Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2016-04-05Prepared: March 23, 2016 * Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Tuesday, April 5, 2016 9:00 a.m. — Town Hall Board Room 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of minutes dated March 16, 2016 3. LOT 47, LITTLE VALLEY 2ND FILING; 1545 HUMMINGBIRD DRIVE Owner: Donald & Kathy Townsend Applicant: Donald & Kathy Townsend Request: Variance from EVDC Section 4.3, Table 4-2 which required 50 foot setbacks in the RE—Rural Estate zone district. Request to encroach approximately 17 feet into the front setback to allow construction of a proposed detached garage. Staff: Audem Gonzales 4. 1ST RESUBDIVISION, BUENA VISTA TERRACE; PORTION OF TOWN-OWNED MORAINENVEIST PARKING LOT, NO OFFICIAL ADDRESS Owner: Town of Estes Park Applicant: Verizon Wireless Request: Variance from EVDC Section 5.1, which requires microcell antenna towers to be placed at a public utility substation or within a high-tension power line easement. Request is to allow the placement of a microcell antenna tower near an existing utility pole in a "no-parking" area of a downtown parking lot to provide improved cellular coverage to the downtown area. Staff: Carrie McCool 4. REPORTS a. Planner Kleisler resignation, effective March 31, 2016 b. 2015 International Building Codes Adoption Process c. Vacation Rental Code Amendment Update 5. ADJOURNMENT The Estes Volley Board of Adjustment reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment March 16, 2016 9:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Board: Chair Don Darling, Members Pete Smith, Wayne Newsom, John Lynch, and Jeff Moreau Attending: Chair Darling, Members Smith, and Moreau Also Attending: Planner Carrie McCool, Interim Community Development Director Karen Gumbo, Town Attorney Greg White, Recording Secretary Karen Thompson Absent: Members Newsom and Lynch Chair Darling called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. There were approximately six people in attendance. There were two members absent, but a quorum was present. He introduced the Board members and staff. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes of Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Special Meeting, February 22, 2016. It was moved and seconded (Smith/Moreau) to approve the Consent Agenda as presented and the motion passed unanimously with two absent. 3. LOT 52 OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 51, 52 & 53, BLOCK 10, CARRIAGE HILLS 4th; 1117 Whispering Pines Drive Planner McCool reviewed the staff report. The variance requested is from Estes Valley Development Code Section 7.6.E.1.a(1) which requires all buildings and accessory structures to be set back at least thirty (30) feet horizontally (plan view) from the annual high-water mark of stream corridors, or if not readily discernible, from the defined bank of the stream. Where defined banks are not readily discernible, the setback shall be measured from the thread of the stream. The applicant request is to allow a deck that was destroyed in the 2013 flood be rebuilt entirely in the setback. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 March 16, 2016 Director Chilcott stated the standards for review are in EVDC Section 3.6.C. The existing house on the lot and the decks were located within the 30-foot river setback prior to the 2013 flood. As a result of the flood, the Fish Creek channel migrated to be approximately five feet closer to the house. During the flood, the Kane residence was significantly undermined by the water, making the foundation unstable, and a large portion of the deck was destroyed. Soon after the flood, the foundation was stabilized with fill material and the main structure, including most of the deck, was repaired. The Kane's are now seeking to repair the remaining portion of the deck with a few modifications to the design. Staff Findings 1. Special circumstances exist...: Staff found the home on-site is classified as a legal non-conforming structure as a large portion of it is located within the 30-foot stream corridor setback. The previous deck was also considered part of the non-conforming structure. Any building addition on the Southeast, East or Northeast portion of the home will be contained entirely within the 30-foot setback. Strict compliance with Code standards would prevent the remainder of the destroyed deck from being rebuilt. Post-flood, the annual high-water mark has shifted westward roughly five feet, further restricting future development of the site. 2. Practical difficulty...: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff found the home, as it stands today, does not have the corner section of decking attached. The development proposal will include concrete sidewalks/patio and new decking along the Southeast, East and Northeast sides of the home. The single-family home use on the site may continue without a variance being granted. The new additions do not affect the use of the site or access to the home. b. Whether the variance is substantial: Staff found the variance is substantial in that it would allow deck support piers to be located downslope of the streambank upper edge. The farthest piers would be located on the post-flood fill material. Granting this variance involves risks from floodwaters and geologic hazards to both the property owner and neighbors up- and downstream. There is great streambank erosion potential at this site. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; Staff found the single-family character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered with this proposal. In the occurrence that another flood arises on Fish Cree, neighboring properties may be impacted. Debris from damaged structures may potentially fall into the river channel and dam up or RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 3 March 16, 2016 alter water flows and/or cause damage to neighboring properties. The development proposal includes a gas firepit on the deck area. If a flood damages or destroys the deck, including the firepit, the gas line servicing the firepit would be severed, thereby posing a significant fire hazard. Flood hazard mitigation efforts can be taken to lessen the risk of future damage or destruction which include: (1) maximizing streambank stabilization using bioengineering methods to restore natural stream and ecological functions while protecting existing and potential future structures from further streambank erosion; (2) removing the firepit from the proposed deck area to mitigate potential fire hazards. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer; Staff found the approval would not have any effect on public services such as water and sewer. e. Whether the applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff found the EVDC was adopted in the year 2000 and was readily available to the public. The applicant built the home in 2002. Stream setback requirements were in effect at the time. The building permit for the home was approved which created a legal non-conforming structure. f. Whether the applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance; Staff found no deck expansions or sidewalk/patio construction may occur at this specific location of the site without a variance. 3. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff found a variance for this proposal is the only option to achieve the desired outcome. 4. In granting such variances, the Board of Adjustment may require such conditions that will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Staff is not recommending approval or disapproval of this variance request. If it is approved, staff recommends removing the gas firepit from the deck design. Also, staff encourages the Board of Adjustment to take into account the comments made by Tina Kurtz, Environmental Planner III. The memo addresses future risk potential at this site and potential mitigation efforts. Board and Staff Discussion Ms. Chilcott stated staff does not have a recommendation of approval of denial of this application. If the Kanes had applied for a building permit and began construction within a year of the 2013 flood, staff would have had the ability to approve the building permit and a RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 4 March 16, 2016 variance would not have been required. At that time, staff would have given approval of the plan review to rebuild the piers in the setback. Because of the time lapse, staff no longer has the ability to approve the rebuilding of the deck and the Board of Adjustment is now the decision-making body. Ms. Chilcott stated there have been numerous discussions with administrators of both the Town of Estes Park and Larimer County, as well as planning staff from both jurisdictions. The proposed deck is larger than what was originally there. The County Planning staff stated they would have approved the proposed deck at staff level, if presented to them within the one-year period following the 2013 flood, even with the modifications. Ms. Chilcott stated what staff determined from the review is the home was built out of compliance with the setback criteria. It was not identified by the property owner, builder, or staff that the structure would be in the setback after construction. This home is considered by planning staff to be a nonconforming property. Public Comment Bruce Kane/applicant stated their home was not substantially damaged during the 2013 flood, so they were able to rebuild with assistance from FEMA. First, they stabilized the foundation by the end of September. The permanent foundation repair was completed in December, 2013. A small portion of the deck was rebuilt in early 2014, which is what they have now. They started the process of rebuilding the home before the one year time lapse. He interpreted to code as they would have three years to complete the rebuild. He did not understand a permit was required. Mr. Kane stated the stream bank consists of an armored rock area on top of a membrane. In November 2014, a temporary sewer line was installed, and replaced with the permanent line in the spring of 2015. He stated the creek could not be moved back to the original location within the one year period. The discussions revolving around this issue have been ongoing since October 2015. Thomas Beck/applicant's architect stated the only part of the deck that is larger is the addition of the stairs on the north side. The stairs were added and the upper right corner has been redesigned to be further from the creek. Mr. Kane added that before the flood, the river was at least 15 feet further away from the house than it is today; however, he disagrees the home was built in the setback. Regarding the gas firepit, Mr. Beck stated he would recommend a type of hookup that has a quick disconnect next to the house. In case the deck was destroyed again, the flow of gas would be shut off at the house. Member Darling was concerned about the negative impact on neighbors during a future flood event. Mr. Kane stated he thinks there is enough armoring along the bank that any future flooding would be directed to the east side of the bank rather than the west side near his RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 5 March 16, 2016 home. He noted the Larimer County Floodplain Manager, Eric Tracy, has given his approval to rebuild. Joe CoopNan Horn Engineering stated the geo-fabric that was installed on the stream bank would make erosion a slower process during a future flood event, and he thought the same geo-fabric would be installed on the east side of the streambank during the restoration projects. Mr. Beck stated Larimer County extended their post-flood rebuild period to three years, while the town kept its standard of one year. There have been many agencies involved in post- flood recovery in the immediate area of the Kane property, which has delayed the project. The Kane's have been diligently rebuilding since the flood. Merle Moore/county resident stated he is a neighbor that was very aware of what happened at the Kane residence during the 2013 flood. He was actually in the Kane house when the deck was torn off by floodwater. He stated the main cause of damage to the Kane property was the failure of the culvert at Whispering Pines Drive. This failure caused the excess water to flow down Fish Creek Road. There was a very heavy willow cover on the edges of the creek, which he thinks washout because the plugged culvert redirected the water to the west side. Another culvert failed upstream at Rambling Drive. He thinks there would not have been any water issues at the Kane residence if the culverts would have contained the flows. Conditions of Approval Recommended by the Board 1. A quick breakaway gas line connection to the firepit shall be required. 2. Following construction, an As-Built survey shall be completed by a registered land surveyor and submitted to the Community Development Department. It was moved and seconded (Smith/Darling) to approve the variance request with the findings recommended by staff and two conditions of approval recommended by the Board and the Department and the motion passed unanimously with two absent. REPORTS 1. Director Chilcott reported Planner Phil Kleisler has accepted a position with the City of Loveland. His last day will be March 31, 2016. He will be greatly missed, and we wish him well in his new endeavor. 2. Director Chilcott reported a new brochure regarding the Town's flood mitigation efforts is now available. Copies will be provided to all members of the Town's Boards and Commissions. There being no other business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:41. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 6 March 16, 2016 Don Darling, Chair Karen Thompson, Recording Secretary 1545 Hummingbird Dr. - Setback Variance fP Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 230, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org (p) ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE & LOCATION: April 5, 2016, 9:00AM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: This is a request for a variance to Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) Section 4.3.C.4 Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts. The variance would allow a 33-foot front setback in lieu of the 50-foot required in the RE Rural Estate zone district. The purpose of the variance is to allow for a detached garage to be built on the property Staff recommends approval. LOCATION: 1545 Hummingbird Drive, within the unincorporated Estes Valley. VICINITY MAP: See attachment APPLICANT/OWNER: Don Townsend STAFF CONTACT: Audem Gonzales, Planner I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request to grant a variance to allow for a 33-foot front yard setback in lieu of the required 50-foot setback. The RE zone district standards require a 50-foot front yard setback. The applicant is proposing to build a 704 sq. ft. detached garage entirely within the front setback. The front yard setback encroachment cannot be approved at a staff level, therefore a variance has been requested. REVIEW CRITERIA: In accordance with Section 3.6 C. "Standards for Review" of the EVDC, all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Board of Adjustment is the decision-making body for this application. REFERRAL AND PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public Notice. Written notice has been mailed to 18 surrounding property owners. A legal notice was published in the Trail Gazette. The application is posted on the department "Current Applications" webpage. The site has been posted with a "variance pending" sign. Affected Agencies. This request has been routed to reviewing agency staff for review and comment. No comments or concerns were received. Public Comments. Staff has received two written public comments in opposition of this variance request. Both letters are included as attachments to the packet. STAFF FINDINGS: 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code's standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: The property is zoned RE Rural Estate, which has a minimum setback on all sides of 50- feet. The lot is approximately 2.13 acres in size, which does not meet the 2.5 acre minimum lot size for the zone district. 50-foot setbacks are intended for much larger lots. The subdivision was platted in 1968, before adoption of the EVDC. Because of such steep slopes, platting subdivisions and lots today would require much larger lots to account for the slope. This plat was created before steep slope provisions, therefore lots were not required to be adjusted in size. Although this situation occurs in other subdivisions, staff believes it is still unique to the larger Estes Valley Development Code boundary area. The slopes on this site range from 20-40%. The buildable area outside of the 50-foot setbacks has an average of 35% grade. The home is located within the setbacks closer to the road. The applicant is proposing to build the garage between the home and road, which would utilize the existing concreate drive. 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the BOA shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; Staff Finding: The existing single-family use can continue but any addition to the home or additional building on the site will be determined by the setbacks. These building additions may occur on the site without a variance but the practical location for them may be hindered by the physical attributes of the land and setback requirements. The applicant has provided as part of the application a site plan that depicts the buildable area outside of the setbacks. Although the area is quite large, the garage would need to be further down the mountainside which is not a logical or practical location in relation to the home. b. Whether the variance is substantial; Staff Finding: The variance is substantial. The proposed garage would be entirely within the EVDC 50- foot setback. Local covenants require a 75-foot setback. The applicant was granted approval from the Little Valley HOA board to place the garage at this location. The HOA meeting was held in December of 2015. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; 1545 Hummingbird Drive — Front yard setback Page 2 of 4 Staff Finding: The single-family character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered, and the adjoining properties would not suffer a detriment (no impact to view corridors, drainage, migration corridors, etc). Two neighbors have provided written comment on this variance and are both in opposition of this request. Staff has conducted several site visits to this neighborhood and has found that several buildings are built within 75-feet of front property lines and some are built within 50-feet of front property lines. Whether or not this is due to the steepness of slope is unknown. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: Approval would not have any effect on public services such as utility lines, drainage, or roads. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement; Staff Finding: The EVDC was adopted in the year 2000 and was readily available to the public. The applicant purchased the property in 2014. RE zone district setback requirements and the HOA covenants were in effect at the time. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: A detached garage could be built on the site at a different location that complies with the EVDC 50-foot setback and 75-foot covenant setback. This would involve professional engineering for steep slopes. Although it is not practical to locate the garage so far from the existing home, it could be accomplished. 3. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: Building at this location has little effect on the neighbors and aims to make a practical decision in the placement of the garage. 4. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions at will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Staff Finding: The applicant provided an email thread from the HOA president that documents variance approval for the garage. Staff would like to see the actual letter of approval sent to the applicant. Staff recommends the BOA require the letter within 1 month of this variance approval. 1545 Hummingbird Drive — Front yard setback Page 3 of 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requested variance CONDTIONAL TO: 1. Provide Little Valley HOA approval letter for garage variance from restrictive covenant within 1 month of this conditional approval. SUGGESTED MOTIONS I move to APPROVE the requested variance with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. I move to DENY the requested variance with the following findings (state reason/findings). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. HOA email 5. Written comments 6. Site plan 7. Plat map 1545 Hummingbird Drive — Front yard setback Page 4 of 4 1620 147„ mossRco(OR Vicinity Map 1550 1649 1460 402E 37._ 1670 1605 1673 '645 L I LI ESTE5 PARK COLORADO Town of Estes Park Community Development Vicinity Map 1640 1551 1495 1655 vier r_ 1 in = 167 ft 0 80 160 Feet Protect Name: Townsend Variance• 1545 Hummingbird Dr. Project Description. Variance to 50-foot front yard setback Petitioner(s): Don Townsend Created By: Audem Gonzales Printed: 3/31/2016 A i 1545 Hummingbird Drive Parcels-Larimer -1 Town Boundary _ sommtnirryscli Ecpf1,.i, Statement of Intent We are requesting a variance to change the minimum 50' setback to a 33' setback to accommodate a free-standing 2-car garage on our property in Little Valley. Without the variance, the garage would have to be located farther back on the lot which is much steeper than the proposed location and would require a very long and steep driveway access from Hummingbird Drive. The proposed location for the garage is the logical location for the garage for ease of access to and from the house. 3/31/2016 Town of Estes Park Mail - Fwd. Garage Variance Follow Up if II Li Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes.org> Fwd: Garage Variance Follow Up 1 message Don Townsend <drtownsend@q.com> Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:04 PM To: Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes.org> Hi Audem, Please disregard remarks in this email from the HOA regarding a failure on my part to get approval for remodeling the cabin. This was a mixup at the time HOA offices were changing hands. If you need any further clarification, let me know, Thanks, Don Begin forwarded message: From: Doyle Baker <Ivoa.president@grnail.com> Subject: Re: Garage Variance Follow Up Date: December 12, 2015 at 8:21:26 AM MST To: Don Townsend <drlownsend@q.com> Hi Don, The board approved the variance during our meeting However, our discussion also covered your seeming failure seek architectural review and approval before starting the remodel of your main structure. The LVOA covenants require such review and approval. Therefore, the board agreed that the letter informing you that the variance had been approved should also note and express concern about the covenants violation. This will have no impact on the variance for the garage and we will not pursue further action but agreed that a statement should be made for the record. I will not send this message until Monday so if you did seek architectural review and approval then please do let me know. Perhaps this was done before the changeover in the board and we overlooked the previous approval. if this was the case, I would rather get this right before sending the letter rather than correcting afterwards. Thanks, Doyle On Dec 11, 2015, at 20:54, Don Townsend <drtownsend©q,com> wrote: Hi Doyle, Wondering the status of our request regarding the variance for building a garage. I think you said the board was meeting on the 7th. Thanks for your time and consideration. Don Townsend Sent from my iPhone https://mail.googte.com/mail/u/00u1=2&ik=c0a7e0f533&view.pt&q=clon&qs=true&search=query&th.153c98e7c1cc35a6&sim1=153c98e7c1cc35a6 1/1 Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.org> Setback Variance Proposal/Townsend-Lot 47 2nd Filing Little Valley 1 message Mike Cossota <mfcaec@verizon.net> To: planning@estes.org _.. Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:36 PM To Whom it May Concern: I am the property owner at 1705 Hummingbird Drive and am totally against this variance request. The proposed structure's close proximity to the road (33 feet) and the overall height of the building is a major concern. This variance request infringes substantially upon the set deed restrictions/covenants. I believe the property owners can place the structure further into their property to abide by the agreed and approved restrictions. As an example, my three car garage is constructed on steel beams suspended above the slope of my property. They can do similar by grading further into their property or constructing on steel as my example. Our covenants in place for a reason. Please DENY this request and instruct the owner of the property to build his garage according to County and Little Valley Covenants. Thank You Mike Cossota 1705 Hummingbird Drive Little Valley Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.org> Setback Variance Proposal/Townsend-Lot 47 2nd Filing Little Valley Scott Liggett <sligg@msn.com> ~. ~~!~r lYh Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:32 AM To: "planning@estes.org" <pianning@estes.org> 3 - To Whom it May Concern: ITYPEvEt.opmpyr I am the property owner directly across the road and am totally against this variance request--in fact I am very upset at it. There are in place existing Covenants of Little Valley and the County specifically to prevent this activity. It is your job to enforce them. This current owner knew in advance of these requirements or should have known. He knew the price of his lot was much less for a significant reason--his property has a sharp fall off making ANY construction very expensive--now he wants to share that burden with us--forever. You have a public duty to protect the existing property owners and enforce existing rules and regulations--not make excuses for leniency. The owner can still build his proposed garage--it will just be more expensive for him--but that is the cost of living in Little Valley. Mr. Doyle Baker reportedly "signed off' on this request and did so without informing the BOD of Little Valley nor taking a vote--he committed an unauthorized action in doing so and may well lose his BOD seat over it. Please DENY this request and instruct the owner of the property to build his garage according to County and Little Valley Covenants. Thank You Scott Liggett 1620 Hummingbird Drive Little Valley message i3 Age-es EPSD EPSD Other UTSD 1- UTSD None No Yes Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Existing Gas Service Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Zoning gt....7- ES/ D&A.,7 778e-- -' )u /yVy ADO 2 (1/Le-CAP./99(-- r Town NWell I Other (Specify) I- Town S Well l Other (Specify) Septic J< Septic Submittal Date: ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION General Information Record Owner(s). Street Address of Lot: -1 ,0ivae-n N . 19 -Thy . -To 4v ALs, D /64/6 1)/ nwrii .6her) Legal Description: Lot: Subdivision: Li TT LI- 7. (2 c.Ey Parcel ID # : O 06- 6) 41 Block: Tr ct Site Information Name of Primary Contact Person .7)(2,14 -0(6m ist _,W.) /5e/6" Homn)/Alhigo'Dc' EP c.7.)..5"/ Prima Contact Person is A. Owner . A • • licant I - Consultant/En•ineer Complete Mailing Address Variance Variance Desired (Development Code Section #): AfiLg E.,,A 1. Si T4/ .i AND Dp1)-eyu 5.167.Al yeesidr: IVT? L mc:7)/ Primary Contact intormation Attachments Town ofIstes Park -dis P.O. Box 1260 Ksk 170 Mac Gregor Avenue -6 Estes Park. C 0 80517 Community Development Department Phone (970)577-3721 Fax. (9701586-0249 www.estes.org/Communitylievelopment Application fee (see attached fee schedule) 1-- Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6. C of the EVDC) 1 copy (folded) of site plan (drawn at a scale of 1" = 20') ** 1 reduced copy of the site plan (11" X 17") f Digital copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planning@estes.org " The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.VII.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule) Copies must be foide Ai? Revised 2013.08.27 KI Contact Information Record Owner(s) Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email 1-)(_n /497Hy 74,ii)/v6E/v6 /5"(1 -- Hoinipbucieivii2D1?i , Fri POD/7 a70- 56i2 oil't Cd q, ((m _.9tne 1)6 ith:),o&)_. APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: http //www.estes.orci/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanninciApplicationFeeSchedule odt All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 2013.08.27 KT APPLICANT CERTIFICATION IP' I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. IP' In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I/ I acknowledge that i have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: http.