of the exercise is to develop an organized strategy for raising awareness of the
barriers to family success. Through the exercise, the group will identify their top three
issues/concerns/topics that will help shape the family portraits.
Primary issues identified were quality of community, affordable housing, childcare, living
wages, food availability and diversity.
Next the group discussed the primary targets for communication of the family portraits,
such as those who do not believe there are housing or childcare issues and major
employers in town.
Finally, the group worked to identify the families which will be highlighted in the family
portraits - fire/police/ems, teacher, senior citizen, nurse, park employee, hotel, restaurant,
administrative professionals, etc.
Katherine Chu from Larimer County will help create economic graphs that will be used in
the portraits.
Messages to weave into the portraits include quality of life, character and culture of
community, the need to thrive not just survive, toxic stress and negativity.
Chair Dale Marshall and Vice Chair Balduzzi will organize the list and create a draft of
those questions to take to potential interviewees.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Seeing no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:02 p.m.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Family Advisory Board will take place Thursday, Aug. 1 at 3:30
p.m. in room 203 at Town Hall.
17
18
Effective Period: Until Superseded
Review Schedule: After each municipal election
Revised: 8/13/19
Effective Date: 8/13/19
References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board
Appointed Committee Principles
TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
101
Revisions: 8/13/2019
1. Purpose The Board of Trustees has many varied responsibilities. In order to effectively use
their time, the Board finds it necessary to divide duties and responsibilities among the Board
members.
2. Assignments To Ongoing Committees: At the first regular meeting following the certification of
the results of each biennial election, the Board of Trustees determines each Board and
Commission Primary Liaison assignments and responsibilities for the remainder of the term of
the current standing Town Board.
a. Interim Assignments: Should the Board deem it necessary to create a new liaison
assignment or to modify assignments at some time other than as described in 101.2,
the Board may do so at any regular meeting of the Board.
3. Assignment To Committees Of The Board Of Trustees (committees comprised solely of
members of the Board of Trustees)
a) Assignments to Audit Committee:
At the first regular meeting following the certification of the results of each biennial
election, the Mayor shall appoint two (2) Trustees to the Audit committee with the
Mayor serving as the third member.
(Ord. 26-88 §1(part), 1988; Ord. 7-03 §1, 2003; Ord. 10-10 §1, 2010; Ord. 10-14 §1,
2014; Ord. 13-15, § 1, 9-22-2015)
b) Assignment to Special Committees:
Special committees may be established by the Board of Trustees. The Mayor shall
appoint all members of any special committee subject to the approval of the Board of
Trustees. (Estes Park Municipal Code 2.08.020)
4. Appointment of Mayor Pro‐ Tem: “At its first meeting following the certification of the
results of each biennial election, the Board of Trustees shall choose one (1) of the Trustees as
Mayor Pro Tem who, in the absence of the Mayor from any meeting of the Board of Trustees,
or during the Mayor's absence from the Town or his or her inability to act, shall perform his or
her duties.” (Estes Park Municipal Code 2.16.010)
19
Effective Period: Until Superseded
Review Schedule: After each municipal election
Revised: 8/13/19
Effective Date: 8/13/19
References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board
Appointed Committee Principles
TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
101
Revisions: 8/13/2019
5. Special Assignments to Ad‐Hoc and Temporary Committees: The Mayor may nominate
trustees to serve on committees, community groups, or in some other capacities as a
representative of the Town, except in cases where a Board Liaison has been approved by the
Board of Trustees (Policy 1.7.) The Mayor shall present the nomination of any such
appointments to the Board for approval at a regular town board meeting. The Mayor will
make every effort to distribute special assignments equitably among the members of the
Board.
6. Interview panels for Town Committees – In accordance with Section IV A 6 of Policy 102,
Town Committees, “Applicants for all committees will be interviewed by the Town Board, or
its designees. Any designees will be appointed by the full Town Board.”
7. Outside Committees – Outside committees are committees or boards where the Town is
represented by a member of the Board of Trustees and/or staff. These are not committees of
the Town of Estes Park and therefore the rules and guidelines for membership are those of
the outside entity not the Town. At times, they may request that the Trustees assign an
individual(s) to represent the Town, however they may also request a specific individual or
position as the Town’s representative to the committee.
8. Liaison Assignments ‐ The Mayor may nominate trustees to serve as a Board Liaison. The
Mayor shall present the nomination of any such appointments to the Board for approval at a
regular town board meeting. The Mayor will make every effort to distribute special
assignments equitably among the members of the Board.
20
Effective Period: Until Superseded
Review Schedule: After each municipal election
Revised: 8/13/19
Effective Date: 8/13/19
References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board
Appointed Committee Principles
TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
101
Revisions: 8/13/2019
Board Assignments
Mayor Pro‐Tem ‐ __ Trustee Walker______________
Board and Commission and Community Representation
Board, Commission or Task Force Liaison Staff Liaison Type of
Committee
Estes Valley Planning Commission Trustee Norris Randy Hunt Advisory/ Decision
Making
Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Randy Hunt Decision Making
Western Heritage Inc Trustee Cenac n/a Outside
Estes Park Museum Friends and Foundation
Inc.
Derek Fortini Outside
Ambassadors Teri Salerno Outside
Police Auxiliary Wes Kufeld Working Group
Parks Advisory Board Trustee Martchink Brian Berg Advisory
Transportation Advisory Board Trustee Bangs Greg Muhonen Advisory
Estes Valley Restorative Justice Denise Lord Working Group
Estes Park Board of Appeals Randy Hunt Advisory/Decision
Making
Sister Cities Trustee Bangs n/a Working Group
Family Advisory Board Trustee Norris Travis Machalek Advisory
21
Effective Period: Until Superseded
Review Schedule: After each municipal election
Revised: 8/13/19
Effective Date: 8/13/19
References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board
Appointed Committee Principles
TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
101
Revisions: 8/13/2019
Committee or Board Appointed
Member(s)
Staff Liaison Type of
Committee
Audit Committee Mayor Jirsa
Mayor Pro Tem
Walker, Trustee
Cenac
Travis Machalek
Duane Hudson
Advisory
Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) Voting Designee
– Mayor Jirsa
Alt Designee TA
Machalek
n/a Outside
Platte River Power Authority Board of
Directors
Mayor Jirsa Reuben Bergsten Outside
Larimer County Open Lands Board Trustee Zornes n/a Outside
Estes Park Economic Development
Corporation Board of Directors
Mayor Pro Tem
Walker, Travis
Machalek
n/a Outside
Larimer County Solid Waste Policy Council Trustee Zornes Outside
Local Marketing District (Visit Estes Park) Mayor Jirsa,
Trustee Cenac
n/a Outside
Regional Transportation Infrastructure
Funding Task Force
Trustee
Martchink
Outside
Larimer County Behavioral Health Policy
Council
Trustee Zornes n/a Outside
___________________________________
Todd Jirsa
Mayor
22
PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
Applicable items include: Rate Hearings, Code Adoption, Budget Adoption
1.MAYOR.
The next order of business will be the public hearing on PLANNING
COMMISSION ACTION ITEM #1.A. ORDINANCE 21-19 AMENDING THE
ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE §7.12 TO PROHIBIT GATED
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES IN MULTIPLE-LOT SUBDIVISIONS AND
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS.
At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the information
presented during the public hearing, from the Town staff, public comment,
and written comments received on the application.
Any member of the Board may ask questions at any stage of the public
hearing which may be responded to at that time.
Mayor declares the Public Hearing open.
2.STAFF REPORT.
Review the staff report.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT.
Any person will be given an opportunity to address the Board concerning the
Ordinance. All individuals must state their name and address for the record.
Comments from the public are requested to be limited to three minutes per
person.
4. MAYOR.
Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard
to the Ordinance which are not in the Board packet.
Ask the Board of Trustees if there are any further questions concerning the
Ordinance.
Indicate that all reports, statements, exhibits, and written communications
presented will be accepted as part of the record.
Declare the public hearing closed.
23
Request Board consider a motion.
7. SUGGESTED MOTION.
Suggested motion(s) are set forth in the staff report.
8. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION.
Discussion by the Board on the motion.
9. VOTE ON THE MOTION.
Vote on the motion or consideration of another action.
24
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa
Board of Trustees
Through: Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Claire Kreycik, Planning Technician
Date: August 13th, 2019
RE: Ordinance 21-19 Amending the Estes Valley Development Code §7.12 to
Prohibit Gated Residential Communities in Multiple-Lot Subdivisions and
Multi-Family Developments
(Mark all that apply)
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________
QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO
Objective:
Review and Vote on the proposed text amendments to the Estes Valley Development
Code (EVDC) Chapter 7, Adequate Public Facilities, and Appendix D. Street Design
and Construction Standards to ensure that residential developments do not install
security gates and other barriers to safe vehicular access.
As it stands, the EVDC has a policy priority of ensuring that all development within
Estes Valley has “safe and adequate access” to paved roads, both for transportation
connectivity as well as for emergency services access (See 7.12.H). This Code
Amendment would expand and clarify this policy objective, and specifically prevent the
development of “gated communities” within Estes Valley to mitigate public safety and
security risks.
The primary goals are:
• To make the community more visible to law enforcement and patrol,
• To facilitate response to natural disasters, like fire or flood, and
• To shorten emergency response times, ensuring safety especially for
individuals who may need immediate attention while in a vulnerable state,
such as children and the elderly.
Present Situation:
There has been a trend over the last thirty years especially in the southern and western
United States for communities in residential areas to create fences and gates to restrict
access to outsiders (Drew and McGuigan 2013). So called “gated communities” are
those which have established security-personnel stations or unmanned barriers to
25
restrict free vehicular access to a neighborhood or apartment complex. These new
communities have cropped up mostly due to homebuyers’ worries about security and
crime. Other reasons that people buy into gated communities include elevated status,
lifestyle, and desire to protect their property value (Taylor and Francis 2013).
There is some research suggesting that gated communities reduce crimes of
opportunity (Addington et al, 2013). Residential burglary rates are lower in gated
communities, even controlling for factors such as tenure, income, and location (Ibid).
However, even though choosing a gated community may reduce the already statistically
low probability of a home burglary, there are other wide-ranging effects of gated
communities.
Whereas proponents of residential gated communities believe they provide a safer
environment, gated communities are less visible to public law-enforcement and patrol.
Therefore, residents might have a greater risk of grievous harm from violent assault,
bullying, or intimate partner violence because the victim may not be able to escape as
easily (Taylor and Francis 2013). Crucially gated communities may provide wider public
safety concerns because gates may limit access for emergency personnel such as fire
fighters, ambulances, and police. With gated communities, emergency vehicles may be
impeded or blocked, slowing response time for EMT or ambulances, which affects our
most vulnerable citizens. Importantly, firefighting trucks are affected because even
though fire trucks could ram through gates to gain access to a road, someone will be
responsible for paying to fix the gate and the truck.
There are no known single-family residential subdivisions with gated access within
Town limits; however, four exist within the Estes Valley Planning Area and one more
has been proposed. Cliff Road and Terrance Lane off of Highway 66 have a gate on
both access points that allows multiple locks. Additionally, Clara Drive near the Gem
Lake Trailhead has a gate on the single driveway and they too have multiple locks on
the chains. Off of Dry Gulch Road, the Eagle Rock School, which is partially residential,
has an unmanned gate to restrict free access to their private facility and Lory Lane has
an unmanned gate that allows admittance through a livestock fence which surrounds
the neighborhood.
The Hillcrest Estates subdivision has indicated at a pre-application meeting that they
would be interested in installing secured gated access, but to date have not pursued an
amended plat or building permit as such. The amendment is a preventative measure, so
that there are adequate regulations in place to ensure safe emergency access by
preventing gated communities in the Estes Valley.
Proposal:
The Code Amendment would prohibit the use of gate-controlled access to residential
single-family subdivisions, apartment complexes, or condominium developments. The
Amendment would forbid the installation of any security barrier that blocks public right-
of-way or public access easements. Additionally, the Amendment would restrict private
entrances to multi-family apartment complexes or similar concentrations of dwellings
along private driveways. The Amendment would also provide for certain legitimate
exceptions, such as public-safety-authorized gates on public streets, such as for
26
inclement weather, for temporary street closures for special events, or for maintenance
work.
Current secured gate accessways would be able to continue as legally non-conforming
or “grandfathered” facilities, but as with other non-conformities, removal or major repairs
or replacement may not allow them to remain in place.
Commercial and industrial facilities would continue to have gated private driveway
capability in Code. Individual single-family dwellings could continue to have gates
across driveways as long as the gate-controlled access serves only one house. Gates
on private driveways are controlled by neighborhood covenants.
The Larimer County Land Use Code dictates that gated public roads are prohibited and
gated private roads are prohibited unless appealed to and approved by the Board of
County Commissioners, after meeting a series of criteria lined out in §8.14.1. These
criteria include:
1. The subject road is a private road and all owners of property having a legally
established right to access via the private road have approved gating the
road;
2. The standards for private roads in Subsection 8.14.2.M are met;
3. The appeal request has been referred to the applicable fire protection entity
and the sheriff's department, emergency services for their review and
comment, and such comments have been duly considered; and
4. The design provides for adequate vehicle stacking distance and turn around.
The County has advised that very few gated accesses meet the criteria and are
approved.
Advantages:
• Generally complies with the EVDC §3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for
Review.
• This Code Amendment supports policy priorities of providing safe and
adequate access to paved roads (§7.12.H).
• The proposed Code Amendment has support from Estes Park Police
Department, Estes Park Health (EMS), Estes Valley Fire Protection District,
and County Engineering.
• It is advantageous to address security barriers in the EVDC instead of
approving or denying them on a case-by-case basis because of the severity
of the consequences in the case of an emergency.
• Including the regulations in EVDC also provides for ability to flag proposals at
the stage of the development plan, subdivision, or building permit.
Disadvantages:
• None identified to date.
