Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2017-03-21Prepared: March 8, 2017 • Revised: STUDY SESSION AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 21, 2017 10:45 a.m. Room 202 10:45 Dollar General Development Plan 2016-08 (15) Planner Gonzales 11:00 View @ 242 - Preliminary Condominium Map (15) Planner Gonzales 11:15 Vacation Homes — Discussion regarding cap (10) Director Hunt Commissioner White 11:25 Sign Code Discussion (15) Director Hunt 11:40 Building Height Discussion (20) Director Hunt Planner McCool 12:00 Lunch (10) 12:10 Corridor Plans/Neighborhood Plans (20) Director Hunt Commissioner White 12:30 Comprehensive Plan Modernization Update (45) Commissioner Hull 1:15 Adjourn Chair Moon Informal discussion among Commissioners concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this meeting at approximately 11:15 a.m. The public is welcome to attend study sessions; however, public comment will not be accepted. Times are approximate. Prepared: April 8, 2016 * Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION March 21, 2017 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Town Hall 1. OPEN MEETING Planning Commissioner Introductions 2. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 3. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of minutes of February 21, 2017 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016-08, DOLLAR GENERAL, LOT 31, AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 32-35, AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 31, & 37, WHITE MEADOW VIEW PLACE, LESS 2000032927, 455 STANLEY AVENUE Owners: Vaquero Estes Park Partners, LP Applicant: Devan Pharis Request: Proposed 9,100 square-foot building for retail sales Staff: Audem Gonzales 5. VIEW @ 242 — PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP; METES & BOUNDS PARCEL LOCATED AT 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE Owner : CD Investments, LLC c/o Derek Westmoreland Applicant: CD Investments, LLC c/o Derek Westmoreland Request: Proposed ten-unit condominium development, where two buildings would contain four units each and one building would contain two units. Note: Project was revised following the approval of an EVDC amendment regarding attainable housing. Staff: Audem Gonzales 6. REPORTS A. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 1. Dollar General Variance — Approved March 7, 2017 2. Estes Valley Fire Protection District Variance — Approved March 7, 2017 B. Estes Park Town Board 1. Grand Estates Rezoning — Approved February 28, 2017 2. Resolution #04-17 Intent to Annex Cloud Nine Subdivision Addition — February 28, 2017 C. Planning — Staff-Level Approvals 1. Mountain Meadow Amended Plat — Approved D. Community Development Update 1. Downtown Plan Update 2. Hydrology Report Update E. Other 7. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission February 21, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Michael Moon, Vice-Chair Russ Schneider, Commissioners Betty Hull, Doug Klink, Steve Murphree, Sharry White, one vacant position Attending: Chair Moon, Commissioners Schneider, Hull, Klink, Murphree, and White Also Attending: Community Development Director Randy Hunt, Planner Carrie McCool, Code Compliance Officer Linda Hardin, and Recording Secretary Karen Thompson Absent: Planner Audem Gonzales, County Liaison Michael Whitley Chair Moon called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. There were eight people in attendance. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of minutes, January 17, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. It was moved and seconded (Schneider/Hull) to approve the consent item as presented and the motion passed 7-0. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016-08, DOLLAR GENERAL, LOT 31, AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 32-35, AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 31 & 37, WHITE MEADOW VIEW PLACE, LESS 2000032927; 455 STANLEY AVENUE Approximate time 00:21. Planner McCool stated staff was requesting the item be continued to the March 21, 2017, Planning Commission meeting. However, if there are members of the public that wish to speak on this item, they may comment at this time. Public Comment None. It was moved and seconded (Klink/White) to continue the Dollar General application to the March 21 approve the consent item as presented and the motion passed 7-0. 4. CLOUD NINE MINOR SUBDIVISION, METES & BOUNDS PARCEL LOCATED AT 1595 FISH HATCHERY ROAD Approximate time. 1:40. Planner McCool reviewed the staff report, as Planner Gonzales was not in attendance. Project is a request to subdivide four single-family lots in the A-1— Accommodations zone district. The subject property (3.13 acres) is located in unincorporated Larimer County, within the Estes Valley Development Code area. Each proposed lot would meet the minimum lot size standard. 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission February 21, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Approximate time 4:00. Review criteria. Items are listed in detail in the staff report. It should be noted the applicant has also applied for an annexation of the proposed lots into the Town limits. The annexation application is tentatively scheduled to be heard by the Town Board on March 28, 2017. The application was routed to affected agencies, and no significant comments were received. A legal notice was published in the local newspaper, and a notice was mailed to adjacent property owners. No comments were received. Public Comment Karen Cherman/applicant was available to answer questions. David Bangs/applicant's agent stated there is a small structure on the property that encroaches onto the neighboring property, but it does not come into play with the proposed subdivision. Attorney White stated once an application for annexation has been accepted, it cannot be revoked. Staff Findings 1. With the conditions of approval listed, this proposal will comply with all applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2. Adequate public facilities are currently available to serve the proposed subdivision. 3. The proposed lot configurations meet minimum lot size requirements. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Conditions of Approval 1. Show existing sewer service line to home on Lot 3 on Preliminary Plat. 2. Show joint access easement across Lot 1 and Lot 2 on Final Plat. 3. Submit maintenance agreement for shared driveway with Final Plat submittal. 4. Remove language on Note 9 of Preliminary Plat stating the maintenance agreement and shared access easement will be submitted with building permit. Both are required with Final Plat submittal. 5. Remove Town Board signature block and replace with Board of County Commissioners. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Mu rphree) to recommend approval of the minor subdivision to the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners with the findings of fact and conclusions of law, with findings and conditions recommended by staff and the motion passed 7-0. 5. AMENDMENT TO ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO VACATION HOMES. 2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission February 21, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Approximate time 14:50. Director Hunt stated there have been some conflicts between the Vacation Home application descriptions and the Larimer County Assessor records; specifically, the number of bedrooms. Staff is working diligently with the Assessor's office to resolve the issues. It is unknown how long it may take to resolve the reconciliation. The proposed amendment would revise the regulations to say the application must be filed by March 31, 2017. Staff will work as quickly as possible to complete the application process with the property owners. Director Hunt reviewed the staff report. The following lists approximate times and specific topics: Approximate time 18:35. Planning Commission guidance in 9-and-over decision-making. Approximate time 21:50. Maximum parking requirements. Approximate time 22:30. Vacation Home deadline in non-residential districts. Staff and Commissioner Discussion Approximate time 25:20. Regarding EVDC Section 5.2.B.1.a.(3), Commissioner Schneider questioned the calendar year dates. Director Hunt would like to have a conversation with the Town Clerk to clarify the text. Attorney White stated there should be provisions to allow vacation home owners to operate during the renewal process. The Town Clerk handles the registrations, and will be asked to clarify the language for this section. Commissioner Schneider requested a minor change to EVDC Section 5.1.B.2.j. Director Hunt stated the change could be addressed in the motion. Approximate time 32:30. Regarding Section 5.1.6.3.c.(3) and (4), Commissioner Moon was concerned about the judgement calls in this section, wanting there to be a level playing field. Town Attorney White stated it is up to the Planning Commissioners to make sure they maintain a level playing field in their decisions. Approximate time 35:05 Commissioner Leavitt questioned the parking regulations. Code Compliance Officer Linda Hardin stated the previous code language allowed a maximum number of parking spaces to three. The new regulations are in line with the zone district in which the vacation home is located. Approximate time 36:09 There was brief discussion regarding the local representative section of the registration. Approximate time 40:00. There was brief discussion regarding Urgent and Non-Urgent issues with vacation homes. Staff will review EVDC Section 12.7 to see if the language can be clarified. Public Comment None. Staff and Commission Discussion 3 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission February 21, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall The following revisions to Exhibit A were discussed and the general consensus from the Commissioners was to approve them: §5.1.B.1.a.1 — Addition of a grace period §5.1.B.1.a.3 — Addition of a licensing period (after reviewing the section with the Town Clerk) §5.1.B.2.e — Replace Community Development Department with Regulatory Agency §5.1.B.2.j - Revise the first sentence to say: All vacation home owners in any residential zoning district who wish to obtain an operating registration during 2017 shall be required to apply for a new or renewed, as the case may be, operating registration no later than March 31, 2017. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Schneider) to recommend approval to the Estes Park Town Board and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners as presented in Exhibit A as recommended by staff, and subject to the discussed alterations listed above, and the motion passed 7-0. There was brief discussion regarding the Large Vacation Home Special Reviews that will be forthcoming. Chair Moon stated it will most likely be necessary for the Commissioners to do site visits, similar to site visits conducted with development reviews. Attorney White added site visits are not required, but considered good practice; however, Commissioners will need to remember that discussion with the applicant would not be allowed. 6. AMENDMENT TO ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO ACCESSORY KITCHENS. Approximate time 53:40. Director Hunt stated the EVDC has a conflict that does not allow Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), but does allow Accessory Kitchens. To remove the conflict, the allowance of Accessory Kitchens as a permanent accessory use in residential districts is proposed to be removed. A limited kitchen would be allowed. The determination of a limited kitchen versus a permanent kitchen would be the installation of a second 220-volt stove or equivalent gas-fired appliance. An outdoor kitchen (open on at least two sides and exposed to the weather) would not be affected by this code revision. This amendment is an appropriate step to eliminate the loophole for ADUs. Approximate time 58:34. Discussion among the Planning Commissioners regarding this proposed amendment. Public Comment Approximate time 1:06:50. Paul Brown/town resident and local home designer was opposed to the removal of the allowance of accessory kitchens. Public comment closed. Staff and Commission Discussion 4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission February 21, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Approximate time 1:12:45. Comments included but were not limited to: is there a way to use technology to assist with the enforcement of ADUs; Estes Park is not the only municipality dealing with these issues; there is a need for aging in place or children moving back home, and ADUs could assist with that. It was moved and seconded (Hull/Schneider) to recommend that the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners deny the text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code as presented in Exhibit A, finding that it is a solution to an unenforceable non-problem and the motion passed 6-1 with Chair Moon voting against the motion. There was brief discussion regarding enforcement of the rental of ADUs. Code Compliance Officer Hardin stated the Host Compliance software is for short-term rentals, and does not identify long- term rentals. 7. REPORTS A. Downtown Plan public workshop will be held Thursday, February 23, 2017 at the Estes Park Event Center. This is the first of several public meetings for the Downtown Plan. B. Hydrology Study public meetings will be held Monday, February 27, 2017. A study session will take place at 2 p.m. in the Town Board Room. The same presentation will be provided at 6:00 p.m. at the Estes Park Event Center. Both meetings are open to the public, although no public comment will be taken at the study session. C. Director Hunt stated the Planner I position has been filled, and the new employee will begin work at the end of March. There being no further business, Chair Moon adjourned the meeting at 2:55 p.m. Michael Moon, Chair Karen Thompson, Recording Secretary 5 Staff Report A fP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Randy Hunt, Community Development Director Date: February 21, 2017 RE: Proposed Text Amendment to Estes Park Municipal Code: Sign Code replacement [Study Session item only] Planning Commission Objective: Begin review of the Laramie Sign code, with Mar. 21 study-session discussion on whether and how this can be adapted to Town of Estes Park. Discussion: This is the first of what will probably be a monthly series of discussions on Sign Code updates. Laramie's code is not perfect and includes some elements that won't apply to Estes Park (such as Interstate Highway signs, billboards, and other such urban signage.) At the Mar. 21 study session, my idea would be to get your "big picture" thoughts on the Laramie Sign Code. Overall, what do you like or dislike about this approach? What aspects do, or do not, seem to fit Estes Park? A few specifics to consider: • The goal is a complete replacement for our current Sign Code, which can be found as Chapter 17.66 of the Estes Park Municipal Code (not the EVDC). Candidly, most of our Sign Code is so outdated and unduly complicated that it would be difficult to salvage; that is why a rewrite instead of revision is proposed. Additionally, a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision significantly changed what can be done in sign regulations, and our Sign Code is seriously defective in some areas as a result (Laramie's is compliant). • As the above comment indicates, the Sign Code applies only inside the Town of Estes Park. Along with floodplain regulations and the Stanley Historic District, this is one of only three planning/zoning chapters that have never been moved to the EVDC. Larimer County Community Development Dept. handles signage outside the Town (there isn't a lot of that). • The Laramie Code does not address downtown signage, as their code has that in another chapter. For our part, I suggest we approach our downtown signage on a different, later timetable than other signage — primarily so the Downtown Plan Steering Committee can review it first. A link to the Laramie Sign Code was emailed to PC members last month — here is the link again, if needed: https://www.cityoflaramie.orq/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2230 (This is a long chapter in their Code — the Sign section is Sec. 15.14.120, beginning on p. 83, which comes up as p. 86 in the PDF numbering.) Written February 16, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Staff Report COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Randy Hunt, Community Development Director Carrie McCool, Planning Consultant Date: March 21, 2017 RE: Discussion regarding possible EVDC amendment for Building Height Planning Commission Objective: Continue discussions regarding possible EVDC amendments to increase building height limitations in the RM - Residential Multi-Family Zone District, consider multi-family development standards as well as simplify the measurement of maximum building height and define terminology utilized within the potential Code changes. Code Amendment Objectives: As discussed at the February 21, 2017, study session the objective of the code amendments is to revise the EVDC to facilitate successful implementation of recent EVDC text amendments related to housing (Attainable Housing Density Bonus and removal of minimum lot size requirements in the RM Zone District). Those prior amendments and this proposed amendment would further efforts to address housing demand, including attainable and workforce housing needs, in the Valley by removing regulatory barriers to multi-family housing development while setting forth multi-family development standards that ensure high-quality multi-family development that is consistent with the Valley's unique community character. Additionally, the code amendments include a simplified method of calculating building height and defines terminology utilized within the proposed text amendments. The recommended text amendments contained in this report aim to address concerns expressed by the Commission relating to the protection of scenic resources and desire to ensure that quality multi-family residential development is consistent with the Valley's unique community character. Discussion: This text amendment has been updated to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission at the February 21st, study session. As the town moves forward with efforts to address housing affordability and expansion of housing opportunities in the Valley, it is desirable that multi-family development support an attractive public realm and visual and community design characteristics of the community. In the suggested code revisions this month, building height in the RM Zone District would be limited to: (a) 45 feet, including roof; or (b) 3 stories plus roof, whichever is less. Providing a maximum on the number of stories has the virtue of being easily understood, whereas a number like 45 feet may seem abstract to many outside the building industry. The amendment also includes suggested new multi-family residential development standards aimed at protecting the Valley's scenic qualities and community character through quality site design, building architecture (building mass, scale, articulation, materials, etc.), well-designed amenities and common spaces. Lastly, staff has updated the Rules of Measurement to include information on how to measure a building story and stepback as well as provides clarification on the terminology utilized within the proposed text amendments. Proposed changes to text with new proposed text is shown as red and eliminated text is shown through the use of stfiketh-re-ug4; in Exhibit A, attached. Proposal: Amend the Estes Valley Development Code as stated in Exhibit A. Action Requested: Review draft text amendment for compliance with Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) §3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for Review and provide feedback to staff in preparation for a Public Hearing on April 18, 2017. Attachments: Exhibit A, Draft Estes Valley Code Amendments March 21, 2017 EVPC Study Session Page 2 of 2 Max. Net Zoning District Density 1(units/acre) Minimum Building/Structure Property Line Setbacks [2] [7] (Ord. 25-07 §1; Ord. 15-11 §1) Max. Building Height (ft.) [81 Min. Building Width (ft.) Minimum Lot Standards [11 [41 (Ord. 25-07 §1) Area Width Front Side Rear (sq ft.) (ft.) (ft.) i (ft.) (ft.) RM (Ord. 18-01 §14) Residential Uses: Max =Sand Min = 3 Senior Institutional Living Uses: Max = 24 40,000, 5,400 sq. ft./unit [6] (Ord. 25-07 §1; Ord. 15-11 §1) Senior Institutional Living Uses: 'A Ac. 60; Lots Greater than 100,000 sq. ft.: 200 25- arterials; 15-other streets 10 (Ord. 15- 11 §1) 10 3045 or 3 stories plus roof, whichever is less 20 [5] EXHIBIT A Estes Valley Development Code CHAPTER 4. ZONING DISTRICTS Section 4.3.C.4. Table 4-2: Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts. Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Section 4.3.D Additional Zoning District Standards. 5. Multi-family Residential Development Standards Site Design a. The minimum separation between multi-family buildings, including accessory buildings, on the same lot or parcel is fifteen (15) feet. b. Individual buildings within a multi-family development shall be oriented to the following: i. Common open space, such as interior courtyards or on-site natural areas or features; ii. Perimeter streets; iii. Other residential buildings; or Exhibit A March 21, 2017 Page 1 of 5 Draft #1 EVPC Study Session iv. Through-access drives. c. Multi-family buildings in a single development shall be clustered or grouped to form neighborhoods. d. To the maximum extent practicable, buildings shall be oriented or arranged in a manner to enclose common open spaces such as gardens, courtyards, recreation or play areas, that shall contain a miniumum of three of these features: i. Seasonable planting areas; ii. Trees; iii. Pedestrian-scaled lighting; iv. Gazebos or other decrorateive shelters; v. Seating; vi. Play structures for children, or vii. Natural features or areas. Building Design a. Floors rising above thirty (30') in height shall be stepped back ten (10) horizontal feet from the building foundation at grade for building elevations that are adjacent to a public street, public trail, or public open space. A maximum of sixty (60) percent of the overall façade width may encroach in the stepback. This step back does not apply to buildings that have balconies on floors rising above thirty feet (30) in height. a. The maximum length of any multi-family building shall be 200 feet or six townhomes units, whichever is less. b. Multi-family buildings with a façade length of greater than thirty (30) linear feet shall incorporate a variety of different wall planes and roof planes and shall feature a minimum of two of the following design elements in the design of the front façade: i. Bay windows; ii. Covered porches or balconies; iii. Structural offsets of a minimum of four feet from the principal plane of the façade; iv. Accent materials such as brick, stone, or stucco with banding highlights; or v. Window grills and shutters. c. Side and rear facades should maintain the architectural design, articulation, level of detail, and materials consistent with the front facade. d. Second and third floor massing and articulation shall relate to ground floor. e. At least fifty (50) percent of all ground-floor units shall be provided with a minimum 6' x 10' patio directly accessible from the unit. Atl leasty fifty (50) percent of all units above ground-floor level shall be provided with a minimum 4' x 10' balcony directly accessible from the unit. Exhibit A March 21, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Draft #1 EVPC Study Session NO PORTION OF EXTEND ABOVE BUILDING NAY ROOM' LAST POLLOWS PROFILE OF EXISTING NATURAL TERRAIN NOGNT LIND EAISTIPG IIATUPAL PRIOR TO GRADING 3 E NEIGIfT Figure 1-3 Hentrr Lner FOLLOWS PROFLE OF EXISTIt+3 NATURAL GRADE EXIST NO TERRAIN ••••••... EIUSTING NATURAL TERRNII PR1 10 GRALWa FILL IN TERRAIN CUT IN TERRAIN RLL FI TERRAIN .11•111• Rear-loaded units shall be the first choice when facing public streets while front-loaded units should be used when development faces a side or rear property line. g. All construction shall be of durable high-quality materials. h. Windows and garage doors should be "punched" in from the exterior building wall or should be defined by well-designed trim. The trim material should contrast with wall materials. Section 1.9.E.1 Rules of Measurement, Height E.l. Measurement of Maximum Building Height. Height shall means the vertical distance be-established-by-a-plane measured from the mean average elevation of the finished grade ((lowest-point elevation + highest point elevation) 12) along the front of the building: (1) To the highest point of the roof surface, if a flat roof; (2) To the deck line of a mansard roof; or (3) To the mean height level between eaves and ridge for a gable, hip or gambrel roof. Exhibit A Draft #1 March 21, 2017 EVPC Study Session Page 3 of 5 height of buildings on slopes may be adju-- Itb=30' Original ground surface E-27-Ifteasurement-ofr-Maisicri-unl-Building-Ret It n-Sleig-es. The maximum proposed contours. Mb-30+[.50(a b)] where: Mb-Maximum height in foot at any given point above original grade 4. Measurement of Stepback. A stepback is measured from the ground story outer wall plane to the façade of the story required to be stepped back. No part of a building may project into the stepback, except as listed below: a. Balcony railings provided they are a maximum height of 4 feet and are at least 75% open. b. Building eaves, roof overhangs, awnings, and light shelves provided they don't extend more than 3 feet into the stepback. 5. Measurement of a Story. That portion of a building included between the upper surface of a floor and the upper surface of the floor or roof next above. 6. Story Above Grade Plane. Any story having it's finished floor surface entirely above grade plan, or in which the finished surface of the floor above is either of the following: a. More than 6 feet (1829 mm) above grade plane. b. More than 12 feet (3658 mm) above the finished ground level at any point. 7. Grade Plane. A reference plane representing the average of the finished ground level adjoining the building at all exterior walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from the exterior walls, the reference plane shall be established by the lowest points within the area between the building and the lot Exhibit A March 21, 2017 Page 4 of 5 Draft #1 EVPC Study Session line or, where the lot line is more than 6 feet (1829 mm) from the building between the structure and a point 6 feet (1829 mm) from the building. Section 13.3.114 — Definitions of Words, Terms and Phrases Grade, Finished shall mean the final elevation and coutour of the ground level after cutting or filling and conforming to the proposed design Exhibit A March 21, 2017 Page 5 of 5 Draft #1 EVPC Study Session DRAFT What is a Corridor Plan? A set of planning tools to allow the Estes Valley Planning Commission to guide development/redevelopment of a highway corridor within the town limits of the Town of Estes Park. The purpose of these tools would be to manage new development and redevelopment using design guidelines to retain our “premier mountain community” and the quaint mountain town image quality so important to Estes Park residents. These tools would provide design guidelines reflecting our history and location for use in redevelopment and new development and insure that a specific corridor retains its character and aesthetics. Design guidelines DO NOT affect the underlying zoning in any way. Potential Tools Design Guidelines: Specific recommendations for: Materials Orientation of facades of structures Orientation of parking on lot Height Massing (refers to the perception of the general shape and form as well as size of a building) Density View corridors/view maintenance Architectural surface articulation (delineate spaces so different functions such as use, accessibility, circulation, etc., are clear) Landscaping What would be included in the Corridor? The properties abutting the designated highway. Design guidelines (these are guidelines, not restrictions) would be helpful to potential developers of new properties and those considering redevelopment of existing properties, as they would be aware of the design guidelines and would have the expertise of the Community Development Department available to them before submitting a development plan. DRAFT A Corridor Plan for Highway 7 Why Highway 7? Highway 7, Peak to Peak Highway, is one of twenty-six designated Colorado Scenic Byways The Scenic and Historic Byways program is a state program established in 1991 that promotes heritage tourism along unique roadways. Heritage Tourism – Defined by the National Trust for Historic Preservation as a unique niche in the tourism industry devoted to historic, cultural or natural resources. The heritage tourist is “traveling to experience the places, artifacts, and activities that authentically represent the stories and people of the past and present.” According to the U.S. Travel Association 76% of the 170.4 million leisure travelers in the U.S. participated in some sort of cultural or heritage activity in 2013. Those visitors spent more money overall during their trips and tended to travel for longer than did non-heritage tourists. Heritage tourists were also more likely to stay in hotels, shop, dine out, and participate in a variety of activities. Economic Impact of Heritage Tourist Spending in Colorado, 2015 Heritage Tourist Spending: $7.2 Billion, Other Tourist Spending: $6.9 Billion Peak to Peak Highway economic impact 2009-2014: $99.6 million NOTE: The above information is from the Colorado Preservation, Inc. 2017 report on The Benefits of Historic Preservation. Where: Highway 7 Corridor - from the intersection of US 36 to the Town boundary on the South Why now? Highway 7 is currently in transition and has the highest potential for immediate development and redevelopment (more property for sale, more flux). Highway 7 Corridor will transition into the Downtown Plan at the East end of Elkhorn Highway 7 has a number of locally owned hotels and restaurants, it is near the Estes Park Museum and other local points of interest including the Masonic Lodge, American Legion and the historic Reclamation Neighborhood. For tourists enjoying the Peak to Peak Scenic Byway this will be either a first impression or the last visual image of the Town of Estes Park DRAFT Corridor Plan Time Frame: 4 – 6 months to draft plan, 8-12 months for completion Corridor Plans would become a part of the Comprehensive Plan to be used as a guide for future development and redevelopment. Additional Corridors for inclusion in the completed Comprehensive Plan: US 34: from the Town limits to the US34/36 intersection Elkhorn: from the US34/36 intersection to the Fall River/Wonderview intersection (end of Downtown Plan?) Moraine: from the intersection at Elkhorn to Mary’s Lake Road intersection Wonderview/Fall River: from the US34/36 intersection to the entrance of RMNP Spur 66: from the US36 intersection to the East Portal ESTES VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Five—Land Use Zoning Categories Zoning Data Summaries Zoning Maps Valley Wide Planning Areas: Downtown North End Carriage Hills/Marys Lake Spur 66 Beaver Point Fall River Road Fish Creek/Little Prospect Mountain Estes Park Corridors & Planning Purpose Design Standards Chapter One—Introduction Estes Valley Trends Citizen Survey Results of Vision and Needs Chapter Two—Planning for the Future Comprehensive Plan Mission Statement Comprehensive Plan Planning Area Estes Valley Trends Citizen Survey Results—Vision & Needs Chapter Three—Economic Trends Population Income Employment Housing Proposed Economic Development Strategies Chapter Four—Mobility and Circulation Problem Goal Recommendations Zoning Categories Zoning Zoning Data Summaries Zoning Data Summaries Zoning Maps Chapter Six—Action Plan Purpose: Land Use Natural & Scenic Resources Community Design Housing Economics Mobility & Circulation Public Safety Growth Management Intergovernmental Cooperation CHAPTER ONE—INTRODUCTION DEFINITION: A Comprehensive Plan, sometimes referred to as a Master Plan, serves as a long term guide to articulate a common vision based on community values for future growth and development in order to maintain the community character and values of the Estes Valley. PURPOSE: This Comprehensive Plan states long term goals and objectives and recommends courses of action for future growth and development of land, public facilities and services, and environmental protection in order to maintain the quality of life, the unique community character and values of the Estes Valley. HISTORY: This Comprehensive Plan is an update of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. In 1996, the Town of Estes Park and Larimer County initiated a process to develop a Comprehensive Plan which included strong and representative community involvement and was reviewed by the Town Attorney to insure it would reflect the diversity of issues, concerns and land use opportunities throughout the Valley in order to achieve a long term, practical guideline for future land use development. This Plan was adopted by both entities in December, 1996. This Comprehensive Plan established a joint planning area between the unincorporated area of Larimer County outside the Town limits of Estes Park commonly known as the 32 square mile Estes Valley. CHAPTER TWO—PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE MISSION: The Estes Valley, a mountain resort community surrounded by abundant wildlife and spectacular scenery shall have a goal of sustaining both a highly favorable quality of life as well as the needs of all local residents. This Comprehensive Plan shall encourage sustainable and environmentally sound practices which support a year-round economy, including tourism, which is the primary economic foundation of Estes Park. PLANNING AREA: The Estes Valley is a unique, enclosed mountain valley. The borders of Rocky Mountain National Park form the western and northern boundary. The approximate eastern border is Crocker Ranch/Pole Hill. The southern boundary extends from Lily Lake, eastward into Roosevelt National Forest. Prospect Mountain is located in the center of the Valley. ESTES VALLEY TRENDS: 1. Tourism will increase and continue to be the principal driver of our sales tax driven economy. 