//www estes oro/CornDev/DevCode 111. I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. b. I understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. II, I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. ► The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. 111. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. ► I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. 1/0 I understand that I am required to obtain a "Variance Notice" sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where it is clearly visible from the road. I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked. I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10) business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. Po I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request, "Failure of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the variance approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance may automatically render the decision of the BOA null and void." (Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Names: ov_ Record Owner PLEASE PRINT ' /e-4 7-tiy L/oz.() kx.SEALO 7c7 Signatures: Record Owner Applicant 4,e.7074)-71.44 14 757-7027J."-')14-;( _ Date Date c3/c,)-ViP Re vise d 2013,08.27 KT Applicant PLEASE PRINT . C,i(1 Townsend RE _ce Variance.xls Owner Owner ll Address City ST Zip Sandra &John Burns 1490 Hummingbird Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Roger & Susan Toy 1418 W Cademon Cir Lincoln NE 68523 Craig & Lode Kramer 628 Sand bridge Cir E Worthington OH 43085 Gary Barth PO Box 1002 Hastings NE 68901 Lyn Ferguson & Kristine Mann 1661 Black Squirrel Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Michael Bryant 3965 Little Valley Rd Estes Park CO 80517 Carol Hanchett & Charles Thompson 1640 Black Squirrel Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Keola Kennicke & Marilyn Bradley 1673 Black Squirrel Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Scott &Judity Liggett 2601 Wolldleigh Ln Lincoln NE 68502 Timothy Darnell 1460 Hummingbird Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Carol Glazer 1457 E Lake Woodlands Pkwy Oldsmar FL 34677 Robert & Linda Lovgren 24145 103rd St Omaha NE 68124 Donald & Kathy Townsend 5821 Claret St Timnath CO 80547 Susan Magnuson 1605 Hummingbird Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Lindi & Bruce Carmichael 1680 Black Squirrel Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Nancy Kramer 3209 N 82nd Pi Scottsdale AZ 85251 Tim & Sharon Mikkelsen 585 Lakeside PI Windsor CO 80550 Sidney & Linda Wells 6310 Bayonne Spring TX 77389 age 1 t..tINEtt,fRAGL t,t 1 ... : 1 4. '" - .., Proposed 22x32 2-Car Garage r 33' Requested Setback j".L T" ANL , r-k"'-jR 6 f MIN • 41! 1.7 I () 1( 7' FES 23 2016 _ ill IcorrimyNn):-EiEVE—f LOT ci 4 '• So' BuiLLANC r- SETBACKS 12,.. I E FIRE RtiGi / gt 6 46.5 STCRAG- ,8485_ I • LeCIND • SITE COAIROL POINT (NAL) • SEPT:. V..A.T O UTILITY POLE • TELEPHON: PEDESTAL © WELL -ow - oVERHEAL UTILITY LINE j. EXISTING 'RRUCE 1,0_1_16 , , , , .... l' , ....... , --., 04 REBAR WITH ,.... ...., PLASTIC `... -..... -..... -.... AhIPED 9485 -..... -...., I \-.... .....„ 10' WOE UTILITY AND EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT (SEE NOTE 7) 10' WDL unurr AND ffI FA sEMENT EMERGENCY ACRM TE S (SEE NO7) I LOT 47 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (FROM LARIMER COUNTY ASSESSOR'S RECORDS) LOT. 47 LITTLE VALLEY 2N1) SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE REEFED UPON AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY NOR A LAND SURVEY PLAT 2. AT THE TOME OF THE SURVEY THE HOUSE SITS ON CONCRETE PADS WITH PIERS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE PLAN IS TO SHOW THE CURRENT LOCATION OF THE STRUCTURES SO THAT A CONTRACTOR CAN PROPOSE TO ENCLOSE THE UNDERSIDE OF THE HOUSE WITH A FOUNDATION TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION. 3. THE PLAT OF LITTLE VALLEY SUBDMSION SECOND FILING ANC THE LARIMER COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION WERE THE CNLY SOURCES USED FOR BOUNDARY AND EASEMENT RESEARCH FOR LOT 10 DMSION 7 OF HIGH DRNE HEIGHTS. 4. THE CONTOURS SHOWN ARE AT 1 FOOT INTERVALS AND ARE BASED ON AN ON-SITE CONTROL POINT (NAIL SET :LUSH WITH THE GROUND) WHICH HAS AN ELEVATION OF 8504.00 FEET AS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN. APPROXIMATE ON-STE ELEVATION FROM ON GOGGLE EARTH. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON, ON THIS SITE PLAN, ARE RELATNE TO THIS BENCHMARK 5 BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE UNF BETWEEN, THE EASTERLY, PROPERTY CORNERS ASSUMED TO BEAR N04'09'E. BEING MONUMENTED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH END BY A 44 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 9465 6. THIS LOT IS ZONED RE (RURAL ESTATE). THE PRESCRIBED BUILDING SETBACKS FOR THIS ZONING ARE 50' ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINE. 7. A 10' WIDE UTILITY ACCESS EASEMENT RUN ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES (ACCORDING TO OTHER SURVEY'S AND zieS TJAT HAVE BEN PERFORMED BY THIS OFFICE (BY COVENANT)). 8. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERJEY THE LOCATION OF All UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND MAINTAIN THEM IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. 9. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ALL DUSTING PROPERTY CORNERS. 10. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SITE PLAN. 11. THE POSTED ADDRESS FOR THIS PROPERTY IS. 1545 HUMMINGBIRD DR. ESTES PARK. COLORADO 80517. LOT 47 SITE PLAN LOT 47, OF THE LITTLE VALLEY SUBDIVISION SECOND FLING, IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO LOT 35 1,9T 37 so' BUILDING SETBACKS N "N. -,.. 10.. 'UTILITY AND FAN4 ENT (5 TE 7). _ Y.„......,, ••... 7--.....„. ACC .'' ,_ ••...... . 1 . , . - ..- --. •-- - ' '::-:=..;',,. , -.... - '-.. _ ..... - - . --. rAre !SS) 25' SCALE: 1' 20' 20 40 60 r - 30. - s` 10' RIDE MUTT MID 0 EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT (SEE NOTE 7) 00.00 (0000) FOUND M(NUMEATTATION MEASURED DIMENSIONS PLATTED EIMENSK1NS 0 euu_oroc SETBACKS 40 80 120 SCALE: = 40' 50' WONT OF WAY PER PLAT SEPTIC VAULT PUMP CONNECTION LOT 46 SITE CONTROL ELEVATION 8504.00' (NIL SET FLUSH) BASE OF BENI fa REBAR 50' BUILDING SETBACKS SEPTIC VAULT PUMP CONNECTION LOWER STORAGE AREA 495_ CRETE 1.11) 8500- 04 REBAR PLASM CAP WITH STAMPED 9485 12 -.1 -1- 4 REBAR WITH LASTIC CAP STAMPED 6499 RICNT WAY PER PLAT 14 REBAR WITH PLASTIC STAMPED 9485 04 ROAR WITH PLASTIC STAMPED 26974 ACCESS TO ANC FRON- N, SITE SITE CONTROL. LEVATION 8504L00. (NAIL SET FLUSH) -ACCESS' 0 AND FRAM VIE r eu. LOT (901'17.001 394' gN A SPAWN BY • - 1718 C1WOCCD LA.5 Bo., YAM 50/89/8910 SST 1 01 1 440.I 2016-08-13 1 Verizon Wireless, Variance Request Location Requirement Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 230, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DATE: April 5, 2016 REQUEST: Variance from location standards within Section 5.1 (T)(2) of the Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Standards, to allow a microcell antenna tower to be placed on a site that does not include a school, hospital, police station, public utility substation or a high-tension power line easement. LOCATION: Weist/Moraine Parking Lot west of Moraine Avenue APPLICANT: Verizon Wireless PROPERTY OWNER: Town of Estes Park PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND: The applicant, Verizon Wireless is proposing to construct a 30-foot microcell antenna tower located in a "no parking section of the Weist/Moraine Parking lot. The tower would be painted dark green. An equipment enclosure is proposed at the bottom of the tower structure and would be made of cinder block and have green metal gates and bollards to match the nearby trash enclosure. There is an existing wooden utility/light pole within approximately five feet of the proposed facility. Since September of 2013, Verizon Wireless has evaluated the suitability of various locations throughout the Downtown Core to provide enhancements to existing cell coverage. The potential sites were eventually eliminated due to topography, inadequate structural characteristics of buildings, or a lack of agreement from all parties involved. The applicant found that the 505 square foot "no-parking" area within the Town-owned Weist/Moraine Parking Lot was the most suitable available site for improving cellular coverage downtown although it does not meet the location criteria within the Code. The applicant is requesting one variance related to the location criteria as a part of this project scope to accommodate the use on the proposed site. SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: TowerCom Technologies, LLC Parcel Number: Not Applicable (Unplatted Town owned parcel) Development Area: 505 square foot lease area (0.012 acres more or less) Existing Land Use: No parking area within a public parking lot Proposed Land Use: Microcell Antenna Tower Zoning Designation: CD Commercial Downtown/ R Residential Adjacent Zoning: East: CD Commercial Downtown North: CD Commercial Downtown West: R Residential South: CD Commercial Downtown/R Residential Adjacent Land Uses: East: Retail; public parking North: Retail; public parking West: Town-owned land and right-of-way South: Retail; public parking Services: Electric: Town of Estes Park REVIEW CRITERIA: In accordance with Section 3.6 C. "Standards for Review" of the EVDC, all applications for variances shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein. The Board of Adjustment is the decision-making body for this application. Please refer to the "Statement of Intent" document received on February 10, 2016 for the Applicant's comments regarding the review standards. 1. Special circumstances or conditions exist (e.g., exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of the property) that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code's standards, provided that the requested variance will not have the effect of nullifying or impairing the intent and purposes of either the specific standards, this Code or the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Finding: The subject lot does not include any physical particularities that require a variance. However, in this case, the "special circumstances" are the unique characteristics of all other sites that prevent development of this facility and resulted in the proposed use of this property. As such, the use of the site for public parking, proximity to downtown, and distance from residential uses makes it a comparably more appropriate location than other parts of the community. Additionally, all location criteria indicate intent to locate microcell antenna towers on sites with public facilities. This parking lot is a public facility but not one that is included on the list of acceptable sites within the Wireless Telecommunication Facilities standards. Staff finds that due to the characteristics of the proposed location, this variance would not impair the intent of the Code. The Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan identifies the CBD (Commercial Downtown district) as a district allowing many uses with the purpose of establishing the downtown as the retail, cultural, and entertainment center of Estes Park. Staff finds that the location of proposed development, considering the need to provide adequate cellular services to tourists, residents, and emergency personnel, is consistent with the long-range planning policies related to land use and economics. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, April 5, 2016 Page 2 of 6 Verizon Wireless Variance Request 2. In determining "practical difficulty," the Board of Adjustment shall consider the following factors: a. Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance. Staff Finding: The proposed tower would be located on an unused portion of the parking lot that is not delineated as parking and marked with the words "No Parking" since its unusual configuration cannot accommodate parking spaces. No other use is proposed for the site. Without a variance from the location standard, there is not another suitable location available at this point in time that could accommodate the type of facility necessary to improve cell phone coverage in the Downtown Core. b. Whether the variance is substantial. Staff Finding: The variance request is to allow for the microcell antenna tower to be developed in a location other than on a property which also includes a school, hospital, police or fire station, or placed at a public utility substation or within a high-tension power line easement per the requirements of Section 5.1 (T)(2) of the Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Standards. Both the type of locations allowed by Code and this public parking lot site share the characteristics of being a public or quasi-public use, and do not negatively impact residential land uses. As such, the variance requested is not substantial. c. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance. Staff Finding: Given the buffer of Town-owned land surrounding the proposed site, close proximity of this site to the Downtown Core, and distance from residential uses, the addition of a microcell antenna tower within a public parking lot would not significantly change the existing commercial character of the site. Materials used for the wall surrounding the equipment will match the materials used for the existing on-site trash enclosure. The applicant has provided photo simulations to demonstrate that the adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment as a result of granting the variance. The western corner of the equipment area and wall extends into an area of the parking lot zoned R Residential. However, since this is Town-owned property at the base of a steep hillside unsuitable for development, no residences will be built adjacent to this facility. Staff finds that this variance would allow Page 3 of 6 1.0 Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, April 5, 2016 Verizon Wireless Variance Request development that is substantially in conformance with the existing types of uses in the immediate area. d. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer. Staff Finding: Granting the variance to allow the proposed facility to be located in the Town-owned parking lot would not adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer but would positively impact the delivery of cellular service to Verizon customers, including the Town of Estes Park Police Department. The Public Works Department raised concerns that the vehicle sight distance is impacted by the proposed structures and the vehicle turning radius in the travel lanes is impacted by the proposed bollards. As such, the Public Works Engineering Manager requested the Site Plan be revised to delineate vehicle travel lanes along the north side of the site. This travel path should include the turning radius of an emergency vehicle driving through a lane. A painted centerline stripe between the travel lanes is required. The applicant has reduced the lease area by approximately three feet to accommodate the travel lanes and emergency vehicle access. The revised plans depict a 22'4" of drive area in front of the lease area. Although the revisions are an improvement, Public Works maintains some concerns regarding traffic circulation in that long vehicles that extend beyond the parking stalls adjacent to the cell tower boundary could cause uncomfortable situations. The applicant is willing to work with Public Works to address all issued raised in the March 28th comment letter. Staff has provided a condition of approval that all Public Works comments shall be adequately addressed. Although the applicant indicated that no existing parking stalls would be removed with this development, the Public Works Engineering Manager raised concerns about parking space availability considering that maintenance vehicles that would periodically utilize parking stalls. The applicant stated that the site would be regularly maintained approximately once every three months by one or two technicians traveling in one vehicle. Technician site visits usually take approximately 2-4 hours per visit. Staff finds that the proposed maintenance schedule would not adversely affect public service of parking spaces provided by the Town. Since the proposed cell tower and equipment are proposed on existing asphalt, no modifications to the existing drainage and grading pattern would be completed with this development. Proposed access and utility easements as delineated on the topographic survey (Sheet LS1) and Site Plan document (Sheet Z1) of the development review plan set will need to be dedicated pursuant to the easement dedication process. Staff has provided a condition of approval to this effect for the Board's consideration. e. Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the requirement. 111 Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, April 5, 2016 Page 4 of 6 IA Verizon Wireless Variance Request Staff Finding: The property is owned by the Town and the applicant will lease the land. Therefore, this review criterion is not applicable to this variance request. f. Whether the Applicant's predicament can be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Staff Finding: The applicant has made a concerted effort to locate a telecommunications facility in the area and cannot locate in this area without a variance. Staff finds that the applicant's proposal cannot be accommodated through any other method except a variance. 3. No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or circumstances affecting the Applicant's property are of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the applicant's request for a variance is due to a one- time need for a tower that can provide coverage in the downtown area. It is unlikely that due to the unique characteristics of cellular network signal dispersion another situation will arise that would require another variance for a similar project in the downtown area. As such, Staff finds that the circumstances are unique to the applicant's proposal, and are not so general or recurrent of a nature as to make it reasonable for the regulation to be changed to accommodate similar circumstances. 4. No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision, pursuant to the applicable zone district regulations. Staff Finding: The variance requests will not result in a reduction in the size of lots contained in an existing or proposed subdivision. 5. If authorized, a variance shall represent the least deviation from the regulations that will afford relief. Staff Finding: The applicant has demonstrated that all other locations were not available and, therefore, this is the least deviation necessary to afford relief. 6. Under no circumstances shall the BOA grant a variance to allow a use not permitted, or a use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code for the zone district containing the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Findings: The variances requested will not permit a use prohibited or not expressly permitted in the Commercial Downtown zone district where the tower would be physically located. One corner of the lease area and enclosure will be located within the Residential zoning district where this use is also not expressly prohibited. 7. In granting such variances, the BOA may require such conditions as will, in its independent judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standard so varied or modified. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, April 5, 2016 Page 5 of 6 Verizon Wireless Variance Request Staff Finding: Staff has included two possible conditions of approval for the Board's consideration relating to the site circulation comments received from the Public Works Department and access and utility easement dedication. REFERRAL AND PUBLIC COMMENTS: The variance request was routed to reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. All agency staff comments and concerns related to the variances are included in this staff report. The public hearing for the variance request were publicly noticed in accordance with the applicable public notification requirements of the Estes Valley Development Code. STAFF FINDINGS: Staff finds that the proposed variance request would comply with the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 3.6.0 "Standards for Review" of the Estes Valley Development Code and advance goals, policies, and objectives adopted in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan once the two conditions of approval have been adequately addressed. POTENTIAL MOTIONS: Below are the Board of Adjustment options related to the one (1) variance request: 1. I find that the application substantially meets the criteria above, and move to recommend APPROVAL of the variance request application with no conditions. 2. ! find that the application substantially meets the criteria above, and move to recommend APPROVAL of the variance request with the following Conditions of Approval: a. Compliance with the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department memo dated March 25, 2016. b. Dedicate all proposed access and utility easements as depicted on the topographic survey (Sheet LS1) and Site Plan document (Sheet Z1) of the development review plan set prior to building permit submittal. 3. I find that the application does not substantially meet the criteria above and move to recommend DENIAL of the variance application 4. I find that the Applicant has not provided sufficient information to review the application per the criteria above and recommend CONTINUING THE HEARING to provide adequate time to review additional materials. ENCLOSURES: 1. Statement of Intent and Application 2. Development Review Plans dated March 28, 2016 3. Comment Letter from Public Works dated March 25, 2016 4. Photo Simulations Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, April 5, 2016 Page 6 of 6 Verizon Wireless Variance Request Enclosure #1 STATEMENT OF INTENT Verizon Wireless Microcell Antenna Tower at Public Parking Lot (FTC Redrum) Board of Adjustment Variance Request Introduction: In order to provide much needed enhancement of the wireless coverage in the downtown Estes Park area, Verizon Wireless (VZW) would like to install a permanent antenna tower in the public parking lot located at Moraine Avenue and Davis Street. As Estes Park continues to grow, and with increased traffic in the spring and summer months, the number of wireless users increases as well. Not only will this site provide more coverage to the downtown area, but it will also increase capacity in the Estes Valley in general. Specifically, the VZW site would be comprised of a 30 ft. microcell antenna tower located in a "no parking" section of the public parking lot at Moraine Avenue and Davis St. There will be a small equipment enclosure at the bottom of the tower as well. The tower will be painted dark green to better blend in with the surroundings. The equipment enclosure will be made of cinder block and have green metal gates and bollards to match a nearby trash enclosure. There is an existing wooden utility/light pole within about 5 feet of the proposed VZW site. The entire VZW lease area will be 666 square feet and will be limited to what it already a "no parking' area. That is, the VZW site will not take away any parking spaces from this public parking lot. The provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code inflict unnecessary hardship and practical difficulties upon VZW as follows: 1.) In this case, there are special circumstances of exceptional topographic conditions and lack of alternative sites that are not common to other areas or buildings similarly situated, and practical difficulty may result from strict compliance with this Code's standards. There are existing antenna towers located on top of Prospect Mountain, one of which has VZW antennas on it, but because of the topography of the area, these towers do not provide sufficient coverage for the downtown area in particular. That is, downtown is in a small valley of it's own and requires antennas on the floor of the valley to adequately cover the low lying area. Similarly, there is a rooftop antenna site off of Hwy 34 near Lake Estes (1260 Big Thompson Ave.), but it is also blocked by buildings and land, and so it cannot adequately cover the downtown area. To summarize, due to the unique topography of the Estes Valley and the downtown area in particular, there are very few areas that have the necessary height and clearance to make a telecommunications site feasible. VZW has been trying to get a permanent site built in the downtown Estes Park area since shortly after the flood in September of 2013. Most recently in 2015, VZW was going to build a rooftop site at Town Hall but the project was determined to not be feasible due to asbestos in the building. Alternative sites around the Town Hall were explored but were ruled out due to unavailability of space or lack of antenna clearance to the downtown area. Prior to that, VZW explored permanent sites at the following locations: 2 -US Bank at 363 E. Elkhorn was not interested in leasing rooftop space to VZW due to the number of antennas already located on their rooftop. -the Simply Christmas Shop (129 W. Elkhorn) was visited, but the AT&T antennas recently installed there take up the entire rooftop and there is not enough space for more antennas at that site. -the Park Theatre (130 Moraine) was visited several times, but the owners decided they were not interested in renting space to VZW for antennas. -the retail center at 210-220 Elkhorn indicated, through their property manager, Jessica Collins, that they were not interested due to issues with roof access. The public parking lot at Moraine Ave. and Davis St. is in a particularly good location for a telecommunications site in that it is above most of downtown and, from a 30 foot microcell antenna tower, provides a line of sight all the way through the downtown area. The Estes Valley Development Code, (Section 5.1.T. & Table 4.4) however, allows 30 ft. microcell antenna towers in a commercial district only on at public utility substations or in high-tension power line easements. VZW's proposed parking lot site does not fit the use criteria, although it is within a few feet of an existing utility pole. 2.) In determining "practical difficulty", VZW requests that the Board of Adjustment consider the following factors: a. without the variance, this part of the property is of no use in that it is a "no parking" area of the parking lot. (With the variance, this small unusable part of the lot can be used to improve downtown's cellular coverage as well as to generate substantial rental income for the Town of Estes Park.) b. the variance is not substantial in that the microcell antenna and equipment will take up very little space, will not project above the 30 foot height limit, will be located next to an existing utility pole and will be constructed and painted to blend with the surroundings. c. the essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered in that building and roof mounted antennas are allowed in this zone (up to 10 feet above the roof) and microcell antenna towers are also allowed in this zone at the locations listed above. Further, the microcell antenna tower would not exceed the valley side height limit of 30 feet and it would be located near an existing utility pole. In addition, the adjoining properties would not suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance because the adjoining properties are all owned by the Town of Estes Park and are used for a parking lot. d. the variance would not adversely affect the delivery of public services such as water and sewer (but it would positively impact the delivery of cellular services to VZW customers, including the Town of Estes Park Police Department.) e. the Applicant has knowledge of the zoning requirements on this property and will lease it (as opposed to purchasing it) from the Town of Estes Park if this variance is approved. f. the Applicant has explored several other possibilities for telecommunication sites in this area and has determined that this is most likely their last, and only feasible, option. Therefore, the Applicant's predicament cannot be mitigated through some method other than a variance. 