Action Recommended:
Staff is recommending approval of the proposed amendment as drafted in Exhibit A.
The Planning Commission, at their July 16, 2019 meeting, forwarded a recommendation
of approval of the Code Amendment, by a vote of 6 – 0.
27
Level of Public Interest
Low. One written comment was received, and citizen concerns were addressed in text
amendment language. Any written comments for this proposal received by staff will be
posted to: www.estes.org/currentapplications.
Sample Motion:
APPROVAL
I move that the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees APPROVE Ordinance 21-19,
including findings as identified in the Ordinance.
DENIAL
I move that the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees DENY Ordinance 21-19, finding that
... [state findings for denial].
CONTINUANCE
I move that the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees CONTINUE Ordinance 21-19 to
[date certain], in order that… [state direction to staff pursuant to continuance].
Attachments:
1. Ordinance 21-19
2. Exhibit A
3. Public Comment
Citations:
Addington, LA, and CM Rennison. (2013). “Keeping the Barbarians Outside the Gate?
Comparing Burglary Victimization in Gated and Non-Gated Communities.”
Justice Quarterly, 2013; 1 DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2012.760644
City of Estes Park, Colorado. “Municipal Code.” Accessed 4 June 2019 at:
https://library.municode.com/co/estes_park/codes/municipal_code
City of Laramie, Wyoming. “Unified Development Code.” Accessed 6 May 2019 at:
https://www.cityoflaramie.org/444/Unified-Development-Code
Drew EJ, and JM McGuigan. (14 Aug 2013). “Prevention of Crime: An Overview of
Gated Communities and Neighborhood Watch.” International Foundation for
Protection Officers. Accessed at: https://www.ifpo.org/resource-links/articles-and-
reports/crime-prevention-physical-security-training-and-risk-
management/prevention-of-crime-an-overview-of-gated-communities-and-
neighborhood-watch/
Larimer County, Colorado. “Land Use Code.” Accessed 4 June 2019 at:
https://library.municode.com/co/larimer_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeI
d=PTIILAUSCO
Taylor & Francis. “Risk of crime in gated communities.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 20
March 2013. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115113.htm
28
ORDINANCE NO. 21-19
AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE §7.12 TO PROHIBIT
GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES IN MULTIPLE-LOT SUBDIVISIONS AND
MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2019, the Estes Valley Planning Commission conducted
a public hearing on a proposed text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code
to prohibit gated residential communities in multiple-lot subdivisions and multi-family
developments, and found that the text amendment complies with Estes Valley
Development Code §3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for Review; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2019, the Estes Valley Planning Commission voted to
recommend approval of the text amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park finds the text
amendment complies with Estes Valley Development Code §3.3.D Code Amendments,
Standards for Review and has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town that
the amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code, as set forth on Exhibit A, be
approved; and
WHEREAS, said amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code is set forth
on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Estes Valley Development Code shall be amended as more fully
set forth on Exhibit A.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after
its adoption and publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,
Colorado, this day of _______, 2019.
TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Board
of Trustees on the ________ day of _______________, 2019 and published in a
newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the ________
day of ____________, 2019, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado.
Town Clerk
EXHIBIT A
[Chapter 7 General Development Standards - §7.12.C, Adequate Public Facilities]
C. General Requirements.
1. Approval Conditioned Upon Adequate Public Facilities.
The approval of all development shall be conditioned upon the provision of adequate public
facilities and services necessary to serve the new development. No building permit shall be
issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in
this Section have been made.
2. Level of Service Standards.
a. This Section establishes level of service standards for the following public facilities: sewage
disposal, water, drainage, transportation, fire protection and electricity. (Ord. 8-05 #1)
b. No development plan or building permit shall be approved or issued in a manner that will
result in a reduction in the levels of service below the adopted level of service standard for the
affected facility.
3. Vehicular Access to Public Streets and Private Driveways.
a. No public right-of-way or public access easement shall be gated, have security-personnel
stations or facilities, or have similar barriers installed, so as to restrict free vehicular access
thereupon. This provision shall not apply to: (a) gates or barriers, temporary or permanent,
installed under authority of public safety agencies; (b) temporary street closures under special
event permits; (c) permits granted by the Town; or (d) temporary closures required to perform,
infrastructure work or similar public-property maintenance duties.
b. Gate-restricted access and similar physical access-control barriers and facilities shall be
permitted across private driveways associated with non-residential developments; provided that:
(a) no gates or other access-restriction measures shall be installed across public right-of-way or
access easements.
c. Gates capable of closure and similar barriers shall be specifically prohibited from installation
or operation on the primary entrance of a private driveways accessing multi-family dwelling
sites. Multi-family dwelling sites shall include private driveways accessing multiple single-family
dwellings or driveways accessing apartment complexes. These driveways shall be maintained
with unobstructed vehicular access between the dwelling entrance(s) and the public street
access. However, additional accessways to a such developments may be created with
emergency-access-only gates or barriers, provided the design, installation and operation shall
be approved by appropriate public-safety review entities, including the Estes Valley Fire
Protection District (EVFPD) Fire Marshall, for that purpose.
d. Temporary closures of private right-of ways to prevent adverse possession claims for public
use shall be allowed.
[Appendix D. Street Design and Construction Standards]
II. STREETS
31
D. Private Streets.
Where private streets are used, they shall meet all design and construction standards of this
Section, including right-of-way widths and surfaced widths. The entire street width shall be deed
restricted for street purposes. When private streets are used, the subdivider shall submit written
documentation, acceptable to the Town, that the streets will be properly maintained. The
recorded plat of any subdivision that includes a private street shall clearly state that each street
is a private street. Private streets shall not be allowed where a public street connection to
adjacent property may be required for existing or future access and traffic flow purposes. Private
streets shall have a primary entrance that is not restricted to vehicular traffic. Refer to Section
7.12.C.
[ … ]
J. Street Dedication.
1. All streets that dead-end at the subdivider's property line, but will not connect with a
street dedicated to public use, shall be dedicated to public use to the property line.
2. All subdivisions shall provide for street construction and right-of-way connections to
adjoining properties, and shall not use gate-controlled access to restrict to vehicular
traffic. Refer to Section 7.12.C.
3. All right-of-way dedications to Larimer County for the purpose of streets shall be in
accordance with the Larimer County Transportation Plan Functional Road
Classification System.
III. GENERAL SITE ACCESS:
A. Access to Public Streets. All new lots, however created, shall have access to a
dedicated public road. If the approved plat provides for indirect access (i.e., over
intervening private drives), access easements and driveway/drainage maintenance
agreements, benefiting all lots with indirect access, shall be provided and recorded at
the same time the plat is recorded. Refer to Section 7.12.H.
B. Driveway Access—General Standards.
1. Safe Access Required. Safe, convenient and adequate access to individual
buildings by driveways shall be provided. Driveway access to collector and arterial
streets shall be discouraged. No driveway shall be so located as to create a hazard
to pedestrians or motorists, invite or compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements or
block or alter access to adjoining properties or uses. To the maximum extent
feasible, new driveways shall align directly across from existing driveways.
2. Backing Prohibited. All multi-family and nonresidential off-street parking spaces
shall be accessible without backing into or otherwise reentering a public right-of-
way, unless it is physically impossible to provide for such access. See Chapter 10,
Subdivision Standards, for flagpole lot requirements.
3. Access to Streets Required. Driveways to a nonresidential building site shall
have access to an approved public or private street or private right-of-way. Gates
32
across single-access private driveways shall be allowed, but no gate shall block a
public right-of-way. Refer to Section 7.12.C.3.b.
4. Grade Requirements. [ …]
5. Limits on Number of Driveway Curb Cuts. [ …]
6. Shared Driveways. (Ord. 8-05 #1) Private residential driveways shared by two or
more dwelling units shall be maintained with unobstructed vehicular access between
the dwelling entrance(s) and the public street access. Refer to Section 7.12.C.3.c.
a. Shared driveways are strongly encouraged.
b. Shared driveways may be used on adjoining properties.
c. Shared driveways require submittal of a maintenance agreement for recordation.
d. Single-family. Driveways may be shared by up to four (4) single-family residential
units.
e. Multi-family Developments. A driveway may provide access for not more than one
hundred twenty (120) vehicle trips per day.
f. Nonresidential. Driveways may be shared by two (2) or more principal
nonresidential uses.
7. Driveway Opening Requirements. (Ord. 8-05 #1)
a. Nonresidential and Multi-family residential driveway openings shall not exceed
thirty (30) feet in width at the street line. Refer to Section 7.11.K.2 for
minimum driveway openings. (Ord. 8-05 #1)
b. Single-family residential and duplex driveway openings shall not exceed a
cumulative width of thirty (30) feet at the street.
c. The primary entrance for driveway openings shall not have gated access or
other security barriers installed, with the exception of private single-family
driveways where gated access is not restricted by Section 7.12.C.
33
TheEstesValleyPlanningCommissionisproposingamendmentstotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeconcerninggatedcommunitiesandsecuritybarriers.Iwishtopointoutthepotentialforunintended consequencesforhistoricprivateroads, andtosuggestlanguagetoamelioratetheconcern.Thereareanumberoflong-establishedprivateroadsintheEstesValley.Iliveoffoneofthose,McGrawRanchRoad.ThisroadrunsaboutthreemilesbetweenCountyHighway43,otherwiseknownasDevilsGulchRoad,andtheMcGrawRanchentrancetoRockyMountainNationalPark.Theroad’shistoryisprobablytypicalinthevalley,whereadirt roadwascutacenturyagotoconnectanisolatedparceltooneofthepublichighways,and overtimepropertiesalongtheroadweresoldandresidenceswerebuiltthataccessedtheprivateroad,butnotthepublichighway,aswould berequiredundertoday’scode.Thecountydoesnotcontributetomaintenanceoftheroad,andneitherthesheriffnorthetownpolicepatroltheroadexceptwhencalled.Thereisnopublicrightofwayonthisroad,andneither thepublicnor privateindividualsotherthantheownersofpropertyalongtheroadhaveanyeasementforaccess.TheownersalongMcGrawRanchRoadpermituseoftheroadtoreachtheNationalPark.Propertyownersonprivate roads facepotentialclaimsthatusersoftheroadhavearightofpassage,based onassumptionstheroadispublicorassertionsofaprescriptiverightoreasementtouseit.Inordertopreventatakingoftheirproperty,theownersofprivate roadspreservetheprivatenatureoftheroadbylimitingaccessandbygivingexpresspermissiontocross.Suchactionsarenecessarytodefeatassertionsofcontinuousadverseuseorsuggestionsthattheownershavededicated theroadwaytopublic use.Onerecognizedpracticeistocloseaprivateroadonedayeachyear.Todothat,yearsagotheMcGrawRanch RoadownersinstalledasecuritygateofftheentranceatDevilsGulchRoad.Theowners,workingnowundertheumbrellaoftheMcGrawRanchRoadAssociation,closethegatetopublicaccessannually.Usuallythisisdoneinconjunctionwithroadmaintenance,whichhelpswithgraderoperationsthatcantakeuptheentirewidthoftheroadway.Theroadisalsoclosedwhenemergencyactivities,suchaswildfirefighting,aretakingplace.Theownerstaketurnsatthegatetoexplaintheclosuretovisitorsandtofacilitateentrancebyresidentsand emergencyservices.TheAssociationnotifiesemergencyandlawenforcementagenciesinadvanceofanyclosureandprovidesthemwiththecombinationtothelockfor usewhenthegateisnotmonitored.Thestaffpaperacknowledgesgrandfatheringforexistinggatedsubdivisions,butdoesnotdiscussthetypeofgateandaccess controlonhistoricprivateroadsinthevalleyasdescribedaboveanddoesnotmentionMcGraw RanchRoadorothersimilarsettlementsthatmaybeservedbyprivate roadsthataroseunderearlier,orperhapsno,regulation.Theproposedchangesimplypermissionforcontinueduse ofthesecuritybarrierthathasbeeninusefordecadesatMcGrawRanchRoad.However,itwouldbehelpfultomakethisexplicitinboththestaffpaperandthechangestothecode,soastopreventunwarrantedclaimsofprivate orpublicaccessthatarenotconsistentwiththeprivatepropertynatureofthistypeofroad.IntheCurrentSituationsectionofthestaffpaper,page2of8,recommendyouaddthissentencetotheendofthefirstparagraphtorecognizehistoricpractices:“Inaddition,therearehistoricallyprivateroadsinthevalleythatprovideaccesstomultipleresidences,suchasMcGrawRanchRoad,thathavegatesfortemporaryaccess controlandtoallowtheroadtobeclosedonalimitedscheduletoconfirmprivateownershipoftheroadway.”InSectionII,D,PrivateStreetsinthecode,addthefollowingsentencetotheendoftheparagraph,followingtheproposedamendment,inordertoprovideexplicitgrandfathering:“TheprecedingsentenceconcerningrestrictionstovehiculartrafficshallnotapplytoprivatestreetsandroadswheresecuritygateswereestablishedpriortotheeffectivedateofthisamendmenttotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode.”Public Comment34
PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
Applicable items include: Rate Hearings, Code Adoption, Budget Adoption
1.MAYOR.
The next order of business will be the public hearing on PLANNING
COMMISSION ACTION ITEM #1.B. ORDINANCE 22-19 RIGHT-OF-WAY
VACATION, PORTION OF WILDFIRE ROAD, WESTOVER CONSTRUCTION,
INC., RDA ASSOCIATES LLC, CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK,
INC./APPLICANTS.
At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the information
presented during the public hearing, from the Town staff, public comment,
and written comments received on the application.
Any member of the Board may ask questions at any stage of the public
hearing which may be responded to at that time.
Mayor declares the Public Hearing open.
2.STAFF REPORT.
Review the staff report.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT.
Any person will be given an opportunity to address the Board concerning the
Ordinance. All individuals must state their name and address for the record.
