The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2017-08-15Prepared: August 4, 2017 ** Revised: August 14, 2017 STUDY SESSION AG ENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:15 a.m. Rooms 202/203 11:15 Proposed Larimer County IRC/IBC local amendments regarding Vacation Homes (25) Eric Fried 11:40 Lunch (10) Chair Schneider 11:50 ** Estes Park Baptist Church Development Plan (15) Planner Gonzales 12:05 Sign Code (20) Director Hunt 12:25 EVDC Amendment regarding height limit of A-frame dwellings in the RM zone district (5) Director Hunt 12:30 EVDC Amendment regarding Bed & Breakfast Inns (20) Planner McCool 12:50 EVDC Amendment regarding a definition for “Single Family Use” EVDC Amendment to eliminate a density bonus for Attainable Housing in certain zone districts (20) Director Hunt 1:10 Adjourn Chair Schneider Informal discussion among Commissioners concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this meeting at approximately 11:00 a.m. The public is welcome to attend study sessions; however, public comment will not be accepted. Times are approximate. Prepared: August 1, 2017 * Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION August 15, 2017 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Town Hall 1. OPEN MEETING A. Planning Commissioner Introductions 2. AGENDA APPROVAL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT A. The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of minutes of July 18, 2017 B. Large Vacation Home Review 1. 664 Castle Mountain Road: Stephen Johnson, Owner — 10 Occupants 5. LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW — 560 HONDIUS CIRCLE; SCOTT RILEY, OWNER; 10 OCCUPANTS 6. LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW — 3149 FISH CREEK ROAD; MARY JAY YUSUF, OWNER; 10 OCCUPANTS 7. LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW — 1320 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE; MARVIN & PAMELA HART, OWNERS; 10 OCCUPANTS 8. LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW — 1461 ST. MORITZ TRAIL; THANE SPONSEL, OWNER; 10 OCCUPANTS 9. FERGUSON ONE PRELIMINARY TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION PLAT; LOT 5 & A PORTION OF LOT 6, BLOCK 13, FERGUSONS SUBDIVISION; 1551 MARYS LAKE ROAD Owner: Seth Hanson Applicant: Seth Hanson Request: Create two lots and one outlot to accommodate one duplex on proposed Lots 1 & 2 Staff: Audem Gonzales 10. FERGUSON TWO PRELIMINARY TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION PLAT; LOT 8 & A PORTION OF LOT 7, BLOCK 13, FERGUSONS SUBDIVISION; 1573 MARYS LAKE ROAD Owner: Seth Hanson Applicant: Seth Hanson Request: Create two lots and one outlot to accommodate one duplex on proposed Lots 1 & 2 Staff: Audem Gonzales The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 11. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP; RIVERVIEW PINES II CONDOMINIUMS; 1150 W ELKHORN AVENUE Planner Gonzales Owner: Fred Kropp Applicant: Fred Kropp Request: Condominium map to finalize the newly constructed office and manager's quarters. No improvements are proposed with this submittal. Staff: Audem Gonzales 12. SPECIAL REVIEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN; ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION; 2200 MALL ROAD Owner : Estes Park Baptist Church Applicant: Ralph Nations Request: Proposed 9000 square foot, two-story addition to existing church building, removing one existing modular and replacing it with one single-family residence; upgrading other existing modular. Staff: Audem Gonzales 13. AMENDMENT TO THE ESTES PARK MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17 REGARDING SIGNS. Director Hunt 14. AMENDMENT TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING BED & BREAKFAST INNS Planner McCool 15. AMENDMENT TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING OUTDOOR FOOD VENDORS Planner McCool 16. REPORTS A. Staff-Level Reviews 1. Goodall Lot Consolidation - Approved 2. Seals Boundary Line Adjustment - Approved 3. Safeway Amended Development Plan - Approved 4. Stanley Village Minor Modification — Starbucks - Approved 5. The Meadow Condominiums Minor Modification to approved DP 06-01 - Approved B. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 1. Peak Residence Variance - Approved July 12, 107 C. Estes Park Town Board 1. EVDC Amendment for Preferred Plant List continued to August 22, 2017 2. Estes Park Resort Preliminary Townhomes Subdivision Plat - Approved July 25, 2017 D. Larimer Board of County Commissioners 1. Planning Commissioner Appointment update E. Community Development Update 1. Vacation Homes 2. Downtown Plan 3. Senior Planner Update 14. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. A EP TOWN OF FIST ES PARIc, Report PUBLIC WORKS To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Greg Muhonen, PE, Public Works Director Date: August 8, 2017 RE: Update on the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Drainage Plan & Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study Objective: This report introduces the progress update presentation by Anderson Consulting Engineers on the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan (SMDP) and the presentation by Headwaters Corporation on the Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study. Present Situation: The Town of Estes Park and the surrounding unincorporated Estes Valley suffer from the lack of adequate drainage facilities to capture and safely discharge stormwater runoff from storm events ranging from intense afternoon summer cloudbursts to sustained rainfall experienced in the 2013 flood. No inventory of existing stormwater infrastructure exists. While the Town has hired consultants to create two subbasin stormwater improvement plans, no comprehensive master plan exists to define the magnitude of the system-wide deficiencies and the associated projects to remedy them. Maintenance staff, equipment, and funding are insufficient to respond to the stormwater damage complaints received each year by the Public Works Department. In 2016, the Town received a $300,000 grant to fund a SMDP within the Estes Valley development code boundary area. Additionally, the Town Board appropriated $30,000 for the companion study to explore the potential of creating a Stormwater Utility to fund the masterplanned improvements and the requisite operation and maintenance. A public meeting introducing these two studies was held on May 11, 2017. It was sparsely attended. Conversations held with Larimer County staff indicate the County has reservations about implementing a Stormwater District that would obligate residents within unincorporated Larimer County to pay a new fee. Out of respect for this concern, the Town's feasibility study will focus on a new Stormwater Utility that serves only Town residents. 25 Proposal: The consultants will present updates on the progress made to date on the two studies. The grant funding expires September 30, 2017. A joint study session with the Town Board and Larimer County Board of Commissioners is proposed for September 26, 2017 to discuss the drainage issues (problems and potential solutions) that transcend jurisdictional boundaries. A third study session with the Board of Trustees is tentatively scheduled for October 24, 2017 to discuss the potential revenue, setup, and operational issues associated with a new Stormwater Utility within the Town. Advantages: • A SMDP will tabulate and map the existing stormwater infrastructure. • The need for potential improvements will be quantified in terms of prioritized scope and cost. • A potential funding strategy will be recommended. • Implementation and sustained maintenance of the stormwater infrastructure will reduce risk and recurrence of repeated property damage. Disadvantages: The disadvantages for the Town to assume this maintenance responsibility include: • The Town is not staffed or equipped to take on this maintenance effort. The cost of maintenance equipment and personnel will need to be determined. • A new Stormwater Utility adds additional administrative effort to Public Works staff. • A new utility fee will be needed to fund this effort. Some residents will object. Action Recommended: This report is advisory only. No action is requested. Budget: New costs should be offset by new revenue. This will be evaluated further at the October study session. Level of Public Interest Public interest on this proposal will move from low to high once a new utility fee is proposed. Attachments: Electronic link to slides of the report presentation. 26 ESTES VALLEY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT Phase I. Stormwater Master Plan Phase II. Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study Meeting No. 2 — Town Board Work Session, August 8, 2017 • Stormwater Master Plan Update • Stormwater Utility Feasibility Introduction ESTES PARK EuesPark100.1m Celebrate the Virion ESTES PAWN tnesPert 100.rarn (debate the Vition CORNERSTONE rwortatrateenoe. 8/9/2017 • ANdERSON CONSUITINg ENONEERS, INC. Civil a Water Resources a Environmental Headwaters CORPORATION Agenda • Introductions • The Project Team • Reason for the Estes Valley Stormwater Management Project (EV SWMP) • Purpose of a Stormwater Master Drainage Plan (SWMDP) • Phase I. Stormwater Master Drainage Plan • Existing Facilities Inventory & Assessment • Potential Improvements & Implementation Plan • Phase II. Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study • Introduction (Concepts, Samples, & Financing) guestphst,.;, •';",-- 8/9/2017 1 Project Team Town of Estes Park (and Larimer County) • Greg Muhonen, P.E. (Mark Peterson, RE.) • Many Others Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Chris Pauley, P.E., CFM • Jason Albert, P.E. & Brian Thompson Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. • Mike Todd, P.E. Headwaters Corporation, Inc. • George Oamek -71 L:11 S 'oentr EsiesPorkIDatam Ceiebta Le the Vision ANdERSON CONSUITIN ENGINEERS, INC. Civil e Water Resources a Environmental Headwaters CORPORATION -4 CORNERSTONE > ..... £.14011,11,1531.14.. (4. NUKVIEYMCIIN 8/9/2017 Reason for the EV SWMP • Following 2013 Flood, Stormwater Infrastructure improvements Identified • Provide for Health, Safety, & Welfare Citizens and Visitors • Phase I. Stormwater Master Drainage Plan (FEMA Grant Funded) • Phase II. Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study F unded) ' 4;7 .7) r • I • :21:± urr 2 Potential Objectives/Responsibilities Of Stormwater Management Program 1. Implement Capital Improvements Program (New and Old Infrastructure typically ID in Master Drainage Plan) 2. Operation & Maintenance of Existing Infrastructure (clean out of inlets & detention ponds, channel mowing, etc.) 3. Perform Stormwater Reviews (adherence to Design Criteria and Regulations) 4. Coordinates SWMP with other Corridor Planning (transportation, utilities, recreation, etc.) 5. Coordinate with Adjacent Jurisdictions Responsible for Stormwater Management (e.g. Larimer County, RMNP, NFS, School District, etc.) 6. Floodplain Management (FEMA-NFIP, State-Regulations, Local) 7. 1't7t6t- - • - • _ - Purpose of a Stormwater Master Drainage Plan 1. Identify Stormwater Infrastructure/Problems 2. Develop Conceptual Solutions/Improvements to Fix/Improve Drainage Issues 3. Develop Concept Level Costs for the Potential Improvements 4. Provide an Implementation Plan based on a Prioritization of Identified Improvements 5. Provide the Basis for Funding Capital Improvements Program (solicit grants/loans/etc. & form the basis for fees/assessments/tax/etc.) 6. Provide a Flexible Document to Guide Program Implementation and Integrate New Development within the Watersheds and the Community Oit i os i, :51V, vitc, 'Mb • 8/9/2017 3 PHASE I. STORMWATER MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN MNWOFFITPUISW MAMIMSWIAGEPLIN iityAmoIMMWirm, homPARWYnx an. of 1...or 11.1ronbig rAppenrs 111111,12•19* VIlidsr. CV HAY 8/9/2017 Focus of the EV SW MDP - Five Major Drainage Basins • Dry Gulch Basin • Black Canyon Basin • Fall River Basin • Big Thompson River Basin • Fish Creek Basin • Development Code Boundary • Town of Estes Park Boundary 4 Existing Facilities — Inventory & Evaluations • Drainage Facilities Portfolio • Presented on Inventory Maps • Inventory Summary • Evaluations of Existing Facilities r-- no- — f - -VP--;.$1• Existing Drainage Facilities Portfolio pproximm • Inlets • Channels • Detention Ponds • Storm Sewers • Culverts • Bridges 8/9/2017 5 17 37 78 07 Inventory of Existing Facilities Summary I 7 lurisriktion Drainage basin Town of Estes Park (TOP) Lai-Imes-County (LC) Dry Gulch Black Canyon Creek Fill River Big Thompson River -Lake Estes Fish {reek Public Private Total Public Private (Total TEP LC Total TOP LC Total TOP j LC Total TOP LC Total TEP LC Total 30 24 54 1 5 5 1 2 3 5 0 5 37 1 38 11 14 0 0 69 39 108 25 92 117 15 17 32 11 1 12 a 63 30 113 26 47 62 15 20 2 6 3 3 3 1 0 13 19 0 0 0 3,645 1,358 5,013 2,273 90 2,363 2,273 90 2,363 0 0 0 4,918 0 4,918 96 0 96 25,934 5,596 51,530 1,097 3,617 4,716 4,239 37 4,270 2,225 2,225 1,420 0 1,420 22,557 3,257 23,814 552 1,423 1,973 206 119 925 21 46 67 56 57 32 32 29 79 196 35 233 9 31 40 37 12 49 5 4 4 6 6 0 0 38 5 43 0 1 70 50 120 17 20 45 17 0 17 9 0 9 22 0 22 63 23 86 9 22 31 1 August lley Dec 1,2017 lopment Code Bo ndani Summary VotaIs StrUCtbre Type ]ridges ariverts latent-Ion Ponds Open Channel OR itonn Sewer (if) Inlet Manhole Outlet Public 31 29 60 94 7 5,9111 27,031 227 Total Privet. 34 165 1. Drainage I acrlf tit, !own ory Summary as 2. All Inventorying Completed within Fstesv 225 28 7,376 131 21 1,450 36,245 392 9,215 165 8/9/2017 6 Sample of Detailed Facility Summary Summary Totals Junsdiction EfralnegeBas[ri Culvert Structure TYPES MEG= MIIIIEEMEN EIMINEIMMENIMMIEMMEMEILIMEMMENICIEEMINIE ===1EMEMEEINZIMINEEMMEMIMIMEMIENNIMEENCIIIENCIIEMMIIMMIICIIra MIE=INIMMEMEEEZMIEEMEEMMENIEEMIEMEMEMEMIIIMEMEMEM10111111E11111CIIEM 1!13•111INIMEMEllEMIREINEINIMMEIMMEIIIENCIIIMEMENEMEMEMENNIMMNIEN =2:MMEMEMITIMIIKIMMEMEINE:1113111E1111EMIE:111EINICIIIMENEMEMEINNIIIMINM MIME= EMMEN EMENEMMIK1111131 EMENEMEMENEMEIIMIIIIMEN 11132IIMICEMIZIMINIEEMIZIMEMIZEIM EMEINEMIZEIMMEZIE1 MEM SIZES MIMEIM EMMEN 111•111MEMMEIIIMII ICEMEN EMMEN nminsimummmom mnmomormosiminfirtimmom ECM MIZONIIMEMEMEWIMEMEM MUMS I=MM EINEIMEM mom EMI= EMEU M:SMIN MIME MI En NM =I Mil IKE ME ME MEM OEM EN RE ZMENIZI EMMEN ZE EN MN MZIMZEMMENE1111E1111EMINIMEM =El= MEMO= 11:11EMEM MEMEN EllEINEME111110111EMEMIR MENEM IMMZEME IIIMMTI! EN EIMIIKIN WM1E:I IMIIMMEEMIIIMENIEMENIIMINERIEEI IECEMEMES Or,Pp-.en::, Notes: I m,i;keaciftlearInveritnry sanar Lek All ,VoriIgCrIpleted within the • st ilKa-- .. a) .e • -e• _ _ - : _ ::,4611111111ka,. `'''' ',-114 • , - Town of Estes Park (TES') Larimer County (LC) i CIIMEIMMII=M2=10:112113ZEIMEMINEMENEISICIENEMIEINEMIEEIMENIENEM Dry Gulch Black Canyon Creek Fall River Big Thompson River- Lake Estes Fish Creek 8/9/2017 Existing Facilities Evaluations • Focus on Bridges, Channels, and Culverts • Stormsewer Evaluations Require Higher Level of As-built Data (Plans) • Existing Capacities: Bridges to Low Chord Culverts prior to Overtopping Channels to Bank Full • Drainage Design Criteria: Estes — Larimer County — UDFCD Criteria • Drainage Criteria Applied Utilizing 2017 Estes Valley Hydrology Study 7 8/9/2017 DRAFT Facility Evaluations Public / Major Drainageways • DRY GULCH (6 Crossings) • Generally Adequate Hydraulic Capacities and 3 in Poor Condition (Dry Gulch Road No.1, Devils Gulch Road, LCR 61) • BLACK CANYON CREEK (10 Crossings) • Generally Adequate Hydraulic Capacities and most in Good Condition. • FISH CREEK (11 Crossings) • Mostly new Post 2013 Reconstructed Facilities in Excellent Condition and with Adequate Hydraulic Capacity • Notable Exception: US 36 Culverts to Lake Estes; Upstream Ends are in Poor Condition (would recommend detailed inspection) DRAFT Facility Evaluations — Public / Major Drainageways • FALL RIVER (20 Crossings) • 11 Undersized Crossings: 6 Road (3 Arterials & 3 Local) and S Recreation/Pedestrian most in Fair/Good Condition • 9 Crossings Still Under Review (Upstream of Upstream W. Elkhorn Bridge) • Channelized Reach from Water Wheel to Confluence less than 100-year Capacity • Nature Stream Reach from W. Elkhorn Upstream Bridge to Water Wheel less than 100-year Capacity • BIG THOMPSON RIVER (9 Crossings) • 6 Undersized Crossings: 4 Road (Crags, Ivy, Rockwell, Riverside) and 2 Recreation/Pedestrian • Crossings Upstream of Crags Still Under Review (SH 66 & Marys Lake Road) • Channel Undersized from Crags to St. Vrain Avenue 8 8/9/2017 Potential Improvements — Primary Focus • Life/Health Safety • On Major Drainageways • Dry Gulch, Black Canyon, Fall River, Upper Big Thompson, Fish Creek • On Major Arterials • US 34, US 36, SH 7, SH 66, Devils Gulch Rd, Marys Lake Rd, etc. • On Critical Facilities & Access • Hospital Routes — Crags, Prospect, & Stanley Avenues • Police/Town Hall — Black Canyon Channel from Park Lane to E. Elkhorn Avenue Potential Improvements — Secondary Focus • On Property Damage along Major Drainageways • On Secondary Drainageways • On Local Roads • Known and Repetitive Problem Areas Potential Improvements — Minor Focus • On Property Damage along Secondary/Tertiary Drainageways • On Tertiary Drainageways • Minimal Focus on Private: Roads/Driveways, Culverts, Bridges, etc. 9 PHASE II. STORMWATER UTILITITY FEASIBILITY STUDY Organizational Options • WHO CAN IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN A STORMWATER PROGRAM? • Town, through the General Fund or an Enterprise Fund? • Wastewater entities?? • Partnerships (IGAs, etc.)??? • A new 'regional' entity that specializes in stormwater???? • HOW IS A STORMWATER PROGRAM SETUP? • Town Ordinance? • Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)?? • Colorado Revised Statute 29-1-203, State Constitution Article X Section 20 ??? • Other legal mechanisms???? 8/9/2017 10 Examples of Stormwater Entities Urban Drainage and Flix3a Control Distric • District: 1969 Denver - Urban Drainage & Flood Control District • Authority: 2006 Arapaho County - Southeast Metro SWA 2008 Larimer County - Boxelder Basin Regional SWA • Enterprise: 1987 - City of Loveland 2003 - Town of Windsor 2008 - Town of Frederick 2005 - 2009 Colorado Spring • Utility: 1980 - City of Fort Collins Ihmi:"11117411Lun.Asiomx\xiiR .rim WINDSOR Organizational Options • EXISTING ENTITIES • May already perform some stormwater utility functions • Have administrative capabilities (funding streams & billings) • Probably conduct a range of activities aside from stormwater • Current jurisdictional boundaries maybe limited for stormwater • NEW ENTITY • Can be stormwater and watershed focused (not limited by existing boundaries) • May achieve economies of scale (especially if multiple jurisdictions involved) • Needs ability to issue debt, set fees, and possibly impose assessments • Could be viewed as more bureaucracy and taxes • Needs public buy-in and acceptance 8/9/2017 11 8/9/2017 Financing and Funding Options • FINANCING INITIAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • Influenced by organization structure • Funding Sources: o Reserves, phased Pay-as-you-go o Grants (typically require local matching funds) o Debt financing (Loans and/or Bonds) • FINANCING ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • Development impact fees • Debt • Annual or monthly user fees to property owners • Tax assessments; other tax options • FINANCING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE • User fees to property owners • .ax assessmen s Charges and Fees • Develop Finance Plan pro forma, determine costs to be recovered from customers and new development • Benefits and costs should be fairly allocated across types of customers • Costs are generally allocated based on impervious area • An equivalent residential unit (ERU) is often a basis for billing • Single family residence = 1 ERU • Gas station = 5 ERU • Retail store = 10 ERU, etc. 12 Utility Administration • Evaluate billing systems and customer databases • Billing options • Policy issues and recommendations with respect to billing lowN or ES TES PAR (010RAM) Utilities 8/9/2017 Phase II. Implementation • Recommendations Regarding Organization Type & Structure • Develop an Implementation Timeline • Draft and Finalize Finance Plan • Draft Stormwater Utility Ordinance and/or IGAs (samples) • Final from Town Counsel • Final Utility Feasibility Report 13 Elkhorn Avon ue, July 26, 2017, "5:15pm Next Steps • Phase I. Finalize Development of Improvements • Phase I. Develop Capital Improvement Costs • Phase 1. Determine Prioritization of Improvements • Draft SW MDP to Town Board and Public (September 2017) • Phase II. Determine Preferred Stormwater Utility • Phase II. Develop Financing Plan • Draft Utility Feasibility Recommendations to Town Board (October 2017) 8/9/2017 14 ESTES VALLEY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT Phase I. Stormwater Master Plan Phase II. Stormwater Utility Feasibility Study S Meeting No. 2 — Town Board Work Session, August 8, 2017 • Stormwater Master Plan Update • Stormwater Utility Feasibility Introduction NW' EstesPerK100Aarn tek-Isis le thr Vision Ege.Park100xern Ceitbree the Vi6on THANK YOU CORNERSTONE .Aril VICISKi a q,... 11,44, VINA, IN, t ANdERSON CONSIJITINg ENGINEERS, INC. Civil . ithler ReS0141VeS . Environmental Headwaters CORPORATJON 8/9/2017 .110246i 8/9/2017 15 The Oldest Real Estate Company In Estes Park August 8, 2017 Estes Park Planning Commissioners: (---% V.\ V---- COtigOii tOEMPTAEVT: M \ I support the proposed amendment to the development code that would ADD A DEFINITION OF SINGLE FAMILY as this involves zoning and other provisions in the code. I also encourage the adoption of the proposed amendment to SECTION 11.4 of the code as Attainable Housing Density Bonuses should only apply to the RM Zones. Perhaps a discussion will soon take place about Attainable Housing in the CO and CD Zones. 300 East Elkhorn rio enue PO. Box 1604 fAes Park. Colorado 80517 (970) 586-2345 Near (970) 586-5293 Estes Valley Planning Commission Study Session August is, 2017 Remarks from Citizen of Estes Park Honorable Commissioners: In re. recommendations you will be considering at this meeting, I respectfully speak in support of two prospective amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code: i. Defining "Single Family Use" in the code as follows: A .family related by blood, marriage or adoption; or eight or fewer individuals living together in a small group home as defined in this code. I am aware that limiting the number in the first part of this definition may not be possible legally; also, that a small group home is mandated by state law involving the care of handicapped individuals. 2. Allowing Attainable Housing in only the RM (Multiple Family) zones rather than in all residential zones as current code provides. Thank you for your consideration. Patricia D. Blume 651 C edar Ridge Circle Estes Park (11-year fulltime resident) Submitted via email on August 8, 2017 to Jackie Williamson for distribution. Art Blume Ill Honorable Commissioners: Please support the following amendments to the EP Development Code: Allowing Attainable Housing in only the RM (Multiple Family) zones rather than in all residential zones as current code provides. Defining "Single Family Use" in the code as follows: A family related by blood, marriage or adoption; or eight or fewer individuals living together in a small group home as defined in this code. I am aware that limiting the number in the first part of this definition may not be possible legally; also, that a small group home is mandated by state law involving the care of handicapped individuals. Thank you for your service, Arthur W. Blume Ill 651 Cedar Ridge Circle Estes Park, Co..80517 10+ year full time resident RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 18, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Attending: Also Attending: Vice-Chair Russ Schneider, Commissioners Betty Hull, Steve Murphree, Sharry White, Bob Leavitt, Robert Foster, one vacant position Vice-Chair Russ Schneider, Commissioners Betty Hull, Steve Murphree, Sharry White, Bob Leavitt, and Robert Foster Community Development Director Randy Hunt, Planner Audem Gonzales, Town Attorney Greg White, Planner Robin Becker, Town Board Liaison Ron Norris, and Recording Secretary Karen Thompson Absent: None Vice-Chair Schneider called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. He explained the purpose of the Planning Commission. 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved and seconded (White/Hull) to approve the agenda as presented and the motion passed 6-0 with one vacancy. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval ofJune 20, 2017 Planning Commission meeting minutes. B. Approval of June 30, 2017 Special Planning Commission meeting minutes. It was moved and seconded (Murphree/Leavitt) to approve the consent agenda as presented and the motion passed 5-0 with one vacancy and Foster abstaining. 4. FERGUSON ONE PRELIMINARY TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION PLAT; LOT 5 & A PORTION OF LOT 6, BLOCK 13, FERGUSONS SUBDIVISION; 1551 MARYS LAKE ROAD Staff received a request from the applicant requesting to continue this review to the August 15, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. It was moved and seconded (Foster/Hull) to continue the Ferguson One Preliminary Townhome Subdivision Plat to the August Planning Commission meeting and the motion passed 6-0 with one vacancy. 5. FERGUSON TWO PRELIMINARY TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION PLAT; LOT 8 & A PORTION OF LOT 7, BLOCK 13, FERGUSONS SUDIVISION; 1573 MARYS LAKE ROAD I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 18, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall It was moved and seconded (Foster/Hull) to continue the Ferguson Two Preliminary Townhome Subdivision Plat to the August Planning Commission meeting and the motion passed 6-0 with one vacancy. 6. KEARNEY MINOR SUBDIVISION; METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL; 1360 BROOK DRIVE Planner Gonzales reviewed the staff report. The property is approximately eight acres, zoned I-1— Industrial, with a mix of commercial and industrial uses. If the minor subdivision is approved, it will create two legal lots and one outlot, with the continued industrial/commercial use. Access will be Brook Drive and Acacia Drive. Planner Gonzales stated landscaping requirements were reviewed, and it was determined no district landscape buffering was required. The Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) requires a sidewalk be installed for Lot 1, which would run along Brook Drive. The applicant did not place the sidewalk on the preliminary plat. Such sidewalk would connect other existing sidewalks and tie in to the Fish Creek Trail. Staff has requested a condition of approval, requesting the sidewalk be installed along the north edge of Lot 1 in the public right- of-way. There were other minor changes needed to the plat, which are also listed as conditions of approval. Staff and Commission Discussion There was brief discussion regarding the floodplain for Fish Creek, and possible environmental concerns from having an industrial area immediately adjacent to Fish Creek. Director Hunt explained how landscaping is addressed in the EVDC. Public Comment Jes Reetz/applicant representative stated stormwater and drainage is taken into consideration in the development stage. Mr. Reetz stated the property owner plans to move his existing business to the upper lot and put the lower lot on the market for sale. Regarding the sidewalk, he stated the reason they want to delay the sidewalk install is because they do not know where the sidewalk cuts will need to be when the property is developed, and would rather wait until the future development plans are submitted to ensure proper installation. Mr. Reetz stated the applicant would be acceptable to providing cash in lieu of constructing the sidewalk now. It was moved and seconded (Leavitt/Foster) to recommend approval of the Kearney Preliminary Minor Subdivision Plat according to findings of fact, including findings and conditions recommended by staff, with the modification of Condition #2 to also provide an option to allow the applicant to arrange for an improvement guarantee for the sidewalk construction and the motion passed 6-0 with one vacancy. 7. AMENDMENT TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING OUTDOOR FOOD VENDORS Director Hunt requested this item be continued to the August Planning Commission meeting. 2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission July 18, 2017 Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall It was moved and seconded (White/Hull) to continue the proposed EVDC amendment to the August Planning Commission meeting, and the motion passed 6-0 with one vacancy. 8. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Due to the recent resignation of the Planning Commission Chair (and one other position), elections are required to fill that position. Vice-Chair Schneider acknowledged Michael Moon and Doug Klink, the Commissioners who resigned, for their service to the Estes Valley community. It was moved and seconded (Hull/Murphree) to nominate and elect Commissioner Schneider for the position of Chair, and the motion passed 5-0 with Commissioner Schneider abstaining and one vacancy. It was moved and seconded (White/Hull) to nominate and elect Commissioner Leavitt for the position of Vice-Chair, and the motion passed 6-0 with one vacancy. 9. REPORTS Director Hunt stated the EVDC amendment regarding building height was approved by the Town Board in June and the County Commission in July. Town Administrator Lancaster had earlier stated the July 25th Town Board Study Session was to include a discussion of a property on Dry Gulch. The potential developer has a conflict, so the discussion has been rescheduled to August 22, 2017. Director Hunt reported interviews are being conducted for the Senior Planner position. Out of 12 applicants, there are two finalists, who will hopefully be able to come to Estes Park in early August for second interviews. The hiring date will most likely be early September. Commissioner White reported there was a fire in a firepit at a vacation rental during the fire ban. Response from CCO Hardin was quick, and a decision was made to email all vacation home property owners and property managers, notifying them of the responsibility to notify their guests of any fire bans or other public information deemed necessary for the safety of the community. There being no further business, Chair Schneider adjourned the meeting at 2:02 p.m. Russ Schneider, Vice-Chair Karen Thompson, Recording Secretary 3 Office Use Lot Size a . I to Side 05jRear 63 'Side fl 0 Rear YES NO Y S NO Zone District P.-- COUNTY Maximum Number of Occupants Allowed Number of Approved Parking Spaces A] Staff Recommendation: DENIAL Scheduled Hearing Date0b1 S IS Date PID3 5.)-.14 ' Required Setbacks: Existing Setbackil Statement of Intent Required? Front Front3) -ozz)t-f MSubmittal Date: 11" illEffective 2017-04.01 ESTES VALLEY LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW u Owner Information Vacation Home (VH) Address Homeowner's Name Business Name Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address 1\-tn RS. S e gqg 1,0 .3("( PL GrAc9e..A c,c) Fry._‘42, rnryln\c,kfl C3)(?jY'NChk 0m Site Information VH Certificate # 207Ci Number of Bedrooms If registration is still in process, provide date submitted to Town Number of Existing Off-Street Parking Spaces 6 Number of Occupants Proposed (Maximum allowed is 2 per bedroom plus 2) J C Local Property Manager Contact Information Name Physical Address Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address sc,)4 7)11 50,/,‘)cc-,\ PO io)L 1-09L( Eske, Co goci 970-59o- 999/ Es4nC)o-KCecAe2,1r.e, C o Attachments / $150 Fee (Town AND Count 40 1 Copy of property site plan, if available Owner Certification Se4e- As Owner, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property Record Owner Date )9 -17 Estes Valley Planning Commission Use APPROVED DENIED Planning Commission Chair Date UACodeComOance\VacationRentals\LVHRApplication.xlsx TOWN OF ESTES P Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Linda Hardin, Code Compliance Officer Date: August 15, 2017 RE: LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW, 560 Hondius Circle, lot size less than one acre. ORDINANCE #5.1.B.3.c.(3) Planning Commission to make a finding that the buffering or screening from adjacent and nearby properties is such that the lot size is commensurate with Large Vacation Home use. Scott Riley dba Black Bear Escape/Applicant Objective: Conduct a review to consider approval of a Large Vacation Home Review compliant with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Present Situation: The vacation home at 560 Hondius Circle is in the "E-1 - Estate" zoning district. The lot is .70 acre. The setbacks exceed the required 25 ft., with the front setback at 45 ft., the rear side setback at 54 ft., and the north side setback at 53 ft., and the south side setback at 90 ft. The home is surrounded by trees buffering from neighboring properties. The nearest home to this property is more than 120 ft. away. The distance between homes exceeds 140 ft. in all other directions. There is no record of any violation for this property. The current owner has been diligent to insure that the property is code compliant with the Building Division and Planning Division codes. Proposal: The request is to permit a Large Vacation Home use on this lot, allowing for 10 occupants based on the two per bedroom, plus two formula. Advantages: 1. Exceeds required setbacks from property line, on all sides of the property. 2. Neighboring homes are not impacted by this vacation home 3. Trees buffer the homes on the north, south and west, and the street and trees separate this home from the property to the east. Disadvantages: None. Action Recommended: The Community Development staff recommends approval of this application for the Large Vacation Home permit. The following findings of fact are recommended: 1. No reports or complaints have been submitted by neighbors. 2. This use would not change the residential character of this neighborhood. 3. The home provides ample parking for up to four vehicles. 4. The lot size of .70 acre does not cause concern for impact to neighboring homes. Level of Public Interest: Low: For the Large Vacation Home permission in general, there has been a high level of public interest. However, there have been no concerns voiced for this particular property with this application. Sample Motions: Below are the Planning Commission's options related to approval or denial of this application: 1. I find that the application meets the review criteria with the demonstration of no impact to the neighbors regarding the less than one (1) acre, and move to APPROVE the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home including findings of fact as recommended by staff. 2. I find that the application does not meet the review criteria and has not demonstrated that there would be no impact to the neighbors, and move to DENY the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home, including findings of fact that [state findings for denial]. 3. I find that the applicant has not provided sufficient information to review the application and move to CONTINUE THE HEARING to provide adequate time to review the property. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. Site Plans (2) Town of Estes Park This draft document was prepared for internal use by the Town of Estes Park, CO. The town makes no claim as to the accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon. A EP 1 in = 78 ft 0 40 80 ESTES PARK COLORADO Due to security concerns, The Town requests that you do not post this document on the internet or otherwise make it available to persons unknown to you. Feet 560 Hondius Circle Approximate Property Boundary Lines Community Development Created By: Linda Hardin Printed: 8/9/2017 Li -6 Number of Existing Off-Street Parking Spaces Copy of property site plan, if available Attachments 7. $150 Fee (Town AND County) (9Lf Owner Certification YES Side Rear Side / 'Rear NO NCIF--)J APPROVED DENIED Date Planning Commission Chair Vacation Home (VH) Address Homeowners Name Business Name Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address ESTES VALLEY LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW ;11,7 Rack- ?pear 6 Goa 707 StAa.cdoW %roott. $ . .. k.