3.) The conditions and circumstances of this property are not so general or recurrent to make it reasonable to formulate a general regulation for such a situation. Rather, this is a 3 unique situation that requires a special exception to accommodate the exceptional topography and lack of alternative sites specifically for the downtown area. 4.) No change in lot or subdivision size is being proposed. S.) A variance of the locational criteria to allow a microcell antenna tower at this public parking lot is a minor deviation from the regulations. 6.) A microcell antenna tower is a not a "use not permitted" or a "use expressly or by implication prohibited under the terms of this Code." 7.) VZW will abide by any conditions required by the BOA to grant this requested variance. ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Submittal Date: COMMOIVITt0E ?EtOPMENT„ GoneraJ Information Record Owner(s): Town of Estes Park Street Address of Lot: Alley, adjacent to Lots 45, 5B, 4A & 5A in 1ST RESUBDIVISION OF BUENNA VISTA TERR. Legal Description: Lot: Subdivision: Block: Tract: 1st Resubdivision of Buena Vista Terrace Parcel ID # : There is no Parcel ID# for this property - it is in the Town parking lot at Moraine & Davis SL Site. Information Lot Size unknown (proposed lease size 666 sq. ft.) Zoning CD Existing Land Use "No Parking" section of Town owned public parking lot Proposed Land Use Telecommunications site Existing Water Service N/A r Town Well r Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service N/Ar Town Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service N/A r" EPSD UTSD Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service N/A : EPSD UTSD Septic Existing Gas Service N/A r Xcel C'' Other None Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Vor cince in public parking lot r yes Variance Desired (Development Code Section #): Sect.#5.1 Microceli Antenna Towers 8rfable-4-4Wireless Tele= VZW wants to put a 30 ft. antenna tower in the public parking lot (which is not a public utility substation or in a high-tension power line easement as required by the Development Code) c, .IT Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Barbara Grant - Closser Consulting, LLC Complete Mailing Address 5430 Mini Way, Boulder CO 80303 Primary Contact Person is r Owner Applicant : Consultant/Engineer AttaGhir nts Application fee (see attached fee schedule) Statement of intent (must comply with standards set forth in Section 3.6.0 of the EVDC) 1 copy (folded) of site plan (drawn at a scale of = 20') " \,‘„, 1 reduced copy of the site plan (11' X 17") Digital copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF formal emalled to planning ri-J esteserg The site plan shall include information in Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B.Vil.5 (attached). The applicant will be required to provide additional copies of the site plan after staff review (see the attached Board of Adjustment variance application schedule). Copies must be folded. Town of Estes PolicP75.1GTiO0.767;priiiir venue ----ssates Park, CO 80517- Community Development Department Phone: 19701 577-3721 .e Fax: 1771)) 5S50249 www.estes.arg/CommunityDevelopment Revised 2013.08.27 KT Record Owner(s) Town of Estes Park Mailing Address 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park CO 80017 Phone (970)577-3576 Jon Landkamer, Facilities Manager Cell Phone Fax Email jlandkamer@estes.org Applicant Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Verizon Wireless 3131 S. Vaughn Way, #550, Aurora, CO 80014 303)901-3092 Stacey Bell-Brower, Real Estate Specialist Stamiy.Bell-Brower@VerizonWireless.com Barbara Grant - Closser Consulting, 5430 11lini Way, Boulder CO 80303 303)618-7469 Fax 303)554-1494 (please call first) Email barbiegrant@comcastnet APPLICATION FEES For variance applications within the Estes Valley Planning Area. both Inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at- htto:ilwww estes orgiComDev/Schedules&I-ees/F-lanninclApplicationFeeSchati*.pctr All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. Revised 2013.08.27 KT APP CANT CERTIFICATIOR t, I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct (o the best of my knowledge and that in filing (ha application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at htlp://www estes org(ComDeviDevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Par!: for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. understand that this variance request may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, Inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. in I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I-' I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Members of the Board of Adjustment with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Variance Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. i understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. I understand that I am required to obtain a 'Variance Notice' sign from the Community Development Department and that this sign must be posted on my property where his clearly visible from the road. I understand that the corners of my property and the proposed building/structure corners must be field staked. I understand that the sign must be posted and the staking completed no later than ten (10) business days prior to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment hearing. t- I understand that if the Board of Adjustment approves my request, 'Fat of an applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or action with regard to the varicnce approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the variance may automatically render the dscision of the BOA null and void." (Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.6.D) Nemec: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 1-04/1- 6,-4.-A k-eY Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Barbara Grant Signatures: Record Owner Applicant „- Date Date 2/512016 Revised 201108.27 KI Use Regulations § 5.1 Specific Use Standards 1. All wholesaling, distribution and storage of materials and equipment, except vehicles used for transporting the warehoused products, shall be conducted within a totally enclosed building. 2. Vehicles used for transporting the warehoused products shall be screened from view from all neighboring properties and from internal and external streets with a minimum six-foot solid masonry or wood fencing and landscaping, berms and landscaping or other approved comparable screening. T. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. All wireless telecommunications facilities shall be subject to the following standards: 1. General. a. All telecommunications facilities shall comply with the standards of this Code, all applicable standards of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. b. Building permits for a facility shall not be issued until the facility is approved through the development plan or special review process. 2. Microcell Antenna Towers. a. Microcell antenna towers shall be permitted by right in the zoning districts shown in Tables 4-1 and 4-4, provided that the following conditions are met: (1) The tower is thirty (30) feet in height or less; and (2) The tower is placed two hundred (200) feet or less from the right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 34 or 36 or Colorado Highway 7; and the tower is placed on a lot on which is located any of the following uses: (a) Schools; (b) Hospitals; or (c) Police or fire station; or The tower is placed at a public utility substation or within a high-tension power line easement. b. Microcell antenna towers that are higher than thirty (30) feet and/or do not satisfy the locational criteria set forth in paragraph a above shall only be permitted by special review. 3. Compliance with the Larimer County Wireless Facilities Siting Regulations. All telecommunications facilities shall comply with the purpose and standards set forth in the Larimer County Land Use Code, §16, "Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) Facilities," including but not limited to the following provisions contained therein: a. §16.1.2.B, "Preferred CMRS Facilities"; b. §16.1.2.C, "Facilities on Residential Properties"; c. §16.1.2.D, "Facilities at Historic Sites and Visually Sensitive Areas," except that for historic sites located within the Town of Estes Park, the Board of Trustees shall be the entity with sole authority to allow siting of facilities on a historic site or structure. In addition, to the maximum extent feasible, siting of facilities shall not occur in public open areas or parks. > (3) 5-7 Verizon Cell Tower-Town Parking Lot.xls Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip Edward Kueteman 346 Admiral Cir Galveston TX 77554 James & Garnet Hocker 1005 Ramshorn Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Maureen Marsh PO Box 3226 Estes Park CO 80517 T & 1 Hays, LLC 1440 County Club Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Charles & Christine Hall Trust 161 Stanley Cir Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Whimsical Inc Po Box 3223 Estes Park CO 80517 Randy & Karen Martin PO Box 4528 Estes Park CO 80517 251 Moraine LLC PO Box 2128 Estes Park CO 80517 Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park CO 80517 Trendz at the Park LLC 7501 E McCormick Pkwy Scottsdale AZ 85258 JT Clough Company PO Box 634 Greeley CO 80632 TNT Investments LLC 41 Kuester Lake Grand Island NE 68801 Leta & Everett Lefzger PO Box 67 Estes Park CO 80517 Michael Lemley & Marsha Groome 138 Courtney Ln Estes Park CO 80517 Apropo Inc 2305 Broadway St Boulder CO 80302 Park Theatre Mall LLC PO Box 3052 Estes Park CO 80517 Larry Beal PO Box 1573 Wickenburg AZ 85390 Lott Street Familiy Holdings LLC 221 Lott St Estes Park CO 80517 BBC Holdings LLC 1550 K St Gering NE 69341 WAG Corp Inc 1021 Carr St #27 Lakewood CO 80214 Riverspointe Downtown Lofts LLC 1692 Big Thompson Ave #200 Estes Park CO 80517 Anita Thapa PO Box 1066 Estes Park CO 80517 MMMJ LLC 1957 Yonkee Dr Windsor CO 80550 JIB Properties LLC PO Box 8106 Breckenridge CO 80424 Barbara Haber 910 Lahinch Cir Richardson TX 75081 Trading Post Real Estate Holdings LLC PO Box 2315 Estes Park CO 80517 John Grace 156 Juniper Hill Rd NE Albuquerque NM 87122 Ginger & Dean Harris 2803 Fall River Rd Estes Park CO 80517 Robert Copper Family Ltd Ptnshp PO Box 1125 Estes Park CO 80517 William & Sheila Ellzey 141 Courtney Ln Estes Park CO 80517 Robert Hayes 12569 Hazel St Broomfield CO 80020 Freemont Investments LLC 1025 W 25th St Casper WY 82604 Melinda Merrill 1550 Larimer St #185 Denver CO 80202 Michael & Karol Harris 3512 Red River St Austin TX 78705 Russell & April Sorenson 13792 Breeders Cup Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Gerald & Donetta Patrick 11579 Decatur St #A Westminster CO 80234 Jeffrey & Patricia Bergan 3330 Glacier Dr Estes Park CO 80517 Donna Petrie 3031 Rockwood Cir Estes Park CO 80517 Barbara Morley & Toni Siebenaler 145 Courtney Ln Estes Park CO 80517 Stephen Komito PO Box 2106 Estes Park CO 80517 Sharon Keeler PO Box 3021 Estes Park CO 80517 Stephen & Melinda Rickard 22512 WCR 72 Eaton CO 80615 William & Madelyn Burcaw & Linda Paglia 1991 N Sharon Ct Estes Park CO 80517 Ralph & Alegra Haber Trust 3208 Ardsley Dr Orlando FL 32804 Daniel & Susan Doylen PO Box 669 Estes Park CO 80517 Page 1 Memo To: Community Development Enclosure #3 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PUBLIC WORKS From: Kevin Ash, PE, Public Works Engineering Manager Greg Muhonen, PE, Director of Public Works Date: March 25, 2016 RE: Verizon Wireless Microcell Tower — Weist Parking Lot Public Works offers the following comments and conditions for the Verizon Wireless Microcell Tower Development Plan application as submitted. Comments and Conditions are applicable for plans received on February 101h, 2016. Transportation: 1. Condition: Vehicle sight distance is impacted by the proposed structures. Vehicle turning radius in the travel lanes is impacted by proposed bollards. The Site Plan should delineate vehicle travel lanes along the north side of the site. This travel path should include the turning radius of an emergency vehicle driving through a lane. A painted centerline stripe between the travel lanes will be required. Any impacts to parking stalls opposite the tower structure should be identified. 2. Condition: The application indicates no existing parking stalls will be removed with this development. However I would believe that maintenance vehicles would periodically take parking stalls. The applicant should provide an estimated maintenance and site usage schedule that the Town should expect to see and what impact on existing parking stalls this would have. Drainage & Grading: 1. Comment: The proposed cell tower and equipment are proposed on existing asphalt. No modifications to the existing drainage and grading pattern will be completed with this development. ) -4 Pe4/PS5 PS2IPS3 ag5R : FTC MORAINEIWEIST PARKING LOT 0S6/P,S7 Sa/PS -71W P 9 • r , PS14/PS15 Enclosure #4 verirAonwireless FTC MORAINEIWEIST PARKING LOT PHOTO SIMULATION MARCH 23, 2016 7-• YE§ TECHNOLOGIES SITE ADDRESS: MORAINEIWEIST PARKING LOT ESTES PARK, COLORADO LARIMER COUNTY COORDINATES: LAT: 40°22'29.93"N LONG: 105°31'26.98"W CONTENTS: PS1: COVER PS2: EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION PS3: NORTH ELEVATION SIMULATION PS4: EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION PS5: NORTH ELEVATION SIMULATION PS6: EXISTING EAST ELEVATION PS7: EAST ELEVATION SIMULATION PS8: EXISTING EAST ELEVATION PS9: EAST ELEVATION SIMULATION PS10: EXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION PS11: SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SIMULATION PS12: EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION PS13: SOUTH ELEVATION SIMULATION PS14: EXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 13515: SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SIMULATION TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC 767 N. Star Road Str 7 83669 (208) 286-0266 Albuquerque, NM • Boise, ID • El Paso, TX • Las Vegas, .1 • Denver, CO • Irvine, CA • Tempe, AZ • West Valley, U PS1 FTC MORAINENVEIST PS2 yen onmitmess IMO FTC MORAINENVEIST PARKING LOT SITE PHOTO EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION MARCH 23, 2016 PS4 `1. FTC MORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT SITE PHOTO NORTH ELEVATION SIMULATION MARCH 23, 2016 PS5 Mum 7-ery-arrol_crarms Aon wireless PS7 FTC MORAINE/WEISAFi'ARKINg LOT SITE PHOTO EXISTING EAST ELEVATION MARCH 23, 2016 PS8 FTC MORAINENVEISZIPARKING SITE PHOTO EAST ELE\1MULATION MARCH 23, 2016 PS9 ' h• J • • 4 6.