Comments from the public are requested to be limited to three minutes per
person.
4. MAYOR.
Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard
to the Ordinance which are not in the Board packet.
Ask the Board of Trustees if there are any further questions concerning the
Ordinance.
Indicate that all reports, statements, exhibits, and written communications
presented will be accepted as part of the record.
Declare the public hearing closed.
35
Request Board consider a motion.
7. SUGGESTED MOTION.
Suggested motion(s) are set forth in the staff report.
8. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION.
Discussion by the Board on the motion.
9. VOTE ON THE MOTION.
Vote on the motion or consideration of another action.
36
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa
Board of Trustees
Through: Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Jeff Woeber, Senior Planner
Date: August 13, 2019
RE: Ordinance 22-19 Right-of-Way Vacation, Portion of Wildfire Road,
Westover Construction, Inc., RDA Associates LLC, Crossroads Ministry of
Estes Park, Inc./Applicants
(Mark all that apply)
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________
QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO
Objective:
Conduct a public hearing and make a decision on a request to vacate a portion of
Wildfire Road Right-of-Way, associated with the Wildfire Homes Subdivision project.
Present Situation:
On May 23, 2019, the Town Board of Trustees approved annexation of the Wildfire
Homes Addition into the Town of Estes Park, including this portion of unimproved right-
of-way. An associated rezoning and preliminary plat was approved by the Town Board
on July 23, 2019. The right-of-way as currently configured will not accommodate the
proposed development. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision Final Plat proposes to dedicate
a new, redesigned right-of-way to serve the development.
Proposal:
Applicant proposes to vacate a portion of the existing Wildfire Road right-of-way as
shown and described on Exhibit A to allow for subdivision and dedication of a new right-
of-way to serve future development. The new dedication is through the associated final
plat, subject to review and approval by the Town Board at their August 13, 2019
hearing.
See accompanying final plat staff report for Wildfire Homes on tonight’s agenda for
more information on the project.
Advantages:
The realignment and subdivision are consistent with the Estes Valley
Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
37
2
Will allow for the construction of a new road to serve development that will be
built to current road standards.
Disadvantages:
None identified.
Action Recommended:
Staff recommends that the Town Board approve the request to vacate a portion of
Wildfire Road as shown and described on Exhibit A.
Finance/Resource Impact:
None
Level of Public Interest
Medium: Public comments have been received expressing no objection, along with
comments pointing out “disadvantages” to the Wildfire project. The overall project is of
relatively high interest for the Town of Estes Park. Interest is low on the right-of-way
vacation specifically.
All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications.
Sample Motions:
I move that the Town Board of Trustees approve Ordinance 22-19, vacating a portion of
Wildfire Road, including the findings as identified in the Ordinance.
I move that the Town Board of Trustees deny Ordinance 22-19, and not vacate a
portion of Wildfire Road as proposed, finding that [state findings for denial].
I move to continue Ordinance 22-19, to vacate a portion of Wildfire Road, to the next
regularly scheduled meeting. (State reasons for continuance.)
Attachments:
1. Ordinance 22-19
2. Exhibit A
3. Vicinity Map
4. Application
38
ORDINANCE NO. 22-19
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION
OF THE WILDFIRE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, the applicant, Westover Construction, Inc., RDA Associates LLC,
has requested that the Town vacate a portion of the Wildfire Road right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, vacation of the portion of unimproved Wildfire Road as proposed is
necessary for the redesign and reconfiguration of Wildfire Road, in order to develop the
Wildfire Homes Subdivision project as proposed; and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to dedicate a new, redesigned section of
Wildfire Road right-of-way to serve the Wildfire development, through recordation of the
Wildfire Homes Subdivision Final Plat; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has determined that it is in the best interest of
the Town to permanently vacate a portion of the Wildfire Road right-of-way as more fully
set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado hereby
authorizes the vacation of a portion of the Wildfire Road Right-of-Way as set forth on
Exhibit A and incorporated herein and by reference.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days
after its adoption and publication, subject to any applicable provisions within the
associated Wildfire Preannexation Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,
Colorado, this day of , 2019.
TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
Town Clerk
I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the
Board of Trustees on the day of , 2019 and published in a
newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the ________
day of _________, 2019, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado.
Town Clerk
41
Site Location
DRY GULCH RDBIG
T
H
O
M
P
S
O
N
A
V
E
RAV
E
N
A
V
E
WILDFIRE RD
LONE PINE DRLAKEFRONT STDEER P A TH CT
RAVEN CIRELK TRAIL CTHIGH PINE DR
NORTH RIDGE LN
NOR
T
H
L
A
K
E
A
V
E
RED TAIL HAWK DR
OLYMPIAN LN
GRAY HAWK CT
COY
O
T
E
R
U
N
GRANDESTATESDRSOAR ING CIR
BEACH LN CRABAPPLE LN
MACCRACKEN LN
G R A N D E S T A T E S DR
0 250 500
Feet -Town of Estes ParkCommunity Development
Printed: 8/8/2019
Created By: Jeff Woeber
Project Name:
Project Description:
Right-of-Way Vacation
Portion of Wildfire RoadFor Illustrative Purposes Only
42
NameofPrimaryContactPersoniOn4tL.ie/c,,/07SerEmailOry..r...zria*,a.4’LPrimaryContactPersonisFOwnerFApplicantKOonsultantlEngineerLiFTiliiiiDigitalcopiesPDFemailedtoplanning@estes.orgApplicationFeeSubmittalDate:ESTESVALLEYDEVELOPMENTAPPLICATIONFPre-Application(check applicationtype(s))FDevelopmentPlanFSpecialReviewFPreliminarySubdivisionPlatFFinalSubdivisionPlatFMinorSubdivisionPlatFAmendedPlat,FBoundaryLineAdjustthentE’RezoningPetitionOther:PleasespecifyProjectNameProjectDescription°rojectAddressegalDescriptionParcelID#W’.’tc/fneiCIOUFCondominiumMapFPreliminaryMaprFinalMapFSupplementalMapiZait/ntaJeanA/Ase’t•111—7crnn,&totcL00000476Lar,on.n‘7(ZqLoCLotSize(.z3,‘Acr-s$ExistingLandUseProposedLandUseExistingWater ServiceProposedWaterServiceExistingSanitarySewerServiceProposedSanitarySewerServiceS,e.t\4netsir.tWaw4st,CflSCr.IXTownTownExistingGasServiceNoneNoneExistingZoningFWeIIFFWeIIFFEPSDFEPSDFOtherFXcelFOther(specify)______FOther(specify)______&UTSDrSepticUTSDFSepticFNoneFNoneProposedZoningeThF.TRIfl(]IiN[•]ISee12.ft.2.e’”StatementofIntentFF3copies.24”x36”(folded)ofplatlplansF1copy,1l”X17’reducedsetofplat/plansFRefertotheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodeAppendixBforapplicationsubmittalrequirements.TownofEstesPark.P.O.Box1200e.170MacGregorAvenue.e.EstesPark,CO80517CommunityDevelopment DepartmentPhone:970-577-3721.Email:plonnlng@estes.org.ewww.estes.org/CommunityDevelopmentRevised2017.01.09Kr43
RecordOwner(s):i4r.q.Oa’etnp*t.-4-LL.cMailingAddressjgi,flLJ.flr..j4Phone97o-g-j—ttzEmailIt..,(.j.jI,.tar(,Sant-(c>AsContactInformationApplicantVs..ft4rMailingAddresstowstsL.LVs’cp24Phone’5.-cnrEmailp..,,C/.r.,4.’1...4.crNr..q./cA.4ConsultantlEngineer)./euI,j0MailingAddressiasa.0aPhone--EmailGory,%ikw,ij,’ø.ert&.L.,,,;4ri/..hL,rveo-.i40MINERALRIGHTCERTIFICATIONArticle65.5ofTitle24oftheColoradoRevisedStatutesrequiresapplicantsforDevelopmentPlans, SpecialReviews,Rezoning.PreliminaryandFinalSubdivisionHats,MinorSubdivisionPlatsifcreatinganewlotandPreliminaryandFinalCondominiumMapstoprovidenoticeoftheapplicationandinitialpublichearingtoallmineralestateownerswherethesurfaceestateandthemineralestatehavebeensevered.Noticemustbegiven30dayspriortothefirsthearingonanapplicationfordevelopmentandmeetthestatutoryrequirements.IherebycertifythattheprovisionsofSection24-65.5-103CR5havebeenmet.Names:RecordOwnerPLEASEPRINT:ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:Signatures:RecordOwnerDate___________________ApplicantDateOWNER&APPLICANTCERTIFICATIONAsOwner,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandIamtherecordowneroftheproperty.IAsApplicant,Icertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledge andinfilingtheapplicationIamactingwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftherecordowner(s)oftheproperty.IgrantpermissionforTownofEstesParkemployees,reviewingagencystaff,PlanningCommissioners,membersoftheTownBoardofTrustees,orLarimerCountyCommissionerswithproperidentificationaccesstomypropertyduring thereviewofthisapplication.IacknowledgeIhavereceivedtheEstesValleyDevelopmentReviewApplicationScheduleandamawarethatfailuretomeetthedeadlinesshownonsaidschedulemayresultinmyapplicationbeynigdelayedor anyapprovalof myapplicationbecomingnullandvoid.Names:RecordOwnerPLEASEPRINT:ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:Signatures:,RecordOwner(44itj..kZtptICDate5/s//iiApplicant______________________Date___________Revised20110109KT44
RecordOwner(s)MailingAddressL)4%LaJer4-n..l-.c4J,i.c.I1C’L..s’AC-r.tZW(Phone47o#11Email1J4’S-.JtfLQa.c4..CnApplicantContactInformationMailingAddressPhoneEmailConsultantlEngineerMailingAddressPhoneEmailMINERALRIGHT CERTIFICATIONArticle65.5ofTitle24oftheColoradoRevisedStatutesrequiresapplicantsforDevelopment Plans,SpecialReviews,Rezoning,PreliminaryandFinalSubdivisionPlats,MinorSubdivisionPlatsifcreatinganewlot,andPreliminaryandFinalCondominiumMapstoprovide noticeoftheapplication andinitialpublichearingtoallmineralestateownerswherethesurfaceestateandthemineralestatehavebeensevered.Noticemustbegiven30dayspriortothefirsthearingonan applicationfordevelopmentandmeetthestatutoryrequirements.Iherebycertifythat theprovisionsofSection24-65.5-103CRShave beenmet.Names:RecordOwner PLEASEPRINT:ApplicantPLEASEPRINTSignatures:RecordOwnerDate___________________ApplicantDateOWNER&APPLICANTCERTIFICATIONAsOwner,Icertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedare trueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandIam therecordowneroftheproperty.frAsApplicant,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandinfilingtheapplicationIamactingwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftherecord owner(s)oftheproperty.IgrantpermissionforTownofEstesParkemployees,reviewingagencystaff,PlanningCommissioners,membersoftheTownBoardofTrustees,or LarimerCountyCommissionerswithproperidentificationaccesstomypropertyduringthereviewofthisapplication.IacknowledgeIhavereceivedtheEstesValleyDevelopmentReviewApplicationScheduleandamawarethat failuretomeetthedeadlinesshownonsaidschedulemayresultinmyapplicationbeyingdelayedoranyapprovalofmyapplicationbecomingnullandvoid.Names:RecordOwner PLEASEPRINT:ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:Signatures:OwnerPklt5,aU)es-uerDate5/31119APPlicant/ft&-Dates/at1//Revised2017.01.09fl45
RecordOwner(s).D1S.Ass0a%—cc£.LcMailingAddressrc2c(Z.(.ttnU..a4nLa35tPhone2.Aid%4flr+I%fl‘‘tq70—lto-ic.tCContactInformationApplicantMailingAddressPhoneEmailConsultantlEngineeMailingAddressPhoneEmailMINERALRIGHT CERTIFICATIONArticle65.5ofTitle24oftheColoradoRevisedStatutesrequiresapplicantsforDevelopment Plans,SpecialReviews,Rezoning,PreliminaryandFinalSubdivisionPlats,MinorSubdivisionPlatsifcreatinganewlot,andPreliminaryandFinalCondominiumMapstoprovidenoticeoftheapplicationandinitialpublichearingtoallmineralestateownerswherethesurfaceestateandthe mineralestatehavebeensevered.Noticemustbegiven30dayspriortothefirsthearingonanapplicationfordevelopmentandmeetthestatutoryrequirements.IherebycertifythattheprovisionsofSection 24-65.5-103CRShavebeenmet.Names:RecordOwnerPLEASEPRINTRtcA,oa’bALL4zi±-ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:Signatures:Owner)4f’t4’49..zze44.tfDate6ApplicantDateOWNER&APPLICANTCERTIFICATIONAsOwner.IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandIamtherecordowneroftheproperty.AsApplicant,IcertifytheinformationandexhibitsherewithsubmittedaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandinfilingtheapplicationIam actingwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftherecordowner(s)oftheproperty.IgrantpermissionforTownofEstesParkemployees,reviewingagencystaff,PlanningCommissioners)membersoftheTownBoardofTrustees,or Larimer CountyCommissionerswithproperidentilicationaccesstomypropertyduringthereviewofthisapplication.IacknowledgeIhavereceivedtheEstesValleyDevelopmentReviewApplicationScheduleandamawarethatfailuretomeetthedeadlinesshownonsaidschedulemayresultinmyapplicationbeyingdelayedoranyapprovalofmyapplicationbecomingnullandvoid.Names:RecordOwner PLEASEPRINT:‘t’Jb’111114zt1ApplicantPLEASEPRINT:Signatures:Owner.Zt.tI_W’4:::9.25LL2fYDate_________________ApplicantDate____________________Revised2011.01.09K46
LEGALDESCRIPTIONAPORTIONOFTHESOUTHWESTQUARTEROFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION20,TOWNSHIPSNORTH,RANGE72WESTOFTHE6TH.PRINCIPALMERIDIAN,WHICHISTHEWESTERLY±705WILDFIREROADRIGHT-OF-WAY,THELEGALDESCRIPTIONOFWHICHISRECORDEDATBOOK1899PAGE114,ANDBEINGMOREPARTICULARLY DESCRIBEDASFOLLOWS:CONSIDERINGTHEWESTLINEOFTHESW1/4OFTHENW1/4OFSAIDSECTION20ASBEARINGN01°35’24”E AND WITHTHEFOLLOW[NGBEARINGSBEINGRELATIVETHERETO:COMMENCINGATA31/411G.L.O.BRASSCAPSTAMPEDS19/S20,1953WHICHISTHEWEST1/4OFSAIDSECTION20;THENCEFOLLOWINGTHEWESTLINEOFSAIDSW1/4OFTHENW1/4OFSECTION20N0I°35’24”EADISTANCEOF311.61TOTHESOUTHWEST CORNEROFTHEWILDFIRE ROADRIGHT-OF-WAYASMONUMENTEDBYA#4REBARWITHPLASTICCAP6499ANDPOINTPOINTOFBEGINNING:THENCECONTINUINGALONGSAIDWESTLINENOI°35’24”EADISTANCEOF59.99’TOTHENORTHWESTCORNEROFSAIDRIGHT-OF-WAYASMONUMENTEDBYA#4REBARWITHPLASTICCAP6499;THENCELEAVINGSAIDWESTLINEANDPROCEEDINGS89°52’59”EADISTANCEOF9.22’:THENCEALONGASON-TANGENTCURVETOTHERIGHTHAVINGANARCLENGTHOF92.75’,ARADIUSOF50.00,ANDACHORDOFS89°52’59”E80.01’;THENCE589°52’59”EADISTANCEOF273.10;THENCES89°52’59”EADISTANCEOF303.54’TOA#4REBARWITHPLASTICCAP 6499;THENCEWITHANON-TANGENTCURVETURNINGTOTHE RIGHT HAVINGANARCLENGTHOF38.50’,ARADIUSOF1030.00’,ANDACHORDOF588°5i’ll“E38.50’;THENCES00°07’2I‘WADISTANCEOF 60.14’TOTHESOUTHLINEOFSAIDRIGHT-OF-WAY;THENCEWITHANON-TANGENTCURVETOTHELEFT HAVINGANARCLENGTHOF38.53’,ARADIUSOF970.00’,ANDACHORDOFN88°47’05”W38.53’TOA#4REBARWITHILLEGIBLEPLASTICCAP;THENCEN89°52’20”WADISTANCEOF576.61’;THENCEALONGANON-TANGENTCURVETOTHERIGHT HAVINGANARCLENGTHOF92.75’,ARADIUSOF50.00’,ACHORDOFN89°5220”W80.01’;THENCEN89°52’20”WADISTANCEOF1036’MOREORLESSTOTHEPOINTOFBEGINNING.CONTAINING1.023ACRES.COUNTYOFLARIMER.STATEOFCOLORADO.1043Fish CreekRoad•EstesPark, CO80517•970-586-9388•E-mail:infovanhornengineering.com47
48
1
PROCEDURE FOR LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING
Applicable items include: Annexation, Amended Plats, Boundary Line Adjustments, Development
Plans, Rezoning, Special Review, Subdivision
1.MAYOR.