-_,-----7z :- / :\k:'../.,,(,-,-_,.-H-L---- lq: ....\ ,,, ,,r,___. 1 itIL 2 ? 200 A p — -- ------ .L7. •12Pt.f,t.:Arr RigOwner Information ppli Effen. 2017.04.01 ill Submittal Date: 'TX 7738 0 Site Information VH Certificate # Number of Bedrooms 4 If registration is still in process, provide date submitted to Town Number of Occupants Proposed (Maximum allowed is 2 per bedroom plus 2) 10 Local Property Manager Contact Information cQb A4C,C& 1100 67 ict(ft Trc.rk t sees Irk, LO So5 SArnc 970 - 2.15 - 6 9 Pi 1-0100,(0)ex,,, e 0,01. CO As Owner, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property Date I4 .23,P-ro1g Zone District TOWN Maximum Number of Occupants Allowed Number of Approved Parking Spaces Staff Recommendation; APPROVA Scheduled Hearing Date an (-1— 0 S'ST orn fl -ohs-oS Date Estes Volley Planning Commission Use Record Owner Coee p (3.5-31.z.5 of Required Setbacks: Front Existing Setbacks: -1 'Front Statement of Intent Required? Comp! DC? • 0 •reptiance Medal Lot Size c•-),.-7 560 de:or-li (4 2'1-86s 01i7J9 c:A.A04n d.eer jou:tit Coen Name Physical Address Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address IC) DENIAL CAUserikUnda Hardin\DownloadALVHRApplicationDRAFT ( / Scott Riley Black Bear Escape July 23, 2017 Linda Hardin Code Compliance Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 , ?,...\•/7,5--'' I II jut I /11/, --------___,JUi/ comioupirrynEll Pi rIPMPfttf7V Dear Linda: SUBJECT: LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW Based on our emails, I'm enclosing an application for large vacation home review for our home, the Black Bear Escape, located at 560 Hondius Circle in Estes Park. It's a four bedroom home that I believe has adequate linear buffering and set-backs that qualify it for 10 people (2 per bedroom + 2) per Code §5.1.B.3.c(3-5) despite being on less than an acre. Please find enclosed an Improvement Location Certificate from December 2016, application, and $150 review fee. Note: I do have an approved vacation home certificate posted in the home, but I don't have the certificate number with me in Texas to complete my application. Is that something you'd be able to pull up and fill out for me? If necessary I would appreciate it if you would forward this on to the appropriate person with the Planning Commission for review. Thanks for your help! Sincerely, 707 SHADOW BROOK DR SPRING, TX 77380 Date: 12/01/16 Jean A.Deoud P.L.S. 37946 CONSTRUCTION • BOUNDARY • CADD DRAFTING fi IMPROVEMENT LOCATI J4 ON CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this Improvement Location Certificate is not a land survey plat or improvement survey plot, and that it is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other future improvement lines. I further certify that the improvements on the hereon described parcel on the date shown hereon, except utility '1P 1 connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, that there ore no encroachments upon the described premises by improvements on any adjoining premises, except as indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any part at said parcel, except as noted. Project No. 560 hondius Address: 560 Hohdius Cir, Estes Pork, CO 80517 201., N • r LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 16, HONDIUS HEIGHTS. EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 25 FEET THEREOF, MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE STREET, FOR STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. S85'08'E 202.9 1 POWER POLE NO, 4 R AR 70.7' Q 75 0 2.0 n 2.0 O 01 0 CPI DECK ,OG)110 SflIGNOH POWER POLE ENO NO. 4 REBAR (\woo° BOX NO NO. 5 REBAR NOTES: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY NO. 580—F0568846-381—DFB OTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION B UPON ANY DEFECT 1N THIS SURVEY 1MTH1N THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVE DEFECT. IN ON EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FORM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHO NORTH SCALE t • 30 AZIMUTH SURVEYING, INC P.O.BOX 528 • BROOMFIELD. COLORADO 80038 • (303) 450-5455 (PH) (303) 450-5465 (FAX) S85'09'E TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Memo To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Linda Hardin, Code Compliance Officer Date: August 15, 2017 RE: LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW, 3149 Fish Creek Road, lot size less than one acre. ORDINANCE #5.1.B.3.c.(3) Planning Commission to make a finding that the buffering or screening from adjacent and nearby properties is such that the lot size is commensurate with Large Vacation Home use. Qaiser and Mary Jay Yusuf/Applicant Objective: Conduct a review to consider approval of a Large Vacation Home Review compliant with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Present Situation: The vacation home at 3149 Fish Creek Road is in the "E-Estate" zoning district. The lot is .45 acre. The setbacks exceed the required 25 ft., with the front setback at 80 ft., the rear side setback at 58 ft., and the west side setback at 29 ft., and the east side setback at 30 ft. The nearest home to this property to the west is 40 ft. from this home, and is also a short-term vacation rental. The home to the north is more than 120 ft. from this home, and the home to the east is 73 ft. from this home. Code Compliance has received one complaint of a non-compliant exterior light. The motion sensor on the light was not working and the light was staying on. Upon notification to the property owner, the light was removed the same day. The current owner has been diligent to insure that the property is code compliant with the Building Division and Planning Division codes. proposal: The request is to permit a Large Vacation Home use on this lot, allowing for 10 occupants based on the two per bedroom, plus two formula. Advantages: 1. Exceeds required setbacks from property line on all sides of the property. 2. Neighboring homes are not impacted by this vacation home 3. The home to nearest this home is also a vacation home. Disadvantages: None. Action Recommended: The Community Development staff recommends approval of this application for the Large Vacation Home permit. The following findings of fact are recommended: 1. The owner is extremely responsive to ensuring compliance with all codes. 2. This use would not change the residential character of this neighborhood. 3. The home provides ample parking for up to four vehicles. 4. The lot size of .45 acre does not cause concern for impact to neighboring homes. Level of Public Interest: Low: For the Large Vacation Home permission in general, there has been a high level of public interest. However, there have been no concerns voiced for this particular property with this application. Sample Motions: Below are the Planning Commission's options related to approval or denial of this application: 1. I find that the application meets the review criteria with the demonstration of no impact to the neighbors regarding the less than one (1) acre, and move to APPROVE the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home including findings of fact as recommended by staff. 2. I find that the application does not meet the review criteria and has not demonstrated that there would be no impact to the neighbors, and move to DENY the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home, including findings of fact that [state findings for denial]. 3. I find that the applicant has not provided sufficient information to review the application and move to CONTINUE THE HEARING to provide adequate time to review the property. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. Site Plans (2) 1 in -= 65 ft A A fl) for internal use by the makes no claim as to data contained hereon. This draft document was prepared Town of Estes Park, CO. The town the accuracy or completeness of the 0 30 60 Feet Town of Estes Park 3149 Fish Creek Road pproximate Property Boundary Lines ESTES PARK COLORADO wn requests that you internet or otherwis unknown to you. Due to security concerns, The To do not post this document on the make it available to persons Community Development Created By: Linda Hardin Printed: 8/9/2017 _Z Vtrte 4_) 2 ct CApr - — C-7 fc fl VH Certificate # Number of Bedrooms 24 - Name Physical Address Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address Local Property Manager Contact Information 1-€ r 0c 41-..-A217-C (.751 k c-3 - 51 (s) - Q Ck 014.,E 4‘. Date Record Owner 0 -7/ y 1") 19 pi634 Lot Size0i Zone District L TOWN DENIED APPROVED Date PlannIng COMMISSIOA Chair eck )•/\ 3-Ait 7,v.` OF MAer- 1 J-A 'Yu cu F M61-)``p + cle .. MOwner Information Vacation Home (VH) Address Homeowner's Name Business Name Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address Site Information If registration is still in process, provide date submitted to Town Number of Existing Off-Street Parking Spaces Number of Occupants Proposed (Maximum allowed is 2 per bedroom plus 2) 10 Attachments k t'L $150 Fee (Town AND County) Owner Certification As Owner, I certify the information and ex it herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property Office Use Copy of property site plan, if available - Required Setback sa5: Front Fro Side Rear Side ,..55 Rear Maximum Number of Occupants Allowed Number of Approved Parking Spaces Existing Existing Setbacks: Staff Recommendation:AICLDPROVAL DENIM. Scheduled Hearing Dateell "Op aprl Date NO Com Statement of Intent Required? • , 1 0111** 44411ri . Co li ,a[ Estes Valley Planning Commission Use ESTES VALLEY LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW pmEffecIrve an 7 04 01 Submittal Date: ( CAUsers\linda Hardin\ DownloadALVHRApplicationDRAF1 JUL 2y 2017 1,1 , We kindly request our home to be approved for 10 guests. CommuNir:' !PIF! 1.) We are currently licensed for a total of 8 guests. 2.) We are approved and have 4 bedrooms and have been inspected for this. 3.) We are in compliance with all applicable Building, Health and Fire codes and this has been confirmed by the city inspector. 4.) We have attached the site plan to our home which shows the following : A.) The north side (or back of the house) set back is at 58.5 feet from our boundary line. B.) The west side of the house is at 29 feet from our lot boundary line. In addition there are rows of mature large pine trees planted by the neighbor between our house and their home. These are 9 pine trees over 15 feet tall and currently about 8 feet in diameter and are continuing to grow. C.) The east side of the house is at 30 feet from our boundary line. In addition the neighbors home on the east side is set back an additional 26 feet backwards giving additional privacy. D.) We are 80 feet from the south or front of Fish Creek Road on a small hill with a very large parking driveway in front of our home as shown on the site plan done by Cornerstone Engineering and Survey. We are therefore kindly asking to be approved for a total of 10 guests. We thank you very much for your hard work! Qaiser and Mary Jay Yusuf, 3149 Fish Creek Road, Estes Park, Colorado 80517. 1 11 1 11 11 II I I r9..9 Is ars..9 9. ,1.199,L 10•9•99. STIMPLIIN LOT 19. BLOCK IC CARRIAGE WILLS 5th FIL191G 3199 FIGh CREEK ROAD, ESTES PARK. CO 80517 9, WO. T M. 1.7, 1•111.01, 1411.9.1 .319999 * 1141901 1/11211 ...:*.nr.17;IF.1 .11900./9zi9 / 994519-111•9999 , .-11•91911 9.9{9 969 0116 — *199 *95101., 0951090 --- 0.109w0 • t0s. ra. 2017 I to. .1'10111 99 . 9nt 91CLVITY MAP —4 N' •••!I I • ---- 1 —. LOLLY 10 91 19 SCALE 10' NOTES': LEGEND! " ArtZ7-.Vcr- .11.-.1 ,915 145 9,1 rer-49 sK.99 91.01(5 SuIvit• 1991919/9 0.1 0191111.0.11,9 .99.1.r• Led 801101C.111004 I•12 09.999151 991 9.19,19 W. 991 99,4•99 - 1.1•15 9.5 10919.9 - • 91.99.3 9.99.4 69011.11.5,90 11 09•13 .91•990•••1 009,9 - - 01.951.5 91.1 MGM.* 105<1 --1111.15 191991 GAL 0. 510991 Ci•VER OF COICRAGO 1-800-922-1987 slwrt 1. soeurn 9405191, 29.10 1- ES,A9 .999 sun.. 5.11119. • 91 MI 91.1 9,499...19 SEIM. - qv ,9,91 extorz 110941 - RV 99995 19/7.9, 11501..9.99.[ 1,L13•4110.1 A. 9•11.., /.99•9919.r5 49.1 /MK •59 .19•••9 mem. OW95 4 [P •••••=11, TOWN OF FSTES P Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Linda Hardin, Code Compliance Officer Date: August 15, 2017 RE: LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW, 1320 Country Club Drive, lot size less than one acre. ORDINANCE #5.1.B.3.c.(3) Planning Commission to make a finding that the buffering or screening from adjacent and nearby properties is such that the lot size is commensurate with Large Vacation Home use. Marvin and Pam Hart dba MPH970, LLC/Applicant Objective: Conduct a review to consider approval of a Large Vacation Home Review compliant with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Present Situation: The vacation home at 1320 Country Club Drive is in the "E-1 Estate" zoning district. The lot is .96 acre. The setbacks exceed the required 25 ft., with the front setback at 67 ft., the rear side setback at 81 ft., the west side setback at 42 ft., and the east side setback at 92 ft. The nearest home to this property to the west is more than 170 ft. from this home. The home to the southwest is also more than 170 ft. from this home. The home directly south is over 220 ft. from this home. Trees buffer this home from the neighboring properties. The north and east borders of this home are buffered by roadways. There are no complaints received regarding this vacation home. The current owner has ensured that the property is code compliant with the Building Division and Planning Division. Proposal: The request is to permit a Large Vacation Home use on this lot, allowing for 10 occupants based on the two per bedroom, plus two formula. Advantages: 1. Exceeds required setbacks from property line, on all sides of the property. 2. Neighboring homes are not impacted by this vacation home. 3. The home nearest this home is over 170 ft. away. Disadvantages: None. Action Recommended: The Community Development staff recommends approval of this application for the Large Vacation Home permit. The following findings of fact are recommended: 1. The lot is just .04 acre from the one (1) acre standard in the code. 2. This use would not change the residential character of this neighborhood. 3. The home provides ample parking for up to four vehicles. 4. The lot size of .96 acre does not cause concern for impact to neighboring homes. Level of Public Interest: Low: For the Large Vacation Home permission in general, there has been a high level of public interest. However, there have been no concerns voiced for this particular property with this application. Sample Motions: Below are the Planning Commission's options related to approval or denial of this application: 1. I find that the application meets the review criteria with the demonstration of no impact to the neighbors regarding the less than one (1) acre, and move to APPROVE the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home including findings of fact as recommended by staff. 2. I find that the application does not meet the review criteria and has not demonstrated that there would be no impact to the neighbors, and move to DENY the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home, including findings of fact that [state findings for denial]. 3. I find that the applicant has not provided sufficient information to review the application and move to CONTINUE THE HEARING to provide adequate time to review the property. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. Site Plan 1 in = 78 ft 7.71, 1 ESTES PARK COLORADO This draft document was prepared for internal use by the Town of Estes Park, CO. The town makes no claim as to the accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon 1320 Country Club Driv Approximate Property Boundary Lines Town of Estes Park Community Development Printed: 7/21/2017 Created By: Linda Hardin 0 40 80 Feet Due to security concerns, The Town requests that you do not post this document on the internet or otherwis make it available to persons unknown to you. Submittal Date: CU 80 Owner Information Vacation Home (VH) Address Homeowner's Name Business Name Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address /_3Z0 Cc"-dA t C/Li ve_ 61 Pi-1 20 L 0 . /3 ii/ /Z 1 5 9 7u—— 6. Z/7 141p/197o e pv,-4/1 T3 Site Information VH Certificate # Complies with EVDC? DENIED Estes Valley Planning Commission Use APPROVED Planning Commission Chair Date Number of Existing Off-Street Parking Spaces Number of Occupants Proposed (Maximum allowed is 2 per bedroom plus 2) Local Property Manager Contact Information R ocky filo -tat...)4.s Pr #.47 v e 1_1_ C goad / 4.--54c5Ark CB ebsi 7 flboG1A.,474ck 12.4d ,E5•54.516.41 rk, co E3c2-5.1 970 .2-/f &YgY rob a_ ccav utex e azicep-7 Copy of property site plan, if available hi)4441 ID U-4.— As Owner, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property Record Owner 771 eni---------7?/042-•(A Office Use Name Physical Address Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address 11 00 G Attachments $150 Fee (Town AND County) Yr? Owner Certification Date „2c, 7-o/ -1 PID -01 -00 Lot Size (../7 Required Setbacks: a6' Front 3•5' Side as± Rear Existing Setbacks: 6,7 r Frontli;let'side 5i 1 Rear Statement of Intent Required? NO NO Zone District CT---"TOWN ) COUNTY Maximum Number of Occupants Allowed t 0 Number of Approved Parking Spaces Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL DENIAL Scheduled Hearing Date ::9- / -7 -Ce- L5 21 7- a7--1 Date If registration is still in process, provide date submitted to Town Number of Bedrooms ..r2a. ' 2_oi 3 4- 9 ESTES VALLEY LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW i ll Effective 2017.04.01 U:\CodeCompliance\VacationRentals\LVHRApplication.xlsx 8/2/2017 Town of Estes Park Mail - Lot Size Variance Request for Large Vacation Homes Linda Hardin <lhardin@estes.org> S T E $ FARK Lot Size Variance Request for Large Vacation Homes 2 messages Marvin Hart <mph970@gmail.com> Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 8:13 AM To: Linda Hardin <lhardin@estes.org> Date: July 21, 2017 To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Marvin Hart Subject: Request for a variance to Codes Specific to Large Vacation Homes My vacation home located at 1320 Country Club Drive, Estes Park, Colorado is on a lot that is less than one (1) acre. Larimer County Tax Records show the size of the lot as 0.96 acres. The lot is a corner lot and is bordered on the north and east sides by Country Club Drive. The house is situated on the lot no closer than 150 feet to the closest neighboring house on the west side thus providing more than adequate buffering from adjacent and nearby properties. The setback from all property lines is more than the minimum required 25 feet. With this accompanying property description I request my property be allowed a variance to the one (1) acre requirement for Large Vacation Homes. Respectively, Marvin Hart Linda Hardin <lhardin@estes.org> Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:10 AM To: Marvin Hart <mph970@gmail.com> Good Morning Marvin, Thank you for your Statement of Intent. We will put you on the agenda for the August 15th Planning Commission meeting. Regards, Linda [Quoted text hidden] nnnnip rAmfmailhi/11/91ii=2&ik=af029285al&isver=1KukmJVEMCA.en.&view=pt&q=mph970`)/040gmail.com&qs=true&search=query&th=15... 1/2 A EP TOWN OF FSTES P Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Linda Hardin, Code Compliance Officer Date: August 15, 2017 RE: LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW, 1461 St. Moritz Trail, lot size less than one acre. ORDINANCE #5.1.B.3.c.(3) Planning Commission to make a finding that the buffering or screening from adjacent and nearby properties is such that the lot size of .57 acre, is commensurate with Large Vacation Home use. Thane T. Sponsel, Jr. dba Sponse! Interests, Ltd./Applicant Objective: Conduct a review to consider approval of a Large Vacation Home Review compliant with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Present Situation: The vacation home at 1461 St. Moritz Trail is in the Windcliff Homes subdivision. This subdivision has been successfully and willfully operating vacation homes with an office on site for more than 20 years. The lot size for this property is .57 acre. The setbacks meet or exceed the required 25 ft. in all directions. This home, as is common with many homes in Windcliff, is built into a hillside. This creates natural buffers with elevation changes to the east and west. The property to the east and west is owned by the HOA, and the property further east is Federal land. There are no known plans for developing these areas. The private lots to the north and south are undeveloped at this time. There are no close neighbors to this home. The nearest neighbor is to the south, buffered by a vacant lot, is more than 250 ft. from this home. This property owner has been diligent in complying with all building and planning codes. Proposal: The request is to permit a Large Vacation Home use on this lot, allowing for 10 occupants based on the two per bedroom, plus two formula. Advantages: 1. The home is in the Windcliff subdivision, which is known for having vacation homes. 2. Exceeds required setbacks from property line on all sides. 3. The home is surrounded by elevation changes and HOA, vacant lots, and Federal land. 4. The lot size does not present a problem for the neighbors. Disadvantages: None. Action Recommended: The Community Development staff recommends approval of this application for the Large Vacation Home permit. The following findings of fact are recommended: 1. Windcliff Homes has an onsite management office overseeing all activities in the subdivision. 2. No reports or complaints have been submitted by neighbors. 3. This use would not change the residential character of this neighborhood. 4. The home provides ample parking for up to four vehicles. Level of Public Interest: Low: For the Large Vacation Home permission in general, there has been a high level of public interest. However, there have been no negative concerns voiced for this particular property with this application. Sample Motions: Below are the Planning Commission's options related to approval or denial of this application: 1. I find that the application meets the review criteria with the demonstration of no impact to the neighbors regarding the less than 1 acre lot size, and move to APPROVE the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home including findings of fact as recommended by staff. 2. I find that the application does not meet the review criteria and has not demonstrated that there would be no impact to the neighbors, and move to DENY the application allowing permission to operate as a Large Vacation Home, including findings of fact that [state findings for denial]. 3. I find that the applicant has not provided sufficient information to review the application and move to CONTINUE THE HEARING to provide adequate time to review the property. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Statement of Intent 3. Site Plan •140:.4.146.4, . 1 in = 162 ft This draft document was prepared for internal use by the Town of Estes Park, CO. The town makes no claim as to the accuracy or completeness of the data contained hereon. 0 90 180 Feet ESTES PARK COLORADO Printed: 4/27/2017 Created By: Linda Hardin A 1461 St. Moritz Trail Approximate Propert Boundary Lines Town of Estes Park Community Development Due to security concerns, The Town requests that you do not post this document on the internet or otherwis make it available to persons unknown to you. ESTES VALLEY LARGE VACATION HOME REVIEW 17, 2017 April Estes Valley Planning Commission Use PlanningComodisimatair Lot Size 0.51 PIL5-hi24, 1L J1~ Zone District C.— 1 TOWN COUNTY APPROVED DENIED Date Required Setbacks: a6_I_ Front 23 ' Side ,a5 Flew: Existing Setbacks: 33! Front Side ,65 Rear Statement of Intent Required? NO 001114. C?D Corn. ode Co M xi mum mum Number of Occupants Allowed IC) Nu ber of Approved Parking Spaces Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL ENIAL Scheduled Hearing Date "Oil- Oa -15" D ate -7- 0 48- oq pi' Effective 2C1170401 ill Submittal Date: Owner Information Vacation Home (VH) Address Homeowner's Name Business Name Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address 713-523-5052 ty@tysponsel.com 1461 St. Moritz Trail Thane T. Sponsel, Jr., Managing Partner Sponsel Interests, Ltd. 50 Rriar Hollow Ln Ste 370 West, wouston, TX 7707 7 Site Information VH Certificate # 3041 Number of Bedrooms 4 If registration is still in process, provide date submitted to Town Number of Existing Off-Street Parking Spaces 4 Number of Occupants Proposed (Maximum allowed is 2 per bedroom plus 2) 1. Local Property Manager Contact Information Windcliff Homes, LLC Name Physical Address Mailing Address (same) Phone Number Email Address Attachments Yes $150 Fee (Town AND County).incix) Copy of property site plan, if available Owner Certification 51;4avVte—t 34U (A• As Owner, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property Record Owner a-40.0,41e4g, Date 4-17-2017 2220 Windcliff Dr. Estes Park, CO 80517 970-586-2181 rich@windcliff.com Office Use C:\Users\Linda Hardiri\Downloads\LwiRApplicationDRAFT 8/7/2017 Town of Estes Park Mail - Statement of Intent for Planning Commission's August 15th Meeting SUS 3 PARK Linda Hardin <lhardin@estes.org> Statement of Intent for Planning Commission's August 15th Meeting 1 message Ty Sponsel <ty@tysponsel.com> Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:56 AM To: Linda Hardin <lhardin@estes.org> Ms. Hardin — should my home at 1461 St. Moritz Trail (in Windcliff) be granted "large vacation home" status, it is my belief that occasionally having up to ten guests will not negatively affect my neighbors for the following reasons: 1. The home is high up on Rams Horn Mountain and the vertical terrain of Windcliff provides significant separation from my neighbors below. 2. The home has private (WPOA) greenspace above it which borders on the National Forest and therefore there are no homes above mine. 3. The home is located in an area of larger lots in Windcliff with natural buffers to each side including significant spacing, trees and rock outcroppings. There are also no homes on the lots on either side of my home. 4. Windcliff has been continually operating vacation rentals for 47+ years and all neighbors are fully aware of rental operations and the onsite property management, as the property manager also lives and offices in Windcliff. thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Please let me know should you or the Planning Commission need any further information. Ty Sponsel Please note my new office address. My email and phone numbers remain the same. Ty Sponsel Jr. Attorney at Law 50 Briar Hollow Ln, Suite 370 West Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 523-5052 (Direct) (713) 523-5233 (Fax) ty@tysponsel.com Confidentiality & Circular 230 Notices: This email and its attachments are intended for the indicated recipient only and may be confidential or privileged. if you are not the indicated recipient, you may not review, use, duplicate, or distribute this email or its attachments. If you received this email in error, please notify me immediately, If this email or its attachments contain any tax advice, that advice is not intended to be used, and cannot he used, to: (i) avoid any tax or penalty; or (ii) promote, market, or recommend any tax strategy or matter. • _ •• • or. ••-,• o :1.--Ennne,c)c— !Wit amn .12.....ioatAr=r0R.coaq rrh=inhAVAM.---164-1 hr1RA71112f72 1 e&siml= 15dbd697032f7... 1/2 Ferguson Preliminary Townhome Subdivision ONE and TWO Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 210, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE & LOCATION: August 15, 2017, 1:30PM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: Recommendation for approval for two Preliminary Townhome Subdivision Plats. Staff recommends conditional approval of the two Preliminary Townhome Plats. PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) and Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan; and 2. Provide recommendation for Approval/Denial of the Preliminary Plat applications. LOCATION: 1551 and 1573 Mary's Lake Road. within the unincorporated Estes Valley VICINITY MAP: See attachment OWNER/APPLICANT: Seth Hanson I Same as owner STAFF CONTACT: Audem Gonzales, Planner II PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Present Situation: The project areas are located west of Mary's Lake Road and south of Griffith Court. The properties are zoned A-1 Accommodations. Ferguson ONE and TWO are both approximately 0.5 acres in size. Ferguson ONE is currently developed with a duplex building while Ferguson TWO has an issued building permit for the construction of a duplex building. Proposal: The proposals entail creating two townhome subdivisions. Each townhome subdivision would consist of two townhome lots and an outlot. Each subdivision will contain a duplex building with two units, with each unit being located on one townhome lot. Both subdivisions will utilize a common drive accessing Mary's Lake Road. REVIEW PROCESS: 1. Preliminary Townhome Subdivision. §3.9.E. All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, "Subdivision Standards," and all other applicable provisions of this Code. SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Van Horn Engineering & Surveying Parcel Number: 35354-00-091 and 35354-00-092 Development Area: Approx. 1 acre (0.5 for each townhome subdivision) Existing Land Use: Ferguson ONE (existing duplex) and Ferguson TWO (building permit for duplex) Proposed Land Use: Two townhome subdivisions, each containing two townhome lots and an outlot. One duplex on each townhome subdivision. Zoning Designation: Al- Accommodations Proposed Zoning Designation: No change Adjacent Zoning: East: E-Estate North: Al-Accommodations West: A-1 Accommodations South: A-1 Accommodations Adjacent Land Uses: East: Undeveloped North: Single-Family Homes West: Single-Family Homes South: Single-Family Home Services: Water: Town of Estes Park Sewer: Upper Thompson Sanitation District REVIEW CRITERIA: Generally, depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1. Landscaping. District buffering is not required at this subdivision stage. 2. Water. Four wet taps are proposed to connect into a new main extension. Currently the main runs along the east side of Mary's Lake Road. The extension will run west under the road and to a new fire hydrant. 3. Sewer. Each of the four units will tie, via private service lines, directly into the Upper Thompson Sanitation District main that runs along the west side of Mary's Lake Road. 4. Fire Protection. A new fire hydrant and water main extension are part of these applications. The proposed hydrant meets the required 250-foot maximum distance from the hydrants to the frontage of the new structures and desired limits for "hose wrapping and fire access". Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 2 of 5 Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO Preliminary Plats The driveway has been designed to provide adequate spacing for the largest fire apparatus. Maximum grades do no exceed the required 12%. 5. Right-Of-Way Dedication. 20-foot ROW is required to be dedicated on each townhome subdivision plat. The applicant has provided the appropriate dedication corridor on both preliminary plats. The dedications do not affect the allowed densities of each subdivision. 6. Stormwater. The projects were originally granted waivers to providing a drainage plan and grading plan due to the fact that there were existing buildings/approved building permits on the two properties. The County does not review drainage at the building permit stage for these properties. After the waivers were granted, the property owner of the adjacent north property brought up concerns about drainage onto their property (new drainage onto their property they believe is caused by the building of the duplex). In response to Staff's comments to those concerns, the applicant provided staff with a drainage memo and proposed drainage/grading plan to alleviate any drainage concerns to the north. County Engineering staff has reviewed these documents and has found them to be inadequate. Guidance was given by County Engineering Staff for potential revisions. Since these are preliminary townhome plat applications, Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission condition the approvals to comply with Larimer County Engineering Department requests. These requests/comments shall be addressed before/with the submittal of the Final Plat townhome applications. The Final Plats will not be scheduled for public hearing or vote unless drainage concerns have been addressed to meet Engineering concerns. 7. Traffic and Parking. No traffic impact study was required with these projects. 8. Access. Both townhome subdivisions are proposed to share a driveway access from Mary's Lake Road. The County Engineering Department has waived the paving standard for the 100-foot shared portion of the drive. The applicant is proposing to gravel the driveways. A draft Road Maintenance Agreement has been submitted for the shared driveway. 9. Building Envelopes. Building envelopes are required with townhome subdivisions. The applicant provided the appropriate envelope locations. 10. Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the two townhome subdivision areas as the "Giant Track Special Study Area". There is no information in the Plan about this study area and Staff cannot find external information about this "study area". g Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO Preliminary Plats Page 3 of 5 REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: These applications have been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Larimer County Engineering staff has outstanding concerns about drainage/grading, as reflected in recommended conditions of approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS: In accordance with the notice requirements in the Estes Valley Development Code, legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail- Gazette. Typical mailings include a 500-foot radius. As of August 8, 2017, one written public comment has been received for this application package. All written comments are posted to www.estes.oro/currentapplications. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Preliminary Townhome Subdivisions comply with applicable standards set forth in the EVDC. 2. The Preliminary Townhome Subdivisions comply with the goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Planning Commission is the Recommending Body for the Preliminary Townhome Subdivisions. 4. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed projects. 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Larimer County Engineering has concerns over drainage/grading and has recommended conditions of approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional APPROVAL of the proposed Preliminary Townhome Subdivisions with the following conditions pertaining to both applications: 1. A detailed grading and drainage plan for both projects shall be submitted with the Final Plat applications. Upstream and downstream contours and flows shall be discussed and shown on the grading and drainage plan. 2. Show detailed contours and spot elevations on grading and drainage plan. 3. Underdrains shall not daylight within the limits of County Road ROW. 4. Shared drainage and maintenance easements between Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO shall be shown on PP and FP. This is for the berm shown between the two projects and underdrains shown crossing lot lines. 