Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2015-08-18Prepared: August 5, 2015 * Revised: STUDY SESSION AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 18, 2015 12:00 p.m. Estes Park Town Hall, Room 202 12:00 Lunch Chair Hull 12:15 Review of Minutes (5 minutes) Chair Hull 12:20 Transit Facility & Parking Structure Planner Kleisler Development Plan 2015-04, Location & Extent Review (20 minutes) 12:40 Vacation Home Update (30 minutes) Chair Hull 1:10 Adjourn to meeting Chair Hull Informal discussion among Commissioners concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this meeting at approximately 11:45 a.m. The public is welcome to attend study sessions; however, public comment will not be accepted. Prepared: August 5, 2015 * Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION August 18, 2015 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Town Hall 1. OPEN MEETING Planning Commissioner Introductions 2. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 3. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of minutes, July 21, 2015, Planning Commission Meeting 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015-04 — ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY & PARKING STRUCTURE, 500 Big Thompson Avenue Owner: Town of Estes Park Applicant: Ginny McFarland, Space Into Place Request: Proposed parking structure, with Phase I adding one deck & 110 new spaces. Future Phase II would add two additional decks and 198 new spaces. At completion, 410 total spaces would be available for public parking. Staff: Phil Kleisler 5. REPORTS A. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 1. Wilson Residence Variance Approved at a Special Meeting July 28, 2015 B. Estes Valley Planning Commission 1. Update on Downtown Neighborhood Plan process 2. Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan Modernization Update C. Estes Park Town Board D. Larimer County Board of County Commissioners E. Flood Recovery/Mitigation F. Vacation Home Rental Update G. Other 6. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 1 July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Betty Hull, Commissioners Doug Klink, Nancy Hills, Steve Murphree, Sharry White, Russ Schneider, Michael Moon Attending: Chair Hull, Commissioners Klink, Hills, Murphree, White and Moon Also Attending: Director Alison Chilcott, Planner Phil Kleisler, Town Attorney Greg White, and Recording Secretary Karen Thompson Absent: Town Board Liaison John Phipps, Larimer County Liaison Michael Whitley, Commissioner Schneider Chair Hull called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. There were approximately 15 people in attendance. Each Commissioner was introduced. Chair Hull explained the process for accepting public comment at today's meeting. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of minutes, April 21, 2015 Planning Commission meeting. It was moved and seconded (White/Klink) to approve the consent agenda as presented and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. 3. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 06-01D, MARYS MEADOW CONDOMINIUMS, TBD Kiowa Trail and TBD Bemish Court Planner Kleisler reviewed the staff report. He provided a brief history of the development and stated this was the fourth amendment to this plan. The property is zone A—Accommodations, with areas to the south zoned E-1—Estate. Areas to the west, north, and east are zoned A— Accommodations, and includes some undeveloped property. The initial plan had a co-housing concept, which was not attractive to buyers, so the plan was amended to include duplexes. The applicant, Frank Theis, is now wrapping up the first phase, and ready to begin future phases. He now wishes to move towards a more traditional model including duplexes and single family dwellings. The proposed amendment reduces the density from 35 approved units to 24 proposed units. Planner Kleisler stated the original development plan established Kiowa Trail, which is maintained by the property owner. The site plan from the previously approved amended development plan is being used for this project; however, there are some pedestrian circulation and vehicle access changes. Bemish Court would come off of the northwest end of Kiowa Trail, and would be the roadway for the single family dwellings. Both the duplexes on Kiowa Trail and the homes on Bemish Court would have garages, allowing the removal of street parking on Kiowa Trail. Planner Kleisler stated fairly significant changes have been made to the architecture of the RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall proposed duplexes, as compared to the previously approved plan. The changes include, but are not limited to, the inclusion of single-car garages. Planner Kleisler stated the application was routed to all affected agencies for review and notice was sent to the local newspaper and adjacent property owners. The Planning Commission received public comment relating to the location of the proposed sewer line. The proposed sewer line consists of a main extension between the Phase II and Phase Ill units. Upper Thompson Sanitation District supports the concept, with minor changes involving moving the line to allow better access, as well as prohibiting landscaping in the sewer easement. The current proposal attempts to keep the natural flow of drainage throughout the site, which is why no curb and gutter is proposed. Planner Kleisler stated the applicant has requested a minor modification regarding the minimum number of spaces for bicycle parking. The requirement is four (4) spaces. In accordance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) Section 3.7, the Planning Commission may grant a minor modification of up to a maximum of 25% from certain zone district standards. In this case, the Commission could lower the requirement of four spaces to three spaces. The applicant is proposing some surface parking and primarily single-car garages. Because of the limited garage space, staff assumes future residents and guests would utilize bicycle racks. If the Commission decides to approve the minor modification request, they would need to make one of the following findings: (1) The modification advances the goals and purposes of the EVDC; (2) The modification results in less visual impact; (3) The modification results in more effective environmental and open space preservation; or (4) The modification relieves practical difficulties in developing a site. Public comment issues involve a no-build easement, which is shown on the plat. There was no town involvement with the creation of the easement. Because it is a recorded easement, it is required to be shown on the plat. Staff has reviewed this document with Town Attorney White, and the legal opinion is the enforcement power of this easement rests with the developer and the HOA. It is staff opinion the amended development plan complies with the easement. The Easement states, in part, "...shall not build any buildings or structures within the area...to preserve the view of condominium units over and across the portion of the property shown in Exhibit A." Planner Kleisler stated the other key issue with this proposal is the grading for units 19 and 20 on Bemish Court. A substantial amount of cut and fill was planned, and staff determined it did not comply with the building standards in the EVDC. The applicant revised the plan by designing a slightly steeper road that will eliminate most of the cut and fill. If those steps are taken, the property would be in compliance with that standard. A condition of approval addresses this issue. Staff Findings 1. The application is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Adequate services and facilities are available to serve the development. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall 3. If revised to comply with recommended conditions of approval, the application will comply with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code, as described in the staff report. 4. The Planning Commission is the decision-making body for this application. Staff and Commission Discussion Planner Kleisler clarified the duplexes are proposed to have single-car garages, with the single- family dwelling having double-car garages. Public Comment Frank Theis/applicant stated the project includes a construction site maintenance agreement to ensure the area will be kept clean during construction. After discussion with the property owner, he stated Unit 24 will be removed from the plan to satisfy owners of the nearest existing unit who were concerned about that unit blocking their view. After this change, there would be a total of 23 units in the development. Sabina McWhinney/town resident was one of the first residents in Phase I. She stated the HOA requested the no-build easement, as a way to ensure the open space would remain as such in order to maintain the view corridor. She stated the intent of the easement was housing units would be limited to Kiowa Trail, and that the detention ponds would be constructed in a natural manner. She was opposed to the single-family dwellings on Bemish Court. She was supportive of the construction site maintenance agreement. John Crone/attorney representing Marys Meadow Development clarified the No-Build Easement is a private matter between the developer and the HOA, and is outside the purview of the Planning Commission. Beverly Wright/town resident was one of the original owners in phase I. She understood there would be one more row of homes on Kiowa Trail (Phase II), and the developer never alluded to a Phase Ill. She was opposed to the proposed development. Frank Theis/applicant stated it was not his intent to mislead the property owners, and he is willing to make concessions to satisfy them. His intent with the no-build easement was to prevent the neighbors from seeing any buildings in the open space. Mia Tawney/property owner stated Phase I was under construction at the time her father, Jim Tawney, passed away. As the new property owner, her intentions are to keep the commitment that her father wanted. Jim was a futurist and cared strongly about community. She explained the concept behind the original co-housing development. Sabina McWhinney/town resident stated the intent of the easement was to keep the area in its natural state. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Richard James/town resident stated his unit was going to be directly impacted by proposed Unit 24, and sees the removal of that unit as a positive. His main concern with this proposal is the height of the buildings. He purchased his unit in 2013, and Mr. Theis presented a plan similar to what is being presented with this application. Public comment closed. Staff and Commission Discussion Town Attorney White clarified the easement was recorded with Larimer County. It is an easement agreement between Marys Meadow LLC and Marys Meadow Condominium HOA. The Town is not involved. The recording puts it on record so it will be found during a title search. He advised the Planning Commission that it is not their responsibility to react to this easement. Conditions of Approval 1. Compliance with the following affected agency comments: a. Estes Valley Fire Protection District memo dated June 25, 2015; b. Town of Estes Park Utilities Division memo dated June 25, 2015; c. Town of Estes Park Community Development memo dated June 29, 2015; d. Town of Estes Park Public Works memo dated July 13, 2015; e. Upper Thompson Sanitation District memo dated July 15, 2015. 2. The site plan shall be amended to accurately show the existing grade and drainage flow along Kiowa Trail, including how off-site drainage flows through the area near the existing traffic island. 3. The slope of parking stalls shall be decreased to provide for safe vehicle access. 4. The site plan shall be amended to reflect the proposed adjustments detailed in the memo from the applicant dated July 10, 2015. Such changes require the review and approval of applicable reviewing agencies. 5. Utility pedestals and boxes north of Unit 18 shall be moved to the west to accommodate 20-foot clearance for utility truck access. 6. HOA Declarations shall be amended to prohibit any landscaping within the sewer and electric easement area in Phase II and Ill, with the exception of small shrubs within three (3) feet of units. 7. The site plan shall be amended to remove Unit 24. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Hills) to approve the Amended Development Plan 06-01D, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. 4. UPDATE ON VACATION HOMES REGULATIONS Planner Kleisler stated the purpose of this presentation is to provide the Commission with an update as to where staff and the Town Board are concerning vacation homes. Discussion has occurred concerning changes to processes and policies throughout the Estes Valley. Vacation RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall homes are becoming an issue nationwide. A major report, the Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) Report, addresses vacation homes and will be forwarded to the Commissioners as soon as possible. The Town Board and County Commissioners requested staff review processes and policies to ensure enforceability and meet the goals that they were initially intended to do. He stated this information was shared at a Town Board Study Session, and the Trustees wanted to make sure the Planning Commissioners were included in any conversation concerning vacation homes. Planner Kleisler provided a recap of the schedule, stating June through September would include refining the regulations and processes, with possible adoption and implementation occurring before the end of 2015. In the spring of 2015, a public meeting on this topic was held, and approximately 100 people attended and had the opportunity to provide comments and share ideas about how vacation homes should or should not be regulated in the Estes Valley. There will be an additional meeting in mid- September to allow further discussion. Planner Kleisler provided a summary of the trends. Legally permitted vacation homes have increased by roughly 25% since 2010, and staff assumes this number will continue to rise. The Larimer County attorney is reviewing the addition of licensing fees for vacation homes in the Estes Valley, outside of Town limits. The main concerns coming out of the meeting included, but were not limited to: enforceability, including fair fees and applications; clearly defined expectations, signed by owners, posted for renters; property managers, or equivalent, held responsible to "act"; flexibility in the regulations, recognizing differences of needs based on location, lot size, proximity, and number of rooms. Occupancy limits were discussed, and flexibility was encouraged. More specific comments/ideas were as follows: Property managers should have clear expectations and processes for grievances; need not be a full-time resident of Estes Park but must be easily reachable; residents in neighborhood and visitors to rental have clear knowledge of who to contact for what; does not have to be property manager but has to have clear access and accountability in the process. Town and County Fees should be enforced with fines for violators; fees should be commiserate with occupancy limits and enforcement time; fees need to be clear and concise and known by all. Location of vacation homes should preserve the character of long-term neighborhoods, and more code enforcement would be supported; Vehicles parked at vacation homes should be proportionate with the size of the home. Attendees at the public meeting said they would like to see more of the following: compliance, enforcement, clarity in the regulations, encouragement of long- term rentals, and owner-signed statements stating they understand the regulations. They would like to see less overlap of regulations between residents and rentals, and less unenforced regulations. During a brainstorming session, attendees said the most important considerations were: enforce, define and clarify; flexibility; clear lines of accountability for owner/property manager; preserve neighborhood character; expand occupancy limits based on size, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, lot location and size. Planner Kleisler stated the project scope includes: Occupancy Limits, Vehicles and Parking, Fire Protection, Workforce Housing Impact, Highway Development, Fees, Licensing, and Property Management. There is now a trend occurring that the most dense zone districts for RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall accommodation uses have less dense developments being built. Consequences for violations have been rolled into the licensing and enforceability. The Town has one code compliance officer, and vacation home regulations are a small part of her duties. Commissioner White recommended the Commissioners read the CAST report when they receive it. She thinks our community can learn a lot about this issue from other communities. S. DISCUSSION CONCERNING ESTES VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MODERNIZATION Planner Kleisler stated this chapter, Planning the Valley's Future, sets the stage for the next update of the Comprehensive Plan. The goal is to have a final draft of this chapter next month. Planning the Valley's Future provides a primer on some key upcoming issues facing the community. Much of this narrative is conceptual and policy related. As such, staff has primarily updated the statistical information, and would welcome feedback to learn if they are going in the right direction. Visit Estes Park has completed a study, and staff would like to review that information and possibly add some of that information to the Plan. Commissioner Moon stated he saw this chapter not as a code issue but a directional chapter. There are many changes in the socio-economic aspect of our visitor base as well as residential base. Workforce housing should be addressed. What do we want to be in 10 years? He urged the Commission to be visionary in the document. He is willing to participate in the editing process of this chapter. Planner Kleisler stated this chapter has a lot of gray areas, and it may be a good idea to take it to Town Board and the County Commission in the near future to get their feedback. Commissioner Klink explained the reason behind the modernization versus an overhaul of the entire plan, where funding was an issue. Director Chilcott stated it would be best to have the Downtown Neighborhood Plan concluded before pursuing additional funding to fully update the Comprehensive Plan. She stated it was within the scope of the modernization to accurate reflect the trends being seen by the town, county, state, and country. However, there are some gray areas and we need to be cautious about being biased about what trends we choose to include in the modernization of the plan. She would recommend allowing staff to continue to work on this chapter, adding some additional language. Staff could give the Planning Commission the original language and the proposed language. Commissioner Hills recommended having each Commissioner provide written comments to staff. Additional information will be provided at the next Planning Commission meeting. 