The next order of business will be the public hearing on PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION ITEM #1.C. FINAL PLAT, WILDFIRE HOMES SUBDIVISION, WILDFIRE
ROAD, WESTOVER CONSTRUCTION, INC., RDA ASSOCIATES LLC,
CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK, INC./APPLICANTS.
At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the information
presented during the public hearing, from the Town staff, from the
Applicant, public comment, and written comments received on the
application.
Has any Trustee had any ex-parte communications concerning this
application(s) which are not part of the Board packet.
Any member of the Board may ask questions at any stage of the public
hearing which may be responded to at that time.
Mayor declares the Public Hearing open.
2.STAFF REPORT.
Review the staff report.
Review any conditions for approval not in the staff report.
3.APPLICANT.
The applicant makes their presentation.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT.
Any person will be given an opportunity to address the Board concerning the
application. All individuals must state their name and address for the record.
Comments from the public are requested to be limited to three minutes per
person.
49
2
5. REBUTTAL.
The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal that is limited to or in response to
statements or questions made after their presentation. No new matters may
be submitted.
6. MAYOR.
Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard
to the application which are not in the Board packet.
Ask the Board of Trustees if there are any further questions concerning the
application.
Indicate that all reports, statements, exhibits, and written communications
presented will be accepted as part of the record.
Declare the public hearing closed.
Request Board consider a motion.
7. SUGGESTED MOTION.
Suggested motion(s) are set forth in the staff report.
8. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION.
Discussion by the Board on the motion.
9. VOTE ON THE MOTION.
Vote on the motion or consideration of another action.
50
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa
Board of Trustees
Through: Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner
Date: August 13, 2019
RE: Final Plat, Wildfire Homes Subdivision, Wildfire Road, Westover Construction,
Inc., RDA Associates LLC, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park Inc.,/Applicants
(Mark all that apply)
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________
QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO
Objective:
Conduct a public hearing and make a decision on a Subdivision Final Plat request to subdivide
four parcels into 2 blocks with 43 lots.
Present Situation:
Currently, the subject 16.082 acres consists of 4 separate parcels. Existing improvements
(Westover Construction) on parcel addressed 1753 Wildfire will remain and will be placed on its
own lot to serve Crossroads Ministry. The existing structure addressed 1851 Wildfire Road and
the Crossroads Ministry building addressed 851 Dry Gulch Road will be demolished to make
room for proposed development. The remaining acreage is currently vacant.
The Preliminary Plat for Wildfire Homes Subdivision was processed prior to this Final Plat. The
Preliminary Plat was approved by the Town Board on July 9, 2019. The Preliminary Plat
involves review of access, utilities, topography and slope, drainage, existing structures and
improvements, etc. The Final Plat delineates the lot lines, with easements, required
dedications, signature blocks for approval and ownership, etc. The Final Plat is congruent with
and fulfills requirements set by the Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat, if approved by the Town
Board, would be signed by the Mayor and others and recorded in the land records of the
Larimer County Clerk and Recorder.
Proposal:
Applicant requests approval of a Final Plat to subdivide 4 parcels into 2 blocks with 43 total lots.
14 lots will be for detached single-family homes, 26 lots will be for townhomes, 2 lots will be for
condominium projects, and 1 lot will be dedicated for an office use benefiting Crossroads
Ministry. Also included are 10 outlots dedicated for open space, utilities, access, and drainage.
The 14 detached single-family lots will range in size from .210 acres for those zoned R-
Residential to .432 acres for those lots zoned E-Estate. Reduction in minimum lot sizes for
51
single-family subdivisions is permitted within EVDC §4.3.D (Table 4-3) with the provision of at
least 15% dedicated private open space. The proposal meets this requirement.
Additionally, 26 individual townhome lots are proposed. The townhome lots are located in the
center of the subdivision to allow for buffering by the single family lots on the perimeter. The
application proposes townhome lots ranging in size from .056 acres to .07 acres (2,439.36 -
3,049.2 square feet). Pursuant to EVDC §10.5.H.7, individual townhome units may be
constructed on smaller lots, subject to approval by the Decision Making Body. As the minimum
lot size for the RM zoning district is 5,400 square feet, the Town Board may approve smaller lot
sizes as proposed. The proposed townhome lots and building envelopes adhere to all
dimensional and density standards as required by Code.
Lot 17 is proposed to utilize the existing Westover Construction office building to benefit
Crossroads Ministry. The current improvements and proposed lot dimensions meet lot
standards imposed by the O-Office zoning district.
The 2 remaining lots, Lot 1 and Lot 16 are proposed to house multi-family condominium
developments. Lot 1 is proposed to contain a 72-unit workforce condominium development and
Lot 16 is proposed to contain a 16-unit workforce condominium development. These
development plans have been provided for review and may be found on the Town website
under “Current Applications”.
An associated “Right-of-Way Vacation” application is being processed, and is on the same
August 13, 2019 Town Board agenda as this final plat. This is to vacate a portion of the
existing, platted Wildfire Road Right-of-Way, in order to redesign this portion of that road to
move forward with the Wildfire project as proposed. The redesigned Right-of-Way is being
newly dedicated on the final plat.
A waiver is requested to permit a shared driveway to access up to 5 single-family units (Lots 2-
6). While the EVDC encourages shared driveways, Appendix D restricts service to no more than
4 single-family units.
The Wildfire project property is to be annexed into the Town of Estes Park, with the annexation
approval contingent on the various required approvals for the project.
Review Process:
EVDC §3.9.E. All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and
criteria set forth in Chapter 10, “Subdivision Standards,” and all other applicable provisions of
Code.
Review Criteria:
Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the
standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues
relevant to any particular project.
1. Buildings and Lots. Existing improvements will conform to applicable density and
dimensional standards of newly created lots. Proposed lots and outlots conform to
zoning standards and applicable subdivision standards set forth in the EVDC.
The proposed townhome lot sizes must be approved by the Decision Making Body
pursuant to EVDC §10.5.
2. Water. Water is available to serve the development and all Town and District
requirements have been met.
52
Participation in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal
Subdistrict is required. The District has approved the applicant’s petition for inclusion on
May 9, 2019.
3. Fire Protection. Emergency access routes have been provided, which meet Fire District
standards. The Estes Valley Fire District has no objections.
4. Electric. All new electric will be installed underground per EVDC §10.5 and appropriate
utility easements are proposed. The Estes Park Power and Communications Division
has no objections to this proposal.
5. Sanitary Sewer. Sanitary sewer is to be provided by the Upper Thompson Sanitation
District. All district requirements have been met with this proposal.
6. Stormwater Drainage. Drainage facilities and related easements are proposed with this
subdivision. Public Works has no objection.
7. Access. Adequate and safe access is provided with this proposal. Public works has no
objection to the road infrastructure as presented. Please see Agency Comments, below.
A waiver request is included to allow up to 5 single-family units to access via a shared
driveway.
8. Sidewalk/Trail. An 8’ multi-modal trail is proposed with this subdivision to link with the
existing trail along the west side of Dry Gulch Road.
9. Parking. Parking requirements set forth in EVDC §7.11 have been met with this
application.
10. Comprehensive Plan. This project conforms to goals and policies within the
Comprehensive Plan. Specifically as follows:
5.1 – Encourage a variety of housing types and pricing.
5.2 – Encourage housing for permanent residents of all sectors of the community
that is integrated and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods.
5.5 – Provide for mixed-use developments which integrate commercial, housing,
employment, and service needs.
5.7 – Identify affordable housing opportunities on an ongoing basis.
5.9 – Support the creation of public and private funding sources for affordable
housing.
5.10 – Establish a linkage between new development and the provision of affordable
housing.
8.4 The Town and County will encourage redevelopment and infill as a primary tool
to create a compact community and to prevent sprawl.
Agency Comments:
The subdivision (Preliminary and Final Plat) went through an extensive review process, and
review agency comments were addressed through the process leading to this final plat. The
Town Public Works Department has submitted a memo with requirements and stipulations, see
Attachment 4. Two stipulations of approval are recommended, regarding Final Construction
Plans and the guaranteed completion of required improvements, as follows:
53
1. No Final Plat shall be recorded unless Final Construction Plans have been received and
approved by both Town of Estes Park and, where applicable, by Larimer County (when
proposed improvements cross into their jurisdiction). The Final Construction Plans shall
address Preliminary Plat conditions detailed in the Public Works comments dated April
27, 2019.
2. No Final Plat shall be recorded unless improvements required by Chapter 10 of the
Estes Valley Development Code have been installed, or the installation of the same
have been guaranteed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10.
Advantages:
Allows for a subdivision consistent with the Estes Valley Development Code.
Provides additional housing for permanent residents of the community in a variety of
housing options.
Provides for much needed workforce housing to benefit residents of the Estes Valley.
Disadvantages:
Increase in traffic in the immediate area.
Action Recommended:
The Estes Valley Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary
Plat, which was then approved by the Town Board on July 9, 2019. Final Plats are not subject
to review by the Planning Commission, per the EVDC.
Staff recommends approval of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision Final Plat.
Finance/Resource Impact:
None
Level of Public Interest
Medium: Public comments have been received, expressing no objection, and also pointing out
“disadvantages” to the Wildfire project. The overall project is of relatively high interest for the
Town of Estes Park.
All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications.
Sample Motion:
I move that the Town Board of Trustees approve the Wildfire Homes Subdivision Final Plat,
according to findings as presented.
I move that the Town Board of Trustees deny the Wildfire Homes Subdivision Final Plat, finding
that [state findings for denial].
I move to continue the Wildfire Homes Subdivision Final Plat to the next regularly scheduled
meeting. (State reasons for continuance.)
Attachments:
1. Application
2. Vicinity Map
3. Statement of Intent
4. Public Works Comments
5. Final Plat
54
jSubmiUaI Date:
Pre-Application (check application type(s))
Development Plan
Special Review
Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Final Subdivision Plat
F Minor Subdivision Plat
r Amended Plat
F Boundary Line Adjustment
Rezoning Petition
Other:Please specify
F Condominium Map
Preliminary Map
Final Map
Supplemental Map
‘Project Name ‘jt)\AP’iyp -\4pfl-pz.S3SAavi<lcyr
Project Description
1Project Address 1’?t \L\\i.ife_,‘PA
‘Legal Description Mk S20 TSw 1flZL
Parcel ID#f’j3\tD-S DOOo’5 StOor-nd7’aoooogjn
LotSize 13.92 flrcoc
Existing Land Use
Proposed Land Use
Existing Water Service
Proposed Water Service
Existing Sanitary Sewer Service
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service
Existing Gas Service
Existing Zoning
Lonruc S\\€i40(\Name of Primary Contact Person
Email ftQetr\c’c\.Ccw-
Primary Contact Person is Owner
J
7c Statement of Intent
,,Y 3 copies,24”x 36’(folded)of platlplans
1 copy,11”X 17’reduced set of plat/plans
‘Refer to the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for application submittal requirements.