•";, V"ereOnWirel8*. • ,y:. FTC MORAINENVEIST PARKINGLFOT PS10 1 • 11 MORAINEANEIST SOUTHEAST • 4,64010miovigivisiaisemumw.- . _ TtsumPrneurn SIMULATION ELEVATION TEC1-11-101-0ME.M. MARC 23, 201.6 PS11 11CN MORA IN ENVEIST PARKING verir £011 wireless PHOTO MEW@ SOUTH ELEVATION "TotafuriCionn MARCH 2016 TECHY7C71_001E5 PS12 PS13 PARKING MORAINE/WEIST verir Ion wireless ELEVATION PHOTO SIMULATION TOCI-ItIOLCIGIES" 2016 MARSH Ttisaimr42;;n1IVI fp- SOUTH FISd ...Vie. -••• .". =IC Wienkstais.... NZ - ', ., ?,, ,,. x . ;i'g' t fttkrr..577Z;747,%.tAkt4...11 . ',Pita... ' ,,,i.. rat A. ;":'':. . e ._. . -......_ t ._ cf,ed Town owned - utility poie6. vacant areas and part 0 parking lot Ptivateiy owned residence (Harris)" Ite '3 Town owned - parking bland public restroorn trash enclosure public restroo Land Use of Adjacent Properties Buildings/Structures within 200 feet VZW Microcell Antenna Tower site at Town parking lot (FTC Redrum) 1: C 1;1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ( ) GIE SIN 03/16/16 33/28/1B 'Enclosure #2 I BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: ALL GoNSTIAUCTIDN SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING APPLICABLE CODES. USED Cad. Year I Type: (ORDINANCE) X 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) X 2012 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE (w/0 CHAP. 13) (UPC). X 2012 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE (IEGC) x 2012 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (IRA) x 2017 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 1 X 2012 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE (IECC) x 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (ITC) x 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC). REFER TO BUILDING PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. verliofiwireless MORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT (ALT 5) PROJECT NO. 20151278686 PUBLIC RECORD PARCEL NO. CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW 29'-0" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING: INSTALLATION • ONE (1 29'-0" MONOPOLE (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) • THREE 3) NEW OUTDOOR CABINETS • NEW GALVANIZED PLATFORM • TWO (2 NEW MAIN OAP UNITS • SIX (6) NEW RRH UNITS • TWO (2 NEW HYBRIFLEX CABLES • NEW CAAU WALL ENCLOSURE ON CONCRETE SLAB WITH WROUGHT IRON GATES - THREE 3) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS • TWO (2 NEW 6•e PVC CONDUIT PIPES • ONE (1 NEW GENERATOR PLUG • FOURTEEN (14) NEW 4'0 CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARDS • EIGHTEEN (18) NEW %'IA COAX CABLES • TWO (2 NEW HYBRID CABLES FUTURE INSTALLATION • THREE (3) FUTURE RRAi UNITS THESE DRAWINGS MID SURVEYS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOwERCOLA TECHNOLOGIES. LLC AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES. LLC. SHEET SP1 Z3 RF1 LS.1 Z2 Ti 1 TITLE SHEET SPECIFICATION & PHOTO SHEET SITE SURVEY SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE FUN & EQUIPMENT INSIST PLAN. BOLLARD WOO MAN REV PUBLIC RECORD PARCEL NO: JURISDICTION: PROJECT INFORMATION: OWNER: VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T S NORTH PROJECT INDEX: APPLICANT/CLIENT. VERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT 3131 VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 550 AURORA. COLORADO 130014 CONTACT: JASON SHELLEDy CELL: 970-545-1283 FAX: 353-873-2654 ENGNEERS/DESCNERS• TOwERCOM TECHNOLOGIES LLC 1745 SHEA CENTER DR. 4TH FLOOR HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 CONTACT STEVE HAAG PHONE: 303-683-3194 En_ 151 suRNiFYON ALTURA LAND CONSULTANTS 6551 5 REVERE PARKWAY. SUITE 165 CENTENNIAL. CO 60111 CONTACT: JESSE LEM PHONE, 720-488-1303 ZONING/SITE AO. CLOSSER CONSULTING, LLC 5430 ILUNI WAY BOULDER, COLORADO 80303 CONTACT: BARBARA GRANT (303) 554-1494 - OFFICE (393) 618-7469 - MOBILE GENERAL PROJECT NOTES: PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF/HERSELF WITH THE SCOPE OF WORK AND ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS Of THE JOB SITE AND CONFIRM THAT WORN AS INDICATED ON THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. ALL FIELD MODIFICATIONS BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL RE APPROVES IN WRITING By A VERIZON WIRELESS REPRESENTATIVE. 4. NOTIFY VERIZON WIRELESS, IN WRITING, OF ANY MAJOR DISCREPANCIES REGARDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND DESIGN INTENT_ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING CLARIFICATIONS FROM A VERIZON WIRELESS REPRESENTATIvE AND ADJUSTING THE BID ACCORDINGLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND FINISHES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR DURING THE CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF A VERIZON WIRELESS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR RED-LINING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE THE AS-BUILT CONDITION OF THE SITE. FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION BY VERIZON WIRELESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE VERIZON WIRELESS WITH ONE COPY OP ALL RED-UNED DRAWINGS VERIFY ALL FINAL EQUIPMENT WITH A VENDON WIRELESS REPRESENTATIVE ALL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT, SPECS, PERFORMANCE INSTALLATION AND THEIR FINAL LOCATION ARE TO BE APPROVED BY VERIZON WIRELESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS/HER WORK WITH THE WORK AND CLEARANCES REQUIRED BY OTHERS RELATED TO SAID INSTALLATIONS TOWN OF ESTES PARK 170 MACGREGOR AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 0017 CONTACT: ERIC ROSE, COMMANDER PHONE: 970-227-6968 CITY OF ESTES PARK PO BOx 1200 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 50517 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONTACT: PHIL KLEISLER, PLANNER PHONE: 970-577-3725 CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE FCC COMPLIANCE: RADIATION FROM THIS FACILITY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH OPERATION OF OTHER COMMUNICATION DEVICES_ ADA COMPLIANCE: THIS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION, LANDINGS AND EKES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE DRIVING DIRECTIONS: FROM THE VERIZON WIRELESS OFFICE LOCATED AT 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY. AURORA. CO. HEAD SOUTHWEST ON S VAUGHN WAY. MERGE ONTO CO-83/S PARKER RD VIA THE RAMP ON THE LEFT. MERGE ONTO 1-225 N. TRAVEL 8.0 MI. TAKE THE I-70 W EXIT, EXIT 12A. ON THE LEFT TOWARD DENVER, TRAVEL 1.22 MI. MERGE ONTO US-36 W, TRAVEL S-5 MI. MERGE ONTO 1-25 NAS-87 N VIA EXIT 0 TOWARD FT COLLINS. TRAVEL 25.8 MI. TAKE THE CO-6.6 EXIT. Exff 243, TOWARD LONGVONITAYONS. KEEP LEFT TO TAKE THE RAMP TOWARD LONGmONT/LYONS/EsTES PARK/ROCKY mOUNTAN/NATIONAL PARK. TURN LEFT ONTO CO-66/COUNTY HWy-30/STATE HIGHWAY 66. CONTINUE TO FOLLOW c0-66. TRAVEL 15.9 MI. TURN SLIGHT RIGHT ONTO W MAIN ST. W MAIN ST BECOMES US-36 w/C0-56. TRAVEL 19.8 MI. TURN LEFT ONTO US-36 W/US-34 BUS w/C0-65/E ELKHORN ATE. TURN LEFT ONTO MORAINE AVE/US-36 W/C0-66, SITE WILL BE AHEAD ON YOUR RIGHT. DEFAMED roa, m VerlMwireless 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 550 AURORA, COLORADO 80014 DESIGNED or: I Taweriilum richrax_oz, AZ - CA - CO - ID - NM - NV - TX - LIT PROJECT MALI HORAINUWEIST PARKING LOT NEW 29'-0" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30.-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE PROJECT ADDRESSI MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY SAX, TM.E TITLE SHEET DATE O APPROVED FOR LEASING & ZONING JURISDICTION COMMENTS SHEET INDEX TITLE ELEVATIONS WA1IIN. 1110116101i1E111111341188111/001 6(1611 0 5. 3 5 6. 7. B. 9. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERU•LS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. REV TE•CRIPIIOS CNA SAVE ERTL I 3/26/2016 4:25 Pm SHEET NURSER: I I- 1 LEGEND OF SYMBOLS: REFERENCE LETTER <> EQUIPMENT OR FIXTURE NUMBER OR NUMBER SECTION OR DETAIL () KEYED NOTE CALE SHEET WHERE DRAWN 4 T.C..; 113111g SPOT ELEVATION SHEET WHERE TAKEN 4011 0 SECTION LETTER 4 1T 6 0 3P9,00F0 WALL CONTROL OR DATUM POINT SHEET WHERE DRAWN SHEET WHERE TAKEN PROPERTY LINE tli c DETAIL NUMBER SHEET WHERE DRAWN SHEET WHERE TAKEN It CENTERLINE d PENNY NEM EXISTING 1631 CONTOUR NEW CONTOUR A ROUND/DIAMETER APPROXIMATELY \\_NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 13'-6'K47'-3" LEASE AREA (505 SO. FT) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 13'-eX47'-3' LEASE AREA (505 SO. FT) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS A •j.° 13' -6"X 4 7' -3 LEASE AREA ;rr. , R(505 50 IT; VIEW OF NEW LEASE AREA (LOOKING SOUTH) VIEW OF NEW LEASE AREA (LOOKING SOUTHEAST) VIEW OF NEW LEASE AREA (LOOKING NORTHWEST) CJE APPROVED FOR LEASING & ZONING SJH JURISDICTION COMMENTS 33`16/1 6 33428/1D GENERAL PROJECT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ERECTING TEMPORARY BARRICADES AND/OR FENCING TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE PUBUC DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY BARRIERS AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGE To PROPERTY ON THE SITE CAUSED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION. THE COST OF REPAIR IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 2. ..-fr."--1E ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL. STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL MEASUREMENTS AT THE SITE PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY MATERIALS OR CONDUCTING ANY WORK. 4. EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL AND DEBRIS CAUSED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE A SITE FREE OF DRAINAGE PROBLEMS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE A CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA SHALL BE FENCED-IN WITH TEMPORARY (45 OAT) CONSTRUCTION FENCE. THE TEMPORARY FENCE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FABRIC AND IS TO BE REMOVED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. LAYDOWN AREA IS TO BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AFTER FENCE REMOVAL. 7. SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN WAS CREATED FROM RECORD INFORMATION .AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 8 THESE PLANS DO NOT ADDRESS THE SAFETY AND STABILITY OF THE STRUCTURE DURING ASSEMBLY AND ERECTION, WHICH ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ERECTOR, BASED ON THE MEANS AND METHODS CHOSEN BY THE ERECTOR. 9. NEW EQUIPMENT COMPOUND SHALL BE COVERED W/ 4- CRUSHED ROCK INSTALLED OVER CUENT-APPROVED WEED BARRIER MATERIAL (IF APPLICABLE). (OR PER BULT-UP COMPOUND SECTION.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK DEFINED UNDER THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR THIS PROJECT AND ALL ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS AND DOCUMENTS PROVIDED. THE RFP AND ALL ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS SHALL DEFINE THE COMPLETE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL DOCUMENTS AND IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK. ALL DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE PROJECT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ARE REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK (EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL, INSTALLATION, TESTING, ETC.) INDICATED IN ALL DOCUMENTS. THE REP, VERIZON WIRELESS NETWORK STANDARDS AND PROJECT ADDENDUMS AND CLARIFICATIONS ARE COMPLEMENTARY TO EACH OTHER. THE FORMAT OF THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWING NUMBERING PER DISCIPLINE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPLY SEGREGATION OF SUB CONTRACTOR WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSIGN ALL SUB CONTRACTOR WORK AND VERIZON WIRELESS WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY CHANGE ORDERS FOR INTERNAL CONTRACTOR WORK ASSIGNMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DisTRIBuTING ALL REP DOCUMENTS TO THEIR SUB CONTRACTORS. Al RFP DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRE() TO INDICATE THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. PARTIAL SUB CONTRACTOR DOCUMENT PACKAGES ARE HIGHLY DISCOURAGED. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS. REFERENCED STANDARDS, VENISON WIRELESS STANDARDS, OR AGREEMENT TERMS ANT) CONDITIONS THE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR FORMAL INTERPRETATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UL DEEMED TO HAVE PROVIDED THE DETAILED AND EXTENSIVE INTERPRETATION. ANY WORK INSTALLED IN CONFLICT WITH THE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INTERPRETATIONS SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO EXPENSE TO VERIZON WIRELESS. 2. ALL ANTENNAS MUST BE PINT TESTED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THEM BEING RECEIVED BY THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. THOSE RESULTS MUST BE SENT BACK TO THE VERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER AND EQUIPMENT ENGINEER WITHIN THE SAME 4B HOURS. IF YOU MISS THE 48HR TIMEUNE AND THE ANTENNAS DO NOT PASS UPON INSTALLATION, YOUR COMPANY WILL BE CHARGED FOR THE COST OF THE ANTENNAS FOR REPLACEMENT. 3. ALL LOADS MUST HE SECURED PROPERLY TO THE VEHICLE OR TRAILER. VERIZON WIRELESS WILL PASS ALONG THE COST OF ANY REPLACEMENTS DUE TO DAMAGE OR LOSS WHETHER rr IS NEW OR USED. ANTENNA. MOUNTS & HARDWARE INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ANTENNAS, MOUNTS AND TOWER HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS (OR AS REQUIRED BY THE OWNER/PROVIDER). -.2. ALL BOLTS SHALL BE TIGHTENED PER AJSC REQUIREMENTS (SEE STEEL NOTES). 3. ANY GALVANIZED SURFACES THAT ARE DAMAGED BY ABRASIONS. CUTS, DRILLING OR FIELD WELDING DURING SHIPPING OR ERECTION SHALL BE TOUCHED-UP WITH TWO COATS OF COLD GALVANIZING COMPOUND MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A780. 