6. REPORTS a. Director Chilcott reported the Board of Adjustment approved a variance request for a storage shed on Pinewood Lane. b. Director Chilcott reported the Riverview Pines Development Plan was withdrawn by the applicant. Staff expects to see a revised plan in the next few months. c. Director Chilcott reported the Town Board and County Commission approved the amendment to the EVDC allowing pet grooming in the CD—Commercial Downtown zone district. She stated the business owner requesting the amendment has since closed her business. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 21, 2015 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall d. Director Chilcott reported the Town Board approved the Amended Plat for Silver Moon Inn. e. Director Chilcott reported the Marys Lake Replat Amended Development Agreement was withdrawn by the applicant. She stated there was a steep lot in the Marys Lake Subdivsion that the property owner hoped to place in a conservation easement. That did not occur, and the property owner desired to make the lot available for a single- family dwelling. A request was processes, but there were some legal issues and the application was withdrawn pending resolution of the legal issues. f. Director Chilcott reported staff would like to have a plan in place for public outreach and education to inform the public of the risks of flooding. By flood standards, the 2013 flood was not a big flood for the local rivers involved. Staff expects FEMA to require remapping of the floodplains using accurate information. Estes Park is in a high risk area, and the cost of flood insurance will be extremely high. Staff is especially concerned about the impacts of risk and the cost of insurance in the downtown area and other areas near river corridors. Additional hydrology studies are being completed. It is important that the Town have a good strategy to engage the public on next steps for mitigation. Staff is working with Slate Communications to assist with a successful public engagement process. The Town has contracted with Brian Varrella from Olsson & Associates to perform our floodplain management duties for the immediate future. Brian is the former floodplain manager for the City of Fort Collins, and the past-president of the Colorado Association of Stormwater and Floodplain Managers. g. Director Chilcott reported staff is reviewing a possible change in the code to allow for an extended re-build time, similar to what was done following the Woodland Heights Fire. The elected officials have directed staff to put an amended re-build process in place. The August agenda will include a draft EVDC amendment on this topic. h. Director Chilcott reported the Downtown Plan Request for Proposal (REP) will be released tomorrow. Consultants will have 21 days to submit proposals. A selection committee will be created to select the consultant. Chair Hull stated Commissioner White would be willing to serve on the selection committee if allowed the opportunity. Director Chilcott stated she would need to submit an application. There being no further business, Chair Hull adjourned the meeting at 3:04 p.m. Betty Hull, Chair Karen Thompson, Recording Secretary fP Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 230, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE & LOCATION: August 18, 2015, 1:30 PM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: Location and Extent application review and approval. STAFF OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC); and 2. Provide a recommendation to the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC); 2. Conduct a public hearing to consider applicants testimony, public comment, and Town staffs findings and recommendations; and 3. Consideration of a motion approving or denying the application. LOCATION: Lot 1, Visitor Center Subdivision; Lot 3, Stanley Meadows Addition. OWNER/APPLICANT: Lot 1: Town of Estes Park Lot 3: Rocky Mountain National Park CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Primary Contact: David Bangs, Van Horn Engineering STAFF CONTACT: Philip Kleisler, Planner II REPORT SUMMARY: This report describes a request to build a four story, 414 space parking structure on government land just south of the Estes Park Visitor's Center along Highway 36. The applicant received land use approvals in March, 2014 to construct a parking structure adjacent the Visitor's Center along Highway 34. Since this time the applicant (Town) has determined that the proposed location along Highway 36 was a better fit for the structure by achieving better access and fewer visual impacts. Staff reviewed this application for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code and finds that if revised to comply with recommended conditions of approval, the application will comply with applicable regulations. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the application, subject to conditions described in the staff report. CONTENTS SITE DATA MAP AND TABLE. 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & REVIEW PROCESS: 6 REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: 7 PUBLIC COMMENTS: 7 STAFF REVIEW: 8 STAFF FINDINGS 12 RECOMMENDATION 12 Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 2 of 12 Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure Stanley Village Safeway Light and Power Fire District To Visitor Center Project Site SITE DATA MAP AND TABLE: The building site is located directly south and across the Big Thompson River from the Estes Park Visitor Center. Figures 1 a and 1 b shown below provides views from Highway 36 showing the relationship of the project site to surrounding buildings. Located less than one half block east of downtown, the site is considered by many to be an important entry point into the commercial center of Estes Park. The site is bordered by a river and the Visitor Center to the north, a golf course to the east, highway and single family residential homes to the south and downtown to the west. Figures 2a thru 21 illustrate the overall residential and commercial context. Figures la (above) and lb (below): Proximity of Site to Nearest Buildings Figures 2a thru 21: Character of Surroundings Parcel Number: 35251-71-901 25302-53-903 Project Area: 2.6 Acres Existing Land Use: 94 Surface Parking Spaces (public) Proposed Land Uses: 414-space multi-level parking structure Services: Water: Town of Estes Park Sewer: Estes Park Sanitation District Hazards/Physical Features Mapped in the project vicinity? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No Streams/Rivers Yes Ridgeline Protection No Wildlife Habitat Yes PROJECT DESCRIPTION & REVIEW PROCESS: This is a request to replace an existing surface parking lot with a four level 399-space structured parking facility. The parking structure will be located south and across the river from the Visitor Center, and will utilize the existing access from Highway 36. This application package includes: Location and Extent Review (§3.13): This Section is intended to provide an opportunity for review of the location and extent of specified public facilities and uses sought to be constructed or authorized within the Estes Valley, especially as to whether such public use is consistent with the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan and the EVDC. Following the Location and Extent Review, the applicant may exempt itself from local zoning regulations; such an exemption requires a majority vote of the entire Town Board. c. Sosple Fertlly lissIdenthi Figure 4: Land Use of Subject Property Fy EsIale Figure 5: Zoning of Subject Property 1, Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 6 of 12 R Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure Decision-Making Body: Estes Valley Planning Commission Variance (§3.6): The location of the building is such that a setback variance is required: the variance is to allow a greater setback than is allowed in the Downtown district, which has a maximum front setback requirement of 16-feet. The purpose of the maximum setback is to maintain a 'street wall' in the downtown area. The applicant is also seeking (i) height variance to account for the additional (future) stories and light poles and (ii) a variance to allow the main entryway to the structure not face the highway. The variance application will be reviewed after the Planning Commission's determination. Decision-Making Body: Estes Valley Board of Adjustment REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: This request has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Memos are included as part of this staff report. • Estes Park Sanitation District email dated July 16, 2015; • Estes Valley Fire Protection District memo dated July 21, 2015, 2015; • Town of Estes Park Utilities Department memo dated July 1, 2015; • Town of Estes Park Community Development memo dated July 21, 2015; • Town of Estes Park Public Works Department memo dated July 24, 2015; PUBLIC COMMENTS: In accordance with the notice requirements in the Estes Valley Development Code, legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail- Gazette. Town staff exceeded typical mailings by sending notices to all properties notified of the original proposal and all additional properties within 1,500 feet. Additionally, a press release was also published on July 31, 2015, notifying the community of this review. Typical mailings include a 500-foot radius. As of August 6, 2015, no formal written comments have been received for this application package. Written comments will be posted to www.estes.orq/currenta•_plications if received after August 6 and summarized in the staff presentation. , Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 7 of 12 '; '1 Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure STAFF REVIEW: The area included as the project includes a small portion of Town-owned land zoned CD to the west, with the remainder of the site being federally owned, yet locally managed by the Estes Valley Parks and Recreation District. Given the unique site, staff reviewed the proposal with the assumption that the entire site is zoned CD. The rationale for this decision is that this is a critical entryway to downtown and that any future rezoning would likely be to CD. Additionally, the applicant must obtain final approval from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The Bureau has the authority, given that they are the land owner, to require adjustments to the site. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission acknowledge that minor changes may be necessary as a result of the Bureau's permitting process. On a similar note, the applicant has also worked closely with the Estes Valley Parks and Recreation District to mitigate any potential adverse impacts to the golf course. Some minor changes may also be necessary depending on further input from the Recreation District. Use, Density and Dimensional Standards The site plan demonstrates compliance with density and dimensional standards, vehicular access/circulation requirements, and pedestrian amenities/linkage requirements. Use (EVDC §4.4) As with the original proposal, a single use is proposed: Park and Ride Facility, which is a Use-By-Right in the CD Commercial Downtown district. Grading and Site Disturbance Standards (EVDC §7.2) The grading plan demonstrates compliance with general grading standards such as limits on raising/lower natural grade and design of stormwater basins. The plan attempts to limit grading disturbance by following the natural grade of the land as much as possible. To that end, the plan utilizes some of the existing surface parking spaces to the west as part of the site design. Landscaping and Buffers (§7.5) The plan proposes various enhancements to the site, the centerpiece being the wildflowers, shrubs and trees planted at the entryway to the structure. Given the existing site conditions, there is very limited space available for screening along the westerly, uncovered surface spaces. Staff finds that the roadside light poles and planters achieve the EVDC intent for street frontage landscaping. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 8 of 12 E L'' Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure Stall Depth Stall Width 19'-6" 9'-0" 17'-9" 8'-6" Drive Aisle 24'-0" 26'-0" Parking Standard EVDC Requirement Proposed Dimensions Exterior Lighting (EVDC §7.9) The applicant has submitted an exterior lighting analysis (sheet 11 — 12) that complies with this Section. The light poles on the top level will be roughly 19 feet high (maximum height is 25 feet). Off-Street Parking and Loading (EVDC §7.11) The site plan generally demonstrates compliance with the EVDC Off- street Parking and Loading standards. The applicant requests three Minor Modifications to these standards: 1. Location of Parking Section 4.4.D.3, Table 4-7 requires that off-street parking not be located between the building line and the lot line in the CD district. In this case a small handful of surface parking spaces to the west and east of the building will be slightly in front of the building line. As with other standards in the CD district, the intent of the requirement is to maintain a "street wall" in the downtown area. 2. One-way Drive Aisle Width Section 7.11.K.2 required a minimum driveway width of 15 feet for large, non-residential uses. The ground level plan (sheet 5) proposes a 14-foot one-way drive aisle entering from the, existing surface spaces on the west. 3. Stall Dimensions As with the original submittal, the applicant proposes slightly shorter stall lengths, which as generally consistent with industry best practices for parking structures. The intent of the request is to help minimize the structure footprint, while still allowing for comfortable movement within the structure. Additionally, the smaller stall depth will encourage drivers to drive further into the stall, thus keeping a wider drive aisle for vehicles passing circulating through the structure. As shown below in Table 1, while the stall will be slightly shorter than the requirement of 19'-6", the total length (staff depth + drive aisle) is wider than the EVDC requirement. Table 1. Pro osed alterations to •arkin. stall size. Adequate Public Facilities (EVDC §7.12) Adequate services and facilities are available to serve the development. The design for public facilities will be finalized with construction plans. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 9 of 12 Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure Sewer The structure will have no impact on nearby sewer lines along the west side of the structure. Water and Electric Service Adequate water and electric service are available to serve the site. A water main extension is required for fire protection. The applicant has worked with the Water Division on a concept to provide non-potable water to the site for the sole purpose of supporting two new fire hydrants. An existing electrical line will be rerouted around the building to an existing electrical vault on the north end of the structure (see sheet 10). The Light and Power Division has no concerns with this approach. Drainage. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage report. Existing drainage flows from the south will remain largely unchanged, traveling through culverts/inlets under US-36. On-site pipes convey the runoff through water quality ponds and discharge into the river. Some additional details about the internal drainage concept will be needed with construction plans. Public Works reviewed and provided comments for the preliminary drainage report. Fire Protection. Two new hydrants will be installed just north of the structure for fire protection (see sheet 10). The Estes Valley Fire Protection District did not express concerns with this concept. Transportation. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was submitted with the application, which determined that no traffic improvements (e.g. traffic light) are required in the public right-of-way as a result of this application. However, one warrant was triggered, leading the traffic engineer to recommend additional monitoring of the site to determine if a traffic light is needed in the future. The TIA indicated that the left-turn movements of the parking facility and onto US-36 will operate at a Level of Service F during the peak conditions (pg. 23). A Level of Service is often used in transportation planning to describe measures such as the average travel delay, number of vehicle miles traveled and level of congestion. A Level of Service rating may cover a variety of activities (e.g. transit, signalized intersections, bicycle facilities, stairwells) and will range from an A through an F rating (with A being the most functional). Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 10 of 12 c. 