2. Estes Park will become a year-round travel destination. a. In 2016, Colorado was among the top 10 states for population growth. The Front Range is home to 85% of the state's population, and the entire Front Range is within a 3 1/2 hour drive to Estes Park, which has impacted traffic congestion, parking, housing availability, sales tax revenue and public infrastructure. b. Rocky Mountain National Park has experienced a 40% increase in visitors from 2012 to 2016. 3. The State demographic illustrates an increasing population of retirees and more diversified inhabitants in Estes Park who will demand an increase of social services. 4. Estes Park will need to diversify and develop a year-round economy with expanded economic opportunities. 5. Schools will face decreasing enrollment due to lack of affordable housing and young families leaving the area 6. Housing and land costs will continue to escalate. a. Rental Housing will remain at a premium. b. Vacation rentals will continue to be a significant presence in the Estes Valley. c. There will be a need to increase affordable and workforce housing. 7. Downtown traffic congestion, a significant issue, will continue to increase. a. Public transportation alternatives need to be explored. b. Completion of proposed roadway improvements, i.e. the Loop and traffic lights along Highways 34&36, will relieve some congestion. 8. The need to manage the rate of growth and quality of development will increase. 9. Wildlife/human conflicts will continue to increase. 10. Residents of the entire Estes Valley will continue to engage in Town issues. 11. The Town must serve both local residents as well as tourists. 12. Estes Park's unique mountain community atmosphere needs to be preserved. 13. Estes Park needs to diversify and develop a year-round economy. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITIZEN SURVEY: This survey was completed in 2016 and illustrates the commonality in thinking of all 1,500 participants. 1. What do you like about living in Estes Park? a. Ample Wildlife i. Overall feeling of Safety b. Easy access to Rocky Mountain National Park j. Ease of Walking d. Low Density k. Availability of Good Health Services e. Scenic Views 1. Good Opportunities for cultural/arts/music d. Good Weather & Air Quality m. Excellent Public Services e. Fantastic Library f. Sense of Community and Small Town Atmosphere; involved citizenry—Opportunities to Volunteer g. Variety of Youth Programs h. Great Outdoor Recreation Opportunities 2. What would you like to see changed in Estes Park? a. Encourage year-round business opportunities, especially high-tech b. Better Traffic Flow in summer, perhaps make downtown one-way; more downtown parking c. More Affordable Housing, especially for young families; provide dormitory housing for seasonal workers d. More winter activities, especially cross-country skiing e. Bicycle lanes throughout the Valley, even Highways 34 &36 f. More active participation in solar energy g. Staffed Fire Department h. Expand and improve geriatric care i. Space developed areas with pockets of open space throughout Valley j. Create an ice skating rink on top of a parking structure k. Create historical site walking tours 1. Create regular transit system to DIA and Valley m. Expand bypasses around downtown For more information, please visit website: www.colorado.gov/pacific/townofestespark/citizensurvey CHAP rER THREE—ECONOMIC TRENDS ECONOMIC DRIVERS OF THE ESTES VALLEY: Population: The Estes Valley's Retired Population is increasing a. They have a higher expenditure on health care b. More generous in charitable giving c. Less spent in shelter, apparel and transportation d. Employed population declines as retired population increases Male Population by Age Female Population by Age 544 561 On 0-9 10 19 20 79 30.19 40-49 50. 59 I 60- 69 ut 70 /9 80# 455 482 M0-9 010-19 20.29 30-39 40-49 r, 50.59 al 60- 69 .70-79 80• 264 282 246 267 326 267 279 257 256 266 249 171 ..moronTO-Waft." US Census Bureau (2014) 560K to $75K 575K to 5100K 5100K to $125K 5125K to $1501 5200K or more 5150K to $200K Income: Sales Tax Revenues remain significant: a. 2014- 14.5% increase over 2013 b. 2015- 11.5% over 2014 c. 2016- 6.7% increase over 2015 Construction activity is at a slow to moderate pace a. Value of commercial construction consistently increases Family income in The Past 12 Months (In 2013 inflation- Adjusted Dollars) 0 0 0 ,c 8 ,r, In Li ,o C. v- NJ No re) re) -c- zA. if) ....CA) t/1 to VI to tr) Ln to 0 4-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L., -.JJC 'e '.z CY Lin 0 ur) CD Lin co in 0 v-- ..-- NI 4-.4 Cel en a in v, vi. vl. v., „,-, American Community Survey 42012 500 400 300 200 100 0 Employment: Most jobs are tourism related-lodging, retail, food Wages are comparable to the rest of Larimer County in construction, finance and professional sectors Increase of employees commuting to and from Loveland, Longmont, Boulder, etc. Industry Type (civilian employed, 16 years and 2000 Colorado 2011 over_ Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and Estes Park Estes Park Colorado mining 1.4% 2.0% 0.0% 2.3% Construction 10.2% 9.1% 8.8% 8.3% Manufacturing 4.5% 9.1% 3.0% 7.2% Wholesale trade 1.4% 3.5% 2.5% 2.8% Retail trade 13.7% 11.8% 9.8% 11.3% Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 2.4% 4.9% 4.2% 41% Information 1.6% 4.9% 1.8% 3.2% Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 7.4% 7.7% 6.5% 7.4% Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 8.6% 11.7% 7.9% 13.0% Educational services, and health care and social assistance 12.4% 17.0% 24.1% 19.6% Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services 30.5% 9.0% 21.6% 10.2% Other services, except public administration 3.9% 4.8% 5.1% 5.1% Rocky Mountain National Park: a. Steady visitation growth Public administration 2_1% 4.6% 3.7% 4.8% b. Visitor season is expanding-now runs from early June through October c. Shuttle system begun in 2006 has been very successful The largest segment of Estes Park's tourist market is based on visitors who want a good, outdoor nature experience as well as comfortable accommodations. They are between 35 and 44 years old, family oriented and relatively affluent and educated. Many are first-time visitors, mostly due to proximity of Rocky Mountain National Park. Housing: Percentage of Second Homes increasing which places more pressure on full-time residents. Median housing value is higher than rest of State. a. Median rent is 85% of rest of State Great demand for Workforce Housing Increase in number of Vacation Rentals, approximately 700 in Estes Valley in 2016, will continue to impact housing availability & cost, neighborhood character and create zoning issues. Estes Park Housing Distribution US Census Bureau (2014) For More information please go to the weblink: www.colorado.goviEstes%20Valley%2011ousing%20Needs%20Assessment PROPOSED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES: These strategies will prioritize actions leading to a more prosperous year-round economy and vibrant quality of life: I. Construct and maintain a high-speed broadband network for businesses and residents 2. Implement flood mitigation measures that reduce the risk to lives and properties and minimize insurance premium increases according to the floodplain designation 3. Support Organizations and Facilities that encourage wellness, athletic opportunities and other year-round activities a. Encourage working with the Forest Service to expand recreational activities within Roosevelt National Forest 4. Encourage the development of the Arts in the Estes Valley 5. Encourage both the Estes Park Conference Center and the Events Center to make them more competitive 6. Encourage business re-development by reviewing and revising development policies For more information, please go to the weblink: www.colorado.gov/pacifichownofestespark/economicdevelopmentstrategy Strengths of the Estes Valley: 1) Physical Environment 2) Clean Industry base 3) Community Spirit 4) Good Health Care 5) Good Schools 6) Positive Arts Possibilities 7) Lack of Serious Crime Weaknesses of the Estes Valley: 1) Lack of Affordable Housing 2) Traffic Congestion 3) Conflicting Needs of less affluent renters versus homeowners 4) Conflict between creating jobs and preserving the environment 5) Lack of year-round economy 6) Conflict between development and open space 7) Needs of Local residents balanced with growing tourist base COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITIZEN SURVEY: This survey was completed in 2016 and illustrates the commonality in thinking of all 1,500 participants. 1. What a. b. d. e. d. e. f. g. h. do you like about living in Estes Park? Ample Wildlife Easy access to Rocky Mountain National Park Low Density Scenic Views Good Weather & Air Quality Fantastic Library Sense of Community and Small Town Atmosphere; Variety of Youth Programs Great Outdoor Recreation Opportunities i. Overall feeling of Safety j. Ease of Walking k. Availability of Good Health Services 1. Good Opportunities for cultural/arts/music m. Excellent Public Services involved citizenry—Opportunities to Volunteer Most important Overall Quality of Life Education and Enrichment Built Environment Safety Good 49% Natural Environment Recreation and Wellness Community Engagement Mobility Economy 2. What would you like to see changed in Estes Park? a. Encourage year-round business opportunities, especially high-tech b. Better Traffic Flow in summer, perhaps make downtown one-way; more downtown parking c. More Affordable Housing, especially for young families; provide dormitory housing for seasonal workers d. More winter activities, especially cross-country skiing e. Bicycle lanes throughout the Valley, even Highways 34 &36 f. More active participation in solar energy g. Staffed Fire Department h. Expand and improve geriatric care i. Space developed areas with pockets of open space throughout Valley j. Create an ice skating rink on top of a parking structure k. Create historical site walking tours 1. Create regular transit system to DIA and Valley m. Expand bypasses around downtown For more information, please visit website: www.colorado.gov/pacifichownofestespark/citizensurvey CHAPTER FOUR—MOBILITY & CIRCULATION Problem: The Town of Estes Park is the gateway to popular Rocky Mountain National Park and both are major tourist attractions. As the result, the conditions of traffic and parking in the Town vary from extremely congested streets with little or no available parking in the summer, to no congestion and ample parking in the winter. All major roads converge within pedestrian-oriented downtown, causing frustration and safety concerns for residents, business owners and visitors. Additionally, all major routes are not two-lane. Goal: Both Estes Park and Rocky Mountain National Park will have a comprehensive transportation system that is safe and easy-to-navigate, which will preserve the unique character and natural beauty of the Estes Valley and fulfill the needs of the entire community as well as its visitors. Recommendations: 1) Publicized bypass around downtown to reach the RMNF'. 2) A year-round shuttle system with clearly understood stops and schedules with the hub originating at the Visitors' Center. a. Establish a year-round transportation system between the Estes Valley and Lyons, Longmont, Loveland, Boulder, etc. 3) Sufficiently advertise parking areas in and near Town with electronic real-time signage to indicate availability. a. Develop digital internet/cell phone applications to deliver information on parking availability, shuttle services, traffic congestion, special events, etc. 4) A valley-wide bike/walking trail system throughout the Estes Valley. 5) A transportation plan designed to protect the area's natural environment, especially its wildlife. 6) Solutions must accommodate Estes Park's increasing shoulder seasons. 7) Encourage downtown employees to park in remote Park-and-Ride locations using shuttle opportunities during peak season. 8) Modify traffic signal times to achieve improved pedestrian and traffic flow. 9) Optimize the proposed one-way loop system around Town. 10) Identify sites for additional public parking structures in the downtown area. For more information, please visit website: www.colorado.gov/pacifichownofestespark/TransportationStudies CHAPTER FIVE—LAND USE Land use guides the formulation of transportation, economic and housing elements. It is a statement of existing zoning categories in the Estes Valley that may indicate future necessary modification as needed to address current and future economic and social challenges. Zoning Categories: Residential: RE-1-Rural Estate- Established to protect and preserve some of the most rural areas of the Estes Valley. Allows for the development of low-density single-family residential uses. Ten Acre minimum. RE-Rural Estate- Low density single family residential development, which encourages incorporating rural residential conservation designs, such as clustering and other open space techniques. 2 1/4 acre minimum. E-1-Estate- This district permits single family residential development of 1 unit per acre. E-Estate- Allows single family residential uses in areas convenient to services and key highway corridors at two (2) dwelling units on 1/2 acre minimum. R-Single Family Residential- Encourages relatively high density single family residences allowing four (4) dwelling units per acre. R-1-Single Family Residential- Established to provide opportunities for attainable single family residential development. Allows eight (8) dwelling units per acre. R-2-Two Family Residential- Encourages duplexes as well as single family dwelling units. Allows twenty-seven thousand (27,000) square feet for duplexes and eighteen thousand (18,000) square feet for single family dwelling units. RM-Multi-Family Residential- Allows for multi-family development. Stanley Historic District: This district is regulated by the 75 acre Stanley Historic District Master Plan and Design Guidelines and Development Standards in order to ensure the historic importance and physical setting of the Stanley Hotel be maintained in perpetuity. The buildings in this Historic District serve as a reminder of the early history of Estes Park and provide a strong link to the tourism heritage of the area. For further information, please see this website: www.colorado.gov/pacific/townofestespark/comprehensiveplan Non-Residential: A Accommodations/Highway Corridor- Applies primarily in highway-oriented commercial areas. Allows for higher intensity accommodations, including multi-story hotels or motels. A-1 Accommodations- Provides for low-intensity and small-scale residential and lodging uses. CD-Downtown Commercial- Provides for a wide variety of relatively high-intensity pedestrian- scale retail and commercial within downtown Estes Park. Employee housing mixed with commercial or retail uses are also encouraged. CO-Outlying Commercial- Encourages commercial and retail uses along the major highway corridors. CH-Heavy Commercial- Provides for heavy commercial uses, including vehicle repair, utility facilities and installations, construction trades, bulk goods retailing and storage and limited manufacturing, not fronting highways or arterial streets. I-1-Industrial- Permitted uses include concrete/asphalt plants, propane distributors, gravel mining and crushing facilities and construction trade storage yards. Residential uses are not permitted. For further information, please see this website: www.colorado.gov/pacific/townofestespark/estes-valley-development-code Residential Multi-family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) 319 2%, Single Family: 10 acre min. (RE-1) 7,369 37% Single Family: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) 4,694 24% Single Family: 1 acre min. (E-1) 2,212 11% Single Family: 1/2 acre min. (E) 1,026 5% Single Family: 1/4 Acre min. (R) 202 1% Single Family: 5,000 s.f. min. (R-1) 14 <1% Two Family: 27,000 s.f. min. (R-2) 74 <1% Non-Residential Accomodations (A) 1,962 10% Accomodations (A-1) 967 5% Commercial Downtown (CD) 66 <1% Commercial Heavy (CH) 15 <1% Commercial Outlying (CO) 859 4% Restricted Industrial (1-1) 84 <1% Office (0) 8 <1% TOTAL 19,871 100% LAND USE TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE R R-2 RE Non-Residential Districts 1-1 Note: Analysis from 2013 Town of Estes Park and Latimer County Land Use Records Figure 5.i Existing Zoning Summary Residential Districts RM To Glen Haven Residential Commercial wn Zoning Code ED Downtown Commercial : (CD) OuVALCornmercial : (CO) Industrial I-1 Restricted Industrial (I1) Ea Macgrel Cd H to RMNP Beaver Meadows Entrance 41(k. 305. Rocky Mountain National Park k. YMCA ° Conference Grounds Rocky to Estate : (EST) in 1 & 2 Family : (RS) Multi-Family : (RM) TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Non-Residential Accomodations (A) 1,961 10% Accomodations (A-1) 967 5% Commercial Downtown (CD) 66 <1% Commercial Heavy (CH) 15 <1% Commercial Outlying (CO) 859 4% Restricted Industrial (1-1) 84 <1% Office (0) 8 <1% Residential Multi-family: 3-8 units / acre (RIM) 319 2% Single Family: 2 units / acre (E) 1,026 5% Single Family: 1 unit / acre (E-1) 2,212 11% Single Family: 4 units / acre (R) 202 1% Single Family: 1 unit / 10 acres (R-1) 14 <1% Single Family: 1 unit / 2.5 acres (RE) 4,694 24% Single Family: 1 unit / 10 acres (RE-1) 7,369 37% Two Family: 4 units / acre (R-2) 74 <1% TOTAL 19,871 100.0%, CD LAND USE Non-Residential Districts 1-1 Figure ?-7":- Existing Land Use Summary Residential Districts RM Cook Zantng Cade tidorttial Cell mercie L_J Rural Estate : (RE-1) Estate (E) Estate : (E-1) Residential : (R) Residential : (R-1) Multi-Family : (M-1) • t • _17 Commercial : (C) Business : (B) Acommodations Accommodations (A) L I 17 Open (0) Eagle Roc 1 ' i',I . L -i ,- • =,- ,, 1 , i !--r-fir -i .- - ----t—Y.1-- ..i.:-A 1g 1 •tip y. 34 to Lavaland RMNP Beaver Meadows Entrance Hwy. 35 to Boulder lucky Mountain National ?ark • . Ma Lake 14;1. fe .re CIT9OF : Rociry Mountain national Park 710 Alenspait VALLEY-WIDE PLANNING AREAS: Overview—The Estes Valley consists of seven (7) distinct neighborhood Planning areas. Each area is defined by unique natural resources, physical features land uses and Jurisdictional and/or special improvement boundaries. 1) The North End—Primarily consists of large-lot single-family residential development and commercial accommodations uses along the US Highway 34 corridor. 2) Fall River Road—Land uses within this planning area consist primarily of single-family residential and accommodations uses. Accommodations exist primarily west of the intersection of the US Highway 34 bypass and the US Highway 34 business loop, on both sides of the highway. 3) Beaver Point—Contains a variety of land uses, including highway-oriented commercial uses along the US Highway 36 corridor. The Elm Road industrial area is the main industrial area in the Valley and supports residents and guests. 4) Fish Creek/Little Prospect Mountain Contains the widest variety of uses including a residential use (large & small lot and multi-family development, light industrial, highway, commercial, medical and accommodations uses. 5) Spur 66—The most intensive land use is the YMCA of the Rockies. Along the valley bottoms, adjacent to waterways are found small-scale accommodations uses and residential development. 6) Mary's Lake/Carriage Hills— The largest of the seven planning areas. Land use is almost entirely residential with some accommodations use on Colorado Highway 7 and Mary's Lake Road. 7) Downtown—Includes distinct areas, the downtown commercial core and the Stanley Historic District. Neighborhood Plans Overview The Estes Valley consists of seven distinct planning areas (neighborhoods). Each area is defined by unique natural resources; physical features land uses, and jurisdictional and/or special improvement boundaries. Downtown: Is defined by the boundary of the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority in the mid-1990s. Includes distinct areas, the downtown commercial core, the Stanley Historic District. The North End: Primarily consists of large- lot single-family residential development and commercial accommodations uses along the Highway 34 corridor. Ash Creek/Lithe Prospect Mountain: Contains the widest variety of uses including a residential use (large lot, small lot, and multi- family development) light industrial, highway commercial, medical, and accommodations uses. Carriage Hills/Mary's Lake: Is geographically the largest of the seven planning areas. Land use is almost entirely primarily residential, with some accommodations use on Highway 7 and Mary's Lake Road. Tunnel Road/Aspen Brook: The most intensive land use is the YMCA of the Rockies, Along the valley bottoms, adjacent to waterways there are small-scale accommodations uses, and residential development. Beaver Point Contains a variety of land uses, including highway-oriented commercial uses along the Highway 36 corridor. The Elm Road industrial is the main industrial area in the Valley and supports residents and guests. Fall River: Land uses within the planning area consist primarily of single-family residential and accommodations uses. Accommodations exist primarily west of the intersection of the US 34 bypass and the US 34 business loop, on both sides of the highway. The established planning policies and development guidelines: Are unique to the each planning area , community of residents and business- Are complementary and reinforce the overall comprehensive communi- ty-wide goals, objectives, policies and the land use plan. Reflect specific objectives and pol- icies which the neighborhood resi- dents felt were critical to include as part of the Comprehensive Plan. es. • .0` • ' ITetfzisi ' , To Loveland. Fort Collins H Korth End • Panoren Peak 9264 rif Giant Track Mountain 9091 McGregor Mountain X 10986 c•,\.)'" Ti' GInr. I To Grand Lake Deer Mountain x 10013 RAIN AvE Mount Oly7us 8808 Eagle Cliff Mountain X 8806 Cgs Spur 66 Fish Creek / Little Prospect Mouqtain Kruger Rock 9355 Prospect Mountain 8900 Glacier Park Hill Mount _ Pisgan X 6630 ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK Steep Mountain x • r-- . EmOald 'Mountain 9237 Rams Horn Carriage Mountain Hills 9555 Marys Lake • Mou X ntain i 9788 tit. 90 N6-\' Liles() r, To Allenspark 0 1 - Lion Head To Lyons, 9740 Boulder; Denver Pierson Mountain x Map 8.1: Neighborhood Planning Areas Neighborhood Plans Overview The Estes Valley consists of seven distinct planning areas (neighborhoods). Each area is defined by unique natural resources; physical features land uses, and jurisdictional and/or special improvement boundaries. Downtown: Is defined by the boundary of the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority in the mid-1990s. Includes distinct areas, the downtown commercial core, the Stanley Historic District. The North End: Primarily consists of large- lot single-family residential development and commercial accommodations uses along the Highway 34 corridor. Fish Cre k/Little Prospect Mountain: Contains the widest variety of uses including a residential use (large lot, small lot, and multi- family development) light industrial, highway commercial, medical, and accommodations uses. Carriage Hills/Mary's Lake: Is geographically the largest of the seven planning areas. Land use is almost entirely primarily residential, with some accommodations use on Highway 7 and Mary's Lake Road. Tunnel Road/Aspen Brook: The most intensive land use is the YMCA of the Rockies. Along the valley bottoms, ad jacent to waterways there are small-scale accommodations uses, and residential development. Beaver Point: Contains a variety of land uses, including highway-oriented commercial uses along the Highway 36 corridor. The Elm Road industrial is the main industrial area in the Valley and supports residents and guests. Fall River: Land uses within the planning area consist primarily of single-family residential and accommodations uses. Accommodations exist primarily west of the intersection of the US 34 bypass and the US 34 business loop, on both sides of the highway. The established planning policies and development guidelines: Are unique to the each planning area , community of residents and business- es. Are complementary and reinforce the overall comprehensive communi- ty-wide goals, objectives, policies and the land use plan. Reflect specific objectives and pol- icies which the neighborhood resi- dents felt were criticaB to include as part of the Comprehensive Plan. North End - H Deer To Grand Ridce Lake ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK Steep Mountain x 1 Carriage Hills /- Marys Lake Kruger Roc* 9,955 Mount Olympus 8rtfal Mount Pisgan x 8830 4 s 2 Mile iTo Allensperk 4 "t” Glen /lave, McGregor Mountain X 10466 To Loveland, Fort Collins Castle Mountain 8e9, River Man x 83; r4 • Beaver G`racier Ci e Spur 66 ....._. Emttread 0). Perna Horn Mountain ta Mouin 9555 9237 •-' 9555 9237 . •-it 'i % 1 .ioti ?-i 1 I;;Ti t jiy 1.- . .- I ,..) .' 4SL ,.. . ._ : Mounta Z in '4,s, , NIAtt- I - --i9roo ".!.., 1 1 Deer Mountain x 10013 Fish Creek.!. Little. Prospect' Mountain - Lion Head 9740 Pierson Mountain x Park Hill Panorarr Peak x 9284 To Lyons, Boulder, Denver Map 8.1: Neighborhood Planning Areas Neighborhood Rans Downtown The Downtown area is the only planning area completely within the Town boundary. Downtown is generally defined by the district boundaries of the former Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority (dissolved by public vote in 2010). The Visitor Center, Stanley Village, and the Stanley Hotel form the eastern boundary. Elkhorn Avenue forms the central core, bounded on the west end by the Elkhorn Lodge. Downtown extends south along Moraine to Crags Drive. Natural and Scenic Resources Open Space The Town of Estes Park owns property along West and East Riverside Drive that fronts the Big Thompson River. The Town has converted much of this area into a riverfront greenbelt. It is anticipated that this will continue. The Knoll-Willows property is a landmark as the rock cliffs are a backdrop for the entry into downtown. The Knoll-Willows Master Plan was adopted by the Town Board in February 2005. This master plan is a culmination of land assembly and conservation easements initiated by the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority in 1989. The Bond Park Master Plan was adopted in March 2010, and is guiding revitalization of Bond Park, including significant infrastructure upgrades, a new plaza area on the east side, and improved pedestrian amenities on Elkhorn Avenue. . • •.-12—)Wijay.454jogrj,9-rjoWL‘otii . '1 ^/ i;I:11r,11;11{1111t 13161r00 = w Lake Estes 9-hole golf course Topography The elevation within Downtown ranges from approximately 7,500 feet where the Big Thompson River drains into Lake Estes, to approximately 7,620 feet at the highest point within the Stanley Historic District- Topography within downtown is flat to gently sloping, with rock escarpments defining the perimeter. To the north and east of downtown (Stanley Village and the Stanley History District), terrain is gently sloping from north to south. South from Elkhorn, on Moraine Avenue, the terrain is gently rolling with a large cut slope identifying the western boundary of the area. The western portion of the planning area includes the extension of downtown along the US 34 business loop and the Elkhom Lodge. The terrain is generally flat in this area, with large escarpments defining the southern boundary of the planning area. Viewsheds There are many important viewsheds within the planning area. Views from the downtown to RMNP and Longs Peak have been framed and maintained as part of the downtown design effort. The views from the Stanley property to RMNP and Longs Peak have been carefully considered in master planning for the Stanley Historic District. Maintaining downtown views of the surrounding rock cliffs is important. Vegetation Native vegetation is relatively sparse within downtown, Some stands of pine can be found on hillsides. Natural drainages include willow and other riparian vegetation along the Big Thompson and Fall River. Extensive ornamental and native plantings along both Elkhorn Avenue and the Riverwalk have been done in conjunction with the downtown streetscape improvements following the 1982 Lawn Lake flood. Rock Features There are numerous natural landmarks and rock outcroppings within Downtown. Rock formations adjacent to downtown are significant in their appearance, and help to define the character and boundaries of the downtown commercial core. These features provide a scale and context for downtown. There is a stone embankment along the western side of US 36 as it approaches the intersection of US 36 and US 34. The hillside west of the US 34/36 intersection and south of the Big Thompson River is open and undeveloped, and publicly owned. The rock outcroppings behind the Stanley Hotel are important and give context and a backdrop to the hotel. Rivers and Streams The Big Thompson and Fall Rivers are the main water courses that flow through Downtown. They converge at Riverside Plaza and continue along the Riverwalk past the Visitor Center and into Lake Estes. Performance Park hosts popular entertainment for residents and guests A GUEST RANCH WEI. "COME IINTOItt( 71't rr so. Apra um. " ELKHOPN LiOutaqa; CABINcl - ALIA: RES1nURAN1 1374 HP;TOPICAL LOOC,E 9 7. CIIT- 8 6 - 474 - • _ ..r: Att, rTiT) er; 41, r -43, The Black Canyon Creek drains Lumpy Ridge from the north into Downtown, and joins the Big Thompson near the Hwy 34/36 intersection. Wildlife Wildlife, especially deer and elk, frequent the planning area. Deer and elk migrate through the Stanley Hotel area on a year-round basis and pass through to Black Canyon Creek and the west. In recent years, black bears have frequented businesses, targeting unsecured trash dumpsters. The Town has taken steps to reduce this by changing trash pick-up time moving toward animal resistant containers. A local task force has been created to raise awareness of the issue. The historic Elkhorn Lodge, located west of downtown Estes Park Historic esources The Stanley Historic District is a distinct area within downtown. The historic significance of the Stanley Hotel and the surrounding buildings creates a setting and image for the entire Valley. The site is generally open, and slopes gently to the south. Views to the south and west are outstanding, with the background formed by the peaks in RMNP. There are outstanding rock formations located within the northwest portion of the Stanley Historic District, which add to the area's character. The Stanley Hotel is on the National Register of Historic Places. The hotel, completed in 1909 by F.O. Stanley, is a striking building. Across the country, the facade of the hotel is recognizable, and is linked with the Town of Estes Park. View corridors, facade easements, and other legally binding steps have been taken to preserve the views of the hotel from major roads in town, and to protect the integrity of the hotel. The Park Theater building is listed on the National Historic Register. The Elkhorn Lodge has been in operation since the 1880s. There are six buildings on the National Historic Register. Land Use The primary land use within downtown is commercial, including retail shops, offices and restaurants. In the outlying area, there is the Stanley Hotel, Stanley Village Commercial Center, Holiday inn and Conference Center, and other accommodations uses. Residential, accommodations, and commercial development are planned for outlying parcels within the Stanley Historic District. Commercial Core The downtown commercial core, centered at the intersection of Elkhorn and Moraine Avenue, provides a highly developed pedestrian environment with small retail stores. The streetscape along Elkhorn contributes to a lively and pedestrian-friendly downtown. Most downtown land uses are intensive and compatible with one another. Most of the downtown is fully developed. Stanley Village, is designed as a highway-oriented use, and functions well in that regard. Redevelopment of existing buildings within downtown will continue on an incremental basis. aat:4s4; Ativ. y 4Trigjali Figure 8.2: Existing Land Use Summary Within Downtown Residential Districts Non-Residential Districts LAND USE TOTAL AC HES Non-Residential PERCENTAGE Accomodations (A) 45 19% Commercial Downtown (CD) 77 33% Commercial Outlying (CO) 85 36% Residential Single Family: 4 units I acre (R) 8 4% Multi-family: 3-8 units / acre (RM) 19 8% TOTAL 235 100% Mobility All major highways in the Estes Valley intersect downtown. These highways are US 36, US 34, and Highway 7 Congestion Having these major linkages connect within a small scale, pedestrian-oriented downtown shopping area causes severe traffic congestion during the peak summer season. This is inconvenient for shop owners, pedestrians, people in their cars trying either to enter or leave RMNP, and focal merchants and business people trying to access local needs such as the downtown Post Office. There is no other street system within the planning area, as the highways serve multiple purposes in this area. In the fall of 2013, the Town was awarded a grant from the Federal Lands Access Program to rebuild portions of Elkhorn Avenue _.-----_-__.•_____.