5. Construction details on the retaining wall and berm shall be submitted with the Final Plat. SAMPLE MOTION FOR FERGUSON ONE PRELIMINARY TOWNHOME PLAT: 1. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Ferguson ONE Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" according to findings of fact, including findings and conditions recommended by Staff. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 4 of 5 Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO Preliminary Plats 2. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Ferguson ONE Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" according to findings of fact, including findings recommended by Staff. 3. I move to CONTINUE the "Ferguson ONE Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" application to the next regularly scheduled meeting. 4. I move to recommend DENIAL of the "Ferguson ONE Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" application. SAMPLE MOTION FOR FERGUSON TWO PRELIMINARY TOWNHOME PLAT: 1. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Ferguson TWO Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" according to findings of fact, including findings and conditions recommended by Staff. 2. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Ferguson TWO Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" according to findings of fact, including findings recommended by Staff. 3. I move to CONTINUE the "Ferguson TWO Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" application to the next regularly scheduled meeting. 4. I move to recommend DENIAL of the "Ferguson TWO Preliminary Townhome Subdivision" application. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statements of Intent 3. Applications 4. Ferguson ONE Preliminary Townhome Subdivision Plat 5. Ferguson TWO Preliminary Townhome Subdivision Plat Complete Preliminary Townhome Subdivision plans can be found at www.estes.orcilcurrentapplications. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 5 of 5 Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO Preliminary Plats Statement of Intent Ferguson One Townhome Plat June 29th 2017 RECEIVED JUNE 29, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The subject property contains a total ± 21,859 square feet (0.50 acres total) located in a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., and is currently under construction (site address: 1551 Mary's Lake Rd.). A Townhome Map is being submitted for a Minor Subdivision for a duplex. This project proposes a single duplex townhome and seeks to maintain the same zoning Accommodations (A-1). Site History: The site has been historically zoned A-1 Accommodations and has been undeveloped since its platting as Lot 5 and a portion of Lot 6, Ferguson's Subdivision. The site is surrounded by single-family residences and undeveloped lots, all within A-1 zoning. The site is accessed from the east by Mary's Lake Rd. Zoning/Easements The applicant wishes to keep the existing zoning of A-1 Accommodation, this zoning is characterized by low-intensity residential and lodging uses, including resort lodges, cabins, and condominium/townhome developments. Additional easements for both private and public utilities are to be granted with the new townhome map. Density: This proposal includes the following units and uses: • Duplex: The duplex is on 21,859 ft2 (0.50 acres) of land. After the townhome plat 19,929 square feet remain due to the dedication of right-of-way to Latimer County for Mary's Lake Rd. The Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) requires 10,890 ft2 of land per unit. The total required square footage for the density is 21,780 ft2. The net land area, for the property is 19,929 ft2 (total area after access easement reduction), which allows for a total of 1.83 units which allows for two units. Structures: Existing: • 1 - duplex Phasing: Phasing for this project is a single phase: Drainage: This property historically drains from the south to the north by sheet flow. Minimal/Minor grading is currently utilized to direct flow around the duplex. No concentrated flow exists currently on the site except for along Mary's Lake Rd in a roadside ditch. The entire site drains north toward Griffith Ct. and east towards Mary's Lake Rd. Much of the area is vegetated with very little impervious surfaces. The flow is sheet flow over grassy areas. There is no observed channelized flow over the grass lined areas and the plan proposes to keep the existing drainage for this property as sheet flow with minimal grading to direct water around the proposed building. Neighborhood Compatibility: In comparing this proposal to the neighboring A-I Accommodations uses, much of the immediate area is single family residence or long term rentals and there are several short term rentals to the east of Mary's Lake Rd. Grading: The existing site has an average slope of +/-6.0% making the driveway and drainage grades gentle. The subject site has a shared access for approximately 100 feet with Lot 8 to the south. The shared driveway access area accesses four units and thus needs to be paved up to where the driveway splits per Estes Valley Development Code. A waiver is requested for the paving. After the split the driveway and parking area will be surfaced as a gravel drive. A plan is included in the submittal showing the driveway. This proposal has taken into consideration the Estes Valley Development Code in regards to the grading and paving driveways serving 6 or more parking spaces. Landscaping: The layout of the townhomes have taken into consideration the few trees on the subject lot and has avoided removing trees unnecessarily. No new landscaping is proposed with this project submittal. Parking/Paving/Road Design: Parking consists of 4 parking spaces that will service the two units. Parking stalls are 19.5' deep and 9.0' wide. Two spaces service the southern unit with outdoor parking and two spaces service the northern unit as a 2-car garage. This shared driveway access area accesses four units and thus needs to be paved up to where the driveway splits. A waiver is requested for the paving. After the split, the driveway and parking area will be surfaced as a gravel drive. A plan is included in the submittal showing the driveway. Sewer: Each unit is serviced with a single 4" pvc service line that connects directly to Upper Thompson Sanitation District Main that runs along the west side of Mary's Lake Rd. Water: Two wet taps are to connect into a main extension (extended from water main that runs along the east side of Mary's Lake Rd.). The main extends under Mary's Lake Rd. and provides a fire hydrant on the west side of Mary's Lake Rd. All the units are serviced by 3/4" individual service lines tapped into this extension. Said service lines connect to the new 8" water main extension and share a trench with 2 additional service lines that service an additional townhome plat to the south of the subject property on Lot 8. The water main extension includes a fire hydrant to service the subject property. See Townhome Map for details. Electric: The Town of Estes Park Electric Department has recently installed a transformer to the south of the property and a secondary electric pedestal on the subject property. The electric lines run underground to the secondary pedestal. Fire Protection: This project has been created with the assistance of the Fire Authority in the Estes Valley. There is a water main extension to extend the main waterline to the north of the proposed driveway entrance. The new hydrant meets the required 250' maximum distance from the hydrants to the frontage of the new structures and the desired limits for "hose wrapping and fire access". Units are architecturally designed to meet Fire Codes for ingress and egress. The driveway geometry is designed (with wheel tracking software) to provide assurance that the largest applicable fire response vehicles will have access to the driveway in the event of a fire. Grading on site is such that the longitudinal grade on the driveway does not exceed 12% per Fire Department guidance. County Road Dedication: This project consists of only two units, it does not trigger a full development review and therefore no additional right-of-way is expected to be dedicated. Nevertheless, twenty feet is being offered for additional right-of-way along Mary's Lake Rd. Storm Drainage: With no increase in impervious coverage for the existing detention is not proposed. The sheet flow nature of the stormflows will not be altered. A culvert is to be installed under the driveway, near Mary's Lake Rd. Road Improvements: This project consists of only two units, it does not trigger a full development plan and therefore no road improvements are proposed Wetlands: There are no mapped wetlands onsite. Hazards Area: There are no mapped geologic or wildfire hazard area onsite. Exterior Lighting: All exterior lighting will comply with the current EVDC Standard Downcast Requirements. Signage: There is currently no existing or planned signage. Variance Reauests/VVaivers: This property is currently seeking approval for several variance by the Estes Valley Planners at staff level due to project sizes. Since this project is staff level and does not trigger a development plan, the owners of the property are seeking waiver for a traffic study, storm water draining plan, landscaping plan and grading plan. Additionally, due to the existing permitted units being allowed by building permit, the eaves encroach into the building setback. Since building envelopes are required for townhomes, a 10% staff level variance is requested to allow the envelopes to be 13.5' from the side lot lines instead of the typical 15' setback. FergusonONETownhomePlat-100.xls Page 1 Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip ROBISON RALPH B/NANCY L 210 KAREN CT JONESBORO AR 72401 HANSON SETH W 2803 E HARMONY RD FORT COLLINS CO 80528 MLR ADRIAN FAMILY LLC PO BOX 3427 CAREFREE AZ 85377 JACKSON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 1050 GRIFFITH CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 SWITZER JOSEPH E 1575 MARYS LAKE RD ESTES PARK CO 80517 KEEP ROBERT D MCGLOTHLEN SHANNON E PO BOX 1132 ESTES PARK CO 80517 HANSON SETH 2803 E HARMONY RD FORT COLLINS CO 80528 ELMARR LINDA L 1146 GRIFFITH CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 ESTER TRUDY M 1070 GRIFFITH CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 HANSON SETH 2803 E HARMONY RD FORT COLLINS CO 80528 RECEIVED JUNE 29, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Statement of Intent Ferguson Two Townhome Plat June 29th 2017 The subject property contains a total ± 23,459 square feet (0.54 acres total) located in a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., and is currently under construction (site address: 1573 Mary's Lake Rd.). A Townhome Map is being submitted for a Minor Subdivision for a duplex. This project proposes a single duplex townhome and seeks to maintain the same zoning Accommodations (A-I). Site History: The site has been historically zoned A-1 Accommodations and has been undeveloped since its platting as Lot 8 and a portion of Lot 7, Ferguson's Subdivision. The site is surrounded by single-family residences and undeveloped lots, all within A-1 zoning. The site is accessed from the east by Mary's Lake Rd. Zonina/Easements The applicant wishes to keep the existing zoning of A-1 Accommodation, this zoning is characterized by low-intensity residential and lodging uses, including resort lodges, cabins, and condominium/townhome developments. Additional easements for both private and public utilities are to be granted with the new townhome map. Density: This proposal includes the following units and uses: • Duplex: The duplex is on 23,459 ft2 (0.54 acres) of land. After the townhome plat 21,535 square feet remain due to the dedication of right-of-way to Larimer County for Mary's Lake Rd. The Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) requires 10,890 ft2 of land per unit. The total required square footage for the density is 21,780 ft2. The net land area, for the property is 21,535 ft2 (total area after access easement reduction), which allows for a total of 1.98 units which allows for two units. Structures: Existing: • 1 - duplex Phasing: Phasing for this project is a single phase: Draina2e: This property historically drains from the south to the north by sheet flow. Minimal/Minor grading is currently utilized to direct flow around the duplex. No concentrated flow exists currently on the site except for along Mary's Lake Rd in a roadside ditch. The entire site drains north toward Griffith Ct. and east towards Mary's Lake Rd. Much of the area is vegetated with very little impervious surfaces. The flow is sheet flow over grassy areas. There is no observed channelized flow over the grass lined areas and the plan proposes to keep the existing drainage for this property as sheet flow with minimal grading to direct water around the proposed building. Neighborhood Compatibility: In comparing this proposal to the neighboring A-1 Accommodations uses, much of the immediate area is single family residence or long term rentals and there are several short term rentals to the east of Mary's Lake Rd. Grading: The existing site has an average slope of +1-6.0% making the driveway and drainage grades gentle. The subject site has a shared access for approximately 100 feet with Lot 8 to the south. The shared driveway access area accesses four units and thus needs to be paved up to where the driveway splits per Estes Valley Development Code. A waiver is requested for the paving. After the split the driveway and parking area will be surfaced as a gravel drive. A plan is included in the submittal showing the driveway. This proposal has taken into consideration the Estes Valley Development Code in regards to the grading and paving driveways serving 6 or more parking spaces. Landscaping: The layout of the townhomes have taken into consideration the few trees on the subject lot and has avoided removing trees unnecessarily. No new landscaping is proposed with this project submittal. Parking/Pavine/Road Design: Parking will consist of 4 new parking spaces that will service the two units. Parking stalls are 19.5' deep and 9.0' wide. One space outdoors and another space as the garage will service each unit. This shared driveway access area will access four units and thus will need to be paved up to where the driveway splits. After the split the driveway and parking area will be surfaced as a gravel drive. A plan is included in the submittal showing the proposed driveway. Sewer: Each unit is serviced with a single 4" pvc service line, through the lot to the north, that connects directly to Upper Thompson Sanitation District Main that runs along the west side of Mary's Lake Rd. Water: Two wet taps are to connect into a main extension through the lot to the north (extended from water main that runs along the east side of Mary's Lake Rd.). The main extends under Mary's Lake Rd. and provides a fire hydrant on the west side of Mary's Lake Rd. All the units are serviced by 3/4" individual service lines tapped into this extension. Said service lines connect to the new 8" water main extension and share a trench with 2 additional service lines that service an additional townhome plat to the south of the subject property on Lot 8. The water main extension includes a fire hydrant to service the subject property. See Townhome Map for details. Electric: The Town of Estes Park Electric Department has recently installed a transformer in the southerly portion of the property and a secondary electric pedestal on the property to the north. The electric lines run underground to the secondary pedestal. Fire Protection: This project has been created with the assistance of the Fire Authority in the Estes Valley. There is a water main extension to extend the main waterline to the north of the proposed driveway entrance. The new hydrant meets the required 250' maximum distance from the hydrants to the frontage of the new structures and the desired limits for "hose wrapping and fire access". Units are architecturally designed to meet Fire Codes for ingress and egress. The driveway geometry is designed (with wheel tracking software) to provide assurance that the largest applicable fire response vehicles will have access to the driveway in the event of a fire. Grading on site is such that the longitudinal grade on the driveway does not exceed 12% per Fire Department guidance. County Road Dedication: This project consists of only two units, it does not trigger a full development review and therefore no additional right-of-way is expected to be dedicated. Nevertheless, twenty feet is being offered for additional right-of-way along Mary's Lake Rd. Storm Drainage: With no increase in impervious coverage for the existing detention is not proposed. The sheet flow nature of the stormflows will not be altered. A culvert is to be installed under the driveway, near Mary's Lake Rd. Road Improvements: This project consists of only two units, it does not trigger a full development plan and therefore no road improvements are proposed Wetlands: There are no mapped wetlands onsite. Hazards Area: There are no mapped geologic or wildfire hazard area onsite. Exterior Lighting: All exterior lighting will comply with the current EVDC Standard Downcast Requirements. Signage: There is currently no existing or planned signage. Variance Requests/Waivers: This property is currently seeking approval for several variance by the Estes Valley Planners at staff level due to project sizes. Since this project is staff level and does not trigger a development plan, the owners of the property are seeking waiver for a traffic study, storm water draining plan, landscaping plan and grading plan. Additionally, due to the existing permitted units being allowed by building permit, the eaves encroach into the building setback. Since building envelopes are required for townhomes, a 10% staff level variance is requested to allow the envelopes to be 13.5' from the side lot lines instead of the typical 15' setback. FergusonTWOTownhomePlat-100.xls Page 1 Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip ELMARR LINDA L 1146 GRIFFITH CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 ESTER TRUDY M 1070 GRIFFITH CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 HANSON SETH 2803 E HARMONY RD FORT COLLINS CO 80528 JACKSON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 1050 GRIFFITH CT ESTES PARK CO 80517 KEEP ROBERT D/ MCGLOTHLEN SHANNON PO BOX 1132 ESTES PARK CO 80517 MLR ADRIAN FAMILY LLC PO BOX 3427 CAREFREE AZ 85377 SWITZER JOSEPH E 1575 MARYS LAKE RD ESTES PARK CO 80517 DocuSi Envelope ID: 3DBC2E2A-E6B4-475F-99A8-60ABF07771D0 ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Lot Size 0.5 acres Area of Disturbance in Acres Undeveloped Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service r Septic r Septic X None r Yes No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? currently under construction IX Yes r" No Are there wetlands on the site? 1K Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planning@estes.org Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant 1 Consultant/Engineer Attachments OK Application fee • Statement of intent • 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan rX 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Submittal Date: Type of Application 3 Development Plan 3 Special Review 3 Rezoning Petition 3 Preliminary Subdivision Plat 3 Final Subdivision Plat • Minor Subdivision Plat I— Amended Plat General Information 3 Boundary Line Adjustment r ROW or Easement Vacation 3 Street Name Change 3 Time Extension 3 Other: Please specify Townhome Plat Condominium r Preliminary*GeliVk- f- Final Mad .,f Suppler10 , 141 4 V "" Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Site Information Ferguson One Townhome Plat Single Duplex Townhome Plat 1551 Mary's Lake Rd. Lot 5 and a Portion of Lot 6 West of MLD R-O-W, Block 13, Ferguson's Subdivision 35354-00-092 Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service r Xcel Townhomes I— Town X Town Existing Zoning A-1, Accommodations Proposed Zoning A-1, Accommodations Site Access (if not on public street) Mary's Lake Rd. Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Christopher Beatty Complete Mailing Address 1043 Fish Creek Rd. Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Well X None r- Well r None 3 EPSD r EPSD 3 Yes 3 Other 3 Other (specify) 3 Other (specify) r UTSD t UTSD • No D< None Town of Estes Park -6, P.O. Box 1200 .e 170 MacGregor Avenue -4, Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 Fax: (970) 586-0249 .6 www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Revised 2013.08.27 KT General Information Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Site Information Are there wetlands on the site? r Yes R No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? currently under construction Yes r No DocuSiri Envelope ID. Cl8F7507-88813-40FA-93CC-4D3FB06E9OEF ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Submittal Date: Type of Applicat on 3 Development Plan 3 Special Review 3 Rezoning Petition 3 Preliminary Subdivision Plat 3 Final Subdivision Plat X Minor Subdivision Plat 3 Amended Plat • Boundary Line Adjustment 3 ROW or Easement Vacation F Street Name Change • Time Extension • Other: Please specify Townhome Plat Condominium** I Prelim in4It,V.0a141Ay • r Final Mai)of 17 201% r supplertiv*KbEll4OPMEN'-i Ferguson Two Townhome Plat Single Duplex Townhome Plat 1573 Mary's Lake Rd. Lot 8 and a Portion of Lot 7 West of MLD R-O-W, Block 13, Ferguson's Subdivision 35354-00-091 Lot Size 0.5 acres Area of Disturbance in Acres Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service Existing Sanitary Sewer Service r EPSD Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes Existing Gas Service F Xcel F Other Existing Zoning A-1, Accommodations Proposed Zoning A-1, Accommodations Site Access (if not on public street) Mary's Lake Rd. Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Christopher Beatty Complete Mailing Address 1043 Fish Creek Rd. Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant X Consultant/Engineer Attachments • Application fee 15< Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to 15K Statement of intent planning@estes.org IR 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan • ii" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town 01 Estes Pork .6 P,O. Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue .6 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Deportment Phone: (970) 577-3721 Fax: (970) 586-0249 www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Revised 2013.08.27 KT Townhomes r Town r Well X None X Town r Well F None 3 Other (specify) E Other (specify) r UTSD UTSD • No • None C Septic IX None r Septic DocuSion Envelope ID: Cl 8F 75137-88813-40FA-93CC-4D3F806E9OEF Contact Information Record Owner(s) Seth Hanson Mailing Address 2803 E Harmony Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80528 Phone 970.310.7498 Cell Phone 970.310.7498 Fax n/a Email seth.w.hanson@gmail.com Applicant Seth Hanson Mailing Address 2803 E. Harmony Rd. Fort Collisn, CO 80528 Phone 970.310.7498 Cell Phone 970.310.7498 Fax n/a Email seth.w.hanson@gmail.com Consultant/Engineer Christopher Beatty Mailing Address chrisvhe@airbits.com Phone 970.586.9388 ext. 11 Cell Phone 720.254.4346 Fax n/a Email chrisvhe@airbits.com APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: www.estes.orq/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanninoApolicationFeeSchedule.pdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names; Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Seth Hanson Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Seth Hanson Signatures: Record Owner Applicant DocuSignedby St& bkVSNA, t Eilt;:ANC:1440: 0„. 5/17 /2 017 5/17/2017 Date Date YtitS;if4AL.lb04.1l)t- Revised 2013.08.27 KT APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I. I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. t In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). ► I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: hltol/www.estes.orq/ComDeviDevCode I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I. I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. I. I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access t- iny property during the review of this application. 10- I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Seth Hanson Applicant PLEASE PRINT. Seth Hanson Signatures: Record Owner Applicant DocuSigned by: St t<ls Nusaek, citA, KARAM, VW1i6Oracc Date Date 5/17/2017 5/17/2017 DocuSin9 Envelope ID: Cl8F75D7-88813-40FA-93CC-4D3F806E9OEF • 9B8O7.tAC16044DC Revised 2013.08.27 K1 Printed: 8/10/2017 Created By: Audem Gonzales Town of Estes Park Community Development Vicinity Map Ferguson ONE & TWO (Preliminary Townhome Subdivisions) 1 in = 108 ft MIIMM===l 0 60 120 Feet This draft document was prepared Town of Estes Park, CO. The Town the accuracy or completeness of the Due to security concerns, The To do not post this document on the make it available to persons COLORADO U ESTES PARK for internal use by the makes no claim as to data contained hereon. wit requests that you internet or otherwise unknown to you. FERGUSON ONE TOWNHOME PRELIMINARY PLAT ON LOT 5 AND PORTIONS OF LOT 6, BLOCK 13, FERGUSON'S SUBDIVISION LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 1(11 LI) JUNI -1V, 2111', I To.1.11.N1'11 11 11 1111\P1 RI S TfL„ rc CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION: KNOWN ALL LIEN RI THESE PRESENTS THAT SETH W. HANSON, BONG THE DARER OF 17.00 PART OF SECTION 35. TOWNSHIP 5 Kent RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 610 P.M., LAPTEV, COUNT,. BONG METRE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. TO &T. ISO n Mom IL EE1381=0.-.868)0111811 (0.40 KITES) ,CIT 4 310r6 IT UES, ,565"5 SURnAns.ly TO S. ACRES< ....PUT NAL FENCING rcoNo /4 REBOP MTh PLASM CAP STNAPED PEA 94-55 .• LOT 5 AND A PORTION OF LOT G. BLOCK 13. FERGUSON'S SUBDIVISION EXCEPT A PORTION IN 60 FOOT RIGHT OF NAY FOR MARY'S L400 ROAD LOCATED REST OF MARYS LAW ROAD ACCORDING TO THE BOUNDARY 5060(11 RECORDED AT RECEPTION No 159017537 AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW 120.2' TO CENTERLNE. OF 06.T. EASEMENT BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5, CLOCK 13, FERGUSON'S SuEemSON; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAO LOT 5, NORTH 01 DEGREES 41 MINUTES II SECONDS EAST 49.18 FEET. THENCE LEAKING SAID EASTERLY UNE SOUTH 08 DEGREES 42 MINUTES AI SECONDS EAST 44.93 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY FOR MAWS LAKE RD, THENCE LENANG SAID RIGHT Of WAS NORTH 55 CEGREES 47 MINUTES <3 SECONDS WEST 9.01 FEET TO THE POINT 0, BEGINNING. COUNTY OF EARNER STATE OF COLORADO- CONTAINTNG 0.5D ACRES MORE OR LESS( NAVE BY THESE PRESENTS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SuBCDADED INTO LOTS TO BE KNOWN AS FERGUSON ONE TONNHOLIE PLAT. AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE AND OCHRE., TO AND FOR THE PUBLIC ESE. FOREVER HEREAFTER. THE EASEMENT AS ARE WD OUT AND DESIGNATED ON TH6 PLAT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC AND FERMATE UOLITIES, AND FOR KARATE ACCESS As ARE LAID OUT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS PAT. WITNESS DAR HANDS AND SEALS 7145 __ OAY OF _ 20_ . Ses15'131 126.5.1' {DWI 552T 123.651 FOUND 04 RUHR 12.53' 1 • 3e515'061 21521' , (S55T5'321 219.35') 216' I I simenCOTNT - - /I T , E- - T-POST LINE 03' SOUTH 0, PROPERTY UNE se.E151tr1 06.20 556.1•165t (SENT 5121 60 67') 2 PROPOSED 13.5' RIRLDNG Cm/ELOPE ISO MAILC840 1 SMACKS 7657' 6.S' 115516'5551 91.83' 11 / 1 (4401.27011 8424.56') TR-966.161 - -1311759•141V 6-0,26'34" 4-24AS' R-946.15 W06110'2615 24.83' I Ar- 1 I A -1----4-____ , AR."44;f: DOST"(ArDROMS TO 1300' FIX PRES...MIT"' M411041'1 '-01-6,'..../.0,1, APPLY / r ' PRNATE LITANY E RA SER FOR LOT 5 / ..-... 81.081. IS OP THE / 104 1-11R2 c rli;CA:1 . 00t TED E TWITHOME .-i.._ / ---/ / / / I\ it (TO BE"S°41DEDICA'ItD) ELECTFAC Uttrry 20.01X NIDE I SETH W. HANSON - I5' EAVES STATE OF COLORADO) Ks / A401.8785" 1- 9' N41006.14 04.9.018156"01 2889' COUNTY Of (912111ER) THE fOREGOING INSTRUMENT wAS ACTDOwLEDGED BEFORE MY THIS Cm Or 20 BY SETH W. HANSON. LOT I 0.10 ACRES WITNESS MY HAND AND OPTICAL SEAL. 1-POSTS WITH WIRE OM GROUND OUTLOT A 0.27 ACRES 20.00' 1ON1-01 -WIT - ECD1CMION TO 01348 GOGNIY 0.01 ACRES NOTARY PUBLIC 1.11 COMMISSION EXPIRES LXINHOLDER'S STATEMENT• THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY AGREE AND CONSENT TO THIS PLATTING 0190 DOES ALSO CONSENT 70 THE DEW-AEON OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS DEPICTED HEREON FROM THEIR LEIN 14 CONSIDERATION OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID PLATITNG. .1 5 R.C11 t ITAGNS.04(5, SufrAVNON OAS ACRES (0.50 ACRES) 5.33 47 05-E 56.0o PALO 6 NIENATC BRUN EATER PROPOSED 10.0 I BUILINIG CM/ELOPE 10.0' ITUNDINS SMACK EERIER LIT LINE VIBE STATE Of COLORADO) )SS COUNTY OF EARNER) JAMES TATTLER, PRESIDENT. FARMER'S SANK ISM' ROE SNARED PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT AND p18030 011LITY EASEMENT FOR LOT Dm. II OF THE FERGUSON'S WO 440 LOT 1-2 FIRCANON ONE XIRTHHOAC 15.00' WIDE PRIVATE 519.1131 EASEMENT FOP LOT &OEN 13 OF THE FERGUSON'S SUS AND LOT 1-2 FERGUSON ONE TOWNHOME (TO BE DEDICATED) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE TAE TOWS _ DAP OF 20 RI JAMES MILLER. PRESIDENT. FARMER'S BANK. AC ES AES) 10 LOT 2 0.09 ACRES ORNEVINF. (GRAYER) -601000 Tub6C W COLALASS,Ov EXPIRES __--------. DOARD OF TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE- APPROVED ANO ACCEPTED BY THE HOARD Of TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF EsTEs PARK, COLORADO ON NHS __ DAY Of 25 z 0 (71 O 3 1 E -1-- CD VJ 0 r/) 1.4 4 r: o w A U O FERGUSON ONE TOWNHOME PLAT *50105(0 15.5' BLELDIND ENCLOPE IJ -RaTPNEsO'•;-75..3,-:-- -1--- _ - --,--.,,---:-__ 1._ 5 II ,I - 7 I , ,...._ 4 24" I I ;2 - -1--- _ a 1 t. I.-- 100.0' A lDA. • "2. i50' REIRENNG SETBACK W221214 4381* _ _ - (SIGN) (SON) STMT roust /4 ROMA wan /PLASTIC CAP SINARD) PLS 9435 4 4- a FOuNo J4 NEEum 6110 Ruts= cm STIRRED ‘1.4_ MO 9165 A- (PRAT) 701PN CLERK MAYOR --- a 1 TO CENTERLINE Rimino'snif 221.29' (66547'1314 227.40') a ¨ 4 • TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: Of uTtLiTy EASEFAEN. 5H1RE0 DRNEXA1 4 (nocEs7 ERR TAMER 70 PAN NO) APPROVED BY THE TOW. ENGINEERING OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO THIS DAY OF 20 1 Foam 2.5F ALTANARA CAP 840Hu1F]NING TIC GOITER SOUTH 1/16TH MO SWAPO AS OFHOHIE 551•5P13 -041E47" GI A w MK I, ErMalaCS-51.6165Ifili (0.50 ACRES) .6 ,411. A MN. rouND f4 AMA (024' PRA GlASON SE ONSTALLED 900104 Of 107 7 410131 14 azsmeasuazanel 0.015 ACRES (0.04 ACRES) S S , (SIGNATURE). TOWN ENGINEER THE SUBJECT LOTS ORE SUBJECT TO TLC INK RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS. AND REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE PLAT OF RECORD OF FERCuSON'S SUBDNISION. VICINITY MAP APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1 . 300' SURVEYOR'S NOTES' I OWNERSHIP ARO EASEMENT RESEARCK ANC INFORMATION FOR 1146 PLAT WAS °BINNED FROM ROCKY MOUNTAAN ESCROW AND WIC COMPANY, FILE NO. RT13850-16. 1 DC PLAT OF FERGUSON'S SUBDRASION. RECEPTION NO. 87551 (RECORDED JANUARY I. 1904), THE BOUTCLARy SWAY Of BLOCKS 4, 5 AND 6 AND PORTIONS OF DOCKS 7. 12 AND 13. FERGUSON'S SO8055014. RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 108913317537 (RECORDED APRIL 24. 1989). THE ROCKY mOuNTATN ESCROW & TITLE, IRO. (FILE NP. R143850-16) AND AAR,v1A/ED DOCUMENTS WERE THE ONLY SOURCES USED FOR THE BOUNDARY, EASEMENT AND ROW-OF-WAY RESEARCH FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 3. THESE LOTS ARE ZONED 0-1 (ACCOMMODATIONS). THE PRESCRIBED BUILDING SETBACKS FOR THIS ZONING ARE 15' ALONG THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE (25' FOR ARTERIALS). 15' ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES. AND ICY ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINE, 4. THERE ARE NO GEOLOGICAL LAZARD WILDFIRE HAZARD NOR ANY RIDGE LINE PROTECTION AREAS ON THE SWAIM PROPERTY AS PER THE ESTES VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING LIARS. 5, AN EASEMENT. RECORDED AT RECEPTION ND. 20150023976, DEDICATED THE POTION OF LOTS 7 AND ID LYING WEST OF THE 60' RTCHT-Of -WAY OF MARY'S LAKE ROAD AS A PRIVATE ACCESS AND LRCM, EASEMENT FOR LOT 5 AND A PORTION OF LOT 6 LYING WEST Of MARY'S LACE ROAD RICH-OF-WAY IN BLOCK 13 5. DENSITY CALCULATIONS: - GROSS LAND AREA. 0.50 ACRES (21.859 5.r) - NET LAND AREA (SUBTRACTING ACCESS EASEMENTS ANC RIGHT-OF-WAY) 0.46 ACRES (19.929 SF.) - A-1. ACCOANADOATIORS MINIMUM LAND AREA PER UDR: 10.890 S.F. ALLOWABLE UNITS - 19.929 S.F./10.890 S.F. - 1,83 UNITS TOTAL ALLOWABLE UNITS. 2.0 UNITS 7. THE POSTED ADDRESS FOR low PROPERTY IS. 1551 MARLS LAKE RD, ESTES PARR. COLORADO 80517. I. A 20 F007 WOE PUBETC WOE, EASEMENT IS TO BE DEOCATED ALONG TLC EXISTING OVERHEAD UTERI' ENE AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES WITH ASSOCTRIED ARKERIENAREES UPON, ACROSS, OVER. UNDER, THRETEcH AND NUNN THE SUBJECT PROPEFRY AS SHORN HEREON, 9. THIS PLAT DEDICATES A PERTAANENT BLANKET EASEMENT Oft. OVER ARO UNDER OUTLOT o, IN ITS [MITRED, FOR THE INSTALLATION, REPNR AND MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES. DRANAGE AND ACCESS FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING SUCH LITIETTES, ORNNAGE AND ACCESS TO THIS TOTINNONE PLAT. TO. ALL TOWNHOME LOTS SHALL BE ANAMETLE 70 CONVEY ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE DRENAGE FROM THIS SEEIDAPSON THROUGH THEIR LOTS AND ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR NECESSARY MAINTENANCE. 11. THE LINEAL LAW FOR 11115 SURVEY 6 ERE U.S. SURVEY FOOT. 12. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LOT" YOU NWT COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACT/ON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WHIN THREE YEARS OF THE DATE YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. pi NO EVENT MAY MP( ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT 114 THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE WON TEN SEMIS FROM THE CERTIFICATION DATE SHOWN HEREON. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: LEGEND I. LONNIE A SHELDON, A Day REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN TITE STATE OF COLORADO. CO HEREBY CERTIFY THAI TH6 FERGUSON ONE TOWNHOME PLAT OF LOT 5 AND A PORTION OF LOT 6. FERGUSON'S sui3OTWON, LOCATED IN SECTION 35, 15N, R73W Or THE 601 P COUNTY OF LANIALER, STATE OF COLORADO. TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE Ery NE OR UNDER Tr, CIRCLE SUPERvISION. ELECTRIC PEDESTAL IRAN POLE LNEERGRouw 1111010 LINE MINIM LINEN UNE ouN0018 SEWER UNE ARE HrDRAIW HATER SNOW, VALVE RATER LIFE PENCE UNE (AS DESCRIBED) RAN.. PROPERTY LINES PROPERTY ..R.E5 TO SE VACATED NFIGNRCANNG PROPERTY LICE 4NUIN0 DACLOPE CASOCIFTS (AS DFSCRINO/) Moo LIONIANNTAToN As NEMO OCT /4 REBA HRH RAMC COP 1123974 KOUT MONLIMENTATION .A.A.SuRED 00 CALCULATED INFERMONS PLATTED ONENSONS OF THE BOuNDARy SURyfy AT MOHAN No. 10890011531 LOT COVERAGE TABLE L07 LOT AREA 805 LOT AREA 'LOOP AREA 4010 OGRES/ (ACRES) (so.rr) I 2 0.104 0.087 0.063 0.069 0.221 0.017 WW1 A 0.255 _ 0213 01193 10106 0.157 0.366 0.092 Y ou BRAND BY: LETTLTTE A. SHELDON REG. LAND SURVEYOR 128976 CUB CHECKED BY: LAS vrAl F VARIES REARING STATEMENT - DOTE: 05/16/2017 THE BADS OF RENNET:TS IS THE (NI BETWEEN TIC CENTER SOUTH I/16TH, REPRESENTED BY A 0.0' &ANNUM COP AND STAMPED AS CERcTED, AND A FOUND 94 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 9485. REPRESENTING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 13. OF FERGUSON'S SUETOMSION AND 6 ASSUMED TO BEAR NORTH 01'09'55' EAST. SHEET 1 SCALE. 