'I Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure Both the intersection at the project site and at 34/36 has a Level of Service rating of F during peak conditions. Because of this, the Public Works Department requests additional alternatives and more analysis. The TIA also indicated that the intersection of the parking facility may warrant a signal by 2016 and recommends that the site be monitored over time to assess the need for traffic light (pg. 23). Outdoor Storage Areas, Activities and Mechanical Equipment (§7.13) As with the original submittal, loading areas will be screened from public view through landscaping and building placement. Street Design and Construction Standards (Appendix D) Many of the standards found in Appendix D are addressed with construction plans, such as the detailed driveway design and erosion control methods. Minor Modifications In summary, the applicant has requested three Minor Modifications, as outlined in Table 2 below. Table 2. Minor Modifications re • uested b a . Iicant. Standard EVDC Section Decision-making Body Location of Parking One-way Driveway Width Parking Staff Dimensions 4.4.D.3, Table 4-7 7.11.K.2 7.11.0.3 Planning Commission Planning Commission Planning Commission Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan The site is located within the Downtown planning area. The proposed use and design is consistent with the uses and issues outlined in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. The Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the Estes Park Planning Commission and Larimer County Planning Commission in 1996, and continues to serve as the guiding document in the Estes Valley. A component of the Estes Valley Plan was transportation planning to help reduce downtown traffic congestion. To this end, the Town, Larimer County, State, and Rocky Mountain National Park partnered in the creation and adoption of the Estes Valley Transportation Alternatives Study in 2002- 2003. This study identified the Visitor Center for structured parking. The proposed parking structure will fulfill this component of the Transportation Alternatives report. Community-Wide Policies. Community-wide policies in the Comprehensive Plan include "the natural colors of wood and stone are most desirable for Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 11 of 12 Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure building exteriors." The proposed structure includes stone veneer and heavy timber. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. If revised to comply with recommended conditions of approval, the application will comply with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code, as described in the staff report. 2. The application is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Adequate services and facilities are available to serve the development. 4. The requested Minor Modification concerning the location of parking relieves practical difficulties in developing the site. 5. The requested Minor Modification concerning the parking stall and driveway dimensions results in more effective open space preservation. 6. The Planning Commission is the Decision-making Body. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Development Plan (DP 2015-04) All subject to the following conditions: 1. Variance approval for the building setback, height and location of entryway. 2. Compliance with the following affected agency comments: a. Estes Park Sanitation District email dated July 16, 2015; b. Estes Valley Fire Protection District memo dated July 21, 2015, 2015; c. Town of Estes Park Utilities Department memo dated July 1, 2015; d. Town of Estes Park Community Development memo dated July 21, 2015; and e. Town of Estes Park Public Works Department memo dated July 24, 2015. SAMPLE MOTIONS: I move to recommend APPROVAL (or denial) of Development Plan Application 2015-04, as described in the staff report, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 18, 2015 Page 12 of 12 Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure A •••••••111 TOWN or ESTES PARK Community Development Memo To: Ginny McFarland, Applicant Anirudh A. Chopde, Walker Parking Consultants From: Philip Kleisler, Planner II Date: July 21, 2015 RE: Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure — Findings of Compliance with Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) This written analysis includes only those EVDC provisions that apply to this development proposal. The following are a list of comments which must be addressed in order for staff to determine that the application complies with the EVDC. Planning staff would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss these comments. Approach to this Review As discussed in the Pre-Application Meeting, staff will review the application as if the entire site is zoned CD Commercial Downtown. During the original review staff determined this use to be classified as "Transportation Facility Without Repairs", which is a Use by Right in the CD district, but does require Location and Extent Review by the Estes Valley Planning Commission. Building Height and Setback 1. Building height exceeds the maximum limit. A variance application has been submitted. 2. The proposed parking structure is setback 24' to 35' from the property line. The CD district has a maximum setback of 16 feet. A variance application has been submitted. 3. Include the Annual High Water Mark to confirm River Setback (7.6.E.1.a.3). Building Siting, Orientation and Materials Requirements 1. The main entrance of buildings shall be oriented towards highway (4.4.D.2.a). Please add this to your Board of Adjustment Variance application. 2. Planters, as shown in visual illustrations, help achieve the Code requirement of avoiding long, blank walls that face a public street (4.4.D.2.a). Parking 1. Some off-street parking is located between the building line and lot line (4.4.D.3, Table 4-7, "Location of Parking"). The Planning Commission will consider this as a Minor Modification. 2. The one-way drive on the ground level (sheet 5) is one (1) foot short of the 15 foot requirement. The Planning Commission will consider this as a Minor Modification. Page 1 3. The Planning Commission will consider your Minor Modification request for the stall length, as outlined in the Statement of Intent. Site Grading 1. Add Proposed Contours to Sheet 9 legend. 2. Indicate which trees are being removed. Proposed contours run over trees and through driplines. 3. Slopes of 25% or less are strongly encouraged whenever possible (7.2.B.5.a). How much additional site disturbance will take place as a result of decreasing the 3:1 slopes. Slopes over 25% must be reestablished with plant materials with deep rooting characteristics to minimize erosion and reduce surface runoff (7.2.C.3). Landscaping 1. Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping Requirements call for a minimum of one (1) tree per twenty (20) lineal feet and one (1) shrub per five (5) lineal feet along the perimeter of a parking area located adjacent to an arterial street. Due to existing conditions, there does not appear to be adequate room for plantings along the existing westerly surface lot. It also appears that partial intent of the roadside light poles and planters is to screen the electric vehicle parking spaces. The grade separation also partially screens these spaces. 2. A minimum of one (1) tree and two (2) shrubs should be planted in each interior landscaped island. Lighting 1. The style and height of light poles complies with §7.9 Exterior Lighting. Please note that all outdoor light not necessary for security purposes shall be reduced, activated by motion sensors devices or turned off during non-operating hours. Easements 1. Do any of the platted easements need to be vacated with the new design? Input from Golf Course Planning staff understands and supports necessary changes to the site plan as a result of input by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and/or Estes Valley Recreation District (i.e. Golf Course). Staff will need to review changes to the plan to ensure compliance with the EVDC. Drafting Modifications 1. An official Town Logo should be used in place of the Visit Estes Park logo (pg. 1). Construction plans must address: Page 2 1. 7.5.D.3.e: Trees cannot be within seven (7) feet of buildings. 2. Exterior Lighting: a. Include unit fixtures, light pole height and design. 3. Label man-made slopes greater than 25%. 1. §7.2.0 Restoration of Disturbed Areas 2. §7.5.D.2.b.3 Root Zones. Trees need to be surrounded by pervious area around 1.5 times the area of the drip line. 3. §7.5.D.5 Standards for Protection During Construction. 4. §7.5.D.3.i No trees shall be planted within 25 feet of intersections 5. §7.5.D.5 Include plan for irrigation 6. §7.11.0 Parking and Loading Area Design Standards. Add note stating that markings shall be white. 7. §7.11.J Accessible Parking for Disabled Persons regarding ADA signs and markings, and slope of parking space and access aisle. 8. §7.13 Outdoor Storage Areas, Activities and Mechanical Equipment. Trash enclosure materials, colors and design of screening walls or fences shall conform to those used as predominant materials and colors of the buildings. If such areas are to be covered, then the covering shall conform to those used as predominant materials and colors on the building. 9. Appendix D.III.B.9 Driveway Design Requirements 10. Appendix D.I II. B.10 Driveway Construction Standards. 11. Appendix D.V Sidewalks, Pedestrian Connections and Trails 12. Appendix D.VI Erosion Control 13. Appendix D.VII Tree and Vegetation Protection During Construction and Grading Activities 14. Appendix D.VIII Other Requirements, regarding construction plan approval, quality control, etc. 15. Demonstrate positive drainage from building. Page 3 A EP TOWN OF ESTES PARK Memo PUBLIC WORKS To: Phil Kleisler From: Kevin Ash, PE, Public Works Civil Engineer Date: July 24, 2015 RE: Estes park Transit Facility Parking Structure Development Plan Phil — Public Works has reviewed the submitted application for the Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure and offers the following conditions: Transportation: 1. Traffic Impact Analysis (FHU, June 2015) indicates left-turn movements out of the parking facility site will operate at a Level of Service F during peak conditions. A delay of 273.4 seconds is modeled for the 2020 period. The application should acknowledge this impact and propose alternatives: right-in/right-out only in peak season/peak hour times; signage; etc. 2. The traffic study indicates a warrant exists at the intersection for a traffic control signal. This warrant is raised because of the peak hour volume. A warrant exists, but that does not require the installation of a traffic signal. Discussions with CDOT about a signal at this intersection should be ongoing. A schedule for when this signal would be installed should be investigated. 3. LOS F conditions exist at the US 34/US 36 intersection. This application does not address that issue. 4. Additional turn lanes at the intersection are not required. 5. Applicant is required to submit and get approval of Final Construction Plans before construction of any transportation related infrastructure. Drainage: 1. The submitted drainage report (Van Horn, June 24, 2015) addresses off-site drainage basins from the south. Existing culverts/inlets will pass the flow from the south across US 36. On-site pipes convey the runoff through water quality ponds and discharge into the river. The proposed storm system re-routes this storm pipe/pond system — and adequately conveys off-site runoff flows. 2. Drainage Plan does not address proposed runoff inside the structure (or the top) with much detail. Drainage flow arrows/slopes/elevations/inlets/etc. should be provided. 3. Applicant is required to submit and get approval of Final Construction Plans before construction of any drainage related infrastructure. From: James Duel( To: pkleisler(aeste_s.org Subject: RE: REFERRAL FOR COMMENT: FINAL REVIEW - Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure - Lot 1, Visitor Center Subdivision less por. in Tax Dist. 3300 - 500 Big Thompson Avenue Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:57:47 PM Hello Phil — as per review of the 6/24/15 Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure plans, structure will have no impact on the District or our lines that are along the west side of the structure providing that no cover is removed the line location. Also the District is fine with draining the 3000 gallon sand and oil interceptor to the water quality pond and subsequently the river drainage. Obviously regular cleaning of the interceptor will be required to ensure the purpose of the interceptor. Thank you — Jim Duell, Estes Park Sanitation District From: pkleisler@estes.org [rnailto:pkleisler@estes.org ] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 1:20 PM To: 'Karen Thompson'; 'Greg White'; 'Frank Lancaster'; 'Alison Chilcott'; 'Greg Muhonen'; '05 Kevin Ash'; '06 Jen Imber'; '07 Susie Parker'; 'Cliff Tedder; 'Steven Rusch; '08 Jeff Boles'; '09 Reuben Bergsten'; 'Joe Lockhart'; 'Will Birchfield'; '12 Marc Robinson'; '13 Eric Rose'; '14 Skyler Rorabaugh'; 'Kate Rusch'; '31 Gloria Hice-Idler'; '32 Rick Spowart'; 'Jim Duell'; 'Ron Duell'; '47 Laura Harger'; 'Stroh, Terence' Cc: 'Ginny McFarland' Subject: RE: REFERRAL FOR COMMENT: FINAL REVIEW - Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure - Lot 1, Visitor Center Subdivision less por. in Tax Dist. 3300 - 500 Big Thompson Avenue The routing attachment was not attached to the previous email (my apologies) Phil Kleisler Planner II Town of Estes Park, CO 970.577.3725 From: pkleislerestes.oro [nnailto:pkleisler(aestes.orcil Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 1:18 PM To: 'Karen Thompson; 'Greg White'; 'Frank Lancaster'; 'Alison Chilcott; 'Greg Muhonen'; '05 Kevin Ash'; '06 Jen Imber; '07 Susie Parker'; 'Cliff Tedder'; 'Steven Rusch; '08 Jeff Boles'; '09 Reuben Bergsten'; 'Joe Lockhart'; 'Will Birchfield'; '12 Marc Robinson'; '13 Eric Rose'; '14 Skyler Rorabaugh'; 'Kate Rusch'; '31 Gloria Hice-Idler'; '32 Rick Spowart'; 'Jim Duell'; 'Ron Duell'; '47 Laura Harger'; 'Stroh, Terence' Cc: 'tinny McFarland' Subject: REFERRAL FOR COMMENT: FINAL REVIEW - Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure - Lot 1, Visitor Center Subdivision less por. in Tax Dist. 3300 - 500 Big Thompson Avenue Good afternoon, Attached please find the guidelines for commenting on the FINAL REVIEW of the project listed above. The Parcel ID is 25302-84-901. Documents can viewed at www.estes.org/currentapplications. Please let me know if you prefer hard copies (no changes to the site plan were made through the completeness stage). Comments concerning this review are due on or before Friday, JULY 24, 2015. Please be sure to copy the applicant on your comments (ginnyPspaceintoplace.com ). Please let me know if you have any questions. We look forward to hearing from you and please don't hesitate to contact with any questions. Phil Meister Planner II Town of Estes Park, CO 970.577.3725 ESTES VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 1907 Serring the Residents and Tisitars of the Estes Miley with Superior Fire and Safety Services PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: July 21, 2015 Project Identification: Estes Park Transit Facility & Parking Structure Location: Lot 1 Visitor center Subdivision Referral: Step 3: Final Development Review The Estes Valley Fire Protection District has reviewed the submitted material describing the proposed project referenced above, and approves those plans contingent on compliance with the following requirements (conditions of approval): Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following requirements shall be met: 1. Construction plans (access / roads, water line system design) shall be reviewed and must meet approval of the Fire District. 2. The new required fire hydrants shall be installed before any combustible material are on site. The hydrants shall be maintained operational at all times thereafter, unless alternate provisions for water supply are approved by the fire District. The Town of Estes Park must approve the installation and oversee the testing of water mains and hydrants. 3. 3 foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of the proposed fire hydrants. 4. In accordance with IFC Chapters 5 and 14, approved fire department access shall be provided during all phases of construction, as well as to completed buildings. The criteria for fire department access roads shall be as follows: A. Permanent asphalt or concrete roads shall be installed unless a temporary road surface, such as recycled asphalt or concrete, is approved. B. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. C. The unobstructed width of a fire apparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. D. Turning radii of a fire department access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. E. All dead-end roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall provide adequate space for fire apparatus to turn around. F. Emergency access gates shall be located a minimum of 40 feet back from the adjacent street flow line. Swinging gates must open in the direction of ingress (both directions) to the site. Gates must have a minimum opening width of 20 feet Emergency only access gates shall have approved signage marked: EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY NO PARKING FIRE LANE 901 N. Saint Vrain Avenue • Estes Park, CO 80517 • P-970-577-0900 • F-970-577-0923 #14(i, ESTES VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Serving the Residents and Visitors of the Estes Valley with Superior Fire and Safety Services 4. Fire apparatus access roads shall be permanently signed and / or marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" in accordance with municipal sign/traffic standards. A. Access roads less than 26 feet wide shall be marked as fire lanes on both sides of the road. B. Access roads at least 26 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide shall have at least one side of the road marked as a fire lane. C. Access roads at least 32 feet wide need not have fire lane markings. All construction and processes shall be in accordance with the provisions of the International Fire Code (2009 Edition) and the International Building Code (2009 Edition). Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve any aspect of this project that does not strictly comply with all applicable codes and standards. Any change made to the plans will require additional review and comments by the Estes Valley Fire Protection District. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Marc W. Robinson Fire Marshal 970-577-3689 mrobinsonOestesvalleyfire.org 901 N. Saint Vrain Avenue • Estes Park, CO 80517 • P-970-577-0900 • F-970-577-0923 A EP TOWN or EST ES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum To: Community Development From: Steve Rusch Date: 7/1/2015 Re: REFERRAL FOR COMMENT: COMPLETENESS - Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure - Lot 1, Visitor Center Subdivision less por. in Tax Dist. 3300 - 500 Big Thompson Avenue The Utilities Department has the following Completeness Review comments for the above application: Water Division: The above application is complete for Water Division review but not approved as waterline construction drawings for the water line installation or issuance of any building permits. A Water Main Extension will be required for fire protection. At this time, this new line will be required to have an approved backflow prevention assembly and pressure reducing valve installed at the tie in point of the extension and it is to be considered a non-potable water main for the sole purpose of supporting two new fire hydrants. This assembly is to be owned, tested annually and maintained by the Town's Public Works Department. Spill control method must be shown for proper disposal of discharge from the relief valve, indicating location and sizing of drainage capable of accommodating the discharge that could occur. Gate valves will be needed at each of the two dead end lines for future connections to eliminate the dead ends and the need for backflow protection. This infrastructure must be installed; testing performed/passed and accepted by the Division prior to issuance of any building permits. Any project phasing of the infrastructure must be submitted with the construction drawings for approval prior to construction. Phased infrastructure must be completed and accepted prior to issuance of any building permits within the phase. Construction Drawings are required and must be submitted for review, approval and signatures by the Utilities Director or his designated representative. No installation of any project infrastructure is allowed until the Construction Drawings have been signed. All water main lines and easements must be deeded to the Town of Estes Park. Along with the submission of the construction drawings A EP TOWN 01: ESTES PAR1c Inter-Office Memorandum provide the contact information of the firm or person acting as Utility Construction Manager for the project. Construction drawings must include: • Plan and profile to show potential conflicts between water and other utilities including culverts, show Utility Easement locations when utility is not in Road Right of Way. All water line design and construction shall be done according to the Water Utility Policies and Standards. All water main lines and easements must be deeded to the Town of Estes Park. All water mainlines are required to have a minimum of 10 ft. horizontal separation from both sanitary sewer and storm sewer. Additionally, water mainlines are required to have a minimum 4 ft. horizontal separation from all other utilities. All construction and processes shall be in accordance with the provisions of the International Fire Code (2009 Edition), the International Building Code (2009 Edition) and Town of Estes Park Codes and Standards. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve any aspect of this project that does not strictly comply with all applicable codes and standards. Any change made to the plans will require additional review and comments by the Town of Estes Park Water Division. Light and Power: The above application is complete for review but not approved as construction drawings or issuance of any building permits. • Please schedule a required meet at site with Joe Lockhart, Line Superintendent at (970)577-3613. • All infrastructures must be paid in advance to the Town of Estes Park. No Building permits will be approved by Light & Power until such time. • All new construction must be underground. Trenching & conduit to be provided and installed by developer to Town specifications. • All other material will be purchased from & installed by the Town of Estes Park. TOWN or ESTES PARIc Inter-Office Memorandum • All Town of Estes Park Light and Power lines, (Primary/Secondary) must have a 20 ft. utility easement. This easement can be shared by water, phone and cable. • Water must be at least 4ft from electric. • All services must be on the owner's property. • The size of the service must be shown on the electrical drawings. • All existing lines must be shown on the electrical drawings. • Transformers/pen cells must be in an easement, or if possible on the property line. • All primary lines must be 4ft deep with red warning tape at 2ft. • All subdivision must be designed by an electrical engineer. • All pipes must be schedule 40 gray PVC pipe, if there are more than 4 pipes in a trench then all conduit must be put into a pipe rack. • Town must have ownership of all road crossings. • On underground electric services, it will be the electrician's responsibility to dig them into the transformers or pedestals. • The electrician will need to schedule with L&P to unlock and open transformers or pedestals. • All temporary and permanent electric services will be connected by Light & Power within 5 business days after the state electrical inspection & fees are paid. • Permanent meter sockets must be permanently marked with address or unit number. • All spare conduits will be provided by Light and Power and to be installed by the developer at their cost. Light and Power will not reimburse contractor or developer for conduit obtained elsewhere. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve any aspect of this project that does not strictly comply with all applicable codes and standards. Any change made to the plans will require additional review and comments by the Town of Estes Park Light and Power Division. From: Glenn Malpiede [mailto:glennOesteslegalservicescom] Sent• Tuesday August 11, 2015 6:25 PM To: pkleisler@lestes.orq Subject: Transit Facility Parking Structure Hi Phil, c_.(aymoy,,,. V...._JL___ EL0P4::" At i G 1 2 2015 id 0 lib(ill ----4,10) I just wanted to reiterate my opinion regarding the stair tower on the northeast corner of the Transit Facility Parking Structure as presented in the public input meeting where the clear majority of us chose the four-story tower vs the two-story tower despite the possibility that the parking structure itself may only have two stories for some period of time. My understanding is that, since that meeting, there have been discussions of, instead, moving the stairwell inside the structure and eliminating the tower. I, and others with whom I have discussed this, feel that this would be a lost opportunity, at best (and a huge mistake at worst). My understanding is that the reason for this is because the golf course has pointed out that there would be a danger of flying golf balls entering the exposed stairwell, a danger, I might add, that currently exists throughout the current parking area where the structure is to be built, yet nothing has ever been constructed to "protect" the occupants exiting or entering vehicles (or the vehicles themselves) for all this time. So why worry now? Furthermore, even if suddenly there were some compounded danger (which I simply cannot accept) the "exposed" tower stairway could easily be protected with some form of netting without losing the positive aspects of being more esthetically pleasing and offering an attraction to tourists at the same time. Please do not change the structural plans that the entire community approved simply to "avoid" a truly non-existent "danger" (or at the very least, a "danger" which has been accepted for many years in relation to the current parking configuration). Thank you. Best regards, Glenn Glenn D. Malpiede, Esq. Estes Legal Services, LLC 212 Virginia Drive Estes Park, CO 80517 Office: 970-586-2874 STATEMENT OF INTENT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE PARKING CON SUIANTS ift441-;: WALKER AUGUST 12, 2015 STATEMENT OF INTENT DESCRIPTION tti2 E Li AUG 1 2 205 FZ cgAtywrirpEvELopmENT The need for the proposed Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure was identified in the Estes Valley Transportation Alternatives Study, by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig, published in 2013. This Study identified the need for an additional 525 new parking spaces to serve the needs of Estes Park in 2020 due to increased visitation to Rocky Mountain National Park. The proposed parking structure will be located across the river from the existing Visitor Center and will provide an improved visitor experience by providing a total of 410 parking spaces, 258 of which will be covered. An initial phase of the project with 110 new spaces on two levels is currently funded, and two additional levels will be possible if more funding becomes available. A total of 308 new parking spaces could be achieved in a future four-level structure. The first phase, a two-level design, will result in an upper deck approximately level with U.S. 36 adjacent to the structure. When the full four-level structure is funded, the height above the level of U.S. 36 will be similar to that of a two- story home. View corridors to the Continental Divide, Lumpy Ridge and the Stanley Hotel will be maintained except for a momentary lapse in view for westbound motorists as they pass the structure on U.S. 36. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer lines: The site contains no sanitary sewer lines. No sanitary sewer will be required for this project. Drainage / Storm Sewer: The historic drainage is mostly handled as sheet flow across the subject property with the exception of some existing storm drainage paths that are discharged onto the property in the form of point releases from the mostly undeveloped areas located to the south of Highway 36. All flows from the parking lot area then pass through the site and are discharged into a water quality basin prior to discharging into the Big Thompson River. The major drainage flow paths for offsite flow will still be kept historic for the most part by the use of the proposed storm sewer networks. The runoff generated on the western side of the site is proposed to be conveyed to the eastern side of the lot and discharged into a rain garden which will provide water quality treatment of storm water discharge from the parking areas. The flow from the eastern side of the site will be handled as sheet flow into the golf course area as currently occurs and functions as a natural grass buffer for treatment of storm water flows prior to being discharged into the river. Water: The site contains no water lines or service. New water lines for fire protection will be installed, either through extension of an existing line to the east of the site, or extension (under the river of and existing line to the north across the river. Page I of 4 STATEMENT OF INTENT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE WALKER -44§1-3r PARKING CONSUTANTS AUGUST 12, 2015 Electric: There is an existing electrical vault on the site, and conduit / supply to it directly under the area to be developed. Plans are being made to provide for access to these lines through construction accommodation and easement or special use permit with the BoR. Fiber: There is an existing fiber line that is located along the buried primary power through the site and extends into the electrical vault; it comes from the west foot bridge. The line is a critical communications line that is looped in the valley, but there are plans in place (as part of a different project) to sever the loop on the other side of Town for repairs. Gas: No natural gas mains are known to pass through the subject property. PUBLIC OUTREACH This project has continued the intensive public outreach effort that was started with the original plan to locate this project on the north visitor center parking lot. In that effort, a three day design charrette gathered and engaged residents and stakeholders. Public desire was gaged on programming and site use, aesthetic preferences, and practical feedback, all of which was considered, with much of it integrated in rendering the design for that first effort. Much of that feedback and public engagement has been translated and reintegrated in this refreshed south site effort. The public has been invited to public presentation and polled for thoughts and feedback on the initial designs in the last several weeks and months, Specific feature integration has been with regard to roof form (gable selected over flat), color and stair tower integration. The public was polled on height of the structure and all unanimously agreed that a four story structure was preferable to a two story structure. We have received comment in public presentation and through website feedback and response to several email outreach efforts. BICYCLE RACK INTEGRATION Bicycle racks will be integrated on the north side of the structure, with some under cover and some more visually apparent on the exterior of the structure. Because high usage is anticipated, the design team will integrate a higher than required number of bicycle securing stations. The design team is looking at new, innovative rack design, to encourage use and elevate awareness of their presence. MINOR MODIFICATIONS 1. Off Street Parking and Loading (EVDC Section 7.11.0.3) A Planning Commission minor modification is requested from the Town of Estes Park Zoning requirement 7.11.0.3 which requires 9'-0" wide parking spaces with a 19'-6" stall depth and 24'- 0" two-way drive aisle for 90° parking. This results in a 63'-0" parking module. We typically Page 2 of 4 STATEMENT OF INTENT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE -1 %.,-"Zif, WALKER ..IlpiP PARKING CON5AANI5 AUGUST 12, 2015 recommend a Level of Service (LOS) A parking module of 61'-6", in accordance with industry recognized and published parking dimensions. This slightly smaller parking module will continue to provide an industry recognized highest level of service for patrons, while helping to minimize the footprint of the parking structure. The "level of service" approach used by traffic engineers con also be used as a tool for adapting parking module designs to the specific needs of users. LOS A, which is the most comfortable, allows vehicle movement with little or no constraint. As the level of service decreases, from A to D, the comfort level decreases, LOS D is the minimum dimension for safe maneuvering of a vehicle at low speed. The table below displays published LOS A, or "high level of comfort" parking module dimensions. Reference Stall Width Stall lencith Aisle Width Module Urban Land Institute' 9'-O" 18'-0" 25'-0" 61'-0" Walker Standards 2 91 -0" 17'-9" 26'-0" 61'-6" National Parking Association 3 9'-0" 18'-0" 25'-6" 61'-6" 1. Smith, Mary and Cnristiar Luz. 'Parking C-eornetlics," in The Dimensions of Parking 'Fifth Edition) Woshingion. DC: Urban iond Institute, 2010. 2. &test, Anthony, Mary Smith, et al Parking Structures, Third Edition. Boston. Kluwer, 2001 3. Pori,ing Consultants Council. Guidelines for Parking Geometries, Washington DC: National Porking Association, 201i However, considering the various site constraints the proposed garage has to meet while maintaining a minimum parking counting, we are proposing to use 8'-6" wide stalls, in lieu of 9'-0" wide, with a 61'-0" parking module, which results in a LOS B. By implementing these measures, the structure will be shorter by 9'-0" in the east-west direction and by 2'-10" in the north-south direction. The smaller footprint structure snug-fits on the site in a way that is acceptable to all the stakeholders, i.e. Public Works, Bureau of Reclamation, and Recreation District. To summarize, the parking garage will have a 61'-6" parking model with 26'-0" drive aisles and 8'-6" by 17'-9" stalls. 2. Off-Street Parking Located Between the Lot Line and Building Line (4.4.D.3. Table 4-7, "Location of Parking") The design team has located a very small portion of parking {less that the equivalent of one whole stall) between the lot line and building line, due to site constraints. Maximum effort has been given to work with in the code intent to maintain the building edge at the street without parking between street and building. The vast majority of the site design complies with building edge at or near the street, with no parking between. The plan as shown maximized landscaping opportunities with required parking stalls. Page 3 of 4 STATEMENT OF INTENT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION WALKER ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE .41%.11114.. I'ARKING CONSULTANTS AUGUST 12, 2015 3. The One-Way Drive (Sheet 5) is 14 Feet Wide, One Foot Short of the Required 15 Feet Drive Aisle Minimum. The design team requests a minor modification to allow 14 foot drive aisle in this location, as the 15 feet in this application is not material to parking drive level of service. MAIN ENTRANCE OF BUILDINGS (EVDC SECTION 4.4.D.2.A) The Design Team has carefully considered the design intent of Section 4.4.d.2.a. of the Code with regard to entrance facing the street or highway. The urban design intent of this development is to create street frontage and gateway to the community, in accordance with design intentions of the Commercial Downtown District. The entrance to the structure will be highly visible from the street (Highway 36) and the East and South Facades are to be positioned to enhance the Gateway entrance quality to the community of Estes Park. The South Facade, facing the street will be treated as celebrated entrance way, with flags and flowers, framing the arrival of guests. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING (SECTION 7.5.G) A Planning Commission minor modification is requested from the Town of Estes Park Zoning requirement 7.5.G which requires minimum parking lot interior landscaping for all parking lots with thirty (30) or more parking places. We are proposing to preserve the existing planting zones, including existing trees, in the median adjacent to Highway 34. Of the 39 surface lot parking stalls on the site, 20 are existing in the southwest portion of the site, with no proposed modifications in this phase. The 19 new surface lot stalls are proposed in the same location as an existing surface lot, (modified to provide improved circulation for the visitor's center and new circulation to the proposed parking structure) and do not introduce new uses or hardscape to areas that were not previously used as surface parking. We believe that the parking and landscape improvements proposed as part of the Transit Facility Parking Structure project, specifically preserving the median adjacent to Highway 34, the addition of a large vegetated round-about median, and the increased parking efficiency of the Parking Structure itself, meets the design intent of the Parking Lot Interiors section, although the project does not propose any individual landscaped islands. Page 4 of 4 STATEMENT OF INTENT ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE 4GCONSUtTAN'5 TAN' .444' WALKER JULY 14.2015 [I) STATEMENT OF INTENT / JUL 1 DESCRIPTION ENIE1 h 2 2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I The need for the proposed Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure was iden Hied in the Estes Valley Transportation Alternatives Study, by Felsburg Halt & Ullevig, published in 2013. This Study identified the need for an additional 525 new parking spaces to serve the needs of Estes Park in 2020 due to increased visitation to Rocky Mountain National Park. The proposed parking structure will be located across the river from the existing Visitor Center and will provide an improved visitor experience by providing a total of 410 parking spaces, 258 of which will be covered. An initial phase of the project with 110 new spaces on two levels is currently funded, and two additional levels will be possible if more funding becomes available. A total of 308 new parking spaces could be achieved in a future four-level structure. The first phase, a two-level design, will result in an upper deck approximately level with U.S. 36 adjacent to the structure. When the full four-level structure is funded, the height above the level of U.S. 36 will be similar to that of a two- story home. View corridors to the Continental Divide, Lumpy Ridge and the Stanley Hotel will be maintained except for a momentary lapse in view for westbound motorists as they pass the structure on U.S. 36. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer lines: The site contains no sanitary sewer lines. No sanitary sewer will be required for this project. Drainage / Storm Sewer: The historic drainage is mostly handled as sheet flow across the subject property with the exception of some existing storm drainage paths that are discharged onto the property in the form of point releases from the mostly undeveloped areas located to the south of Highway 36. All flows from the parking lot area then pass through the site and are discharged into a water quality basin prior to discharging into the Big Thompson River. The major drainage flow paths for offsite flow will still be kept historic for the most part by the use of the proposed storm sewer networks. The runoff generated on the western side of the site is proposed to be conveyed to the eastern side of the lot and discharged into a rain garden which will provide water quality treatment of storm water discharge from the parking areas. The flow from the eastern side of the site will be handled as sheet flow into the golf course area as currently occurs and functions as a natural grass buffer for treatment of storm water flows prior to being discharged into the river. Water: The site contains no water lines or service. New water lines for fire protection will be installed, either through extension of an existing line to the east of the site, or extension (under the river of and existing line to the north across the river. Page 1 of 3 STATEMENT OF INTENT WALKER ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE JULY 14. 2015 Electric: There is an existing electrical vault on the site, and conduit / supply to it directly under the area to be developed. Plans are being made to provide for access to these lines through construction accommodation and easement or special use permit with the BoR. Fiber: There is an existing fiber line that is located along the buried primary power through the site and extends into the electrical vault; it comes from the west foot bridge. The line is a critical communications line that is looped in the valley, but there are plans in place (as part of a different project) to sever the loop on the other side of Town for repairs. Gas: No natural gas mains are known to pass through the subject property. PUBLIC OUTREACH This project has continued the intensive public outreach effort that was started with the original plan to locale this project on the north visitor center parking lot. In that effort, a three day design charrette gathered and engaged residents and stakeholders. Public desire was gaged on programming and site use, aesthetic preferences, and practical feedback, all of which was considered, with much of it integrated in rendering the design for that first effort. Much of that feedback and public engagement has been translated and reintegrated in fhis refreshed south site effort. The public has been invited to public presentation and polled for thoughts and feedback on the initial designs in the last several weeks and months. Specific feature integration has been with regard to roof form (gable selected over flat), color and stair tower integration. The public was polled on height of the structure and all unanimously agreed that a four story structure was preferable to a two story structure. We have received comment in public presentation and through website feedback and response to several email outreach efforts. BICYCLE RACK INTEGRATION Bicycle racks will be integrated on the north side of the structure, with some under cover and some more visually apparent on the exterior of the structure. Because high usage is anticipated, the design team will integrate a higher than required number of bicycle securing stations. The design team is looking at new, innovative rack design, to encourage use and elevate awareness of their presence. MINOR MODIFICATIONS OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING (EVDC SECTION 7.11.0.3) A Planning Commission minor modification is requested from the Town of Estes Park Zoning requirement 7.11.0.3 which requires 9'-O" wide parking spaces with a 19'-6" stall depth and 24'- 0" two-way drive aisle for 90° parking. This results in a 63'43" parking module. We typically Page 2 of 3 STATEMENT OF INTENT WALKER ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE PARKING CONSO:AN7S JULY 14, 2015 recommend a Level of Service (LOS) A parking module of 61 1 -6", in accordance with industry recognized and published parking dimensions. This slightly smaller parking module will continue to provide an industry recognized highest level of service for patrons, while helping to minimize the footprint of the parking structure. The "level of service" approach used by traffic engineers can also be used as a tool for adapting parking module designs to the specific needs of users. LOS A, which is the most comfortable, allows vehicle movement with little or no constraint. As the level of service decreases, from A to D, the comfort level decreases, LOS D is the minimum dimension for safe maneuvering of a vehicle at low speed. The table below displays published LOS A, or "high level of comfort" parking module dimensions. Reference Stall Width Stall Length Aisle Width Module Urban Land Institute' 9'-O" 18'-0" 251 -0" 61'-0" Walker Standards 2 9,_0" 17'-9" 26'-0" 61'-6" National Parking Association 3 9 1 -0" 18`-0" 25'-6" 611 -6" 1. Smith, Mary and Christian Luz, 'Parking Geometries,' in The Dimensions of Parking lFihh Editiord Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute, 2010. 2. Chrest, Anthony, Mary Smith, et al. Parking Structures, Third Edition. Boston: Kluwer, 2001 3. Parking Consultants Council Guidelines for Parking Geometries, Washington DC. National Parking Association, 2011 However, considering the various site constraints the proposed garage has to meet while maintaining a minimum parking counting, we are proposing to use 8'-61 ' wide stalls, in lieu of 9'-0" wide, with a 61'-0" parking module, which results in a LOS B. By implementing these measures, the structure will be shorter by 9'-0" in the east-west direction and by 21 -10" in the north-south direction. The smaller footprint structure snug-fits on the site in a way that is acceptable to all the stakeholders, i.e. Public Works, Bureau of Reclamation, and Recreation District. To summarize, the parking garage will have a 61'-6" parking model with 26'-0" drive aisles and 8 1 -6" by 17'-9" stalls. MAIN ENTRANCE OF BUILDINGS (EVDC SECTION 4.4.D.2.A) The Design Team has carefully considered the design intent of Section 4.4.d.2.a. of the Code with regard to entrance facing the street or highway. The urban design intent of this development is to create street frontage and gateway to the community, in accordance with design intentions of the Commercial Downtown District. The entrance to the structure will be highly visible from the street (Highway 36) and the East and South Facades are to be positioned to enhance the Gateway entrance quality to the community of Estes Park. The South Facade, facing the street will be treated as celebrated entrance way, with flags and flowers, framing the arrival of guests. Page 3 of 3 STATEMENT OF INTENT ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE PARKING CONSLCAN1S .44Hrsw# WALKER Ear----121 JUNE 24, 2015 STATEMENT OF INTENT JUN 2 I, DESCRIPTION „ The need for the proposed Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure was identified in the-E Valley Transportation Alternatives Study, by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig, published in 2013. This Study identified the need for an additional 525 new parking spaces to serve the needs of Estes Park in 2020 due to increased visitation to Rocky Mountain National Park. The proposed parking structure will be located across the river from the existing Visitor Center and will provide an improved visitor experience by providing a total of 410 parking spaces, 258 of which will be covered. An initial phase of the project with 110 new spaces on two levels is currently funded, and two additional levels will be possible if more funding becomes available. A total of 308 new parking spaces could be achieved in a future four-level structure. The first phase, a two-level design, will result in an upper deck approximately level with U,S. 36 adjacent to the structure. When the full four-level structure is funded, the height above the level of U.S. 36 will be similar to that of a two- story home. View corridors to the Continental Divide, Lumpy Ridge and the Stanley Hotel will be maintained except for a momentary lapse in view for westbound motorists as they pass the structure on U.S. 36. Page 1 of / General Information Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Site Information 3 Well X None 3 Well E None X EPSD EPSD 7 Yes E Other Other (specify) Other (specify) UTSD UTSD K No X None • Septic r- None ▪ Septic Proposed Zoning CD ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Submittal Date: Type of Application Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map r Special Review I— ROW or Easement Vacation r - Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat f— Street Name Change r Time Extension r Other: Please specify r Su FinaMaR r t,91r I Minor Subdivision Plat r Amended Plat JUN 2 it 7niq J Estes Park Transit Facility Parking Structure New Parking Structure to support the Visitor Center 500 Big Thompson Ave, Estes Park, CO 80517 Lot 1, Visitor Center Sub EPK (2050036687) Less Portion in Tax District 3300 25302-84-901 Lot Size 5.442 Acres + BoR Land Area of Disturbance in Acres 2.57 Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service r Town Proposed Water Service X Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service E Xcel Existing Zoning CD/Federal Land Surface Parking Lot Parking Structure Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? US 36 X Yes r No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? X Yes r No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Ginny Gerhart McFarland, AIA, LEEP AP, NCARB Complete Mailing Address PO Box 1645, Estes Park, CO 80517 Primary Contact Person is r Owner Applicant E Consultant/Engineer Attachments 3 Application fee Requested waived, pending response Alison Chilcott jr( Statement of intent X 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan tir 1 1 " X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park -G., P.O. Boy 1200 •G‘, 170 MacGregor Avenue -G.. Estes Park. CO 80517 Communjiy Development Deportmeni Phone: 1970) 577-3721 -e. Fax: 1970) 586-0249 - www.estes org/ComDev Revised 2011,11.16 KT Signatures: Record Owner Owner Contact Information Record Owner(s) Town of Estes Park Mailing Address Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone 970-586-5331 Cell Phone N/A Fax Email townadmin@estes.org Applicant Ginny Gerhart McFarland, AIA, LEEP AP, NCARB Mailing Address PO Box 1645, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone 303-731-3750 Cell Phone 303-731-3751 Fax Email ginny@spaceintoplace.corn Consultant/EngineerWalker Parking Consultants, Contact: Anirudh A. Chopde Mailing Address 5350 S. Roslyn Street, Ste 220, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Phone 303-694-6622 Cell Phone 813-482-2192 Fax 303-694-6667 Email anirudh,chopde@walkerparking.com APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: www.estes.orq/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanninqApplscationFeeSchedule.pdt All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 1 - Applicant PLEASE PRINT Z;11-41-1T Date c I Date Revised 2011.11.16 KT APPLICANT CERTIFICATION 10. I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. IP In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I10.- 1 acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: httpa/www.estes.orolComDev/DevCode 111. I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC, 10. I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. 10. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. 111. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. II. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT, 1--1 E. V -C4 A-P\tc- (.-t--tic Applicant PLEASE PRINT. k Signatures: Record Owner`"-- 2/1 Date Applicant Date Revised 20 1 .1 1 .1 6 KT Created by Larimer County using data from multiple sources. Larimer Count): makes no esarrant,, as to the accuracy of this product. map may not reflect recent updates prior to date of printing. ITTL PRO:;PECT MOUNT 427.,; Visitor Center Transit Facility & Parking Structure ,c.je_cj 30 13 Owner Address City State Zip ABUNDANT PROPERTIES OF THE ROCKIES LLC PMB 400-169 KERRVILLE TX 78028 ACHESON GERALD SHAW/MARY LYNNE 2300 W EISENHOWER BLVD LOVELAND CO 80537 ADAMS BRUCE G/KRISTIN J PO BOX 2825 ESTES PARK CO 80517 ALEXANDER ROBERT E/NANCY 242 CENTENNIAL DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 ANDERSON MARTHA D/EVERETT 1951 UPPER HIGH DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER 1300 S STEELE ST DENVER CO 80210 ARENTZEN ROLF F JR 137 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 BANK OF COLORADO 605 4TH ST FORT LUPTON CO 80621 BARLOW INC PO BOX 1116 ESTES PARK CO 80517 BARTLETT PATRICIA L /ROBERT 1506 SUNNYSLOPE DR CARROLLTON TX 75007 BENBROOK BRUCE T PO BOX 1008 WOODWARD OK 73802 BERGER JEFFREY W/TAMI M 13309 65TH ST NW WILLISTON ND 58801 BIEN GARY K/VICKI J 675 FREELAND CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 BOHLENDER LARRY L/KAREN G 1476 43RD AVE GREELEY CO 80634 BOYD HERBERT EUGENE 466 SKYLINE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 BRECKENRIDGE ROBERT 9552 W HIGHWAY 14 BELLVUE CO 80512 BROWNFIELDS LEATHER SHOP INC PO BOX 250 ESTES PARK CO 80517 CAMPION CAROLYN A/FRAME JANET C 3805 VALLEY OAK DR LOVELAND CO 80538 CANDY LAND INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 270927 LITTLETON CO 80127 COMANCHE FORKS LLC PO BOX 270223 FORT COLLINS CO 80527 COOPER JOHN D/DONA R 838 PANORAMA CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 COPE JAMES D/KATHERINE B 631 FINDLEY CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 DISCO DOG LAND CO 2898 S LAKERIDGE TRL BOULDER CO 80302 DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 355 HYGIENE CO 80533 DUELL JAMES L/LISA W 842 PANORAMA CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 ELKHORN LLC PO BOX 173836 DENVER CO 80217 ERNST ROBERT/DIANE TRUST 147 STANLEY CIRCLE DR UNIT A ESTES PARK CO 80517 ESTES PARK LLC PO BOX 997 SNOQUALMIE WA 98065 ESTES PARK SANITATION PO BOX 722 ESTES PARK CO 80517 ESTES PARK VILLAGE GREENS HOA/STEPHENS GEORGE G/HAZEL D 5720 ARROWHEAD DR GREELEY CO 80634 ESTES VILLAGE PROPERTIES LTD PO BOX 4130 ESTES PARK CO 80517 ETCHCEPTIONAL 1 LLC 836 VISTA LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 2390 ESTES PARK CO 80517 PasViv,k) (r. 01 .1 I fV,-^3 Visitor Center Transit Facility & Parking Structure FIXTER ROBERT H/CAROLE A PO BOX 1633 ESTES PARK CO 80517 FLATIRONS BANKING SOLUTIONS INC 401K 2030 MONIDA CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 FOWLER HAYWOOD CHERYL 5285 DIAMONDBACK DR LAS CRUCES NM 88011 FOX KEVIN R/BARBARA R /NAMUTH RONALD/PAIGE 1976 A ST LINCOLN NE 68502 GERON JOHN/MARY M/ JAMES M JR/ROSS MARY 4411 UNIVERSITY BLVD DALLAS TX 75205 GIBBS JOHN W/DORIS E 1836 GLEN GARRY DR LAKEWOOD CO 80215 GINTHER FREDERICK L/RITA B 3106 W EISENHOWER BLVD LOVELAND CO 80537 GREAT WESTERN BANK/FBO FUCHS OLIVER FAMILY 9290 W DODGE RD STE 401 OMAHA NE 68114 GREEN JIM B/MARY R 1715 GLACIER ST LARAMIE WY 82070 HABER ALEGRA M FAMILY TRUST 3208 ARDSLEY DR ORLANDO FL 32804 HAYEK EDWARD A/MARLENE A 611 FINDLEY CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 HAYES EUGENE W/DOLORES M 3 GLENKIRK LN SAINT LOUIS MO 63122 HEISER MATTHEW/TRESSELL SHELLIE PO BOX 3633 ESTES PARK CO 80517 HESS DONALD E 1484 CREEKSIDE CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 HILTNER ORIN K/CONNA L 464 SKYLINE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 HIRSCHFIELD NANCY L 842 VISTA LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 HOFEMANN PAUL A/JOYCE A 13008 COUNTRY TRAILS LN AUSTIN TX 78732 HOFF BARRY J 2057 FOX MEADOW LN JOHNSTOWN CO 80534 HOLDT MARK L REVOCABLE TRUST 823 PANORAMA CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 HOLLER MARK E/VICKY L PO BOX 303 ESTES PARK CO 80517 HOLLEY DONALD LEAGUE/MICHELE 680 HIGHLAND LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 HOLMES BRYON/DEBORAH 829 PANORAMA CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 HORNBACHER SARA L 178 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 HOUSTON BENNETT R 434 KARSH DR LONGMONT CO 80501 HUGHEY IRA A/MARY F /LICKLIDER LINDA 905 COMPOUND ENID OK 73703 HUITT SHARON LOWTHER/CIANCONE KARYN 7423 GUINEVERE DR SUGAR LAND TX 77479 IMBACH-RINEHART KAROL J 7741 MONTECITO CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 JAENECKE RUSSELL E/CAROLE T 610 FINDLEY CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 JAROLIMEK TAMARA L/JAMES F PO BOX 3523 ESTES PARK CO 80517 JEREB RICHARD F II PO BOX 3473 ESTES PARK CO 80517 JOHNSON CANDACE/ZELL