Septic
Septic
ESTES VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
b\?
Town
K Town
‘XWell
Well
None
None
EPSD
EPSD
Xcel
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
UTSD
UTSD
Other None
Proposed Zoning ‘kin
None
F Applicant
q9J Qfç gyç cçj cw c
,P(Consultant/Engineer Jçjc k
Digital copies PDF emailed to pIanningestes.org
Application Fee
Town of Estes Park -P.O.Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue .e.Estes Park,CC 80517
Communify Development Department
Phone:970-577-3721 .e.Email:planning@estes.ocg -e www.estes.org/Communllybevelopment
Revised 2017.OT09 Kr
55
Record Owner(s)
Mailing Address
Phone
Email
Applicant
Contact Information
Mailing Address
Phone
Email
Consultant/Engineer
Mailing Address
Phone
Email
MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION
Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans,Special Reviews,Rezoning,
Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats,Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot,and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to
provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate
have been severed.Notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory
requirements.
I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-1 03 CR8 have been met.
Names:
Record Oer PLEASE PRINT:
Applicant PLEASE PRINT:/J’r1t..4L_24rctx4—
Signatures:/
Reco Owner
A/
OWNER &APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
0 As Owner,I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner
of the property.
0 As Applicant,I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and in filing the
application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the record owner(s)of the property.
0 (grant permission for Town of Estes Park employees,reviewing agency staff,Planning commissioners,members of the Town Board of
Trustees,or Larimer County Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application.
0 I acknowledge I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and am aware that failure to meet the deadlines
shown on said schedule may result in my application baying delayed or any approval of my application becoming null and void.
Names
Record Owner PLEASE PRINT:4/fr’t’k
Applicant
_____________________________________________
Signatures:/
Record Owner
_________
Date -/hj 7 t
Applicant
__________
Date /f/7
7-
Revised 20 17.01 .09
56
1631 1659 1739 1759 1821
1741
1740
1661
1720
1740
1730
851
1825
730 1761 1821
1820176017201660
631
651
721
731
741
1771
1765
176117411721
1660 1740 1776
1810
1820
1830
1840
1860
17201660
1719
611
17531851
1741
1747
1732
177916331655
1520
1508
1504
1500
610
1725
1760
561
1901
2000
863
1715
1629
1680
1681 1717 1817
1903 1913
1760 1770 1780 1790
1800
1755 1775 1795 1815 1835 1855 1875 18951735171516951675165516351615
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900
1775 1773
1950
RAVEN AVE
HIGH PINE DR
RAVEN CIR
RAVEN CT
NORTH RIDGE LNGRAY HAWK CTWILDFIRE RD
DRYGULCHRDPTARMIGAN LN
GRAY HAWK CT
LONEPINEDRRED TAIL HAWK DRRED TAIL HAWK DR
RAVEN CIRRAVEN
C
I
RC R A B A P P L E LNCRABAPPLELNSOA RI NG CIR
SOARING CIR
P T A R M I G A N TRL
PTARMIGAN TRL
OLYMPIAN LNOLYMPIAN LN
This draft document was prepared for internal use by the
Town of Estes Park, CO. The Town makes no claim as to
the accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon.
Due to security concerns, The Town requests that you
do not post this document on the internet or otherwise
make it available to persons unknown to you.
0125250
Feet
1 in = 231 ft±Town of Estes Park
Community Development
Wildfire Homes
Printed: 5/29/2019
Created By: Brittany Hathaway
Subject Properties
57
SUPPLEMENT TO
WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT
May 21, 2019
Applicants submit this Supplement to the Wildfire Statement of Intent for the purpose of
clarifying information and explaining revisions to the pending development applications
made as a result of the Staff and agency review:
1. The four Properties that make up the Wildfire Annexation are surrounding by
property within the Town limits and the right-of-way for Dry Gulch Road, but are not an
enclave under State statute.
2. The Townhome Subdivision for the Divide Townhomes at Wildfire is now a part
of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision. The Divide Townhomes are proposed to be
constructed on 26 lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size pursuant to EVDC §
10.5.H.7.c.
3. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision is accompanied by an application for vacation of
approximately the west 705 feet of the existing Wildfire Road right-of-way; the right-of-
way vacation is proposed to occur prior to the dedication of right-of-way for a different
alignment of Wildfire Road on the Wildfire Homes Subdivision plat.
4. The Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire includes 72
multi-family units of workforce housing; the 72 units include the 42 units allowed as the
Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC plus 30 bonus units (or 71% of
the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus for workforce housing pursuant to EVDC §
11.4.D). Because 100% of the 72 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce
housing, the 9 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height
allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC.
5. The Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire includes 16
multi-family units of workforce housing; the 16 units equal two times (or 200%) the
Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC as allowed pursuant to the
Maximum Permitted Density Bonus provisions of EVDC § 11.4.D. Because 100% of the
16 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 2 buildings will be 38
feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the
RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC.
6. The Development Plans for The Meadow Condominiums and The Divide
Condominiums are both accompanied with applications for preliminary subdivision plats
pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H.
58
7. A restrictive covenant for the purpose of assuring the long-term availability of the
workforce housing units in The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide
Condominiums As required by EVDC § 10.4.E.4., will be reviewed by the Town Board
with the preliminary subdivision plats for The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide
Condominiums.
8. Parcel C is included within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District (“NCWCD”) and the Municipal Subdistrict. The owners of Parcels
A, B and D consent to the inclusion of their Properties into the NCWCD and, as
applicable, into the Municipal Subdistrict, and such owners have executed and
submitted petitions for such inclusions. The NCWCD approved the petitions on May 9,
2019.
9. A preannexation agreement has been submitted and is under review by the
Town Attorney. The Wildfire Preannexation Agreement will be on the Town Board’s
agenda the same night as the public hearing on the Wildfire Homes Annexation.
10. The previously requested waiver 1) has been revised in response to comments
from Public Works dated April 27, 2019, to increase the turn lane redirect taper length
from 160 feet to 266 feet in length.
59
WILDFIRE
STATEMENT OF INTENT
For Submittal on 4-18-19
BACKGROUND
Westover Construction, Inc. (“Westover”), Wildfire Development, LLC (“Wildfire”), RDA
Associates, LLC (“RDA”) and Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. (“Crossroads”),
(referred to collectively herein as the “Petitioners”) are the owners of the Properties
described on the four exhibits attached hereto:
Exhibit A (“Parcel A” or the “Westover Property”);
Exhibit B (“Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property”);
Exhibit C (“Parcel C” or the “RDA Property”); and
Exhibit D (“Parcel D” or the “Crossroads Property”).
The Properties are located in the northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 5 North,
Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., lying west of Dry Gulch Road, about ½ mile north of US
34 in the North End Planning Area of the Estes Valley. Although once on the very edge
of the Town, the Properties are surrounded by residential uses of various types and
densities within the Town limits. South of the Properties is an Estate (“E”) zoned
neighborhood (1/2 acre minimum) called Lone Pine Acres which was annexed to Estes
Park and developed in the 1960’s. To the southwest is the Ranch Meadows
Condominiums in the RM Multi-Family Residential zone district (“RM”) of the Town, and
to the west is the Reserve in the E-1 Estate (“E-1”) zone. North of the Properties is
Vista Ridge, an approximately 6-acre Estes Park Housing Authority project of 59
affordable and market rate condominiums, and The Neighborhood, an approximately
10-acre subdivision that includes small single-family lots and the Salud Family Health
Center on Dry Gulch Road. Just north of The Neighborhood are the Talons Pointe
Apartments and the Falcon Ridge Apartments and Townhomes, both of which are also
Estes Park Housing Authority affordable housing projects with a combined 89 units, and
the Good Samaritan Society – Estes Park Village, a senior community with 46 paired
homes, a 34-unit apartment complex and a 24-bed assisted living center.
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
Petitioners desire to annex the Properties to the Town, and then rezone and subdivide it
for the development of a variety of single family homes, townhomes and condominiums
to provide additional housing options in the Estes Valley in a manner that is compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, the applications submitted are as
follows:
1. Wildfire Homes Annexation of all four of the Properties, a total of 16.802 acres.
60
2
2. Wildfire Homes Rezone from the current zonings of: O Office (“O”), E Estate
(“E”), RE Rural Estate (“RE”) and CH Heavy Commercial (“CH”), to a
combination of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), R Single Family Residential (“R”),
and RM Multi-Family Residential (“RM”).
3. Wildfire Homes Subdivision is proposed to include 14 single family lots (six ½-
acre lots in the E zone, eight ¼-acre lots in the R zone), a townhome project
(The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire which is noted as Block 2 of this subdivision),
two lots for workforce housing condominium projects (The Meadow
Condominiums at Wildfire and the Divide Condominiums at Wildfire), 6 outlots for
drainage and other purposes, and one lot in the O zone for the relocation of
Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. The existing commercial construction
operation now located on Parcel B will be relocated to a location outside of the
Properties.
4. Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire (9 buildings, 8
units/building) on Lot 1 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current
EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units.
5. Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire (2 buildings, 8
units/building) on Lot 16 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current
EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units..
6. Townhome Subdivision for The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire a subdivision
of Block 2 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision into 26 townhome lots meeting the
current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units
Petitioners believe that the housing they intend to provide is compatible with the
surrounding residential neighborhoods and needed to help provide additional housing
options for the residents of the Estes Valley.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The units shall be eligible for the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus (Sec. 11.4.D) if at
least one (1) resident in each housing unit annually submits an affidavit, including a
copy of a W-2 form, to the Town certifying that the resident is employed within the Estes
Park School District R-3 Boundary Map). The Wildfire project is a 128-Unit
development of approximately 16 acres. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision will create six
Outlots (A,B,C,D,E and F) to provide transitions between internal density and zoning
changes. The total acreage of these Outlots is approximately 1.06 acres.
Annexation of the Properties is also proposed. Currently, the limits of the Town of Estes
Park surround the Properties and the perimeter of the Wildfire Homes Annexation as
proposed is 4611 feet long. Right-of-Ways are proposed as necessary on both Wildfire
Road and Dry Gulch Road for dedication of access to the proposed development. At
61
3
this time, there is no additional right of way width proposed on Wildfire Road, nor Dry
Gulch Road (although it appears that the recently constructed sidewalk along the west
side of Dry Gulch Road may be within the subject property limits). Additional right of
way may be pursued on Dry Gulch Road with the design of the north bound left turn
lane that has been determined to not be required (by LCUASS Standards), but is
proposed to be constructed for safety. Utility Easements are also dedicated for the
current utility needs as well as future needs associated with the buildout of this plan.
At buildout, the housing units in this development will be sold individually and used as
single family housing. HOA(s) are being formed and Covenants also formed for the
proposed use and care of the common spaces and improvements. The right of way for
Wildfire Road and the internal looping road will be dedicated to the Town for
maintenance.
ACCESS:
Currently the southern 9 acre lot (Parcel C) is vacant and has no internal roads. Parcel
C is adjacent to the Wildfire Road right of way for access as well as adjacent to the
internal road in Lone Pine Subdivision (North Ridge Lane). No daily access to North
Ridge Lane is proposed and only emergency access is proposed there. Emergency
access is also proposed at the southeast corner of the internal loop road. All lots that
are proposed have frontage on a public street or front on a private access easement
(Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5). Outlot B on the west side of the loop road is also for access that
would (in the future) possibly connect to properties to the west in the Reserve
Subdivision. This area adjacent to the west side of the Wildfire Homes Development is
in a Conservation Easement that does not allow roads; therefore, no physical road is
proposed. The ground there is relatively flat and can be accessed in an absolute
emergency. The Traffic Impact Study (attached with this submittal) has shown that
there is not a requirement for the left turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road.
This development has planned for that and it is indicated as proposed for construction
with this submittal. A preliminary design for that improvement is also included herein.
It is a somewhat complicated improvement given the alignment of the current road, the
large storm sewer catch basin in the southwest quadrant, and the steep (retaining wall)
slope to the east with the floodplain of Dry Gulch Creek nearby. Additional right of way
is not felt absolutely necessary, but would be helpful to decrease the cost of that
possible improvement. A Traffic Memo has been submitted and the formal Traffic
Impact Study is also now included. Fire truck access is adequate for the appropriate
wheel base truck length and is shown specifically on the attached development sheets.
The steepest new internal main road profile grade is less than an 11% slope which
meets the EVDC. As mentioned above, emergency access loops are also proposed to
mitigate the possible long cul-de-sac concern.
Pedestrian access is provided with a looping sidewalk paralleling both sides of the
internal looping road as well as a detached sidewalk generally following the south side
of Wildfire Road leading to the large sidewalk on the west side of Dry Gulch Road.
Bicycle traffic is expected to share the road system in this subdivision as no individual
bicycle lanes are proposed.
62
4
OPEN SPACE:
This project includes six Outlots and other areas of open space as shown on the
attached designs. There are no outstanding or noticeable specific features on this site
(like wetlands, or rock outcrops, or significant trees).
UTILITIES:
This property is currently adjacent to all the main utilities. The main lines will be tied into
and extended for use by the proposed condominiums, Townhomes and single family
lots.
ELECTRIC:
Contact has been made with the Town of Estes Park Light & Power Department as well
as an Electric Engineer. The current plan is to come off of the existing three phase
power along the west line with drops to transformers to serve the western portions of
this subdivision. All proposed electric lines will be buried. The same plan is true for the
southern line which is a secondary line. Transformers are shown on the electric utility
plan to serve the units along the southern side of the development with all buried lines.