-. ------,_ Figure 8.3: Existing Classification Use Summary Within Downtown LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Commercial 9 • 4% Commercial Unimproved or Unplatted 3 1% Condo 17 7% County Land <1 <1% Industrial/Manufacturing <1 <1% Lodging 57 24% Merchandising 26 11% Multi-Family <1 <1% Multi-Use <1 <1% Office 3 1% Other 11 5% Residential Unimproved or Unplatted 5 2% Single Family 11 5% State Highway Dept. Land 1 <1% Town Land 68 29% Warehouse <1 <1%, null 22 9% TOTAL 235 100% and Moraine Avenue as a one-way coup et. This will help reduce the congestion in the downtown area, and may spur redevelopment of Moraine Avenue. Trails connections to the Fairgrounds parking lot and into Rocky Mountain National Park. A parking structure is planned for the Visitor Center that will also serve as a Transit Center. Parking Parking is a major concern downtown. The provision of ample and convenient parking to accommodate the needs of the business and other activities is key to the continued vitality of the downtown. The traffic and parking congestion currently focused in downtown must be resolved in order to maintain a positive image of Estes Park to visitors and residents alike. Discussions to alleviate the parking problems range from structured parking to outlying parking and a shuttle system. In 2005, the Town commissioned a Downtown Parking Study. The study provides an inventory and analysis of parking downtown. The primary purpose of the study was to create a comprehensive and integrated system of downtown parking that provides convenient and safe parking in a cost effective manner for visitors, employees and residents that is consistent with the vision for a vibrant and active downtown. and continues along the river to connect to the Estes Park Conference Center. The Riverwalk connects downtown with the Lake Estes Trail via the Big Thompson River. Transit A key element of what may someday be a Valley-wide trail system is located downtown. The Riverwalk provides direct access along the Fall River and Big Thompson River. The Riverwalk extends from Picadilly Square, south of the Post Office, into Riverside Plaza Since the 1996 Estes Valley Plan, effort has been underway to create a public transit system in Estes Park. The last several years have seen a shuttle bus system created, with the Estes Park Visitor Center serving as a central hub for this system, including Special Considerations and Key issues 1. There are many steep slopes and rock outcroppings adjacent to downtown. These add visual interest and diversity to downtown and should be preserved with view corridors. *ilit:4)-4P:1160414.4. PUBLIC RIVERWALK 2. An excellent river walk exists within downtown. There is the potential to extend the Riverwalk to adjacent areas as new development occurs within downtown, to create a system of integrated Valley trails. 3. Traffic congestion in downtown and entry corridors is a major problem during the tourist season. 4. At peak periods, downtown parking is inadequate and adds to traffic congestion. 5. Development within the Stanley Historic District is regulated by its Master Plan. The Stanley Hotel is on the National Register of Historic Places, as well as having the designation of a property with national significance, The hotel is a landmark within Estes Valley. Redevelopment of the hotel property should be encouraged. The Stanley Historic District is located within the proposed Downtown District. However; the various parcels within the Stanley Historic District have been designated to reflect the provisions and requirements of the Stanley Historic District Master Plan. 6. Within the downtown district there is a wide variety of uses. Therefore, as standards for the downtown district are prepared there will necessarily be a variety of development standards, criterion and design guidelines. Downtown Development Guidelines Primary Concepts • Ail redevelopment shall strengthen the unity of the block as a single entity. Please refer to specific guidelines on color, horizontal elements, building heights, and facade fronts for specific details. The block is seen as an entity. • All redevelopment shall preserve the visual quality of the individual facades and careful consideration given to treatment, placement and size of signs. • Maintain the visual emphasis of each block at its corners. Renovations of corner buildings should be more elaborate than renovations of other buildings. 8 Franchise architecture is not allowed. Doorways • Maintain the pattern of primary building entrances facing the street. • Maintain the traditional pattern of recessed entrances. ▪ All development and redevelopment adjacent to Fall River or the Big Thompson River shall provide access and orientation to the rivers. Windows • Maintain the pattern created by upper story windows and also their vertical horizontal alignment. • Window sizes and shapes should not be altered during renovation. New construction should use windows of similar sizes and shapes as adjacent facades so that established patterns are maintained The popular, downtown Riverwalk. Facades • Facades will be aligned with the sidewalk line. There shall be an 8 foot setback from the street property line for sidewalks. • Build out to side lot lines to maintain the sense of a "wall" along the street. • Maintain the similarity in building widths. The minimum street frontage and river frontage width of retail shops shall be 25 feet. • Building components should be similar in size and shape to those already in use along Elkhorn Avenue. The 100 block of East Elkhorn shall serve as the building design standard. Horizontal Elements O Maintain a variety of building heights. The primary facades should be no more than two stories high. A 36-foot height could occur only on Moraine Avenue and the north side of Cleave Street if a third floor is used for residential. • Maintain the same high proportion of glass in renovations and new construction. At least 60% of the ground level facing the street shall be transparent window surface. First floors, which have large areas of glass and small areas of opaque materials are clearly separated visually from upper floors. O Maintain the clear distinction between first floors and upper floors. Use of horizontal moldings, awnings, or sign boards to emphasize the distinction between floors. Materials & Colors • Materials used for renovations or additions should be finished in ways that are consistent with the original building. • Variety in building materials is acceptable as long as other design criteria are met; however, it is desirable to maintain the present distribution of building materials along the block. All construction, redevelopment and building facade changes shall be reviewed by the Town of Estes Park Planning Staff for color and material consistency. Subordinate color schemes to be the composition of building elements. The colors chosen for one building should bear some relationship to other colors used along the block. The use of contrasting colors to accentuate architectural details is desirable. • All roof mechanical equipment shall be screened. Signs • All businesses closed during off- season months shall leave window displays in place or allow displays by community groups. • Keep signs subordinate to buildings. Signs should fit with the existing features of the facade. Backlighted plastic signs are not allowed. Symbolic logos are encouraged. •lam? *149a1:411ar n "16 ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK -\6? S Stanley Village hopping Center Stenle; iltsinnc Difstnci Map 8.2: Downtown Planning Area - 2: Neighborhood Plans North End Natural and Scenic Resources Topography The Topography within the North End planning area can be characterized as gently rolling, with several natural drainages dispersed throughout the area. The area generally consists of open meadows, with a steeper, wooded landform in the center. The portion of the North End which is to the east of Dry Gultch Road consists of heavily forested mountainous terrain. The established Stanley Heights subdivision is forested and rolling. The western portion of the planning area consists of MacGregor Ranch, which includes open meadow areas bordered by steeply sloping and forested hillsides. Lake Estes forms the southern boundary of the planning area. Lake Estes is currently used for recreational activities such as boating, sail boarding, and fishing, and is a prominent landmark for people arriving in Estes Park from US 34 and US 36. Rivers and Streams Several water courses lie within the boundaries of the planning area. Black Canyon Creek drains into the Big Thompson River. Dry Gulch drains the eastern portion of the planning area before draining directly into the Big Thompson River below the dam. A number of intermittent drainages flow into Dry Gulch. Rock Features Several prominent rock outcroppings are within or adjacent to the planning area. Eagle Rock (shown above), which is a large, solitary formation, is in the northeastern portion of the planning area. It is a prominent landmark for visitors and residents. Lumpy Ridge, located within Rocky Mountain National Park, consists of spectacular rock formations. This ridge forms the northern boundary of the planning Built In 2003, Talons Pointe Is the Estes Park Housing Authority's newest rental property. MacGregor Ranch is a funtional ranch and museum, with roots back to the 1870s. area, and is a visual landmark for the entire Valley. Wildlife Wildlife, found throughout the entire study area, is especially abundant within the North End. Elk and deer are very common in the area in both summer and winter. Scenic Res a IICCOS As noted above, the Lumpy Ridge is a landmark of the planning area. Spectacular views of Rocky Mountain National Park (including Longs Peak) are found along Dry Gulch Road, Devils Gulch Road and many local roads. Existing Land Use Residential The primary land use within the North End Planning Area is large-lot, single-family residential development. Lot sizes range from less than one acre to over 40 acres. A large area currently under County jurisdiction has been zoned for residential development with a minimum lot size of 10 acres. The majority of the land is undeveloped. However, much of the area has been previously subdivided into smaller lots. There are small enclaves of residential development scattered within the northern portion of the planning area which include summer cabins and cabins converted to year Devils Gulch, as seen from the entrance to MacGreggor Ranch round residences. Typically, the lot sizes are less than one acre within these areas. Commercial The commercial development along the US 34 corridor makes up a small portion of the total acreage within the planning area. The primary commercial uses along US 34 consist of commercial accommodations. Visitors to Estes Park form their first impression of the Town while traveling this corridor. On the north shore of Lake Estes is the marina. This receives extensive use in the summer, from locals and visitors. There is also a 9-hole golf course. Below the dam, there are several highway-oriented commercial uses, including commercial, recreational, a small accommodations parcel, and a manufacturer of pewter sculpture. The Eagle Rock School is located within the planning area. Physically, the impact of Eagle Rock School is minimal on the planning area. It is not visible from Dry Gulch, and the only indication of the school's existence is the drive that accesses the property. Compatibility The land uses found within the planning area are generally compatible with one another. Various parcels zoned "accommodations" along Big Thompson Avenue lying adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Extensive development within the open meadow areas found in the North End Planning Area would significantly alter not only the visual integrity of the area, but would impact the image of the entire Estes Park area. The North End is visible from a number of locations within the Estes Valley, and the perceived openness of this area, if lost, will affect the image of the entire Valley. The redevelopment of the Lake Estes area could have a positive impact on the overall perception of the Estes Valley. All the primary transportation corridors pass by Lake Estes. Careful consideration must be given to the quality of any type of development in this area. Undeveloped Land There are numerous undeveloped parcels in the planning area, each zoned for a residential use. Only one of the undeveloped parcels is located along Big Thompson Avenue (10 acres along Elk Trail Court). Historic Resources The MacGregor Ranch is located along the western border of the planning area. The Ranch has roots back to the 1870's, and currently operates as a functional ranch and museum. Mobility Trails The trail system around Lake Estes will serve as the hub to a Valley-wide trail system. It is centrally located, and will provide a natural focal point for trails which can develop adjacent to the various waterways. The Lumpy Ridge and Gem Lake trailhead are located off the north side of Devil's Gultch Road. Located in the Rocky Mountain E..1-..-%111.4y,Ziorn94.4)3aPa Phi;11 Figure 8.4: Existing Land Use Summary Within North End Residential Districts Non-Residential Districts LAND USE TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Residential Multi-family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) 97 2% Single Family: 10 acre min. (RE-1) 5,136 94% Single Family: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) 245 4% Single Family: 1 acre min. (E-1) 276 4% Single Family: 1/2 acre min. (E) 48 1% Single Family: 1/4 Acre min. (R) 32 <1% Single Family: 5,000 s.f. min. (R-1) 10 <1% Two Family: 27,000 s.f. min. (R-2) 29 <1% Non-Residential Accomodations (A) 79 1% Accomodations (A-1) 3 <1% Commercial Downtown (CD) 2 <1% Commercial Heavy (CH) 5 <1% Commercial Outlying (CO) 302 , 5% Office (0) 3 <1% null 145 2% TOTAL 6,411 100% Figure 8.6: Existing Ciassiffoation Use Summary Within North End LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES 1,015 PERCENTAGE Agriculture 16% Charitable, non-residential - 1,774 28% Church Land 15 <1% Commercial 31 <1% Commercial Unimproved or Unplatted 9 <1%_ Condo 19 <1% County Land 4 <1% Federal Land 186 3% Lodging 33 1% Multi-Family 2 <1% National Forest 102 2% National Park 130 2% Office <1 <1% Other 55 1% Residential Unimproved or Unplatted 338 5% School Land 636 10% Single Family 1,745 27% Special Purpose 47 1% Town Land 65 1% Vacant 18 <1% Warehouse 46 - 1% null 65 1% TOTAL 6,411 100% National Park, this area is extremely popular for residents and guests alike. 36 runs along the southern part of the planning area, north of Lake Estes, while highway 34 runs just south of the Lake. These serve as the primary entrance points to Estes Park. Devils Gultch Road (arterial) spans the northern portion of the area, mainly through residential neighborhoods and farm land. Access Access for accommodations parcels along Big Thompson Avenue is generally designed to allow for safe turning movements to and from properties. The Lake Estes Trail, pedestrian sidewalks and property entrances may lead to safety concerns in some areas. The parking at the Lumpy Ridge and Gem Lake trallhead often fills during the weekend, leading to patrons parking along Devils Gulch Road. Special Considerations and Issues Key issues 1. With the recent water and sewer line completion to serve the Eagle Rock School, a large portion of the area is developable. 2. Numerous drainages can be found within the planning area, creating sensitive wildlife habitat. These areas should be preserved from development and "setback/no disturb areas" established. transit operations that serve others parts of the planning area. Roads Public Transportation/Transit Public transportation is offered along Big Thompson Avenue and a section of Dry Gulch Road by a public trolley. There are no public There are two highways in the southern portion of the planning area, each in the southern portion of the planning area. Highway 3. Abundant wildlife is found within the planning area, and design considerations should be given to maintaining and enhancing habitat, and minimizing disruption to migration routes. 4. Steep slopes exist within the planning area. Development should not be allowed to negatively impact the visual sensitivity of these areas. 5. Given that the majority of the planning area is in open meadow, it is very important to preserve existing native vegetation, and locate buildings to minimize disruption and intrusion. 6. Uses along US 34 range from stables to commercial lodging facilities and large undeveloped tracts. The image of Estes Park will be affected by the development along this highway corridor. Future development within the area should enhance the open quality of the area, and be visibly unobtrusive. 7. Development along US 34 has allowed continuous access points along the highway, creating potentially unsafe turning movements, and creating a visually unattractive street scene. North End Development Guidelines The guidelines listed below are unique to the North End and are intended to resolve or address the various issues of the North End which were identified throughout the future land use planning process. 1. Prepare a streetscape master plan for Highway 34 and provide for Pedestrian/Bike access. As properties along Highway 34 develop or redevelop, require construction of a Highway 34 streetscape with defined access points. o Provide for pedestrian/bike trails on Highway 34, Dry Gulch and Devils Gulch Roads. 2. Protect critical natural resource areas within the North End which may be adversely affected by future development. • The natural drainageway to the North End shall be protected by developing building setback and non-disturbance criteria. (e.g., 100' from centerline of drainageway) • That portion of MacGregor Ranch, on the east side of Dry Gulch Road, should be maintained as open space. • Development should allow for wildlife migration. Fences should reflect traditional construction and design (as evident in Stanley Heights) using natural materials. 3. Revise the Regulatory System to encourage low density, low Impact development in the North End. • Develop or update standards for domestic animal density. • Maintain the low density character of the North End. Annexations should occur through an annexation agreement between property owners and the Town. North End - Future Land Use Plan The North End Future Land Use Plan will generally consist of low-density residential classifications and parks, recreation and open space. Some commercial and accommodation uses are identified along US 34: within these areas, access control will be an important consideration in shaping future development. Natural features such as drainage ways should provide a framework for future development. In general, impact should be minimal within these areas and the definition of specific lots, building envelopes, and access should take the natural features into consideration. Eagle Rock School, the Storer Ranch. and the MacGregor Ranch Trust properties represent significant individual parcels within the planning area. Eagle Rock and The Reserve (portion of Storer ranch) have set aside significant open space. Cluster development patterns should be utilized to enhance open space opportunities. (Cluster development groups building sites on a parcel and preserves or leaves open the remaining land. The Concept allows for savings in development and service costs and for preservation of open Space.) On the Storer Ranch property, some limited commercial or accommodations development would be suitable along US 34. Ca Mountain x 8894 A4('4\4Y4/ g Az(' de0. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK .:;.". ->4?:':::'.. / Eagle _ _.....• . .._ . ____ — _ • , Rock j_ _ ._._ • i ,,,r-...-- .. --,..,-------__, ..,,..);: ...i. ____1'.." -.. , .,,,,• * i ;..• Yer';:',--"-Iii.'-• ' •• 'I -%. • .,:';,.' _ .••.---! id .71,: .6 -h 7 , .--„--'?,--. -; -. i ) Lumpy Ridge , \ - Li SAINT v W LAKE ESTES Downtown \ Ri roer Old Men Mountain l.. . MO • OM. Ng ea Mount Olympus 8808 so! Wiles Map 8.3: North End Planning Area Aziatifly p.irjo-. 114? lei T.4.410r. _ PPOLifUlIPM.d.T38 fo5d) -tro;114.c.) a.r z.CAFilk . - . C y r RIVINP Boundary MacGregor Ranch x _ •;! 0 r4goollb; _ . _ : Neighborhood P ans Carriage Hills/Marys Natural and Scenic Resources Topography The Carriage Hills/Marys Lake Planning Area is geographically the largest planning area within the Estes Valley. It can generally be described as a low central valley with rolling topography surrounded on the west, south and east by rugged, steep hillsides. Fish Creek flows from south to north through the center of the planning area. As the creek flows north, the topography becomes more rolling, and groves of aspen give way to intermittent stands of pine and open meadow. Rivers end Streams Marys Lake is the second largest body of water within the study area. The drainage below Marys Lake flows from west to east, draining into Fish Creek. This drainage forms the northern boundary of the study area. Rick Features There are open, rolling meadow areas around Marys Lake, interspersed with large rock formations, creating an unusual and spectacular landscape. The Crags and Twin Sisters are rugged rock outcroppings visible from most of the valley. On the eastern boundary of the planning area, The Finger is a very prominent rock outcrop. Kruger Rock is another prominent outcropping visible on the steep, heavily wooded mountainside to the east. Wildlife Wildlife is abundant within the entire planning area. The diverse topography and vegetation, combined with Fish Creek Drainage, create excellent wildlife habitat. Elk as well as deer can be found in the area on a year-round basis. During the summer months, the animals retreat to the higher elevations. Scenic Resources The entire planning area lies within one large viewshed„ The large, open valley floor. surrounded to the west, south and east with high ridges, clearly defines the limits of the viewshed. The different vegetation types create a high quality visual setting. The valley floor, with its open, rolling topography, meadow areas, and interesting rock outcroppings, creates a wide diversity in the landscape which adds interest Distant views to the major rock outcroppings and other points of visual interest further enhance the visual quality of the planning area. Existing Land Use The entire planning area lies outside the Town limits of Estes Park. All zoning regulations in the area currently fall under the authority of the Town of Estes Park through the Estes Valley Development Code. Since most of the area is outside the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County issues most of the building safety services (e.g. permits, inspections). RMNP recently acquired the area which forms the southwestern boundary of the planning area including Lily Lake. The southwestern and eastern boundary of the planning area is bordered by Forest Service property. Other uses include Marys Lake Lodge and a commercial campground adjacent to Marys Lake. Lily Lake and the new Lily Lake Visitors Center are part of RMNP. Cheley Camp is O The open meadows and wetlands between Fish Creek Road and Cheley Camp should be protected. • Require a minimum percentage of natural open space in all developments. m Encourage private and public efforts to promote conservation easements. e Review density limits with incentives offered for open space. Carriage Hills/Marys Lake - Future Land Use Plan This planning area provides a transition between the core commercial and residential portions of the community and rural development within the County. It includes a variety of steeper slopes and key visual resources. There are a number of water resources including Lily Lake, Marys Lake and associated drainageways. Development within the area should be sensitive to these resources and maintain the drainage corridors. Also found in this area are key recreation and visitor facilities, such as the Lily Lake Visitor Center for RMNP, and a number of potential trail connections to the community and the Park. The majority of this area is above the current water service elevation. As a result, there are only limited opportunities for small lot, affordable housing or accommodation uses. Marys Lake Lodge represents an innovative and affordable housing opportunity. This planning area is adjacent to Rocky Mountain National Park, Forest Service lands, and Bureau of Reclamation property. This combination of property ownership and the range of unique environmental and scenic resources help to support the use of this area as a transition from the more intensively developed portions of the Valley. Figure 8.9: Existing Classification Use Summary Within Carraige Hills/Marys Lake LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE 9% Agriculture 400 Bureau of Land Management 158 4% Church Land 9 <1% Commercial Unimproved or Unplatted 8 <1% Condo 10 <1% County Land <1 <1% Federal Land 77 2% Forest 611 14% Lodging 100 2% National Forest 39 1% National Park 683 15% Other 18 <1% Residential Unimproved or Unplatted 454 10% Single Family 1,712 39% Town Land 10 <1% Vacant 36 1% null 106 2% TOTAL 4,427 100% development within this area should Cheley Camp. Preservation of these preserve the visual integrity of the and other meadow areas will help to hillsides. maintain the character of the area. 19. Significant rock outcrops exist within the planning area, including The Finger, as well as Twin Sisters on the southern boundary. These outcrops are important scenic elements within the community. 20. Open meadow areas make up an important visual element, especially around Marys Lake Lodge and the meadow along the lower portion of development of the Lily Lake Visitors Center as well as in creation of trail links into the National Park from the east. Carriage Hills/Marys Lake Development Guidelines The neighborhood guidelines listed below are unique to the Marys Lake/Carriage Hills sub-area and are intended to address the various issues of the Marys Lake area which were identified throughout the future land use process. 1. Lighting should be kept to a minimum, and use cut-off fixtures. 2. Develop comprehensive wildlife preservation standards. 3. Identify site within the Marys Lake/ Carriage Hills area as affordable housing for future development. t Marys Lake Lodge is suitable for employee/affordable housing development. 4. Protect natural resource areas within the Marys Lake/Carriage Hills area which may be adversely affected or endangered by future development. The drainageway from Marys Lake to Fish Creek is an important wildlife habitat and should be protected. 5. The opportunity exists to connect the Lily Lake Visitors Center to the Fish Creek area and the Spur 66 area, via trail links. 6. Marys Lake Lodge is an historic building. Development within the immediate area should acknowledge the historic importance of the building. 7. The opportunity exists to work closely with the National Park Service in rewerm61.-41 7S- —4 11•.11•01 Lily Mountain F ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK uur esso To Allenspark 11.1111;. Pat I; 0;,-- sm;;••• Kruger Rock 9355 Mult -Farrlv RpsIcIental r.7 Giant Track Mountain x 9091 1, :.1-11119 '' , - 'is/ ----- ' 1--.11; , ..,.2 ' ‘• , f, . . • ..3 . ' . 1, .,•• .... 7.... 1 i''". .'"IFC: ' .. j' : : 1:‘. ,. ....•Y l• Ir.' :li • , . S .,.... rs:, ... .r, u.--- ------J Z? r :-.,...,... ' • o'—'' .7, .1 '1•''' 1) i .„ .1, '..1.--1_ . 7 '..`" (' ' ... 1.- .... N., —... i . •, _•,. .,,,-__- --,• , , . --3,1_ • *,,.., \„ _ ..,..,.;\ .......,, Cheley Camp x Lion Head x 9740 IRositiontzll NI ,^rrr- p1;,- ;Miles 0 Map 8.5: Carriage Hills/Marys Lake Planning Area ACCOrrOdatIOnS Commercial NM r- NMI Industrial r1r;.! :1 ?1-11 (—; • %.14112,1.:9A-fier4ae- 1P1b- rz. -4;X:r;'H Neighborhood Plans Spur 66 Natural and Scenic Resources Topography The topography within the Spur 66 neighborhood is a narrow river valley with steeply sloping hillsides, opening up to a wider river valley in the upper reaches of the planning area. The eastern boundary of the planning area is formed by a ridge line, and includes the top of Giantrack Mountain. It continues south to include Rams Horn Mountain and Teddy's Teeth. The southeastern corner of the area includes the ridge line of Lily Mountain. Rivers and Streams The Big Thompson River originates in the Rocky Mountain National Park, flows through the lower portion of the area and serves as the main drainage. Wind River also originates in the National Park, and flows north and east. A small tributary, Aspen Brook, flows into Wind River from the southeast. Wildtife Wildlife is abundant throughout the entire area. Deer, elk, bear, mountain lion, and beaver all frequent the area. With the National Park forming the west, south and a portion of the north boundary of the area, migration through the area is extensive. Viewsheds The topography in the area is unique and contributes to well-defined viewsheds. There are some limited views to the west into Rocky Mountain National Park. The Windcliff Estates area presents a strong visual intrusion from the upper areas of the planning area. Due to the steep topography and lack of vegetation, the extensive roadcuts and homes located on the hillside present a VVIldlife Is present around much of the planning area strong visual contrast to the surrounding area and are visible from within the National Park. Land Use Development is limited due to topographical constraints. Along the valley bottoms, adjacent to the waterways, there are accommodation uses, limited commercial establishments, and residential development. Single-family residential development occurs in the upper sections of the area. Windcliff Estates is located within the planning area, along with Thunder Mountain Estates. The most intensive land use within the planning area is YMCA of the Rockies. The facility is separated from the road and is only visible from limited locations along the roadway. The YMCA is an important economic component within the Estes Valley. The YMCA Master Plan was approved by the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners in 2007 and has since led to significant redevelopment. The plan focuses development in the core area, with an emphasis on pedestrian access. The Spur 66 area is bordered on the west and south by the National Park. Development immediately adjacent to Park boundaries can affect the quality of the Park. The National Park Service is taking an active role in planning outside its boundaries to ensure the quality of the quality of the Park is maintained. There is a camping facility at the end of Spur 66. The Spur 66 area borders National Park and is generally composed of low density residential development and accommodation uses. Accommodation uses are generally located along the roadway. Future development will need to be sensitive to the Big Thompson River. The Spur 66 area contains lands adjacent to the major entry to the Rocky Mountain National Park. The sensitive redevelopment of this area is important to promote a transition between the Park and the Valley. Special Considerations Redevelopment of some of the uses at the entrance of the planning area will visually improve visitors' and residents' images of the entire planning area. Key issues • Windcliff Estates presents a strong visual impact from the YMCA Camp and other areas. • The potential impacts of additional mountainside development on steep slopes, and development on forested and unforested areas, needs to be addressed. • Accommodations immediately adja- cent to the river are generally small scale and create an identity in the area. Future development should maintain and enhance the established character. • The vegetation along the roadways, drainageways, and hillsides is an im- portant visual asset within the area. Important trail connections can be developed between the Town of Estes Park and National Park. Specifically, connections may be developed at the historic entrance to the Park, and from the Lily Lake Visitors Center west into the Park. The Aspen Brook Trail is an important connection in the Estes Valley Trails System. This connection would provide a loop system through- out the Valley. Residential development along the Big Thompson River. WIndcliff neighborhood overlooking the Rocky Mountain National Park. o The visual character of the street scene at the entry to Spur 66 is viewed by many residents as a problem that must be addressed. • Continue to build a strong working re- lationship with National Park planners. Development Guidelines The following guidelines address the various issues and concerns of the Spur 66 area: • Prepare a streetscape plan for Spur 66. The entrance to the Spur needs to redevelop into more compatible uses with an appropriate streets- cape. o The Town of Estes Park should annex out to the YMCA. • Commercial uses should not be extended along the Spur. They should be contained within their existing locations. ▪ New accommodations should be residential in character. The riparian system in this planning area provides important wildlife habitat and needs protection. • Develop landscape and architectur- al design standards for Spur 66 that specify appropriate building materials, tg:s*.4411VAAkelArikotziro,th:Ptie • „ • :. Figure 8.10: Existing Land Use Summary Within Spur 66 Residential Districts RM Non-Residential Districts co null LAND USE TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Residential Multi-family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) 7 <1% Single Family: 10 acre min. (RE-1) 198 8% Single Family: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) 408 16% Single Family: 1 acre min. (E-1) 262 10% Single Family: 1/2 acre min. (E) 86 3% Single Family: 1/4 Acre min. (R) 0.1 <1% Non-Residential Accomodations (A) 1,117 44% Accomodations (A-1) 365 14% Commercial Outlying (CO) 28 1% null 46 2% TOTAL 2,516 100% colors, building height, massing, bulk, dards. Maintain the character of the Spur by setting buildings well back from the roadway. • Site design, architectural, fencing, and lighting standards are need- ed. Require that non-conforming uses within Spur 66 renovate or remove the use or structure. • A mechanism should be adopted which triggers property cleanup and maintenance. • The campground at the portal should not be expanded. Camp- grounds should be limited to the existing number. • Identify sites within Spur 66 that may be appropriate for future affordable housing development. The commercial campground at the Spur 66 Park entrance inter- section should evolve into hous- ing. • Protect and conserve unique and crit- ical natural resource areas within the Spur 66 area. Figure 8.11: Existing Classification Use Summary Within Spur 66 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Commercial Unimproved or Unplatted 1 <1% Church Land 64 3% Condo 15 1% Duplex/Triplex 2 <1% Lodging 76 3% National Forest 39 2% National Park 270 11% Office 1 <1% Other 34 1% Residential Unimproved or Unplatted 226 9% Single Family 796 32% Town Land 1 <1% Vacant 11 <1% Warehouse <1 <1% YMCA of the Rockies (partially exempt) 795 32% null 183 7% TOTAL 2516 100.0% '•,*:1114;icofitipi41:,u011:3;l.PhiP 0 IMiles 0 Map 8.6: Spur 66 Planning Area AtteatiorIations ,k'r elrnm!lAtinn.c. br,,,,,,rnr,!,,trynt: (A-1) industrial Commercial 1111 COMMereAl Commr4 ,ch4 nowntc-in icd3) Conmerc,,I1Honvy ,'!;Hi C.,)!4ir6 Single Family Renidental L. • ,T P.S1=.!