RODNEY 635 STEAMER DR UNIT A ESTES PARK CO 80517 JONES SHAUN T/JANET C 7580 LOST CREEK FLOWER MOUND TX 75022 JWC STANLEY HOLDING 333 WONDERVIEW AVE ESTES PARK CO 80517 KANE NICK AKA NICHOLAS PO BOX 1961 ESTES PARK CO 80517 Visitor Center Transit Facility & Parking Structure KEIMIG GARY L/EILEEN L PO BOX 1014 ESTES PARK CO 80517 KEY SHARON B ./RANDALL 6755 COYOTE RIDGE CT UNIVERSITY PARK FL 34201 KING DAVID/SUSAN 134 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 KINGSWOOD MICHAEL R/CYNTHIA A 152 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 KIRKS FLYSHOP LLC PO BOX 1662 ESTES PARK CO 80517 KRALL RUSSELL G/DOLORES PO BOX 2242 ESTES PARK CO 80517 LEAGUE LARRY D/ALICE F 620 STEAMER DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 LEE GEORGE/MEI-CHI PO BOX 1973 ESTES PARK CO 80517 LEHMAN JAMES L/HENRIETTA 415 RIDGECREST CIR DENTON TX 76205 LEYMASTER KREG A/JANE A 5045 W COTTONWOOD COVE HASTINGS NE 68901 LININGER DINA G/SHERWIN M 174 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 LITTLE CURRENT CONSULTING LLC PO BOX 1379 LONGMONT CO 80502 LONGWELL VIRGINIA M/DANIEL A 650 HIGHLAND LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 MARGHEIM FREDERICK W/DOROTHY M 610 STEAMER DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 MARSHALL DONNIE K/JILL T PO BOX 2661 ESTES PARK CO 80517 MATTHEWS GARY/IRENE 139 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 MAXWELL LLOYD R/GAYLE PO BOX 1861 ESTES PARK CO 80517 MCKINNEY JOAN ELIZABETH REVOCABLE TRUST 155 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 MI CASA HOA/ETCHCEPTIONAL 1 LLC 836 VISTA LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 MI CASA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 844 VISTA LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 MILBURN JOHN P/SARAH P 407 S MYRTLE ST GEORGETOWN TX 78626 MINDFUL SOLUTIONS LLC PO BOX 1592 ESTES PARK CO 80517 MOELLERS MARCIA R 447 SKYLINE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 MOINAT DAVID H/HARRIET 148 STANLEY CIR DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 MONGE KAREN P 1397 GLACIER VIEW LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 MORANO JOLENE S 2220 LONG VIEW DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 MOUNTAINVIEW VACATIONS LLC 742 LAKEWOOD CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 MULHERN RICHARD E/ELIZABETH PO BOX 1569 ESTES PARK CO 80517 MURPHY BRIAN 3620 CAPULIN DR LOVELAND CO 80538 NEWENDORP PAUL D/DONNA L 625A STEAMER DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 PANORAMA LLC 1865 TWIN DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 PIKA PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1793 ESTES PARK CO 80517 POCHOP DIANA M DBA MYSTIC/MTN GALLERY PO BOX 58 ESTES PARK CO 80517 POST PROPERTIES LLC 6307 COUNTY ROAD 43 DEVILS G ESTES PARK CO 80517 Visitor Center Transit Facility & Parking Structure PROSPECT INN LLC PO BOX 2128 ESTES PARK CO 80517 PROSPECT OF ESTES LLC 700 N SAINT VRAIN AVE ESTES PARK CO 80517 RACINE ANN PO BOX 1604 ESTES PARK CO 80517 RAHNE RANDAL R/HUGHES BEVERLY 8253 UTE HWY LONGMONT CO 80503 RAY ALICE CLAIRE 2461 ARAPAHO RD ESTES PARK CO 80517 RENO CHARLES S 21021 SHACKLEFORD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 RETRUM WILLIAM S 650 FREELAND CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 REVELEY CHRISTOPHER G/FINLEY ANN 665 FREELAND CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 RICCIARDI ANTHONY F/KATHY 837 PANORAMA CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 RICHARDSON GLENN.ROBERTA/TIMERLINE TRUST 37146 DICKERSON CT SEVERANCE CO 80550 RILEY QUEST LLC 15446 STEVENS PLZ OMAHA NE 68137 RISSMILLER MARK D/JEAN P PO BOX 948 MCKINNEY TX 75070 RKEP LLC 175 REDROCK RD SEDONA AZ 86351 ROCKY MOUNTAIN PARK INN LLC PO BOX 29041 PHOENIX AZ 85038 ROSA DUANE J/LYNN C 6804 BENT OAK DR AMARILLO TX 79124 SAEMISCH RHONDA M/TODD 30 MANZANITA LITTLETON CO 80127 SAFEWAY STORES 46 INC 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 SAHM RAYMOND C/LUZIA M 700 HIGHLAND LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 SAINT LARRY L/CAMILLA R PO BOX 3338 ESTES PARK CO 80517 SALASEK JOSEPH K/DEANNA 28553 KELSEY PT LAKE BARRINGTON IL 60010 SAXTON CHARLES 1738 FRANKLIN ST UNIT 1-B DENVER CO 80218 SCHMIDT DONALD L/RENA B 18804 N DIAMOND DR SURPRISE AZ 85374 SCHRADER LAND CO LLLP 320 N COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS CO 80524 SHIPMAN ROBERT L/JUDITH A 531 HIGHLAND LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 SIECK AND FIND LLC 812 BIRCHWOOD CIR COUNCIL BLUFFS IA 51503 SILAR DONALD F/DEBORAH D 5220 GRIFFITH DR FORT COLLINS CO 80525 SINDELAR JEFFEREY A 356 E ELKHORN AVE UNIT 3 ESTES PARK CO 80517 SMALL MARJORIE L PO BOX 4649 ESTES PARK CO 80517 SMITH CHRISTINE R 620 FINDLEY CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 SMS FINANCIAL XXIII LLC 6829 N 12TH ST PHOENIX AZ 85014 SNOWDEN MARY ANN 395 PARK VIEW LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 SOLIDAY STEVEN L/KATHRYN K 827 PANORAMA CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 SPALDING WILLIAM J/ELIZABETH J 355 PARKVIEW LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 SPEAR FAMILY TRUST 5495 US HIGHWAY 36 ESTES PARK CO 80517 Visitor Center Transit Facility & Parking Structure STANDSTEDT PHYLLIS M 1528 64TH AVE CT GREELEY CO 80634 STANLEY HILLS ASSN PO BOX 3344 ESTES PARK CO 80517 STANLEY VIEWS HOA/HAYEK EDWARD/MARLENE 611 FINDLEY CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 STANLEY VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LLC 1130 38TH AVE STE B GREELEY CO 80634 STANLEY WELLNESS CENTER LLC 333 E WONDERVIEW AVE ESTES PARK CO 80517 STARK GARY R/LYNNE M 164 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 STARR P CHARLES P/DARLA L REV TRUST 14505 S 158TH BENNET NE 68317 STATE OF COLO HIGHWAY DEPT 1313 SHERMAN ST DENVER CO 80203 STEIN KENNETH A/BEVERLY 203 LEISURE LAKE RD DONIPHAN NE 68832 STEPHENS GEORGE G/HAZEL D 5720 ARROWHEAD DR GREELEY CO 80634 STEVENSON JERRY L/PATRICIA J 950 VISTA LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 SWEARINGEN JAMES P /CHRISTOPHER W/ANN 3781 W 101ST AVE WESTMINSTER CO 80031 SWIFT BRADLEY DAVID 1939 12TH AVE GREELEY CO 80631 TESAR VICKI PO BOX 421 ESTES PARK CO 80517 TESELLE LIVING TRUST 272 SOLOMON DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 THAPA ANITA PO BOX 1066 ESTES PARK CO 80517 THOMAS NANCY P TRUST 160 STANLEY CIR ESTES PARK CO 80517 THOMPSON ENTERPRISES LLC 401K PO BOX 4294 ESTES PARK CO 80517 THORP ROGER M/VERLENE G 1038 KIOWA RD LYONS CO 80540 TIMBERLINE TRUST 37146 DICKERSON CT SEVERANCE CO 80550 TORRICELLI MARK A/CHERYL JOAN 1303 INDIAN SPRINGS DR GLENDORA CA 91741 TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK CO 80517 TREAD LIGHTLY PROPERTIES LLC 300 J J KELLY RD LYONS CO 80540 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL DELIVERY WASHINGTON DC 20090 UNITED STATES/ROCKY MTN NATL PARK 1311 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS CO 80524 UNITED STATES DEPT OF INTERIOR PO BOX 1366 FORT COLLINS CO 80522 UNITED VALLEY BANK PO BOX 1210 GYPSUM CO 81637 UNIVERSAL HARMONY LLC 114 TIMBER LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 VESTERMARK KEITHA R 149 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 WAPATI MOUNTAIN RLLP 20080 S 96TH ST HICKMAN NE 68372 WEST BERTHA MAE PO BOX 1336 ESTES PARK CO 80517 WEST 0 FEDERAL LLC 151 WESTON LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 WICKS JOSEPH L JR PO BOX 3619 ESTES PARK CO 80517 WIESNER MARK L/JEAN K A 122 STANLEY CIRCLE DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 Visitor Center Transit Facility & Parking Structure WILCOCKS ANN M/RONALD L 2711 SUNSET LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 WILLIAMS LLOYD T/AUGUSTA N PO BOX 12 VALE OR 97918 WINDY CITY LLP 3225 DEVILS GULCH RD ESTES PARK CO 80517 WITTE MARY KAY / PEARSON KENNETH/DOUGLAS 1471 29TH LN PUEBLO CO 81006 WOJCIK JULIAN/ELIZABETH 729 PINEWOOD DR LYONS CO 80540 ZELL RODNEY D/JOHNSON CANDACE S 635 STEAMER DR UNIT B ESTES PARK CO 80517 2ONNG. CD-COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN GROSS PROJECT AREA (INCLUDES PORTIONS OF MULTIPLE LOTS) 2,569 AC,111 904 S F 801 OF LAND UNDER EFFECTIVE FLOOD PLAIN_ 0203 AC413.829 S F AREA IN PROPOSED RIGHTS-OFWAY DEDICATIONS_ ▪ ACIO SF 80% OF LAND ABOVE TOEP WATER SERVICE ELEVAT NI' DAGO S.F I FAST AREA 1) ACID S.F NET PROJECT AREA 2.367 AC,103.075 S F NET SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AREA 2202 AC,95,934 S F GROSS FLOOR AREA PROPOSED PAFtKWG STRUCTURE (2 LEVELS) 59.987 S F FUTURE PARKING STRUCTURE (4 LEVELS) 126.6555E FLOOR AREA RATIO PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE (2 LEVELS). 054 FUTURE PARKING STRUCTURE (4 LEVELS) 1.13 LOT COVERAGE. EXISTING LOTS, ROADWAYS. OTHER. 37.995 SF PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTuRE. 33.387 S.F TOTAL (SITE). 71.382 S.F LOT COVERAGE RATIO. BA% STRUCTURE HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS 30 FEET STRUCTURE HEIGHT. PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE (2 LEVELS)' PARKING STRUCTURE (TOP OF SPANDREL) 1T-2 STAIR CANOPY N/A UGHT POLE 388" FUTURE PARKING STRUCTURE (4 LEVELS) PARKING STRUCTURE (TOP OF SPANDREL) 317.-2- STAR CANOPY 44'-R' LIGHT POLE BU-6 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED LEVELS STANDARD STALLS CAR ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESS. F TOTAL ENCLOSED (COVERED) UNENCLOSED (UNCOVERED) GROUND LEVEL 75 6 2 63 63 0 SECOND LEVEL Ti 0 C 77 77 0 TOTAL (PROPOSED STRUCTURE) 152 6 2 160 160 0 FUTURE LEVELS SECOND LEVEL 24 0 0 24 24 0 THIRD LEVEL 101 0 0 101 78 23 TOP LEVEL 77 0 0 77 0 77 TOTAL (FUTURE STRUCTURE) 202 0 0 202 102 100 SURFACE LOT STALLS 48 2 10 52 52 GRABS TOTAL AT BUILD OUT 403 5 3 414 262 IS, PARKING/ADA REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS 1 SHE ADA PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE DERIVED FROM THE 2010 ADA STANDARDS TOR ACCESS BLEIDESIGN. SECTION 2082 THE SITE SURFACE PARKING IS CONSIDERED A PARKING FACLITY AND THE PARKING STRUCTURE IS CONSIDERED A PARKING FACILITY. EACH WITH THEIR OWN PARKING REQUIREMENTS. 2 THE SURFACE PARKING WITH 154) TOTAL STALLS REQUIRES (2) CAR ADA STALLS AND 11) VAN ADA STALL THE PARKING STRUCTURE. AT BUILD OUT, WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF 1366) STALLS: REQUIRING (8) CAR ADA STALLS AND (2) IAN ADA STALLS PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE: APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION ON THIS DAY OF 20 PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR ATTEST SHEET INDEX COVER SHEET 2 SURVEY PLAN 3 PROPOSED SITE PLAN • FIRE ACCESS PLAN 5 GROUND LEVEL RAN 8 TOP LEVEL PLAN 7 SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL PLANS . FUTURE • TOP LEVEL PLAN - FUTURE 9 GRADING PLAN 10 UTILITY PLAN 11 LIGHT SPILL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 12 PARKING STRUCTURE PHOTOMETRIC FLANS 13 LANDSCAPE PLAN 14 PLANTING DETAILS 15 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 16 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 17 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATORS. FUTURE 15 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS • FUTURE 15 PHOTO SIMULATION - EAST VIEW 20 PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE EAST VIEW 21 PHOTO SIMULATION - WEST VIEW 22 PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE WEST MEW 23 PHOTO SIMULATION - NORTH VIEW 24 PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE NORTH VIEW 25 PHOTO SIMULATION - STAIR ENTRY VIEW 26 PHOTO SIMULATION . FUTURE STAIR ENTRY VIEW I Town of Estes P. AlMrrtbn. Grepay P MALonen P E Putac Works D.C. [13 • 17D MacGregor Avenue PO BoR12W ESTES PARA Eslas Park, 00 00517 COLORADO 970.577.35111 OWNER/APPLICANT Gnny Gerhart McFarland RA. UEED AP. RCA% SoaoantoP1ane I AD P 0 Boa 1845 Estee Park CO 6051 r 303-731-3760 CONTACT PERSON PRIME CONSULTANT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ARCHITECT 5350 S. Rcelyn Street Stole 220 Gnsenwood Wham. CO 60111 503 694 6922 FT 303 094 0667 f Contact Dab Stariey IhAchaal Nash. M56 PC 711871.51larahlYetomse 725 LahaallaSIrtat Dower. CO, BOOR 30&780.7880 CIVIL ENGINEER MEP ENGINEER YAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 013 MIX RC • Hens O- 00.03 1••••• au-smt • r. NA) am-oral SSG - -7.MEP SSG MEP. Inc. VICINITY MAP SCALE" - 500 'Sow PARKING CONSULTANTS WALKER ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO GENERAL NOTES: CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL: 1 ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL SE COMPLETED OR GUARANTEED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 2 THE OWNER SHAil BE REOUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY IN ACCORDANCE PATH THE ADA AND I.B.C. 3 APPROVAL Of THIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 58 OF TITLE 24. C.R.S.. AS AMENDED. THE UNDERSIGNED. BEING THE OWNERS, 00 HEREBY AGREE THAT THE REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW FILED HER EVATH. AND AS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO AND ANY OTHER ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO PERTAINING THERETO. STATISTICAL DATA: TOWN OF ESTES PARK WILLIAM P1NKHAM. MAYOR 3025 5 Pater Read. Sum I 1011 Aurora. CO 80014-2950 101 08.1601 ha 303.04.0812 me-Rd saroupriccon COVER SHEET - SHEET 1 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2013. All rights reserved. No port of this document moy be reproduced in any form or by any means .ithout permiss:on from Wolker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LEGEND M ELECTRIC PEDESTALNAULT (SOTS yairi) ORR POLE :71 NecATION BOY 0 SEWER 0N41.0LE STORM SEWER MANHOLE O 007470.5107 BORE ODLE WARM* NAFER 0411 4412.E61570* ElowED 1101061 p7960O1/TNER 001145 (PRPA)--.357114 el ED 11001 op.* (70.47-1035004 EFT'ECTNE IX ANN. 01X090-ELOODWAT EPICENE IS ANNUAL GN0N1E-11.00001101 ••••••• EFFEC714 0.2% APNEA. ENNAX F1000P.04 fw.71- LISTING DECIDUOUS FINCE-CTISTING BOLDING SETBACK NONFAT (AS ACHED) [15110 5' COMMA ROMs 1010000 I' CONNOR INTERYN. ROAD aR NON pRop70y urrt PkopERTY LIRE APPRox my.. NCH RATER MARK 0 rams INARNATM IS NOTED 04100 WOUND OR ...NED 0410 9 01174 (00.00 PLATTED OR ram 041604S415 EXISTING EVERGREEN 00G SAC DISPENSER 01-195.9.961 =96g; (GM.. (1W) p SURVEY PLAN - SHEET 2 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO BIG THOMPSON RIVER 21 • 16 .13 SCALE - 20,f fttVEY 0101 „om9S, J OT t S6Lsi rp - "mull IROP/ISION. ZONED CD IC. WIN= PLATTO L.I M TISTY (UM 1 1301 cp - 73 1109 .1 2 .. -..„.....-....-;•....-......,--. .7.-z• ERmwm•EN.•6•1.8m8•%Rnm..•••••••=1•N mAIINEMINNIMEradmpfs'....•7-i7.-....,..-- .. geimp-: { 1 Iii s___6-4.''...-.".......ok,••,..• •••• SPI all, .-• ".-- -- - . 1 ---- ---- i i.:••••'- " • 47 • - ----- ..... .5____s ___.-- a ..- _---- _.(67-- ,.' -... • s. • P, . - ..• - ,-- .....010.... ..... .... ,...--- MOOR --- SA: _MY ______ IPAI _.-Ar. NA 1705.7414.28 (MINED) .. ; . 11. ,2. 7 2 :9176 . Roa ocy.35C0.55 ,77 & ----,__ $ RR .".....; " ....* 1 \ SEGE OF NON LAO FOR GOLF CAROM SAISTINO 0D Me 4.00.7 13017071 0010 . • 0 LOT 3 /STANLEY MFADOALS ADDITION ZONING N/A r (NA .,,p400000E kr,ii WATER Y 20151 FROM ROA. IMAGE-NOT L GOLIINS ON THE GOLF CORPSE- SGM FOR GOLF GORSE PARNK SRAM 58-75 WAY ONLY RON AND P0S7 AOrEt ROSE esrer 71100 SIGN wel) P461 - Jar Leak rrE PARNICV"S 448.4419NWA OeyA•PT1uTj 111 ORATE 7970. .)50199 -7502.59 posanar (.561.1411 TurEry 7 0.24' INVELED WAY U.S. 36 A-0 (MT) SURVEYOR'* NOTO-S• 11446 SITE PIAN 6 REPRIMORATNNAL DM? MD I NOT TO SE RUED UPON IS A 60AN0ARY SURREY ND. RAPROVENENT SUNS, 2. CONON. NOAH ARE AT A I' IMIONAL ANO IRE EASED wail or LOCAL GON11104. moos Noon. 67 CCM *RAE R 7E01o0 (/4 RES. w/PLASTO CAP 2604) ESTAOLNED FOR 11.1 40041I04 O< THS SITE RIJN. MS ON E.1.7518 T 0T CONTRC4. was N10 TO THE Row. RIANCAN OATIN (..y0611) CAPS SURYET LIMING 04Y OUT-7510.3 NOS BENCINARK U.0567. HORIZONTAL GOORDNATES ARE SASED OFF Of MS GRYIROL POINT LII 338 (GOWNS., 0000110 NAN), Nu NOM OPS SUM, 119742 A 00501002 01610 PLANE Nonni (0504) PROJECTION (AT 1.9041140), NE REANGS AND OINNOES SHOWN HeRfoo ARE 701140. 3. I317 FotioNwo saw. WERE LASED FOR LOT uNC AND EMMERT RESEARCH FOR MC CANTON OF RFS ME PLAN 007011 CERN. SUENMAON LOT 1(0014 pwCfPflop NO. 2005-0936687). NAT OF STNS. WEADOM AMMON TO OE TOWN OF ESTES PAN (13306 R. PAGE M. 11.14 40950,4 PLAT OF LITTLE PROSPECT 100401.4 AMMAN TO IFE TOM Of ESTES PAN (13000 5. P1.00 39. 91.14 02910-1 AND CONSTRUCTION 00400405 OF ME ENSTING PAIRD40 LOT- TIC *NCR EASAIDAT CO LOT uof NODAL. 025 TO RAN NORM ENGINEERING MO RAWL-ONG. 4. LINTS OF THE EITEGTNE ROMP.. 80071004E5 00 SHOW HEREON ARE FROM A MST FR couomoo. 0.911o. of OAR PANEL 10947 ONG :001007 LAVES COSTING ROADS AND ,EUESTRON WEDGES AS 00710449 041 NF FAN 1.4 COMANSON ANN 714E %AMID =AT.. N 7146 REED OF sae rodtPts. SOME DISCRENNICIES WERE NOTICE 0in4 GNOMICAL USAINN Of NE AwooPLAN/FLDERNAT 00.00.043 orD SASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS 114 OCNPA.SON 91770 THE S.W.) 71Ev4471015 of 414E 9.4NO0 PRON.. ON * LSE. DUE TO THE UM HONG CREATED MOO TO THE PANONG LOT FIEING 10617174:00, NO MENAI NAS WADE 00 REICALA EI0S CISGREPANCy 01 USE OF MONAULIC INGE.* on orNER fl000pLool DELNEATIoN wows. NE GRANIGAL LOCAROM OF 112 uNIM AS SKAATI 014 THE row 204 111 0011.1 NON HEIR FIN 100 OnFATCH or rws slt PLAN. 5. onurr Local-Alms wow( HEREON AM PROw L0CA115 AND 1410040 PROM. BY NAISIOOS UTILITY ACE1IC100. ter taxless 0, DM; MFRS HEREON NIO.D BC GOMSDERED APPROELLIDE ANO ME 10 DE YEN= IN NE FIELD PAN. TO CO1STAvG11001. NINA LANDSCAPNG .1116104 (FLowl. 0003/040nADDAL 81.151405) ARE NOT SINN. 1, SPANNER HEADS NNE N07 LOWED FOR II* 010.471011 OF 714 5 SITE PLAN. 'OSELE INARATIGN 001,70101 saws 965/1 L4 0100 MD ME NONA HEREON IRRIGATION LAVES WERE 1101 LOWED AND SASSEED AS A PART 0, THE FIELD EFFORT FOR RI CREATION OF nfo MN 0. Ala oras ANp or. SHOWN 1171170N 5 SINENAD 'ETRE 2 CRIREI APO GUTTEN (2' .OM) woo NE ExcEPTIoN 01 111100.-Ordi -CLOS LOCATED NOAS PAN.1140 SPACES 27-44 (AS view FOR ors brE RAAN 91I1;I4 ILLS A TOTAL NIGH OF 1.3'. 9001146 10017104,15 WERE SURVEYED IN NE ROA MOTHS NO LOADITVERIA EAMES 04 EMIR. GONDRIE 01.460415 RANT 106733 THE RTC W OEM FOE A Mt RENNIN?, 911 OUDA1310,S1 -____ ...._,... --.--_ 6 moor erre mg.= -....... 01111100.10) 11RAAN40;"a4"-- ----ERNA WAN LOPATIX IT 0 NOT FRO, A PANTED LOCATE ON 714E MAINS 7518 SOU. Air Copyright 2015. Alt rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Welker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc. ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LEGEND: NOT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (237 TONS TOTAL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (1.110 SY TOTAL) ratitzq 0....V1181 COMMERCIAL GRADE TDRESTONE PERMEABLE PAVERS (6,500 SF TOTAL) TOWN PROPERTY U.S.S.R-PROPERTY REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO CONFORM WITH PARKING STRUCTURE ,••• LAYOUT MATCH EXISTING ROADWAY LANDSCAPE ELAND ROADSIDE LIGHT POLES AND PLANTERS. TYPICAL ;ROW ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO PARKS BUILDING SCALE. I. = 3)T43. TO1414 P9IP L1.5". P LOT I VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION ZONING: Cb OWNER: TOWN OF ESTES PARK ...••••• EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE NET-l'tor+ imG -0-04's NEW WATER _ OUALITy.. Keg: .., I • -IC .... o in .... to ...." z 0. -0 0 ..), ..- O - /APPROXIMATE — 33 1, 0 li WATER (MAY 201 S) \ •••• \ tit .6 ......-' - '- ...".. ANNUAL NIGH 0. \ 3 ...,....I' .. , ,•'.- l '' -, '..1•:2. -./ .I .„ PLANTERD BE t4 ir'S45 SO. VI .....--''. INA° EXISTING VAG PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IC7-0' - RIVER COMMERCIAL GRADE TURFS PERMEABLE SETBACK PAVERS FOR LOW-ROY AND FIRE TRUCK ACCESS ) -- LOT 3 STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION ZONING: N/A OWNER U. S. D. R. TREES 7TH TO REMAIN GREEN PLANTER BASE WITH 2-RAIL. DOWEL i PLANTERS, TYPICAL FENCE NEW ARE HYDRANT • TONGA/ • 1725,0, LANDSCAPE \ BUFFER BETWEENEC>v— EXISTING TREES TRAIL AND FUTua TO REMAIN \ CART PATH PROPOSED SIDEWALK MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK - PROPOSED MOUNTABLE DRIVEWAY CURB RELOCAT • LIGHTpat • REPAVE SURFACE OT AS REQUIRED. REMOVE AND PAVE OVER EXISTING LANDSCAPE ' PROPOSED FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE /13,0- WIDE FUTURE CART PATH - - -TUTOR EXISTING 2-RA1L DOWEL FENCE 8-IT WIDE) REALIGNED ROADWAY EXISTING SHELTER MAINTENANCE AND. FIRE ACCESS GATE LOT 44 LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN AOO1TION ZONING: CO EXISTING 101 PARKING STALLS TO REMAIN REMOVE AND PAVE OVER EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND pERTT. LANDSCAPE TERRACE WALL. TYPICAL ASPHALT APRON FOR LOW-BOY AND FIRE TRUCK ACCESS RELOCATED LIGHT POLE - PROPOSED SITE PLAN - SHEET 3 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 US 36 (10V ROW) ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE Copyright 2015. Alf rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in on y form or by any means without permission tram Walker Parking COnSuIT0n)5/EngirleerS. 0 30' SCALE 1, sp. 0. EXISTING WATER LINES 1 n EXISTING WATER LINE v— NEW r DIP 70 TOWN PROPERTY FIRE TRUCK FEET wiDTN 8,6" TRACK LOCK TO LOCK TIME eD SECONDS STEERING ANGLE 37 S. R153,0" TYPICAL FIRE ACCESS GATE INUN --- PERMANENT SIGNAGE READING `EMERGENCY ACCEDE ONLY NO PARKING FIRE LANE' ON BONI SIDES OF GATE ASPHALT APRON FOR FIRE TRUCK ACCESS US 36 (100' ROW) NEW w. DIP \ —NEW HYDRANT II ASSEMBLY AND ) VALVE COMMERCIAL GRADE TURFSTONE PERMEABLE PAVERS FOR FIRE TRUCK ACCESS •-•"' . PROPOSED MOUNTABLE DRIVEWAY CURB FOR ARE TRUCK ACCESS 2-RAL 00WEL FENCE • ---- r - - ------ - _ -- - - - / ----- - PERMANENT 110 PARKING FIRE LANE* SIGNAGE ON BOTH SIDES OF ROAD, TYP. w • NO PUBLIC ACCESS SIGN \ PROPOSED 1, FOUR LEVEL PARKING TRUCTURE — 1 , • DRY STANDPIPE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO FIRE ACCESS PLAN - SHEET 4 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No port of this document moy be reproduced in any form or by ony means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers. Inc ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No port of this document may be reproduced in ony form or by any means without permission from Walker Porking Consultants/Engineers. Inc. EXISTING PEDESTRTAN BRIDGE 1004P PROPS r7ktmElx6tArgRr).PeruRsSrOfiEl 4 PERMEABLE RAVERS TYPICAL ' • ACCES RAMP LANDSCAPE ISLAND NECHAELEC. ROOM U.S.B. R FiROPERTY REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO CONFORM WITH PARKING STRUCTURE LAYOUT REMOVE AND PAVE OVER EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND pcR'EY E EXISTING 031 PARKING STALLS TO REMAIN MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER MATCH EX STING SIDEWALK UINDSCAPE-1 TERRACE WALL. TYPICAL ASPHALT APRON FOR LOW-BOY AND FIRE TRUCK ACCESS - ROADSIDE LIGHT POLES AND PLANTERS TYPICAL- US 36 (100' ROW) 246,01 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 0 rr r \0 .0o09- PLANTER BED COMMERCIAL GRADE TURFSTCNE PERMEABLE PAVERS FOR LOW-BOY AND FIRE TRUCK ACCESS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PROVIDSED SIDEWALK BOLLARDS. TYPICAL RELOCATED i EXISTING LIGHT POLE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK AND RAMP SLOPE LP I§ 1.0% .'.e asouoi 17 SPACES 9#6,61 = 144%6 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER T51" REMAIN BO WIDE FUTURE CART PATH 6 6. \ 6, 16 /BO 25,01. LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN TRAIL AND FUTURE CART PATH 6. b 6 16,06 16-01 PROPOSED TRAIL WITH ATTACHED MOUNTABLE DRIVEWAY CURB .00* (7503.501 NO PUBLIC ACCESS SIGN _ _ ---- MATCH EXISTING 2-RAIL DOWEL FENCE LANDSCAP ISLAN jr 4 SPACES @VS' 36-tr EXISTING SURFACE LOT SPACES 9/ 724r. 11 SPACES a 4 .93 -W RAMP U 10}6.1% 15 SPACE-SO Er-or . 1'6 b.4 8, BP 4. AC . i E rS_0 3_ RAMP LIN MATCH EXISTING \t'°AbWAY REALIGNED ROADWAY .2,6' • (7606.031 - - - 0.0.W1136 TRAIL TO B47 WIDE MAIL Tit"- 27,0' I NEW FIRE HYDRANT, TYPICAL rs!!!! SCALE- 25-01 7TH GREEN NO PUBLI ACCESS SIGN ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO _ - Row GROUND LEVEL PLAN - SHEET 5 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 0 0 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 246-0* 20' SCALE 1' • 20-0- 451-0. 21-0' 2T-0" 30,0' 45-0. ROOF OVER PLANTER WALL MOUNTED LICHT F ATURE. TM. spAcEs 4-6. • 204.-cr 2T-0- 1 )1 BOLLARDS, TYPICAL 1 ow 4104', 45,0" ROOF OVER ENTRYNEXIT 1T-r •13,6* (7517.001 2714" SLOPE UP 1% 17 SPACES a ow = 144'43' k 2,0- (7515.971 27,1' \—ROOF OVER ENTRYlEKIT *POLES. — SIGNAGE 6 SPACES • = 61,0' ROOF OVER ENTRY RAMPD61 • • 12,0' (7515.50) 1•13,11.Y ' (7517.001 e-,910 ! ES ON . -6 ir _ @6.% SP ACES 9 B'$ • 76-6- Rb TOP LEVEL (SECOND LEVEL) TOP LEVEL PLAN - SHEET 6 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015. A6 rights reserved. No port of this document moy be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Walker Parking Consultonts/EngineerS, Inc. ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE 0 OF OVER TRIPEXIT -4A 0 NAGE TEAS. PICAL 0 OVER PIL'AefFER SPSIGNAGE -..,-... BED BOLLARDS. I—I TY PICAL - _. I.i I i p , i z 1 111:11I 1111111i d mom [ 1,,__. 1 ' i J._____ 1 2. si.i.c..0 ro . zor-o• 1 1 SLOPE UP ..... i 424.44 (7628.02) ++28-0• ak--- I 0 1.0% FUTURE .IT SPACES ay-8..144W FUTURE FUTURE I / (4526.501 2r-I• , Mir 1r 27-1' ,.// I CI ti. RC En 14 —= a a sh II SPACES fp BI8 = 42-6- 6 SPACES G EAT • 51,0" 4, ;II -•••1 1 , RAMP UT RAMP ON 234:6 424,64 15 SP 0 er FUTU Ij INT - I2T.i EE 6 % F 9 SP ES. E.6 4,11,6" (TS20.52) F UTU RE _,,,, IN...,.. (75.211-02) FUTURE i_L_____ i _ __._ —If _ _ 1 , II ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,0' 2T-0' 27,4T RE-0' NY-IT 2T4T RooF OVER PLANTER BED -- —F-FM— - - -1 ' • I . BOLLARDS, TYPICAL ROOF OVER ENTRYIEXIT SLOPE UP I.0% EXISTING .12-2 gs15 STI EXISTING 20 40' SCALE 1' = 20-0- ROOF OVER ENTRY 4.1243.4 17517.021 EXISTING REMOVE--,, ,, , EXISTING SPANDREL 4, IF PANEL ' *1244. I.r. ITS1T.001 I EXISTING ' I II L R , E4VEI5u s STIN TYPIC:Ll I I r 11 SPACES ire 43-= 92-e- RAMP U CP S. FUTI11 SPACES (1 =112-6- L RAMP, ON E'Nfo (7515.500 ExISTING 0 0 FUTURE EXISTING SECOND LEVEL-FUTURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24E-0" FuTuRE FUTURE THIRD LEVEL - FUTURE SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL PLANS - FUTURE - SHEET 7 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No port of this document moy be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers. Inc. ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 20' SCALE I' • 20,o- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2445.0" 4.7-06 27-0. 45'd 2r-o• 45.4r BOLLARDS, TyPICAL 4."-• 24 SPACES @ W-ir 204.0 .t. -s,Ei. J ) --* - FIU-TU3S39"RWr-; SLOPE UP 17 SPACEFUTUS42:11:.E.S. • 144L6 45. •24LET F(7u5T-u3TRE.S° ' Ina, 274' I 1 -- 17V, „. ... 1. POLES, —) LIG1iC el CAL 5 SPACES eV • 51,0” 1. *35,64 ON ..34,06 1 1 @ 5.1% t 17539.05) FUTURE ' FUTURE 9 SPACES 0/ 8L6 • 75,6* 0537.551 FUTURE i SPACES 0 .1.• 643..,r4) _ _ _ FUTURE TOP LEVEL-FUTURE (FOURTH LEVEL) TOP LEVEL PLAN - FUTURE - SHEET 8 ISSUE DATE 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015 AN rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by ony means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE F•A''VERMC"'i tlV 404:wee+ taw os.rro skisniqc DECIDUOUS EXISTING EVERGREEN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TO BE REMUYE12 )c• EXISTING EVERGREEN TO DE REMOVED • Oa nti.113 ow no " I/O• 1/0- worn 4 1 STANDARD TYPE 2 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION GRADING PLAN - SHEET 9 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 1' FOR OuTFLON LORD TS' GLeaLso com mic-noN) 9 2a 40 RR . ,or'e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO aim S1G IA-10050S R1NEIR. TYPICAL INTERNAL/ENTRY DRIVEWAY CROSS—SECTION TYPE 0 CURD AND GLITTER (WHERE- APRJCABLE) IOU 20' MIN-ONE WAY 24' MIN-TWO WAY VARIES tars watrI4v14L-U TYPE 2 CURS ANC GUTTER (WHERE APRECASLE) iF COMPACTED ASPHALT IN PLACE e COMPACTED ADDREGATE ROAD ENSE WITH EINES, COMPACTER1 WILL BE TO 055 OR SETTER COMPACTED SUS RiisE krAirRAL, FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL WOOF ROLL TESTED WITH COMPACTION TESTING PRIOR) A.101.1" zgy•ANG 7.1, -20151 AP( o'se z\c' MSG iG,ED soe'r)` 1,1011.2 WORM PEOESTAVVAULT-TO SE AMOUR/ ELECT. PEOESTAIVAULT (MZES VARY) UGIV POLE RRTGAIRON 1164 SERER NANNCIE STORM SEWER LONNOLE-NEW VW. WREN luvalou-1U RE Firmo46 Cl/OR Rum uRE-NEW WATER IR. LANE-EusoNc sLARA Luw UNE-CHSRINC BUR= ELEG1mC PRINARy ANo/DR FIBER 051105 (HRA)-ERHURC TIBER OFTIR (Evaig-f0151054 unicrivE-1l MICA. civRcY-auotmAs ETFELIRVE-1t ANNUM 044125-CL0000URI EFFECOVE-0.25 ANNUAL C•imuS FLOOOPLAN m-0 untri 061£-TO OE MOVED G=1 RR. SEWER-NLIR GOATS Or CRSFURELLRcs. o C FENCE NEW EugmG Mum. RaLvem THSTIRG CONTOUR WENN. — WISH CONTOUR ROC ON DAHE-PROPOSSO NW OR ONIVE-ERSDNG PALCDITY URE WM% ANNUAL x054 wATEB mum C voLNLI 61016.41+7 AS WED 00.00 rolEASIRED CN CALCULATED OINENsIoNs (1X1.00)PLATTED OR 0£01£12 DINENSIONS 501 - _To --.P0_ DAIr _.141{ '"-"`!: AuRSTIBIA . ORO usa:MY R.T TV °LS" __O. • .--051-2161 11.3 111 0 0 NEW MONT Assam., MO SALVE PaRct-raSINC TO BE RUORED BULLING SETS.. EASER,LNI (A5 NOTED) ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Walker Parking Consultonts/Engineers, Inc- ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO ELECTRIC NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UNDERGROUND PRIMARY CONDUITS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY ESTES PARK LIGHT & POWER. CRITERIA SHOWN IS FOR COST ESTIMATE ONLY. ONCE APPROVED CRITERIA IS CONFIRMED WITH ESTES PARK LIGHT G POWER, THE DRAWINGS WILL 6E REVISED. 2. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 35- BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ESTES PARE LIGHT IS POWER IEPLIT) REGARDING ACCESS AND WORK IN THE UTILITY VAULT. 4. IN ALL EMPTYISPARE CONDUITS. PROVIDE AND INSTALL A MINIMUM 700L8 PULL STRING IN EACH CONDUIT EXISTING WATER LINE WET TAP EXISTING MAIN WITH VALVE - RP (HIGH HAZARD) BACKFLOW DEVICE TO BE INSTALLED DOWNSTREAM OF PROPOSED CONNECTION ABOVE GRADE WITH FREEZE PROTECTION REQUIRED ELECTRIC KEYED NOTES 1 NEW UTILITY PAD MOUNTED 3-PHASE TRANSFORMER. NEW TRANSFORMER SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY EPLP WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR INSTALLING THE TRANSFORMER PAD. SIZE OF THE TRANSFORMER TO BE DETERMINED BY EPLP AND THE ENGINEER DURING DESIGN. SECONDARY OUTPUT OF THE TRANSFORMER SHALL BE 208/120V, 3-PHASE. 4 WIRE. FINAL LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER TO BE COORDINATED WITH EPLP, 2 NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL PRIMARY CONDUITS BETWEEN THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL VAULT AND 7HE NEW UTILITY TRANSFORMER, THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL (2)2 (7} 4- AND (2) G'SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS. 3. NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SECONDARY CONDUITS BETWEEN THE NEW UTILITY TRANSFORMER AND THE NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THE TRANSIT FACILITY. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL (2) 2 AND (2)4' SCR 40 PVC CONDUITS. WIRE INFORMATION FOR THE ESTIMATED 400AMP SERVICE WILL RE PROVIDE ON LATER SUBMISSIONS. t. EXISTING LIGHT POLE TOWN PROPERTY U.S.B.R PROPERTY EXISTING WATER LINES (190*-4 -T044NO 1- p sR,c'" 7-EXISTING PEDESTRIAN &RIDGE BtG 1°9S°14 °jEll NEW NEW 30' ADS EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTALSIVAULTS ILMIALLITYWNAOTETERS: MAIN LINES SHALL BE r (AS NOTED) DUCTILE IRON PIPE CLASS 52 WITH BONDED JOINTS. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY'S MAY USE A GT DUCTILE IRON PEE SO LONG AS THERE ARE NO TAPS ONTO THE ASSEMBLY. THE ENTIRE WATERMAN EXTENSION INCLUDING FIRE HYDRANT' ASSEMBLYS MUST BE RESTRAINED USING MEGALUGS OR TIE-ROOS. GATE VALVES WITH THRUST BLOCK WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE DEAD END OF BOTH ONES FOR FUTURE CONNECTIONS. 2. ALL WATER MAIN LINES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND BURIED ACCORDING TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATERMAN DESIGN AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERMAN EXTENSIONS. THE TOWN N COVERING. WATER DEPARTMENT WILL NEED TO INSPECT ALL LINES PRIOR 3. RP (HIGH HAZARD) BACKF LOW DEVICE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED ATTIRE CONNECTION POINT OF THE NEW WATER MARL PRESSURE REDUCTION VALVE MAY BE REQUIRED UPSTREAM OF THE BACKFLOW DEVICE. RP BACKFLOW DEVICES ARE REQUIRED TO BE BETWEEN 12 AND GO. ABOVE GRACE. FREEZE PROTECTION WILL BE NECESSARY. MAINTENANCE AND TESTING OF THE DEVICE WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TOW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 4. 10' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN ALL 2-RAIL DOWEL STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN ENCASEMENT FENCE . OF THE UTPLITY MAINS WILL BE REQUIRED WHERE SEPARATION BLIP WIDE FUTURE REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET. ___ _ 7-CART PATH 5.UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE SCHEMATIC FROM UTILITY LOCATES AND MAPPING PROVIDED BY INDIVIDUAL UTILITY PROVIDERS. ACTUAL UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ON PROPOSED UTILITY EXTENSIONS. 7TH GREEN IC LINE. SEE KEYNOTE 7 PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN -EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE SAND-OIL ARAT OR EQUIVALflIT EXISTIN 24' ADS CULVER (RENO EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE NEW ELECTRIC VAULT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE NEW WATER 3 .\ QUALITY POND .—NEW IP DIP EXISTING ELECTRICAL -Le Rcp I VAULT ' . 5>•,,,.. I EXISTING 24' \ \N I e% - TRENCH ELLIPTICAL i DRAIN I RCP CULVERT RELOCATE '''.•. EXISTING (REMOVE), •-• , -• -1 u1:11.rr HOLE /2 TYR , / / i / / ' ANEW B' DIP ..---"' .....1-7--------7:-. EXISTING OISRT1NEMAING TREE , 1 _••••• . i \ - --'• NEW HYORAN II T \ VALVE ASSEMBLY AND \ . E -MECLANICAURECTRICAL ROD f1 TOWN PROPERTY f-- NEW ELECTRIC JUNCTION BOX FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE STATIONS 0 NEW 24' ACP STORM SEWER 4h O NEW SS MH. TYPICAL NEW ELECTRIC LINE. SEE ELECTRIC KEYNOTE 3 rowN ROW ASPHALT APRON FOR LOWBOY AND FIRE TRUCK ACCESS US 36 _ (10Cr ROW) EXISTING / 24. RCP CULVERT EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE NEW ELECTRIC VAULT EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE RETA&SIDE LIGHT POLES AND PLANTERS. TYPICAL. EXISTING SEWER MAIN LINE EXISTING Ir • PVC PIPE (REMOVE) _-5 EXISTING SEWER MAIN UNE NEW HYDRANT ASSEMBLY AND VALVE • EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTALIVAULT • - - — EXISTING 24' RCP CULVERT 0 30' SCALE:1'd 30,0' UTILITY PLAN - SHEET 10 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No port of this document moy be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers. Inc. ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No port or this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, inc ll'AOMPS°14 _ /0_2 02 tL2 imAG1NARY UNE USES AS LIMITS ku OF LIGHT SPILL ANALYSIS — /0.2 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO NOTES: I. LIGHTING TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 7.9 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE. 2. LIGHTING WILL BE EITHER ACTIVATED BY MOTION SENSOR DEVICES OR TURNED OFF DURING NON-OPERATING HOURS. S. OPERATING HOURS TO BE DEFINED IN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 4. SINCE THE PROJECT CROSSES PROPERTY LINES, WE USED AN IMAGINARY LINE TO ESTABLISH LIMITS OF LIGHT SPILL ANALYSIS. 20' 40. SCALE. V 425-T h.! /0.0 5,1 IMAGINARY LINE / 0.0 USED AS LIMITS / OF LIGHT SPILL 0.0 ANALYSIS / 0.0 rJ tta \ ' tea I I I b o \ /o.0 / 0.2 45'. vkik' 3 /02 9SCI -4D3' / 0 'a \C' / 02 /02 / 02 • -------- --------- - • • PROPERTY —or—r —or —F—r---T— Thor or o . O o Ca OA OA y—Dr _Thr —or —oAT 0-7 —0.0 ----- --- or --oT o2 -°7 —Or / /01 / ,p, P-* P° P° P.° P° lID P° P O P.° — —0 -,-- OA LIMITS OF LIGHT SPILL ANALYSIS. VALUES SHOWN ARE LIGHT LEVELS IN FOOT CANDLES. TYPICAL —or toWNF,R Co- —or ---- ----- ------ —or OOTC -cfr _Ls _ US 36 (100' ROW) PAAGINARY UNE USED AS UNITS OF LIGHT SPILL ANALYSIS / 0.2 /01 /01 PROPOSED POUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE LIGHT SPILL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - SHEET 11 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 b.o 1,0 b.o 10.0 TOWN PROPERTY 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 / /0.1 /0.1 0.1 2,2 241-07 (-1--) 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 45•-0' I 27 1 , .j. 3-11. -0. 2L-01 4547' 3a-o- 270' 45'4. El 9.0 9.0 51 3.8 63 6 9.1 8.0 5.0 1 GA 0.6 9.1 0.0 0 la 8.8 6.0 9.1 7.9 4.6 3 5.11 83 9.1 12 3.3 12 8.1 91 6.5 3.8 6.5 14 9.7 r--t 0 41 4.5 3.6 3.0 4.1 .7 4:9 4; 3.5 9. 4.1 4.7 4:9 43 3.1 4.1 4.7 4.9 4.5 -3.4 2P"3.7- 4.5 4.9 4.5 31.27. 3.5 4.4 9.0 .13 4.0 3,1 3.7 4.6 5.1 0110131111 11111111 II 16 97 5.4 4.2 7.9 010,992 54 4. 74 10.4,30,9 67 4,1 73 11610.9 9.1 5.3 3. 6.3 93 *A 9.4 0. 