There has been some preliminary discussion about burying the lines along the south
side of the subdivision (with help from the southern adjoining lot owners in Lone Pine
Subdivision). The poles and service lines along the south line are on or near the Lone
Pine lots. Should a new buried power line be completed, agreements with southern lot
owners would be needed to re-connect their service lines. A 20’ Utility and Drainage
Easement is proposed along this south line within the Wildfire Homes Subdivision for
this utility improvement if an agreement comes together. If an agreement cannot be
made, then the plan as outlined above will move forward.
WATER:
A water main exists to the north of this development within the Neighborhood
Subdivision and the new main lines through this development will connect to that water
main (proposed here between Lots 15 and 16). This subdivision will include a looping
water main running west to east to connect to the existing main in Wildfire Road east of
the circle road. This connection will help to balance pressures in this area of Town.
SEWER:
Upper Thompson Sanitation District controls the sewer lines in this area of Estes Park
and gravity flow main lines are proposed in easily accessible locations to serve the
future units and connect to the existing sewer main line in Wildfire Road east of the
circle road.
PARKING:
The EVDC parking quantities are proposed or exceeded with this development. Internal
parking is provided on the ground floor of the 8-plexes (8 in each building), and
additional outside parking is also proposed. Code required parking for the proposed
multi-family and townhome units collectively is 239 spaces, while 251 spaces are being
provided. The Crossroads land use currently has 22 spaces and operates acceptably.
The proposed Crossroads site is planned to have 25 spaces.
63
5
STORMWATER:
Given that this property is close to a river (Dry Gulch Creek), and there are established
roadside ditches along Wildfire Road, the main drainage changes are higher on the lot
in the area where stormwater features are not currently present. A Preliminary
Drainage Report meeting the requirements of the Larimer County Stormwater
Management Manual is included with this submittal. Also, two relatively large detention
ponds (with outlet structures) are proposed to the north and south of the proposed
looping road. These detention ponds provide open space for the development and also
hold back the difference between historic runoff and the increased runoff from the
increased hard surfacing associated with this proposal. The ponds are provided with
relatively shallow side slopes in at least one direction for animal and public safety. The
net result downstream is that no increase in flow (Cubic Feet per Second) is proposed
to Dry Gulch Creek. Of course, disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to promote
grass growth and to minimize erosion and look aesthetically pleasing.
SCHEDULE:
One general phase is proposed for buildout. A consecutive approach is planned for
construction. The current plan is to work from higher density (Townhomes) to the
Condominium units, and then single family lots. The units are planned to be built
simultaneously or consecutively without any delay following the over-lot grading, and
installation of roads and utility main lines.
CODE WAIVERS:
All of the appropriate Utility District, EVDC and other standards for development
(requirements) are met with this submittal except for the following three (3) items:
1) Redirect Taper length for north portion of the turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and
Wildfire Road. As mentioned above, this turn lane is not required by the cited
standard, but is proposed by the developers for safety of the future residence.
The taper and striping lengths for this proposed improvement equal or exceed
the similar left turn lane recently constructed just 500’ north of the proposed left
turn lane.
2) Appendix D.lll.B.6 where shared single family driveways may be shared by up to
four units. Lots 2-6 are proposed to share the driveway in the access easement
proposed. Lot 6 could access from Divide Circle, however not as safe as
accessing on the private driveway.
3) Multi-modal path detached and located on the south side of Wildfire Road. This
concrete walk is proposed at 8’ wide. Federal Standards (AASHTO) suggests a
10’ width. Reasoning for this waiver is limited right of way (some of the sidewalk
area is proposed in easements), site disturbance is limited with a smaller path
(keeping the roadside ditches along Wildfire Road), the uncommon (non-existing)
occurrence in Estes Park of a multi-modal path in a residential subdivision, and
most importantly, this proposed 8’ path connects to the existing ‘downstream’
64
6
path along the west side of Dry Gulch Road (recently constructed trail system
connection to the Town).
65
7
Exhibit A
to Statement of Intent
Description of “Parcel A” or the “Westover Property”
owned by Petitioner,
Westover Construction, Inc.
Current zoning: RE Rural Estate Zoning District
Address: 1851 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517
Parcel Number: 25200-00-016
Legal Description:
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5
NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 20, AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP WITH ALL
BEARING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4, CONSIDERED AS
BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST THENCE NORTH
01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30
SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40
MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89
DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES
40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.56 FEET ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SECTION 20 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT
PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE
AS DESCRIBED IN DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN
BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
66
8
Exhibit B
to Statement of Intent
Description of “Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property”
owned by Petitioner,
Wildfire Development, LLC
Current zoning: CH Heavy Commercial Zoning District
Address: 1753 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517
Parcel Number: 25200-00-015
Legal Description:
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20,
TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS PRESENTLY
MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE
WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20, CONSIDERED AS
BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE
NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64
FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A
DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE
OF 343.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST
A DISTANCE OF 300.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19
SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40
MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE IN THE
DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE
114, ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 2, HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION, COUNTY OF
LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
67
9
Exhibit C
to Statement of Intent
Description of “Parcel C” or “RDA Property”
owned by Petitioner,
RDA Associates, LLC
Current zoning: E Rural Estate Zoning District
Address: vacant property
Parcel Number: 25200-00-007
Legal Description:
A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2
WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE W1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, MONUMENTED BY A
BRASS CAPPED PIPE WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID NW1/4 OF SECTION 20 CONSIDERED AS BEARING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47
MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST
1506.46 FEET TO A BRASS CAPPED PIPE; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 25
MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST 236.97 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS
WEST 163.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE;
THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT 225.13 FEET, SAID CURVE
HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 26 SECONDS A RADIUS OF
430.10 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 33
SECONDS WEST 222.57 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 50
SECONDS WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 288.62
FEET SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 13
SECONDS A RADIUS OF 973.48 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 81
DEGREES 22 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 287.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89
DEGREES 52 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST 666.81 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF
THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST
326.57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20 TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
68
10
Exhibit D
to Statement of Intent
Description of “Parcel D” or “Crossroads Property”
owned by Petitioner,
Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc.
Current zoning: O Office Zoning District
Address: 851 Dry Gulch Road, Estes Park, CO 80517
Parcel Number: 25200-00-910
Legal Description:
A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE
72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF
SECTION 20 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 1506.3 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 26 MINUTES EAST 395.8 FEET, THENCE SOUTH
89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES EAST 161 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 46
MINUTES WEST 377 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST
274.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED
IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1983 IN BOOK 2239 AT PAGE 1089 AND
SHOWN IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 22, 1986 AS RECEPTION NO. 86020283.
COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO.
69
Public Works Engineering Development Review
Project:Wildfire Homes Subdivision
Date:July 26.2019
Project Contact:Greg Gladov phone:(970)577-3577 email:£wladov destes.orsi
Analysis (Final Plat)
This project is expected to partially address a significant community need for workforce housing
by providing expanded home ownership opportunities to our residents.The Public Works
Department supports this project,provided that the anticipated impacts are mitigated.
Public Works Standard Requirements (Final Plat)
1.The submitted Final Plat is subject to the Estes Valley Development Code (Appendix B.
Chapter D).
2.The Final Construction Plans were not submitted for review and approval (as required by
the Estes Valley Development Code)at the time of Final Plat submittal.This requirement
has been waived by the Community Development staff.It is understood,however,that
the Final Plat shall not be recorded unless Final Construction Plans has been reviewed
and approved by both Town of Estes Park and.where applicable,by Larimer County
(when proposed improvements cross into theirjurisdiction).
Public Works Stipulations (Final PIat)
No Final Plat shall be recorded unless Final Construction Plans has been reviewed and
approved by both Town of Estes Park and,where applicable,by Larimer County (when
proposed improvements cross into their jurisdiction).The Final Construction Plans shall
address the Preliminary Plat conditions detailed in the Public Works comments dated
April 27,2019.
2.No Final Plat shall be recorded unless the improvements required by Chapter 10 of the
Estes Valley Development Code have been installed,or the installation of the same have
been guaranteed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10.
Public Works Technical Corrections (Final Plat)(Minor changes that can be made to the
final drawings)
Correct overlapping text in a Vicinity Map on Sheet I of 2.
End of Comments
Page I of I
70
ATTACHMENT 571
72
TOWN ADMINISTRATOR Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa
Board of Trustees
From: Frank Lancaster, Town Administrator
Date: August 13th, 2019
RE: 2020 Strategic Plan
Objective:
Adoption of the 2020 Strategic Plan
Present Situation:
Each year, the Town Board reviews and adopts a Strategic Plan. This plan guides the
Board and the staff in setting priorities for actions and is used in preparation of the next
year’s budget. This year, the Board held several meetings to discuss and update their
strategic plan. The Board held two special study sessions in April to work on the Plan,
which culminated with a special meeting on June 26th to finalize the draft. The final
draft was then shared with the public for the month of July and comments were
solicited.
Prior plans included the Mission and Vision statements. The strategic plan is organized
around Key Outcome Areas that specify the various general areas of Town activities,
and the Board’s vision, or “Outcome” in each area. Each Key Outcome Area includes
Town Goals (2-7 years) and Objectives (1 year.) Also reported are the Capital Projects
included in the adopted Capital Improvement Plan for the strategic plan year.
An addition this year is incusing of Strategic Policy Statements. These are statements
more specific than the general Key Outcome statement, and provide additional
clarification and guidance for Town staff.
Several comments were received from the public on the plan and are included for your
information.
Proposal:
Adoption of the 2020 Strategic Plan
Advantages:
Provides transparency to the Public of the Town Board’s priorities
Provides guidance to staff in setting priorities, taking action and in preparing the budget.
Disadvantages:
Time and resources are required to prepare the plan and for ongoing monitoring
73
Action Recommended:
Consider adoption of the 2020 Strategic Plan
Finance/Resource Impact:
The plan provides guidance for the 2020 budget and allocation of resources.
Level of Public Interest
Moderate
Sample Motion:
I move to approve the 2020 Town Board Strategic Plan (as presented/ as amended.)
Attachments:
2020 Town Board Strategic Plan
Public Comments
74
Town of Estes Park 2020 Strategic Plan: Vision, Mission and Goals*Final 8/13/2019
*Outcome areas, Goals and Objectives are not listed in any
priority order
VISION: The Town of Estes Park will enhance our position as a premier mountain community.
MISSION: The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to provide high-quality, reliable services
for the benefit of our citizens, guests and employees, while being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting.
KEY OUTCOME AREAS STRATEGIC POLICY STATEMENTS GOALS (2-7 YEARS)2020 BOARD OBJECTIVES (1 year time frame)2020 CAPITAL PROJECTS
1 Robust Economy - We have a diverse, healthy year-
round economy.
1. We will develop a robust and sustainable economy by
making our economic development decisions based on a triple
bottom line model, considering econonic, social and
environmental impacts and benefits.
4.a. Implement the Downtown Plan.
4.a.1 Determine the strategic direction, financial options and
leadership responsibility for implementation of the Downtown
Plan.
2. We will create and sustain a favorable business climate and
we value building strong relationships with the business
community
3. Our economy should be diverse, attracting and serving a
broad range of current and potential stakeholders.
4. We recognize the importance of our Downtown Core to the
overall economic health of the community.
5. The Town will support Economic Development efforts lead
by other organizations, including business attraction,
retention and expansion.
6. The Town will lead specific economic development efforts
identified by the Town Board, such as development of the
Broadband Utility, and provision of electric and water services.
7. Town policies and actions reflect a preference for local
businesses.
8. The Town's policies should collectively support all
demographic segments of the community, and strive to
minimize barriers to a diverse, family-friendly community and
robust workforce.
2 Infrastructure - We have reliable, efficient and up-to-
date infrastructure serving our residents, businesses and
guests.
1. Ensure water service reliability and redundancy, with each
treatment plant meeting all customer needs throughout the
year, including that Each water treatment plant should have
two separate raw water supplies
1.a We will have enough year-round stream flow water rights to
meet annual customer demand by 2021
Rebuild and level the stall barn floors.
1.b The Glacier Creek Water Treatment Plant will have a raw
water supply from the Big Thompson River by 2026 Rebuild the sedimentation basins at Glacier Creek.
1.c We will replace the Glacier Creek Water Treatment Plant by
2026
Prospect Mountain water main replacement.
2. We will fund the replacment of water pipes before the end
of their useful life Spruce Drive Water Main Replacement
a. We will complete construction of a broadband over fiber
optic cable network for customers in the electric service area by
2024.
a.1 All systems and space required to support the Broadband
Utility will be operational by the end of 2020.
Automated Meter Reading Improvements
3. We provide high quality and reliable electric service by
expanding smart grid technologies.
4.a. We will establish electric industry reliability metrics by 2022 Skinner Road Area Power Line Rebuild
Ski Road Area Power Line Rebuild
b. With a data-driven approach, we will evaluate the service
condition, safety, functionality, accessibility and land use
restrictions of our 32 public buildings, and upgrade the quality,
function and safety of the 5 busiest public facilities, to exceed
the expectations of our guests by 2025
Rebuild Carriage Hills power lines, replacing bare copper lines
with insulated tree cable.
75
2 Infrastructure - We have reliable, efficient and up-to-date infrastructure serving our residents, businesses and guests.
c. We will pursue energy conservation projects that improve the
efficiency of our buildings.
b.1 Develop and adopt a Facilities Masterplan, with funding and
implementation strategies for all Town departments.Park View and Cyteworth water main replacement
d. We will pursue flood mitigation measures to reduce flood risk
and increase public safety, while minimizing flood insurance
costs to the community.
b.2 Budget the annual funding contribution for facility
expansion needs as identified in the Facilities Master Plan.
Complete the Tregent Restroom remodel and ADA accessibility
upgrade
b.3 Complete 15 of 32 needed Building Condition Assessements.