+.1' iRE-V2 1111 2 ' '2 1111 iz,,esicjer.111 tr4 n7rP P+:,siclentai 1111 -R-00 ,t n• n. IR -2.) 36 Prospect Mountain x 8900 YMCA 771_ ViAndcliff Estates Emerald Mountain x 9239 Rams Horn ...112110rn 9555 Eagle Cliff Mountain x 8806 Thunder Mountain Estates Moraine Park x ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK Glacier Giant Track Mountain X 9091 to 1-e> --et • c-e,r ea,!fr BEAR k-W-E RD Neighborhood Plans Beaver Point Natural and Scenic Resources Topography The Beaver Point planning area is located southwest of downtown Estes Park. The topography of the area is generally flat along the Big Thompson River and gently rolling as the distance increases from the river. The southern boundary (Prospect Mountain) and northwest corner (Deer Ridge) are both extremely steep. Rivers and Streams The Big Thompson River runs from west to east, dividing the planning area into two areas of relatively equal size. The northern half of the planning area has a southern aspect, with the boundary to the north being Deer Ridge. The southern half of the planning area faces north to the Big Thompson River with a view of the Elm Road commercial area and Lumpy Ridge. Typical riparian vegetation, including cottonwood and willow, is found along the Big Thompson River. The north-facing slope of Prospect Mountain is heavily wooded, with clusters of pine found along Deer Ridge. Most of the area is open meadow, with dry land grasses found in the meadow areas. Rock Features Prospect Mountain is the dominant landmark within the planning area. There are small rock outcroppings located on Deer Ridge in the northwest corner of the planning area. As in all other planning areas, wildlife is abundant. Elk and deer migrate freely between the Park and the planning area. Wildlife is A rotatively now subdivision, Park River West, along Moraine Avenue. Industrial uses along Elm Road. If urces most notable on and close to the ridgefines along the northern and southern boundaries of the planning areas. Scenic Res The viewshed driving west on Highway 36 (Moraine Avenue) towards the Rocky Mountain National Park's primary entrance is important; a panoramic view of the Park meadowland forms the foreground with mountain peaks forming the background. The view is relatively open with pods of commercial and residential development along highway. Because this is the first impression of the National Park, degradation will impact the perception of the Park. The Beaver Point Planning Area is the main entrance to the Park. It is important to the future image of the Park, as well as the Valley, that future development within the planning area, and especially along the US 36 corridor, be in keeping with the natural setting of Estes Park. The importance of maintaining the integrity of this entrance to the Park cannot be overstated. Existing Land Use Resiffriential g Commercial A small portion of the planning area along US 36 is in the Town limits. The large majority of land is under the jurisdiction of Larimer County. A variety of land uses are found within the planning area. Highway commercial uses are located along US 36 from downtown to the Beaver Point intersection. Generally, once off the US 36 corridor, the area is predominantly composed of residential uses. The primary exception is the Elm Road area, which consists of Town/County/State vehicle maintenance shops, gravel mining, service commercial uses, the former landfill, and the transfer station and recycling center buildings. The mining operation and buildings are most noticeable from Marys Lake Road heading north into the planning area. Many of the single-family homes south of the Big Thompson River look directly across to this area. Cornpatibility There are two issues relating to compatibility within the Beaver Point Planning Area. The first concerns the industrial uses previously described. The industrial uses are immediately east of single family homes, creating conflict between these different uses; however, there is a significant grade change between the uses. Of greater concern is the visual compatibility of the industrial uses with the large number of homes that look across the Valley directly into the area. Screening could potentially mitigate the visual impacts. Undeveloped Land There are several large, undeveloped parcels within the planning area that could impact its existing character. One parcel is adjacent to US 36, on the south side. It is approximately one third of the way between the existing downtown and the Park entrance. The land is gently sloping, dropping gently from the highway to the Big Thompson River and is large enough to accommodate a wide variety of uses. The property is currently zoned commercial. Another area which could have a large impact on the character of the area lies directly north of US 36, across from the parcel previously described. The site rises gradually from the highway up to the top of Deer Ridge, and then drops gently to the downtown area, in the Fall River Road Planning Area. Any development here will significantly alter the open character of the area, thus impacting the "front door" to RMNP. The Beaver Point Planning Area is bordered on the west by the main entrance to RMNP. The importance of maintaining the integrity of this entrance to the Park cannot be overstated. Mobility The primary highway corridor within the planning area is US 36 which bisects the planning area east to west of the planning area U.S. 36 accesses downtown Estes Park. To the west, the highway splits, with Spur 66 accessing the YMCA of the Rockies and several residential areas before dead-ending. The northern road is the main entrance to RMNP. US 36 is an arterial through the planning area. Heavy traffic leaving the Park heading east into town occurs regularly in the afternoon during peak tourist season. Marys Lake Road serves as another arterial through the planning area. The local street system serves as a collector road within the planning area, providing access for the residential development south of US 36 and into the downtown area. Trails There are mixed trails within the planning area. There have been discussions of continuing the Riverwalk, located in the downtown area, west along the Big Thompson River to the entrance to the Park. Informal surveys of property owners along the river have indicated a strong desire not to allow public access along the river. Public Transportation/Transit Public transportation is offered along Marys Lake Road and Moraine Avenue by a public trolley. There are no public transit operations that serve others parts of the planning area. Roads For several years, a US 36/US 34 street connection has been discussed. The location for this street has been focused on the Elm Road area. Access control along US 36 is poor and undefined. The unlimited access creates a safety problem. Access The Beaver Point Planning Area is the main gateway to RMNP. It is important to the future image of the Park, as well as the town, that future development within the planning area, and especially along the US 36 corridor, be in keeping with the natural setting of Estes Park. Wbv Figure 8.12: Existing Land Use Summary Within Beaver Point Residential Districts RM Non-Residential Districts 0 LAND USE TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Residential Multi-family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) 26 1% Single Family: 10 acre min. (RE-1) 212 10% Single Family: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) 703 33% Single Family: 1 acre min. (E-1) 482 23% Single Family: 1/2 acre min. (E) 205 10% Single Family: 1/4 Acre min. (R) 2 <1% Single Family: 5,000 s.f. min. (R-1) 1 <1% Non-Residential Accomodations (A) 114 5% Accomodations (A-1) 140 7%., Commercial Outlying (CO) 65 3% Restricted Industrial (I-1) 76 4% Office (0) 2 <1% null 87 4% TOTAL 2,114 100% Figure 8.13: Existing Classification Use Summary Within Beaver Point LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES 21 PERCENTAGE 1% Agriculture Church Land 3 <1% Commercial 3 2% Commercial Unimproved or Unplatted 98 5% Condo 20 1% County Land 16 1% Forest 80 4% Lodging 80 4% Merchandising 9 <1% Multi-Family 1 <1% National Park 93 4% Office 2 <1% , _Other 22 1% Residential Unimproved or Unplatted 349 17% Single Family 1,145 54% Town Land 26 1% Vacant 33 2% Warehouse 29 1%_ null 56 3% TOTAL 2,114 100% are incompatible with the primary entrance to RMNP. area into RMNP. It is important that these views be maintained. 4. There are times when traffic congestion is severe between the National Park and downtown. 5. The Big Thompson River flows out of RMNP and through the planning area. A portion of the area is undeveloped, and provides the opportunity to utilize the river as a strong amenity. 6. Visually intrusive land uses exist along the Elm Road industrial area that degrade the view for visitors and residents traveling north and down Marys Lake Road towards Beaver Point. 7. The north side of Prospect Mountain consists of steep slopes which are visually prominent from most locations within the planning area. Development in this area would impact visual quality. Prospect Mountain is also a significant natural landmark within the entire Estes Valley. 8. Opportunities exist to create trail links along the Big Thompson River, over Deer Ridge to Fall River Road, to downtown, to the Park, and to the YMCA. Key Issues Introduction 1. It is essential to maintain a high quality entrance to RMNP. The main entrance to RMNP lies within the planning area. It is very important that this area remain as uncluttered as possible. Some of the land uses along the US 36 corridor 2. Several large, undeveloped parcels exist on both sides of US 36. If these are developed in inappropriate ways, they will have a significant impact on the entrance to RMNP. 3. There are currently expansive viewsheds from within the planning 9. Many developments along US 36 have uncontrolled access, creating unsafe and unsightly conditions. 10. Vehicular connections between US 34 and US 36 needs to be addressed. The Estes Park Aerial Tramway. 11. Streetscape plan for the US 36 corridor needs to be implemented. Beaver Point Development Guidelines The guidelines listed below are unique to the Beaver Point sub-area and are intended to address the various issues of Beaver Point which were identified throughout the future land use planning process. 1. Develop a Highway 36 streetscape plan and architectural standards. A streetscape program addressing landscaping and curb cuts, pedestrian and bike access, signage, lighting, and private development standards needs to be implemented from Crags Drive to Marys Lake Road. • A pedestrian/bike path system should be developed along Highway 36 to the Park entrance. • Piccadilly Square needs traffic control and a master plan for the area. • Development along Highway 36 should be low profile to protect the views to the Continental Divide. • Reduce sign clutter along Highway 36 and require monument signs. • As development/ redevelopment oc- cur, require highway frontage street- scape improvements (e.g., defined access points, landscaping.) • Prohibit metal buildings along High- way 36. • Develop bulk/plane regulations for Highway 36 in order to protect the panoramic views into Rocky Mountain National Park 2. Require that future development proposals within the Beaver Point area complement and reinforce the Future Land Use Plan. • Pockets of A-Accommodations in E-Estate districts should be elimi- nated, except where existing accom- modations are located. The area at the northeast corner of Marys Lake Road and Highway 36 needs to be cleaned up and redevel- oped into neighborhood commercial uses. Beaver Point Future Land Use Plan Beaver Point includes the main vehicular link from the center of the community to Rocky " iiritsw166.411111iP Mountain National Park Along this portion of Highway 36, sensitive redevelopment of existing commercial uses will be important. Redevelopment should provide defined access, streetscape improvements, landscaping, pedestrian/bike paths, and careful treatment of the Big Thompson River. The area contains industrial and gravel mining uses, the former landfill, governmental maintenance shops, and service commercial. Reclamation of the mining uses over time will be important, and it is likely that some of the reclaimed area may be utilized in the future for commercial and light industrial use. VklihtiltatiliaroikaA406 OWE ESins ELM! 7477 Ii Eagle Cliff Mountain 8806 /•- -136 laver Bmok .011•S R• MVP/. -MP Grant Track Mountain x 90.91 ci Singly= Family Ri.,sdontal 11111 P ( P 0 liniReswrier4.z1. 4 acre. rat I Miles -, 0 • —0Erls - • Residdniai Map 8.7: Beaver Point Planning Area Accomodations 1-ccorriSdPi,e-m5 (1-; 11111 LrrqMori•ifitins f4-1 , Industrial tial 1-1 MAR15 LAKE' ',ELE'g 8075 Commorr;a1 CO1nme2it-Th. nrvnhy,r, , C.:;ntirrr.rrin Heavy •• T. I Elm Road Industrial Area Prospect Mountain x 8900 PEAK 1,7,611, qR ESTES PARK PRIMARY CORRIDORS: 1) C07—From the Town limits to the intersection with US3 6 2) US34—From the Town limits to the US34/36 intersection 3) Elkhorn—From the US34/36 intersection to the Fall River/Wonderview intersection 4) Morraine—From the Elkhorn intersection to the Marys Lake intersection 5) Wonderview/Fall River—From the US34/36 intersection to the entrance to RMNP, which is a sensitive wildlife area 6) Spur 66—From the US36 intersection to the East Portal Purpose of Corridor Planning: To allow the Estes Valley Planning Commission better control the development/redevelopment throughout the Estes Valley. To manage new development/redevelopment in order to retain the "quaint mountain community" so important to a large percentage of Estes Park's residents. To provide Design Standards on new development/redevelopment in order to insure that a specific corridor retains its essential visual qualities. Purpose of Design Standards: To encourage high quality development/redevelopment. Emphasize Estes Park's unique mountain resort community character. Maintain quality of life for Estes Park's residents. Protect and enhance property values. Establish a clear and equitable set of parameters for land development/redevelopment. Minimize negative impact on the natural environment. Contribute to Estes Park's economic sustainability. Encourage a pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment. CHAPTER SIX—ACTION PLAN Recommended Actions are grouped into eight Policy Categories. Land Use— 1) Maintain adopted land use Classification system and development regulations for the Estes Valley as seen in the EVDC. 2) Maintain adopted land use performance standards which address development in varying environmental and locational settings that are reasonable and understandable. 3) Encourage commercial uses to be located within a compact, well-defined downtown business district. 4) Provide a pedestrian-friendly downtown environment. 5) Encourage outdoor public use spaces throughout the Estes Valley. 6) Larimer County and the Town of Estes Park must continue to be committed to working together to implement the Comprehensive Plan with honesty and respect for people and their rights. Natural and Scenic Resources-1) Maintain the quality of the Estes Valley's scenic and natural resources. 2) Protect the scenic character and visual quality of the gateway experience to the Estes Valley and Rocky Mountain National Park. 3) Protect Lake Estes. 4) Encourage preserving an open space network through land acquisition, development agreements and conservation easements. 5) Ensure that new development/redevelopment minimizes the impact to visual and environmental quality within the Estes Valley. a. Avoid development on ridgelines. b. Development on steep slopes must meet set standards. c. Protect existing vegetation by minimizing disturbance. d. Minimize development impact within riparian areas, wetlands, and floodplains. 6) Encourage the protection of native wildlife corridors and vegetation habitats. 7) Work to reduce the threat of wildfires through the development of a wildfire mitigation plan. 8) Encourage sensible trail connections and linkages. Community Design— The purpose of undertaking architectural and design standards in order to achieve development which protects and compliments the high quality of the natural environment. 1) Locate and design buildings to fit the land and blend into their surroundings to the maximum extent feasible. a. Building materials and colors, such as wood and stone, should blend in with the native landscape. b. Avoid removal of trees on slopes and ridgelines except as required for wildfire protection. 2) Utilize plant materials that are indigenous to the Estes Valley and soften the visual impact of Housing— 1) Encourage a variety of housing types and price ranges. 2) Establish a balanced program of incentives, and private and public actions to provide attainable housing. a. Support the creation of public and private funding for attainable housing. 3) Encourage re-development of existing substandard areas. 4) Provide opportunities for mixed-use development integrating commercial, housing, employment and service needs. Economics— 1) Maintain a workable blend of businesses, residents, and guests without negatively affecting the natural beauty of the Estes Valley. 2) Develop eco-tourism, which relies on the high quality physical setting and a minimal impact on the environment. 3) Sustain existing tourism with marketing programs. 4) Encourage environmentally clean economic development that is compatible with adjacent land uses, community values and the natural environment. 5) Build on the strength of the growing retirement community of the Estes Valley. Mobility and Circulation— I) Encourage a comprehensive and balanced transportation system for the Estes Valley a. Establish a transportation system between the Estes Valley and Longmont, Loveland, Boulder, etc. 2) Encourage adequate parking for both residents and visitors. 3) Create a comprehensive trail system throughout the Estes Valley. 4) Encourage alternative modes of transportation. a. Include year-round shuttle system. 5) Rocky Mountain National Park continues its shuttle system throughout the Park and between the Park and the Town. Public Safety— 1) Emergency Preparedness 2) Crime Prevention 3) Fire Prevention a. Both structural and wildfires 4) Potential Flooding Hazards 5) Snow and Ice Removal 6) Hazardous Waste—sewer and landfill— sites 7) Need for Improving or Expanding Social Service Programs 8) Unsafe Pedestrian Crossings Growth Management— The future land use plan is intended to enhance and preserve the natural beauty of the Estes Valley, ensure that critical open space is maintained as development occurs and that population growth and commercial development proceed at manageable rates. 1) Encourage infill of older core areas in order to reduce infrastructure costs and to stabilize residential neighborhoods. 2) Avoid non-contiguous, scattered development throughout the Valley. Intergovernmental Coordination— A Comprehensive Plan can exist only if there is complete cooperation between Larimer County and the Town of Estes Park. 1) To maintain a joint Planning Commission—The Estes Valley Planning Commission. 2) To maintain a uniform set of development regulations and standards for the Estes Valley. 3) To work together to implement the Comprehensive Plan. 4) Maintain a joint partnership between the Town of Estes Park, the Estes Valley Recreation and Park District, Larimer County. Rocky Mountain National Park and other local, state and federal agencies in order to promote integrated planning which meets the goals of the various entities and creates a model for natural resource preservation, tourism, and sustainable communities. Dollar General — 451 Stanley Ave. Development Plan Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 230, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org LT ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE & LOCATION: March 21, 2017, 1:30PM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: Approval of Development Plan for the construction of a 9,100 square foot retail building Staff recommends approval of the proposed Development Plan PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) and Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan; and 2. Approve/Deny the proposed Development Plan LOCATION: 451 Stanley Ave., within the Town of Estes Park VINICTY MAP: See attachment OWNER/APPLICANT: Timberline Corner, LLC/ Devan Pharis, Vaquero Ventures STAFF CONTACT: Audem Gonzales, Planner II PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Present Situation: 451 Stanley Ave. (NW corner of Stanley Ave. and St. Vrain Ave.) is currently undeveloped. The property had a motel/accommodations use years ago but it was later demolished. The lot currently contains mature trees on the north half of the lot. There is a sidewalk along St. Vrain Ave. but no sidewalk along Stanley Ave. Access onto the property was once shared by a gravel driveway between Cousin Pat's Bar & Grill and the subject property. The north portion of the site contains an unpaved parking area. Proposal: The proposal entails developing the lot with a commercial retail building (Dollar General). The store would be about 9,100 square feet, with a 30- space parking lot. If approved, the building will access existing public utility lines. The building will be located along south and west property line, with a stormwater basin located at the north between the building and the highway. Parking will be located to the east of the building between the building and Saint Vrain Ave. and Stanley Ave., with the service area north of the building. The trash enclosure will be located north of the building along the north property line. It will be screened and animal-resistant. The site will provide stormwater management techniques that will filter stormwater before it leaves the site. Stormwater management is discussed in more detail below. The site will be landscaped and ADA compliant. The site will also provide a sidewalk connection on Stanley Ave., and increase vehicular safety by providing access to the site off Stanley Ave vs. Saint Vrain Ave. The building facade will be split face concrete masonry and wood siding, with colors that comply with design policies set forth in the comprehensive plan. The project was approved for a Variance request on March 7, 2017. The Board of Adjustment approved a requested Variance to the driveway entrance width to be 42.04' in lieu of the 30' maximum allowed. SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: April Hock, W-Design Associates, Inc. Parcel Number: 2530357002 Development Area: Approx. 1.161-acres Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use: Retail Establishment Zoning Designation: CO Commercial Outlying Adjacent Zoning: East: CO Commercial Outlying North: CO Commercial Outlying West: CO Commercial Outlying South: RM Multifamily Adjacent Land Uses: East: Commercial North: Commercial West: Residential multifamily and single family South: Residential multifamily and single family Services: Water: Town of Estes Park Sewer: Estes Park Sanitation District Review Criteria. 1. Development Plan: §3.8.D Development Plan Standards for Review requires the staff and EVPC to review the development plan application and all submitted plans and reports, and evaluate them according to the following standards: • The development plan shall comply with all applicable standards set forth in the EVDC; and, • The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. .1Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Dollar General Development Plan Page 2 of 6 2. Minor Modification: §3.7.A.2.a: Staff may grant modifications to the development code, provided that Staff finds that such modification advances the goals and purposes of the development code, and either results in less visual impact or more effective environmental or open space preservation, or relieves practical difficulties in developing a site. REVIEW CRITERIA: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issue relevant to any particular project. 1. Tree and Vegetation Protection. 14 mature trees are proposed to be removed with this project. The applicant has provided a landscape plan that incorporates the replacement of these trees. 2. Landscaping. The applicant has provided more landscaping than is required for this type of project. The landscape buffers have been increased by adding more trees and shrubs. No district buffer is require between this property and properties to the west because both are Commercial zoned. The applicant has provided shrubs and trees at this location. All landscaping shall be irrigated. 3. Public Trails/Sidewalks. A 5 foot wide sidewalk is proposed with this project to be located along Stanley Ave. and will tie into the sidewalk along St. Saint Vrain Ave. The sidewalk will be located within public ROW and will not require any easement on the property. 4. Water. Existing water taps are proposed to be abandoned with a new tap proposed to be installed for the project. 5. Fire Protection. The Estes Valley Fire Protection District has reviewed this proposal and has no comments/concerns. The existing fire hydrant is proposed to be located as it is currently located where the main drive entrance is proposed. 6. Electric. Multiple existing power poles are proposed to be relocated. An additional pole is proposed to be placed on the northwest portion of the property. 7. Sanitary Sewer. A new 4" service line is proposed to connect to the main running along South Saint Vrain Ave. 8. Stormwater Drainage. The on-site storm flow is currently handled as sheet flow over the project area. The site flows to the lowest point of the site, the north corner, and then flows into the roadside drainage system for S. Saint Vrain Ave. This proposal calls for installing a detention pond at the north corner. Multiple storm water inlets and piping will capture on-site flow and relay it into the detention pond. It will then be released at historic flow levels into the S. Saint Vrain Ave. stormwater system. 9. Parking. EVDC requires 1 parking space for every 200 square feet of retail area. This retail parking ratio is outdated with contemporary retail parking Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Page 3 of 6 Dollar General Development Plan demand. Under EVDC regulations, this project requires 45 parking spaces. The applicant has provided a letter from the Dollar General Corporation stating their need for only 30 spaces per a refined design process including over 12,000 stores in productive operation. This process includes peak customer flow rates and Christmas customer levels. The EVDC gives Staff the ability to approve an alternative parking proposal. Staff has approved the site for 30-spaces. 10. Access. Access to the undeveloped site is currently from two points. There is an existing gravel entrance for Cousin Pat's Bar & Grill that was once shared by the subject property. The applicant stated this is the State Highway permitted access point. There is also a curb cut located within 50 feet from the Stanley Ave. St. Vrain intersection. CDOT has commented several times that access is recommended and preferred to be from Stanley Avenue at a safe distance from the intersection. The detention pond location is at the north of the property, the lowest portion of the site, so improving the access point at this location is not practical or feasible. Granting another access point from St. Vrain is not an option per CDOT's comments and would not be allowed per EVDC driveway spacing provisions. The existing curb cut on St. Vrain is not permitted by CDOT nor is it allowed by the EVDC. It cannot be used, and the plan does not show it being used for access. Proposed access from Stanley Avenue is Code compliant and the preferred location by CDOT. The driveway entrance is located -277 feet from the intersection of Stanley Ave. and St. Vrain, which makes it in compliance with the EVDC. The applicant has also located the driveway directly across from an existing driveway. Again, this is compliant with the EVDC. The proposed driveway shall comply with all MUTCD standards. 11. Public Right-Of-Way. There is no dedication of public right-of-way associated with this Development Plan. 12. Comprehensive Plan. The site is located within the Fish Creek/Little Prospect Mountain planning area, which anticipates a wide-range of land uses, including the South Saint Vrain Ave. commercial corridor. There are no identified issues that affect this property. Community-Wide Policies. Staff has evaluated the proposed development for compliance with Community-Wide Policies set forth in Chapter Six of the comprehensive plan, including Community Design policies: • The natural colors of wood and stone are most desirable for building exteriors. • Facades should be broken up with windows, doors or other architectural features to provide visual relief. Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Dollar General Development Plan • Avoid use of metal siding along highway entries. 13. Minor Modification. Staff has approved two Minor Modification requests associated with this project. The first being from EVDC 7.2.6.2.b which states: Original grade may be raised or lowered a maximum of twelve (12) feet if a retaining wall or terracing is used. The proposal entails raising the original grade 13.01' above original grade. This increase represents less than a 10% deviation from Code standards, therefore it is a Staff level Minor Modification. The second approved request is from EVDC 7.11.N.2.b which states: A loading area shall not be located in a required setback. The request entails locating the loading area 1.5 feet into the required 15 foot side setback. This request represents 10% or less of a deviation from Code standards. The proposed modifications will relieve a practical difficulty in developing the site, specifically regarding the slope of the site and utilizing retaining walls to alleviate steep man made slopes. Also, it relieves a practical difficulty with the odd shape of the site and having to locate the loading area on the side of the building. REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: This application has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff. PUBLIC COMMENTS: In accordance with the notice requirements in the Estes Valley Development Code, legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail- Gazette. Typical mailings include a 500-foot radius. As of March 14, 2017, one formal written comment have been received for this application package. All written comments are posted to www.estes.orc/currentapplications. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The development plan complies with the goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. Community Design policies). 2. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making Body for the Development Plan. 3. Adequate public facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were 5. The development plan complies with applicable standards set forth in the EVDC. RECOMMENDATION: Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Page 5 of 6 Dollar General Development Plan Staff recommends CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the proposed Development with the following conditions: 1. Provide cost estimates and full design details for the sidewalk. Financial security shall be provided for the sidewalk before any building/grading permit is issued for the property. SAMPLE MOTIONS: 1. I find the application substantially meets the criteria in the EVDC, and move to APPROVE the "Dollar General Development Plan" according to findings of fact and conclusions of law, with findings and conditions recommended by Staff. 2. I find the application substantially meets the criteria in the EVDC, and move to APPROVE the "Dollar General Development Plan" according to findings of fact and conclusions of law, with findings recommended by Staff. 3. I find the application has not provided sufficient information to review per the criteria in the EVDC and move to CONTINUE the Development Plan application to the next regularly scheduled meeting. 4. I find the application does not substantially meet the criteria in the EVDC and move to DENY the Development Plan application. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. Development Plan Set 5. Colored Building Elevations 1 A Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Page 6 of 6 ? Dollar General Development Plan Project Name: Project Description: 455 S. Saint Vrain Ave. Dollar General Development Plan Town of Estes Park Community Development Owner/Applicant: CD Investments, LLC I Vaquero Ventures 1 in = 125 ft 1=111=1•=1 60 120 Feet S ESTES PARK Vicinity Map COLORADO Printed: 3/15/2017 Created By: Audem Gonzales A TOWN OF ESTES PARIc_ L [..143 >,`f<); :t Community Development Fre e :o Kevin Ash, PE, Public Works Engineering Manager Greg Muhonen, PE, Director of Public Works 0 atie December 29, 2016 Dollar General Development Plan — Review Phase Public Works offers the following comments and conditions on the Dollar General - Development Plan application as submitted: Transportation: 1. Condition: ADA compliant pedestrian walkway along the south side of the property that connects to adjacent existing public walkways and facilities should be identified. Type and size of walkway and direction arrows to where they extend should be identified. Access ramps, crosswalks and signage should be shown. 