1 10' NOTICE OF APPROVAL' 0 • 00.Co (00.00) 0 10 20 30 APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN CFEATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, G.R.S As AMENDED. OF 1 Mal NO. 2016-06-02 STATE OF COLORADO) )55 COUNTY OE DARNER) JAMES MILLER, PRESIDENT, FARTAER S BANK 0 • 00.00 (00.00) EFEcurc PEDESTAL &MEM POLE LINVERGROURD Me' LINE cramota ANTRA. uNE MANICAE S1 ER LAE NRE 11171•7 80100 SvuTCPE MET WATER LINE FENCE LAE cescusco PASKANC PROPERTY LINES PROPER, 1.144ES TO OE YAGATED 50014BORINC 0405001? FATS CAC. SETBACKS SUADNG ENVELOPE EASEMENTS CAS OESCREED) FOUND NONLAIDWAIXIN AS NOM SET 194 REBER MIDI PLASTIC COP /26974 Au01901 maNumenTAIoN MEASURED OR uLcuurED DRAENSIONS PLATTED DIMENSIONS OP TIE DOENDARY SURVEY AT RECEPTION NO. 101391:047137 FERGUSON TWO TOWNHOME PRELIMINARY PLAT ON LOT 8 AND PORTIONS OF LOT 7, BLOCK 13, FERGUSON'S SUBDIVISION LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO LEGEND VARIES 05/1612017 1 OF 1 PM. AO. 2016-08-02 11E1 I IV 1-11 IL1N1 211 I:411.1 1 Ili-( I 1 011.141 I DATE: 13.50' BUILDING EENELOPE 5'14.4471 FENCE POSTS] Enla •IRE oy cRouNo BONES I m 5 m IC ELEICLUBBLLAVADIESION (0.50 AarES) 'DUEL POMP OF LEP 7 Wee 11 TETAL9DN'SBADD:w50, 0 03E ACRES (0. ACRES) A 00 P2 EDUND BENT 14 'WEAR fOuND 04 PEW AIM PLASTIC. STAAAPED PL5 126974 15.0 EMILONG SEMEN .309115'241 1111111N. L 12156' EOLND ALLMNUm CEP MONUMENTING DIE 008100 MUM 1/4610 END SI.A.ED 505 DEPICTED 0.5 161241 227.2.0 (599.165061 227.39') 133.7' TO CENTETENE pv lam OE 0)010 EASENENT IFIT 9 Po not 15 ISERDISOPLIL_SuBOACEN (550 ACRES) Xe 909 '3.S BAR' SCALE- 1' 10' II TO 36 LOT COVERAGE TABLE LOT LOT AREA GOP MDT AREA -Loop AREA 13.00 (AGRES) (ACRES) (50.R.) 1 0.115 0.1011 0.021 2 tuTFOT A 0.130 0.2711 0.1o4 0-I010 0.025 YHAS 10TH 0.494 0.399 0.099 ylaNIEY 1196 APPREILTMARE SCALE: 300' ImMm SURVEYOR'S NOTES: OWNERSHIP AND EASEMENT RESEARCH AND 0LFORMA7I044 FOR 71115 PLO) WAS OBTAINED FROM ROCKY MOUNTAN ESCROW AND NILE COMPANY. 511.5 NO. RII3800- us. 2. ME PLAT Of TERGusohs suPONISIDIL. RECEPTION NO 87551 (RECORDED JAPILIARY 1, 19041. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY Of FLOCKS 4, 5 AND 6 AND PoRTON5 OF RECCES 7, 12 &NO t3. MR01110113 SLIBDIVISON, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO 198-9001 7531 (RECORDED APRIL 24, 1969), THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ESCROW & 5012, INC. (Cu NA RA13550 - 10) AND ASSOCATED DOCUMENTS WERE THE ONLY SOLACES 01E0 FOR THE 000NDARY. EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY RESEARCH FOR TILE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 3, MESE LOTS ARE ZONED A-1 (000099000710AS). ME PRESCRIBED BUILDING SETBACKS FOR BUS ZONING ARE 15' ALONG THE FRONT PROPERTY ENE (25' FOR ARTERIALS), 15' ALONG ME SIM PROPERTY LINES. ANC 10' ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. 4 THERE ARE NO CEOLCCGAL RIVARD. WILDFIRE HAZARD NOR ANY RIDGE LINE PROTECTION AREAS ON THE Su MOT PROPERTY AS PER THE ESTES VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANTING MAPS. 5, AN EASEMENT. RECORDED AT RECEPTOR NCL 261 5002.5977. DEDICATED THE PORTION OF LOT ID LYING WEST OF 'THE 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY Or WRVS LANE ROAD As A PR 0070 ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT FOR LOT El AND A PORTION OF LOT 7 LYING WEST OF MARYS LAKE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAN IN BLOCK 13 AND IS WAN HEREON 6, MASON. CALCULATIONS. - GROSS LAND AREA. 0.54 ACRES (23.459 5.0) - NET LARD AREA (SUBTRACTING RIGHT-OF-WAY): 0.49 ACRES (21.533 5.f.) - A-I, ACCOMMO0ATIO1+5 MINIMUM LAND AREA PER UNE. 10.890 S.F. ALLOWABLE UNITS - 21,535 s.r.tio.asho S.F. 1.90 UNITS Torm. ALLOWABLE UNITS: 2.0 UNITS 7. THE POSTED ADORESS FOR 11410 PROPERTY .15, 1573 MARTS LANE RD.. ESTES PARA. COLORADo 50517. 8. A 20. foOT ACE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS TO BE DEDICATED ALONG THE ERIVING OVERHEAD LOILITT UNE AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTION MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF ABOVE ARO UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES AM, ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES UPON.. ACROSS. 0900. UNDER, IHROLIOH AND WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON. O. THIS PLAT DEDICATES A PERMANENT BLANKET EASEMENT 044. OVER AND UNDER OUTLOT A. IN EIS ENTIRETL FOR THE INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE UTILITIES. DRAIAIAGE AND ACCESS FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING SUCH IJIRLITIFS, DRAINAGE AND ACCESS TO THIS YOVRIHOME PLAT IC, ALL TOWNHOME LOTS SHALL DE NemLADLE 70 CONVEY EN-SITE ANO OFF-SITE DRAINAGE FROM 1015 SLIBELVISIZN THROUG-I THEN LOTS A/40 ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PECESsARy MAINTENANCE. I1.THE LINEAL LENT FOR MIS SURVEY IS ME U.S. SURVEY FOOT. 12 ACCORDING 50 COLCRADD LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION [WED UPON ANY CEFECT P4 TF115 SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS OF 7HE DATE 300 FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE 0019E9CE0 MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROm ME CERTIFICATION BATE SHOWN HEREON CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION KNowN BEN ST MESE PRESERTS THAT SETH W. HANSON. BENG THE DAHER OF THAT PAIET OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5 NORM, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE. 601 P.M.. EARNER COLINV, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO Wr: LOT B AND A PORTION OF E07 7, BEM< 13, FERGuSCAIS SUBON1510114 EXCEPT A PORTION IN 60 FOOT 13101IT OF WAY FOR NARY'S liwE ROAD LOCATED WEST OF MARYS TANI ROAD ACCORDING TO TMF BOUNDARY 51113540( RECORDED AT RECEPTION 190 60077537 DESC048E0 AS FOLLONS BEG.NNNG Al THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5. BLOCK FIROuSON'S SUBOLVISION: THENCE ALONC 'NE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT I, NORIN 01 DECREES 41 MINILITES 11 SECONDS EAST 94.97 FEET. THENCE LEAVING SM111 EASTERLY UNE SOUTIT BD DEGREES 07 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 9.411 FEET TO E we51601.0 REHT OF WAY FOR heAktIS LAKE RD. SOUTH 05 DECREES 42 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST 95.1 MET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF NWT NORM 89 DEGREES ILL LAINLITES 56 SECONDS NEST 26.37 FEET TO TILE POINT OF BEDN RING , couNTY OF LAMER. STATE OF cOLORADO CONTAINNG (1.54 ACRES MORE CR LESS: FLAME CY INESE PRESENTS CALISEC ME SAYE TO BE SURvEr51) ANC. SUBDERDED INTO LOTS TO BF NNOWN rurcusot, TWO TOWNFIONE PEAT. AND DO NERCO, DEDICATE AND coNvey TO AND FOR THE PLIEJC uSE. FOREvER HEREAFTER. ME EASEMENT AS ARE LAO OuT AND 0E510110E0 ON THr5 PLAT FOR ME INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE Or LIBLIC AND PINNATE LJTILMES, 018) FOR PRIVATE ACCESS AS ARE LAID ouT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT. WITNESS OUR 4-.0as AED SENA CAT OF 20 SETH W. HANSON sTATE OF COLORADO) }Ss COUNTY OF LAE:BIEN) THE FOREGODS NSTRLIMENT ADS ACKNOWLEDGED REFDRE ME THIS DAY OF 20_ OF SET. w HANSON. *TRESS my NANG ANC OFF1CAT SEAL. NOTARY PURL 0 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES EINHOIARFR'S STATEMENT THE uNDERSIGNED 00ES HERERT ACRE E AHD CONSENT TO TARS PLATIING ARO DOES ALSO CONSER TO THE DEDICATOR oF THE &GILTS-Cr-WAY MID EASEBBilS DERCTED HERED0 FROM TILER LEIN IN CONSIDERATION Or THE ACCEPTANCE OF SOD PLATTING. THE FOREGOING MISTRUMEAR WAS ACENOWLEDCED BEFORE ME 1040 OAT OF 20 ELY JANEs ARLEEN. PRESIDENT, FAIDAER's RANK. NoTARY RALE 100 COMIHSSION EXPIRES BOARD OF TRUSTEES rEHTLEICATE APPRO.YED AND ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MAN OF ESTES PARS, COLORADO ON TIES DAY OF CsIGN) (stGAR (PRINT) (PRINT} TOWN CLERK MAYOR TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE. APPROVED at THE TOWN ENGINEERING Of ESTES PARK, DOLORADO THIS DAY DF _ . 20 (PRINTED NAME). TOWN ENGINEER LSONATURE). TOVRI ENUNEER TTIE SUBJECT TOTS ARE SORIECT TO THE SAME RESTRICTFONS. COvENANTS. AND RECULATA3145 AS SEL FORTH IN THE PLAT OF RECORD 01 FERGUSON'S SUBDIVISION 2.1.8VEYOR'S CERTIFICATE. I. LONNIE A SPELD0A. A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADo. Do HEREBY CERTIFY THAT MIS FERGLISON TING IDIANHOM1 PLAT OF LOT 8 AND A PORTEN OF LOT 7, FERGUSON'S SUBOVISION, TOCATE0 IN SECTION 35. T5PA 073As Of THE 6711 P.M.. COUNTY Of LARINIER. STATE GE COLORADO. TRUE( ARO CoRRECTLY REPRESENTs THE RESuLTS OF A SuRvEy TAM BY AIE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION DRAWN DE: CUB CHECK En BY LAS LONNIE A. 56FED08 RE0. LAND SLIPPETOR f26974 BEARING STAZEMENT_ THE BASIS OF BEARINGS THE NE BETwEEN THE DENIER SOWN 1 /1-5TH, REPRESENTEC BY A 2.5' ALLA9900 CAP AND STAFFPED As DIONCTE13. MD AL FOUND IA RFBAIR RAM PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 9.85. REPPESEAMNG THE NORMIwEST CORNER Or LOT 5. BLOCK t 3, OF FERGUSON'S SUBDIVISON AND LS ASSJILED TO BEAR NORni 01'39'55" FAST. NOTICE OF APPROVAL APPROWAL OF TH15 FRAN CREATES A vESTED PREPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO on= 68 OF TITLE 24, DR.'S AS AMENDED. IPP 5 FROCK 11 ,porsoopy sueolvEROL 049 ACRES (can ACRES) FOND 11 MEW AIM ..- -- /-81..Asoc CAP 517AIPIII IRS 9485 541' TO CEIGERUNE 00 UTILEEr 13.50' WOWS 0.963" EmE1ORE • CIENTRAI \ olnouv.) N, '' • 996295.inr 75..55: \ ' • RE "416647'31 CR 227,9' (.4e47'1rir 4.7 ¢1 oo.0 Is Do' ARA SEARED ORNATE ACCESS 7410/4111 AND PUELC 011010 EASEMENT FOR LOT - BLOCK 13 or THE W/o-054.15 foe AND EDT 5-2 FERGUSON OLE TOANKAILE ISO)' 0107 PRvATIE VNUTY EASEMENT TOR L01 B ffi00 13 OF THE FeNouScR's sup 1186201110 73.01' • 14 a a SNARED 004.0800 (PEOUEST APR 61058 TO PAANG) pour CF 101 IL Pon4.9 1.2 ease.EN 9PAEwEIN 0.005 ACRES (0.005 ACRES) TAR lo MAN EXIIPSION MAD 114 REEL. ANN PLESTC CAP STAMPED 14 FOP a N0837.2.314 11.133,713711 d a A 99.51'6 14A was 11 15.-D0' INN SAWED PRNATE ACCESS EASEFEE mo poem UTILITY EASEMENT FOR 1.01 1-2 EE00.15041 ONE MAYMENE AN) Lal 1-2 TERCASDN TWO TORNEENE 0117.1.01" A 023 ACRES priTALF A IAN (1)24- DRAINAGE CutvERT To 00 NsT1ILE0 20.00' AGM-OF-WAY TO oeleckININ LARINEA COMET 0.04 /CIES BEE RIGHT-Of -Aar A = ti. t:;., • PA it 2 OFWEEPAY (GRADES) AN ACCESS AND unury EASDENT 04510 ACROSS TIE ENTREE, oF LOY Y. (ARCA 19 LANG 8651 OP 'EARNS LANE FDRcao-01-NAT FOR For 5 0.110 A PORRON OF LOT 6. MOO< IS. 41540 ACV or MARE'S LANE RO FORMER LOT LINE 10.00' NEC E1,10100 uOuty EESE14111 (10 EC DEDICA1E01 D.W PEST OF ppopEETy uNE . • - --. • - • 81 9.1'1 61241 20.10' (sas-10156/ 25.37) PORTON OF 01 10 A nog , ETRE...sag, 5.M51/1411 10.06 ACRES) FOUND 04 REBER AIM PLESTIC CEP STAMPED Pty 9495 15 ITFEDAS SETBACK July 12, 2017 To: Estes Valley Planning Commission (EVPC) Ferguson One Townhome Plat Ferguson Two Townhome Plat After seeking legal counsel I have been advised to speak at this meeting and to show evidence against this proposal and any further building by Mr. Hanson until my concerns on drainage are addressed and acceptable to mine, my attorney and engineer's satisfaction. Mr. Hanson states in his proposal that there is no concern about the drainage that these lots have always drained to the north to Griffith Court. This is not true. I have never had any drainage from this land until Mr. Hanson changed the landscape of the property. These lots have always drained to Mary's Lake Road. My evidence for this is a picture from the flood in 2013 where it shows all water coming down and through my neighbors The Jackson's yard. Mrs. Jackson has already agreed to give testimony to this fact. It is also recorded by FEMA the amount of damage done to their house. My house had minimal damage done to my furnace ($245.00) due to the fact that there is no culvert at Griffith Ct and Mary's Lake Rd. When the waters hit Griffith Ct they came down and pooled in my front yard and Mr. Switzer's llama meadow to the North. Please see attached photos. At this time (September 2013) all the natural springs in the area came to life, there is one to the west on Griffith Ct. that ran over a year and also one on Mr. Hanson's lot where he is now building his second town home. Mr. Switzer had these lots listed for sale for years after the flood; one offer fell through due to the water content in the soil. I am sure Mr. Hanson is also aware of this. The spring is around the southwest edge of the townhomes near me to the northwest edge of the second set of townhomes. This is why I feel they have changed the landscape. The townhome closest to me has always been allowed to drain into my back yard. I started my calls from an advice of a family friend back in March. Mr. Hanson was never in his office and my calls to his contractor Mr. Kingswood were never returned. I then went to the office of EVPC and was informed that if there was a drainage plan that it would have to be submitted to Larimer County and was instructed to go to their offices here in town. When I an-ived there I was informed that we are not in Larimer County's' rules we are under EVPC rules. This is not the first time I had been given the run around by both EVPC and Larimer County. They also did this to me and my neighbors on the Robison development. When construction on Mr. Hanson's second townhome started that was my last straw. As shown in the pictures, they have again landscaped and are forcing all drainage onto my property. From the very first rain storm to the video I took just last Sunday, July 9, 2017, I have had rivers of water into my yard. Last Sunday's storm has dampened the top row of the blocks of my foundation to the south. My back yard is still to this date from the continual rains a small marsh. I was forced to seek legal counsel because 1) no one can/could or would answer my drainage questions; 2) neither EVPC or Larimer County seem to know who is in charge or whose rules should be enforced. My counsel has advised that I go to this meeting to show that I am trying to protect my property from Mr. Hanson's development. I feel no action should be taken on Mr. Hanson's proposal until the drainage issue is addressed. If you feel that you need to proceed and you allow this to go to the Larimer County Commissioner's my attorney will be at that meeting to show all my evidence. She has just won another legal action in Estes Park from another developer who damaged the surrounding existing property. That developer now has to mitigate his damage after the build. It will be much cheaper for Mr. Hanson to fix his problem now before any further construction is allowed. If you decide to proceed with Mr. Hanson's proposal I am objecting to any lot separation. We are in the county, no matter that Estes Park has allowed all the overbuilding in the City limits this is not what we want in the county. Our road, Griffith Ct, is owned by people who live and work in Estes Park, with the exception being the Robison's who use their home as a second source of income from vacation rentals. The majority of Giant Track is also locally owned by working Estes Park families. It would seem from Mr. Hanson's previous developments in Estes Park he is requesting these .5 acre lots be divided so he can come back and build 2 more townhomes on his front outlots. This is not fitting with the neighborhood or county rules. Mr. Hanson knew when he purchased the lots from Mr. Switzer what he was getting. He informed Mr. Switzer at the closing that he was going to build single family homes on the lots. Then from what I heard from Mr. Kingswood EVPC informed them that they could build 2 townhomes on the .5 acre lots according to your rules. Please stick by your rules and do not divide these small county lots any further. Thank you for your time in this matter. I sincerely want this problem ended without having to take any further legal actions. Trudy Ester 1070 Griffith Ct. Estes Park, CO. 80517 PHOTOS IN ORDER // -:,.,-.._ Pane 1) Summer before construction. Bench in my backyard looking south to Joe, S itz -- P s Sage brush meadow is Mr. Hanson's Lots that he is calling One and Two'.-:-,----;zii,.. .d9p e..i Page 2) From my deck looking SW before construction. Original wooden fence post installed biyo,0,,, Mr. Switzer and metal post the Keeps (Mrs. Fenton) They have signs up now explaining to all the property and No Trespassing. Page 3) A picture of the final construction of Townhouse 1 showing the 4- 6' buildup to the property and runoff from front and back onto my yard Page 4) Flood of 2013 looking into the Jackson's yard to the east of me. Their address is 1050 Griffith Ct. right next to Mary's Lake Rd. This shows all the water coming down Mary's Lake Rd, there is no running or standing water in my yard which is the grass shown in front of the fence Page 5) Again the Flood of 2013 hitting Griffith Ct. with no culvert and coming down the road pooling in my and the Jackson's front yards Page 6) Start of construction, the build up did not seem so bad here, than again they are around 6' on my property. Please note the black tubing, P7 7) I sent this picture to Larimer County at the beginning because I though it was their foundation drainage tube. I was informed that this was for radon gas and would be put upright after construction. This tube is still on the ground facing my backyard where my dog and grandchildren play. Page 8) This is the first run-off of the dirt surrounding the foundation to the south of me. It is in my yard along with the 3 others times that they have put more dirt in replace this one. Page 9) A close up of the runoff along with the dirt from Mr. Hanson's townhome 1. My fence is on 8' post so now he is way over that amount into my yard Page 10) This is the entirety of my backyard border so you can see the depth and length of the dirt that my property has from his runoff. Page 11) Most recent when water started running into my backyard from the west, I walked up behind townhouse 1 to see what they were doing to cause this. As you can see this is the foundation for his townhouse 2 right next to Joe Switzer's home. They have scooped around this new foundation, made a dip/ditch to lower it Page 12) *l am in the exact same location as picture 11 just turned around to face my home. The picture shows they are now funneling an acres worth of his drainage into my back yard r.• ito ft. f . Pio .4 t Pk/ , j." • , f • '44ft.` Ar:ifteri;.. • ` 1. s. • : ft s. 4 1 fto , 7 • fir '" IL ' • I# t • f Oft. • -r 4 , ."-. :-4 4%. - -v„ 2... ..... . .... ,.-‘.,„... r r1.1 4.' . ' . • 01*".!. .-''' 44 n ., .• 'a"' .. • 1. 4 ,4 A ji tc ., . 4,—. -c`"iftikv`jor'4r4orelok. 4 • • J ° 1 .: .. .. • . -10 , •aloo r, `• • • '0•C• ',kr •rt.,r0111Z'YV.•vilL14';;•:. • , s .6._ ft • I 11. • • 91:11 , „ 4.1 6 . 10;04 I • I Yr). • 4::• . ?"4 4 1 " • • • .4, .„4.• tar g • 1 N' 744.2'1 i 41. , .1 f011:.•* ' . , • A 1 • ,fr — 7tl • 21. g -51.44 LP*. • c. +00: 11 . • ..+11vitit • '5-- ;I... , • ',.; 1.7• ,z• % •,„ ;1.14' i? • ' 5 ' 6 •""t. • ' • ..*:•-* „. 4 ;:4.; -10.7,440,0„ 'f• • .- ter A 44,', • ."-* '4" r • ,le"fr :1 • 4. .110 . • • f• .` "Ar. .11;1*••- it 5- • 4 • . • 4. ;• d "4 . • • 'dt ? " , , • - • - ; . loy • 1 • ti r t C ) a • ' 1 ' 6 V • • e ,t.t14:, • c 4r- • • ti r • ''W "S.' j ': 1 ,l'',.•..-:- ..- ' • ''"I'. \ ' .1 4" .',. ' 1 , .‘"?' (4". • ; Ii4V -:k7 rjr ' , • 9 l LLr: • k . . ) ' 'v. .... ----; T. 1 , r,. y , it " ..- ,,,,, , Acr7.A.'" ./ • r 11 - -• . . )1' A /, F r 1 r ; f .1 •1 • P I • • t f .4 • .1; k.` • Riverview Pines II Preliminary Condo Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 210, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE & LOCATION: August 15, 2017, 1:30PM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: Recommendation for approval to condominiumize an office building containing a dwelling unit. Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Condo Map PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) and Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan; and 2. Provide recommendation for Approval/Denial of the Preliminary Condo Map LOCATION: 1050 West Elkhorn, within the Town of Estes Park VICINITY MAP: See attachment OWNER/APPLICANT: Fred Kropp / Same as owner STAFF CONTACT: Audem Gonzales, Planner II PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Present Situation: The project area consists of five separate existing structures. One structure is proposed to be condominiumized with this application. It was built in 2015. The property is zoned A-Accommodations. Proposal: This proposal will preliminarily plat the newly constructed office/dwelling unit. There are also two easements proposed to be vacated. One is a utility easement for electric that is no longer in use. The other is a water main easement. The main has been relocated within side lot utility easements. The Final Condo map is the instrument that will vacate these easements, as the Final Condo map is recorded as a plat per EVDC. The applicant is also proposing to establish a 15-foot easement for a sewer main. The main has already been constructed but there was no easement established for it. Again, the Final Condo map is the instrument that will dedicate that easement. REVIEW PROCESS: 1. Preliminary Subdivision. §3.9.E. All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, "Subdivision Standards," and all other applicable provisions of this Code. REVIEW CRITERIA: Generally, depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. This project has already been built. There are no proposed physical changes. REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: This application has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No major comments/concerns have been received. PUBLIC COMMENTS: In accordance with the notice requirements in the Estes Valley Development Code, legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail- Gazette. Typical mailings include a 500-foot radius. As of August 10, 2017, no written public comment has been received for this application package. All written comment received after August 10th will be uploaded to the following website: www.estes.orq/currentapplications. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The Preliminary Subdivision complies with applicable standards set forth in the EVDC. 2. The Preliminary Subdivision complies with the goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Planning Commission is the Recommending Body for the Preliminary Subdivision. 4. Adequate public facilities serve the proposed project. 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Preliminary Condo Map (Preliminary Plat) with no conditions: SAMPLE MOTIONS: 1. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Riverview Pines II Preliminary Condo Map" according to findings of fact, including findings recommended by Staff. 2. I move to CONTINUE the "Riverview Pines II Preliminary Condo Map" application to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 2 of 3 Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO Preliminary Plats 3. I move to recommend DENIAL of the "Riverview Pines II Preliminary Condo Map" application, finding that ... (state findings for denial). Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. Preliminary Condo Map 5. Preliminary Condo Plans Complete Preliminary Condo plans can be found at www.estes.orq/currentapplications. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 3 of 3 Ferguson Townhome ONE and TWO Preliminary Plats A EP ESTES PA COLORAO. Town of Estes Park Community Development Vicinity Map Vicinity Map Project Name: 1050W. Elkhorn Riverview Pines II 1 in = 125 ft Printed: 8/10/2017 Created By: Audem Gonzales Project Description: Preliminary r'-ndo Map IM=1 0 60 120 Owner/Applicant: Fred Kronl- Feet Parcels-Lanmer A ‘r" CORNERSTONE July 24, 2017 Mr. Randy Hunt Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park. Co. 80517 RE: "Riverview Pines II Condominiums" Preliminary and Final Condominium Map Statement of Intent Dear Mr. Hunt: Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of Mr. Frederick Kropp, are pleased to submit plans and correspondence for the "Riverview Pines H Condominiums Preliminary and Final Condominium Map" of the "Replat of Tract 56, Amended Plat of Lott, Deer Crest Subdivision and Tracts 56 and 57, Fall River Addition to the Town of Estes Park". EXISTING CONDITIONS Presently, the property is developed with five (5) separate structures. The structures existing on the property consist of an existing office with an attached dwelling unit, garage/shop, 6-plex, 12-plex motel and a single family residence. The property is bounded to the north by Fall River. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed condominium map will finalize the newly constructed office and manager's quarters constructed in 2015. The office had gone through a site plan review prior to issuance of the building permit and final certificate of occupancy to ensure adequate public facilities including fire access. No improvements are proposed with this submittal. ACCESS Access to the property is off of East Elkhorn Avenue. No improvements are proposed. EASEMENTS The existing water line that had crossed the property has been relocated to lie within side lot utility easements. This plat will vacate that portion of waterline easement that is no longer in use. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Planner ;?f)i..; Submittal Date: July 24.2017 ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Condominium Map X Preliminary Map X Final Map Supplemental Map Development Plan Special Review Rezoning Petition Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat Boundary Line Adjustment ROW or Easement Vacation Street Name Change Time Extension Other: Please specify Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Riverview Pines ll Condominiums Condominimrze an existing office/manager's quarters 1150 West Elkhorn Estes Park, CO 80517 Tract 56B, Amended Plat of Lot 2, Deercrest Subdivision Parcel ID it 35233-15-056 Existing Land Use Accomodations Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service Proposed Water Service Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service X Xcel Existing Zoning A - Accomodations Site Access (if not on public street) Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is Area of Disturbance in Acres 0 ac X EPSD X EPSD Other (specify) Other (specify) UT SD UTSD Septic None Septic Lot Size 2.77 ac Acccomodations - No chages proposed, unit is existing X Town Well l .. None X Town Well None Yes No Other None Proposed Zoning A - Accomodations West Elkhorn Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? Yes Name of Primary Contact Person Jes Reet7 - Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying. Inc 1692 Big Thompson Ave.. Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Owner - Applicant X ConsuitantlEngineer Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planning@estes.org Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. 'own of Estes Park 7-, 0 Box 1200 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Dark. CO 5051 CommunTty Development Department Phonc (97O).577-3T'1 Fax (9701586-024C www estes orgiCommunityPevelopment Pe vise d 2013 ee.27 K- Record Owner(s) Fred Kropp 111 4 Mailing Address P.O. Box 4545, Estes Park. CO 80517 Date Date - /7 Phone (970) 227 1368 Cell Phone Fax Email FNPKropp@hotmail.com Applicant Fred Kropp Phone (970) 227-1368 Cell Phone Fax Email Mailing Address P.O. Box 4545. Estes Park, CO 80517 Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying. Inc Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave.. Suite 200. Estes Park. CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-2458 Cell Phone Fax Email rreetz@ces-ccc.com APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www estes.org/CornDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. Pevisev 201a 05 27 MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Color ado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans. Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65 5 103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PiQuvr- Fred Kropp Applicant PLEASE PRINT Fred Kropp Signatures: Record Owner. Applicant Record Owner r / r Applican Date /- Date APPLICANT CERTIFICATION IP I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. to In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement. I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). ► I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that. prior to filing this application. I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: http -//wwvv. estes.orolcom DeviDevC ode ID. I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. 10. I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. P I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. P The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. P I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my properly during the review of this application. P I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT. Fred Kropp Applicant PLEASE PRINT Fred Kropp Signatures: PC vise d 2013 05 27 RiverviewPinesllPrelir, alCondoMap-100.xls Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip BRYSON JON A/PAULA M 1152 W ELKHORN AVE ESTES PARK CO 80517 COFFEY KIMBERLY A 509 FALL RIVER LN UNIT C ESTES PARK CO 80517 FALL RIVER HOLDINGS LLC 1908 DAKAR RD E FORT WORTH TX 76116 FORTNER RICHARD G/CONNIE M PO BOX 632 BYERS CO 80103 FRASER ROBERT N/SANDRA E 25442 E 5TH PL AURORA CO 80018 GEISLER KELLY J/LINDA S/LOIS M TRUSTEE HENRICHSON ROGER L/KIM L 1936 N CLARMAR AVE FREMONT NE 68025 GOMEZ JAVIER A/MARIA A 505 FALL RIVER LN UNIT D ESTES PARK CO 80517 KROPP FREDERICK L/PAMELA 1 PO BOX 4545 ESTES PARK CO 80517 KURZ WEST° 5/KRISTIN L 30941 ROCKY RD GREELEY CO 80631 LECLERC MICHELLE PO BOX 2495 ESTES PARK CO 80517 LIN JOHNSON W K/MARIA H Y TRUST PO BOX 1845 ESTES PARK CO 80517 MASSETT IRVIN C/MARIE C 507 FALL RIVER LN UNIT D ESTES PARK CO 80517 NAUGHTON ELIZABETH R HECKEL CATHERINE M 2965 JUILLIARD ST BOULDER CO 80305 RENNER DAVID R REVOCABLE TRUST 1260 FALL RIVER RD ESTES PARK CO 80517 RIVERWOOD ON FALL RIVER INC 525 FALL RIVER LN ESTES PARK CO 80517 ROBINSON CHRISTIANE E & BRYANT 10303 CEDAR SPRING LN CULPEPER VA 22701 SANDUSKY CHRISTINE PO BOX 2596 ESTES PARK CO 80517 TWO DEER INC PO BOX 1768 ESTES PARK CO 80517 WILLIAMS JEFFREY A/DENISE E 8633 5 98TH CIR LAVISTA NE 68128 Page 1 NT ONLY) REMONTE ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NET DENSITY (UNITS/SF) GROSS LAND AREA - 120,6605 SF 2 7705 ACRES LESS 805 LAND AREA WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN(0.80.93325 SF) -74665 SF NET LIVID AREA -115,194± SF 2.599± ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING ACCOMMODATION UNITS (18'1,800) = 32,400 SF TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIOENTIAL UNITS (2'9,000) = 18,000 TOTAL SQUARE FOOT DENSITY = 50,400 SITE I ANO_AREA COVERAGE STATISTICS COVERAGE 7.1.41 (NET LAND AREA - 113,1945 SF) EXISTING LAND USE Buildings 12.158 sf 10.745 Asphalt Drove/Parking 9,120 sf 13.06R Gravel Driveways 6,738 3f 7.725 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 30,016 sf 25.525 TOTAL OPEN SPACE 83,178 sf 73.45R • 0 0 p.) 0 0 neE Lte OVERHEAD uToLfEr EASEMENT TO BE RAIL MW,c Ale WM El58a38 a Wart Eamon =10 10' EXISTING 1D' POWERUNE EASEMENT If EXISTING 20' ; UTLITY EASEMENT I DEERCREST SUB. AMENDED PLAT ; 0 10 20 30 SCALE 1" = 10' _J an. ----- ----- - EXISTING KTOC45 -_ _ _ - - ----- BUILDING 51 f•-• EXISTING CONCRETE PARKING G. C.E. i -4--- —• .1 EXISTING 30' WIDE UTILITY /i 1 •• /EASEMENT NO PRIVATE ACCESS cASEMENT PF EVIOUSLY PLATTED 7 f SERVE TRACT 55A & TRACT 57 LEGEND PRELIMINARY CONDMINIUM MAP RIVERVIEW PINES II CONDOMINIUMS TRACT 56B REPLAT OF TRACT 56, AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 2, DEER CREST SUBDIVISION AND TRACTS 56 AND 57, FALL RIVER ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO MN 2I — - • .:::•:•''---111/Rethib r V _ ! t. ; iaarriii Qa --- .s ° .... i•XEN FROM TO.T ESTESA • DID a 04.1 1.1•A VICINITY MAP SCALE 1 = 1000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT UO REPLAT OF TRACT 56, AmENOED PLAT OF LOT 2. DEER CREST SUBDMSION AND TRACTS 56 AND 57, FALL RIVER ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER. STATE OF COLORADO ; NOTES: 1) ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A -ACCOLIOOATIONS 2) SETBACKS - 10 FEET FROM REAR, 15 FEET FROM SIDES AND 30 FEET FROM FALL RIVER HIGH WATER LINE. 3) CONTOURS ARE 2' INTERVAL. %1ST NG ; 0 ANA FORMER ""• EXISTING s . — —40'-.404617if EASEMENT 4CfELT% HEAD DNE et- -1. . . . . t g PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE — • • — • • — • • —• • • • • BUILDING SETBACK EASEMENT /600 EXISTING CONTOUR PRIMARY EXISTING CONTOUR SECONDARY EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (SIZE AS NOTED) <— — <— — <— EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE 3 EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION EXISTING PINE TREE (TYP.) EXISTING ASPEN TREE (TYP.) SITE STATISTICS: C040 i$'4"- STg re 1 <7.‘,% PROPOSED • --.. css. /EASEMENT ' - OL1.-1 I L -- EXISTING BUILDING ----------- I .1. 0 1 I 'TRACT 56R ° ,77 ACRE5 fYj -PUkr,"4/0 I S89'55'35'rW 210.42-- Owo • sa• SS ,— T —, FI.CIAW,, 56A i ...2 — --, , / I I - 1 ---,_—.., --_ --...,----_ ...h../...z1 •-•-- r-I 1.1 EXISTING 20' •"/\\I f WATERLINE EXISTING EASEMENT TO "'OFFICE 5 BE VACATED I 1 . 0 .0•1 1.3 (py 42 56,..,EN 380.63.1 v";••••• \ • --- ry EXISITNG 10' OVERHEAD UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED RACT 56B I - V ,-, --N iiiin—ik: _.,,,_ ,..„,.... . . . ic ,e_y_q _o_ i _ __ — -I L- .....1 L 5.00 -...--, oo ----... 1-- -...--.. .2.e0.33--.. --...-... I PROPERTY OVERVIEW SCALE 1"-60- A EXISTING 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED --1 ; ><-50 Lugoli 1 Dialaa• •• an armada R — mall •• _Ala-- am ••• •• E, =ma IR IRA saux A.* MP. AS 1W I N. err WIT 1 1144.06 FRED KROPP 2s17 RCoRMERESCNE ENDINEFaudG suRvEr v. DP1 0.ffRir,RTS RESERVED VE 34 S'esi. 1/CHO% 41,4. 1102 114C6IPSOR AVE SIM X'J ESTES PARS. CO AST? 157011401-2461 ax11101 Man% yr: Man TAIL RIVER VIEW PINES OFFICE REPLACEMENT SITEPLAN mat irnr_ CUlaa: j L DEC.( L C.E.-OFFICE 17.0 160 A' I3.6' L 'CM'-AS 170 — 1 I 0 — GARAGE 25.0 CONCRETE PATIO L.C.E.-OFFICE 16. 223 24.0 IL 7 -4 CONCRETE SIOEVEALK C.E -OfTer CONCRETE PAIN C.C.E.-OFFICE CONCRETE DRIVE LL.D.-OFFICE 7 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SCALE T-10" B' LOFT LEVEL SCALE 1--10' j 400 L BASEMENT LEVEL SCALE 1".10' 13. SECTION A—A' SCALE 1', o' MEIEllmilmiNIMENE.IIIIMMINE MI DEN LC E. OFFCE MI kV ammumpoomm ....... 111111 SECTION B-13' SCALE I -..H1FT PRELIMINARY PLAT RIVERVIEW PINES TOWNHOMES TRACT 56B REPLAT OF TRACT 56, AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 2, DEER CREST SUBDIVISION AND TRACTS 56 AND 57, FALL RIVER ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO GENERAL NOTES: I) G.L.E. DENOTES COMMON ELEMENT AS SANE ARE DEFINES 01 1NT DELLARADON 2) LC E. DENOTES LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT AS SAME ARE DEFINED IN THE DECLARAMON 3) INTERIOR wrALLs ARE SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT RELECCT ACTUAL COM-ROOTED INTERIOR WALLS. .NOTICE OF APPROVAL APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S.AS AMENDED. LAM REVISION, PROJECT TIM: RIVERVIEW PINES II TO, RIG ,KOMI.SON.VE SURE WO CONDOMINIUMS E51gS PANK. CO KCIT PH: 070) 96-2.3 ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY SAM' lrt E: ,101,11701156-2. LEGAL ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT, IN FLOORPLANS NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE g.,...... . .yq MMITCO Yr —4.V.—.101 NO alui N.,' .0 mer-,I IDRNERSTNE C,I4 .I HP. a SUR V F. YING 1.1, H O 2 "E'' FREDERICK KROPP DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. [ROM OS _AL_ MEL .6A. sm.to AA TN.. 2 [ 017 CORNERSTONE ErrednEERING a GONYNIGIR - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED atom, Er NEI SolivANNC INC. Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review Development Plan EP Estes Park Community Development Department, Planning Division Room 210, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estes.org ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE & LOCATION: August 15, 2017, 1:30PM; Board Room, Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue APPLICANT REQUEST: Approval of a Special Review Development Plan for the expansion of the Estes Park Baptist Church. Staff recommends conditional approval of the proposed Special Review Development Plan PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: 1. Review for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) and Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan; 2. Conduct a public hearing to consider applicant's testimony, public comment, and Town staff's findings and analysis; and 3. Provide a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners of approval or denial of the Special Review Development Plan application. LOCATION: 2200 Mall Road, within the unincorporated Estes Valley VINICTY MAP: See attachment OWNER/APPLICANT: Bob Risch / Ralph Nations STAFF CONTACT: Audem Gonzales, Planner II PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Present Situation: 2200 Mall Road is currently developed with the Estes Park Baptist Church, parsonage house, and modular offices. The property is zoned RM -Multifamily Residential. The property is bounded on the north by the U.S. Department of Interior (contains the Upper Thompson Sanitation District office), on the east by Crocker Ranch and on the south and west by single family residences. Access to the site has historically been provided by a gravel driveway access off Mall Road. The gravel drive is located on the Department of Interior property. Proposal: The proposal entails expanding the church building by approximately 9,000 SF, removing one modular office building, retaining the other modular office building, retaining the parsonage house, removing and constructing a new maintenance shed and constructing a new parking area. Future plans calls for building a duplex residential building. This duplex project is not part of the Religious Assembly Use or Special Review and would only require a building permit. SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Van Horn Engineering & Surveying Parcel Number: 25291-00-905 Development Area: Approx. 4.5 - acres Existing Land Use: Estes Park Baptist Church and Parsonage Proposed Land Use: Same as existing. Add one modular office building. Zoning Designation: RM — Multifamily Residential Adjacent Zoning: East: RE Rural Estate North: RE Rural Estate West: RE Rural Estate South: RE Rural Estate Adjacent Land Uses: East: Undeveloped North: Commercial (Upper Thompson Sanitation District offices) West: Single Family Residential South: Single Family Residential Services: Water: Well Sewer: Upper Thompson Sanitation District Review Criteria. 1. Special Review Uses: §3.5. Standards for Review requires all applications for a special review use shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable criteria and standards set forth in Chapter 5, "Use Regulations," of this Code and the following requirement: (The application for the proposed special review use mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment.] Planning Commission is the recommending body for special review applications. Town Board or Board of County Commissioners are the decision-making bodies for special review applications. This application is not following the recently updated special review process in the EVDC. The application was filed before the new regulations went into effect. REVIEW CRITERIA: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1. Building Uses. The church addition and associated classrooms, kitchen, and fellowship hall area are permitted by Special Review. Accessory office space for the church is also a permitted use by Special Review. One of the existing modular buildings is proposed to be removed from the site. Staff Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 2 of 7 Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review had evidence that it was used for residential housing at one point. The applicant will have this building removed and in the future has stated the intention is to build a duplex housing unit on the site, which is permitted. The other modular building is proposed to be used as office space. Also, a maintenance shed is proposed to be removed from the site with a new 20x30 shed proposed to be built in the future. 2. Landscaping. District Boundary landscaping is required between any RM property and any residential district. All adjacent land is zoned RE Rural Estate and per Code requires district buffering. The applicant has requested several waivers to district boundary landscaping due to various reasons: a. North property line — The property is development with a gravel drive and the Upper Thompson Sanitation District office. It is being used commercially and chances of it being developed with single family home are low. If anything, a rezone to CO Commercial would be anticipated with this property. b. West — There are approximately 20 large trees and a large bermed area that would physically shield the proposed church addition from the adjacent property. It currently shields the parsonage house from the western property. c. East — Crocker Ranch is located to the east of the subject property. Any reasonable future development on Crocker Ranch would take place at least 1,000 feet away from the proposed building addition. There is also a drainage swale on the western edge of the ranch that further limits the practicable location for building on the 135 acre property. Existing mature trees on the ranch would physically buffer the proposed addition from future development on the parcel. d. South — The proposed parking area is 10-15' below the southern property line which helps to create a natural buffer. The applicant is proposing to plant 8 trees and 12 shrubs along the south property line to additionally screen this area. 4 trees and 5 shrubs are also proposed along the interior parking area to serve as additional screening. There is also existing landscaping on the south property line consisting of multiple trees. Staff has allowed the alternative landscaping plan as proposed. 3. Water. The property is currently served by a well and water cistern located at the southeast section of the site. Upgrading the water service was discussed but ultimately decided against as any possible service connection to public water is not feasible. The Town Water Department has no comments on this application. 4. Fire Protection. The existing church is currently not sprinkled nor is it required to be sprinkled as it falls below the square footage threshold for sprinklering a building. There are no fire hydrants in the near vicinity of the property. Alternative fire protection means must be taken. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 3 of 7 101 Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review The applicant is proposing to sprinkler the building and install alarms for automatic fire detection. Adequate fire flows will be provided by an on-site water storage tank. The required volume of the tank will be determined during building construction. The location of this tank is proposed to be south of the existing church adjacent to the parking area drive. The applicant has provided several flat areas along the drive aisles/parking areas per the request of the Estes Valley Fire Protection District in order to allow placement of tanks and bladders in the event water is needed for firefighting. 5. Electric. The use of the existing overhead service line from the east side of the property to the southeast corner of the church building will continue to be above ground. The transformer will be upgraded from the existing 200 amp service to a 400 amp service. The modular office building will be served by a recently added buried electric service line. There is no proposed change to the parsonage house. 6. Sanitary Sewer. Each building is served by a separate 6" pvc service line connecting directly into the Upper Thompson sewer main that runs north of the property. There are no proposed changes. 7. Stormwater Drainage. Site drainage west of the parsonage gravel drive drains to and along Mall Road and into the Big Thompson River. Site drainage east of the parsonage drive is conveyed across the property to the north which then flows along the gravel drive eastward. It flows across Crocker Rach and to the Big Thompson River via an existing natural drainage swale. These drainage patterns are proposed to continue with this development. Additional drainage from the proposed parking area is to be directed northwest and encouraged to sheet flow by installing rip-rap. These flows will run over 150-feet through vegetated slopes which will help to serve as water quality treatment before it is concentrated at the northeast portion of the property. 8. Parking. EVDC requires 1 parking space for every 50 square feet of seating/assembly area. The existing assembly area is not proposed to increase or decrease. It currently is 2,650 SF which requires 53 parking spaces. This project is proposing to increase by 30 spaces, most of which will be installed along the one way drive south of the church addition. The total parking spaces on the site will be 70 spaces, 17 more than required. 9. Access. Access to the site has historically been from the existing private gravel drive coming off Mall Road. It runs across the Department of Interior property. This private drive serves Upper Thompson Sanitation District offices as well as the Crocker Ranch to the east. The church property has two existing drives off the main private drive, one for the parsonage house and one for the church. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 4 of 7 Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review There is a proposed one way loop drive associated with this project that would extend from the proposed parking area north. The one way drive lane is proposed to be gravel and 20-feet in width, except where it runs through the parking area, at which it will be 22-feet in width. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission place a condition of approval on this project that states the applicant shall obtain approval or consent from the Department of Interior that the special review project be able to continue to use their drive, and also have a new egress drive installed. The applicant has provided no recorded access easements or other permissions for the church to use this private drive. 10. Comprehensive Plan. The site is located within the Fish Creek/Little Prospect Mountain planning area, which anticipates a wide-range of land uses, including the subject property envisioned to be for public/semi-public institutional use. The existing land use complies with the future land use designation. Community-Wide Policies. Staff has evaluated the proposed development for compliance with Community-Wide Policies set forth in Chapter Six of the comprehensive plan, including Community Design policies. Staff finds that this project complies with the following policies: • The natural colors of wood and stone are most desirable for building exteriors. • Facades should be broken up with windows, doors or other architectural features to provide visual relief. 11 Mitigating Adverse Impacts. Code requires that Special Review applications mitigate to the maximum extent feasible, any potential adverse impact the project may have on surrounding properties. With this project the only impact Staff could foresee is how the proposed landscape plan proposes to buffer the existing and expanded use to adjacent properties. The applicant is installing new landscaping to the south to help existing buffers. The other property lines are adequately buffered (berming, existing trees, drainage swales, etc.). Staff has not received comments from the public in regards to development standards. All comments have been with activities not associated with this project (summer tents on the property and events). Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 5 of 7 Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS: This application has been submitted to reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff. PUBLIC COMMENTS: In accordance with the notice requirements in the Estes Valley Development Code, legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail- Gazette. Typical mailings include a 500-foot radius. As of August 8, 2017, no formal written comments have been received for this application package. All written comments are posted to: www.estes.orq/currentapplications. Staff has had phone calls from neighboring properties concerned about summer events on this property. Also, general questions were asked about the use of the buildings. STAFF FINDINGS: Based on the foregoing, staff finds: 1. The development plan complies with the goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. Community Design policies). 2. The Planning Commission is the Recommending Body for the Special Review Development Plan. 3. Adequate public/private facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were received. 5. The Special Review Development Plan complies with applicable standards set forth in the EVDC. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the proposed development with the following condition: 1. Provide recorded access easement for the church property through the U.S. Department of Interior property or provide written approval/consent from the U.S. Department of Interior for access through their property before this Special Review item is schedule for the Board of County Commissioners public hearing date. SAMPLE MOTIONS: 1. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review application" according to findings of fact with findings and conditions recommended by Staff. 2. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the "Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review application" according to findings of fact with findings recommended by Staff. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 6 of 7 Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review 3. I move to CONTINUE the "Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review application" to the next regularly scheduled meeting. 4. I move to recommend DENIAL of the "Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review application". Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Statement of Intent 3. Application 4. Development Plan Set 5. Building Elevations/Floor Plans Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 7 of 7 Estes Park Baptist Church Special Review ...... v. %.. i • 1., : ....., . 4 ' '''.. ,. - 4- -!. ". *T. , 7 4, . • :fr''' , `r,':6* •0 • Ink Town of Estes Park Community Development Vicinity Map Project Name: 2200 Mall Road Estes Park Baptist Church 1 in = 125 ft Printed: 8/8/2017 Created By: Audem Gonzales nN Project Description: Special Revi,—, Development Plan 0 60 120 Owner/Applicant: Bob Risch sh Nations Feet Parcels-Larmer fr) ESTES PA' COLORADL Statement of Intent The Estes Park Baptist Church Development Plan The subject property (4.62 acres total) is located in a portion of the Northeast 'A of Section 29, Township 5 North, Range 72 West and is currently an existing church building and 3 free-standing buildings (including a parsonage (single family house), and two modular office spaces) all located at 2200 Mall Road in Estes Park. This proposed re-development follows the expansion of the main church building with a two story addition to the existing church, upgrade of modular office space to a single story Staff Housing building and to add a foundation to the existing modular office space. This redevelopment project proposes no additional square footage to the existing sanctuary (main meeting space). This development plan seeks to maintain the same zoning (RM), increase use by adding square footage and parking, construct more usable meeting rooms in the main church building, update the modular office space to be more conforming, add parking, create a one-way drive circle to improve access and provide for additional fire protection while utilizing existing utility connections. Site History This site was purchased by the Church in March of 1974. The existing church building was completed in 1977 and remodeled in September of 1988 (adding a kitchen and the fellowship hall). The parsonage building was added in 1981. The modular office spaces were added in 1983. In 2016 the modular spaces were relocated to their existing location. The property is bounded on the north by the Department of Interior property (which contains the Upper Thompson Sewer District office), on the east by Crocker Ranch on the south (395 Joel Estes) and on the west (375 Joel Estes Drive. The access to the site historically has been provided by a gravel driveway access off Mall Road. The land is zoned RM — Residential Multi-Family under the current Estes Valley Development Code, the four bordering parcels are all zoned RE (Rural Estates - 50' front, rear and side setbacks). Zoning/Easements The applicant wishes to keep the existing zoning of RM, which under the Estes Valley Development Code requires a special review for Religious Assembly uses. No easements will be required with this development. The setbacks associated with RM zoning are modified when property abuts a residential zone and are increased to 25 along all lot lines. There are no known existing easements for the main utility lines. Structures/Usage This proposal includes adding the following proposed buildings and uses: 9000 s.f. addition to the existing church building This proposal includes continuing the use of the following rental units/buildings and uses: Existing +/-6250 s.f. existing church building Existing Modular office Space (+/-1120 s.f.) Existing Parsonage (+/-3348 s.f. ) These proposed and remaining existing uses are proposed on 4.62 acres of land. The existing parsonage is an existing use by right. The proposed church addition will not grow the size of the existing assembly area (+/-2600 s.f.). Phasing There is no phasing planned for this development plan. The Church Building Addition and related improvements to infrastructure — new access road and parking area and related paving will be completed in one phase. Drainage Site drainage west of the parsonage entry is along Mall Road to the Big Thompson River, site drainage east of the parsonage road all conveys across the area north of the subject property along the gravel road and flows east of the property across Crocker Ranch to the Big Thompson River via an existing natural drainage swale. These drainage patterns are to be continued with this development. The flows on the subject property are predominantly sheet flow over grass lined areas before entering the river. There is no observed channelization of these overland flow paths in this area. Save concentration north of the property prior to conveying to Crocker Ranch. This development plan proposes to keep the existing drainage plan for this portion of the property as it has been historically. Additionally the flows from the proposed parking area and addition are to be directed northwest of the proposed improvements and encouraged to sheet flow by installing rip-rap. These flows will be overland for approximately 150' across an 8% vegetated slope. This will serve to improve water quality prior to flow concentration at the northeast of the property. Grading The existing site has an average slope of 8.5%. The existing access to the easterly parking area is approximately 8% cross slope on average. The new access (exit drive for one way traffic) will be approximately 8.5% slope. The new access road, parking area and sidewalk will be paved with this development plan. Site Access The main access to the facility is a 20' wide gravel road across Dept. of the Interior property with an access to the existing parsonage and an existing access to the existing parking lot and church building. This access point is the same entry that has served the property since the property was originally developed. A Traffic Impact Study is not triggered by the uses as their will be no increase in use as the sanctuary will not be growing in size. The sight distance to the gravel road from the property is greater than 300' with speeds to be no greater than 25mph. The off-site access to Mall Road has site distances in both directions greater than 600' with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Neighborhood Compatibility In comparing this proposal to the neighboring residential uses this development differs from surrounding uses. Although the properties abutting the property are zoned residential the properties surrounding the property are a mix of commercial, industrial and residential zoning. The property is located within 100 feet of the Upper Thompson Sewer District Offices, within 500 feet of the sewage treatment plant and within 1000 feet of the Ride-A-Kart adventure park. On the east the property is bounded by Crocker Ranch and a large drainage swale between the east side of the property and any residential uses on the Crocker Ranch. The western and southern property abuts residential uses. So this property fits well with the many and varied uses of properties along Mall Road, especially considering that the church has been in its present location since 1977 and the neighborhood has grown up around it. Landscaping A waiver is requested to the landscaping requirements, and that only a partial district buffering is considered for required landscaping along the southeast portion of the property. Due to the varied industrial and commercial uses on the north and west, and the presence of large buffer distance and existing trees no plantings are recommended for those landscape buffers. A waiver to any landscape buffering to the north is requested to not be provided as the width of the property, the presence of the water distribution tunnel and the existing road preclude any development north of the existing tree line. This existing tree line buffers views from the Upper Thompson Sanitation District offices to the subject property. A waiver to any landscape buffering to the east, toward Crocker Ranch is also requested. The existing parking lot and Church building is visible from the Crocker Ranch, however, the proposed expansion of the church building will be shielded almost entirely by the existing building, and the parking expansion will be shielded somewhat by the slope and will be less visible that the existing building. Aside from being less visible than existing improvements the church expansion will be placed approximately 150' from the east property line and any new sidewalk will be placed 100' from the east property line. Another reason for this waiver request is the proximity to a large drainage swale that buffers views and the great distance to any existing structures. A waiver to any landscape buffering to the west is also requested. Views of the subject property are buffered by approximately 20 large trees and large bermed area that physically shield sight lines to the existing parsonage and proposed buildings as shown. The existing buffering adequately shields the existing parsonage from the residence located there. The proposed church building is located 300' east of the west property line and is shielded by both the trees and a significant bermed area. This development plan requests a partial waiver to landscaping along the southern property line. The proposed parking lot is located 10-15' feet below the southern property line, which will adequately shield the parking lot surfacing and most vehicles. The proposed district buffering plantings will shield views to the parking lot and church. For these reasons this development plan is requesting a waiver to the landscaping requirements, but to place a portion of the district buffer on the south to shield proposed buildings from the neighboring property to the south. This will result in placing an additional 8 trees and 12 shrubs along the southern property line as shown. In addition to these plantings 8 trees are proposed along the interior parking lot to serve as beautification and screening. It is proposed by the local Fire Authority to leave open spaces to provide for water shuttling areas around the parking lot. The Landscape calculations are attached and the resulting required landscaping is shown on the Landscaping Plan. Parking/Paving/Road Design Parking will consist of continuing the use of 40 of the 44 existing parking spaces serving the church sanctuary on the eastern portion of the property and 30 proposed new parking spots along the one way drive north of the proposed and existing church sanctuary. 1 parking space per 50 s.f. of meeting area is required. The assembly area from the existing sanctuary will not change, and as such the assembly area of 2650 s.f. requires 53 parking spaces. The existing and proposed spaces together provide 70 total parking spaces as shown. Additionally two parking spaces will be required for the staff housing building which will be provided by a 12' wide gravel access and hammerhead turnaround as shown. Five spaces are proposed to be handicap designated. The existing and proposed parking areas will be paved on the property. The access to the property from Mall Road is a private gravel road across US Department of the Interior property. The land contains the Olympus Tunnel (a water distribution tunnel) which is located directly under the gravel road. Since access to the tunnel is required the road shall not be paved. Access by the Church property historically has been across the US Department of the Interior property and is proposed to remain as the sole access to the property across said gravel access road. An additional one-way drive lane is proposed to provide a one-way loop as shown. This one-way drive lane is proposed to also be gravel. An additional 12' wide gravel road and hammerhead turnaround is also proposed to serve the staff housing building as shown. The one-way drive lane around the property is proposed to be a 20' in width (except through the parking area where the width is 22' wide. Parking stalls are 19.5' in depth or 17.5' deep with parking blocks as shown on the development plan. Sidewalk access is provided along the south frontage of the existing and proposed sanctuary as well as an upper entry and lower entry along the eastern frontage of the sanctuary parallel to the parking area. Sewer Each structure is served with a separate 6" pvc service line that will connect directly to Upper Thompson Sanitation Districts Sewer Main that runs just north of the property. This use is to continue with this development plan. Water The existing water service is from a deep well and water cistern located at the southeast corner of the existing church building. Upgrading the water service was explored with this development plan; however, the distance to possible service connections to current public water lines were not feasible. Electric The Town of Estes Park Electric Department has indicated that an upgrade to the existing electric service is necessary. The use of the existing overhead service line coming from the eastern side of the property to the southeast corner of the building will continue to be above ground. The transformer is to be upgraded from the existing 200 amp service to a 400 amp service. The line servicing the building will be upgraded to a tri-plex line for two-phase power. The modular office space and proposed Staff Housing building are to be served by the recently added buried electric service as shown. The parsonage electric use shall continue as it presently exists. Fire Protection This proposal has been created with the assistance of the Fire Authority in the Estes Valley. There currently are no hydrants or water service in the vicinity of the property. Therefore this development plan proposes to use alternate means of fire protection. Presently the existing and proposed buildings are not required to be sprinklered (as both are constructed/retrofitted with adequate fire proofing of building areas to provide the square footage to be below the threshold for required sprinklering). As an alternative means of fire protection the building will be sprinkled and alarms for automatic fire detection will also be installed to notify the fire station for quicker response for fire suppression. The fire flows for the proposed sprinkler system will be provided by an on-site water storage tank. The required volume of the tank will be determined during building construction. The placement of several flat areas are located along the southeast and southwest drive aisles to provide for flat areas for placing tanks and bladders to facilitate with shuttling water for firefighting. The existing and proposed building is capable of hose wrapping and fire access with less than 150' of hose length from the proposed drive aisles. The proposed addition is architecturally designed to meet Fire Codes for ingress and egress. The road geometry has been designed (with wheel tracking software) to provide assurance that the largest applicable fire response vehicle will have access to the driveways in the event of a fire. Grading on site is such that the longitudinal grade on any common driveway or the main road does not exceed 9%. Wetlands There are no mapped wetlands onsite. Geologic Hazards There are no mapped geologic hazards or wildfire hazards in the area of this site. Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting will be attached to buildings and will comply with the current EVDC standards. Modular Office Space and Maintenance Shed This development plan proposes to eliminate the existing maintenance shed and construct a 20'x30x maintenance shed. This shed will consist of a concrete slab with typical wood framing and roofing. No electrical connection or utilities are proposed with this shed. The existing modular office space building is proposed to remain as shown on the development plan. This 14'x60' building does not have a kitchen or kitchenette and serves solely church functions as additional office space. Variance Requests/Waivers The property is seeking approval for several variances and a waiver by the Estes Valley Planners at staff level due to site constraints. These variances include: a requested variance for the current access to remain gravel, to have only one point of access to the property for fire protection, to not provide for hydrants for fire protection but to utilize alternate methods of fire protection, and a waiver to provide partial district buffering landscape and waive other landscaping requirements. The current access to the property is over a gravel road as shown on the development plan. This existing access across the gravel road has been the historic access for this property since it was originally developed. A water distribution tunnel system is located under the gravel road that can't be, paved as it would inhibit access to the tunnel. This development is seeking a variance to not pave the existing access, but leave the existing gravel road across the US Dept. of the Interior property unchanged. A trip generation calculation was performed to ensure that the maximum trips per day is less than 200 trips per day. This development plan is also seeking a variance to provide a second access to the property. A second access point could not be reasonably achieved to Mall Road, due to the surrounding properties, river and other topographical limitations. It is requested that the development plan provide a single access point to the gravel road, as it presently exists, across the US Dept. of the Interior property. Alternatively this development plan proposes to provide a one-way entry and exit to the property with two roads. This will be achieved by using the existing access from the gravel road along the east side of the property, then turning west south of the church building, then turning north along the west side of the church and back to the gravel access to Mall Road. Additionally a waiver to the landscaping requirement is requested. This request is described in "Landscaping" on page 3 of this letter. Existing and proposed landscaping features are detailed on the Landscaping Plan on Page 2 of the Development Plan. --14151k. ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Revised 2013.08.27 KT Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 -6 Fax. (970) 586-0249 .6 Submittal Date: Type of Application L-I.6 2-- Lai s Area of Disturbance in Acres 7 Re)(5i0o_s C47 S~r.vr sr Lot Size Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use iz Existing Zoning Site slaking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? Yes I- No Consultant/Engineer Name of Primary Contact Person Complete Mailing Address Primary Contact Person is 2- ci /44 14 c4.. /44:1 /4- 0 r Owner r Applicant Attachments Application fee 17. Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Digital Copies of plats/plans in TIFF or PDF format emailed to planning@estes.org Primary Contact Information er/a,e-c zi 5 T6 ,5 AelZ Zap e .'$ E. 5 Ck) 1-5 1 g;2_ oio-qos- General Information Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Site Information /6/9/97---is 7-- (/•/e-so-e't den lease review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic Impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. )5( Development Plan r Special Review I- Rezoning Petition 3 Preliminary Subdivision Plat 3 Final Subdivision Plat 3 Minor Subdivision Plat I- Amended Plat 3 Boundary Line Adjustment f- ROW or Easement Vacation 3 Street Name Change I- Time Extension Other: Please specify Condominium a r Preliminary tvtap !.. riW I- Final Map 1- Supplemental' p :it!N1TY DEVELOP Existing Water Service r- Town Proposed Water Service r Town Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service Is a sewer lift station required? Existing Gas Service Xcel Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? F Well I- None r Other (specify) Well I- None r Other (specify) • EPSD Fe- UTSD 3 EPSD r UTSD 3 Yes No 3 Other r None Proposed Zoning )2. IA Ad( 1-Zp4J r Yes )( No P Septic r None I" Septic Town of Estes Park •6 P.O. Box 1200 -6 170 MacGregor Avenue .6 Estes Park, CO 80517 Date Signatures: Record Owner Applicant Date /17,47 t 7 Contact Information Record Owner(s) IS R i'$C-t1Estes Park Baptist Church Mailing Address 2_7-6 ,eD A-10 H Phone cf 7 6 .5S Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant 4-444/4 /44 -77 o 5 Mailing Address 6 #144( Gc a I, Phone f 76) 5,5-4 2- Cell Phone 30 5 56 7 g 56 z• Fax Email Consultant/Engineer V a r )--1 orvt E r,te'er f ( 13.4, vv, ) Mailing Address 1 0 uc. 3 F-, (lee f'-A_ RO a Pc41-) 10 Phone 70_ 'f388 Cell Phone 9 7 b 3 1- Li Li 2- Fax Email kee2Cl. r L:4-.5 • CO Vt•-• APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at: www.estes.orq/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.odf All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: //vr3 A5e-6z Applicant PLEASE PRINT: 141-49A1 A/4 716 A---f Revised 2013.08 27 KT APPLICANT CERTIFICATION P- I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. ► In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). P I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at: http://mm.estes.orq/Com Dev/DevCode P I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. IP I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. P I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. 10. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. 0. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. IP I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application or the approval of my application becoming null and void. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: 444 Signatures: Record Owner Applicant 7- `'/f Date Date Revised 2013.08.27 KT EstesParkBaptistChurch-100.xls Page 1 Owner Owner II Address City ST Zip APC CROCKER RANCH LLC BOWTON HANNAH H PO BOX 276A WAYNE PA 19087 GILLILAND GERALD & CLAYOMA 395 JOEL ESTES DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 GREEN PATRICIA J 375 JOEL ESTES DR ESTES PARK CO 80517 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 11056 W COUNTY ROAD 18E LOVELAND CO 80537 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPT OF INTERIOR PO BOX 1366 FORT COLLINS CO 80522 U , i--- /411,,/_ 1 -----,-.:: /), I 0 /4? i --------7-7 ig lit , y To whom it may concern, LCOM..0 As a neighbor of the proposed development at 2200 Mall Road, I have someqBeitions for the planning commission about the proposed development at 2200 Mall Road. 1. In the section on neighborhood compatibility, the SOI says that the neighborhood has grown up around the church. The church is one of the newest buildings in the neighborhood. I believe that the oldest building in the neighborhood was built in the 1920's and others were built up to 1970. Although this is a small detail, it is inaccurate. 