3.5 5.6 9.3 Op , A 72 4.1 51 9A IA i 1.4 - ',1 13 .1 7.9 9.0 82 5.8 41 7.1 A 9.0 81 5,7 • 7.1 16 30 62 7 4.8 7.1 16 91 1.1 5.4 41. 32 8.3 30 4.2 6. 4.1 5.7 6. 10 4 7.0 43 59 9.3 9.1 35 0. MA 7A 92 53 4. 7. 9.9 10.8 9.1 4,3 7.6 39 103 97 3,3 3. 6.4 9.5 116 9.4 6 3.7 56 9.3 30_6 .7 7,3 12 8.0 9.5 11.1 93 6. I 2.1 0.6 7.4 6.7 5.6 4.9 83 91 TS 6.7 5.8 43 6.3 7.1 7.5 6.7 6.6 4.9 0.3 7.1 7.4 6.6 5.5 4.2 56 63 7.3 37 51 4.4 5.5 67 7.3 6.9 6.2 4.9 5.7 19 7.4 7.0 5.9 13 39 8.4 95 6.5 5.7 4.6 7.4 p.0 85 95 5.7 4,q 7,1 0.0 93 82 .7 4,6 7.4 9.0 9.5 0.4 5.5 t 6.4 6.7 0.4 6.5 1. 4.1 541 36 6.4 6.8 7.1 4.6 13.1 8.6 9.5 119 6 9.34101 93 5.7 4.4 7.7 1411.0 83 5.7 4. 7.7 1041073 13 7 4.4 7.1 11411.0 9.3 5.5 3.. 6.6 6.3 470 9.5 6. 36 5.0 9.5 iv y,. 7A 4.3 6.1 93 6_0 100 7 77 4.6 4.1 6 3 6.9 9 3 , 2.0 3_54118 9.3 5.7 4.4 7.7 0410.6 9.3 57 4 7.7 10.45).8 9.3 .7 4.4 7.7 10.410.0 9.2 5.5 3. 6.5 9.7 603 9.5 6. 18 38 9.3 43 , .9 7A 4.3 6.0 9.5 ipa 9. 7.J I 4.4 93 103 9.3 5.7 4.4 7.7 ' 90 1E75 10.1 9.3 10.8 6 93 .77 4_7 710.1 13 103 04 5 9.2 , 0.6 17 103 6 9,5 6.1 33 56 58 3 5 10.1 .8 7.4 4.3 6.0 9.5 10.13 10.0 6 7 '21 7.4 .3 14 5.3 4.7 72 A 5.3 /4 5.7 4. 7.3 96.4 ,2 .5 4. 5.4 3 92 .4 7f 8,4 03 _6 5.9 8.4 9.3 8.7 -73-377-5.% 3'.1-U RD /A 5.1 5.0 4.9 04 /.5 r.4 81 5.5 5.0 53 3.1 1.2 b b 5.3 •.. 5.0 5.5 32 80 5.8 4.5 5.h 31 rl' litim..1 41 57 -6.$--.3 6.9 III ij Z1 15 9.3 a. 33 V 7.3 .8 9.3 84 5.7 4. 7.3 89 9.4 84 _8 4.1 7.4 8.9 9.3 113 5.5 4. 84 5.6 9.3 6.4 6. 4.7 5,9 6.4 5.3 .7 7.1 4.6 6.0 8.5 9.3 8.6 6.1 0 23 9.6 10.9 9.4 5,7 44 77 0,2 10.2 11.0 83 7 4.4 7.7 103 10.9 10_9 8 10.9 .9 7.4 4.3 63 96 11.0 110 7 10 1 ; 3. 1 r , 3.0 6.5 9.4 8.5 5.3 4.7 7.3 .0 9.5 35 5.7 4. 73 0.0 33 15 .7 4.8 7.3 9.0 0.5 8.4 5.5 3. 63 8.7 9.4 6.5 9. 41 5.9 6.5 9.4 .7 72 4.6 6.0 16 9.5 6.9 6. l• 33 114 7.1 6.7 5.6 43 6.3 5.1 7.4 6.7 5.6 4.9 12 7.7 7.4 8.7 6.5 4.9 83 1.1 7.4 6.3 5.3 42'3.8 61 7.3 6.7 51 444 5.8 6.7 7.3 6.9 5.2 43 5.7 5.0 7,4 6.9 5.0,, [1:1 3.4 11 10 8.1 5.7 4,7 73 .6 0.0 ILI 57 4. 72 63 10 67 .7 4.7 72 9.7 0.1 al 5 5 4_ 8.3 0_3 9.0 1.1 6. 4.1 SA 52 9.0 .4 0.9 •I3 6.0 8.3 9_0 8.5 6. 1 12 156 0.2 56 4.3 7.0 .9.101 12 53 4. , 7.8 19.136 31 1 6 1.1 7.6 10/101 9.1 5.4 3. 0.4 9.5 40.6 9.4 & 3.7 53 03 196 7 72 4.3 5.9 5.3 : 1 7.5 53 7. , 0 * • I 3.3 95 400 103 131 103 10.1 10.5 0.1 52 3 133 18 10.9 33 16 93 10.8 10.9 I. i 1 i„ a. 20 11 11 BO 5.1 3.0 6.7 6 5.1 80 3.0 6.0 83 9.0 8.0 0 311 BA 18 9,1 7.9 41 3. 5.3 03 97 62 5 33 52 6.1 11 .4 65 31 5.3 67 97 15 5 h I -- ci -. 1--711-1217.73.1_,= , -.1-1±1415-6.1113.7_4L7L 411-,7731 7.71.1 tT 111_ sla0.1113.-9.117-11_,-137171_71.40._,AIL11_7171314.0.77.1.22_,-.4.111111-43 731,351thl-L-LtIT14 1 .- -1‘ ,'' • ' \ LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE - TYPH2AL. COVERED LEVEL ST MBOL QUANTITY LABEL ARRANGEMENT TOTAL LAMP LUMENS LIE DESCRIPTION WM. WATTS 0 26 TEKDEK 73W LED SINGLE NA 0.800 KENALL TD17H0-101-5.6410.0W-721.4310-11CCOV 713.42 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE - irePICAL. TOP LEVEL SYMBOL QUANTITY LABEL ARRANGEMENT TOTAL LAMP LUMENS LLF DESCRIPTION we 1 TWIN 18130 P21 BACK-BACK N/A 0,800 GARDCO PUREFORM P21-5W-180LA-NW AO 2 TRIPLE 100W P21 131C 50' WA alma GARDCO PUREFORM P21-5W-160LA-NW CALCULATION SUMMARY - TYPICAL COVERED LEVEL UNITS AVERAGE MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE/MIMMUM MAXIMUM/MINIMUM FOOT CANDLES 7.01 11.13 2.0 331 5.90 0 0 0 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 20' 40' Gi9 1 SCALE: 1' t 20,0' TYPICAL COVERED LEVEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 248,0' 45,13. 27,01 2T-0. 45,0' 30,0' 27,01 461701 1.7 4s 9.6 11 1,5 1.4 32 3 1.1 1.6 1.1 19 23 A 2.1 2.1 7.1 2. 2.1 20 2.0 2.9 5 2.1 2.1 2.0 13 2.1 2.1 2 2.0 19 2.0 2.0 2 2D 2.1 2.1 3 1.7 1.11 7.0 2.2 2,3 24 25 LS 21 2A 2.3 3.3 23.,3 2.4 2.4 22 22 7.4 2.3 2.. 73 32 22 22 23 23 2.4 2.4 1.9 LI 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 12 2 2.3 2.7 3,7 26 26 126 2.7 2.7 25 25 2.7 2.6 2' 23 23 25 2.8 2.0 2.7 2.7 23 1,6 7.9 22 2.4 2.7 13 2.1 2.4 2. ao 11 20 23 2.7 3.1 14 3.0 I 22 2.5 .9 3.3 33 CALCULATION SUMMARY - TYPICAL TOP LEVEL UNITS AVERAGE MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE/MINIMUM MAXIMUWWNIMDM FOOT CANDLES 2.97 6.2 1.0 2.97 120 23 2.7 it 17 45 5.3 5.8 23 3.7 .1 36 42 4.9 53 3 I f 3.1 25 2. 33 3.9 43 4,9 .6 2.0 2.3 2.7 ' .8 13 33 4.0 .8 ; I 13 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.3 3.5 2 ''I 1.7 1.9 2,1 2.4 2.7 2.9 0 8 -! 1.5 1.7 1.13 2.1 2.1 25 23 3 13 IS 1.7 1.9 20 22 2.3 20 I 1.2 1.3 13 13 1.8 1.5 3.0 I.7 ... 1 1.0 1,1 13 1.1 1.5 1,7 I 7 2.0 7 1,9 1.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 9.6 r 43 4,9 5g I I ,. 16 3.5 3.8 3.8 .1 4.4 43 16 5 .5 52 4.6 4.1 15 25 2 57 52 4.4 3.7 21 2 3.0 ,s..3 14 3.4 35 37 SA 42 4.5 4.9 5/ ? .7 2_5 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 12 3.9 2.8 21 2.4 2.9.1 110 :111 :: ,i! .5 4.0 4.2 3.7 .4 3.3 13 9.9 33 r 3.9 4.1 43 4, 3 39 37 3 3: 8 LT 2.3 1: ...!' 3.0 1 32 3 15 3.7 3,3 5. 131, .6 2.6 2.5 2.8 23 '.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 1,03' 3 33 ao 2.7 24 21 .9 23 21 28 2.9 2 33 3. 3 .4. 2.3 2.3 3,3 2.3 12.3 2.4 23 26 29 l a 22 7.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 .1 2.1 22 23 2 0 ID 1.8 1.7 IA 1.4 1.3 1. .1 9 1.9 1.9 1.8 la 1.9 1.9 1.9 1. 1.6 1.7 1.0 1.5 to 1.3 I 1 1 3. 3. .9 3.2 3.3 3.3 1 1, .9 2 73 2.8 28 3.3 3.9 6.4 3.7 33 3.7 33 3.4 3.3 33 03 3.3 3.4 32 3.1 9.4 13 3/ 11 3.8 4.0 43 4.3 4.2 4.1 3.9 37 17 33 33 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.7 16 3. 3.4 43 13 . .5 4.9 4.6 43 4. , 4.2 4.0 3.9 33 .9 4.0 4.2 42 4.0 4.2 4 31 ,03.7 23 2.7 3.1 3.6 4.2 4.9 3.3 .5 57 54 5.0 4. 4,5 4.3 4.2 4.1 11.3 4.4 4.7 4,7 43 43 4.3 4. 39 39 2.9 2. 3.2 3.7 4.4 3.3 5h .816 08 51 4, 43 4,4 4.3 4.2 _3 46 4.9 5.5 4.0 4.0 43 4. 4.0 3.9 2.4 2 3.2 111 4A 5.4 5 2.3 .0 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 Ie.... 2.7 TA 25 2.3 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 I. .0 7 3.2 3.2 3. .0 23 2A 2.1 1.9 1. 3.1 3.1 33 3,3 15 3.6 3.7 16 113 3A 3.2 .7 0 2.4 2.1 t. 6 . 3. L 1 14 14 3.5 3. 3.9 4.0 4.1 42 6 39 1.7 3.3 2.7 23 33 3.7 3.3 4. 4.2 43 4.7 4.6 .5 4.5 42 3.7 33 2.9 2.5 2. , ti 3.9 4.1 4.9 4.5 4.8 5.3 5.5 i 3 5.2 43 4.1 15 2.7 3 4.0 47 t 4,6 51 5_6 10 9 17 5.2 4.4 3.7 3. 2.7 2. a -s3-T.3 -3.4 3 23 4 22 2.1 2,0 1,9 13 1. 1 1 , TYPICAL TOP LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS - SHEET 12 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. No part or this document may be reproduced in any form or by ony means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers. Inc ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE PLANTING BED (I BLS SF) X% z 2 X' X x r. z 14 X. X 1 X X WEI NATIVE GRASS SEEDING {12807 SEI NEW CONIFEROUS TREE (XT) ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 YY 60' SCALE 30,0' v Eft 0,,,,Rsosg‘ BlG -""‘ WE I NATIVE GRASS SEEDING (13591 5FI NEW WATER DUALITY X X , M M 2(2::(4 M2(2(XX. ,XXXXX (4 X. (4 03 X X X 11-(7.-* / .(•(.. (0 .2'...:B.NI:41616)Bir.f4Z--46-6))6X))9'.14 2.1 16 • Y.) 7.: 14- • . e.; z z z z• 'X if. ';.; (1XXXX.:42( z :XX XXXX X 2-RAIL DOWEL FENCE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LEGEND: WILD FLOWER SEEDING 7 7, WILD FLOWER NATIVE GRASS SEEDING SHRUB BED PLANTING BED CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE s C41° .cy‘00? PUNTING BED OM kG PLANTER BAS PLANTE SHRUB BED (329 SF) NEW DECIDUOUS TREE PROPOSED FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE POND STRUCTURAL DESIGN WILL ACCOMMODATE PLANTING BED (43 SF EACH) WILDFLOWER FtAN PLANT4R n r ryF E I WITIE m I SEEDING (496 SF) EXISTING CONIFEROUS c r- TREE 7TH GREEN NEW FIRE HYDRANT. TYPICAL NEW CONIFEROUS TREE (SHALL-1Q2) NEW DECIDUOUS TREE (SMALL-X19) CD-6 EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (52) WIDE FUTURE CART PATH EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE %X X XXX X X Z. z'4 EW CONFEROUS TREE COL WR 1 NATIVE SEEDING (1913 SF) - -2)( X % 'X X 'X i.Erlef4O .14 'Ct*UrROVir, ' AsNPAL T APRON FOR NEW DECIDUOUS TREE (X9) ROADSIDE LIGHT POLES LOW-SOY AND FIRE TRUCE ACCESS AND PLANTERS. TYPICAL TOWN PROPERTY U.S.B.R. PROPERTY LANDSCAPE PLAN - SHEET 13 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyrsghl 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission 1rom Walker Porking Consultants/Engineers. Inc. ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE EVERGREEN TREES I. GUY ALL CONIFER TREES AND ALL DECIDUOUS TREES LARGER THAN 2.1S" CAL. AS SHOWN, 2. IN SODDED AREAS, CUT SOD IN 36" CIRCLE AND MULCH. FOR CONIFERS CUT 50D AT DRIP LINE OF TREE AND MULCH. 3. GUT EVERGREEN TREES IN 3 PLACES AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE SLIGHTLY TAUT ONLY TO ALLOW SOME MOVEMENT. USE NYLONG STRAPS (NOT HOSES) WITH METAL GROMMETS FLAGGING 14.1:4'‘,.000*.eir ttipr SET TOP OF ROOT BALL 4" ABOVE LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE. REMOVE TOP 2/3 OF WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP. ----WOOD MULCH (4" DEPTH). 6' DEPTH AMENDED SOIL BACKFILL PIT WITH EXCAVATED SOIL DECIDUOUS TREES STAKE TREES USING METAL POSTS WIRED (SLIGHTLY TAUT). WITH NYLON STRAPS. SET POSTS VERTICALLY PLUMB. NO RUBBER HOSES, PROTECTIVE RUBBER CAPS ON POSTS. PANG FROM BRANCHES WITH I" WITH NYLON STRAP ANTLER RUB PROTECTION SHRUBS PLACE SHRUBS A MINIMUM OF IS" FROM PLANTING BED EDGE (STEEL HEADER, CURBS. WALKS. WALLS. ETC.) FOR I GALLON SHRUBS, 3' MINIMUM FOR 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS, 4' FOR CONIFER SHRUB. FOR 5 GALLON AND LARGER PLANT MATERIAL CONSTRUCT A 2" HIGH WATERING RING AROUND SHRUB AT EDGE OF PLANTING PIT. FOR I GALLON MATERIAL, CONSTRUCT A 2" X IS" DIA. WATER RING AND MULCH WITH WOOD BARK INSIDE OF THE WATER RING. IS" MIN. WRAP TREES TO FIRST BRANCH N THE FALL. IF PLANTED IN THE SPRING DO NOT WRAP. REMOVE TOP 3/4 OF WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP. SET TREE ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE WITH TOP OF ROOTBALL 3' ABOVE LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE. 2' DIA NO WEEDBARRIER FABRIC HAND SPADED EDGE 4" DEPTH LALLN 4' DEPTH WOOD MULCH AT BASE OF TREE. 30" DIA. MULCH RING IN LAIN AREAS_ 6" DEPTH AMENDED SOIL. NO SPECIAL iL7] I 11 I IE BACKFILL MIX. =111E11E11 EXISTING SUBGRADE 11E1 I =III=1117 II kill IF SHRUB BED FINISHED GRADE 6" DEPTH AMENDED SOIL Ez-111E111111111E111_111' 111_-111E111.7=-111:- llE m-i= Ns., 2X ROOT BALL DIA. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM, 11,111,111-1 1=1 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE COST ESTIMATE item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost landscaping 1 Trees- 8' height (con.) 10 EA $500.00 $5.1:40.00 2A Trees- SMALL (con.) 22 EA $300.00 $6,600.00 2 Trees- 3" Caliper (dec.) 11 EA $500.00 $5,500.00 2A Trees- SMALL (dec.) 19 EA $300.00 $5,700.00 3 Shrubs/Perennials 3576 SF $5.00 $17,880.00 4 Wild Flower /Native Seeding and Ileveg. 28317 SF $1.00 $28,312.00 5 Wild flower Seeding 496 SF $1.00 $496.00 6 Planting Bed (Perrenials /Annuals) 1714 SF $5.00 $8,570.00 7 Irrigation 34103 SF $2.00 $68,206.00 HardScape 8 Mow Edge - 6" concrete curb 43 LF $7.00 $301.00 Mountable curb 67 LF $6.00 $402.00 Site Amenities 10 Feature Stones, Boulders 50 EA $450.00 $22,500.00 11 Planters (Building Budget) Subtotal $110,576.00 Soft Costs 121Contingency(15%) I I I $16,586.401 TOTAL $127,167.40 General Notes 1 Pricing for general reference only. Landscaping to be provided in-house by EP Parks Dept 2 All Signage not in Landscape Scope of Work. 3 All lighting to be specified and priced by others. 4 All existing hardscape indicated to he integrated with new work. 5 All retaining wall work to be designed and specified by civil engineer and included in base bid. 6 Curved landscaping edge at vehicular entry to be loose rock / boulder edge, included in landscaping. TREE AND SHRUB INSTALLATION PLANTING DETAILS - SHEET 14 ISSUE DATE: 08-11-2015 Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE 0 ro, NORTH ELEVATION PHASE 1 3/32" = 1'.0" ij 0 0 45 10 TOP LEVEL 34' - 0" \JP 11 THIRD L LEVEL 23' - 0" Lia;;or IP" CI El 15 SECOND LEVEL 6 GROUND LEVEL gini 0" 14 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO O EAST ELEVATION PHASE 1 3/32"=1 ELEVATION LEGEND: 1. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL OR WALL 2. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL WITH TEXTURED SURFACE 3. PRECAST GRAY CONCRETE COLUMN 4 STAINED PRECAST COPING OR INSET PANEL 5. STONE VENEER ON CMU OR PRECAST WALL 6. HEAVY TIMBER 7. LOG COLUMN 8. CORRUGATED. RUSTED FINISH STEEL ROOF 9. PAINTED METAL STAIRS AND GUARDRAIL 10. SIGNAGE 11. LIGHT POLE (AT TOP LEVEL) 12. STREET LIGHT POLE 13. HANGING METAL PLANTER BOX 14. SITE PLANTER WALL WITH VENEER STONE, PRECAST CAP AND CONTAINER PLANTS 15. WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 16, 1" VERTICAL REVEAL 17. r HORIZONTAL REVEAL 19. LANDSCAPED TERRACE 19. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SHEAR WALL 20. HEAVY TIMBER FASCIA ? 1 21.3; ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - SHEET 15 SCALE: X32' = iLcr ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE 1 11 14 1 6 jh SECOND WEST 13° - 6" 11'- t -P I 6-9` 1T -S 26.0` 36-10' /1 1111111F:,1111:111-11111111,1111111.111 _ TOP WEST 35 - 6' /1111, 12 _ THIRD wesi, 24'- 6" 14 SECOND WEST 13'-6"`111 GROUND ) ELEVATION LEGEND: 1. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL OR WALL 2. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL WITH TEXTURED SURFACE 3. PRECAST GRAY CONCRETE COLUMN 4. STAINED PRECAST COPING OR INSET PANEL 5. STONE VENEER ON CMU OR PRECAST WALL 6. HEAVY TIMBER 7. LOG COLUMN O. CORRUGATED. RUSTED FINISH STEEL ROOF 9. PAINTED METAL STAIRS AND GUARDRAIL 10. SIGNAGE 11. LIGHT POLE AT TOP LEVEL) 12, STREET LIGHT POLE 13. HANGING METAL PLANTER BOX 14. SITE PLANTER WALL WITH VENEER STONE. PRECAST CAP AND CONTAINER PLANTS 15. WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 16. 1" VERTICAL REVEAL 17. 2' HORIZONTAL REVEAL 19. LANDSCAPED TERRACE 19. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SHEAR WALL 20. HEAVY TIMBER FASCIA ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT I, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO O '9) ri) SOUTH ELEVATION Vi 3132"=1-0" ,-;„ WEST ELEVATION 3132" = SP.6 211' e f SCALE: 312" = t-ff ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - SHEET 16 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE 11 11 .70" 34' - 0" TOP LEVEJ___5", 9 _ THIRD LEVElgrk, 23' - 0" "AP 13 k SECOND LEVEL 12' - 0" ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO c5) -10P LEVE ILI 34' - 0" TOP WEST 35 - 6" AL THIRD LEVEb,,. IL/ - THIRD WEST SECOND LEVEL 17 - 0" OUND WEST ill, 1/61,1 14 O NORTH ELEVATION FUTURE 3157' = 1'-0" 19 1$ ELEVATION LEGEND: 1. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL OR WALL 2 ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL WITH TEXTURED SURFACE 3, PRECAST GRAY CONCRETE COLUMN 4, STAINED PRECAST COPING OR INSET PANEL S. STONE VENEER ON CMU OR PRECAST WALL 6. HEAVY TIMBER 7. LOG COLUMN 8. CORRUGATED, RUSTED FINISH STEEL ROOF 9. PAINTED METAL STAIRS AND GUARDRAIL 10 SIGNAGE 11. LIGHT POLE {AT TOP LEVEL) 12 STREET LIGHT POLE la. HANGING METAL PLANTER BOX 14. SITE PLANTER WALL WITH VENEER STONE. PRECAST CAP AND CONTAINER PLANTS 15. WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 16. 1" VERTICAL REVEAL 17. 2" HORIZONTAL REVEAL 19. LANDSCAPED TERRACE 19. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SHEAR WALL 20. HEAVY TIMBER FASCIA a a :Fa GROUND LEVEL 0" 4 O EAST ELEVATION FUTURE 3/32" = 1*-0" ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - FUTURE - SHEET 17 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 106 212; SCALE:33T ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE 11 1110.74p.mming ty _rA oii111111111 ..aig1111111111 a TOP WEST /ii 35 - 6 12 THIRD WF-F_ts ELEVATION LEGEND: 1. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL OR WALL 2. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL WITH TEXTURED SURFACE 3. PRECAST GRAY CONCRETE COLUMN 4. STAINED PRECAST COPING OR INSET PANEL S STONE VENEER ON CMU OR PRECAST WALL 6. HEAVY TIMBER 7. LOG COLUMN 8. CORRUGATED. RUSTED FINISH STEEL ROOF 9. PAINTED METAL STAIRS AND GUARDRAIL 10. SIGNAGE 11. LIGHT POLE (AT TOP LEVEL) 12. STREET LIGHT POLE 13. HANGING METAL PLANTER BOX 14. SITE PLANTER WALL WITH VENEER STONE. PRECAST CAP AND CONTAINER PLANTS 15. WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 16. 1" VERTICAL REVEAL 17. 2' HORIZONTAL REVEAL 18. LANDSCAPED TERRACE 19. ACID ETCHED PRECAST CONCRETE SHEAR WALL 20. HEAVY TIMBER FASCIA 24' - 6" 14 _seconowesT GROUND WEST 1' - 6" ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO SOUTH ELEVATION FUTURE Q 3/32" .1%6' a WEST ELEVATION FUTURE 3/32" = 1'4" 0 10.6' 21 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - FUTURE - SHEET 18 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 SCALE. liLt =1,0" r r 1 I ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 1+11.(1K c E p.p.K.otc +i Sr./6kt PHOTO SIMULATION - EAST VIEW - SHEET 19 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 21.3" SCALE 3/32" = 1,0" ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 141111kr • ik* idhe f4 T. ir- )0LITIMer,431- E•1 1 ' •E I • f I. '71 • 4 • PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE EAST VIEW SHEET 20 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 2).3' SCALE 352-= 1'-0' ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION. LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 21.7 PHOTO SIMULATION - WEST VIEW SHEET 21 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 SCALE' 3137 .= 1,7 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 10.6' 21.3 1 ' 0 I t SCALE 113T = 1,0" PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE WEST VIEW SHEET 22 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO PHOTO SIMULATION - NORTH VIEW - SHEET 23 ISSUE DATE 06-24-2015 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE NORTH VIEW - SHEET 24 ISSUE DATE 06-24-2015 ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 21.3' PHOTO SIMULATION - STAIR ENTRY VIEW - SHEET 25 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 SCALE: 3/3T = I I'. -II ,- 7-d I I I-, I ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE LOT 1, VISITOR CENTER SUBDIVISION, LOT 44, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION AND LOT 3, STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 1,16' >1 1 PHOTO SIMULATION - FUTURE STAIR ENTRY VIEW - SHEET 26 ISSUE DATE: 06-24-2015 SCALE 3137 =1,0' ESTES PARK TRANSIT FACILITY PARKING STRUCTURE