2. Condition: Show existing and proposed striping on Stanley Avenue and Saint Vrain Avenue (State Highway 7). 3. Condition: Driveway spacing from an arterial roadway (Hwy 7) is required to be 250' or greater. Compliance with this distance along Stanley Avenue should be identified on the plan. 4. Condition: Non-residential driveway openings shall not exceed 30' in width at the street line. 5. Condition: The driveway grade within 20' of Stanley Avenue shall not exceed 4%. This compliance should be identified on the plan. 6. Condition: Adjacent property access points and access driveway locations for properties across Stanley Avenue should be shown for a distance of 500'. Driveway access entry from Dollar General on public right-of-way should be shown to align with a driveway access on the opposite side of Stanley Avenue. 7. Comment: Site location is within 1/4 mile of State Highway 7 arterial. CDOT's evaluation is that Dollar General stores do not create a significant traffic impact and that the existing auxiliary lanes are adequate. 8. Condition: Final construction plans will need to be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to installation of any transportation related infrastructure. Drainage & Grading: 1. Condition: Add a note: All on-site drainage infrastructure will be privately owned and maintained. 2. Condition: Identify 10' drainage easement as existing or proposed. The type of drainage infrastructure in this easement should be identified on the grading plan and utility plan. 3. Condition: Footing over-excavation should not extend into 10' drainage easement. Further evaluation on location of existing drainage infrastructure may be needed to confirm any future maintenance will not impact the building foundation. Options of relocating drainage infrastructure or widening of the easement may be necessary. 4. Condition: Height and type of retaining wall should be provided. 5. Condition: Final construction plans will need to be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to installation of any drainage or grading infrastructure. Drainage Study, W Design Associates, October, 2016 6. Condition: Drainage report must be compliant with Larimer County Standards (Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals). This should be identified in the report and all calculations compliant with these standards. 7. Condition: Roof drainage downspouts will surface drain to Hwy 7. This is a change in the historical drainage pattern from sheet flow to consolidated runoff and will be more erosive. Impacts from this change must be mitigated and shown to not create a hazard to the downstream walk along Hwy 7. Directing this roof runoff into the underground detention structure would be preferred (if feasible). 8. Comment: Detention is proposed to be underground storage, privately owned and maintained. 12/29/2016 Town of Estes Park Mail - Re: DRAFT - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT: Dollar General DP 2016-08 - Lot 31A, Arnd Plat of Lots 32,33,34,35 & portions ... Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes.org> Re: DRAFT REFERRAL FOR COMMEWT: Dollar General DP 2016-08 - Lot 31A, Amd Plat of Lots 32,33,34,35 & portions of Lots 1,31 & 37, White Meadow View Place 1 message Steven Rusch <srusch@estes.org> Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:35 AM To: Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes.org> 1) Need to abandon both existing water taps (Note on plan) 2) Backflow required for all commercial, irrigation and fire suppression 3) Water service size can be determined more specifically once we have a fixture count for the building Steve Rusch Utilities Coordinator Town of Estes Park 170 MacGregor Ave. Suite 140 PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970)577-3625 Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Karen Thompson <kthompson@estes.org> wrote: TO REVIEWING AGENCIES The Town of Estes Park Community Development Department has accepted the below referenced development application(s) as complete for review, i.e. minimal submittal requirements have been met and the application is ready for review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code. PROJECT NAME, TYPE, & LOCATION Name: Dollar General Type: Development Plan 2016-08 Address: TBD Stanley Avenue Legal: Lot 31A, Amended Plat of Lots 32-35, and portions of Lots 1, 31, & 37, White Meadow View Place; Less 2000032927 Project details can be found in the Statement of intent & Application Additional pages were submitted for civil plans & the building permit. Development plan pages are: T1, C-1, C-5, C-7, C-8, C-9, C-11, C-15, Al, A2, ES1, ES2 COMMENTS DUE ON OR BEFORE 5 P.M. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2016 httos Jim ai I .googl e.com /m ai 1/u/0/7ui.2&i k= c0a7e0f533&vi ew = pt&q= doll ar %20gener a t&qs = true&search=query&th=158f8d361db2bce98s m I= 158f8d361db2bce9 1/2 12/2912016 Town of Estes Park Mad - Re: DRAFT - REFERRAL FOR COMMENT: Do',Iar Gerwa! DP 2016-08 - 31A, Amd Piet of Lois 32,33,34,35 & polcm EMAIL COMMENTS TO Property Owner: Timberline Corner LLC epcotn@aol.com Applicant: Vaquero Ventures c/o Devan dpharis@vaqueroventures.com Consultant/Engineer(s): W Design Associates, Inc. c/o april Hock april@wdesignea.com Planners: Audem Gonzales agonzales@estes.org Email addresses can also be found in the email distribution list above. APPLICATION DOCUMENTS Documents are attached. Please let me know if you want a hard copy. EXTENSIONS OF TIMEFRAMES FOR REVIEW In certain circumstances, review agencies can request additional time to review an application and the public hearing(s) may be delayed. For questions about this please contact the planner. Karen Thompson Executive Assistant Community Development Department Town of Estes Park Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 kthompson@estes.org https://mail.google.com/mailiu/0/?ui=2&ik.c0a7e01533&view=pt&q.dollar%20general&qs=tue&search=query8th=158f8d361d0heYA% sim1=15818d361db2bce9 212 EV Is7 ESTES VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 5"rrS:;itg ti ic,sid<7 as ond4hito,...y II f'...11's I 'e.ti/ev st.Ith ...Sujje7i0 Ftfrc,Ind Safety SE.1171 FLAW REVIEW COMMENTS Date: November 21, 2016 Project Identification: Dollar General Location: TBD Stanley Ave. Referral: Dollar General Development Plan 2016-08 The Estes Valley Fire Protection District has reviewed the submitted material describing the proposed project referenced above, and approves those plans contingent on compliance with the following requirements (conditions of approval): Revised plans and written responses addressing the items below shall be included with the 1 submitted construction plans. 1. Show all fire apparatus access roads utilizing a B40-R template throughout the site. All fire access roads shall have a standard turning radius of 25ft. inside and 50ft. outside throughout the site (right hand and left hand turns). Please contact me before resubmitting. 2. Per IFC Section 503.2.1 fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet. 3. Fire apparatus access roads shall be permanently signed and / or marked "No PARKING FIRE LANE" in accordance with municipal sign/traffic standards. A, Access roads less than 26 feet wide shall be marked as fire lanes on both sides of the road. B. Access roads at least 26 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide shall have at least one side of the road marked as a fire lane. C. Access roads at least 32 feet wide need not have fire lane markings. All construction and processes shall be in accordance with the provisions of the International Fire Code (2015 Edition), the International Building Code (2015 Edition) and Town of Estes Park Code and Standards. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve any aspect of this project that does not strictly comply with all applicable codes and standards. Any change made to the plans will require additional review and comments by the Estes Valley Fire Protection District. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Marc W. Robinson Fire Marshal 970-577-3689 mrobinsonAestesvalleyfire,orq 901 W. Saint Elvin Avenue Estes Part, CO 80517 P-970-577-0900 F-970-577-0923 12/29/2016 Town of Estes Park Mail - RE: Dollar General Development Plan l h r F Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes,org> RE: Dollar General Development Plan 1 message James Duel! <jduell@estesparksanitation.org> To: Audem Gonzales <agonzaies@estes.org> Cc: 'Thomas, Chris" <cthornas@estesparksanitation.org> Wed, Nov 2, 2016 al 10:16 AM Hello Audem, As per review of the development plan for the proposed Dollar General Store at 445 Stanley Avenue the Estes Park Sanitation District has the following comments: 1. The development plans submitted to us and dated 10/26/16 has adequately addressed our concerns and requirements for sewer service. 2. The Site Utility Plan (C-8) references their desire to use the existing service line that provided sewer service to an earlier development on that parcel. The District will allow that as long as that service line is shown to be in GOOD operating condition. This requirement is also referenced on C-8. District personnel must be present when the existing service line is televised. If the development desires the District can televise the service line, but our standard rates for televising service lines will apply ($200 for most applications ). Either way, please allow 48 hours advance notice for this procedure. If the line is shown to be substandard, then a new service line will be required. 3. The lot does not have an existing paid tap. System development fees will required. 4. Ron Duell (970) 481-1458 or Chris Thomas (970) 481-3494 will be the District contacts for all sewer service line questions and/ or inspections. Thank you — James Duell D James Duell, District Manager Estes Park Sanitation District (970) 506-2866 https.//mail.google.com/rnail/u/ORti=2&ik=c0a7e0f5338‘viewg--pt&cpdollar%20general&qs=true&search=query&th=15825d346e80dc131&siml=15825c1346e8Odd31 112 12/29/2016 Town of Estes Park Mail - Development Plan 2016-08+Dollar General Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes.org~ Development Plan 2016-08/Dollar General 1 message Hice-Idler - COOT, Gloria <gloria.hice-idler@state.co.us> Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:42 AM To: Audem Gonzales <agonzales@estes.org> Audem, Since access for this development is off of Stanley Avenue, our concerns would be with the SH 7/Stanley Avenue intersection. Our experience with Dollar General stores has been that they do not create a significant traffic impact so it's my opinion that the existing auxiliary lanes on SH 7 can adequately accommodate this proposal. CDOT has no further comment. Gloria Hice-Idler Region 4 Permits Manager Region 4 Permits Unit - Traffic P 970.350.2148 I C 970.381.2475 I F 970.350.2198 10601 W. 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80634 gloria.hice-idter@state.co.us I www.codot.gov I www.cotrip.org Ell I L I lairr https.//mai I .google.corn/mail/u/0/?iii=28,ik=c0a7e0f533&view= lar%20general&qs=true&search=query&th= 1586e72a160574dasim1=1586972cd60574de 1/1 To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: David W. Shirk, MUP, AICP Date: February 21, 2017 RE: Dollar General development plan and minor modifications Dear Commissioner- I am writing this letter to you as a private citizen at the eleventh hour regarding the proposed development plan for Dollar General on S. St. Vrain Avenue. My preference would be to attend today's meeting, but I became aware of this proposal only yesterday and have a previous business engagement to attend to. I would like to offer a few thoughts for your consideration on this matter: 1. This building will outlive the Dollar General store. Please consider the long-term impact of having a generic 'small box' store located on one of the primary entrances into town. 2. The application includes a variance request to orient the front of the building away from the highway. The purpose of that requirement is to maintain the current pattern of having buildings front the street. An underlying purpose is to ensure the rear of buildings are not facing the street. The application does not appear to offer any concessions regarding architecture in return for this variance request. 3. Please consider the prohibition against long blank walls e.g. the rear of the building facing S. St. Vrain. 4. Please consider the design guidelines outlined in the Comprehensive Plan regarding preferred materials. The proposed building is a metal building, which violates our design guidelines. 5. Please consider the building color. 6. Please consider the design guideline that prohibits corporate architecture. At the very least, require a store design that will fit into the character of Estes Park. The 0-Reilly Autoparts, while not the most beautiful building, can provide a prototype. 7. Please consider the visual impact of the requested modification to build a 14-foot tall retaining wall facing S. St. Vrain. At a minimum, ensure the wall includes planting pockets as required by the landscaping code. 8. Please consider the impact of the exceptionally wide driveway entrance on pedestrians, Have turning templates been submitted to ensure truck traffic will not impact Stanley Ave? Thank you for your consideration. David W. Shirk, MUP, AICP This ..... Or something like this.... DOLLAR GENERAL Dollar General Corporation 100 Mission Ridge Goodlettsville, TN 37072 June 2, 2016 Town Hall Room 100 170 MacGregor Ave. P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Parking requirements at the proposed Dollar General location in Estes Park, CO. Mr. Kevin Ash, Through the years Dollar General has been in the process of refining the design criteria for new store development. With over 12,000 stores in productive operation, we have gathered a significant amount of data. One area in which we are balanced between development cost and customer need is in the area of parking requirement and accessibility for our build-to-suit locations. Our stores average around 15-20 transactions per hour. We have estimated and confirmed that 30 spaces would accommodate the customer flow rate that our business generates. This standard has been sufficient for even the traffic generated at the peak Christmas season levels. Thanks for the inquiry and feel free to contact me with any other questions you may have. Best regards, Baron T. Bentley A & E Plan Coordinator - Western Region AZ, CA, CO, IA, KS, MN, ND NE, NM, NV, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT Email: bbentlev(Fidollargeneral.com Phone: 615-855-4895 November 8, 2016 Karen Thompson Town of Estes Park Community Development 170 MacGregor Ave. Rm. 210 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Statement of Intent for Development Plan Karen Thompson, Construction of a new Dollar General store is being planned for the property located at 4S5 S. Saint Vrain Ave, which is located at the NWC of S. Saint Vrain and Stanley Ave. The property is currently vacant and is commercially zoned. Site improvements include 30 parking spaces, landscaping, a 9,100 square-foot building, and storm water management. Dollar General with lease the building from Vaquero Estes Park Partners, LP of Fort Worth, Texas, and will be in the business of selling general household items to the public. Operating hours for the store will be Sunday-Monday from 8AM-10PM. Dollar General will employ approximately 10-12 people and will have 2-S employees in the store at all times. Dollar General expects to have 1-10 customers in the store at any given time. Exterior sales/display will only occur if permitted to do so. A truck will make deliveries to the store 1-2 times per week and will use the delivery door located on the West side of the building. Vaquero Ventures and Dollar General look forward to working with the Town of Estes Park, and will go above and beyond to ensure that a quality development is delivered, and that the property will be well maintained and operated for many years to come, Devan Pharis Vaquero Ventures 3211 W. 4th Street Fort Worth, TX 76107 1"-Town Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service Yes 17"—No Are there wetlands on the site? K.- Yes r No • Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? - )-ip.r-a ^ Via itiftairVitr • W`' • • In, 1Li /,Lig) EST VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION • • • Special Review Rezoning Petition Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat • Condominium Map I Preliminary Map Final Map Supplemental Map 4i,Cato -741' VOS7 Project Description Project Address Legal Description I 7' IAderf. "4 el e 4k 7'2 n 1 ,d .rd.e,35 ip iti ) Project Name ji.„-e-ce ft Ae 6 94.0/1 oratsiej 4“.0.1001c0. Parcel ID # kikorivittor• Lot Size 1./4 / Acres I 3183 Area of Disturbance in Acres I. /t1 Submittal Date: ,z)f ApPircN1Or -i-"Development Plan Boundary Line Adjustment ROW or Easement Vacation Street Name Change Time Extension Other: Please specify Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service r Xcel Existing Zoning C A periAic rc I 7 Well r None r Other (specify) 17 Well r None r Other (specify) UTSD 7-EPSD UTSO F Yes Other 1 None Proposed Zoning Lei....N.p?...42.-'c , A I Site Access (if not on public street) Primary Contact Person is r Owner rApplicant r Consultant/Engineer • ,"r•-.TY1A7VAMINditifftt1401314F4tf.S.:. •-• r Application fee V. Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to i;...§fatement of intent planning@estes_org r, 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan r ii" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional in(ormation. Town of Estes Park •••f• P.O. Box 1200 4, 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Pork. CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 -5. Fax: (970) 586-0249 -5, www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Revised 2013.08.27 KT Name of Primary Contact Person ectott" Complete Mailing Address 3,D 1k v-) • t-0'14-' Sir • PI' Lis) 6 1-1•N) Yt ?Tk I z A-4,./ 5, Septic I None • Septic Email rAy61,x,E &_' Applicant es, Cell Phone Fax Email deRh‘.....", St:R.16.9 iArPT4 ts kot r . (0 'A or Date to /2'74 hp _ . . :(,::re,ffigliiji IA631' 3?.:14 - • : I ; . I Record Owner(s) (t4^./. 4. ALL- A 6 Ac-c ti j2 r Mailing Address '32 5- 47,,, h e /Ape S 7 47/70. Phone Cell Phone Fax Mailing Address 3..2 „cr.'. 1/-1 0,- r 64, rk 1776 to J'9- Phone 6,64 ar6 4 A.-6‹ 3 r4( Mailing Address PO.. 5 ci , 2 eq./ ilAro 9'00 / Phone (Fair) 7q5-- - 2 3'170 Cell Phone (PO 7Y6 4/-723 Fax_ Email aer,',/ t-ide, . co .' Revised 20? 3.08.27 KJ , • ; Consuitant/Englneer APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: vorw.estes.orcyComDeviScnedules&FeftiPlannincApniicationFeeScPedule ;Ai Ali requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal, MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT; 4 4 kt Applicant PLEA RiNT. es., 4,4 A 5 Signatures: Record Owner Applicant Date /0 -3/-it- APPLICANT CERT IF ICA f4°Phc t I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to my knowledge and that in Mina the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. Signatures: Record Owner Applicant Date /6) -31-A, Date la /iv 91/4 Names: Record Owner PLEAsEPRiNT: b e 4 her - In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that. prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provicionc governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at I., I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC f,b I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. • I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged it my application is incomplete. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. ro• I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. • I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of en application that has become null and void. ReOsed 20; 3,08.27 KT Dollar Gene 100 feet.xls Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip HOUSER CHERI M/FREDERICK R PALLISSARD ANITA J/MARK R 250 VIRGINIA DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 ESTES PARK LUMBER COMPANY 9101 HARLAN ST STE 300 WESTMINSTER CO 80031 PHELAN HERBERT J/LUCY S 507 COLUMBINE AVE ESTES PARK CO 80517 BLUE SKY III LLC 10047 ALLISON CT BROOMFIELD CO 80021 VERUS COMMERCIAL INC PO BOX 2128 ESTES PARK CO 80517 FERGUS JOHN DISTACIE D 452 STANLEY AVE ESTES PARK CO 80517 HAACK CALLA FERRARI & GRAHAM COLLEEN S 1661 OLYMPIAN LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 COSTON THEODORE J 2288 BUCKINGHAM CIR LOVELAND CO 80538 TIMBERLINE CORNER LLC 325 DUNES BLVD APT 201 NAPLES FL 34110 NOWAK/POYNTER LLC 2528 STANFORD RD FORT COLLINS CO 80525 MCADOW SCOTT W 12618 BALDWIN SPRINGS CT TOMBALL TX 77377 VAQUERO ESTES PARK PARTNERS LP 3211 W 4TH ST FORT WORTH TX 76107 Page 1 Tn DOLLAR GENERAL 11 • , LP BY. VAQUERO VENTURES MANAODAENT, LLC BY: BRIAN C IVIWAMS CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE OWNERS, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN THE APPUCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN RENEW FILED HERE TH, AND AS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN SHALL BE SU CT TO THE P VIS/ONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUMCIPAL CODE OF THE OF ESTE' If, COLORADO AND ANY OTHER ORIDNANCES OF THE K, COLORADO PERTAINING THERETO. APPROVAL APPROVED BY THE ESTES VALLEY PLANMNG COMMISSION DAY OF LOCATION MAP PROJECT LOCATION Chapter 7 - FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION ESTES PARK GENERAL NOTES Chapter B - TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION 602.5 Type Il-B (NON-SPRINKLERED) Table 601 - Type II-B- Groupe IA Structural Frame: 0 hour rating Bearing Walls, Exterior - 0 hour rating 0 hour rating Interior - Non-Bearing Walls and Partitions: Exterior - (Table 602) < 2 hour ratIng > 5' to < 10' - I hour rating > 10' to < 30' o 0 hour rating > 30' - 0 hour rating 0 hour roting Interior - 0 hour rating Floor Construction: 0 hour rating Roof Construction: OCCUPANT LOAD: SALES AREA 7,422 SF /30 247 STORAGE 905 SF /300 3 ACCESSORY AREA (OFFICE,RESTROOMS) 351 SF /300 1 TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD: 251 Chapter 3 - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION 309.1 Occupancy Group 1,1 (Mercantile) - Showroom Chapter 5- GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND BUILDING AREAS Tot,le 503: Construction Type II-B Group LI - Allowobl• areo 12,500 SF, Allowable height = 2 story - 55' Provided: 9,100 SF, Provided: 1 story 1e-0" height 2015 (IBC) NTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2015 (IMC) NTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2015 (IPC) NTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 2011 (NEC) NTERNARONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2015 (IECC) NTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE 2015 (IFC) NTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 2012 (ADA) ADA STANDARDS BUILDING INFORMATION ONE STORY, PRE-ENGNEERED METAL BUILDING VAIN METAL ROOF SYSTEM. NEW METAL STUD AND MASONRY FACADE, SHOWROOM AND ACCESSORY AREAS SALES AREA 7.263 SF STORAGE 1,111 SF ACCESSORY AREA (0MCE,RESTROOMS) 350 SF TOTAL NET AREA 8.724 SF 1. ALL RECUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR GUARANTEED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 2. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBIUTY IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE A.D.A. AND U.B.C. 3. APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN CREATES A VESTED RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24. C.R.S. AS AMENDED. 4. CONDUIT, METERS. VENTS AND OTHER EOUPMENT ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING OR PROTRUDING FROM THE ROOF SHALL BE SCREENED, COVERED OR PAINTED TO MINIMIZE VISUAL IMPACTS. 2017. 704,2,2 ProMahone from walls of Type II-e Construction shall be of ony approver/ material. ,CHAIR P1 P2 PLUMBING PLANS & SCHEDULE PLUMBING DIAGRAMS & DETAILS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 9,100 S.F. TOTAL LEASABLE AREA 9,002 S.F. OVERALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS 70I-0' X 130I-0" SALES FLOOR DIMENSIONS 88I-O• X 107'-5" SALES AREA 7,422 S.F. RECEIVING AREA 905 S.F. BREAK ROOM & OFFICE AREA 185 S.F, TOILET ROOMS & HALLWAY AREA 176 S.F. TOTAL NET AREA 8.688 S.F. (BLDG AREA PER CODE) NOTES: 1. BUILDING MUST COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING (FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL). FIRE, ADA AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT CODES. 2. NO TAPERED COLUMNS ALLOWED. 3. MAINTAIN INTERIOR CLEAR SALES SPACE AS REQUIRED ON PLANS. SQUARE FOOTAGE LEGEND GENERAL: TI 1T1TLE SHEET CIVIL: C-1 PROPERTY SURVEY C-2 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN C-3 SITE PLAN C.-4 SITE STAKEOUT PLAN C-5 SITE GRADING PLAN C-6 PAVEMENT JOINT LAYOUT PLAN C-7 PAVEMENT MARKING AND FENCING PLAN C-8 SITE UTILITY PLAN C-9 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0-10 DETAILS C-11 DETAILS U12 RETAINING WALL AND GUARD RAILING PLAN C-13 RETAINING WALL DETAILS 0-14 RETAINING WALL DETAILS U15 UNDERPAVEMENT STORMWATER RETENTION PLAN C-16 STORM DETAILS C-17 SVVPPP SITE PLAN C-18 NOTES C-19 NOTES U20 NOTES C-21 NOTES ARCHITECTURAL: Al FLOOR PLAN, DETAILS AND INTERIOR PARTITIONS A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3 SECTIONS AND DETAILS A4 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE & SALES FLOOR ELEVATIONS A5 DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS A6 RESTROOM PLAN & DETAILS A7 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A8 ROOF PLAN AND METAL BUILDING NOTES A9 SIGN DETAILS ADA-I ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD ADA-2 ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD ADA-3 ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD STRUCTURAL: Si STRUCTURAL NOTES S2 FOUNDATION PLAN S3 FOUNDATION DETAILS ELECTRICAL: El POWER PLAN E2 LIGHTING PLAN E3.1 POWER DETAILS E5.1 THREE PHASE OPTION - ELECTRICAL PANEL CRITERIA EMS1 EMS/LOW VOLTAGE PLAN EMS2 CPU TERMINAL DIAGRAM ES1 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN ES2 SITE PLAN- PHOTOMETRICS MECHANICAL: ; MI ;HVAC LAYOUT & SCHEDULE PLUMBING: I( 1111 11 V 1C--_," in mAl, f 7 " CORM., AM O 00 0 -J 0 C.) CC CL LL1 I— (/) LU 2 ff 1.; o 3 3g DI Sa 4€1 DOLLAR GENE 451 STANLEY AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 STORE # 18151 REQUIRED NATIONAL ACCOUNT VENDORS COMPANY CONTACTS PHONE # REQUIRED ITEMS MC CUE CORPORATION PRICING - BRAD ROBINSON ORDERING - BRETT JOHNSON 404-293-7758 brobinson@maxmorp.corn 800-800-8503 EXT. 268 TRIM KIT INCLUDES BUMPER GUARDS AND CART STOP YORK GEOFFREY ILLIAM 800-481-9738 york-dollargenerel-beactcom HVAC UNITS AR, CO, IL, IN, KS, KY, MO, OH, OK VW CARRIER ANDREW BROWNELL 877-5014432 andrew.browNell@canier.utc.com HVAC UNITS CT. IA, MA, ME, MI, MN. ND. NE, NH, NJ. NY. PA, RI, SD. VT, WI LENNOX MICHAEL JOHNSTON 972-49746249 dollargenerLd2Lennoxind.com HVAC UNITS AL. AZ, CA, DE, FL. GA. LA, MD, MS. NC, NM. NV, OR, SC, TN. Tx, VA — ROOF CURB SYSTEMS GREG SMYTH 800483-5848 ossnytt@roorcurb.com RTU CURB CURBS PLUS INC. ALLAN THRAILKILL 888-639-2872 alanAhrailkillecurbs-plus.com RTU CURB KCC INTERNATIONAL INC, GREG CONRAD 800-382-2872 gconrad@kcccurbs.com RTU CURB SHERWIN WILLIAMS LOCAL SHERWIN WILLIAMS STORE PAINT, PRIMER, CONCRETE SEALER AND BLOCK FILLER NABCO ENTRANCES KIM RAUSCH 262-679-7513 dollargeneralenabcoenlrances.com CT,DC.DEJN,KYMA,MD.ME,M1, MODEL #G11175-02 NH,NJ,NY,OH, PA,RI,VA,VT,WV STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES DENNIS WEBB 256-776-8902 DGdoors@sbdinc.00m AR.AZ,CA,CO,ILIA,KS,LA,MN, MODEL #ESA200 MO,MS,NE,NM,NV.OK.SD,TKUT,W1 ASSA ABLOY ENTRANCE SYSTEMS ROSS MERKLING 609-528-2580 clollargeneralbesam.us@assaalboy.corn AL, FL, GA, NC, SC, TN D&P CUSTOM LIGHTING NATIONAL ACCOUNT SALES 800-251-2200 CUSTOM POWER POLES EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES WEBSITE: http://dollarganeralbld.ectsolutIons.net USER NAME: daargenaralbid PASSWORD: dollargeneraltn0 EMS SUPPUER NOTE: CUSTOMIZED DOLLAR GENERAL EMS PANEL REQUIRES STORE B. CITY, STATE. ZIP CODE & QTY. OF HVAC UNITS OF THE INSTALL SITE WHEN ORDERING. EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY PHIL BRANDT 877-438-3826 P8ranat@eucticicherniceLcom CONCRETE POLISHING SYSTEMS RETRO-PLATE SYSTEMS CURTIS TURNBULL 888-942-3144 corpormeaccountsaretroplatesystem.com CONCRETE POLISHING SYSTEMS LEDS (LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL DESIGN DEVICES) MICHAEL STRINGER 920-850-7287 OR 920-740-5010 DGorders@leds-11c.com ELECTRICAL LIGHTING SUPPLIES GIRTMAN AND ASSOCIATES MIKE MOYNAHAN 615-350-6000 dgconstruciion@bass-secuity.com INTERIOR DOORS AND FRAMES ALARAECA,CO.FL.GAJA.KS.LA.MS,A1N. AND RESTROOM ACCESSORIES MO.NE.NMNV.OX.OR,SC,SD.TN,TX,WI COOK & BOARDMAN GROUP JOE HARRELL 336-837-0673 natiandsalesacookondboardrnan.com INTERIOR DOORS AND FRAMES CT.DEILIN,ICY,MA,M0.1.1E,MLNC,NKNJ. AND RESTROOM ACCESSORIES NY.ON.PA,RIVA,VT,WV STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS DAN GOLDSMITH 740-215-8913 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM PANELS CROSSCOM NATIONAL ANDREA LEMAY 847-850-6297 ddlarganeralectosscomnatIonaLcom LOW VOLTAGE & VOICE/DATA EAST: CT, DE, FL, IL,IN, MA, MD. ME. MI, MO. NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI. VT. WI. WV ASD DWAYNE SIMMONS 826-624-1044 ctsinynons@ascl-usa.corn LOW VOLTAGE & VOICE/DATA SOUTH: AL. AR. GA. KY, LA, MS. NC. SC, TN, Tx. VA BAILIWICK COREY CARLSON 952-658-7975 ccerlson@bailiwick.com LOW VOLTAGE & VOICE/DATA WEST: AZ, CA, CO, IA, KS MN. ND. NE. NM. NV, OK, OR, SD GRAYBAR JEROME BANNISTER 615-743.3202 office, 615924.2139 cell DaJarGeneral@graybar.corn CABLE TRAY RAINBIRD IRRIGATION LOCAL RAIN BIRD DISTRIBUTER WWW.RAINBIRD.COM IRRIGATION SYSTEMS REQUIRED NATIONAL ACCOUNTS FOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TESTING COMPANY CONTACTS PHONE # ATC ASSOCIATES, INC. LESLIE GREENWOOD 205-733-8775 dollaryenaral@atcassociales.com www.elcassociales.carn BUILDING AND EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MATT ADAMS 205-836-6300 dotlargeneralabuIldingandearlh.com www.buildingandearth.com EAS PROFESSIONALS. INC. JERRY MARRONE 864-234-7368 doltarqeneraleleas-pro.com vmweas-pro.com PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. (PSI) TERESA HEBNER 770-424-6200 #3030 teresa.hebnen2pslusa.com www.pslusa.com TERRACON JOHN MEADOW 770-623-0755 #353 dollameneralaterracon.corn www.terracon.com NOTE: MATERIAL TESTING IS REQUIRED ON ALL TRIPLE NET LEASES PROTOTYPE MANAGEMENT TEAM COMPANY CONTACTS PHONE # MJM ARCHITECTS GARY CONWAY 615-244-8170 dg@mjrnarch.corn www.mjmarch.com ENTECH MITCH SIMPSON 615-373-2640 emaii@entechtn.com www.entechtn.com NATIONAL ACCOUNT & CONTACT INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE \ 3.00'1640E UTILITY 0 —J W 0g Z Lu OV 0 < a• t. Co O 1 co NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT (7) Lu!! 0 I (7i1 UI '11 211 gt I 1111 ... _ , .---- - -. —.- - A E .. s. - —..-)• --(.-1,-'--, ........ I XISTING "s......,1 ......"-- DRIVE ENTRANCE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:50:31 AM 44> BUILDING SETBACK UNE , % \ • EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE PROPERTY SURVEY 0 10 20 30 40 69 SCALE: 1•=2o,th Vv. Iva • EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE LEGEND — - - — - - — NEW PROPERTY UNE — - - — - - — EXISTING PROPERTY UNE EXISTING ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE F A RFMENT aia EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE NEW UNDERGROUND GAS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OW EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL wa EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL ocK NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING FENCE OVEREXCAVATION UMITS SILT FENCE EXTSTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT .7277=4 DEMOLITION NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 5' LIGHT DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: IV HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: r HEAVY DUTY 1 NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 4' SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD BOUNDARY LINE DATA LINE / CURVE DISTANCE BEARING RADIUS LI 105.15 14286 47. 09.00'E 1.2 6565 SA?' 10' 30.00'E L3 110.74 A154' 30'00.00'E L4 274.13 535' 30' 00.00YE L5 33.62 SW 37/ 00.00'W C1 133.64 566. 24' 15.00W 120.00 LB 236.67 N61' 41' 30.00'W Control Data Point 6 Description Northing Easting Elevation 100 BM-1 980199 19561.00 7570.44 ONTROL NOTES POINT BIOS. BM-I: LOCATED ON THE NCRTINIEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. A MAC NAIL SET IN ASPHALT. INAVD 80) DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 80517 \ \ \.\\\\ 006711.3 ELECTRICAL - -\\_ BOX O I I -= r.• •,!•••••• NEW r THICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE • EXIST NG STORM MANHOLE • EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE • EXISTING WATER VALVE • NEW WATER VALVE/CURB STOP q EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER BOX SW of Coomnang Arairsioniu S 6 a a REVISIONS - 1 DATE: OCT.. 2016 Ill fnalensectivnllusehootoloirmal•lovsaa, X RETAINING WALL BADGE CENTERED UNDER WALL. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C-15 (....BUILDING SETBACK LINE -",.. EXISTING ONE-STORY STRUCTURE EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE NEW STORM WATER INLET EXTS▪ TNG CURS INLET NEW STORM WATER INLET NEW CURS A GLITTER I.NEW 4' 51-0,MIDE SIDEWALX ADA RAMP 1:12 MAX -SLOPE EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT HE:A1.IY DUTY CONCRETE \ PAVEMENT GUARD RAIUNC. SEE SHEETS C-10 SC-13 BLOCK RETAINING WALL, SEE SHEETS C-13 THROUGH 0-17 . . ROCK AREA BETWEEN CONCRETE PARKING AND RETAINING WALL EXISTING CURB INLET EXISTING SIDEWALK 16. CMP \\ EXISTING EXISTING ELECTRICAL ,7 805 5 NUarNUI:E:4:45S-1/ErbA'-4:E EXIGNO CURB 6 GUTTER 100 ENI-1 960299 1056100 7579.44 BUILDING SETBACK LINE PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL BUILDING 7P-9' x 139-6 PROTOTYPE IIVAC ON ROOF F.E. 7564.20 ADA RAMP I -12 MAY SLOPE STOP CURB I CUTLER SIDEWALK AT THIS POINT SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART NO. CF LOTS LAND USE DESIGNATION PROPOSED ZONING PROPOSED USE NET ACREAGE PROPOSED BLDG. AREAS PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT PROVIDED PARKING PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OPEN SPACES! LANDSCAPE AREA CONSTRUCTION TYPE BUILDING OCCUPANCY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL RETAIL (DOLLAR. GENERAL STORE) 1.161 ACRES OR 50.563 SO. FT. 9,100 SO. FT. 2P-6 30 16.057% 16,777 SO. FT. OR 33.18% 24,606 SO. FT. OR 4842% IBC TYPE 11.B' IBC GROUP 'IT (NO HIGH PILED STORAGE PER 20004PC 2392. NO STORAGE ABOVE 174 NO HAZARDOUS COMMODITIES ABOVE!' BOUNDARY LINE DATA 'Jaz / claWa DISTANCE BEARING RADIUS L1 1051S NV' 47'0900'E 1.2 SEAS S6710 30.00'E L3 119,74 654' 30 00.07E L4 274.13 535' 30 00.00T LS 33.62 S54' 30 013.00'W CT 133,64 SW 24' 15.0111N 120.00 1,4 235.57 Nel• 41' 30.00'W Control Data Point # Description Northing Easting Elevation CONTROL NOTES PO114E4100. LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. A MAO NAIL SET IN ASPHALT. INAVD 58) LEGEND •— NEW PROPERTY UNE — - - - - — EXISTING PROPERTY UNE FASTING BUILDING SET-SACK UNE EXISTING ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE NEW UNDERGROUND GAS UNE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE var NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE cam EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL iam EASING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL 1414 NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL FASTING FENCE OVEREXCAVATION UNITS SILT FENCE DEMOLITION EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT .Z= DEMOLITION NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 5' LIGHT DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 41 HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. FIEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT, 4' SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD :•: 444.0.4.•9.a, NEW THICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE OUSTING STORM MANHOLE OUSTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING WATER VALVE NEW WATER VALVE I CURB STOP EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER BOX BLOCK RETAINING WALL. SEE SHEETS C-13 THROUGH C.*? GUARD RAILING. SEE SHEETS c-la 8 C-13 DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.151 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 00517 NEW STORM WATER PIPING NEW STORM WATER \ JUNCTION BOX \ EXISTING ELECTRICAL \ BOX SITE PLAN 69 SCALE 1' =. 20'-0' 0 10 20 39 40 NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT 5oa1 HI Camenung 1 I A a .14 2 0 0 C77 5 IY LI 0 0 C-3 DATE: OCT.. 2018 EXISTING CURB HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE INLET PAVEMENT NEW CURB GUTTER LIGHT OUfY &NORSE WEST FROM THIS POINT PAVEMENT ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF STANLEY AVENUE AND FROM CENTERLINE OF S ST. WAN HIGHWAY TO THE CENTERUNE CF DOLLAR GENERAL PARKING ENTRANCE THE DISTANCE IS 2771 EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:60:48 AM EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE Mi,TRITaiRWIRiTARiT. 51 0 LEGEND — - - - - — NEW PROPERTY LINE — - - EXISTING PROPERTY UNE - • • — • • — • • —.• - EXISTING BUILDING SET-BACK UNE EXISTING ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE NEW UNDERGROUND GAS UNE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ucT NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE Orli EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL Imp EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING FENCE OVEREXCAVATION LINTS SILT FENCE EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR I E33STING CONCRETE PAVEMENT DEMOLITION NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT, a. LIGHT DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT, 13. HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 7' HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT N SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD NEW 6' TRICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING STORM- MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING WATER VALVE NEW WATER VALVE / CURB STOP EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER BOX GRADING NOTES I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PRCTECT ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOIL TESTING TO VERIFY COMPACTION OF BACKFEL AREAS. INCLUDE PROCTOR AND DENSITY TESTS REQUIRED AS WELL AS PROOF ROLLING. 3. BORROW MATERIAL_ IF NEEDED SHALL NOT BE PAID FOR DIRECTLY. IFT SHALL BE SUBSIDIARY TO THE PROJECT BID ITEMS. •••••„. 4. ALL EMBANKMENT UNDER BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 012% FROM OPTIMUM MOISTURE. (SEE SOILS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION} 5 ALL OTHER EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR 6 32% FROM OPTIMUM MOISTURE (SEE SOILS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION) EL GRADE AND SLOPE STAKING SHALL BE DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7. THE ENTIRE AREA OF THEME SHALL BE STRIPPED 6" OF ORGANIC MATERIAL AND TOP SOIL ALL EMBANAMENTIN THESE AREAS SHALL BE SUBSOIL FROM CUT AREAS OR AN APPROVED BORROW AREA. E. ROCKBOLDERS LARGER MANS. IN DIAMETER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BELOW THE BUILDING AND PARKING AREA 9 TOPSOIL IN ANY BORROW AREA SHALL BE STRIPPED. THEN REPLACED AFTER BORROW OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETE 10 TOP SOIL FROM ALL STRIPPING SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND MAY BE USED TO DRESS ALL SLOPE AREAS IF FREE Of ROOTS AND STONES AND APPROVED, ALL UNUSED TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE. 11. ALL FINAL GRADES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO A TOLERANCE OF 111.15 FT. OF P1AN ELEVATION AND 10,20 FT. OF HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT. 12. ALL STOCK-PILES AND EXCAVATED SOILS NOT USED SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE 13 STRUCTURAL HU. SHALL BE FREE OF ORGANIC OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS, HAVE A LICKAD LIMIT LESS THAN 30, A PLASTICITY INDEX LESS THAN 10 AND MEET THE FOLLOWING GRADATION. SCREEN SIZE 2' 04 5700 PERCENT PASSING 100 50 -1130 .30 THE STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL ALSO HAVE A SWELL POTENTIAL OF LESS THAN 1% WHEN COMPACTED TO 45% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNIT WEIGHT AND AT 2 PERCENT BELOW OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND TESTED UNDER A SWELL TEST SURCHARGE OF 501 PST. (THIS INFORMATION CAME FROM PSI PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL SOILS REPORT DATED OCT_ 13, 2016) EROSION CONTROL 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT THE SILT FENCE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. 2 THE SILT FENCE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL SOD AND OTHER SURFACING IS APPLIED TO PREVENT EROSION OF SOILS ONTO THE HIGHWAY SOIL TESTING 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES INC. TO COMPLETE QUALITY CONTROL TESTING AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 019000N SHEET C-19. 4 EXISTING , DRIVE ENTRANCE CT 4.13 O ro 5 Control Data Point # Description Northing Easting Elevation 100 050299 10501.00 7570.44 CONTROL NOTES' POINT SM. BM-1, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. A MAO NAIL SET IN ASPHALT. (NAND SS) SITE GRADING PLAN 0 1fl 2T1 39 40 SD SCALE 20-0" PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:51:03 AM tm verng eany 1.1.4 V, ....L. Kaolastaano, C-5 DATE: OCT... 2016 DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LAMER COUNTY, COLORADO 80517 BUILDING FOUNDATION OR RETAINING WALL BASE 7-0" MIN. t 2,0. AREA OF FOOTING OVEREXCAVATON S INLET STORM WATER STORM WATER JUNCTION BOX \ N \ \ EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX \ , FOOTING OVEREXCAVATION DETAIL SCALE, ir'.1,4r NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. OVEREXCAVATE BELOW THE FOOTINGS AND BACKFILL W/COMPACTED STRUCTURAL PILL AS DESCRIBED IN THE GRADING NOTES PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL BUILDING TM' It 130,0' PROTOTYPE "F HVAC ON ROOF F,F, • 7534.25 PI DUSTING DRIVE ENTRANCE -fik e4): STORM WATER. INLET 244,3' EXISTING CURB INLET EXISTING SIDEWALK 18 CMP \ 41•4 atCommlweAmhumm, RETAINING WALL BRIDGE FROM ETA. .1.43.64 TO STA 4.59.57 CENTERED UNDER WALL. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C-15 EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX Control Data Easting Northing Description Elevation Point # 7570.44 too 10561.00 EM•1 960299 DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY. COLORADO 80517 - - _ EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE PAVEMENT MARKING AND FENCING PLAN BMW 11 MINCE NM 0 10 20 30 40 60 SCALE: r • 2T-0' NH N Cn.rdn.np Prointbrtel: DWG: EIIE•16 Sim 2917102.13 DATE: OCT., 2015 C-7 LI W REVISIONS GNP . . . WIDE STRIPING. 2,0' SPACING STORM WATER INLET OUSTING ORME ENTRANCE \ STORM WATER,\ Junrcnon sox \ dETENTION POND STORM WATER INLET (.. BUILDING SETBACK UNE 'N... EXISTING ONE-STORY STRUCTURE .) GADOUT AREA TRASH CUMPSTER ENCLOSURE \ -S, 7-- \ \ ,-- ...,, \ c-, ...t. -s- \ 4.9 \ \ 7' \ 6 , \ BUILDING SETBACK UNE PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL BUILDING 70-CE x 130,7 PROTOTYPE "F" FIVAC ON ROOF F.F. • iS8420 4' WIDE STRIPING, TYP. . . • EXISTING CURB INLET EXISTING SIDEWALK • EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX T t 4' WIDE STRIPING. r-ir SPACING EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE 7 7 • • I LEGEND --- NEW PROPERTY UNE — - - — - - — EXISTING PROPERTY UNE EXISTING ELECTRICAL FASCMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE 04* NEW UNDERGROUND GAS UNE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE oun NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE P1F EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL • EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL ▪ NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING FENCE OVEREXCAVATION LINTS SILT FENCE DEMounoN • EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT _Z] DEMOLITION NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT 5' LIGHT DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 6. HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. r HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 4' SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD NEW S' THICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE 5:r EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE N EXISTING WATER VALVE • NEW WATER VALVE I CURB STOP q EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER BOX CONTROL NOTES: POINT #100. 8V-I. LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. A MAG NAIL SET IN ASPHALT, (NAED 55) FE 411 .cr• clul.l•alm Mg, r PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:51:20 AM < 09 cn co TI Swl eCoord.topPmlesslonai NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT TRASH DUMPSTER • ENCLOSURE MIME LEGEND --- - NEW PROPERTY LINE — - - — - - — EXISTING PROPERTY UNE - • • — • • — • • — ••- EXISTING BUILDING SET-BACK UNE EXISTING ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT aN EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE ON* NEW UNDERGROUND GAS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL Val NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL o EXISTING FENCE OVEREXCAVAIION UNITS SILT FENCE OPT EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT =.Z =J DEMOLITION NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. LIGHT DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT CP HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 7' HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 4" SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD NEW 6. THICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING WATER VALVE NEW WATER VALVE / CURS STOP I N 0 CONNECT NEW 4' SEWER TO EXISTING SEWER LINE. NOTE: NO TEE OR ELBOWS ON SEWER LINE STORM WATER INLET 0 EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER BOX TO EXISTING <:LEPHONE RISER F. RELOCATED POWER POLE, COORDINATE WITH UTE.ITT TWO ORIGINAL WATER UNES TO BE ABANDONED. COORDINATE WITH u•nurr NEW POWER POLE, COORDINATE WITH UTILFTY NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL. COORDINATE WITH unury EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT STORM WATER INLET c O.................„... GAS METER EXISTING NE-STORy STRUCTURE EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE POWER POLE TO BE RELOCATED nottesnc WATER METER. 1' LANDSCAPE WATER METER RIGHT ABOVE IT Y WATER LINE (WATER SERVICE SHALL HAVE 4' SEPARATION FROM ALL UTILITIES) UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL LINE, COORDINATE WITH mar( 2' TELEPHONE CONDUIT NEW UNDERGROUND -ELECTRICAL. COORDINATE WITH LMUTY DOUBLE CLEANOUTS NEW POWER POLE, COORD/NATE MOTH UTILITY NEW PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMER. COORDINATE WATH UTILITY 4' FLOOR DRAIN RIGHT BELOW BACKFLOW PREVENTOR PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL BALDING 130,0" PROTOTYPE HVAC ON ROOF FF.. 7554,20 LOAUOUT AREA NEW 4' SAN LINE \ EXISTING ELECTRICAL • BOX STORM WATER JuNcnoN Box \ 115•_, \ ,•••'. \ it NOTES t EXTERNAL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE EDIT 35 PIPE WITH GASKETED FITTINGS. (NO GLUED PIPE IS ALLOWED) IL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DOUBLE CLEAN OUT ON EXTERIOR SEWER PIPE WITHIN 56 OF BUILDING. 3. SEWER LINE DEPTH OF BURY SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 35'. THE CITY WOULD PREFER A NE BURY OR GREATER 4. NEW F WATER LINE SHALL BE A MIN OF 5-0. DEEP. 5. NEW 2' WATER UNE SHALL RE TYPE K COPPER PIPE B. ALL CHANGES TO OVERHEAD UNES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH TOEP L E P TELEPHONE AND EARLE COMPANIES THE COSTING SEWER TAP IS VCP, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE THE EXISTING SERVICE AND HAVE THE CONNECTION TO THE SEWER MAIN INSPECTED. BEFORE NEW PIPE IS CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING TAP THE CITE WILL NEED TO INSPECT IT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 45 HOURS ADVANCED NOTICE FOR TELEVISING SERVICE IF UNE IS SUBSTANDARD, ANEW SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED. APPROXIMATE STORM SEWER PL. m 75T7.01-t /1,API i...*-7--'-'''''''. ..e.' • - . _.. . . - SANITARY SEWER LINE SHALL. 1 1 I I_ it i BE EEWL ER STORM WATER INLET Ap7eDB.ELnOV;.,,1.2:LTORMN., DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CtTY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 80517 EXISTING CURB INLET N \ EXISTING SIDEWAUC TA \ 16- CUP N • WILL BRIDGE THE 1D EASEMENT TO TRANSFER THE WEIGHT OF THE WALL SO IT DOES NOT CRUSH THE 16' CAF. FIREHYDRANT TO BE RELOCATED . POWER POLE TO BE RELOCATED • RELOCATED TRANSFORMER POLE. COORDINATE WITH UTILITY RELOCATED ARE HYDRANT, - COORDINATE WITH UTILITY RI BUILDING SETBACK LINE EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX CONNECT NEW 2' WATER UNE TO EXISTING WATER MAIN Iy EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE RELOCATED TELEPHONE RISER. COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY A . EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE Lit se 0 1,72 Control Data Point Description Northing Easting Elevation 100 13M-1 41602.29 +956 100 757044 ONTROL NOTES, EFIRT 0100, BM-17 LOCATED ON THE WWII-WEST SIDE OE THE PROPERTY, A MAD NAIL SET IN ASPHALT, INAVD AA} SITE UTILITY PLAN MiteMS1 0 10 20 30 40 60 SCALE i= = 20'-0= PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:51:26 AM TwardkonwIndlialscne•NAAe.... q C-8 DATE: OCT. WIN N ( LEGEND - - -- NEW PROPERTY UNE — - - — - - — EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING ELEcTRIcAL EASEMENT FxLST1NG DRAINAGE Fiix FNENT EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE ▪ NEW UNDERGROUND GAS UNE MS-TING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING FENCE ENE:EXCAVATION UM1TS SILT FENCE DEMOLITION EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT [_ A DEMOLITION NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 5' LIGHT DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 6' HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 7 HEAVE DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD NEW 6- THICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE C>) EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE U EXISTING WATER VALVE U NEW WATER VALVE / CURB STOP q Ex-STING TELEPHONE RISER BOX LANDSCAPE PLAN EM ME EN N M EM 10 20 30 40 No SCALE- = 204 —J 0 0 LLJ O z 0 LU 0 LL U) 0 IL 12 0 co sea CoadnurN Prdnelona DATE: OCT.. 2011 h•• WA Imp cp sglyarry C-9 DWG: NH5,21017-02-3 REVISIONS O U U U NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT 014 0 ME WRE PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE TYPE QTY. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME ES 11 COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE PICEA PUNGENS CI 16 COMMON JUMPER (UPRIGHT) JUNPERUS SCOPIJLORWA ME 5 MOUNTAIN ELDER ALNUS TENUITOUA WRO 8 WESTERN RIVER BIRCH 8ETULA OCCIDENTAL'S GO 6 CAMEL OAK QUERCUS GAMBELL1 ELI 4 TABLE TOP SLUE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SCOPoLoRuM ML B MOUNTAIN LOVER PACHISTRJA mYRsiNEFFS ROD 24 RED-OSIER DOGWOOD CORNUS STOLONIFERA SC 24 SQUAW CURRENT RBES CEREUm DM 4 DWARF AMUR MAPLE ACER GINN/MA •COMPAcTA. MS 23 ml- SNOwBERRY SYMPHORICARPOS GREOpmEus NOTES: SEE ESTES PARK CHAPTER 7. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TREE / SHRUBS SIZE AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. (ORD. 8-05 81) GRASS SEE SPECIFICATIONS ON SHEET C-IA LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. TILL SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 4- MINN Lim 2. REMOVE ALL ROCKS LARGER THAN V MEASURED IN LARGEST DIRECTION. 3 ALL GRADED AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD, TOP SOIL. WATER UNTIL HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 4. AREAS TO RECENE 500 SHALL BE CLEAN OF DEBRIS AND FREE OF WEEDS. 5 MANTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER SODDING, WATER REGULARLY TO SEEP LAWN AREAS MOIST TO MAXIMIZE GERMINATION AND MAINTAIN OPTIMUM GROWTT4 AND SURVIVAL TO ACHIEVE AN ACCEPTABLE STAND OF ESTABLISHED LAWN PRIOR TO THE STORE POSSESSION DATE, FREE OF ERODED OR BEAR AREAS, H. PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STORE BY DOLLAR GENERAL. THE SITE SHALL BE CLEAN OF ALL DEBRIS AND TRASH, AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN NOTES ABOVE 7. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS AND LAWNS ADJACENT To PAVED AREAS ARMS STREETS ARE TO BE FULLY IRRIGATED. 8, IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO INCLUDE ALL SPRAY HEADS, VALVES AND CONTROLLERS. 9, A SEPARATE METER AND BAcripLow pREvEtiToR shiALL BE INSTALLED. 10, LOCATE HEADS A MINIMUM OF 2-V FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1 CURB. it SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR LAWN SPRINFJ_ER SYSTEM PER SHEET C-19. Control Data Point # Description Northing Easting Elevation 100 NM-I 980299 19561.00 7575.44 CONTROL NOTED POINT #100. PM-I: LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST siOE OF THE PROPERTY. A mAG NAIL SET IN ASPHALT. (NAvD 88) DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.181 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, CITY OF ESTES PARK. LARIMER COUNTY. COLORADO 80517 •SS GO • "L 10 MS /a, ROD SC 01.1 JD STORM WATER INLET ExistiNG cum INLET STORM WATER INLET EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE 1 EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE ....131.81.DiNG SETBACK UNE -...... EXISTING ONE-STORY STRUCTURE TREE LEGEND EXISTING SSIDEWALK , • \ IV CUP SIZE PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL BEADING MO' x 13.11,0- PROTOTYPE 7' tA/AC ON ROOF - 7584.20 BUILDING SETBACK UNE EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE IRRIGATION NOTES 1, NIOBIUM GPM FOR IRRIGATION ZONE SHALL BE 15 GPM . PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:51:35 AM EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER. USE IN PLACE EXISTING ASPHALT GUARD RAIL PAINTING SPECIFICATION A. INSPECTION AND PREPARATION OF SURFACES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INFORM THE ENGINEER N REGARD TO HIS PAINTING SCHEDULE IN ADVANCE. TO COORDINATE THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 2. INSPECT ALL SURFACES TO BE PAINTED AND PERFORM SUCH SURFACE PREPARATION AS IS NORMALLY REQUIRED BY GOOD PAINTING PRACTICE. a. IF ACIDS HAVE BEEN USED FOR CLEANING THOROUGHLY NEUTRALIZE. RINSE AND DRY ALL TRACES OF ACID BEFORE ANY PAINT IS APPLIED b. ALL SURFACES TO BE FINISHED SHALL BE CLEAN MID FREE OF DIRT. DUST. GREASE. OIL OR OTHER SURFACE CONTAMINANTS. 3. STEEL: REMOVE ALL LOOSE SCALE AND RUST FROM IRON AND STEEL TO PRODUCE A SATISFACTORY SURFACE FOR PAINTING_ a. THOROUGHLY WASH ALL METAL SURFACES WITH MINERAL SPIRITS TO REMOVE ANY DIRT OR GREASE BEFORE PAINTING. B. PAINTING SCHEDULE 1. EXTERIOR STEEL ONE COAT. RED OXIDE METAL PRIMER. b. TWO COATS. EXTERIOR OE-ALKYD ENAMEL. A' CHAMFERED EDGE 5' x BASE PLATE ./I'x a' EXP. BOLTS. 1,0.0 CONCRETE PIER, TYP. PARKING LOT GUARD RAIL ANCHOR PLAN SCALE 1 a' • .1,0' FTI CONCRETE DETAIL SCALE: IC • 1,0' X' EXPANSION ACNNT r THICK CONCRETE WALK CD-U CONCRETE DETAIL SCALE: X." • 1,0- RAIUNG TO BE PAINTED PER SPECIFICATON THIS SHEET I X" SCH. 40 PPE RAILS AND POSTS 5' x 5' x A' BASE PLATE 4. EXP. BOLTS. FINISH GRADE X' CHAMFERED EDGE CONCRETE PIER DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 80517 NOTE: 6' THICK CONCRETE TO 5' THICK CONCRETE TRANSITION SIMILAR INTEGRAL CURB 4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK SET r BELOW FINISH FLOOR 11' EXPANSION JOINT WISEALANT BUILDING FINISH FLOOR L2 CONCRETE DETAIL SCALE: X' - "2-0' ff-a CONCRETE DETAIL SCALE: - CD-6 LOADING AREA DETAIL SCALE. 1' • 5,0' CD-5 ENTRANCE DETAIL 6.50 1D. I W P 6.00 11 95 BOLLARD. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET BOLLARD, IN/SIGN, SEE DETAIL TINS SHEET BOLLARD. W/SIGN, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET SCALE: I' • 5,0* 6- THICK CONCRETE PAVEMENT WAX BAAS B 1%6" EW.. SEE SPECIFICATIONS 4' COMPACTED Aral.PFGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE FS DOWEL B 1,6* VG EXTEND F-0' INTO PAVEMENT 4' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE IT TACK HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT Wfit3 BARS B 1,6" C/C E.W. SEE SPECIFICATIONS CONTROL. / CONSTRUCTION JOINT. IF CONSTRUCTION JOINT. INCLUDE DOWELS AS SHOWN FOR CONSTRUCTION JOINTS WeW,KV,R,*"*\** • STANDARD STATE APPROVED ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE INSTALLED ON A METAL COLUMN AT PROPER HEIGHT REDS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE BELOW THE ACCESSIBLE SIGN AS REQUIRED PER REGULATIONS T STANDARD SCH. GALVANIZED PIPE 11s. SCH. 40 PIPE RAILS AND POSTS 5' x E x4' BASE PLATE W14 - x 4' EXP. BOLTS. TYP. FINISH GRADE X• CHAMFERED EDGE CONCRETE PIER PARKING LOT GUARD RAIL SECTION SCALE: 4,'• 1,0' SILT FENCE FABRIC PLASTIC CABLE TIES- IF PINS ARE USED THEY MUST BE THROUGH ALL LAYERS OF FABRIC x T x SD' WOOD STAKES (NOMINAL) SPACING. 3,0' MAX ON CTRS. x WIRE PINS t///‘ BACKFILL SILT FENCE SECTION SCALE I'• 1,0' INTEGRAL CURB X' EXPANSION JOINT WISEAIANT DIMENSION VARIES EXISTING ASPHALT 4' COMPACTED SAND CUSFRON COMPACTED SUBORADE NOTE: CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL BE FLUSH WITH MAIN ENTRANCE AND TRUCK LOADING ENTRANCE. 6' THICK UGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT WED BARS C/C E.W. SEE SPECIFICATIONS 4' EXPANSION JOINT / 4' THICK CONCRETE WALK MATCH EXISTING 5,0" 2.5% SLOPE TS IV 2" MINIMUM COVER KEY FORMED WEDS 1 .2 WITH 1:3 SLOPED SIDES NOTE: 5" THICK LIGHT DUTY AND r HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT SIMILAR. X' EXPANSION JOINT W/SEALANT 6' THICK HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT WED BARS B 1,6' E.W. SEE SPECIFICATIONS NOTE: V THICK UGHT DUTY AND IT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT SIMILAR 1. CONCRETE DETAIL SCALE:51' • 1'-0' EXISTING CONCRETE STREET 4' OMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUSGRADE CO-4 CONCRETE DETAIL SCALE: K' • 1,0' 6' STANDARD SCH. PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE, PAINT SAFETY YELLOW, TO. 4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4' COMPACTED SAND CUSHION COMPACTED SLIBGRADE BOLLARD DETAIL SCALE: 1,0" SW MAX CENTERS 0' POURED SEAL IN FORMED OR SAWED JOINT (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) 6' THICK HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT W.103 BARS B 1,6' C/C E.W.. SEE SPECIFICATIONS DOWELS THROUGH JOINT 64 BARS 90' LONG. 24' C/C 4' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE SAW CUT JOINT r WIDE AND FEL WITH SEALANT FOAM BACKER ROD 6' THICK HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT WAX BARS B 1,6' C/C EW., SEE PECIFICATONS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:51:46 AM 4' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6' STANDARD SCH. PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE, PAINT SAFETY YELLOW, TYP. 4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4' COMPACTED SAND CUSHION COMPACTED SUBGRADE BOLLARD W/SIGN DETAIL SCALE. x" • 1,0- PARKING LOT GUARD RAIL ELEVATION SCALE: X' • 1,0' CONSTRUCTION JOINT CONTROL JOINT SCALE X'. SCALE: Y."• 1,0' This h maw. ling ar edginCIs*.. ons dons all. W. .an.... iseMOT Z 0 UJ 0 ..(C‘ co 0 11-1 0 co NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT STORM WATER INLET !DUSTING ONE-STORY STRUCTURE WALL CORNER TA 0+99.56 STA 1+5149 WALL CORNER TA. 1+87.86 HEADWALL. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C-12 WALL CORNER STA 2+79 52 \ \ \!, \ \ \ \ \`-, 'L BLOCK RETAINING WALL. .N. SEE SHEETS C.43 THROUGH C-17 \ GUARD P./BUNG, SEE .., SHEETS C-10 FOR MORE INFORMATION UMW; OF OVEREXCAVATION SEE SHEET C-5 FOR MORE INFORMATION WALL CORNER STA. 0+0000 PROPOSED DOLLAR GENERAL BUILDING 717-0.x 190-0- PROTOTYPE 'F" HVAC ON ROOF F.F. • 756420 ROCK AREA BETWEEN 41 TOE DRAIN PIPE VENTED TO DAYLIGHT A' HEEL DRAIN PIPE VENTED TO DAYLIGHT EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE CONCRETE PARKING \ AND RETAINING WALL • N • RETAINING WALL BRIDGE MOM ST0.1+43. 64 TO STA 4+59.97 CENTERED UNDER WALL SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C-15 RETAINING WALL RENDERING NO SCALE STORM WATER EJECTION BOX WALL CORNER STA 2+06 45 EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE ALL CORNER STA 5+40.91 WALL CORNER STA. 5+90.21 EXISTING ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT o+s EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS UNE NEW UNDERGROUND GAS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE um NEW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL IAN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL vox NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING FENCE OVEREXCAVATION UNITS SILT FENCE DEMOLITION - - /544 - - - - EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR T NEW GRADE CONTOUR EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT r7Z7-7= DE MOUTON NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6". LIGHT DLITT NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT 9" HEAVY DUN NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 7' HEAVY DUTY NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT: SIDEWALK NEW SEEDING NEW SOD NEW 6- THICK ROCK EXISTING POWER POLE • EXISTING STORM MANHOLE CD. EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE N EXISTING WATER VALVE N NEW WATER VALVE/CURB STOP q EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER BOX 1E-113 Rev Men-V.02a a 111/ 5 C-14 Control Data Description Northing Easting Elevation Point # BM-1 950299 19561.00 7570A4 1E10 I EXISTING 11 DONE ENTRANCE RETAINING WALL AND GUARD RAILING PLAN 0 10 a0 70 viwo 60 SCALE- 1' = 20-0' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:52:13 AM SE A 'if 111 Sea 171 Cearial1161%1 Pressibnal LEGEND — - - — - - — NEW PROPERTY UNE — - - — - - — EXISTING PROPERTY UNE DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 86517 CONTROL NOTES. POINT 9162 BM-1: LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. A NAG NAIL SET IN ASPHALT. (NAVY 99) DATE: OCT.. 2016 7690 7616 7580 7375 7570 7565 = B B :1113.1 11161•13.11 516. Elpx7563.33 HEADWALL. SEE DETAIL HEADWALL. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C-12 ON SHEET 0-12 90.96 45.40 1713 7.4.47 18.49 72.37 96.66 --H 5675 89.1 14.10 254.99 RT EE. B 511 ;fa g., S 4 B B 1.00 2-.00 3.00 1.00 6010 0 _I 0 W 0 z O W 0 < ac. U) 0 0 cn NEW SITE DEVELOPMENT -¢ ..... ...... ......... .... 7"- .. .... 7 .. 71" 0 • I ; • t 00 0 0 2 1 ea ........ Ian ... my, • '0 2L0' .... • ....... • ••*•-.01•0= we 410 Mr•di . .. • • . 18.4 RETAINING WALL BRIDGE Swig( CoortIret96mesuiv. 04 BARS la 1,3. GC E.W. TOP OF BRIDGE ELEV, • 7577.33 6TH. OF BRIDGE ELEV.. 7575.33 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03/17/2017 10:52:20 AM A CO rc C - 1 5 DWG: wiE4imwsiettv-cre a Lu0r DOLLAR GENERAL STORE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1.161 ACRES OF LAND IN THE POINT CONSULTING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. CITY OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 80517 .0130 RETAINING WALL PROFILE HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5' Gal dew:75811D • 1 1 .o.to m mei i a Ito III ZO I N=1 o . . . " iiiiii7o7i7ii7474 I u oh 741174717iM7roi r 7 ''''' ' '" • MI 'mom iii7 r ra" l""""'" olfenImuio;a7 .7.1Tniriiinan-Nela airifirtiViNamr•I Inn 4-„Farnimial sse twanuttesammitiv-- '''''' Tun: "um imiuda m i llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll tkonmom mpommmumoomm.madosomoluijMIRRIP17,747:47" ..; jai riall io g -7-111-o OVA ri rt tip . -skit . n .. o mo s.7. 711 ou: Ears 42.71.7_ff m m fain elm- mil .. 2111 . 2j , .............................................. ..... . ... .. ... ................ .68174 f7- 1111 11:11.10111M11110111.111111.11,11.91S1.11.11•89 1111111111.1W111111111114111 .11M1111111111.1.W1111111111111•••••11. IMMIL 1 • •Ht111110111111.11111111111111111/11111 111111111111M m r r 1 1 1 'Oa 1717111 1711 I io o hi& MITE 111mii m" 841816lull" 16.33' x 7.4" 3 CONCRETE BRIDGE OVER EXISTING 18. CA1P., SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET E. 0.00 SP 3.68 56 Ber7562 67 11111-1111011121.111MIA111.11.1SINI 1 11111•11.1112.11/11181911$11. 11111111111111 no 'mom moumniomi M1111613•1111112111WITITUTellalliffITUM11111 1111111MI MN 3111 iii:M1111111111111M11111611111111111111 1111111 ........ tomoimummil 11111111111.115gipan maw I 186 . 1 1 / '; 1111111111618 1 15i 11 1 1111 111111111111WIMMll n "n -" AL AU* VAW•Wi ' ..... 1171 11111110, af Wiiiiiieili01111,10MPTETMIMMEIM1.11 7 210 1 V:17:1 WI le 7 lmomomoli rZ17-7,RAYMZA 111111111111=111111 WAIT I Won% mir ... ...... po elm ommim room /1111W1111 " "n. . 117 Sh% ITMOU-Lti -- It 111111111813 11 1111111 ... 11111111/1111111111g118911111111111111/11•••"3:0 floommisiwr ism 7570 18.73 10.70 7505 5.50 7590 Elorr i62. 7585 a 3 7580 MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT BETWEEN EXISTING GRADE AND TOP OF WALL = 13.2 FT 84 BARS 11 1,0" E.W. IAN DATE: ocr 2016 B m •4 11•1•11•1•1•.' M=4=M4M1=4=. =1•Abliel• PMIREPMiN4= MI 11•11.••••••• IN•4=11•4=4=11=4 ..... IMM ==i4= MME11=11=11••••=110.1111•1•1=1M MM• =44==4 MIEV=1=1.1•1•111•1•1114=4 4•1•MMINE =I I= =1!••••••=1.11.••••444MMIP=MIN 0 0 0 U am 12'-o- 0 El 0 0 a FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1-0" MI11E111111 • 1•1110.111•MIM MAM.11•M•1•••••14•1MIM =4=======MiNM11•• MM.••=4M•••.1••=••061111.N.1••••••4MM IMEM.0•!MMI••••••••=.111•10•4 IMM=M=4=4MIN •DI=•••1•4 m C) RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1.-0" 0 1111111111I11111111111111 DOLLAR GENERAL.' O ii==MOIM 1,==.======1•14 IMPI•1111•••11==1.11 IM• 1 di r 0 REAR ELEVATION "";2 YIfiM .1=1111 SCALE: 1/8" = 1LO" 110 IM4 r ) T-1 rL15 ) ) 0 LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1111111 11111111111:181111 Inti I 1 41/ 17 DOLLAR GENERAL I 1 m r I 11117 r7,44-.:01,-:: • Val r mn.. I 0 0 0 M SIGN FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY DOLLAR GENERAL CORP. '--' WITH CIRCUIT AS NOTED ON ELECTRICAL PLAN. SIGN TO DE CENTERED OH FROM' OF BUILDING. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE AORDLIATE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BY SIGN MANUFACTURER To SUPPORT SIGN WEIGHT OF HP TO 1- ADO LBS. EXTERIOR CANOPY SIGN SHALL RE SUPPORTED BY THE FACE OF THE CANOPY. cooRIJINATE THE PROPER SIGNAGE TO BE USED WITH DOLLAR GENERAL_ NOT USED. WALL PACK 18E-REF. TO TOP OF WALL PACK REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. LIGHTS TO BE BRONZE COLOR ALL EXTERIOR LIGHT FTXTURL.S SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DOWN CASTING. . TO TO 0 WALL ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDMONAL INFORMATION. E WALL PACK (ALTERNATE PARKING LIGHT) REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADOMONAL INFoRiwknoro. REQUIRED ONLY IF THERE IS PARKING THIS SIDE of BUILDING NOT USED E TRIM SEE EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR COLOR FOR O GLITTE CO R LO NI , D DOWNSPOUT-SEE EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE M r SPOT FACE coNcRETE MASONRY UNIT. PAINT SW 7532 '--' ',HARM STONE E STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. GALVIALUME FINISH _-_. • - .8 BOARD AND BATTEN WOOD SIDING, 'CEDAR-COLOR LI NOT USED_ • • . E VENT FOR BATHROOM EXHAUST, REFER TOM( FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ▪ DOOM BUZZER, REFER TO El FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 0 NOT USED. ISAAC UNITS MOUNTED ON RODE REFER TO MECHANIGAL SHEET Ml FOR MORE INFORMATION. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT TO BE BARRED To MATCH THE BUILDING. OUTSIDE AIR TEMP. SENSOR MOUNTED OVER RECEIVING Ono.; )pelLr AF.E. E MINIMUM EAVE HEIGHT is 14•TE &RR FINISHED GRADE AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE A MiMmum OF F BELOW FINISNED FLOOR AT ALL NON PAVED AREAS 0 IN NORTHERN CUMATES. PROVIDE SNOW GUARDS ON ROOF PER LOCAL CODE. O METAL CANOPY Ere PRE-ENGINSEREP METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER (ONLY APPLICABLE TO CAD PROTYPES) g 12' DiAmETER x 6' LONG STAINLESS STEEL EYE BOLTS ;CLOSED) WITH IT DIAMETER OPENINGS. DRILL MO EPDXY INTO BLOCK WALL, A BOLTS TO BE LOCATED AS SHOWN EACH SR* OF ENTRY. TOTAL OF 8 BOLTS. • „ 0 4' SPUT FACE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT. PAINT SW1012 'WARM STONE'. ELEVATION KEYED NOTES a cc...avow Hoe 0 El View©242 Preliminary Condo Map Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 230, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE & LOCATION: March 21, 2017, 1:30PM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: To condominiumize ten units in accordance with the View@242 Development Plan. Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary condo map PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) 2. Recommend approval/denial to the Town Board LOCATION: 242 Virginia Drive, within the Town of Estes Park VINICTY MAP: See attachment OWNER/APPLICANT: CD Investments, LLC / CD Investments, LLC STAFF CONTACT: Audem Gonzales, Planner II PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This application is running concurrently with a Development Plan and Amended Plat for the property. Both the DP and AP applications are staff level and are in the process of being approved. The project consists of ten (10) units, six market rate and four proposed as attainable units. The Amended Plat proposes combining three lots into one legal lot. The preliminary condo map provides information on where each unit is located on the site. It also provides information on what areas are to be LCE (Limited Common Elements) and GCE (General Common Elements). The condominium map is consistent with the Development Plan. SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer/Project Manager: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying Inc. Parcel Number: 3525108002 & 3524400020 Development Area: 0.764 acres Existing Land Use: undeveloped Proposed Land Use: Multi-family residential Zoning Designation: RM — Multifamily Residential LEL Adjacent. Zonin,g: RM - Multifamily RM - Multifamily RM - Multifamily RM -• Multifamily Adjacent Land Uses: East: Single-Family Homes North: Townhomes West: Single-Family Homes South: Single-Family Homes Sereices: Water: Town of Estes Park Sewer: Estes Park Sanitation District REVIEW CRITE.RIA: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. This proposal complies with the applicable standards of the EVDC, specifically: Section 3.9.E "Standards of Review" for subdivisions, and Section 10.5.H "Condominiums, Townhouses and Other Forms of Airspace Ownership." RE.VPIElfttiNG AGENCY COMMENTS: This application has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff. PUBLIC COMMENTS: In accordance with the notice requirements in the Estes Valley Development Code, legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail- Gazette. Typical mailings include a 500-foot radius. As of March 14, 2017, one formal written comment have been received for this application package. All written comments are posted to www.estes.orq/currentapplications. The public comment was in regards to the building heights on the property. There is a proposed three level building that meets Code provisions for slope adjustments and maximum height. The Preliminary Condo Map application is in conformance with the Development Plan. The DP is the application and process that addresses allowed heights. Heights are not a regulatory element in the condominium process. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. This proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code, as well as the Development Plan. 2. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 3. This is a Planning Commission recommendation to the Town Board. Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Page 2 of 3 View@242 Preliminary Condo Map RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends COMA -110E4AL APPROVAL of the View@242 Preliminary Condo Map with the following conditions: 1. View@242 Development Plan approval shall occur within 60 days of the preliminary condo map Planning Commission public hearing date. 2. Amended Plat approval shall occur within 60 days of preliminary condo map Planning Commission public hearing date. SAMPLE MOTIONS: 1. I find the application substantially meets the criteria in the EVDC, and move to recommend APPROVAL of the "View@242 Preliminary Condo Map" according to findings of fact and conclusions of law, with findings and conditions recommended by Staff. 2. I find the application substantially meets the criteria in the EVDC, and move to recommend APPROVAL of the "View@242 Preliminary Condo Map" according to findings of fact and conclusions of law, with findings recommended by Staff. 3. I find the application has not provided sufficient information to review and move to CONTINUE the preliminary condo map request to the next regularly scheduled meeting. 4. I find the application does not substantially meet the criteria in the EVDC and move to DENY the preliminary condo map request. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. Preliminary Condo Map 5. Preliminary Elevations/Floorplans Estes Valley Planning Commission, March 21, 2017 Page 3 of 3 View@242 Preliminary Condo Map 6' `1- 2-4;41 5. Ar r - Petitioner(s): CD Invests ..LC vocoioaoiewttE - • ,--- ' VIRGINLA OR .11 Town of Estes Park Community Development Vicinity Map Project Name: View@242 Project Description: Prelminary Condo Map (242 Virginia Dr.) Vicinity Map ESTES PAI COLQRAD I in = 125 ft 111111•1•11=1 0 60 120 Feet Printed: 3/15/2017 Created By: Audem Gonzales A VZO.Lqi6.,24:,F F-4): '1770,!'.P6-2400 cEt@cet- cct tom WEE cora CORNERSTONE 1...14.G0,.:LKINC5 S. t. URVLYING, INC_ 5eS2 Et2 Thompten, Svise 200 ElicE veil. Colauldo 00017 February 16, 2017 Mr. Randy Hunt Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Co. 80517 RE: "View @ 242" Development Plan Statement of Intent Dear Mr. Hunt: Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of CD Investments, are pleased to submit plans and correspondence for the development plan for the "View @ 242" Development. EXISTING CONDITIONS Subject property is currently vacant. When purchased, the property held two (2) residential units and a detached garage. The property slopes both west to east and north to south with an average slope of approximately 5%. Access to the property is from Virginia Drive being public right-of-way. Several rock outcroppings encompass the property with very few existing trees. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development will consist of ten (10) units in three (3) buildings. Two (2) of the proposed buildings (Buildings 'A' and '13') will incorporate four (4) units each with the last building (Building 'C') consisting of two (2) one-bedroom units. The project utilizes the "Attainable Housing Density Bonus" as outlined in Estes Valley Development Code 11.4 which will create six (6) market rate units and four (4) "attainable" units. Retaining walls are proposed with the majority being four (4) feet or less in height. A small portion of wall is proposed to be more than four (4) feet in height that will be engineered for the construction documents. A trash enclosure is proposed that will be both screened and covered. A sign advertising the development will be placed on the face of the trash enclosure facing Virginia Drive. TRAFFIC & PARKING Parking will be provided utilizing a proposed parking lot for the multi-family units and a garages are proposed for Building 'C'. Car-ports a proposed for the parking lot to provide covered parking. Parking calculations have been provided on the plan that show eighteen (18) parking spaces being required and eighteen (18) spaces being proposed with one stall being "ADA Van Accessible". The requirement for a "Traffic Impact Analysis" was waived during the pre-application meeting. UTILITIES Water - Town of Estes Park A 4- water main is existing within Virginia Drive. We arc proposing to connect to the existing main to provide water service to the development. Furthermore, the multi-family units are required to have a fire suppression system to be determined during construction documents. Using the Town's water service chart, a 1-1/2" water service is adequate for providing domestic water to the proposed units. Sanitary Sewer - Estes Park Sanitation District All sewer services will be 4" PVC. The service from Building `A . will flow towards an existing manhole within Virginia Drive. Sewer service from Buildings '13' & 'C' will flow towards and existing manhole within the Wonderview Village Townhomes development. The manhole is within an existing utility easement. Electric - Town of Estes Park An existing power pole is on-site which we are proposing to tie into with a proposed pad mount transformer to feed the proposed development. Units will be individually metered. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP We are requesting this plan be used as the "Preliminary Condominium Map" and reviewed as such. A draft copy of the "Declarations of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for View @ 242 Condominium Residences" has been submitted with this application for review. A Final Condominium Map will be submitted once the first building has constructed. Subsequent supplemental maps will he filed when future buildings are constructed. Please contact us if you have any questions. Si Y rely~~ Jes Reetz Planner ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Submittal Date: January 17, 2017 Lot Size 0.74 ac Area of Disturbance in Acres 0.7 ac F- Septic F None Septic r Yes 1X7 No Virginia Drive Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? IT Owner E, Applicant IX Consultant/Engineer 3 Application fee 3 Statement of intent 3 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan F 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan IT Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planning@estes.org ,4Apaiicabon Development Plan Special Review Rezoning Petition Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat 3 Boundary Line Adjustment r" ROW or Easement Vacation 3 Street Name Change F Time Extension F- Other: Please specify Condominium Map !X Preliminary Map F Final Map i Supplemental Map View @ 242 In-fill development consisting of ten (10) units (six (6) market rate, four (4) attainable) 242 Virginia Drive Metes and Bounds General 4nformation Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service None I Other (specify) None r Other (specify) UTSD UTSD I- No F- None RM- Residential Multi-family Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning RM- Residential Multi-family Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? Yes F No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is Attachments Jes Reetz - Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. to , Project Name 'Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Site Information 3525108002 & 3524400020 Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service IR Xcel EPSD PC EPSD I— Yes Other Previously residential, units have been demolished Residential Multi-family IX Town r Well ITC Town r Well F- Town of Estes Park -6, P.O. Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Departmen1 Phone: (970) 577-3721 Fax: (970) 586-0249 www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Revised 2013.08.27 KT Phone (303) 358-9394 Cell Phone Fax Email ,,Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-2458 Cell Phone Fax Email Jreetz@ces-ccc.com ammwo-rm--amr4 Record Owner(s) CD Investments, LLC Mailing Address PO Box 355, Hygiene, CD 80533 Phone (303 ) 358-9399 Cell Phone Fax Email dr.westmoreland© q/y, A ‘IL Applicant CD Investments, LLC Mailing Address PO Box 355, Hygiene, CO 80533 APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: www.estes.ono/ComDeviSched ules&Fees/PlannineAoolicationFeeSchedule.osif All requests for refunds must be made in writing, All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT, Derek Westmoreland Applicant PLEASE PRINT. Derek Westmoreland Signatures: Record Owner Applicant Date 4?(/2 Date 1 //7_7/ 7 Revised 2013.0827 KT Date Date 1 / 7 P P LE C ANT CERTIFICATIOV tr-, hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. t> In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Cade (EVDC). f> I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: Nttp://www.estes.ota/ComDeviDevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. Fa I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. V- I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. to The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I> i grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper Identification access to my property during the review of this application. • I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result In my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Derek Westmoreland Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Derek Westmoreland. Signatures: Record Owner Applicant Revised 2013.08.27 KT View@242PrelimCondoMap-100.xls Page 1 Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip Daniel Timbre!! 131 Willowstone Ct Estes Park CO 80517 Estes Highlands HOA PO Box 2333 Estes Park CO 80517 Wayne & Debra Klee PO ox 489 Sterling CO 80751 Edward & Anne DuBois 377 MacGregor Ave Estes Park CO 80517 Charles Hautamaki 6425 W 35th St Loveland CO 80538 David & Lisa Mechem 11543 Cty Rd 43 Drake CO 80515 Clazak LLC 4750 Table Mesa Dr Boulder CO 80305 Robert & Carol Wands 424 Carlile Ave Pueblo CO 81005 Philip & Janine LaFrankcis 24416 E Fremont Dr Aurora CO 80016 Stephen & Cheri Houser Frederick Houser 250 Virginia Dr Estes Park CO 80517 David Ridenour 908 Bonnie Ln Peotone IL 60468 GT350 Realty, LLC 910 E State St Lindsborg KS 67456 Ronald Gordon 3340 Rockwood Ln S Estes Park CO 80517 Karla Mosier PO Box 3305 Estes Park CO 80517 Sunnypoint, LLC CD Investments, LLC PO Box 355 Hygiene CO 80533 Juan & Susan Medina 7262 Fozena Dr Longmont CO 80503 Kejal & Orhun Kantarei 3202 Mayowood Hills Dr SW Rochester MN 55902 Linda Wyatt 1612 Corn Hill Ln Round Rock TX 78664 Walsh/Wisniewski Family Trust PO Box 4132 Estes Park CO 80517 Reid Coen 3033 NW 55th St Seattle WA 98117 William & Margaret Noll 12905 W Dodge Rd Omaha NE 68154 ZONED RM- RESIDEFMAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 17 WILLOWSTONE TOWNNOMES ExeSDNG 551.1 GurrER SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE. ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SET BACH LINE EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR W• ELEVATION FASTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR EPSTINGROCH OUTCROPPING EDISTING SIRE FENCE EXISTING W FENCE - - RF - EMSDNGOVERREAD UTER-v PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (SIZE TBD) PROPOSED 4' SEWER SERWCE PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDUIT • EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING SEWER MAMNOLE EXISTING TREE ME) • • • • • PROPOSED ETECTRPO PEDESTAL PARCEL No. 35251-03-046 ZONED RM- RESIDENTLAL MULTI-FAMILY 603 P1. GENERAL NOTES: I) ZONING - REF RESIDENTIAL muLTIPFHELY 21 SETBACKS - 15 FEET FROM STEEETS (25 FEET FROM ARTERIAL), TO FEET FROM REAR AND 10 FEET FROM SEES 31 ALL EXTERIOR 11011104$ SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DOWNCASTING: (REFER TO ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE CFKPIER LEVOCI 7.SE:1:n0N 791. ALL STREET 1:G3-ITS PELL NOT EXCEED 15 FT IN HEIGHT. 41 ALL 1115TuREIEIFKREAS WEL aE RESEEDED OR SODDED WIT14 NATIVE GPASSESARLDROWER MM, ALL NEW TREES AND SHRUBS WILL NE NANTAPED IN A HEALTHFUL COLEIMON. ALL AREAS WEL BE RAIGATED. Al TRAIN ENCLOSURES VIAL BE SCREENED WITH A SOUR FENCE /NG ANIMAL NESIETANT op CONTRACTORS MUST CALL UTILMES NOTFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO PRIOR To ExCAvAONG 04100-922-19171 M THE NuILDING HEIGHT WLL GE WIDEN THE LIMITS SET FORTH IN THE REVISE() HEIGHT MEASDREIFIENT PROv1313N OF THE EvI3C. Al ALL INTERSECTIONS SHALL HAVE STOP SNIS INSTALLED TO 41.111- CAL STANDARDS 9) ALL REOU RED INITROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETES/ OR GUARANTEEDN ACCORDANCE 1VERI EVDC 7.12 AND 1135.K IN) THE OWNER SHALL BE RECuRED T0 1.wpm FOR HARUCAP ACCESSIBILITY SI ACCORDANCE WITH THE AD A-111.CLANO EVSC 7.11_1REQUIREINENTS. 111 APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN CREATES A VESTED RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE ER OF TITLE 24. CR& AS MAEPEED. 121 THIS OEVELOPmENT PLAN M A SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MID DOES NOT SHOW ALL TEE DESIGN ELEMENTS NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT /NY OF TEE IMPROVEMENTS. 131 coNTouRs ARE F pvnkvAL 141 GONORTS. FRIERS. 'ANTS AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO DIE SARONG OR PNOTRuDiNGFRom TEE ROOT SHALL BE ScREENED.CONEREDOR PAINTED TO INNIMIZE MUM. IMPACT. 151 (PC SECTON 50,12.t) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROA:15 SHM.L HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED wpTH OF NOT LESS THAN 20 FUT. FIVE Am/ARAN) ACCESSROADS SHALL EIE PERMANENTLY SIGNED AND/OR MARKEDNOPARARG FRE LANIFt N ACcolinANcE WITH muNESPAL SIGN/TRAFEC STANDARDS. THE FIRE 815171101 WILL MELD LOCATE ALL SIGNAGEADOESS ROADS LESS THAN. FEET WIRE SHALL BE DARNED AS FRE LANES ON DONS SIDES OF THE ROAD- A. ACCESS ROADS AT LEAST 24 FEET BUT LESS THAN 32 FEET WEE SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SIDE OF RE ROAD /MANED AS A FIRE LANE. A. ACCESS ROADS AT LEAST 12 FEET WOE NEED MOHAVE FIRE LANE MARMNGS, IF) GCE. DENOTES GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT AS SAME ARE DEPINEIS IN THE MCl/RATION LCE- DENOTES LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT AS SAME ARE DEFINED IN THE DECLARATION A PROPOSED TRANSFORMER IMP IA.:MFR. IONT Of LEES WM P.M Wr VICINITY MAP SCALE 1,43E47 OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS (svoc§4.3.D.11 GROSS/NET LAND AREA TOTAL OPEN SPACE REDO OED 05%) TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIGED13 LOCATIONS) 31,951e SF 0.7341 ACRES 4.1940 SF CONK at 15.17% CARPORT COLUMN EPCO CONDOMINIUMS ZONED RM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY PROPOSED BLOCS RETAINING WALLL--, - - GCE ! -- PROPOSED CARPORT COL LAIN (TIPS 4 ' -L PROPOSED CARPORT LOT IA AMENDED EPCO SUSolvisioN ZONED RM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY CD HMr.Vr ICI, 0.0 PMI N•rre: APPROVAL: (STAFF LEVEL REVIEW) PARCEL No. 35251417-002 ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY EXISTING RESIDENCE I • • „ • • : VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CON DOMINIUM MAP LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24 T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO OWNERS STATEMENT: THE uNDERSCNED, BEING ALL THE OWNERS ou40 LIE NHOLOSP.3 OF THE REAL PROPERTY AS EmOwN ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL, BE SUSIECT 10 THE PiROASIONS OF THE ESTES vm.LEy DEVELOPMENT CODE MO MY OTHER ORDINANCE OF THE TOome OF ESTES PARN, COLORADO PERTAINNG THERETO. 'OPEN SPACE' --._.19S0 SF Ex1511NO ' GARAGE PROPOSED I OCX WALL APPROVED ED THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DAY OF 2017 825.00 Re., Hunt DP.. "OPEN SPACE' MD SF EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE OUTLOT WILLOWSTONE TOWNHOMES (2)- I BEDROOM BA (21- 3 BEDROOM 'OPEN SPACE 17008F 7 / ED ENIERGENC ACCESS EASE -'EXISTING TELEELEC/ CAGLE TED 09 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL I: ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, BLOCK la, TOWN OF ESTES PARK COUNTY OF LANKIER. STATE OF COLCTLADO PARTICULARLY DESCRIBES AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING:AT A PONT 55 FEET WEST MA 250 FEET SOL/1 H OF THE NORTI-N.ST CORNER OF LOT 1. BLOCK 10, TOWN OF ESTES PARK THENCE WEST 60 FEET. THENCE SOUTH ABOUT 114 POET TO THE MONITORS OF VSIG NIA ERNE. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH SEE OF SAID DRWE TO A POINT WHENCE 10 PONT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH, THENCE NORTH 110 FEET 70 THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF LARIMER. STATE OF COLORADO PAP_IMI; ...PORTION OE THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE VA OF SECTION 24. TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH. RANGE 33 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M, COUNTY OFLARIMER. STATE OF COLORADO. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A PONT 170 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTH 114CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24. THENCE NORTH 70 FEET, THENCE EAST AS FEET. THENCE SCUT-SIC FEET, THENCE WEST IS FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF LARINIER STATE OP COLORADO. PARCEL 31 COMMENCING AT A POINT 155 WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT BLOCK ID, TOWN OF ESTES PARR. COUNTY OF LAMER STATE OF COLORADO ACCORDING TO THE SECOND AMENDED FIAT THEREOF. THENCE SOUTH 204/ FEET. THENCE EAST 100 FEET: THENCE NORTH 200 FEET, THENCE WEST 11): FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. COUNT( OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. LEGEND: ' EXISTING SEWER DANNOLE 130 WEST WONDER VIEW AVE. ZONED RNI- RES/DENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY easne/820 ACcEss 64.5amerr "A. Z PLANVIEW 0 10 20 SCALE F. XJ SCALE IN FEET /4"; fC4 1 /1/ ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 11 ,•• WILLOWSTONE TOY/MIMES \ 7, DEVELOPER: CD INVESTMENTS, LLC P.0.1300155 HYGIENE, CO 1)0531 (1031358-9394 SITE STATISTICS: LIMMos Water Turn of EA. P. EM,Alc 'rpm NE.. FOR Seem EC. PRY Sarateibre 0E30 F4. E,3,41 Tolm3N3A, CommYLEA AVERAGE SLOPE • -5,5% ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NET DENSITY .31,4,73/sFy GROESINET LA1.10 AREA - 3, .FE tE SF 51.345 ACRES BASE ACCONINIDDATION 8 LINITS PER ACRE 2.0 ArTAJNAeLs 90NuS. *UNITS PER ACRE TOTAL HUMBER OF ACCOMMODATION UNITS ALLOWED I13'0/341. IRONED TOTAL ROARER PROPOSED IONFLB'S SITE LAND AREA COVERAGE STATISTICS COI/ER.40E %LOT (GROSS LM/S3 AREA - 31.335,SF) EASING LOT COVERAGE E•IINO&JMYga(TPSo removed) MO 1.93% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE BAdhms 30110 of 12.45% Pa14n9Orkes. 10495 It 52.34% SuewamotEnuyeays 51511 LET% TINS EncDs3no .18 al max TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 15.0E4 al 47.11% TOTAL OPEN SPACE 16,903 el 32.60% PARKING CALCULATIONS: MULTI-FAMILY DINFLUNG (EVOC 7.11) EFFICIENCY OR-1 BEDROOM UNIT: 1.5 PER SUNS 4. 0.25 GUEST SPACE (6 UNITS •1.75) 10.5 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING (010(1 7.11) 2-BEDROOM OR LARGER UNIT: 2 PEN WET SPACES + 0.25 GUST SPACE (4 UNITS .2.25) 9 TOTAL REOUIRE) 19.5 PROPOSED STANDARD PARJUNG STALL 15 PROPOSED ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL PROPOSED GARAGE PARKING 3 PROPOSED PROPOSED PARKINS STALLS 19 SHEET INDEX: SHEET 1 SREPLAN SHEET 2 GRADING PLAN SHEET] LIKITY PLAN SHEET • LANDSCAPE RAN SHEET 5 BOOR TURN TEMPLATE CORNERSTONE 81 • Call bell you. dig. re. 3-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OP UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILMES. REVISION mum m JO_ o•ro IS Ian CMC/tBDSV $CA, PROJECT TITLE VIEW I 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP SMFES SITEPLAN 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO `" CD INVESTMENTS, LLC ccs 1333 I. IHOPAPSCIN..WZ SlifTE 2N1 LUTES PARK CO e¢/IT P111070159&2458 F. WO) S56-2453 1,1,r ro.0 A 5,1E,, F.) 2017 CORNERSTONE ENDREEAPFGE SuRvEYRG. _col:FR.1ST RIGHTSRES41NE0 O di pV OUTLOT WILLOWSTONE ; TOWNHOMES II VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24 T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO LOT 1A AMENDED EPCO SuBDIVIs3ON ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY TOW 9S 0 (sou?, 130') EXISTING I RESIDENCE L Twig? TOW 92 TOWG0 TON 96 BOW 90_y __' • BOw . ___________ - SON FM BON 94 ---- - 180.14' (SOL1114 1/00°) TOW 03 TOW 01 TOW 03 BOW 00.5 BOW 97S 4._ ToO.,;===imF,:„ PARCEL No. 35251-07-022 ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY '6E4 EXISTING I RESIDENCE 500115'23"W th 70'). TOW 02 BOW 01 /, I mama GARAGE / IFF4 MOM 2 +.1 4% F0 PG FP FG 001- E 9.b.-72._. TOW SE • BOW 92 TO FG FG FO 1.01.19 00.95 99.15 70.06' h 70. ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 12 WILLOWSTONE TOWNNOMES / , a (4 / /,, I .; / / ti ZONED RM- /f RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 11 WILLOWSTONE TOWNHOMES 500-07'44-E 200.00' (SOUTH 2001 132 WEST WONDERVIEW AVE. ZONED RM.- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SOUTH 119.28 ----- (501.011,1 PARCEL No. 35251-06-045 ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY EPCO crmoommotims ZONED NM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY z PLANVIEW 0 10 20 SCALE 1• q,41F IN FEET RE,IENEN, I RIM. Er AA *WA —..T- 0.111. BY —.{a— P.,E .....'-' ,,,,, up .1,s g,..,.. PRGIRCT TREE VIEW tp) 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP GRADING PLAN 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO 11006 CD INVESTMENTS, LLC 1094 FIG THOIAPSOM AVE SERE SOO ESTES PARK CO 60517 PSI (9,41390-2258 ENE 191015815.1511 ION NT. SuEET INE,T saa tot 2 5 WENN, 0u...so] CORNERSTONE ' A, '' 3€171ITRTANE 2011G0FINERREONG ENGINEERING E SURVETING. INC COPYRIGHT-ALL IICArrs RESERVED LEGEND: SUEUECT PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LWE SURDINO SETBACK LINE 769.5 EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION EXISTING INTERMEOPTE CONTOUR 11 I T EXISTING ROCK OUTGAOPPING EXISTING WIRE FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE — OH? — ExTSTINuovERNEAD 2126or PROPOSED WATER SERVICE 102111169 S OA. PROPOSED r 000E0 SERVICE P Os PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDOR EXISTING POWER POLE 4D EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL • EXISTING TELEPNOnE PEDESTAL • EXISTING GAS METER ENey.00 SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING TREE ;rep, O AR000160 E105151 U PEDESTAL ARORCENEN IRANEROFUNER FG DENOTES PROPOSED -FINISHED GRADE- ELEVATON DENOTES PROPOSED FL 1FLOMIND ELEVATION FF4 DENOTES PROPOSED 'FINISHED FLOOR' ELEVATION DENOTES PROP:25E011OP OF WALL-6 19612052 OF WALL. ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION T.- PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE TOW SON 1/1 Knox Awes below. • Call before you dig. 3.BU5INESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG. ORADF OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARDNE. OF UNDERGROUND ME.BERLITILINES I VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP EP Co CON DOMIN1UMS ZONED RN1- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY F / , / / ' : N ' / DUSTING / / GARAGE „" SD0115'23-W ,S9.76' S•uth 70')/ ;Z.. Tow COIN f,1, 2 ,LI 5 7E 70.05' / th 70. • " +- - --L B% ~-94.61 9017 Pose .? tlilll~lIIIEI __ 1 ellillillin11111 FG I jef it i COE 4 71 1 FG FG 01.5 000"07'44•E 200.00' (SOUTH 200') 130 WEST WONIDERVIENV AVE. ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY Z PLANWEW 0 10 20 SCALE 1'•7A SCALE IN FEET 02_7 PEN ro FG p T DS,V 03,0 • 052 , FG ea• fa sir ---.."M11111101 : '•• • - rrgr 75% TONI DOW 95 .s.4 (sour 130') RESIDE-ICE L _ - TOPT59 TOW se 1=1097 DOW B4_ _________ _ .acui -•—• tow 94 re.A41, _MAMIE 4..S. DATE: PRO7E5T ISLE VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMiNIUM MAP REvIsiov FBP, Jut 1, DN. RA 9HEET1IT0E. GRADING PLAN 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO 5.1020 JOO M1,0 SNEET CD INVESTMENTS, LLC CLIENT: ...Wt. .5, OAR i"ve„ SO" .65.01. DE6SWEDIT, wR CRAM. _Ea— GnPOol0ter 2 5 r o11 vTA7S WOW- • Call before you dig. p CALL 3-BU5INE50 DA10 IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRASS, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEAGER uTIODES. 81 109200 TNOMPSCIN AVE CkillSt;.‘164. SURE NO ESTES PAFPN CO 50517 ITT E410].5613.2456 FAX W. 599-2455 CORNERSTONE R 51_ RVE .1•C 2017 CeRNEFLSIONE 059105£01)0 5 WI/P.N.:I NO COPROGI-IT -ALL R1GHT5 5E5EI,E0 PARCEL No 10201-02402 ZONED RIA- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY TOW TOW Si 11-3 _ BOW COS 6011 995 SCAN 47S FG -FG FG SCANTS 01.,3 -01.19 0095. LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 24 T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 1.71 00').. LOT IA AMENDED EPCO 77 .."--- l'AL. -E 9927 TONES SUEIDEMICIN • , BONDS - .,, ZONED RM. RESIDENT LAL MULTIFAMILY FG 95.15 O ci GA ouTLOT WILLOW STONE TowNHomES II /// ZONED RM- RES iDENTIAL MULTI-MOLY LOT 12 WILLOWSTONE , TOwmomEs ,f i- r 1 1/// ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-GAMILY L0111 WiLLOWSTONE I/ O TowNHOmES ▪ \ 022 PARCEL NO. 30251.00416 ZONED RM- RESIDENT6AL MuL11-FAmILY SOUTH - (50U TA 1149 r LEGEND: SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY L510 50I01+0 SEThAcx LINE — 7690— — EOSINS INDEX CONTOUR WI ELEVATION ExISORGINTERIBEDIATE CCP-ITC:AA ExISTING ROCA cATCRORPND E0107100 WIRE FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE OAP EXISTINGOVERNEAD UrLIIY PROPOSED wATE13 SERVICE 15E8 LINN PROPOSED 4' SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDUIT EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING ELEC7RIOPEGIE,RTAL ExISTING TELEPADtE PEDESIAL EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING SEWER 400101.5 E.-011155 TREE (71157 PROPOSED ELECTRIC PEDESTAL PROPILISTETRANsFORNEO DENOTES PROPOSED TINISHED GRADE ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED TLIDAPNE• ELEVATION FF. DENOTES PROPOSED TINGRED FLOOR' ELEVATION TOW DENOTED PROPOSED TOP OF I/VAL.& BOW 1110TTOAI OP 'NALL. ELEVADON DENOTES. PROPOSED ENAPPOE FLOW DIRECTION • PROPOSED MANAGE SCALE EXISTING $ .35 RESIDENCE Pr 1 S AN P DFc PrA 4WP 7 FG FL VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24 T5N, FT/3W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL No, 35251-07-022 ZONED Rml- REsIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 1A AMENDED SPOT SUBDIVISION ZONED RM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY FOOTING RESILIENCE r- EPCO GONPOIIINILIMS ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY f I EXISTING GARAGE LEGEND: SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE BALDING SETBACK LINE EH', EXISTING INOEX CONTOUR WI ELEVATION EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR dLLILI EXISTING ROCS OUTCROPPING EXISTING- WIRE FENCE FASTING WOOD FENCE — oRP EXISTINGOVERHEAD UTILITY PROPOSED WATER SERVICE tam 113121 S PROPOSED , SEWER SERVICE P MOROSE n ELECTRIC CONDE, -0- ENSTING ROWER POLE EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EK1.17150 GAO METER EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING TREE {WP.) 0 PROPOSED ELECTRIC PEDESTAL PROPOSED TRANSFORMER N - TI EXISTING I EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE RP..1•759522 PP, 7691 SI OUTLOT WILLOWSTOW TOWNIAOMES PROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRIC PROPOSED I ELECTRIC PER TO PAD FEEDUNITBMSA ELECTRIC BA. BUILDWG C METERS (ryp., / ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMLY LOT 12 wILLOWSTONE TowNsomES 1'../ '7 / A 4 ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 11 WILLOWSTONE TOWNEITMES PROEOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED ELECTRIC RED. EXISTING SEWER 130 WEST To FEED UNITS MMTECLE PlAmT626.60 WONDERVIEW AVE, A3AAA.PI LIT NJ-T6T662 ZONED RM- I RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY 40 PROPOSED ELECTRIC PFD. TO FEED UNITS MS AZ PARCEL No. 36251-08-046 ZONED RN- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY PLANVIEW 0 IL 20 SCALE 11. 22 SCALE ON FEET LIGHT & POWER DEPARTMENT NOTES: WATER DEPARTMENT NOTES: ESTES PARK SANITATION DISTRICT NOTES: 11 PLEASE SCREE/UTE A REQUIRED MEET AT SITU WM JOE LOCKHART LINE SUPERB/TENDERT AT 150512.2.611 11 A PRNATE WATER LINE EXTENSION WELL BE REQUIRED FOR DOMESTIC SERVICE FRE PROTECTIONMC INFRASTRUCTURE MUST 1) EACH BULDRIG IS INSCRIBED AS HAVING A SERVICE LINE,WHICESS ACCEPTABLE UNLESS THE RXTURE COURT FORME BE INSTALL ED; TEST/4 PERFORMEDRASSE0 ANO ACCEPTED BY THE DIVISION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS. BULDING EXCEEDS THE LIMIT FOR A, SERVICE. IF THE MAXIMUM FIXTURE COUNT IS EXCEEDED THE UNE WM NEED TO BE 2) ALL TRENCHING AND GoNpurr FEET BE PERFORMED AND tssrALLEo BY THE TOWN OF ESTES PARE LUNT AND POWER TummoN ANY PROJECT PHASING OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL UPSIZE-0 T06' IN ORDER TO HANDLE THE FLOW PRODUCED. THIS WALL BE INVOICED TO THE DEVELOPER. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PHASE0 INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE CMPLETEO AND ACCEPTED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY FELONS PERMITS WITHIN THE PHASE. 7) BERVEE INES SHALL HAVE 3-FEET 065101..1 COVER AND A SLOPE OF NOT LESS MAN thE PER FOOT. 3) SERVICE LINE TRENCHING L CONDUIT (BETWEEN THE METER AND THE BUILDINGI TO BE PRONFTED AND PL9rAu.ED BY of vELOPER TO TOWN SPECIE/CATIONS. 2) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. APPROVAL AND SIGNATURES EY IRE LMISTIES DIRECTOR OHMS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. NO INSTALLATION OF ANY PROJECT NFRASTRUCTURE 5 ALLOWED UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION a) WHT AND IA , AZIREDUIRES ONE 114. ORANGE PVC SPARE CONOLFT FROM TR JUNCTION BOXIMANSFoRIAER INTO ME DRAWINGS HAVE SEEN SIGNED. ALONG WITH THE suomosiom OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PROL/DE TIE CONTACT BLS G AT INFORMATION OF THE FIRM OR PERSON ACTING AS UTILITY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR TIE PROJECT. 