2. Under landscaping, it claims that the western property is shielded from the proposed building by approximately 20 large trees. I have a pretty clear view of the west end of the current church from any number of eastern points on my property (patio, deck, etc.) Trees on our property do more to screen the view of what will be the new construction than trees on the church property. In addition, our neighbors to the west have a clear and unfettered view of the church, from their front door and patio areas. . There are a lot of trees along the west side of the parsonage back to the property line, but maybe some additional planting would provide better screening to the north of the parsonage. I have attached photos from the patios and front doors of three separate properties that clearly show that the berm and trees do not screen the view of the current building, and it is doubtful that they would be adequate when a new building adds (approximately) 90 feet of new construction to the west. 3. View from View: 375 Joel Estes Dr. Patio (above) 4. 5. View from front door at 309 Joel Estes Dr. (above) 6. 7. View from patio of 309 Joel Estes Dr. (above) 8. 9. View from front door, 330 Joel Estes Dr. (above) 10. It is not at all clear from the site plans and the Statement of Intent what the the Staff Housing is, or where it will be located. We do know that last year the church moved the 2 modulars to the south side of their property (documenting the move on their website, and contemporaneously installed the now existing sewer lines that run to the modulars. ( http://eobc.net/module-relocation/ )We are not sure that this was appropriately permitted, but the modular move is documented on the church website. This did cause concern for our neighbor to the south, who returned from visiting family to find the buildings abutting her property line. 11. We are unsure what the uses of the new construction will be. Please see the following blog entries from the church website. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sunday-july-2-2017/ 12. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sunday-december-4-2016/ 13. http://epbc.n et/from-the-pa stor-on-sunday-october-23-2016/ 14. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sunday-september-4-2016/ 15. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sunday-august-14-2016/ 16. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sundav-iuly-9-2017/ 17. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sunday-december-11-2016/ 18. http://epbc.net/from-the-pastor-on-sundav-october-16-2016/ In the above entries, the pastor refers repeatedly to permission to build a new mission house being sought (which is not included in the site plan), and repeatedly refers to the "Modular Office Spaces" on the existing plan as both Mission House and Bunk House. This doesn't seem to be reflected in the Statement of Intent. There is no "Mission House" or "Staff Housing" in the site plans as presented. 12. The 9000 s.f. addition would bring the total number of classrooms to 14 and number of bathrooms to 8. The only statement of membership numbers I could find was from 2015, which stated that they had 30 (or so) full time members. http://epbc.net/one-small-church-with-a-very-big-heart/ I am not sure how many people would be served by this expansion, nor do they discuss the need to grow based on the size of their congregation. As a neighborhood, we don't feel that the church has been forthcoming with their intentions, and this proposed expansion has not been well explained in their Statement of Intent. I believe that more clarification is called for based on the inconsistencies between the Site Plan, Statement of Intent, and the Long Range Planning discussion detailed on the church website, and that approval of this project may not be appropriate at this time. Thank you for your consideration, Glenn Case VICINITY MAP: SCALE: 1" 1000' ACCESS ROAD SUBJECT PROPERTY (2200 MALL ROM)) 7570 DAY OF SIGNATURE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FAINT WOE TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE APPROVED EN THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF EARNER COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF 20 FOUND #4 REBAR WITH NO CAP (A.K.A. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15, PARK HILL SUB.) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT_PIRF' 13.1'ovonyjr,iTo APPROVED BY THE COMMUNE, DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR or ESTES PARK. COLORADO THIS 2O_. (WEST 512.00') 589'55 2311i FOUND /4 MAR WM/ NO GAP. LIES A0.17' SOUTH OF PROPERTY UNE NERS F p EATIST CHURCH( 2200 PALL ROAD. RM ZONE MEASURED LOT AREA =, 14.62 ACRES CHURCH- 51011 WITH CONCRETE. BASE LAS SCALE CHECKED IFE: 1" 30' DATE: 7/17/2017 1 4 FRoJ. No. 2014-04-22 DRAWN ERB SHEET 0, APPROVAL OF Iles PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TARE 24. C.R.S.AS AMENDED ALL REWIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETES OR GUARANTEED PRIOR TO 114E ISSUANCE OE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. OWNER/APPLICANT: E.P. BAPTIST CHURCH (RALPH NATIONS, REPRESENTATIVE) ENGINEER, VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING (TOM BERGMAN. PROJECT MANAGER) THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROWS FOR HANDICAP ACCESSERUTY IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE AD A. AND U.B.L. ARCHITECT: KENNY LEE ARCHITECTURE GROUP (KRIS LEE, ARCHITECT) SIGNATURE, COUNTY ENGINEER PRINT NAME THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE OWNERS. CO HEREBY AGREE THAT DIE REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION FON OEVELOPTAENT PLAN REVIEW OLEO HEREWITH. ARO AS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROMSIONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL Calf OF THE TOWN Or ESTES PARK. COLORADO NO ANY OTHER ORDINANCES Or THE TOWN OF EVES PARK. COLORADO PERTAINING THERETO. DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH, 2200 MALL ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (FROM BOOK 1728, PAGE 937, DATED OCT. 20, 1976): A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH. RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 61N P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE WEST ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SECTION 29 A DISTANCE OF 1326.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 512.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 ACCORDING TO THE REPLAT OF PARK HILL SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 001 1' EAST ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 378.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 15 WHICH BEARS NORTH 86'26'44" EAST A DISTANCE OF 56.17 FEET FROM U.S.B. R. BRASS CAP NO, A.R. 25; THENCE NORTH 86'26'44" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF U.S B R. PROPERTY A DISTANCE OF 511.70 FEET TO A POI NT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 66.26'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.49 FEET FROM U.S.B.R. BRASS CAP NO. A. P. 24; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 409.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. STATISTICAL INFORMATION, 1. CROSS PROJECT AREA /. 201,311 SF (4_62 ACRES) NET LAND AREA 201,311 SF (4 .62 ACRES) 2 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 0 1 PARKING SPOT PER 50 SF OF ASSEMBLY AREA 2650/50 = 52.4 (53 REQUIRED) 2 HANDICAP SPACES REQUIRED. ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (APPROX SPACES FOR HISTORIC PARKING IN GRAVEL AREAS) = 144 EXISTING PROPOSED PARKING - (4 REMOVED 430 ADDITIONAL) 70 TOTAL INCLUDING 2 HANDICAP STALLS AND 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL 3 EXISTING LOT COVERAGE ±26.810 IN STRUCTURES/IMPERVIOUS. DRIVES AND PARKING 637.600 SF/201.311 SE = 18 79 COVERED (50% ALLOWED) 18.790 GRAVEL DRIVE = 37,600 SF CONCRETE. BUILDINGS. ASPHALT DRIVE (122' WIDE) 4. PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE. 17.590 SF(PARK/NG, WALKWAYS. ROADS). 6922 SF(BUILDINCS WALKWAYS. PATIO)+1080 Sc(reission house)+ 37,800 SF - 840 SF(rrodulor mission house removal): 62,352 SF/201,311 SF 31DX (50% ALLOWED) 5 FLOOR AREA RATIO: +20.588 5F/201,311 SF (0.11) 6 UNITS OF DISTURBANCE: 163,000 SF (329) 5118.675 SF (5811) 7. HITCH LOOTS: 4' OF GRADE CHANGE FROM HIGH SIDE AND ENTRY TO EXISTING GRADE BELOW ROOF PEAK 4.0', 30'41/2(A')-32.0' MAXIMUM ROOF HEIGHT AT CONTROLLING POINT UTILITY NOTES: 1. FUTURE WATER IS PLANNED TO REIMAN UNCHANGED. EXISTING WELL AND WATER CISTERN AND PUMPING SYSTEM WILL SEPOCE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED USES. 2. FUTURE SEWER IS PLANNED TO HAVE THE NEW UNE(S) CONNECT TO THE EXISTING r SEWER MAIN ON THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON. 3 FUTURE ELECTRIC IS PLANNED TO BE UPGRADED TO THE PROPOSED CHURCH SANCTUARY BUILIDING AS SHOWN VIA THE POLE EAST OF THE EXISTING PARKING AREA AS SHOWN HEREON. 4. GAS SERVICE IS PLANNED TO CONTINUE AS IT PRESENTLY DEISTS. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. NO TITLE WORK WAS COUPLE-TED FOR THIS SITE PLAN. ONLY THE LARIMER COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PACE AND DEED WAS USED FOR OWNERSHIP. NO EASEMENT NOR EXCEPTION RESEARCH WAS COMPLETED. AT THE REQUEST OF THE CLIENT NO OTHER RESEARCH WAS PERFORMED BY VAN WORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING IN PREPARATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2. THE BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EAST UNE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BEARS N 00-00-00- E AS mONUMENTED ON BOTH ENDS BY A /4 REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREON RELATIVE THERETO. 3. VISIBLE OVERHEAD AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN ON THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SOME UNDERGROUND LOCATES WERE FOUND ON-SITE AND SURVEYED, BUT LOCATES WERE NOT PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY EFFORT. ACCURATE ANTI COMPLETE UTILITY LOCATES SHOULD BE OBTAINED AND SURVEYED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ON SITE. 4. THE POSTED ADDRESS FOR THIS PROPERTY IS 2200 MALL ROAD. ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517. 5. ALL EXTERNAL PROPERTY CORNERS WERE FOUND WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN EFFORT. THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. NO SIGNIFICANT VARIATION FROM THE DEEDED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION WAS FOUND. 6. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED (RM) RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY WHICH CARRIES BUILDING SETBACKS OF 15' TO MINOR COLLECTOR ROADS. 10' REAR SETBACK. AND 10' SIDE SETBACKS. 7. THE CONTOURS SHOWN ARE 1 FOOT INTERVALS AND ARE BASED ON AN ON-SITE CONTROL NAIL HAVING AN ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 7495.00', DERIVED FROM AERIAL mAPPiNG (GOODIE EARTH), ALL CONTOURS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE THERETO_ B. THE GRAVEL ROAD TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS OWED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND CONTAINS A WATER DISTRIBUTION TUNNEL UNDER THE ROAD. THIS UNDERGROUND UTILITY WAS NOT LOCATED WITH THIS SURVEY AND IT IS PROPOSED TO NOT PAVE THIS ROAD AS ACCESS TO 'THE TUNNEL WOULD BE IMPEDED 8Y PAVING SAID ROAD. CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL: THE BELOW SIGNED OWNER(S). DR LEGLLLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF. DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE OEVELOPEO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN. AND AS MAY OTHERWISE RE REQUIRE° BY LAW. AU. CONDMONS, TERMS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGNATED OR DESCRIBED IN THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL BE ERRDING ON NE OWNERS, THEIR HEWS. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT BY OWNER OF ITS ODUGATION TO MAINTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OR STRUCTURES AS SET FORTH HEREIN. IN ADDITION TO ALL REMEDIES OF LAW AND EQUITY, TOWN SHALL BE ENTITLED TO PS REASONABLE COSTS, EXPENSES AVE ATTORNEY FEES. 10 or swea 'NO KRA., FRE LANE. • ASPHALT ENTRY NOTARY PUBLIC flOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: ARCONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF REcs=linglneliot=CgsZINO _DAY OF Al 5A DAS NUT APPROVED BY THE (AMMER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS CONSTRUCTION. REPAIR ANY STREETS. HIGHWAYS. ALLEYS. BRIDGES. RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT CHAIR ATTEST: CLERK OF THE BOARD BOB R RISCH (CHURCH BOARD CIMOIMAN) STATE OF COLORADO) )55 COUNTY OF LAR11AER) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS - DAY OF 2EI__ BY BOB R. RISCH. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MALL ROAD (ASPHALT) 30' (DRAMS TO BIG THOMPSON RIVER ALONG WALL RIND) FOUND BENT 14 REBAR WITH NO CAP (AKA THE NORTHEAST CORNER Or LOT 15, PARK HILL SUB.) CM OM ------ \ (N86'26.44't 56,17) 1486.47'07*E 55.89 FOUND 2-9- U S B.6. BRASS CAP STAMPED 'AP.25- 375 JOEL ESTES DRIVE OWNER. PATRIcH j GREEN RE ZONING 10' SIDE SETBACK b z Ina 627' EXISTING TWO STORY FRAME HOUSE FF (PARSONAGE) " ' 62.7' • _ _ ----- hE .115 OPT OF ANTERIOR GRAVEL DRIVE, (12014' WID ) • 9196 MAIL ROA:TARE UMW a G__-_G---.G--_-G-- -PROPOSED G--_G---- G c_-__ G-- 7470 G---G , P " PROPOSED IV ADS PIPE..., .._ EXISTING 14'NR0' OFFICE MODULAR SPACE PPPP o PPPP P-PP PP RIP-RAP WOE lin IQ LUNY KENNING MAUS IT TAUT 15- ADS PIPE N136-26.44"E 511.71') 14E6'25.01-E 512.00' 7475 LINE SERVING PREVIOUS LOCATION _OF j. MODULAR UNITS (NOT CURRENTLY USED) 1.010SCAPE BUFFER 10' REAR RAID Q. & CLATOMA M. GILULAND SETBACK RE ZONING rls ffrP2A 7v-A179 STORAGE SOOT. Mal MIRE IRAN. SRC T B.d FOR LOWS Al TIME OFI In P , - Sats T11LH-L WATER VALVE • ACCESS (S E E L E Cia wErow 7495.09' NOTE 17) CONTROL NAIL E RACK '710 ALLED ATED (WEST 1326.00) /VT EAST Y4 COI. SEC. 29 6"x12"x18" STONE MARKER (NOT SURVEYED TO) 00 00 (00.00) POLE MOUNT 0 TRANSFORMER TO 8Z UPGRADED FROM 200 AMP To 40D AMP -0 I SEINAGE, UPGRADE LINE TO BUILDING 409.74') 500'00.00"E 0 FOUND 2-9 U.S.S.R. BRASS CAP STAMPED 'A P. 24T CROCKER RANCH OWNER, APC CROCKER RANCH LTC RE ZONING TRUE POINT Or BEGINNING, FOUND #4 REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP VI 5 0 0 rn r7.1 E-I N o W Vl LLW co o c o \2 C•2 586'26'441V 1.49') SCALE: 1' c. 30' 87.21'5714 1.49' 0 5 15 30 60 FOUND #4 RERAN WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP. (NE PROPERTY CORNER) LEGEND JO' our. POLE ID' SIDE -OM- OVERHEAD twin: LINE SETBACK -E--BURIED ELECTRIC LINE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/CONNECTION TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SEWER MANHOLE 4- SEWER CLEANOUTS (OR AS NOTED) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 5_6' SEWER LINES El GAS METER (EXISTING) BURIED GAS UNE (APPROXIMATE) 'A'-BURIED WATER LINE (APPROXIMATE) WELL CISTERN CONCRETE PAO N- WIRE FENCE -7500--EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS T5015'• SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREES (TRUNK DIAMETER IN INCHES) CASTING DECIDUOUS TREES (TRUNK DIAMETER IN INCHES) EXISTING SHRUBS MEASURED DIMENSIONS DEEDED DIMENSIONS FOUND MONUMENT (AS DESCRIBED) TYPICAL PARKING STALLS 9' WIDE, 17.S' DEEP WITH PARKING BLOCK CR 19.5' LONG WITHOUT PARKING BLOCK G PLA GRADI\ , RETAI\ I & LANDSCAPING PLAN G WALLS, ROAD DESIGN .., A )42'2 EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREES (TRUNK DIAMETER IN INCHES) ExISMNG DECIDUOUS TREES (TRUNK DIAMETER IN INCHES) 00.00 (00.00) POLE MOUNT UPGRADED FROM 2 TRANSFORMER TO Ef o il_ AMP 10 400 AMP SERVICE, TRI-PLE:C--- UPGRADE TINE TO BUILDING MEASURED DIMENSIONS SEEDED DIMENSIONS FOUND MONUMENT (AS DESCRIBED) TYPICAL PARKING STALLS 9' WIDE. + 7.5 DEEP WITH PARKING BLOCK OR 19.5' LONG WITHOUT PARKING BLOCK PROPOSED TREES (5' TALL MIN) SCALE DATE: 10 2017 TOFU LAS DRAWN RC CHECKED BY PROD 2014-04-22 Vi z z Q a, f~l 2 BV F IS 0 Sat ROUND REVISIONS 0 SHEET 2 OF 4 FOR THE ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH, 2200 MALL ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (FROM BOOK 1728, PAGE 937, DATED OCT. 20, 1976): A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE WEST ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SECTION 29 A DISTANCE OF 1326.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 512.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 ACCORDING TO THE REPLAT OF PARK HILL SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 00'11' EAST ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 378.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 15 WHICH BEARS NORTH 86'26'44' EAST A DISTANCE OF 56.17 FEET FROM U.S.B.R. BRASS CAP NO. A.P. 25; THENCE NORTH 86'26'44" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF U.S.B.R. PROPERTY A DISTANCE OF 511.70 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 86'26'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.49 FEET FROM U.S.B.R. BRASS CAP NO. A.P. 24; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 409.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, MALL ROAD (ASPHALT) FOUND U.S.S.R. BRASS CAP STAMPED UPI (DRAINS TO LIPSON RIVER C MALL ROAD) FOUND BENT REBAR WITH NO CAE (AKA. THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15, PARK HILL SUB.) (NE1V26 44"E 56.17) N86"47 07'E 55E19 FOUND 7-34- U S.B.R. BRASS CAP STAMPED .40 25. 10' SIDE_, SETBACK 175 JOF KITS DRIVE RE ZONING TOP 4* SHALL RE MINUS MIKE0 WITH ORGANIC HATERAL ALL FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE ITTOROMULCHED WITH TACKiFiER, OR SEEDED Az BLWIKETE0 WITH EROSION CONTROL FABRIC 06LB/SY DR HEAVIER), ANY SIDE SLOPE TEL NECESSARY SHALL SITE GENERATED 58676'441V 1.49') SCALE: 1" = 30' 8721'57'11 1.49' 9 5 IS 30 60 FOUND #4 REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP. (NE PROPERTY CORNER) LEG ND UTILITY POLE -0Hu-01106HEAD UTILITY LINE -E----BURIED ELECTRIC UNE al ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/CONNECTION ED TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 0 SEWER MANHOLE • 4* SEWER CLEANOLITS (OR AS NOTED) • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF La -s-a' SEWER LINES Q GAS METER (EXISTING) O o G-- BURIED GAS LINE (APPROXIMATE) -.I-BURIED WATER LINE (APPROXIMATE) WELL C CISTERN CONCRETE PAD WIRE FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE 7500 COSTING MAJOR CONTOURS EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS 7501 5' • SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SHRUBS PROPOSES SHRUBS TWO STAGGERED V TR1L RETAINING WAI 114 GO BC LOWER ROM OF FROMM RR. ARO SOUR1 CR P.M.. ADOTOR) 110 5011E 1•41/4/5 MOD Gom 50.4 3000 r• .• i 4. 1.11001 trICIraog ASPHALT DRIVE (122' WIDE) ROAD TO BE SIGNED "CC NOT ENTER 2'I.S. DEPT OF 4NTEDIQR 2196 ° O 15' ADS PIPE GRAVEL ORrVE. (±20-:24' WOE) ° a . PROPOSED 15' ADS PIPE. ED TI• • N oc AE• 11,1 OLL1. 1" gna: "ftl% II472.1:07` '""" rat Antr " ‘""." "". ••• • 5/- C 1011 T. •••• RC 1•••17 r r-r 111.11=4";::2%. 0.1 IA Via. 2200 MEASURED LOT U ACRES 7490 E.P. BAPTIST CHURCH ADORER TWO STORY kp, UPPER FEE - 7494.1' LOWER FEE 7484.1' (Rd) 7495 LLSO. GRASS _[x15TNC 90E SLOPE 352 \ \:1\\\"\\V:;\ COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TYPICAL GRAVEL DRIVEWAY CROSS-SECTION NOT TO SCALE 62.7 EXISTING TWO STORY FRAME HOUSE • (PARSONAGE) r" DECK 62 7 514E0 TO (NEWLAND APED CRASS AREA 7500 r1seTATIVAIT STORAGE C11.,Iir-IrANK WE T.8 0 - LOWS AT TIME 011 Taro_ONE' , CONTROL NAIL • , ELEM•7495.012' .(SEE SURVEYOR '• NOTE 17) - Ise 3' WATER „VALVE . ACCESS ORGANIC TOPSOIL •• • /5•101•11.0 0.L v ,11.11 HRH To WAR DAY'VCA, IV/ 30' BIG ALC O ROHM gift 4,Fit3V AV. VicSWC NSW- VA? -7,t c eiv,„ ,40466..A,,Ag 4T COOT CLASS 5 OR 6 AL ATE RASE COMBS COMPACTOR Nu. BE Rl 1155 OR BETTER, A PROOF R. 15 ROMEO FY 1111 .10/ 11154111ER PRIOR TO PAW. E11611140 BEDROCK OLSCON•DSED 7,1•00* on on REROUTES TSTITIK eAcknu. FREE OF ORGANIC IRTERSIL COMAARTED To 95 ORUTTER MN 12i ORM. 1/CRIVIRIE COMM. TYPICAL ROAD. PARKING. AND DITCH CROSS SECTION • SCALE taxa_ 01015010 CONTOURS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT FINAL FBFSHED GRADE INCLUDING GRAVEL SUB-RASE OF a" AND 3' OF PROPOSED TOPE TX ASPHALT ARE INSTALLED r COMPACTED lYPE SX ASPN5L1 CONCRETE PARKING 2%--- RPURE 5' CINCI Or) .001 1. CFNCALTL 1 Ro MT. FOR 17.5' FOR TRAVELED suRfAd 10' SIDE SETBACK CROCKER RANCH. RE TONER REMOVE ORGANIC SUB BASE BATERAL SANDY SOIL ON DECOMPOSED GRANITE (16P<A1.) SITE GENERATED -STRuCTURAL- RACEME FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 952 CR BETTER WEN 425 MOISTURE CONTENT TRUE POINT or BEGINNING, FOUND #4 RUHR WITH ILLEGIBLE pLASTic CAP LANDSCAPING NOTES: 1. ALL 005.4zero AREAS 514141 RE RESTORED AS NATURAL-APPEARING LAND FORMS, WITH CURVES THAT sLEND IN lieN ASTILENT UNDISTURBED SLOPES. ABRUPT ANGULAR IRANspioNs AND uNEAR SLOPES SHALL BE AVOIDED. 2_ ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING SHALL RE REVEGETATED WITHIN ONE GROWING SEASON AFTER CONSTRUCTION. USING A SUBSTANTIAL TAKEO STAND OF NATIVE OR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. THE DENSITY OF THE REESTABLISHED GRASS VEGETATION AFTER ONE GROWING SEASON SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND INVASION OF WEEDS. I ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE COSTING VEGETATIVE COVER IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED. THAT ARE NOT OTHERWSE COVERED WITH NEW I+APROVEMENTS. SHALL BE SUCCESSFULLY REVEGETATED WISH A SUBSTANTIAL MIXER STAND OF NATIVE OR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. 4, ON MAN MADE SLOPES OF 252 OR GREATER. PLANT MATERIALS WITH DEEP ROOTING CHARACTERISTCS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE SURFACE RUNOFF. ALL MAN WOE SLOPES GREATER THAN 50X TO BE MULCHED AND NETTED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION AND REVEGLTATION. 5. TO THE ammt.1 EXTENT FEASIBLE. TOPSOIL THAT IS ROCK') DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALT BE STOCKPLE0 AND CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING REVEGETARDN DR LANDSCAPING, SUCH AS CUT AND TILL SLOPES. 6. NO TREES OR VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED OUTSIDE THE APPROVED UNITS OF DISTURBANCE. 7. CONIFER TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 505 EIGHT FEET TALL AND SOX Al SIT FEET TALL AT PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 5011 AT FOUR INCH CALIPER AND NOR AT Two INCH cAuFER PLANTING. SHRUBS SI-ALL BE 5 GALLON CONTAINER OR LARGER AT PLANTING. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPECIFICATION FOR NUMBER 1 GRADE. AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY 5-1-m4DAR00 OF THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, TOLE 35, ARTICLE 25, c.R.S., AS AMENDED. 9 ALL LANDSCAPES SHALL INCLUDE A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING AUTOMATED SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH INDFADUAL DRIP LIMES FOR NON TURF AREAS. 10. REQUIRE° LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED RA A HEALTHY. GROWING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRICAT1NG. PRUNING, WEEDING. MOWING. FERTTIJDNG. REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS IN POOR coNomoN win OTHER mAINTENANEL OF PLANTWGS AS NEEDED. I I. ALL TREES SHALL Er STARED OR GUYED A610 FENCED TO PROTECT FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. NO CHAN LINK FENCING SAIAU. BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. 12. DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE SHALL NOT ME REsPorrsiou FOR DAMAGE BY WLDLIFE, 13. THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY. IT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A LAND SURVEY PLAT NOR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. FOUND 44 REBAR WITH NO CAP (A.K.A. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15. PARK HILL SUB.) 5-50 (WEST 512.00') FOUND 14 REBAR WITH NO CAR LIES 5017 SOUTH OF PROPERTY UNE 589'5E1'23.W 512.07' 395 JOEL ESTES DRIVE RE ZONING 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' REAR SETBACK (WEST 1326.00) EAST Y4 COR. SEC. 29 6"x 12"x18" STONE MARKER (NOT SURVEYED TO) PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: PER WORKSHEET AND WAIVER REQUEST (NOTE: ALL CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN FROM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS WORKSHEET) A WAIVER TO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 5 REQUESTER DUE TO EXISTING BUFFERING TO THE WEST AND DISTANCE TO THE NORTH AND NO SCREENING TO CROCKER RANCH, THEREFORE THE WORKSHEET WAS UTILIZED TO CALCULATE PARTIAL DISTRICT SUFFERING ALONG 7HE SOUTHERN Lou 12 TREES AND 17 SHRUBS NOTE: SEE LETTER OF INTENT AND LANDSCAPING WORKSHEET FOR MORE INFORM/110N NO INTERIOR RARDNG Kw REQUIREMENTS NO FENCES OR WAILS ADJACENT TO STREETS REQUIREMENT TOTAL TREES CUT DOWN • NONE. THEREFORE No REPLACEMENT TREES REQVRED TOTAL TREES REMAINING IN BUFFER AREA =. 3 TREES, (ON THE LOT 30 TREES 44 34 SHRUBS EAST) TOTAL PROPOSED NEW TREES/SHRUBS - 6 TREES AND 12 SHRUBS ALONG DISTRICT REFER AS SNIYNN ADDITIONALLY ANOTNER 4 TREES AND 5 SHRUBS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PARKING AREA As SHOWN RECOMMENDED SEED MIX: APPLY AT A RATE or to Los/ACRE W•••••• 1111Reynnv Pr..* 0.551r0•• .1:••••• ••M0 Morn F.D. COWAN MIME ON* ron•na 111.1stin. -*raw. nonnw worn. PErRopyr•An •••••• tr,:r-t= scuerns 1.1•RE 11••••••51•••-• MON no,. “JORDI.o mo URAISI/20 FR Raw 70 25 la 10 10 15 OWNER/APPLICANT: E.P. BAPTIST CHURCH (RALPH NATIONS, REPRESENTATIVE) ENGINEER: VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING (TOM BERGMAN. PROJECT MANAGER) ARCHITECT: KENNY LEE ARCHITECTURE GROUP (KRIS LEE, ARCHITECT) ER LINE %RANG .....\. 1 8.0011005 LOCATION OF ' 140(/11U4R UNITS (NOT CURRENTLY USED) ft! 1x15045 tom000 SIGN "ESTES PAR ' CHURCH' SIGN WITH CONCRETE-BASE 50.7' EP. BAPT5T CHLIRH TWO STORY (EMI TING) UPPER FTE - 7 94,1' EAST LOWER IFE-7484.7 WEST LOWER FEE-7485.4' 55 4' MALL ROAD (ASPHALT) O SEWER MANHOLE ® 4' SEWER CLEANOLITS (OR AS NOTED) APPROXIMATE LOCATION oF -S_6' SEWER LINES -G-BURIED CAS UNE -W-BURIED WATER LINE (APPROXIMATE) O WELL CONCRETE PAD -X-WIRE FENCE 0. EXISTING DRAINAGE -7500-EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREES (TRUNK DIAMETER IN INCHES) e . Emsinnic DECIDUOUS TREES (TRUNK DIAMETER IN INCHES) EXISTING SHRUBS 00.00 MEASURED DIMENSIONS (00.00) DEEDED DIMENSIONS O FOUND MONUMENT (AS DESCRIBED) SCALE: 1' = 30' 0 5 15 30 60 UTILITY POLE -DHU- OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE -E-BURIED ELECTRIC LINE [1] ELECTRIC PEDESTAL • TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 10. SIDE SETBACK sz t_EC,fiff2 '00-E 409.44' 0 I 0 S O 61 ASFHAL-, EA-,77 3 EXISTF\ G CO DITIO S SITE PLAN FOR THE ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH, 2200 MALL ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (FROM BOOK 1728, PAGE 937, DATED OCT. 20, 1976): A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE WEST ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SECTION 29 A DISTANCE OF 1326.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 512.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 ACCORDING TO THE REPLAT OF PARK HILL SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 00'11' EAST ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF SAID LOT 15 A DISTANCE OF 378.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 15 WHICH BEARS NORTH 86'26'44" EAST A DISTANCE OF 56.17 FEET FROM U.S.B.R. BRASS CAP NO. A.P. 25; THENCE NORTH 86'26'44" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF U.S.B.R. PROPERTY A DISTANCE OF 511.70 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 86'26'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.49 FEET FROM U.S.B.R. BRASS CAP NO. A.P. 24; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 409.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 30' CUP (DRMNS TO ERG THOMPSON RIVER ALONG MALL ROAD) FOUND BENT #4 REBAR WITH NO CAP (AKA THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I5. PARK HILL sum) OHLI----OHU-----OH (N86' 26' 44"E 56.17) 1486'47'07-E 55.89 FOUND 14 REBAR WITH NO CAP .../ //49.6 (A.K.A. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15, PARK HILL Sue-) FOUND 2-91- U.S BR. BRASS CAP STARRED -A.P. 25' ASPHALT DRIVE LIGHTED STONE SIGN r' 'ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH' SIGN RATH _CONCRETE BASE GRAVEL DR▪ IVf Ms' SEWER LINE SERVING - PREVIOUS LOCATION_Ce MODULAR UNITS (NOT CURRENTLY USED) N1 1519' _ 0. REAR SU-DACK O FOUND 2-K,' V S.B.R. BRASS CAP STAMPED S0826'4418 1.49') 8721'571,4 1.49' FOUND $4 REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP, (NE PROPERTY CORNER) 1 0' SIDE SETBACK STATISTICAL INFORMATION, I. GROSS PROJECT AREA = 201,311 SF (4.62 ACRES) NET LAND AREA N 74,150-9,625 - 65,525 SF 2. HISTORIC PARKING IN ASPHALT AREAS) = *41 EXISTING 3. LOT COVERAGE = ±25.610 IN STRUCTURES/SW, ±6.790 IN GRAVEL DRIVE = 37,600 KJ. sw/174:19/dH.P/pOrk 137.600 SF/201,311 SF 16.7% COVERED (5.0X ALLOWED) FP BATIST CHURCH 2200 HALL ROAD MEASURED LOT AREA = 34.62 ACRES MODULAR OFFICE SPACE 11'1460 (TO 8E REMOVED) (WEST 1326.00) VT EAST 95 COR. SEC. 29 ) 5-5,12 -0/3" STONE MARKER (NOT SURVEYED TO) ----- - ----- - --- (N8E2544"E 511_7 ') N85'25'01'1 512.00' 7475 7510 689'58'23"W 51 2 07' FOUND #4 REBAR WITH NC (WEST 512.00') CAP, LIES *01 7' SCUM or PROPERTY UNE 6 50 .7' EP. BAPTIST CHURN IWO STORY UPPER FEE 2491.1' •"/ EAST LOWER FFE.7464.7' WEST LOWER FFE-7485.4' 5E4' EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN DRAWN BY EBB CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE = 00' DATE: 5/16/2017 SHEET OF- 3 4 TRANSFORMER TO BE UPGRADED FROM 200 AMP TO 400 AMP SERVICE, TO-PLEX UPGRADE LINE TO BUILDING TRUE POINT OF BEG:RN:NG, FOUND #4 REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. NO TITLE WORK WAS COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE PLAN. ONLY THE LARIMER COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PAGE WAS USED FOR OWNERSHIP. NO EASEMENT OR EXCEPTION RESEARCH WAS COMPLETED. NO OTHER RESEARCH WAS PERFORMED BY VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING IN PREPARATION OF THIS SITE PLAN. 2. THE BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE EAST UNE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BEARS N Bo-avow E AS MONUTAENTED ON 80111 ENDS BY A #4 REBAR WITH ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP, WITH ALL, BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREON RELATIVE THERETO. 3 VISIBLE OVERHEAD AND ABOVE GROUND UTILISES ARE SHOWN ON THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN. SOME UNDERGROUND LOCATES WERE FOUND ON-SITE AND SURVEYED. BUT LOCATES WERE NOT PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY EFFORT. ACCURATE AND COMPLETE UTILITY LOCATES SHOULD SE OBTAINED AND SURVEYED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ON SITE. 4. THE POSTED ADDRESS FOR THIS PROPERTY IS 2200 MALL ROAD, ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517. 5. ALL EXTERNAL PROPERTY CORNERS WERE FOUND WITH SKS SITE PLAN EFFORT. THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. NO SIGNIFICANT VARIATION FROM THE DEEOED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION WAS FOUND. 6. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED (RM) RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY WHICH CARRIES BUILDING SETBACKS OF 15' TO MINOR COLLECTOR ROADS, 10' REAR SETBACK. AND 10' SIDE SETBACKS. 7. THE CONTOURS SHOWN ARE 1 FOOT INTERVALS AND ARE BASED ON AN ON-SITE CONTROL NAIL FROM AERIAL MAPPING (GOGGLE EARTH) HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7495.00'. ALL CONTOURS/ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE THERETO PROD. NO. 2014-04-02 FOUND 7-.41" l! 5.8.11. BRASS CAP 5TA04E0 5AP 24' GRAVEL OR MisMIr111111111 ASPHALT DRIVE erfaligia1111111111* U] V ter. All li erTP -0 -E; • \ CONTROL NAIL ELEV-7400.00' (SEE SURVEYOR'S /5-'' ...NOTE ,(7) A TURNING NOTES: 5-BU 46 Large School Bus (84 pass.) eral 40.00011 erall 5.000ft MirT rVgi pti3y, o °dGYrllil F 10.500ft Track mth u C l earance Lock-to-lock time it Max Steering Angle (ifirluel) 4.4r FOUND BENT OA REBAR 41111 140 LAP (AKA TAE NORTHEAST CORNER or LOT TO. PARK INTL suM) OHO •AB. 17) N96'47'07-E 55.89 .FOUND 17.5.0.0. RECAST LAP STAMPED TV SIDE __ SETEIN:K _1-45 „ vs) Ni.ur '5•T(58626.44 5651 1-49') 87.21.51'W 1.49' FOUND 04 RUMP WITH n_LEGIBLE aLasac. OAP, (NE PROPER', CORNER; 10' SIDE I SETBACK 0 SEWER UNE SERVING PPEVRIUS LOCATION OF MODULAR UNITS (NOT CURRENTLY USES} -C3 0 E.P. sAPirT CHURCH ADDITION TAO sTDRy FEA. UPPER. FEE = 7454.1" LOWER FEE = 5484.1 (1111) E.P. 114P1151 THERM TWO STORY UPPER FEE - 7494.1' EAST LOWER E0E-7484.7' WEST LOWER FEE=7480,4• UT, NA, .OW P PIP P P P P P PIP P 14'x90',rEvsT,Nc) —1--- ----\-- WATER MDELTLAR OFFICE SPACE—I_ .f V f YA --::,,LvE ACCESS -PROPOSED 20'454 1 915510.N HOUSE ;TO I REPLACE FOR EMST-INC .,,(;;R INSLLAAR) S4.4 I— I {9/EST 512.00') MEAD INT REBAR WITH NO LAP, LIES tO 17' SOUR, OF PROPERTY LINE LEGEND ASPHALT ENTEI PEAK Brir— TWO STORY FRAME HOUSE 10 (PARSONAGE) 112.7' DECK I I SHED _ FOUND #4 REBAR WITH NO CAP (0.0.5. THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15, PARK HILL SUB.} MOBILE HOME 14'x80' ITC) BE REPIAGED WITH 25.454 ' DuRDING) c; I TRUE POINT DP 44I) BMINNINCA FOUND 04 RESAR WITH ILLEGIBLE • K PLASTIC CAP _1 / .L. CR'F' ck/ Wpc E („,,„, :326.)re,\ .1 EAST 3', COO. 9E1, 29 , 6"x I 2.'\•1 fr STONE MARKER (NOT SURVEITO TO) 2362' OHT)---- CHU 5e19-55.23-W 51207' CHU- 0115 OH L1' SE ,7.E g!! TBACK H. dr\ SCALE I . 0 10 20 40 BO 80 120 unorr 'Oa --OHS— OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE —E-- MEWED ELECTRIC IRE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SEWER MANHOI.E SEWER GLEAMOUTS (00 05 NOTED) APPROxmlATE LOCATION Cr SEWER ONES ----BURIED 075 LINE WELL CONCRETE PAD S—WIRE FENCE _EhTSTMG ORmATAGE EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREES e, (TRUK. E8AmETER IN INCHES) EXISMNO DECIDUOUS TREES (TRUNK 014411700 IN 1140HES) !RISING SHRUBS 00.00 MEASURED DIMENSIONS (00 CD) DEEDED DIMENSIONS 0 FOUND MONUMENT ;AS DESCRIBES) Er 0 .• 4- 67,1 e \. 11C141E0 STONE -ESTES PARK RAPT6 -CHURCH' SIGN WEIN CONCRETE BASE' KII O TSI -==imme•IS SPRINKLE WATE STORACE TAWS TRANSFORMER 10 RE UPGRADED FROM 200 AMP TD 400 AMP ~SEHKEE, TX NPORADE LINE TO BUILDING EMU 6-0 ASP • (144 PARK! FIRE TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH, 2200 MALL ROAD ./.-... . Ci ' -, N -.:, .. II , 9 :.! r ,..,2 I '' SHEET FIRE TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATES - ....__. ei.. '----. --. ...-- ., .,... , 't .„0,4%„.. i'l lk \\\\ , if ,„.'",,. / - 4'<f ' f/ //,. ....., /.. , • ...... VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING DATE ' REVISION BY PROJECT 2200 MALL ROAD 80517 R2I ESTES PARK, COLORADO • 1043 ASH CREEK RO. ESTES PARK. COLORADO 80S17 PHONE WO 51515-9388 T FAX: (9/0 586-8101 (sN'.,,d HInos) NOIIVAM-1 r 201T Konn.hy tee architecture grop. kw. EXTCR-IOR ELE licheckerl ESTES PARK 111 3c—nairtna BAPTIST CHURCH -u Fstes Park 2200 A.M.,. ROAD ( 9 7 0 ) 6 6 3 - 0 5 4 8 Colorado} La. . Kenney e Lee ordulccrure group, me. L NOTICE Oul, OF GOORGRATION Re us• nAeoe plans oenuamptaum Neume cooperatIon ornong. We 0111 are-Htscr.. Cllo4l.g• end CC•littuGLIP, Ara camp •. AI thOugh the Orchl tact and h. co.. .tent, have p-arrdned their esevocere Rdel Wee and all, gerce. they cannot ranee perfection. COMellnlealt.n le lertperrece. and even, contTnoency cannot be enticriostod. effilorgulty or disc/abbacy dlecoverael by the uta or Rale pyLihm 14V11 be reponehd ImintMlItely to the architect, 1.411cre to nett rg the Rchltect CellipPurt015 •Vsunclaroomicirop end Inormaoes con•Uuction coat, and td cooperate, by • irelpia notica to Ms arch, tact 4.411 R, d, tact non reopOnsIbllity for au eaneque.ce• Gunge. W.de rree Una Pam Mt.. the cchwent Or the Mehl tact ate urauthorl Zed. and Own notiOve the aretd test er responalbillty for all eep•equ•nust Ati.1 out or a,ch pyrua.s Tula SET 16 MILL a VOID SMCULD b.41 A, DR TUE COuEf4 SWT.pE C.4111ED FRCI1 TWIS SET ESTES PARK BAPTIST CHURCH `Estes Park 2200 MALI. ROAD A L . 