4. ANTENNA MOUNTS SHALL NOT BE USED AS A CLIMBING DEVICE. WORKERS SHALL ALWAYS TIE OFF TO AN APPROVED CLIMBING POINT, 5. SEE ALSO GENERAL ANTENNA NOTES ON SHEET RF 1 (IF APPLICABLE). STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA: ALL LOADS DERIVED FROM REQUIREMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2012. ASCE 7- 0, •miromuTA DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES- & ANSI TIA-222-G STRUCTURAL. STANDARD FOR ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES AND ANTENNAS'. BUILDING STRI IrT1 IRF q- 1. WINO LOADS IBC 2012 $1609 & ASCE 7-10 929.4 (SIMPLIFIED METHOD) VON 105 MPH OCCUPANCY CAT. - TI, EXPOSURE CAT. - C; IMPORTANCE FACTOR - 1.0 2. SEISMIC LOADS. !Bo 2012 01613 & ASCE 7-10 612.14 (SIMPLIFIED METHOD) OCCUPANCY CAI. II; SITE CLASS = D V 11 'ISLA*/ R F = 1.0 (SINGLE-STORY), 1.1 (TWO STORY), 1.2 (THREE STORY) Sos - (2/3) SNYS R - 1.5 (ORDINARY PLAIN CONCRETE SHEARviALLS), 6.5 (LIGHT-FRAMED WALLS W/ WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS), 4.0 (ORDINARY REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEARWALLS) 1 WIND LOADS. IBC 2012 61609, ASCE 7-10 429.5 & ANSI TIA-222-G V - 90 MPH (3-SEC. OUST} V = 50 MFH Or RADIAL ICE) STRUCTURE CLASS. - II; EXPOSURE CAT. = c; IMPORTANCE FACTOR = 1.0 2. SEISMIC LOADS' IBC 2012 61613, ASCE 7-10 #15.6.6 & ANSI TIA-222-G DIREST. CLASS. - IL DCC. CAT. - 11, SRE CLASS ..-- I); IMPORTANCE FACTOR = 1.0 V - $0(0.)1 (EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE (METHOD 1)) R v - S S2g1010. (EQUIVALENT MODAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE (METHOD 2)) R THESE DRAWINGS AND SURVEYS ME COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES. LLC AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. DESIGNED FAA I verwwireiess 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 550 AURORA, COLORADO 80014 DESIGNED V. I TowenCon TICHAVILCOMS AZ - CA - CO - ID - NM - NV - DC - UT N WECT IMORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT NEW 29'-0" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE PHONED szvum MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY SAYE mu:I SPECIFICATION & PHOTO SHEET BEV DESCAPSOM DATE NY CHA SP 1 SAYE Coal smrr BUBOES. I 3/25/2018 4128 PM OLCBUGLIS IRE EDGE Of ASPHALT =5= FINISHED FLOOR RASH SURFACE RO W. FIRE *0004111 FLOW UM FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED FOUND SECTION 1HOHUMENI • GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION rrr GAS PERM IRRIGATOR CONTROL VALVE WEIST DRIVE ACCESS LOY ;"' FIRST RESUBolViSioN BUENNA vis-rA T CE ERRA 7 • • • • • 7549 44 • . • PASTOR PROPOSED 12'--,-- ...11.5./UOLITY CASEMENT MORAINE AVENUE sW 40 DEPT APPROVED DATE 1 .-.1 1:1-1 E 4.4 13 2 t.., l_i 0.• 1 i '.4 y ,E. 1 i o, -.-- 61 . I I , t L iii tr D L jH 1. V VerWri- wireless 3131 S. VAUGHN WAY. SINE 550 AURORA, CO. 80014 PH: (303) 503-6700 giQP I 0 P li- 1 g Iii ..!-. ..`--... ',:7'. E. .,..''• s...t. LS 1 Legend Line Legend NATURAL GROUND PARKING MEARD POINT OF BECIL•NING POINT OF COMMENCEMENT OIAERPIEAD ELECTRIC UNE POWER POLE PROPERTY LINE RIGHT OF BAY SEWER MARBLE SIGN POST STREET LICHT STANDARD TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TYPICAL AMER rain WATER raw - SUBJECT PARCEL wird:al. ore - szonoN ere = roroamoc PARCEL BOUNDARY MS - EASEMENT LINES FLCHT OF WAY LIVES = FLOOD PLANE EWES - BARBED WIRE FENCE = CHMUNK FENCE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES UNDERGROUND GAS LINES = OVERHEAD ELECTRFC Lon DADERCROHND SANITARY SERER ULU - UNDERGROIND TELEPHONE LINES UNDERGROUND WATER LINES fi CONCRETE PAVIRMENT LONITERNS TREE ROO DIAMETER ROC Date of Survey OCTOBER 14, 2015 Basis of Bearings THE COLORADO STATE HAM COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH IONE (NAM} E.16S51M6M 112111/91421.091ERCACLUBACCSNDAV THIRD 50 cm + I 10.000 5E1/4 NW1/.4 sEcriont .25, 73 WES7, N -roWNsi-PP 5ORTM, RANGE or THE sTN P.M. • • • H LOT zA Bench Mark NC5 CONTROL POND 'COLINSON A2 ELEVATION = 7494 EZEI (4WD 1513) LOT 51 • • Title Report PREPARED BY. FRONT RANGE TIRE OF 0OWN104161 OMER, TLC ORDER NO, 1501941-2 EFTEOIVE DATE, JANUARY 19. 2019 AT 6.00 AM. Legal Description LOTS 4B, 50 AND 6B AND LOTS AA. SA 6A AND 7A TOGETHER MTH 11-15 purr MAIM THERETO, 0051 00000 0010W OF MEM VISTA TERRACE, COME' OF DARNER, STATE OF COLORADO Assessor's Parcel No. 35252-2 8-95S AS TO LOTS 4A. 54. 60 MO 70 302.42-26-956 AS 10 LOT 4B, 35252-213-958 AS 10 LOT 5B, 35252-26-960 AS TO LOT 6B; THE AILEY ADJACENT IC SAO LOTS WES NOT HAVE AN ASSIGNED PARCEL NUMBER FROM THE mar ASSESSOR. SND ALLY 15 PUBLIC RICA OF MY AS DEOCATEID 54 THE PLAT OF FIRST REARM/ACM OF BOEHM 'Asa. TERRACE Easements 10 MINERALS 65 wHATSOEVER KIND. SUBSURFACE AND SURFACE SUBSTANCES, INCLUDING 11)01 NOT UNITED TO COIL, UGWEE, OIL, CAS, URANIUM DAY, ROCK, SAND AND GRAVEL IN, ON, UNDER 014D THAT MAY B5 PRODUCED FROM HIE LAND, TOGETHER WIN ALL HAFTS PRWIEGES AND IMMONTIES RELATING THERETO, WHETHER ON NOT APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS DR LISTED IN SCHEME B. THE COAL ANT MAKES NO REPRESENEATION AS TO THE PRESENT OWNERSHP OF MAE SUCH NEMESIS. THERE MAY BE LEASES, GRANTS, ETOEPHONS OR RESERVATIONS Of INTERESTS THAT ARE NOT LIAM pro waren emote) II EASBIENTS. RIGHTS OF WHO. NOTTS ANC DEDICATIONS AS SHOYM ON THE FINAL HAT OF FBA RE-SLIBOMSON OF KENNA 44510 TERRACE, RECORDED OECENEER 13, 1944 AT 40515104 NO 574171. (11$ REFERENCED PLAT AFTECTS THE SUBJECT PROPENE' BUT THERE AM NO PLOTTABLE LASEIENTS PLR SN9 PLAT MICH LE WITHIN TIE ABJECT PROPERTY) 12 WARRANTY WEED PROM WPM T DAMS TO THE TERM or ESTES PAM COLORADO, A muNiC/PAt CORPORATION. RECORDED JUNE 13. 1162 PI SOOK-PACE. 1174-253. (NOM CONVEYS LOT 46. MESE KEMP/SION OF BLIENNA VISTA !ENRAGE) (AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS BLAMCET N NATURE) 13 WARRANTY DODO MOW BLUM C. JONES AND GENEVIEVE JONES TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK COLORADO, A NIRIICIPAL CORPORATION, RECORDED JULY 2, 1965 1.14 BOOK-PAGE: 1295-210. (NOTE CONVEYS LOTS 5-9 AND 6-R, 01451 RESUBDIRSION OF BUENNA ASIA TERMCE.) (AFFECTS 51113AEC1 PROPER/1 AND 5 MARKET PI NATURE) 14 WARRANTY DEED FROM ESTES NM POST 119, AMERICAN LEGION CLUE, A COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES MK, COLORADDL A LIUMCIPAL CORPORATION, RECORDED APRIL 22, 1963 IN BOOK-PAGE: 1209-5. (NOTE: COWERS LOTS 4A, 5A 60, AND 70 OF 1041 RESTIROMSION OF /SIENNA VISTA TERRACE.) (AFFECTS ABJECT PROPERTY BID 5 BLANKET or lento Lease Area/Access & Utility Easements FARE AREA. • • • - LOT 51 02500 Lc} LOT 4° FIR57 R.ESUBOMSION oF BL1.ENNA 1/15TA TERgAcE Lo-r 33 NORTH DAVIS STREET GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 5E114 NO /4 5EctioN 25, 700SH1P oroRTH, RANGE. 73 wEs-r, 71-1E 671-4 P.M. FEET — „s. — 1 TSC Rt. k___, ,,„ LOT 39 k \\ •,„ • , \ \ \ \ -• • 1 'A 1 .4 -A \ • • \ \ • • 1, . LOT 3. 4 \ \ t,. • • • • \ * ‘ 1 \ \ \ \•\ b B \ \ ‘ • • • \ ..,.._ ,.. g 't ‘. 1 ‘ \ ‘,.. \ .4.fi,:r 1 ‘ ‘ \ \ \ \ \ • Z 4 4 \ t, 1 \ • \ \AkSP 4 1, 1, 1 ...,-F CR \ \ \ \ \ • 4 \ 1 4 \ ‘ . I 1 !Aar\ 589 .41'27,1.1 \ \ l • • ‘ , • • \ ‘ • \ • 1 B • • 1 k B \ \ 4 4 B \ \ 1 1 B .4 1 \ I ‘ 4 la \\ \ \ 1 L, T v \ N. , , \ \ \ \ 4 l \\ \ \ l \ \ 752ff 1 •,, \ \ \ 'I •,, \ \ _ \ _ It t t. 1/4 1 B,. 1 \ \ `t 1 tt, ‘ . \ \ • • • .m9pP7 f ' / • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '• •" 'N,' • - - • • • \ • .i.7....;: ....... , \ -fr40,4. N-4-31_:-;2;67:..32;7,, ivivii v...._ • • • s. \ • • • \ --_--,E-S-%0141-4t "--,.,.t.t:-. • \ Er ftit. il 04. „ ,i,„ ......1.:1,... ..„,,,,..,„:,„„ . I. \ \ • •,....•.;.• • .s. • \ • • .0 ,•I 1 1 \ \ • • •‘• \ \ • \ • • • • \ •\ -4 E% • \ 18.7. HD N 's .2c1,.... r \ • • \ \ \ f PROPOSEC 10' IL „„Il • • • VRLETY ASEMERT 011 ,. I \ \ \ \ 1 , 1 1i % 1 I 1 ; • __. • \ A • \ • • • • 01 1"I 1i111 I 4 \ • \tV i 1 1 1 .1 1: 11 11: 11 \ \ • • \ • • • \\• \ X \ a LH .,. \ s •'8 it '" 1244 " \ \ \\ \\ It I litiiil 111 •• 104.5 001 ,1/4 \ \ out ,,.., Hill \ \ 1,016 11,1 Int ,, ,,, \ iitB fill int \ \ ‘ \ :I: \k11111:41411114111'111111: \ \ \ 1 01... • \ • or 88 / • • \01 //T/ 1 0#/' • tr_ 14 1111111 t 5111111u11 11 •901:\ &42 148.9M1WT NI) AO - 589'41 27W • C PROPOSED s' z •UTEUTY EAMMINT LTS61.40#1A • • • • \ LOT. \ • •• • LOT IA MOW 069,4527Y N 1E ACCESS A PROPOSE72 ACCESS/VOLIrr EASEMENT • LOT EtA 46=-9,ff. 6A • 10\5.00" BEING A TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEASE PARCEL DING INTHIN A PORTICAI Of LOT 5A. LOT 59 AND THE ALLEY BETWEEN SAID LOTS, Al IN FIRST RESUBDIVISION OF BLEW ASIA TERRACE, CANEY OF LAMER. STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS RIMS. COI/LIMING AT THE SEUTINEAST CORNER OF SAD LOT 5B, THENCE ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 5R, NORTH 0518133' WEST, 9.50 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST ENE, NOM 854170 EAST. 6.06 FEET 70 THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 431556' WEST. 27.52 FEET: THENCE NORTH 1636'16' EAST, 15.60 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER RORERRED 10 AS POINT '41."; THENCE SOUTH 4518515 E457, 47.25 FEET; 'NM/ SOWN BMW 11157, 16.00 FEET 10 THE POINT OF BEGINNING cotartes 505 50009E FEET OR 0.012 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. MCESSAIDUTY EASEMENT' BENIN A STRIP OF LAND 12.00 FEET IN MANN LYING WITIPA A 5081:06 OF 1015 4B, 51, 5B. BA 7A, BA MD THE ALLEY KNEEN SAID LOTS 40, 4B. 5,4 AND 5B, ALL IN EMT RESUBDIVISION Of BLENNA VISTA TERRACE COUNTY OF LAMER, SIAll OF COLORADO. LYPEG 6,00 FEET as EACH ODE OF 1115 FOLLOVANG DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING 01 POINT AS DESCRIBED MOVE; THENCE 9106611 46411:14' EAR 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH 45113.56* FAR 55,95 FELT; 11•ENCE SOUTH 00.0'00' FAST, 151.54 FEET; TIERCE NORTH 3741'27* EAST, 89.18 FEET 15 THE EASTERLY 1.191E OF $A6) LOT 7A MD THE POINT OF TERMINUS EICEPT ANT PORTION LYING 01118* ENE R/GHT-GE-WAY OF LIORNNE AVENUE. 10' !PUTT EASEMENT HEINS A STRIP OF LAND MOO FEET IN BOTH 51105 WONIN A 50101011 OF THE ALLEY 6E119E11 SAID LOTS 4A, 40. SA MII) 59. ALL W 10151 RESUBDMSION DE BUENNA VISTA TERRACE, COMITY OF LARLIAEN. STATE OF COLORADO, 1.116C 51.0 FEET ON IAN SUE OF THE FOLLOAING DESCRIED CENIERUNE, COMMENE2116 AT THE SCARHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 50: THENCE N_ONG NAE EAST LPE OF SAID 121 5B, NORM 05113•33. WEST, 9.30 FM: THENCE DEPARTING SAID LAST UNE, NORM 11141'27' EAST, 805 FEET TO THE POINF OF MIMING; THENCE 50700.00•E, EBB FM TO A PONT HEREINAFTER REEVED 70 AS POINT 187 THENCE CONTINUING S050000'E, 11367 FEET TO THE END OF SAD STRIP OF LAND. 5' UTILITY EASEMENT' BEING A STRIP OF IMO SOD FEET PI WIDTH LYING WINN A POTATION OF THE BEY MAHN 5910 0 1,0 5N TS TER IAs tw 4B, 50 AND 56, ALL IN EWA RESURDMSION OF ROOMER VISTA TureAcE. COUNTY OF LAMER. STATE OF COLORADO, DPP 2 50 FEET ON EACH 1.101 OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BEGINNING AT PUT 13* AS DESGRABED ABOVE, THENCE N8941'271, 11096 FEET TO THE END OF SAJD ARP OF LAND. THE SIDELNES OF SAID MPS OF LAND ARE TO BE LENGTHENED ANC/OR SHORTENED AS TI PREVENT MD DAPS ANO/OR OVERLAPS. Certificate of Survey 1205 IS TO IWERAMME,,n-i Ar THIS TOPOGRAPHiC MAP AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ,WRRECT TO NE BEST OF UV KNOOLCOOE ARO BELIEF S11.4e, 8081 THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMEN TED SURVEY. REFERENCE IS WADE TO A COMMITMENT PEP TOLE INSURANCE, NUMBER 0F01946. morn BY FRONT RANGE 141-11 OF DOINITANN DENVER, LTC, MD IRMANC AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF ,WILIARY 19. 2016. RS SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTI511100 OR INDEPENDENT SEARC11 FOR EASEMENTS OF FROND, ENCUMBRAICES, RESTRICTIVE CONDOMS. WINERSIM TITLE EVIDENCE, OR ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE ANG CURRENT TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE. THE LESSOR'S LEGAL DESORPTION AND RECORD BOUNDARY ME SHOWN HEREON FOR REFERENCE ONLY, 1065 SURVEY ODES NOT COMMIE A BOUNDARY SURREY OF THE LIMES PRO/TRW 081 28/16 1 *rap) • 1..0-r 3A 250 00' 70000 T 4A Aix 00 MAR LDr 45 YAR N (15.5ASE1.1 , 1 ,2537S571191 Last Saved On: 3-28-16 At: 04:24pm As: \\tsclient\N\Projects\2015 Projects\15197—FTC REDRUM\dwg\15197—R6—FTC RENA By: XPMUser LOT 51 EXISTING STREET LIGHT, TYP 4110,10 WEIST DRIVE 110. SETBACK TABLE: TOWER BASE TO PARENT PROPERTY LINE LEASE BOUNDARY TO PARENT PROPERTY LINE NORTH -69'-e SOUTH —ace—o• -59'-0i EAST 4-127 --0' -99'-0' WEST ..122'-0' -114.--0- LOT 51 LOT 1A H LOT 2A 0 r H.J PARENT PARCEL TOWN OF ESTES PARK APN#: CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE ZONED: CD (COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN) -127-0' EXISTING WOODFEN: 6 4 VERIZON WIRELESS_._ u._ _ 21--,......_ _LOT SA ":"-L...i A NEW ._- - - - - ---.4. SITEIACK............ e - \ N6 NEW PAINTED CENTERLINE AT ALLEY -....„. L N E:E vE C R O a R o N N ER, IWREPL'ESS 13-6"X47-3" NEW VERIZON WIRELESS FIBER VAULT LEASE AREA (S05 SO r) AND NEW 12'-0- WOE VERIZON WIRELESS ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING U.G. CATI,'TY P. EXISTING U.G. ELECTR C. TYP. • LOT 6A - EXISTING ,,/1 ASPHALT TIRING LOT 7A LOT 8A PROPERTY LINE 11111A LOT 3A LOT 4A EXISTING BUILDING IX 0 Al O EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE AO° ogre-' 7555— 575 7590 T` 758 —759 _ P LOT 1 J- r EXISTING WROUGHT 11105 FENCE 1 PROPERTY LINE *silk LOT 49 EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 26,-C MONOPOLE (30.-0. WG.L) (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) THESE DRAWINGS AND SURVEYS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES. LLG AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT_ ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES. LLC. DETCRED Pot j Verealwireless 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 550 AL/RONA. COLORADO 80014 OPUOREE &NI TOWeraaMil TOCI4VOLOOMM AZ - CA - CO - ID - NM - NV - TX - UT PRWECT 11AORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT NEW 29'-0" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE PROJECT emu.] MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY 5.Er, SITE PLAN REV DESCRIPTION EWE TIT CDS O APPROVED FOR LEASING A ZONINC/0.3/1616 CJE - 1 JURISDICTION COMMENTS /03/26 16 SJH --r LOT 38 LOT 40 0 IE AVENUE im.p. LOT 39 EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING U.G. TELEPHONE. TYP. LOT 6B WIRELESS UTILITY EASEMENT GRASS/DIRT PROPERTY ENE LOT 7B EXISTING LANDSCAPING, TYP. SITE PLAN e, NORTH xD SCALE: 1- SAVE AATH I 3/25/2010 4:35 PM SHEET RIMIER I Z1 S CA L E - 2 0 — SITE PLAN 2 NEW VERIZON WIRELESS FIBER VAULT MORAINE AVENUE .10. LJ NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 13'-6-X47'-3" LEASE AREA (505 50. FT) AND NEW 12"-0- WIDE VERIZON WIRELESS ACCESS/UMW EASEMENT EXISTING U.C. CATV, TYP. EXISTING U.G. ELECTRIC, TYP. ( 41110NE WEIST DRIVE mop. EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING STREET LIGHT, TYP. ----- —1 — — — — — — — / NEW PAINTED CENTERLINE AT ALLEY 7- NEW NEW VERIZON WIRELE LEASE CORNER. TYP. a _ o. NEW WIDE VERIZON WIRELESS MITT EASEMENT H EXISTING BUILDING PROPERTY UNE P EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING U.G. TELEPHONE, TYP. --T THESE DRAWINGS AND SURVEYS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOWERGOM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT, ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WOHOuT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. DESIGIEO FOR- I VerlMwireless 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 550 AURORA, COLORADO 80014 DCSJONCO w.I Tower BO MICI-ININ-0011111, AZ - CA - CO - ID - NM - NV - TX - UT "Mil "4.MORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT NEW 29'-1:1" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30*-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAMAN() COMMUNICATION SITE Psalm ADDRESS. MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY SEE. rrte: SITE PLAN REV CESCINFTON BAIT ST OW 0 APPROVED FOR LEASING & ZONING 03/16/16 cJE — I JURISDICTION COMMENTS 63/28/16 SJH NAVE OM. I 3/28/2016 8:32 PM 5"a""emr- Z1P H) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 15-8,TX47'-3" LEASE AREA (505 SO. FT) NEW YEFo7.014 WIRELESS LEASE CORNER. TYP. O LEASE AREA • N \ N 0 I- r- NEW 15-0" WIDE VERIZON, WIRELESS UTILITY EASEMENT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN 'SCALE. 