Implement the Town Hall Variable Refrigerant Flow Phase 1
project to replace aging air conditioning units.
e.1 Pursue grant, sales tax and user fee funding for private
and/or public flood mitigation projects.
e Pursue implementation of a Stormwater Utility through
adoption of the Stormwater Master Plan, a stormwater
ordinance and an Intergovernmental agreement with Larimer
County.Design new Water Division facility at 1360 Brook Drive.
f Hire a Stormwater Engineer and support staff to manage the
Stormwater Utility (pending TB approval).
g We will collaborate with community stakeholders to update
our adopted transportation, drainage, and parking design
standards and construction policies in the Development Code
by 2025.
e.1 Establish a timeline to update the street, drainage and
parking standards contained in the Estes Valley Development
Code.
e.2 Develop a funding strategy and timeline to complete a
Multimodal Transportation Master Plan.
3 Exceptional Guest Services - We are a preferred
Colorado mountain destination providing an exceptional
guest experience.
1. We value broad collaboration in providing exceptional guest
services, including, but not limited to working with
organizations such as Visit Estes Park, the Economic
Development Corporation, the National Park Service, and
other organizations representing business and commerce.
a. Provide events and services that attract visitors to Town in
the winter and shoulder seasons.7.1 Develop a strategic plan for the Visitor Center, in
collaboration with Visit Estes Park.
2. We strive to balance the impacts of visitation with the needs
and quality of life of our residents.
3. We make data driven decisions in serving our guests and
residents.
4. As a destination community, we consider our guests as
stakeholders in the Town, along with our residents.
5. The Town provides a high level of customer service to our
guests.
6. We should align our guest strategies with the strategies of
Visit Estes Park.
7. We should balance the events we have in Town to be
compatible with the character of Estes Park
4 Public Safety, Health and Environment - Estes Park is a
safe place to live, work, and visit within our
extraordinary natural environment 1. We will promote polices that encourage environmental
stewardship
7.a Establish a data-driven plan to guide future expansion of
electric vehicles, charging stations and related maintenance
equipment as grant funding opportunities coincide with Town
needs.
Install four dual-stall fast-charging electric vehicle stations at
the Visitor Center
2. We are committed to safeguarding the lives and property of
the people we serve and we believe in reducing crime and
disorder,
1.a . Modify codes and regulations to support alternative and
distributive energy, including micro-grids
Design and install Phase 3 of the security camera system at the
Event Center
3. We value the importance of maintaining a local emergency
communication center to serve the residents and guests of the
Estes Valley
2.a Integrate security camera systems in Town Hall, Visitor
Center, Events Complex and Museum
2.c.1 Hire one sworn officer.
4. We strive to enhance the safety of emergency responders in
non emergency and critical situations
2.b Evaluate and meet the sworn officer and dispatch staffing
needs of the Police Department.2.d.1 Hire one additional dispatcher.
5. We support the County-wide Wasteshed Plan and will
remain active partners with Larimer County in its
implementation.2.c Increase sworn officers to a total of 28 by 2025
1.1 Update the 2007 Wildlife Impact Study.
76
Public Safety, Health and Environment - Estes Park is a safe place to live, work, and visit within our extraordinary natural environment
6. We believe in and support restorative practices as a way to
build and repair relationships, as well as increase
understanding about the impact of crime in the Estes Park
Community. 2.d Increase dispatch staff to 12 by 2025
a.1 Complete the ADA Transition Plan.
Replace the Town Hall elevator in compliance with ADA
7. We make data-driven decisions to improve and protect the
quality of the environment in the Town.
8.1 Seek funding for environmental design and planning for
wildfire mitigation and safety.
a. We will inventory and resolve non-conformities with the
Americans with Disabilities Act in 5 of our 32 public-facing
buildings by 2025.
8. We will train and prepare for responding to community
emergencies
1. Complete the SafeBuilt recommended process improvements
in the Building Division.
5 Outstanding Community Services - Estes Park is an
exceptionally vibrant, diverse, inclusive and active
mountain community in which to live, work and play,
with housing available for all segments in our
community.
1. We support a family-friendly community and strive to be a
family-friendly employer.
a. Develop a master plan for Town Parks and Open Space, in
cooperation with the Recreation District and Estes Valley Land
Trust.
1. Through a public process, complete the revision of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. We will pursue land-banking opportunities as they align
with workforce housing guidelines and childcare needs.
b Specify the additional equipment, personnel and space
needed to deliver and maintain high-quality landscaping as
required by new capital projects.Replace irrigation system along the east end of the Riverwalk.
3. We will target ongoing funding at growing the community's
infant and toddler childcare capacity.
c. Improve the durability, functionality, and efficiency of public
park infrastructure. Overhaul outdated and aging landcaping in
Children's Park, Stanley Historic District, Riverwalk, Parking
Structure picnic area and Weist Park by 2025.
2. Continue accelerated updates to the Development Code.Construct new museum collections/research facility upon
completion of fundraising efforts by the Estes Park Museum
Friends and Foundation.
d. Establish a 5% fund balance reserve to fund one-time
investments in workforce housing and childcare.
b.1 Adopt a policy on the level of landscape intensity for Town
properties
e. Prioritize EVDC amendments on Community Development
Master List that impact housing.
b.2 Pursue General Fund or grant funds for expansion of the
Town's greenhouse.
f. Incentivize Downtown Housing.
g. Participate in County Strategic Plan childcare capacity team.
c1 Replace the gravel path in Bond Park with a hard surface and
install buried concrete anchors to secure the temporary stage.
3 Review the landscape requirements in the Development Code.
4. Establish workforce housing guidelines.
5. Support workforce housing strategic planning efforts.
6. Increase ongoing support for Utility Tap Subsidies to $50,000
for workforce housing
7. Re-evaluate options for development of the Fish Hatchery
property.
8. Re-evaluate options for development of the Dry Gluch
property.
9. Facilitate initiation of conversations between leaders of local
childcare efforts about opportunities for cooperation
10. Develop childcare funding policy.
11. Establish a capital grant pool to incentivize new
infant/toddler childcare capacity.
12. Create a list of Town-owned property suitable for childcare
facilities.
6 Governmental Services and Internal Support - We will
provide high-quality, reliable basic municipal services for
the benefit of our citizens, guests, and employees, while
being good stewards of public resources
1. We will maintain a well-trained and educated Town Staff 4.a. We will conduct a citizen survey biennially in even years to
measure our performance and citizen preferences
2.We will match service levels with the resources available to
deliver them.5.a We will conduct customer service training for all Town staff.Purchase and Remodel current Water Division facility to
accommodate Fleet Division.
1. We will assess residents' sentiments on the impacts of
tourism on quality of life within Estes Park
3. Membership of our Boards and Commissions should reflect
the demographic diversity of the community.
2. The Board will discuss the Human Resources Strategic Plan
and give direction on its implementation
4. We strive to gain meaningful input from our residents and
visitors on the issues that affect them.
4.a.1 We will conduct a citizen survey.
5. We prioritize and support a culture of customer service
throughout the organization.
77
4.2. Pursue a new online engagement platform that furthers
our transparency efforts and makes it convenient for
stakeholders to review information on projects and issues and
provide feedback to the elected officials and staff.
6. We support a culture continuous improvement in our
service delivery.
4.3 Develop and adopt a comprehensive community
engagement toolkit.
7 Transportation - We have safe, efficient and well
maintained multi-modal transportation systems for
pedestrians, cyclists, vehicles and transit.
1. We will continue to develop connectivity of trails in the
Estes Valley in partnership with other entities, implementing
the priorities in the Estes Valley Master Trails Plan.
a. Street rehabilitation efforts will result in an average
Pavement Condition Index of 73 or greater for the Town street
network by 2024
1.1 Pursue funding opportunities for construction of the Fall
River Trail and safe walking and biking routes to schools
b. Explore potential for local and regional year-round transit
services
1.2 Update the Estes Valley Master Trails plans to include
missing gaps and new trails on the Town-maintained network.
Partner with CDOT on the installation of a roundabout at the
intersection of US34/MacGregor.
2. We will continue to reduce traffic congestion and improve
traffic safety throughout the Town
1.3 Expand the U.S. 36/Community Drive roundabout project to
include a multi-use path along the south side of U.S. 36
between Fourth Street and Community Drive and a second
westbound traffic lane.Implement and install downtown wayfinding signage (Phase 2)
Construct the already-designed 2020 segment of the Fall River
Trail.
3. We will work to improve access to and information about
the Town's parking and transportation options
2.1 Pursue grant funding for the design, environmental
clearance and construction of the Moraine Avenue Multimodal
Improvements
Design the Safe Routes to Schools trail improvements along
Graves Avenue.
2.2 Commission a transportation plan for U.S. 34 between
Wonderview Avenue and Steamer Drive, to include pedestrian,
shuttle and general traffic accomodations, and options for direct
access from U.S. 34 to the parking structure.
4. We will make strategic, data-driven investments in
technology that promotes the financial and environmental
sustainability of the Town's parking and transportation assets.
Design, bid and construct projects to deliver chip seal, crack
seal, overlay, patching, major rehabilitation (Cleave Street
interim improvements), and parking lot improvements.
3.1 Initiate Phase 2 of the Downtown Parking Management Plan
(DPMP).
5. We will identify and leverage local, regional and national
partnerships that strengthen and extend the Town's parking
and transportation system.
3.2 Conduct a community and data-driven process to identify
options for the Town Board to consider for the Downtown
Parking Management Plan Phase 3 implementation.
3.3 Improve and enhance the parking and transportation
information that is provided online, and introduce additional
communication tools (e.g., mobile application, text for
information system) to connect locals and guests with parking
and transportation information.
Capital improvements fo Phase 2 of the Downtown Parking
Management Plan
4.1 Develop a funding strategy and timeline to complete a
Multimodal Transportation Master Plan.
6. We will consider the potential impacts of technology
changes, including autonomous vehicles, in all
transportation planning
5.1 Collaborate with Rocky Mountain National Park to identify
locations, funding strategy, and installation schedule for new
variable message signs.
5.2 Extend the regular service season and operational hours of
Estes Transit to align with the Rocky Mountain National Park
Hiker shuttle.
7. We support having a multimodel transportation network
that allows community members and guests to get to their
desired destinations within the Town of Estes Park and the
National Park via walking, biking, transit or private vehicle.
5.3 Implement the Green Route ("Express Route") to better
serve guests and employees, and to encourage increased
utilization of both the Town's parking structure and Events
Complex parking lot.
Amend Bureau of Reclamation Special Use Permit and install
electric gates at the Parking Structure to accommodate shuttle
service
7.1 Explore interest in bringing the concept of a Rural
Transportation Authority (RTA) or similar concept (e.g.,
Transportation Management Authority) to the Town Board in
2020.Complete acquisition of second electric trolley
1 Continue efforts to obtain ownership of the Parking Structure
property from the Bureau of Reclamation.
2. The Board will discuss its philosophy on building capacity for
vehicles versus limiting access and providing alternatives in our
parking and transportation infrastructure.
8 Town Financial Health - We maintain a strong and
sustainable financial condition, balancing expenditures
with available revenues, including adequate cash
reserves for future needs and unanticipated
emergencies.
1. Financial decisions for capital projects should be data-
driven.1.Update purchasing policies
78
8 Town Financial Health - We maintain a strong and
sustainable financial condition, balancing expenditures
with available revenues, including adequate cash
reserves for future needs and unanticipated
emergencies.
2. Establish a grant matching fund.
3. Develop and adopt an annexation policy
4. Develop and adopt a policy on acquistion, retention and
disposal of real property.
79
Town Clerk <townclerk@estes.org>
Strategic Plan Input
Bev Bachman <bbachman6@gmail.com>Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:25 PM
To: townclerk@estes.org
Dear Town Board:
Thank you for solici ng input for the strategic plan. It is though ul, but, in some respects, it could use more
direc on.
The founda on of a healthy organiza on is clear guiding principles, a clear, concise mission statement, and a clear,
concise vision statement. When done correctly, the mission and vision provide the basis for all decisions, planning,
budge ng, ac ons, and hiring. They can prevent conflicts and make decisions much easier. Any proposal must show
how it aligns with and advances the mission and vision, and it is up to the proponents to demonstrate that in a
convincing way while adhering to the guiding principles.
Guiding Principlesaddress how we will work together – how we will behave. It addresses such things as doing what’s
right, doing your best, and trea ng others as you would want to be treated. It’s important to be pre y specific, using
posi ve language. It’s also important that people follow these behaviors and hold each other accountable. It’s a
good idea that Town Trustees and employees sign a commitment to the Guiding Principles each year.
An effec ve mission statementmust address four areas:
· WHAT does the organiza on do – its purpose, what it’s trying to achieve, why it exists.
· For WHOM it does what it does.
· WHY it does what it does.
· HOW it does what it does.
In addi on, the mission must clearly convey WHAT, for WHOM, WHY, and HOW in about 20 words or less so that it is
easy for people to memorize and use as a guide for their ac ons and decisions.
A vision statementdescribes what it would look like if the mission is achieved:
· It is the dream – the ideal.
· It inspires people to be a part of it – it mo vates people to ac on.
· It provides the “North Star” for decisions, planning, budge ng, hiring, and ac ons.
· It, too, needs to be concise (but not as much as the mission) so that people can easily memorize it to use
as a guide for their work.
The current mission statementof the Town of Estes Park is: To provide high-quality, reliable services for the benefit of
our ci zens, guests, and employees, while being good stewards of public resources and our natural se ng. (25
words)
· What: provide high-quality, reliable services and be good stewards of public resource and natural se ng
· For Whom: our ci zens, guests, employees
· Why: (not clear)
· How: (not clear)
The current vision statementof the Town is: The Town of Estes Park will enhance our posi on as a premier mountain
community.
· What does a “premier mountain community” look like?