51 UTILITY PEDESTALS MUST BE SPACED AT A MINIMUM SW ONE FOOT APART. I) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS MUST INCLUDE • PLAN P.NO PROFLE TO SHOW POTENTIAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER AND OMER UTILITIES INCLUDING CULVERTS. SHOW I/TATTY 5 TRANSFORMERS CANNOT BE PLACED MORE THAN SO FEET FROM THE BUILDING BEND SERVICED. EASEMENT LOCATIONS VITALS UTILITY IS NOT% ROAD TOONE OF WAY. • METERINGTAP LOCATION PLAN (DRAWING) INDICATING TAP LOCATIONS AND SIZES. WATER METER LOCATIONS ANDRUS, AND 7) ALL NEW METER CANS MUST HAVE A BYPASS. BUILDINGS SERVED Mr CACTI. 6) ALL INFRASTRUCTURES MUST BE PAID IN ADVANCE TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. NO BULDWG PERMITS WEL BE APPROVED BY II ALL WATER LINE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MALL BE DONE ACCORDING TO THE PATER UTILITY POLICIES AND STANDEADS. LIGUT a POWER ANIL SUCH TES. 5) BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED AT SOME LOCATIONS, CONTACT THE CROSS-CONNECTION CCPROL 5 ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION MUST BE UNDERESouND SPECIALIST AT 020,577-5675 70 DISCUSS AND RESEW TEE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO POTENTIAL HawNos DTI THE PROPERTY. 101 ALL OTHER MATERIAL WILL BE PURCHASED FROM INSTALLED BY ME TOWN OF ESTES PARK. 6) THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINEIS) MOST BE AHANooNED AT THE YAP WHEN DIE NEW PROPCISHR FIRE sPINNRIEREERATCE 11) ALL TOWN OF ESTES PARR LIGHT ARV POWER LINES, IPRIMARYISECONDARY) MUST HAW A SOFT. (AMITY EFREEIENT. THIS LINES ATTE RACED PI SERVICE, EASEMENT CAN BE SHARED BY WATER. PHONE AND CABLE. 2) FOR ANT STRUCTURE ADHERED TO RAVE A FIRE EuPPRESSON SYSTEM. A MAKER DRAWNS MUST DE TURNED IN TO TEE 121 WATER MUST DE AT LEAsT9FT FROMELECTR/C. WATER ONISION NOTING: • LOCATION, SWING AND TYPE OP BACRPLOW PREVENTION DEVICEIS) 131 ALL SERVICES MUST DE ON THE OWNERS PROPERTY CR BE Arms A DESIGNATED EASEMENT. • ENGINEERED ELOw REOUREI/Erws FOR T.5 EIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. PPE SPE EASED ON NEPA -TATTLE 10.1021.3. FIRE FLOW PRODUCED AT A LIA.ILIUM VELOCITY OF loFrAEo. IA) THE SITE OF THE SERVICE MUST SE SHOWN ON THE ELECTRIC. DRAWINGS. RIPE SIZE FLOW RATE IS) ALL EXISTING LINES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE ELECTRICAL DRAWEIGS, 7 120 GPM 101 TRANSFORMERSJUNCTION BOXES MUST BE IN AN EASEMENT. OR IF 5156111.0 011 TEE PROPERTY LINE. E 390 GPM 0 EBOOPIA IT) ALL PRIMARY LINES MUST DE AFT DEEP WITH RED WARNING TAPE AT 2FT 0 1560 GPM 10- 2949 GPM 10). ALL SUBDIVISION you BE DESIGNED BY AN ELECTRICAL ENGINEER 12- 3625 GPM 15 ALL PIPES MUST SE SCHEOULE 40 GRAY PVC PIPE ALL CONITIJIT MUST PE PUT INTO AFIRE RACK. THERE MUST BE 2.2.INCH. ID SILL CONTROL METHOD 'ADORE AHOWN FOR PROPER DISPOSAL OF DROHARQE FROM THE RELIEF vALVE, RADIDATES 7.455.1 AND 2-SMO1S CONOVER NA PRIMARY TREK.., LOCATION AND SRNS OF ORAINACA CAPABLE OF ACCOINJOESTINC. THE 55051ARSE THAT ETuLD DCCuli 25 TOWN MUST HAVE OANEESHR OE ALL ROAD CROSSINGS, ID FRE SUPPRESSION LINES REQUIRE BOTH A CHLORINATOR AND PRESSURE TEST CONDUCTED SY A REPRESENTATIVE Of THE RATER DIVISION PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE. ANY FIRE SUPPRESSION LINE SERVICING A SULONG FROM THE WATER MAN IS A 21) ON UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICES. IT PHIL FIE THE ELECTRICIAN'S RESPONSELITY TONG THEM INTO THE TRANSFORMERS PRIVATE SERVICE LINE AND MST RE NOTED IS SUCH CHI THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE SURDIVEION PLAT. FUTURE REPAIR OR PEDESTALS OR MAINTENANCE NEOLIKED OM THIS SERVICE IS THE SCAR RESRONSIBETTY OF THE PROPERTY OwNER. FRE SUPPRESSION LISS REQUIRE A STATE CERTIFIED FIRE USE INSTALLER MAD MUST HAVE TIE APPROPRIATE FOPS COMPLETED AND SAYE: Rs‘,..13,J. ET 72) THE ELECTRICOMRILL NEED TO SCHEEKLE tons LAP TO UNLOCK AND OPEN TRANSFORMERS OR PEDESTALS. SUBMITTED TO PP ESTES VALLEY FIRE MARSHALL. oao, COFER FTEHAS CITIANEITHE PEA. 1.17,. TO AOCAESS ...raw CONDO NAP Y 22) ALL TEMEORARY AND PERMANENT ELECTRIC SERVICES WILL BE CONNECTED BY LIGHT NEUTER IATTRIN 5 ELISEJESS TAW 10) ALL CONSTRUCTION AND PROCESSES SMALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE TREPAN'S:5AL FRE CODE GOOD 505 MM) 81 • Call begreyou, dig, AFTER THE STATE ELECTRICAL !SPECTOR & FEES ARE PAID. 071111s). ME INTERNATIONAL PAL DINO CODE mn o EDITION I AND TOWN OF ESTES PARK CODES AND STANDARDS. 1St ...."? 21) PERMANENT METER SOCKETS MUST BE PERMANENTLY MARKED WITH AOD1SESS OR LK IT NUMBER 25) ALL SPARE CON ours OIL 33 PROVIDED Ey LICHENS) POWER AND To BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THEIR cost WA 3-BUSINESS DAYS IN AOVANCE BEFORE YOU ,,6„L„, ..„..,,,,.,,,,,„ , 11100. ER El...1-HEET LIGHT AND POWER Will ROT REMELURSE CONTRACTOR OR DEVELOPER FOR CONDUIT OBTAIN ED ELSEWHERE DIG. GRACE. OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF uNDERGRDUND MEMDER UTILITIES. OMAN ay _0_ DA . 1." 411 AM N1 3 5 cHRAEW. .,--I EE....2 AS HID. SKEET TITLE. UTILITY PLAN 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO `"' CD INVESTMENTS, LLC Plin.EGT TITLE, VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP ---... C, 414 0., PP BIG TROMPS. AVE SUITE COO ,IIP ESTES PAW. CARDS!' INC191013.9D295e il, M70, 5654.1 CORNERSTONE a,..zyczrzzE.141,,,,NE£F.W. SUR., ING. (1) PP 4) SHRUBS EPCO CONDOMINIUMS ZONED RM, RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY . (4) SHRUBS TOTAL REQUIRED: T1 62 PLANTING LEGEND PP •Plwaspamerom IPoncleroax DAN (II TOTAL) 17 >// 7,AT?:7 7 I REMOVER RLAP ALPLI= RC'ESILF OF AND BALL IF PLANT LS SHIPPED WITH A AIME BASKET AROUND TEE ROOTS...LI—DLIT THE WBIE BASKET AND REMOVE. PLACE ROOT MALL ON uPEYBAYATEE OR TAMPED SOIL. TAMP SOL AROUND ROOT BALL CASS F ITALY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO TEAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. Know what a below. • Call before you dig. fir CALL 39USINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF 4/NDETIOR0IN3 MOMER. unijrIES_ 81 VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP PARCEL No 35551-07-002 ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY I ExISONG RESIDENCE LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24 15N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COILORADO AMENDED EPCO SUBDIVISION ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY (I) PP SHRUBS °) HRIJBS - — _ ----- _ ) • (3)SHRUBS / (3) EXISTING GARAGE (4) SHRUBS EXISTING RESIDENCE J. _ _ — LEGEND: SUBJECIL PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY Lbw BULGING SETBACK LINE — — 7606— — EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR WI ELEVATION EXISTING INTERMEDIATE COMICTuR RUSTING ROCK OVICROPPING EXISTING WIRE FENCE o EXISTING WOOD FENCE RCA — EXISTINGOVERHEAD UTILITY PROPOSED WATER 5E50 IcE (SUE THITT S PROPOSED AT SEWER SERVES 9 Es - PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDUIT -0- EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING OAS METER EXISTING SEWER MANIOLE EXISTING TREE (TER3 0 PROPOSED ELECTRIC PEDESTAL PROPOSED TRANSFORMER (4) SHRUBS OUTLOT - WILLOWS/ONE ! TOWNHOMES (1 — PP // / ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 12 WILLOWSTONE TOWNHOMES 1/ Z PARCEL No. 35251.08E46 ZONED RM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY I / / ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 11 WILLOWSTONF TOWNHOMFS PLANVIEW TREE PLANTING DETAIL - B&B TREES IN ALL SOIL TYPES 13D WEST WONDERVIEW AVE ZONES RM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS. GO-DCININANT LEADERS, AND PROSE. OR WM/ BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TwIG$ AND LATERAL BRANCHES NAV BE PRUNED, HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF TEE CROWN. MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE 80 THE NURSERY. AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE, MULCH RIEG FT. DIAM.MM SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1.2 IN. HIGHER Al SLOWLY DRAINING SORB. EXCAVATE TREE PIT TO 2.4. RAIL DIAMETER. B IN. 31N. MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAVNTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE A 13.111GIA OF THREE YEAS AFTER PLANNING UNDISTURBED SUBDRe DECIO.TOUS TREES: WRAP TRUNK WW' TREE WRAP FROM BOTTOM LP TO FIRST BRANCH I SECURE. STONES GUY USING 2 STAKES SPACED PRY. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TREES SHRUBS PARKING LOT PERIMETER (1531F) 5 31 STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER (62 LF) 2 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (8.258 SF) 4 27 I BM- Berta* meraaReTab pal Leal EERILY/l3 TOTAL) PF Polon. SAN. DINNIENNAIS) ID TOTAL) PM - PhusmNp IA. Pin*. (a TOTAL) JOG .A.MHevecrE4,,,,,icou Gar 04 Gua angtwlIBTOTRIG COMMON RARE BOTANICAL NAME POUNDS FERACRE Slmyler eiNealgrass Elyria.. Irachwavka v. Pryer T Sheep fescue Forma owl+ v. Cover 3 %INN., wr.oalve. PascEpyrt,tt, STATE .....FRA.Ewa, I Idaho Test. Fas%oue VaNTEATIE 2 Sm4PAL4.2 LAJagrow. P. AL,TX4440. 2 Eike war. Boutalcua gracills v. HaENN, 2 13bcKey.1 mum RuabEckla Elie Dl RAILS MA. ONTErorno., Gard,. Fenstemm .414-1.4 04152111. GIstate IA 014e flax LIELm lewiall U.S 561'4.0 poppy P.m./err Hasa. 0.1 TOTAL 2730 SEED MIX LANDSCAPING NOTES: 11 ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED AS NATURALAPPEAPITIC LAND FORMS WITI-1 CURVES TWAT REND IN WITH ADJACENT uNIII$TuRBEC, SLOPES ABRUPT ANGULAR TRANSITIONS AND LINEAR SLOPES SHALL BE AVOIXO (SECTION 7.2.C5) 2) AIL AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING SHALL BE REVEGETATED WHIN ONE (1)0ROwmG SEASON APITH CONSTRUCTION. USING A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NAME OH ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. THE DENSITY OE THE ITEESTARLISHME GRASS veuETATION AFTER ONE (II GNOMIC SEASON SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SOL EROSION AND INVASION OF WEEDS. (SECTION TA .C2) 3) ALL PORTIONS OF THE STE WHERE EXISTING VEGETATIVE COvERR OANIASED OR REMOVER THAT ARE NOT OTHERWISE COVERED WEIR NEW IMPROVEMENTS. SHALL BE SUCCESSFULLY REVEGETATED WITH A SURSTANTIN, MIXED STARA OE NATIVE OR /TEMPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS (SECTION 1.5.041 41 ON MANMADE SLOPES OF 20% OR GREATER. PLANT MATERIALS WTI OPEP ROOTING CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE SURFACE RUNOFF. ALL MANEAADE SLOPES GREATER THAN 53% WILL HE MULCHED AND NETTED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION ANOREVEGETATION (SECTIONS 72.CA AND al 5) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE. TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURHIC CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING kEvEGETAFION OR IANDSGAPING, SUCH AS CUT.AND-FLL SLOPES. )SECTION TICS) S) NO TREES OR VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED OUTSIDE THE APPROVED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. (SECTION 1.6.61) TT CONIFER TREES SHALL SE SEED AS 50% EIGHT FEET TALL AND 50% AT SIX FEET TALL AT PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE SUED AS SO% AT ELENA INCH CALIPER ASS NM AT 11Y0-wc. CA-RER PLANTING. SHRUBS SHALL ESE 5 GALLON CONTAINER OR I EPIT.FR AT PLANTING. ISECTION 15.020) 8) ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPEDFICAT IONS FOR NUMBER I GRADE. AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY STANDARDS Of THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, TITLE 25, ARTICLE 20, CRS,. AS AMENDED (SECTECH 1,0.2E) R ALL LANDSCAPES SHALL INCLUDE A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING AUTOMATED SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH INDIVIDUAL DSP LINES FOR NATURAL AREAS: (SECTION 7.5 DS) SPRINGER SYSTEM TOPE TEMPORARY FOR PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE IN PLACE FORA LIAMAUM OF 15 MONTHS. 191 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY, GROWING CONDITION STALL TIES. HE PROPERTY OWNER IT RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRIGATING. PRUNING. WEEDING, MONANG. ERTIHZ1NG, REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS IN POOR CONDITION AND OTHER NAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANPNBB AS NEEDED- ISEGTION 7.54)) II) ALL TREES SHALL BE TIMED OR GUYED MID FENCED TO PROTECT FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. NO CHAIN-LINK FENCING SHALL BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT LANDSCADING FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. (seems 7.5.121 12) DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE SHALL. NOT SE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE BY WILDUFE, 13) IF CONSTRUCTOR ACTEVIre RESULTS (N THE DEATH OE TREES SHOWN AS TREE TO BE PROTECTED' NATHIN A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS AFTER THE FINAL CERTIFICATE or OCCUPANCY HAS SEEN RELEASED. THE TREE SHALL BE REPLACED PURSUANT TO ENDG 'EN:NS) co' 5.7 TOT EVERGREEN TREES, STAKE L OUT USING 3 STOKES M MDT AROUND TREES. NO SPRAYING OR WRAPPING NOM PROTECT TREE WITH STALL WIPE FENCING POE ABOVE GROUND. FENCE TO REMAIN UNTL PLANT CAN SURVIVE WILDLIFE DAMAGE. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES DO-IERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT vLSIBLS SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT MALL WITH SOL. OS IN- DIM PLASTIC HOSE GALVANIZED WIRE Di CABLE TWIST WIRE TO TIGHTEN. I 5 N. HARDWOOD STAKES DR EITHER APPROVED STOLE NIATERM. 4 IN. H IGH DAR/ SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL MAK/TAN TINDER ALL TOPO CONDITIONS pFgFJEpF .111. G/SCANDS. .33 TESTERSTESTERS PREU SOCAISR N/A 4.11 NOTE THIS DETAIL ASSUMES THAT THE PLANTING SPACE IS LARGER THAN B FT. SQUARE, OPEN TO THE SID. AND NOT COVERED HY ANY PAYNE... GRATING THIS DETAIL IS TYPICAL IN NIEPIT 1.11..Y. CONTRACTOR SNAIL ADJUST HIS WORK TO ACCOMMODATE ALL COMMONS, PROJECT TILE VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP SHEET 5150: LANDSCAPE PLAN 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE SHTFT (HEEL TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO 4 5 CD INVESTMENTS, LLC 15591 ERTHORPsoN AVE nTE ARE ESTES PIPH, CO LOU:; PN:(91OISB8-2E93 FAX, 19701501I-2159 CORNER LONE 2[317 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING ....VETO. INC COPYRIGHT ALL RI.TS RESERVED ....waveallr 33T J.. IT TDI B33.301 SCE BST.. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY VIEW @ 242 DOMINIUM MAP PRELIMINARY CON PARCEL No. 35251-67-002 ZONED RAM RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY (11) (3) SHRUBS —(8 SHRUBS (m SErc, '11 (1) PP `4— (6) SHRUBS (3) SHRUBS OF THE SE 1/4 OF OF THE 6TH P.M., COLGRADO AMENDED E PG0 SUBOMS ION ZONED RM. EXISTING RESIDENCE (4) SHRUBS r 3) SHRUBS rr.. OUTLOT WILLOWSTONE I TOWNHOMES PD // ZONED RN- RES IDENTLAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 12 WILLOWSTONE TOWNRCNES • 1/ r. 1/ ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 11 WILLOWSTONE TOWNHOMES PARCEL No. 35251-08-046 ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 SECTION 24 TSN, R73W r __LARIMER COUNTY, EPCO CONDOMINIUMS ZONED RM. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY PP (1) PP 130 WEST WONGERVIEW AVE ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY Z PLANVIEW TREE PLANTING DETAIL - B&B TREES IN ALL SOIL TYPES NOTE: THIS DETAT. ASSUMES THAT THE PLANTING SPACER LARGER THAN a FT SQUARE. OPEN TO THE SKY, AND NOT COVERED BY ANY PAYING OR GRATING THIS DETAL IS TYPICAL EH INTENT OILY CONTRACTOR SMALL ADJUST HR WORK TO ACCOMMODATE ALL CONDITIONS. EVERGREEN -FREES: STARE B Mir USING 9 STARES 62 126. ARCUNE TREES NO SPRAYING OR WRAPPING DO NOT MEANLY PRUNE IRE TRH AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIABS.CODOMINATO LEADERS. AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED, HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL NOS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF TEE CROWN. MARE THE NORTH SFR OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, MID ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE MULCH ENG 5 FT. OLAM. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE CR 1-2 N. PICKER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. EXCAVATE TREE PIT TO Or BALL DIAMETER. N. 3 IN. MULCH. DO NO PLACE gi ?t? ? 7 MULCDA.IN TIKE LA u ar- , 111 ,,E =L F INK. 7, 2, ? 7,7 77 7 7 777 A AINIMUM OF THREE YEARS AFTER 77? 7 PLANTING. UNDISTURBED SUOGRADF MCI:roc:1u S TREE& WRAP TRUNK NOT TREE WARP FROM BOTTOM UP TO FRET BRANCH L SECURE. STAKE 6 GUY USING STAKES SPACED 180.. NOTE: PROTECT IEEE MTH 5 TALL KITE FENCNO 1,13. ABOVE GROUND. FENCE TO REMAIN UNTIL PLANT CAN SuRv/vE vaLDLIFE DAMAGE. EACH TREE REST RE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS NIMBLE AT THE TOP OF TIE ROOT BALL TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER OR TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH Rau DR IN. DAM. PLASTIC HOSE OALvArozEDwIRE OR CABLE TWIST WIRE TO TIGHTEN, 1.5 N. HARDWOOD STAKES OR OTHER APPROVED STAKE MATERIAL PL HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL MANTAN UNDER ALL TORO CONDITIONS REMOVE ALL TWINE . ROPE MO BURLAP /RCM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL LE PLANT R SAPPED WITH A WRE BASKET AROUND ORE SOOT BALL. CUT THE WIRE BASKET AND REMOVE. PLACE ROOT ILA, ON UT/EXCAVATED DR TAMPED SOIL TAMP SOL AROUND ROOT RAIL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT HALL DOES NOT SHIFT Know WISAt6 .111 81 • Call before dig. ...,1,k ,/,,,, CALL 3-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE NARKING OP UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILMES, LANDSCAPING NOTES: I) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SMALL BE RESTORED AS NATURALAPPENENG LAND FORMS. WM4 CURVES THAT BLEEP NJ WITH ADJACENT uNoisTuRSED SLOPE& ABRUPT ANGULAR TRANSITEAS AND LINEAR SLOPES SMALL RE AVOIDED (SECTION 72.C1) 2) ALL AREAS °WHEELED BY GOADING SHALL BE REVEGETATEO WITHIN 01.4E INGROWING SEASON AMER CONSTRUCT/DN. USING A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVE CR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. THE OENSETY OF THE EREVAN. REED GRASS VEGETATION AFTER ONE (I) GROWING SEASON SMALL BE ADEQUATE TOPREVE NT SOL EROSION AND INVASION GE WEEDS. (SECTION >I C2) 31 ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE EXLSTIRG VEGETATIVE COVER is DAMAGED OR REMOVED. THAT SAE NOT OTHERWISE COVERED WITH NEW INPROVEMENTS. SHALL BE SUCCESSFULLY REVEGETATED WITH A SUBSTANTIAL ANTED STAND. OF NATIVE OR ADAPTED GRASSES AND CAMPO COVERS (SECTOR 7.5.04) 41 ON NAN-MADE SLOPES OF ASS OR GREATER, PLANT MATERIALS WITH DEEP ROOTING CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT WEL MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE SURFACE RUNOFF. ALL MAN-MADE SLOPES GREATER THAN 50% WILL BE MULCHED AND NETTED TO ENSURE ACEMATE STABILIZATION AND REVEGETATION. (SECTIONS 7203 AND 4) 5) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVES DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL RE STOCKPILE° AND CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS RECUIRINGREVEGETATICN OR LANDSCANING, SUCHASCOT-ANDEILL SLOPES. ISEDTION 7.2.5) 5$ NO TREES OR VEGETATION SHAD, BE REMOVED OUTSIDE THE APPROVED ARTS OF DISTURBANCE. (SECTION 7.3.131) 7) CONFER TREES SHALL SE SIZED AS 50% EIGHT FEET TALL AND 50% AT SIX FEET TALL AT PLANING DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 56% AT FOUR-NCH CALMER AND 50%AT TWO-INCH CALMER PLANTING. SHEARS Situ]. RE 5 GALLON CONTAINER OR LARGER AT ;LANNI.) $5500011 0,5D201 El ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICA. ASSOCIATIoN OF NURSERYMEN SPECFICATONS FOR NUMBER 1 GRADE, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE DUALITY STANDARDS OF THE COLORADO NuESERY ACT. TITLE 35, ARTICLE 2a. CRS.. AS AMENDED. (SECTION TS.02E) 91 ALL LANDSCAPES SHALL INCLUDE A pRORE Nor furriCTIONING AUTOMATED SPRINKLOISysITAL wmi INDrviDwu DRe CITES FOR NODE. AREAS (SECTION -FROM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO DE TEMPORARY FOR PLANT ESTABLISHMENT SPRINKLER SYSTFJA TO BE IN PLACE FOR A vAximuloi OF re MONTHS. TO) REWIRED LANDSCAPPIG SHALL BE MAINTARED Su A HEALTHY. GROWING CONER.DN AT ALL Terms. HE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRIGATING PRUNING. WEEDING. MOWING. ERTLIZING, REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS N POOR CONOMON AND OTHER ALANTENAACE OF ALL PLANTINGS ASNEEDEID (SECTION TER) II) ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED OR GUYED AND FENCED TO PROTECT FROM %%DOM nAlmr, NO CHAIN-LINA FENCING SHALL BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING FROM MILLE. DAMAGE. (SECTION 7.6.12) 12) DEPARTMENT OF WLDLFE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE ENV/LI:ALPE. 13) F CONSTRUCTION ACTIv/TY RESULTS N THE DEATH OF TREES SHOWN AS TREE TO BE PROTECTED' WIDEN A PERIOD Of 12 MONTHS AFTER THE FINAL CERTPICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS We/RELEASED. THE TREE SHALL BE REPLACED PURSUANT TO EVOD 7.3(0)(5). PLANTING LEGEND: PP - PINS Plml III TOTAL( BM-BARES ParnowAla u•I Bob,' irB TOTAL) PF PrAndbearces (N•ON NYMAN (IT TOTAL) a' PM - PINA Iwo SAND Haw. ToTALI 62 TOTAL JOG • Justana Laura. -ow car ION Gold AdMmr) IN TOTAL) COMMON NAME BOTANIGI NAME POUNDS PuSJACRE MAMA, Aftarmass EARN bachNNALN v. Pryor 7 Sneep Imam Fett,a Nina v. Cow 3 Witmem ANNurem Peaccsymm AWNS, Nan, 7 NM. rer.6. Fetbas Delarms 3 Sandoem N.Nmr.6. Pm aemberpi 2 ELI Lama BoLmkra gmtiTs v. KAMM 2 NAM earl msar ERN,. Mrs 0.1 Reclry lAn. perry Low Penton/co Mims IS 5.151150 GaMENT Thum BAH Am Unurn LNILII DS FILMees WPM papaws. Ham 0.1 TOTAL 2723 SEED MIX LEGEND: SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE AD4AGENT PROPERTY LINE BULDNG SETBACK LINE — — 766E— — EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR NO ELEVATION FASTING ROMPED WE CONTOUR " " 1 " EATSTNG ROCK OUTCROPPING EXISTING WIRE FENCE &AMR. WOOD FENCE — — — exp — EXISTINGovERHEAD UTILITY PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (SEE nib) PROPOSED 4. SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED ELECTRIC CONDUIT FASTING POWER POLE EXISTMG ELECTRIC PEDESTAL EDSTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EKLSTING GAS METER NTSTING SEWER MANHOLE ENS7IND TREE (TYP.) PROPOSED ELECTRIC PEDESTAL PROPOSED TRANSFORMER REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TREES SHRUBS PARKING LOT PERIMETER (153 LF) 31 STREET FRONTAGE BUFFER (62 IF) 4 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (8.265 SF) 4 27 TOTAL REQUIRED: 11 62 PRORDT TIRE: VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP Of SC.1140 iv. All mmonz IN IF•T 4614e, ........ .—.12,— Nut AB... 113..xn oinao IN ,_A _m_ mL.. m sHowN DATE: RE visION g6N; F1.1.6E n TIE TO AOCREVPREL,INCGNPG.A.P RR S •, P —0- 0 C) SHEET SHEET SLEET TRUE. LANDSCAPE PLAN 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO 4 5 CLEAR : Co INVESTMENTS, LLC 1502 BIG THOMPSON AYE SHOE 203 ESTES PARA, GO 8017 Pk On) 589.2491 FAX: (BM flA.24.511 1111, CORNERSTONE EINGNE.EP .40 R SURVE :NC 20T/ ccmaarisreKe ENDINEDLINGESURverriN3 COPYRIGHT • ALL RcHals REsERLED LCCAT W NG V!. T.L G REAPJLEFT TIRE TRACK t Mf r • I HOSE-DROP 140 LF OUTLOT WILLOwSTONE TOWNHOMES 0015110G GARAGE REAR/RIGHT THE TRACK FRONT/RIGHT THE TRACK J EXISTING I LRESIDENCE J LOCATION SIC-FEET FROM ExISTINSF IRE STORMS' IN IAROINNA DRIVE FRONT/LEFT THE TRACK • HOSEDROP WO LF HOSC—OROP 115 IF // / ZONED RU- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOT 12 / WILLOWS TONE / TOWNHOMES / .I1 \/ / ,. ,.. ‘..._ / ' ZONED RM- / RESIDENTIN. /' MULTI-FAMILY // LOT Ti ' / WILLOwSTONF TOWNHOMES FIRE DISTRICT NOTES: 130 WEST WONDERVIEW AVE. ZONED IRM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY —AAR Z PLANVIEW I .1 20 I SCALE IT u 2B SCALE IN FEET PARCEL No. 35251-08-046 ZONED MA, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY PARCEL No 35251-074102 ZONED NM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY EPCO CONDOMINIUMS EXISTING E LOT TA AMENDED EPC0 SIIRONISION ZONED PEW RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY ZONED RM- RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY Km* whore below. • Call before you dig. /4.-• CALL 3-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRACE. OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MAWS. OF UNDERGROUND NEARER INTLITIES. 8 VIEW @ 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP LEGEND: LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24 T5N, R7aW OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 11 FIRE SUPPRESS/ON LINES REQUERE A SATE CERTIFIED FIRE SuPPRESSION INSTALLER THROUGH THE COLORADO orwmoN OF FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL. CONTRACTORS SHALL cow-Lore AFPROPRIATE FORMS (CONTRACTORS MATERIAL AND TEST CERTIFICATE FOR UNDERGROUND PIPINDINK2 RAVE ALL AppROERLATS MSPECTION BY ESTES PARK WATER DIVISICN AND FIRE CHSTII1C, COMPLETED PAPER.). SHALL BE 8.1,411.0 TO THE HOE DISTRCT AND AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR_ 7) 00100 VALLEY FRE PROTECTION DISTRICT UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS BU LDS. WILL BE PROTECTED BY AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM ANS FRE ALARM SYSTEM. ME FOLLOWING REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY. 2)0- AN ONLABE HYDRANT NON TEST SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY THE FIRE OSTRICT, THE RESPONSISLE PARTY SHALL CONTACT THE FRE DISTRICT OFFICE AT 00-577-2503 TO ARRANGE FOR THE FLOW TEST_ 20, AL uNCEROROuND RAINS AND LEAD. IN CONNECTIONS TO SPRINKLER SYSTEM RISERS SHALL BE CONPLETELY FLUSHED BEFORE CONNECTION IS MADE TO THE SPRINKLER PIPING A. COMPLETE YONTRAOTORS MATER, AND TEST CERTIFICATE FOR UNDERGROUND FIRE TINE PIPING-IS REQUIRED TORE FORWARDED TO THE FE. OIRRICT PRIOR TO ROUCARN SPRINKLER ASPECT/ORS. PRNATE CONTRACTOR INSTALLING UNDERGROUND FRE LINE PP NG BETWEEN A PUBLIC WATER MAN AND A SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE THE FIRE DISTRICT MTH EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE CURREN., REGISTERED WITH THE COLORADO DNISION OF FRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL AS A FRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM CONTRA,COT-UNEERG ROUND. ME FIRE SERVICE MAIN SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT NOT LESS 111074 1E PSI FOR TWO HOURS AND FLUSHED ATM MINIMUM FLOW RATE AS OETERMINED BY THE PPE SIZE FOR A SUFFICIENT THE TO ENSURE THOROUGH CLEANING. SC. PER NFPA 19 INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEM, NEE SHALL NOT RUN UNDER BUILDINGS. WHERE PPE MUST RUN UNDER EILMONGS, SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN. INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING. ARCH NG THE AM A-PATON WALLS OVER THE PIPE, RUNNING PIPE IN COVERED TRENCHES. OR PROMOS. VALVES TO ISOLATE SECTIONS OP PIPE ANDER EIVILITING PLEASE CONTACT THE FRE DISTRICT BEFORE SVINSTIING CONSTRUCTION PLANS 215. THE FIRE RISER ROOM SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOW,. IDENTROATION ON ME ODOR FACP SPRINKLER RISER SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE ENSTINB WIRE FENCE EKISTP. WOOD FENCE — — — INP — ETISTINGOvERHENT Kure —0— EXISTING POWER POLE O EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL O EXISTING TELEPNONE PEDESTAL EKI511NG GAS LIKTBR 3) TEC SECTION 5032,1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS MINA_ LAVE AH UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF NET LESS THAN 20 FEET. EIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHAT BE PERIAANNNIty SIGNED ARDOR MARE:EDIT/0 PAPNNG FRE LANE' IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL SIGN[TRAFFIC STANDARDS. THE FIRE DISTRICT WILL FIELD LOCATE ALL SIGNAGEACCESS ROADS LESS THAN75 FEET LANDE SHALL BE MARKED AS FIRE LANES ON BOTH SIDES OF ME ROAD, A, ACCESS ROADS LESS THAN 25 FEET WIDE sFALL BE MARKED AS FIRE LANES ON 130111 SIDES OF THE ROAD. A_ ACCESS ROARS AT LEAST , A FEET BUT LESS THAN 52 FEET AIDE SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SEE OF THE ROAD MARKED AS A FRE NNE_ EL ACCESS ROADS AT LEAST 37 FEET WE. NEED NOHAVE FIRE LANE MARKINGS. A) ALL FRE PROTECTION SYSTEM PLANS (EG. FIRE SPRINKLER, FRE ALARM SYSTEM), PERNIP APPLICATORS PAR FEE SCHEE1J LE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ESTES VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. 5) ALL CONSTRUCTION AND PROCESSES SHALL SE IN ACCORDANCE WTI THE PROM...R:050B THE INTERNAM:NAL FRE COPE 12015 EDTTIOIR AND THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CORE (7015E01710NX 5) THE FRE OLSTROT WELL CONOUCT A FINAL INSPECTION. PLEASE SCHEDULE ALL INSPECTIONS AT LEAST IMO (2) wORKIND DAYS IN ADVANCE. TRUMP ET J. CRAM./ w L JAN A., _CHNNeSIN usT se.LE As SPORT OATS 04.15.2. 03.29, Pes45WIWONSCRES5 ARUN WNW mAP/OL' 40.5NO- 833.161 "EF,TrII, B-40 R TURN TEMPLATE 242 VIRGINIA DRIVE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO ge+ -sae" 5 5 "- CD INVESTMENTS, LLC PROJECT TRUE VIEW g 242 PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP MR SIG MOIAPSON 'NE RUDE 200 ESTES PARR 001 RN IA72/ 6598 FRY: 51015 6-2.1 JR-ERSP RNERSTONE F.TREEFEFIRG SUR E I.4C 1011 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERINGS SURVEYING. PC. COPFRISHT - ALL FIKIHRSRESEFREP 8" 7'-7" 12'-0" 51 .4 /2" 51/ ( 2" 5 1/2" U 19'-10" STEEL COLUMN x FLOOR ABOVE L ABOVE I I I LINE OF DECKS ROAD/CURB 1/4" = 1'-O" x I Garage Floor PROPOSED 7, 1 SETBACK, TYP. vox: 970.586.9140 BAS1S.00m © BASIS Architecture. P.C. Issue: Schematic Date: 2/3/2017 Sheet Title: GARAGE FLOOR Sheet No: Al vox: 970.586.9140 BAS1S.com © BASIS Architeclum.P.C. Issue: Schematic Date: 2/3/2017 'JULIETTE' BALCONY CL CL DW -- --- DW / / BATH 8'x7' BATH 8.x7' F / / 1 / W/D / / / / / A / 00 0 KITCHEN 10'x10' 00 U 0 KITCHEN 10'x10' I DN W/D DN BDRM 11'6"x12'7" CL BDRM 11'6"x12'7" / / / A DINING 9'x11' / / / / / LIVING L 11'x15'3 CD Investments F.P. fi F.P. 9 '61 DECK 10'x5' DECK 10`x6'6" Sheet Title: MAIN FLOOR Sheet No: Main Floor MAIN MAIN FLOOR/UNIT: 753sf ENTRY: 70sf GARAGE + STORAGE: 620/440sf 1/4" = 1'-0" A2 ,4t7 Ridge EL: 123,7 1/2' VERTICAL CHANNEL SIDING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, TYP, '.-,1 LAP SIDING Main Floor EL: 10V-1 3/4" 2x4 WOOD TRIM DOORSPWINDOWR TYP. WOOD PANEL SINNG • Garage/Entry Floor EL: 100,0" North Elevation 1/8" 1'-0" 3 LAP SIDING RUSTED METAL SIDING 72. 0 U) 0 STONE WAINSCOT C E U LI . Garage/Entry Floor:7_ EL 100 °" Sheet Title: Elevations South Elevation 1/8" = 1.-0" TIMBER RAFTERS & EXPOSED BEAMS METAL ROOF ON TIMBER RAFTERS 0.H_ DOOR STEEL POST STEEL BEAM O.H. DOOR ENTRY Sheet No: A3 I ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. U.O.N. 12 METAL ROOFING ENTRY ROOF STONE WAINSCOT East Elevation 118" = 1'-0" 4 vox: 970.586.9140 BAS1S.com © BASIS Architecture. P.C. Issue: Schematic Date: 2/3/2017 ASPHALT SHINGLES. TYP. Plage METAL ROOFING 12 EL: 123'-1 Mr 4 LAP SIDING {, 3/8 alLIETTE BALCONY ENTRY ROOF STONE WAINSCOT Garage/Entry Floor 4104184-40444:41,4**visszst.Atsitgtip West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 • .„- ▪ c o c o CO C) V) 6 a - E o .c oi c0 PC) 01 N co vox: 970.586.9140 EAS1Scom © RASE Architecture P.C. ENTRY PATIO UN Issue: Dev. Plan Date: 1/18117 COA NAD Sheet Title: Lower Units Plans Sheet No: A2.0 of RILL HT, PURRED WALL 2'.9" 1(2' T.11!2' 10'8' -9. ce 21 ; 2 PATIO 12'x8' BATH DINETTE RJLL Hr. FU ED WALL WID LIVING BDRM Tv. LIVING UNIT B UNIT A ACESSIBILITY - CRS 9.5-101 ARTICLE 5 TOTAL UNITS 9 REQUIRED POINTS 6 ALL LOWER UNITS TO BE TYPE '6" 4 POSITS EA. TOTAL POINTS ACCULRED 16 SF Totals: Lower Units - 1,102 Upper Units - 443 Total SF - 1,545 BATHE — — 9,6"x51j" ao or) I N DINETTE PATIO 12)0 Ground Floor 1/4" = AR CHIT EC T U R E P. C. In DINING vox: 970.586.9140 BASIS.corn JULIETIE BALCONY SW' 7.410" UNIT D DINING 4-1 DECK 12xff r-r 11'-712" BASLS Architecture, P.C. UNIT C LIVING 2-SIDED FIREPLACE Date: 1118/17 UP BDRM 1 MASTER 2-SIDE D FIREPLACE JULIETTE BALCONY BATH 7'x7' coo ob -6' MASTER II s-4 10" 7-3" BATH KITCHEN 1' 7-4 1/2" 13,1 1/2" Zz6" V1 cl) C .2) > aco < 0 c o CI) o a _ E 0 FE c° resl51) u j MASTER BATH BALCONY BDRM us7 DECK 12'4' Sheet Title: Third Floor Second Floor Upper Units Plans era 1(4" = 1'4r 114" = 1.-0" Sheet No: A2.1 of AR CHIT EC T U R E EL: 100,0" c N. 111111Iii-riiJI Issue: Dev. Plan SMOOTH DARK WOOD PANEL SIDING Lower/Entry Floor EL: 90-101/4" A R C H I T E C T U R E P. C. CID c Zi• 7> > co ct 0 O -o O Cif) aEu) o itto: 4 .c RI 07 m N Q]cip u vox: 970.586.9140 EAS1acom © BASIS Airhitecture, P.C. 2 PAW ---------- North Elevation METAL ROOFING East Elevation 1/4" = LINE OF APX. 55131. GRADE,111 Sheet No: A3.0 of I ASPHALT SHINGLEs, wp. Lhati,-- RUSTED METAL-SIDING -------------- ------------- ----------------- — SMOOTH WOOD PANEL INSIDE 2x TRIM COLOR MAT -I SIDING LAP SIDING, TYR METAL ROOFING 1111 SMOOTH LIGHT WOOD PANEL SIDING Sheet Title: - ELEVATIONS _V• Second Floor EL: 108,10 3/ Date: 1118/17 Mon Floor EL: IRE-R' J--'1 111 0, SMOOTH WOOD PANEL SIDING INSIDE 2x TRIM, COLOR MATCH LAP SIDING _z± 12 Second Floor EL: 104,10 3/8' RUSTED METAL SIDING BOARD & BATTEN SIDING META., ROOF FIRE SPRINKLER Room LINE OF APX. HEIGHT LIMIT TAP SIDING - ------- ------- __—_--__—___ ----- -------- ______-- ------------ 12 —14 METAL ROOF EL: 122-0 3/4' — \ \ •V-Rlige"-- — — ------------- — — ------ SMOOTH LIGHT WOOD PANEL SIDING Main Floor NOTE: All exterior lighting to comply with Estes Park "Dark Sky' requirements. Exterior siding to have a flame spread class of III (76-200) or better. All exterior siding and roofing to be natural tone wood and asphalt shingle with rusted metal accents LINE OF AND. HEIGHT LIMIT ifiquI111 111111111111111 4 SMOOTH WOOD PANEL SIDING INSIDE D TRIM COLOR MATCH SIDING _12 EL: 90.10 I/4 DC TRIM BAND LINE OF APE. 0(1ST. GRADE, TYP FiL_SX7 EL: 122'.0 3/4' METAL R Scomd Floor 'E7' EL: 108,10 3/8" LAP SIDING SMOOTH LIGHT WOOD PANEL SIDING Cl) CU r.... 7 C La •,,— 0 co co < 0 vox: 970.586.9140 laAS1S.com South Elevation 1/4" 2 C R A H 12 —14 T LAP SIDING SMOOTH LIGHT WOOD PANEL SIDING 2cr TRIM SAND SMOOTH DARK WOOD PANEL SIDING •ccy LowellERNY Floor EL: 9O,I0 1/4" LINE OF APX. EXIST. GRADE, TYP E P C. I T E C T U R METAL ROOFS Second EL: 108'7171 mah, Floor EL, 100'-0• West Elevation 1/4" = RUSTED METAL SIDING ASPHALT SHINGLE RD4DE METAL ROOFS Issue: Dev. Plan Date: 1/18117 Sheet Title: - ELEVATIONS Sheet No: A3.1 of