1/4 = 1 -D NORTH eN NORTH NEW YERIZON WIRELESS 13'-6"X47'-3" LEASE AREA (505 50. FT) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE CORNER. TYP. • PARENT PARCEL TOWN OF ESTES PARK APN#: CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE ZONED: CD (COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN) SITE NOTES: PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE AREA FOR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. EXISTING CONCRETE CURB ExISTING LOT 4B • NEW VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE CORNER, TYP. \, NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 13)-6"X47)-3" LEASE AREA (505 50. FT) \ EXISTING LOT LINE NEW PAINTED CENTERLINE AT ALLEY NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 41-0"X13)-OT HIGH WROUGHT IRON GATE-PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE NZ (6) NEW & (3) FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS UNITS MOUNTED AT BASE OF MONOPOLE • NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 29)-111" MONOPOLE (35-0" A.G.L.)(DESIGNED BY OTHERS)-PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE (3) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO MONOPOLE-PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE • (1) NEW YELLOW GUIDE LINE SIGN (1) NEW BLUE CAUTION SIGN (1) NEW GREEN NOC SIGN MOUNTED AT GATE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 4 )-0"x8"-OT HIGH WROUGHT IRON GATE-PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS I2)-O-X 27'-4511111-0" HIGH CLAD BLOCK ENCLOSURE-CM) TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS GALVANIZED PLATFORM FOR NEW OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS (3) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS WITH A/C UNITS MOUNTED ON NEW GALVANIZED PLATFORM (14) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 4"0 BOLLARDS -PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING BOLLARDS AT EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE H • LOT 4A EXISTING PARKING STIPE, EXISTING LOT LINE r''--. 4,.. • I NEW VERIZON WIRELESS GPS ANTENNA N MOUNTED TO NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET \ • LOT 5A ED (:::i24 malmoi APPROV tow97,2) THESE DRAWINGS ANT SURVEYS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES. LLC AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES, LED, ..... TOR I „ VeriZallwireless 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY, SUITE 550 AURORA, COLORADO 80014 MESRAED Si; PROJECT WINE CEscRIERR. DATE RU APPROVED FOR LEASING A ZONING CJE TMCAINCILOONZ AZ - CA - GO - ID - NM - NV - TX - ur Tauferiatip MORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT NEW 29'-O" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE FRANC) REE.REsS MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY "'"' I ENLARGED SITE PLAN, EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN, & BOLLARD LAYOUT PLAN REV 33/16/16 JURISDICTION COMMENTS 33/28/180;JH (2) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS MAIN OVP UNITS MOUNTED AT BASE OF MONOPOLE (2) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS HYBRID CABLES FROM EQUIPMENT CABINET To MOVP AT BASE OF TOWER IN NEW 6.To UG, PVC CONDUITS I LOT 58 63 I (2) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS U.G. 6'61 PVC CONDUIT PIPES FROM NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO MONOPOLE .---GRAsS/DIRT NEW VERIZON WIRELESS Fl8ELL VAULT NEW PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER NEW VERIZON WIRELESS GENERATOR PLUG MOUNTED TO NEW CMU WALL ENCLOSURE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS UTILITy DISTRIBUTION CENTER MOUNTED ON NEW CMU WALL ENCLOSURE NEW VERITEN WIRELESS INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER MOUNTED TO NEW CMU WALL ENCLOSURE NEW YERIZON WIRELESS TECH LIGIPING MOUNTED TO CMU WALL EXISTING U.G. CAN TO RE RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE AREA EXISTING U.G. TELEPHONE TOBE RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE AREA EXISTING U.G. ELECTRIC TO BE RELOCATED OUTsIDE OF vERIZON WIRELESS LEASE AREA ENLARGED SITE PLAN 'SCALE: 3/B = 1 -0" NORTH SCALE (" = 1'-0" BOLLARD LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" - 1-o SAVE DKrE: I 3/28/2015 4:34 Pm EU KuMR1 Z2 NORTH SCALE: )16- = 1)-5 T T ID' 0 1' 0" B.O.B.P C'e\V *ke‘W IAORAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT PROJECT UNITE. FA'/FCC COMPLIANCE NOTES; 1. CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE AIR TERMINAL IS CORRECTLY INSTALLED ON THE TOP OF THE TOWER AS DEPICTED, AND THAT THE AIR TERMINAL IS THE TALLEST/HIGHEST OBJECT PROTRUDING ABOVE THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE. 2. CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE TOWER uGHTNO SYSTEM MUST HE PROPERLY INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONING PER FAA/FCC REGULATIONS (IF REQUIRED MO DEPICTED). 3. CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT ADDITIONAL OR MORE STRINGENT TOWER LIGHTING SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED IF REQUIRED BY ANY SUBSEQUENT FAA STUDY. 4. THE TOWER LIGHTING s1si EM MUST COMPLY WITH FM ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC70/7460. KEY: C.O.R. = CENTER OF RADIATION AL. = ATTACHMENT LEVEL B.T. = BOTTOM TIP LEVEL TA - TOR TIP LEVEL ALGA_ = ABOVE GRADE LEVEL B.0.13.P = BOTTOM OF BASE PLATE 7143o. a' C'CIR'4 27' 0- (3) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO MONOPOLE-PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE NEW VERIZ0N WIRELESS 29'-0' MONOPOLE (3EV-0T A.G.L.)(DESIGNED BY OTHERS)-PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE (IX) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS ire COAX CABLES INSIDE NEW MONOPOLE F.T. WALL +8. 8. WALL b8' 4. NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 4' - DNB' - DT HIGH WROUGHT IRON GATE TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE CATE (6) NEW ex (3) FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS NPR UNITS MOUNTED TO BASE OF MONOPOLE (14) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 4",a BOLLARDS-TO MATCH EXISTING - UPI ARDS AT EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GRADE (3) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO MONOPOLE-PAJNT TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 29'-Er MONOPOLE ..7 ,...---(35'-(1" A.G L.)(DESiGNED ETY OTHERS)-PATE TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE (113) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 34.4 COAX CABLES INSIDE NEW MONOPOLE ROCK HILL THESE DRAWINGS AND SURVEYS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES, LLG AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENT'S IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES. 1.1C. DESOMID FOR VerliMwireless 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY. SUITE 550 AURORA. COLORADO BOOR TMCI4NOLORIVN AZ-CA-CO-ID-NM-NV-TX-UT NEW 29'-0" MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE ' I ST CJE SJH DATE 03/16/1.6 a3/28/16 Z3 1.1E0' ML.BER SAW AM. I 3/23/2D16 4128 PM NEW NORTHEAST ELEVATION ScALE, 3/5 - 1 -0 NEW NORTHWEST ELEVATION CALF. 3/8' = Y-D' PROJECT AoOREss I MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY SHEET ELEVATIONS CESCWPTIOR (APPROVED TOR LEASING A ZONING 1 1 JURISDICTION COMMENTS NEW VERIZON WIRELESS CPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET 9, 8.$ TT T WALL Er-4-+T.T. WALL NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 12'-0TX 2T-4")03'-Er HIGH CMU BLOCK ENCLOSURE-GNU TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE (14) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 4To BOLLARDS-TO MATCH EXISTING BOLLARDS AT EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 12.-ON 2r-4•55.-0" HIGH CMU BLOCK ENICLOSuRE-CMU TO MATCH EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO NEW EQUIPMENT CABINET DISTRIBUTION CENTER MOUNTED- \\ NEW VERIZON WIRELESS GENERATOR PUG MOUNTED TO NEW GNU WALL ENCLOSURE NEW PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER (1) NEW YELLOW GUIDE LINE SIGN (1) NEW BLUE CAUTION SIGN (1) NEW GREEN NOC SIGN mouNTES AT GATE NEW VERIZON WIRELESS UTILITY ON NEW GNU WAIL ENCLOSURE MI UMW (4%TvvwP**mc5f .;SS'7;4*, ‘,/ # " GRADE 0' B.D.B.P4, (8) NEW 0,4 (3) FUTURE VENISON WIRELESS RRH UNITS MOUNTED TO BASE OF MONOPOLE (3) NEW VENISON WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO MONOPOLE (2) NEW VERIZON WIRELESS MAIN OVP UNITS MOUNTED AT BASE OF MONOPOLE AR ICI a AR Ilr RRH RRH RRH RRH RAH RRH MOVE II T.O.M. NOW, la EON. `Pc NEW V RI ALEVEL TTACH (co(CDR}(DEG.,U ON WIRELE ANTENNA D AZIMTHS MN) ANTENNA TYPE ct MANI= mouNT TYPE COAX (QUANTITY) SIZE (NOMINAL) CO ESTMATED AX CA LE L.EN,....„ msoRANICAL DOWN TILT 27'-0'180' 300 60'ANTENNA 6' PANEL ANTENNA 3 SEE MOUNT 4 SCHEDULE (2) HYBRID CABLES (NEW) (18) 38'' COAX CABLES (NEW) SEE SHEET RF1 FOR COAX DESIGN nous. 7. EQR EXACT ANTENNA INFORMATION REFER TO THE RF DESIGN. 2. ALL NEW COAX SHALI. BE INSTALLED ON INSIDE OF NEW MONOPOLE 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL DIPLEXERS IN EELLRPLAENT CABINETS AND ON TOWER AS REQUIRED BY RF DESIGN (IF APPLICABLE). ANTENNA SECTION A, 27'-0" SCALE N.T.S. NORTH DIAGRAM ABBREVIATIONS: TAM.- TOP OF MONOPOLE 0.E.C.- OUTDOOR EOUIPMENT CABINET RRH- REMOTE RADIO HEAD PDF. POWER DISTRIBUTION FRAME LTE= LIE PANEL ANTENNA AWS- AWS PANEL ANTENNA PCSx PCS PANEL ANTENNA NEW HYBRID CABLE LENGTHS: FROM (MAIN OVP) To (LIMN OVP) SECTOR CABLE/COM SIZE (NOMINAL) CABLE/COY (QUANTITY} ESTIMATED CAB /COAX LENGTH - HYB 6012 2 -25' FROM (MAIN OVP) TD (RRH) E 0. IT SECTOR CABLE/COAX SIZE (NOMINAL) CABLE/COAX (OLJANTor) ESTIMATED CABLE/COAX LENGTH X HYB 1X1 1 -10. HYB 151 1 •N14' r H HYB 151 1 ,...6. HYB 121 1 -10' Z FOB 101 -6' 1 HYB 101 1 -10' FROM (RRH) TO (ANTENNAS) '.g SECTOR CABLE/COAX SIZE (NOMINAL) CABLE/COAX (QUANTITY) ESTIMATED CAB LE/COAX LENGTH X WO 6 -28P Y TO) 6 -28' Z W. 6 -28' THESE DRAWINGS AND SURVEYS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TOW CROON TECHNOLOGIES. LLC AND PRODUCED FOR THE USE OF OUR CLIENT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN SAID DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TOWERCOM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. DESIGNED FOR I VerMliwireless 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY, SURE 550 AURORA. COLORADO 80014 umoNINT Tuwer'Gem rocravotormw AZ - CA - CO - ID - NM - NV - 7X - UT PAWMT WILE 1110RAINE/WEIST PARKING LOT NEW 29'-D' MONOPOLE (OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" A.G.L.) NEW RAWLAND COMMUNICATION SITE PNCREGT ADDINETIR MORAINE AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LARIMER COUNTY werr TrrLEI ANTENNA INFORMATION & RRH HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM & CHART REY DESCRIPTION GATT BY CHN APPROVED FOR LEASING & ZONING 03/16/16 CLE - 1 JURISDICTION COMMENTS 03/28 I EN_SJIA SAVE DAM I I SIC NoTINER. 3/28/2016 4:28 Pfol RF1 ANIENNII QOLOR CODE: ANTENNA FUNCTION COLOR. COMA-BOO RED 13- BAND C DMA - BOG WHITE A-BAND 7,c5-1900 YELLOW LTE-700 PURPLE ANTENNA SECTOR X GREEN Y ORANGE Z BROWN X I FA0VP'S/B8U'S 0 OEC 0 PDF RRH HYBRID CABLE DIAGRAM AND CHART SCALE. N.T.S. ANTENNA COLOR CODES (CELL SITE COAX LABELING) ANTENNA FUNCTION ANTENNA SECTOR X Y Z FIRST STRIPE SECOND STRIPE FIRST STRIPE SECOND STRIPE FIRST STRIPE SECOND STRIPE ROD VOICE WRITE/RED wFuTE/YELLOW BLUE/RED SLUE/YELLOW GREEN/RED GREEN/YELLOW 600 EVDO WHITE/2 RED WHITE/2 YELLOW BLUE/2 RED BLUE/2 YELLOW GREEN/2 RED GREEN/2 YELLOW BOO LTE WHITE/3 RED WHITE/3 YELLOW BLUE/3 RED BLUE/3 YELLOW GREEN/3 RED GREEN/3 YELLOW 1900 MD PURPLE/RED PURPLE/YELLOW ORANGE/RED ORANGE/YELLOW BROWN/RED BROWN/YELLOW 1900 VOICE PURPLE/2 RED PURPLE/2 YELLOW ORANGE/2 RED ORANGE/2 YELLOW BROWN/2 RED BROWN/2 YELLOW NOTICE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT SUBMIT BIOS OR PEORM CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THIS PROJECT WITHOUT ACCESS TO THE CURRENT COMPLETE SET OF DRAWINGS LISTED IN THE TITLE-SHEET INDEX. ANTENNA MOUNT SCHEDULE: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PART NUMBER(S) 3 ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE KIT C10-900-106 NOTE: ALL PRODUCTS ARE FROM "SABRE SITE SOLUTIONS PHONE: (866) 428-0937 / (712) 293-1964 WWW.SABREVIESOL LIMNS OM GENERAL ANTENNA NOTES: 1. DUAL POLAR ANTENNAS REQUIRE TWO RUNS OF COAX PER ANTENNA. 2. LENGTHS GIVEN ON THIS CHART ARE ESTIMATED FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION. 3. TYPES AND SIZES OF THE ANTENNA CABLES ARE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED LENGTH OF THE CABLES. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL ACTUAL LENGTHS TN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ANO NOTIFY THE FIELD ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION OF SIZES OF CABLES. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AS BUILT FOR THE LENGTH OF CABLES UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION. S. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE F1N.AL CABLE LENGTHS AND RETURN LOSSES FOR ALL CABLES. 6. ALL AZIMUTHS REFERENCE TRUE NORTH. CONSULT REQUIRED QUADRANGLE MAP FOR NECESSARY MECHANICAL DECLINATION.