· What does “enhance our posi on” mean? Is this a compe on?80
· If a vision is not clearly defined, people will resort to their personal default, and that can lead to conflict.
Sugges ons:
· Mission: To provide structure and services for our thriving community of ci zens, visitors, and employees
to respec ully experience our mountain environment. (20)
· Vision:
o As the gateway to Rocky Mountain Na onal Park, Estes Park is an exemplary model of a mountain
community that is thriving, while protec ng and living in harmony with the natural environment that
people come to experience.
o A though ul community structure supports people working together and using good stewardship
of public, natural, and human resources to have a thriving, diverse economy with low environmental
impact.
o The community is powered by renewable energy and, with an extensive recycling and reuse
system, generates very li le waste.
o The community has a though ul development plan that recognizes the limits needed to maintain
the quality of experience with nature that people seek, including, among other things, respec ng the
needs of the wildlife, maintaining mountain views, and minimizing light and sound pollu on.
o Accessible, affordable housing availability is priori zed to allow people who work in the community
to live in the community.
· Town’s 2020 strategic plan: sugges ons
o Robust economy
§ What, in the vision, preserves our environment – the experience with nature that we seek -
as the economy develops? How does a diverse economy look?
o Infrastructure
o Excep onal guest services
§ What does it look like to be a preferred Colorado mountain des na on?
o Public health, safety, and environment
o Governmental services and internal support
o Transporta on
§ Any plans to have transporta on that runs on renewable energy?
o Town financial health
o Outstanding community services
Thank you for your considera on.
Sincerely,
Bev Bachman
--
Bev Bachman
bbachman6@gmail.com
With our gifts comes the responsibility
to develop and use them
to make this world a better place,
and to help others do the same.
Go...make a difference!
81
Town Clerk <townclerk@estes.org>
Strategic Plan comments
Earthwood HQ <rwilc@beyondbb.com>Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:02 PM
To: townclerk@estes.org
Feedback for Strategic Plan
My top priorities are:
1) Flood mitigation for downtown (i.e. new bridges, pedestrian underpasses on Moraine Ave., E. Elkhorn and Hwy 34 by
visitor center, and increased river capacity)
2) Completion of trails from downtown to RMNP along Fall River to Fall River entrance, along Moraine Ave to Beaver
Meadows entrance and along MacGregor to Twin Owls trailhead/entrance.
3) Reduce conflict between pedestrians, bikes and cars (i.e. implement “complete” streets as much as possible, build
underpasses on Moraine Ave under new bridge, under new Riverside drive bridge along Riverwalk, under E. Elkhorn by
Library and under Hwy 34 between visitor center and Safeway plaza, and continue to build more roundabouts)
4) To reduce the number of sworn police officers and thus the overall police/dispatch budget as a percentage of our
overall budget. Estes Park is already way above the norm in number of sworn officers and background police staff by any
measure and when compared to other cities in Colorado and the USA. We have huge needs and the police/dispatch
budget is already far too much of our limited Town budget
Thank You,
Ron Wilcocks
577-0021
82
Town Clerk <townclerk@estes.org>
Comments for Stragegic Plan
1 message
Bob Leavitt <bob@bobleavitt.com>Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:56 AM
To: Town Clerk <townclerk@estes.org>
Here are my comments for the Town's Strategic Plan. I've grouped them under the main topics in the plan.
1.Robust Economy
a. Support the EDC in it's efforts to incubate new businesses. Not only outdoor businesses but others that might function in the off
season to help foster a year round economy.
b. Reach out to educational institutions that might agree to place a mini-campus in Estes Park
c. Promote our broadband infrastructure as it is built out as a reason for businesses to locate in Estes.
4. Public Health Safety and Environment
a. Prioritize the update of the 2007 Wildlife Study and incorporate it into the Estes Valley Development Code.
b. Prioritize seeking funding for environmental design and planning for wildfire mitigation and safety.
5. Outstanding Community Services
a. Prioritize the development of a master plan for Town Parks and Open Space, in cooperation with the Recreation District and Estes
Valley Land
Trust.
b. It is essential that we complete the Comprehensive Plan update in 2020. There should be one Comprehensive Plan for the entire
Estes Valley.
c. Evaluate the success of workforce housing projects as housing developments are built out. This includes meeting intended
occupancy, affordability, tenant problems, parking problems, covenants, etc.
d. Use Wildfire Acres project as a model for the design of other multi-family development projects.
e. Update density and height bonus sections in the EVDC to deal with unintended consequences of these codes.
f. Include redevelopment of existing housing in the strategies for workforce housing.
6. Governmental Services and Internal Support
a. As part of the HR plan set objectives for staff hiring and retention. Measure this by staff turnover and duration of vacancies.
Analyze areas where staff turnover and vacancies are the greatest and recommend solutions.
b. Consider financial incentives for hiring and workforce housing.
c. Conduct employee job satisfaction surveys periodically. Publish aggregate results as is done by the Medical Center. Set objectives
for employee job satisfaction.
7. Transportation
a. Accelerate the construction schedules of the roundabouts at MacGregor / Wonderview Avenue and Community Drive / Highway
36. We need these sooner rather than later.
b. Keep the green route running throughout the busy tourist season. Encourage tourists and employees to use the green route
shuttle between the parking garage and town.
Thanks,
Bob
Bob Leavitt
740 Ramshorn Drive
Estes Park, CO 80517
Phone: 970-480-1588
Email: bob@bobleavitt.com
83
From: Jo Stensland <joanna@morninglight.us>
Date: Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:39 PM
Subject: Comments on Strategic Plan
To: Town Clerk <townclerk@estes.org>
Respectfully submitted to the Town of Estes Park:
Thank you for the Strategic Plan draft and opportunity to comment. I was especially happy to see that
pedestrian crossings are planned for Highway 7. This is much needed for the safety of kids walking to and
from school as well as others on foot in this high traffic area.
I was also at first happy to see Outcome # 7: Transportation. I believe that better public transit systems as
well as bike and pedestrian pathways throughout town are essential to keeping congestion and the ensuing
problems to a minimum. However, I was disappointed to see that much of the plan excluded areas
officially outside town boundaries (which is a very small area!). I strongly believe that these need to be
extended beyond the narrow confines of the town limits. There may be a need for more shuttles in town,
but since a very large number of people live (and vacation) outside of the official town boundaries, there
is an even greater need for shuttles, cycle paths and footpaths for them. It seems a little illogical to further
develop the downtown area with transit but deprive those who really need it - those who have no other
option but to use a personal vehicle. This will not reduce congestion at all.
My strong hope is to see a public transportation system that runs year round and is available to all the
residents of the Estes Valley (whether free or for a payment). I would also love to see footpaths and bike
paths in all areas that have the zip code 80517 and are called Estes Park, and not just downtown.
Thank you for considering these thoughts.
Sincerely,
Joanna Stensland
From: Terry Rizzuti <tprizzuti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:35 AM
Subject: Town Strategic Plan
To: <townclerk@estes.org>
Town Clerk, here's a couple of observations I'd like passed on to the powers that be.
One, phone and internet service in the summer time leave a lot to be desired, especially for
those using Verizon and cable. Frequently, my family visits and can't make or receive phone
calls or timely texts. And frequently, internet service through cable TV is hit or miss.
Two, on the last night of the Rodeo, I was approached by a scared, frustrated, sometimes angry
family that couldn't find a ride back to the Mary's Lake Campground. They told me they'd never
return to Estes Park. I helped them as best I could to find a Taxi, even offered to take them
personally, which they refused because I was a stranger. They kept repeating "why doesn't a
so-called destination paradise" such as this one have Uber service." Shuttle service after the
rodeo might be a solution. Thanks for listening, Terry
Terry P. Rizzuti
84
John E Vernon <fac026@binghamton.edu>
Mon, Apr 1, 12:33 PM
to townclerk, me
Dear Mayor Jirsa, Trustees, and Town Administrator Frank Lancaster,
I write, first, to belated thank you for your unanimous support of last year's resolution to require the
PRPA to transition to 100% renewable energy by 2030. This was a farsighted and prudent response to
the crisis now facing our environment. Thank you!
I write also to make the suggestion that in your April 3 Strategic Planning Session you give more serious
consideration to environmental concerns in Estes Park. Your official agenda does mention "health and
environment," but Its position at the bottom of the list suggests that it is hardly a top priority. Please
consider some issues that ought to make it a number one priority: the fact that wildlife corridors and
habitats should be considered in approval of new developments, and in general should be a principle part
of any planning process. This would also entail giving the Comprehensive Plan a position of greater
authority in our code when new projects come before the board. Estes Park's superb environment, and its
proximity to the a gorgeous and wild national park, should be tops on your agenda. Sustainability, too,
deserves a careful and detailed consideration. For example, since the town board often financially
supports the Estes Park Housing Authority, you could require that any new project the EPHA undertakes
be built utilizing such sustainability principles as energy efficiency, water conservation, and passive solar
design. Such precepts are not only good for the environment but cost-saving measures in the long run.
Thank you for listening to my concerns.
John Vernon
P.O. Box 20620
3175 Tunnel Road
Estes Park, CO 80511
Gordon MacAlpine <gmacalpi@trinity.edu>
Mon, Apr 1, 11:18 AM
to tjirsa, cbangs, mcenac, pmartchink, Rnorris, cwalker, kzornes, me, Reuben, rhunt, gmuhonen,
tmachalek, dhudson
To Our Estes Park Officials.
Prior to the upcoming Strategic Planning Session, we are taking this opportunity to provide some citizen
input for your consideration.
1. Please prioritize our exceptional environment and wildlife. Our economy and quality of life are
strongly dependent on them. In particular, we ask that you respect wildlife and protect wildlife corridors
or habitats in all planning processes.
2. Strong, creative participation by municipalities will be vitally important for the Platte River Power
Authority to meet its goal of 100% non-carbon energy production by 2030 and to protect our
environment for future generations. We ask that serious consideration be given to requiring all new
buildings and development projects to meet the highest reasonable standards in terms of energy
efficiency, insulation, and design. In addition, if practical, new buildings should be capable of
supporting solar energy generation. For instance, roofs could be oriented or designed (with necessary
structural integrity) to accommodate future potential solar installations. Also, please emphasize or
incentivize the potential for heat pump installations with any new building or development plans. This
85
will be especially important when our electricity comes from clean solar, wind, and storage
facilities. Finally, as promoted by the Platte River Power Authority, Estes Park should look into
potential development and financing options for solar-power micro-grids on public buildings. Local
storage possibilities should also be studied. These will help the PRPA in meeting its non-carbon energy
production targets.
Thank you.
Gordon and Barbara MacAlpine
86
UTILITIES Report
To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa
Board of Trustees
Through: Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Project Manager Swoboda
Date: August 13, 2019
RE: Quarterly Broadband Update
Objective:
Present progress on the Board’s goal to construct and maintain a high-speed
broadband network for businesses and residents.
Present Situation:
This report is for the 2nd quarter of 2019, April – June 2019.
The broadband project schedule and budget are on target. Our two original pilot
customers have been thrilled with the reliability and quality of our internet service.
Highlights:
Construction Status:
● Modern gigabit internet service is ready to roll out in the Raven Circle
area. This area has 168 residential units. To date, 19,000 linear feet of
fiber has been installed and ready to serve these future customers.
Construction from the curb to the premise will be completed as each
customer signs up.
● The easements/land use documentation has caused some delay but they
are now completed.
● Well received presentations were made to the Ranch Meadows HOAs
which included instructions on how to sign up for updates and service
information. Over 30% of those residents have expressed interest in
obtaining the new high-speed broadband service.
● Carriage Hills construction is on track. Those services will roll out in
phases with the first phase in October through December. Broadband
work has been combined with overhead electric construction which has
proved to be more labor-intensive but highly cost-effective.
● Installation of 12,000 linear feet of FuturePath™ (fiber conduit) has been
completed in the Carriage Hills service area to-date. This is exceeding our
expectations and is explained by good weather and our dedicated and
overachieving Power and Communications crew.
Business Operations
Call Center/Sales and Billing Operations:
To ramp up Call Center Operations, Customer Experience Manager, Kim Smith,
started on June 17, 2019. Integral to customer service is our cloud-based call
center support software which will record calls to enable continuous
improvements and quality control.
All customers are encouraged to sign-up for the latest news and interest in
getting service at https://www.GoEstesBroadband.com/ .
Billing:
Test accounts and re-occurring payments were used to successfully process and
track payments in our Customer Relationship Management system.
Marketing:
Marketing plans for print, copy, email campaign and the website design are in the
review phase with plans to roll out the official brand at the end of September.
Project Financials: Expenditures through July 18 total $833,341.00.
Other:
● An official brand launch event is being scheduled for the end of
September. This will be a soft rollout event as service will be limited in
2019.
● Collaboration with Fort Collins and Loveland is going better than expected.
An Intergovernmental Agreement enables us to share the costs of data
transport to internet data centers, saving us thousands every month in
operating expenses.
The broadband project team wishes to acknowledge and express thanks to Trustees
Carlie Bangs and Ken Zornes for their participation in the April Focus Groups to help
build the brand.
Power and Communications Enterprise staff live
here and will be maintaining the system. They have
a vested interest in building reliable, easy to
maintain infrastructure while being good stewards of
the natural setting.
The following pictures provide a visible comparison
of the pride our crews have in their work. The
picture below was taken in the Southern US last
May.
This picture of the P&C system illustrates
how the same complexity resides in colored
conduits contained in the FuturePath™
(fiber conduit).
Superintendent Lockhart worked with a
local tool and die maker, Frank Ferree to
create a specialized tool that reduces the
time required to install the enclosures which
house the conduits and fiber cables. This
cleans up the view shed and adds
protection resulting in longer useful life and
more reliable service.
Power & Communications is saving
construction costs in Carriage Hills by
performing both powerline upgrades and
fiber installation at the same time.
Power Line
Construction
Future Path Fiber
Construction