7:1. Colorado) ( 9 7 0 ) 6 6 3 — 0 5 4 8 Co 2117 Mealy lee NeNleclsre area. Ina EXTERIOR. ELEVAT I ONI_J Kenney it Lee arehhccrure group, r rn rn rn rn r rn O z I rn z rn NOTICE Darr OF COOPERATION • Ream or Vase plea laws rater ceopernroe Among the owe, Ele cont.-so and Pr ...c.1111.ect. DatIgn and consuvotlon ere camp. Although the architect end ha copal... have performe. . teal due oar•• and oullSinc+. the, camot guarante• pert •cti on. ceemunrce..on If lap sect, and every contIngesca, cannot ha antrorpateel Any a.VOC-8.ty or dIscreapancy cescovarrad by Pa use of thine pi... all Ice mart ampar Pal, to the architect. F I hoe to roar rS archFlect coepppols mrsunderetanclIng and ...creates con.rocl ,ce costs A 111116e. cooper.. lay a Pepe notice to the Pahl.ct shall relieve he Pealsd rrom responsibility for all camtequences. Changes made Pow We pans sitPout the content or tbe Pohl teat pa awe/write., and shalt rel.,. I e ersh Sect or responsrbtIlly for all consequence. Crill111q out or such changes. TtitS SET IS NULL 1 VOID SWOULD Eat A-I OR INE COVER Slit GE OMITTED FRom TaIS SET CLASSNoon IPIRATE F. ENTRY ma.PCOBC1 111, LOUNGE WEFFS TABLES I CHAIRS OPEN I=3 I=1 LOOS, 17= vESTIOLLE CD 1_ _IFIFFIMFFIZ. FIFFIFFA _> OLONER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3.410 5.F. EXISTING 403,0 If F • . PROS DEVOTES EXISTING ONO..L6 =OENOTES NEN WALLS DENOTES EXISTING WALLS DENOTES ,e:5 H.1.1.6 OMANI LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3.327 6 c. ExISTING 4.610 65 RROPOSED co ID 0 —1 RRO5RED XELLO015. O DECK O NCRTEN 5 ?„ovecem DECK mal666. CENTER MEN'S z MOO, TO P.011.1.0 SMOG. TO r..114.0.15 LOT r yy 111 ! cf it, tij 1111 r Si Sheet LA5.1j La ROOM 0 I 4 13.8' -9--- 19.0' ROOM I 0 MAINTENANCE ROOM 5'X3' L BATH 5.5r X5' A CLOSET 3'X3' BATH 5.51 X5' CLOSET 3'X3' 60.2' 19.0' -du 13.8' ---ii- 13.8' Z 1.- 19.0' 0 y Mil 1 3.9' BATH 5. ROOM 5'X5' a, E.P. BAPTIST CHURCH MODULAR OFFICE SPACE NOTE: 1. THIS FLOOR PLAN IS A SCHEMATIC DRAWING FROM MEASUREMENTS TAKEN ON JULY 14 2017 AND IS INTENDED TO SHOW THE COMPONENTS INSIDE THIS MODULAR SPACE. THERE ARE NO KITCHEN FACILITIES INSIDE THIS MODULAR BUILDING. DRAWN DATE VAN HORN ENGINEERING SCALE PROJ. NO. 1043 Fish Creek Rood — Estes Pork, CO 80517 TWB 7-17-2017 Phone: (970) 586-9388 — eMAIL: VHEOAIRBITS.COM NO SCALE 2014-04-22 TOWN OF ESTES P Staff Report To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Linda Hardin, Code Compliance Officer Date: August 15, 2017 RE: Proposed Amendment to Estes Park Municipal Code; Section 17.66 Signs Planning Commission Objective: Amend Chapter 17.66 of the Estes Park Municipal Code the same relating to Signs (Sign Code). Code Amendment Objectives: The objective of this proposed code amendment is to revise the EPMC to do the following: • Update the Sign Code to a standard consistent with the vision of the Estes Park community; and • Bring the Sign Code into compliance with the recent Reed v. Town of Gilbert, AZ legal decision documented in 2015. Proposal: Amend EPMC Title 17.66 as stated in Exhibit A, attached. Staff recommends that Planning Commission recommend approval of the language in Exhibit A to the Town Board of Trustees. Advantages: Updating this chapter of the Estes Park Municipal Code to meet current legal standards from the Reed v. Gilbert Supreme Court decision regarding First Amendment rights to individuals with respect to sign content. The proposed Code updates sections with specific regard to electronic message boards, which provides current technology to the sign industry and allows individuals and the Town to use this technology for commercial and non-commercial purposes. This proposed Code will clarify the standards and regulations required in the Town for the permitting and erecting of all signs. Disadvantages: Changes may cause concern with some residents and/or business proprietors, and will require a minimal re-education to the sign community. Action Recommended: The Community Development staff recommends approval of amending the Sign Code. Level of Public Interest Minimal. One business owner and one sign company have expressed interest and support for the adoption of this amendment Sample Motions: Below are the Planning Commission's options related to approval or denial of this amendment: 1. I find that the amendment meets the review criteria and move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the amendment to the Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66 as presented, including findings as recommended by staff. 2. I find that the amendment does not meet the review criteria and move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the amendment to the Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66 as presented, find that (state findings for denial). 3. I find that there has not been sufficient information provided and move to CONTINUE THE HEARING to September 19, 2017, to provide adequate time to consider the amendment to the Estes Park Municipal Code Section 17.66. Attachments: Exhibit A Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A SIGN CODE (Ord. XX ) Chapter 17.66 Signs Chapter 17.66.010 Title. This Chapter shall be known and cited as the "Town of Estes Park Sign Code." 17. 66.020 Intent and Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens by providing for uniform control of signs. It is the intent of the regulations set forth in this Chapter to: (1) Encourage the effective use of signs as a means of communication in the Town; (2) Enhance economic development opportunities for the community; (3) Provide for a safe and efficient transportation network; (4) Ensure that pedestrians, motorists, travelers, and other citizens are protected from damage or injury caused or attributable to the distractions and obstructions which are caused by improperly situated signs; (5) Minimize the adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property; (6) Preserve Estes Park area's natural scenic beauty; and (7) Improve the aesthetic appearance of Estes Park. The Town intends to provide a reasonable balance between the right of an individual to convey a message, and the right of the public to be protected from the visual discord that results from unrestricted proliferation and uncoordinated placement of signs. This Chapter is not intended to and shall not regulate: (a) building design, exclusive of sign regulatory elements; or (b) the content and message of signs. 17.66.040 Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter, the following words and terms shall have the meanings set forth in this Definitions subsection. Other words and phrases shall be given their common, ordinary meaning, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. "Abandoned sign" means a sign that no longer identifies or advertises a bona fide business, service, or product. An abandoned sign is not defined as a nonconforming sign. "Animated sign" means any sign that uses movement or change of lighting to depict action or create a special effect. An animated sign is not defined as a changeable copy sign for purposes of this Section. "Area, sign" See "Sign display area" 1 "Banner" means any wall sign made of fabric, plastic, or other non-rigid material with no enclosing framework. A banner is deemed to be a type of temporary sign. "Beacon" means any light with one or more beams directed into the atmosphere or directed at one or more points not on the same lot as the light source; also, any light with one or more beams that rotate or move. "Billboard" means an off-premise sign on a permanent structure on which the copy may be periodically changed, typically designed for viewing from interstate or primary arterial corridors. An off-premise sign on a permanent structure with sign display area of two hundred (200) square feet or more is deemed to be a billboard for purposes of this Chapter. "Building marker" means any sign indicating the name of a building and date and incidental information about its construction, which sign is an integral part of a masonry surface or made of bronze or other permanent material. "Building frontage, street" means the width of a building parallel to the street frontage. In a shopping center or mall where buildings do not have direct access or frontage on a street, the building frontage is defined as the width of the building parallel to the public parking lot frontage. "Canopy sign" means any sign that is a part of or attached to an awning, canopy, marquee or other fabric, plastic, or structural protective cover over a door, entrance, window, sidewalk or outdoor service area. "Changeable copy sign" means a sign or portion thereof with characters, letters, or illustrations that can be changed or rearranged without altering the face or the surface of the sign, either manually through the use of attachable letters or panels, or electronically using incandescent bulbs, liquid crystal displays (LCDs), light emitting diodes LEDs), or similar technologies. An off-premise sign on which the message changes more than seventy-two (72) times in any given twenty-four (24) hour day is defined as an animated sign and not a changeable copy sign for purposes of this Chapter. "Commercial message" means any sign wording, logo, or other representation that names, advertises, or calls attention to a business, product, service, or other commercial activity. "Commemorative sign" means a sign, tablet, cornerstone or plaque less than ten (10) square feet memorializing a person, event, structure or landmark. "Construction sign" means a temporary sign placed in advance of occupancy of a building or structure indicating the name of the building or structure, the architects, the contractors, and other information regarding the building or structure. "Directional sign" See "Off-premise directional sign" or "On-premise directional sign" "Electronic message center (EMC)" means a sign which meets the definition herein of either an "On-premise Electronic Message Center (EMC)" or an "Off-premise Electronic Message Center (EMC)". "Electronic message center (EMC), monochrome" means a sign which meets the definition herein of either an "On-premise Electronic Message Center (EMC)" or an "Off- premise Electronic Message Center (EMC) and displays only one color within any given eight (8) second period of time, excluding black and white. 2 "Electronic message center (EMC), multicolor" means a sign which meets the definition herein of either an "On-premise Electronic Message Center (EMC)" or an "Off-premise Electronic Message Center (EMC) and displays more than one color at any given time, excluding black and white. "Festoon" means a string of ribbons, tinsel, pennants, or pinwheels. "Flag" means any fabric or bunting containing distinctive colors, patterns, or symbols, used as a symbol of a government, political subdivision, or other entity, or displaying a noncommercial message. "Freestanding sign" means any sign supported by structures or supports that are placed in, or anchored in, the ground and that are independent from any building or other structure. Freestanding signs as defined herein are deemed to include monument signs and pole signs. "Fuel price sign" means an on-premise sign, located on property whose primary use is retail dispensing of fuel and fuel products, and that displays any or all of the following elements: (a) the name or logo of the business on which premises the fuel dispensing activity occurs; (b) the per-unit price(s) of fuel(s) to be dispensed on the premises. "Governmental sign" means a sign installed by a unit of federal, state or local government whose purpose and function is control of traffic or other regulatory purposes, including government facility identification signs, street signs, detour signs, danger signs, railroad crossing signs, and temporary or permanent signs erected by or on the order of a public officer in the performance of his public duty. This term is deemed to include signs of public service entities whose purpose and function is control of traffic or other regulatory purposes, including hazard or danger warning signs and similar aids to service safety. "Holiday decorations" means noncommercial signs, graphics, or other materials that are temporarily displayed during the generally accepted season of traditionally accepted civic, patriotic, cultural, and/or religious holidays. "Incidental sign" means a sign, generally informational, that has a purpose secondary to the use of the lot on which it is located, such as "no parking," "loading only," "telephone," and other similar directives. No sign with a commercial message legible from a position beyond the boundary of the lot on which the sign is located is deemed to be incidental. A sign that meets the definition of an on-premise directional sign is not defined as an incidental sign. "Monument sign (low profile sign)" means a freestanding sign that is composed of a solid base structure between finished grade and the topmost point of the sign structure, such that the base length at grade equals seventy percent (70%) or more of the maximum sign length, measured parallel to the widest horizontal dimension of the sign face(s). "Multi-tenant complex" means a lot that contains multiple business entities contiguous to a common parking lot. "Neon-style sign" means a sign that utilizes electrically charged neon or other inert gas contained within a vacuum tube to generate light. "Neon-style sign" may also mean a sign that uses other technology to mimic or reproduce the visual appearance of gas- containing tubes, such as LED light source(s) within flexible light-diffusing tubes. The sign message is created by bending and forming the tubes into lettering and/or iconic graphical shapes. 3 "Nonconforming sign" means any sign that was lawfully established prior to the effective date of this Chapter or a subsequent amendment thereto, but does not conform to the requirements of this Chapter. "Off-premise sign" means a stationary sign that advertises or displays commercial information about a commercial or business establishment, good, facility, service or product that is not sold, conducted or offered on the lot, property or premises on which the sign is located. An off-premise sign is deemed to not include a sign that meets the definition of an off-premise directional sign. "Off-premise directional sign" means a sign that is not located upon the lot, property and premises of the activity to which it refers that directs the movement or placement of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. To be classified as an off-premise directional sign, the subject sign shall display only a business name or logo and directional information. "Off-premise electronic message center (EMC)" means a changeable copy or animated sign that utilizes a computer or other electronic controlled means to change and control the message displayed, and that advertises or displays commercial information about any commercial or business establishment, good, facility, service or product that is not sold, conducted or offered on the lot, property or premises on which the sign is located. An off-premise EMC may use incandescent lamp, LCD, LED or other illuminated display technologies. An off-premise EMC whose copy changes more than seventy-two (72) times in any given twenty-four (24) hour day is defined as a type of animated sign; any other EMC is defined as a type of changeable copy sign. An off-premise EMC that also meets the definition of a billboard as defined herein is deemed to be a type of billboard for purposes of this Chapter. "On-premise sign" means a sign that is located upon the lot, property, or premises of the activity to which it refers. To be classified as an on-premise directional sign, the subject sign shall display only a business name or logo and directional information. "On-premise directional sign" means a sign located upon the lot, property, or premises of the activity to which it refers that directs the movement or placement of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. "On-premise electronic message center (EMC) " means a changeable copy or animated sign that utilizes a computer or other electronic controlled means to change and control the message displayed, and that is located on the same lot, property or premises to which all sign messages refer. An on-premise EMC may use incandescent lamp, LCD, LED or other illuminated display technologies. An on-premise EMC whose copy changes more than seven and one-half (7.5) times in any given minute is defined as a type of animated sign; any other on-premise EMC is defined as a type of changeable copy sign. "Pennant" means any lightweight plastic, fabric, or other material, whether or not containing a message of any kind, suspended from a rope, wire, or string, usually in series, designed to move in the wind. "Pole (pole-style) sign" means a freestanding sign that is supported by one (1) or more columns, uprights, poles or braces extended from the ground or from an object on the ground. "Portable sign" means any sign not permanently attached to the ground or other permanent structure and designed to be transported, including, but not limited to, signs designed to be transported by means of wheels or signs converted to A- or T-frames. 4 For purposes of this Chapter, a portable sign shall be classified as either: (a) a temporary sign; or (b) a vehicle sign, as applicable. "Principal building" means the building in which is conducted the principal use of the lot, on which it is located. Lots with multiple principal uses may have multiple principal buildings, but storage buildings, garages, and other clearly accessory uses are not deemed to be principal buildings. "Principal street frontage" for properties with frontage on more than one public street, the property owner at his discretion shall designate the principal street frontage to be either: (a) the street with the longest frontage, or (b) the street with the highest functional use. "Projecting sign" means any sign affixed to a building or wall in such a manner that its leading edge extends more than twelve (12) inches beyond the surface of such building or wall. "Revolving sign" means a sign that has the ability to turn at least 180 degrees. All or a portion of the revolving sign shall be capable of revolving at a steady or variable speed. "Roof sign" means any sign erected and constructed wholly on and over the roof of a building, supported by the roof structure, and extending vertically above the highest portion of the roof, or any sign painted on the roof of a building. "Sandwich board sign" means a portable self-supporting sign with one or more faces, typically designed with an A-frame (i.e., upside-down "V") or similar shape. "Setback" means the distance from the property line to the nearest part of the sign, measured perpendicularly to the property line or right-of-way. "Sign, signage" means any device, fixture, placard, or structure that uses any color, form, graphic, illumination, symbol, or writing to advertise, announce the purpose of, or identify the purpose of a person or entity, or to communicate information of any kind to the public. The term "signage" is deemed to be identical to the term "sign", whether singular, plural, or collective. A graphic display whose purpose and function is purely decorative or artistic in character, that is recognizable as such to a typical observer, and that is not intended to convey a particular message, is not deemed to be a sign for purposes of this Chapter. "Sign display area (individual) " means the area of a sign face (which is also the sign display area of a wall sign or other sign with only one face) shall be computed by means of the smallest square, circle, rectangle, triangle, or combination thereof that will encompass the extreme limits of the writing, representation, emblem, or other display, together with any material or color forming an integral part of the background of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop or structure against which it is placed, but not including any supporting framework, bracing, or decorative fence or wall when such fence or wall otherwise meets zoning regulations and is clearly incidental to the display itself. "Sign display area (multi-faced)" means the sign display area for a sign with more than one face shall be computed by adding together all individual sign display areas visible from any one point. When two identical sign faces are placed parallel (back-to-back), so that both faces cannot be viewed from any point at the same time, and when such sign faces are part of the same sign structure and are not more than twelve (12) inches apart, the sign display area shall be computed by the measurement of the individual sign display area on one face. 5 "Sign height" means the height of a sign shall be computed as the distance from the base of the sign at normal grade to the top of the highest attached component of the sign structure. Normal grade shall be construed to be the lower of: (1) existing grade prior to construction; or (2) the newly established grade after construction, exclusive of any filling, berming, mounding, or excavating solely for the purpose of locating the sign. "Suspended sign" means a sign that is suspended from the underside of a horizontal plane surface and is supported by such surface. "Temporary sign" means any sign that is used only temporarily and is classified as either: (a) Special-Event Temporary Signs, (b) Supplemental Temporary Signs. "Temporary sign (special-event temporary sign)" means any temporary sign that is displayed in association with a town approved event of limited duration that is of special importance to the greater Estes Park community. For purposes of this Chapter, temporary signage for a special event whose duration is two (2) consecutive weeks or longer shall not be classified as special-event temporary signage. "Temporary sign (supplemental temporary sign)" means any temporary sign that is not classified as a special-event temporary sign. "Time-temperature sign" means a sign that displays only an electronic or mechanical indication of time, temperature, or both. A time-temperature sign is deemed to be a changeable copy sign, and thus exempt for purposes of this Chapter, without respect to frequency or duration of the changeable copy message. "Total sign display area" means the total aggregate sign display area permitted to an individual or business, including all on-premise and off-premise signs. "Vehicle sign" means any sign which is painted on, affixed to or otherwise mounted on any vehicle or on any object which is placed on, in or attached to a vehicle that is parked and visible from the public right-of-way, unless said vehicle is used in the normal day-to- day transportation operations of a business. For the purposes of this definition, the term "vehicle" is deemed to include trucks, buses, vans, railroad cars, automobiles, tractors, trailers, motor homes, and semi-tractors. "Wall sign" means any sign attached parallel to, and within twelve (12) inches of, a wall, painted on the wall surface, or erected and confined within the limits of an outside wall of any building or structure, which is supported by such wall or building, and which displays only one sign surface. "Wayfinding sign" means an off-premise directional sign, located within a right-of-way or on public property that guides the traveling public to key noncommercial civic, cultural, visitor, or recreational destinations within Estes Park. A wayfinding sign is deemed to include an off-premise directional sign guiding the traveling public to a specific neighborhood or district within the Town of Estes Park. "Window sign" means any sign, pictures, symbol, or combination thereof, designed to communicate information about an activity, business, commodity, event, sale, or service, that is permanently affixed inside or upon a window and is visible from the exterior of the window. "Wind sign" means a sign consisting on one (1) or more pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers or captive balloons, or other objects or materials fastened in such a manner 6 as to move upon being subjected to pressure by wind or breeze, but does not include flags, supplemental or special event temporary signs. 17.66.041 General Requirements (a) Sign Permit Requirements (1) Unless otherwise provided by this chapter, alt signs shall require a permit. (2) If a sign requiring a permit under the provision of this chapter is to be placed, constructed, erected, or modified on a lot, property or premise, the owner or designee of the lot, property or premise shall secure a sign permit prior to the construction, placement, erection, or modification of such a sign. (3) A permit shall not be required for a modification to an existing sign that changes only the message content thereof and does not alter or affect the sign structure in any other way. Examples of such changes that do not require a permit include, but are not limited to: Repainting faded lettering or graphics; replacing visibly worn materials in the sign display area, such as plastic lettering; or changing the sign copy to reflect a change in a business's name or identity. (4) A permit shall not be required for changing the message content of an Electronic Message Center (EMC), provided that all requirements of Section 17.66.110(h) Electronic Message Center [EMC] Signs) are met. (b) Installation, Maintenance All signs shall comply with all applicable code provisions as adopted by the Town, in addition to the requirements of this Chapter. The Community Development Department shall have the right to order the repair or removal of any sign which is defective, damaged, or substantially deteriorated. (c) Illumination (Except Electronic Message Center signs) Illumination of a sign (except Electronic Message Center signs) shall be regulated as specified in this Section 17.66.110(h). Illumination of signage shall be allowed, with the following provisions: (1) No flashing lights, or rotating or revolving beams shall be used; (2) All direct light shall be directed toward the sign and away from any residential areas and public rights-of-way; (3) All lamps or luminance-generating fixtures for external, reflected illumination of signs shall be shielded such that the lamp or luminance-generating fixture is not directly visible from any residential property, from any public right-of-way, or from any point higher than the uppermost point of the subject sign; (4) Sign illumination shall generally be designed and directed such that the illuminated area lies at or below the horizontal plane corresponding to the topmost point of the sign structure, and any illumination of the area above the sign's topmost point shall be minimal and incidental; and (5) Any illumination that is provided by artificial light shall be constant in direction, intensity, and color. (6) Signs shall not have exposed incandescent lamps exceeding fifteen (15) watts per bulb. Signs shall not have exposed neon or fluorescent lamps exceeding four hundred (400) 7 lumens per foot. (d) On-Premise Directional Signs An on-premise directional sign shall contain no message(s) other than business name or logo and directional information. (e) Noncommercial Signage Signs containing noncommercial speech or messages shall be permitted anywhere that commercial, business or advertising signs are permitted under this Chapter, subject to the same regulations applicable to such signs. 17.66.050 Exempt Signs The following signs may be erected without a sign permit. These exempt signs shall not be included in the determination of the total allowable number of signs or total allowable sign area for a business. All signs shall meet all applicable setback, construction, illumination and safety standards. Any signs larger in size or with any different standards than stated in this Section shall be required to obtain a sign permit. (1) Barber poles (whether revolving or stationary); (2) Building markers, plaques, or cornerstones; (3) Time-temperature signs that do not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in sign display area; (4) Commemorative signs; (5) Construction signs that do not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in sign display area and seven (7) feet in sign height; (6) Display of street addresses or numbers; (7) Flags of any governmental unit (nation, state, etc.), or flags with a noncommercial message; (8) Fuel price signs, provided the copy area devoted to displaying fuel pricing is 32 square feet or less per each price displayed, and provided that any fuel price sign that also meets the definition of an on-premise electronic message center (EMC) conforms to this Chapter's regulations governing same; (9) Governmental signs for control of traffic and other regulatory purposes, including street signs, detour signs, danger signs, and railroad crossing signs; (10) Signs of public service companies indicating danger or aids to service safety, erected by or on the order of a public officer in the performance of his public duty; (11) Holiday decorations; (12) Neon-style signs that do not display a commercial message; (13) Neon-style signs displaying a commercial message, provided that such sign: a. is eight (8) square feet or less, b. is located and displayed interior to a building, such as behind window glass, and 8 c. Shall comply with the frequency, duration, and operational standards for on- premise EMCs (Section 17.66110(h)). (14) Incidental signs; (15) Gravestones or grave markers; (16) Nameplates in residential districts; (17) Pennants and festoons; (18) Political signs that do not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in sign display area and seven feet (7) in sign height, provided they are not located in any public right-of-way, (19) Product dispensers and point of purchase displays; (20) Signs on property being offered for sale or lease, provided that the sign: a. is an on-premise sign; b. does not exceed the following sign display area measurements: nine (9) square feet for residentially zoned property, or thirty two (32) square feet for non-residentially zoned property; and c. is not artificially illuminated; (21) Traffic control signs, whether on public or private property (e.g., parking-lot stop signs), provided they conform to the standards of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and provided they do not contain any commercial message or logo; (22) Vehicle signs on properly licensed vehicles used to transport persons or property. (23) Sign not legible from a public right-of-way, with "not legible" defined as: Less than one inch (1") height for the largest letter or graphic element on the sign, measured vertically, for every twenty-five feet (25') of distance from the nearest point in the right-of-way to the nearest letter or graphic element in the sign. (24) Temporary window signs; (25) Messages and graphics transmitted and displayed via television that are primarily intended for interior view within a building, and only incidentally visible from outside; (26) Window signs that cumulatively constitute less than twenty five percent (25%) of the window area; (27) Signs that are held or carried by person(s) at all times when visible from a public right- of-way. 17.66.060 Prohibited Signs The following signs shall not be permitted, erected or maintained in the Town: (1) Beacon signs and displays; (2) Revolving signs; (3) Off-premise signs, except off-premise directional signs (4) Roof signs (5) Signs located in or partially in or above the public right-of-way, whether temporary or permanent, except governmental, wayfinding signs and projecting and suspended signs pursuant to Section 17.66.110(e) 9 (6) Portable signs except vehicle signs as defined in Section 17.66.050 (7) Billboard signs (8) Wind signs 17.66.070 Temporary Signs Temporary signs shall be allowed under the provisions of this Section. Such signs shall be classified as either: (1) Special-Event Temporary Signs; or (2) Supplemental Temporary Signs. The following regulations shall apply to each temporary sign so classified: a. Special-Event Temporary Signs Special-Event Temporary Signs shall not require sign permits when a Town of Estes Park Special-event permit is issued. A Special-Event Sign Plan must be submitted with the special-event permit application. Special-Event Temporary Signage shall be installed no earlier than one hundred and twenty (120) hours [i.e., five (5) days] before the commencement of the special event, and shall be removed no later than forty eight (48) hours after the special event's cessation. b. Supplemental Temporary Signs Supplemental Temporary Signs shall require sign permits. Any Supplemental Temporary Sign shall remain in place for a period not to exceed thirty (30) consecutive days. A maximum of four (4) Supplemental Temporary Sign permits shall be allowed per applicant, per calendar year. 17.66.071 Historical or Culturally Significant Signs Signs that have historical or cultural significance to the Town but do not conform to the provisions of this Chapter may be permitted by the Estes Park Board of Trustees, provided that the following regulations and procedures are followed: (1) Application for Historical or Culturally Significant Sign is completed and submitted. (2) The Board of Trustees holds a public hearing on the application. (3) The Town Board of Trustees may approve the request, adopting findings supporting historical or cultural significance of the sign, and directs the Community Development Department to issue a Historical or Culturally Significant Sign Permit. Criteria to determine a finding of historical or cultural significance include, but are not limited to: nostalgic significance; character, design, or materials that represent a particular historical period; landmark recognition; and character or design that are recognizably important to one or more cultures. Signs that are hand-painted directly on the surface of a building and include artistic work, in addition to a commercial message, may be eligible for a finding of cultural significance. Historic or cultural nature of the signage may be significant to society generally or in the context of the Estes Park community particularly. Re-created historical or cultural signs shall be an identical replication of the original sign. 17.66.110 Sign regulations in non-residential zoning districts (A, CD, CO, CH, 01-1) (a) Total Sign Display Area per Lot or Business: Frontage on a Single Street 10 (1) Total sign display area for each lot, or for an individual business in the case of multi- tenant lots, with frontage on only one (1) public street; a. Shall not exceed one and one-half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage at ground level, and three-quarters (0.75) square foot per lineal foot of second story building frontage. b. Shall not exceed two hundred fifty (250) square feet total sign display area per lot or individual business, except in the CD district where the maximum shall be one hundred fifty (150) square feet total sign display area. c. Total sign display area shall include sign display area of all signs for which a permit is required under this Section, including any legally nonconforming signs, and including any off-premise directional signs on other properties that refer to the subject property or business. (a) Total Sign Display Area per Lot or Business: Frontage on Two or More Streets (1) Shall not exceed one and one-half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage at ground level, and three-quarters (0.75) square foot per lineal foot of second story building frontage. (2) The principal street frontage as defined herein shall be allocated two hundred fifty (250) square feet of total sign display area, (3) Each additional street frontage shall be allocated one hundred twenty five (125) square feet of sign display area. (4) Signage shall be oriented to and primarily visible from the respective street to which the sign display area is allocated. (5) Total sign display area shall include sign display area of all signs for which a permit is required under this Section, including any legally nonconforming signs. (b) Freestanding Signs One freestanding sign shall be permitted per property, irrespective of the number of individual businesses or tenants on said property. For purposes of this subsection, the term "property" shall refer to a single functional developmental site with common circulation and parking, irrespective of the number of recorded lots, parcels, deeds, or similar instruments comprising said property. (2) Freestanding signs shall not exceed one hundred and twenty (120) square feet in sign display area, (3) Freestanding signs shall have a minimum setback of five (5) feet. (4) Freestanding signs shall have a maximum sign height of twenty five (25) feet. (5) Exception: Monument Signs on Lots with Two or More Street Frontages a. For properties with more than one (1) public street frontage, the principal street frontage as defined herein shall be allocated one (1) freestanding sign with size, height and setback standards as specified in the preceding subsection. In addition; 1. One (1) monument sign per each additional street frontage shall be allowed. 11 2. Each such additional monument sign shall not exceed forty five (45) square feet in sign display area, 3. Shall have a minimum setback of five (5) feet, 4. Maximum sign height of twelve (12) feet. (6) Exception: Freestanding Signs on Corner Lots a. A property with a corner location (i.e., with frontage at the point of intersection of two (2) public streets) may elect to combine its front and side street sign allocation into a single corner sign with a total of one hundred and eighty (180) square feet of sign display area, measured in accordance with the "sign display area (multi-faced)" definition herein, provided: 1. The sign is a two-faced sign, oriented diagonally so as to be equally visible from both streets; 2. The sign is set back at least five (5) feet from the nearest right-of-way; and 3. The sign does not obstruct the vision of traffic from any direction (c) Projecting and Suspended Signs (1) One (1) projecting or suspended sign per business or building tenant shall be permitted. (2) Projecting or suspended signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet in sign display area. (3) Projecting or suspended signs shall not extend more than four (4) feet from the building. (4) Projecting or suspended signs shall provide a minimum clearance from grade of eight (8) vertical feet. (d) Right-of-Way Encroachment Any projecting or suspended sign shall be allowed within any public right-of-way, only when a right of way permit or encroachment agreement is issued by the Town. (e) On-premise Directional Signs (1) The total number of on-premise direction signs per lot or business shall not be limited, and shall not be counted toward the total sign display area allocation. (2) Any individual on-premise directional sign shall not exceed six (6) square feet of sign display area (3) Any individual on-premise directional sign shall not exceed seven (7) feet in sign height. (f) Off-premise Directional Signs (1) Number: One (1) off-premise directional signs shall be permitted per lot (or per business, in the case of multi-tenant lots) to which the off-premise directional sign refers, provided that consent of the property owner on which the sign(s) are located is obtained. (2) Size and Type: Each off-premise directional sign shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in sign display area and shall not exceed sixteen (16) feet in sign height. 12 (g) On-Premise Electronic Message Centers (EMCs): Number and Type of Signs Permitted (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the following limitations shall apply to on-premise EMCs: (2) No more than one (1) on-premise EMC sign shall be allowed per property or parcel on which the sign is located. This limitation shall apply without regard to the number of businesses or tenants occupying the property or the property's number of street frontages. This limitation shall not prevent the installation of both an EMC and fuel price digits on the same property or frontage for service stations. (3 ) No on-premise EMC shall be installed or used as: a. A temporary sign; b. A portable sign; c. A projecting sign; d. A suspended sign. (4) An on-premise EMC sign shall have a frame hold time of no less than eight (8) seconds per static graphic display, and the total number of transitions from one frame to another shall not exceed seven and one half (7.5) in any given one-minute period. (5) The following illumination standards shall apply to all EMCs: a. No Electronic Message Center sign installed after [effective date of Ordinance] shall be permitted to operate unless it is equipped with: 1. A default mechanism that will freeze the sign display in one position as a static message if a malfunction occurs; and 2. A mechanism that will automatically adjust the illuminative brightness of the display according to ambient light conditions by means of a light detector/photocell. 3. No Electronic Message Center sign installed after [effective date of Ordinance] shall exceed 0.3 foot candles above ambient light, as measured using a foot candle (Lux) meter at a preset distance depending on sign area. The measurement distance shall be calculated with the following formula: The square root of the product of the sign area and one-hundred. Example using a 12 square foot sign: Measurement Distance = \I(12 Sq. Ft. x 100) = 34.6 feet. Conformity with these illumination levels may be established by submittal of a manufacturer's certification that the sign is incapable of exceeding the stated limits, subject to approval of the Department. (6) The following operational standards shall apply to all EMCs: a. Entrance and exit effects may be used to transition from one static display to another, provided said entrance effects result in all of the text within the frame appearing at once. b. Fading and dissolve transition effects may be used, provided the fade or dissolve effect results in all of the text within the frame appearing at once. Entrance and exit effects where all of the text within the frame does not appear at once are prohibited (including, but not limited to, scrolling from left to right, 13 scrolling from top to bottom, and entrance effects referred to as slot machine, slots, splice, mesh, radar, kaleidoscope and spin). c. Except for the transition effects permitted herein, each frame shall remain static with no additional frame or hold effects applied to text within the frame (including, but not limited to, the fading or flashing on any part of the message and hold effects referred to as flash, spin, twinkle, wavy and rumble). d. The use of background animation shall be prohibited. e. The use of streaming video or full-motion video on any EMC sign shall be prohibited 17.66.120 Sign regulations in multi-family residential zones (RM, R-2, and A-1) (a) For properties used for multi-family residential buildings or townhouse structures (1) One (1) monument or wall sign per street frontage shall be permitted. (2) Each sign shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in sign display area. (3) Monument signs shall not exceed five (5) feet in sign height. (4) Monument signs shall be set back at least five (5) feet from both the front and side property lines. (b) For properties used for multi-family residential buildings or townhouse structures that have more than one street frontage (1) A two-faced monument sign oriented so as to be visible from either right-of-way (such as a diagonal sign on a corner lot) shall be allowed in accordance with the standards in the preceding subsection and other requirements of this Chapter, (2) Provided it meets the "sign display area (multi-faced)" definition herein. (c) For residential subdivisions consisting of more than four (4) residential units (1) One (1) monument subdivision sign per development entrance shall be permitted. (2) Each sign shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in sign display area (3) Each sign shall not exceed five (5) feet in sign height (4) Each sign shall be set back at least five (5) feet from any property line, unless designed and constructed as part of an entranceway architectural feature, such as a gate, decorative wall, archway, or similar element. 17.66.130 Sign regulations in all single-family residential zones (R-1, R, E-1, E, RE, RE-1) (a) Total allowable sign area (1) The maximum allowable total display area for any one (1) single-family residential lot shall not exceed nine (9) square feet. (2) Home occupation signs shall not exceed four (4) square feet in cumulative area. (3) Freestanding signs a. One (1) freestanding sign per lot shall be permitted. b. Each sign shall not exceed a height of five (5) feet. 14 c. Each sign shall be set back at least five (5) feet from any property line. (b) For properties used for any use other than residential uses, no signs shall be permitted except those reviewed and approved through the Temporary Use or Special Review process. (c) Sign Illumination (1) Non-single-family use residential identification signs, if illuminated, shall be illuminated only from the exterior. (2) Single-family use identification signs and home-occupation signs shall not be illuminated, except for such illumination as may result from general-purpose household exterior lighting (e.g., porch lights). (d) Animated signs and Electronic Message Centers shall not be permitted in these zoning districts, except: (1) Electronic Message Center sig nage may be reviewed and approved as specifically provided through Temporary Use or Special Review process; provided: (2) Signage complies with Section 17.66.110(h) of this Title, (3) Signage shall not exceed sixteen (16) square feet in aggregate sign area. 17.66.160 Application for Permits (a) Application for a sign permit shall be made to the Community Development Department upon a form provided by the Department, and shall provide all information. (b) All applications for permits filed with the Department shall be accompanied by a payment of the sign permit fee, in the amount specified. (c) The Department shall approve and issue a permit for the erection, structural alteration, or relocation of a sign within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a valid application, provided the sign complies with the provisions of this Chapter and with all applicable laws and regulations of the Town. (d} All required building permits, including electrical permits, shall be duly applied for and obtained prior to installation of the subject sign, per Town and other code requirements. Issuance of a sign permit is not intended to and shall not serve as a substitute for any other required permit. (e) Issuance and Denial and Revocation (1) In all applications, where a matter of interpretation arises, the more specific definition or higher standard shall prevail. (2) When a permit is denied, the Department shall within seven (7) days of the denial, provide a written notice to the applicant along with a brief statement of findings and reasons for the denial, citing code sections and interpretation of applicable nonconformity. (3) The Department may suspend or revoke an issued permit for any false statement or misrepresentation of fact in the application. 15 (4) The Department's decision on any sign permit may be appealed to the Town's Board of Adjustment, as provided by the Estes Park Municipal Code. 17.66.220 Appeals, variances, and minor modifications (a) Appeals. The owner of any sign who believes a decision, ruling or order of the Building Inspector is factually or legally contrary to the provisions of this Chapter may appeal the same to the Estes Park Board of Trustees. The appeal shall be in writing and filed with the Community Development Department. The appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of the decision, ruling or order of the Code Compliance Officer. The written appeal shall specify the decision, ruling or order of the Code Compliance Officer being appealed. The Estes Park Board of Trustees shall have no jurisdiction or hear any appeal not filed within ten (10) days from the date of the decision, ruling or order. (b) Variances. The owner of any sign may request a variance from the requirements of this Chapter. The request for variance shall be in writing and filed with the Community Development Department. The variance request shall specify the provisions of this Chapter to which the variance is being requested. There shall be no variance for maximum sign area on a lot or building. In granting any variance, the Estes Park Board of Trustees shall find that all of the following conditions exist: (1) There are special circumstances or conditions, such as the existence of buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent public right-of-way, which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question; provided, however, that such special circumstances or conditions must be particular to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention and do not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises. (2) The variance is in general harmony with the purposes of this Chapter and specifically is not injurious to the neighborhood in which the business or enterprise is located. (3) The variance is the minimum one necessary to permit the applicant to reasonably draw attention to the business or enterprise. (c) Conditions. The Estes Park Board of Trustees may grant an appeal or variance subject to any condition it deems necessary to make the granted appeal or variance compatible with the purpose of this Chapter. (d) Procedure. The Estes Park Board of Trustees shall adopt procedures for the review of appeals and variances pursuant to this Section. (e) Prohibited signs. The Estes Park Board of Trustees shall not grant an appeal or a variance which allows any prohibited signs specified in Section 17.66.060 of this Chapter. (f) Staff authority to grant minor modifications. Staff may grant minor modifications up to a maximum of ten percent (10%) from the following general sign standards, provided that the staff finds that such modification advances the goals and purposes of this Code and results in reduction of visual clutter results in more effective signage, or relieves practical difficulties on the site: (1) Setback requirements; (2) Specific sign size restrictions, provided that the total sign display area remains in compliance; or (3) Other dimensional and temporal standards contained herein. 16 17.66.230 Administration and Enforcement (a) The Community Development Department is authorized to process and approve or disapprove applications for permits, and to enforce and carry out all provisions of this Chapter. The Community Development Department is authorized to promulgate regulations and procedures consistent with this function. (b) The Community Development Department is empowered, upon presentation of proper credentials, to enter or inspect any building, structure, or premises in the Town for the purpose of inspection of a sign and its structural and electrical connections to ensure compliance with all applicable codes and Ordinances. Such inspections shall be carried out during business hours unless the Community Development Department in its discretion finds that an emergency exists. (c) Removal of Signs (11 The Department may cause the removal and impoundment of any sign not permitted under the provisions of this Chapter in cases of emergency, or for failure to comply with written orders of removal or repair. After removal or demolition of the sign, a notice shall be mailed to the sign owner stating the nature of the work, and the date on which it was performed and demanding payment of the costs as certified by the Department. The debt may be collected in accordance with the established debt collection procedures of the Town. The owner of the property upon which the sign is located shall be presumed to be the owner of all signs thereon unless facts to the contrary are brought to the attention of the Department, as in the case of a leased sign. (2) For purposes of removal, the definition of sign shall include all sign embellishments and structures designed specifically to support the sign. (d) Other Enforcement, Remedies and Penalties In addition to the foregoing section providing for removal of signs, all applicable provisions as specified in Section 1.20.010, Required conformance to Code and Section1.20.020, Fines and Penalties, of this Title, shall pertain to in the case of signage compliance and violations. 17 TOWN OF FSTES PART Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Carrie McCool, Planning Consultant Randy Hunt, Community Development Director Date: August 15, 2017 RE: Proposed Text Amendments to Estes Valley Development Code: EVDC § 4.3 Bed and Breakfast Inns Permitted by Special Review (Table 4-1: Permitted Uses: Residential Zoning Districts); §13.2 — Use Classifications/Specific Use Definitions and Examples; and § 5.1 — Specific Use Standards for Bed and Breakfast Inns Staff requests that this item be continued to your September 19, 2017 meeting, in order to allow more discussion about the relationship between Bed and Breakfast Inns and Vacation Home regulations. August 15, 2017 EVPC (Written August 9, 2017) Page 1 of 1 Staff Report COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Robin Becker, Planner I Date: August 15, 2017 RE: Proposed Text Amendment to Estes Valley Development Code: EVDC §5.4 Temporary Uses and Structures: Outdoor Food Vending License, §3-17 Outdoor Food Vending License Review Procedures and Standards, Chapter 13 Definitions, and Appendix B Submittal Requirements Planning Commission Objective: Review and Recommendation on proposed text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) regarding the inclusion of an Outdoor Food Vending License. Code Amendment Objectives: The objective of this proposed code amendment is to revise the EVDC to do the following: • Provide an opportunity for a current unsatisfied need in the Estes Valley for Outdoor Food vendors to operate with a license specific to the use. • Provide a clear interpretation of how and where this operation is allowed in specific zoning districts in the Estes Valley Zoning Code. • Update our plan to accommodate current food vendor needs that are economically beneficial to the Town and local business owners. Proposal: Amend EVDC section §5.4, §3-17 , Chapter 13 Definitions, and Appendix B Submittal Requirements, as stated in Exhibit A ["PC Draft"], dated August 15, 2017, attached. Staff recommends that Planning Commission recommend approval of the language in Exhibit A to the Town Board of Trustees and the Board of County Commissioners. Discussion: This text amendment is in response to a new form of outdoor food vending that is becoming more popular and an economic provider to towns and cities around the country. Currently the process to regulate these outdoor food vendors is through a temporary use permit. It is common planning practice around the United States to provide a more streamlined and activity specific license. This lack of applicable code and or license specific to this use is at no fault of previous planners or planning code. It is due to the fact that outdoor food vendors were limited in existence and they have evolved in the past ten to fifteen years. It is our time to adapt to meet the changing food requests and needs of the population. Outdoor Food Vending License would allow local and new entrepreneurs to become invested and involved in the Estes Valley. These businesses would also serve a need for alternative food options for businesses that find it cost prohibitive to have a kitchen on site, i.e. distilleries, breweries and beer gardens. The one year license would allow for more flexibility with both the businesses being served and the outdoor food vendor. Capping the number of vendors each year to ten (10) licenses would provide a healthy number of options for kitchen less businesses while not overwhelming the local community with excessive outdoor food vendors. By providing this license to local businesses and outdoor food vendors we are allowing our community to both have their cake and eat it too. It is staff's recommendation that including this outdoor food vending license in the EVDC would meet a growing need for both new and local businesses and locals and visitors alike. Staff Findings of Fact: The text amendment complies with EVDC §3.3.D (Code Amendments — Standards for Review). §3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for Review "All rezonings and text amendments to the EVDC shall meet the following criteria:" 1. "The amendment is necessary to address changes in conditions in the area affected;" Staff Finding: The amendment is necessary to address changes in conditions in the area affected. 2. "The development plan, which the proposed amendment to this Code would allow, is compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 2 of 4 the Comprehensive Plan and with existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley;" Staff Finding: The proposed text amendment is compatible and consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley. 3. "The Town, County or other relevant service providers shall have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities that might be required if the application were approved." Staff Finding: Providers of public water, sewage disposal, electric services, fire protection, and transportation services have expressed no concerns with the proposed amendment in principle. Advantages: • Provides a specific license for Outdoor Food Vendors instead of attempting to add them to permits not applicable to their use i.e. Temporary Use Permits. • Provides more food variety and options to locals, business owners and visitors. • More organized structure and health and safety regulation for Outdoor Food Vendors. Disadvantages: • Local restaurants may feel a strain or more competition. Action Recommended: Review the amendment for compliance with Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) §3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for Review and forward a recommendation to The Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners for a final decision to approve, deny, or approve with conditions. Level of Public Interest High: This issue has attracted the interest of local business and restaurant owners. Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Low: This particular Code Amendment Sample Motions: APPROVAL I move to recommend that the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners approve the text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code, according to findings of fact and as recommended by staff. CONTINUANCE I move to continue this agenda item to the next regularly schedules Planning Commission meeting because (state reason (s) for continuance —findings). DENIAL I move to recommend that the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners deny the text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code, finding that ...(state reasons for denial). Attachments: 1. Exhibit A: (August 15, 2017). Planning Commission, August 15, 2017 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A [August 15, 2017] Chapter 3. Review Procedures and Standards Table of Contents §3-17 OUTDOOR FOOD VENDING LICENSE 3-23 A. Applicability. B. Procedures for Approval of Outdoor Food Vending License. C. Conditions of Approval. D. Time Limits on License. Page 1 of 10 § 3.17 Outdoor Food Vending License A. Applicability. All outdoor food vendor uses and structures shall obtain an Outdoor Food Vending License pursuant to the procedures set forth in this Section. Prior to commencing operation and continuing throughout the entire period (s) of operation. B. Procedures for Approval of Outdoor Food Vending License. The procedure for processing or approving an application for an outdoor food vending license shall be as follows: 1. Step 1: Pre-application Conference. A pre-application conference is voluntary for outdoor food vending licenses. 2. Step 2: Staff Review and Action. Within (30) days from the date a complete application is submitted, the Staff shall review the application according to the standards set forth in this code, and make a final decision to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. C. Conditions of Approval. In approving an outdoor food vending license, the Staff may impose conditions, including but not limited to control of nuisance factors (e.g., glare, noise, smoke, dust), provision of security and safety measures, and limitations on hours of operation, storage and parking, provided that staff determines such conditions are necessary to: 1. Achieve the general purposes of this Section and not interfere with specific purposes of the zoning district in which the outdoor food vending use will be located, or to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 2. Protect the public health, safety and general welfare; or 3. Ensure operation and maintenance of the outdoor food vending use in a manner compatible with existing uses on adjoining properties and in the surrounding area. D. Time Limits on licenses. Outdoor food vending licenses shall be valid for a specified period of time, not to exceed one year (365) days. This shall include a review process after the license has been in effect for six (6) months for staff to evaluate the licenses and administer any changes or adjustments. Page 2 of 10 Chapter 5. Use Regulations Table of Contents §5.4 OUTDOOR FOOD VENDING USES 5-27 A. License Required B. Licenses C. General Standards for Review D. Outdoor Food Vending Uses Allowed Page 3 of 10 § 5.4 — Outdoor Food License Uses A. License Required. All outdoor food vending shall obtain an outdoor food vending license pursuant to the procedures set forth in §3.17 of this Code and prior to commencing operation and continuing throughout the entire period (s) of operation. B. Licenses. An outdoor food vending license authorizing an outdoor food vending use shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of §3.17, and shall be reviewed, approved or revoked only in accordance with the regulations of this Section and §3.17. C. General Standards for Review. All outdoor food vendors shall meet the following requirements: 1. Outdoor food vending uses shall not violate any applicable conditions of approval that apply to the principal use on the site. 2. Outdoor food vending uses shall comply with building/structure setbacks established for the zone district in which the temporary use is located, provided that staff may waive or adjust this provision. This includes the proposed site for the use or structure is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the outdoor food vending use. 3. Outdoor vendors shall be defined as accessory uses in the zone districts in which they are licensed, provided they are on lots that contain a principal building wherein active operations are being conducted. Outdoor vendors that qualify as accessory uses shall not be subject to change —of-use regulations which would otherwise require the properties upon which they are located be brought into compliance with the standards of this Code. 4. The proposed outdoor food vending use shall be located, operated and maintained in a manner consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of this Code. 5. The proposed outdoor food vending use shall not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. Outdoor Vendors shall be prohibited on undeveloped lots. 7. The proposed outdoor food vending shall comply with all applicable general and specific regulations of this Section and §3.17, unless otherwise expressly stated. 8. Permanent alterations to the site shall be prohibited in connection with the outdoor food vending operation. 9. Permanent signs shall be prohibited. All approved temporary signs associated with the temporary use shall be removed when the activity ends. Page 4 of 10 10. The following additional requirements shall apply to outdoor vendor licensees, as specified: a) Vend only on lots in specific zone districts including (CD,CO,I1,A, and CH); b) Not stop to vend within two hundred (200) feet of the property boundary of any public or private school for students within the grade range of kindergarten through twelfth (12th ) grade; c) Vend only food and nonalcoholic beverages; d) Permanently affixed or paint any sig nage only on the mobile food truck, with no signs/banners in or alongside street right —of-way or across roadways. e) No licensee shall use, for the purpose of onsite storage, display, or sale, any vehicle, cart, kiosk, table, chair, stand, box, container or other structure or display device not described on the license. 11 The vehicles, structures, devices and other similar items described by the license for any outdoor vendor shall not be located by the vendor in any of the following manners or places: a) In an on-street parking space that is not parallel to the adjacent travel way; b) In any public parking area in a manner that does not comply with applicable parking regulations or a properly issued parking permit for the use of said parking space; c) Upon a public sidewalk d) Within the extended boundaries of a crosswalk e) Within ten (10) feet of the extension of any building entranceway, doorway or driveway; f) In an location in which the vehicle, structure or device may impede or interfere with or visually obstruct; 1) the safe movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic; 2) parking lot circulation; or 3) access to any public street, alley or sidewalk; 12. No licensee shall operate during the hours of 11:00 pm - 7:00 am. 13. Each licensee who, during the course of its licensed activities, operates within or enters upon a public right-of way or publicly owned property shall maintain liability insurance in an amount to be determined by the financial office according to administrative regulation with proof of the same to be presented at the time of submission of the application. Any licensee who fails to provide proof of such insurance shall be prohibited from operating within or entering upon such property. 14. Each licensee shall pick up and dispose of any paper, cardboard, wood or plastic containers, wrappers or any litter which is deposited within twenty- five (25) feet of the designated location or within twenty-five (25) feet of the point of any sale or transaction made by the licensee if the radius of the designated location exceeds twenty-five (25) feet. The licensee shall carry a suitable container for the placement of such litter by customers or other persons. 15. Each licensee shall not leave unattended for more than fifteen (15) minutes at any one time while vending any vehicles, structure, device or any other similar item described in the license, on a public right-of-way or at any licensed location, or place on public sidewalks or in public streets or alleys any structures, canopies, tables, chairs or other furniture or equipment. Page 5 of 10 16. Each licensee shall prominently displace the license issued hereunder in a location readily visible to the public on each vehicle, structure, device and any other item described in the license. 17. Each licensee shall comply with the provisions of all applicable ordinances of the Town as well as requirements of all state and federal laws, including, but not limited to Town Noise restrictions, sign regulations, limitations on discharge of liquid waste, sales tax requirements, food safety, and other related requirements established by State or County Regulation. 18. No more than two (2) outdoor vendors of any specified type shall be licensed to operate concurrently on any lot, tract or parcel of land. 19. Each licensee shall have an affirmative and independent duty to determine the safety and suitability of any particular stopping point or location of operation, and to operate in a manner reasonably calculated to avoid and prevent harm to others in the vicinity of the licensee's operations, including, but not limited to, potential and actual customers, pedestrians and other vendors or vehicles. 20. Licensees shall not operate from a location approved in the licensee's license for more than three (3) consecutive calendar days, or for more than three (3) calendar days within a single calendar week, unless the licensee is authorized in the license to operate as an outdoor food vendor at that location. 21. No licensee shall operate from a location that is not authorized in the licensee's license. 22. All licensees shall operate in accordance with all vehicular traffic laws and regulations. 23. All lighting on vehicles must be Dark Sky Compliant meaning shielded and downcast. 24. A cap on the number of outdoor food vendor licenses issued shall not no exceed ten (10) at one time during a calendar year. 25. The outdoor food vending regulations of this Section shall not exempt the Applicant or operator from any other required permits, such as health department permits or business licenses. Page 6 of 10 CHAPTER 13. DEFINITIONS § 13.3 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS, TERMS AND PHRASES Outdoor Food Vendor or vendor; shall mean any person, whether as owner, agent, consignee or employee, who sells or attempts to sell, or who offers to the public free of charge, any services, goods, wares or merchandise, including, but not limited to, food or beverage, from any outdoor location. Page 7 of 10 Appendix B. Submittal Requirements Table of Contents Xl. OUTDOOR FOOD VENDING LICENSE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS B-19 A. Outdoor Food Vending License Application Requirements Page 8 of 10 Appendix B Xl. Outdoor Food Vending License- Submittal Requirements A. Outdoor Food Vending License application requirements The Application shall contain the following information: 1. An address or legal description for each location for which the application is made; 2. Written consent of the property owner of location for which the application is made; 3. Proof of liability insurance; 4. A Site Plan of each location on private property for which the application is made, showing the location of existing and proposed structures, access, equipment and parking; 5. Statement of Intent: All outdoor food vending licenses applications shall include a written Statement of Intent explaining; a) The type or types of vender operation the licensee will conduct; b) The period of time for which the license was issued; c) The hours and days of operation; 6. The designated location or locations, including specified types of public rights-of-way, as applicable; 7. A brief description of any vehicle, cart kiosk, table, chair , stand, box, container or other structure or display deice to be utilized by the licensee; 8. Any special terms and conditions of issuance; 9. A statement that the license is personal and not transferable in any manner; 10. A statement that the license is valid only when used at the location or locations designated on the license; a statement that the license is subject to the provisions of this Article. 11. Any other information the Applicant believes illustrates the proposed activity. 12. Documentation of a sales and use tax license in good standing issued by the Colorado Department of Revenue, the County and the Town; 13. For the vending of food, documentation of regulatory approval as a retail food establishment by the County, and applicable health department. 14. Fee. The outdoor food vending license application shall include all applicable fees as set forth by the Community Development Department. Page 9 of 10 15. Any proposed grease trap dumping within the boundary of the Estes Valley Development Area shall require written prior approval by the appropriate sanitation district. Page 10 of 10